Netflix doesn't control the creation process though. The production companies are separate from Netflix and partner to do the shows. This is how shows for network TV are also done.
Netflix is the one with first dibs, we'll just have to see in a few years if they syndicate their shows. House of Cards was their first big original, and that's only been out of three and a half years.
Yup, though it's probably going to be over a year before season two is out since it's been ten months so far and there hasn't been a release date announced. Daredevil got its second season after 11.5 months. We do get Luke Cage next week Friday, and Iron Fist and the Defenders shows next year.
With how many shows they are doing, it might end up like the movies and have releases every other year.
Ford Sync is doing something like that. The car can do monthly system diagnostic checks. When it sends them out, it does a voice call instead of relying on the phone having a data connection.
Yes you might have to use something like DOSBox. But you can still run your original copy on the latest hardware. You can't run anything that's not PS4 on a PS4 (PS3 digital, PS2 disk, PS1 disk, etc). Hopefully the way consoles are going will fix that.
That's no where near where this is going. You're right in that you just buy "Playstation" rather than a Playstation XYZ. But your new console will play all your older games and all newer games going forward for X number of years without needing a subscription. Sure if 2023 a game might come out that requires a 2017 or newer version of the hardware, but how if that different than the normal generational increases?
I find this much more attractive than the PS3/360 -> PS4/XBone shift. On the Microsoft side there is some backwards compatibility, but on Sony's side unless you keep a PS3 around, your digital collection and older games are no longer usable. On my PC I can fire up a 30 year old game and still play it on a system that will play all the latest games.
That's fine if you are accessing the sites only from a single computer. Otherwise that database has to be uploaded somewhere else you'll need to reset your password when you try logging in from another machine.
Windows does have a built-in credentials manager that pretty much no one uses. OSX has a keychains password vault.
I completely agree, I've been wearing yellow tinted glasses for three years now. Just last week, I forgot to switch glasses at night and I was up tossing and turning rather than passing out in less than five minutes.
Again I see your point. But I've used this system for close to a decade now and I'm only using two master passwords so far. How many passwords have you memorised in the last ten years?
Less than a half dozen. One for the password vault, encrypted phone unlock, PC login, work login and one or two others I'm forgetting. The rest are all just random unique passwords per site.
One issue I see with your hash is using it for sites that have piss poor password policies such as your password can't be over X characters long, or it has to contain letter, number, and limited list of symbols, etc. Your hash could possibly not match the requirements. What do you do in this case?
And it's still better than your terrible example of using a single password for all sites. Sites HAVE been hacked, other sites HAVE been logged into via bots because someone used the same credentials on multiple sites.
LastPass only stores an encrypted blob. Any decoding is performed client side.
Say there is a security breach and you are forced to update your password. With your hasher you now need to update every single site to use the new password.
With a password vault with unique passwords for every site you change the password for that single site and you're done.
If a site has shitty password storage and is compromised that password is leaked and their are bots that try logging into other sites using the same credentials. By having different passwords for different sites you can prevent this.
There are password vaults that keep everything local if you are worried about security.
The thread is about how some smartwatches are nothing but a remote for a phone. It was asked about just how functional a smartwatch that wasn't connected to a phone was.
Other than not making calls which I don't want. It was extremely functional.
It had on board GPS, WiFi, BlueTooth 4.0, and ANT+.
This allowed you to use it as a fitness device and leave your phone at home. It could track a run via GPS, while having a heart rate monitor connected via ANT+ (it also supports footpods, and bike modules). You could have a pair of Bluetooth or wired earbuds connected and listen to locally stored music or Podcasts/Audio Books. And when you get home it automatically uploaded the run to your online profile.
When connected to a phone it showed calls and SMS. It didn't support emails very well.
It even ran full Android and you could hack it and run whatever you wanted on it if you really wanted to deal with the small screen.
It was a great first gen product, and then Google bought Motorola's mobile division and killed it....
Slashdot Mirror
Yup, better download all of the Internets. Then you can just browse what you have local rather than using up your cap.
Why yes, yes they do: http://drafthouse.com/
I don't have one near but, but the Emagine Theaters near me serve beer, wine, and mixed drinks. http://www.emagine-entertainment.com/
This is the same company that told millions of people they hold their phone wrong.
Netflix doesn't control the creation process though. The production companies are separate from Netflix and partner to do the shows. This is how shows for network TV are also done.
Look at what the production company of the amazing Stranger Things also did: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_Laps_Entertainment
Netflix is the one with first dibs, we'll just have to see in a few years if they syndicate their shows. House of Cards was their first big original, and that's only been out of three and a half years.
Yup, though it's probably going to be over a year before season two is out since it's been ten months so far and there hasn't been a release date announced. Daredevil got its second season after 11.5 months. We do get Luke Cage next week Friday, and Iron Fist and the Defenders shows next year.
With how many shows they are doing, it might end up like the movies and have releases every other year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Marvel_Cinematic_Universe_television_series#Netflix_series
Exactly, now I can just Velcro my shoes. And drink this delicious Tang.
Speak for yourself. Everyone I know that has prime only uses the free two shipping. No one is using prime video or music.
Ford Sync is doing something like that. The car can do monthly system diagnostic checks. When it sends them out, it does a voice call instead of relying on the phone having a data connection.
Exactly, we'd have a Buck Rogers or Lost in Space style future if everyone wasn't so busy watching cat videos all the time.
Yes you might have to use something like DOSBox. But you can still run your original copy on the latest hardware. You can't run anything that's not PS4 on a PS4 (PS3 digital, PS2 disk, PS1 disk, etc). Hopefully the way consoles are going will fix that.
That's no where near where this is going. You're right in that you just buy "Playstation" rather than a Playstation XYZ. But your new console will play all your older games and all newer games going forward for X number of years without needing a subscription. Sure if 2023 a game might come out that requires a 2017 or newer version of the hardware, but how if that different than the normal generational increases?
I find this much more attractive than the PS3/360 -> PS4/XBone shift. On the Microsoft side there is some backwards compatibility, but on Sony's side unless you keep a PS3 around, your digital collection and older games are no longer usable. On my PC I can fire up a 30 year old game and still play it on a system that will play all the latest games.
They are probably using SteadyState which is great for a computer lab environment.
Not when their main competitors Intel and Nvidia beat them in performance while generating less heat.
Paid Hulu had ads since the beginning. The updated ad-free plan is actually new.
Skateboarding is now in. Maybe they can integrate the sharks into that?
That's fine if you are accessing the sites only from a single computer. Otherwise that database has to be uploaded somewhere else you'll need to reset your password when you try logging in from another machine.
Windows does have a built-in credentials manager that pretty much no one uses. OSX has a keychains password vault.
I completely agree, I've been wearing yellow tinted glasses for three years now. Just last week, I forgot to switch glasses at night and I was up tossing and turning rather than passing out in less than five minutes.
Less than a half dozen. One for the password vault, encrypted phone unlock, PC login, work login and one or two others I'm forgetting. The rest are all just random unique passwords per site.
One issue I see with your hash is using it for sites that have piss poor password policies such as your password can't be over X characters long, or it has to contain letter, number, and limited list of symbols, etc. Your hash could possibly not match the requirements. What do you do in this case?
And it's still better than your terrible example of using a single password for all sites. Sites HAVE been hacked, other sites HAVE been logged into via bots because someone used the same credentials on multiple sites.
LastPass only stores an encrypted blob. Any decoding is performed client side.
Say there is a security breach and you are forced to update your password. With your hasher you now need to update every single site to use the new password.
With a password vault with unique passwords for every site you change the password for that single site and you're done.
The key file doesn't change, the password vault file will change as you add and change passwords.
You manually copy the key file locally to any device you want to be able to open the vault.
The vault itself is synced via a cloud service so all devices can access the latest passwords.
If someone were to get into your cloud storage they could get the vault, but not the key.
This method doesn't protect against locally exploited or physical access, but it stops online security breaches.
If a site has shitty password storage and is compromised that password is leaked and their are bots that try logging into other sites using the same credentials. By having different passwords for different sites you can prevent this.
There are password vaults that keep everything local if you are worried about security.
If you pay month to month. Both Xbox Live and PS+ are available for $50/yr, and you can find it them on sale for $35-40/yr.
The thread is about how some smartwatches are nothing but a remote for a phone. It was asked about just how functional a smartwatch that wasn't connected to a phone was.
Other than not making calls which I don't want. It was extremely functional.
My old MotoACTV was pretty functional.
It had on board GPS, WiFi, BlueTooth 4.0, and ANT+.
This allowed you to use it as a fitness device and leave your phone at home. It could track a run via GPS, while having a heart rate monitor connected via ANT+ (it also supports footpods, and bike modules). You could have a pair of Bluetooth or wired earbuds connected and listen to locally stored music or Podcasts/Audio Books. And when you get home it automatically uploaded the run to your online profile.
When connected to a phone it showed calls and SMS. It didn't support emails very well.
It even ran full Android and you could hack it and run whatever you wanted on it if you really wanted to deal with the small screen.
It was a great first gen product, and then Google bought Motorola's mobile division and killed it....