To answer your questions:
No Christian is sinless, but we are saved the Christ sacrifice. All fall short of the glory of God, but a christian will acknoledge that he has repent and turn away from that sin. An unrepentant (in his heart not from his mouth) sinner is not a Christian, I am sorry if this seems harsh but it is the truth.
The Nazi's were unrepentant sinners (Murder, is the easiest to point out). They did not allow Jesus to move them, they moved themselves and were not at all "christ like"
" but that doesn't change the fact that the whole appeal of anti-Semitism was the centuries long Christian inspired hatred of Jews"
If I misread this I am sorry, my intent was not to insult you but to show because an evil man calls himself a christian he can effect the view others will have of Christ and thus they must be called on it. Please understand that while I may shout at times no disrespect twords you is intended (and I apologize for the times that I have let the moment get the best of me), I am only sharing with you as I am best able.
I have done my best to respond to everything you have asked, I would ask that in kind you respond to the following " If I call myself a buddhist but live in the world tied to physical posestions more than hummanity it does not make me one, if I call myself a daoist and do all the ritual but think its all horse crap it does not make me one."
Thats exactly my point. There is no reason to make it its own degree because you take almost everything you need to do it as *REQUIRED* ee courses (including EM). Therfore if you have a really good EE program getting so solid in wireless you can go anywhere would be a matter of 3 electives/ 4 tops.
Thats a great point and should be moded up. This would be a great assioated degree, or tecnical 2 year degree but it is not a borad enough field for its own BS..
Thats what you elective courses are for. I think I took 6 electives (I took mine all over the place so I could eventually teach) but you could easily take 6 elective in areas that would be wireless (computer encryption/rf circuits,...).
A good Enginnering program will have sub-programs, which are a listed set of classes to take if you want to go into a given area. A crap program will almost always have 20 different 'joint majors' between two departments becuase it lies kind of between them. (note not all schools that have them are crap so dont get you underware in a bind yelling at me).
I hate 'special degrees' Wireless shoudl be a specialization in either Computers or Electrical or both. Im sorry wireless fall totally under EM theory, Computer Algorithms, and Electronics. There is nothing in it that an EE major (or Computer Engineering) would not/could not be exposed to in the course of their required courses + their elevtives. Its a gimik to increase admissions, no more no less.
just like the $EthnicGroup Studies majors. They should be specializations in either history or political science. What were beginning to do is produce college graduated who are way too over specialized. I know of EE's who think they dont need E-Mag because they are going to do VLSI.
Actually he is right and wrong. The conditional probability of an event is defined as
P(L|A) = P(LA)/P(A)
the probability of winning the lottery (L) given you have been hit by an asteroid (A) is equal to the intersection of the set of Lottery winners and asteroid strikers divided by the set of asteroid victoms.
Now if winning the lottery is a subset of being hit by an asteroid than her odds of winning now are the same as they ever were (if you win the lottery you will have been hit by an asteroid this is not the case). If being hit by an asteriod was a subset of winning the lottery than whe would automatically win the lottery(again not the case). If the events are mutually exclusive than she can not win the lottery (this is obviously not the case because she is alive).
therefore the answer has to be between the three examples above and in the space of all people there are events in which someone may be hit by an asteriod and events in which someone may win the lottery, and yes even people who are in both sets. Now figuring out if P(L|A) is greater than P(A) would be mathmatically easy if one has access to the entire set of humanity, but as we have
australlians messing up their census;) we will never know for sure.
No its not, the fact is MS damaged two other companies by bastardizing Java.
My example was aweful ill grant you that a better would be if an OEM (say Dell) altered windows so that it was incompatable with other hardware vendors (ay HP). This would give people the impression windwos sucked because of incompatability between hardware.
The point is M$ broke the law, and broke a buisness contract they had with another vendor. The punishment of saying now you must support the product you tried to break out of the market by illegal methods seems quite apt to me.
I am not saying M$ should have to include Java in XP I really dont give a rats behind one way or the other. The point is that they knowingly violated a license inorder to crush a competirot and than when they were done with that tried to cursh another by stopping support.
If you thought I was saying M$ should have to use Java I was not, what I am saying is that by using their market share and violating the agreement with SUN they destroyed and chance Java had (not that it had a huge chance)..
Re:Its a rollercoaster.
on
Want Freedom?
·
· Score: 1
The problem is if we lay the legal foundations to do something now (ie Moniter a certain group) after the heat of the moment passes that foundation is still there to be abused in the future..
By the time M$ had to pay fines for violating the license they *THEY AGREED TO IN 1996* netscape was dead and they were dying to kill Java.
hink they should be forced to pay to include a program they don't want to?
If I buy a three year license for win2k advanced server and after a year it outlives it usefullness I am still liable for the next two years, I doubt M$ would say 'ok we understand'. M$ is doing the same thing, they needed JVM to compete with netscape, they agreed to a license with SUN they than violated that licnse what part of this makes SUN the bad guy?
The fact is they had a license with SUN, they violated it. They used that violation to kill netscape, than they used the fact netsacpe was done to kill Java.
I remember the headache back when Netscape was still popular, and I had to deal with the differences between M$ JavaScript and Netscape JavaScript. Then there were differing standards for Stylesheets, and Java, and XML, etc etc.
But the point is that M$ had a license with SUN that they violated, thats why you saw the differences between Netscape Java and IE Java. They used 'thier' Java in an uncontractual way to kill netscape (by altering Java itself so that people would write Applets which would not work on netscape) and when Netscape was done they dteremined they did not need Java anymore so they shelved it.
Now that they have virtually no competition in the browser market they are using the fact that they killed netscape to kill the tool they used to kill netscape, really slick..
You can personally insult me all you want it does not change the fact that if someone is out there murdering people he is not obeying Jesus. You will know a christian by the fruits they produce, that is the best answer I am capable of giving you.
I am not the one who will sit in judgemnt over who is and who is not a Xtian but for the sake of argument If I start to call myself a hari chrishna today this moment it does not make me one. If I call myself a buddhist but live in the world tied to physical posestions more than hummanity it does not make me one, if I call myself a daoist and do all the ritual but think its all horse crap it does not make me one. The fact is churches the world over are full of people who live for the world all but one hour a week(and mayby even during that hour), they are not Christ like and are therfore not Christians.
It is my right to say that, and to call someone on it if the call themselves a xtian because their witness will be what other think of xtians in general. Your view of christianity is a perfect example, because a bunch of evil men called themselves xtians (the Nazi's) you are convinced that all/most Christians ar antisemites. you are the living enbodyment of why a christian must be careful what kind of witness he puts forth for others.
-God bless
N3WBI3
Look this si move M$ would have made and most people here would flip (myself included). But because its apple the new kid in the *nix world many people (mostly apple buffs) are going to overlook this competition squashing move. If this was a move to prevent software piracy so is the move to keep people from designing software to read DVD's in the first place...
Yes but the doctor is not using *YOUR* phone, *YOUR* computer and will not be very adverly affected if you happen to use *YOUR* phone to make a call which would bring down the RICO act.
The doctor is not copying your medical files and emailing them to himself, which make you have to ask yourself: How would you feel if your doctor decided to start forwarding his patients medical history to his hotmail account.
And in some states 'just getting rid' of someone is pretty damn hard.
We had an example of someone forwarding out company memo's to his personal account and giving them to someone he should not.
Its a sad fact but if youre working in development you have to keep you code locked down (especially for internal billing applications)
Point is if this is used responsablly it will make sys admins jobs much easier.. When I accept payment from my company, I am confirming I submit to their policies, included in that (in my case) is that $employer has the right to every packet travelling over their network.
What a dumb arguement. Whatever sect of Christian you are or suggest to me, I bet I could find tons of Christians willing to make the same statement about them. Obviously, everyone thinks they have the true faith.
It only seems done becuase you did not understand a word I said. I dont care where in xtianity you come from, people in my own church may not be xtians, many people in others (and other 'secs') are. No one branch has the Gods ear alone. So Ill thank you not to put words into my mouth. And anti-semitism is much more widespread and ancient than xtians. while there are 'xtians' who are anti-semites I think youll find 99% are not and true xtians (again I dont care what branch they are in) have 0% who are anti-semites...
Well the gutless wonders was pointed at 'im ok youre ok' which you are boviously not. The fact you think I am a delusional twit because I have different beliefs than you show that. It also shows you are just as closed minded as any xtian 'nut'.
I was not resume dropping with the 95% in Math and Analysis its a fact, and I point that out because alot of xtian bashers assume thay are all so dumb to understand the way things 'really' are.
By the tone of your reply you dont want to have a discussion so Ill let you to your own devices I am not here to fight with anyone. Any time you actually feel like talking about it instead of dropping insults.
BTW sharing is not ramming down the throats, no more than someone telling me cigerretts are bad for me is. I share you tell me where I can put my beliefs and its done, I want no law of special protection but none for special persecution either.
Naa Im American (WNY), but I have faimly in Fort Erie (which I still consider WNY (JK).
As an American I know youre 100% right in how hostile Canada is for non pc stances on issues, the sad part is the US will be right there with you in no time. Not so much because of experiences like mine, but because people are beging to equate thinking something is a sin and teaching it to your children makes you a bad parent/person.
Helloooo if the Nazi;s were polytheistic (ie believing in many nordic gods) they were not xtian, the only reason they tolerated any xtians was because of their alliance with italy, and the fact Germany had a large xtian population.
Just because someone calls themselves a xtian, just because someone goes to church, just because someone owns a Bible does not make them a xtian.
Slashdot Mirror
The Nazi's were unrepentant sinners (Murder, is the easiest to point out). They did not allow Jesus to move them, they moved themselves and were not at all "christ like"
" but that doesn't change the fact that the whole appeal of anti-Semitism was the centuries long Christian inspired hatred of Jews"
If I misread this I am sorry, my intent was not to insult you but to show because an evil man calls himself a christian he can effect the view others will have of Christ and thus they must be called on it. Please understand that while I may shout at times no disrespect twords you is intended (and I apologize for the times that I have let the moment get the best of me), I am only sharing with you as I am best able.
I have done my best to respond to everything you have asked, I would ask that in kind you respond to the following " If I call myself a buddhist but live in the world tied to physical posestions more than hummanity it does not make me one, if I call myself a daoist and do all the ritual but think its all horse crap it does not make me one."
God bless N3WIB3
Sorry if I was not clear
Thats a great point and should be moded up. This would be a great assioated degree, or tecnical 2 year degree but it is not a borad enough field for its own BS..
Yes but to get your EE you have knoced down about 8 of your dozen areas, including (IMHO) the most difficult Electro-Magnetics.
A good Enginnering program will have sub-programs, which are a listed set of classes to take if you want to go into a given area. A crap program will almost always have 20 different 'joint majors' between two departments becuase it lies kind of between them. (note not all schools that have them are crap so dont get you underware in a bind yelling at me).
just like the $EthnicGroup Studies majors. They should be specializations in either history or political science. What were beginning to do is produce college graduated who are way too over specialized. I know of EE's who think they dont need E-Mag because they are going to do VLSI.
Sorry for the rant its just my 2 cents.
P(L|A) = P(LA)/P(A)
the probability of winning the lottery (L) given you have been hit by an asteroid (A) is equal to the intersection of the set of Lottery winners and asteroid strikers divided by the set of asteroid victoms.
Now if winning the lottery is a subset of being hit by an asteroid than her odds of winning now are the same as they ever were (if you win the lottery you will have been hit by an asteroid this is not the case). If being hit by an asteriod was a subset of winning the lottery than whe would automatically win the lottery(again not the case). If the events are mutually exclusive than she can not win the lottery (this is obviously not the case because she is alive).
therefore the answer has to be between the three examples above and in the space of all people there are events in which someone may be hit by an asteriod and events in which someone may win the lottery, and yes even people who are in both sets. Now figuring out if P(L|A) is greater than P(A) would be mathmatically easy if one has access to the entire set of humanity, but as we have australlians messing up their census ;) we will never know for sure.
My example was aweful ill grant you that a better would be if an OEM (say Dell) altered windows so that it was incompatable with other hardware vendors (ay HP). This would give people the impression windwos sucked because of incompatability between hardware.
The point is M$ broke the law, and broke a buisness contract they had with another vendor. The punishment of saying now you must support the product you tried to break out of the market by illegal methods seems quite apt to me.
If you thought I was saying M$ should have to use Java I was not, what I am saying is that by using their market share and violating the agreement with SUN they destroyed and chance Java had (not that it had a huge chance)..
The problem is if we lay the legal foundations to do something now (ie Moniter a certain group) after the heat of the moment passes that foundation is still there to be abused in the future..
hink they should be forced to pay to include a program they don't want to?
If I buy a three year license for win2k advanced server and after a year it outlives it usefullness I am still liable for the next two years, I doubt M$ would say 'ok we understand'. M$ is doing the same thing, they needed JVM to compete with netscape, they agreed to a license with SUN they than violated that licnse what part of this makes SUN the bad guy?
Here and Here
The fact is they had a license with SUN, they violated it. They used that violation to kill netscape, than they used the fact netsacpe was done to kill Java.
(sarcasm) Yea you should have went to lean sanskrit (sp?) it apperantly is more useful (/sarcasm)
But the point is that M$ had a license with SUN that they violated, thats why you saw the differences between Netscape Java and IE Java. They used 'thier' Java in an uncontractual way to kill netscape (by altering Java itself so that people would write Applets which would not work on netscape) and when Netscape was done they dteremined they did not need Java anymore so they shelved it.
Now that they have virtually no competition in the browser market they are using the fact that they killed netscape to kill the tool they used to kill netscape, really slick..
I am not the one who will sit in judgemnt over who is and who is not a Xtian but for the sake of argument If I start to call myself a hari chrishna today this moment it does not make me one. If I call myself a buddhist but live in the world tied to physical posestions more than hummanity it does not make me one, if I call myself a daoist and do all the ritual but think its all horse crap it does not make me one. The fact is churches the world over are full of people who live for the world all but one hour a week(and mayby even during that hour), they are not Christ like and are therfore not Christians.
It is my right to say that, and to call someone on it if the call themselves a xtian because their witness will be what other think of xtians in general. Your view of christianity is a perfect example, because a bunch of evil men called themselves xtians (the Nazi's) you are convinced that all/most Christians ar antisemites. you are the living enbodyment of why a christian must be careful what kind of witness he puts forth for others. -God bless N3WBI3
And if you do act on them instantly you are clear, two issues that are covered are legal and buisness too many employees abuse internet privlidges..
Look this si move M$ would have made and most people here would flip (myself included). But because its apple the new kid in the *nix world many people (mostly apple buffs) are going to overlook this competition squashing move. If this was a move to prevent software piracy so is the move to keep people from designing software to read DVD's in the first place...
Meant to say, you will not be adversly affected if he uses *HIS* phone to make a call which would bring RICO charges while he is billing you...
The doctor is not copying your medical files and emailing them to himself, which make you have to ask yourself: How would you feel if your doctor decided to start forwarding his patients medical history to his hotmail account.
And in some states 'just getting rid' of someone is pretty damn hard.
Its a sad fact but if youre working in development you have to keep you code locked down (especially for internal billing applications)
Point is if this is used responsablly it will make sys admins jobs much easier.. When I accept payment from my company, I am confirming I submit to their policies, included in that (in my case) is that $employer has the right to every packet travelling over their network.
It only seems done becuase you did not understand a word I said. I dont care where in xtianity you come from, people in my own church may not be xtians, many people in others (and other 'secs') are. No one branch has the Gods ear alone. So Ill thank you not to put words into my mouth. And anti-semitism is much more widespread and ancient than xtians. while there are 'xtians' who are anti-semites I think youll find 99% are not and true xtians (again I dont care what branch they are in) have 0% who are anti-semites...
I was not resume dropping with the 95% in Math and Analysis its a fact, and I point that out because alot of xtian bashers assume thay are all so dumb to understand the way things 'really' are.
By the tone of your reply you dont want to have a discussion so Ill let you to your own devices I am not here to fight with anyone. Any time you actually feel like talking about it instead of dropping insults.
BTW sharing is not ramming down the throats, no more than someone telling me cigerretts are bad for me is. I share you tell me where I can put my beliefs and its done, I want no law of special protection but none for special persecution either.
Regrads..
As an American I know youre 100% right in how hostile Canada is for non pc stances on issues, the sad part is the US will be right there with you in no time. Not so much because of experiences like mine, but because people are beging to equate thinking something is a sin and teaching it to your children makes you a bad parent/person.
Just because someone calls themselves a xtian, just because someone goes to church, just because someone owns a Bible does not make them a xtian.