bean counters can be swayed by certain arguments that now can be made for some of the AMD chips. money talks, and I think we'll be seeing more AMD in the corporate space
but they'll also be killing whale species that are smart and have spindle cells (believed to have role in developing advanced intelligence compared to other animals) in brain that only humans, great apes and elephants do.
In other words, we already protect land mammals (primates) believed to have a high capacity for self-awareness and suffering... shouldn't whales get the same consideration?
use of resources irrelevant, stupid way to argue against the more than ten times ISP of thermal nuclear vs. chemical. They have the power to do what chemical cannot
Yes nuclear thermal rocket engines were built and tested in the 1960s and early 1970s.
However I did say nothing has been done with them, meaning never carried into space and used, no R&D or tests are being done in the present.
I only mention it as realistic way of getting to Mars, unlike the people who think Musk's or anyone else's chemical rockets are viable means of establishing Mars colony.
You should stay silent since you are ignorant of the subject.
Morgan Freeman in 2000 said he wanted to produce it and be Cmdr. Norman, but says even after ten years no one has written a good script that matches the book.
No, the "falcon heavy" is a bottle rocket next to the Saturn V... and a colony would need many, many times the 17 ton payload of a falcon. And a manned mission much more performance to avoid the long stay in hard radiation in space. Fission powered rocket is real tech that could be used to solve the problem... but nothing has been done as of now.
Haha no, the amount of gear and supplies would require heavy lifting rockets and propulsion a couple orders of magnitude bigger than what we have now, and yes that's doing a dozen or more missions. Plus several other problems needing a solution that doesn't yet exist. The rough estimate for a small Mars colony is 50 years to more than a century away, deal with it
"And on far-off Earth, Dr. Carlisle Perera had as yet told no one how he had wakened from a restless sleep with the message from his subconscious still echoing in his brain: The Ramans do everything in threes."
what bullshit, no relativistic corrections needed for Mars trip. All of us who studied orbital mechanics for our physics degree know this, you want proof pick up any of the standard texts.
The "developed country lifestyle" is of course very sustainable, keeping it so is an engineering problem with known solutions. We have essentially infinite energy supply on this earth, an ocean full of water, resources that magically DON'T leave the planet after use, 20+ miles of the earth's crust for "rare earths" we've barely scratched, helium that mostly is just vented from natural gas wells instead of being captured at all, etc.
In short, the chicken-little flailing of arms and wailing is just silly.
I never said to ignore "the problem". You keep assuming and asserting things that are false. This shows a common mindset among self-imagined "greenies" that have no conception of reality. Your world view can't work, won't work in reality.
Slashdot Mirror
funny my neighborhood is clean. so you live around slobs who don't recycle? sounds like the evil isn't bottle but on two legs.
bean counters can be swayed by certain arguments that now can be made for some of the AMD chips. money talks, and I think we'll be seeing more AMD in the corporate space
Even with the impressive high number of frequency response there is distortion, another issue.
I'm not audiophile but I can hear it, went back to wired.
but they'll also be killing whale species that are smart and have spindle cells (believed to have role in developing advanced intelligence compared to other animals) in brain that only humans, great apes and elephants do.
In other words, we already protect land mammals (primates) believed to have a high capacity for self-awareness and suffering... shouldn't whales get the same consideration?
use of resources irrelevant, stupid way to argue against the more than ten times ISP of thermal nuclear vs. chemical. They have the power to do what chemical cannot
Musks rockets are useless for Mars colony.
so you're tone deaf? the sounds quality is garbage.
Yes nuclear thermal rocket engines were built and tested in the 1960s and early 1970s.
However I did say nothing has been done with them, meaning never carried into space and used, no R&D or tests are being done in the present.
I only mention it as realistic way of getting to Mars, unlike the people who think Musk's or anyone else's chemical rockets are viable means of establishing Mars colony.
You should stay silent since you are ignorant of the subject.
most the people here will have trouble with flights of stairs in middle age. if you're eating well and exercising what you are saying is fine...
Morgan Freeman in 2000 said he wanted to produce it and be Cmdr. Norman, but says even after ten years no one has written a good script that matches the book.
No, the "falcon heavy" is a bottle rocket next to the Saturn V... and a colony would need many, many times the 17 ton payload of a falcon. And a manned mission much more performance to avoid the long stay in hard radiation in space. Fission powered rocket is real tech that could be used to solve the problem... but nothing has been done as of now.
Haha no, the amount of gear and supplies would require heavy lifting rockets and propulsion a couple orders of magnitude bigger than what we have now, and yes that's doing a dozen or more missions. Plus several other problems needing a solution that doesn't yet exist. The rough estimate for a small Mars colony is 50 years to more than a century away, deal with it
If you can't supply the components your competitor will get more business.
you can't put a motherboard using "transparency" into a system. talk in lieu of product means nothing
Strangely enough, no one has made a porn with a moss covered 3 handled family gradunza yet.
yes 37.5 is actually where I work too, 8 hours - half hour given break = 7.5
For decades the talk was of putting that into four days.
"And on far-off Earth, Dr. Carlisle Perera had as yet told no one how he had wakened from a restless sleep with the message from his subconscious still echoing in his brain: The Ramans do everything in threes."
that would be overpriced in the rib sense too, even at a posh restaurant
no, the idea is four 10 hour days
same pay
same work
what bullshit, no relativistic corrections needed for Mars trip. All of us who studied orbital mechanics for our physics degree know this, you want proof pick up any of the standard texts.
Wrong, Newtonian mechanics work fine for getting a craft to Mars. Cosmologists use General Relatively and other more difficult maths
most touchscreens at McDonalds in UK and USA test positive for fecal contamination.
unemployment continues to go down
the big online guerrilla Amazon is hiring in droves, thousands of jobs to fill
oh my, automation is creating jobs, who'd have thunk. Anyone in IT or who uses computer all day... has a job that automation created.
dumb-ass chicken little lies, is what this article is
meanwhile unemployment continues to go down.
meanwhile most touchscreens at McDonalds in UK and USA test positive for feces
service jobs replaced by robots? ain't happening.
The "developed country lifestyle" is of course very sustainable, keeping it so is an engineering problem with known solutions. We have essentially infinite energy supply on this earth, an ocean full of water, resources that magically DON'T leave the planet after use, 20+ miles of the earth's crust for "rare earths" we've barely scratched, helium that mostly is just vented from natural gas wells instead of being captured at all, etc.
In short, the chicken-little flailing of arms and wailing is just silly.
I never said to ignore "the problem". You keep assuming and asserting things that are false. This shows a common mindset among self-imagined "greenies" that have no conception of reality. Your world view can't work, won't work in reality.
my car will take audio via bluetooth.... but it sounds like shit compared to wired connection
blah blah blah
they actually telephoned a relatively few number of people. get your knickers untwisted, the numbers are meaningless.