Slashdot Mirror


'Two Years Later, I Still Miss the Headphone Port' (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader shares a column: I've been trying to figure out why the removal of the headphone port bugs me more than other ports that have been unceremoniously killed off, and I think it's because the headphone port almost always only made me happy. Using the headphone port meant listening to my favorite album, or using a free minute to catch the latest episode of a show, or passing an earbud to a friend to share some new tune. It enabled happy moments and never got in the way.

Now every time I want to use my headphones, I just find myself annoyed. Bluetooth? Whoops, forgot to charge them. Or whoops, they're trying to pair with my laptop even though my laptop is turned off and in my backpack. Dongle? Whoops, left it on my other pair of headphones at work. Or whoops, it fell off somewhere, and now I've got to go buy another one. I'll just buy a bunch of dongles, and put them on all my headphones! I'll keep extras in my bag for when I need to borrow a pair of headphones. That's just like five dongles at this point, problem solved! Oh, wait: now I want to listen to music while I fall asleep, but also charge my phone so it's not dead in the morning. That's a different, more expensive splitter dongle (many of which, I've found, are poorly made garbage).

566 comments

  1. I don't. by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because I don't buy phones that don't have one.
    Genius, isn't it?

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I donâ(TM)t either and my phone doesnt have a headphone port.

    2. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Damn straight it is. I just got a new set of Sony wired headphones and I will use them on a phone with a headphone jack or I will now own the phone. Genius Club++

    3. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I don't buy phones that don't have one.
      Genius, isn't it?

      Sure you may be a genius - and in a perfect world everyone else is too. There would be a manufacturer out there itching to build a phone for you.

      Unfortunately for you (and for me) there will soon be no phones with a headphone jack available. You will be phone-less and I will continue to futz with dongles.

    4. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and this is why slashdot is dead.

    5. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is always about choice and how companies try to force consumers into things, while at the same time talking about it as though they were giving choices to consumers

    6. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately for you (and for me) there will soon be no phones with a headphone jack available.

      This is needless fearmongering. There is absolutely no reason to expect this to happen.
      Last year I bought a phone with a hardware keyboard.

    7. Re:I don't. by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because I don't buy phones that don't have one.
      Genius, isn't it?

      Enjoy it while you can. All the android phones are starting to follow suit.

      and it sucks

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    8. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The
      floppy disc
      Compact disk drive
      Firewire, usb1, 2, etc
      debate.

      History says we will survive

    9. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'll also listen to my free FM radio that doesn't eat up my data plan or battery

    10. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May a wildebeest rip your anus to uncharted widths.

    11. Re: I don't. by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      Now tell us how you don't use social media (because you have no friends), make phone calls (because you have no friends) and use a ridiculously unworkable seventy-three step backup process to ensure that you never lose data even though the only data you have is hentai.

      Texting is faster than calling or social media and I have a 3 step backup plan that is CTRL-A, CTRL-C, CTRL-V with data that is only mostly hentai.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    12. Re: I don't. by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 2

      Flash Storage is a definite improvement over older media like those.
      USB 3 is better that 2 and 1, but you can still plug in you 1 and 2 devices into a 3 port no problem.
      I don't really know the history of Firewire

      So we got two improvements over time there. This is not that. Bluetooth headsets are still expensive compared to normal ones. A cheap set of earphones is only $5-10. I have yet to see a BT set this cheap. And if there is, it will still sound better than the cheap wired ones. They also have batteries that need to be charged.


      The biggest kicker, is when the phone will lock down Bluetooth with DRM so only their fancy overprice, terrible sounding, headphones will work.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    13. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FM radio will disappear within a few years.

    14. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have a floppy drive on my old box and a 5 1/4 drive in my "extra" box. As for optical drives, don't spend anytime at Costco or Fry's looking at desktops eh? A majority of those machines still have optical drives. I have a USB DVD Burner/Blu-Ray reader so I can load Turbo Tax.

      My new phone has a dongle (it ain't no iShitski either) and when I put in my wired earphones the volume control absolutely sucks.

      (I still have my TRS-80 model I with a "flippy" drive)

    15. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I donâ(TM)t either and my phone doesnt have a headphone port.

      Congratulations on leading a sad fucking life without music

      Today I learned that music cannot exist in the absence of a headphone jack.

    16. Re:I don't. by mfearby · · Score: 1

      You're still here ;-)

    17. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things progress

      In fact this is just an idiotic thread to begin with

      Take a headset and try to use it across gsming consolds, stereo, desktop, laptop and the old flip phones, airline jack and todays smartphone

      Its always been a mess

    18. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bluetooth headphones were made for making phone calls, not listening to music. Technically what you hear through them is not the music itself, but a compressed approximation of the music.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    19. Re:I don't. by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      it's getting really hard to buy a premium smartphone with one

    20. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It would have been nice for an alternative evolution came out first. USB headphones have been around for years, but not in usb-c form and not as analog over usb.

      Like the beauty of the 3.5mm jack is that it doesnâ(TM)t fucking break. It rotates if itâ(TM)s an L-shape. USB? It will break off the PCB and since that is also your charging port, you just killed the phone.

    21. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, even my bluetooth headphones are quite an improvement from taking that live band with me on every trip.

    22. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was fast. Did google skip a step as usual?

    23. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in cucked Anglo-Saxon or Nordic countries.

    24. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      If that's what you like to tell yourself.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    25. Re:I don't. by dryeo · · Score: 5, Informative

      And I'll also listen to my free FM radio that doesn't eat up my data plan or battery

      But the FM radio in the phone uses the headphone wire, plugged into the headphone jack, as an antenna.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    26. Re: I don't. by quenda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bluetooth headphones were made for making phone calls, not listening to music.

      Back in the 1990s, yes. But welcome to the 21st century.

      Technically what you hear through them is not the music itself, but a compressed approximation of the music.

      You will be very sad if you every study anatomy and psychology, and learn how human senses work. Our perception is necessarily highly compressed.
      Do you imagine you "hear" the sound-pressure level at every moment? Are you one of those Luddites who hated CDs because of the sampling, or born too late?
      Best not to use the word "Technically" when you have zero technical comprehension.

    27. Re: I don't. by dmacleod808 · · Score: 1

      If that's what you like to tell yourself.

      aren't you the same person?

      --
      There Can Be Only One...
    28. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize you just described all digital formats of sound regardless of format or transmission channel, correct?

    29. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the thing. CD sampling rate and size were designed to generally reproduce what human physiology was capable of hearing. Unfortunately, modern "lossless" wireless headphones can't match this (they're not actually lossless, they either compress or reduce sample rate to compensate for bluetooths limited bandwidth, its just a marketing slogan), so its like listening with your ears clogged full of wax. The short of it is some people are happy to eat junk food, but they shouldnt assume everyone else is also, or try to force it on them.

    30. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a fun weekend.

    31. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a zombie.

      I'm a zombie, too.

    32. Re:I don't. by quenda · · Score: 1

      Because I don't buy phones that don't have one.
      Genius, isn't it?

      Yes, easy to be smug if you are an Android user, and have real choice. But isn't "smug" what we accuse the Apple "sheeple" of ?
      Let's not be hypocrites.
      Many people, through no fault of their own, have become locked into the Apple ecosystem, and Apple killed their last phone with 3.5mm socket a few months ago.

      It is a serious annoyance, just just that. Apple is missing countless features that you may or may not want, but people only complain about the one that was there, and taken away.

    33. Re: I don't. by quenda · · Score: 1

      so its like listening with your ears clogged full of wax.

      If they seem the same to you, you have terrible hearing and may as well stick to AM radio. :-)

      The emperor truly has no clothes.

    34. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Enjoy it while you can. All the android phones are starting to follow suit.

      One of the advantages that Android enjoys over iPhone and iOS devices is the cheapness and ubiquity of device options. There are Android devices for every niche and at every price point. There will always be models with phone connectors (aka "audio jacks") or QWERTY keyboards or any number of other niche features. Apple, on the other hand, has always offered a very limited selection of devices and is well-know for consumer unfriendly nudges, like removing the phone connectors as TFA laments. The products that Apple makes have always struck me as overpriced and unprofessional and I have never understood how anybody involved in serious software development or engineering work could have been satisfied with their "prosumer" nonsense. Now, I do recognize that since we software developers represent a fraction of a percent of the market it's hard to find any company interested in making specialist devices just for our needs. Although, in this department Google does get a bit of credit for at least producing limited numbers of android devices geared towards android developers, first with their Nexus line and later with their Pixel devices. Apple never gave its developers that courtesy, probably because they thought that their developers should be grateful that they were even allowed to develop on their platform at all.

    35. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All power to you who has the huge chest to afford your travelling minstrel show. The rest of us plebians make do with an approximation of what music might be.

    36. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not even restricted to Android phones. Tablets are getting rid of it too.

    37. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... So don't upgrade?

    38. Re:I don't. by mschuyler · · Score: 2

      Because I have never used the headphone jack on any phone.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    39. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my LG V30, and after looking, the V40 still has one. There's your premium?

    40. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My LG G6 has a standard headphone jack. It uses the headphone cable as an antenna for the built in FM receiver.

      FM radio provides music and doesn't hit my data.

    41. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and listening on music stored on a digital device is not a compressed approximation of the music?

      Sure, Bluetooth compresses it slightly more depending on codec, but most modern Bluetooth devices already support the major codecs that the music is compressed with, and therefore do not compress it more, hence no change in the quality of the music.

    42. Re: I don't. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like the beauty of the 3.5mm jack is that it doesnâ(TM)t fucking break. It rotates if it's an L-shape. USB? It will break off the PCB and since that is also your charging port, you just killed the phone.

      ^^^^^THIS.

      Headphone ports work perfectly well in literally billions of devices going back ~40 years or more. It's an amazing technological success that just works.

      Apple's bullshit excuse of "courage" was believed only by suckers and fanbois.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    43. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will continue to be lots of phones with headphone jacks, check back in 10 years?

    44. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care or worry about DRM e.g. I never notice a difference when clicking the checkbox for DRM support on Firefox ; DRM may remain some sort of faint threat eventually.
      What may bother me and you already is CODEC licensing (or Bluetooth levels). Phone A support Foo 2.x, phone B supports Baz 2.x, phone C supports Foo 2.x and Baz 1.x ; headphones Z support Foo 1.x and Baz 2.x and everything is patented... This is a nightmare.

      I never even dealt with wired digital audio or multichannel audio - I may deal with digital audio (USB or otherwise), if it's the simple stereo with CD quality that works everywhere and doesn't involve any codec.
      Even HDMI is good for 1080p 60Hz display with stereo sound. At least it works and the job is done. I may do such thing as broadcasting audio with Icecast and a free codec on a network (I needed to do this exactly once), that's an uncommon thing to do but any mplayer GUI or winamp clone can read that. Wireless audio broadcasting? There's FM radio (or AM for amerikans). You can conceivably walk to an FM radio station and ask to speak into a mike, or call the radio station with your phone to the same effect. I say this is easier than buying a wireless headphones and phone combination - for the latter I feel like I have to hire a legal team.

    45. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, some here. I just had to replace mine and bought a model specifically because it has a headphone jack. I have around 6 systems I use routinely that I just plug-in and go, no dongles, no pairing, just plug, play, awesome.

    46. Re: I don't. by Immerman · · Score: 1, Troll

      Hey, it takes a lot of courage to blatantly fck over your customer base while you tell them they like it. Even if you're Apple and have most of your customers brainwashed that everything you do is The Next Great Thing. The reality distortion field hasn't been quite as strong since Jobs died, and a nakedly exploitative move of that magnitude seems to have woken up at least a slight percentage of the fanboys to their predicament.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    47. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people invest a lot in headphones. Forckng them to replace them is as much a bold business move as it is a dick move for consumers.

    48. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      technically, all sound is a compressed approximation of its source

    49. Re:I don't. by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Many people, through no fault of their own, have become locked into the Apple ecosystem

      I don't think you understand how fault works.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    50. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty inconvenient to bring a church organ with me. And where do I park it at work?

    51. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm old, everything is an approximation of reality.

    52. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sampling doesn't imply lossy compression.

    53. Re: I don't. by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The 3.5mm headphone jack was one of the greatest inventions ever. There were attempts at smaller, but the 2.5mm was just too fragile.

      After 50 years, the 3.5mm jack is damn near perfect. There are some potential problems with it, but nothing which is too much of a problem.

      If people want to use bluetooth, they're welcome to it. But I've gone iPhoneX and then back again. A major part of this was the headphone jack.

      What people often don't realize about the headphone jack is that it takes power. This is this real problem for companies these days. A small audio amplifier places a drain on the battery. It also requires space on the PCB. It's extremely difficult to design an audio amplifier with insanely good audio which fits within the real-estate constraints of a phone and also make it so there's no interference from all the surrounding radio circuits.

      So... the solution is to charge us more and remove the port.

      What Apple and the others seem to forget is that we like the choice. I don't like constantly losing headphones because they're not connected to the phone. Or constantly leaving my phone on the desk and being out of the building before I realize I forgot it... because the sound starts crackling. I don't like breaking expensive lightning to headphone dongles. I don't like having to constantly charge wireless headphones. I hate when my headphones run out of battery on the train.

      Now.. here's the REAL PROBLEM

      I don't like having to constantly pair and pair and pair and pair my damn headphones. I use my headphone with my PC to talk on Skype. I use my headphones on my phone to ... well everything. I use my headphone on my tablet to... well everything. I have one pair of headphones I simply plug or unplug. When I use bluetooth, I have to delete the device and repair it every time I switch. With proper headphones I can move the cable and click the button on the headphones to play. I don't even have to unlock the phone.

      I've been hoping Apple or Google will release a phone at some point called "The old fogey phone" for people who want all the features of the latest phone but are willing to live with lesser audio to get the headphone jack.

    54. Re: I don't. by bkmoore · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth headphones were made for making phone calls, not listening to music....

      I agree, but only to a point. I use high-quality wired headphones on my home stereo, as it was designed specifically for rendering music with the highest-fidelity possible. That would be lost with a bluetooth headphone. OTOH, no iPhone and other small portable device is really audiophile quality, and I don't think bluetooth is necessarily any better or worse on such a device.

    55. Re: I don't. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After 50 years, the 3.5mm jack is damn near perfect. There are some potential problems with it, but nothing which is too much of a problem.

      A lot of people try to claim that "it can't be made waterproof" or that "it collects dust and lint" or some other bullshit excuse.

      1) It's trivial to waterproof a 3.5mm jack and plug. I've done it dozens of times with nothing more than a little bit of RTV or silicone sealant. So that excuse is pure bullshit.

      2) It collects pocket lint or dust? OH NOES!!1! But so does a USB-C port, as well as every other connector on the planet. Just use some compressed air to blow it out and it's as good as new.

      But noooooooooooooo, we have to buy dongles and/or $75 bluetooth earbuds...now you have more things to lose, more batteries to wear out, more cables to break, etc etc etc.

      I can buy dozens of earbuds on Amazon or eBay for $5 ~ $10 and if I lose them it's no big deal. No additional batteries to wear out, no dumbass charging station or gizmo needed.

      Also, sound is better over a wire than over Bluetooth. That's a fact. Don't waste my time telling me that the fidelity over Bluetooth is better (or even equal)...I have enough decades of electronics under my belt to know you're mistaken.

      Interference? Never really been a problem with wired earbuds unless you're standing next to a major source of EMI like a transformer or sparky motors.

      Finally, if my wired earbud falls out, I just put it back in. If your Bluetooth earbud falls out...oh shit. Lets hope you're not in tall grass or over a grate or on a gravel parking lot or a roadway or on an escalator or jogging, etc etc etc. If it's gone, just smile and shell out another $75 for a new pair (since you can't buy them singly as far as I know).

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    56. Re:I don't. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Or being locked into an ecosystem, for that matter.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    57. Re: I don't. by Gabest · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Where is the IR transmitter on my notebook!

    58. Re:I don't. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Apple customers are the country club set of the digital world. They want the rules, they want uniformity, they want the lack of choice, some people enjoy all the rules and restrictions of the country club and paying too much for exclusivity and others do not, just the way it is. I am mainly interested in utility, flexibility and reliability, let's be honest no smart phone really provides that any more.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    59. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What jealous assholes you guys are. Pixel doesnâ(TM)t have a headphone port. Companies make money any way they can, get over it and gtfo my lawn

    60. Re: I don't. by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      willing to live with lesser audio to get the headphone jack.

      The headphone jack is actually better audio. Not just for headphones, even for the brand name speaker system in my car, plugging the headphone jack into "aux in" is noticeably higher quality than bluetooth, like night and day. Only reason I don't do it is because unfortunately some form of digital connection is needed (bt or USB) for the steering wheel buttons to work.

    61. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BT audio can be good, but it has the option to be bad to save cost.

    62. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's compressed by neirology, and *the zero crossings matter*. Typical digital compression completely distorts of not destroys critical timing information. Robert Licklider demonstrated a great deal of the analog timing sensitivity that is *flushed away* by digital sampling.

      Think I'm kidding? Look at Licklider's papers on audio compression, where he turned the gain up to a maximum and *clipped* the sound amplitude. The timing data is intact, the amplitude information is thrown away, and it *works better* for speech comprehension than modern digital sampling.

    63. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bro beaver,
      Audioamplifiers in tiny packages at good to fantastic quality now. Super high effencies too.

      Check out the offerings of AnalogDevices or some of the class D bag chips some are smaller than a grain of rice.

    64. Re: I don't. by atrex · · Score: 0

      They could do two things that would let them continue on their way (of removing the 3.5mm port) but would stand a good chance of satisfying consumers.
      1) Add a second USB-C port. With two ports one can be used for an accessory while the other is used for charging. No expensive and often proprietary splitter required.
      2) Instead of a straight simple dongle that just converts 3.5mm to USB-C, design a dongle that clips onto the 3.5mm jack and prevents it from easily falling off, but instead of just USB-C on the other side have it be both USB-C and 3.5mm (effectively a Y cable).

    65. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      N1ggers and stupid fags run crapple now.
      There is no point in complaining that the phone you just bought from fags is somehow shit.

    66. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wireless denon phones sound better than anything Iâ(TM)ve ever had before and itâ(TM)s great without cables. I use them daily during commuting and have never had any problems ever. The battery life is great. If you want a jack then buy a phone with one and enjoy your wires hanging. Donâ(TM)t pretend there are no benefits of wireless and donâ(TM)t pretend that itâ(TM)s difficult to get decent Bluetooth headphones that are VASTLY better than any quality metric which is relevant to the vast majority of people listening to music on their fucking phone you tool

    67. Re: I don't. by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Try taking a pair of headphones and plug them into a receiver from the 60s. Works just fine.

    68. Re: I don't. by burnetd · · Score: 1

      Can you please explain why I used to get though an aux cable every six months and why the only thing wrong with my 4th Gen iPod touch is the jack plug socket is knackered ?

    69. Re: I don't. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

      BS, how many 3.5 jacks I have seen being broken, it's just ridiculous. So it's BS that it doesn't break. And to be honest, I myself haven't used a 3.5 jack for ages..

    70. Re:I don't. by stooo · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't have that basic hardware, it's not a premium phone.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    71. Re:I don't. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Because I have never used the headphone jack on any phone.

      I too thought the headphone port was super important.

      My realization came earlier this year when the bumper case my iPhone 4S finally broke apart and around the headphone port was years worth of pocket lint. The phone was bought brand new in 2011, and the bumper case was put on it within a few minutes of unboxing.

      It looked strange - a pristine band of metal around the phone not seen in years, except around the headphone port. I picked out years worth of pocket lint - not just what was around the part the case didn't cover, but all the pocket lint INSIDE the port. That took some fine tweezers.

      At that point, I decided that the headphone port was truly not important for me. I thought it was a necessity, but for me, the truth was the opposite.

      Yes, I understand some people need it. Some people have headphones on them 24/7 and a wire running to their pocket constantly. I see that all the time. And for them perhaps they should make sure their phone has a headphone port. (I say perhaps because I don't know if they use the adapter).

      Of course, perhaps Apple realized that few of their crowd used the headphone jack, and even fewer people used headphones and charged their phone at the same time. Thus using the lightning port wasn't a big a drawback as it seems - you simply reassign a port, and actual usage proves few people actually used both ports at the same time.

      As an aside, I found an adapter I bought back in the OG iPhone days - it plugs into the 3.5mm port and has a microphone on it, and splits out a regular 3.5mm port for your own headphones. For those who don't remember, the OG iPhone had a recessed port that most headphones will not plug into. It had a microphone so you didn't lose headset functionality (and remained compatible all the way). It was still new in box.

    72. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you that that this is just a tribute?

    73. Re: I don't. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I want my phone to get regular updates for more than 18 months (including new versions of the OS) and to not be spied on by Google. Is there an Android phone like that (LineageOS doesn't count)?

    74. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the direct electrical signal "lesser" than the electrical signal compressed, modulated for RF transmission, demodulated, and converted back to an electrical signal?

    75. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      conversely, you shouldn't assume someone doesn't know anything and then not post why, it makes you appear as though you don't know anything either.

    76. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've no idea why this post keeps getting modded insightful because it sounds like bullocks. Let me explain:

      Very few cheap modern Bluetooth headphones support AptX and even fewer smartphones even in 2018 support AptX out of the box (a lot of them do however this codec is not enabled by default and on Android you have to enable developer options). This codec is currently the only way to listen to music at maximum fidelity (no, the original poster wasn't talking about dynamic range compression - he meant lossy data compression).

      The default Bluetooth audio codec is SBC (Subband Coding) and its default bitrate is close to 200Kbit/sec (my 2017 Google One smartphone has a bitrate close to 100Kbit/sec) and let me tell you that it sounds like pure shit where high frequencies (>12KHz) are completely cut off.

      More on it here: 1 2 3 // Artem S. Tashkinov

    77. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I listen to music on the tiny built in speaker. To me it sounds just as good as bluetooth, you tool!

    78. Re: I don't. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Most people are used to listening to FM radio or MP3 anyway. Very few keep FLAC files on their phones or carry a portable CD player any more. To most people, AptX sounds identical to wired headphones. Often better in fact, as the amplifier is tuned to those specific cans instead of using the often quite weak one in the phone.

      I'd be willing to get bet that in a double blind test most audiophiles couldn't tell which were wired and which were AptX either.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    79. Re: I don't. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      You're holding it wrong.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    80. Re: I don't. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I have a church organ at work.

      The again, I am the Archbishop of Canterbury.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    81. Re: I don't. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So what happens to the parts between the samples?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    82. Re: I don't. by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      The 3.5mm headphone jack was one of the greatest inventions ever.

      Fiddly little things. When I was a young 'un, headphone plugs were the size of a frankfurter.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    83. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xbox and PlayStation both have 3.5mm audio jacks on their controllers and they work just fine. Same with PSVR HMD. Many MoBos for computers still have 3.5mm in/out and many have them for 5.1 and 7.1 hookups. Nintendo Switch runs a 3.5mm.

      Lots of things outside of shitty phone maker world still run 3.5mm just fine.

    84. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happens to the parts between the samples?

      https://www.rane.com/note137.h...

    85. Re: I don't. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So they're lost, then?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    86. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No fault of their own?

      Don't be moronic. That's literally their choice and it's the consumers fault apple is removing features,becuase they havnt left yet.

      What is with the incessant victim narrative in every single aspect of life?

      Yes. Yes it is indeed your fault.

    87. Re: I don't. by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      Best not to use the word "Technically" when you have zero technical comprehension.

      Well to be fair, he had some comprehension, but the quantizing steps rounded it down to zero...

    88. Re: I don't. by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      A $5-10 pair of headphones is awful no matter what the connection choice is, you need to spend considerably more to have any quality. An inexpensive Bluetooth headset that works well for me is the Cowin E7, around $60 on Amazon right now. It offers automatic noise cancellation which you can turn off if you don't like it. I found with that on, and in normal ambient sound situations, it enhances the music by letting me lower the volume, sometimes to its minimal setting. If I am at home with one of my audio systems and everything is quiet and I'm willing to sit in the zone where everything is optimized, then of course the home audio system wins hands down. If I'm moving around, maybe cooking while listening to music, of course the staging isn't perfect and there is loss of quality.

      So really the key is the environment in which you're using these. While staging for headphones can be really great, there is always something changed by using them. Same with a higher-end audio system in a noisy or acoustically poor environment. Even lower-end wireless solutions such as Rocketfish which uses radio to wirelessly transmit sound to speakers has better quality than you will notice in most environments.

    89. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had 2 phones with usb -c ports, just used for charging. THe port lasts a little under a year then the cable just jumps out. Its a frustration. I couldnt immagine how long it would last if I was using it as a headphone jack too.

    90. Re: I don't. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to get bet that in a double blind test most audiophiles couldn't tell which were wired and which were AptX either.

      Give them the prices, and they could. That's because most bluetooth headphones don't support AptX, that comes at a premium. When you couple that with the fact that most phones don't support it, it's barely worth mentioning at all.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    91. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pull the battery out and charge the spare overnight. My Galaxy 4 is great for this. What's the problem?

    92. Re: I don't. by number6x · · Score: 1

      Upvote for choice #1.

      If you are determined to take away the 3.5 mm headphone port, then give me multiple usb-c ports.

      This is a valid use case. Working at the desk, with the phone charging, listening to music. And, most importantly, not having another wireless thing to keep charged and keep track of.

    93. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well unless you know what is better, the phone or bluetooth, why add a guaranteed bottleneck?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    94. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      What about those like myself that go out of their way to get flac? Also, I don't pay a lot for headphones. We should compare bluetooth headphones at the $40 price point. The problem with bluetooth headphones is that you don't really know what you are getting. The battery may only last 1.1 years so I won't put too much money into it. Wired headphones I will put more money into, so compare at $80 wired.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    95. Re: I don't. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It also requires space on the PCB. It's extremely difficult to design an audio amplifier with insanely good audio which fits within the real-estate constraints of a phone and also make it so there's no interference from all the surrounding radio circuits.

      Audiophile crap aside this isn't really true. There was pretty much no extra PCB space required for the electronics of a headphone jack thanks to them being integrated in the general DAC chips (which phones still have anyway) since about the second generation iPod (not iPhone, years before the iPhone).

      Yeah it's no class A discrete MOSFET amplifier, but it was well and truly more than good enough for the 99.999% of people out there.

      The only PCB space reasonably taken up was that of the socket itself.

    96. Re: I don't. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Technically what you hear through them is not the music itself, but a compressed approximation of the music.

      Maybe you should throw away your 10 year old Bluetooth headphones and your Samsung Galaxy S1 and buy something from the past 5 years which includes things like AAC passthrough or lossless bluetooth compression like aptX.

      Unless you're being more philosophical in that because it's 1s and 0s you're not listening to music itself since music is an analogue construct that can only truly be represented by etching into a spinning disk of plastic, in which case piss-off weirdo.

    97. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Excuse me? Maybe I should throw away something that works? Maybe I should embrace the new shiny shiny and feed the consumer monster? When my 10 year old wired headphones work fine.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    98. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes "courage" to try fucking over your customers with those $300 airpods they'll lose or put through the laundry after the first day to see if they're dumb enough to keep buying them. It was a success.

    99. Re:I don't. by epine · · Score: 1

      All the android phones are starting to follow suit.

      Your definition of the word "all" is 80% FOMO bling.

    100. Re:I don't. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Most (all?) of LG's flagship phones still include it. They have that stupid "button on the back" design (which even after 3 months of owning one I still don't like), but it was the lesser of two evils for me.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    101. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit fapping with it in your hand, it's wearing out the cable.

    102. Re: I don't. by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Clean out the pocket lint! I had the same problem. Watch a tutorial on YouTube, you'll have it fixed in two minutes.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    103. Re:I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So at some point am I supposed to read the 53rd comment with someones testimony that they just gave into the capitalist monster and "things were much better" and decide that I, too, would like to sacrifice my standards?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    104. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

      Yup pretty much this.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    105. Re: I don't. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Hey you are the one complaining about it. Not us.

    106. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I don't see how this matters at all. Unless you can justifiably say that the bluetooth is not the weakest link in the chain, it doesn't make sense to add a limitation to the chain.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    107. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Lol.. At $60 you are in the range where it will hurt if you roll on top of it at night and it breaks. I recently paid $40 for my BT headphones but even at that price point I won't wear them at night for fear of breaking them. Also you need to pick day or night since they need to charge and they are two expensive for a set of two so you can alternate. I paid $6 each for a bulk box of wired silicone earbuds and that is what I wear at night.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    108. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you buy low end cheap wired phones your whole life then get medium quality wireless ones apparently it is possible to be tricked into thinking "wiresless sounds better".

    109. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Note that I don't listen to music with any of this. I don't really have ear buds that I would listen to music with right now, these are for audio books and TV.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    110. Re: I don't. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately you are a bit of a niche market... But presumably since you are using FLAC you also have an external USB DAC anyway, as the internal one and the built in headphone amp won't be up to scratch.

      Back in the day I found the best thing was to just get a dedicated music player with decent sound quality and an SD card slot. Much cheaper, memory costs peanuts and the battery lasts forever. But of course it is one more thing to charge.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    111. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=usb+c+headphones&tag=googhydr-20&index=aps&hvadid=174252743918&hvpos=1t1&hvnetw=g&hvrand=12824216404059343649&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=e&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9013478&hvtargid=aud-589036435099:kwd-158986874175&ref=pd_sl_8478t60sh3_e

    112. Re: I don't. by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      I wear headphones for 2 reasons: I need to block out noise, and I want to listen to music in a place where I can't use my home audio system. That's pretty much it. I don't sleep with them, I don't even recline with them on, that isn't my use case. Mostly I wear them at work but not even daily, I have a lot of days where I would be constantly taking them off with interruptions.

      My headphones' battery lasts well more than a workday, they claim 30 hours but I'm not exactly sure how long they last since I charge them every few times I use them. If you're wearing headphones so long each day at a power rating that eats batteries so quickly you need a second pair, you're at serious risk of damaged hearing and ear infections.

      $60 for a pair -- or a second pair -- is probably trivial to most people, that's a night out at the movies for 2 people nowadays or a non-alcoholic dinner for 2, or a tank of premium gas, or a new game for your Playstation / XBox, or a few drinks in an upscale bar. If it's that important to you, you will find the funding for it.

    113. Re:I don't. by fattmatt · · Score: 1

      I simply shrink wrapped the adapter onto the end of my 3.5 mm equipped headphones. I use separate headphones with my 3.5mm equipment vs my iphone though, so might not be a solution for those who need to mix and match.

    114. Re: I don't. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      The 3.5mm jack is far from perfect though-- the contacts wear and lose their springyness with use-- aircraft IFE headphone jacks are a good example.

      But boy do the alternatives really suck!

    115. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comrad,

      Bluetooth pairings are universally garbage, as well as almost no bluetooth devices have a user-replaceable battery.

      So... planned obsolesence!

      Congratulations Gullable Consumer, you get to buy your headphone every 3 years into perpetuity due to Brave Capitalist Pig-Dogs market weight.

      Then to add insult to injury, you are also helping to rape mother-earth.

    116. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds impressive and all, but no. Bluetooth is more compressed than analog. Sorry you don't understand that.

    117. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So you would be perfectly happy with a 10 year old set of bluetooth headphones. You wouldn't replace them with something newer.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    118. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      But now you can't get a decent portable music player because EVERYONE STARTED TO USE THIER PHONES.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    119. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      $60 for a pair -- or a second pair -- is probably trivial to most people, that's a night out at the movies for 2 people nowadays or a non-alcoholic dinner for 2, or a tank of premium gas, or a new game for your Playstation / XBox, or a few drinks in an upscale bar. If it's that important to you, you will find the funding for it.

      Apparently your money is far, far easier to earn than mine is.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    120. Re: I don't. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      What people often don't realize about the headphone jack is that it takes power. This is this real problem for companies these days. A small audio amplifier places a drain on the battery. It also requires space on the PCB.

      No, we realize that the small audio amplifier which is also required for speaker output takes power and requires space on the PCB. It must not be that much of a problem, since manufacturers are still putting speakers on their phones.

      It's extremely difficult to design an audio amplifier with insanely good audio which fits within the real-estate constraints of a phone and also make it so there's no interference from all the surrounding radio circuits.

      What about one of the single-chip solutions that actually fits into an earbud... and the shielding cans that are already in place over the radios?

      Stop making bullshit excuses, you're not helping.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    121. Re:I don't. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Because I don't buy phones that don't have one.
      Genius, isn't it?

      Yes, easy to be smug if you are an Android user, and have real choice. But isn't "smug" what we accuse the Apple "sheeple" of ?
      Let's not be hypocrites.
      Many people, through no fault of their own, have become locked into the Apple ecosystem, and Apple killed their last phone with 3.5mm socket a few months ago.

      It is a serious annoyance, just just that. Apple is missing countless features that you may or may not want, but people only complain about the one that was there, and taken away.

      I was on the upgrade plan. The last iPhone I got was the first without the headphone jack. I won't be replacing it with a non headphone jack phone. I paid off the 'loan' and kept the phone. LG is likely to get my business when that time comes.

      The first batch of headphone jack victims haven't yet had time to act on their learnings. It will get worse for the no-jack vendors as most of the population loses the jack, learns it's bad, lives with it and a couple of years later makes a different purchasing decision. The dwell time is around two years.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    122. Re: I don't. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      That's because your SuperBeats have SuperBluetooth... SuperDre...

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    123. Re: I don't. by epine · · Score: 2

      Are you one of those Luddites who hated CDs because of the sampling, or born too late?

      I once owned a first generation CD player. The audiophiles were not wrong. The analog recording process had evolved over decades to use microphones that were intrinsically too bright, to compensate for the LP recording process, which was intrinsically low-pass.

      All the original CD transfers from the early 1980s are ludicrously shrill. On the other hand, every audio CD I've ever bought going all the way back to 1983 is still playable, but I have to manually equalize everything from the 1980s differently than what came later. The original CDs also ruined stereo staging, as perceived by a listener with sufficiently good speakers. The vast majority used a single DAC, which was multiplexed between the two channels (rendering the two channels permanently half a sample out of phase). In addition, the earlier recordings (especially when played on the earlier players) had a lot of structural quantization noise. Both of these last two problems disappeared with the advent of the 1-bit DAC, interpolated to 20-bit precision, combined with changes to recording technology which computationally dithered out the quantization error term.

      Yes, there were plenty of idiots who blamed all these very real problems on the digital process itself. The digital process itself was a broken panacea before an additional decade of secret sauce was quietly supplied behind the scenes. And there is still a group of people out there who think that digital signals travel best over uni-directional, oxygen-free copper wire. But I wouldn't call these people Luddites. I'd call them nearly anything else—but not Luddites.

      Some of these people now have hermetically-sealed listening rooms equipped with HEPA filters and helium recirculation pumps—because not even regular indoor air is pristine enough until fully ensconced in a Goldfinger money pit.

      Another effect worth mentioned is the analogy to the transition from incandescent bulbs to modern LED lighting. If you've been used to the yellowish incandescent colour-temperature for decades and decades, the new whiter-whites seem peculiar. Then when you get used to the new whiter-whites and you go back to the yellow incandescents, it's now the incandescents that seem weird.

      Some of the early CD problems was simply a change of customary colour temperature.

      All of this was hotly contested back in 1983 and 1984. Some of the loudest voices in the room were the audiophiles with $30,000 of analog gear in their listening rooms, many of whom claimed to hear nuance that mere mortals couldn't detect.

      There was one voice of reason in the wild-west wilderness of the early digital era, and this was the NRC psycho-acoustic research center in Ottawa, Canada.

      National Research Council

      Over the course of more than 20 years, the validity of these measurements has been confirmed by double-blind listening tests conducted in a nearby NRC listening room that approximates the size and furnishings of a typical living room. The program was guided by Dr. Floyd Toole, a Canadian physicist and psycho-acoustician who received his PhD in England in stereo localization, and continued his experiments at the National Research Council beginning in the 1970s. In his search for an accurate speaker with which to conduct his experiments, he discovered wild inconsistencies in speaker design and measurement, and an absence of controlled scientific research. Since he was already an audiophile, Toole invited several young Canadian speaker designers, including Axiom's Ian Colquhoun, to work with him in evolving new speaker measurements and listening tests (part of the NRC's mandate was to assist Canadian firms in product development).

      The facility also tested audiophiles, and they gradually identified a group of people they called "golden ears", who really could hear more a

    124. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as long as the sample rate is high enough then more than a human ear is required to hear the loss..so this is loss that only Superman can accurately detect.

    125. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you complaining about something so minor; get over it. It's not a big deal.

    126. Re: I don't. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      Time to throw away your 5 YO bluetooth headphones... aptx was superseded by aptxHD which has been superseded by LDAC.

    127. Re: I don't. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Do you have a split personality disorder where one of your personalities imitates the person you are arguing with?

      To answer your question let me quote myself:
      "Maybe you should throw away your 10 year old Bluetooth headphones and your Samsung Galaxy S1 and buy something from the past 5 years which includes things like AAC passthrough or lossless bluetooth compression like aptX."

      I'll let you figure out if I would be happy with a 10 year old set of headphones. I'll also let you try and figure out why you are applying your own logic to my purchasing decisions.

      Throw out old junk and be happy, or keep your old junk and stop complaining since it's not representative of what the current state of the technology is.

    128. Re: I don't. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair if you have 5 year old bluetooth headphones the battery life on them and general wear of having something mobile is probably reason enough to throw them away. Welcome to the new millennium where nothing lasts and consumer desires don't matter.

      In any case, point was aptx was more than good enough for nearly every headphone on the market. True high quality headphones which were bluetooth based haven't been on the market very long so far.

    129. Re:I don't. by mydots · · Score: 1

      My first Google branded smartphone in 2010 came with wired earbuds. I have bought a Google branded smartphone every other year since and used those same earbuds. This year I bought a Samsung phone because Google phones no longer have them, but Samsung still does; and I am still using those same 8 year old pair of earbuds.

    130. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe Apple was trying to make thinner phones. Courage was used for marketing, and based on the hostility of most of the posts here, it's on point.

      The 3.5mm jack works great, but you can't shrink it.

    131. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Ok so you are pro-consumer.. exactly what I was saying.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    132. Re: I don't. by shilly · · Score: 1

      Because there are things other than fidelity that matter to people, such as convenience, a lack of wires to get tangled, etc. How much these different things matter to people is a matter of judgement -- there's no right or wrong.

    133. Re: I don't. by CWCheese · · Score: 1

      12" vinyl still a great music storage medium

      --
      Have a Day!
    134. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Ok so if there is no right or wrong, why is my choice being limited? People could have bluetooth and analog jack before, now one is forbidden and we are forced to use another. That seems to make the assumption that only the use cases of the people who use wireless matter.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    135. Re:I don't. by luther349 · · Score: 1

      i would assume you could still do that with a type-c adapter.

    136. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can genuinely say that my hearing is better than your reading comprehension!

    137. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LDAC is a competitor to AptX-HD, and they are both lossy. (otherwise called "AptX Lossless", AptX-HD is still lossy, but they assume the kind of morons buying bluetooth headphones can't tell the difference anyway)

    138. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, why should customers complain when something they want and use is suddenly removed by every manufacturer at once in a cartel like fashion? Damn ingrates. I assume you'll be first in line to buy Mr Garrisons IT? Beats the airlines.

    139. Re: I don't. by shilly · · Score: 1

      Because companies aren't obliged to fulfil your needs or preferences, much as that may gall you. They are offering the product; you are deciding if it's worth your hard-earned cash. You are free to make that choice as you wish. But you can't dictate to them what they have to offer, save as mediated by the government (eg safety regulations).

    140. Re: I don't. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well since that is pretty much the only promise that capitalism makes to the consumer.. that they will have options that will fit their needs.. I guess capitalism completely fails the consumer then, so it's not capitalism.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    141. Re: I don't. by quenda · · Score: 1

      [CD players] used a single DAC ... (rendering the two channels permanently half a sample out of phase).

      I'm going to query that part, because it is specific. Have you done the maths on this? (Am I off?)
      44kHz, so 11ms. Multiply by 343m/s = 4mm. FOUR MILLIMETRES

      Please explain to me how this makes any sense? Moving one of your speakers by 4mm (or head by 2mm) will have the exact same delay effect. Does that ruin your listening experience? Are you detecting phase in the top octave of your hearing range?

    142. Re: I don't. by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth audio still sucks ass in 2018. Pitch stability is still a problem. How on earth have they not solved this? And who seriously thought that adjusting pitch was a good solution to dropped packets anyway? Probably one of the humans you describe with special powers to just ignore this.

    143. Re:I don't. by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      It is fun to poke fun at the dongle wall in Apple Stores though.

    144. Re: I don't. by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with LineageOS?

    145. Re:I don't. by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      after two straight LG phones that fried themselves (nexus 5 and 5X) i said never again

    146. Re: I don't. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Nothing at all, it's great and is what Android should be. Unfortunately you can't buy a phone from a major manufacturer with it installed, you need to do some messing about.

    147. Re:I don't. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      And there goes the wire less benefit.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    148. Re: I don't. by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      I just got hold of my original Commodore 64 and hope to get it working again.
      But guess what? No headphone jack!

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    149. Re: I don't. by virtualXTC · · Score: 1

      Not sure why this is only at a +3, but thank you sir for the interesting history lesson. The part about golden ears only being able to desern frequency resoloution or temporal resolution but not both explains a lot about music perception and why there are so many shitty DJs.

    150. Re: I don't. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No. I'm just pro-good-life. I never threw away headphones. My old ones have a cable, and my wireless were bought after aptx came out.

      Did you chase after the latest shiny gadget and are now complaining? Shame on you.

    151. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Batteries wearing out = need to buy new bluetooth headphones!!!! HATE THIS!

    152. Re:I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read a while back that Apple had this functionality included in one of their phones and they disabled it once they realized(pressured?) that it would result in less data consumption/profit for cell carriers.

    153. Re: I don't. by shilly · · Score: 1

      Capitalism isn't an independent entity that makes promises of its own accord. If you don't anthropomorphise concepts, your life becomes a lot easier to navigate.

      I'm also not aware of any political or economic theorists who would make the claim that capitalism provides a mechanism to meet every individual's every need and desire. It's too obviously impossible. In fact, the concept of market failure is a standard term in talking about capitalism, so no-one even begins to pretend it's some kind of nirvana.

      You're attacking a strawman of your own creation. Maybe it gives you some small pleasure to do this, but it's a bit of a pointless exercise. Surely you'd be better of using your prodigious talent to propose some entirely new way of organising the allocation of economic resources that avoids all the problems of all the systems we've tried so far. You're a fan of perfection, after all.

    154. Re: I don't. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Family of 8 over here and all the kids need headphones for school. Let's see, 2 need computers and 3 need ipads, school clothes, school supplies, book fees (thanks indiana), etc...

      So back to headphones, 7 pairs (none for the 3 year old) at $60 / pair is $420. How many do you think I'll need to replace because they got stepped on, lost, one ear quit working, etc. (all of these have happened multiple times).

      Or I can buy wired headphones on sale from monoprice for $3 each and keep a few spares on hand. The kids can use them on mulitiple devices or plug into the splitters I bought so they can share music.

      hmmm... what to do...

    155. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said it, family of 8. You chose to have such a large family. Very selfish if you canâ(TM)t afford them and expect society to do your job. Headphones are the least of the problems in that situation. You should have been an adult and used contraception.

    156. Re: I don't. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      "That X can only detect" doesn't satisfy your typical audiophool though.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    157. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you have so many children when you can't afford little things like headphones? This seems poor planning and a lack of responsibility on your part. Now society has to pay for your mistakes.

    158. Re: I don't. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      $60 headphones are extravagant, especially for children.

    159. Re: I don't. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Whoever pretended any such thing? Not me.

      Please don't put words in my mouth or throw out strawman 'arguments' like that; it looks dumb and desperate to defend a position that hasn't even been brought up.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    160. Re: I don't. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The 3.5mm headphone jack was one of the greatest inventions ever.

      Fiddly little things. When I was a young 'un, headphone plugs were the size of a frankfurter.

      Oh yeah, those new-fangled frankfurter jacks. In my day we made do with ceramic bobbins and fabric-woven insulation.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    161. Re: I don't. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      What people often don't realize about the headphone jack is that it takes power.

      Ummm, no. The jack is a passive, unpowered device.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    162. Re: I don't. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Why not tell the idiot who posted it, and not the guy who was quoting him to explain how he was wrong?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    163. Re: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not having friends is bad? I would rather not have any than to count you as one.

    164. Re: I don't. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Why not tell the idiot who posted it, and not the guy who was quoting him to explain how he was wrong?

      Slip of the finger, which I'm sure has never ever happened to you.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    165. Re: I don't. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Hard to tell around here. All of my trolls have gone silent and I haven't noticed you around before, so my initial assumption was... well, you can see where this is going. My apologies if that is not the case.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    166. Re:I don't. by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      The products that Apple makes have always struck me as overpriced and unprofessional

      Especially how most of the iPhones I see people using have cracked screens. If you make such a pretty object so fragile that they are often broken but still being used because it's too expensive to fix, then that beautiful image you are trying to portray is just ruined. Apple phones look like crap because they are most often cracked.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    167. Re: I don't. by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      And that is $75 every couple of years just from batteries that loose their charge capability. All rechargeable batteries degrade over time. A wire doesn't.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  2. I know this is too ideal, but ... by bobby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know I'm being unrealistic, but I wish free-market economics worked the way they theorize it should: that very few people would buy a product that doesn't have a 3.5mm port, and the demand would be filled by other manufacturers (unless you're Apple-addicted, then you're at their mercy). It bugs me to no end when the market bends and adapts to the supplier.

    1. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by js290 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's actually counterintuitive: "The Most Intolerant Wins: The Dictatorship of the Small Minority" https://medium.com/incerto/the...

      --
      "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    2. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The theory you are mentioning is actually called the Rational market theory. It works when an informed public acts rationally. Not altruistically, not socially responsibly, not any highflatulating weirdly. Simply rationally.

      And you apply it to iPhone market? That is the most irrational market there is.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by thaylin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Or it could be that it IS working as it is supposed to, and the 3.5mm port is not as needed as you want. From my experience it is only needed by a few, at home people connect to bluetooth speakers, that lets them charge and play. Similar in modern cars, and you should not have head phones in while driving anyways. For exercise is the only time you need something and charging is not something you normally can do at that time anyways.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    4. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one was clamoring for SuperGlare displays (also known as "glossy finish") but because Apple started shipping them everyone followed suit. Cunts.

    5. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why can't I find any good phones with full qwerty wide format slider keyboards?

    6. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's someone who does not take the metro to work!

    7. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Marketing is the poison for the free market.

    8. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Due to channel congestion?

      Also, bluetooth doesn't work on my phone at all when wifi is enabled.

    9. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your experience is limited. I spend many hours on conference calls and it is quite clear that people are now using bluetooth more frequently than corded headsets. You know why? there's lag and dropouts from even the best bluetooth. And during those long conference calls I frequently need to charge and talk at the same time. The lack of 3.5 jack has in fact led to a diminished experience and consumers aren't irritated enough to complain about yet. That's unfortunate.

    10. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar in modern cars, and you should not have head phones in while driving anyways.

      That drove me nuts for a long time: not only is it illegal to drive with headphones on or both earbuds in but unless you drive a really old car your in-car stereo like has better sound quality than those cheap little earbuds anyway yet for over a year I was seeing several drivers a day wearing the little white stock Apple earbuds while driving.

    11. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is working. Most people don't care about the 3.5mm port. A few, very loud, minority are adamant about keeping it. People who don't care generally don't voice their opinion. I personally, am happy it is gone. I have used bluetooth for years without issue. That port is antiquated tech and is consuming space in a very small device. I do not want to have to carry around that extra useless port just because a small minority is upset they don't want to charge a headset.

    12. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by msauve · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Or it could be that it IS working as it is supposed to,"

      OK, if it's working as it should, what's the reason for removing the jack? It's not any of the bullshit ones the marketing department came up with: cost ($800 phone and you need a $40 accessory to replace all the lost functionality), size/space (plenty of phones to compare, a dongle is bigger, and they charge more for larger phones, anyway), water resistance (a jack can be just as water resistant as a USB port). I suspect the reason Apple did it was strictly aesthetics - one less hole in their device. That's not unexpected, they make a lot of form over function design decisions ("you're holding it wrong"). But please, what's the legitimate, real, user benefit of removing the jack?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    13. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The thing is while I do miss a 3.5mm port as well. Not as much I like having my device waterproof. or trying to clean gunk, pocket fluff, from the slot.
      It is a case of a trade-off vs rewards. Heck I would love for my phone to have HDMI or a VGA connector, USB 3 port... But I have a laptop for the real usage, with all these crazy ports. I use my phone, mostly for basic internet searches, emails, text and sometimes I will make a phone call. We forget that this device is not a PC replacement.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    14. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by thaylin · · Score: 1

      And how does taking the metro to work stop you from using a lightening based headphone jack during the commute? They come with one. You typically cannot charge on the metro so there is nothing there preventing it.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    15. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by thaylin · · Score: 1

      That i t is not needed and there is a drive to make the devices thinner.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    16. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      very few people would buy a product that doesn't have a 3.5mm port, and the demand would be filled by other manufacturers

      You're not factoring in that for many people, it's not a dealbreaker. I primarily listen to music in my car or at home, and in both places Bluetooth is more convenient than cords. The pair of headphones I own (Samsung Level On), I charge roughly twice a month. They don't get much use because I don't listen to music on headphones as much, now that I'm pushing 40.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    17. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by thaylin · · Score: 0

      That is your opinion, again your experience is limited.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    18. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by godrik · · Score: 2

      I don't understand what you are saying. I just changed my phone. When I bought it, I made sure there was a headphone jack on it. I had no problem finding what I wanted. (I ended up picking an LG Q7+ if you wonder.)

      Jackless phones tend to be the tech high end ones. There I am not surprised not having a jack isn't much of a problem. These phones are pretty much only purchased by tech enthusiast who probably have different wireless headset for their different devices.

    19. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      There are lot of people who use the headphones that come with their product and not aftermarket products. If the Apple store sells some Apple ear buds that work with Apple iPhone, then that is seemingly good enough for many people.

      Think of the last few decades where people bought a walkman or CD player and most only ever used the shitty bundled in headphones? Market forces are at work here, and the theory tells us the selective pressure is not high for 3.5mm headphone jacks.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    20. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how people forget that other vendors made waterproof phones WITH 3.5 mm headtphone jacks. They've totally bought into the marketing message that waterproofing can't exist with a headphone jack. :-/

    21. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but it seems that it's kind of silly to replace something tried and true that just fucking 'works'; with a menagerie of dongles, adapters, and overpriced wireless headphones that may or may not deliver comprable sound quality.

      It's a step backwards any way you slice it. New does not necessarily mean 'better'. (unless you're Apple, and you're wanting yet another way to extract even more money from your customers.)

    22. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, smartphones aren't needed, either. Like them, it is a want. What's the user advantage of a thinner phone? Easier to break? Less room for battery capacity? An excuse to build in planned obsolescence with a non-user replaceable battery?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    23. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, you can't find good phones with full qwerty wide format slider keyboards because "good phone" and "full qwerty format slider keyboard" are antonyms.

    24. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      That is the most irrational market there is.

      It takes courage.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    25. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      I think Apple probably did it so they could sell the Bluetooth headphones that people would constantly lose and need to replace.

    26. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought my phone four years ago. I listen to meetings, music, podcasts, radio. All the time.

      Theres a little rubber plug to keep my sound jack from letting in water. I have never removed it except by accident.

      Bluetooth all the way.

      Quit whining and move with the times.

    27. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forge the increase in crappy Bluetooth headsets that you can barely hear people over.

    28. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a pretty good experience to demonstrate how it is not just an opinion. Bluetooth for realtime/live/conference type audio is a total ass

    29. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try again.

      The iPhone 6 had a headphone jack and was thinner than any model they've made without the 3.5mm headphone jack. Removing the jack has nothing to do with making the phone thinner.

    30. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is Apple is a monopoly on Apple OS.

      you must follow the whims of the Physical phone if you want to use the Digital Software.

    31. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by kbg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So they can make the USB port waterproof but not the 3.5mm port? And the USB port has more wires and also has power, which the 3.5mm port doesn't

      I don't think so.

    32. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ... water resistance (a jack can be just as water resistant as a USB port) ...

      Case in point. My Kyocera Hydro Vibe (that I bought in 2015) has a headphone jack and is "Certified waterproof for IPX5, and IPX7. Immersible for up to 30 minutes in up to 3.28 feet (1 meter)." Also comes with a user-replaceable battery and FM receiver that works with NextRadio. Sure, it only runs Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) but it does what I need it to using Ting

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    33. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      The materials (and licensing?) to create the port are most certainly greater than zero. This cost saving can be passed on the customers.

      Have you looked at how much new iPhones cost by any chance?

    34. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by bobby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wish I could upmod you. Brilliant insight. Thank you, and for that link. Awesome article; dovetails with much of my observation and thinking.

      I've only dabbled in economics (college minor) and it's obvious that the major assumptions are false, and / or are based in illogic. I still say that something's wrong when there's much demand for 3.5mm jacks and suppliers are willing to risk the loss in sales, especially when newer phones don't really have gigantic offsetting advantages. I think the world needs much better and updated economics classes.

    35. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by bobby · · Score: 1

      Then why can't I find any good phones with full qwerty wide format slider keyboards?

      I don't know nor have access to statistics, but my hunch is that the demand is quite low. I don't particularly want one, but I think they're cool enough that some phones should have them.

      How about bluetooth KB?

    36. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you use the earphones that came with your phone package?

    37. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by mfearby · · Score: 1

      Even though I've been using a MacBook Pro for the past five years, I replaced my iPhone 5c it with a Samsung Galaxy S8 and it's just fine. I have three (on screen) buttons at the bottom of the phone instead of just one really dumb button for everything, AND I don't have to use iTunes to copy stuff to and from my phone. I'll never go back to an iPhone (but I'm still happy with macOS... for now).

    38. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by jythie · · Score: 1

      The classic problem with the simple model is, regardless of rhetoric about rationality, it only really works if you have consumers and producers, with no additional layers or competing interests. After that it quickly starts looking more like feudal systems or international diplomacy.

    39. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      One bottleneck is better than five.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    40. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Free market economies only work when the supply isn't externally constrained. In a truly free market, another company might be able to produce, for instance, an iPhone which was otherwise identical and fully compatible to Apple's but included a headphone jack. The problem is it stands is that they can make a poor decision and because of business momentum, legal protections, and consumer lock-in it can appear to be successful even when it is abysmally stupid.

    41. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I'm being unrealistic, but I wish free-market economics worked the way they theorize it should: that very few people would buy a product that doesn't have a 3.5mm port, and the demand would be filled by other manufacturers (unless you're Apple-addicted, then you're at their mercy). It bugs me to no end when the market bends and adapts to the supplier.

      Has it occurred to you that market forces are working as intended and that maybe, there is no overwhelming silent majority that loves the 3.5mm port more than life it self? ... I'm pretty sure that there must be 3,5mm audio port separation anxiety support groups you can join.

    42. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even wish for that (there are many other keyboards than qwerty US). Why can't I get a good phone with a phone keypad?

    43. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you, but not everyone's experience has been the same. A 3.5mm phono jack is *provably* more reliable than Bluetooth.

    44. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Informative

      And yet thinner phones (2mm thinner) already existed - and kept the 3.5mm jack. Not to mention a hacker added 3.5mm jack internally to an iPhone 7. Clearly it can be done, and clearly thinner phones can be made. It was dropped because Apple was spending $3.2 billion buying one of the biggest Bluetooth headphone brands in the world - Beats.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    45. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad phones with slider keyboards only really existed in the US as far as I know. In Europe they stopped selling them like 8 years ago and I only saw them rarely, high end things like Nokia N900 and some other I saw a dev and network admin and community wireless ISP founder using. They couldn't be arsed to make cheap, bad, old hardware phones with a choice of British, French, Italian, German, Polish, Spanish, ..., ... keyboard.

    46. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It only runs 4.4.2, so it's EOL is in 2019. How usable will it be once Google starts cutting off its services.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    47. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet my old galaxy s5 was pretty thin, and had waterproof headphone port, and also a usb3 port, amazing!

    48. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble is that virtually every phone in the world is made in a handful of factories. Once a factory fundamentally changes a manufacturing process, it's expensive to re-implement it. Adding keyboards to phones at the factory-level at this point would be expensive (off-the-shelf components/designs lesser brands use aren't geared for it). It would be easier to create keyboard cases.

    49. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's one theory: market economics doesn't work.

      The other theory is that the vast majority of people don't give a crap whether they plug their headphones into a round port or a rectangular one.

    50. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by dinfinity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Horseshit.

      Unless you define 'good' as 'unusably thin'.

    51. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      It only runs 4.4.2, so it's EOL is in 2019. How usable will it be once Google starts cutting off its services.

      I don't really use the Google (or any) apps that much, but thanks for the info; I'll keep a watch on that. I imagine it'll still work fine for most other things...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    52. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bluetooth is 20th century technology as well, so is USB.
      It's the same problem as S/PDIF for 5.1/7.1 sound, or worse. Bluetooth was for phone voice and replacing serial 9600 baud 8N1 for random crap, then more standards were piggybacked on it and we can't get rid of it because of all the legacy.

      Wireless audio should probably be on 5GHz, LOW LATENCY, lossless and all of that universally supported (but well, then you need crypto and I don't know how that works for 20/30 years). Even then that's a load of bullshit.
      They also still make bicycles without electric motor and battery you know. They have unlimited range and are much lighter.

    53. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They even have a proprietary wireless headphones protocol.

    54. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by msauve · · Score: 1

      You're apparently one of those people who buys a phone. You're doing it wrong, you're supposed to buy a lifestyle to impress the people you meet who buy into marketing. :)

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    55. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by sheramil · · Score: 1

      OK, if it's working as it should, what's the reason for removing the jack?

      The designers have to be SEEN to be earning their pay. "Okay, this month's new model - what have you got for us, guys?".. "Well, we moved the camera port a bit to the left and added a speed stripe..."

      If they can say they removed a part, even a part with a trivial cost, it sounds like they're doing something other than shuffling features around. If they force the user to buy a series of additional modules to keep the same functionality, even better. You see the same thing in government web design, where there's a perfectly useful and SIMPLE portal that's been tarted up like a Predator's HUD just because some jackanapes doesn't want management to think he's not doing anything.

    56. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      You're apparently one of those people who buys a phone. You're doing it wrong, you're supposed to buy a lifestyle to impress the people you meet who buy into marketing. :)

      I bought the Kyocera Hydro Vibe in 2015 because nTelos (originally Primeco) sold their spectrum in my area to Sprint and they said my original phone -- a Qualcomm QCP-1900, I bought in 1998 -- wouldn't be supported on their network anymore. I switched to Ting (which uses Sprint) because the cheapest Sprint plan was $80/month. I only spend about $15/month with Ting. (I don't use my phone that much.)

      As for the other part... The only person I cared about impressing was my wife Sue, who died in 2006, so I don't worry about that stuff anymore.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    57. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit being a retard and kill yourself

    58. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a fallacy in what you're describing. You don't buy a feature but an entire phone with many features. The market selects the most pleasing bundle of features regardless of less than optimal flaws. Sometimes these flaws means it comes without the "courage port". This is frustrating but not a failure of market economics theory.

    59. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by js290 · · Score: 1

      When you are rewarded for perception, not results, you need to show sophistication. (Why economists are charlatans) @nntaleb

      — Finance Myths (@FinanceMyths) December 22, 2018

      --
      "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    60. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. I do presentations all day and would be very worried if I didn't have a headphone jack at least to fall back on. And all the bluetooth headsets I've tried have made me fall back to wired. At least I know it will work.

    61. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it would cost $.02 MORE. aren't you glad ?

    62. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by sjames · · Score: 1

      My phone is rated as waterproof to 6 ft. and has a headphone jack. There's a rubber flap with a gasket covering the USB and headphone jack.

    63. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Well, smartphones aren't needed, either. Like them, it is a want.

      No phone, no job. No job, no food until you can find a different one. Is it still a want?

    64. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by msauve · · Score: 1

      Perhaps when the GP speaks of making "devices thinner," they're referring to wallets.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    65. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by tepples · · Score: 1

      at home people connect to bluetooth speakers

      Unless the listener is using headphones so as not to distract someone else in the house who is working from home.

      Similar in modern cars

      Replacing a non-modern car with a modern car just for its Bluetooth receiver is probably not practical. People still use aux in or even tape adapters.

    66. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      In my limited experience, about half the people don't care about headphones period and so don't care at all about having a headphone jack. Those that do care, mostly use the headphone jack.
      So, numbers pulled out of my ass, if 50% don't care about headphones and half of those who do care, are happy with Bluetooth or dongles, that means that only 25% care about the headphone jack.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    67. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by msauve · · Score: 1

      Yes, a phone is still a "want." You're begging the question. There are plenty of jobs which don't require having a phone. If you want a job which requires a phone, the phone is bundled with that "want." And, you say it as if there aren't basic phones available, whether landline, VoIP, or basic cellular "feature phones." A smartphone is a "want," even for a job where you need a phone.

      Just because you're not smart, doesn't mean your phone has to be.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    68. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      The problem is there are just way too many things to take a stand against. I don't like a heavily customized OS, so I want something that runs a more or less barebones version of Android (good support for Lineage OS is also highly desired here, so that later when the vendor stops updating, I can switch there for my updates). So I've got to make my stand on the OS.

      When my OnePlus One was about 2 years old, I started looking for a replacement. Nothing felt right. The original Google Pixel was a good contender, but was a bit too pricey in my opinion. So I've got to make my stand on the price.

      I waited for a bit and the Pixel 2 was coming out. It was looking pretty interesting, so I considered abandoning my stand on the price. But wait...no headphone jack? No way. So I've got to make my stand on the headphone jack.

      So I was thinking about another OnePlus phone. The OP6 was coming out soon so I waited even longer for that. Hooray, a real headphone jack and a decent price. But WTF...a glass back? God damn it, I hate that, so I've got to make my stand on the glass back.

      So I wait even longer and now my phone is approaching 4 years old. I'm making my stands on installed OS, price, headphone jack, and glass back. the OP6t is coming but fuck, now it too ditches the headphone jack. The situation is getting worse.

      Pixel 3 is coming out. All the downsides of the previous, plus now they too have the fucking glass back. But god damn did they do a really incredible job on the camera and camera software. My 4+ year old phone is on it's last leg, having to charge it twice a day and dealing with constant reboots (I replaced the battery but since there are no genuine ones I found the replacement even worse than the degraded original). The way the market has gone, my stand on no glass back is pointless. My stand on the headphone jack is nearly the same. So I compromise on those and the price, keep my stand on the OS, and get the nice camera of the Pixel 3.

      I've been holding out for 2 years now and I feel that's about the best I can do. It's a good phone, and I'm really happy with it. It's annoying every time I have to hook up that dongle. I'm annoyed I had to buy a case for it (I used my previous phones with no case, but that's not a realistic option with a glass back). But I love the camera (which to me is probably more important than the cellular functionality itself). I tried making my stands, but it's just not realistic.

    69. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by tepples · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of jobs which don't require having a phone.

      In my experience, application forms that allow leaving phone blank are few and far between.

      And, you say it as if there aren't basic phones available, whether landline, VoIP, or basic cellular "feature phones."

      If one is trained as a smartphone app developer, none of those qualify for testing your product. Food while retraining for a different job is a need.

    70. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen!

    71. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by msauve · · Score: 1

      If you're a "smartphone app developer," and can't save enough to feed yourself when you're in between jobs, you're not very good at it and should look at changing careers. And, if your're a "smartphone app developer," the cost of a smartphone is simply an associated cost - no different than a mechanic needing tools.

      But, you've devolved into trying to create a straw man. Won't work. A smartphone is simply not a need unless you stretch logic to create one. By your logic, I "need" a billion dollars to live the life I want.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    72. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      1. Or you could put a jack in it

      2. No licensing (3.5mm TRS has been around forever) and the cost for 10MM jacks is about $0.07 each. Meaning it would save about $0.35 per phone, to the consumer.

      3. See number 1 - I guess Apple's engineers aren't as smart as a lone hacker in Hong Kong?

      4. Because apparently lots of people - including the author of this article - want it?

      5. Mine has a serial port - of course, it has bog-standard USB OTG, so it does RS232 over USB. Oh wait, an iPhone doesn't have a USB port, does it - at least, not without a custom dongle...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    73. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Let Lil' Wayne educate you about waterproof 3.5mm jacks...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    74. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      But don't you see, this means that it cost apple like -$200 to include the 3.5mm port. When they got rid of it, they had to pass that (negative) savings onto the consumer.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    75. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Then you bought shitty phone.

    76. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      You donâ(TM)t need to have a phone just to have a phone number.

      Welcome to the modern world.

    77. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Licensing? For a 3.5mm jack socket?

      Are kids these days so brainwashed that they automatically believe every physical connection needs a license?

    78. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be operating on the assumption that the market, and not just Slashdot, actually wants a headphone jack.

    79. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a previous owner of the Maemo powered Nokia N900, I beg to differ. I'd pay a lot of money for a modern equivalent.

    80. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by nagora · · Score: 1

      Not "rational", but "short-sighted".

      "Rational" makes it sound really clever when in fact it's plain old dumb as bricks. The market is led down the path the suppliers want by incremental moves which give immediate apparent advantages to the buyers and harder to understand disadvantages ("$1 cheaper" Vs "You will have your usage monitored and sold to someone somewhere") which are only apparent once the market is dominated by the new version/product. The cumulative effect is that the buyer gets screwed because they can never undo those moves when they realize where they went - no one is supplying the old model any more and younger consumers are used to it and don't have the deeper memory to even understand what's happened to them. So the commercial space for anyone to come along with a "retro" version which reinstates the old rights or powers the users had shrivels over time until there's nothing that can easily be done about the new situation.

      Economists do this sort of thing all the time - push a political view and then label it "rational" or "free" and pretend it's some innate characteristic of the universe that's either desirable or inevitable when it's really just some wanky theory they think will make them personally richer. People aren't rational - if they were then there'd never be a stock-market crash or a bad leader in a democracy. Saying your theory "just" depends on people being rational is like saying it "just" depends on the tooth fairy selling shares in her operation.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    81. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just as usable as it was before for making calls and texts?

      Sure you won't be able to install shit on it but its been years since I installed anything on my phone because I realize that 90% of phone programs are pointless bullshit made for children

    82. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It isn't that they can't but for a device meant to fit in your pocket, should they?
      Remember the Note 7 battery catching on fire, because everything was so jammed pack that they didn't account for the battery to expand. These devices are made to a high tolerance levels, and are jam packed with stuff.

      I am willing to think those headphone ports which are a lot of empty space are an engineering nightmare. And to make it waterproof, having to add a mm gasket around it would just take up more space that can be used for an extra 20 minutes of battery life, improved reception on the phone bigger and faster CPU....

      I work in software development, I get into many arguments where I choose not to add a particular feature, it isn't because I can't but because I shouldn't. Often because it will make the product difficult to manage, be a large programming effort for a minor payoff, and just have the developers in the future go what the heck is this code for, it seems to be used for one particular feature that isn't used anymore. But we need to make sure it doesn't break.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    83. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      How much more battery life can you get with that extra space?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    84. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by spitzig · · Score: 1

      The main topic is about no headphone jack. The GP is about thinner phones and smartphones. A phone that can text might be a need. A phone with internet capability is a need for somed jobs. A superthin headphone jack-less phone is a want.

    85. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      OK, if it's working as it should, what's the reason for removing the jack?

      You're assuming that *you* are the market. The reality is the market is wide and varied with different desires and price points. No company ever could produce a phone that suits everyone in the market, even if they managed to do it to the right price point someone will want thing, someone else will want fat, etc.

      The reason for removing the jack from Apple was obvious: drive purchases of new bluetooth headphones, Apple being the worlds largest supplier of precisely that.
      The reason for removing the jack from other companies was also obvious: There was a realisation that the market was quite happy to see the jack go and they bought the device anyway. Great I just saved $1.50 on my BOM and reduced engineering effort to boot.

      The market is working exactly as intended. There are plenty of phones out there with headphone jacks, but ultimately you have to remember one sad fact: You are a person, not a market. What *you* care about is not relevant until it's identical to the desires of a million other people.

    86. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The thing is while I do miss a 3.5mm port as well. Not as much I like having my device waterproof. or trying to clean gunk, pocket fluff, from the slot.

      Then just buy any other phone which has a 3.5mm port and is just as IP68 certified as Apple's devices. As for gunk and pocket fluff, just hose out the port or better still wash your cloths and don't use your phone when having a big old gunk wrestle.

      I use my phone, mostly for basic internet searches, emails, text and sometimes I will make a phone call. We forget that this device is not a PC replacement.

      And yet you just said you replaced some of the things you do on your PC. But I agree, personally I carry my desktop with me when listening to music on the bus.

    87. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that applies.

      "People who use headphone jacks won't buy phones without headphone jacks, but people who don't use headphone jacks will use phones that have headphones jacks". That would indicate the market would put the jack on the phone.

    88. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      then that is seemingly good enough for many people.

      ..and the long sad march to the capitalist drums continue.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    89. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      My theory is that the second factor is a stupid way to govern what gets created if you wand a market with full selection.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    90. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I think I misrecalled an EOL rumor as an EOL announcment They were flying hot and heavy when Google EOL'd some other versions this year. It may actually have longer. (Done as a reply to fahrbot-bot instead of my original post, so he can see it). Stay aware but you may have longer.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    91. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Happy New Year.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    92. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by kbg · · Score: 1

      It isn't that they can't but for a device meant to fit in your pocket, should they?

      Yes because this is just a small port that is already compatible with million of deployed devices. Bluetooth audio or USB audio is good to have but it has a number of shortcomings that the 3.5mm port doesn't have:

      1) Bluetooth audio is being recompressed which can result in lower quality.
      2) Bluetooth headphones need power and a charged battery.
      3) The same USB port is used both for charging and audio, which means you can't do both at the same time.
      4) Bluethooth can suffer from interference.
      5) Bluetooth is not very reliable, which anyone knows that has tried to pair some devices together and failed for no apparent reason.
      6) Non compatible audio ports. First we had Mini, then Micro and now USB-C. In a few years we will have some new USB connector that will make all these obsolete as usual, but the 3.5mm has been in use since 1950.

      Remember the Note 7 battery catching on fire, because everything was so jammed pack that they didn't account for the battery to expand. These devices are made to a high tolerance levels, and are jam packed with stuff.

      That is just bad engineering. If more space is needed then this is something that can be dropped from the phone: Wireless charging, fingerprint scanning, NFC or curved screen.

      I am willing to think those headphone ports which are a lot of empty space are an engineering nightmare. And to make it waterproof, having to add a mm gasket around it would just take up more space that can be used for an extra 20 minutes of battery life, improved reception on the phone bigger and faster CPU....

      Nobody is really asking for a smaller phone. Usually people want a larger screen. There is a limit on how small you want the phone before you start limiting the screen and being able to hold it as a phone.

      I work in software development, I get into many arguments where I choose not to add a particular feature, it isn't because I can't but because I shouldn't. Often because it will make the product difficult to manage, be a large programming effort for a minor payoff, and just have the developers in the future go what the heck is this code for, it seems to be used for one particular feature that isn't used anymore. But we need to make sure it doesn't break.

      I also work in software development. A useful feature for users should not be removed or not added just because it's hard for developers to implement. Implementing software is your job, doesn't matter if it's complex, hard or needs lot of documentation, there is a reason why it's called a job and not leisure time. The number one priority in software is being backward compatible with existing software/hardware and not creating any bugs.

    93. Re: I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. In most countries you CAN typically charge on the metro. American the world.

    94. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by shanen · · Score: 1

      Solution approaches, both related to freedom per my sig:

      (1) Cost recovery funding to support what people are willing to pay for rather than only what corporate cancers deem most profitable. In this case "what" means goods, services, and even specific features such as headphone jacks. As long as enough people are willing to pay for the costs associated with the headphone ports, they would remain available, though people would also be free to switch to alternatives (such as a waterproof USB port).

      (2) Forced reproduction of the corporate cancers to make them smaller and less harmful. NOT a penalty for success, but rather a focus on increasing freedom rather than the unsolvable fake problem of infinite corporate profit. Natural implementation would be with a progressive profit tax linked to market share. Excessively large corporations could reduce their taxes only by dividing themselves into competing companies that offered REAL choices (and freedom) to the customers.

      Time's up, but ADSAuPR, atAJG.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    95. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      ..and the long sad march to the capitalist drums continue.

      I don't think that shitty headphones is a sign of the end of western civilization.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    96. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I didn't say the end of western civilization, I just said corporations seem to always get what they want. Long has it been since corporations give the customers what they want as in a capitalist economy. Now customers take what the corporations want to give them. If you want to be one of those then fine, but I grew up with better sounding and more convenient equipment and progressing in technology shouldn't be a step backward in that.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    97. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by CWCheese · · Score: 1

      I was just on a conference call a week ago where the meeting host himself suffered the dread battery brownout, forcing him to tell the entire room to let him switch over from his headset to the speakerphone mode. It wasn't a killer for the meeting but I do remember it more vividly than most of the points of discussion.

      --
      Have a Day!
    98. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think would have been better than what happened? Forcing people to pay money for better headphones they don't want?

    99. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Beats is overpriced garbage in my experience.

      Great margins I would imagine.

    100. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The thing is while I do miss a 3.5mm port as well. Not as much I like having my device waterproof. or trying to clean gunk, pocket fluff, from the slot.

      1) It's trivial to waterproof a 3.5mm jack and plug. I've done it dozens of times with nothing more than a little bit of RTV or silicone sealant. So that excuse is pure bullshit.

      2) It collects pocket lint or dust? So does a USB-C port, as well as every other connector on the planet. Just use some compressed air to blow it out and it's as good as new.

      3) My ancient S5 Active is waterproof- it has an IP67 rating (which is for fresh water only), but also a MIL-STD-810G rating, which includes salt water.

      Your argument has no real merit. Try again.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    101. Re:I know this is too ideal, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be happy to have a secondary phone that I can swap my sim card out and have just phone and texting with a T9!!!

      I haven't done this because it is a pain to get my sim card out on my current smart phone :/

  3. So don't buy shit electronics. by o_ferguson · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have an iPhone 5s with a stereo jack and it works great. Your problem was spending more money on newer tech that's not as good. Don't be an asshat.

    --
    - In Soviet Korea, only old people loose all their bases to Natalie Portman's petrified hot grits overlords.
    1. Re:So don't buy shit electronics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an iPhone 5s with a stereo jack and it works great. Your problem was spending more money on newer tech that's not as good. Don't be an asshat.

      Wait until your 5s dies much like my 6s just did. Sooner or later, it'll die and then see if you stay with Apple/iOS because they don't have anything new that has a headphone jack.

    2. Re:So don't buy shit electronics. by wwphx · · Score: 2

      What's ticking me off with the iPhone is that, aside from removing the headphone jack, is their size bias. I want a smaller form factor. I want the 5-series form factor back, and they're showing no inclination to go in that direction. I loved my 4S, which is now used by my wife, but Verizon is turning off their 3G network in '09 so that will have to be retired. I can give her my 6, which has a headphone jack which will work in her Subaru which doesn't have Bluetooth. So what then, I look for a used 5S?

      We're not replacing my wife's car in the near future, and we're not interested in putting in a BT adapter to sync with her phone. I didn't like Apple's decision to get rid of the headphone jack then and nothing has shown me a compelling reason to like it now.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    3. Re:So don't buy shit electronics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's ticking me off with the iPhone is that, aside from removing the headphone jack, is their size bias. I want a smaller form factor. I want the 5-series form factor back, and they're showing no inclination to go in that direction. I loved my 4S, which is now used by my wife, but Verizon is turning off their 3G network in '09 so that will have to be retired. I can give her my 6, which has a headphone jack which will work in her Subaru which doesn't have Bluetooth. So what then, I look for a used 5S?

      We're not replacing my wife's car in the near future, and we're not interested in putting in a BT adapter to sync with her phone. I didn't like Apple's decision to get rid of the headphone jack then and nothing has shown me a compelling reason to like it now.

      Fortunately there are probably hundreds of smartphone manufacturers and dozens of those that make respectable high end devices. To say nothing of the low end devices that will do the trick just fine.

      Stop limiting yourself to Apple now that you realize you are not their target demographic, based entirely on the fact that you actually have requirements other than "I want the latest Apple device".

    4. Re:So don't buy shit electronics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here; I wish I'd bought an iPhone SE before they discontinued it. Now whenever my iPhone 6 dies, I'll probably get an Android phone, as small as I can find, with a headphone jack. Sure, I hate that Google will track me, but at least I'll have a phone that does what I want to use it for.

    5. Re:So don't buy shit electronics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are looking for SE.

    6. Re:So don't buy shit electronics. by o_ferguson · · Score: 1

      I won't. I only use this because I got it free and I need something to put my SIM in when it's not in my Lenovo x230

      --
      - In Soviet Korea, only old people loose all their bases to Natalie Portman's petrified hot grits overlords.
    7. Re:So don't buy shit electronics. by edwdig · · Score: 1

      If you're using it in your car, you're almost certainly leaving a cable connected to your car stereo, and just connecting/disconnecting the phone end of it as needed. Get the $10 headphone to lightning adapter, connect it to the wire that's already in your car, and then everything is exactly the same for you. If you want to charge your phone at the same time, you can get a slightly more expensive adapter that adds an extra connector you can use for charging.

      The dongle is annoying for people that use one set of headphones with multiple devices, but for something like this where you've got a stationary cable, it's just a minor annoyance that you have to spend a little more.

    8. Re: So don't buy shit electronics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a small phone check out the Palm series by TCL... TCL also makes BlackBerry and Alcatel phones

    9. Re:So don't buy shit electronics. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      And if there are 20 things that I want to plug into, then I should just happily buy one adapter per device at $10 a pop?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    10. Re:So don't buy shit electronics. by shakezula · · Score: 1

      Adding a Bluetooth dongle to an existing radio is pretty trivial now-a-days. You can pick one up that will sit in your 12v (ciggie) adapter for about $8 at ***Mart stores with the 3.5" standard aux plug. Usually these little guys have a USB port for charging too so you can add two features her older model might not have in one quick go. Not as clean as replacing the deck (sub $100 could get you Bluetooth, USB, SiriusXM, MP3/WMA, etc) but if you want to stay easy going, they work great.

      --
      I know what you're thinking. Did I forward 65,535 packets or 65,536 packets?
    11. Re: So don't buy shit electronics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like your wife gets the shitty end if the stick with all forms of technology. Hope she's st least got a better dildo than you

  4. expensive mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    removing the headphone port is the most annoying "feature" ever. im ready to pay off my iphone 8 so i can sell it to get a cheap android phone with the headphone port. it's ridiculous. 3rd party dongles are cheap and not built to spec so they burn out and/or have terrible audio. apple charges too much for dongles. i cant charge and listen at the same time on road trips now. dumb. i should have never "upgraded". i am learning an expensive lesson.

    1. Re: expensive mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you just get an iPod for $?

    2. Re: expensive mistake by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Why carry one device when you can carry two! Double the Apple-y goodness!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:expensive mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      removing the headphone port is the most annoying "feature" ever. im ready to pay off my iphone 8 so i can sell it to get a cheap android phone with the headphone port. it's ridiculous. 3rd party dongles are cheap and not built to spec so they burn out and/or have terrible audio. apple charges too much for dongles. i cant charge and listen at the same time on road trips now. dumb. i should have never "upgraded". i am learning an expensive lesson.

      Apple's Lightning to 3.5mm Headset adapter, which also supports mic and remote control functions, is a whole NINE DOLLARS, FFS! With Free Shipping.

      https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MMX62AM/A/lightning-to-35-mm-headphone-jack-adapter

      If that really is "too much", then you might examine a free "Obama phone". The people who run the shelter where you are staying will have papers you can fill out to get one; because, if nine dollars for a simple headphone adapter is truly an economic hardship, then you obviously shouldn't be wasting your precious few dollars on any cellphone you have to actually purchase.

    4. Re:expensive mistake by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      And it doesn't allow you to charge the phone and use the headphones, you fucking cretin.

    5. Re:expensive mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Financing a phone is rather stupid, to be honest.

    6. Re:expensive mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eventually you will have no choice as more and more manufactures follow the trend, samsung is next over the next two years it will be gone.

  5. The universal port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    360 degree reversable insertion
    Power delivery
    Analog and digital

    We need more of it.

  6. Re:Seriously? by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    USB sticks are superior in every way to a floppy disk; therefore invalid comparison.

    Touch-tone phone ares superior in every way to a rotary phone; therefore invalid comparison.

    Verdict: Point missed.

  7. Want to know why it bugs you? by DrXym · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because removing the headphone jack was a cynical move by phone manufacturers to upsell you a pair of bluetooth headphones. There is virtually no benefit to the consumer of such a move.

    1. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Because removing the headphone jack was a cynical move by phone manufacturers to upsell you a pair of bluetooth headphones. There is virtually no benefit to the consumer of such a move.

      So cynical that the company I bought my headphone jack-less phone from included a pair of earbuds that plug directly into the remaining port on the phone. And even included an adapter to allow other, standard headphones to plug into the same port.

      Now that's cynical /s

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even included an adapter to allow other, standard headphones to plug into the same port.

      Now that's cynical /s

      the "standard" requires an adapter? who is fooling who?

    3. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by H3lldr0p · · Score: 2

      Yes, because it locks you into their DRM scheme. Getting rid of the port is one of the last steps in sealing the analog hole. What better way of distracting you from this fact then by giving you nearly the same functionality without it having the same function as before?

    4. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Well that's wonderful!. An inconvenient dongle that you can stick in the only port in your phone and while it is plugged in (obviously not when you're charging, syncing, docked or whatever), you can use wired headphones. What a wonderful solution to simply putting a jack in the phone and incurring literally pennies of additional cost.

      What will this unnamed but innovative and consumer-focussed phone manufacturer thing of next? Perhaps yet another dongle that allows their phone to sync / charge with cables that virtually every manufacturer already uses?

    5. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In a way it is, because I'm guessing the earbuds are not high quality. And that adapter, you will probably lose at some point so they will happily sell you another. And maybe another if you lose that one too.

      The cynicism came about because the company who first removed their headphone jack just also happened to have bought a major headphone manufacturer a couple years earlier. To my knowledge, LG and Samsung don't own headphone companies.

    6. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by MrJones · · Score: 1

      I think there is literally no benefit to the consumer of such a move. I really miss the headphone and have updated to an old iPhone with headphone jack because of that.

      --
      Get my e-mail after a captcha test in: http://tinymailt
    7. Re: Want to know why it bugs you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was temporary. They just did that to placate people they could trick into buying their BS.

      I doubt they still include them.

    8. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by chispito · · Score: 2

      So cynical that the company I bought my headphone jack-less phone from included a pair of earbuds that plug directly into the remaining port on the phone. And even included an adapter to allow other, standard headphones to plug into the same port.

      Now that's cynical /s

      That's called a free sample. Pack-in headphones and small, easily misplaced or lost adapters, are consumables.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    9. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by OzPeter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And even included an adapter to allow other, standard headphones to plug into the same port.

      Now that's cynical /s

      the "standard" requires an adapter? who is fooling who?

      So when was the last time that you used a keyboard with a PS/2 connector? That was really cynical of PC manufacturers getting rid of PS/2 ports, forcing me to buy brand new USB keyboards. And don't get me started on those adapters that they forced on me when I had to use the AT style keyboard connectors with PS/2 ports.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    10. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      In a way it is, because I'm guessing the earbuds are not high quality.

      LOL you're bitching about not having high quality ear buds used to listen to MP3's?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    11. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      This makes sense. LG for example still has headphone jacks and MicroSD slots in even their latest flagship phones. Possible reason: they don't make accessories (the quasi-official recommended wireless charger was a Samsung last year, not sure if they even have their own yet) and they don't offer cloud storage.

    12. Re: Want to know why it bugs you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!

    13. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      And even included an adapter to allow other, standard headphones to plug into the same port.

      Now that's cynical /s

      the "standard" requires an adapter? who is fooling who?

      So when was the last time that you used a keyboard with a PS/2 connector? That was really cynical of PC manufacturers getting rid of PS/2 ports, forcing me to buy brand new USB keyboards. And don't get me started on those adapters that they forced on me when I had to use the AT style keyboard connectors with PS/2 ports.

      *sigh*

      1. It is still possible, in 2018, to buy desktops with PS/2 ports. Sure, it's a limited choice, but the port remains in existence. Now yes, I know the response to this one is "but you can still buy phones with headphone jacks", and you'd be correct...but the point is that while a port that was depreciated over a decade ago is still on the market, it is unclear whether the same will hold true in ten years for phones. Ten years ago, iPhones had 30-pin connectors and non-iPhones generally used mini-USB, but you can't find current-gen phones with these ports at any price.

      2. The PS/2 ports were generally replaced with two USB ports; while you did have to get a new keyboard, even the first-gen motherboards without PS/2 had four or more USB ports; computers of the PS/2 era generally had only one or two USB ports, so the increase did not come at the expense of existing USB peripherals or a requirement of a hub. Apple didn't add a second general connectivity port (be it lightning or USB-C), so while a 6S could have both wired headphones and a charging cable, 7++ cannot.

      3. PS/2 to USB adapters cost less than lightning to 1/8" adapters, and generally allow both mouse and keyboard to share a port, and require no drivers. Apple doesn't have a lightning-to-lightning-and-1/8" splitter for $10.

      4. Bluetooth has awkwardness when it comes to multiple device combinations - my Plantronics headset can handle two devices concurrently, but not three, and my tablet can also handle two devices, but gets weird when I try connecting my Plantronics, my Bluetooth mouse, and my Pockethernet network tester. USB has this figured out already, and (albeit very differently) so did PS/2. Bluetooth isn't a panacea, but as it's quickly becoming the only connectivity option while charging, it's being treated as one.

      So, even ignoring the sound quality and Yet Another Thing To Charge arguments, the PS/2 comparison falls flat.

    14. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      So, even ignoring the sound quality and Yet Another Thing To Charge arguments, the PS/2 comparison falls flat.

      The point is that times change in ways that are out of our control. I think I still have some 8" floppies around, but all modern computers seemed to have ditched 3 1/2" floppies now days.

      I'm not going to defend bluetooth. It sucks in some areas but excels in others.

      As for adapter cost, when flagship phones are t the $1k mark, I find bitching about the price of adapters a bit incongruous.

        And I'd suspect that for 90% of people your multiple-connector head phone cable is a special case - just like the PS/2 connector is nowadays.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    15. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      No, he's bitching about being forced to add another series of compression to what he already has. It doesn't really matter what the quality is, how can adding another 5 layers of compression possibly be better?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    16. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by budsetr · · Score: 1

      Modern (six years old) HP desktops have PS/2 connectors that are plug and play. Yes! Plug and play. You do not have to restart the computer.

    17. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Dude/tte; my PC has a PS/2 port. What the hell are you talking about?

    18. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by thogard · · Score: 1

      Gamers seem to be moving back to PS2 mice and keyboards so many of the newer motherboards have PS2 ports on them. The two I bought this month had both a keyboard and mouse port. Inside they even had the headers for RS-232 and parallel ports.

      I don't know why the parallel ports are heading back. Parallel ports are easy to use much like the GPIO pins on a Raspberry Pi except they are 5v not 3.3. I'm guessing the makers are looking at the replacement business and much of the stuff that wasn't updated on the Win98 -> Win 7 cycle was because of lack serial and parallel ports to talk to old equipment. Most of the old restaurant use serial ports and the bell signal to open the cash drawer.

    19. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by berj · · Score: 2

      How do you suppose they can close the analog hole when headphones, by their very nature, are analog devices? If you can attach a set of headphones (or a speaker) to a device then the analog hole exists. It's impossible for it to be closed. Even if a wireless connection is required to connect to those headphones.. the headphones themselves will *still* be an analog device with no possible way of protecting the signal with DRM. Just can't be done.

    20. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because it locks you into their DRM scheme. Getting rid of the port is one of the last steps in sealing the analog hole. What better way of distracting you from this fact then by giving you nearly the same functionality without it having the same function as before?

      What DRM Scheme?

    21. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Stream Tidal (or use their offline mode) on your phone - Redbook or better audio quality.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    22. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by misnohmer · · Score: 1

      Yea the first adapter is free. Next ones are not. Consider it a free sample, or a trial period. You don't even have to lose the dongle, Apple adapters for example just stop working. My kids go through 1 or 2 per year, they just die (nothing visually wrong with it, but just doesn't work anymore). .

    23. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      How do you suppose they can close the analog hole when headphones, by their very nature, are analog devices? If you can attach a set of headphones (or a speaker) to a device then the analog hole exists. It's impossible for it to be closed. Even if a wireless connection is required to connect to those headphones.. the headphones themselves will *still* be an analog device with no possible way of protecting the signal with DRM. Just can't be done.

      The final step is a digital port wired into your brain, but first they need to get rid of all of the analog outputs.

    24. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by Luke+has+no+name · · Score: 1

      Has this EVER been corroborated? Like, is there an example of not being able to record or play amateur stuff on HDMI or thunderbolt/USB? Or is it just more FUD?

    25. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now. These words are being typed on an MS Natural (version 1) PS/2 keyboard directly attached to a PS/2 port on the motherboard of the computer yadda-yadda-yadda. It gives me < 2 ms delay from keypress to raised interrupt pin. I couldn't find a USB keyboard that gave reliably less than 25 ms keypress to USB controller interrupt. Don't get started on wireless crap.

      From someone else's measurements report https://danluu.com/keyboard-latency/
      "computers from the 70s and 80s commonly have keypress-to-screen-update latencies in the 30ms to 50ms range out of the box, whereas modern computers are often in the 100ms to 200ms range when you press a key in a terminal."
      He has also provided data on "keypress and the display of a character". https://danluu.com/input-lag/
      He's measuring something slightly different than what I measured, but my numbers are compatible with his.

      One of my AT keyboards is sitting a foot or so to the right. It is attached to a different working computer's AT port. Unlike several motherboard's and hub's USB ports, I have never had an AT or PS/2 port fry itself when experimental hardware was plugged into it. (There is a specification for current and voltage that these three ports are required to accept without damage. Guess which ports frequently don't meet their spec because missing isolation isn't readily visible. Hint: It's the one I'm not using.) I've had exactly the same outcomes with devices' 3.5 mm audio plugs (and attendant circuits) surviving experimentation where "replacement" plugs die due to poor isolation.

    26. Re:Want to know why it bugs you? by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      It's still a downgrade. The only thing you can do with these shitty, 1$ manufacturing cost, 20$ retail price earbuds is put them in a fucking iPhone. You can't put them in a fucking computer. You can't put them is a fucking portable gaming console

  8. What are you people whining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been using various BT headphones for years and years, way before it started being removed.

    Being tethered with a cable from your pocket to your head is so damned uncomfortable and clunky. Far worse then having to *gasp* charge your device once in a while.

    You might as well keep clamoring for floppy disks and CD burners for all they're worth too.

    Good luck with that.

    1. Re:What are you people whining about? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      The fact that a once passive device now needs a battery. Headphones sat for a month and the battery died? Can't use them until they charge.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    2. Re:What are you people whining about? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      ...and the fact that the battery now has a lifetime/maximum charges.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:What are you people whining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there headphones that take one AAA battery? The one good thing with 90s style throwaway batteries is, they can sit on a shelf for a month or years.
      This design is easier for the manufacturer too.
      A similar thing is bicycle lights. They use LEDs and CR2032 on the cheap ass ones.

    4. Re:What are you people whining about? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      That's even worse. Now you're consuming batteries.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  9. How to live without your stupid phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a complete and utter idiot. Unplug from your phone, meaning turn the fucking thing off. You'll live longer, and actually enjoy yourself.

  10. I think it will come back, ... eventually by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Smart phone market has saturated, and the shakeout is coming. I am sure the handsets with headphones will thrive, market research will show the value and it will come back.

    Same way the free checked bags will come back. Aviation kerosene prices are set to plunge in five years. It will remove all the nickel and diming from the air lines, 35$ for exit row seats, 25$ for guaranteed aisle seat...

    But the 40$ late fee for credit cards will stay. The banksters are cruel jerks and they got poor people by their balls. They are not going to stop squeezing anytime soon.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:I think it will come back, ... eventually by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you think the airlines will remove the nickel-and-diming. Have they lost any flyers since they instituted it? IIRC, most airlines are pretty much running at capacity already, and Boeing has a years-long waiting list.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re: I think it will come back, ... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I doubt the plane tickets will get that low.

      But I am intrigued by the lower price of fuel. What's your reasoning? That would be interesting and cool if true

    3. Re: I think it will come back, ... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Me. I havenâ(TM)t set foot on an airplane in over a decade. I drive, including across country. Why? Iâ(TM)m boycotting the bullshit airlines. Fuck the lot of them. So thatâ(TM)s at least ONE theyâ(TM)ve lost, and somehow, I doubt very much that Iâ(TM)m alone.

    4. Re:I think it will come back, ... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand the attachment and practical value of the headphone socket, but it is also a mechanical nightmare and a standard ripe for replacement, like floppy disks were. It is much more likely that someone comes up with a replacement that dominates the headphone socket in every way before it "comes back". If you want the socket, you can still buy it, so it's not gone, but its days are numbered.

    5. Re:I think it will come back, ... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure the handsets with headphones will thrive, market research will show the value and it will come back.

      Year of the Linux!

    6. Re:I think it will come back, ... eventually by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Smart phone market has saturated, and the shakeout is coming. I am sure the handsets with headphones will thrive, market research will show the value and it will come back.

      Same way the free checked bags will come back. Aviation kerosene prices are set to plunge in five years. It will remove all the nickel and diming from the air lines, 35$ for exit row seats, 25$ for guaranteed aisle seat...

      But the 40$ late fee for credit cards will stay. The banksters are cruel jerks and they got poor people by their balls. They are not going to stop squeezing anytime soon.

      Like 8-track audio tape and Betamax?

    7. Re:I think it will come back, ... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It will remove all the nickel and diming from the air lines, 35$ for exit row seats, 25$ for guaranteed aisle seat...

      Hahahaha, pretty positive on the airline market there. Unfortunately they wont, as most airlines are already looking into pricing airfares and seat fares dynamically. There are some low-cost carriers that have seen more money when they did that, and more are already showing interest.

      So expect more "smart" pricing as airlines maximize their profits.

    8. Re:I think it will come back, ... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging from all of the north american travel I've done, they're flying at capacity using much smaller planes and fewer routes. Rather than 2-3 and 3-3 planes (DC9/737/757) they use 2-2 and 2-1 configurations (Embraer and the like). Way cheaper for the airlines, nastier for the customers and no open seats if there's flight disruptions.

    9. Re: I think it will come back, ... eventually by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
      Automotive batteries have gone through the tipping point. It is now simply a matter of producing them. It is below 120 $/kWh already and it is going to crack through 100 $/kWh soon.

      An oil glut is coming.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    10. Re:I think it will come back, ... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like the kind of post that came from a person who bought bitcoin at 20k.

    11. Re: I think it will come back, ... eventually by houghi · · Score: 1

      No 40$ late fee where I live. I pay 8Eur late fee if I am late. Had to look it up, as payment happens automagically, like many other bills.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:I think it will come back, ... eventually by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Same way the free checked bags will come back. Aviation kerosene prices are set to plunge in five years. It will remove all the nickel and diming from the air lines, 35$ for exit row seats, 25$ for guaranteed aisle seat...

      You forget that we weren't being nickle and dimed. Rather the cost of the ticket has plummeted made possible by selective purchases of precisely the services you require. We all hate cable bundling but you're pining for the days when airlines bundled? Madness. Personally I'm much happier knowing I can fly 1200km for cost of an exit row seat upgrade. I certainly don't miss the days when a trip to another country cost 10x what it does now.

      You want you free bag? Check in as a premier passenger. You get all the benefits of an economy passenger from 15 years ago and leave us in the cheap seats be.

    13. Re:I think it will come back, ... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Competition will remove baggage fees. Once every airline is on-board with the fees, someone will use no-fees as a way to pull customers.

  11. Re:Seriously? by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure that it's serious so much as a troll post. Anyone who felt that strongly about a headphone port wouldn't have purchased a phone without one. Judging by the amount of shit it's already stirring up, I'd say it's a pretty successful troll at that.

  12. Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vote with your feet, move on to a manufacturer that actually cares what YOU, the customer, wants.

    1. Re:Easy... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Apostasy is a crime punishable by death.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  13. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the beginning, USB keys were crazy expensive. Obviously not so much anymore. But I could imagine a day when I would've preferred a floppy.

  14. Long phone calls by ugen · · Score: 1

    Add to the list - any long customer phone calls (like to any customer service, for example)
    Before getting on a call I do 2 things:
    1. plug in a set of headphones
    2. plug the phone into power

    3.5mm connector is not optional. As of now I own iPhone SE and expect to continue in foreseeable future (might buy another SE spare just in case). Eventually either:

    Eventually I will have to decide between imessage/facetime (that's the primary reason I stick with IOS, though not being Google product is a close second) and the need to use 3.5mm connector. TBH I suspect that it would be easier to replace imessage/facetime (though since the entire family is on IOS it might take a while).

    1. Re:Long phone calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feature wise it sounds like you should be looking for battery life in your next phone. Not a headphone jack.

    2. Re: Long phone calls by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      Too late. Assple has discontinued the SE. I knew those fuckers would do that, which is why I bought THREE. You might be able to snag a used one... best of luck to you.

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    3. Re: Long phone calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is why I bought THREE.

      You showed 'em, all right!

    4. Re:Long phone calls by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You know you can get an adapter with both power and standard audio jack for $10-$15 on Amazon right?

    5. Re: Long phone calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought of doing that, but I told myself "Nah, they won't get rid of the one phone in their lineup that appeal to so many in the less wealthy parts of the world". Wrong again, that's exactly what they did.

      I'd get a used one, but I don't trust any resellers out there. So I'll probably get the smallest cheapest android with a jack that I can find whenever my current iPhone dies. I could replace the battery, I suppose, but if Apple doesn't want me as a customer I'm not going to fight to stay with 'em.

    6. Re:Long phone calls by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      You know you can get an adapter with both power and standard audio jack for $10-$15 on Amazon right?

      Which won't work, since Apple has decided to disable any "unapproved" accessory. Amazon is full of adapters that no longer work. I recently got a new work iPhone and it was a horrible experience to obtain a headphone jack adapter and I still need to ship the non-working ones back to Amazon so the experience isn't even over yet. I ended up paying the Apple tax and buying the "official" adapter from their store and it is low quality. It's made with very thin wire and flimsy jacks. It is already shorting out in one ear and I've only had it a month. The reviews for the adapter on Apple's site are all negative and say it's a piece of junk but I don't have a choice of another manufacturer since Apple has decided I can only buy Apple branded accessories. I'm stuck with this phone since my work only lets me update every 2 years but my next phone certainly won't be made by Apple and it will have a headphone jack.

      --

      Enigma

    7. Re:Long phone calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case anybody knows people with shit hearing, the ability to use in-line amps is critical when dealing with low-volume or wrong-frequency voice calls. Haven't seen bluetooth amps anywhere. Also, having tried bluetooth hearing aids (y'know, the devices with excellent little speakers), there's no comparison with good earphones.

      Is that a small market, yeah. Sucks to be non-mainstream, but y'know everybody ends up that way...

    8. Re:Long phone calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you can get an adapter with both power and standard audio jack for $10-$15 on Amazon right?

      Which won't work, since Apple has decided to disable any "unapproved" accessory. Amazon is full of adapters that no longer work. I recently got a new work iPhone and it was a horrible experience to obtain a headphone jack adapter and I still need to ship the non-working ones back to Amazon so the experience isn't even over yet. I ended up paying the Apple tax and buying the "official" adapter from their store and it is low quality. It's made with very thin wire and flimsy jacks. It is already shorting out in one ear and I've only had it a month. The reviews for the adapter on Apple's site are all negative and say it's a piece of junk but I don't have a choice of another manufacturer since Apple has decided I can only buy Apple branded accessories. I'm stuck with this phone since my work only lets me update every 2 years but my next phone certainly won't be made by Apple and it will have a headphone jack.

      Why do you feel the need to lie?

    9. Re:Long phone calls by shilly · · Score: 1

      I don't really get this. A pair of AirPods give you 2 hours of talk time on a single charge. How often do you have phone calls that last that long? Surely once in a blue moon? Then you stick them in their case and they're ready again in 15 mins.

  15. You forgot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Bluetooth? Whoops, forgot to charge them.

    Do you really have anyone other than yourself to blame if you forgot to charge your Bluetooth headset? Are refrigerators useless just because you forgot to go buy groceries?

  16. Time may fix it by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Maybe it's a me-too fad that will die off as people gradually realize they miss it and stop buying lame phones.

  17. Apple manipulation by daftna · · Score: 2

    Like many aspects of Apple's newer business philosophies it is a blatant money grab. If they want to fix slumping sales then go back to putting the product before profits again. That's how they got to their position in the market today. Companies are constantly ripping us off. I used to look forward to Apple releases but now I just worry about what they're going to take away so that I have to buy more stuff (and I buy nothing new from Apple anymore).

    1. Re: Apple manipulation by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      Me either. Done getting screwed by those bastards. Hope it was worth it to permanently loose this customer.

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    2. Re: Apple manipulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha! Correct use of "loose" for a change, although I suppose they also lost you when they turned you loose...

  18. But, it's not rational by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

    How is it rational for me not to buy a device that, in total, is better than my current one. Sure, the lack of a headphone jack is a negative, and worse than the same phone with a headphone jack, but all in all, the new features may still make it a better phone.

    It's not irrationality, it's coarseness of decisions. It's not like Apple offered two versions and let the market choose.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:But, it's not rational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but all in all, the new features may still make it a better phone.

      Agree with your hypothetical argument. Reality doesn't show the iPhone to be a better device overall, at least not on technical merit alone.

    2. Re: But, it's not rational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That argument would make sense if it weren't for the fact that there are hundreds of phone models on the market that are better than any iPhone.

    3. Re:But, it's not rational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't buy Apple products! Problem solved. A $50.00 phone beats an iPhone every time, and day!!When you buy Apple products, you are buying the lowest quality available! And paying the highest price!! That make you an iDiot!!!

    4. Re:But, it's not rational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >better than my current one
      Think carefully and consider what problems this "better" phone solved.

      This, so you could introduce new problems that your inferior phone did not suffer.

      If you were upgrading from 2009, fine, but I doubt you were packing legacy shit and the truth is your functionality changed for fuckall with your "better" phone.

    5. Re: But, it's not rational by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Rational people realize that technical merit is not the only component of overall merit.

    6. Re:But, it's not rational by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Your mistake was getting locked in to the Apple ecosystem. If you were on Android you would have a choice of many phones with headphone jacks.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re: But, it's not rational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's rational to put a different weight on difficult to quantify attributes. Coming to an agreement on what is the correct weight for something subjective is a source of much debate.

  19. Analog mini jack great Ethernet RJ45 too! by aisnota · · Score: 2

    The two ports:

    1.) Analog mini jack for audio out and in

    2.) Ethernet RJ 45

    Mess with either and your business growth if used will suffer for sure.

    Me it tops out iPhone 6s and forget the 7 and nice Xr Max OLED screen or even switch to Note a port be gone is a mistake for customer demand

    Same goes for ports on network gear or even make it different for edge gear, security forces through App instead of at least a hard link to physical device, what?

    USB-C is really just Ethernet flattened out looks like an interesting compressed compromised to be determined if it has staying power with a truce between Apple lightning/thunderbolt types with mainstreamed other makers gear.

    However, under the hood all of us know it is still Ethernet with mangled frame identifiers and interconnection stack.

    --
    http://www.aisnota.com/slashdot/ Welcome to Logic and the Future
    1. Re: Analog mini jack great Ethernet RJ45 too! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Wow, I've never seen a phone with an RJ-45 port!

      But my iPhone 6S still has a headphone port, and the battery's in pretty good shape. And, when the battery eventually dies, I'll gladly pay $49 for a new one - beats paying $1200 for a new, headphone-jack-less phone.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  20. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USB sticks are superior in every way to a floppy disk; therefore invalid comparison.

    You can't put a USB stick in an envelope ant mail it like you can with a floppy. You can't use a USB stick to maintain a vintage computer like you can with a floppy. There are most certainly cases in which a floppy is superior.

    Touch-tone phone ares superior in every way to a rotary phone; therefore invalid comparison.

    Verdict: Point missed.

    A Rotary telephone will function fine with degraded service on damaged wires (welcome to the USA) that is too noisy for touch tones

    it would be invalid to compare you to an intelligent person

  21. Just because you miss it doesn't mean others do by Strider- · · Score: 1

    I don't miss it on my iPhone 7. The adapter that Apple shipped with the phone lives in the little pouch that came with my IEM ear buds, and everything else connects via Bluetooth, USB (Car), or wifi (home stereo).

    --
    ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
  22. Re:Seriously? by hawguy · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure that it's serious so much as a troll post. Anyone who felt that strongly about a headphone port wouldn't have purchased a phone without one. Judging by the amount of shit it's already stirring up, I'd say it's a pretty successful troll at that.

    Every purchase is a tradeoff, you rarely get everything you want.

    A headphone jack could very well be important to some people, but not as important as other features.

  23. oh I forgot about those... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Even though my iPhone 6s actually has one, I stopped using those way before Apple ever removed one because the port never worked right and was always full of pocket lint.

  24. Removing the 3.5mm jack was not necessary by Stonent1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was a guy on youtube that lives in China that was able to source the parts, and free up enough room inside his iPhone to readd a 3.5mm jack. He used one of those lightning to 3.5mm passthrough dongles and stripped it down to the bare minimum. So if some guy in his bedroom could do it, apple could have done it.

    1. Re:Removing the 3.5mm jack was not necessary by Stonent1 · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:Removing the 3.5mm jack was not necessary by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      New iPhones are water-resistant. Could be the reason.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:Removing the 3.5mm jack was not necessary by MicroSlut · · Score: 1

      You are correct and informative, but I have never wanted nor required a water-resistant phone.

    4. Re:Removing the 3.5mm jack was not necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As are many other phones that still have an headphone jack.

    5. Re:Removing the 3.5mm jack was not necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New iPhones are water-resistant. Could be the reason.

      My Kyocera Hydro was water resistant in 2013, it had a headphone jack. My Motorola e5 Play only cost me $70 the day it launched, water repellent, headphone jack, upgradeable SD card storage. Apple is charging out the ass for less features and making up excuses as to why they can't offer it.

    6. Re:Removing the 3.5mm jack was not necessary by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      So are new (all other competitors premium phones which still have a 3.5mm jack). Hell the Galaxy series was IP rated with headphone jack before Apple even know what water resistance was.

  25. Re:Seriously? by sconeu · · Score: 1

    USB sticks are superior in every way to a floppy disk; therefore invalid comparison.

    Three words: Write Protect Tab.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  26. Re: Seriously? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    There was a somewhat uncomfortable period for anyone who wanted to sneakernet files to other people; floppies were cheap enough to give to someone who might not bring them back, flash drives not even close; but for personal storage the price difference wasn't so bad(helped by the fact that floppies had tepid reliability and were individually quite small, so the fact that you could buy a 100 pack and have 140mb of space for way less than a 128mb flash drive was less helpful in practice). CD-Rs also helped soften the blow: much more capacious and acceptably cheap for situations where you were not expecting them to return.

  27. Re: Seriously? by NFN_NLN · · Score: 2

    A high density floppy drive held 1.44MB. You could get a 128MB USB drive for $0.25/MB in 2003 with a whopping $33 investment.

    https://www.jcmit.net/flashpri...

    A floppy drive was popular because there were no alternatives. Zip drives proved that.

  28. Why didn't you switch to another phone ? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Even with my carrier's very limited set of choices for phones (mainly apple product) , I had no trouble finding a perfectly good smart phone with a headphone jack and at about a 1/3rd the price of the lowest end Apple product.

    So if you wanted the feature and don't have it, don't blame markets for not working blame yourself for not making them work. They aren't magic after all, they represent the summation of all the participants decisions.

  29. Revable batteries... by fbobraga · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... the lack of it was the first "fail" to me (it's a reason why I still keep my S5 [it shines with http://lineageos.org/ ] :P)

  30. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol. What. You can mail a USB stick if you wanted in a normal envelope without anything happening to it.

    As long as your envelope isn't tissue paper that is.

  31. I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by Carcass666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This isn't an appropriately Luddite response for Slashdot, but I don't miss the headphone jack. Why? Because I don't miss one-half of my audio disappearing when I bumped the cable or, worse, the headphone jack just stop working for one ear because the contacts got messed up in the jack itself. I don't miss the cable flapping around. I don't miss bending/breaking the plugs that for some mind-numbing reason rarely were the 90-degree angle that would keep them from getting bent/broken.

    Yeah, charging headphones is a bit of a pain. But so is charging my phone, my notebook and my tablet. I've learned to deal with that. If ditching the headphone jack truly was a trade-off to allow more room for a battery, I'm fine with it, I'd rather have the battery life. Perhaps if I was also a blogger for Tech Crunch or similar publication, I would have enough devices that the Bluetooth pairing issue described would be annoying, but I don't. For me, and my small universe of devices, Bluetooth headphones work well enough, even the cheap Ankers I use 90% of the time.

    I don't see this as a freedom (or "bravery") topic or even a big deal. It's an area where for reasons of efficiency (or more likely, cost) the market moved away from something. For the audiophiles with $400 cans, they were complaining about the digitized music in the first place. For the people who miss getting cheap $10 headphones at Ross or Marshall's that they could lose or throw away without feeling bad, there are almost as-cheap Bluetooth alternatives. It sort of reminds me when physical keyboards went away. We adapted, and we're fine.

    1. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lmy moto x4 can also use your stupid bluetooth buds but you can't use the FM radio, total loss

    2. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Apple no longer has an excuse to allow 24-bit audio now that the DAC was removed from the motherboard. The fact we still don't have it points out that Apple is a little bitch!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every single cell phone I got before I switched to the iphone 6S had a shit jack that died. In the Android days, I was forced to use Bluetooth going back to 2010 as my jacks always got mangled, mostly as I live in New York and would use them all day on the subway.

      Wireless is a godsend and headphone jacks are proven shit in my book. I don't miss them,at all.

    4. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Yeah, charging headphones is a bit of a pain. But so is charging my phone, my notebook and my tablet. I've learned to deal with that.

      That would be fine if the phone had a dock embedded right into the device, not unlike a pen dock on some devices, which charged the cordless earphones when the phone is also plugged in.... it would also provide a convenient storage that you don't have to keep separate track of when you aren't using the bluetooth headphones.

    5. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      You know you aren't supposed to be sticking paper clips in there, right?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad the Bluetooth headphones work for you.

      For me, with my wired headphones I can switch from listening to my iPhone 6 to my older Macbook Pro, or to my PS4 through my monitor's jack, or to my old iPod, or to my radio -- by unplugging and plugging. Three or four seconds per switch. How long does it take to resync a Bluetooth headset to a new source? Because I switch sources many times per day.

      My next phone will come with a headphone jack. If Apple isn't making one of those, then goodbye Apple.

    7. Re: I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      24-bit audio is useful on the production side, but quite pointless on the consumer playback side. Even without dithering, the noise floor of 16-bit audio is extremely low.

    8. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple no longer has an excuse to allow 24-bit audio now that the DAC was removed from the motherboard. The fact we still don't have it points out that Apple is a little bitch!

      I know that reading comes so hard to the average Slashtard, but iOS has been able to handle 24/on the iPhone 6 and up since iOS 10 (two major revisions ago), and iOS 11 (1 major revision ago) has added 24/96 support on iPhone 7 and up.

      https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/24bit-audio-now-supported.2065263/

      Do try to keep up.

      Oh, and iOS 12 added official FLAC (and I think maybe Ogg) support, too.

      NOW who's the little bitch?

    9. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, charging headphones is a bit of a pain.

      And this is where our use-cases diverge. I use my headphones every few months, but when I need them, I tend to need them for a few hours. For this, wireless headphones are not a solution, at least until they retain charge indefinitely.

      Micro-USB or USB-C headphone adapters come with the issue that most don't allow charging at the same time. You really need to pay more for that. And it requires buying and keeping yet another piece of equipment around, with all the exponentially more things that can go wrong as you link more and more hardware together. Not many people seem to be as hamfisted as you when it comes to using the headphone jack, and I honestly don't understand how the technology was so hard for you to use. But given this complaint, I would expect you, of all people, to understand that adding an expensive dongle to a phone that allows charging and audio through a wired headset at the same time makes such issues far more likely than a dedicated port.

      For many years now I've carried a moderately priced set of 3.5mm headphones in my bag rolled into a little loop. When I need them, they're there. The rest of the time they are tucked out of the way. You could use your bluetooth headset or headphones this whole time too. We both got what we needed to fit our use-cases. There are zero benefits to me to suddenly be forced to move to wireless headphones or an expensive dongle. And from the comments here, I don't seem many other people seeing a benefit either.

      I don't see this as a freedom (or "bravery") topic or even a big deal.

      Then you are blind. If they had kept the option for wired, it wouldn't be a big deal. You could have your best fit, and we could have ours. Removing that option and charging a lot of money to be able to charge and listen to headphones is a big deal. Charging a lot more money for headphones and accessories is a big deal. Requiring another dongle is a big deal. All of these things were not necessary in the least, as they were solved by a $0.10 port that has been used for decades, and will still be useful for decades.

      It is a big deal when multiple companies remove functionality from their products in the name of additional profits.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    10. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.whathifi.com/advic...

      Someone at Apple should be fired for not marketing a Beats 24 ear-can via lightning port. Such a missed opportunity here.

      Shit served in a can never sounded sooo goooooodd!

      Next, 24bit audio over tin cans and shoe string.

    11. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      We adapted, and we're fine.

      Nope, People who didn't like the old way adapted. The rest of the people still happily use their headphones in their phones that have headphone ports. Apple's sickness is well and truly a minority in the market, quite unlike physical keyboards which have nearly all disappeared.

      I was sitting next to guy on an Iberia flight recently and they actually specifically called out not using Bluetooth during takeoff and landing. The guy next to me took off his Bose 35 series headphones. Me... I just plugged a cable into the bottom of mine and kept listening.

    12. Re:I Don't Miss the Headphone Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's it like working in Apple's marketing department?

      Do they pay you well?

  32. On the other hand... by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 0

    ...I'm the complete opposite. I see a headphone jack and feel as if I'm stuck in a time warp. I have managed to eliminate several patch-cords from my life, thanks to Bluetooth and other tech, but whenever some outdated device with an analogue plug on it shows up on my desk and I need to dig through a box of yesterday's tech to find a converter that was probably built and/or designed a decade (or more) ago.

    No, I don't miss that silly headphone jack at all. Charging my headphones is a very minimal amount of hassle compared to having a freakin' tether attaching me to a device.

    --
    The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
    1. Re:On the other hand... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      That's the thing, even having the jack you can still use bluetooth if you wish.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  33. Don't give a single fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a hell of a lot better than the shit I use to put up with fragmented Android on a wireless service that may or may not send you the right update in a timely fashion.

    Just another hit piece on Apple brought to you by msmash. Getting the bitches' panties in a bunch is now a business model around Slashshit. This brings nothing new, just another chance for the same people to piss and moan like they did years ago. Don't you people ever get sick of crying about the same thing all the time? Who gives a fuck if it has a headphone jack if you don't want it anyway? I don't cry like a bitch because some people like sunroofs in their car, I just buy a car without a sunroof and get on with my life.

    You people are fucking sheep.

  34. 600 other manufacturers do by raymorris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just walked through the electronics section of a general merchandise store and there are no fewer than 30 different phone models available within 10 feet of me right now. At least 27 of those have headphone jacks. Most of them are available at a much lower price than the iPhone. Rationally, people with different needs and desires would choose different phones. This LG on my left is probably the best choice for 3% of buyers, the more expensive LG two feet away is probably the rational choice for 2% of buyers, the iPhone is probably the best for 2% of people, etc. The difference between the 2% of people who *should* buy iPhones and the number who *actually* buy iPhones is the number of irrational iPhone purchases.

    1. Re:600 other manufacturers do by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I mean, that's an anecdote with superficial plausibility. But you're assuming what you want to show... namely that the iPhone is only the best choice for 2% of people. And, of course, people who naturally agree with you about the lack of iPhone merits are voting you up

      I'm not sure why you think that the iPhone is such a bad choice for over 100 million Americans (and many more outside the US). It's amazing that you know more about their needs than they do. Or, the alternative, that their preferences are different from what you would expect to prefer. I mean, I would point to FaceBook as an example of "why would anyone want this", but clearly a lot of people have made a decision that they do. I'm not so arrogant as to say they're irrational, just that they put a different value on their privacy.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:600 other manufacturers do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of those 27 take user security seriously?
      I suspect most of them either:
      - were involved in some scandal in the past years.
      - supply outdated Operating Systems.
      - do not provide security updates for 5 years, or even 2 years.
      - claim to provide security updates but it turns out not all of them...
      - provide an OS made by a known privacy invader.

      And then we have not even mentioned the ones that are downright user hostile because they include the spyware in their own firmware or bundle unremovable third party spyware.

      What does that make the rational choice for anyone interested in his privacy and security? And please do not come with the overused argument that users are clueless. That is not true anymore, the happenings of the last couple of years have opened up a lot of people's eyes.

    3. Re:600 other manufacturers do by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      It's really very simple: indifference until it starts hurting them. People do know that about the Facebook Cambridge fiasco, but it didn't actually hurt them so they don't care.

      There are options for the security conscious however: get a model that doesn't even really run code much at all (like a single function cell phone) or get a model that supports LineageOS, where you can choose to not install Google Play at all or as little as possible: from here, start with Pico and manually install if needed https://opengapps.org/?api=8.1...

    4. Re:600 other manufacturers do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to thank the parent for his/her comment and also to say that LineageOS is an option but what a weak sauce one. I don't think Google Play is of much use without a Google account, so just forget about it entirely. Then, the easiest is to just never use the Internet and bluetooth on the phone at all (save a bit of wifi at home for installing F-droid apps and updating the OS). The phone doesn't do that much, then. There are a few quality issues e.g. on mine, I can listen to FM radio through the jack such as on headphones, but not on the phone's own speakers (I had to get the FM radio "app" on F-droid instead of having it shipped as part of the OS!). I installed a helper app to get your phone viewed as USB mass storage for booting isos etc. and since then USB storage is broken and I can't fix it.
      You suffer some Google braindead things because the OS is "Google's code dump". Most visible for me is the notifications or call log tell me a friend called "1h ago" or "2h ago". Expected behavior is "friend called at 16:11" (which was 2h 40 mins ago not 2h ago!). I didn't find a setting for this although you can click something in the call log to get a more "detailed" view for a call or missed call which gives you the time.

      tl;dr I don't like anything.

    5. Re:600 other manufacturers do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just walked through the electronics section of a general merchandise store and there are no fewer than 30 different phone models available within 10 feet of me right now. At least 27 of those have headphone jacks. Most of them are available at a much lower price than the iPhone. Rationally, people with different needs and desires would choose different phones. This LG on my left is probably the best choice for 3% of buyers, the more expensive LG two feet away is probably the rational choice for 2% of buyers, the iPhone is probably the best for 2% of people, etc. The difference between the 2% of people who *should* buy iPhones and the number who *actually* buy iPhones is the number of irrational iPhone purchases.

      In your not so humble opinion.

      CAPTCHA: absolute

    6. Re:600 other manufacturers do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, that's an anecdote with superficial plausibility. But you're assuming what you want to show... namely that the iPhone is only the best choice for 2% of people. And, of course, people who naturally agree with you about the lack of iPhone merits are voting you up

      I'm not sure why you think that the iPhone is such a bad choice for over 100 million Americans (and many more outside the US). It's amazing that you know more about their needs than they do. Or, the alternative, that their preferences are different from what you would expect to prefer. I mean, I would point to FaceBook as an example of "why would anyone want this", but clearly a lot of people have made a decision that they do. I'm not so arrogant as to say they're irrational, just that they put a different value on their privacy.

      This is Slashdot. Nearly everyone here is convinced that their personal world view is the only rational one.

      Oh, and Because... Apple.

    7. Re:600 other manufacturers do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is irrational to pay more than you need to for the same functionality. If you don't know *why* you want an iPhone over a comparable Android - and how much more you're paying for it - then you don't even have enough data to make a rational decision, it's all emotions and 'gut' at that point. Ask your average iPhone user why they chose it. The response you're most likely to get in my experience is, "I just like them." Which usually means they didn't do any research and are being influenced by peers and ads.

    8. Re:600 other manufacturers do by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I mean, if you were logged in, l'd be happy to go over the numerous reasons you may want an iPhone. I can make an excellent case for it, for an Android and for a dumbphone.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    9. Re:600 other manufacturers do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing that you know more about their needs than they do.

      Needs? Give me a break. THAT is what is irrational. It is not about needs but rather desires. How those desires originate is the crux of it.

  35. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent said about USB keys:
    "You can't put a USB stick in an envelope ant [sic] mail it like you can with a floppy."

    Sure you can! They survive the mail better than a floppy disk. I am sure what you meant was USB keys are not as cheap as a disk, with which I will agree, but they are not that expensive if you buy a no-name key.

  36. blue tooph ain't Hi-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's a fact

  37. Duhrrrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you stupidly pay Assple (st)Inc., to remove your headphone jack?

    I sure as fuck didnâ(TM)t. The iPhone SE is the last Assple phone Iâ(TM)m going to buy until they put the goddamned motherfucking headphone jack back.

    If you buy a defective-by-design piece of shit phone that has no headphone jack, which speaking only for myself, I consider absofuckinglutly fucking MANDATORY, you are PAYING Assple to take functionality AWAY from you, so unless youâ(TM)re prepared to boycott their D-b-D bullshit, (as I do,) all youâ(TM)re doing is bitching and whining, then knuckling under and paying them to treat you like dog shit.

    What, really, does that say about YOU?

  38. I just bought some iPods by mveloso · · Score: 2

    I've forgotten to charge my BT headphones, or just plain forgot my BT headset, or forgotten my dongle so many times that I just bought a couple of old iPods, converted them to flash, and carry them around with me.

    I could care less about waterproofing. I dropped or placed my iPhone in water like 0 times in the last 11 years.

    After evaluating my iPhone usage, I'll be moving back to an iPhone SE this year. I'll miss the camera, but I have a real camera that I can carry around now.

    1. Re:I just bought some iPods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could care less about waterproofing.

      Then do it!

  39. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like Bluetooth, use USB-C or Lightning headphones.

    Problem solved.

  40. The need for the 3,5mm plug. Professional version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi all,

    The need for that little plug comes from the entertainment indrusty professionals, who have a strange attachment to Apple hardware.
    There are numerous soundchecks done right now with iPhones, iPads and MacBooks all around the globe.

    Personally I hate Apple stuff, but the removal of the 3,5mm jack is just frustrating.
    You can connect your device to the professional equipment with one cable. Except the newer iPhones etc that need a dongle (that somebody forgot at the last gig)
    And somebody forgot to tell this (intro, couple of background tracks and the outro coming from the device) to any of the tech crew.
    You can always get a 3,5mm cable from somewhere, but an Apple adapter...

  41. I have a headphone port by julian67 · · Score: 2

    I have a headphone port and it is immensely useful while still being crappy in some respects. My phone is an LG V20. The audio system is excellent: it adaptively supports low and high impedance IEMs and headphones. It offers bit perfect decoding and playback of all the music I own (ranges from 16-bit 44100 kHz to 24-bit 88200 kHz derived from SACD as well as purchased 24-bit 96 and 192 kHz tracks. But the port/jack itself is a thowback, and especially bad on a portable device that is exposed to the elements, pocket lint etc.

    Surely the ideal solution is not to force the decoding and amplification into a low power and inadequate chip, but to update the very simple physical interface from a crude jack into to one of pins with reliable connection and the capacity to be adapted and enhanced? It would also make converters very simple and cheap and universal. ....oh shit, I forgot....it's not about quality or customer satisfaction, it's about squeezing more money out of us cattle.

  42. How long will you have a choice? by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't buy phones that don't have one.

    Tell that to someone who resolved not to buy phones that lack a QWERTY keyboard.

    1. Re:How long will you have a choice? by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Good news, though! The market may actually finally provide what we desire:
      https://www.readyfx.com/
      https://twitter.com/livermoriu...

      They only recently reneged on their keyboard Moto Mod and instead announced that they were switching to developing a complete device: https://www.indiegogo.com/proj...
      It could still turn out to be a disappointment, but I am nevertheless cautiously optimistic. At least someone seems to be seriously developing a (landscape) slider, because Blackberry sure as fuck isn't anymore (I bought and use the Priv).

    2. Re:How long will you have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Tell that to someone who resolved not to buy phones that lack a QWERTY keyboard.

      The tiny keyboards on phones were reasonably duplicated by screen keyboards. No, it's not perfect, but they are reasonably close, and in exchange, you get something really useful- a huge amount of screen real estate for everything else you might do on your phone. If all you want is a specialized typing machine, no, it's worse, and it's very hard to find useful phones with that.

      By contrast, none of this applies to the headphone jack. We didn't get ANYTHING useful out of losing the headphone jack. The space was, in the first iPhone without it, even replaced with a tiny piece of plastic with no actual use. We lost the ability to charge the phone or sync data while using a wired headpiece. We didn't gain wireless, we already had that and it's a separate thing. The phone gives up basically nothing, not even waterproofing, to be a fully functioning MP3 player with support for normal headphones.

      This was a scam. It's a trick to sell more wireless whatever the fucks, and it is lame without exception. I have an iPhone 7 as my main phone, and the lack of headphone jack bothers me again and again. Excellent normal earbuds with top quality audio that last for years? Ok, I have to remember the dongle. I'm on my fourth one of those. Wireless headphones? I'm on my third set, and it adds one more idiotic thing to worry about before I go on a trip. BETTER REMEMBER TO CHARGE MY HEADPHONES THE NIGHT BEFORE is the stupidest thing I've had to utter in the 21st century. Headphones shouldn't even need to be charged!

      It's endless hassle, and I'll do what I can to get a headphone jack on my next phone. At some point, it is now obvious to me, I'll have to transition away from Apple.

    3. Re: How long will you have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still miss my Nokia 6800 keyboard.

    4. Re: How long will you have a choice? by Mars+Saxman · · Score: 2

      I'm typing this comment on my shiny new-ish Blackberry KeyOne, an Android phone with a QWERTY keyboard. It took about a week to adapt back to using physical keys, but after a few months of use I'm totally content. So much less frustration when you can actually feel the keys!

    5. Re:How long will you have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      may finally provide what we desire
      Getting one thing right does not make a functional phone. Being sold now would also be a help, rather than "coming soon".
      Still, thanks for the link. It will be interesting to see if it is any good.

    6. Re: How long will you have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am typing this on a BlackBerry key2 128 GB dual sim phone :-)

      Qwerty phones are the best

      Check out the cosmo communicator from planet computers

    7. Re: How long will you have a choice? by xystren · · Score: 1

      Hear Ye! Hear He! Another KeyOne user here also. I can not stand touchscreens and touchscreen keyboards in general - they just don't respond, and when they do, it is always the wrong key. It funny when you freak out your friends with their "swipe" keyboards, where you can swipe and they don't respond at all (not even a wrong word).

      I used to have 3 cardinal rules for when I was choosing a phone... 1) User replaceable battery (which unfortunately was the first to go); 2) User installable memory card (see ya later Apple); 3) Physical keyboard (hello BlackBerry/BB Mobile)... I've had to compromise on #1, as virtually all phone today are "factory sealed" with regards to the battery.

      I also really miss BB10 as an operating system. I've been about a year and a half with my KeyOne, and still, I continually miss BB10, and curse Android - it's a compromise as physical keyboard phones are few and far between. :(

      There is something to be said for a true tactile response on the keyboard that touchscreen just can't replicate.

    8. Re:How long will you have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are dozens of us! DOZENS!

    9. Re:How long will you have a choice? by sad_ · · Score: 1

      i had an android phone once with a keyboard, the keyboard slide out from under the screen. the screen was the full size of the device, as was the keyboard. the models where the keyboard and the screen share the same space are just dumb. ok, the phone was thick, but i didn't really mind (current phones are too thin anyway).

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    10. Re: How long will you have a choice? by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

      Another BB K1 user here. and very happy about the keyboard being real. Fantastic phone, even with Android (or possibly in spite of Android)
      I'd like to root mine to dump some of the crap pre-installed, but alas, can't have everything...

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    11. Re: How long will you have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you make sure to email John Chen the keys from the phone?

      Oh wait! You don't have to, he already has them and sent them along to the cops.

    12. Re:How long will you have a choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm bitter about the lack of clamshell phones. The others always pocket call people. Always.

  43. I literally forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot. Home of the 3 nerds who are fuming about the lack of a 100 year old analog port on their pocket supercomputers with advanced neural network based image recognition and augmented reality capabilities that would have required several 19" racks of computers 20 years ago.

    Up until I read this article, I literally forgot that my iphone doesn't have a headphone jack. Because I never use headphones. Seriously guys. Get a life. You you can buy a 56 GFLOPS super computer for $1000 and IT FITS IN YOUR FUCKING POCKET. An iPhone XS is almost as fast as the fastest computer on the planet in 1992. Quit worrying about dumb ass stuff like headphone jacks and work on the tech of the future.

    1. Re:I literally forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough word salad yet.
      It's a multimedia computer. Just that, a multimedia computer. These used to come with two many jacks, in some cases a jack on the CD-ROM/DVD-ROM drive (each), jacks on the front of the case, jacks in the back on the motherboard and on the sound card you installed to get better sound, and perhaps even a jack on the monitor, then a headphone jack on the speakers. But in the worst of cases, we had one jack (or likely two, one for input and one for output). Why? Because a multimedia computer is able to combine text, still images, video and SOUND in a single application!

  44. May Have My 2 Yr Old S7 Edge by rally2xs · · Score: 2

    ... a really long time if the only new alternative is a phone without a headphone jack. Use the H out of it, and am NOT going to buy a new set of bluetooth headphones or some cockeyed adapter. That's just the way it is. That is all...

  45. Slob by bobbutts · · Score: 0

    I charge my BT headphones when I am done using them and pair them only with my phone. Took me almost no time or effort to solve your problems. I think this article is just complaining for the sake of it.

    1. Re:Slob by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      I don't have to charge my Radio Shack AM/FM headphones with the 6' audio cable to my phone, 'cuz the phone powers them directly. That's what I'm talking about - just plug it in, and if the phone has power, then so do the headphones. F progress... some things are not better just 'cuz they're newer...

  46. BT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does everyone who defends the move to kill the headphone jack conveniently forget that BT can still be used on a phone with a jack? I use BT on a stereo at home and in my car, but almost everywhere else I'm plugging in a pair of wired headphones, especially when I'm at work.

    Leaving the jack in gives you a lot more options, and unless something massively changes in the future I will not be buying a phone w/o a jack

  47. Can't spell radio without ad by tepples · · Score: 2

    The vast majority of FM radio is ads 24/7. Even the music is ads for the albums the songs are on.

    1. Re:Can't spell radio without ad by mfearby · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should try ABC Classic FM in Australia :-D No advertisements at all (though sometimes the music is not particularly classical and I have to switch off; beats listening to the local ad-riddled pop station playing tripe while I'm driving).

    2. Re:Can't spell radio without ad by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of FM radio is ads 24/7. Even the music is ads for the albums the songs are on.

      Not in countries with ad-free public radio.

    3. Re:Can't spell radio without ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public radio is ad-free in many countries.

    4. Re:Can't spell radio without ad by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      (inb4 cayenne8 & ShanghaiBill)

      So do you live in Venezuela or Zimbabwe?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Can't spell radio without ad by tepples · · Score: 1

      Where I live, I can get WBOI (NPR news), WBNI (NPR classical), and a couple Christian stations, but everything else is nonstop ads. Or ought one news station and one classical station to be enough for anyone, like 640K?

    6. Re:Can't spell radio without ad by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Canada here. Hi. I live in a small city of 250,000 and we have five commercial-free radio stations here, including our community radio station.

    7. Re:Can't spell radio without ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guessing you live in America. Try somewhere else.

    8. Re:Can't spell radio without ad by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      >> The vast majority of FM radio is ads 24/7

      > Not in countries with ad-free public radio.

      I live in a country with ad-free public radio (Canada).

      Nevertheless, the grandparent is correct - The vast majority of FM radio is ad-supported - Only three channels on my FM dial are public, and one of those is in a language I don't speak (French).

    9. Re:Can't spell radio without ad by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      >> The vast majority of FM radio is ads 24/7

      > Not in countries with ad-free public radio.

      I live in a country with ad-free public radio (Canada).

      Nevertheless, the grandparent is correct - The vast majority of FM radio is ad-supported - Only three channels on my FM dial are public, and one of those is in a language I don't speak (French).

      True, but if it is anything like Europe, those ad-supported stations have an order of magnitude fewer ads than American radio stations since they have to compete with those few ad-free stations. Which makes them much more sufferable. Plus everybody listens to the public ones anyway as they have been content.

  48. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this whiny bullshit on the front page. Boo hoo, charge your fucking headphones and just get over it.

  49. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word: tape.

    Okay, two more words: file permissions.

  50. Two Years Later, Nobody Cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except the 5 whiners on slashdot

  51. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USB sticks are superior in every way to a floppy disk; therefore invalid comparison.

    Three words: Write Protect Tab.

    I have USB sticks with a write protect switch. So ???

  52. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Write protect tabs didn't provide absolute protection. I have seen programs write to a supposedly write-protected disk.

  53. two months later... by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    ...i still miss the notification LED which seems to have been killed by every premium android phone maker. let's see what samsung does with the S10.

    1. Re:two months later... by MicroSlut · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember my Blackberry from 2007 that had a red LED that would blink when a new message arrived. I loved that! With my current phone I can wave my hand over it and it shows me all the info I want, but it doesn't work from across the room. I still have my old Motorola razr (in great condition) that I am saving for the Smithsonian Institute.

  54. Yep me too by ReneR · · Score: 1

    That's why I did not buy a new iPhone, and I just tweeted it this morning, too: https://twitter.com/renebln/st... guess my next phone will by a Samsung Galaxy or so –can even run my desktop Linux on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  55. A simple solution by Gimric · · Score: 1

    Here's a suggestion - Have tried NOT being a whiny little bitch? I find that works for me.

    I tell ya what, I'll send you my spare dongle (I, unlike you, manage to keep my bluetooth headphones charged) and you can stop post annoying stories. Deal?

  56. Do you want mine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a moto x4 and it's got a headphone jack. It's never had anything but dust in it.

  57. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That write protect switch on your USB stick doesn't physically inhibit the drive from writing, like the write protect tabs on floppies do. This in turn points out a big problem with technology today - the vast majority of consumers don't actually understand enough about how things actually work, and because of that, can't make fully-informed decisions.

  58. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of VoIP ATA devices don't support pulse dialling, so DTMF phones have an advantage there.
    Those who have ditched copper lines can't rely on the regulation that pots lines needs to support pulse dialling.

  59. Why not 2.5mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had several home landline answering machines with wireless handsets with 2.5 mm jacks and headsets to go with them. Why did cellphone manufacturers not consider this option to make their phones thinner?

  60. Really? This? Still....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh for christs sake are we still here beating that old horse about the bloody headphone jack?
    Only Apple had the balls to take it outside and shoot it like the toothless old animal that it was.
    Having to listen to people winge about how stupid apple ear buds look without wires was beyond believable.
    You look stupid with them in this day and age. Luddites.
    Move on and stop your belly aching.

  61. Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple will ditch the lightning socket soon and replace it with USBC like the iPad Pro.
    You'll need a whole new set of dongles and cables.
    I bet they'll screw around with it too so it only works with half the 3rd party chargers like they with the new macbooks

  62. It's not the phone jack you miss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the phone jack what you're missing, but in fact good engineering.

    Ever since I got quality bluetooth headphones, I haven't missed the headphone jack much. Because I rarely use it. Of course I do appreciate its presence when I do use it, and I'm wholly against removing it.

    But from what you describe, what you're missing is good engineering. It should be possible and easy to use the phone and charge it. It should be seamlessly interoperable with legacy or third-party equipment (read: analogue headphones, or from other manufacturers). It should just work, but doesn't, because it was badly engineered. And what you actually miss is a time-tested, well engineered inteface.

    They could have optimized the experience for bluetooth headphones without sacrificing wired functionality. Many phones from other companies do. They didn't have to build a crappy product. They just did.

    So... you should just stop buying crappy products. Brand loyalty is a thing, up to a point. When your favourite brand screws/disappoints you, you should be looking into other brands. Not doing so is just silly. And there are lots of very viable alternatives that don't sacrifice anything in the music-listening experience if that's what you favor.

  63. opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only time I use the headphone port is when bluetooth won't sync for hangouts and I have to hear the audio for a meeting. I still have to plug in wired ear pods when that happens -- just in the past, I had some 1/8" earpods packed away for that, now they have a lightning connector instead.

    isn't life strange?

  64. Arithmetic by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > It's amazing that you know more about their needs than they do. Or, the alternative, that their preferences are different from what you would expect to prefer.

    Quite the opposite. I'm assuming (knowing) that different people have different needs and preferences. People prefer different screen sizes, battery life, value price differently, etc. "Everyone should get an iPhone" would assume everyone is exactly the same.

    > agree with you about the lack of iPhone merits are voting you up

    Actually my numbers have the iPhone being best for 37.5 times as many people as the average phone model.
      I'm assuming that iPhones are 37X "better" than the average smartphone.

    OpenSignal reports that their app has been installed on 24,000 different models of smartphone. About 20 of those are iPhones.

    *All other things being equal* (they're not), each phone model would be the best match for 0.00416667% of people. Multiplied by 20 iPhone models, 0.083333% of people would be best matched by an iPhone.

    Since some phones aren't the best for *anyone*, some photos are objectively better, we can reasonably (but debateably) assert that iPhone models are much, much better than average. Instead of being the best match for only 0.08% of people, as the arithmetic suggests, if we multiply the iPhones desirability by 37.5 times, we get 3% of people who would be best served by an iPhone.

    1. Re:Arithmetic by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      I'm kinda shocked by this logic. Clearly, phones are unequal. There's no reason to use the total number of phone models as anything interesting. For one thing, Android models churn much faster, because Android model IDs change when the OS gets upgraded on the same hardware or depending on the carrier. What matters is how many phones are available in a store at one time.

      The second issue is that subdividing similar products doesn't make each equally likely, because you ignore bucketing. If there were 10 Chinese restaurants, and 90 pizza restaurants, your logic would say that the Chinese restaurants (on a whole) do 10% of the business. But that ignores that how people actually decide things. They decide on pizza or Chinese first, then choose a restaurant. So, even if pizza was three times as popular, you would expect the Chinese restaurants as a whole to do 25% of the business. Which would make each chinese restaurant three times as busy. And that's not suggesting quality, it's saying that, as people choose, important questions (OS) are answered before minutia such as screen size,

      Lastly, you're again assuming bullshit. you have this holy 37X better. Clearly, according to crowdsourced research, the answer is that about 1/3 people prefers an iPhone. That measure has real world implications, not naval gazing. If you want to demonstrate that those people are wrong, you have to show it some other way. For what it's worth, Samsung phones enjoy a similar premium in choice.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Arithmetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, according to crowdsourced research, the answer is that about 1/3 people prefers an iPhone.

      The core of OP's argument is that a significant proportion of iPhone buyers are irrational, so it's not clear why you'd want to collect self-reported data (such as phone preference) from them. Doesn't that only further support OP's claim that since it's exceedingly unlikely that a single phone (or of late, two or three 'current' iPhones) would be optimal for such a large proportion of phone users (1/3?!), the most plausible explanation is irrationality?

    3. Re:Arithmetic by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Huh, no. That's a stupid argument I reject, because there's nothing there. He assumes that they are irrational and uses that to dismiss the only evidence. Note, Samsung phones (of which there are a only few more current models than iPhones) have a similar highmarket share.

      I guess I need a car analogy. If 1/3 of the market bought pick ups, and the other 2/3 bought sedans, it would be stupid to say "But the only pickup is an F-150, there are so many more models of sedans. So F-150 purchasers must be irrational." Similarly, if suddenly the number of sedan models doubled overnight, there may be an uptick in sedan purchases from former truck owners, but hardly the 2x increase his math suggests. Esp. if the differences are things like color or power windows instead of "now able to tow X"

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  65. Fiio i1 anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    £35 or whatever $. Far better than the original DAC in iCrap. Buy one and stop whinging.

  66. Re: Just because you miss it doesn't mean others d by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    Just because you donâ(TM)t doesnâ(TM)t mean others donâ(TM)t. I only donâ(TM)t because I have never bought a smartphone without a headphone jack. Far as Iâ(TM)m concerned it is required equipment. I would never (and will never) buy one without it. When my existing collection of iPhone SEs dies, then I will either buy a different brand of smartphone, a dumbphone, or a no-phone-at-all.

    I will NOT REWARD Apple for trying to rip me off and force me to buy their crappy headphones.

    My phone uses wired headphones and they JUST WORK. The headphones never have problems connecting, and have yet to run out of power before the phone does.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  67. Re:Seriously? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    The true hipster buys a product and then complains bitterly (years later even) about a missing feature that it obviously didn't have at purchase time.

  68. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people complaining about USB had a great point: all the existing computers relied on floppies. It was obvious to EVERYONE that USB was the future, and that floppies were legacy. They were complaining about losing legacy support too early, and as a result, some didn't buy the Mac with that, and Apple sold a ton of external floppy drives along with that Mac. It was actually a bad call for Apple, and the only thing that worked about it is that they got free tech coverage as a result.

    By contrast, analog headphones are the best. They are better than digital ones in every possible way. They are less complex, and less likely to break. You can improve performance by buying a good DAC, the same headphones that are poor on a phone can be top notch on your stereo. Add a ghetto DAC to them and they always suck, if you can even plug them into actual audio devices. The 3.5mm headphone jack is not the floppy drive here, it's the power cable. If anything, the variety of random connectors Apple pushes, and the still-evolving bluetooth things that fail to work and have security vulnerabilities and are banned in some workplaces, are the floppy drive of all this. The 3.5mm jack will still be used in 50 years, tell me you believe the same thing about Apple's proprietary phone port (that they are on their third version of I think already).

  69. I don't miss it. I didn't use it when I had it. by swillden · · Score: 1

    I quit using wired headphones at least four or five years ago, maybe more. Wireless is better. Other people obviously have different preferences, but I don't get why. I have two sets of Bluetooth headphones, one on my head and one charging. If I were less scatterbrained I could get by with only one, because the ones I use have 8+ hours of battery life and charge in an hour or so, so if I just plugged them in when I took them off I'd be fine. But I don't, so I spend an extra $8 for a second pair, so that when the ones I'm wearing die, the others are always fully charged. Actually I own three pairs; I splurged and blew $8 on the third pair just so I'd have a backup if one of the first two pairs dies.

    This is much less hassle than dealing with wires that get caught on stuff and rip the headphones out of my ears. Or have to be threaded somehow through my ski jacket to keep my phone safe inside while letting me listen. Or worse, that get caught in spinning machinery when I'm working in my shop or mowing the lawn or something, and get ripped out of my ears and wrapped around the piece of equipment. Or worse yet, pull my phone out of my pocket and throw it onto the ground -- or into a table saw blade (yes, that happened).

    Nope, wires suck. I put my phone safely away in a pocket, or over on a shelf near my work area but safely out of the danger zone.

    I don't mind having a headphone jack, mind you. It ends up packed full of pocket lint couldn't easily be used even if I wanted to, but it doesn't bother me. But I'll never actually use the thing.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:I don't miss it. I didn't use it when I had it. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      When I need headphones for the first time in three months, and I reach into my bag and pull them out, will the bluetooth ones still have any charge? I ask, because if I leave them on the charger, they won't be in my bag when I need them. And I certainly am not about to set a calendar reminder every week to charge the headphones I'm not using. That's stupid, given that my wired ones work every time even after a couple years of ignoring them.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:I don't miss it. I didn't use it when I had it. by swillden · · Score: 1

      When I need headphones for the first time in three months, and I reach into my bag and pull them out, will the bluetooth ones still have any charge? I ask, because if I leave them on the charger, they won't be in my bag when I need them. And I certainly am not about to set a calendar reminder every week to charge the headphones I'm not using. That's stupid, given that my wired ones work every time even after a couple years of ignoring them.

      OTOH, if you use headphones so rarely, just having a dongle in the bag with them (the one that came with the phone) will work fine.

      Personally, I use mine for 20-30 hours per week, sometimes more.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:I don't miss it. I didn't use it when I had it. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      That free dongle that allows charging and using the headphones at the the same time which comes with the phone and will be supported for the life of the phone? Or that expensive dongle that I need to purchase which may or may not work at a later date if the phone manufacturer decides to update their software, since this needs to interface with the USB-C port as an "officially supported piece of hardware"?

      All that cost and effort just to deny us a $0.10 port that works just fine. It's really a load of crap. FFS, I'd rather pay $20 more to have the 3.5mm port back in the phone than pay that for a dongle. But that's the point, right? I can lose, break, or they can stop supporting that dongle. The headphone jack? It just works, and there's no additional profit available from it.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    4. Re:I don't miss it. I didn't use it when I had it. by swillden · · Score: 1

      If you only use headphones every few months, how often do those uses coincide with needing to charge? If it's common, then it seems like your bigger problem is needing a larger (or swappable) battery.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  70. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but for personal storage the price difference wasn't so bad(helped by the fact that floppies had tepid reliability and were individually quite small

    Flash drives today have crappy reliability. I'd trust the average floppy over the average flash drive any day. And if you're using a flash drive for personal storage longer than a couple months, you're asking for trouble.

  71. USB-IF isn't dominated by one company by tepples · · Score: 1

    So when was the last time that you used a keyboard with a PS/2 connector?

    The analogy between the PS/2 to USB transition and the 3.5 mm to Lightning transition is imperfect. First, the governing body for USB (USB Implementers Forum) isn't nearly as dominated by one company as the governing body for Lightning (only Apple). Second, the vast majority of laptops with USB ports still have a barrel connector for power; only Apple is pushing laptops that have only one port to connect both peripherals and the charger.

  72. Re:Seriously? by dryeo · · Score: 1

    My backup, cheapo corded phone that I get out in power failures, has a switch to use pulse. Used to be quite common though I haven't looked in years

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  73. I have 2 use cases for my headphone jack by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    1) When I hike. Plug my earbuds into my phone and I'm good for hours, long as the phone is charged. No headphone jack means $100-200 for new earbuds that sound as good as what I have now
    2) At home. Plug my wireless headphones into my phone and I'm good till I have to take out the trash, or whatever. No headphone jack means I spend $100-$300 for new wireless headphones. Yeah this sounds stupid. Thing is, my wireless headphones sound better than my current sound system, and I wear them for 2-3 hours a day

    In other words, take away my headphone jack and you can add a few hundred $$$ to the price of your phone for me to get back to normal.

    OTOH:
    1) My hikes could be from the basement to Mom's fridge. I never really said.
    2) It's a basement, mom's drunk. watevs

  74. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a gimmick. If you want to protect your data from loss, you maintain a backup plan.

  75. Re:Seriously? by MicroSlut · · Score: 1

    WTF? The write protect tab on a 3.5" floppy is a hardware feature. Software cannot override it. Damn Anonymous Cowards.

  76. Re: Seriously? by tepples · · Score: 2

    If your file is smaller than 1.25 MB, $33 is a lot of money to spend to sneakernet one copy of a file to one person. It was also bigger than many email providers' attachment limit prior to wide availability of Gmail.

  77. Define "not that expensive" for USB flash drive by tepples · · Score: 1

    It depends on what you call "not that expensive". Even a no-name USB flash drive is more expensive than a blank floppy or CD for the purposes of distributing physical copies of data to the public. This includes, for example, distributing source code "on a medium customarily used for software interchange" pursuant to the GNU General Public License, GNU Lesser General Public License, or another copyleft license.

    Correct me if I'm wrong though, with a link to a reliable source of bulk USB flash drives.

  78. It's because of DRM. by thedarb · · Score: 1

    Once no phones have analog headphone jacks, they can lock down the audio with DRM. Just as they did when they put HDCP on HDMI. You are being quietly herded into a world with no analog audio out, and then the DRM will come. Your existing bluetooth devices and audio dongles will be dropped, in favor of only DRM approved headphones.

    How can none of you see this coming? Listen to us tin-foil hat types, we keep turning out to be right about this stuff.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
    1. Re: It's because of DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. No one except stupid n1gg3rs or deaf faggots EVER copy music from an analog source unless it's vinyl. You bypass or crack the DRM, which has always been and will always be possible, even for novice pirates.

    2. Re: It's because of DRM. by thedarb · · Score: 1

      Audio jack out to cassette adapter for your older car. Audio jack out to cassette recorder. Audio jack out to audacity to record that podcast or audio book. Audio jack out to record a call. There are people who do these things. There is more to audio than just music. Why all the hate, dude?

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
  79. Why i like to purchase dedicated hardware still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the reasons why I purchased a dedicated music player. I don't have to upgrade it every 3 years, has both 3.5mm and 2.5mm jacks, can play any music format, batter life is amazing, and storage is upgradable with micro-sd cards. Yes it is an extra item to carry, but its fairly small, weighs almost nothing, and I carry my laptop bag around with me everywhere anyway so I always have it. (and when I don't have my laptop it because I'm doing something that I wouldn't carry around the music player with me anyway. )

  80. I don't miss it. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    I got a phone that has no headphone jack a few months ago. I didn't notice the difference. I was already using bluetooth headphones on the previous phone anyhow.

    1. Re:I don't miss it. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      so you're tone deaf? the sounds quality is garbage.

    2. Re:I don't miss it. by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      It's AAC at up to 250 Kbps. Only an audiophile would consider 250 Kbps AAC to be "tone deaf garbage". Personally, I can't tell the difference, and I doubt the vast majority of people can either.

      Things have come a long way from the early days of bluetooth audio.

    3. Re:I don't miss it. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Even with the impressive high number of frequency response there is distortion, another issue.

      I'm not audiophile but I can hear it, went back to wired.

    4. Re:I don't miss it. by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      The latency is usually a much bigger problem with bluetooth audio for me than the quality. It's generally mitigated on phones, since there is latency compensation on the OS level (at least iOS does) for video playback. On a PC, via bluetooth, there may not be the automatic latency compensation, though you can often adjust audio latency manually in some video players.

      If neither the OS nor the player compensate for the latency, and you're not using a really low latency audio codec (there's a version of aptx for low latency, IIRC), then you may have lip sync issues with video, and audio latency can also cause problems for certain games.

      All that said, there is, at least, a backup. If I'm trying to do something on my phone, and that thing is latency sensitive, and iOS doesn't correct for the latency, then I can always fall back on the dongle. Which, when you think about it, isn't all that different to how I need to use a 3.5mm to quarter inch adapter to use headphones on my desktop PC's DAC.

  81. Bigger problems (offtopic) by MicroSlut · · Score: 2

    I work with tech and I see a lot of phones. There are many issues, like phone calls drop when enabling wi-fi sharing, or the screen turning black when enabling wi-fi sharing, etcetera, but the biggest problem I see with all phones? Cracked screens. Screw the water-resistant, high-def blue tooth, AI enabled smart voicemail crap. Make a more durable screen. The more edge-to-edge screens I see, the more they shatter. What's the point of getting a slim phone if you put a giant Otterbox around it?

  82. Dongle that works with the iphone and In-line Mic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone have any ideas of an iPhone dongle that is lightning and can charge and still do in-line mic??? All the ones I've seen so far have been great for charging and listen to music but not charging and listening on the phone.........

  83. FUCK APPLE by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    ntr

  84. and no shops stock USB headphones by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Walk into many audio shops, retail shops, dept stores, cheap stores, where they have dozens of headphones, ALL ARE 3.5s

    No one at all stocks USB native headphones, or rarely at massive high prices.

    Adapters? well... still rare to find, or 10x EBAY prices at retail stores.

    Apple+Google+Others = Your are dicks, moron managers, who never listen to music, who ignore their engineers, and I bet even their own kids prefer a old style socket. So you might be rich ass fuckers, but your dumbass fuckers.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:and no shops stock USB headphones by luther349 · · Score: 1

      walk into the pc area they have usb. walk to the cellphone are tons and tons of Bluetooth.

    2. Re:and no shops stock USB headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but your dumbass fuckers

      Ouch, that must've gotten to them. Hard.

  85. Bluetooth has some advantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't buy a phone without the 3.5mm Jack, but to be honest, I prefer Bluetooth. For one, easier in the car, just get in the car are listen.

    Second, I'm sick of yanking the cord out. Bluetooth allows for little or no cord (I prefer a connecting cord between the left and right earbuds

    I do agree that Bluetooth batteries run out of juice, which is why bought several paper for $3 each on eBay.

    I sure hope the vocal minority doesn't get their way. I wouldn't even care, but they exaggerate. What next, bring back the physical keyboard?

  86. When you need the port, you need the port. by thadtheman · · Score: 1

    I just checked and Bose QuietComfort Headphones have a jack so you can connect to a device via audio connector. The only BT headphones that don't have the port are inexpensive noname ones, or brands like Soundbot. ( around $!5-$20 ).

    As for devices i would never get one without an audio port.Most of the time I don't miss it, but there are a few times when i need it. Usualy when I need it I really need it.

  87. Re: I don't miss it. I didn't use it when I had it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biggest problem is latency. Bluetooth adds around 200 milliseconds. Tolerable if you're listening to music. Horrible if playing a game or using a video player without audio delay adjustments.

  88. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially since it places the entire blame, even for other company's phones dropping the headset jack, on Apple.

  89. Compressed Approximation of Music by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

    Right. So how would you describe the âoemusicâ stored on my phone?

    1. Re:Compressed Approximation of Music by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      It depends whether you went out of your way to get lossless or not. I generally use flac for the best stuff myself.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  90. Re: Just because you miss it doesn't mean others d by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

    Just because you donâ(TM)t doesnâ(TM)t mean others donâ(TM)t. I only donâ(TM)t because I have never bought a smartphone without a headphone jack. Far as Iâ(TM)m concerned.....I will NOT REWARD Apple for trying to rip me off

    We are all now 100% convinced that you don't use any apple products, and have not been ripped off by them. And will most certainly never reward them for it.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  91. I'm fine by jimbo · · Score: 1

    I used wired headphones with an adapter on a phone with no headphone port because I don't want to bother with charging BT devices. I don't notice the adapter in daily use, it's just there.
    I have wireless phone chargers so don't need splitter adapter but generally I only need to charge when I sleep anyway.

    So I really don't notice a problem in daily life and it's not that I'm a fanboi, I detest loyalty of this sort and I've had both Android and iPhones and enjoyed both.

    Just offering the view that there's differing opinions and they're all valid because of different usecases. I'm happy there's still choice and hope it'll remain for those to whom it matters.

  92. Looks like some people just look for problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with all the dongle switching? I have a mixture of Apple laptop, Win/Linux desktop, Android phone and all the devices have headphone jacks and bluetooth in them. The only dongle I have is for my Logitech trackball, I can't use a mouse as it gives me minor RSI so I have to use trackballs instead.

    Here's a tip, don't rush out and buy the very latest kit all the time because bleeding edge consumers are always guinea pigs for new ideas. Apple know they can entice new buyers, so they try out the idea of removing the jack socket and they sell millions so class removing the socket as a success and they will market it as such even though their argument is specious. I tend to buy tech gadgets I like, if I buy them new or second hand I don't care. My laptop is 3 years old, my phone was new, I buy the gadgets I like because of the features they offer. A jack socket is useful on my phone for pushing through my portable guitar amp unit but I could live without it, I'll simply find a BT-to-socket adapter off Amazon or eBay. I don't need all my gadgets in perfect harmony from the same manufacturer. I build my own PCs 'cos my desktop never goes anywhere so it can look as ugly as sin so long as it has the features I want. Mix and match bits in your life for the features you need to make your life easier, take advantage of consumer choice.

    Just stop looking for ( first world? ) problems to moan about, look for solutions even if that means a compromise sometimes.

  93. um... right by arsenix · · Score: 1

    Two years later I still have a headphone jack on my phone... still have only used it a handful of times in those two years. Occasionally nice to have as a fallback but otherwise who cares. All my Bluetooth stuff works great.

    Apple does what they think people want. Android makers will just do what people buy. Honestly most people (including me) could care less at this point about the headphone jack. I'm sure there will always be Android phones will headphone jacks for the ./'er crowd who reminisces about the "good old" analog days.

    --
    (this is offended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  94. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USB sticks are superior in every way to a floppy disk; therefore invalid comparison.

    Three words: Write Protect Tab.

    I have a USB stick with a write protect switch on my desk right in front of me as I type this.

  95. Fix bluetooth by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

    Seriously, bluetooth is part of this problem.

    Most bluetooth headphones that can pair with multiple devices have a clunky and non-standard method of switching between paired devices, often that depends with switching off bluetooth on one of them. Many can't pair with more than one device at all. Devices suck too, often not willing to output to more than one device (bluetooth or otherwise) at once.

    So this means invariably unless you dedicate headphones to specific devices, your bluetooth configuration will most likely be wrong or require a bunch of intervention to get working.

    I don't quite get why bluetooth (with some kind of protocol changes, most likely) couldn't be much smoother with multiple devices, allowing multi-device pairing (multicasting if you will) so your headphones could get audio from your pc, your phone, and whatever else all at the same time. And the fucking other devices should be willing to send so that all the paired receivers can receive audio.

    The headphone jack problem would be a lot less bad if bluetooth worked right.

    1. Re:Fix bluetooth by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      I think part of it may have to do with privacy/security. If multiple devices can pair up, your phone call may be getting broadcast into someone else's earphones as well as your own.

    2. Re:Fix bluetooth by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the answer somewhere is tied to design decisions tied to security and the assumption that the user interface/computing functionality of headphone devices would always be primitive. Kind of 640K ought to be enough for everybody mindset.

      But really, there's no reason that you have to give up security for added functionality. I'm pretty sure there could be a pairing/security mechanism that puts all the right keys on the right devices so they can listen to sender broadcasts.

  96. Reverse that POV by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    You're looking at it backwards. From the designer's point of view, the beauty of breaking the phone is that someone gets to sell you a new one. If everyone jumps on the bandwagon, even changing vendors won't help. And you'll note that even Samsung and Google are beginning to suck down this particular mug of koolaid. Either you go without a phone (which most people won't do) or there's a brand new cause of planned obsolescence, plus they get to sell you more dongles, batteries, chargers, etc.

    Follow the money. Pretty much always works. Also keep in mind that companies are like people: the people they are like are sociopaths and psychopaths.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  97. Nobody cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit yourself to death, geek.

  98. Bluetooth is the pleh by jd · · Score: 1

    Low quality, hackable from 1.6 miles away due to a total lack of security, SOP is to disable Bluetooth on any device you care about. The only relationship to the Vikings is tgat it makes you easy to plunder.

    But from a headphone stamdpoint, it's the quality that suffers the most.

    I buy high end heafphones. If I can't use them on a device, I don't use that device for audio or won't buy the device at all.

    *mutter mutter* off *mutter mutter* lawn.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  99. You're not alone by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    #MeToo

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  100. Re: I don't. . You don't have to pair it again.. by DutchDopey · · Score: 1

    In the Apple eco system you don't have to pair your headphones again and again. You just choose the headphones at the device you are using, iCloud syncing has managed it for you. As I think about it, it actually is more convenient in that regard than a plug.

  101. Markets are NEVER rational. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It works when an informed public acts rationally

    Never happens. Because people - individuals - very very rarely act rationally and it takes quite a bit of thought for us bald apes to act rationally. But to have everyone who participates in a market act rationally? Never.

    See Daniel Kahneman's and other behavioral economists' research.
    Rational (human) markets are a fairy tale.

  102. Just specifically purchased a phone with one by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    And a flat screen too!
    Beast processor also

    Going to try and get 5 full years a out of it, until this stupid curved screen and headphone jack far has circled back around.

  103. Wrong Headline. Lamenting. by stooo · · Score: 1

    >> 'Two Years Later, I Still Miss the Headphone Port'

    That's a hell of a wrong headline, it should read :

    "Two Years Later, I Still Buy The Wrong Phone For My Use Case And Lament"

    --
    aaaaaaa
  104. Its why I keep my iPhone SE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have some really good sounding headphones that work great in my iPhone. Yeah I bought some equally expensive Bluetooth ones that sound absolutely horrible. Plenty of connection problems, and so I keep my iPhone SE for that great little jack. When Apple bought Beats the writing was on the wall. Apple could sell more expensive Beats wireless headphones then wired. The technology is rather inexpensive but they double the price for wireless over wired headphones.

  105. Not buying new phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an iphone user, and i won't buy a newer phone because of the headphone jack idiocy. If my current phone breaks i will buy a used one that has an headphone jack.
     
    It's an essential feature i just demand from my phone. I could live without a camera, but not without a headphone jack.

  106. Miss HP port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple Watch + , No HP -. Apple could offer a variant option and charge for it but they are challenging my patience especially with a lame marketing byte of courage.

  107. LG V40 gets it right for listening to music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thankfully the LG V40 (and previous V35, V30, V20) get it right. They not only have a headphone jack but are built with the users music experience as a priority.
    They have quality amps to run your headphones and the electronics (DACs - digital to analog converters) are audiophile quality. It's also an amazing phone with all of the features that matter.
    And you can charge it while you listen to music through your headphones. Yes, at the same time. That's what we used to be able to do before Apple was "brave" enough to take that option away.

  108. this makes zero sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Literally no reason to buy a phone without a 3.5mm

    If you miss it sell your phone and get another one you moron.

    All you're doing is pushing the market towards no headphone jack by being complacent. What exactly are you thinking?

  109. Battery service for 6S to keep my earphone jack by PKI+Champion · · Score: 1

    Apple is running a deal until the end of the year for battery replacement service. My 6S just got new life and will keep my earphone jack going strong for years to come, until perhaps Apple figures out a way to brick the jack like they did cell data service with iOS.

  110. Class Action Lawsuit - A good start! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Class Action Lawsuit - A good start!

  111. The problem with bluetooth headphones by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    The problem with bluetooth headphones is that you do not know what you are getting. Demo them at a shop all you want, but there is no way to tell how long a battery will be able to charge at full capacity or whether it will completely give up 1.1 years into the life of the device. Then you're shopping for headphones again. Wires are just far simpler, and I find you generally get what you pay for. Yes there are some cheap buds that break after a week, but buy anything over $20 and you will generally have them for awhile.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  112. Never used it before, doesn't matter by Arkham · · Score: 1

    Reading the comments, there are clearly a large group of people who loved their headphone jacks. I was never one of them. I always got the cords tangled, and I found the whole process of plugging and unplugging and managing the wad of cord in my pocket annoying. I'd bought some Bluetooth headphones long before the headphone jack left the iPhone line. I got some over-ear ones from Amazon for using in bed at night. I bought some Anker BT earbuds for the gym also. I liked them for the most part, but keeping them charged was annoying.

    Recently though my wife bought me some AirPods. Honestly, they're what wireless headphones should be. The case charges them, they automatically pair and activate when you stick them in your ears, and they deactivate when you take them out. It even pauses the music/podcast when you remove them. I know it's cool to base Apple these days but this is a great product that shows you how it could be better than what came before.

    I think the big issue is most people, like me, thought all Bluetooth headphones were basically the same thing. They aren't.

    --
    - Vincit qui patitur.
  113. I donâ(TM)t. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the headphones that came with the phone. If I was a true audiophile Iâ(TM)d buy some bluetooth ones.

  114. Re:Seriously? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Just like some folks miss the floppy disk and the rotary-dial phone...

    Oh really? You can find someone like that?

  115. ingenue mulligan by epine · · Score: 1

    Many people, through no fault of their own, have become locked into the Apple ecosystem, and Apple killed their last phone with 3.5mm socket a few months ago.

    Are you on drugs?

    From videotape format war:

    Although Betamax initially owned 100% of the market in 1975 (as VHS did not launch until the following year) the perceived value of longer recording times eventually tipped the balance in favor of VHS.

    By 1980, VHS had proven favorable among consumers and was successful in controlling 60 percent of the North American market.

    By 1981, sales of Beta machines in the United States had sunk to 25% of the VCR market.

    As movie studios, video studios, and video rental stores turned away from Betamax, the combination of lower market share and a lack of available titles further strengthened VHS's position.

    In the United Kingdom Beta held a 25% market share, but by 1986 it was down to 7.5%, and continued to decline further.

    By the mid-1980s every sentient consumer on the planet (with less than a PhD in navel lint) knew that consumer gadgets—like marriage—are a package deal. And like marriage, "caveat emptor" is the word of the day, as every now-unplayable Betamax fairly tale soundly advises.

    Typically, the ingenue is beautiful, kind, gentle, sweet, virginal, and often naive, in mental or emotional danger, or even physical danger, usually a target of the cad; whom she may have mistaken for the hero.

    That pretty much sums up the iPhone right there: reeked of true love (at first sight), but ultimately just another chiselled, gracile cad right from the splendid skirt-lift of the inaugural staged event.

    1. Re:ingenue mulligan by quenda · · Score: 1

      Many people, through no fault of their own, have become locked into the Apple ecosystem, and Apple killed their last phone with 3.5mm socket a few months ago.

      Are you on drugs?

      I was aiming for condescending (toward iPhone users) :-)
      Maybe they were given one as a hand-me-down from parents, or from work?

      The original iPhone kind of sucked. No copy&paste even! But the early Androids (later) were not great either.

      Now, either one is great, and we are just arguing over details.

  116. My Comparison by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    I've had an iPhone 6s since they first arrived, and two sets of headphones, one bluetooth, one wired (Bose noise cancelling earbuds). I've used the Bose for noisy places like airplanes and I love them, but my bluetooth headset works great for places like the gym, and has 8 hr charge capacity. I'm very happy with the music playback quality on both. So, now that I picked up an iPhone XS, the only reason I'll miss the port is because of the Bose...gotta pick up a dongle cuz I won't replace the Bose until they break...they were expensive but worth it IMO.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  117. If you buy a phone without a headphone jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You deserve what you get. Don't support scam marketing like that. It's an obvious move to sell more adapters. It has absolutely nothing to do with the engineering to fit them in the phones. I've seen many phones, apple and android alike without a 3.5mm that had plenty of room for one. Bluetooth headphones flat out suck. The audio quality is nothing near hardwire. They never stay synced. They never stay charged. They always fall off your person bc they're not attached to anything. Don't buy bullshit hardware. If you buy apple products in general, you're probably a lost cause but the rest of the people who bought those idiotic devices should be ashamed of their stupidity and have no room to complain about the state of their dumbassery.

  118. Re: I don't miss it. I didn't use it when I had it by swillden · · Score: 1

    Biggest problem is latency. Bluetooth adds around 200 milliseconds. Tolerable if you're listening to music. Horrible if playing a game or using a video player without audio delay adjustments.

    I don't notice any latency when watching video or playing games, and I'm pretty sensitive to latency. I think you must have gotten really unlucky with your choice of headphones; I've used at least a couple dozen (mine and other peoples') over the years and never once seen that.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  119. Pretty simple why it is gone by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    $$$$$$$ They want you to purchase overpriced BT headsets. They want to make them more "water proof" They want to use the room for larger batteries LOL They want to reduce the cost by eliminating the jack. LOL It's pretty simple, they take something away, call it a "feature" then jack up the price. Personally, I haven't used the headphone jack on my phone ever, so I don't miss it. I'm older, almost 60, and grew up without an ipod, walkman or anything shoved into my ears all the time.

  120. Only idiots buys a phone that doesn't have a jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, they took out something very useful to the consumer to keep the price and size down. Blue tooth is not as good as a wire, and likely won't be for a decade, at minimum.

  121. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A floppy drive was popular because there were no alternatives. Zip drives proved that.

    Um, Zip drives were an alternative, and that didn't even dent the popularity of floppies.

      I don't disagree with your statement, but that's a weird choice of example.

  122. All it means is I use the device less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why my iPhone stays in my car while I use my iPod Touch for just about everything, including music and Square payments.

  123. And ONE size does not fit all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have yet to find an earbud or such thing that does not fall out of my ear.
    Perhaps I am in the minority but I HATE sticking stuff in my ear. The volume control
    of all of them stink.

    Bluetooth is fragile (better than it was). Smart watches are dumb for the same reason
    They need to be charged and they have 7x24 applications sleep tracking, walking, working...

    Flipping out... that reminds me "time to charge my flip phone"

  124. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are actually thumb drives with a write protect switch, not many but they do exist. And in literally every other way thumb drives are vastly better than floppies

  125. Re: I don't. . You don't have to pair it again.. by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

    In the Apple eco system

    If you're OK with limiting yourself to the Apple systems, maybe... but if you try, for example, to pair those Apple earbuds to an Android device, you have to go through the whole routine.

    Forget that, I'll take plug-n-play any day.

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  126. Filter your searches for phones by KaLeVR1 · · Score: 1

    When I look for phones, I always use the filters and I exclude phones that don't have the 3.5 jack. You can follow like a lemmings if you want but headphone jacks haven't disappeared for people who won't buy a phone without one. I don't even see phones that don't have one so as far as I'm concerned, they all still have them.

    --
    Peace, K1
  127. Re:Seriously? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Or... (s)he purchased the no-jack phone to, then, realize how important it is to hum (her).

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  128. Re: Seriously? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Yes, but does that USB drive make that unforgettable tick-tick-tick sound when you use it?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  129. Re: Seriously? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Oh you always have one file per drive?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  130. Re: Seriously? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Oh you always have one file per drive?

    By "file" I meant a file or a related set of files.

    It's still beside my point though. If you're giving a person a copy of one file or a related set of files, and it is small enough to fit on a cheap medium such as a floppy or a CD, and you don't expect to see the medium returned to you afterward, a more expensive medium is a waste of money.

  131. You miss them but still support the industry? by fygment · · Score: 1

    Why persist in buying phones without the plug?
    As with the climate, either you're doing something about it or you are part of the problem.
    And whining isn't 'doing something'.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  132. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also the nice feature that a floppy disk doesn't have a microcontroller on it which can compromise your computer just from being plugged in. It's just a dumb bit of curiously magnetized material.

  133. Re:Seriously? by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

    I know they aren't common, but they do exist. https://www.newegg.com/Product...

  134. Re:Seriously? by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Not protection from data loss, but protection from infection.

    The old saw: "Practice safe computing... always wear a write protect tab".

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  135. I don't miss it, not for a single second by unicorn · · Score: 1

    About 5 years ago I switched from corded headphones to bluetooth when in the first week of a gym membership I destroyed 2 headphone cords by getting them caught on equipment.

    I would never look back now. BT is by far a better solution.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  136. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. That I miss as well.
    Early USB sticks did have a write protect switch though. It was probably removed so users would not get confused ;)