Problem is it's being kept in many places, and no the possible contamination in event of spent fuel pool fire would dwarf even coal's. We're doing nuclear the stupid way. Sure there are smart ways, and even that spent fuel could be gold mine of energy, but that's not what is being done in these united states and not what will happen. better not to do it at all, we don't need it now. the united states of america is far too fucking stupid for nuclear power, and the Gen I and Gen II reactors it has are very dangerous.
toxic wastes that linger for tens of thousands of years, and risky spent fuel pools that if cooling were interrupted would produce the equivalent contamination of several reactors without containment melting down.
hardly, there is no evidence whatsoever that anything but random chance over billions of year has produced everything. god(s) is/are an invention of the human mind
wow you seem to be ignoring the extend and harm of a few nuclear plant disasters in the past few decades. problems not local at all, cross many countries.
while I'm not anti-nuclear let's not sugar coat the truth
really solar and energy storage tech has become efficient enough we should go that route, we don't need nuclear any more
"secured" can have broad definitions with letter of intent and such, but this boy really did have nothing when he could easily have had *something* to show
if we had another propulsion system than chemical that might be effective for manned mars mission... but otherwise you're talking about multiple launches to get the fuel up there too... it just raises costs with horrible inefficiency then.
you mean someone who makes market B.S. spew to lure investors but finds out that reality doesn't live up to the flying unicorns shitting rainbows between their ears?
fuck 'em, and I'll enjoy that type of marketing wank's downfall if I want.
Slashdot Mirror
Problem is it's being kept in many places, and no the possible contamination in event of spent fuel pool fire would dwarf even coal's. We're doing nuclear the stupid way. Sure there are smart ways, and even that spent fuel could be gold mine of energy, but that's not what is being done in these united states and not what will happen. better not to do it at all, we don't need it now. the united states of america is far too fucking stupid for nuclear power, and the Gen I and Gen II reactors it has are very dangerous.
Quantum annealing is another, this company is ripping off investors
that's okay, it's hardly provably "quantum resistant" anyway; it's the same as any other encryption in that regard. Bunch of marketing hooey is all...
toxic wastes that linger for tens of thousands of years, and risky spent fuel pools that if cooling were interrupted would produce the equivalent contamination of several reactors without containment melting down.
Any downsides to nuclear can be based on facts.
spying in people's windows a hobby? buzzing close to people's heads for a laugh? (like a coupe were doing in my neighborhood)
hobbyists like that need their toys broken. maybe a punch in the face too.
hahaha, you're saying Christmas and other solstice celebrations prove a "god".
yeah, the gods of money and/or power over others.
he said it was a failure. what part of him making up stupid lies don't you understand?
just the little problem of where the energy to split water is going to come from...
Those Toyota in California run on hydrogen which is 70% made from fossil fuel, hahaha. That's because cracking water is a money losing deal.
you remember no such thing, this was the very first test of the system.
The older system put in place in Bush administration was for radio.
how clueless, President Barack Obama signed the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Modernization Act of 2015.
And the messages are from FEMA.
Beside this fools in major media outlets are embarrassing themselves with their ignorance, spewing about "Trump's messages"
okay, let's forget about reactors, the real danger is the spent fuel ponds. those are a more massive danger than the reactors.
I'm not lying, I speak from reason. I've worked as engineer at nuke plant, have you?
hardly, there is no evidence whatsoever that anything but random chance over billions of year has produced everything. god(s) is/are an invention of the human mind
so I hope you were given other things to do at that company, or did they toss you out the door?
wow you seem to be ignoring the extend and harm of a few nuclear plant disasters in the past few decades. problems not local at all, cross many countries.
while I'm not anti-nuclear let's not sugar coat the truth
really solar and energy storage tech has become efficient enough we should go that route, we don't need nuclear any more
why even worry? seriously, texting designed for 99% percent casual and occasional comm like "booty calls" and "pick up milk & eggs on way home"
never intended to communicate to ALL FUCKING CUSTOMERS AT ONCE, and not intended to warn people in emergency.
so who gives a shit what it really does? your car is not a stunt vehicle either, despite what you see in movies
you do realize the cellular texting systems were designed for
meet u 4 lnch
and similar, not a national communication system
Gratuitous license are for property
Guess again
you can already do that with vmware and other virtualizations, run CP/M or whatever
no, very low bar for entry into that list. some are just researchers with no particular achievement of note
more than 95% of truly notable physics discoveries were done by men, get over it
per capital irrelevant, china emits more than twice what the USA does and is growing. Soon India too will pass up the USA
we should judge countries because the USA doesn't matter
"secured" can have broad definitions with letter of intent and such, but this boy really did have nothing when he could easily have had *something* to show
if we had another propulsion system than chemical that might be effective for manned mars mission... but otherwise you're talking about multiple launches to get the fuel up there too... it just raises costs with horrible inefficiency then.
copyright law doesn't allow it, it's impossible
nonsense, the claim is that the USA's output is inconsequential compared to China's. per capita is irrelevant
you mean someone who makes market B.S. spew to lure investors but finds out that reality doesn't live up to the flying unicorns shitting rainbows between their ears?
fuck 'em, and I'll enjoy that type of marketing wank's downfall if I want.