wrong, fraction of what China produces. it's just a small fraction of China's emissions. China is huge, their emissions more than double the USAs. Soon India will join them as the #2 emitter. China is bigger than USA and europe combined, doesn't matter. It's due to their HUGE population and their c02 will only grow for decades. USA doesn't matter, we don't need to do anything because it won't matter what we do. That's hard math, that's reality.
get it out of your head. Musk's rockets will not be taking humanity to the stars or Mars, there is nothing innovative about their thrust or capacity. In fact, his rockets are bottle rockets next to a Saturn V's ability.
Musk is not the savior of mankind, is not working on any tech that is revolutionary for space travel, and certainly not any useful for manned missions to any planet or moon.
There are 12 sites in the world that do it, besides France done in China, UK, India, Pakistan and Russia. Reprocessed fuel is sold commercially and used the world over.
correct, and all he had to do was show proof of talks... quite surprised he had nothing for SEC, you'd think a couple drinking (or bong hitting) buddies would agree to back claim...
were false claims made by company executives that caused that dip? no? then you have no point. Musk lied and manipulated market price, that's against the law.
you are the one making incorrect assumptions, in this case that the difficulties of a couple countries with low aptitude in recycling fuel applies to all.
CANDU are using reprocessed fuel in China and Canada.
eh, it's technically possible (and a done deal) to use spent fuel or even depleted uranium or natural uranium in certain types of reactors, and to get many times the energy out of said fuel than a PWR could do.
the propaganda was the ridiculous claim of thousands without facts by U.S. media and government.
the "civilians" are said to have attacked, and were NOT the majority student protesters who left peacefully. Unarmed? How do you know they didn't have bats or large rocks? If you don't know stop repeating propaganda.
The facts are very much disputed, again see major news sources like the NY Times I quoted written AFTER the emotional sensationalist drivel of the time.
Slashdot Mirror
big injection of investor funds coming, Musk said so. Don't listen to those SEC detractors.
you're the one that needs to do legwork of very well known facts, including that China's emissions is more than twice the USAs and growing.
lazy git
google the emissions of each country and educate yourself. not a "big claim" at all, just common knowledge and fact.
why do you question what is hard fact? why don't you know? why do accept accusations against the USA that are based on nothing?
wrong, fraction of what China produces. it's just a small fraction of China's emissions. China is huge, their emissions more than double the USAs. Soon India will join them as the #2 emitter. China is bigger than USA and europe combined, doesn't matter. It's due to their HUGE population and their c02 will only grow for decades. USA doesn't matter, we don't need to do anything because it won't matter what we do. That's hard math, that's reality.
the big emitter is not the USA, it doesn't matter what the USA does. Some of you green tards are bad at math, but that's the reality.
get it out of your head. Musk's rockets will not be taking humanity to the stars or Mars, there is nothing innovative about their thrust or capacity. In fact, his rockets are bottle rockets next to a Saturn V's ability.
Musk is not the savior of mankind, is not working on any tech that is revolutionary for space travel, and certainly not any useful for manned missions to any planet or moon.
News for you. Musk is also a rich asshole. He doesn't have a plan for Tesla to become profitable, and lied about funding.
He will not save humanity with the type of chemical rockets his company builds. those will not go to Mars.
There are 12 sites in the world that do it, besides France done in China, UK, India, Pakistan and Russia. Reprocessed fuel is sold commercially and used the world over.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
correct, and all he had to do was show proof of talks... quite surprised he had nothing for SEC, you'd think a couple drinking (or bong hitting) buddies would agree to back claim...
were false claims made by company executives that caused that dip? no? then you have no point. Musk lied and manipulated market price, that's against the law.
the law says otherwise. your silly immature view of sort selling and lack of understand of markets is of no relevance. Musk broke the law.
I had to laugh at all the Musk fanboys here saying at the time that he committed no crime. Yes he did, you can't do such things when a public company.
you are the one making incorrect assumptions, in this case that the difficulties of a couple countries with low aptitude in recycling fuel applies to all.
CANDU are using reprocessed fuel in China and Canada.
France has been recovering uranium for decades.
What are you talking about, seven countries use CANDU reactors, there are 31 around the world in use and more are being built.
not debunked at all, smarter countries than yours are doing them
eh, it's technically possible (and a done deal) to use spent fuel or even depleted uranium or natural uranium in certain types of reactors, and to get many times the energy out of said fuel than a PWR could do.
and anything bought during the marriage, like the property in the article, is of both. which is the default
the chinese claim less than 200.
the propaganda was the ridiculous claim of thousands without facts by U.S. media and government.
the "civilians" are said to have attacked, and were NOT the majority student protesters who left peacefully. Unarmed? How do you know they didn't have bats or large rocks? If you don't know stop repeating propaganda.
The facts are very much disputed, again see major news sources like the NY Times I quoted written AFTER the emotional sensationalist drivel of the time.
Your "statelaws" information is dated, the age was raised to 16
In any case the word "pedophile" does not apply with a human of sexual maturity.
false, in the United States it absolutely is the default. Ask anyone in a divorce. Look up things before spewing
No, mechanical watches are the the most complex machines made. guess gain.
they're obsolete and they keep poor time, the world has moved on
so they rolled in the suicide stats if there was a bottle nearby at time of death?
fishy! junk science! fake news!
those 20th century jewelry accessories people wore on their wrist that had a clock on it.
people still wear those now that we have supercomputers in our pockets hooked to a planet-spanning network? how retro.
eh, husband and wife own things jointly in these United States. Husband can invite friends into his property.
Legal age for marriage for female in Texas is 16.
"Pedophile", ha nope.