Slashdot Mirror


Cellphones Across the US Will Receive a 'Presidential Alert' at 2:18 pm Eastern Today (nytimes.com)

At 2:18 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday, cellphones across the United States will emit the ominous ring of an emergency presidential alert. From a report: It will be the first nationwide test of a wireless emergency alert system, designed to warn people of a dire threat, like a terror attack, pandemic or natural disaster. There is no opting out, which has already prompted a lawsuit. "THIS IS A TEST of the National Wireless Emergency Alert System," it will read. "No action is needed." Two minutes later, televisions and radios will show test alerts. There is no notification plan for landlines. Officials say they believe that the wireless test will reach about 75 percent of the cellphones in the country, though they hope the number is higher. It could take up to 30 minutes for the alerts to be transmitted to all devices.

Some things that could interfere: ongoing phone calls or data transmission, a device that is turned off or out of range, and smaller cellphone providers that are not participating in the program. The test, originally planned for last month but delayed by Hurricane Florence, is the culmination of many years of work. The federal government developed a system to issue the alerts, which are scripted in coordination with numerous government agencies. They are limited to 90 characters, but will be expanded to 360 in the future. The Communications Act of 1934 gives the president the power to use communications systems in case of an emergency, and a 2006 law called for the Federal Communications Commission to work with the wireless industry to transmit such messages.

267 comments

  1. Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was implemented during under Obama:

    WEA was established in 2008 pursuant to the Warning, Alert and Response Network (WARN) Act and became operational in 2012.

    1. Re:Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Please see a doctor, you have a terrible case of TDS.

    2. Re:Obama-era implementation by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's the problem with making laws or setting rules that allow for an autocrat to have too much control. It's all well and good when it's your guy or some responsible leader that's more a figment of the imagination than anything, but this is precisely why you don't ever allow for those kinds of powers, even if they seem innocent enough or even good intentioned. Eventually it won't be your guy, or it will be someone quite reprehensible (and Trump's more of a buffoon than malicious, so consider yourself lucky), and likely eventually someone downright evil. That kind of power seems to be a natural magnate for exactly the worst sort of people.

    3. Re:Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, I disabled that shit in my phone long ago.

    4. Re: Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you got problems you should seek help for.

    5. Re:Obama-era implementation by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Back when you could trust a presidents message to be something based on the countries best interests.

      Unless it was to children on their first day of school, and you lived in a red state.

    6. Re: Obama-era implementation by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Yup. If people just focused on how much power & responsibility their actual representatives gave away, we wouldn't have half the nasty us vs them discussions.

    7. Re:Obama-era implementation by tsa · · Score: 0

      Is this one of the things Trump's staff snatched off his desk?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    8. Re:Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back when you could trust a presidents message to be something based on the countries best interests.
      New when my phone gets an emergency alert, I feel I need to make sure we didn't get nuked.

      You mean like, "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor."

      That statement has only two resulting interpretations: Obama was an incompetent or a liar.

      If you argue it's obvious that you couldn't keep your doctor post-Obamacare, then Obama's a liar.

      If you argue it wasn't obvious, then Obama signed a law that no one knew what the consequences would be - a pretty good definition of incompetent.

      What was that you were saying about trust?

    9. Re: Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good one. All politicians suck.

    10. Re: Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please see a doctor, you have trumps COCK stuck up your ass. As the great ice cube said: "big dicks in your mouth are bad for ya health.

    11. Re: Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize, it was the insurance companies who broke that promise, not Obama. But keep spouting your strawmen. It's fun to watch Republicans lie constantly.

    12. Re: Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get us started on liars. We would be here all day listing the lies that trump has told. I believe someone already does that. And the number is pretty fucking big.

      So you have NO moral high ground here at all.

    13. Re:Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was implemented during under Obama:

      And the law says it is to be used only in an emergency. Obama never decided to violate that law with a non-emergency broadcast.

    14. Re:Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, so Obama implemented this in the election year before he became President???

      STOP THE PRESSES!!!!

      Maybe you should look to the President at the time, George W Bush

    15. Re:Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a shit idea then, and it's a shit system now.

    16. Re:Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happened. It was blocked in the Cell Broadcast settings page along with AMBER Alerts and everything else. That is all.

    17. Re: Obama-era implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because those garbage rip-off plans shouldn't have existed in the first place. They were so cheap because they really covered nothing, and didnâ(TM)t meet basic coverage.

  2. Oh Great! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is a test, it is not a real emergency. Democrats are meanies and poopie heads - sad

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Oh Great! by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Save it until the Presidential Alert! dude...

  3. This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's hope it works better than the Hawaii test.

    1. Re:This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then you're a bigger idiot than he is, because he's nowhere near that bad.

    2. Re:This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see you dying of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

    3. Re:This is a test? by Howitzer86 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Step 1. "That'll never happen. You're being overly dramatic."

      Step 2. It happens.

      Step 3. "He's a different kind of President. You'll just have to accept these kinds of things."

      Repeat.

    4. Re:This is a test? by siege72 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They live the Narcissist's Prayer (https://www.chrisshepherd.org/the-narcissists-prayer/)

      That didn’t happen.
      And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.
      And if it was, that’s not a big deal.
      And if it is, that’s not my fault.
      And if it was, I didn’t mean it.
      And if I did...
      You deserved it.

    5. Re:This is a test? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Message didn't end with "So sad!" Obviously false.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:This is a test? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I can see only two uses of this:

      1) Political bullshit
      2) Inciting mass panic

      Is there anything else that a nationwide alert system could possibly get used for?

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    7. Re:This is a test? by Raenex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Step 3. "He's a different kind of President. You'll just have to accept these kinds of things."

      Step 0. Ignore that Obama hung out with the black equivalent of David Duke, Louis Farrakhan.

      Was Obama a "different" kind of President? We don't have to accept these kind of things, we just have to ignore them.

    8. Re:This is a test? by Raenex · · Score: 1
    9. Re:This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BRAWNDO MAKES PLANTS GROW ! ! ! ! ! ! :-D

      now I like my A b c, cant you help me how to count from one to three
      aye bee see, one two three, etc etc blah blah, argh /. crud filters

      caption - prosodic

    10. Re: This is a test? by houghi · · Score: 1

      So only one reason.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:This is a test? by gtall · · Score: 1

      Nah, the real problem is that if he made a voice recording that went out, no one would believe him no matter what he said.

    12. Re:This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from the fact that attending a Black Caucus meeting, prior to becoming president, which is also attended by Farrakhan is not exactly "hanging out" with him, what exactly does that have to do with anything? The GP was pointing out that Trump repeatedly acts well outside established norms, while in office. Did Obama, as president, ever refer to Nation of Islam members as "very fine people", ether in the context of a riot in which they killed people or not?

    13. Re:This is a test? by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

      +1, Insightful

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    14. Re:This is a test? by swb · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I'll bet Louis Farrakhan or David Duke would be fascinating (say it in Spock's voice) to talk to.

      You don't have to actually believe whatever bullshit they spout, but listening to them might actually be at least entertaining.

    15. Re:This is a test? by VicVegas · · Score: 1

      Suppressing the vote was the first thing that sprang to mind.

      I suppose that would fall under 1) Political bullshit, and could be accomplished via 2) Inciting mass panic.

    16. Re:This is a test? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      And by "hung out" you mean "taken a picture with once". Yeah.

    17. Re:This is a test? by tsa · · Score: 0

      Fox nonsense, is what it is.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    18. Re:This is a test? by Raenex · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fox "news" is never correct.

      Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Ignore inconvenient news, including inconvenient photographs that show Saint Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus hang out with racist hate preachers. But here's the same story from the liberal New Yorker: https://www.newyorker.com/cult...

    19. Re:This is a test? by Raenex · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And by "hung out" you mean "taken a picture with once". Yeah.

      Are you a useful idiot or just an apologist? This is not about "taking pictures", this is about seeking support and working with the Nation of Islam:

      "Indeed, it's a sign of Farrakhan's oddly lasting hold on popular influence that he was even invited to clink drinks with the members of the C.B.C."

      But his Farrakhan connections go way back.

      And let's put this into perspective. Trump was raked over the coals by the national media because he didn't immediately disavow David Duke when a reporter mentioned that Duke supported him. Imagine if that photo was Trump with David Duke instead, surrounded by a bunch of Republican congressmen. The national media storm would have been immense, and it's a story even Trump would not have survived, let alone the congressmen.

    20. Re:This is a test? by aquacrayfish · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh please, he insults victims of assault and attacks gold star families, and you think he wouldn't survive a simple picture?

    21. Re:This is a test? by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 2

      What is the left's problem with one major conservative media outlet existing when they have NYT, WaPo, CNN, ABC, MSNBC... and ESPN. It's not like any of those is a paragon of unbiasedness. Last time NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate was in 1956; last time WaPo endorsed a Republican candidate: never.

    22. Re:This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fox "news" is never correct.

      This link may help you improve your FEEELZ process to an actual thought process: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem:

      Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

      Grow a brain, progtard.

    23. Re:This is a test? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Oh please, he insults victims of assault

      Do you mean Kavanaugh's phony accuser that has an inconsistent, unsubstantiated story and has been caught lying about being afraid to fly, among other things?

      attacks gold star families

      You mean gold star families that attacked him politically?

      and you think he wouldn't survive a simple picture?

      No, he wouldn't have. David Duke is radioactive. There was a national media storm just because Trump didn't disavow him quick enough. And yet the same media is silent about Obama's and the Congressional Black Caucus's long associations with Farrakhan.

    24. Re:This is a test? by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      the black equivalent of David Duke, Louis Farrakhan.

      They are not equivalent, so please stop.

      Yes, Farrakhan has said some crazy, stupid, hateful things, but that's about where the equivalence ends.

      The KKK, an organization to which David Duke belongs, has a very long history of systemic violence, lynching, and intimidation. Trying to claim that Farrakhan is equivalent is like saying that yelling at someone is the equivalent to brutally murdering them.

      Neither are good, but they are far from equivalent.

    25. Re:This is a test? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can't help but feel like China and Russia missed their chance to nuke us!

      Everyone was expecting a test this afternoon... if China and Russia nuked us, everyone would see the message and think "oh, it's only a test we're not really getting bombed..."

      You missed you chance Ivan.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    26. Re:This is a test? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Technically, they don't provide the news, instead they have editorials disguised as news stories.

    27. Re: This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he had the ability to send that from his desk, do you really think he could stop himself?

    28. Re: This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reality has a liberal bias. Just because every major news outlet is not a sycophantic fluffer for whatever lies are being peddled by the right at the moment does not mean they are in the tank for the other guys.

    29. Re:This is a test? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Fox "news" is never correct.

      That makes no sense. Reality is created by The News, so Fox, as purveyors of The News, are by default correct.

    30. Re:This is a test? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Yes, Farrakhan has said some crazy, stupid, hateful things, but that's about where the equivalence ends.

      Yes, Farrakhan has, like "white people deserve to die". He also interfered into the investigation of a murdered policeman, threatening riots.

      But hey, it's totally fine that the Congressional Black Caucus and Obama sought his endorsements. Because "the Klan".

      The KKK, an organization to which David Duke belongs, has a very long history of systemic violence, lynching, and intimidation.

      Duke doesn't belong to the Klan. He left it a long time ago. Furthermore, did he ever advocate for violence while at the Klan? This is what Wikipedia has to say about him during his time there:

      "In 1974, Duke founded the Louisiana-based Knights of the Ku Klux Klan (KKKK), shortly after graduating from LSU.[98] He became Grand Wizard of the KKKK. A follower of Duke, Thomas Robb, changed the title of Grand Wizard to National Director, and replaced the Klan's white robes with business suits.[99] Duke first received broad public attention during this time, as he endeavored to market himself in the mid-1970s as a new brand of Klansman: well-groomed, engaged, and professional. Duke also reformed the organization, promoting nonviolence and legality, and, for the first time in the Klan's history, women were accepted as equal members and Catholics were encouraged to apply for membership.[100] Duke would repeatedly insist that the Klan was "not anti-black" but rather "pro-white" and "pro-Christian." Duke told The Daily Telegraph that he left the Klan in 1980 because he disliked its associations with violence and could not stop the members of other Klan chapters from doing "stupid or violent things."[101]"

      I don't know the veracity of this, but even the SPLC doesn't accuse him of violence during his time there. And they're not exactly shameful about lying or distorting the truth.

      By the way, Robert Byrd was lifelong Democrat senator, and he was also a member of the Klan, but he was allowed to escape his past, even though he filibustered the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

    31. Re: This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can you see you dying of aids, contracting from Republicans fucking you in the ass everyday.

    32. Re: This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL show us where Obama said that radical Islam are "fine people". Go ahead.

      Because we have video PROOF of trump saying some Nazis are "fine people".

    33. Re: This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are defending a fucking racist. Do you even hear yourself. You are rationalizing it in every way possible. You even bring out Obama as a strawman to try to fit your narrative. And you wonder why we call people like you racist, because your are actively saying that an x KKK member, is a good person, because he didn't commit violence that you know of?

      NO, all KKK and Nazi people are BAD. Regardless of the crimes they commit.

    34. Re: This is a test? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      You are defending a fucking racist.

      Oh, am I defending Obama? After all, he's the one who took a smiling photo with the notorious racist hate preacher Farrakhan, and also worked with his Nation of Islam organization in the past. As have the members of the Congressional Black Caucus, including top-level Democrat Keith Ellison. Odd how the national media is silent on that.

      You even bring out Obama as a strawman

      Obama wasn't the strawman. He was the subject. It was Obama's defenders that tried to bring in a strawman version of Duke to say that Farrakhan wasn't all that bad. All I did was show the true record.

      And you wonder why we call people like you racist, because your are actively saying that an x KKK member, is a good person, because he didn't commit violence that you know of?

      Aaaand here's the strawman. I never said Duke was a "good person". You conveniently forget that I equated him with Farrakhan, and I hold both in equal contempt. You also pass over the fact that Byrd was a lifelong Democrat who also had a past history of the Klan, but was allowed to escape his past and was lauded.

    35. Re:This is a test? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Once it has ben proven to work, and to get (say) 75% penetration of adult Americans, then the bidding for this new advert delivery channel will start.

      >Not "if", but "when".

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    36. Re: This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're probably not old enough to remember when Reagan said exactly that, in to a hot mic just before a press conference.

      No remorse. Thought it was funny.

    37. Re:This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You completely pwned that guy.

      Fox "news" is never correct.

      Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Ignore inconvenient news, including inconvenient photographs that show Saint Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus hang out with racist hate preachers. But here's the same story from the liberal New Yorker: https://www.newyorker.com/cult...

    38. Re:This is a test? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Even though it is a national system, is it really nationwide only? We have a similar system in the Netherlands, and besides the (nationwide) test every 6 months, it has been used a couple of times to send messages to specific areas, for example in case of a rather large industrial fire; the alert warned people in the immediate area to stay indoors and close doors and windows in order to avoid inhaling the smoke. It's quite useful for cases like that, as it reaches around 80% of the population.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    39. Re:This is a test? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Ummm.. the orders to launch nukes don't come over cell-phones. This is the civilian alert system, not the military one.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    40. Re:This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You raise an interesting question, why aren't there more conservative sources? And why is that one consistently lying to and distracting its audience?

    41. Re:This is a test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there anything else that a nationwide alert system could possibly get used for?

      The mass panic thing is useful. An alert about "Incoming nukes" will cause panic. But a lot of people will then survive in basements, or by turning away from the city they were driving towards.

      A sane alert system would also support smaller regions. Useful for warning about tsunamis, earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, flooding, and even bomb threats.

      As for political bullshit, you can always hope that your next president will criminalize such abuses. Besides, he already has a twitter account for that.

    42. Re:This is a test? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Ummm.. the orders to launch nukes don't come over cell-phones. This is the civilian alert system, not the military one.

      Whoooosh!

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    43. Re:This is a test? by aquacrayfish · · Score: 1

      Do you mean Kavanaugh's phony accuser that has an inconsistent, unsubstantiated story and has been caught lying about being afraid to fly, among other things?

      The fact that you can believe this sentence is... sad. And this is with the series of Kavanaugh's lies notwithstanding.

      You mean gold star families that attacked him politically?

      First, if you believe it's the case that it was a political attack and not throwing his own words back at him, I would like to think that we would want the leader of our country, or at that time prospective leader, to be a bigger person than that. Or have an ounce of empathy for the dead. Second, he was called out about his hypocrisy on his comments of sacrifice and the proposed Muslim ban. Feel free to disagree with their opinion, but their son served, and they have every right to talk about sacrifice and equal protection under the law. If you think that makes them fair game for attacks over their family, well, that says more about you than Trump.

      There was a national media storm just because Trump didn't disavow him quick enough.

      No, first he lied about not knowing who he is. Then he attempted cover with a lie about a faulty earpiece.

    44. Re:This is a test? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      The fact that you can believe this sentence is... sad.

      The fact that you're ignoring the evidence, including her own testimony, and the conclusions of an accomplished prosecutor with an expertise in sex crimes is pathetic:

      Inconsistent:

      "Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened.

      In a July 6 text to the Washington Post, she said it happened in the "mid 1980s."

      In her July 30 letter to Senator Feinstein, she said it happened in the "early 80s."

      Her August 7 statement to the polygrapher said that it happened one "high school summer in early 80's," but she crossed out the word "early" for reasons she did not explain.

      A September 16 Washington Post article reported that Dr. Ford said it happened in the "summer of 1982."

      Similarly, the September 16 article reported that notes from an individual therapy session in 2013 show her describing the assault as occurring in her "late teens." But she told the Post and the Committee that she was 15 when the assault allegedly occurred. She has not turned over her therapy records for the Committee to review."

      Unsubstantiated:

      "Dr. Ford has named three people other than Judge Kavanaugh who attended the party-- Mark Judge, Patrick "PJ" Smyth, and her lifelong friend Leland Keyser (nee Ingham). Dr. Ford testified to the Committee that another boy attended the party, but that she could not remember his name. No others have come forward.

      All three named eyewitnesses have submitted statements to the Committee denying any memory of the party whatsoever. Most relevantly, in her first statement to the Committee, Ms. Keyser stated through counsel that, "[s]imply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford." In a subsequent statement to the Committee through counsel, Ms. Keyser said that "the simple and unchangeable truth is that she is unable to corroborate [Dr. Ford's allegations] because she has no recollection of the incident in question." "

      Lying about Flying:

      "She maintains that she suffers from anxiety, claustrophobia, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

      The date of the hearing was delayed because the Committee was informed that her symptoms prevent her from flying. But she agreed during her testimony that she flies "fairly frequently for [her] hobbies and ... work." She flies to the mid-Atlantic at least once a year to visit her family. She has flown to Hawaii, French Polynesia, and Costa Rica. She also flew to Washington, D.C. for the hearing."

      Second, he was called out about his hypocrisy on his comments of sacrifice and the proposed Muslim ban.

      So that's what his "attack" amounted to.

      Feel free to disagree with their opinion, but their son served, and they have every right to talk about sacrifice and equal protection under the law.

      Nobody denied them that right. And there is no "equal protection" or "right" for foreigners to be allowed entry into the United States.

      No, first he lied about not knowing who he is. Then he attempted cover with a lie about a faulty earpiece.

      Whatever. The "outrage" is that Trump's expected to loudly and immediately disavow Duke if asked about him. Any other answer results in a national media storm. Yet the same media will remain quiet when Obama, the Congressional Black Caucus, and DNC big wig Keith Ellison all seek the support of racist hate preacher Farrakhan, including when they take smiling photos with him.

  4. Twitter upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've uninstalled twitter because I didn't want to have to read presidential tweets and now this.
    Wireless Emergency Alert System - Covfefe

    1. Re:Twitter upgrade? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I've uninstalled twitter because I didn't want to have to read presidential tweets and now this.
      Wireless Emergency Alert System - Covfefe

      If it bothers you that much, turn your phone off for a few minutes- it's not like they haven't been warning us about this for weeks,

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Twitter upgrade? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Yep. Phones are just like radios. If yours is switched off when this is sent then you'll never see it.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Twitter upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't under stand what "have to" means

    4. Re:Twitter upgrade? by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      That's the same argument spammers came up with years ago and continue to use to this day. Fuck that.

    5. Re:Twitter upgrade? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      That's the same argument spammers came up with years ago and continue to use to this day. Fuck that.

      It's one message years after this was created and advertised that it would happen weeks in advance. It's really not that big a deal.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:Twitter upgrade? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      You had to read presidential tweets?

      I can see signing up for it, perhaps twitter even turning it on by default for some misguided reason akin to emergency messages, but not that you couldn't turn off tracking of it!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    7. Re:Twitter upgrade? by barakn · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm noted. But you missed the point. One metric that will be measured is how quickly the message is received, and if a bunch of people turn off their phones, this metric will be skewed towards a longer delay. This will send a big "screw you" message to... somebody.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    8. Re: Twitter upgrade? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Actually this is the first I've heard of it. If only we had some way to send a message to every phone in the country to inform us about the test...

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    9. Re:Twitter upgrade? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      The Amber Alert system already gets abused all the time, why wouldn't this be abused as well?

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    10. Re:Twitter upgrade? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      The Amber Alert system already gets abused all the time, why wouldn't this be abused as well?

      That probably depends on where you are. I don't feel like the Amber Alert system is abused where I am. I've probably had four amber alerts in the last year.

      As for, will this be abused: hasn't this been in place since Obama era- and this is the very first test of it? So far it doesn't look like it is being abused. Maybe that will change... I will worry about it when that happens.

      I'm not a fan of Trump, but there is no indication this will become his "new twitter". An alert system that can warn of a national threat is not a bad idea. An abused one is- but so far no evidence of abuse.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    11. Re: Twitter upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns phone off didnâ(TM)t work, getting message/no confirm power off didnâ(TM)t work, now Iâ(TM)m marked in the dataset. FUNNY fu

    12. Re:Twitter upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the second test, apparently.

  5. Not participating by twdorris · · Score: 1

    Will need to research which carriers are "not participating" and consider their plans for my future contract...

    1. Re:Not participating by deKernel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what exactly is causing you issues with this? Local TV stations have been doing this for years for severe weather situations. Now if they start broadcasting baseball scores or election results, then I will be with you on the objections.

    2. Re:Not participating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you REALLY think our President, with his impulsiveness and stubborn attitude towards everyone and everything, will RESIST the urge to use this for something OTHER than an actual emergency?

      Naive.

    3. Re:Not participating by deKernel · · Score: 1

      So you have a fear of something that has not happened and you have ZERO proof (other than your quite vivid imagination) that it will happen which results in you changing cell phone carrier....gotcha.

      May I make a suggestion. Turn off the news, stop reading every conspiratorial news site and just start enjoying life because you are letting non-events control you.

      I will now stop feeding the troll and take my own advice because it is sunny outside.

    4. Re:Not participating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what exactly is causing you issues with this? Local TV stations have been doing this for years for severe weather situations.

      The issue isn't the broadcast, it's that we're not in sufficient control of our personal computers such that we get to choose if/how the broadcast is presented to the user. Classic televisions weren't programmable so they just had to show whatever was being broadcast, but our 21st century handheld PCs should be above that. Far above that.

      I assume that if I upgraded to Lineage this would be fixed/fixable, so maybe it's on me for being so lazy as to still be running Samsung's proprietary software.

    5. Re:Not participating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the tinfoil hat in me sees this being abused during certain events. i.e.
      Think of these countries implementing the same:
      China, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia

    6. Re:Not participating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have already seen examples of weaponizing the IRS and FBI against political opponents and you are worried about weaponized text messages?

    7. Re:Not participating by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      So what exactly is causing you issues with this? Local TV stations have been doing this for years for severe weather situations.

      The issue isn't the broadcast, it's that we're not in sufficient control of our personal computers such that we get to choose if/how the broadcast is presented to the user. Classic televisions weren't programmable so they just had to show whatever was being broadcast, but our 21st century handheld PCs should be above that.

      No one is forcing your personal computer to display this message (and if they were, open source obviously would be the solution, yadda yadda yadda). This is actually an FCC regulation, and it's been the same since the 1960s with the Emergency Broadcast System.

      It is illegal for an FCC-licensed broadcast station to continue broadcasting normal programming during a Presidential EAS Alert -- they have to either carry the signal from the local LP1/LP2 station, go dark, or display a message to tune to the appropriate station. If the President needs to tell the nation that the Russians just attacked us, that needs to get out there.

      The parallel decision to handle this the same way for Alerts going over WEA rather than EAS is not a particularly large leap. There are plenty of other things your cell phone is forced to do, by law... Including allow you to dial 911 even if the phone is locked, has no SIM card, and has no service provider. "Accept cell tower based Nationwide Emergency Alerts" is not particularly out of place in that light.

    8. Re: Not participating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You saw what he did with Twitter. Only time will tell.

    9. Re:Not participating by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      It's not really an issue for me because I don't own a cell phone, listen to the radio, or watch TV. All that said it's just one more small reason for me to avoid carrying a cell phone. If I was in fear that something dangerous was likely to happen I would go out of my way to check for such events. But as it is we're safer today than at any previous point in history. Robo calls and spam messages are annoying enough I don't see any reason of significance that warrants allowing even more, typically useless, annoyances.

    10. Re:Not participating by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      It's not really an issue for me because I don't own a cell phone, listen to the radio, or watch TV.

      You're either allergic to EM, in which case you might be living near the US NRQZ... or you're quite the hipster.

    11. Re:Not participating by strikethree · · Score: 1

      So what exactly is causing you issues with this?

      I don't know about you, or the person you are responding to, but for me, I am deeply annoyed by this. I did not buy a device to allow anyone in a position of authority to contact me. I don't care about their fucking alerts. I don't care if there is severe weather. I don't care if there is nuclear war. I don't care if some child has been abducted. I don't care if an 80 year old man escaped from his "home".

      TL;DR, I bought my phone for MY use and it is being hijacked. Fuck that noise.

      And for the record, I received TWO Presidential Alerts. My phone is now powered off.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    12. Re:Not participating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't been watching local TV stations or other stations for the pst 10 years since I cut the cord.
      I don't really want to be bothered, or notified.
      If something big happens, I won't get the alert via this modality.... someone I know will likely tell me as happened with 9-11.
      Being pestered is annoying.

    13. Re:Not participating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real issue is that shit has hit the fan. Hitler failed at his attempted coup of a democratically elected government only to assume power by a vote. There are also lots of situations where your forced notification could injure or kill someone. I can only imagine what happens when a device including a cellular modem is interrupted by a pre-programmed OS feature in a situation that was never tested in QA because it had never happened before. I can just see an emergency broadcasting system or network reliant on cellular technology failing in an imminent emergency because some law forced code into critical components that some other device designer (who is coding at a higher level of the stack) never considered or realized because *IT NEVER HAPPENS*. Sure- we know about amber alerts and storm alerts but not necessarily presidential alerts. Just because it doesn't impact most people does not mean it won't KILL some. It may be well intended, but the law should not dictate these things. Period. These are features worth having, but not at the cost of lost freedoms. Let individuals have them via demand with he option to disable. There are plenty of devices today that there is no excuse to force such functionality on any particular company, person, or device.

    14. Re:Not participating by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      No allergies, and while I like the idea of being unique I don't think I'd make a good hipster. I don't own a cell phone because I spend nearly all of my time either at home or at work, where cell phones are not permitted but I have constant access to a full function computer. My daily commute is very short, 10 minutes. When I want to hear music I opt for either a CD or an MP3 player over the radio because they are usually playing more commercials than music. I suppose I should have said I don't watch any live TV, as I still use Netflix, PrimeVideo, and Youtube quite a lot.

  6. And the message will read... by khandom08 · · Score: 5, Funny

    covfefe

    1. Re:And the message will read... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Was anyone ever able to figure that one out?

    2. Re:And the message will read... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Was anyone ever able to figure that one out?

      According to Spicer it was a well thought out message and the people who it was intended for knew exactly what it was meant to say.

      (I found Spicer's brown-nosing about the situation more amusing than the typo itself).

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:And the message will read... by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      obviously it means thank you in russian.

    4. Re:And the message will read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is from an ancient dialect of a dead language.

      Roughly translated it means:

      Donald Trump can never admit he made a mistake, no matter how trivial.

    5. Re:And the message will read... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      That would make my day.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    6. Re:And the message will read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read somewhere it was a typo for "Coverage", that got accidentally sent..

    7. Re:And the message will read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > obviously it means thank you in russian.

       

    8. Re:And the message will read... by necro81 · · Score: 1
    9. Re:And the message will read... by tepples · · Score: 1

      "Our President is human. He occasionally mistypes words like 'coverage'."
      Would that have been a better way for Spicer to have handled it?

    10. Re:And the message will read... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      "Our President is human. He occasionally mistypes words like 'coverage'."
      Would that have been a better way for Spicer to have handled it?

      That would have been accurate and understandable and no one would really have a major fault with the president over that.

      Spicer just came across as a buffoon with his explanation.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    11. Re:And the message will read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Our President is human. He occasionally mistypes words like 'coverage'."
      Would that have been a better way for Spicer to have handled it?

      I disagree--- he's a lizard-person!

    12. Re:And the message will read... by swillden · · Score: 1

      covfefe

      Is this system President Trump's backup plan, in case Twitter ever gives him the boot?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re:And the message will read... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      That would have been accurate and understandable and no one would really have a major fault with the president over that.

      When a Republican politician gets roasted for the rest of his life because he spells "potato" with the 'e' at the end -- a valid spelling -- you can believe that Trump wouldn't get off for any "understandable" misspellings, because, well, Trump. But we excuse the US having '57 states" (actually, 58, since the statement was about visiting 57 and having one more to go) as just an understandable slip of the tongue because, well, not Trump.

    14. Re:And the message will read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans tried to mark Obama as an elitist scumbag for eating arugula and dijon mustard, while proceeding to elect a man who lives in a New York City penthouse that would make King Midas roll his eyes. Trump wouldn't have gotten nearly the shit for covfefe he did if he didn't try to play the "I meant to do that" card through Spicer.

    15. Re:And the message will read... by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      Regarding Spicer, he seems to have been a really bad choice for the Press Secretary. Anyone who seizes-up trying to explain a mis-typed word is out of his/her element there.

    16. Re: And the message will read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck is a whole word spelled wrong not even close to the original word a typo?

      You know what a typo is? Thsi si a tpyo.

    17. Re:And the message will read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Our President is human. He occasionally mistypes words like 'coverage'." Would that have been a better way for Spicer to have handled it?

      That would have been accurate and understandable and no one would really have a major fault with the president over that.

      Spicer just came across as a buffoon with his explanation.

      Yes, but the narcissist-In-Chief can never admit any mistakes. If Spicer had said it was an error, he'd instantly be fired via tweet

    18. Re:And the message will read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would have been accurate and understandable and no one would really have a major fault with the president over that.

      When a Republican politician gets roasted for the rest of his life because he spells "potato" with the 'e' at the end -- a valid spelling -- you can believe that Trump wouldn't get off for any "understandable" misspellings, because, well, Trump. But we excuse the US having '57 states" (actually, 58, since the statement was about visiting 57 and having one more to go) as just an understandable slip of the tongue because, well, not Trump.

      Yes, remember the days when misspellings were the worst thing we had to worry about in our federal executives, instead of deep psychoses, psychopathy, unpresidented narcissism, and pure greed?

    19. Re:And the message will read... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      That is (transliterated into Latin, to accommodate Slashdot's idiocy), "spacibo".

      Which I'm sure you knew. Even if it's beyond President Tiny-Hands' knowledge or even ability to comprehend.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    20. Re:And the message will read... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      It was a typo of "coverage". Why they didn't just say that, and doubled down as intentional, I do not know.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    21. Re:And the message will read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "potato" with the 'e' at the end -- a valid spelling

      In which language? Because it certainly isn't a valid spelling in English.

    22. Re:And the message will read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Spicer it was a well thought out message and the people who it was intended for knew exactly what it was meant to say.

      Ah, a trigger message to some secret org, then.

  7. Damn it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the orange moron just found the button for SuperTwitter...

    1. Re:Damn it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, Boris. Let us trash that cyka blyat together!
      First they had a Chimp in Bush Jr, then a Bonobo in Obama, and now an Orangutan!

  8. How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Officials say they believe that the wireless test will reach about 75 percent of the cellphones in the country, though they hope the number is higher.

    How do they plan to measure this number? That worries me WAY more than the fact that we get an alert. Is there some process built into phone software and.or the cell network that will report this, and if so what else can it report regarding my activity?

    1. Re:How will they know? by bws111 · · Score: 2

      'Hey carriers, how many phones were connected to your network when the alert was sent'. Are you under the impression they don't know this information?

    2. Re:How will they know? by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 1

      Call a significant number of people and ask them if they got the message. "A significant number" would be around 1000 probably.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    3. Re:How will they know? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      why even worry? seriously, texting designed for 99% percent casual and occasional comm like "booty calls" and "pick up milk & eggs on way home"

      never intended to communicate to ALL FUCKING CUSTOMERS AT ONCE, and not intended to warn people in emergency.

      so who gives a shit what it really does? your car is not a stunt vehicle either, despite what you see in movies

    4. Re:How will they know? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      They can probably just ask the NSA. They probably would know.

    5. Re: How will they know? by houghi · · Score: 1

      If itis sms, the confirmation is standard. And if it is sendvia interwebs, it will also be. Justan ACK. of sorts.

      Well, as long as you can buy guns, you arefree, right?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re: How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If itis sms, the confirmation is standard. And if it is sendvia interwebs, it will also be. Justan ACK. of sorts.

      Jesus, a 5-digit ID, and no idea how the Preview button works.

    7. Re:How will they know? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Be sure to call just the landlines.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    8. Re:How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you under the impression they won't lie?

    9. Re:How will they know? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't answer the question, the question is how many people received the message, not how many should have received the message.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re: How will they know? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Are we playing the game of Questions?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    11. Re: How will they know? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      He is suffering from covfefe withdrawal.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    12. Re:How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why even worry? seriously, texting designed for 99% percent casual and occasional comm like "booty calls" and "pick up milk & eggs on way home"

      never intended to communicate to ALL FUCKING CUSTOMERS AT ONCE, and not intended to warn people in emergency.

      so who gives a shit what it really does? your car is not a stunt vehicle either, despite what you see in movies

      Neither was TV, or radio, or mail, or carrier pigeons.

      Doesn't mean it's not a good idea to use something for what it wasn't designed for.

    13. Re: How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My butthole hurts. I spent the night in one of trumps penthouses last night. Boy does he have a big juicy cock.

    14. Re: How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, tv, radio, and mail were all designed for that purpose.

    15. Re:How will they know? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      why even worry? seriously, texting designed for 99% percent casual and occasional comm

      Is that what was actually the design intention of the system that we now use for SMS? It wasn't even mentioned when I first got a phone (1994 or 95, IIRC ; certainly several years before I got a 486 or a CD drive) and it was several months before I knew enough people with a mobile phone to discover that SMS was actually quite useful. Then the story was that it was a system primarily designed for network diagnostics, but to everyone (of the GSM system's designers) it was surprising that the very limited message length did not greatly deter people from using it. But hey, if you've got a link to one of the design specification proposals for GSM - which would date to around 1990 - saying what the purpose of SMS was, that'll be great.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    16. Re:How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we can just assume that every phone connected to the network received the message, then what the fuck was the point of waking me up early today?

  9. Phone will be off... by spywhere · · Score: 1

    ...and in several static bags.

    1. Re:Phone will be off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you use extra static. Also get out that tin foil hat while your at it.

    2. Re:Phone will be off... by kackle · · Score: 1

      FYI, I hear that inside of microwave oven and clothes-washing/drying machines block signals. The microwave oven worked for my cellular test.

  10. Please no by Frank+Burly · · Score: 1

    I don't want to see Yeti Toad.

  11. Covfefe Prevails. by InfiniteBlaze · · Score: 1

    Bigly.

  12. Well I guess it's still better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...than the test of this alternative system.

  13. how long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...before this is abused by the petulant child currently occupying the oval office?

    1. Re:how long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot meet kettle.

    2. Re: how long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the OP a president? He isn't? Hmmmm says a lot about a guy YOU voted for. When you think him and OP have the same temperament.

  14. Country not participating by stooo · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you should rather research which countries are "not participating" and consider them for your future settlement...

    --
    aaaaaaa
    1. Re:Country not participating by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      Good idea. There are plenty of excellent alternatives with a similar flavor but less of the artificial ingredients.

  15. I will turn mine off by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Of course the sirens will be going off at 2pm eastern anyway, its the first wednesday of the month.

    What happens if your phone is in airplane mode?

    2pm EDT (1pm CDT) is sleep time for me - I work nights

    1. Re:I will turn mine off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens if your phone is in airplane mode?

      Obviously it won't work.

      I work nights

      Me too. Amber alerts are only annoying at 3am and don't wake us up, so there is that.

    2. Re:I will turn mine off by rossdee · · Score: 1

      > Amber alerts are only annoying at 3am

      Obviously this is a RED ALERT not an amber one
      (cue TOS sound fx)

    3. Re:I will turn mine off by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      2pm EDT (1pm CDT) is sleep time for me - I work nights

      Well, at least you won't have to worry about being woken up when Trump accidentally sends one of these out at 3am instead of a tweet.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:I will turn mine off by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      I'll go and change the bulb right now.

  16. Radios off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't people switch off the radios when not in the middle of using them? Airplane mode saves absolutely huge oodles of battery life AND prevents a lot of unneeded device location tracking from which towers you are connected to. I routinely get a week of normal usage between charges if I keep the radios and GPS off.

    How would this work with devices that have switched off their radios? Have they put in some kind of radio-back-door?

    1. Re:Radios off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't people switch off the radios when not in the middle of using them?

      No, no they don't. Do you know why? So that people can actually REACH THEM. Some of us here actually have a life with people who actually need to reach us once in a while.

    2. Re:Radios off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do too.. but not while driving or walking around.

      Whatever did you all do before cell phones were a thing anyway? You know, when people couldn't phone you up when you were in the middle of the expressway?

  17. Remember when.... by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember when in 2006 the law was updated every was certain Bush would use to spam their cellphones with unblockable political spam? Then when cell companies started turning on the feature, how Obama was certain to use it for political spam?

    Don't disappoint me /. Keep the dream alive!

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:Remember when.... by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

      No, I don't remember when Obama used it for political spam. Could you please cite sources?

    2. Re:Remember when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're serious, you may want to slow down and re-read the comment.

    3. Re:Remember when.... by deKernel · · Score: 1

      Might want to brush up on your reading skills. He was pointing out to all of the tin foil wearing people that the system was never abused by any President.

    4. Re:Remember when.... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      You might want to start here

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    5. Re:Remember when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why abuse this when you have the IRS and FBI at your disposal.

    6. Re:Remember when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Obama was trying to help us with those messages. Keeping McCain out of the White House was important.

  18. Aint this beautiful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The test, originally planned for last month but delayed by Hurricane Florence, is the culmination of many years of work.

    LOL.
    Will it be delayed when the real thing comes?

  19. Why the delays? by schure · · Score: 2

    The GSM protocol includes a broadcasting feature that overrides all other transmissions in order to deliver emergency messages to all cellphones simultaneously. Why then the delays?

    1. Re: Why the delays? by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Informative

      > The GSM protocol includes a broadcasting feature that overrides all other transmission
      > in order to deliver emergency messages to all cellphones simultaneously.
      > Why then the delays?

      Because roughly half the cell phones in America have historically been CDMA devices, not GSM. CDMA generally had comparable functionality (on paper, at least), but wasn't literally identical.

      Compounding the problem, major parts of CDMA's functionality was officially "optional" & left up to the carrier to pick & choose. Qualcomm intentionally allowed Sprint & Verizon to implement CDMA in slightly-incompatible ways... and Sprint & Verizon liked that, because it meant that even a theoretically-unlocked phone from one network would be forever crippled & dysfunctional on the other, EVEN IF a user managed to get it activated somehow.

      Ultimately, it was (mostly) Apple & Google who put an end to much of the silliness. Blackberry & Sidekick mitigated it... but only for THEIR devices... and used their mitigations as a way to try and lock out Palm & Microsoft. The main thing that saved Apple & Google was Microsoft's purchase of Danger & subsequent willingness to license out their patent pool on fair & non-discriminatory terms (and why Microsoft makes more in profits from the sale of an iPhone or Android phone than it ever did from the sale of a Windows Mobile phone).

  20. Almost as annoying as by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    the three times a week emergency test on my TV.

    Or the amber alerts that are from somewhere else in my state 400 miles away,

    The real test of their system will be the ability to block
    Reply All to the messages. /s

    1. Re:Almost as annoying as by Rastl · · Score: 1

      the three times a week emergency test on my TV.

      Or the amber alerts that are from somewhere else in my state 400 miles away,

      The real test of their system will be the ability to block Reply All to the messages. /s

      You can disable amber alerts on some/most phone carriers. You can do the same thing with weather alerts even though Sprint seems to have stopped sending those. But you can't disable or block the Presidential ones.

    2. Re:Almost as annoying as by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Damn! I would donate a testicle to see a reply all feature for such a system. The cataclysmic avalanche of people replying all to ask they be removed, and others trying to publicly shout them down would be worth just about any price.

    3. Re:Almost as annoying as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't disable or block the Presidential ones

      LOL, of course you can. What you meant to say is that YOU don't know how to disable them.

    4. Re:Almost as annoying as by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      Actually, it turns out that just about any Android phone can opt out. Several of my co-workers did not get the alert because they had turned off Amber alerts in their phones' settings.

  21. Appropriate Soundtrack by Millennium · · Score: 1

    Here's Carl Orff's "O Fortuna" from Carmina Burana. For best results, start plating at 2:17:36 Eastern, preferably in an environment with a lot of cell phones.

    Then sit back and brace for the Toad pic to come.

  22. Pandemic? by Mspangler · · Score: 1

    This wouldn't seem to be at all useful in a pandemic. It's not like they spread that fast.

    If you are in the affected area of a earthquake you would already know, but for an incoming tsunami it would certainly be useful. I sure hope they don't go crazy with this. I turned off the other alerts due to too many stupid alarms. 35 mph does not rate a high wind warning.

    1. Re:Pandemic? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      This is basically for nuclear war or incoming asteroid end-of-the-world type of events that affect a large swath of the country and that may not propagate via news coverage fast enough for people to prepare. No president has ever used it. Even on 9/11 they chose not to use it as they felt news coverage was sufficient. It's been around for a long time with TV and radio. They added it to cell service back in 2013 (by law passed in 2006).

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:Pandemic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A perfect system for a large Yellowstone eruption. The states should really have a targettable but coordinated version of the system for those smaller tsunamis and terrorist attacks, if this federal system can't be utilized so. Alerting the whole East Coast for a West Coast earth quake would probably just lead to the collapse of the cell phone service.

    3. Re: Pandemic? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      A message warning about an earthquake arriving in 4 seconds still has merit... if nothing else, it increases the likelihood that your phone (and for women, your purse) will be in your hand (rather than 7 feet away) when the earthquake strikes, maximizing your likelihood of being able to use it to call for help if you get partially buried under debris (or at least ensuring that you're ready to grab the phone and/or purse a moment later, instead of having to stop & think about it).

    4. Re:Pandemic? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      They already have that. There are three levels of alerts. Amber alert (for missing kids), Emergency Alerts, and Presidential Alerts (I think Android splits the emergency alerts into two sub categories). The Amber alerts and emergency alerts are targetable, while the presidential alerts are nation wide. You can also turn off the amber and emergency alerts, but not the presidential alerts (without hacked firmware).

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  23. Seit 5.45 Uhr wird zurückgeschossen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See you on the other side.

  24. Up to 30 minutes to warn of a "dire threat" by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    It could take up to 30 minutes for the alerts to be transmitted to all devices.

    Two questions:

    1. Have we flushed broadcast messages THAT far down the architectural memory hole?
    2. Who in the world designed a system for this sort of purpose with that sort of potential latency?

    1. Re:Up to 30 minutes to warn of a "dire threat" by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you do realize the cellular texting systems were designed for

      meet u 4 lnch

      and similar, not a national communication system

    2. Re:Up to 30 minutes to warn of a "dire threat" by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Given that we're several generations down the road both in design and bandwidth, it would be extremely disappointing if "cellular texting systems" (and I presume by that you mean something like SMS) are the mechanism being used for something like this. Did you have a definitive source you forgot to paste in?

    3. Re:Up to 30 minutes to warn of a "dire threat" by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Everything rolls out in batches now. Where did you get the idea that simultaneity is a wanted condition? Up to 30 minutes to distribute to hundreds of millions is excellent scalability. Quantity has a quality all its own.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:Up to 30 minutes to warn of a "dire threat" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not using SMS. It's using an entirely different system. For example, SMS messages are limited to 160 bytes, while these WEA messages are limited to 90 bytes. This is one of the reasons they're so useless, because they can't include hyperlinks and can't include a lot of text. (The Wikipedia article mentions that they intend to increase that to 360 characters by the end of 2019.)

      But yes, they're basically glorified text messages sent through a special government system.

    5. Re:Up to 30 minutes to warn of a "dire threat" by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      you do realize the cellular texting systems were designed for

      meet u 4 lnch

      True, and it shows they're not really with it and happening and hellow fellow kids. If they had any sense, they'd send out YouTube alerts rather than text messages, it's what the cool kids are doing.

      Hi, President [Placeholder] here with an important message for the entire country, we're going to be talking about some frightening stuff that's going to happen to all of you in just a few minutes, but first I want to say hello to our sponsors, Dollar Shave Club, who are bringing this alert to you today. Dollar Shave has some awesome gear to keep that face smooth and fresh, and if you wait until the end of this message, they've got an exclusive message just for our viewers. So, uh, stay on to the end! OK, now, let's talk about the alert, yes, the alert, now some of you may be aware that we're currently not having a friendly relationship with China, I mean, we've put some tariffs on some of their goods, they've put some on our's, there's that whole lead painted iPhones thing, and, well, one thing's lead to another, and YES, it looks like they've launched some nuclear weapons. Mostly at the West Coast, so those of you in Seattle, well, you're screwed. Californians, you might want to high tail it out of there if you're in San Diego, Angelians you might as well stay put, the traffic's going to keep you there anyway, am I right? So yes, West Coast, Nuke coming your way. Now we are sending some Nukes their way of course, so if you have friends in China, you probably want to call them now and say goodbye. Alright. Well, that's the alert. Brought to you by Dollar Shave Club, if you go to their website right now and punch in the code SAVE10, you can get 10% off your very next order. That code again, SAVE10. Right, that's all I have today, if you like alerts like this, don't forget to subscribe! We'll see you next time, unless you're on the West Coast of course! See you soon!"

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Up to 30 minutes to warn of a "dire threat" by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Everything rolls out in batches now. Where did you get the idea that simultaneity is a wanted condition?

      I have absolutely no idea where I got the idea that anyone would want to notify everyone in the nation about a nationwide "dire threat" as quickly as humanly possible. You can't be serious.

      Up to 30 minutes to distribute to hundreds of millions is excellent scalability.

      Says who? Compared to what? Under what set of assumptions? You can't be serious.

      Quantity has a quality all its own.

      Yup, you're not serious.

    7. Re:Up to 30 minutes to warn of a "dire threat" by Gornkleschnitzer · · Score: 1

      The only way to make this more perfect is if it included an overly long intro jingle and a few requests to "Like up this video and leave a comment on where you think the nuke's gonna hit first!"

      "And don't forget to hit that bell icon to make sure you're notified of our next nuke strike!"

  25. This is a test... crooked Hillary.. no collusion.. by KingTank · · Score: 1

    ...blah blah blah...

  26. Re:Please tell me this has to run through committe by KingTank · · Score: 0

    Nope. Get ready for "no collusion" texts 30 times a day.

  27. Notice you get texts when you turn your phone on? by raymorris · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you ever noticed that when you turn your phone on after it has been off all day, you receive texts that were sent hours earlier? That's because the carrier doesn't just send it out to you and hope that you got it, the phone acknowledges receiving the message. Until the message is acknowledged as received, the carrier keeps it to retry later.

  28. I can opt out by TomBauserman · · Score: 2

    Leave my fucking phone off that afternoon.

  29. Re:Please tell me this has to run through committe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What absolute nonsense. Can't believe people think like you.

  30. Re:Please tell me this has to run through committe by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the president is able to use this at his discretion, without supervision, we all need to prepare ourselves for a whole lot of pain. That orange buffoon won't be able to resist the urge to constantly inundate all cell phone users with an endless stream of what he deems "important information" but is really just a constant spouting of nonsense.

    You realize this is a test of an existing system, right? The alerts have been around on radio and TV going back to before most of us were born and on cell phones since 2013.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  31. The new twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really think this is going to turn in to the new presidential twitter!

  32. what ??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    omg! so trump can tweet at even us who dont use twitter now ?

  33. Re:Please tell me this has to run through committe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the president is able to use this at his discretion, without supervision, we all need to prepare ourselves for a whole lot of pain. That orange buffoon won't be able to resist the urge to constantly inundate all cell phone users with an endless stream of what he deems "important information" but is really just a constant spouting of nonsense.

    You realize this is a test of an existing system, right? The alerts have been around on radio and TV going back to before most of us were born and on cell phones since 2013.

    You realize that Trump has repeatedly demonstrated doesn't understand any part of his job, what tools are available or what their appropriate use and scope are, right? Or that he has constantly spit in the face of every long held presidential tradition and mannerism? I doubt Trump even remembered or knew this existed and it's a joke to believe he won't abuse it. There's nothing Trump won't do for attention and to pander to his base. Absolutely nothing.

  34. No, and you don't either. Because they DID. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, and you don't either. Because they DID.

    1. Re:No, and you don't either. Because they DID. by EvilSS · · Score: 2

      No, and you don't either. Because they DID.

      Really? Bush and Obama both used the national presidential alert system to send political messages? Are you sure it wasn't just the CIA beaming then directly to your brain from their satellite?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:No, and you don't either. Because they DID. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Signals don't go directly into your brain, they're transmitted from a receiver installed in your teeth during one of your dental visits.

  35. GSM broadcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why not use the existing features in the standard?

    Back when the GSM standard was designed, people (companies/countries?) contributed ideas. Japan requested a broadcast system and it made it into the standard. It's there but nobody outside of Japan really thought about it.

    Fast forward to March 2011. A major earthquake hit off the coast of Japan. Sensors at the bottom detected the earthquake and now a high speed race started. An earthquake moves at the speed of sound. Optic fiber connections transfers at the speed of light. The information is forwarded to the phone system and antennas goes into broadcast mod and transmit the message "major earthquake approaching". The phone system doens't have the capacity to send an sms to each phone. Instead it transmit a specially encoded sms message, which is received by any phone within range, like multiple TVs all receiving the same signal from the same TV transmitter.

    This system warned people, but also machines. Elevators stopped, opened the doors and pushed thick metal rods into the walls, ensuring that they wouldn't drop even if the cable failed. Trains went into emergency braking and so on. This worked and with everything important in safety mode when the earthquake hit land, the damage was minimal.

    Next the broadcast system was used again, this time to warn about a tsunami. Most of the damage and possibly all deaths were caused by water, not the earthquake itself. Still it could have been much worse if people haven't been warned as it resulted in lots of people running for the hills.

    This made people outside of Japan aware of GSM broadcast and started questioning why only Japan used it. It's in the standard and everybody should be able to use it.

    Now more than 7 years later, we should be impressed by a system, which use 30 minutes to alert people?

  36. Tornado alerts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the tornado warnings I suddenly started getting on my cellphone were annoying and non-specific. After the tornado destroyed my local power sub-station, I changed my attitude.

  37. Alert! It’s not Hillary! That is all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.

  38. Trump's new Twitter? by macraig · · Score: 1

    Awaiting Trump's first abuse of this system in five.. four.. three.. two.. one....

  39. In other words ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

    ... screw the rural Bubbas who voted for the pussy-grabber.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  40. Hypnotoad by Zorro · · Score: 1

    All Hail Hypnotoad.

    You must comply with his message at 11:18 PDT.

  41. Boycott by SteveR · · Score: 1

    Turn your phone off at 2:17 pm.

    1. Re:Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Boycott! Turn your phone off at 2:17 pm.

      It is not possible to turn off the phone agains such master-pushed messages per se. If the device has a non-removable battery, as is the case with many "fashionable" smartphones nowadays, then it will automatically turn itself on upon special reception, it's written in the standard. Only removal of battery and charger cord would stop a phone from receiving presidental messages.

  42. useful message? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides a test, what useful message could be broadcast simultaneously to over 300 million people spread across 3.8 million square miles?

    Does this give its broadcaster a loc snapshot of every cellphone that received the message?

  43. Re:Notice you get texts when you turn your phone o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can confirm...
    In spotty cell area on 1 of the major US carriers.
    I end up getting the same text messages, multiple times...

  44. This is the POTUS, and Hypnotoad is the pOnOs by tepples · · Score: 1

    PDT? That's the time zone for Redmond, Washington, right? If "Hypnotoad" is in any way related to Stormy Daniels' nickname for the President's intimate body part, then I can think of one company in Redmond that won't be impressed. And it isn't Microsoft.

  45. CORRECTION for android users. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Informative

    cellphones across the country that run stock roms will receive this alert. anyone running lineageOS or other roms can disable the presidential alert.

    And im sure ill get a shitstorm of people telling me this isnt wise, but let me clarify. after Amber alerts basically turned EAS into a carnival of CYA by local cops hoping to keep their budget another year, I decided to disable them on my EAS receiver, where I can also disable presidential alerts.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:CORRECTION for android users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am running lineageOS, have the presidential alert setting turned off and still received it.

    2. Re:CORRECTION for android users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was able to disable the CMAS app on a Galaxy S6 using Package Disabler Pro. Not rooted, stock ROM. I was pretty happy this test was coming, since I was able to see that it did get disabled fully.

    3. Re:CORRECTION for android users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after Amber alerts basically turned EAS into a carnival of CYA by local cops hoping to keep their budget another year

      Yep... up in Ontario we recently had a similar emergency alert system put in place recently. The very first alert sent out was an amber alert for a missing child up near Thunder Bay, and I actually received it multiple times (including a French version). I believe the entire province got the alerts, including me and everyone else in Ottawa, 1500 kilometers away. I immediately disabled amber alerts.

    4. Re:CORRECTION for android users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Amber alerts basically turned EAS into a carnival of CYA by local cops hoping to keep their budget another year

      This is certainly just the same thing beginning with the Presidential alert.

      When I first heard about it and how it can't be disabled, I was kind of OK with it given that they'd never used it for anything. It can't really hurt to have some means to warn of alien invasion should it ever occur. However, today I'm reading the FEMA twitter feed where they say something like "it can't be turned off but it'll only go off for major emergencies you need to care about." Except that they already fucked that up by setting it off for a fucking test.

      Clearly someone was looking at this and just saw it as another tool in their toolbox that they should be using and devised this test to put it to some use, and in the future they're just going to keep finding new uses for it because clearly some idiot is now in charge who can't look at it and say "no, that's only for real emergencies." The only question now is how quickly we'll slide to having weekly tests and monthly alerts for shit no one cares about.

    5. Re:CORRECTION for android users. by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      Actually, it turns out that just about any Android phone can opt out. Several of my co-workers did not get the alert because they had turned off Amber alerts in their phones' settings. No special OS required.

    6. Re:CORRECTION for android users. by antdude · · Score: 1

      What about jail breaking iOS for iPhones? Is that possible?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  46. Concentrated power instead of checks and balances by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The saddest part of all that is that while I expect liberals to maybe disagree (or at least be ambivalent) about that, I sure as fuck expect conservatives to be 100% behind your statement without the slightest hesitation. IMHO it's the very core of conservativism, moreso than even "low taxes" or "states' rights." It's right up there with preferring free markets over central planning, since it's a variant of the same underlying idea: mistrust of power, fear of arrogant power.

    But Republicans disagree with you, and worse, they disagree even more than Democrats do. It's one of the reasons (among several, especially since 2016) I'd plot 'em as being left of Democrats.

    You know what grinds my gears? When Republicans say they're conservative. That's just a plain lie. Republicans, stop fucking lying about being right-wing. You're not. If you were right-wing, you'd either be voting Libertarian or Democrat. Embrace your radical liberalism, Republicans. Come out of the closet. I guarantee that Democrats will let you use "their" bathroom.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  47. What happens when the system gets hacked? by TangoCharlie · · Score: 2

    This system had better be secure, because how much chaos could be achieved by 'bad actor' if they were able to broadcast a fake message (like an impending nuclear strike)? I suppose it'll keep the NK and Russian hackers busy for a while...

    --
    return 0; }
  48. Re: Concentrated power instead of checks and balan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Projection much?

  49. Re:Notice you get texts when you turn your phone o by raind · · Score: 1

    No, I never turn my phone off!

    --
    Get up!
  50. Re: Concentrated power instead of checks and balan by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    Are you saying distrust of concentrated power means I'm a closet liberal?

    I'm the guy with the reversed right/left axis?!

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  51. No opting out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just unclicked the presidential alerts button, just like I did with the AMBER alerts.

    Not using android? Your loss.

  52. Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big Giant Orange Head lied in a statement today! He said something ignorant/sexist/racist/offensive! He praised himself!

    Alert! Alert! Alert!

    Big Giant Orange Head speaks nonsense! Space Force! Tariffs are good! Covfefe! We have the Best People!

    Alert!

    Big Giant Orange Head praises a dictator! Then goes on to trash the democratic leader of a friend and ally!

    Alert! Alert!

  53. Worth? by kackle · · Score: 1

    What I don't understand about such a system is that you can't trust it by itself, so its worth seems dubious. No matter what it tells you, you pretty much have to confirm the information in another way - it seems too easily hack-able or prone to error (whether it really is or not). And talk about a single point of failure/Russian hacking concerns...

    I fear this system will cause more problems than it's worth.

  54. In protest ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... I'm going dark at that time.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  55. Re:CORRECTION for android users. - INSIGHTFUL by gavron · · Score: 1

    Thank you for that insightful and informative reply. You're 100% right. My LineageOS 15 phone will -not- be displaying any orange messages today or any other day.

    Thank you Free and Open Source Software for allowing US to decide what to do with OUR device. I did not "purchase a public address speaker" for our elected criminals.

    E

  56. just follow the sound by renegade600 · · Score: 2

    wonder how many people will be fired today for sneaking in phones into their workplace.

    wonder how many people will run off the road because some high pitch sound startled them while driving.

    wonder how many people will drop their phone because they were scared silly by a high pitch sound.

    it is going to get interesting...they really did not do a good job advertising the test.

    1. Re:just follow the sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darwin at work. To weed out the wimpy ones.

    2. Re:just follow the sound by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      wonder how many people will run off the road because some high pitch sound startled them while driving.

      I hope 100% of them. Any idiot startled by a sound while driving should hand in their license, or at least not drive a car newer than about the late 80s given that most cars have some high pitched alert tone.

    3. Re:just follow the sound by bwd777 · · Score: 1

      I wonder who wrote the book of love.

  57. Waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for a hacker to connect this announcement service to Trump's Twitter account. Best way for Trump to lose the next election: make all the electorate read his tweets.

  58. And Done by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    That was strangely freakin' cool.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  59. MESSAGE RECEIVED! by Zorro · · Score: 1

    KILL ALL HUMANS

  60. Good news... by Topmounter · · Score: 1

    I disabled all Emergency Alerts on my Pixel XL (Pie) and the test alert did not come through. I left Emergency Alerts activated on my 8+ and got the alert. If Twitter perma-bans Trump, you know what will happen :-)

  61. not as bad as feared by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Phone made noise but not horrible. Basic message this is a test with no need to respond. phew, at least not a long screaming diatribe about Hillary and Obama.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:not as bad as feared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I left my phone on, curious as to what it would be like, and it did absolutely nothing until I interacted with it just now. And contrary to what is implied in TFA, it did not make any noise, honoring my vibrate-only setting.

  62. Re:Please tell me this has to run through committe by barakn · · Score: 1

    You've wallpapered over an important distinction. For radio and tv, the test was for the broadcaster. It was not a test to see if every radio and tv in the country was capable of receiving the broadcast signal. Nobody forced all tv and radio users to turn on their tvs and radios at test time. This is the first time the cell system has been tested nationwide, and cell phones are on almost all the time, so that makes it a fundamentally different test. And one that might get the orange pencildick's attention.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  63. Re:Concentrated power instead of checks and balanc by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    There's nothing leftist about authoritarianism. You're using 1-dimensional political thinking in a political world that has at least 2 dimensions. Today's Republicans and "conservatives" are even further right than they were in 2015, but also much, MUCH more authoritarian.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  64. You have a text: Presidential Alert!! by easyTree · · Score: 1

    I'm locked out of my Twitter account!!!

  65. Re:Concentrated power instead of checks and balanc by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    But Republicans disagree with you, and worse, they disagree even more than Democrats do. It's one of the reasons (among several, especially since 2016) I'd plot 'em as being left of Democrats.

    This is the problem with trying to put all possible political ideologies/practices on a single spectrum. When it comes to economic issues, the Republican party is still farther to the right than the Democratic party (the Democratic party, or at least its leaders and politicians, hasn't been left of center for a few decades, though the voters appear to be pulling back to the left). Republicans are generally still more opposed to corporate regulation than Democrats are, and generally want the tax rate to be lower, which puts them to the right of Democrats.

    Authoritarianism in regards to things other than taxes and commerce is a separate issue. The Republican party tends to be more authoritarian than the Democratic party when it comes to regulating individual, personal behaviors, but, as you point out, both parties are quite happy to increase government power.

  66. Re: Concentrated power instead of checks and balan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stereotypical liberals are black people and hippies, both of whom faced naked, official (and unofficial under color of law) subjugation at the hands of the government. I for one think that the libertarian paradigm of libertarian/authoritarian and left/right as separate axes is overreductive, but your insistence that Right=freedom and Left=Tyranny, especially when you are actively disowning Republicans for their inescapably tyrannic acts, is even more overly simplistic. Consider recent liberal issues: Police Brutality (Black lives matter), legalization of marijuana use, releasing government restrictions on who can get married (IE, Homosexuals with each other). Can you, with a straight face, frame these as centralizing power?

    Liberals do at the same time favor more centralized oversight of the economic system with safeguards to keep people from falling through the cracks, which refutes the idea that they would be anarchists, so it's not about you being a closet leftist either. I'm not sure I concur with the grandparent's use of projection, but the Democrats are the party of conservatism in the modern day, with a strong progressive streak, in that they have the much-vilified corporate wing maintaining the system as it is, with the progressive wing trying to get their agenda past, frequently unsuccessfully despite being held as the only facet of the party. The Republicans, meanwhile, seem to have forsaken their pretenses of stability entirely in the names of corporatism, nationalism, and theocracy. The progressives only wish that the Republicans were left of them, because then they would have a major party fully under their control instead of having a tenuous toehold that they feel is taken for granted (which dissatisfaction kept people home in '16).

  67. Re:Concentrated power instead of checks and balanc by easyTree · · Score: 1

    You're using 1-dimensional political thinking in a political world that has at least 2 dimensions

    Lucky for us we live in a two-dimensional world otherwise politics would be of no use.

  68. FAKE NEWS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Help! Help! Timmy O'Toole has fallen down the well!

  69. I didn't get one. by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    I feel all left out.

    Was it something I posted on Slashdot?

  70. I feel deprived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't get it. Probably blocked by noroot.

  71. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  72. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  73. Was spared an alert by vdc · · Score: 1

    My stock, unrooted, unmodified Android phone did not get the alert, so I recommend you upgrade to Android version 4.4.4.

  74. I just don't care to get these messages. Need out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really care who implemented it. I haven't had to listen to radio or TV alerts for years for the most part and am glad of it.
    I suppose it is fine to have the alerts for those who want them, but I don't.
    I would prefer to check a box to opt-out.

  75. Re:Please tell me this has to run through committe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is entirely different and we all know that amber alerts cause major upheaval when they go off. It would be better for a child to die then that rest of the world to suffer from these things every time it happens! It doesn't bother me near as much as it is a problem for some.

  76. Re: Notice you get texts when you turn your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they can't be redownloaded. But I'm in Canada, so maybe that's your provider.

  77. he's talkin bout phones, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one is forcing your personal computer to display this message (and if they were, open source obviously would be the solution, yadda yadda yadda).

    He said handheld PCs, so he means phones/tablets. Those DO force your loss of control. Open source phone systems are not feasible yet, but they should eventually be. Maybe. If we legislate the manufacturers stop locking bootloaders. The only way to disable those 3am amber alerts is to root your phone and disable that alert app which for normal folks is not very easy. The legality is also questionable. I don't give 2 shits. I root all my phones and delete that annoying app. I don't care if the pres needs to get that info out there, as you put it. I'm not stopping him. But I sure as fuck DO NOT HAVE TO LISTEN TO HIM!

    TLDR: As supplied by your carrier, you DO NOT have autonomy over the operation, monitoring, or performance of your portable personal computing device.

    1. Re:he's talkin bout phones, stupid by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      No one is forcing your personal computer to display this message (and if they were, open source obviously would be the solution, yadda yadda yadda).

      He said handheld PCs, so he means phones/tablets. Those DO force your loss of control. Open source phone systems are not feasible yet, but they should eventually be. Maybe. If we legislate the manufacturers stop locking bootloaders. The only way to disable those 3am amber alerts is to root your phone and disable that alert app which for normal folks is not very easy. The legality is also questionable. I don't give 2 shits. I root all my phones and delete that annoying app. I don't care if the pres needs to get that info out there, as you put it. I'm not stopping him. But I sure as fuck DO NOT HAVE TO LISTEN TO HIM!

      TLDR: As supplied by your carrier, you DO NOT have autonomy over the operation, monitoring, or performance of your portable personal computing device.

      Buried in your rant is the key: If your device communicates via cell tower and can make a POTS call, it's subject to the various relevant FCC regulations here, which are basically just extrapolations from the FCC's regulations on licensed radio spectrum for TV and radio broadcast. Your iPod Touch, Amazon Kindle, or iPad *without* cell/SIM connectivity is unaffected by this --- *those* are "handheld PC's" from a regulatory perspective. Cell phones are not. If you don't like that, replace your smartphone with a dumb "regular" phone and purchase a tablet/phablet/handheld device that doesn't have a CDMA/GSM/cell radio transmitter.

  78. Re:Please tell me this has to run through committe by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    This test was a test of the cell providers equipment. No one forced anyone to turn their phones on during the test. You are also glossing over the fact that radio and TV were far more ubiquitous in the past before the internet and streaming. A president would have a captive audience of almost every household during US prime time when TV shows could get cancelled for having viewer numbers higher than the major networks get in total in a broadcast week these days. Nearly everyone in the nation would be watching TV or, before that, listening to the radio in the evenings. And stations have no discretion in airing these alerts. Heck for the past, what, 4 decades or so they didn't even have a choice, the system installed is automated.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  79. CORRECTION; it was a "presidential alert" by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    > Yep... up in Ontario we recently had a similar emergency alert system
    > put in place recently. The very first alert sent out was an amber alert

    Correction; it was sent at "Presidential Alert" level ("Emergency Alert" in Canada) being (ab)used to send an "Amber Alert" message. They cannot be turned off in a phone with a stock ROM. My phone has the following alert levels...

    * Emergency (cannot turn off)
    * Extreme
    * Severe
    * AMBER
    * WPAS Test alerts

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  80. Re: Concentrated power instead of checks and bala by kenh · · Score: 1

    Consider recent liberal issues: Police Brutality (Black lives matter), legalization of marijuana use, releasing government restrictions on who can get married (IE, Homosexuals with each other). Can you, with a straight face, frame these as centralizing power?

    Odd you left out the defining liberal issue of the past ten years, Healthcare, which is, at itâ(TM)s core, about centralizing power by defining what must be covered, what premiums can be charged, and how profitable insurance companies can be.

    --
    Ken