What does a "win" at the BBB give you? They're not a government agency. The worst they can do is take away Comcast's BBB accreditation or A+ rating.
Not that BBB complaints are useless—I used them with Blue Cross once, and it allowed me to get in touch with a different department of the company that was able to resolve my claims. However, the BBB itself had no real power to help me.
Buildings have a useful lifetime, and become prohibitively expensive... obsolete plumbing, electrical, heating cooling, insulation.
Those things can all be upgraded. Within the past few years, I've upgraded all of those systems in my century-old house to modern standards, spending orders of magnitude less than we would have to construct a new house of comparable finish and quality.
All mechanical systems have lifespans far shorter than the structures themselves. Even copper or plastic pipes will fail with time. Repair is almost always cheaper than tearing down and rebuilding.
What basis do you have for the claim that we "couldn't even begin to recreate" those structures? There are certainly some ancient structures for which we haven't figured out how they were constructed with the technology available at the time, but nothing that we couldn't reproduce with today's technology.
The sticking point isn't technology—it's economics. A large portion of recent development has been around cost-effectiveness. This is why we're able to have so many more material possessions, even in the face of stagnant wages (for most classes). Of course, many (including myself) would argue that we've gone too far in this direction at the expense of durability, but that's an economic choice we've made. Look hard enough, and you can find any product that meets your durability specifications—if you're willing to pay the higher price.
That being said, I do agree with the sentiment that there is more than survivor bias at work. My house was built in 1916, and has an unusually open floor plan for its age. Lacking CAD, the builders accomplished this by massively overbuilding—the floor joists (with are already quite thick) rest on beams comprised of four 2x10's laminated together. Despite its age, this house feels more solid than just about any other wood-framed building I've been in. I have no doubt that if it were placed alongside a newly-constructed house and both left to nature, that the 99-year-old house would remain intact longer.
There's likely someone else on a nearby IP address with a misbehaving mail server, and your IP address is collateral damage. While they might not be able to fix your problem, the reputation of the IP addresses that they hand out is at least partially your ISP's responsibility.
The problem with supporting multiple init systems is that each package that provides a daemon needs to support all of them. A traditional init script is just a shell script, while upstart and systemd have their own formats. You could write software to convert an upstart or systemd script to a shell script, but there would likely be cases where it wouldn't be easy to translate automatically.
With filesystems, applications don't need to know anything about what's mounted how and where—you could mount/var on a btrfs partition on LVM2,/home over NFS,/tmp on an ext2 ramdisk,/usr on a read-only CD-ROM,/etc on a floppy... and everything would just work (albeit slowly because of some of my hypothetical choices).
The smart watches I've seen aren't meant to be used independently - they're used in conjunction with a smartphone. I'm not sure I want one, but I can see the appeal of - you can read a text, see who's calling, and perform simple functions without pulling out your phone.
If you step on the brake it will overcome the accelerator every time no matter how hard you rev the engine.
I have a counterexample:
5-6 years ago, I was driving my wife's 1997 Ford Taurus when the accelerator pedal stuck to the floor. I pressed the break as hard as I could (both feet and as much of my 220 pound weight that I could put on it from a seated position), but we continued to accelerate. Thankfully, I was able to put the car in neutral before we crashed into anything. I coasted to the center turn lane, put on the e-brake, and sat there calming down, with the engine redlining until I shut it off.
I know with 100% certainty that I wasn't pressing the wrong pedal - the accelerator was still stuck to the floor after I got help from a cop to push the car into a parking lot. This was a mechanical issue (not many manufacturers were doing drive-by-wire throttle back in 1997); the engine had just been rebuilt, and the shop must have reinstalled the cable incorrectly - among other things they screwed up.
This car was fairly old (probably 130k miles at that point), but the brakes were well-maintained, and they were four-wheel disc.
You might be right for some - perhaps most - instances, but not 100%, as my experience proves.
As for programming software for one - don't bother. There's so many variants that it's easier to aim for an Android or iOS.
Also, there's no money there. The people that own feature phones have them because they either can't afford a smartphone, or they don't want to learn how to use one. Neither market segment is particularly prone to purchasing apps, and they're not as valuable to advertisers.
Sounds plausible to me. Keep in mind that many of those customers - especially in rural areas - have no other option for high-speed Internet, so the buyer is also receiving a near-monopoly.
I'm sure that the TOS offers a way for this to happen outside of the customers' control. Even if not, they could just say, "Sorry, Mr. Comcast Customer, we're not longer servicing your address. If you would like to continue receiving cable service, please sign up with SpinCo."
I'm sure that the "well, at least no lives were lost!" response will fly really well when a patch causes the company to lose $100,000 in worker productivity.
I have enough education to know that there hundreds of "west coasts" in the world. I also live in West Michigan, so I could easily interpret "west cost" to mean the eastern shore of Lake Michigan.
However, I also have the skill of inference. Given that this is being posted on a U.S.-centric forum and the reference is being made in the context of a time of day, I was able to reason out that in this case, "west cost" does in fact refer to the Pacific timezone.
Let me guess: You're not a parent. The best parents are always the ones without children. After they have kids, they realize that their perfect ideas don't work on actual children.
Either that, or you've been blessed with an angel of a child. It happens, but it's far from guaranteed.
Re:Here's the key phrase
on
Hacking Charisma
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I'd turn that around: "Intelligence is realizing that nobody knows what the fuck they're talking about. Wisdom is realizing that you don't, either."
This isn't going to be pretty. Just as the oil industry uses FUD to create false "uncertainties" about climate science, Ken Ham misrepresents evolutionary science to make it appear that there is a debate. There is no way for a logical person like Nye (who is a mechanical engineer by training, BTW) to effectively counteract Ham's bullshit.
The very fact that this debate is happening is already a win for Ham (and not just because of the millions of dollars that AIG is raking in): The amount of media coverage that this "debate" has received creates the impression that there is a debate to be had - when the basic science is very well-understood and unambiguous. Ham's work is FUD at its finest.
How often do you take cross-country trips? For me, it's at most once or twice per year - renting a vehicle for those times is no problem, especially if my daily driver is cheaper to operate. If you do take such trips frequently, then present EVs are not for you. However, you're among a small minority of the driving population.
By requiring your daily driver to be capable of any situation you can imagine - even if it occurs very infrequently - you're wasting a lot of resources, including your own money.
Never going to happen. Do you really think that average people will be able to manage their own bitcoin wallets with adequate levels of security and reliability?
A bank-managed payment system (i.e. debit/credit cards) will be the ultimate winner.
Because nobody in America wants 20 largish coins in their pants/wallet/purse.
Then carry a single twenty, two tens, or four fives. You should never have more than four singles at a time - if you do, it means that you neglected an opportunity to get closer to exact change.
I don't want 20 paper bills in my wallet either - it would barely fold.
What the city slicker politicians and neo-econazies don't understand is that the 100W bulbs are useful.
You do realize that those "fascist, idiot, city slicker, neo-econazie politicians" you're referring to were in the Bush administration, don't you? (the ban was passed in 2007)
Slashdot Mirror
What does a "win" at the BBB give you? They're not a government agency. The worst they can do is take away Comcast's BBB accreditation or A+ rating.
Not that BBB complaints are useless—I used them with Blue Cross once, and it allowed me to get in touch with a different department of the company that was able to resolve my claims. However, the BBB itself had no real power to help me.
Buildings have a useful lifetime, and become prohibitively expensive... obsolete plumbing, electrical, heating cooling, insulation.
Those things can all be upgraded. Within the past few years, I've upgraded all of those systems in my century-old house to modern standards, spending orders of magnitude less than we would have to construct a new house of comparable finish and quality.
All mechanical systems have lifespans far shorter than the structures themselves. Even copper or plastic pipes will fail with time. Repair is almost always cheaper than tearing down and rebuilding.
What basis do you have for the claim that we "couldn't even begin to recreate" those structures? There are certainly some ancient structures for which we haven't figured out how they were constructed with the technology available at the time, but nothing that we couldn't reproduce with today's technology.
The sticking point isn't technology—it's economics. A large portion of recent development has been around cost-effectiveness. This is why we're able to have so many more material possessions, even in the face of stagnant wages (for most classes). Of course, many (including myself) would argue that we've gone too far in this direction at the expense of durability, but that's an economic choice we've made. Look hard enough, and you can find any product that meets your durability specifications—if you're willing to pay the higher price.
That being said, I do agree with the sentiment that there is more than survivor bias at work. My house was built in 1916, and has an unusually open floor plan for its age. Lacking CAD, the builders accomplished this by massively overbuilding—the floor joists (with are already quite thick) rest on beams comprised of four 2x10's laminated together. Despite its age, this house feels more solid than just about any other wood-framed building I've been in. I have no doubt that if it were placed alongside a newly-constructed house and both left to nature, that the 99-year-old house would remain intact longer.
The Bridge Inspector's Reference Manual does sound like a good way to avoid masturbation.
There's likely someone else on a nearby IP address with a misbehaving mail server, and your IP address is collateral damage. While they might not be able to fix your problem, the reputation of the IP addresses that they hand out is at least partially your ISP's responsibility.
The problem with supporting multiple init systems is that each package that provides a daemon needs to support all of them. A traditional init script is just a shell script, while upstart and systemd have their own formats. You could write software to convert an upstart or systemd script to a shell script, but there would likely be cases where it wouldn't be easy to translate automatically.
With filesystems, applications don't need to know anything about what's mounted how and where—you could mount /var on a btrfs partition on LVM2, /home over NFS, /tmp on an ext2 ramdisk, /usr on a read-only CD-ROM, /etc on a floppy... and everything would just work (albeit slowly because of some of my hypothetical choices).
The smart watches I've seen aren't meant to be used independently - they're used in conjunction with a smartphone. I'm not sure I want one, but I can see the appeal of - you can read a text, see who's calling, and perform simple functions without pulling out your phone.
If you step on the brake it will overcome the accelerator every time no matter how hard you rev the engine.
I have a counterexample:
5-6 years ago, I was driving my wife's 1997 Ford Taurus when the accelerator pedal stuck to the floor. I pressed the break as hard as I could (both feet and as much of my 220 pound weight that I could put on it from a seated position), but we continued to accelerate. Thankfully, I was able to put the car in neutral before we crashed into anything. I coasted to the center turn lane, put on the e-brake, and sat there calming down, with the engine redlining until I shut it off.
I know with 100% certainty that I wasn't pressing the wrong pedal - the accelerator was still stuck to the floor after I got help from a cop to push the car into a parking lot. This was a mechanical issue (not many manufacturers were doing drive-by-wire throttle back in 1997); the engine had just been rebuilt, and the shop must have reinstalled the cable incorrectly - among other things they screwed up.
This car was fairly old (probably 130k miles at that point), but the brakes were well-maintained, and they were four-wheel disc.
You might be right for some - perhaps most - instances, but not 100%, as my experience proves.
I just upgraded from a shitty Android 2.3 device to a Nexus 5 running 4.3. The difference was night and day. Android 4.x is really an impressive OS.
As for programming software for one - don't bother. There's so many variants that it's easier to aim for an Android or iOS.
Also, there's no money there. The people that own feature phones have them because they either can't afford a smartphone, or they don't want to learn how to use one. Neither market segment is particularly prone to purchasing apps, and they're not as valuable to advertisers.
Grammar Nazis should be fine with that sentence, as it is 100% correct - a few billion is definitely more than 13.
Sounds plausible to me. Keep in mind that many of those customers - especially in rural areas - have no other option for high-speed Internet, so the buyer is also receiving a near-monopoly.
I'm sure that the TOS offers a way for this to happen outside of the customers' control. Even if not, they could just say, "Sorry, Mr. Comcast Customer, we're not longer servicing your address. If you would like to continue receiving cable service, please sign up with SpinCo."
I'm sure that the "well, at least no lives were lost!" response will fly really well when a patch causes the company to lose $100,000 in worker productivity.
Many states also don't allow felons to vote. That's much more basic (and non-controversial) than gun ownership.
I have enough education to know that there hundreds of "west coasts" in the world. I also live in West Michigan, so I could easily interpret "west cost" to mean the eastern shore of Lake Michigan.
However, I also have the skill of inference. Given that this is being posted on a U.S.-centric forum and the reference is being made in the context of a time of day, I was able to reason out that in this case, "west cost" does in fact refer to the Pacific timezone.
Let me guess: You're not a parent. The best parents are always the ones without children. After they have kids, they realize that their perfect ideas don't work on actual children.
Either that, or you've been blessed with an angel of a child. It happens, but it's far from guaranteed.
I'd turn that around: "Intelligence is realizing that nobody knows what the fuck they're talking about. Wisdom is realizing that you don't, either."
This isn't going to be pretty. Just as the oil industry uses FUD to create false "uncertainties" about climate science, Ken Ham misrepresents evolutionary science to make it appear that there is a debate. There is no way for a logical person like Nye (who is a mechanical engineer by training, BTW) to effectively counteract Ham's bullshit.
The very fact that this debate is happening is already a win for Ham (and not just because of the millions of dollars that AIG is raking in): The amount of media coverage that this "debate" has received creates the impression that there is a debate to be had - when the basic science is very well-understood and unambiguous. Ham's work is FUD at its finest.
What's wrong with that code snippet? It fulfills the API contract perfectly. Is it the indentation and line-breaks?
(I'm kidding. Your post is going to give me nightmares tonight. Thanks a lot.)
How often do you take cross-country trips? For me, it's at most once or twice per year - renting a vehicle for those times is no problem, especially if my daily driver is cheaper to operate. If you do take such trips frequently, then present EVs are not for you. However, you're among a small minority of the driving population.
By requiring your daily driver to be capable of any situation you can imagine - even if it occurs very infrequently - you're wasting a lot of resources, including your own money.
As long as the people are properly tagged from the farm, they won't be too concerned.
Never going to happen. Do you really think that average people will be able to manage their own bitcoin wallets with adequate levels of security and reliability?
A bank-managed payment system (i.e. debit/credit cards) will be the ultimate winner.
Because nobody in America wants 20 largish coins in their pants/wallet/purse.
Then carry a single twenty, two tens, or four fives. You should never have more than four singles at a time - if you do, it means that you neglected an opportunity to get closer to exact change.
I don't want 20 paper bills in my wallet either - it would barely fold.
What the city slicker politicians and neo-econazies don't understand is that the 100W bulbs are useful.
You do realize that those "fascist, idiot, city slicker, neo-econazie politicians" you're referring to were in the Bush administration, don't you? (the ban was passed in 2007)