Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How To Unblock Email From My Comcast-Hosted Server?

New submitter hawkbug writes For the past 15 years, I have hosted my own email server at home and it's been pretty painless. I had always used a local Denver ISP on a single static IP. Approximately two years ago, I switched to a faster connection, which now is hosted on Comcast. They provide me 5 static IPs and much faster speeds. It's a business connection with no ports blocked, etc. It has been mostly fine these last two years, with the occasional outage due to typical Comcast issues. About two weeks ago, I came across a serious issue. The following email services started rejecting all email from my server: Hotmail, Yahoo, and Gmail. I checked, and my IP is not on any real time blacklists for spammers, and I don't have any security issues. My mail server is not set as an open relay, and I use SPF records and pass all SPF tests. It appears that all three of those major email services started rejecting email from me based on a single condition: Comcast. I can understand the desire to limit spam — but here is the big problem: I have no way to combat this. With Gmail, I can instruct users to flag my emails as "not spam" because the emails actually go through, but simply end up in the spam folder. Yahoo and Hotmail on the other hand, just flat out reject the traffic at lower level. They send rejection notices back to my server that contain "tips" on how to make sure I'm not an open relay, causing spam, etc. Since I am not doing any of those things, I would expect some sort of option to have my IP whitelisted or verified. However, I can not find a single option to do so. The part that bugs me is that this happened two weeks ago with multiple major email services. Obviously, they are getting anti-spam policies from a central location of some kind. I don't know where. If I did, I could possibly go after the source and try to get my IP whitelisted. When I ask my other tech friends what they would do, they simply suggest changing ISPs. Nobody likes Comcast, but I don't have a choice here. I'm two years into a three-year contract. So, moving is not an option. Is there anything I can do to remedy this situation?

405 comments

  1. Call Comcast? by Pope · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a business account, you should have a business support line.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:Call Comcast? by hawkbug · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And say what exactly? They are not the problem. It's the other email providers blocking me simply because I'm on a Comcast IP.

    2. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly.

    3. Re:Call Comcast? by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's likely someone else on a nearby IP address with a misbehaving mail server, and your IP address is collateral damage. While they might not be able to fix your problem, the reputation of the IP addresses that they hand out is at least partially your ISP's responsibility.

    4. Re:Call Comcast? by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Their IP is their management problem. If they were on a spam blocklist, you'd expect to move to another.

      You tell them if you can't send mail from your business account, it's pointless having it.

      Then you terminate the contract because it's now useless and the conditions you can use it under have changed - you can NO LONGER SEND EMAIL.

      Then it's in their court. They can either fix it, or let you out of the contract. If they do neither, you terminate the contract and let them chase you.

    5. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now you know how it feel to be Russian or Chinese and have your mail rejected just because of the ip address you have.

    6. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't the only one on a comcast business connection with an email server, it's in comcast's interests to find and remove the block - and they're in a better position to do so than you are

    7. Re:Call Comcast? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      They are likely to use some kind of block list service. So if you can find out which service that they are using you can get on.

      There is also a possibility that Comcast do a "man in the middle" intervention on your mail traffic that you aren't aware of yet. Check the IP addresses that can be involved, and if you have account on servers elsewhere it might help.

      But often whole net blocks are marked as dynamic addresses in anti-spam services even though they aren't.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    8. Re:Call Comcast? by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Informative

      www.mxtoolbox.com is your friend. Run SMTP tests, and check your static IP against a huge list of known black lists.

      I ran into a similar issue with one of my clients behind an rural business-class DSL connection. They were only black listed from SORBS because their netblock range was dynamic (DUHL). Technically, this was true because their "static IP" was really a sticky IP via DHCP with an indefinite lease. But SORBS doesn't give a shit. You're on the DUHL, you're fucked. Only their ISP can talk to SORBS, not the end-user as I understand it. In the end, the client had to subscribe to a Smart Host to get around this.

      With regards to SORBS; admins don't let admins reference SORBS. Fuck them, and their shitty pompous policies!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:Call Comcast? by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      And say, exactly, "Hi, I have a business account. I can't email my customers who use Yahoo, Hotmail, and Gmail, apparently because those providers are blocking mail originating within Comcast's IP space. This needs to be fixed or your business account is worthless to me and I'll consider it a breach of contract." Work with them. The answer might be to move you to a different block of IP addresses. Or, it might be to forward mail through their servers. There is undoubtedly a solution.

      Also, talk to Yahoo, Hotmail, and Gmail about being blocked. Maybe they can tell you what criteria you're hitting. It may not be Comcast's fault. (I know it seems incredible, but it is a possibility. Really.)

      Lastly, if you can't get satisfaction from Comcast but there really is no alternative ISP that works for you, you can purchase email service from hundreds or thousands of different providers out there. Get an account somewhere else and set up your server to forward through theirs.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    10. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately this is not the case. I tracked it down. The anti spam service blocks all cable company ip address blocks by default. There's no direct appeal process and com-bast will not help

    11. Re:Call Comcast? by Melkhior · · Score: 1

      Explain to them how to fix the problem once and for all:

      1) block outgoing port 25 to everything but their own mail servers;
      2a) add an optional feature in each customer account to reopen outgoing port 25;
      2b) add an optional feature in each customer account to pick the reverse DNS entry;
      3) tell every other ISP/mail servers operators what they have just done,
      so they get un-blacklisted since they won't be sending much spam any more.

      This should block most of the outgoing spam without any side-effects,
      since power users will still be able to operate their own mail servers,
      complete with reverse FQDN. Non-power users won't notice a thing.

      Also, they will save money on bandwidth to the outside world.

      That's what my (strictly residential) ISP has been doing for almost a decade.
      Works perfectly well for everyone involved.

    12. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since this only started to occur recently it may be the result of POODLE exploit fallout and the switch to enforcing TLS vs SSLv3. Many email servers will bounce.

    13. Re:Call Comcast? by mattventura · · Score: 2

      Comcast provides a smarthost for customers to use. This is nothing new, I had to deal with this years ago. Hell, nowadays they even block outgoing port 25. Just look up what the comcast smarthost is and point your server there. If you're coming from a comcast IP, you don't even have to authenticate or anything.

    14. Re:Call Comcast? by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      Two words: "Smart Relay"

    15. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's everything you deserve.

    16. Re:Call Comcast? by sjwest · · Score: 0

      As an european person who gets lots of spam attempts from comcrap/roach runner and twc especially trucklawyersomewhere@spammy i assume no decent email traffic comes from comcrap ranges et al. so when fail2ban id's hosts they lose visiting rights.

      Since comcrap would not action any report of mine without a legal order i sent in your on your own since they dont give a stuff.

      Most of that mention stuff never gets seen by us. Do yourself a favour and get a better isp.and if the fcc wont allow that then that is your problem.
       

    17. Re:Call Comcast? by arth1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unfortunately this is not the case. I tracked it down. The anti spam service blocks all cable company ip address blocks by default.

      No, they don't. I send e-mail just fine through a cable company IP address. You have to make sure you're not on a residential IP block, and that you request removals from lists like Spamhaus PBL.

    18. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move out of the sticks and into an actual city. Then you can get a real ISP.

    19. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly...

    20. Re:Call Comcast? by ZipK · · Score: 1

      They are not the problem. It's the other email providers blocking me simply because I'm on a Comcast IP.

      Most businesses would be interested and willing to advocate for their customers. Particularly in a situation that's unlikely to be isolated to a single customer's account. Comcast's bureaucracy may obscure their interest in helping their customer get this issue resolved, but there is certainly business value to Comcast in a resolution that favors the customer being able to continue operating their mail server via their Comcast connection.

    21. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tell Comcast to remove the PBL on the reverse DNS entries for your IPs. Cable companies setup and configure the PBL for thier IPs
      I had the same problem with Charter a few years ago. The issue is finding the right person or group to fix this for you. The General Tech Rep that you speak with won't have a clue what your talking about.
      http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/section/Spamhaus%20PBL

      If you can't get this done, your alternative is to get a VM (ie Digital Ocean, RackSpace, Amazon) for your smtp service, Configure the VM smtp mta to relay all your mail to your home smtp server. This is probably what I am going to do in the future. Cable companies charge $$$ for static IPs. It likely cheaper to just set up hosted VM handling any services that require static IPs (smtp, DNS, Web, etc).

    22. Re:Call Comcast? by crypticedge · · Score: 1

      Do you have a PTR record set with them? If you don't this kind of block is common. Make sure you get one established right away.

    23. Re:Call Comcast? by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've used that site and checked it against that list. 0 results found on the blacklist check.

    24. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be sure to tell them the arbitrator will side with you because they are not holding up their end of the contract.

    25. Re:Call Comcast? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Say that their business class service is not sufficiently functional and it's a Comcast problem. This problem will presumably be shared by other Comcast customers, if it's IP address based. It renders their service less valuable, and can be a reason for business class customers to choose another option. They may be losing business today because of this problem.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    26. Re:Call Comcast? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Mmm. Maybe.

      If Comcast has been negligent in controlling spam and as a result he cannot use his service as it was sold to him... then I think he has a merchantability case.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    27. Re:Call Comcast? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Then you terminate the contract because it's now useless and the conditions you can use it under have changed - you can NO LONGER SEND EMAIL.

      Agreed. Also, be sure to record the conversation when you try to terminate the contract. It might help you later, and it'll amuse the hell outta the rest of us.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    28. Re:Call Comcast? by hawkbug · · Score: 2

      I have verified. I am not on any RBLs as I mentioned in my original question. As for whether or not my IP range is residential, I was told when I signed up that it was not. However, I have no way that I know of to verify that.

    29. Re:Call Comcast? by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      I got so overwhelmed with Taiwan web server attack attempts that I finally blocked Taiwan on my old server. On the new server I use fail2ban with the additional configuration of permanently blocking IPs that repeatedly attempt to break in (that would be any ssh attempt).

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    30. Re:Call Comcast? by JimMcc · · Score: 2

      Also, talk to Yahoo, Hotmail, and Gmail about being blocked.

      For the first time every I'm going to use this expression....

      ROTFLMAO

      Unless you have some kind of super squirrel secret agent phone number, or your company is worth billions, please explain how to call any of these companies and actually talk to somebody that can _accurately_ answer your questions and just as importantly has the power to make a change.

    31. Re: Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk to Gmail? They are notorious for not being contactable.

    32. Re:Call Comcast? by Simulant · · Score: 1

      My employer runs their entire business on Comcast business class internet and we are not being blocked as you describe. Are you sure something else isn't going on?

      That said, I also run my own mail server at home, on a comcast consumer connection, and I use google's mail servers to proxy my outbound mail. I got in on free google apps for your domain account back during the beta... but you may be able to pull this off with a normal gmail account. Just set your mail server to forward through googles smtp servers using your gmail credentials. Not sure if this will work if your reply to address domain is not hosted by google.
      What really sucks is that Comcast also blocks inbound port 25 on consumer accounts so I have my mail delivered to google and then I transfer it to my own mail server via pop/imap, in theory leaving nothing on the google servers but probably rather pointless in practice. This is what I'm reduced to unless I wan't to pay more for a business connection. There has never been any such thing as net neutrality at the consumer level here, afaict. Every internet connection I've ever had has been asynchronous and limited in some way.

    33. Re:Call Comcast? by jonwil · · Score: 2

      The reason why big email providers would be blocking business IP ranges from big ISPs like Comcast as well as residential is probably because they have seen too many people with a "Comcast Business Grade" connection, and no knowledge of whats going on get infected with the same spam-bots as residential connections.

    34. Re:Call Comcast? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      I have verified. I am not on any RBLs as I mentioned in my original question. As for whether or not my IP range is residential, I was told when I signed up that it was not. However, I have no way that I know of to verify that.

      %host mail.fimble.com
      mail.fimble.com has address 23.31.69.157
      % whois 23.31.69.15

      #
      # ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use
      # available at: https://www.arin.net/whois_tou...
      #
      # If you see inaccuracies in the results, please report at
      # http://www.arin.net/public/who...
      #

      #
      # Query terms are ambiguous. The query is assumed to be:
      # "n 23.31.69.15"
      #
      # Use "?" to get help.
      #

      #
      # The following results may also be obtained via:
      # http://whois.arin.net/rest/net...
      #

      TOPPAN PHOTOMASKS INC TOPPANPHOTOMASKSINC (NET-23-31-69-8-1) 23.31.69.8 - 23.31.69.15
      Comcast Business Communications, LLC CBC-CM-4 (NET-23-30-0-0-1) 23.30.0.0 - 23.31.255.255

    35. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly...

    36. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does your mail server IP set for correct reverse DNS?

    37. Re:Call Comcast? by Wildbear · · Score: 1

      A big "mod up" to that about SORBS. My email server has been on the same static IP address for about 14 years, within a leased business-class static IP address block. SORBS is the only blacklist it is on in the mxtoolbox list, and it is there because SORBS has it incorrectly classified as a dynamic IP address. SORBS has not been cooperative in fixing it. It has caused many a failed email in the past, although that problem seems to have diminished as admins recognize that SORBS will give false positives, and they apparently aren't using it much any more, thankfully. Sorry that I don't know what to suggest for the author of this "ask slashdot" topic, except to offer my sympathy - I know the frustration.

    38. Re:Call Comcast? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Also, talk to Yahoo, Hotmail, and Gmail about being blocked.

      For the first time every I'm going to use this expression....

      ROTFLMAO

      Unless you have some kind of super squirrel secret agent phone number, or your company is worth billions, please explain how to call any of these companies and actually talk to somebody that can _accurately_ answer your questions and just as importantly has the power to make a change.

      For Yahoo or Google, it's pretty easy to do; just call up their business internet services group as if you had a domain being hosted by them. For Hotmail, I have no idea; I'm pretty sure that Microsoft doesn't host third party domains.

      But since his problem is going to be DMARC policy plus SPF/DKIM records anyway (which he would have known, if he'd just Googled the problem), it's not going to help him, because he's trying to do something they don't want him to do anyway, and whining about that instead of doing things they way they want him to do them isn't going to change their policy decision, or cause them to make an exception just for him.

    39. Re:Call Comcast? by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm using Comcast Business with 5 static IPs like yourself, I also run my own email services like you. I just sent an email to my gmail account from my domain and it was passed through cleanly, not spam filtered.

      Your IP is likely blacklisted somewhere, that you are flagged in multiple providers says you're on a list somewhere whether that's an RBL (there are literally hundreds of RBLs) or one of the others or you have a configuration issue that is triggering the flag. What have you changed recently or applied security updates to? I had an update at one point that toggled a configuration overwrite and took ages to find because I didn't think the configuration had changed.

    40. Re:Call Comcast? by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I had an issue with an incorrect address on my Googles business listing thing they tie to your G+ page. Think they had our opening times wrong too, sent them an email and got a call back from America (I'm in the UK) a day or two later and she fixed the problem there and then. We don't pay for any of their advertising services.

      Pretty good support from my experience.

    41. Re:Call Comcast? by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One thing I forgot to mention, in reading the other replies people are claiming that google at least requires DKIM in that they reject all mail without a valid DKIM. My server is setup to use both SPF and DKIM and I'm not having problems.

    42. Re:Call Comcast? by shrikel · · Score: 2

      I have the exact same problem, in Salt Lake City, and I've run into the same issue for a good 2 dozen of my clients on Comcast's network. It is a categorical block of Comcast's IPs, regardless of business / residential status.

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    43. Re:Call Comcast? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Still, they are the ones to go though. Maybe you are wrong? I find it hard to believe that 50% of the Internet was blocked as spam overnight and this is the first we are hearing of it.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    44. Re:Call Comcast? by taustin · · Score: 1

      Spamhaus has its issues, too. I had an infected machine, and when I finally found the listing, at the top of the page it say "this list is for computers infected with malware that sends spam." Then, a paragraph down, it big red letters, it says "this malware does not send spam." From there, I concluded that Spamhaus is run by psychotic chimpanzees, and recommend not sending email to people whose email systems are run by idiots.

    45. Re:Call Comcast? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      This.

      Want some real fun?

      Google, "support number for (gmail, or hotmail, or yahoo)" and get scammed.

      I use Hosted Exchange Service and mail is weird sometimes with "freemail."

      My solution is to tell management to tell their buddies to use the email that their ISP gave them.

      Hell, AOL doesn't even bother sending bounce notices. Smart move, actually, because bounce message are a sink that provides zero income.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    46. Re: Call Comcast? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, blacklisting via reputation has been expanded beyond the scope of just email, and been used to include the IPs of known sources of botnets and other bad-nasty traffic. Most likely you got flagged and put on their RBL or XBL list.

      Aside from keeping all clients up to date with OS updates and antivirus, get a business class firewall to block malware at the WAN (ISP) side as another later of defense. Also, restrict outbound SMTP (port 25) traffic to only your mail server; all other internal devices denied. That way if you do get an infected machine, it can't blow out SPAM and kill the reputation of your static IP.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    47. Re:Call Comcast? by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      You forgo the last part of that I assume, the 7.

    48. Re:Call Comcast? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I have verified. I am not on any RBLs as I mentioned in my original question.

      How can you possibly state that? I have a blocklist here that I know for a fact that you haven't checked.
      Unless you have a complete and exact list of all block lists that GMail, Yahoo and Microsoft use, your claim is without merit, and you come across as someone who shouldn't be running his own mail server due to proven ignorance. I.e. someone I recommend blocking.

      Anyhow, you must be on one or more blocklists for your IP to be blocked. It's not like the mail server does a whois on your IP realtime and grep for Comcast. You just haven't identified which blocklist it is.

    49. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they know someone who knows someone.
      Really, after Facebook, Linkedin, Twitter and every other social media tool, don't think asking your ISP is the first step regardless of where the issue lies?

    50. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have verified. I am not on any RBLs as I mentioned in my original question. As for whether or not my IP range is residential, I was told when I signed up that it was not. However, I have no way that I know of to verify that.

      Ok, not to sound like a dick here but yes you do have a way to "know that", and it should have been one of the first things you did when you set up your mail server.
      Look at the reverse DNS entry for the static IP you have your server using. It should MATCH your server's hostname. So if your server is 'mail.hawkbug.com' then the rDNS for its IP address should ALSO read 'mail.hawkbug.com'. If it doesn't, then call your support and have them update the DNS record for you. (might take a couple business days for that to happen, just FYI).

      Blacklist providers don't just block based on company. They block based on two things primarily: 1st if the IP scope is listed as a Dynamic range. 2nd on if the reverse DNS is updated correctly. It's not uncommon for an ISP to re-purpose some IP space which used to be dynamic as Static space, but that ought to show up on a dynamic list.

      The other possibility is that someone before you did bad things with that IP, and some blacklist provider the servers you try to reach has it specifically blacklisted. If you have the trouble with multiple other unaffiliated servers, then that's not likely to be the case.

    51. Re: Call Comcast? by taustin · · Score: 1

      Getting the problem cleaned up wasn't the issue, once I got off my ass and started checking the outgoing logs. But the bullshit about "this malware doesn't send email" on a list (XBL, as it happens) specifically for computers with malware that does send email was just stupid and dishonest.

      The real stupidity, of course, is people using a block list without understanding what's on it.

    52. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google at least requires DKIM in that they reject all mail without a valid DKIM.

      This is incorrect.

    53. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.mxtoolbox.com is your friend. Run SMTP tests, and check your static IP against a huge list of known black lists.

      I ran into a similar issue with one of my clients behind an rural business-class DSL connection. They were only black listed from SORBS because their netblock range was dynamic (DUHL). Technically, this was true because their "static IP" was really a sticky IP via DHCP with an indefinite lease. But SORBS doesn't give a shit. You're on the DUHL, you're fucked. Only their ISP can talk to SORBS, not the end-user as I understand it. In the end, the client had to subscribe to a Smart Host to get around this.

      With regards to SORBS; admins don't let admins reference SORBS. Fuck them, and their shitty pompous policies!

      While I agree with your hatred of SORBS (and most of those list companies) the fact of the matter is you should not be running a mail server from a dynamic IP, sticky or not. And if you run any kind of legit email server you won't accept connections from them either. It's Static IP or piss up a rope, and all your DNS records of all sorts need to match as well. Do all that, and unless you're actually running a spam service you won't end up on those lists.

      As for the poster, in another post he admitted that he can actually connect to three big mail providers, including Google. Two of them are putting his mail on indefinate delay queues, google is sending them but pre-marking them as spam so unless the recipient has his server white-listed it ends up in their spam folder.

      While it's possible that a previous owner of that IP was abusing it for mail purposes, it's highly unlikely. To be sure, Submitter should change to a different IP, or better yet just bite the bullet and get his ISP to re-issue him a completely different static scope. If the problem follows, then his issue is that his server has been "fingerprinted" as suspicious.
      This could have happened BECAUSE he changed ISP's, and the mail services see that and are suspicious that the origin IP for his server suddenly changed. It's also possible his DNS stuff didn't fully propagate before he started using it, and pissed off their spam-fingerprinting systems. And no matter how much he denies it, it's ALSO possible that his server really HAS been flooding spam and he just hasn't figured out how to detect it yet.

    54. Re:Call Comcast? by skids · · Score: 1

      You should start the business-account ticket process anyway. You might even convince them to proactively approach these services from their side. Defending the ability of one's assigned blocks to send email is one of the jobs of any address holder, even if Comcast doesn't care about how badly their residential customers are treated (by others as well as their own techs) they should care about business address ranges.

      You could try demanding different addresses as well.

    55. Re:Call Comcast? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      This is big.

      Even if they don't let you set it, you need to make sure it's not pointing at their dynamic residential DNS pool.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    56. Re:Call Comcast? by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

      > Then you terminate the contract because it's now useless and the conditions you can use it under have changed - you can NO LONGER SEND EMAIL.

      This is not a Comcast issue.
      The statement "No Longer Send Email" is false. He is still able to sent emails.
      The problem is that Two SPECIFICALLY NAMED RECIPIENTS are CHOOSING NOT to accept them.
      Google IS accepting, and receiving the email.
      And I'm sure other businesses, users, and recipients not on a mass-email-host are receiving them just fine.

      Thus, Comcast lawyers can very easily say (with support from network engineers, and email support engineers) that, yes, they are holding up their end of the contract. They are providing a static IP. They are allowing servers to run. They are allowing outgoing Email TCP data streams to fully connect, unhindered.

    57. Re:Call Comcast? by WoTG · · Score: 1

      I'm not 100% sure, but Gmail does require something different for IPV6 email than IPV4. I ran into this a few months ago when my VPS provided "helpfully" added IPV6 support. It was either DKIM or maybe it was encryption...

    58. Re:Call Comcast? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      And no matter how much he denies it, it's ALSO possible that his server really HAS been flooding spam and he just hasn't figured out how to detect it yet.

      THAT is entirely possible! It happened to us about six years ago. I'll keep this short. Basically, we had a Plesk server that hosted both e-mail and websites in a multi-client setting (multiple domains). Basically a WAMP box that ran MailEnable. There were only a few ports open to the box; 25, 80, 110, and 443. For whatever reason, we had an older version that allowed for SQL injection and ASP exploits. For a few weeks, we noticed that our IP to the server was constantly being flagged on Spamhaus every day. We scanned for malware and checked all SMTP logs; nothing unusual found. Eventually, we noticed that the server was under heavy CPU and bandwidth usage during the period of 7pm to 6am (central standard time) and 24 hours on Saturday - Sunday. Further investigation led to a bogus website hosted on our box with code to perform the exploit. Access logs indicated the remote execution to generate the SPAM was happening in Italy. The bastard rightfully guessed we were an 8am - 5pm shop and proceeded to go to town on the server when we weren't actively looking. Played us and the server like a stradivarius. I gained some relief by null-routing his IP, but he just proceeded from another source days later when he figured out the server was live all along. Eventually, we were forced to renew our Plesk subscription and upgrade the box.

      A few lessons learned from this:

      1. Never lag behind updates and product versions on a production hosted server. If it cost money, factor that in or it simply isn't economically viable.
      2. Never host web content on the same server as your e-mail. Just don't. That web exploit to use the MailEnable program off the C drive was proof of this (path found in his exploit code).

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    59. Re:Call Comcast? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Just as a data-point, I am run my own email services on Comcast but chose not to go with a business account. I use easyDNS's email forwarding inbound to get around port 25 blocking and use Comcast's email servers as a smarthost outbound and have never seen any issues.

    60. Re:Call Comcast? by richlv · · Score: 1

      never even researched dkim or spf properly, my mailserver can send mails to google just fine

      --
      Rich
    61. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, now we reverse the policy of ALWAYS use a third party ESP? People switch ISP's a lot...

    62. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please explain how to call any of these companies and actually talk to somebody that can _accurately_ answer your questions and just as importantly has the power to make a change.
      You may not be able to call them, but you can contact them (expect Yahoo). Just search postmaster and their domain to find their support pages and there is contact form.

    63. Re:Call Comcast? by ledow · · Score: 1

      Okay.

      You buy an SSL certificate.

      But then you discover that 50% of browsers don't accept it as SSL.

      It's no longer "fit for purpose". If you have a single brain cell, and read a wiki page about your local consumer law, you will get a refund or a better certificate.

      If, however, you live only by the vague wording of the contract, ignore all consumer and contract law, and because it's a large company you are terrified they might wriggle out of it, you might not.

      You can, and will, argue that an IP is not fit for purpose if it's blocked for spam email - the only cause of that is the ISP not managing the IP properly. No different to a credit card that nobody will take anywhere because fraud on it is so high and shops won't risk taking it - it's up to them to stop the fraud.

      They are not holding up their end of the contract - the paper contract is only 1% of what they have to do. They have to also provide services fit for purpose. If you have a business that needs to reliably send email, this service is NOT fit for purpose. They are failing to manage their own network and thus impacting on you because they are doing it so poorly that third parties don't want to deal with you PURELY because of that reputation.

      Which is why, in any ISP of any significant size, arguing here will get you moved to another IP range in a second. I know. I've done it.

      Or you could practice "I'm not a lawyer and that looks scary" and pay them another year's money for doing bugger-all.

      Say you hired an e-marketing firm to send out email on your behalf. And they come back and say they couldn't send any emails because their server was blocked (e.g. by their supplier ComCast) but here's our bill anyway. Do you still think you have zero recourse there?

      Your contract is worthless in the face of consumer law and a legal interpretation of "reasonable". It's unreasonable to expect your business customers to not be able to send email to three of the largest email outfits on the planet, just because you can't be bothered to throw spammers off your network.

    64. Re:Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trying to shoot the messenger. SORBS listing in the case you describe was correct, the IP was dynamic and that's what DUHL lists. Your problem was that someone mis-sold your client a dynamic IP address and told them it was static.

    65. Re:Call Comcast? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      No. My problem is that SORBS and certain blacklists like it provide very little recourse (if any at all) to the end-user of the IP. But beyond that, I'm shooting admins that use SORBS; so both take a hit from me.

      I'm all about providing an equal opportunity if only to make the point. People will often spout "don't hate the player; hate the game!" How about not playing the fucking game in the first place?! And both SORBS and admins that use SORBS play it dirty!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    66. Re:Call Comcast? by ZeroWaiteState · · Score: 1

      They are the problem if their IP's are flagged due to abuse. I doubt Comcast will address it before your term is up, but who knows. In that case, it's either use a smart host (which Comcast itself may offer) or switch ISP's and terminate the contract. If Comcast does not address spammy senders, then unfortunately their customers end up being collateral damage. My advice is move your server stuff to a cloud service at the earliest opportunity. My second advice is to never host an MTA yourself. I am saying both of these things from personal experience, especially if you are not familiar with the reputation databases. The internet is slowly turning into a @(#@ war zone and MTA's are in the trenches with the hot lead whizzing overhead. If you wanna stay in the trenches that's fine, but better grab a helmet.

    67. Re:Call Comcast? by ale2011 · · Score: 1

      I see fimble has a /29:

      NetRange: 23.31.69.152 - 23.31.69.159
      CIDR: 23.31.69.152/29
      NetName: FIMBLE
      Customer: FIMBLE (C03254701)
      RegDate: 2012-12-19
      Updated: 2013-12-11
      Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net...

      OrgAbuseHandle: NAPO-ARIN
      OrgAbuseName: Network Abuse and Policy Observance
      OrgAbusePhone: +1-888-565-4329
      OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@comcast.net
      OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc...

      Whi don't you have your own abuse poc? Also, about that /29, 157.69.31.23.in-addr.arpa is set correctly, but the rest of the IPs are not. This has probably nothing to do with reputation, but it'd be convenient for you to have comcast define CNAMEs for RFC2317 delegation.

  2. They've been screwing me too. by SirGeek · · Score: 1

    I'm not hosted by them either. They reject silently all emails from my qmail based servers and don't even tell me WHY they've been rejected either.

  3. Host your email somewhere else by dheltzel · · Score: 5, Informative

    I gave up trying to do this on Comcast and now host my email at Zoho. It's free for the few accounts I need. I now it may not work for everyone, but I got weary fighting those battles.

    1. Re:Host your email somewhere else by Darth+Muffin · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem and solution. I went with google apps to host my domain. Painless, great spam filtering, and integrates with other google services like the Android play store, G+ and hangouts.

      --
      Real programmers use "copy con program.exe"
    2. Re:Host your email somewhere else by swillden · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem and solution. I went with google apps to host my domain. Painless, great spam filtering, and integrates with other google services like the Android play store, G+ and hangouts.

      Ditto, though I did it when it was free. It's not any more, and depending on how many users you have on your domain (I've got around 30), it can get quite expensive.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Host your email somewhere else by bware · · Score: 1

      Me too, except Charter and not free.

      I miss the good old days of hosting my domain, but I don't miss configuring sendmail.

  4. VPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    get a cheap Linux VPS to run as a smart host

    1. Re:VPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't help - if your VPS is in the same netblock as a spammer you fall into the same traps....probably some other clown in your netblock for Comcast has been doing bad things. I have this issue with my VPS, and there is jack I can do about it. I see no way to get off these lists as it isn't my IP, but a whole /24 at stake. Easy to see with various checking tools though. I now pay a 3rd party just for providing an SMTP relay. Sad times.

    2. Re:VPS by cruff · · Score: 1

      I second this. When the Century Link customer service drones stated, for the second time, that my third party ISP could not support the upgraded DSL connection (much to my ISP's surprise), I said "goodbye" and ditched my land line at the same time. I ordered a $20/mo VPS from my ISP, with whom I was very happy with their service, to host my email. I use a VPN connection initiated from my Comcast provided dynamic IP address to my home. A happy side effect is that I no longer receive unsolicited phone calls on an expensive land line either. :-)

    3. Re:VPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for this site. I've had a VPS with linode for years. No complaints with linode, but for the tiny amount of web hosting I do, they're a little overpriced for my needs. I've found a cheaper provider, which even has a location in my country!

      lowendbox.com FTW!

  5. Buy a VPS and route it through. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I hate to say it but your best bet it just to proxy over an encrypted channel to a machine inside a friendly hosting environment.

    Go buy a VPS that allows sending outbound mail (check up front) and then configure your server to route through the VPS first.

    Tada: you are no longer appearing to come from Comcast, yet you still have the contract and everything set up.

    1. Re:Buy a VPS and route it through. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I am very surprised half the responses don't mention this. This is why spoofing IP and MAC addresses should be publicly encouraged, not vilified. Anything that can help defeat geo-location can only be a good thing.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Buy a VPS and route it through. by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Just check the IP range of your VPS servers first. Thanks ColoCrossing....

      http://lowendtalk.com/discussi...

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  6. tl;dr by ihtoit · · Score: 2

    call Comcast, it sounds like it's a "their problem" problem.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:tl;dr by wiredlogic · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Comcast phone slaves won't have a page on their script to fix his problem. Might I suggest pulling the power plug from the router and rebooting the PC, though.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:tl;dr by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      one would sincerely hope that CC has a support tier - beyond Tier I script drones - manned by people actually qualified to investigate such esoteric issues? Pretty much any other provider I've ever dealt with certainly does.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can escalate past the phone slaves ya know. It requires hours of patience and complaining and waiting, and a headset is highly recommended to prevent arm fatigue.

    4. Re:tl;dr by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The comcast business forums online have a few techs moderating who are not morons and have access to fix many things. I've had very good luck there and highly recommend it over phone support for anything that's not in a script (for example reverse DNS records). Be prepared for delays in getting a response though.

    5. Re:tl;dr by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I have never had to work with Comcast, but what I do is call and tell the script reader that, "Yo ... Bill said call here and tell you to escalate my problem." When they ask who Bill is, I just say, "Dunno, but I just spent 2 hours with him and he said call you and tell you it has to be escalated."

      Sometimes it works and stuff.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    6. Re:tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that doesn't work with comcast.
      Each tier has different 1-800 numbers
      And anything above tier 1 requires a one-time use code to be entered in the automated system before being connected; otherwise you're booted to Tier 1.
      I've only ever been given a direct line in once; most of the time, it's be calm, enumerate the issues. Have them replay them back. If you're techinical, and can clearly, and concisely explain it -- and the CSR can repeat it back (they may not understand it) -- Ask them to forward it to the "----- engineering team" and explicitly allow them to use your account (either you change the password and give it to them, or explicitly give permission for them to change your password so the Engineers can work on your account directly, and try to mimic your issue) This is for any Comcast side issue. It will of course not work for any Client-Side hardware, or cabling issue.
      I heard nothing of my issue for months, then one day, it was fixed. I assume because it went through bug-triage, feature development, scheduling, QA and deployment. I've worked coding jobs before, and even critical user bugs, need to be scheduled in. There isn't infitinite bandwidth for developers, despite managements desire to have us work 24/7
      YMMV.

      I've gotten the mysterious 16 digit code but once before.
      And sure enough, that ID was tied permanently to a specific customer/issue combination.
      I tried random Numbers and got "not valid" "expired" and others "you are not calling from the phone number registered for the account; Please enter the account holders phone number for this issue"

  7. I use a virtual host as an MX relay.. by Miguelito · · Score: 2

    When the entire RoadRunner residential IP spaces were blocked, I just got a virtual server (now a Linode) and simply run that as my MX. Helps on inbound mail as well for any times my home connection goes down.. it'll queue up there. I use trusted certs for relaying from home and send mail via authenticated SMTP (TLS required) for mobile devices, via the same virtual host avoiding issues with connectivity to home (which was rare, but now I don't have to worry). I also have the connections between the VM and home box use a port other than 25 to avoid any blocking of port 25 by my ISP (which, for San Diego at least, hasn't happened in years).

    It comes down to $20 a month for the size of vm I got (I also started using it for a few other things too). I also do my greylisting and other anti-spam measure there before it even tries to deliver to my server at home.

    --
    - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    1. Re:I use a virtual host as an MX relay.. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I use a mail forwarding service so the mail seems to come from them rather than me. Nicely gets around the problem of dynamic IPs being banned by a lot of mail servers for inbound traffic.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:I use a virtual host as an MX relay.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am handling 3500 emails a day running a remailer on a 500MB $5/month VPS. Tons of space left.

  8. Involve your Comcast Sales Rep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously if this continues it will hurt their commercial sales.
    Sounds like a little Corporate to Corporate (yahoo, hotmail) needs to be involved.

  9. Bennet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Talk to Bennet Hasselton. He's fought the same issue.

    1. Re:Bennet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk to Bennet Hasselton. He's fought the same issue.

      You've just illustrated the remark that sometimes the cure is worse than the disease.

    2. Re:Bennet! by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I sure would be interested in reading Bennet's thoughts on this, especially if it were a 17 long paragraphs and stuff.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  10. Probably tagged as DHCP by Sandman1971 · · Score: 2

    I'm guessing that even though you have static IPs Comcast has tagged the /24 (or higher) as DHCP. Most providers are now blocking consumer/business DHCP IP classes.

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
    1. Re:Probably tagged as DHCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP could call Comcast about getting moved to a better IP then. It may take a while to explain to technical support what needs to be done though.

      It also may be possible to use the Comcast mail servers as relays. If you do this in authenticated mode, it may not show up as coming from a questionable IP.

    2. Re:Probably tagged as DHCP by Selur · · Score: 1

      is there an easy way to check if the static ip one has is flagged as static`or dynamic?

    3. Re:Probably tagged as DHCP by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      SORBS will tell you if your behind a DUHL. They by default blacklist dynamic IP pools (residential). Performing a reverse DNS lookup will reveal this often. However, you have to call your ISP to create a PTR (reverse DNS record) for the domain of your sending e-mail server. Though having a valid PTR is extremely important, SORBS still will blacklist you baed on the netblock range.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Probably tagged as DHCP by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

      ^^ this.

      Your likely options are:

      1) relay all of your email through Comcast's SMTP gateway (this is what I do w/ TWC)
      2) host your mail server elsewhere (extra $$/mo)

      --
      Evolution: love it or leave it
    5. Re:Probably tagged as DHCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast won't let you do that anymore. I used to do that as a solution but it will reject mail going through now.

  11. Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this. by mcmonkey · · Score: 0

    Doctor: Then don't do that.

  12. Dedicated email line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get another connection dedicated to email in/out and keep your comcast for surfing and downloading stuff.

  13. VPS by Art+Challenor · · Score: 1

    All the "Virtual Private Server" VPS suggestions seem to be AC so may not make the viewing cut. I'd recommend taking a look at:

    http://lowendbox.com/

    should be able to find something cost effective that will resolve your issue.

  14. VPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd buy a cheap virtual private server, set up a vpn tunnel (openvpn or similar) and forward traffic (I guess NAT + port forwarding) between your VPS and your home email server. Then mail would appear to come from the VPS provider.

  15. Port 25 Block by DarkPengu · · Score: 0

    Sounds like you might be blocked on port 25 by Comcast. They do this to people who send out a lot of mail. When I worked there, fix was to tell user to switch to port 587 (or other secure outbound email port) and setup authentication/etc.

    --
    -On Your Mom Like White On Rice
    1. Re:Port 25 Block by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't sound like that if you actually read their post.

      With Gmail, I can instruct users to flag my emails as "not spam" because the emails actually go through, but simply end up in the spam folder.

      Yahoo and Hotmail on the other hand, just flat out reject the traffic at lower level. They send rejection notices back to my server that contain "tips" on how to make sure I'm not an open relay, causing spam, etc.

      Reading comprehension FTW.

    2. Re:Port 25 Block by DarkPengu · · Score: 1

      I read the first half. Got distracted. Went back to read the second half after posting. Blah.

      --
      -On Your Mom Like White On Rice
  16. SmartHost Setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Set Comcast's mail server as your outgoing smart relay in your MTA's config. The other mail systems will accept your mail if it comes through Comcast's server.

    1. Re:SmartHost Setting by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

      I bet that would work. Makes sense. Just ask comcast what SMTP you are supposed to use.

    2. Re:SmartHost Setting by Megane · · Score: 1

      This. I've done this with AT&T for years, even before they blocked outbound port 25. If an ISP takes outbound e-mail for a regular e-mail client, they should be able to relay outbound mail for your domain in general.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  17. Stop trying to host it yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem like a do it yourself kind of person so I'm not sure you'll like this advice. It is good advice though so I'll give it anyway and hope for the best.

    Stop trying to host everything yourself. Unless you are a defense contractor or otherwise dealing with extremely sensitive data there is no reason in the year 2014 to run your own mail server. I get that you want to. Just stop.

    Google is a great provider, has competitive pricing, and great reliability. Their competitors are worth looking at as well.

    1. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by bobintetley · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? Google are great if you just want a few mailboxes, but they are not even *close* to a replacement for flexible mail aliases, transports, procmail and data privacy.

    2. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      So I take it you are not in favor of net neutrality?

      Ok with things costing more simply because corporations fear no consequences for their actions?

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    3. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by mlts · · Score: 2

      If possible, I'd definitely host E-mail myself if I were running something bigger than a SOHO where hosted Exchange is my best bet.

      First, I keep physical control of my Exchange mailboxes. Mail might be intercepted, but internal users that send and receive at the same domain are not going to be at the mercy of some nosy (or hacked) provider.

      Second, I know how redundant and secure my E-mail system is. Ideally, I have an edge instance of Exchange for incoming stuff, which gets scanned and then passed to the an instance that runs as a hub. Then, I have another edge Exchange instance for outgoing E-mail, and yet another edge instance for ActiveSync and OWA. This isn't 100%, but it will at least give an intruder a fun time in getting to the juicy stuff, and the actual mailboxe servers are nestled well away from the outside world via firewalling.

      Third, it doesn't take much to use a "legit" relay provider. I personally use Rackspace's Mailgun (although similar offerings are just as good or better.)

      Of course, the downside is the infrastructure. Four copies of Exchange, Active Directory, a good firewall that supports DMZs, and the utilities it takes to back up mailboxes. However, this makes eDiscovery and other regulation compliance quite easy to deal with.

      This is a tough choice. A cloud provider is better than services poorly run, but the best of all is a well run enterprise with company servers so the data has good physical control.

    4. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I agree with your comment about data privacy, but what do you mean by flexible mail aliases? I have about a dozen email aliases linked to each email address on Google Apps Premier/Business, they all seem to work just fine. The filtering and dot notation also seem to work well.

    5. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try Schmidt but you aren't getting your ad-selling, NSA-cock-stroking fingers on my email.

    6. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by ahodgson · · Score: 2

      Yeah fuck that. I can host my own mail just fine, thanks. Google owns enough of the world.

    7. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Mail is tricky. If it was ANY other service, i would be right there with you, we want a two way internet. People should be able to serve from home. But its email, and that monster brings the internet to its knees if we dont keep it leashed tight.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      You can make the same argument for streaming audio, video, cloud services, p2p and internet of things. If you can block one, you can block all. No, the problem of email needs more finesse, no brute force.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    9. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Stop trying to host everything yourself. Unless you are a defense contractor or otherwise dealing with extremely sensitive data there is no reason in the year 2014 to run your own mail server.

      There is no reason in the year 2014 everyone who wants to should not easily be able to host their own mail servers. None of this is or should be rocket science.

      The underlying problem is that SMTP email constitutes the most costly and disastrous failure of any Internet RFC in the history of the world. It needs to be replaced.

      I get that you want to. Just stop.

      The Internet was never intended to be a network of spectators.

      Google is a great provider, has competitive pricing, and great reliability. Their competitors are worth looking at as well.

      Google reads your email... not so "great" in my book. The rest are subject to "any tangible thing" / third party doctrine intrusions here in the US... not interested.

    10. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by diamondmagic · · Score: 1

      Net Neutrality is a routing philosophy. It doesn't state that recipients of these packets have any obligation to listen.

    11. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Of course, the downside is the infrastructure. Four copies of Exchange, Active Directory, a good firewall that supports DMZs, and the utilities it takes to back up mailboxes. However, this makes eDiscovery and other regulation compliance quite easy to deal with.

      Not that I'm looking to defang anyone from hosting their own e-mail, but when you factor in the cost of the above and amortize it for its expected usage life, it's possibly way cheaper to just go with Office365 hosted Exchange. They take the bandwidth hit on all the filtering, and you have lots of back end bandwidth for syncing all devices. They also have plans that make eDiscovery and online archiving possible. It starts out at $4 a month per user. So say you have 10 employees and need service for 5 years, that's a cost of $2400. Not too shabby!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:Stop trying to host it yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use two hosted Exchange providers -- themessagecenter.com (now saashost.net), and Rackspace. Saashost is "meh", while Rackspace (same price on both providers) is pretty good. I just hope the telco that bought them out doesn't run them into the ground.

      However, there are many regulations that force businesses to keep data in a physically secure location. Sarbanes-Oxley comes to mind, although it has only gotten enforced on a guy who did not have all papers in place to go fishing. HIPAA is another, although again, it has no teeth. The only thing that has any influence is PCI-DSS3, or if one works with the government, FISMA... and both has physical security requirements.

      Most cloud providers can't provide documentation about physical security, nor do audits. So, a business can lose its license to operate if they go with a cloud provider as opposed to keeping it in-house and being able to handle physical audits of KPNG Peat Marwick or another agency to validate that things are up to contract. No cloud provider can offer this vetting, so just stashing stuff in the cloud may not be a solution for everyone.

      Plus, there is the "all eggs in one basket" issue. If companies had their own servers, blackhats have to split their effort among lots of targets. A few cloud providers -will- get hacked eventually, and every client nailed.

  18. Mandrill by jklovanc · · Score: 2

    Use Mandrill as a mail relay.

    1. Re:Mandrill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to use Mandrill for my personal domain email. My outgoing volume is so low that it would be a couple of orders of magnitude less than their paid levels.

      BUT I don't want them data-mining my email. I couldn't find any iron-clad promises on their website that they won't data-mine the meta-data (or outright content) of my email. They do say they insert beacons in messages.

      Do you know more?

    2. Re:Mandrill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandrill? What a terrible name. It sounds like a sex toy for men.

  19. Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have had the exact same issue for months now... In my case, Gmail and Microsoft services (hotmail and the office 365 hosted exchange services of some of my clients) both put the mail in spam ... I contacted MS (afaik. they have 2 different anti-spam teams and ways to report false positives), got a reply that it's been taken care of, but still my mails end up in spam. Had one of my clients report me as false positive. No effect.

    Have SPF, use encryption and am not an open relay.

    I really don't know what else to do.

  20. I'd reject your email too. by snarfies · · Score: 1

    My mail server is set to reject anything without a FQDN (a fully qualified domain name). Do you have one of those?

    You've set up SPF, but have you set up DKIM? If not, do so. DMARC too while you're at it.

    1. Re:I'd reject your email too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does having a FQDN mean, technically? Do you mean a PTR record? Or something else?

    2. Re:I'd reject your email too. by Tukz · · Score: 1

      Fully Qualified Domain Name.
      A lot of people leave their servers with default hostname and that is usually going to cause issues with mail if you don't manually configure it.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    3. Re:I'd reject your email too. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      You are rejecting TONS of valid email. At least I was when I did the same thing. The problem with FQDN is that tons of major businesses using servers with invalid FQDN's or relay it through other servers that don't match the FQDN of the sender. I don't get a lot of spam because of my filtering measures but when I toggled FQDN on in postfix I started tossing 80% of my valid email. Major hosts such as Amazon couldn't send to my server because they have hundreds of randomly named relays sending our their automated messages. After my experience I realized that with VM's and the way things are setup now at most places FQDN filters are damn near worthless. There are far better filtering methods.

    4. Re:I'd reject your email too. by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      My mail server is set to reject anything without a FQDN (a fully qualified domain name). Do you have one of those?

      You've set up SPF, but have you set up DKIM? If not, do so. DMARC too while you're at it.

      Mod parent up. SPF and Domain Keys (DK or DKIM) are required to get through Yahoo and others.

      I setup my own mail server and until I put Domain Keys in it would go to the SPAM/Bulk mail of my own Yahoo! account regardless of whether or not I told Yahoo! it wasn't spam. I'm not sure the FQCN matters as much, but SPF+DK/DKIM is certainly required now-a-days.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    5. Re:I'd reject your email too. by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      Yes, obviously I have an FQDN. And yes, I have SPF set up - that was mentioned in my original question up top. No, I do not have DKIM or DMARC set up, but based on a lot of feedback today, I most certainly will by tomorrow morning. Thank you for your input.

  21. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop using comcast and get google apps for business.

  22. Google Apps for Business? by grilled-cheese · · Score: 2

    I got mine setup through what is now Google Apps for Business while the bottom tier was still free. Their current cheapest pricing isn't bad if you don't have a lot of email addresses for what you're getting.

    1. Re:Google Apps for Business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a real business that makes any kind of money at all then their prices are amazingly low.

    2. Re:Google Apps for Business? by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      Unkind people might say that Google is holding his mail hostage until he pays up and gets an account with them. Unkind people might regard this as evil.

      Network neutrality demands that things work, without having to pay for extra services that should not be needed, or jumping through hoops.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    3. Re:Google Apps for Business? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Network neutrality demands that things work, without having to pay for extra services that should not be needed, or jumping through hoops.

      A better example of the silly interpretations of what 'net neutrality' means would be hard to find.

    4. Re:Google Apps for Business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for MOD points ...

  23. Give up and use Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I fought this battle for years. Eventually I wouldn't even get reject messages - the servers would accept the incoming email and then just silently drop it. Looking back I wonder now how many business opportunities I missed, friends I lost, job interviews I didn't get, dates I didn't get, etc.

    Drink the cool-aid and use Gmail/Yahoo/whatever. Or Facebook. Most people don't even read their email anymore.

  24. Business class connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will need to get a business-class connection with reverse DNS and all that before you can expect to not be banned by consumer IP address ranges. Unfortunately, typical consumer-level internet service does not provide what you need. I am in the same boat, but realized the problem several years ago and gave up on running my own SMTP server.

    1. Re:Business class connection by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      If you read the actual summary up top, you'll see that I am using business class. And yes, I do have a valid domain associate with it, reverse PTR record and all.

  25. Reverse DNS setup properly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see no mention of your reverse DNS record, matching the name your host gives during the SMTP greeting. That alone will cause GMail to block you.

    1. Re:Reverse DNS setup properly? by Whatanut · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I had to scroll this far down to find this comment. It's the first thing that popped into my head.

      --

      yvan eht nioj
  26. Do you have reverse dns in place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We turned on Reverse DNS checking and ran into a HUGE stack of domains on Comcast Business who had missing pointer records.

  27. Static IP reverse DNS. by Sansavarous · · Score: 1

    Check your static IP address for both forward and reverse DNS.

    Hard to belive nobody posted this yet.

    1. Re:Static IP reverse DNS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did already....first FTW, but it posted as anon. Damn...probably got filtered on your end.

    2. Re:Static IP reverse DNS. by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

      Not just that, even if you have both a valid forward and reverse DNS entry, a lot of spam filters will reject the message if the DNS entry is in the format of x192.168.168.168.comcast.net or other similar format. Make sure both the forward and reverse are for your domain. I had that problem when I first put my business server on Comcast.

  28. Maybe these ISPs are getting even with Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For many years Comcast has been declaring that other ISPs are sources of spam and blocked all traffic from them. This goes on for a few days or weeks, until the ISP can get Comcast to correct things. Maybe the other ISPs just got tired of this and decided to fight fire with fire.

  29. Use a Relay by EdmundSS · · Score: 1

    Get another email account externally, and configure your email server to send all your outgoing email via that account (using POP3/SMTP authentication). Comcast might already provide an email account/server you can use like that...

  30. Cheap VPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheap VPS.. host your mail there

  31. Route through comcast's mail servers. by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 1

    Try having your mail server send all mail to the comcast mail server for delivery instead of trying to send it directly. That's what you usually have to do if they block the port, may try it without the block anyway.

  32. Contact the ISPs individually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happened to me with a static IP for my VPS. It had been blocked for producing spam in it's past life. It's worth a shot to contact the ISPs and ask them to unblock you. If you let them know you've purchased the IP addresses recently they may be willing to unblock them now.

  33. Speaking as a Comcast victim by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    I too am a Comcast victim, business class, and I have a mail server on their static IPs. This has been the case for years and while I have seen occasional blocking during inter-company spats, nothing blaket like you are seeing. It could just be the range you are on or it could be something else. What I am trying to say is that it is not those big three blanket blocking Comcast IPs.

    I would see if Comcast can give you another set of statics in another range. That may help.

                        -Charlie

    1. Re:Speaking as a Comcast victim by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Ditto; just tested to be sure - my email from my self-hosted domains gets through just fine. This is not a 'Comcast is blocked' problem. This is a 'submitter's IP address is blocked' problem.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
  34. Get a relay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I moved from Comcast to FIOS because of this. Fortunately, I live in the small fraction of the country with two high-speed Internet service providers.

    In the interim, you need an SMTP relay. You can set one up on a commercial virtual machine host, contract for one from the many providers out there, or just use Amazon Simple Email Service (aws.amazon.com/ses/). Your server can make a secure, authenticated connection to the relay and pump your mail out. The relay does the same thing, only without the stigma of a Comcast IP.

    Viva net neutrality, where providers like GMail can't persecrte traffic just because of the source! Oops, not this Internet.

    1. Re:Get a relay by Megane · · Score: 1

      Or you can usually use your ISP's outbound mail server as your relay, without having to set up a bunch of crap that costs money.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  35. Use a relay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stop trying to "fix" comcast. You can't. Find a provider that will act as a relay, which may even be Comcast. Then setup your mail server to relay the mail through that provider.

    You can fix this problem in less than half a day.

  36. Have you tried spamhaus? by mystik · · Score: 1

    Check here:

    http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/

    I've operated my own mail server on a VPS for years. Rackspace voluntarily lists their IP spaces to prevent spammers from just buying a vps for a few hrs, sending out spam and then trashing it. Occasionally I need to remove my IP from the blacklist.

    --
    Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
  37. Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by mlts · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have had the same problem, and this is regardless of providers. Lists of dynamic IP ranges (be it cable, DSL, or other providers) wind up on DUL (dial-up lists), and those are often part of blackhole lists. Since most botnet clients are from DUL-based IPs, E-mail providers just block those as a matter of course.

    What I did was have my private E-mail server use the SMTP server of my ISP for relaying. Problem fixed. However, if you don't have a SMTP server available that allows for different domains, there are commercial services which can relay your outgoing E-mail, which provides "legitimacy" to your messages.

    The exception were direct Exchange connectors. Those were established from Exchange server to Exchange server, so mail would go directly via a secure pipe, and not be relayed.

    1. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by Anon-Admin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ditto! I had the same issue and solved it the same way. Comcast has an SMTP relay that will blanket allow all internal ip's. I simply pointed mine to there smtp relay and it was allowed.

    2. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      Wow, I did not know this. This could solve all my issues. Thanks for the information, I'll look this up right away.

    3. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by fgodfrey · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't use that on a Comcast Business account (or at least my Comcast Business account couldn't). After 4 phone calls, they finally confirmed that their mail server won't send mail for anyone else's domain. Ie, if you own example.com, Comcast's server won't relay mail for foo@example.com only for foo@comcast.net.

      Now.... My information is about 7 months old so maybe they changed this without telling anyone? If your information is newer I should probably revisit my mail configuration.

      Meantime, I just tried from my domain (email server sends directly from a Comcast Business IP) and had no problems sending to Yahoo Mail so they aren't blocking *ALL* Comcast Business IP's. I also have (hopefully) correct reverse DNS on my email server and SPF records in my DNS.

      --
      Go Badgers! -- #include "std/disclaimer.h"
    4. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that real? Here on the Europe side it is the norm that you are supposed to send outgoing mail using your providers smtp server. Just u have to config authentication with your account. If my provider is PROV, I can send mail with a sender of foo@company.com using mail.PROV.hu, just I have to auth using my user account.

      Vajk

    5. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      Bummer. I was hoping that earlier post about using Comcast as my relay would solve it.

    6. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by fgodfrey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was surprised as well. It's normal to relay in the US as well. I switched to Comcast earlier this year from CenturyLink. With CenturyLink, I was relaying through their SMTP server. Comcast doesn't allow that (at least on Business Class accounts).

      --
      Go Badgers! -- #include "std/disclaimer.h"
    7. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      Bummer. I was hoping that earlier post about using Comcast as my relay would solve it.

      A Comcast residential account can be used to send emails through Comcast's servers with any "from" address (using my Comcast login and smtp auth). I just tried this and it worked. I suggest that you try it with your business account.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    8. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by drakaan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bear in mind that doing so gives Comcast a copy of every email you send, of course.

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    9. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      Ditto! I had the same issue and solved it the same way. Comcast has an SMTP relay that will blanket allow all internal ip's. I simply pointed mine to there smtp relay and it was allowed.

      External IPs with authentication, too (cell phone on carrier network, for example).

    10. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      You might have said what MTA you were running and I missed it, but if you're using anything remotely flexible (postfix, for example) you can relay your yahoo, gmail, and hotmail emails through the Comcast relay, and direct deliver everything else (better logging).

    11. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by svalery · · Score: 1

      there are service out there that will allow you to relay through then all in and out. Your mx record has to be changed, but then main thing is then they do the spam filtering for you, so your local pipe is not flooded with junk mail that then you delete locally. unfortunately i forget some of the providers

    12. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by snsh · · Score: 1

      Same situation. If running Exchange, for example, configure Comcast's SMTP as a smarthost.

    13. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true. I use Comcast's relays to send email with my Gmail account as the FROM: field. I have a NAS on a Comcast connection and another NAS on a verizon fios connection at my parents house. They're both sending out their logs with the same authenticated Comcast SMTP server.

    14. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Let me just pile on here and say this is also what I do through a Time Warner household account. When I first set it up nearly a decade ago, I thought I saw an article that just flat-out said this was the polite/ expected/ required thing to do in the first place (and email basically didn't work for me until I did so). When I first read your post, I was a little puzzled, because I assumed that you were already set up that way.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    15. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1. Use another ISP's SMTP relay. Also, do not send mail to Yahoo. They are a joke and even my ISP has a "Yahoo is broken, call Yahoo" policy. Users with Yahoo accounts get what they deserve. Yahoo is the new AOL. You've got NO mail!

    16. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few service providers ago, I did have a Comcast account. You would set up your postfix configuration to login to the relay server with your Comcast account and password, and it would forward it your postfix mail with your domain. The problem I had with Comcast is I downgraded to residential. I could still send mail out from my server, but I could not received it as they blocked all incoming connections.

    17. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      Comcast provides DNS registry service for their business customers, so their mail relays damn well better support mail coming from a domain that they registered (or at least acted as the middle-man for a real registrar).

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    18. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      OTOH, Comcast business class accounts use Outlook/Exchange, so maybe you just need to point to their Exchange servers instead.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    19. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by BringsApples · · Score: 1
      Typically the ISP will relay mail from any IP on it's network, performing it's own spam checks. I know AT&T used to not allow any traffic whatsoever out of it's network on port 25, so even trying to get another SMTP server to relay for you is impossible, unless you're using something other than port 25. Comcast's relay is smtp.comcast.net (96.114.157.81). And you should have a user/pass with comcast, given at time of setup. That's the user/pass that you'll need to present their SMTP server with. If you're using Sendmail then you'd add:

      define(`SMART_HOST',`[smtp.comcast.net]')dnl

      to your (MC) config file. Here is some info on how to pass the user/pass. But of course you're not using Sendmail...

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    20. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

      When I was still working at Comcast, we went through SIGINIFICANT expenditure to ensure that BUSINESS customers DO NOT have any access to RESIDENTIAL services.
      Thus, BUSINESS clients, tend to have far more restricted set of services on the account.
      No access to online voice management.
      No access to residential technological services
      No access to 90% of compatible cable modems
      No access to advanced phone features
      etc.

      This is because we provide additional support guarantees, and additional service guarantees.

      The residential services (including the mail relay) go through regular development, upgrades, and service improvements.

      But, each additional service a business user has access to, increases support costs exponentially as more and more things can go wrong. This includes misusing a service, relying on a "bug" that gets fixed, the regular downtime residential class services experience due to constant technology and stack upgrades that go on 24/7/365.

      And when we discover that a Business customer has access to a new service or feature implementation (this sometimes happens due to Engineers not knowing any better and letting all users access it based on essential requirements); we then have to add in checks, and force-block any business users from using it. (Which can cause complains for the small set of adventurous users), in order to keep the support costs down, and to limit the number of items that can break or be misused.

      Personally, I would say that technology-wise, infrastructure, feature-set, and "future-development"-wise. Residential customers get 20-30x the features (IP Telephony; SIP Relay), updates (IPv6), Mail (new Mail server infrastructure and regular upgrades); And residential services are always improved due to end-user complaints. The complaints get bubbled up and filtered, and by the time it gets to Engineering, we have a never-ending stream of technical problems to solve; strange edge-cases, which over time force rearchitectures, new logic, etc. NONE OF THIS HAPPENS to Business Users and Business Systems. They are kept static. No new features are developed constantly - the focus is on hardening and cementing current behaviours and increasing reliability of the current system -- including bugs and broken states that Business Users MAY BE relying on. Fixing them would be a breach of the service contract -- because we do not want to make any change that affects behaviour.

      For a Business Service to be added. That's a completely unrelated Full Stack division of support, engineers, management, etc. And they have their own criteria, driven by lawyers about support and features. While a new Residential feature can be conceived, and rolled out within a month -- I have seen the same feature get rolled out to Business after 2 years of constant development on their side to fully describe, monitor reliabilty, full support documentation, all potential bugs and misbehaviours, and hardening. Despite it going into general Residential use (mostly) problem free.

      Commerical Users 99% don't want anything to change for any reason, as that costs them money to react to the changes.
      And Comcast knows that. They will avoid change to busines users like the plague, unless it's provable as required new feature that other business services are providing with the same support guarantees; or the engineers can prove without a doubt the reliability and fully document every possible error, bug, and edge case -- which usually ends up with them requiring to start fixing these remotely possible bugs, error and edge cases untill they become a remote possibility of anything happening. And even then, documentation of what is required to fix it is required, in case it does happen and is reported by a business customer -- which will at that point require it to be fixed outright.

    21. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

      Caveat to the above: I worked in my Silo; and only on my siloed feature-developement stream; for residential services. Much of the above is based on day-to-day communication and comraderie, but not "hands-on" experience. Thus, the more further removed the service and implmentation (Feature -> Project -> Service Class -> Stack Class in the Residential World) The business world, as far as I know is 99% separated and removed.

    22. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but this isn't a dynamic IP range. This guy has static IPs. If they're from the same pool I could see your problem, but static IPs are often excluded from the dynamic pool.

    23. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When were you able to find an ISP mail server that allowed relaying? I stopped being able to use that route (no pun intended) at least 5 years ago.

    24. Re:Same issue... just relayed all outgoing mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The easiest solution is to use your ISP's SMTP for outgoing mail. However, they may add your account name to the headers, which may look like you@the_ISP_domain.com. But as fgodfrey said, some ISPs may not let you use your own domains through their SMTP.

      The next step is to ask your ISP to change the reverse-DNS (in-addr.arpa) of your email server IP to show your email domain as mail.yourdomain.com, and not some long string that looks like it's from a pool of dynamic home user IPs. SBC/AT&T allowed us to do this. Some filters block r-DNS strings that match patterns of dynamic IP blocks, even though you have a static IP block.

      Also check ARIN to see if your IP block shows leased to your company, and not just to the ISP. It only takes my ISP a day to make the entry. Your mileage may vary with Comcast.

  38. I've done it. by HaDAk · · Score: 0

    Spamhaus' RBL has a permanent block on Comcast's residential prefixes. You can't petition them to change it, so you're always going to be blocked. Sorry. Aside from that, Comcast blocks outbound SMTP, for spam reasons. It is absolutely possible to get Comcast to unblock your traffic -- I know, because I've done it. (I have the phone number and name of the guy I talked to taped to my modem... but that's not with me, at the moment. Sorry.) If you do get them to unblock the traffic (they'll ask you why you need to, etc. It's a very personal process.), it'll be good until you reboot your modem. If that happens (let's hope the power never goes out), you'll have to call back and have them unblock it. So, yeah: you can absolutely get Comcast to unblock it. The problem comes down to getting other mail servers to accept the email as NOT spam (thanks Spamhaus!).

    1. Re:I've done it. by HaDAk · · Score: 0

      Dammit...ignore me. I didn't read everything first.

  39. Get rid of your home datacenter by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    I did the same thing described by the OP for many years. Suffered through hardware failures and soradic ISP service interruptions that caused me MANY hours of unnecessary work and lost productivity. I also shouldered the expense of electricity, noise, and replacing hard drives.

    Then the price of virtual private servers became so cheap, I couldn't rationally keep hosting stuff out of my house.

    Check my sig. Five bucks a month for a 512mb linux server with 150gb of storage and 2TB of bandwidth a month. You're root on your own box and don't have to deal with all the crap mentioned above.

  40. VPN to VPS by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

    I would get a VPS somewhere (e.g. linode) and install OpenVPN on it. Then VPN between there and your local machine, set up your incoming and outgoing connections to route through there, and update your DNS to point to the VPS. Net effect: you're still on Comcast, but the world sees you as being in some datacenter.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  41. Moving is always an option by gowen · · Score: 1

    "When I ask my other tech friends what they would do, they simply suggest changing ISPs. Nobody likes Comcast, but I don't have a choice here. I'm two years into a three-year contract. So, moving is not an option"

    Moving is always an option. But you have to eat the cost of one year of Comcast. Sorry, but that's your solution.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  42. PTR Record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask Comcast to put in a PTR record on the static IP address that resolves to the same name as your mail server.

  43. check this list by wolfie_cr · · Score: 1

    http://ipremoval.sms.symantec.... Turns out there is something in addition to the standard lists I was familiar with, these 'nice guys' of brightmail acquired by symantec) are used by hotmail. If you email hotmail, they will send it to symantec on your behalf thats it, they will email you canned answers telling you to do the same things over and over again, they never bother to read the history of the ticket etc as for contacting symantec, not even a canned answer may be you will get a better answer if thats the source of your problems

  44. Host with Fastmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and forget your issues. They are hands down the best email host I can name. I'm not affiliated with them, just a happy user for over a decade. These guys take email hosting really seriously and give you so many options and tools.

  45. Move it out of your house by Inoen · · Score: 1

    I know it isn't the answer you're looking for, but i would suggest to move the mail server to Linode or similar.

    I have have been through a similar story, trying to avoid being blocked as spam. If you fix this problem, new ones will appear again and again. It just isn't worth the fight IMO.

    Moving to the cloud won't solve all your problems, but it will be easier.

  46. I'm not doing that anymore by sentiblue · · Score: 1

    In 2000 I used to do what you're doing... I ran a static IP block on my home ADSL line which was only under 1Mbps. Ever since Google Apps, I switched and have been happy since.

    I imagine working with the listed providers is almost zero results because you wouldn't know where to begin and even if you got to speak to their right person, it would still change nothing.

    If the blocks occur all at the same time, I do agree that your IP was obtained from the same source... if you can find that source... you can reason with them... working with the big corps won't be a good idea.

    1. Re:I'm not doing that anymore by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Google blocks guys from you to get you to switch to Google Apps. They make money parsing your emails and showing advertising content. Then they make money again if you're one of those poor suckers who pays full price for Google Apps.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:I'm not doing that anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/from you/like you/

    3. Re:I'm not doing that anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice paranoid delusions you have there. You'll fit right in at SlashDerp.

    4. Re:I'm not doing that anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google doesn't make money processing your emails for marketing information?

  47. Smarthost setup by chihowa · · Score: 1

    I'm in the same boat and I've found that just sending all of my domain's email through Comcast's servers works well enough. I hate doing this on principle, but it has saved me so much hassle that it's not worth fighting.

    Depending on your MTA, the configuration will be different, but the arrangement is generally referred to a using a Smart Host. Basically, your MTA directly connects to the ISP's SMTP server and sends the mail from there. Comcast requires authentication to use their servers, but they don't do anything funky to the mail they pass on. All of the headers remain intact except for the DKIM-Signature, which is replaced(?) when Comcast signs the message. I've never had a bounced message that I rerouted through their servers and they support TLS and IPv6, so it's not the worst setup.

    I'm sure that if you share your MTA details, someone can help you with the configuration.

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  48. double check your mailserver! by akanellis · · Score: 1

    Trust me, this only happens when you actually are sending out spam. I would strongly suggest that you checked your server for malicious files on it (maybe if you are hosting a joomla/drupal/wordpress site on it, it might be hacked already and using the server to send out spam). Also, keep in mind that if you send out spam, it will still have valid SPF records, so, SPF doesn't help you enough at this. So check your access_log for POST requests, check your maillog for outgoing emails, and/or block outgoing connections to port 25 unless the uid is root or the mail account so that hacked files running as different users, can't bypass the local mta. Also try to register with some feedback loops (hotmail and yahoo have their own, google does not believe in feedback loops :P) so that you can see the emails reported as spam that were sent out from your mailserver. Also keep in mind that yahoo wants your emails to be signed with DKIM.

    1. Re:double check your mailserver! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it doesn't only when you are sending spam, I had it happen based on a policy change in an often used dnsbl, suddenly my ptr for the ip was flagging: spammer. It took some time with the dnsbl to actually tell me the real reason, after monitoring turned out I wasn't sending any unaccounted for mail.

  49. Testing and config verification by Xanthvar · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am probably going to repeat things that you already know, but lets start at the basics.

    1. Do you have a PTR/reverse DNS record set up? This has to be done by your ISP, and is not something that you generally do on your own. You generally want it to match the host name for your mail server, but it doesn't have to be a match (but it does look better). Be sure to have an A record for that hostname as well.

    2. Are your MX records pointing to hostnames and not an IP address? Again, you probably are, but we are covering basics here.

    3. Have you checked to see if you are on any blacklists? mxtoolbox.com and dnsstuff.com have some very good tools for checking these things. If you are on one, they often have pretty good instructions on how/why you are listed and what you need to do to get off of it.
    FYI backscatterererererererererer is generally a pain to deal with, good luck if you have to deal with them, you will need it.

    4. Are you(or any other users) forwarding any email to external mail services? We (unfortunately) have several of our clients who are forwarding email from their custom domain name to a yahoo/hotmail/aol (yes, it still exists) email account. The problem with this, is that when they get spam (that they signed up for, like newsletters and bargain alerts), and they forwards to their external account, it looks like our mail server is the one sending the spam, so we get the black mark.

    5. This is the tough one.. are you absolutely sure you are not sending spam? You may need to go so far as to slap a sniffer on your network and see if you are sending out any other email. You may be infected with a virus, or you have an account with compromised credentials that are sending out email.

    6. Are you running SSL/TLS (even though SSL 3 and TLS 1.0 are now dead) with a real (non self signed SSL cert) on your server? SSL certs can be gotten very cheap, $10 year, or possibly even cheaper. They are a minor pain to set up as they need intermediary certs set up, but helps to define that you are a legitimate email sender, rather than a PC with a virus.

    You may be all of these steps, especially if you have been running your own mail sever for 15 years, but I posted these suggestions in the hopes that it may jar something loose.

    Good Luck

    1. Re:Testing and config verification by Rotten · · Score: 2

      I bet the answer for 1) and 2) is NO

      3) is what maybe prompted to get SPF

      4) inevitable but won't force a block on your IP unless it's 1000's of mails daily

      5) you have to protect yourself against password guessing and installing outbound antispam/antivirus for your own mails. it's 2014 ffs.

      6) probably it's a NO, or MAYBE for a self signed certificate.

      Yikes, we could fix the submiter's server for a fee.

    2. Re:Testing and config verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1" is a particularly valuable check for a mail server as zombie machines don't go request comcast for a reverse PTR.

    3. Re:Testing and config verification by hawkbug · · Score: 3, Informative

      You guys crack me up. To answer the questions:

      1) Absolutely. The first thing I did when I moved to this net block on comcast is have them create my associated pointer records, so reverse DNS is correct.

      2) Yes, MX records are correct.

      3) I've checked every blacklist using sites like mentioned above. My IP does not exist on a single one.

      4) No forwarding.

      5) Yes, I monitor my network traffic in various ways - and no, I am not sending spam. If I was, it would be a matter of hours before I would show up on an RBL anyway, which I'm not on.

      6) Absolutely. I have paid for a cert that matches my domain. It's not self signed.

      I think some others have brought up some things that I'm not doing:

      1) DKIM. I've read about this, but I didn't realize a lot of people were using it yet. Sounds like they are and that I'm behind the curve here.

      2) DMARC. Same here. I've read about it, but not using it yet.

      I'm also using SPF.

    4. Re:Testing and config verification by Rotten · · Score: 2

      Owwww CMON!

      "3) I've checked every blacklist using sites like mentioned above. My IP does not exist on a single one."

      REALLY??? Senderbase it's just a basic check, if your are talking about the email you use on your slashdot profile:

      http://www.senderbase.org/lookup/?search_string=23.31.69.157

      Whooha:
      "IP Address 23.31.69.126 is listed in the CBL. It appears to be infected with a spam sending trojan, proxy or some other form of botnet.
      It was last detected at 2014-11-05 04:00 GMT (+/- 30 minutes), approximately 9 days, 30 minutes ago."

      Now you owe me a beer.

  50. Consumer IP ranges by Rotten · · Score: 1

    When your server is running on a comcast owned ip block, and the block is used to assign dynamic ips, then your IP is -to everybody else in the internet- dynamic. Even if comcast is giving those dynamic ips statically to you.

    Those 3 big name companies and almost every sysadmin who is tired of spam has been blocking dynamic ip ranges for years.

    You don't need slashdot for this, you can figure out the problem and the solution just searching google in 5 minutes: rent a dedicated server

    1. Re:Consumer IP ranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also use Comcast Business. I also run a dedicated server. It's in a rack, connected to Comcast Business.

      The alternative I chose was to pay Google for their Apps service so I could get email. I'm not super happy about it, it feels like extortion. but at least my mails aren't always ending up in a spam folder.

    2. Re:Consumer IP ranges by Rotten · · Score: 1

      does comcast business let you control/change/update your reverse DNS for your fixed IPs?

      I've been running servers in south america for 15 years. Local network blocks have been pretty abused by spammers. I know there are professional spammers close to my ips (same subnet plus 1 or 2) and never had my server denied by yahoo, gmail or hotmail.

      What's our secret then?

      DKIM, DMARC, SPF, good reputation, reverse DNS matching our server name, SSL for outbound smtp, antispam and antivirus for outbound mail.
      For those 3 big guys and some others we use outgoing mail delay and receiver throttling (we don't want to send 100 RCPs to yahoo servers and get nailed)

      We even had some mail accounts/client computers hacked and used by spambots. We reacted, solved the problem promptly, and still we are not getting rejects.

      But if some mail from "mail.legitLLC.com" comes to my smtp port asking to send a mail, and it's IP turns out to reverse-dns to "bussiness-comcast-blabla.net" i will flag your mail as spam.

      Ask slashdot is turning into a basic support forum....

    3. Re:Consumer IP ranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does comcast business let you control/change/update your reverse DNS for your fixed IPs?

      Yes, it's a little bit of a pain to find the information but I have done this by calling tech support.

      I've been a sysadmin for about 15 years. With expertise mainly around DNS and it's been really troublesome to get mail to deliver reliably.

      The cynic in me thinks email is dead, and we're just all waiting for the day we can close our gmail/yahoo/hotmail accounts.

    4. Re:Consumer IP ranges by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Ask slashdot is turning into a basic support forum....

      This thread is not "basic." I'm having random issues at work where "freemails" are just not making it to us and the comments here are teaching me much.

      And, I have been working with email ever since Moby Dick was a minnow and stuff.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  51. Blacklist by kdub007 · · Score: 2

    Your IP is likely listed on a Blacklist. My company firewall checks a half-dozen or so blacklists and automatically compares them to all incoming email. You need to find out which blacklist is listing your server public IP and contact the blacklist service directly. They can, after some verification process, remove you from the list. I just had this problem with emails coming from a vendor...turns out their IP(s) were blacklisted by one of my blacklist providers. It was mistaken, but it happened nonetheless. My vendor had to get themselves unlisted. I also removed that blacklist provider from my settings.

    --
    The correct answer is 42.
  52. Smarthosts, how do they work? by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    I used gmail as my smarthost when I had Verizon FiOS
    Something like:
    https://alimanfoo.wordpress.co...

    (generate a dedicated gmail password for this instead of using your "main" one)

    1. Re:Smarthosts, how do they work? by tepples · · Score: 1

      The more smarthosts your domain has, the broader you need to make its SPF policy, and the more likely a spammer who uses the same smarthost is to be able to send mail that meets your SPF policy.

  53. VPS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spin up a cloud server and configure your Postfix/Exchange to route outgoing mail through that instead. Worked for me when ProofPoint decided to block my server for 3 weeks then shrugged when I asked them for an explicit whitelist. Fascist fucks.

  54. Relay Host by Klync · · Score: 1

    My Domain Registrar provides SMTP relaying (TLS & authentication required), so I can configure my MTA to use that as its "smarthost" to get around this particular problem.

    --

    ----
    Not to be confused with Col.
  55. Verify your mail is DKIM Signed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verify that your mail server DKIM signs your message. More than likely they are being blocked due to that.

    Checkout https://support.google.com/a/answer/174124?hl=en

    https://support.google.com/a/answer/174124?hl=en

  56. Spammers wounded peer to peer email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anti-spammers finished it off. Find a "smart host", i.e. a relay operated by a reputable source. Email is a managed service now.

    1. Re:Spammers wounded peer to peer email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-spammers finished it off. Find a "smart host", i.e. a relay operated by a reputable source. Email is a managed service now.

      Trufax. However, while your comments are true, I will note that spam is effectively dead now. My GMail inbox SNR is practically infinite.

  57. First step is to collect data. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He's having problems with 3 services.

    1. GMAIL - messages accepted but marked as spam.

    2. YAHOO - messages rejected (what do the logs say?)

    3. HOTMAIL - messages rejected (what do the logs say?)

    So the first step is to look at the logs and see if the rejection message has any information in it. Do the rejection messages at YAHOO and HOTMAIL have the same code?

    The next step is to check with a service like http://www.dnsgoodies.com/ to make sure that Comcast has configured their side correctly. The reverse DNS should point to your domain. You DO have a domain, right?

    The more information you have before you contact Comcast, the better. Because the first 2 levels won't know anything about anything. They will be reading off of a script.

    1. Re:First step is to collect data. by tepples · · Score: 1

      messages rejected (what do the logs say?)

      Hypothetical: Let's just suppose for a moment that the logs say "Connection refused" or "Connection timed out". This would mean that an MTA on Comcast can't even connect to port 25. (MUAs are instead supposed to connect on the MSA port, port 587.) What's the next step to troubleshoot after that?

    2. Re:First step is to collect data. by hawkbug · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thanks for the reply, I appreciate it. To answer your questions:

      1) Yes, I have a domain. The reverse DNS is correct and I have SPF records for the domain. Also, I'm not running an open relay and my mail server and IP address are not on any RBLs.

      2) Each mail service I listed above provides different results. First, Google doesn't send me an email back notifying of an issue. They simply dump the email into the spam folder of whomever I email. Yahoo spits out several messages:

      Deferred: 421 4.7.1 [TS03] All messages from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX will be permanently deferred; Retrying will NOT succeed. See http://postmaster.yahoo.com/42...

      Deferred: 421 4.7.0 [TS01] Messages from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX temporarily deferred due to user complaints - 4.16.55.1; see http://postmaster.yahoo.com/42...

      Hotmail spits back this message:

      Deferred: 421 RP-001 (BAY004-MC5F24) Unfortunately, some messages from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX weren't sent. Please try again. We have limits for how many messages can be sent per hour and per day. You can also refer to http://mail.live.com/mail/trou....

    3. Re:First step is to collect data. by khasim · · Score: 2

      The code is what matters. Here's a site with a bit more info:
      http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3463

      If HOTMAIL is rejecting with one code but YAHOO is rejecting with a different code then there may be THREE issues for him to deal with.

      And since he is running a server he will most likely be using port 25. Encryption may change that. But for initial testing purposes he should skip encryption for HOTMAIL and YAHOO until he can determine why his messages are being rejected.

    4. Re:First step is to collect data. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Deferred: 421 4.7.0 [TS01] Messages from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX temporarily deferred due to user complaints - 4.16.55.1; see

      That seems to indicate that at least one of your recipients at YAHOO is actively flagging your messages as spam. Maybe they have incorrectly written a rule that is doing so.

      Deferred: 421 4.7.1 [TS03] All messages from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX will be permanently deferred; Retrying will NOT succeed.

      ... and ...

      Deferred: 421 RP-001 (BAY004-MC5F24) Unfortunately, some messages from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX weren't sent. Please try again. We have limits for how many messages can be sent per hour and per day.

      And that one seems to be saying that your IP address is sending too many messages.

      How many messages per day are you sending?

    5. Re:First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your mail server require authentication before it sends? Not all are configured that way by default. If it isn't, your server could have been "noticed" by a spammer and being used to relay mail. If you do require authentication, look at your server logs to make sure none of your accounts has been hacked to send large volumes of mail.

      Do that before you fill out any of the forms listed above, as the error messages you're posting make it look like you are sending large amounts of spam. If you request to be removed from their spam lists and are still sending spam, you may be added to a permanent blacklist.

    6. Re:First step is to collect data. by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      Regarding the person from yahoo rejecting my email - I can confirm that's not the case. I set up a yahoo account for my self, brand new, and can't email it.

      Regarding the hotmail one - I checked the logs. The average is about 3 emails a week to hotmail.

      So, in other words, both of these messages are crap and not accurate.

    7. Re:First step is to collect data. by hawkbug · · Score: 2

      Yes, it requires authentication. It is definitely not an open relay or being used for spam, even by a legitimate user who may have had their password hacked or something.

    8. Re:First step is to collect data. by kiphat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It may be that when one users complains, they block ALL email from your server; not just mail to the complaining account holder.

    9. Re:First step is to collect data. by khasim · · Score: 3, Informative

      So, in other words, both of these messages are crap and not accurate.

      They are similar messages from two different services. It is very unlikely that they are both claiming the same problem ... incorrectly.

      You've had those IP addresses for 2 years without problems so it probably is not a pre-existing issue with the IP addresses.

      Do you have a firewall that you can configure to monitor outbound port 25 attempts from your network? Or do you know how to use a sniffer such as Wireshark to do so?

      Or can you move your email server to one of the other IP addresses you have? And see if it is still blocked?

      Right now it is looking like the problem is on your network. Not Comcast and not GMAIL or YAHOO or HOTMAIL. I might be wrong. But if it were me, I'd test my network first. Otherwise, even if you do get through to YAHOO or HOTMAIL they'll look at the logs and say the same thing.

    10. Re:First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So stop spamming.

    11. Re:First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding the person from yahoo rejecting my email - I can confirm that's not the case. I set up a yahoo account for my self, brand new, and can't email it.

      I believe that's not what the parent meant. He probably meant: one (or several) person receiving the emails complained about your emails and as a result yahoo (or some sort of centralized repository between gmail, hotmail and yahoo) banned your IP for *everyone*.

      So back to your main question "where is that centralized blacklist ?"

    12. Re:First step is to collect data. by hawkbug · · Score: 2

      Yes, before I brought this question to Slashdot, I did my homework first. I've scoured logs, check RBLs, used wireshark, etc. It's definitely not a misconfiguration on my end or an issue with complaints resulting from spam. The traffic coming from my server is so ridiculously small, that I was shocked to begin getting messages like these from those email providers.

      The only conclusion that I can draw is that these major providers all use the same dynamic, or what they interpret as dynamic anyhow, IP lists and block based on them. I can understand that... the part that I have an issue with is that I have no recourse to have my IP reevaluated.

    13. Re:First step is to collect data. by hawkbug · · Score: 2

      Exactly. I would love to know what centralized IP blacklist that those 3 providers use.

    14. Re:First step is to collect data. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Contact Hotmail. Somewhere there is a link to contact them about email delivery.

      Hotmail was blocking emails from my VPS, but after I contacted them, they put my IP on a list for "conditional accept" -- which the describe as allowing a limited number of emails to be sent from my IP to hotmail. It's enough for my small family server.

      Gmail, on the other hand, tends to put emails from my VPS into spam boxes unless there is a history of the recipient receiving from my server.

      I now have a problem with mxlogic. mxlogic blocks my IP address with a 550 code. They did not respond to me contacting them.

      Basically, too many big email services use block lists that are not updated with enough frequency. My problems are not caused by nearby IP addresses -- the ISP has put in place a transparent email proxy which analyzes and rejects spam (if no TLS) and limits outgoing email rates (if TLS used).

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    15. Re:First step is to collect data. by khasim · · Score: 4, Informative

      The traffic coming from my server is so ridiculously small, that I was shocked to begin getting messages like these from those email providers.

      Not your server.

      Your network.

      Monitor the traffic going into or out-of your cable modem to see what is happening on outbound port 25 for that IP address. Do this for 24 hours.

      Move your mail server to a different IP address if that is possible. You have 5 addresses, right?

      The rejection messages are saying that YAHOO and HOTMAIL are seeing too many messages from your specific IP address.

      GMAIL is accepting the messages but flagging them as spam.

      It is extremely unlikely that three competing services are all using the same SMTP-blacklist (that they refuse to identify) to reject messages.

    16. Re:First step is to collect data. by tibit · · Score: 1

      Regarding the person from yahoo rejecting my email - I can confirm that's not the case. I set up a yahoo account for my self, brand new, and can't email it.

      Yahoo isn't looking at whether one person is rejecting the mail, the yahoo blacklisting is an aggregate process. Most likely your IPs were used by a spammer or an open relay or an owned host before, and were source of spam reported by multiple Yahoo users. Now you've got the broken goods.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    17. Re:First step is to collect data. by tibit · · Score: 1

      You've had those IP addresses for 2 years without problems so it probably is not a pre-existing issue with the IP addresses.

      OK, I didn't notice that. I think Yahoo is simply overzealous and they treat all Comcast subscriber IPs as spammy.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    18. Re:First step is to collect data. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      For Yahoo, set up DMARC with addresses to get DMARC reports.

      I did this for one domain and found that Yahoo (and only Yahoo) was failing on my SPF with "permerr". I tracked this down to an excessive spf record (or perhaps an spf record that exceeded the limit on dns lookups).

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    19. Re:First step is to collect data. by ChrisSlicks · · Score: 1

      Ask for a new IP block that won't be detected as dynamic. My mail server is on a comcast business IP block and has no issue sending to gmail, yahoo etc.
      I've had a lot of problems receiving mail from providers such as AOL since their servers are always on a RBL. Personally I don't care to receive any mail from someone that still has an AOL account but the boss complains. Was forced to make a blacklist exception for their servers.

    20. Re:First step is to collect data. by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Yahoo spits out several messages:

      Deferred: 421 4.7.1 [TS03] All messages from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX will be permanently deferred; Retrying will NOT succeed.

      Not that this will likely help you, but you're probably completely screwed, since Yahoo doesn't even care they are intentionally violating the RFC.

      All 4xx response codes are for messages that can't be delivered right now, but some condition change will allow them to be delivered. The text of their message implies that the response code should have been a 5xx. This sort of behavior is usually done in response to spam (foolishly, since most spambots never retry) in an attempt to waste the resources of the sending server by causing it to retry.

      The Microsoft response might be legitimate if their systems think that you are sending "too much" e-mail.

    21. Re:First step is to collect data. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand him.

      If person "B" sets up a rule saying your are spam (or "enough" person "B"s) then general heuristics of their spam filters may filter you as spam from all yahoo users.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    22. Re:First step is to collect data. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      We recently put servers up on a new circuit. One of them was a mail server. It immediately refused by Yahoo for the same reasons. I tried everything conceivable to fix it, and nothing helped. That IP wasn't listed anywhere as being blocked, but it was.

      We needed a second block of IPs, because we simply ran out of space in the first rather quickly (we were migrating a lot of servers). I switched the primary IP on the machine from the first block to the second, and suddenly those refused emails went through fine.

      So, it may be a matter of changing your IPs. Another solution may be to put up a smart host somewhere, and relay all your outgoing mail through it. Doing that, when a provider decides to block it, you can just switch to another smart host rather painlessly.

      In sendmail, the .mc file would have this line:

      define(`SMART_HOST', `relay.example.com')

      In sendmail.conf (if you like to do it manually"

      # "Smart" relay host (may be null)

      DS relay.example.com

      On your relay server, you'd just need to make sure that the IP of your real mail server is authorized to relay through the relay server.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    23. Re:First step is to collect data. by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Yes, before I brought this question to Slashdot, I did my homework first. I've scoured logs, check RBLs, used wireshark, etc. It's definitely not a misconfiguration on my end or an issue with complaints resulting from spam.

      One change you can make is to configure the outbound NAT from your mail server to appear to come from a different one of your static public IP addresses. Change your DNS to match, and see if that helps at all.

      If it doesn't, then perhaps as others have said, you are collateral damage from nearby IP addresses. Has your IP block been allocated to you? If so, you can usually use the WHOIS info to convince the other end that you aren't related to the collateral IP address.

    24. Re:First step is to collect data. by hawkbug · · Score: 2

      Yes, I have 5 IPs. It's a pain, but yes, I can try one of the others. In regards to the cable modem - it's set up in a manner that the single outgoing IP for my mail server is directly linked to it. So, when I say I ran wireshark on the traffic, I did so for that IP. It is the only machine on the network that uses that IP. The results were well within what I expected for email traffic. Most of the traffic is incoming spam, and the only outgoing messages are being sent by valid users - and not many of them at that.

    25. Re:First step is to collect data. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Does the reverse DNS give the same hostname that your mail server uses for its EHLO/HELO greeting?

    26. Re:First step is to collect data. by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      https://ers.trendmicro.com/rep...

      It's not on any known blacklists, but it's a major one that many use.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    27. Re:First step is to collect data. by tepples · · Score: 1

      The code is what matters.

      If Hotmail or Yahoo flat out rejects the incoming connection, there will be no status code.

    28. Re:First step is to collect data. by rikkards · · Score: 1

      You have an account setup with yahoo. Ask them why they are blocking it. They will probably give you an answer

    29. Re:First step is to collect data. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I should add that my domains are set up with spf and dkim records and I get dmarc reports indicating passes. My mail server has correct and matching forward and reverse DNS. My IP addresses do not show up in any reputable blacklists.

      Yet still Gmail thinks that I am sending spam.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    30. Re:First step is to collect data. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Regarding the person from yahoo rejecting my email - I can confirm that's not the case. I set up a yahoo account for my self, brand new, and can't email it.

      I think that you misunderstand the reply from Yahoo. Yahoo is saying that *someone* flagged emails from your IP address as spam, so now, Yahoo won't accept *any* emails from your IP address.

      Question for others: why is Yahoo rejecting the emails with a 4XX code if Yahoo will never accept the emails. Why not a 5XX code? Using a 4XX code forever seems like poor etiquette.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    31. Re:First step is to collect data. by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Gmail at least doesn't use blacklists. They have custom spam filtering built off their huge position in email.

    32. Re:First step is to collect data. by Cantankerous+Cur · · Score: 1

      This.

      Having Comcast do a reverse DNS on the static IPs should be on the to-do list

    33. Re:First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not a Comcast issue, this is an issue with what you are sending and who you are sending it too.

      I have seen the same thing happen to legitimate private emails sent back and forth between an Office365 hosted domain and those same 3 domains.

      As the sender you can only put the data on the wire in the right way and open the receiver wants to play ball.

      Your can call the 3 Domains blocking you and prove you are sending legitimate personal or business emails to those accounts and have them unblock you.

      You can request your correspondence counter parts use a private email server not a public free-as-in-beer service so they can receive email from you.

      You can play the, I have been blocked let me use a different IP / provider / host etc. cheapcloud.com is reasonable I have a 4 core, 2GB Ram, 80 GB VD, 3TB of monthly bandwidth that runs me $5 a month. You could run a new one every month and use a new IP.

      Or you can just realize that spamming people put you in the same group, as people you kick puppies and stop doing it.

    34. Re:First step is to collect data. by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 1

      Deferred: 421 RP-001 ...

      Are you sure your systems haven't been compromised by spambots? Everything was fine two weeks ago [and had been for a while]. What's changed? ISP logs before and after may show something.

      Can you set up a new system [with a different OS like linux, netbsd, etc.] that is a gateway between your current systems and your router/modem [would require a second ethernet port/card]. Have this system filter/monitor all traffic, looking for something suspicious.

      --
      Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
    35. Re:First step is to collect data. by khasim · · Score: 2

      It is the only machine on the network that uses that IP.

      ON A WIRED WORKSTATION ON THAT NETWORK, go to http://www.whatismyip.com/ and see if the IP address it reports ends in .157.

      ON A WIRELESS DEVICE ON THAT NETWORK, do the same.

      This will tell you whether a machine on your network may be sending spam from the same address as your email server.

    36. Re:First step is to collect data. by CBravo · · Score: 1

      Actually: Gmail is quite the odd one out. They have their own opinion on how to filter, and quite succesful at it. Hotmail and Yahoo both offer feedbackloop and, sometimes, you can contact them.

      Now the anti-spam organisations sure know each other, and share data. But on a larger scale that you would probably see in blacklists (for a full list of blacklists: http://multirbl.valli.org/). Since you are not blacklisted, I don't think that that is the issue.

      About the messages: Hotmail says you should try again later. Do that. But Yahoo says that there are user complaints... That is probably true. You may actually be sending too little email (that looks like a botnet-like signature). They want a lot of legitimate traffic per IP, not droplets of maybe-spam.

      But to conclude: Email is not easy anymore, even if it is your profession (it is mine). Forget about getting to know what is behind the curtains of blacklists and large inbox providers (they have their hands full on real crime to worry about a few false positives).

      --
      nosig today
    37. Re:First step is to collect data. by CBravo · · Score: 1

      Bounce codes are often a lie. Do not believe them per se. This has to do with anti-spam methods.

      --
      nosig today
    38. Re:First step is to collect data. by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      DMARC is definitely at the top of my list to make sure I have set up after reading about it today. Thank you for the input.

    39. Re:First step is to collect data. by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      This has been done for the past 2 years, so I'm good there.

    40. Re:First step is to collect data. by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've monitored traffic. And no, my system has not been compromised.

    41. Re:First step is to collect data. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not your server.

      Your network.

      May still be the server. I recently ended up on all sorts of spam lists too yet my mail log and stats showed only the 3-5 outgoing emails I send each day. None the less i got 1000s of replies about destination host unreachable.

      The latest craze is not misconfigured servers, it's hacked servers where the attacker places their own program. This doesn't even need to be a Windows trojan. In my case it was a dodgy Wordpress plugin with a security hole which allowed an attacker to modify the plugin source. The replacement plugin contained amongst other things a mail relay written in Python.

    42. Re:First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmm, yes, SOMEONE has treated him like he's guilty, so he MUST be guilty! BURN HIM! BURN HIM NOW!

      No, wait, parent poster is just a fucking idiot. Typical Intertubez vigilante. My bad. Sorry about those burns, dude.

    43. Re:First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo doesn't even care they are intentionally violating the RFC.

      Well, at least they're consistent. They don't care about anything else, either.

    44. Re:First step is to collect data. by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Unless you've been keeping detailed records long BEFORE the event(s) that triggered your blacklisting, odds are you'll have no record of what actually caused it. With Yahoo, you may not even know who was sent what, so you don't know who might have clicked the "spam" button. (and it used to be far to easy for complete idiots to click spam instead of delete, and not have any idea the difference between them.)

      NET-23-30-0-0-1 was assigned to Comcast Business two and a half years ago. Your (apparent) netblock [NET-23-31-69-152-1] was assigned to you about a year ago. If anti-spam outfits were, as you claim, blocking all Comcast addresses, you'd've been blocked from day-one. The fact that you weren't, and have now mysteriously been blocked very strongly suggests something occurred from within your netblock to cause it. That means ANY device within your network could be the "bad apple".

    45. Re:First step is to collect data. by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 1

      All the rejection messages point to your systems being affected in some way. The "agent" may be establishing an SMTP connection that doesn't need authentication (e.g. it connects directly to yahoo's inbound SMTP port for a message to a yahoo user. Thus, it's not a relay as far as yahoo is concerned).

      It could be bypassing anything you've already set up [or co-opting it in some way that you don't yet understand]. If your systems have been compromised, all the authentication credentials are available to the agent. The best way I know of to prove/disprove this is to set up a sniffer/router/blocker.

      The rejections are based on [too] high message frequency, which tends to indicate that you're not on a blocklist [yet]. It's also not likely to be a policy change at a given mail recipient ISP since at least three started rejection at more or less the same time.

      Having the ability to log/monitor/analyze traffic in general might be a good thing. What if it weren't just emails but DDoS or other attacks [which carry considerably more liability for your business]?

      If you can track down some of the messages that got sent that had complaints attached to them, the delivery envelope may have some clues. For example, the specifics of the SMTP parameters used (ordinary SMTP or eSMTP, etc.) Perhaps contacting the mail abuse departments of yahoo et. al. and explaining what is happening may help. They could tell you how many messages are arriving from your IP address. Compare this against an estimate of what your users are doing. If your legit users haven't starting sending many more messages recently, but the ISP is seeing a huge uptick, this will be telling.

      Since you've got [and are paying the extra money for] Comcast business class, they should be able to help with the traffic logging/analysis. Also, if the targeted ISPs are limiting based on an IP range, Comcast may be able to help in dealing with the ISPs. You may have to escalate this a level or two within Comcast's support hierarchy. Be sure to get a trouble ticket filed [if you haven't already].

      --
      Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
    46. Re:First step is to collect data. by s.petry · · Score: 1

      So the first step is to look at the logs and see if the rejection message has any information in it. Do the rejection messages at YAHOO and HOTMAIL have the same code?

      They won't, each major ISP uses their own codes and return strings. They do follow RFC, 400 is a deferral and 500 are rejections, but both will return their own custom of 4xx and 5xx.

      A huge problem with Yahoo, AOL, and Hotmail is that they won't provide much information on why you are being deferred or rejected. You can sign up for their feedback loops and start looking for where they get complaints. Working at an ISP one of the best is that customers forward mail from our servers to a Yahoo account and then mark it as Spam which gets our servers into the Yahoo shit list. Yes, they are too lazy to determine when mail is forwarded to a single recipient, and have refused to fix this issue for over a decade. They also allow a single user to submit the same 1 message as spam as often as they want. We have had single Yahoo mail accounts submit the same exact message tens of thousands causing our servers to be hard rejected. I personally hate them, and yes I have reason for my hate.

      Gmail does return some pretty good text with their rejections and deferrals. Reading the messages will usually point out the problem, at least from the Google point of view.

      If you are not already doing so, run SpamAssassin which can rate outbound mail and places headers in the mail so you can trace problems. One of your connecting clients may be in a RBL and not know it, which may cause rejections. I'd also recommend something like Cloudmark plugged in, or at least DCC. Quarantine mail detected as spam and see what's going on.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    47. Re:First step is to collect data. by IcyWolfy · · Score: 2

      Users are assigned 5 IP addresses.
      Many block lists are not that granular blocking a /32 address.

      Thus, with the user's 23.32.69.15 address:
      If they block 23.32.69.15 /31 (.12 to .15) addresses, that would cover 4 IPs. We do not know if he owns all 4, but it would mean his 5th IP may escape the block. If he doesn't have all 4 in that block, then someone else, assigned an adjacent IP could have triggered the block.

      If they block 23.32.69.15/30 (.8 to .15) That would cover 8 IPs, a rule which could be triggered by someone unrelated to him that happens to have an ajacent IP address.

      It really depends on how granular the block is.
      I have pretty much never seen anyone block specific IP addresses before in Emal spam prevention.
      Normally, I only see /25 (128 IP addresses) blocks and rarely /26 (64 IP address blocks). And provable exceptions within those blocks get white-listed.
      It's much easier on the spam processing filter to minimize the number of potential rules. So, we over-block. And almost never get any complaints. The major commercial IPs are white-listed at the ACCEPT level (may be further down the line be flagged as SPAM)

    48. Re:First step is to collect data. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      "It may be that when one users complains, they block ALL email from your server; not just mail to the complaining account holder."

      this is not always true, one of yahoo's partners was once accidently flagged as spam when i was cleaning house... that service then became blocked for about 3 months, then the messages started coming back, then rinse repeat every 3 months. near as i can tell everyone else got their messages from the yahoo partner company despite me having one time accidently flagged them as spam. there is no way to unflag spam(that i know of) and i don't feel like trying to unsubscribe and resubscribe..

    49. Re:First step is to collect data. by IcyWolfy · · Score: 1

      Gmail filters are also heavily content based.

      If you send similar messages all the time, then it'll get auto-flagged as spam as significant repeated content.

      I've seen this happen with users having large annoying HTML signatures. All their emails suddenly started going to Spam folder (and I was then not receiving important emails from their other-coworkers with whom I was communicating)

    50. Re:First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This here.

      Double check that you're not accidentally running an open SMTP relay agent and someone is just bouncing their outgoing mail through you.

    51. Re:First step is to collect data. by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      I agree, if only to diagnose the original problem. But regardless, outbound port 25 should be restricted in the LAN with the exception of your e-mail server. That way, if a machine is infected, it can't blow SPAM out and sully the reputation of your public IP.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    52. Re:First step is to collect data. by Skylinux · · Score: 1

      Not only that. Yahoo is one of those providers that will silently drop messages. My server receives an "OK" but the message never makes it to the inbox - puff - gone.

      Only happens with Yahoo.

      --
      Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
    53. Re: First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people really do want your messages, ask them to complain to Yahoo (& others) that they are not receiving them. "I can't receive his messages" is WAY more powerful than "They can't receive my messages" in the world of messaging and anti-spam management.

    54. Re: First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we seriously trying to help a spammer ?

      He hit message limits, and his targets filed complaints.

      He needs to address those issues. It's in the error messages clear as day.

    55. Re:First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      temporarily deferred due to user complaints -

      I have users sending their vanity domain email to GMail accounts with .forward files. I'm getting aggressive rate-limiting from GMail, on one IP but not on nearby IP's, but mail still gets through on the rate-limited IP.

      I speculate the users are reporting the forwarded mail as spam. I've told them to use GMail's POP3 client feature to suck their mail instead of .forward'ing it, but they're too lazy. If you can, I would suggest:

        - use 3 different IP addresses, one for mailing lists, one for .forward'ed mail, and one for normail mail.
        - ban forwarding of mail entirely and insist that your users configure GMail POP3

      Unfortunately the big ISP spam filters are designed not to give you any feedback, so this is all speculation. I haven't done these things myself because I'm lazy, and mail is still getting through.

    56. Re:First step is to collect data. by AK+Marc · · Score: 2
      You've done so much pre-work that you argue with everyone trying to help.

      the part that I have an issue with is that I have no recourse to have my IP reevaluated.

      Ah, you just came here to bitch about it because you are helpless. That's why you are rejecting all the help offered.

    57. Re:First step is to collect data. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Sometimes because it's true. Small businesses with opt-in only newsletters get tagged spam all the time.

    58. Re:First step is to collect data. by ale2011 · · Score: 1

      ...I have SPF records for the domain...

      Your record is bad. Please check dmarcian's spf test.

      ...and IP address are not on any RBLs.

      Right, but they're not on any whitelist either. Try this: https://www.dnswl.org/

    59. Re:First step is to collect data. by ale2011 · · Score: 1

      The only conclusion that I can draw is that these major providers all use the same dynamic, or what they interpret as dynamic anyhow, IP lists and block based on them. I can understand that... the part that I have an issue with is that I have no recourse to have my IP reevaluated.

      IME, it's unlikely that Hotmail and Yahoo do something in the same way; khasim is right, attach a firewall and have outgoing port 25 connections logged, then compare that log with your mail server's "official" log. That's the nasty side of remote control.

      Subscribing to their FBL might also, occasionally, reveal unwanted activity. You need DKIM signatures for Yahoo. For Hotmail, you have to prepare a curl script that downloads their page every 12~24 hrs.

    60. Re: First step is to collect data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /ip-log/karma.log.11:virus 23.31.69.157 fimble.com NOTQUIT [S=5 - FakeMX NoQuit] X=tarbaby H=mail.fimble.com [23.31.69.157] HELO=[fimble.fimble.com] F=[lollypop@fimble.com] T=[terrydw@mkl.com] S=[Feeling adventurous tonight? Multiple mega hot lasses, free access!]

      Hostkarma still had it in the logs.

      You sent junk mail; you got blacklisted. Nothing more to see here.

  58. Ready made solution by DigitalHavoc · · Score: 1

    You have the option of using a smart host. You can read a brief description here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S... Some have a free tier, some don't. I've usually use a smarthost by default so that my smtp server's IP address is not directly associated with the message by default and instead I can opt to bypass the smarthost if the smarthost gets blocked for any reason. Here is one that I found but have never used: http://www.socketlabs.com/sign...

  59. Makes Google, Hotmail, Yahoo more money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By rejecting email from private email servers, they are in fact interfering with the way SMTP and Internet mail is set up. Email should be delivered non-discriminately, but by Gmail and Hotmail blocking stuff, they are actually trying to force people who use third party services to use their services to send and receive mail. "Either switch, or have your mail go undelivered."

    The SMTP specification was not set up to allow companies to monopolize off the traffic but that's how it's being done today.

    Also, I myself host my own mail server. I host it in a VPS, a server in Seattle, WA, w/ static IPs. The server is set up w/ proper SPF records. Most mail goes through, but I do get a lot of rejections by a large amount of providers who automatically flag it as "SPAM" or it's blocked by "Content filtering". AOL seems to block most of my messages exclusively. As does many super aggressive spam filtering set ups..

    Gmail puts it right in the inbox half the time, Yahoo sent it to spam box the first receipt, then sent it to inbox after I flagged one message as not spam.

    Overall the system is borked. By that, I mean there is no way to guarantee any message is not marked as spam, and the filters seem to be arbitrary and mark many non-spam messages as spam OFF and ON regardless of where the message is sent from.

    On my Gmail and Yahoo! account I notice this the most. It's also why I think all anti-spam measures are broken, because it's easy to get bounced messages and messages sent to SPAM folder ..

    What I do know is that there is no solution other than to get these providers of anti-spam services and these large email providers to fix their stupid services, perhaps implementing a system that only flags actual SPAM messages as SPAM and is set to never bounce or reject any message at all.

    http://www.obamasweapon.com/

  60. I used to run my own mail server... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Comcast residential service. My outgoing emails were also rejected by other mail servers. The easiest solution is to use Comcast email servers as a SmartHost and relay your outgoing emails through them.

    You should also adjust your SPF record to show that you are relaying through the Comcast server.

    Example DNS SPF

    example.com. IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a:smtp.comcast.net"

    Many mail servers will blacklist your emails based upon your IP address as being in the Comcast IP range. They expect email coming from any IP that is not an actual Comcast email server IP as being spam.

  61. Can you use an SMTP relay smarthost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try using an upstream smtp smarthost that will relay the outbound mail for you.

    Either set one up on a cloud platform outside of Comcast (make sure the relay is secured to only your mail server's IP!!!) or pay someone like Dyn.com to use theirs (they call it Email Delivery Express).

  62. Save yourself the headaches..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a smarthost......Comcast's smtp server or purchase the service from elsewhere (it's not that expensive).

    I have been through this before many times for many clients. A lot of servers out there either flat out block IP addresses that belong to consumer accesisible ISP (Comcast, TimeWarmer, Bell, Telus, etc)....or flag as spam all emails coming from those addresses pools....

    Even if you manage to solve this one, it will not be long before you run into similar issues. At least when you use a smarthost, it becomes their problem.

  63. I recently went through the same thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I recently went through this on our Comcast business to Verizon e-mail servers. I really wish I could tell you it was easy but I fought Comcast for 2 weeks with ridiculous support to finally get it resolved. You just have to keep pushing the issue with support because they will not believe that they are getting blocked. It was frustrating and they all pretty much tell you to call the other company. I just dug through my e-mails and these were on the chain involving the engineering team that was helping. God speed!

    help4u@verizonbusiness.com
    inengineering@core.verizon.com
    Laura_Jorgenson@cable.comcast.com

  64. Very common, tweak your SPF record by mitgib · · Score: 1
    This is all too common now, tweak your SPF and also add a dedicated SPF for your mailing server

    domain.com. IN TXT "v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:x.x.x.x +ipv6:x:x::x:x/128 -all"
    mailer.domain.com. IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:x.x.x.x a:mailer.domain.com ipv6:x:x::x:x/128 -all"

    --
    Being a spelling & grammar Nazi is a sign you do not poses the intelligence to contribute to the conversation
  65. Sendgrid, Mandril, or Amazon SES. by Tsarnon · · Score: 1

    I really think you shouldn't have to use one of these, but it would solve your problem: Sendgrid, Mandril, or Amazon SES.

  66. virtual ISP ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use IPv6 from tunnelBroker.net, that will get you in most places.

  67. tl;dr SPF not enough, check ptr record, use dkim by layabout · · Score: 1

    SPF records are not sufficient anymore. More spammers use them than legitimate sites. As others have suggested, check your PTR record. Since Comcast owns that, they may not have set it up for you, and sign all of your messages with DKIM. It works amazingly well for helping you bypass blockages. I know your pain, and I wish you the best of luck in beating poorly engineered antispam systems.

  68. Relay to upstream provider by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    OK, I had a very similar setup with AT&T ADSL some years ago, and basically I had the same problem, most other SMTP hosts were bouncing my emails and/or flat refusing to even communicate with my server.

    In my case, the solution was to relay all my email through my internet provider's SMTP, authenticating with my ADSL login. Once I handed off all my email to the upstream SMTP, things worked perfectly.

    Most customer assigned IP's are pretty much blocked out from relaying any email these days. If I were in your position, I'd try to setup to relay to your upstream SMTP so you can relay mail effectively. Having your own SMTP talk to everyone else's SMTP for outbound just doesn't really work very well anymore. Contact Comcast and find out the details on setting up to relay to their SMTP.

  69. Upgrade to business class ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    echo $TITLE

    1. Re:Upgrade to business class ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man $STORY

  70. Try another email provider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like SES

  71. Check for backscatter by ckthorp · · Score: 1

    Have you checked to see if you are sending unintended backscatter? You can get blacklisted by many hosts very fast if you are sending non-delivery reports (NDRs). In this day and age, you need to either reject the email while the connection is active (eg, user not found) or silently drop mail (eg spam that is filtered after the connection is ended). If you send NDRs after the email is acknowledged as received and ok, you are contributing to a significant backscatter problem.

    1. Re:Check for backscatter by ckthorp · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the self-reply -- one more thing. Yes, I know this is non-RFC compliant behavior, but it is essentially required these days.

  72. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bingo. He's on the Spamhaus PBL. His IP range was either added recently or he was given a new IP. Either way this sounds to be a case of being mixed in with the residential customers, who should not be connecting to remote MXes directly.

    The PBL it the king of lists for this kind of thing. If he is on it and can get off, he should be fine in a few days.

  73. Act like a business, not a consumer.... by RedLeg · · Score: 1
    You are paying for business class service, demand it.

    Make this Comcast's problem, as if things are as you describe, it obviously is. DEMAND (politely, through your business support channels) that they resolve it, and demand a resolution deadline. If they do not meet it, terminate (or threaten to) the service.

    In the mean time, I suggest you investigate VPN services which support static IPs on their end. Use comcast as your last mile connection if you must, but poke out on the Internet somewhere more friendly. If you have to do this, reduce your IPs from comcast to one, make it dynamic, citing their failure to provide the service contracted. Your VPN provider should handle the rest, and your comcast bill should go down.

    Hope this helps.....

    Red

    1. Re:Act like a business, not a consumer.... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      As a comcast user with nearly the same described setup (business grade connection, 5 static, mail server) I can say affirmatively it's not Comcast's problem. It's on his end, not Comcast's.

  74. I have had emails rejected by hotmail by ls671 · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    I am in a data center and I had email rejected by hotmail for no reasons (not on any rbl blacklist etc.). I solved it by masquerading outgoing mail for hotmail on another IP on a different subnet I own on my datacenter connection. I would try this first. You can also try to contact hotmail so they whitelist your IPs.

    If your 5 IPs are on the same subnet and blacklisted by hotmail, I don't see any other solutions than routing your mail through an intermediate mail server. Have you tried relaying it through comcast MX? I can't imagine hotmail rejecting emails from all comcast subscribers.

    Also, you probably have somebody sending spam on the same subnet as yours and hotmail seem to like to block /24 subnets. They should eventually unblock you if your subnet stop sending spam.

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  75. Third party smarthost by hymie! · · Score: 1

    I subscribe to a service called Dyn Standard SMTP. My home email machine uses this as its smarthost, and all outgoing mail passes through Dyn's server before going out to the internet at large. Problem solved.

    I'm sure other hosting companies will offer a similar service.

  76. Not so fast by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    Before you say such things, you might want to look up the legal morass surrounging mail servers under your direct control and those not. Start with Megaupload and then follow links to the less public ones. There are DAMN good reason to keep your mail server on premises be it home or business, if you don't understand why you might want to educate yourself before giving advice.

                    -Charlie

    1. Re:Not so fast by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      There are DAMN good reason to keep your mail server on premises be it home or business, if you don't understand why you might want to educate yourself before giving advice.

      Correct. Get a $0.99/mo VPS, set up OpenVPN, and relay out over that connection.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  77. Don't bother. You won't get anywhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your connection comes from anyone remotely connected to plain old end-user internet service don't even bother trying to send SMTP mail from any IP they provide.

    They will all be blacklisted in RBLS (And for good reason) You will never be able to get service reliable enough. Save yourself some pain and get a smarthost service or setup a secured SMTP relay on a VPS or something.

    The issues you will encounter:

    1. The IP pools will be default blacklisted in all of the RBLS by virtue of being connected to a provider that provides generic internet service to consumers. Getting them un-listed is an exercise in futility. You won't get un-listing in all of them, and you'll probably end up back in the pools when those services update their records.

    2. Most Cable/DSL providers cannot or will not provide you with the ability to set proper reverse DNS records for your IPs. They won't delegate you authority and getting them to make entries for you is always a clusterfuck. Not having proper rDNS will get your IPs blacklisted in RBLs

    3. The Cable/DSL providers don't care that you can't run a proper email server. They won't help you, or they'll be clueless as to how to help you.

    Today we just use a hosted Exchange service. I don't miss running email servers at all. Spam filtering, managing exchange servers, dealing with reputation services and fucking with rDNS is someone else's problem now. Not saying that's the right choice for everyone, but in our case it was cheaper to pay someone else to deal with it.

  78. Not a Comcast issue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as I hate Comcast, the issue is on the receiving side - Hotmail, Yahoo, and Gmail are flagging you as spam.

    You have to contact Hotmail, Yahoo, and Gmail and ask nicely to be taken off their spam list. Good luck with their automated systems and low-paid overseas staff.

    My company currently has an issue with hotmail in that they nearly always flag our email as spam, even replying to a customer inquiry.

    We can't find anyone to talk to at hotmail, and their automated systems to request whitelisting don't work.

    It has reached the point that if a customer calls, we ask them please don't use hotmail.

  79. Professional Mass Emailer by Mullen · · Score: 2

    At the company I work at, I run several large high volume mass mailing servers that send million of messages a month (50 million last month). Here is what I recommend you do:

    1) Get forward and reverse DNS setup and most importantly, the forward and reverse DNS information must match.

    2) Set up and use DKIM for all outbound traffic.

    3) Have the SPF information in your DNS records. Don't put your block of IP's in SPF record, just the one IP that you use for sending email. Make sure there is a "-all" in the records so that it makes it clear that all other email claiming to be you is discarded by other server.

    4) You will need to setup Feed Back Loops and proper SWIP (If possible) contact information. You will need to go to the big 10 ISP's and submit the FBL information to them and get put on their White Lists. Don't lie to them, just tell them your personal email server that is having issues sending mail to them and you want to get on their White List. FBL's are usually for people who send high volumes of mail, include Newsletters and some "spammy" mail, but I find it helps regular mail servers if you set up FBL information.

    --
    Linux O Muerte!
    1. Re:Professional Mass Emailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is SWIP contact information?

    2. Re:Professional Mass Emailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Get forward and reverse DNS setup and most importantly, the forward and reverse DNS information must match.

      So long as the ptr resolves, it should be fine. Otherwise, yeah. I block comcast and several other consumer ISPs based on rdns, however it's not only consumer ISPs. I also firewall the whole of leaseweb due to misconfigured mailers without any rDNS.

  80. Aren't Yahoo and Hotmail the same thing? by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    I know Yahoo and Bing use the same data for search. Stands to reason they'd share technical data and policies for other services too.

    1. Re:Aren't Yahoo and Hotmail the same thing? by akanellis · · Score: 1

      lol NO

  81. Simpler: Just a VPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A VPS that will relay mail just for you should do it already.

  82. How I fixed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a similar issue years ago with email from my domain to craigslist being blocked.

    The problem turned out to be the Reverse DNS (PTR record) for the IP address.

    Call Comcast and ask them to change the PTR record for your mail server's IP to "mail.yourdomain.com" (or whatever you actually use). Having the A record and PTR record be perfect matches of each other will likely solve your problem.

    1. Re:How I fixed it by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have proper reverse DNS and SPF records. So, I'm good to go there.

  83. Email Delivery for IT Professionals by sam1am · · Score: 1

    A good read from the folks at mailchimp: http://mailchimp.com/resources... There are a couple sections that might be of use.

  84. DKIM by cs668 · · Score: 1

    Had the same problem until I started signing my email with DKIM. Suddenly google and friends were accepting it without problems.

    I am not on comcast, so it may not help you.

    1. Re:DKIM by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Had the same problem until I started signing my email with DKIM. Suddenly google and friends were accepting it without problems.

      I have good DKIM and SPF, and Google accepts my email, but with a fresh Gmail account, it goes into the spam folder. I know that my DKIM and SPF is good because Google sends me DMARC reports saying that my emails passed.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:DKIM by cs668 · · Score: 1

      I double checked by emailing to myself at a gmail account, then clicking the down arrow near the from line and checking to make sure the signature matched. Ever since I have had no issues with people receiving my emails at gmail.

  85. It'll be almost impossible to fix this by eblum · · Score: 1

    Get a new additional ISP connection just for email, or host somewhere.

  86. A suggestion by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    You might be able to make the argument that Comcast is in breach of their service agreement with you. Firstly, and as painful as it will probably be, try to resolve the issue with their technical support. If you get sent into an endless loop without any kind of resolution, you might get out of your contract by simply making the argument that Comcast is failing to provide services as advertised.

  87. SORBS is evil by visionsofmcskill · · Score: 1

    Your kinda screwed. A lot of the big providers (and small) use blocklists garnered from a bunch of companies who may or may not be responsive - and more often than not simply dont care about the small guy... amongst those companies ive had the most grief with SORBS for my various clients. Some lists you can get off of, others are essentially impossible... amongst which are the "Dynamic IP" and "home user" lists.

    When people set up which block lists to use, there are a couple that are not for specific offenders, but are instead simply full lists of all the known IPs in an ISP's block - such as all DSL / cable modem users. the thought being that you can block all email originating from peoples home connections, etc... which is under the presumption that legitimate emails will never come from cheap consumer grade connections which to be fair are largely spam. Problem is there are tons of small businesses with essentially "home" connections... even under business accounts they get lumped into the same IP ranges.

    The real issue is that in the last few years - particularly since gmail came about... email itself has begun to concentrate in only a few major providers hands... namely intermedia, office365 and gmail. As less and less small/medium sized businesses have their own mail servers the big boys have less concern for keeping things more flexibly acceptable - very few outfits have their own exchange servers anymore, i dropped my last internally maintained client mail server a few years ago, even bigger companies dont want to run exchange in house anymore - its just not worth it in most situations that dont have regulatory or legal requirements. The less companies that run their own mail servers the greater the liklihood that legitimate mail will only come from the major providers (and the less likely wholesale blocking of IP's is going to cause the sales team to freak out when their clients arent getting emails - which is honestly the only way ive ever seen IT departments actually lower their filter strength - usually after being yelled at by the sales execs).

    In order to deal with this problem we have found the best lasting solution is to use a store and forward relay service such as spamstopshere or setup your own via a micro instance in amazon. Postifx and Mailenable (windows) are two great programs that do the trick quite well. By setting up your own instance with a public IP which is more "trsuted" (comming from a major source of servers which have other large mail hosts running in the same IP block) you avoid all sorts of problems... you will have to do the normal MX, SPF and rDNS things as well for full compliance.

    In general this is better anyways, as you probably also want an inbound store and forward for those outages you memntioned (no lost emails!), and youll get the probably unneeded benefit of masking your real world address (one of my clients got a detailed direct bomb threat from a guy who found their address using an IP lookup - their address was otherwise unlisted).

    a micro instance on amazon is VERY cheap, and can be used for other things - like a simple website, a connection monitor etc..

    good luck

    --
    --Idiots, Every single one of YOU, A flaming mass of conglomerated morons, hey wait a second, isnt that how RAID works?
  88. Help from Comcast by ComcastCassie · · Score: 1

    Hi there, I think you need my assistance in setting up a PTR. I work for Comcast's corporate customer service team. Could you please email me at Cassie_Hart@comcast.com so that we can assist? Thanks, Comcast Cassie

    1. Re:Help from Comcast by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      Hi there, I think you need my assistance in setting up a PTR. I work for Comcast's corporate customer service team. Could you please email me at Cassie_Hart@comcast.com so that we can assist? Thanks, Comcast Cassie

      OP, if you decide to go this route, please let us know what happens.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  89. Same Issue, VPC solved it by spacemky · · Score: 1

    I had pretty much the same issue, only a different provider (TWC). I wound up just getting a $20/month Linode virtual server, and haven't had any issues since, and I don't have to host any physical hardware at my house.

    --
    640YB ought to be enough for anybody.
  90. Two things to try. by coldfarnorth · · Score: 1

    1. Check out Cloudmark (https://csi.cloudmark.com/en/reset/) - see if you are on their list.
    2. Make sure that your website (yes, website) has not been hacked. If someone is sending out spam that contains a link to your website, then services may mark you as spam. I had a customer who's wordpress install was hacked, and the 404 page was set up as a redirect to a shady pharmacy site. Once the problem was identified and corrected, the blacklist problems went away.

    --
    Lets start refering to The War Against Terror by it's initials. . .
  91. Solution VS Victory by backtick · · Score: 1

    If you don't care to 'win' the fight w/ comcast, then go get a budget ($1/month) VPS running CentOS like from somewhere cheap like Crissic or Ramnode and use it to route your outbound email. It'll cost you less in actual dollars than your time investment in fighting comcast to date at minimum wage or that you'll spend reading the comments on this 'ask me anything' I figure :)

    Just an option!

  92. Use a relay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep. Anyone who is not saying the word "relay" shouldn't be giving advice. Anyone who says "VPS" is a fucking moron.

  93. SMTP Relay Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't read all of the comments, there were far too many and my time is worth too much to spend all day reading all of the asshole comments. Here is what you should do: Go download Scrollout F1. Set it up on a $10 Linode, set your email server to relay all outbound email through it, and alternatively, set the Scrollout F1 as your MX record and tell it to forward all incoming email to your existing email server on what ever port you can get access to. Setup DMARC and SPF records on the Scrollout F1. Be happy!

  94. Sounds like a spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is trying to crowdsource a solution here on slashdot so he can get up and running again. Keep on selling the herbal viagra, it's God's Work you're doing.

    1. Re:Sounds like a spammer by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      I'm the guy who asked the question, and spammer I am not. I hate spam more than most people since I run my own mail server, and have for years. Back before spamassassin, my email server was basically unusable, thanks to the fact my personal email address was associated with my whois record. I'm just a poor asshole who signed a 3 year contract with comcast, and 2 years in, my connection became unusable for relaying email.

  95. Much more secure... by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    You do realize the guy is sending out unencrypted email over comcast's pipes in plain text. If privacy was his priority in choosing a home hosting solution, then you might want to awake the OP from his delusion of security by telling him he'll never see the court order that enables reading of all his inbound and outbound email messages.

    1. Re:Much more secure... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Not if the server is using TLS, most do these days.

  96. smart host maybe by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

    I did this a long time ago but gave up MANY years ago when I set up google docs/mail for my domain. I forget t he details, but I believe you can receive email to your MX and send it through comcast mail servers as a smart host of something. you'd be able to connect to them being on comcasts network; meanwhile they'll off and send your mail to world+dog and should be allowed since I highly doubt gmail, etc. are block email from Comcast mail servers themselves; probably just the masses of addresses reserved for clients. It might circumvent most of your problems while allowing you to still host your own mail. Good luck.

  97. PTR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your PTR record probably doesn't match your MX record, you dumb little faggot.

  98. Auth failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without seeing detailed headers it's hard to say for sure but this sounds more like an authentication failure. Are you falling afoul of their SPF, DKIM or DMARC authentication requirements by not using the Comcast smarthost for deployment?

    That would far more likely explain the widespread blocking rather than it just being "because I'm using Comcast".

    1. Re:Auth failure by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      I've run SPF for years now, and I pass all the associated tests there. I have a valid PTR record that matches my domain. I do not currently use DKIM, but I guess that's my next attempt at fixing this. DMARC also sounds interesting, I have never heard of that before. I will gladly configure DKIM here and then look into DMARC. Thanks for the information.

  99. There may not be a direct solution by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    First I'd like to say, I'm bookmarking this set of responses. There's a lot of excellent information here. One of the most informative discussions on Slashdot in recent memory.

    I suspect that there is so much animosity against Comcast that you may not ever get this resolved. The advice to "get another ISP" is indicated, but there may not be another viable solution in your neighborhood. (Which is what we as a country should *really* be addressing before we even talk about net neutrality.)

    If you have Comcast, you probably have already switched your land line to cable. That's unfortunate, because it makes this solution more difficult to implement: Consider that email is very low traffic (I think you said it was only a few messages a month) and the bandwidth you're getting from Comcast isn't really helping. One solution would be to get a business DSL account with an alternate ISP and use that for email only. This would allow you to scale back Comcast to a consumer account, which might mitigate some of the cost of having two ISPs.

    At one time I had Comcast cable modem and a static IP with Speakeasy DSL at the same time. I had to keep my copper wire phone service in order to do this. Comcast gave me high download speeds, Speakeasy gave me a circuit that I could basically do anything with. The DSL speed was what you'd expect for DSL, but that doesn't really matter for email.

    Later I dropped Comcast because I got so tired of trying to deal with them, and I'd gouge out my eyeballs rather than go back to them, but that's another story. I went back to DSL only for awhile, and then picked up FIOS when it became available. Running both side by side, I didn't see any limitations to the FIOS circuit so with a tinge of sadness, let the Speakeasy account go. (And before a bunch of anonymous cowards jump on this, yes, I'm aware that some people have had bad experiences with FIOS. I haven't, really. The circuit has been dead nuts reliable. I went through four routers until I got one that worked correctly, but that's not necessarily the ISPs fault, and they were always quick to overnight a replacement when necessary.)

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:There may not be a direct solution by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      At one time I had Comcast cable modem and a static IP with Speakeasy DSL at the same time. I had to keep my copper wire phone service in order to do this. Comcast gave me high download speeds, Speakeasy gave me a circuit that I could basically do anything with. The DSL speed was what you'd expect for DSL, but that doesn't really matter for email.

      Later I dropped Comcast because I got so tired of trying to deal with them, and I'd gouge out my eyeballs rather than go back to them, but that's another story. I went back to DSL only for awhile, and then picked up FIOS when it became available. Running both side by side, I didn't see any limitations to the FIOS circuit so with a tinge of sadness, let the Speakeasy account go. (And before a bunch of anonymous cowards jump on this, yes, I'm aware that some people have had bad experiences with FIOS. I haven't, really. The circuit has been dead nuts reliable. I went through four routers until I got one that worked correctly, but that's not necessarily the ISPs fault, and they were always quick to overnight a replacement when necessary.)

      I've been a Speakeasy (now MegaPath) customer for a long time. They were really great. Since MegaPath took over, they've really gone downhill, killing off services, ESL *and* clueless customer support and billing issues, so don't feel too bad about moving to FIOS. I wish I could, but it's not available here. Aside from the mediocre speeds (ADSL), Speakeasy was one of the best out there. I've been looking for alternatives, but the abusive TOS' used by the big boys is just too restrictive. And Verizon isn't really rolling out FIOS anymore and will likely *never* do so where I live. Sigh.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  100. I don't know about comcast... by Junta · · Score: 1

    But my ISP provides an SMTP relay. I configured postfix to use my ISP relay. This doesn't really impact my mail service or how it's stored or how it may be addressed/migrated in the future, but it gets me past the common blackhole filtering.

    SMTP has just not scaled well and the mitigations have impaired the openness of the network somewhat, but SMTP relay facilities are usually available.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  101. RDNS entry by ghinckley68 · · Score: 1

    most of the big emails giants will block email that has a generic host name. even thow you have a domain name the host name will return what every the host name of the box comcast gave you. Have them set up a Reverse DNS entry and moslike problem solved

    i setup email servers for clients all the time and its a big problem

    --
    Linux modi 2.6.26-2-parisc
  102. DKIM makes a difference by johnw · · Score: 1

    I found a while back that GMail started flagging e-mails from my server as spam, even for a business customer who had explicitly white-listed my server in their configuration. Setting up DKIM message signing cured that.

    Yahoo on the other hand are complete fuck-wits when it comes to spam detection. I've tried in the past to follow up random spam flagging, and they just give you the runaround. I filled in a complicated form with full details of the erroneous spam flagging, and they responded with a request to send all the same information again to an e-mail address, and then when I did the notification bounced because the e-mail address didn't exist.

    The only thing you can do with people who use Yahoo for e-mail is teach them how to look in their spam folders. When they do they'll find lots of other non-spam there too. That's the moment to suggest they move to a proper e-mail provider.

  103. ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome information. I was looking for that. Thanks for sharing:) http://www.posicionamiento-seo...

  104. Why not relay through Comcast's own SMTP-server? by mi · · Score: 1

    Have you tried configuring your server to relay all outgoing mail through Comcast's own server(s)? You can declare it as "smarthost" (in sendmail-speak), or have custom rules (through "mailertable" — sendmail-speak again) for using Comcast's box only for those destinations, which would not talk to you directly... Either way, it may solve your problem and even make life a little easier for your box...

    I've never used Comcast myself — they may have some idiots operating their mail-server (RCN and Verizon FiOS both do, why should Comcast be better?). But it may work...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  105. VPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rent a VPS and use it as a mail relay.

  106. Get a fucking vps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck use comcast, go get a vps for 20 a year. fucking christ NEXT

  107. Retaliations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to the tactics Comcast uses, a lot of sites have taken to completely blocking anything that comes from under the comcast domain (which I do). Your best option is to get off of comcast (which you shouldn't have joined in the first place). Other than that, I suggest you setup asome kind of VPN to a forwarding site under a different domain.

    Stay away from
    Comcast and GoDaddy

  108. It's a common anti-spam strategy - accept it by jtara · · Score: 1

    First off, it's ridiculou to run your own Email server today. If you really insist, do it in a data center with a VPS and your own domain with proper DNS records including PTR.

    Beyond that, it's common for big, low-cost/free email hosts to reject mail coming from dynamic IP pools used for consumer accounts. It has nothing to do with Comcast per se - they will block Comcast, Cox, ATT, whatever. It's an easy way to block a lot of undesirable sources at low cost. It saves them the support cost of dealing with complaints by reducing their spam volume significantly.

    You are not going to get your IP unblocked. You will just waste your time trying to get dozens or hundreds of email hosts to unblock you. Maybe a few of them might.

    If you look at your Comcast agreement you will almost certainly find that - like most consumer broadband - your intended use violates the TOS. This is not why your mail is being blocked, though. It's because others realize that there's no good reason to run a mail server in your home, and plenty of bad ones.

    Wake up and realize it's not 1995.

    Good luck!

  109. spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is obviously a spammer. Stop helping him.

  110. Non-free option by nine-times · · Score: 1

    There may be some way to actually clear up the whole situation, and that's probably going to be the best solution. It will probably also be free.

    However, failing that, one solution comes to mind which is pretty obvious and very likely to solve your problem. Unfortunately, it's not free, but if you're running a business, it may be of benefit.

    The suggestion is: get a smart-host. Essentially, it's a service where you route your email through an email provider first, and then they send it out. You can also set your MX records to direct incoming traffic to the smart-host, which can serve the purpose of a backup MX record (in case your server goes offline). Also, they'll often do spam filtering on their end, which means a lot of spam (and the associated traffic) never gets to your network. Sometimes they'll even offer email archiving, if you're interested in that.

    Of course, if you're going to go with a smart host, it raises the question: does it make more sense to just go with a fully hosted solution? Office 365 and Google Apps are both pretty compelling solutions. I assume you're not interested in that, though, since you seem to want to keep your email onsite.

  111. Can't win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a problem without a permanent solution, and ultimately why I stopped hosting my own outgoing SMTP. Tracking down these types of issues is a huge time sink, and better left to people getting paid to do it IMO. That said, you could try routing all outgoing messages through Comcast's mail server if they allow it. It's business service, they may provide this functionality.

  112. VPN an option? by Kelxin · · Score: 0

    Browsing through all the comments I didn't see anything about setting up a VPN. You can always setup a static IP VPN and have the web server / email server hosting from that IP address. There are tons of VPN hosts that are 1) Free, 2) stable, 3) support full DNS (including IPv6) and 4) have excellent documentation for help setting it up.

  113. Had the same issue. by man_ls · · Score: 1

    I had the same issue and it did take quite a bit of digging to nail down. Comcast Business with 5 static IPs, same setup as yours.

    1. Make sure your reverse DNS entries are correctly configured such that the domain of your reverse DNS lookup will match the domain your messages are claiming to be from. dashed-ip.sea.wa.comcast.net will generate spam warnings on many mail servers if your server claims to be mail.joecorp.com. Call Support and they will update it for you on the phone within a couple of minutes. Also make sure you're not in a residential IP block.

    2. Make sure you're not actually an open relay or otherwise allowing unauthenticated senders to generate outbound messages. I was using MailEnable, and had it misconfigured such that it wasn't actually doing the authentication I had selected. This got me blacklisted quickly. A few bounce messages had links to the blacklists themselves to submit appeals; they'd dutifully take me off each time but I'd get re-added automatically. It took a few weeks of trial and error to get this one fixed. I know you say you're not...and I thought I wasn't either, having specifically taken steps to disable open relaying. But it turns out I didn't quite get it the first time, and was still relaying messages without authentication.

    I'd imagine issue (1) may be a big contributor to your problems, personally.

  114. The don't give a Flying-F*** about your SPF by tlambert · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The don't give a Flying-F*** about your SPF if your DKIM is wrong or if you are using an @yahoo.com email address.

    What they care about is that they've updated their DMARC record to reject @yahoo.com emails in the From: address if they aren't sent by yahoo.com servers.

    You should have googled this.

    https://help.yahoo.com/kb/mail...

    1. Re:The don't give a Flying-F*** about your SPF by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      What?? That link you posted references users who are sending email AS yahoo email users, via a server that is not Yahoo. That is not all what my question was about. What your link does show is that those major providers all use DMARC, so that's an interesting item that ties all those providers together.

    2. Re:The don't give a Flying-F*** about your SPF by ale2011 · · Score: 1

      Except that I can find a (bad) _dmarc record:

      $ dig +short _dmarc.fimble.com txt
      "v=spf1 ip4:23.31.69.157/32 a mx ptr include:fimble.com ~all"

      (I'd remove that '*' from your zone file...)

  115. Relay through Comcast by bradgoodman · · Score: 1
    I had this problem too. I simply use Comcast's SMTP servers to relay my messages from my own SMTP server. You are required to configure SSL-secured transport only, and required to use your Comcast credentials when sending message to the relay. In-turn, when Comcast passes the messages, the services [you mentioned] accept them, but they still are shown as coming from my servers.

    You don't have to "use Comcast's mail service" - they just want to use Comcast as a way of providing some accountability as to where the email is coming from - as a way of limiting spam.

  116. DUL list on SORBS by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Chances are you're in a DUL/dynamic list on SORBS or another service. What you need to do is work your way up past the first level grunt at Comcrap and speak to an actual engineer, and they need to submit updated lists of dynamic vs. static IP lists to the various blacklists and also key email providers (gmail, yahoo, notHotmail, etc.) and other providers (time warner, etc.) so that they acknowledge your block as a static block of IPs.

    What happened is some grunt at Comcast probably fat-fingered when updating these lists.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  117. Re:Thank Comcast! by Technician · · Score: 1, Informative

    The main reason peers block Comcast by deafult is the number of vunerable XP machines that get hijacked to send spam. Dropping mail from home users has almost no false positives. Mail if permitted by peers would increase the number of botnet attempts to send bulk spam. The fact the mail is blocked makes compromised Comcast user's machines much less valuable.

    Even home configured business accounts on static IP addresses do not have a super good IT department to prevent compromised machines becoming part of a spam botnet, which is a good reason to not accept mail from home IP blocks.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  118. reason for failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most likely not whitelist or blacklist issue. most likely has to do with perfect forward security.

  119. Be prepared to spend a long fruitless time on hold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a business account, you should have a business support line.

    So you'd call and they could switch you to an unblocked IP, or initiate deblacklisting on your behalf? I'm literally laughing so hard I gotta wipe my eyes.

    THIS IS COMCAST! Go look up their position in the "most hated companies in America" list. They earned that status. I spent over four hours on the phone with them over the weekend persuading them to make a 2-minute fix to their own MPLS network that they caused with an ill-considered routing change.

    You lie down with dogs, you'll get up with fleas.

  120. Don't have a choice by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    >Nobody likes Comcast, but I don't have a choice here. I'm two years into a three-year contract. So, moving is not an option.

    Yes you do have a choice. If it's that important to you, break the contract and pay the ETF.

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  121. PRT, SPF, and DKIM by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I had similar issues, though on a machine hosted outside my home network.

    The solution was to implement SPF, pointing to the PTR of machine (i.e. what a reverse IP lookup will resolve to), and DKIM.

    In your case, doing a PTR will be hard, since dynamic DHCP may change what the PTR is, but the rest does apply.

    I wrote the following detailing what I did: Setting up SPF and DKIM on Postfix.

  122. Depends what sort of solution you will accept by wilson_c · · Score: 1

    If you want to win this, either as a technical challenge or a test of wills between you and Comcast (or Goolge/Yahoo/Microsoft), good luck. Maybe you'll resolve things in a satisfying way eventually. If you do, you will definitely feel like a champ, but it's going to take you a lot of time and frustration to get there.

    If you simply want your email server working, then you probably ought to consider sidestepping the fight and just solve the problem instead. You could move the server from a machine hosted in your closet to a VM running on a cloud service. Done right, you can probably increase performance and availability while lowering cost (that 24/7/365 electricity isn't free).

    1. Re:Depends what sort of solution you will accept by hawkbug · · Score: 1

      I agree that moving to a VPS would solve the problem. But you got me - I'm stubborn as all hell and refuse to let this beat me. I really want to find a technical solution to keep things the same as they are now.

  123. Comcast Business User With Own Mail Servers Here by ciurana · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Greetings.

    I have a Comcast Xfiniti Business line, 5 static IP addresses, etc. It sounds like our mutual set ups are equivalent. I've been running my email servers in my own domains since 1998, through some gone ISP, PacBell/AT&T, and Comcast without issues.

    Contact the Comcast business line. Have your actual account ready -- you can get that from the Comcast Business web page for your account. Those numbers changed in the last 12 months to a shorter, simpler format. Request technical support and discuss the issue.

    One thing that you MUST do if you want to run your own email: request that Comcast set reverse DNS to point at your servers for the non-authoritative request. A reverse DNS request to your IP address must return the name you use for your primary (and secondary, and so on) MX records. If that's set up, then you've solved 90% of the issues with Gmail and Yahoo!.

    As far as Hotmail: they've been rejecting my email unless users white list my address(es) in their individual accounts. This has happened since Microsoft bought them. No way around that, and no appeals; every time I tried to contact them I might as well have sent the emails/requests through a black hole.

    Source: 8+ years with Comcast Business, and I moved to a new location (with new IP addresses and new routers) 12 days ago. It took them 10 minutes to set the rDNS and propagate. Within an hour it was resolving fine and any lagging email issues were resolved (36 hours of some undelivered messages).

    Google my name "Eugene Ciurana" and ping me through my contact page if you want some assistance with your set up and/or other tips w/dealing with Comcast. I've been a very happy customer with them (they fixed my lines, including physical cable modem replacement due to physical failure, while I was out of the country last January and coordinating with someone who could open the door to them and so on), and in general found that, if you explain what you need and why, their tech guys do work with you to solve issues. The key is understanding that *you* may know more about networking/server set up than their tech guys, so if you aren't specific about what you want they may not grok what you need.

    Dear admins: WTF is a lameness filter? What is it filtering? I couldn't offer complete information to this guy because of the Comcast support number and/or IP addresses I listed. With my Karma level and the number of years I've been around, your system ought to be configured to let stuff through w/o issue. Look at my user ID. Thanks.

    Cheers!

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  124. Smarthost out via SMTP.Comcast.net on 465 or 587 by Hobart · · Score: 2

    You're being blocked because any mail leaving Comcast's IP spaces is expected to come from Comcast's mailservers only.

    Configure your mailserver with a "smarthost" option, have it deliver using Authenticated SMTP (with your Comcast account's username and password hardcoded, yes) over SSL on 465, or if you can't do SSL, use 587.

    Source: Am currently running Postfix on Comcast successfully delivering to Yahoo Mail with no spamfolder problem via this method. (Am using SPF, no DomainKeys yet.)

    More from Comcast on this: http://corporate.comcast.com/c...

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  125. Vint Cerf warned us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vint Cerf warned about about this years ago. Basicly if your not a huge providers you were going to get blocked. No one would ever block gmail no matter how much spam they sent.

  126. Call Comcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure but do you have a point of record with Comcast to point to your mail server? You may have been under the limit send wise and hit the cap with a change they made. This would add you as a trusted mail server and off of black lists.

  127. What I learned from this... by Nehmo · · Score: 1

    Sex sells; we all know.

    However, often you can't simply put it out front because that degrades your message. You need to slip it in. I clicked on the article in the hope of seeing a tit shot. I did, but it really wasn't that good. In any case, I read much of the article for no good reason. I now plan to use this audience-getting technique in my presentations in the future.

    --
    (||) Nehmo (||)
  128. Same setup, no issues by Dribbitz · · Score: 1

    Comcast business subscriber here and have what appears to be a very similar config to yours. No problems with mail, checked mxtoolbox anyway and all is green. As many others have said, it's probably something your network did. I've had folks get into mine over the years and cause similar problems for me.

  129. FOUND IT! by Cramer · · Score: 1

    /ip-log/karma.log.11:virus 23.31.69.157 fimble.com NOTQUIT [S=5 - FakeMX NoQuit] X=tarbaby H=mail.fimble.com [23.31.69.157] HELO=[fimble.fimble.com] F=[lollypop@fimble.com] T=[terrydw@mkl.com] S=[Feeling adventurous tonight? Multiple mega hot lasses, free access!]

    Hostkarma still had it in the logs.

    You sent junk mail; you got blacklisted. Nothing more to see here.

    1. Re:FOUND IT! by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, this is accurate. You found the GP's domain name through his slashdot user page and looked it up. Bravo!

    2. Re:FOUND IT! by jtara · · Score: 1

      Verified this as shown above. Mod parent up! ROFLMAO!

      Hostkarma blacklist Removal Form

      Your reverse DNS is correct! - mail.fimble.com
      The IP address for the reverse lookup name matches the original IP - RDNS Information

      This is a list from our log files showing the activity from IP address 23.31.69.157. Our system stores information for 4 days. /ip-log/karma.log.12:virus 23.31.69.157 fimble.com NOTQUIT [S=5 - FakeMX NoQuit] X=tarbaby H=mail.fimble.com [23.31.69.157] HELO=[fimble.fimble.com] F=[lollypop@fimble.com] T=[terrydw@mkl.com] S=[Feeling adventurous tonight? Multiple mega hot lasses, free access!]

      Please review the above list. It might alert you to an existing problem on your end that you need to look into and deal with. If you have been hacked or you have a virus problem and are still sending spam you will be relisted. If what you are seeing here is clearly a false positive or you have fixed the problem then please do use the remove option below to be delisted. We do not want to block any good email that you are sending. Actual removal will take place in the next 5 minute cycle. Because of DNS caching however other systems might remember the old information longer. If we have wrongly listed you please accept our sincere apologies for the error.

    3. Re:FOUND IT! by jtara · · Score: 1

      FYI fimble.com is listed in poster's SlashDot home page, and is specifically mentioned by him in at least one post on this thread.

      Either he's a spammer, or his PC got hacked.

    4. Re:FOUND IT! by jandjmh · · Score: 1

      I'm more than a little surprised that mxtoolbox doesn't include hostkarma in the list of blacklists it checks
      The guy that runs hostkarma, and the junk email filtering service he offers, is very, very good. I regularly recommend junkemailfilter to my clients who have their own mail servers.

    5. Re: FOUND IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why isn't he responding to this?

  130. Don't read this ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    It's an asshole comment.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  131. Too much hassle by SirLaffalot · · Score: 1

    I used to smarthost out thru comcast servers, but Ive discovered that the no-hassle option is to pick up an smtp-outbound contract. It is cheap, easy, you can use it on all your mobile equipment and hassle free. And if you set up SPF records you will not have any more trouble. I use DnsMadeEasy.com

  132. Yahoo mail whitelisting by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    You can apply for bulk sender whitelisting from Yahoo!. http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/bulkv2.html

  133. General responsiveness of Gmail vs. Hotmail admins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't speak to this particular problem, but having dealt with them not too long ago on an issue of blocked email, I can say that Gmail can very much block you completely prior to the spam folder, and there's no way to contact them or appeal, while Hotmail was very responsive in trying to resolve our blocking issue. Never dealt with Yahoo, though.

  134. Probably due to dnssec by Dave+Hodgins · · Score: 1
  135. Edgewave or similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign up for an antispam service like edgewave that allows Outbound filtering and use them as an SMTP relay.

  136. a comcast employee offers to help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you give me some way to contact you, so I can see if I can help?

  137. Apply to be Whitelisted by Foresto · · Score: 1

    Facing a similar problem a couple of years ago, I discovered that yahoo provides email filters not only for its webmail users, but also for several other companies. They have a procedure for requesting an exemption from their filters. It took a couple of tries, but I eventually got my server accepted. Here's the form:

    http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yah...

  138. Re:Be prepared to spend a long fruitless time on h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You expect a $8/hr Customer service rep to be able to do anything?
    And on a weekend?
    All the FT ENgineers and support staff work 9-5 M-F.
    And even then, they are considered only after direct contact with Tier 5 support.
    Meaning, you were curtious, described the problem, and managed to get it escalated through 5 levels of support to get to the Engineering side of things.
    With each level trying their best to fix the problem (no one ever likes to go to their manager and say -- I don't know how to fix this)

    And at the Engineering phase, the problem needs to be addresses, scheduled, tested, and all reliability and legal sign-offs need to happen;

    Bugs happen, sometimes a Business Rule comes down the pipes for a given product/service that didn't take into account the 100+ other teams services and groups that it affects. And thus it makes it to the wild and breaks. These usally get escalated quickly as internal support teams start to debug their own services, narrow it down to XXX and strat the internal escalation process (with 1000s of engineers worldwide, you can't just go across the office and talk); and if enough internal teams finger one problematic team -- they usually can't reschedule it into their next Sprint; and will have to drop everything and fix it.

    But, to call a CSR (Customer Service Rep) and expect a teenager who's trying their best to solve your problem by googling other support cases to see if anyhing matches your problem (and they have limitetd access; to protect unskilled teens from making changes withut fully realising the consequences in some cases; legally mandated restricted access in some cases -- if you want to give them more power, have politicians get the corresponding laws changed. Or figure out how to get people with full Engineering or CS Degrees to want to work in a Call Center.

  139. SmartHost Setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, not really. Most mail services are smart enough to parse through the mail headers and figure out what the original MTA was.

  140. Me Too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had my site running since the latter 90's. In about 1998 someone hacked my mail server and sent out a slew of spam emails from my @ address. Luckily it was not one of my accounts but a new one they created and my host (small local business) caught it in about 48hrs. However, Comcast and Flagstar bank both got spam hits and my server has been on high alert ever since. I've had countless people jump through the "official" hoops since then to verify the server as being bot free, etc etc etc. And, admittedly it has helped. I still get a substantial amount of filtering on Comcast if I send email to anyone using their mail services. I run a check with friends about 2x a year. Even if I am on someone's contact list, there's a long list of things I've noted that will get me slammed to the spam bin.

  141. Alternate Mail Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get an AWS instance.

  142. SMTP on a Comcast Business IP by networkzombie · · Score: 1

    Dear Hawkbug, I'm apologize for my fellow posters spewing forth knee-jerk postings. I have examined your situation and I must say I am puzzled. Your MX and rDNS records are all in order. The domain in question passes the generic email server tests. Your system can obviously communicate out via port 25 or you would not be getting deferred errors from servers and it does not "look like" it is being altered by any proxy. So... Comcast is not blocking your port, nor is your email server defunct. Everything seems in order. What can we conclude? You say the email server was working up until two weeks ago. What has changed? Either the servers offering up the deferred messages have implemented a new policy against you, or Comcast is altering your outgoing port 25 (to test the proxy/manipulation theory, find a friend who has an SMTP server and examine the SMTP logs). Whatever the case, it is something that has changed recently. Did you changed anything on the server? SMTP Banner? FQDN response? Any modifications to your DKIM or SPF? The "Deferred Errors" to me say greylisting. What would get you greylisted? Someone you sent an email to marked it as spam perhaps. Were any sent to the wrong person? Were any profane? Would anyone have mistakenly reported it as spam? Examine the emails you sent right before it stopped working, they may contain clues. My experience says follow the trail of "what changed when it stopped working." Good luck.

  143. Better solution - use a dedicated server by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

    I don't recommend using your own private server on a IP that is served by a company that owns residential blocks.

    Your IP address can be close to another spammer from comcast and you'll get a very basic response as to why it was blocked. They won't tell you that your entire /24 or anything like that has been blocked due to other people abusing it.

    It might not even be a residential client that is doing this but another comcast business user.
    If you get a dedicated server in a datacenter, they take reports for spam quite seriously and will disconnect peoples servers much faster than Comcast will disconnect a clients internet.

    This is in part that many people using dedicated servers with an email server either as a webhost, company mail server or otherwise. If they get entire subnets blocked, they get a lot of really upset clients /very/ quickly.

    So they are a lot more responsible in that regards.

    I use eSecureData for my servers and have seen their responses.

  144. Smarthost to Comcast's MTA for affected domains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming your MTA is flexible enough, you could configure routing for the affected domains to go via Comcast's SMTP. It isn't a fix but it would get you over the problem while you investigate more fully.

  145. Yahoo by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

    As someone whose ISP uses Yahoo for mail, I can report that they appear to block mailing-list messages that are marked as Bulk. As a product tester for Opera and also a moderator on their user forums, I am supposed to be on several of their mailing lists - but never receive any of them. However, mail from that server sent by individual Opera employees comes through just fine. Likewise mailing lists that do not mark there messages as Bulk (from other servers) come through fine - though several (not all) of those lists are actually on Yahoo's servers. (I've had Opera send messages I need to get to a webmail service.)

    The server is not blacklisted as I do get mail from it, they are not blocking all mailing lists (other than their own) either, so it appears to be the fact the messages are listed as Priority: Bulk.

  146. Stop trying to host it yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many reasons for running your own mail server, having control of your spam filtering is just one reason, another is not sharing everything you do with a datamining corporation.

  147. Add an SMTP relay (sigh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also being a Comcast customer (I know: shoot me now), I too have faced this obstacle. My solution is to have my outbound SMTP server use Comcast's SMTP server(s) as a relay, authentication required. Another option would be an external (outside Comcast's network) relay service, so long as they accept incoming connections on something other than port 25, which Comcast will block here and there (and not tell you in advance).

    This approach worked fine for me for over a year.

    Here's a forum post that has some info and settings:

    http://forums.comcast.com/t5/E-Mail-and-Xfinity-Connect-Help/Using-SMTP-mail-server-and-SMTP-relay/td-p/2053255

  148. DKIM by Havokmon · · Score: 1

    Sign your outgoing emails. If it's in the remote user's Spam folder, then it's not blocked, it's filtered. And since your IP is coming from a known poor reputation provider, you already have an uphill battle.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  149. More competitive by tepples · · Score: 1

    if your VPS is in the same netblock as a spammer you fall into the same traps

    I was under the impression that because the VPS market is more competitive than the home and small business last mile Internet access market. So if one VPS provider is doing a bad job of keeping spammers off its network, you can switch to another.

  150. Hotmail by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    Hotmail did this to me too, sending from my VPS at 1 and 1. The explanation in their bounce was that it was due to other hosts from the same provider being spammers, etc, but that after my host's reputation was established it would be naturally un-blocked.

    That does seem to be what's happened. As I consistently generate non-spam mail toward hotmail/outlook.com accounts, it has been un-blocked and now works without issues.

    I'm particularly interested in your case however, since I plan to migrate to Comcast business myself. I'd prefer not to relay through their servers if possible, what with the shenanigans large ISPs seem to want to pull recently re: STARTTLS downgrade attacks, etc.

  151. this happened to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm running postfix, and i was sending mail directly from my system. I have found that other sites started blocking mail that came from Comcast subscriber addresses. I changed my postfix configuration to route through Comcast. I set this line in my postfix main.cf file:

    relayhost = smtp.comcast.net

    all my mail has been getting through since...

  152. Host your email somewhere else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign up for SendGrid.com. They have free accounts that you can send up to 200 emails a day for free.

    Nathan

  153. Do you have an abuse@yourdomain.com? by ancientmyth · · Score: 1

    I went through this issue as a Comcast customer and feel your pain. Do you have an abuse@yourdomain.com registered with WHOIS? I found this was a requirement as domains started using subscriptions similar to Spamhaus. The alternative is to get the whitelist options as required by RFC from the technical administrator listed in THEIR whois. :)

  154. Shaw in Canada did the same thing to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run all of the domain services for our corporation on a Bell fibre internet connection. Bell simply provides us with a pipe, and 13 dynamic ip addresses.

    We maintain all of our own web, dns, mail, etc. servers on-site.

    On October 1, all email sent to anyone who used Shaw as their internet/email provider, were being rejected. I thought maybe our server was blacklisted, but it wasn't. It didn't affect just @shaw customers, but also the City Police that we are required to email to daily for all of the transactions we do with the public (second-hand purchases). The City has their own TLD, but I discovered through some investigation that their email was going through Shaw.

    I contacted Shaw, who said there was nothing wrong on their side, that it was MY ISP that was rejecting the emails. However, I know better, and I knew that wasn't true. So, I contacted Bell support, who said they had already heard of the issue, and 13 other large corporations were also having the same problem with Shaw.

    After a few days of emails and contact, nothing was being done. It wasn't until I sent an email to Bell to forward to Shaw to inform them that according to the City By-Law, if we did not email our transactions daily by midnight, we would be subjected to a fine of $5,000 per transaction per day the emails were not sent. I informed them that our lawyers were pretty good, and we had the proof we needed to prove that Shaw was purposely blocking our emails. I said that any charges laid to us (which by now after 6-7 days of being blocked would have amounted to several hundred thousand dollars), would be refiled against Shaw.

    Our email was unblocked within 12 hours, with no explanation. Bell informed me that Shaw simply "fixed" the issue, that Shaw claimed it was a "routing" problem. However, I know it can't be a routing problem when your mail servers reject email specifically based on source ISP.

  155. Reverse DNS is the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More and more companies are blocking based on the reverse DNS of your email server. You can call Comcast to have them resolve the issue, by pointing the reverse DNS to your actual domain name.