about this kind of filtering is that it has to download the email content - not always as good idea, especialy in a Windows environment.
Besides, I can identify spam just by looking at message header information. Sender, recipient, and subject line are nearly always enough. Plus I don't need to waste time, bandwidth, or get subjected to offensive graphics, or risk 1-pixel confirmations or getting hacked by the latest security issue.
My homespun message header analysis program drops nearly all spam, and results in few legit email rejections.
I score the headers based on missing recipient, sender info, keywords in subject, string match in sender email or name, punctuation count in subject line, number of contiuous spaces in subject line, plus a few other things that seem to run common in the spam I get. I can also permit certain email addresses to pass no matter the score. It's not fancy, but it works, and I never have to waste time drawing the whole content down to my local machine. What I do may not work for everyone, but it seems that in most cases it should, unless you get a lot of email from unknown (non-spam) sources - not typical for the average email user.
then for capital punishment why bother with an electric chair with hundreds of volts and significant amerage?
Why not just use a 12-volt car battery and a little gel?
A Die-Hard perhaps?
Slashdot Mirror
the 257th Rule of Acquisition says "Sell to your customers first, then sell your customers!"
about this kind of filtering is that it has to download the email content - not always as good idea, especialy in a Windows environment. Besides, I can identify spam just by looking at message header information. Sender, recipient, and subject line are nearly always enough. Plus I don't need to waste time, bandwidth, or get subjected to offensive graphics, or risk 1-pixel confirmations or getting hacked by the latest security issue. My homespun message header analysis program drops nearly all spam, and results in few legit email rejections. I score the headers based on missing recipient, sender info, keywords in subject, string match in sender email or name, punctuation count in subject line, number of contiuous spaces in subject line, plus a few other things that seem to run common in the spam I get. I can also permit certain email addresses to pass no matter the score. It's not fancy, but it works, and I never have to waste time drawing the whole content down to my local machine. What I do may not work for everyone, but it seems that in most cases it should, unless you get a lot of email from unknown (non-spam) sources - not typical for the average email user.
At least the KFC kernel is very stable, having been dead for some years now...oh wait, that's colonel!
since they can only run the assembly line with the vehicles 300 feet apart.
then for capital punishment why bother with an electric chair with hundreds of volts and significant amerage? Why not just use a 12-volt car battery and a little gel? A Die-Hard perhaps?
Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, SCO Executives, spammmers, ax-murderers, lawyers, Dr. Kavorkian, and finally duplicate posters :)
I pee!
at Radio Shack?
with the discovery of a large black rectangle near Jupiter
if the thing has a CLOCK anywhere? I didn't see it mentioned. I used to always run out of time until I started wearing two watches :)
the POWER OFF lamp.
Can you see me now?
Good!
Worf actually says, "We do not speak of it." Klingons do not use contractions! Contractions are without honor.
is the old Get Smart "Cone of Silence" Invent THAT!