It's only one extra coordinate pair, and they're much more descriptive. You also don't have to store a zoom level, as you can calculate it with getBoundsZoomLevel. As used by wikimapia and photolibrary.
E.g., come to think of it, a laser kind of device inserted on the line could multiply that original photon thousands of times, all the clones having the exact same phase, polarisation, whatever.
Sure - you've just blown away decades of research into quantum cryptography with an "of the top of my head". Mod parent as "lazy", and advise him to read a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography.
I ran into this problem a few years ago, and so started work on my own project which I now use to keep my collection of 8500+ photos organised. Categories (tags/labels/...) are arranged in a tree, and are assigned to photos.
So have a look at http://photolibrary.sourceforge.net/ (or http://sourceforge.net/projects/photolibrary)
Perhaps you should RTF link which is the words "As predicted", implying that article was published *before* the event happended, which was on Sunday afternoon, when the charts are announced. And for reference the midweek number one is almost always the end of week number one.
We're supposed to care because it's a landmark event in the growth of online music sales, albeit a somewhat artificial one caused merely by a change in the rules.
Re:True, but not a big deal - clarification
on
Printing Wikipedia
·
· Score: 1
Now, I can not say for sure how long it had been defaced before I got there,
Actually you could if you looked at the edit history.
The vandalism started at "12:22, 31 October 2005 212.85.13.142" and continued until it was reverted "12:34, 31 October 2005 JoanneB", so 12 minutes. (The vandalism continued but was reverted in about a minute each time).
The screen is 82" on the diagonal =~ 2.08m The aspect ratio is 16:9 so (16x)^2 + (9x)^2 =~ 2.08^2 337x^2 =~ 4.34 x =~ 0.113m
So it measures about 1.815m x 1.02m. I imagine it has more than 1920x1080 pixels and has image enhancing to scale the image up, but if it were 1920x1080 then the pixels would be 0.094cm square which is about 1/25th of an inch.
Yup, same here. I was an "other finalist" of 2003 http://www.christs.cam.ac.uk/bio/publicity/r2003-1.html (Ed, Westminster) but they wouldn't let me use QBasic - so I had to do with VBasic (I failed miserably I think). Unfortunately they put us in the skanky Fitzwilliam College. One of the winners of the 2000 comp (Tom Barnet-Lamb, Westminster) that you were in is bloody clever, he's now the main geek at Lionhead studios - oh and he wrote the questions for the 2003 final. See what you could've become if you put your mind to it!
...would be the Disability Rights Commission,
email: enquiry@drc-gb.org
The Disability Rights Commission is a national body, which may be able to help you take a case under the Disability Discrimination Act. It may also be able to give advice on the Act to disabled people, employers and service providers.
.... which spectacular maths leaves your answer out by the small factor of 100! $10 ~ 5.50, 5.50 / 30mins ~ 18p/min. I think that pretty much answers your question.
Sure case sensitivy does make VariablesEasierToRead, but don't most programmers do that anyway? When was the last time you saw a stuPiDLYcapITAliZeDVariAbLe? It should be up to the programmer to choose his own naming conventions, including the capitalization, instead of assuming they doesn't know how.
Slashdot Mirror
https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/220153861007081472
photolibrary is an interesting alternative...
It's only one extra coordinate pair, and they're much more descriptive. You also don't have to store a zoom level, as you can calculate it with getBoundsZoomLevel. As used by wikimapia and photolibrary.
As likely as it was in September: http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/ 25/1837254
I ran into this problem a few years ago, and so started work on my own project which I now use to keep my collection of 8500+ photos organised. Categories (tags/labels/...) are arranged in a tree, and are assigned to photos.
So have a look at http://photolibrary.sourceforge.net/ (or http://sourceforge.net/projects/photolibrary)
According to The Guardian
Perhaps you should RTF link which is the words "As predicted", implying that article was published *before* the event happended, which was on Sunday afternoon, when the charts are announced. And for reference the midweek number one is almost always the end of week number one. We're supposed to care because it's a landmark event in the growth of online music sales, albeit a somewhat artificial one caused merely by a change in the rules.
The vandalism started at "12:22, 31 October 2005 212.85.13.142" and continued until it was reverted "12:34, 31 October 2005 JoanneB", so 12 minutes. (The vandalism continued but was reverted in about a minute each time).
The substrate is much bigger than the screen.
The screen is 82" on the diagonal =~ 2.08m
The aspect ratio is 16:9 so
(16x)^2 + (9x)^2 =~ 2.08^2
337x^2 =~ 4.34
x =~ 0.113m
So it measures about 1.815m x 1.02m. I imagine it has more than 1920x1080 pixels and has image enhancing to scale the image up, but if it were 1920x1080 then the pixels would be 0.094cm square which is about 1/25th of an inch.
Yup, same here. I was an "other finalist" of 2003 http://www.christs.cam.ac.uk/bio/publicity/r2003-1 .html (Ed, Westminster) but they wouldn't let me use QBasic - so I had to do with VBasic (I failed miserably I think). Unfortunately they put us in the skanky Fitzwilliam College. One of the winners of the 2000 comp (Tom Barnet-Lamb, Westminster) that you were in is bloody clever, he's now the main geek at Lionhead studios - oh and he wrote the questions for the 2003 final. See what you could've become if you put your mind to it!
YRC: Radio 1: 9.73 million Radio 2: 13.43 million Radio 3: 2.02 million Radio 4: 9.51 million Radio Five Live: 6.15 million
What are you? blind! They're in the bottom right, there's about seven of them: thin and black......
wait a minute....
.... which spectacular maths leaves your answer out by the small factor of 100! $10 ~ 5.50, 5.50 / 30mins ~ 18p/min. I think that pretty much answers your question.
Yeah, Hotbits have been serving up random numbers from a Krypton-85 source for years, also truly random. This is no Big News.
A Torrent seeing as they've been slashdotted, which I supposed is a Good Thing for them.
Sure case sensitivy does make VariablesEasierToRead, but don't most programmers do that anyway? When was the last time you saw a stuPiDLYcapITAliZeDVariAbLe? It should be up to the programmer to choose his own naming conventions, including the capitalization, instead of assuming they doesn't know how.