Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Firebird gets .8 Release, and New Name

Yage writes "Firebird, the lightweight version of Mozilla gets release 0.8 and changes its name again (remember Phoenix?) to avoid confusion with another OSS project. The new name is Firefox. There's a press release out about the name change and new version. And, as usual, download it from mozilla.org." Worth noting that ThunderBird .5 has been released as well. Update: 02/09 14:55 GMT by H : Thanks to Steve Garrity for pointing out the name change FAQ.

902 comments

  1. firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    why the frequent name changes?

    1. Re:firefox by blackcat++ · · Score: 5, Informative

      As stated in the press release, "[t]o avoid overlap with another open source project". That would be the Firebird database.

    2. Re:firefox by nbdy · · Score: 1

      Because there is already a Open Source Software named Firebird. It's a database software derived from Borland's Interbase.

    3. Re:firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but who was going to confuse a database with a web browser?

    4. Re:firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "firefag" ? Show me a fireless fag and I'll be impressed. Then I'll spark it up and chuff it down, 'cause it's My Own Free Choice.

    5. Re:firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The same people who would confuse a bios with a web browser.

    6. Re:firefox by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but who was going to confuse a database with a web browser?

      Google is changing the way we live.

      Well, it started earlier than Google. I remember trying to search for pages with AltaVista. AltaVista didn't (at some point in its development) like single letters, like "C", so searching for pages about the "C Programming Language" was difficult. AltaVista used the prefix "+" operator to mean "require this word", so AltaVista was especially annoyed at searches for "C++"

      The point is, even though you and I know that a database and a web browser are two different things, Google doesn't. Indeed, because you and "just know" that a Firebird is a browser or a database or a Pontiac, we don't tend to qualify any of them as such: we don't say "Firebird the browser" or "Firebird (database)" or "Pontiac Firebird", because we know that other humans will infer the correct Firebird from nearby words like "site", "select" or "gear shift". But Google won't, and we can't pile every possible nearby word into our queries.

      And since we rely more and more on Google to find anything (hell, we even use it to verify spellings when perfectly good dictionaries are just as handy), people with an interest in Firebird the database are legitimately annoyed when an 800 pound gorilla of a browser invades their namespace. They don't want to have to trouble to weed out references to the browser every time they do the search.

    7. Re:firefox by nolife · · Score: 3, Insightful

      people with an interest in Firebird the database are legitimately annoyed when an 800 pound gorilla of a browser invades their namespace. They don't want to have to trouble to weed out references to the browser every time they do the search.

      Too bad..

      A person should not EXPECT a search engine to magically know what they are looking for. If you only enter a single word in a search engine, you are going to get a wide range of results. That is not a fault or limit of the search engine but a limit of the person searching. Have you ever looked for a headlight for your car? Would any reasonable person simply grab the first thing they saw and hoped it worked? I assume they would break it down to headlight, low beam, 1995 Ford Mustang. Searching the internet is no different.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    8. Re:firefox by mwood · · Score: 1, Funny

      Enough, already! I'm going to get myself a small whiteboard, and every week I'll accept one update on the name of this product so that I can write "Firebird = Phoenix" or "Firefox = Phoenix" or "Bruce = Phoenix" or whatever, and then I'm just going to call it Phoenix no matter how many twists and turns the project's name takes. Ugh.

      (Wishing I had a link to that Dilbert strip about a preliminary preplanning meeting to think up a name for a project.)

    9. Re:firefox by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      I'm just going to call it Phoenix no matter how many twists and turns the project's name takes.

      Not a bad idea since we'll need someone to remind us that all of our Firefox files are still being kept in the .phoenix directory. Took me a while to figure that out with MozillaFirebird 0.7. :)

      --
      I do not have a signature
    10. Re:firefox by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Man, it's just a name. No reason to get all attached to it. Some people would rather keep a few peoples' lives easier and come up with a unique name.

    11. Re:firefox by Captain+Zion · · Score: 4, Informative
      The point is, even though you and I know that a database and a web browser are two different things, Google doesn't.
      Maybe google doesn't know the difference, but Vivissimo does. It clusters the results into categories like Mozilla, Pontiac, Database, and Paragliding, among others.
    12. Re:firefox by nolife · · Score: 1

      It seems to have worked well in your example but try a search for Mustang. There are far too many catagories that represent the same thing. Example

      Ads, parts, vehicle, catalog, lights, motor and "other" all reference relatively the same subset of material. Quite honestly, I see those catagories as useless.

      Same with a search for Linux, it does nice groupings but once you get into some of the sublevels, it makes no sense, like the Linux --> Running section, the first link is to Freshmeat and the rest are not much better.

      Vivisimo seems like a nice concept but I'll stick to searching for what I actually desire to find, not single one word terms.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    13. Re:firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well too bad for firebird the database which before this hardly anyone had ever fucking heard of.

    14. Re:firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wil this not create confusion with the Mig Firefox?

    15. Re:firefox by Shinglor · · Score: 1

      It's too late for that now, Google already had thousands of Firebird related documents. Changing the name of the browser won't make the problem go away unless every web developer changes every reference from Firebird to Firefox.

    16. Re:firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about how clueless people are, it's about easing the search. or perhaps you wouldn't mind everything to be called "nolife" ?

    17. Re:firefox by rembo · · Score: 1

      I can conform this. While working everyday with PHP and Firebird (database), it has become harder to search on google. PHP an Mozilla Firebird are often linked.

      Sometimes I have to use the word interbase as a substitute. But as the source code seems to have forked permanently now, this trick will be less usefull in the future. And besides, I want Firebird not Interbase!

    18. Re:firefox by cowsurfer · · Score: 1

      At least they didn't call it Mozilla "Fiero". There are worse cars to be confused with (albeit not that much worse). It'd have to come with a mullet plug-in.

      ha. ha.

    19. Re:firefox by Ulven · · Score: 1

      So it won't go away today or tomorrow.

      But it will in a year or so.

    20. Re:firefox by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "why the frequent name changes?"

      They should just call it 'Linternet Explorer.' Think of all the times they'll get free advertising on Slashdot!!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    21. Re:firefox by Junkstyle · · Score: 1

      wasnt there a clint eastwood movie called FireFox? I think they should rename it to something generic like Mozilla Internet Browser.

    22. Re:firefox by Alapan · · Score: 1

      They could just name Firefox / Firebird / Phoenix; Surfer. It could solve most problems.

    23. Re:firefox by avida · · Score: 1

      And what about FireBird Shoes, FireBird Books, or FireBird Dentures? They should be equally mad that the FireBird database has invaded their namespace ...

      As Google figures more prominently in our daily habits, I hope people at least learn how to write multi-word queries.

    24. Re:firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, but I would want my project to have a unique name for recognition purposes. If I found out there was a Firebird database before I started my Firebird project, I'd probably change. I'd absolutely change if I was only at version 0.8.

    25. Re:firefox by FreewheelinJoe · · Score: 1

      Would any reasonable person simply grab the first thing they saw and hoped it worked? Only if they're feeling lucky!

    26. Re:firefox by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long untill google does this...

    27. Re:firefox by antoinjapan · · Score: 1

      try searching for firebird -mozilla

  2. Totally brutal... by danielrm26 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can overlook their game of musical names; the browser is just phenomenal. I seldom even go to IE anymore, and when I do have to, I blame the guy who coded the site, not Firebird -- I mean Firefox.

    --
    dmiessler.com -- grep understanding knowledge
    1. Re:Totally brutal... by sweeney37 · · Score: 5, Funny

      let's just hope this stays permanent. it's hard now to have a conversation with someone about the browser and/or the email client.

      Person 1: "Hey I just started using Mozilla!"
      Person 2: "Oh yeah? 1.5?"
      Person 1: "No, .8"
      Person 2: "Oh you mean Firebird."
      Person 1: "No, I think it's Firefox."
      Person 3: "I loved that show on Fox, it's a shame they canceled it."
      Person 2: "You're thinking of Firefly."
      Person 1: "Wait, was that the one with the marionettes?"
      Person 3: "No, I think that's an email client."

      Mike

    2. Re:Totally brutal... by JCCyC · · Score: 4, Funny
    3. Re:Totally brutal... by twbecker · · Score: 1

      The article claims they have researched the name thoroughly, and have applied for the trademark. Personally, I like the name, and more importantly, the browser kicks ass.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    4. Re:Totally brutal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand your point, but remember, this is just like any codename, it can change...
      Somewhere in the future firefox will be simply called Mozilla Browser, just as Thunderbird will be Mozilla Mail/News. Mozilla will stop being ONE big application but a collection of applications with ONE shared "glue".

    5. Re:Totally brutal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I predict in 18 months time, after another 2 name changes, the developers get sick of all the crap related to name changes and we have two very good, quality products from the mozilla team.

      Browser 1.0
      and
      Mail 1.0

      And all will be done, and there shall be no confusion, and they then proceed to take over the world like Word, Excel and Office did.

    6. Re:Totally brutal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u cant do that as there are already 2 amiga products called Browser and Mail already. Best not to tread on any toes!

    7. Re:Totally brutal... by rixstep · · Score: 1

      Name conflicts - resolved by picking the name of an Eastwood movie. Will it be Thunderfox now too? Or can we expect the emailer's spam filter renamed Dirty Harry sometime soon?

    8. Re:Totally brutal... by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

      I would worry more about Craig Thomas, the guy who wrote the book that the movie is based on (read the book if you get a chance)

      --


      Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
    9. Re:Totally brutal... by rwiedower · · Score: 1

      If anything, I think naming a super-fast browser after the MiG-31 is a great idea.

    10. Re:Totally brutal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't get it. Mozilla is associated with Dinosaurs. So why call it FireFox? They should call it FireTyrannosaurusRex.

    11. Re:Totally brutal... by Viduliya · · Score: 1

      I thought MiG-31 was called Foxhound? I wonder if that will be the name for 0.9? :)

    12. Re:Totally brutal... by essreenim · · Score: 1

      Is it a bird?
      Is it a plane?
      No its a fox!

      I agree 100%
      As far as I'm concerned Firefox is the new Opera
      and Opera, well, it used to be the best but now- its slipping towards the Netscape abyss!

      Firefox, preferred the old name but it's the quality that counts.
      It's a fab breowser.

    13. Re:Totally brutal... by goates · · Score: 2, Informative

      The real MIG-31 is the Foxhound. In the Clint Eastwood movie it's the Firefox.

      goates

    14. Re:Totally brutal... by smack_attack · · Score: 0, Troll

      Pfft, don't piss on Opera, fanboy. It's just as standards compliant as your beloved FreeBird or whatever.

    15. Re:Totally brutal... by mwood · · Score: 1

      Not _Fireball XL-5_? :-)

    16. Re:Totally brutal... by IpalindromeI · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, it's standards compliant, but the new Opera7 is a huge memory hog and the UI is slow and glitchy. I liked version 6 a lot, but after getting fed up with 7, I switched to Mozilla and am much happier. Plus, Fire(bird/fox) has a much better extension architecture that allows you to do almost anything in terms of look and behavior.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    17. Re:Totally brutal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than naming it Foxfire and drawing out all the p3d0s!

    18. Re:Totally brutal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "fanboy"?

      Your father was right, Stephen. You are an asshole.

    19. Re:Totally brutal... by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      The only site I have needed to use IE for on either my Windows 95 box at work (ugh), or my seldom powered on XP box at home (ugh) is for windowsupdate.microsoft.com, and that is it's homepage. I am using Phoen...FireBi...Firefox on the 95 box, works like a charm, no complaints here. Now on my OS X box I only use Safari, but even then there is one site that does not work correctly, which causes me to use FireFox. This oh-so-important site? San Diego Zoo's Pandacam!

      --
      I hate sigs.
    20. Re:Totally brutal... by ndogg · · Score: 2, Funny

      G**-F&$!ING-DAMN! Every good name out there is taking, almost. I propose the name Hbleghtek. I'm fairly certain that one isn't used.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    21. Re:Totally brutal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The development team has decided to keep changing the name with each release. Anyone can suggest a new name, but the rules are that it must be:

      a) totally generic
      b) slightly lamer then the last one

      Not as easy as it sounds... good luck!

    22. Re:Totally brutal... by antime · · Score: 1

      If they were to go with Foxhound they could just start ripping names from Metal Gear Solid.

    23. Re:Totally brutal... by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      Have you watched that stinker? I think it's Eastwood that should be sued...

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    24. Re:Totally brutal... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Not to mention Angelina Jolie.

    25. Re:Totally brutal... by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      If anyone should be suing, it's Craig Thomas

      He taught me english at high school!

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    26. Re:Totally brutal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I know that it's inaccurate in several ways, I think I'll call it "the browser formerly known as Netscape" from now on.

      At least they didn't change its name to an unpronouncable symbol...

    27. Re:Totally brutal... by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      Must...think...Russian!

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    28. Re:Totally brutal... by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1
      Was wondering when someone would mention it was actually a book, rather than a movie.

      Great book. Lousy movie. Decent browser name.

    29. Re:Totally brutal... by LIGAFF · · Score: 1

      VelociBrowser

    30. Re:Totally brutal... by PhyreFox · · Score: 0

      "Firefox" was the name of a movie in the early 80's (I think) involving the first public use of the term "stealth aircraft" (which IIRC freaked out the US Air Force because at the time they were secretly developing the F-117A).

      On a sidenote, it feels nice to have a web browser named after me. ;)

      --
      My words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
    31. Re:Totally brutal... by RDW · · Score: 1

      Though AFAIR Thomas dedicated the sequel to Eastwood, so he must have liked something about the film (possibly the cheque for the movie rights!).

      Hopefully the Firefox's amazing stealth technology will not make it invisible to the target users' radar...

    32. Re:Totally brutal... by wilbertnl · · Score: 1

      18 MONTHS?????

      --
      Misunderstandings are my expertise.
    33. Re:Totally brutal... by FLEB · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about the H.B. Legh Corporation, makers of the noted business growth and growth-business management software "HBLeghTek"?

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    34. Re:Totally brutal... by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      Though AFAIR Thomas dedicated the sequel to Eastwood, so he must have liked something about the film (possibly the cheque for the movie rights!).

      When he sold the rights to the book, it was through an intermediary and he did not know who the real buyer was. IIRC, he was paid 100k UK pounds. It was all in the local press at the time.

      Another piece of trivia, the art teacher at my school was credited in many of his books for the technology ideas. IIRC: Terry Jones.

      What always amazed me was the lack of sex in his books. He left us (his pupils) with no doubts about the meanings of some passages in Shakespear's and Keats' writings!

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  3. Mirror by Patik · · Score: 5, Informative
    Be sure to use a mirror, it's getting slow already.

    1. Re:Mirror by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Anybody have a .torrent?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:Mirror by afree87 · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:Mirror by croddy · · Score: 1

      mozdev.org is so slammed that even the google cache is dying.

    4. Re:Mirror by Julius+X · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With something this small, I don't see how BitTorrent could possibly do any good. I pulled down Firebird from one of the mirrors in about 15 seconds. I understand supporting an open source cause, but isn't there a point where it just becomes useless?

      Were I to use BT, it would take 5seconds to check the torrent, another 20 to start running and to find seeds and peers. Hell, I've had the .torrent running for over 2min now and I still don't have even 1%. Doesn't this kind of defeat the purpose? Torrent just isn't suited to small downloads, so why even bother?

      --

      -Julius X
      remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
    5. Re:Mirror by mrdaveb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the conventional download sites are so crushed under the load that you can't get the file at all then bittorrent makes perfect sense, even for just a small download.

      If you find a working mirror, then of course just use that. I tried a mirror and it was overloaded. Then I tried bittorrent and it worked. Simple.

      --
      Homme petit d'homme petit, s'attend, n'avale
    6. Re:Mirror by BandwidthHog · · Score: 0, Troll

      That comment would be much more useful to me if you'd actually linked the various mirrors, as mozilla.org is totally swamped right now.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    7. Re:Mirror by Intocabile · · Score: 1

      Well the mirror site is down, I got this in a minute.

    8. Re:Mirror by lcde · · Score: 1

      Well it seems that mozilla is down, along with their mirrors list. BitTorrent should always be up, no matter what load.

      --
      :%s/teh/the/g
    9. Re:Mirror by Yerase · · Score: 1

      Can someone post the mirror URL's here? I can't even get the mirror page to load, as all of mozilla.org seems slashdotted.

    10. Re:Mirror by Judas-Priest · · Score: 5, Informative

      USA:
      California
      Georgia
      Indiana
      Oregon
      Europe:
      Spain

      The full list may be found on the google cache

    11. Re:Mirror by Firehawk · · Score: 1

      don't know about you but when I read the story, the Mozilla website is totally unavailable while I've gotten the thing on bittorrent via that link while typing this reply ...

    12. Re:Mirror by re-Verse · · Score: 1

      Providing a list of mirrors would haev been nice / intelligent.... Seeing as the mirror list is on mozilla.org, and is now slashdotted.

    13. Re:Mirror by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      Well thanks for not posting links to the mirrors, but posting a page on the slashdotted site! Informative my ass.

      You may call me a troll, but you know I'm right.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    14. Re:Mirror by nolife · · Score: 1

      I pulled down Firebird from one of the mirrors in about 15 seconds. I understand supporting an open source cause, but isn't there a point where it just becomes useless?

      I could not even get to the mirror site. The torrent worked fine and I got the whole thing in under 30 seconds from clicking the link. Seemed very useful to me.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    15. Re:Mirror by philthedrill · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since mozilla.org is slashdotted, here are the primary mirrors:

      ISC (FTP)
      ISC (HTTP)
      Georgia (FTP)
      Georgia (HTTP)
      Indiana (FTP)
      Indiana (HTTP)
      Oregon (FTP)
      Oregon (HTTP)

      And the google cache for more mirrors.

    16. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BitTorrent will indeed go down if the torrent tracker gets slashdotted. However, that would take a WHOLE BUNCH of people all trying to access the Torrent at once.

    17. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://ftp.lug.udel.edu/pub/x11/www/firefox/

    18. Re:Mirror by Patik · · Score: 1

      Point taken. I was trying to keep people away from using the normal download link on the site (to download from mozilla.org), but I didn't foresee that even normal html pages would get slashdotted. I guess I forgot about Mozilla no longer being owned/run by AOL and their seemingly unlimited bandwidth. See other posts in this thread for direct mirror links.

    19. Re:Mirror by Roo · · Score: 1
      > Be sure to use a mirror, it's getting slow already.

      That's not informative, that's stupid. You can't say "be sure to use a mirror" and link to mozilla's list of mirrors!
      Anyway, here's a few you might try:
      United States
      - ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/
      (Californi a - ftp://mozilla.isc.org/pub/mozilla.org/)
      (Georgia - ftp://trillian.cc.gatech.edu/pub/mozilla.org/)
      (I ndiana - ftp://mozilla.ussg.indiana.edu/pub/mozilla.org/)
      (Oregon - ftp://mozilla.oregonstate.edu/pub/mozilla.org/)

      Europe
      - ftp://ftp.eu.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/
      (Switze rland - ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/mozilla/)
      (U K - ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.mozilla.org/pub/)
      (Kor ea - ftp://ftp.kaist.ac.kr/pub/mozilla/)



    20. Re:Mirror by Patik · · Score: 1

      I linked to a simple HTML file that gave you alternative places to download the ~6MB install file. You posted plain text URLs of mirrors that have been posted in this thread a couple times already (as clickable links, too). You're oh so helpful.

    21. Re:Mirror by lpontiac · · Score: 1
      With something this small, I don't see how BitTorrent could possibly do any good. I pulled down Firebird from one of the mirrors in about 15 seconds.

      Think about the resources it would take to make something this popular downloadable that quickly for everyone that wanted it.

      It'd be expensive. More expensive than just hosting a tracker.

    22. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normally I would agree with you, but with all the slashbots setting out to prove you wrong, this bittorrent is pretty fast.

    23. Re:Mirror by p3d0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Question: how can one trust a BitTorrent link from an untrusted source? What's the best way to ensure you're getting the real deal?

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    24. Re:Mirror by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      With something this small, I don't see how BitTorrent could possibly do any good.

      Somehow I am guessing that you aren't on a 56k connection...

    25. Re:Mirror by sepluv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does anyone have a mirror of the MSWindows binary that does not end in .exe for those of use who cannot download *.exe's?

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    26. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but with all the slashbots setting out to prove you wrong,

      No, it is the users that do not want to use a torrent causing the mirrors to be flooded.

      This is the exact thing that a bittorrent is good for. Distributing a file in large demand quickly. Whether or not you agree with its use, it is working .

    27. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point is that for legitimate warez, 99% of the time I can find a fast mirror and finish downloading before BitTorrent gets to 0.2%.

      BitTorrent is good for grabbing illegal Divxes though.

    28. Re:Mirror by robbkidd · · Score: 1

      By checking the MD5sum on the file after it's done downloading and before you install it.

      http://[mirrorURL]/firefox/releases/0.8/MD5SUMS

    29. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why the fuck can't you download *.exes? your mommy have a block against that on the intarweb?

    30. Re:Mirror by David+McBride · · Score: 1

      http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~dwm99/slashdot/FirefoxSet up-0.8.exe.not.

      By the way, you really shouldn't trust random binaries you downloaded from someone else on slashdot. At least validate the MD5SUMS, if you can -- that .exe block is there for a reason.

    31. Re:Mirror by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try this: http://whatever/downloads/mozilla.exe.tgz

      The Apache web server will automatically zip files or directories and send them to you if you ask for the download with a .tgz. I am not sure if this feature is turned on by default, though. Should get you around having to get a .exe if you find a server that does it.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    32. Re:Mirror by SB5 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what connection you got or what computer but I pulled the download in 23 seconds via BT. BT is suited for ANY popular files, no matter the size. It just seems to work better with larger files because of comparing FTP to BT is like comparing a combustion piston engine with a turbofan engine. I am still sharing and am sad that I have only shared the file .706 of the file despite having an upload cap of 30kB/s, it has been running for about an hour now even.

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    33. Re:Mirror by jesser · · Score: 1

      Those are the primary mirrors, btw. When you connect to ftp.mozilla.org, you're connecting to one of those 4 or 5 mirrors.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    34. Re:Mirror by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Looks like some mods need to learn the difference between actual trolling and a basic monday morning lack of manners. (Of course, some of my coworkers still can't make that distinction, but that's beside the point.)

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    35. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checking the MD5 provided by the trusted source, but the best solution would be to have the trusted source provide the bittorrent in the first place.

    36. Re:Mirror by sepluv · · Score: 1

      Thanks very much.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  4. With the way these guys get into name disputes... by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it's surprising they didn't name it "Starfox".

    (Apologies to Eli. :)

  5. damn by relrelrel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I just submitted this. Anyhoo, Firebird is/was? a great browser. It's just so simple and quick and feels really lite that it's a pleasure to use. One thing I would like, though, would be an automatic reload on right-click like Opera has got. Does anyone know of any plugins for this?

    --
    --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
    1. Re:damn by borgdows · · Score: 0

      of course there it is : http://reloadevery.mozdev.org/

  6. Dammit. by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop playing name games. That's the sort of thing that can really hurt adoption.

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
    1. Re:Dammit. by bro1 · · Score: 1

      Sure changing name is no good under normal circumstances. But changing name from FireBird to something is good.

      My rule is simple: ambiguity is bad.

    2. Re:Dammit. by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      I still say it's bad for a number of reasons. It does help that the new name shares the first syllable with the old one.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    3. Re:Dammit. by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Phoen doesn't sound a bit like Fir ;)

      I'm glad they've changed the name. It took astonishing arrogance to swipe the name of an existing FOSS project, knowing full-well that any name they used would, by virtue of Mozilla's mindshare, end up damaging any group already using the name. It shows a willingness to be reasonable that they've changed it and the only grouse I have is the length of time it's taken them to do so.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Dammit. by Gyan · · Score: 4, Funny


      The permanent cname change should be to "The Browser Formerly Known as Something Else".

    5. Re:Dammit. by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Stop playing name games. That's the sort of thing that can really hurt adoption.

      You're right, that valuable brand recognition is damaged by name changes.

      But there were enough problems with the Firebird moniker to justify the name change. And, arguably, with bare single digit percentage market penetration, it's still early in the game; name changes aren't as such a big deal to the party faithful.

      A really important step to promote the growth of firefox might be overlooked: their little button logos available for you to put on your web site.

      As a responsible web site maintainer, these buttons can go alongside some previously collected good button merit badges such as

      1. W3C complaince with standards HTML 4, CSS, XHTML 1, MathML, SVG, etc.
      2. works best with any browser
      including text only.
      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    6. Re:Dammit. by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Ah, but everytime there is a namechange people talk about it.

      And in the streets and cubes, everyone still refers to it as Mozilla.

      Maybe it will go the way of Jennifer Lopez.

      Mozilla Firefox becomes F-Fo!

    7. Re:Dammit. by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's just in beta / technology preview stage yet. I think geeks are using it now, mostly. You often don't want to install 0.x software in corporate environments. They probably use Mozilla 1.x / Seamonkey, which isn't getting any name changes. From what I've seen, it serves mostly as a code name now, and will probably not cause more confusion than Windows Cairo did before it was named Windows 2000. Eventually, Firefox should replace Seamonkey.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    8. Re:Dammit. by hendridm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Stop playing name games. That's the sort of thing that can really hurt adoption.

      In their defense, it's still in beta. I don't think they intend it for widespread adoption yet except among developers and enthusiasts. Besides, I think they were stuck between a rock and a hard place with their lack of research over their last name.

      I still think 'Firefox' stinks. Doesn't roll off the tongue like Mozilla, Firebird, or Phoenix, but I'm sure choosing a name that isn't already taken isn't easy.

    9. Re:Dammit. by DomCurtis187 · · Score: 1

      I hope not... "F-Fo" sounds too much like "F. O.", which would most likely be interpreted as "F**k Off"!

    10. Re:Dammit. by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If Mozilla Firebird/fox and Thunderbird are set out to replace the current Mozilla Suite, why not call them simply by their respective functional names, such as "Mozilla Browser", "Mozilla Mail"?

    11. Re:Dammit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. How very 1995. Remember those days? Back when "Made for Mozilla" referred to Netscape 1.1?

      Give it up, man. Web badges are history.

    12. Re:Dammit. by iso · · Score: 1

      Does anybody have a mirror for the button logos? It looks like mozilla.org is taking a beating!

    13. Re:Dammit. by tka · · Score: 1

      I too think that is wrong for mozilla.org people to start using the firebird name. But when looking at the consequences did it really hurt that much the one and only firebird? It surely make them more known, didn't it?

    14. Re:Dammit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This name change seems to be the recognition that isn't going to happen anytime soon.

    15. Re:Dammit. by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Umm... Wouldn't that be Mo-Fo? (couldn't resist...)

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    16. Re:Dammit. by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I still think 'Firefox' stinks. Doesn't roll off the tongue like Mozilla,
      > Firebird, or Phoenix, but I'm sure choosing a name that isn't already
      > taken isn't easy.

      "Mozilla" is hard for a lot of people to remember and pronounce. Firebird
      and Phoenix are both so horribly generic that the don't make good brands.
      Frankly, Firefox isn't unique either (though I don't recall exactly where
      I've heard it; it might not be computer-related).

      > Besides, I think they were stuck between a rock and a hard place with
      > their lack of research over their last name.

      No, the Firebird Database people were being silly there. The word "Firebird"
      is *way*, *WAY* too generic to ever be considered a trademarkeable, unique
      name. It's been used by *hundreds* of different computer-related products
      over the last three decades and *millions* of non-computer-related products
      over the last three centuries. It's like naming your database ZipSQL and
      then getting offended when somebody releases a Zip web browser. That's
      stoopid with two "o"s. OTOH, for the same reason, it didn't make a good name.

      > but I'm sure choosing a name that isn't already taken isn't easy.

      It's the easiest thing in the world, if you can give up on the idea of
      using an already existing name of something. The word "firebird" is so
      common that any random person off the street should be able to name several
      different products called that. The Mozilla people probably chose it based
      on the name of the car, but we wouldn't even know that if their other names
      ("thunderbird", "camino") weren't chosen the same way, because there are
      myriad other things they might have named it after and called it "Firebird".

      You want a unique name? MAKE ONE UP. It's not that tough. Want a bird
      name to go with "thunderbird" and "sunbird"? Call it "FlameThrush" or "Web
      Falcon" or "Internet Hawk" or "Net Sparrow". Want to imply a great beast
      to go with the "Mozilla" theme? Then call it "Mohemoth" or something along
      those lines. (Playing off the name of a type of dinosaur is possible but
      would probably come off as trite. Besides, the obvious "Morannosaur" is
      too much like "moron".) Want to imply smallness to attract the "lean and
      mean" crowd that wants it to run on 8MB of RAM? Call it "Web Chickadee"
      or "LepraunNet" or "Dime Browser". Speed? "Mozoom" or "Mozilla Quickling".
      Wildness? "Screaming Flaming Rabbit".

      Of all these, I like "FlameThrush" best. It's certain not to be taken,
      rolls off the tongue, and lends itself well toward future expansion to
      include the other components. (Want to rename "Thunderbird"? "RumbleWren"
      is similarly unlikely to be taken, but you could also go with "BoomSwift"
      or "LightningRook" or "PealMartin", or there are many other possibilities,
      and that's just keeping within the basic "thunder bird" idea.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    17. Re:Dammit. by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      Because they're not (yet) replaced the Browser Suite. Firefox is still only (!) at 0.8, and Thunderbird is only at 0.5. Personally, I reckon Thunderbird, great though it is (I use it at work, don't quite trust it for my home mail), is someway off 1.0 status. Until Thunderbird is ready, both it and Firefox will probably remain $WACKY_NAMED_BROWSER and $WACKY_NAMED_MAIL_UA. Once Thunderbird reaches show-time, both it and Firefox will, presumably, make the leap to Mozilla Mail amd Mozilla Browser.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    18. Re:Dammit. by LX.onesizebigger · · Score: 1

      No, seeing as Firebi^H^Hfox is only a provisional name for a provisional piece of software that will eventually replace one of the components of the Mozilla suite, where it should get the name "Mozilla Browser", the proper name would be "The Browser Not Yet Known as Browser".

      --
      I for one welcome our new SCOviet Russian overlords to whom all our base are belong.
    19. Re:Dammit. by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Here's a question I haven't been able to answer.

      In "pine" for all it's evil shortcomings, it allows you to manually enter a "from:" address for each email. This is usefull if you're using the "I own the whole bloody domain" spam prevention tactic.

      I'd like something like this for mozilla mail. As it is, the from line only allows me to select from available accounts.

      Does anyone know of a plugin that does this? If someone can make it work for me, there is $5 by paypal involved. (Hint, hint!)

      Other than that, I love mozmail! Wheee!

    20. Re:Dammit. by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      They are history, but they're coming back. Mozilla.org is going to start marketing their stuff to restart the browser wars.

    21. Re:Dammit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla.org is going to start marketing their stuff to restart the browser wars.

      They can try, I suppose, but they won't succeed. IE has evolved to completeness. Safari, on the Mac, is sufficiently good for the majority of uses now and is improving at a rate that puts Mozilla (by whatever name) to shame.

      Mozilla is welcome to fight over the thirty-seven remaining desktops that are running X-Windows.

    22. Re:Dammit. by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Let's call it nemo (nemozilla if you have to) and be done with.

    23. Re:Dammit. by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Hell yea, I've just installed this button-merit-badge. Keep your visitors up-to-date. Thank you! :)

    24. Re:Dammit. by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, either you're a safari-only user, or all you know is IE. Claiming IE is complete is frankly ridiculous. It has the worst standards support of any browser out there, it has an extremely poor UI (which can be fixed by installing a front-end, but you can just install another browser in that case), it has the worst security track record of any browser, except maybe NS4, with several known unfixed vulnerabilities in the current version, and it crashes, often enough to annoy.

      I agree safari is unlikely to lose any market share to firefox (though I disagree it is improving faster than mozilla), but IE is ripe for the slaughter. Remember, there was a time when netscape had the marketshare of IE, and people ridiculed IE for being a latecomer to the market and having no chance in hell to gain any significant marketshare. Times change, and IE won't be on top forever, just like windows won't be the desktop king forever.

    25. Re:Dammit. by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      To clarify my "worst standards support" comment, I'm talking about browsers which have seen development this side of the millenium turnover. NS4 doesn't count there. But it is considerably worse than any of the gecko, khtml/webcore or opera.

    26. Re:Dammit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has the worst standards support of any browser out there

      So? It works with more actual sites than any browser out there. The pettyness of those who write "standards" documents specifically to piss of Microsoft doesn't interest me.

      it has an extremely poor UI

      That's your opinion, and it's in the distinct minority.

      it has the worst security track record of any browser

      Security isn't a browser issue. It's an OS issue. Any browser on Windows would face the exact same challenges.

      and it crashes, often enough to annoy

      Never seen it.

      Remember, there was a time when netscape had the marketshare of IE, and people ridiculed IE for being a latecomer to the market and having no chance in hell to gain any significant marketshare.

      You know what the difference was? People were still pushing the envelope then. The web is tamed now. There's nothing new under the sun. IE does it all, very well, so what motivation do people have to change except the sheer immaturity of Microsoft-hatred?

    27. Re:Dammit. by boots@work · · Score: 1

      I can speak from personal experience on this, because we were looking into this in depth just last week. I reckon it will be a long time before anyone adopts the kid called "Shithead".

  7. On really! by tobybuk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    For god sake - It's a bloody difficuly sell when the bloody name keeps changing.

    Now I have to tell people that the Mozilla Browser was dead, was called FireBird and is now named after a 80's film.

    We should keep a book on what the next releases name will be.

    1. Re:On really! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot: 'Starring Clint Eastwood as Dirty Special Forces Pilot Dude!'

      -- vranash

  8. Mozilla convert by Ckwop · · Score: 1

    I must say.. i thought when people gave Mozilla such a good rep that it must just be OSS zelots over hyping :P

    How *WRONG* was I? Mozilla totally wastes IE in pretty much every department!

    I only use IE for crap sites that require it. For everything else i use Mozilla ;)

    Simon.

    1. Re:Mozilla convert by Sepper · · Score: 1

      I only use IE for crap sites that require it. For everything else i use Mozilla ;)

      There are some site with stuff to buy,
      for everything else, there's Mozilla

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
  9. I'm just thinking... by ernstp · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Clint Eastwood and a big, sturdy, russian plane!

    ..what about that, don't they have a trademark on their movie?

    1. Re:I'm just thinking... by azzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wasn't it a book before being a film? Anyway, Mozilla have consulted lawyers, and trademarked/copyrighted/whatever this name in the US and Europe, so I think we can assume no legal probs with the name.

    2. Re:I'm just thinking... by ernstp · · Score: 1
    3. Re:I'm just thinking... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it a book before being a film?

      Yup, ISBN 0751511382 written by Craig Thomas

    4. Re:I'm just thinking... by Futaba-chan · · Score: 1

      More importantly, do you have to thinkthinkthink in Russianrussianrussian to use the browser?

  10. More Information by dryan · · Score: 5, Informative

    A FAQ about the name change can be found here.

    There's also a thread on the mozillazine forums about the name change here

    1. Re:More Information by thejackol · · Score: 1

      *yawn*

      FAQ the FAQin FAQ about the FAQin name change.

    2. Re:More Information by Johnathon+Walls · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From the FAQ:

      Won't this confuse people?

      Yes, but if the WWF can pull it off, so can we. Besides, in six months you'll forget there ever was any other name.


      This is amusing.

      Do they mean the WWF (conservation group) that originally had the name, and so took the WWF (the wrestling group) to court to force them to change their name? Or do they mean the WWF that either settled or lost the case, and agreed to change their name to WWE?

      In either case, it involves lawsuits!

    3. Re:More Information by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Or do they mean the WWF that either settled or lost the case,

      The wrestling people lost, at least in the UK, IIRC.

      > Yes, but if the WWF can pull it off, so can we. Besides, in six months you'll
      > forget there ever was any other name.

      Unless they get sued by Clint Eastwood or whoever, and they have to change their name again.

    4. Re:More Information by leifm · · Score: 1

      I thought that lawsuit was kind of retarded. Aside from Google when could you possibly confuse WWE with WWF? Of course maybe the suit was brought on because of serch engine confusion...

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    5. Re:More Information by residieu · · Score: 0

      I always wondered what that Panda had to do with wrestling.

    6. Re:More Information by mr_sas · · Score: 1

      it was brought on because wwf should't have been using wwf.com under some previous agreement iirc. so now it's a wrestling fan site :/

    7. Re:More Information by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, it was WWE's own fault. They agreed to a legal settlement back in the day where they got the rights to use WWF in the USA only. Once they made a website (wwf.com), the wildlife people sued saying that the Internet is an international forum, and hence in violation of the agreement. Kind of like Apple Computer's ongoing fights with Apple Music, there wouldn't have been a problem if the original settlements hadn't been so shortsighted.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    8. Re:More Information by rodbegbie · · Score: 1

      Or the fact that the "World Wildlife Fund" changed its name to be the "World Wide Fund for Nature"?

      It's all namechangetastic.

      Rod.

      --
      Rod Begbie done this, and he's not
    9. Re:More Information by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

      Won't this confuse people?

      Yes, but if the WWF can pull it off, so can we. Besides, in six months you'll forget there ever was any other name.


      So they'll be able to get Spolsky to say something really nice about Firefox like he already did for Firebird? I imagine that if Joel on Software readers forget it was ever called Firebird, it will be because they forgot Joel endorsed it.

      I strongly suspect that Firebird usership has creeped past the usual hardcore anti-Microsoft AND looking-for-the-bleeding-edge technologists, out to a larger slice of the general populace that might not be so patient with all these name changes, and who might be more inclined to try something if someone famous says it's good.

      --
      one hundred twenty
      is just enough characters
      to write a haiku
  11. The new name by rokzy · · Score: 0

    I thought it was crap when I first heard it.

    but look at that logo! beautiful!

    can't wait to have it on my taskbar, but can't get a download atm.

    reminds me a little of Starfox/wing...

    1. Re:The new name by Tanami · · Score: 1

      The big logo looks nice, but the one on your taskbar will look like a tomato ;-)

      Browser is excellent though.

  12. Avoiding Confusion? by Gudlyf · · Score: 4, Funny
    What about now, with Craig Thomas's book? I can hear it now:

    "What's wrong with your browser, dude?"
    "Firefox down, man. Firefox down."

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:Avoiding Confusion? by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      No...the browser is working fine, you just have to think in Russian to use it.

      I really need to read Firefox Down...I loved Firefox.

  13. How creative by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Interesting
    If you rename something to prevent confusion with other products don't you think you should avoid something that is already a
    1. Book series
    2. Wire mesh manufacturer
    3. Movie with Clint Eastwood
    4. Atari game
    5. Web design company specializing in horses
    6. A game controller
    7. A safety technology company
    8. An all-girl hard rockin' poppin' pounding band from Tacoma, Washingto
    9. A model airplane
    10. A slashdot user who posted twice in 1999

    The good things about the name:

    1. It doesn't sound like another similar product (eg Lindows)
    2. It doesn't have the name of the OS it was originally designed to run on in it. (eg WinZip)
    3. It doesn't have the name of the programming language used to create it in it (eg JavaInvaders)
    4. It is unlikely to cause confusion with another software product (except maybe the video game), unlike Firebird.
    5. It doesn't use a famous trademark (at least they didn't name it Nike)

    I've said this in the past, and I will say it again. If you are naming your open source software, make it something unique. Why would you want to compete for search terms with all these other people, products, corporations, and organizations. If your product has merit, then people will recognize the name that you give it and you will get brand loyalty. There is no need show your similarity to other products or your system requirements in your name.

    1. Re:How creative by ghum · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Have you looked at the an all-girl hard rockin??? they make BIG mistakes:
      • No pictures
      • Mailadress @ hotmail
    2. Re:How creative by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      look, the other way than to choose names like that is to make something up like 'Buikoler-browswer', how good does that sound?

      tho can't imagine it being that bad if one would go through with google to see if there's _anything_ out there with the same name. however if one did this then there would be people complaining that "how are you supposed to spell that over the phone line???".

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      If you rename something to prevent confusion with other products don't you think you should avoid something that is already a [long list]

      To avoid further confusion, version 0.9 will be given a new, really-truly-final name.

      Ladies and Gentlemen, the Mozilla Organisation presents - Mozilla Cabbage-Scraunch-O-Echidna-Matique!

      Thank you.

    4. Re:How creative by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      The trouble with any name ending 'fox' is that it makes one think of the awful Linux Fox which fortunately never had a chance of being adopted as the Linux logo. There was a Slashdot story about it at the time, but Slashdot's search box is so useless I can't find it.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    5. Re:How creative by SenorCitizen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...or the Amiga scene musician Firefox/Phenomena: http://www.modarchive.com/artists/firefox/

    6. Re:How creative by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think one thing can be said about Slashdot users... We do it using brute force. :^)

    7. Re:How creative by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... and the major reason to why it was picked:

      They had no conflicts with existing software trademarks. I noticed the About dialog showed a TM sign too, so I have a feeling they now actually got a registration through.

      Who cares if a game controller is called Firefox or a movie with Clint Eastwood is? The thing that can cause confusion to the point it becomes a problem is if there already is a software called Firefox.

      Also, what we're all discussing now is only a code name for a software being a technology preview, that will likely disappear in the future anyway.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    8. Re:How creative by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Informative
      Buikoler is unique, but you are correct, a good name has to make a good brand.
      • It has to be easy to remember
      • It has to be easy to pronounce
      • It has to be easy to spell
      • It can't sound like something nasty
      • It can't mean something nasty in some other language
      • Should actually remind people of something pleasant
      Buikoler:
      • To many syllables to remember easily
      • Not pronouncable
      • Hard to spell. There could be multiple spellings. Even worse, there would be easier ways to spell it and have it sound the same.
      • Sounds too much like "buccaneer", "bukkake", or even "butt"
      A good name is chosen through a brainstorming and making sure that everything coming out meets these criteria. An example of a good name that was chosen this way would be "Expedia" (the travel company):
      • It is part of "expediate" (to make easier) giving it posative connotation
      • Easy to remember for the same reason
      • Totally unique
      • Easy to spell (at least in English) because all the vowel combination are common and not easily mistaken.
    9. Re:How creative by Asprin · · Score: 4, Interesting


      5. It doesn't use a famous trademark (at least they didn't name it Nike)

      Just picking nits here, but I would remind everyone that Nike didn't come up with that name on their own, Athena's been using it for just a little while longer.

      I doubt that even if they *HAD* called it "Nike", Nike would have been able to do anything about it unless the Mozilla Nike project was also about manufacturing and selling tennis shoes. After all, Nike, Inc. aren't the only ones to use the name of the popular Greek goddess for their company or organizations -- the US government even used it for a ground-to air missle program.

      This whole discussion is giving me a hankerin' to go try and DL some old FireFox roms for my atari emulator.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    10. Re:How creative by anthropomorphized · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with your "good things" list about the new name. As to the problem list, have you been to the USPTO web site lately (apologies for my ameri-centrism). The number of registered marks out there is insane (and that's just the registered ones). Trying to find a name that has no parallel in a different market is a frighteningly difficult task. I'd say its harder than trying to find a cool ".com" domain name that isn't taken.

    11. Re:How creative by Jameth · · Score: 0

      Damn. And Nike was always one of my favorite gods. Then some shoe-boys have to go and rain on my parade, wrecking the name for the little-guys.

    12. Re:How creative by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Because, as we all know, all of those things are practically web browsers. *cough*

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    13. Re:How creative by Not+Public · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. A (possible) example of such a naming would be Xaraya. A "extensible content management system." It was cool- they opened up to the community for naming suggestions, and in the end.. went for something that didn't really mean anything, but sounded vaguely familiar (in spanish i believe?) Which is kinda cool to not have it (necessarily) linguistically attached to english. (my opinion)

      It's unique, not bogged down with similarities to other endeavours or product names, readily identifable, and they even have a wav file to instruct you on how to pronounce it. (i still say it wrong in my mind)

      all in all, a good name. a good process to get to it!

    14. Re:How creative by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

      Number 10 is the reason my alias is foxhound...the name they gave the real MiG-31!

      --


      Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
    15. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expedia sounds nasty in spanish.
      Pedo is "fart"
      "Expedir" it's used mostly when you throw something out of your body (Almos always nasty...).
      So, apply your own rules or check twice what you write. Nobody can check the names in every language, well maybe a Big Multinational Company.

    16. Re:How creative by zhenlin · · Score: 1

      Registered trademarks are marked with (R) not TM.

      Microsoft(R) Windows(R) -- not Microsoft(TM) Windows(TM)

    17. Re:How creative by verrucagnome · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only good names that are left are 'placenta' and 'phlegm'.

    18. Re:How creative by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      Does that mean if I hang around long enough that someone will name their OSS project after me? Like 'Teamhasnoi P2P client'? (Would actually be a good name - remainds people to be selfless in their sharing, based off an annoying maxim that everyone knows, could even mean that it contains no spyware.

      Sweet. The revelolution will be bittorrented!

      Of course, that would mean I could no longer easily google myself....hmm. What a crappy name teamhasnoi is!

    19. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "bukkake", or even "butt" ... and that's negative, how?

    20. Re:How creative by bathmatt · · Score: 1
      I doubt that even if they *HAD* called it "Nike", Nike would have been able to do anything about it unless the Mozilla Nike project was also about manufacturing and selling tennis shoes.

      Well, that depends on how much of mozilla's coding is done in sweat shops in the far east... Nike might not like that much of a theft of an idea :)

    21. Re:How creative by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      look, the other way than to choose names like that is to make something up like 'Buikoler-browswer', how good does that sound?

      Sounds like an american pronunciation of the French "Bricoleur", which means "tinkerer" or "do-it-yourselfer".

      The total amount of phonemes is small with regard to the total amount of concepts. It is almost impossible to find a name that will not "look like" something else.

      Thomas Miconi

    22. Re:How creative by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      > After all, Nike, Inc. aren't the only ones to use the name of the popular Greek goddess for their company or organizations -- the US government even used it for a ground-to air missle program.

      Yeah. It looked promising for a while, at least until the darned Russkies came up with the Reebok anti-missile chaff system...

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    23. Re:How creative by flink · · Score: 1

      And for the dyslexic:

      11. A lesbian drama staring Angelina Jolie

    24. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need anybody's permission slip to use the TM symbol with the name of your product. It's simply a declaration that you consider the name to be your trademark. The assumption is that you have the clearance to make such a declaration. If somebody else has a prior trademark that overlaps yours, the TM symbol means nothing more or less than "Sue me."

    25. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want to find a name that doesn't look like anything else. You want to find a name that looks like something vague but good. Verizon makes you think of horizon, which invokes associations of wide-open spaces and freedom. Cingular sounds like "singular," obviously, which both means unique and individual, two highly positive connotations.

    26. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * It can't sound like something nasty
      * It can't mean something nasty in some other

      The sooner the GIMP gets a dignified name the better if you ask me.

    27. Re:How creative by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

      They had no conflicts with existing software trademarks. I noticed the About dialog showed a TM sign too, so I have a feeling they now actually got a registration through.

      "TM" means nothing, really. You can claim anything as a trademark, but unless it's a registered trademark (R) it won't be nearly as strong in court. It takes a lot more effort to defend a trademark you claim is yours (TM) vs. a registered trademark that is yours (R).

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
    28. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is it going to confuse? The three users of the Firebird database? Face the reality that Firebird the database insignificant in the grand scheme of things and like most open source projects will never amount to anything useful. Why should some unknown database have such a big (and negative) effect on the Firebird Browser? The browser team should not have changed their name without being ordered to by a judge.

    29. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And is there now "ThunderFox" or are they stopping the whole name consistency thing?

    30. Re:How creative by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that Nike would be considered a "famous" mark, meaning that it would fall under the fairly new Trademark Dilution statute.

    31. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think Expedia is "Easy to spell (at least in English) because all the vowel combination are common and not easily mistaken"?

      Except that someone hearing it for the first time might think it had something to do with them getting you to your destination faster, and therefore try to spell it "ek-speedier".

      In other words, it only looks obvious to you because you already know how it's spelt.

      Personally it always reminds me of "encyclopedia", and leaves me wondering where reference books come into travel...

    32. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      at least they didn't name it Nike

      Hey, you can read about the Nike surface-to-air nuclear-tipped missles. But hey, if you're so creative with names, can you suggest some???

      And nothing lame like Spherion or Accenture. Of course, those where companies that changed names, but I can't tell you WTF they do...remind me of their old name, and I'll know...

    33. Re:How creative by Asprin · · Score: 1


      I would argue that regardless of whether it qualifies as famous, the word Nike is not distinctive enough to warrant such protection because TESS sez that not only has the trademark "Nike" been used before (best examples in the dead marks at the end of the third page), but these two are still live.

      Even the page you linked states at the bottom that what qualifies as famous would be a matter of some controversy in the courts.

      I'm not saying you're wrong, just that this sucks as least as much as the absurdly hideous and unweildly prospective name "Mozilla Nike" that started this nonsense. I don't see why Nike, Inc. should get to own the name Nike just because they're good at selling tennis shoes when it wasn't even their name to begin with. My inner intellectual is appalled.

      BTW, I went to Nike, Inc.'s web site to look for an FAQ/history in their corporate page on use of the name Nike, and couldn't find any, but boy does my head hurt after sitting through their ridiculous flash based web pages. Ouch!

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    34. Re:How creative by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      No shitter. My mom used to work in a maternity ward. Hand to god, someone named their baby 'Placenta Jones'.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    35. Re:How creative by dryan · · Score: 1

      Also, what we're all discussing now is only a code name for a software being a technology preview, that will likely disappear in the future anyway

      The new name is going to be permanent.

      From the mozillazine news article on the subject:

      The new Firefox moniker is intended to be used as a permanent product name and a strong brand identity will be built around it.

    36. Re:How creative by po8 · · Score: 1

      I always confuse Expedia with the Microsoft encyclopedia whose name I forget. Great branding.

    37. Re:How creative by MrWa · · Score: 1
      I noticed the About dialog showed a TM sign too, so I have a feeling they now actually got a registration through.

      Having the TM symbol only means that you consider it your trademark, not that it has been registered. That is the cirle-R is for...

    38. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "encarta"? I can see how "encarta" and "expedia" would be confusing since they both start in 'e' and end in 'a' but have no middle letters in common.

    39. Re:How creative by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      The goddess was pronounced "neekay."

    40. Re:How creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    41. Re:How creative by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > If you rename something to prevent confusion with other products don't
      > you think you should avoid something that is already a [bunch of stuff]

      I would have thought so, but somebody important at Mozilla.org has always been
      of the opinion that a "good name" has to be chosen because it's already the
      name of something else. Mozilla was named from Godzilla, and frankly that's
      the most original product name that's ever been associated with the project --
      and it was inherited from the very early days at Netscape.

      Navigator and Messenger and Composer and DOM Inspector and Calendar are named
      for what they do or what they are, how clever. (Also, except DOM Inspector
      and Calendar these names were carried over from Communicator.) Seamonkey is
      a small creature, among other things. Rhino is named from the animal on the
      front of an O'Reilly book; SpiderMonkey is also named after an animal.

      Phoenix, besides being a very famous mythological creature has also been used
      as a brand name more times than *almost* any word in the English language,
      though they managed to find one of the few[1] that have been used more often
      when they renamed it to Firebird. Thunderbird and Camino are also cars (and
      though Camino may not be much else, Thunderbird is also a number of other
      things besides just the car, though not as many things as Firebird or
      Phoenix). Sunbird (the new name for the as-yet-nonexistant standalone
      calendar app in the new suite that uses the Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox widget
      set instead of XPFE) also is a car, among other things. Chameleon, the old
      name for Camino, is a lizard, as is Gecko. Necko comes from Necco, a food
      brand (though it was chosen to go with Gecko). I'm not sure where the
      Venkman name comes from, exactly, but I'm certain I'd heard it before, prior
      to its adoption for the Mozilla.org script debugger. I can't place it though.
      Firefox, besides all the things you listed, is an animal; the other things
      are probably mostly all named after the animal and/or eachother.

      This is all not accidental. Someone at mozilla.org is doing this on
      *purpose*, deliberately choosing the names of existing things. I don't
      understand why, but the pattern is clear.

      [1] Several hundred perhaps -- in a language with as many words as English,
      that's not very many.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    42. Re:How creative by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I noticed the About dialog showed a TM sign too, so I have a feeling they
      > now actually got a registration through.

      If they had it registered, they could put an R in a circle next to it. The
      TM just serves as notice that they intend it as a trademark; registration is
      not required to mark it with TM.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    43. Re:How creative by po8 · · Score: 1

      So the one that sounds like it's derived from the word "chart" is the encyclopedia, and the one that looks like it's a short form of the word "encyclopedia" is a travel service?

      My bad.

    44. Re:How creative by DeadSea · · Score: 1

      Peter Venkman was the character played by Bill Murray in the movie Ghostbusters.

  14. Its too bad the names are all unrelated by hey · · Score: 1

    Its seems like basic branding to have some part of the name common for all an enterprise's products.
    MozBird, MozFox MozCam sound good too me.

    1. Re:Its too bad the names are all unrelated by krumms · · Score: 5, Funny

      MozBird, MozFox MozCam sound good too me.

      Thank you, because of your horrible suggestions I now feel less irksome about the name "Firefox" ;)

    2. Re:Its too bad the names are all unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its seems like basic branding to have some part of the name common for all an enterprise's products.

      Sounds pretty unusual to me. I'm assuming that you don't count the "Mozilla" part of Mozilla Firefox and likewise wouldn't count a company or other branding name used in the same way.

    3. Re:Its too bad the names are all unrelated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its seems like basic branding to have some part of the name common for all an enterprise's products.

      you must be a KDE kfan.

    4. Re:Its too bad the names are all unrelated by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      MozBird, MozFox MozCam sound good too me.

      Except that to me they sound like car parts.

  15. Theme by gngulrajani · · Score: 5, Informative

    Be sure to set your theme to default --

    i lost my scrollbars and some buttons when i used
    the "Orbit Green" theme.

    otherwise the aa'ed fonts look great under linux and copy/paste seems is improved.

    -greg

  16. Dang it by AbbyNormal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, I wish they would stop changing their name. I use Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox as my sole browser and absolutely enjoy it. The problem is, I am trying to get my family to use it as well, but trying to keep them straight on what it is called is getting a little ridiculous.
    Conversation with family: "You know that browser I gave you a link on...No, not Mozilla. Yeah, it was Firebird. No now its called Firefox. I don't know why, just use it"

    --
    Sig it.
    1. Re:Dang it by leifm · · Score: 1

      I still suggest Mozilla to people because plug-ins are still a PIA with Firebird(haven't tried FireFox because ftp appears to be /.'d). I usually end up copying DLLs from Moz to Firebird.

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    2. Re:Dang it by johnjay · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly. I just sent them an email a month ago telling them all the reasons Firebird was better than IE.

      Now I'm going to have to send another one: "You know that Firebird-thing email I sent you that you didn't know what I was talking about? Well, if you weren't interested then: now it's even better than before, and it's name has been changed to Firefox."

      Might generate too much confusion.

    3. Re:Dang it by jfruhlinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you are doing the installation yourself, do what I do on my computer: just put a shortcut on the desktop labeled "Internet". People just click on it without a second thought.

      jf

    4. Re:Dang it by johnjay · · Score: 1

      I should mention that, despite my above griping about the name, I am very excited about Firefox 0.8. I've really liked using 0.7 and I think that version 1.0 is going to really shake things up when it arrives. I like the fact that some stuff with bookmarks has been tweaked and the bug fix to remember editted text across tab-changes is a good annoyance fix.

      The developers have done a great job so far. Thanks, guys!

      Posted with Firefox.

    5. Re:Dang it by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox is still pre-1.0. I'd bet lots of software goes through similar name changes during development; it's just that since this is open-source we're privy to it.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    6. Re:Dang it by Eil · · Score: 2, Interesting


      All of the computer systems that I set up for my friends and family generally have the following two desktop icons in addition to the standard Windows cruft:

      * Email
      * Web Browser

      That's it. Sometimes the icons change and that throws them off for a bit, but this, in general, Just Works. Every once in awhile, I've had the temptation to change "Web Browser" to "The Internet" for the less gifted users but I could never quite bring myself to go quite that low.

      However, I would also assert that you shouldn't really be using the alpha-quality Firefox on family or production systems when there's a perfectly good and stable (even in respect to naming) Mozilla 1.x available.

  17. Not keen on the name by Psiren · · Score: 1

    Personally I'm not keen on the name. But a lot of open source software has what I would call dumb names. But at the end of the day, it's their software and they can call it whatever name they choose. The important thing is that the software is functional, and firebox certainly seems to be that. Congratulations and thanks go out to all those involved.

    1. Re:Not keen on the name by azzy · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah.. Firebox is a dumb name, I don't like it either. However Firebird has been renamed to Firefox.. which is a little better.

    2. Re:Not keen on the name by dwhitman · · Score: 1
      I'm sort of neutral on the name, but the new logo is great. I love it.

      I wish there were different flavors of icons to distinguish between the program and url files, though.

    3. Re:Not keen on the name by parksie · · Score: 1

      WatchGuard already cornered the name Firebox for their series of firewall/VPN devices.

    4. Re:Not keen on the name by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      You know, Firebox actually sounds cooler to me, but that's probably because I associate -fox with the film of the same name.

      Let's hope the email client doesn't get renamed to "Matrix Reloaded" ;-)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  18. Trademarked by Mozilla. Good thing! by simpleguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Word Mark:FIREFOX

    Goods and Services:
    IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: Browsers, namely, software for browsing and interacting with data on the global computer network and secure private networks, and software programs to connect computers to the global computer network and to secure private networks

    Owner(APPLICANT):
    Mozilla Foundation NON-PROFIT CORPORATION CALIFORNIA 1350 Villa Street, Suite C Mountain View CALIFORNIA 940411126

    Filing Date:
    December 22, 2003

    Information found with a search on uspto.gov

  19. The name change was done for a reason by The+One+KEA · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ben Goodger made a blog entry where he explained the entire rationale behind the name change to Firefox: http://www.bengoodger.com/weblog/archives/cat_mozb log.shtml

    Some of the MozillaZine forum members share the dismay of earlier posters over how this may damage evangelism efforts, because of the effort required in explaining the similarities and differences between Firebird and Firefox. Either way, because Firebird is beta software, these types of name changes can happen with minimal disruption. Imagine what would have happened if this was Firefox 1.0, not Firefox 0.8.

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    1. Re:The name change was done for a reason by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Imagine what would have happened if this was Firefox 1.0, not Firefox 0.8.

      [SARCASM]

      Oh the horror!

      [/SARCASM]

      -Colin

    2. Re:The name change was done for a reason by rixstep · · Score: 1

      evangelism efforts

      Such a sweet term...

  20. New release... by Shinobi · · Score: 1, Informative

    yet it's still sluggish compared to Opera, and uses more memory on my box here in class.

    1. Re:New release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.. riiiight. Opera blows. Talk about apps that crash a lot. Mozilla & Firefox are some of the most stable browsers available.

      Opera "just disappears" all the damn time. POS.

    2. Re:New release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, so what?
      It renders about 10x better than Opera.
      It's standards support is better.
      And it's a much more stable and usable browser.

      And it's free.

    3. Re:New release... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      On Windows, Opera doesn't "just disappear". It blows up in your face if it's going to do that.

      BTW, I have seen Opera disappear on Linux, but some sites cause MozFirebird 0.7 to fall over FAST on Damn Small Linux.

    4. Re:New release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, I have seen Opera disappear on Linux, but some sites cause MozFirebird 0.7 to fall over FAST on Damn Small Linux.

      Meh, are you sure it's not the Flash plugin?

      I just went there (actually, I go there all the time) and it works fine. Firebird 0.7 (Debian unstable).

  21. Screw it. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'm just gonna call it "The Browser Formerly Known as Firebird" until they can consistently keep the same name for about two years.

    Then they'll change the project name to "MozillaSoft Internet Explorer" just to confuse a few chaps.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Screw it. by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 1

      I'm just gonna call it "The Browser Formerly Known as Firebird"

      But I remember it as Phoenix.

    2. Re:Screw it. by fruey · · Score: 1
      You mean, "The Browser Formerly Known as Firebird previously known as Phoenix".

      I now have to explain a second name change to all those people asking "so what's that browser you use called?"

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    3. Re:Screw it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, I've been calling it "The Browser Formerly Known as Phoenix" for ages.

      Dumbass developers. This is exactly why commercial projects are more successful. Money makes things good, even names.

    4. Re:Screw it. by urmensch · · Score: 1

      I tried explaining for a while, but have now given up.

      My dad keeps calling Mozilla/Fire* Google because google is the homepage i set for him. Also most people I come into contact with that are over 40 barely understand the words "web browser", let alone that there are alternatives to the one that came with their computer.

      Quite amazing.

    5. Re:Screw it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Definitely. Although it's not popular here, I'd advise reading this essay from Craig Mundie, a Microsoft employee. It gives great points on why open source won't work. Choice quote:
      The OSS development model leads to a strong possibility of unhealthy "forking" of a code base, resulting in the development of multiple incompatible versions of programs, weakened interoperability, product instability, and hindering businesses' ability to strategically plan for the future.
    6. Re:Screw it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the correct version. Sorry 'bout that.

  22. How about Einei.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...for EI is Not IE of course

    1. Re:How about Einei.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a a haircut and a job you dirty GNU/hippie.

      And move out of your parents' basement.

  23. Movie with Clint Eastwood by dpilot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean that Firefox will have thought-controlled anti-spam and popup suppression?

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Movie with Clint Eastwood by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but you have to think at it in Russian.

      Chris Mattern

    2. Re:Movie with Clint Eastwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No. In Soviet Russia, Firefox thinks at you!

  24. missed the Bird by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am still using Phoenix 0.5 from which I am currently typing this reply.
    I almost switched to Firebird 0.6 but proxy incompatibilities just made me revert to Phoenix.

    It is actually damn fast and compatible with 100% of the sites I visit, hence my question :
    What do I miss ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:missed the Bird by The+One+KEA · · Score: 4, Informative

      A new download manager.
      Bugfixes.
      Improvements in tabbed browsing.
      Bugfixes.
      A new Help dialog.
      More bugfixes.
      Changes in the Gecko rendering engine.
      Even more bugfixes.

      Seriously, I'd upgrade.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    2. Re:missed the Bird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't say that I've ever experienced a bug in Phoenix, Firebird, or Mozilla in the last couple years.

      So why not use the older browser?

      The only reason I could see upgrading is if Firefox ever gets the proper certificate management stuff (PKCS#11 modules and such).

    3. Re:missed the Bird by seasleepy · · Score: 1

      Moz has the certificate management stuff, but it's not all bundled with the browser due to export regulations worries. (See here.)

      And regarding the benefits for upgrading from older versions, here's two fairly complete lists (moreso than the changelogs) for 0.7 and 0.8.
      It's good stuff.

    4. Re:missed the Bird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moz has the certificate management stuff, but it's not all bundled with the browser due to export regulations worries. (See here.)

      Ah, you know, I just went looking and buried deep in Firebird under Advanced/Certificates there is the cert management panel and PKCS#11 stuff. Wee, cool. I was used to seeing it on the left side in Mozilla. In Firebird it's inside the tree.

  25. I saw, I downloaded, I'm using it now by Schwartzboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Though I have to admit, for my typical browsing experience I don't see a whole lot of difference between Firebird's latest 0.7 release and Firefox. I'll explore the new tweaks and nifties sooner or later, I suppose.

    Now, somebody tell me at what point the name's going to change again and I can run Firefly 0.9 as my browser of choice? That would be sweet, the icon could be a tiny image of the Serenity...for the current icon, has anyone else wondered if that fox is having a little too much fun with the globe?

    But I digress. I'm looking forward to the 1.0 release, whatever the name ends up being. I'd be interested in knowing what the official marketshare (as far as these things can be determined) is for Fire-[$animal_name]/Mozilla browsers. I know that I've had more stability/popup-blocking goodness out of Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox than I usually get out of IE, and far fewer crashes (Firebird crashed on me once on my XP Pro box. Once in how many months? Let's not even think about IE's crash frequency...)

    Stupid quote of the day: "That browser sucks...it doesn't even support VBScript!"

    --
    "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
    1. Re:I saw, I downloaded, I'm using it now by Starji · · Score: 1

      "...for the current icon, has anyone else wondered if that fox is having a little too much fun with the globe?"

      You fscker. Now I'm going to walk into work later today, open up Fire...whatever, notice the icon and think EXACTLY THAT. I don't need more perverted thoughts in my head. Thanks a lot.

  26. slashdotted by Lost+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Firefox 0.8 Our next generation browser is lightning fast in every way. Unless you're trying to download it right now.

  27. needs to integrate better by crayz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (this is on XP): I open up FireFox and have no bookmarks, even though I have hundreds in Mozilla. Oh, I mean I don't have none. I have some basic ones they give you to start with. And my imported IE bookmarks, of which there are none, because I don't use IE. But no Mozilla bookmarks.

    So I close Firebird, go into my Mozilla profile, copy the "bookmarks.html" file from it to the FireFox profile(still in a folder called "Phoenix"), and bam, there's all my bookmarks. Why the damn browser can't do that for me is beyond comprehension.

    Same with all my preferences. No option to inherit these things from Mozilla.

    Overall it is quite a nice browser, and I'd recommend it to people whose computers are too slow/low on memory for the real thing. I still prefer Mozilla, mainly because I think the Modern theme looks better than FireFox's default, because I can't see an easy way to keep FireFox in memory like I do with Mozilla, and because FireFox lacks the wonderful Mozilla ability to simply type text into the URL bar, hit the up key and then enter, and run a Google search. I find the separate Google search field an annoying complication of Mozilla's search ability.

    1. Re:needs to integrate better by Seahawk · · Score: 2

      Because its a beta product?

      Lets first iron out the bugs and establish features, and then lets worry about integration! :)

    2. Re:needs to integrate better by Microlith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What they need is to include a check for an existing Mozilla installation and offer to run a migration tool, with some interactivity in case some options need user-triage. This goes for thunderbird as well.

      I had no end of trouble trying to migrate to Thunderbird and Firebird^C^C^C^Cfox, and when I did get there, the migration left so many little flaws and fuckups in the programs (like I download a .torrent and no matter what the OK button is disabled.) that I just moved back to mozilla 1.6. What a BREEZE that was!

      So, in summary, if they're going to replace the suite with a pair of seperate programs, they need to:

      a) offer a "suite package" that includes both programs and
      b) make sure that all 3 installers (which both apps need, especially on windows) include a proper migration tool. I will not leave the Moz suite until this is done.

    3. Re:needs to integrate better by docwardo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because some people (like myself) run multiple copies of the different browsers for testing purposes. and I wouldn't want my bookmarks overwritten every time I installed a new copy. and it sould have to ask which mozilla profile to copy as well.

      not that it shouldn't be an option, but it shouldn't be the default.

    4. Re:needs to integrate better by dwhitman · · Score: 3, Informative
      I just installed Firefox, and all my Firebird bookmarks came across fine.

      Most of my extensions were there too, but for some reason, TabBrowser Extensions disappeared. And texturizer.net is slashdotted.

    5. Re:needs to integrate better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Wow. You've remapped ^C to be your backspace? Does that mean your program kill is ^H?

    6. Re:needs to integrate better by mst76 · · Score: 3, Informative

      > ... because I can't see an easy way to keep FireFox in memory like I do with Mozilla

      I just never close it, just minimize :)

      > ... because FireFox lacks the wonderful Mozilla ability to simply type text into the URL bar, hit the up key and then enter, and run a Google search.

      For newbies, Firefox is much better, because there is a constant reminder. When I started using Mozilla, I forgot to use the up-button half of the time. Now that I'm used to it, on Firefox I just press ctrl-k to search (or hit tab if I happen to be in the url-box).

    7. Re:needs to integrate better by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Informative

      FireFox lacks the wonderful Mozilla ability to simply type text into the URL bar, hit the up key and then enter, and run a Google search. I find the separate Google search field an annoying complication of Mozilla's search ability.

      Actually, typing directly into the Address bar does an I'm feelin lucky -search, which I've found darn convenient. Granted, the search box uses space, but usually so little it's not a problem. The ability to add alternate searches to the search box is great as well.

      I'm not saying you're wrong, but I'd still say the Firefox aproach has it's benefits.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    8. Re:needs to integrate better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The migration of mozilla settings is scheduled for 0.9. Remember, in spite of appearances, Fire(bird|fox) is still beta software, and it's not feature complete. The plan is to make 0.9 feature complete and then work on polish in the run up to 1.0.

      I'd agree that the mozilla search functionality is easier for advanced users than the corresponding functionality in Firefox. However, the FF functionality is more obvious to less advanced users and more consistent with the behaviour of other programs. Personally, I find that Custom Keywords make for a better search interface than Seamonkey or Firefox. In fact I believe that FF now comes with some custom keywords built in - although you've probably just deleted those by overwriting the bookmarks. See How Cool are Custom Keywords for more information.

    9. Re:needs to integrate better by DeadSea · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I switched to Firebird some time ago from Mozilla and I noticed these things as well. I was upset about the lack of migration from Mozilla ind the need for two text areas at the top - one for urls and one for search.

      There are several things that I have found that I love about it that mozilla didnt have:

      • The ability to move the toolbar elements around with drag and drop. Using this I have put my buttons for back, reload, stop etc, up next to the File menu and the search box on the other side of the menus. This means that my bookmarks have a whole line to themselves and the url bar has a whole line to itself. Much better use of space.
      • You can manage bookmarks in bookmark folders by right clicking on them. (I don't know why this never worked in Mozilla, but I always had to use the bookmark manager.
      • The "live headers" plugin that allows me to see post queries and cookies that get sent to the server.
      • Some plugin allows me to put a checkbox to enable/disable javascript right on the bookmark bar
    10. Re:needs to integrate better by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      But I was running firebird 0.7, ran the nice new MSI installer and it kept the old 0.7 settings including all my bookmarks and layout customisation, and even copied over one of my browser extensions. I was very happy.

      On the other hand I can't download the ever useful open in IE for those, oh so rare, broken sites that don't work properly in firefox, because the new extension site is down.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    11. Re:needs to integrate better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the damn browser can't do that for me is beyond comprehension.

      Why you can't do it yourself without pompously bitching is not. It's version 0.8, bucko. If Moz can work on this, so can you. Got it?

      I find the separate Google search field an annoying complication of Mozilla's search ability.

      Your user input is integral to the future of Mozilla Firefox.

      Even if you are yourself annoying, an irrelevant pain in the ass.

      Thank you.

    12. Re:needs to integrate better by yoz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lets first iron out the bugs and establish features, and then lets worry about integration! :)

      I'd say seamless migration from the previous version is a pretty important feature, wouldn't you?

      BTW, I don't know if anyone else has had this experience, but Firefox seems to be pretty unreliable for me - it's freezing during certain parts of the page-load process, the download manager thinks it's open when it isn't, the new XPI interface gives no progress indication at any stage (which is quite a retrograde step) and generally the whole thing seems to be less persuasively stable than 0.7. Mind you, that was only in 10 minutes' usage, so perhaps I didn't give it enough of a chance, but now I'm back on 0.7 because I have work to do.

      -- Yoz

    13. Re:needs to integrate better by ultrasound · · Score: 1

      The behaviour is still wrong. The developer should be the exception, not the rule. Any barrier to migration is going to reduce uptake.

      Developer mode flags can be set in a number of ways, registry, config files etc.

    14. Re:needs to integrate better by CeZa · · Score: 2, Informative

      For the longest time you could type 'google $searchString' and 'dict $word' where $searchString and $word were what you were trying to find, into the address bar. I liked the feature and started to rely on it. It has been in all the nightly builds except the most recent one. Downloading now, hoping it's back.

      Note: I found out the reason why and if you don't trash your default bookmarks you will be able to do it. See http://devedge.netscape.com/viewsource/2002/bookma rks/. There is a google bookmark that has a keyword that allows you to search by typing 'google' in the address bar.

    15. Re:needs to integrate better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, version 0.8 is not version 1.0. Why do I even need to say this? It's quite clearly displayed on the page - "Firefox is a Technology Preview."

    16. Re:needs to integrate better by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      because FireFox lacks the wonderful Mozilla ability to simply type text into the URL bar, hit the up key and then enter, and run a Google search

      Which I find immensely inferior to Firefox's Quick Searches. You can create fake bookmarks that have some smarts to them, namely take the rest of the address terms and use it as a query on a search engine. I think the default google search is something like "gg" (or maybe "google" -- I dunno, I changed it long ago to "g") so you just go to the address bar and type "g some_search_terms" and it googles for you. Or type "webster some_word" and it runs a dictionary search on Webster online. There's also a stock ticker search that's default, and it's easy to add more. And, as another poster noted, just typing in some terms will run an "I feel lucky" search (as long as the terms don't look URL-ish).

      One of the major reasons I switched from Mozilla to Fire*/Thunderbird was that Mozilla stupidly kept querying your mailbox for new messages -- even after you'd closed the Mail app. As long as you had even one browser open you couldn't make it stop doing so, and I simply didn't want it to do so. Of course, it wouldn't do so until you'd run the mail app the first time after starting any of the suite components. That's really inconsistent behavior and poor design.

    17. Re:needs to integrate better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you create a new profile? Read the release notes about the issue of profiles.

    18. Re:needs to integrate better by Pastis · · Score: 1

      mod this up.

      There's no point complaining about the application not migrating profiles. Firebird^B^B^B^Bfox is still a work in progress and the problem is known and will be addressed in a timely manner. So please read the releases notes and don't complain before posting comments that will be moderated as Interesting I still don't know why.

    19. Re:needs to integrate better by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1
      Tabbrowser Extensions doesn't work with the new release. If you install it, you will get the following message when you try to run the browser:

      "Error launching browser window: no XBL binding for browser"

      And the browser will quit.

      So, until the guys behind the extension fix the problem, the extension won't be available. Too bad really -- personally, it's one of my favourite extensions to the browser.

    20. Re:needs to integrate better by Anthracks · · Score: 1

      With regard to the Mozilla-to-Firefox migration of settings, I know for a fact this is slated for one of the next couple versions of Thunderbird, and I would assume also the next Firebird (unfortunately Mozilla.org is slashdotted to hell so I can't find you a solid link to back this up). This wasn't a high priority for a while, since they wanted more basic things up and running, but now they're at the point where they can spend a lot of time on "polish" issues like this. You're right that Firefox can't be kept in memory. Maybe my machine is fast enough that I don't notice the delay (although it's pushing 2 and a half years old now), but I don't miss the feature and it starts up noticably faster than Mozilla. I guess maybe their reasoning was that if your machine has little enough memory that it takes 15 seconds to start Firefox, it probably doesn't have enough to spare to keep it in memory when you're not using it. I dunno, really. As other people have said, I actually much prefer the new, separate search bar. At least on windows, you can quickly get to it with Ctrl-K, and it's actually much more flexible than the Mozilla equivilent. You can add multiple other search engine options to the bar (in the hundreds), and change which one you search quickly either with a keyboard shortcut or a couple mouse clicks. In Mozilla, you have to dig through several preference panes to accomplish the same thing. I think it's a perfect blend of intuitiveness for beginners and power for advanced users. I'm a confirmed Firefox convert, but I completely understand why some people still dig the suite. I find, however, if people make the effort to use Firefox and Thunderbird for a few days, often they decide that their way of doing things is less complicated/confusing than the suite's once they stop thinking that the two programs should be identical in every respect (just like the initial switch from IE to Mozilla), and fairly soon Mozilla gets deleted. YMMV.

      --
      Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
    21. Re:needs to integrate better by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Because these things need to be developed and tested before the 1.0 release.

      Making sure things are ready to go before the final release is the reason for betas. Better to have a problem in migration tested for and found out now rather than months from now, as it's destroying users e-mail archives.

    22. Re:needs to integrate better by dwhitman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Managed to get through and found new TBE version 1.10, which that seems to be Foxfire friendly. Nice turnaround on Hiroshi's part; I was missing TBE badly after only 30 minutes with Foxfire.

    23. Re:needs to integrate better by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      One of your points overlooks one of Fire(n)'s best features: Quick Searches.

      These let you set up pretty much any search you want to, using just the URL bar. For example, mine is set up so that typing:

      g = Google search
      gg = Google Groups search
      movie = IMDb title search
      actor = IMDb person search
      word = Dictionary.com search

      That way you can get rid of the search bar, and save a lot of toolbar real estate.

      See this for more info.

      Then, you can take it to the next level with Ben Goodger's Smartsearch extension. With it, you can highlight terms in the browser, then use the contextual menu to search for those terms using the Quick Searches you already defined!

    24. Re:needs to integrate better by Gerv · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can create fake bookmarks that have some smarts to them

      Er, this feature is called Custom Keywords and it's been in Mozilla for several years.

      Gerv

    25. Re:needs to integrate better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Beta" usually means "feature complete", which Fire* clearly isn't. This is alpha software -- eventually you will get release candidates and you can bitch about whatever's missing.

    26. Re:needs to integrate better by rsborg · · Score: 1
      Actually, typing directly into the Address bar does an I'm feelin lucky -search, which I've found darn convenient. Granted, the search box uses space, but usually so little it's not a problem. The ability to add alternate searches to the search box is great as well.

      Actually, you can have it both ways. Note: there is a subtle difference in that Firefox search will always do a domain name search first (if you use the address bar instead of the search bar) but if you have fast DNS hits, there should be no problems.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    27. Re:needs to integrate better by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1
      FireFox lacks the wonderful Mozilla ability to simply type text into the URL bar, hit the up key and then enter, and run a Google search.

      Nope, doesn't lack it at all. You can configure the URL to do a google search directly. No need to up arrow at all, just type text then enter.

      Default as mentioned is to do a "I feel lucky" so it goes straight to the first page, but if you change the URL in the about:config customise optons, it goes to the search results.

    28. Re:needs to integrate better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you've got it now, but for the benefit of those still having difficulties reaching texturizer.net, you can get the new Firefox-compatible TBE from its homepage, which is not slashdotted (yet).

    29. Re:needs to integrate better by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Oops. Right you are.

      Odd... I thought Quick Searches were one of the things listed as a feature for Phoenix/Firebird/FireFox. Guess not.

    30. Re:needs to integrate better by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      He didn't, that's why we could read what he typed before the attempt at deleting... ;-)

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    31. Re:needs to integrate better by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Let's first iron out the bugs and establish features, and then lets worry about integration! :)

      It could be argued that doing this integration first makes it easier for people to test the app, and thus helps with the bug catching. I've tried and failed to transfer my Mozilla mail to Thunderbird, for example, so I don't use the T-bird for my main account.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    32. Re:needs to integrate better by Blimey85 · · Score: 1

      It works beautifully for me. All of my settings, bookmarks, extensions, and themes were still there from .7 to .8. Themes didn't work of course, ohter than the default FireFox theme so I had to switch to default and restart. After that everything has worked perfectly... os far anyway. Haven't really noticed much new though... other than the download manager looks different and I now have a DeepestSender button on my bookmarks bar... which doesn't work...but that's DeepestSenders fault, not FireFox's and there is a new version of DS out that fixes that but it's not on the mirrors yet. *sigh*

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    33. Re:needs to integrate better by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      Excellent! That's really commendable. Thanks for the heads up! :)

    34. Re:needs to integrate better by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I'd say seamless migration from the previous version is a pretty important feature, wouldn't you?

      Yes, and it does. All my firebird bookmarks and settings were preserved when I upgraded to FireFox.

      Mozilla is not the previous version, firebird is.

    35. Re:needs to integrate better by prockcore · · Score: 1

      There are several things that I have found that I love about it that mozilla didnt have:

      Don't forget the "Always save to this directory" feature. I hate that Mozilla will pop open a file save dialog every time I download something.

    36. Re:needs to integrate better by lunatik17 · · Score: 1

      Developer behavior should not be the exception in beta software. When it's released as 1.0 and not a technology preview, then it would make sense to default to something more user-friendly.

      --

      Here's my DeCSS mirror, where's yours?

    37. Re:needs to integrate better by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add that for me bookmark keywords are a must-carry feature for a browser. I use them constantly. I have keywords google, amazon, dict (dictionary.com), java (java api search), unstable (debian unstable package search), freshmeat and many more. Being able to do any search you want straight from the url bar is really handy.

    38. Re:needs to integrate better by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Why do you want firefox to remain in memory? I mean, it's a nice gimmick, but on my low-end pIII 1ghz system it launches immediately (window accepts input in less than two seconds). Unless you're running a really slow system with large amounts of ram I'm having a hard time imagining a use for this feature.

    39. Re:needs to integrate better by jesser · · Score: 1

      Firebird 0.9 will include a migration feature. It will work with at least IE/Win and Mozilla Seamonkey, and you can probably figure out which other browsers it will work with by looking at the migration branch on bonsai.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    40. Re:needs to integrate better by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > One of the major reasons I switched from Mozilla to Fire*/Thunderbird was
      > that Mozilla stupidly kept querying your mailbox for new messages -- even
      > after you'd closed the Mail app.

      Maybe one of the reasons I'm still using the Seamonkey XPFE-based suite is
      that I don't use the Mail/News component. For that I have Gnus, a mail client
      with actual features and functionality and stuff. I use Mozilla mostly for
      the browser (though I also use the Calendar a little and the DOM Inspector).

      I don't use Composer either -- I have Emacs for that, with my own custom
      cperl-mode hook functions that rebind certain keys to my own custom functions
      that make web development easier. (Ctrl-t, for example, prompts for a tag
      body and inserts the start tag and the end tag, leaving the cursor between
      them. (If the tag body starts with "table", it also inserts the thead and
      tbody start and end tags with a tr pair inside each, all properly indented.)
      Ctrl-j e prompts for a tag body and wraps the current selection in that tag.
      And so on. Ctrl-j u updates the stylesheet links to my current ones, updates
      the "page updated" information in the footer, and stuff like that.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  28. Next Name... by millahtime · · Score: 0, Funny

    Maybe for the next name they could go with FireShits. Cause eash new name hurts a little more and just burns.

  29. This is because of an API change by The+One+KEA · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is because the authors of the themes have not updated their themes to support Firefox 0.8. In between Firebird 0.7 and Firefox 0.8 there were several changes made to the internal APIs which broke many themes. Because the theme authors do not want to waste time on a moving target, they collectively decided to wait until Firefox 0.8 was released. As a result, you will either have to wait for your theme to be updated or bug the theme author to fix their theme.

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    1. Re:This is because of an API change by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      Because the theme authors do not want to waste time on a moving target

      Some of us users are getting a little tired of it, as well. Unfortunately, the only other options are insecure or non-free.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    2. Re:This is because of an API change by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On Mac OSX 10.3.2 (Panther) the tabs no longer work in .8, they worked great before. In linux, I had to blow away the .phoenix directory to get my buttons back even with the default theme. I did save my bookmarks!

    3. Re:This is because of an API change by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the world of beta software.

    4. Re:This is because of an API change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They whack the APIs in the 1.x versions of Mozilla also. Welcome to software that isn't interested in 3rd party dev.

    5. Re:This is because of an API change by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Well you could use the plain old vanilla Mozilla package.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    6. Re:This is because of an API change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Galeon. It pulls from GTK themes and is almost has fast.

  30. Good. by MooKore+2004 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I just downloaded the Liniux version, and I am typing from it now. It now is quite fast, and unlike epiphany (the Gnome web browser) it supports Bookmark folders, and the really useful feature called "open as tabs". That is open a folder of bookmarks and they all appear as tabs.

    Another Good browser that was recently released is Konqueror 3.2, included with KDE 3.2 of course. The Apple patches really make it fast. Grab that if your a KDE user. But Firefox is definatley the best non kde browser, and the best if you are in stuck in Windows jail.

  31. A question by GonzoDave · · Score: 0, Troll

    I use Mozilla, but there's 2 areas where IE seems to have the edge-it takes less system resources, and it has a history you can actually use. Does Firebird/fox/thingy fix these problems?

  32. Slightly confused by Phekko · · Score: 1

    Great browser but the name change makes me wanna show them the fox...

    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
  33. Future name changes we can look forward to.. by Channard · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. on the project are..

    'Kung-Browser'
    'Browse-Me-Do'
    'Sparrow'
    'Mech a-Mozilla'

    And in other news, Konami today announced the release of the cut down version of Metal Gear Solid 2 to feature Solid Snake's cousin, Trouser.

    *sign* I mean, whatever name you pick, there's going to be some product already out there with a similar name. It's like that Dilbert strip where the only remaining product names were diseases.

    1. Re:Future name changes we can look forward to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to government records, the only names not yet trademarked are Popplers and Zitsels.

    2. Re:Future name changes we can look forward to.. by prockcore · · Score: 1

      While they're at it, they should rename Thunderbird to ThunderCats.

      Ho!

  34. Names by CGP314 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Worth noting that ThunderBird .5 has been released as well.

    Don't you mean ThunderFox?

    -Colin

    1. Re:Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Down under we call the old style outback toilet a "thunderbox". Perhaps that's what they had in mind.

    2. Re:Names by glassesmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, to match FireFox, they are planning to keep with the "Fire" theme and will rename ThunderBird to FireBird

    3. Re:Names by snofla · · Score: 1

      Huh, Tinderbox?

      --
      i don't like style guides
    4. Re:Names by lcde · · Score: 1

      or ThunderCats

      --
      :%s/teh/the/g
    5. Re:Names by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps ThunderBall, wait, damn, that one is taken too!

      --
      I hate sigs.
    6. Re:Names by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 1

      Nah. If they want to keep with the Firefox theme, call it Winter Hawk. :-)

      Just my $.02...

  35. Domain names... by photonic · · Score: 1
    Bummer that firefox.com, firefox.org and firefox.net are already taken! Furthermore, Google already knows 76700 instances of firefox. Should we expect yet another name by version .9??

    The logo is nice though. Can't wait to give it a try.

    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
  36. FAQ on the naming available... by Xpilot · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...here. The other open source project in question is a database (obviously) called Firebird.

    The mail client is still called "Thunderbird", which IMHO introduces and incongruity in the naming schemes. But then again, what's in a name, eh? Besides, "Thunderfox" would sound dumb.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:FAQ on the naming available... by vranash · · Score: 1

      Well seeing as there's a movie called FoxFire, why not call the email client ThunderCat? :-P

    2. Re:FAQ on the naming available... by Unordained · · Score: 1

      I'd like to thank them for the name change ... it should make life at home and at work a little easier. My girlfriend uses the Firebird Browser as well as the Firebird RDBMS -- in fact, most of us do. (We use Firebird both for our common employment and for our non-employment projects) ... makes life interesting to hear "firebird crashed!" coming from anyone in the room.

      (Seems most slashdotters are more likely to have used the browser than the database system, and haven't been particularly sympathetic to those of us who use both, and get confused on a daily basis. If you haven't tried the database, and you have a use for one, please do! I'd say it's similar to Postgres functionality-wise, and quite robust. I've not had a crash yet, my users are happy.)

      They're both great projects, and I'll be glad to have this out of the way. It's unfortunate there were hurt feelings and a fair amount of bitterness involved. They're also both young projects looking to be recognized -- let's give 'em room to grow, and maybe help out?

  37. marketing school by glassesmonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why can't they figure out these names are all dumb and poor for brand recognition.

    Is Mozilla Lite just too obvious for them?! How about Mozilla Jr. and then you could make yet another cute dinosaur! You could even make a family photo out of the whole suite..

    1. Re:marketing school by big-magic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why can't they figure out these names are all dumb and poor for brand recognition.

      Actually, I think the Mozilla project has done much better PR than most of the other large, open source projects. The project always comes across as much better organized than most of the other projects I follow. I think the name change was a smart move.

    2. Re:marketing school by ozbird · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is Mozilla Lite just too obvious for them?!

      Apparently. Rumour has it the next release will be called "iMozilla-NG Xtreme" - something for everyone, I guess.

    3. Re:marketing school by GWTPict · · Score: 5, Funny

      AAAAGHHH. It's spelt light, lite is the creation of some semi literate PR bunny and we hates it, we hates it. Don't we Precious?

    4. Re:marketing school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iMozilla-NG Xtreme eXP

    5. Re:marketing school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FireFox and ... Thunder, Thunder, Thunder, ThunderCat!! HO!

      How's that for brand recognition?

    6. Re:marketing school by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Instead of Mozilla Jr., why not just call it "Barney"?

    7. Re:marketing school by PierceLabs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or since its supposed to be a next generation Mozilla, just call it Mozilla Next :) Since its all Mozilla anyways, they need to stick to the Mozilla brand.

    8. Re:marketing school by FattMattP · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add "2005" to the end. Everyone will want to know what version it is, after all.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    9. Re:marketing school by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's spelt light, lite is the creation of some semi literate PR bunny--

      --and now it's an accepted spelling of a hononyom of "light" that means smaller and airy, as opposed to the object of luminescence.

      Deal with it, or go jump in a volcano. ;)

    10. Re:marketing school by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Is Mozilla Lite just too obvious for them?! How about Mozilla Jr. and then you could make yet another cute dinosaur!

      I think they should call it "Lesszilla".

    11. Re: marketing school by gidds · · Score: 1

      How about Mozilla Express? Hee hee hee...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    12. Re:marketing school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Mozilla Lite just too obvious for them?

      Perhaps they don't want to look like retards in front of everybody who speaks English but doesn't spell like people from the USA.

      The word is "light". Anybody using the "lite" spelling looks like a fucking idiot over here.

    13. Re:marketing school by HumanTorch · · Score: 1

      > I think the name change was a smart move.

      Yes, and what about all those non-expert users out there who I have been advocating pheonix/firebird to? The Camino name change was also difficult; people have a hard enough time as it is trusting your advice. Name recognition helps in the trust dept. Now I have to say 'its part of the Mozilla project' or something like that.

      If they change it one more time (and they probably will, as this name is terrible and has been used for other things before) I think they might as well get used to obscurity until it becomes the new Mozilla.

    14. Re:marketing school by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Actually it's not an accepted spelling - if you used it in prose, as opposed to a product name, you would almost certainly place it in quotes: 'the new "lite" version of Mozilla' rather than 'the new lite version'. It's a common unword used in product names, and that's the only place it's ever used. And, like most such terms (EZ is the one I really hate, mainly because "Eezed" doesn't mean anything anyway), it's an abomination.

    15. Re:marketing school by singram_hashbrowns · · Score: 1

      If we go by the Saturday morning Godzilla cartoon, then the name of Mozilla's nephew should be Mozooky.

    16. Re:marketing school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "EZ" comes from Americans pronouncing the letter Z as "zee" instead of "zed." Sorry

    17. Re:marketing school by macshit · · Score: 1

      it's an accepted spelling of a hononyom of "light" that means smaller and airy, as opposed to the object of luminescence

      `Lite' usually seems to be used instead of `light' in an attempt to connote informality and playfulness, but about 95% of the time just comes off as `tacky attempt to appeal to people that live in trailers.' Naturally this means that it really ends up meaning `light, and especially suited for people that live in trailers.'

      Great, `Mozilla for trailers'...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    18. Re:marketing school by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a common unword used in product names, and that's the only place it's ever used. And, like most such terms it's an abomination.

      You're one of those people that still maintains that "ain't" is not a proper word, aren't you?

      Lite is as proper a word as any other. Heck, two hundred years ago we wouldn't even be having this discussion.

      Now, I'll grant that L-I-T-E isn't a preferred or formal spelling of "light", but it's an accepted one. (You could even go so far as to say that "lite" is really a suffix, and needs to be appended to an existing word for its spelling to be acceptable. I.e., "This isn't really a full burrito; it's more of a burrito-lite.")

    19. Re:marketing school by Whyrph · · Score: 1

      EeZed? I still don't get where the hell does the "zed" pronunciation comes from. You don't pronounce "t", "ted", you don't pronounce "e", "ed" . ..why Z?!?! Silly Canadians.

    20. Re:marketing school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was at a restaurant and they had an option to make the dressing "lite." I asked them if this was low calorie dressing but it wasn't -- it was lesser amounts of dressing. confusing.

    21. Re:marketing school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but in English you pronounce the letter 'Z' as zed. So actually it's silly Americans bastardising the English language.

    22. Re:marketing school by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      It wasn't always like that, I was using Mozilla back in the m1X days, before 0.x was released. All you could hear about was how Moz was a total mess. Back then we all used either lynx or Navigator-4.

      I think Mozilla really came out in full PR-force not too long ago, around 1.2 or 1.4. Losing Netscape seems to have helped too, their web page is MUCH cooler and attractive to potential switchers now.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    23. Re:marketing school by zapp · · Score: 1

      And then ...
      Mozilla Next 2.0
      Mozilla Next Ultra
      Mozilla Next^2
      Mozilla Next^2+1 ...

      hehe, I always find it amusing when things have words like "new", "future", "next" in their title, cuz what's the gameplan for what comes out after that??

      --
      no comment
  38. luckyl me! by IceFox · · Score: 1

    Guess that was a close one!

    -Icefox

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  39. Zips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just call it "the browser with no name"? Even my PHB made a comment about communist fighter planes this morning (he left his homepage set to mozilla.org/projects/firbird/). He'll be able to comment on 0.8 a little when Ben gets round to making a zip build availiable, how much testing does this installer need anyway, it's hardly like it's going to delete your entire drive is it... oh wait!

  40. What a shame by macdaddy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I can't believe the Mozilla Group would go belly up for these people that just want to bitch and moan about a word. A stupid freaking word. Grow a backbone people.

    1. Re:What a shame by resprung · · Score: 1

      Done is done. They can't go back on it, now...

      There's no 'Back' button on Firefox. ;-)

      --
      Now is the winter of our disco tent
    2. Re:What a shame by Queuetue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's possible that instead of going belly up or losing thier backbone, they were instead trying to be considerate.

      Is consideration for others really such a strange concept?

  41. Next names... by yanestra · · Score: 1

    Firefox has already been used by some (Novell?) networking software.
    The next scheduled name is probably: Firefly (already in use by a FreeBSD derived project).
    Obviously, it's too much work for those "fire"men to type in a name at Google before using it.

  42. Name Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I prefer BurnZilla. It matches the stupidity of the Internet

  43. Asking for trouble by andih8u · · Score: 1

    "Get FIREFOX - The Browser, Reloaded"

    These guys are practically begging to have the MPAA swoop down on them. I know they really wouldn't have a leg to stand on, but jeez. They should stick with their "take back the web" slogan.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    1. Re:Asking for trouble by real_smiff · · Score: 3, Interesting
      they seem to not know what their slogan is - their (new) button page lists all of the following:
      1. The browser, reloaded
      2. Take back the web
      3. Web browsing redefined
      With web sites free to pick & choose! Now I love the browser but settling on one slogan might be a good idea no? I suggest "Take back the web", or something i haven't thought of yet :)
      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    2. Re:Asking for trouble by anno1a · · Score: 1

      "Get FIREFOX - The Browser, Reloaded"
      But... Reloaded sucked! Is this a hint?

      --
      ------- I fumbled my registration and I now must suffer
    3. Re:Asking for trouble by GrayTech · · Score: 1

      From the about/credits dialog:

      Mozilla FireFox
      Insert Motto Here!

      --
      -- I need to remember to update my sig
    4. Re:Asking for trouble by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      Hell, if you've got half a dozen names for the same product you might as well chuck in a handful of slogans, too ;-)

    5. Re:Asking for trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "The smarter browser" (smart as a fox)

  44. Explaining it to the parents... by no+longer+myself · · Score: 2, Funny
    Mother already has enough trouble with the computer I set up for her, now I have to go through another round of "Will I still be able to get Yahoo with Mozoolah foxfur?"

    Sometimes (every waking moment of my day) I regret every trying to get them interested in computers... But I was young and excited back then... Now I cringe when they try to pronounce computer related terms.

    1. Re:Explaining it to the parents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should quit treating them like potential converts for your open source religion.

      Install the Google toolbar, tell them to click the big E on their desktop and leave them alone. Trust me, you won't get any more complaints.

  45. The best of Open Source.... by SenorCitizen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ....it really is. If every OSS would work as well, be as easy to use and look as good we wouldn't have a single Windows installation in the World.

    That said, I hope they *finally* fixed the bug with going back a page and finding yourself at the top of the page. That one hasn't been around in Mozilla for a while.

    And, they should f'n register a trademark...

    1. Re:The best of Open Source.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's see: You see, the best of Open Source is already on Windows. People have already voted with their feet, they may like open source software, but they don't give a damn about using it on Linux!
    2. Re:The best of Open Source.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To pick a nit, Cygwin doesn't emulate Linux, it provides a generic POSIX-like environment. One very significant difference is that Cygwin's libc is newlib rather than glibc, which can cause problems porting the occasional bit of Linux software that relies on glibc extensions.

  46. surprising by real_smiff · · Score: 1
    from the first paragraph:
    "[problems with the name change] was the primary reason for the six week delay in shipping our 0.8 release."
    that's... kinda depressing actually.
    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  47. Lightweight? by Bazman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not light enough for our admins to be happy about me sticking it on the Sun E450 that we use for undergraduate teaching. Stuck in an X-terminal lab with only login access to the E450? You're stuck with Netscape 4. They fear 25 firebirds will bring the system to a crawl.

    Anybody know of an even _lighter_ browser, preferably gecko-based, that will work on Solaris? Binaries would be nice :)

    Baz

    1. Re:Lightweight? by mrscorpio · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Dude, NS4 is a hog. I have a much faster computer now than I did when using that machine, but I've used even regular Mozilla on similar machines and it is faster and about the same file size.

      The only ones I can think of are Konqueror and Galeon (Linux) and K-Melon (Windows), I do not know if they will work on Solaris however.

      Can't you build a 1ghz system for $100 and not worry about it?

      Chris

    2. Re:Lightweight? by MrHanky · · Score: 3, Informative
      Anybody know of an even _lighter_ browser, preferably gecko-based, that will work on Solaris? Binaries would be nice :)

      Opera for Solaris does exist. Never tried the Solaris version, and it's not based on Gecko. And it's binary only. But still a nice, lightweight, modern browser. Yes, it's at version 7.23, the same as the Windows version. Should be worth a try.
    3. Re:Lightweight? by Bazman · · Score: 1

      Its not file size, its memory footprint. Firebird has about twice the memory footprint as NS4 on this Solaris box. But the admins say thats too much.

      Yes I could get a new box for them, but heck, our support services are supposed to support undergraduate teaching systems, and I'm busy supporting our postgrads. They have access to an 18-CPU Mosix cluster, and there's probably fewer of them than there are undergrads.

      We're working on compiling Ishzilla for solaris, which claims to be lightweight (and looks it), but we have to hammer our way through the prereqs first. You ever tried to compile something complex on a non-Linux box? Not nice!

      Baz

    4. Re:Lightweight? by Bazman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's some comparison memory usages for opera, firebird , and NS4, on our solaris box, looking at www.plone.org:

      SIZE,RSS, name
      33M, 29M, opera
      38M, 31M, firebird
      17M, 15M, netscape 4

      opera isn't much lighter than firebird in this metric.

      See the small footprint of netscape 4? Shame it can't render the plone page properly because it really doesn't do CSS properly. Gah.

      Baz

    5. Re:Lightweight? by MrHanky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But Netscape 4 leaks memory worse than my grandmother, so that might change after some hours of use. YMMV and all that.

    6. Re:Lightweight? by Just-A-Buck · · Score: 1

      Opera tends to use a lot of memory cache, but you can set upper limits (or disable it completely) in Preferences->History and cache.
      It's worth the try.

      --
      Tread softly because you tread on my dreams. -- Yeats
    7. Re:Lightweight? by dan_polt · · Score: 1

      Something which you could possibly look at is altering the memory cache, i've just spotted this tip here:

      To disable the memory cache completely, add the following code:

      // Disable memory cache:
      user_pref("browser.cache.memory.enable", false);

  48. NOT mozilla-lite by levell · · Score: 3, Informative

    The point is that Firefox is NOT supposed to be mozilla-lite or Mozilla-Jnr; it may replace Mozilla in the long term (although the suite has a stay of execution for now). It's supposed to be a powerful browser, not what would be implied by your (already discussed) Mozilla-lite tag.

    --
    Struggling to find a day everyone can make? WhenShallWe.com
    1. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by eraserewind · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about Browzilla?

    2. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've caught flak from owners of the Godzilla over the *zilla names... I think Mozilla itself is the only zilla name allowed, anything else is grounds for chopped, ground, litiginous manmeat.

    3. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by eraserewind · · Score: 1
      They've caught flak from owners of the Godzilla over the *zilla names... I think Mozilla itself is the only zilla name allowed, anything else is grounds for chopped, ground, litiginous manmeat.
      Ahhh, so what they should do is change their name!
    4. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Trying to copyright or trademark a part of a spoken language is ludicrous.

      Wait... "zilla" is Japanese, right?

    5. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by abdulla · · Score: 1

      I would have thought Mozilla Browser (Mozilla Explorer/Navigator?) and Mozilla Mail would be the best names for the long term.

    6. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      therefore calling it "the broswer" would have been the absolute best choice...

      Internet explorer, windows, word..... all of those are horribly generic names that have enjoyed great marketability... why is it that OSS projects almost always have to choose nerdy,dorky names??

    7. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by smack_attack · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Japanese name was Gojira. You really think they would be able to pronounce the L?

    8. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Japanese has both "L" and "R" but they are in complementary distribution; many places we have an "L" in english do not make any sense to them. Consider, for example, pronouncing "boots" with a Z sound on the end, or "lunchs" (not "es" but "s"). Awkward, yes?

    9. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Rallion · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Funny thing is, when a Japanese person says 'Godzilla,' it really comes out much closer to 'Gojira.' Was that planned?

    10. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Joe+U · · Score: 2, Funny

      We shall call it Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday!

    11. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny
      How about Browzilla?

      A giant lizard with eyebrows like Eugene Levy?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    12. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Mozilla W. Lite?

    13. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention Moron -- "Godzilla" was a movie. It was not part of the spoken language.

    14. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by njm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, your example is a little weak. Before I attack that, however, I'd like to state that, while I'm not especially familiar with Japanese phonology, I rather doubt that /l/ and /r/ are in fact in complementary distribution; my assumption has always been that the Japanese /r/ shares qualities with the two English phonemes, but in fact is articulated as a single phone. I could be mistaken, and would welcome a correction here.

      However, pronouncing a voiced phone immediate after a voiceless one, especially when the voiced one is a sibilant (which are very prone to assimilation), is more than just awkard, it's downright impossible; not just in English, either! Almost every language that allows for such consonant clusters has an assimilation rule wherein either the sibilant is devoiced or the stop is voiced (almost always the former, for what it's worth). This is universal grammar talking. Alternation between allophones by way of a phonological rule is definitely not something that is so strong as something that seems almost certainly to be part of UG.

    15. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by kasparov · · Score: 1

      Japanese most certainly does not have an english 'L' sound. At least, not that I am aware of... maybe they don't teach you that until you take Japanese IV though... The Ra, Ri, Ru, Re, Ro syllables really sound nothing like the english 'L' (nor 'R' for that matter).

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    16. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Boiner · · Score: 1

      What did Brooke Shields ever do to you?

    17. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      It's spelled and pronounced Gojira in Japanese, so I'm assuming so.

    18. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by japhie · · Score: 1
      > You really think they would be able to pronounce the L?

      Well, in Lost in Translation Japanese were able to pronounce both L and R, but mistook them all the time (`Lip my stockings, prease...'). IANAJ, but as far as I know these two western letters map to the same Japanese one (sort of like H and G are both G in cyrillic).

    19. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My GF is from sapporo japan, she says there is no "R". Japanese people only hear mutant variations of "L", their "L" sometimes sound like an "R" to me, but she swears it's an "L".

      They teach english foreigners to use "R" because it's as close as the japanese "L" as they can get becauase of the english accent.

    20. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Using something about halfway between R and L seems to make Japanese people the happiest, but they aren't very picky about it since they don't ordinarily make the distinction. Think of how you make the two sounds, and try and its not too hard to mix them. For a speaker of a language such as English where we make the distinction between the two sounds, you try to map it to one or the other (i.e. you map sounds to what you expect), but if you listen hard enough eventually you notice its usally a mix of the two.

      Only 4 months back and I already miss Japan, as well as Sapporo (the beer).

    21. Re:NOT mozilla-lite by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      "What did Brooke Shields ever do to you?"

      You fiend! Now I shall get no sleep tonight!

      graspee

  49. Another way IE is a little better by millahtime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is with Java applications. The sun java setup uses more resources than the one integrated into IE. If you are on a slightly older setup (like my mom) and you want to play yahoo games (as so many do) then it's faster in IE. Hate to say it but that is one place IE has a one up on the others.

    1. Re:Another way IE is a little better by Nadir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obviously it doesn't really matter that Microsoft's VM is broken in many ways and ancient. I'm sorry, but Mozilla's decision not to bundle a VM and have that provided directly by a real JVM vendor (sun) is the proper way to go.

      --
      --
      The world is divided in two categories:
      those with a loaded gun and those who dig. You dig.
    2. Re:Another way IE is a little better by millahtime · · Score: 1

      Not arguing that it is better Java but the speed is an issue for pratical use on older machines. Their engine may be broken but for a lot of things it works and for all the basic users i know the broken microsoft VM engine works just fine and faster. A lot faster.

    3. Re:Another way IE is a little better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right!

      MS Java is still based on the old Netscape security model. Sun has moved on to the Java 2 model.

      Unfortunately, some applets that require the Netscape model won't work in Sun's Java, so I've had to RE-enable MS Java, for use in IE only. Then for those applets I need to run, I'm forced to use IE w/MS Java.

      MS has been trying for years to fragment Java, and for every applet written for their VM, they partially succeed. So a note to all Java programmers: Write to Sun's standard!

    4. Re:Another way IE is a little better by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Do you mean the Microsoft Java Virtual Machine that Microsoft no longer provides for you to download and install, and which they will stop supporting in September? Sun JVM will then be the only choice.

  50. Re:With the way these guys get into name disputes. by spoodie · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they did it would have to be renamed Lylat Browser for the European market.

    --
    I don't need a compass to tell me which way the wind shines.
  51. the names used to be so much cooler by crayz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think about it:

    Phoenix, Chimera, and Minotaur

    are now

    Firefox, Camino, and Thunderbird :(

    1. Re:the names used to be so much cooler by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      So we've gone from mythical creatures to motor vehicles of some sort (ok, Firefox is a stretch) that seem really appealing when you're fourteen years old.

      Yay!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:the names used to be so much cooler by thunderbird46 · · Score: 1

      only when you're 14?!? uh-oh. i'm 9 years too old for my car then :)

    3. Re:the names used to be so much cooler by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Camino

      You know, every time I hear that name, I think of the numerous cars sitting on blocks in my cousin Jimmy's yard (or field - what do you call a fenced-in area around a house with prairie grasses three feet high?). Man, I hated going there as a kid, although the black velvet string-art sailboat on the living room wall was pretty cool, and the black velvet bullfighter was kind of spiffy to a six year old.

      Camino. Bleah. I'd rather just as soon use "Brat" or "Ranchero", and "Gremlin" wouldn't be much worse.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:the names used to be so much cooler by xorbe · · Score: 1

      The word Firefox just so does not roll off the tongue. =( And I just got my family trained about Mozilla and Firebird! (When they click on IE, it launches Firebird! Muhaha!) Personally I think they need to ditch using the word "fire" in the name altogther. Man, I'm envisioning myself at work, telling someone, "Yeah now launch Firefox." "Huh?"

    5. Re:the names used to be so much cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, Chimera is also a motor vehicle.

  52. Re:Jesus=Gay by azzy · · Score: 1, Funny

    11. Prophet????

  53. is it thought-controlled, like the plane? by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    that'd rule. although i'd imagine i'd end up browsing sites that weren't quite office-friendly.

  54. Mozilla is good enough, why Firefox? by zxm · · Score: 1

    I think Mozilla is very good and use it always, why should I change to Firefox?

    --
    -- forgive me my poor Engl...
    1. Re:Mozilla is good enough, why Firefox? by djeaux · · Score: 1
      I think Mozilla is very good and use it always, why should I change to Firefox?

      I can only speak for myself, of course. But I install Mozilla when I need a browser-email-news suite & Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox when I need just a browser. A specific example: I put Firebird on an old laptop that my household offspring unit uses, because there was limited HDD space and because she uses a webmail site to read her email...

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    2. Re:Mozilla is good enough, why Firefox? by fok · · Score: 1

      Firefox is much lighter and faster and has small memory footprint, as is thunderbird. But I like them all, anyway...

      --
      \m/
  55. I tried Firebird 1.5 on slack... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    It looked cool, but I couldn't get over the constant stream of terminal output, even when I didn't launch it from a terminal. I'd get a stream of 5-25 PC speaker beeps every time I click a link. Checked configure but it didn't appear to be a debug setting. I figure I'll stick with the SlackPack for now, though I may give FireFox a shot.

    1. Re:I tried Firebird 1.5 on slack... by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      1.5?

    2. Re:I tried Firebird 1.5 on slack... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe he's talking about the database, hence the name change due to confusion. :-)

    3. Re:I tried Firebird 1.5 on slack... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Hell if I know. ;) I deleted the tarball, so I ran the binary with the --version switch and got this:

      domino@thorr:/usr/tmp/MozillaFirebird$ ./MozillaFirebird --version
      Mozilla 1.5, Copyright (c) 2003 mozilla.org, build 2003100716

      That's where I pulled the number from. Not my fault! :)

  56. Problem Already? by CompWerks · · Score: 1

    After installing firefox I'm unable to run mozilla at the same time. What gives?

    --
    If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
  57. FireFox? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Finally a name no one else is using! Wait, Firefox.

    Picking a name for a product, especially an extremely valuable internationally famous product such as this one, is far more difficult than it appears. Those who have never had any experience writing advertising often don't realize how difficult.

    Also, consider the connotations of the name. Where is the burning that would cause the product to be named "fire"? Where is the cleverness that would cause the product to be called "fox"? Maybe the name FireFox is not right for a standard household product meant to be used by the entire family as a way to communicate with the world. Yes, writing the product required an enormous amount of cleverness, but using it doesn't. Also, the name FireFox is made of English words, and most of the world does not speak English.

    The name is IMPORTANT. A good name will ease acceptance. A name that people find difficult can kill acceptance. There is a huge amount of importance in this one word.

    Maybe a made-up word is better. Drug companies use made-up words like Claritin or Cialis to name just two. That has the benefit that the domain name is not taken.

    1. Re:FireFox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Also, the name FireFox is made of English words, and most of the world does not speak English.

      Not to mention that East Asian people have a hard time pronouncing r's.

      I don't see why mozilla.org doesn't just use the name "Mozilla Lite". It seems more appropriate and more catchy.

    2. Re:FireFox? by kyknos.org · · Score: 1

      I am an central European and I also cannot pronounce R :o)))

      --

      SHE does throw dice.
    3. Re:FireFox? by Anthracks · · Score: 1
      Where is the burning that would cause the product to be named "fire"? Where is the cleverness that would cause the product to be called "fox"?

      Maybe I'm just weird, but the answers to that seem obvious to me. Fire I see for two reasons; first, the historical one. The project used to be called Phoenix, since it was "rising from the ashes" of the suite, which was eventually to be killed off or at least relegated to a secondary role. Later it was renamed to Firebird, for reasons I can't recall just now. In another post, someone links to a blog by Firebird developer Ben Goodger that says they wanted a name that preserved the link to the past, and thus something incorporating "Fire".

      Also, the fire could be referring to the "blazing speed" compared to other browsers (that's the claim, at any rate).

      With regard to cleverness, I in fact think the UI of Firefox is cleverly designed and intuitive. Ideas like tabbed browsing, popup blocking and find-as-you-type are also clever. Now that I think about it, I might like Firefox better as a name than Firebird.
      --
      Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
    4. Re:FireFox? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      HyperGlobalMegaNetBrowser

      Be careful or Bill Gates might "buy them out"! (He didn't get rich by writing a lotta checks!)

  58. Just stop by SushiFugu · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can see the trend already today with people posting all the different things that the new name conflicts with. The whole point is that the new name (atleast as far as I know/have heard) doesn't conflict in any way with other software products/open source projects, whereas Firebird did.

  59. Great by z0ink · · Score: 1

    Now all the people i've told to go download firebid and delete IE are gunna be lost.

    --
    Steal This Sig
  60. FireChick by Phoinix · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do not like the new name. May I suggest the name "FireChick" in reference to a "smaller" bird?

    1. Re:FireChick by ksiddique · · Score: 1

      Fire is hot and a bird is a chick.

      So Firebird == HotChick

    2. Re:FireChick by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      May I suggest the name "FireChick"

      A hot chick in your browser? Not bad, but ... That project already has a name.

  61. Would make a good movie by RDW · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see it now - Mitchell Gates (Clint Eastwood), elite Microsoft coder and flashback-impaired veteran of the Browser Wars, is sent behind enemy lines to steal the only production prototype of the Firefox, with its revolutionary thought-controlled toolbar technology ("but remember, Mr Gates, you have to _think in XML_!"). The film ends rather abruptly when someone tells him he can download it for free.

  62. Help with name change by Seahawk · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just read this fast... ;)

    Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Firebird Fireford Fireforx Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox Firefox

    1. Re:Help with name change by SushiFugu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mushroom, MUSHROOM!

    2. Re:Help with name change by adamjaskie · · Score: 2, Funny

      AHH!! A Phoenix! A Phoenix!! Ahhhh, its a Phoenix!!!

      Firebird Firebird Firebird...

      sorry...

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
  63. Firefox is a registered trademark in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Firefox was registered as a multinational trademark in Germany in 1995.

    According to the entry, the trademark covers among others the following areas:
    -licensing and lending of computer software
    -creation and development of computer software
    -support, installation and updating of computer programs and computer software

    1. Re:Firefox is a registered trademark in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They know about that one, and it seems they've decided it's not a problem. Can't say I know how though.

    2. Re:Firefox is a registered trademark in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They know about that one, and it seems they've decided it's not a problem. Can't say I know how though.
      They're young. They've got plenty of time.
  64. Microsoft thanks you by m00nun1t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I have trouble telling the difference between mozilla, thunderbird, firefox and phoenix, what chance does the proverbial Mom & Pop user stand?

    Microsoft thanks you for helping continue the IE dominance.

    1. Re:Microsoft thanks you by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The proverbial mom & pop user shouldn't, repeat shouldn't, be using Firefox. It's a technology preview, which means that it's effectively in Beta at the moment. Sure, it's a great browser, sure I wouldn't switch back to IE or even Mozilla Suite, but it is not ready for Joe Public.

      Precisely because the technology is changing, precisely because the name is changing, precisely because they're only now looking at an integrated installer.

      Get mom & pop to wait until Firefox 1.0. I trust the good folks at Mozilla to not release 1.0 until it's ready for mom & pop.

      C'mon! Give the guys a break! They even label it 0.8 to provide a big red flag to non-geeks!

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    2. Re:Microsoft thanks you by croddy · · Score: 1

      (so why isn't it called Internet Explorer 0.6?)

    3. Re:Microsoft thanks you by hether · · Score: 1

      I understand your point and agree that this isn't ready for the public, however I really doubt that the 0.8 label is a red flag to non-geeks. Many I talk to have no idea what version of a browser they are using. They might know if it's Internet Explorer or Netscape, but the version number isn't as important to them. Some people can only describe what kind of icon it uses (the blue e). People using AOL often have no idea they are using a browser, just that they open up their AOL to get on the internet. I really doubt the number tips them off at all.

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    4. Re:Microsoft thanks you by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I think that using version numbers to communicate with non-geeks is kind of like putting up a sign that says "No Spanish Spoken" in English.

    5. Re:Microsoft thanks you by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      There was quite a good post on Mozillazine about this (sorry, no link, the 'zine seems down right now), where a Moz developer basically said theres a limit to how much warning he can give. If people don't read/don't understand the dire warnings Mozilla give, there's not much Mozilla can do. I'm inclined to agree. It's not just the version number; this statement is still up:

      "While this software may work well enough to be relied upon as your primary browser, we make no guarantees of its performance or stability in its pre-1.0 state and it should not be relied upon for mission- critical tasks"

      I've also got to suggest that people (AOL users or not) who don't know they're using a browser probably won't download and install a new browser: I think the real problem is fanboys like me encouraging our nearest-and-dearest to migrate to Firebird/Firefox. It's understandable, but not necessarily a good idea.

      Incidentally, I've just installed Firefox 0.8 and Thunderbird 0.5 at work. I'm rolling back to Firebird 0.7 and Thunderbird 0.4 tomorrow, and submitting bug reports tonight. Is this a complaint? No - it's what "Technology Previews" are for, to gather feedback from interested users. But it sure ain't something I'd recommend subjecting mom & pop to!

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
  65. "Official market share" by levell · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well I'm not sure about official but you can see what fraction of Google hits come from each browser at the Google Zeitgeist. For some reason they don't have browser figures in there year end summary so for the moment the latest figures are for November. The numbers for gecko based engines are depressing.

    --
    Struggling to find a day everyone can make? WhenShallWe.com
    1. Re:"Official market share" by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Informative

      1.8% Gecko users: My employer, major travel website.
      12% Gecko users: My personal site (1500 uniq a day, tech oriented)
      20% Gecko users: Slashdot (at least the ones that slashdotted me)

    2. Re:"Official market share" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My webide market share:

      MSIE - 0.005%
      Mozilla/Gecko -0.0001%
      MyDoom - 99.9%

      Darl

    3. Re:"Official market share" by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      nice to see that there are the same number of people using linux as there are people using windows 95..

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    4. Re:"Official market share" by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 1

      Your forgetting that all the KHTML based browsers aren't listed either (basically other), which doubles the standereds compliant score.

      Also, the fact that they (Gecko and Linux) are there at all is pretty amazing. We are talking about an operating system and a browser who, without any markiting(sp?) or preloads, have managed to be taken seriously enough to be part of these stats.

      Rome wasn't built in a day, and Mozilla has one hell of a hard clime ahead of it...

      I say well done to them, their on the right track.

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    5. Re:"Official market share" by Tom · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Depends a lot on what kind of site you run. Here's my online game:
      1 904331 58.75% MSIE 6.0
      2 449632 29.21% Mozilla/5.0
      3 58935 3.83% MSIE 5.0
      4 58058 3.77% Opera/7.2
      5 33532 2.18% MSIE 5.5
      Which is pretty impressive, given that it's not a Linux-newssite, nor a Free Software project page or anything else Linux/FOSS specific.

      My personal site:
      1 24642 62.16% MSIE 6.0
      2 6832 17.24% Mozilla/5.0
      3 1655 4.18% MSIE 5.0
      4 1149 2.90% MSIE 5.5
      5 620 1.56% Wget/1.8.1
      Different numbers. This site has all kinds of weird stuff on it, some Linux-specific.

      My SELinux site:
      1 2173 53.33% Mozilla/5.0
      2 1045 25.64% MSIE 6.0
      3 308 7.56% Debian APT-HTTP/1.3
      4 160 3.93% Konqueror/3.1
      5 114 2.80% MSIE 5.5
      Pretty obvious. Yes, part of it is a debian mirror for the SELinux packages, that's how apt-get gets in there.

      All these numbers are from February, i.e. as fresh as they can be.

      What do they show? At least as far as I am concerned, the "95% of the people use IE" is a myth, a lie, a marketing gimmick, whatever you want to call it.
      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:"Official market share" by gaspyy · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, in the case of the company I work for, it's quite true. Our site gets about 15,000 visitors/day (1.4 Gb/day). The site doesn't have any MS-centric content. The stats for February (1 to 9) are as follows:
      MS IE 1588660 96.1
      Netscape 40769 2.4
      Unknown 1.0
      Opera 4767 0.2
      Konqueror 140
      Here are the Operating systems:
      Windows XP 890261 53.8 %
      Windows 98 283140 17.1 %
      Windows 2000 266814 16.1 %
      Windows Me 105024 6.3 %
      Mac OS 40932 2.4 %
      Windows NT 35788 2.1 %
      Unknown 18021 1 %
      Windows 95 10908 0.6 %
      Linux 1335 0 %
      I could go into more detail (IE/NS versions) but I think this is enough.
    7. Re:"Official market share" by Eil · · Score: 1


      What do they show? At least as far as I am concerned, the "95% of the people use IE" is a myth, a lie, a marketing gimmick, whatever you want to call it.

      The following numbers come from one of my web pages in which the audience is arguably more diverse than any of yours.

      All these numbers are from February, i.e. as fresh as they can be.

      My numbers come from the last 2 1/2 years and total over 38,000 visits.

      92% -- Internet Explorer 5.x, 6.x
      4.4% -- Netscape 4.x, 6.x, 7.x
      3.4% -- Mozilla 1.x
      1.1% -- Unknown

      Hmm, you may be right. IE market share is not, in fact, 95%.

    8. Re:"Official market share" by croddy · · Score: 1

      indeed...

      Top 15 of 87 Total User Agents
      # Hits User Agent
      1 18978 36.66% Mozilla/5.0 (Windows)
      2 15048 29.07% Mozilla/5.0 (X11)
      3 5226 10.09% MSIE 6.0
      4 2858 5.52% MSIE 6.0 (Windows NT 5.0)
      5 2179 4.21% Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh)
      6 1854 3.58% MSIE 6.0 (Windows NT 5.1)
      7 1208 2.33% Lynx/2.8.4rel.1 libwww-FM/2.14 SSL-MM/1.4.1 GNUTLS/0.8.6
      8 222 0.43% MSIE 5.5 (Windows 98)
      9 179 0.35% MSIE 6.0 (Q312461)
      10 162 0.31% MSIE 4.01 (240x320)
      11 161 0.31% MSIE 6.0 (Windows 98)
      12 154 0.30% MSIE 5.22 (Mac_PowerPC)
      13 119 0.23% MSIE 5.0 (Mac_PowerPC)
      14 105 0.20% MSIE 5.16 (Mac_PowerPC)
      15 95 0.18% MSIE 6.0 (.NET CLR 1.1.4322)

    9. Re:"Official market share" by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      I wonder how IE's inefficiency skews google marketshare. After all, in IE, if you want to do a search you have to first go to google, then do your search. Almost every other browser has a feature that lets you do a straight google search, meaning you only load up one page instead of two, thereby halving your representation in the marketshare stats. Another thing is that the least knowledgeable internet users often have google as their homepage and treat it as a url bar. Meaning, they type in url's into google's search field (which has a tendency for getting you where you want to be). This also inflates marketshare for IE beyond proportion.

      Obviously this is only speculation since we don't know how google collects net stats.

      Also, one has to ask whether the mozilla users aren't more important than their numbers suggest. They tend to be trendsetters (web developers) and/or advanced net users, who in the great scheme of things are more likely to try new internet services and buy stuff online, meaning they become a more important market segment to reach if you're trying to sell something on the net.

  66. Another name? by EvilNutSack · · Score: 1

    This is getting silly. They should call it 'Batshit' just for a laugh.

    --
    --
  67. I kept telling them... by Millennium · · Score: 1

    They should have changed the browser name to Suzaku. Last I checked you couldn't trademark mythology, and since Suzaku was supposed to have been a phoenix, they could have kept the phoenix-style logos. No more confusion.

  68. How the hell.... by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1

    ... am I supposed to sway people away from the dark side (IE) when the good side keeps changing their friggin name!!!

    me: You should definitely use Phoenix. It rocks
    them: What is phoenix? All I see is mozilla and Firebird
    me: oh yeah, thats it. sorry.

    now I have to remember another name?!?!?!

  69. Release notes. by Night0wl · · Score: 1

    I find it quite disturbing the trend they're taking in their updates. More and more, each update, there site becomes more "user friendly" helpful articles hold your hand as it guides you through the new and exciting world of Firefox *ooh, aah*
    Now admittedly I could see why this is a needed change as it begins to encroach on the user base of IE, it will need to cater more and more to the lowest comment denominator.
    I just wish they would still leave the essentials out there. Mainly in this case the change log. For years now a project of this sort I would look immediately for a change log, and not the "release notes" as they currently stand. I want to know that Bug #X is dead, not a select key updates in bold titles, and the hint of much much more! I want the browser to behave like a 1.0 version, not there website. Give me back my geekdom!

    --
    Computational Madness in a round package.
    1. Re:Release notes. by gringer · · Score: 1

      Well, if you've been looking at The Burning Edge, you might have already seen a slightly more informative changelog (like this one). There is extra information out there for those who want it; you just need to bookmark a bit deeper into the sites.

      For those people who want to keep check on specific bugs, add yourself to the CC lists of those bugs in bugzilla. As a template:
      http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=X
      will show you bug X, and tell you whether or not it has been fixed etc.

      --
      Ask me about repetitive DNA
  70. Re:Name Change FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, but given that there is another Open Source project that has been around longer with the name Firebird, why did they change the name to that from Phoenix?

  71. Fun with Foxes by Beardydog · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My first thought was, "Wow, the icon doesn't suck anymore!"

    It really is a beautiful little logo.

  72. My Idea for a new Name: by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait for it...

    Internet Navigator

    TADA!

    All is solved. Everyone happy. Best Name Ever. Service While you wait. Operators are standing by. ;P

    --
    "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    1. Re:My Idea for a new Name: by slide-rule · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Wait for it...
      >
      >Internet Navigator

      Seriously, since at this point the whole naming scheme is fscked anyway, I wonder why they couldn't go back to the old netscape naming conventions:
      Mozilla Navigator (browser only)
      Mozilla Communicator (including Mozilla Mail, etc.)

      Heck, even my family and/or co-workers would be able to know what is going on then, as this would build upon what we finally got them trained on years ago.

    2. Re:My Idea for a new Name: by jason0000042 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      AFAIK that's the plan. It will actually be Mozilla Browser and Mozilla Mail. All this naming stuff is just about the beta codenames. At least, that was the plan a few months ago. Since mozilla.org is /.ed I can't double check right now.

      --
      i don't like my old sig.
    3. Re:My Idea for a new Name: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not bad, but I'd still want to know what's wrong with the name 'Bob'.

    4. Re:My Idea for a new Name: by JahToasted · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I realise you're joking, but that is a better name than PhoenixBird or Mozilla or whatever.

      I remember working at a community computer centre back a few years ago when netscape and internet explorer were roughly equivalent (if anything netscape was better then). So I had both browsers installed on all the computers with icons on the desktop for each of them side by side.

      Every single new user used IE. Why? "because I wanted to go on the internet so I clicked on internet".

      Now think about how microsoft names its products. Office, Word, Windows, etc. Now think about how popular their products are.

      So now when I install phoenix/firebird/fox on people's computers I make a shortcut on the desktop that simply says "Internet Browser" (then sometimes remove the IE icon). You know what? People use it.

      The best name for software indicates what the software is for right in the name.

    5. Re:My Idea for a new Name: by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Seriously, since at this point the whole naming scheme is fscked anyway, I wonder why they couldn't go back to the old netscape naming conventions

      Mozilla.org didn't inherit the netscape trademarks, which remain firmly in AOL's hands to be devalued and generally wasted.

    6. Re:My Idea for a new Name: by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Now think about how microsoft names its products. Office, Word, Windows, etc.
      . . . The best name for software indicates what the software is for right in the name.


      You're right, Microsoft never picks semantically opaque names. Except for things like Powerpoint, Access, Excel, Outlook, Visual Studio, and Bob, of course, but presumably you don't count those?

    7. Re:My Idea for a new Name: by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      back to the old netscape naming conventions:

      Ah, the good old days.

      They ought to just name the browser something like Mozayik.

      Either that, or just continue the high adventure stuff with a name like DeepSpaceProbe.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    8. Re:My Idea for a new Name: by geekster · · Score: 1

      > So now when I install phoenix/firebird/fox on people's computers I make a shortcut on the desktop that simply says "Internet Browser" (then sometimes remove the IE icon). You know what? People use it.

      Well, if you remove the IE icon... ofcourse they do!

    9. Re:My Idea for a new Name: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and what is opaque about Powerpoint (Presentations), Access (Data Base). Outlook (Calendar with integrated E-mail, etc) or Visual Studio (IDE)?

    10. Re:My Idea for a new Name: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got an even better idea for a name. It's simple, it sounds good, it's easy to remember, and nobody is using it:

      Mosaic

      Pretty good, eh?

  73. Bit Torrent Download by ed_g2s · · Score: 5, Informative

    A Torrent seeing as they've been slashdotted, which I supposed is a Good Thing for them.

    1. Re:Bit Torrent Download by aanand · · Score: 1

      Presumably, they've been slashdotted almost entirely by Mozilla/Firebird users. How wonderfully ironic.

  74. Problem with themes? by eraserewind · · Score: 2, Informative

    It didn't display any scrollbars on any pages when I installed it, and it picked up the seamonkey theme from my previous firebird install. Once that theme was uninstalled, it worked fine though.

    Hopefully I can re-install it again though, since the default theme is not nice. Unfortunately the themes site seems to be down.

  75. Yeay! by tttonyyy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have to say that I totally love Fire(bird/fox)'s tabbed browsing capabilities (I'd really miss it now if I had to do without it). The popup management and password management are features I've come to take for granted. IE has yet to integrate them in a usable way.

    Also, Thunderbird answered so many of my mail problems - anyone else that's tried to find a client that works under Windows and Linux AND allows seperate POP3 accounts to be managed properly will appreciate what a boon Thunderbird is. The mailbox files can be copied straight from a Windows system into a Linux system, and with a bit of fiddling it's up and working in no time. This makes it very easy to move people from Windows to Linux and vice-verse.

    Way to go mozilla.org. :)

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
  76. straight from the ftp directory by glassesmonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You couldn't make up this kinda of confusion (from FTP directory)..

    chimera 06/01/2002 12:00:00 AM
    camino 03/06/2003 12:00:00 AM
    thunderbird 02/08/2004 06:38:00 AM
    phoenix 09/23/2002 12:00:00 AM
    firebird 05/16/2003 12:00:00 AM
    firefox 02/09/2004 05:58:00 AM
    grendel 08/07/1999 12:00:00 AM
    minimo 08/28/2003 08:21:00 PM
    mozilla 10/21/2003 01:01:00 PM

    1. Re:straight from the ftp directory by NiteHaqr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Grendel - wonder who that runs on a Beowulf cluster........

    2. Re:straight from the ftp directory by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if Grendel and Beowulf could work together that easily.

    3. Re:straight from the ftp directory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we're going to go with the "natural process-animal" scheme then? Thunderbird, firebird, firefox. Thunderfox. Firesquirrel. Sleetbunny. Snowflurryleopard. Lightningfish. Windyworm.

      Or we could just say screw it and go with Thundercougarfalconbird.

  77. We can just say... by revividus · · Score: 1

    It's the browser formerly known as "firebird".

    1. Re:We can just say... by sepluv · · Score: 4, Funny

      No..no! Firefox(TM) did not used to be Firebird (at least not directly)!

      It is canonically tbfkaMFtwgtbkaM(B)twfkaM(T)FiUAs&ctwfkfafhaFBbotFD BpctwfkaFbPTIttstwfkaP -- the browser formerly known as Mozilla Firebird that was going to be known as Mozilla (Browser) that was formerly known as Mozilla(TM) Firebird in UA strings &c that was formerly known for a few hours as Firebird Browser, because of the FirebirdDB peeps complaining, that was formerly known as Firebird, because Phoenix Technologies Inc. threatened to sue, that was formerly known as Phoenix.

      As someone who has loved the browser since 0.1, they can call it DogCrap(TM) for all I care (and I'm sure most other users agree).

      Seriously though, I really think the new Firefox name is very clear, strong, easy-to-say, unique and the logo is really cool as well as red pandas being sooo cute. I can also see that it was probably a good idea to get a totally unique short strong brand name before starting the pre-1.0 marketing campaign and definitely before realeasing 1.0.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    2. Re:We can just say... by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      As someone who has loved the browser since 0.1, they can call it DogCrap(TM) for all I care (and I'm sure most other users agree).

      I think I should be called 'ClickHereForFreeBoobies' with a Win32 executable of the same name.

      My guess is that it would be the top used browser in 2 months.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    3. Re:We can just say... by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 1
      "Seriously though, I really think the new Firefox name is very clear, strong, easy-to-say, unique and the logo is really cool as well as red pandas being sooo cute."

      Why is the logo a fox and not a panda?

      This makes no sense.

    4. Re:We can just say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has loved the browser since 0.1, they can call it DogCrap(TM) for all I care (and I'm sure most other users agree).

      How about BitchXML?

    5. Re:We can just say... by sepluv · · Score: 1

      I thought that too. Probably because the guy who did the images (a) could not draw pandas (at least not a recognisable panda that small) and/or (b) thought a panda would confuse people because no one knows that firefox is another name for red panda.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  78. Download Manager by paul248 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else not like their new Download Manager, or know of a way to switch it over to the old one-window-per-file layout? I've been using it for several weeks in the nightly builds, but I'm still not very fond of it.

    1. Re:Download Manager by Negativeions101 · · Score: 0

      Why would you want 1 window per file? It's better to have them all on 1 window.

      --

      I'm not anti-microsoft. I'm anti-bullshit. Which means I'm anti-microsoft.
    2. Re:Download Manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur. Not only does the download manager suck (its slow and bloattastic!) but its also riddled with bugs (like pausing the download doesn't pause, the notifer says its finished when it isn't, it doesn't appear half the time).

      Loads of registered bugs for it already...

      What a shame they had to bloat it out with shit. 0.7 was great. 0.8 is bloated and bugged to hell. I'm pretty irritated that such a neat and promising browser is going down the bloat route, and even more so because its doing the bloat so badly!

  79. Reasons to use Mozilla Firebird/fox by e03179 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a great article from Kuro5hin that tells (Internet Explorer) users the advantages of using Firebird/fox. Check it out http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/1/31/125914/125

    --
    -516
  80. No FireFox spinner? by SenorCitizen · · Score: 1

    Okay, they changed the name. They also did a fab new logo..... but the spinner logo on the navigation toolbar is still a firebird. Tsk, tsk.

    1. Re:No FireFox spinner? by frause · · Score: 1

      eh on my copy of firefox it is the standard Qute throbber?

      Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040207 Firefox/0.8

  81. A question by Inf0phreak · · Score: 1
    Is it possible to set Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox (/whatever they are calling it next...) up so it uses the same shortcuts as Mozilla?

    I personally find the default hotkey layout of Mozilla way better than that of FireFox (especially ctrl+enter in the adress bar for opening up a new tab for a URL, I have typed)

    --
    ________
    Entranced by anime since late summer 2001 and loving it ^_^
  82. Holy Volkswagen! by W1K-Galoot · · Score: 1, Funny
    Way to go from connotations of the zippy fast Pontiac Firebird to the poky VW Fox in one easy step. Beautiful choice.

    Next step: Firepinto. Or maybe Firegremlin.

    --
    Been using sigs for 20 years. Nothing funny left to say.
    1. Re:Holy Volkswagen! by eclectric · · Score: 1

      Nobody knows what VW Fox is, so nobody will make the connection. People will simply think *Fox*, whic is either a speedy dog-shaped animal or the Network that is destroying America, one reality TV show at a time (and driving the Simpsons into the ground to boot!)

      That panda is *cute* though. You couldn't ask for a better mascot (expect, of course, for Phoenix!)

    2. Re:Holy Volkswagen! by Jens_UK · · Score: 1

      I would've been happier with "Trans Am" - at least keeping in the same rear wheel drive Pontiac family.

    3. Re:Holy Volkswagen! by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of the VW Fox, but I immediately thought of the Firefox from the movie, which is needless to say much, much faster than anything Pontiac has to offer.

      A friend of mine from high school had a Gremlin that would eat Firebirds for lunch, btw.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    4. Re:Holy Volkswagen! by CuratorTom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obviously none of you have even driven a VW Fox. It's not a sports car by any means but it'll keep up with any similarly priced sub-compact, and blow it away on the turns. Roomier inside, too.

      (Best $7200 I ever spent. 14 years and 160,000 miles ago. Spent about $200 on maintenance total last year.)

      Now, the Audi Fox, THAT was a crappy car.

    5. Re:Holy Volkswagen! by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Obviously none of you have even driven a VW Fox.

      Especially obvious since I said I'd never HEARD of it. Makes it pretty safe to assume I've never driven one, doesn't it?

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  83. Firefox is bad enough... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    It's likely to get them in trouble with Time Warner.

    1. Re:Firefox is bad enough... by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      I guess this means I have to remember to always think in Russian!

      They should put that in "Insert Motto Here".

    2. Re:Firefox is bad enough... by spektr · · Score: 1

      I guess this means I have to remember to always think in Russian!

      No, in Soviet Russia Big Browser thinks for YOU.

  84. Is this a pattern? by GeekDork · · Score: 1

    First Phoenix, then Firebird. Now it's Firefox. The next step will be Firelizard and then it's just a small step to take over Mozilla.

    --

    Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

  85. Re:With the way these guys get into name disputes. by rixstep · · Score: 3, Funny

    'Samantha Fox' would also have been appropriate. After all, the Gecko engine makes it a bit top-heavy.

  86. Name suggestions for 1.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Mozillian 1.0? Thunderbird could become MozillMailer 1.0.

  87. Firefox under Mac OS X by ivarneli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love the Firebird/Firefox lines of browsers under Linux and Windows. I would also love to use Firefox on my new G5 under OS X, but there are three really annoying problems:

    1. Scrolling with the mouse scroll wheel goes WAY too fast, making it almost unusable
    2. Middle-clicking on a link does not open a new tab (or do anything for that matter)
    3. Middle-clicking to scroll (autoscroll) also does not work.

    Do other people see this same behavior? Are there any fixes?

    1. Re:Firefox under Mac OS X by croddy · · Score: 1

      open about:config in the URL bar.

    2. Re:Firefox under Mac OS X by skahshah · · Score: 1

      Doesn't even start here (G5, 10.3.2). The little brown fox cannot jump where the panther strolls!

    3. Re:Firefox under Mac OS X by faaaz · · Score: 1

      What? WHAT?

      OSX Definitely supports three-button mice. Even Apple's own browser Safari opens links in tabs when middle-clicked. So this is a serious flaw with Firefox IMHO.

      --
      we come in peace / shoot to kill
    4. Re:Firefox under Mac OS X by faaaz · · Score: 1

      Solution to 1:

      Enter "about:config" in the URL bar and apply a filter for "mouse"

      Double click and change:
      mousewheel.withnokey.sysnumlines to "false"
      and
      mousewheel.withnokey.numlines to "3"

      The value "3" is what I've found comfortable, but test other values as well, changes take effect instantly.

      --
      we come in peace / shoot to kill
    5. Re:Firefox under Mac OS X by Drakonian · · Score: 1
      I'm seeing other large problems with 0.8. The Google icon in the search bar is all squashed and distorted. And my Toolbar Booksmarks fold only shows one sub folder and none of the main bookmarks in there.

      I had no such problems with 0.7. Do I have to delete my profile or something?

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    6. Re:Firefox under Mac OS X by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      Perhaps its been fixed by now but in the last nightly build for Mac I used you couldn't do a Command-M to minimize the app to the dock. That needs to be there for sure.

  88. Tabbrowser Extensions (version 1.10.2004020801) by real_smiff · · Score: 1
    watch out if you use this extension - it doesn't seem to be compatible with 0.8 - i just had to reinstall fire-whatever after finding it wouldn't start. that was on a clean install with just this extension added. hopefully there'll be an update for Tabbrowser Extensions soon (the official extension page is offline atm due to traffic, i was using the the extension homepage).

    Odd because it worked with the recent nightly build of firebird. Or am i doing something stupid and it should work? (very possible).

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    1. Re:Tabbrowser Extensions (version 1.10.2004020801) by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      The release notes state that you must disable all extensions during an upgrade.

      After, you can only re-enable those that are 0.8-safe.

    2. Re:Tabbrowser Extensions (version 1.10.2004020801) by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      i clean installed 0.8. then i installed Tabbrowser Extensions. then i found it wasn't 0.8-safe! now i'm warning slashdot users. 'cos it ain't too easy to uninstall extensions. heh.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    3. Re:Tabbrowser Extensions (version 1.10.2004020801) by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      I don't have any extensions installed, I upgraded from a plain vanilla firebird. And my tabs do no longer work.

    4. Re:Tabbrowser Extensions (version 1.10.2004020801) by dwhitman · · Score: 1

      When I downloaded TBE about an hour ago, what I got was version 1.10.2004020802. FWIW, seems to be working fine in Firefox for me. Looks like it was updated since you got your copy.

    5. Re:Tabbrowser Extensions (version 1.10.2004020801) by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      I can't download it all now (but i still see Ver.1.10.2004020801 on the site, weird). I get a file not found error. I guess some of the extensions have got slashdotted aswell and he's pulled it... better wait for all this to die down. I shouldn't have upgraded so fast, it was working perfectly before, doh!

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  89. Firefox Ad Campaign by GarfBond · · Score: 5, Informative

    Now that a brand name has finally settled, get the Firefox ad campaign buttons! Stick em on your website!

    http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons. ht ml

  90. zip file distribution by Spetiam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i wish they would still distribute it as a zip file. with the installer, i can't take it around on a pen drive and install on the computer labs at school.

    1. Re:zip file distribution by mr_sas · · Score: 4, Informative

      the .zip will be up within the week according to ben goodger (one of the main developer guys)
      there's an unoffical build (based on the installer build) here

    2. Re:zip file distribution by woztheproblem · · Score: 1

      Just download the file and make your own .zip.

  91. Maybe... just maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they should protect their Names and Logos.

    As long as the whole Mozilla suite is that successful, bad people won't stop fsck them by strange ways.

  92. Re:In their FAQ by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

    just for the record, the new name is still stupid

    the decision to change it is still stupid

    and of course the browser rocks and I support Mozilla.org and their efforts 100%^H^H^H^H 99%

    At the last name change I decided to tell less techy friends and family that it is Mozilla Light.

  93. Re:Jesus=Gay by thumperward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What, hasn't anyone got a sense of humour around here?

    +5 funny you clowns.

    - Chris

  94. Any Mirrors? by base_chakra · · Score: 1

    A FAST FTP search, download.com query, and Google search for FirefoxSetup-0.8.exe turned up squat. Is there a list of official Mozilla mirrors or some other place where the impatient can get it? I've got high hopes for this release. I had stability problems with 0.7 in both Linux and XP. Someday I'd love to see them implement some session recovery features, like Opera's.

    1. Re:Any Mirrors? by ObNoX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thank god for google cache!:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:_PnqbgP1GpI J: www.mozilla.org/mirrors.html+&hl=en&ie=UTF -8

      --
      |O|b|N|o|X|
  95. No Win32 Zip? by wikkiewikkie · · Score: 1

    They seem to have gotten rid of their ZIP distribtion of the Win32 build and gone to an isntaller only. Tough luck for those of us who dont have admin rights on our PC's I guess.

    1. Re:No Win32 Zip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, installers are completely shit, I hate them.

      Firbird/fox is the greatest browser ever, but fuck you guys for not giving a zip file. fuck you all up the ass.

      just give me a fucking zip.

  96. Do you understand what Jr means? by njchick · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not unusual for Mr. Foo Jr. to replace Mr. Foo in the long term. In fact, Mozilla Jr. is an excellent idea.

    1. Re:Do you understand what Jr means? by Fembot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Junior implies younger, and less mature, neither of which are good connotations for a webbrowser really

    2. Re:Do you understand what Jr means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like the PCjr replaced the PC!

      The use of Jr. in personal naming and Jr. in product naming has different implications.

    3. Re:Do you understand what Jr means? by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 4, Funny

      Firefox *is* younger and less mature. For now. When he reaches adulthood he'll undoubtedly prefer the more snooty "II".

    4. Re:Do you understand what Jr means? by g00set · · Score: 1

      Junior implies younger, and less mature, neither of which are good connotations for a webbrowser really

      It is only at version 0.8 right? I had a friend who uses Windows download it last night. He definately paused when he noticed the tag 'Version 0.7'. Maybe used to hearing AOL 19.0, Windows XP, and so on.

      Maybe Fire* could use their youth to their advantage. Similiar to what IBM is doing with Linux.

      --
      ... and furthermore ... I don't like your trousers.
    5. Re:Do you understand what Jr means? by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      The "younger and less mature" label is probably quite okay with all those middle-aged "Juniors" out there who are younger and less mature than their senior parents. With all due respect toward our elders, nursing homes aren't my idea of a good time. Back to the browser topic, I don't know of any businesses that use Mosaic, even though it's definitely more "mature than" most anything in use today. Looking forward, when will Netscape and Mozilla Sr. (and IE??) be ready for full retirement? All that, just to say that I like the name "Mozilla Junior."

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    6. Re:Do you understand what Jr means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla W. Navigator?

    7. Re:Do you understand what Jr means? by njchick · · Score: 1

      There are also different conventions for software and hardware. It's not uncommon for software to improve over time under the same name. On the other hand, hardware usually gets a new name when an improved version is released.

    8. Re:Do you understand what Jr means? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      As long as it doesn't come with a chicklet keyboard...

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  97. WOW. by Viduliya · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am using firefox to post this message.. WOW.. I don't know what they did.. but it seems alot faster than firebird 0.7

    Is it too early to say R.I.P to IE?

    1. Re:WOW. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is it too early to say R.I.P to IE?"

      It's too late ;)

    2. Re:WOW. by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      /me looks at IE with 98% of the browser market

      Yes.

  98. Firbired for Windows by AngryWookiee · · Score: 1

    I really think that Mozilla Firebird for Windows is/was a great browser, I switched from Internet Explorer to Mozilla 1.5 months ago, and fell in love with that browser, then I download Firbird 0.7 and was completely blowen away, I've been using Firebird for about two months now and I don't think that I could ever go back using Internet Explorer.

    I found that Mozilla 1.5 was a great browser but it seemed slow compared to I.E., once I started using Firebird I found that it was one wicked browser, with most of the great features of Mozilla 1.5 but just as fast, if not faster, than I.E. I've been preaching both Mozilla and Firebird to everybody that I know and had some of the them try it out, almost everybody found that Mozilla or Firebird was superior compared to I.E.

    I really think that Firebird is a great browser with huge potential, but I think that changing it's name is only going to hurt it. Firbired was a great browser with a great name that people were getting know and changeing the name is only going to create confusion among the people that are not so computer literate. I really like the name Firebird but I can't really say that I like the name Firefox, oh well at least it's the same great browser.

    1. Re:Firbired for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeesh man... Have a little creativity, eh? :-)

      "Mozilla Firebird for Windows is/was a great browser ... with most of the great features ... I really think that Firebird is a great browser ... Firbired was a great browser with a great name ... it's the same great browser."

    2. Re:Firbired for Windows by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      maybe Firefox 0.9 can include a thesaurus, i know i could do with one

  99. Just Installed Thunderbird by mpath · · Score: 1
    And it's quite nice ... new UI look & feel and what I've been waiting for: envelope icons that update to a status that reflects when you've forwarded or replied to an e-mail already.

    Wary of the new Firebird^H^H^H^Hfox -- not sure if I'm ready for a release that seems just to be a marketing name change (their changes don't seem all that relevant to me, but YMMV).

    --
    I'm not sure what the secret to success is, but the secret to failure lies in trying to please everyone -Bill Cosby
  100. Update your sig by falonaj · · Score: 1

    The link in your signature is broken. I suggest you update it to point to the address which is now used by those whom you call "Litigious Bastards".

  101. and an ed2k/emule-KAD link... by real_smiff · · Score: 1
    ed2k://|file|FirefoxSetup-0.8.exe|6500352 |521C93B4157BC6F76434771DA939807B|/

    ...for people who have eMule running anyway ;) Copy & paste that into the eMule Direct Download box. It should work, i had to add a space after the size part because otherwise /. adds a space in the middle of the hash (doh!). This is already uploading like crazy in the 15 minutes its been in my download folder :o that'll be my u/l b/w gone for the next few days ;). Still it's all for a good cause..

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  102. BFKAF... by sunhorse · · Score: 1, Funny

    Browser Formerly Known as Firebird - that's what I'm gonna call it from now on.

    --
    Gently, we can shake the world...
    1. Re:BFKAF... by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      It'll always be BFKAP to me...

  103. Yeah, this is really going to help adoption by krs-one · · Score: 1

    I spent over 2 hours on the phone this weekend with a friend of mine explaining to her how to remove spyware and viruses on her computer that were put there by using IE. I sent her an email with a link to the Firebird download address. I explained how the browser works and how it'll prevent spyware and viruses from spreading. Now, she'll get the email, not recognize this Firefox thing, and not even download it.

    I realize the download page redirects you to the new page, but its just annoying and not good for brand recognition.

    -Vic

  104. Nice improvements by archen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There have been huge improvements on Mac OSX. I've been using Firebird on my laptop for quite a while, and while it's been a decent browser I've had a few problems with it - bookmarks stop working, browser locks up, etc. Eventually it got to be too much, and I installed a nightly build a week ago. Stability seems to have improved a lot, and it seems to be slightly smoother and possibly faster.

    The one biggest improvement I've seen is the UI, which I must say is probably the best I've seen out of any browser I've used (IE, Netscape, Opera, Mozilla, Safari, among many others). It's clean, and simple, yet still aesthetically pleasing. I found it a bit disapointing that the windows version still used the same theme since I was hoping that I could maybe take the Mac theme and use it there too. If you use Fire{bird | fox} on Mac OSX, then this certainly a must have upgrade.

  105. Torrent for firebird by mishac · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those look for a torrent to download the windows version, there is one here

  106. what about name it "Browzilla" or "Navigzilla"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mozilla has "Chatzilla", "Bugzilla"...
    Why cannot they use names like "Browzilla" or "Navigzilla", "Mailzilla", "Editzilla", etc.?
    They can even do "...zilla" brand pets for each one.

  107. What about SVG? by Queuetue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd really like native SVG support to start appearing in the builds - last I checked the old code is still in the tree. Are there still political/licensing issues preventing it from being in the default builds?

    1. Re:What about SVG? by Drathos · · Score: 5, Informative

      They've been rewriting the SVG backend.

      This was marked as fixed on Feb 7, so now they're probably working on getting more of the bugs it blocked fixed. Once they major ones (there's at least 2 that caused crashes) are fixed, it should start showing up in nightly trunk builds.

      --
      End of line..
    2. Re:What about SVG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they are working on SVG again, good news. because it look like Mozilla native SVG support is stalled for very very long time and no progress.
      It is good to hear that they are working on it again.

      --
      SVG Graphics Editor http://www.kiyut.com

  108. Re:OS X by MinutiaeMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, but some Mac users generally refer to it as "Mail dot app" or "Mail-app", because it's good to have a distinction.

    "Do you use Mail?" "Yeah, I get mail all the time." "No no, do you use Mail?" "Well, if I get it, then I must use it, right?" "No, I mean do you use Apple's-OS-X-Mail-Application?" "Oh! Well, yeah." -- I've had this type of conversation more than once over the years.

    Sometimes I wish Apple had come up with some different name for their client -- after all, they came up with the colorful name "Safari" for their web browser...

  109. First Firefox release? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank goodness they aren't resetting the version numbers with the name changes -- we were so close to Firebird 1.0 and now we'd be at Firefox 0.1 :)

    1. Re:First Firefox release? by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      Actually, we're numerically close to fire[bird|fox] 0.10 - which has no bearing how close we are release wise to 1.0...

  110. New name idea by evrybodygonsurfin · · Score: 1

    Given that they have now changed the name of this fine product on two occasions, surely one more can do no harm?


    That being the case, I strongly suggest taking a leaf out of the Microsoft Mindshare Handbook and calling it simply `Browser'.


    Just think about the impact that would have on the Windows desktop for a minute.

    1. Re:New name idea by Jeff-Dengar · · Score: 0

      That cause even more confusion

  111. Ummm. by npcole · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would have thought that calling the browser "Mozilla Firebird" solved any name-clash issues.

    The new name makes no sense at all. "Firebird" at least reminded one of "Phoenix", ie: a browser rising from the ashes. But Firefox? What's that? Other than a bunch of potential trademark infringements as another poster has pointed out.

  112. Doesn't work, cryptic messages by MoobY · · Score: 1

    The only thing I seem to get out of it is a dialog box with the very cryptic message "Error launching browser window: no XBL binding for browser". Looking for it in google, it seemed to be a problem with browser uptime or firebird 0.7 for Mac, but it should have been solved in 0.7.1 for Mac. Why is this bug troubling me in 0.8? I have it for both GTK and GTK2+XFT releases.

    --
    --- Sigmentation Fault - Comments Dumped
    1. Re:Doesn't work, cryptic messages by obsid1an · · Score: 1

      I am getting the exact same message under WinXP SP1a. Any help?

    2. Re:Doesn't work, cryptic messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have some old extension. Try to remove it first. I got the same error from tabbar extensions and a profile hikkup.

    3. Re:Doesn't work, cryptic messages by mr_sas · · Score: 1

      you should've disabled all extensions before upgrading, or installed using a clean profile iirc

    4. Re:Doesn't work, cryptic messages by Eisenstein · · Score: 1

      This is generated by Tabbrowser Extension or another extension. Disable it.

  113. mozilla upgrade path is getting ridiculous by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

    ok sorry, but gripe time...

    (disclaimer: this is on my winblows box at work)

    i now have 3 installed versions of mozilla browsers on my machine - and that is just stupid. every time they branch the bloody code or rename the browser i get another instance of a browser on my machine. i then have to change my shortcuts on the quicklaunch toolbar, reinstall google toolbar, and manually move all of my links across from firebird to firefox. luckily i found that i could drag and drop them from Manage Bookmarks - but to the novice user that may not be obvious at all. the drawback to this is that i use folders to group my links and i'm used to the order they were presented in previously. i can drag url links around the link bar to change their position - but for some reason I can't do it with folder links.

    so if any Mozilla developer reads this: please speak to your windows installer guys and add some custom actions into your install pack that will provide a seamless upgrade path for those wishing to do so.

    1. Re:mozilla upgrade path is getting ridiculous by Queuetue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both mozilla and firebird (now firefox) are developer tools. Firefox is actually an early beta of a developer tool.

      If you want a stable platform with seamless upgrades and well-tested istallers, you should use the Netscape suite, and expect to be behind in development. Otherwise, expect everything to break every release, because you're on the bleeding edge. The focuses of the two groups are very different.

    2. Re:mozilla upgrade path is getting ridiculous by tr0llb4rt0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had no problems at all.

      Firefox found my existing Firebird 0.7 and imported all favs. address history, etc seemingly perfectly.

      Did you install your firebird into a different directory from the default .zip archives directory?

      If this is the case then the creators of the firefox installer should include and option to ask you where you unzipped firebird to.

      ps Anyone remember the crappy Clint Eastwood film *FireFox*? That's the first thing that sprang to mind when I saw the name!! :-(

      --
      Worst .sig ever!
    3. Re:mozilla upgrade path is getting ridiculous by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

      ah well spotted - i did actually change the default zip directory. obviously with firebird being a binary-only extraction they didn't create any registry entries to keep track of where it is installed.

    4. Re:mozilla upgrade path is getting ridiculous by tr0llb4rt0 · · Score: 1

      heh They should've taken this into account when building the installer.

      Installer cannot locate firebird 0.x. If you have a previous version please enter the path. etc etc

      It's a minor criticism tho considering the quality of the product.

      --
      Worst .sig ever!
    5. Re:mozilla upgrade path is getting ridiculous by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      You mean the Mozilla suite...seeing as how Netscape is dead...

    6. Re:mozilla upgrade path is getting ridiculous by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      I meant Netscape Navigator, which is still very much alive, as far as I know.

    7. Re:mozilla upgrade path is getting ridiculous by Gerv · · Score: 1

      That is no longer true about the Mozilla Suite. With the demise of Netscape, mozilla.org has stepped up to the plate. Mozilla 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 are all labelled as stable, and suitable for all users.

      Gerv

    8. Re:mozilla upgrade path is getting ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's dead. AOL fired pretty much everyone in the Netscape division.

  114. fireBIRD and thunderBIRD by bstil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They should definitely keep "Mozilla" in the name, for non-/. general public recognition. And before they changed "Firebird" to "Firefox", they had a nice symmetry with "FireBIRD" and "ThunderBIRD". I vote they change the name back to "Mozilla Firebird" and "Mozilla Thunderbird".

    1. Re:fireBIRD and thunderBIRD by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

      Well, they can always rebrand the mail client as "thunderfox"; the only software I can find that goes that by name is for old 8-bit Ataris.

      Oh, and this classic movies.

    2. Re:fireBIRD and thunderBIRD by patsalov · · Score: 1

      How about Thunderfox? It preserves the symmetry, and is original.

    3. Re:fireBIRD and thunderBIRD by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      How about Mozilla Browser and Mozilla Mail?
      Yes, I confess, I'm simple minded...

      Remember, back in the days when everybody was using "netscape"?
      Those were the days...

    4. Re:fireBIRD and thunderBIRD by bstil · · Score: 1

      How about Mozilla Browser and Mozilla Mail?

      Yes, that would also keep the symmetry and the Mozilla brand recognition.
      ...using 0.8 as I type.

  115. Why bother with the numbers... by ZipR · · Score: 5, Funny

    when they change the name with every release?

    1. Re:Why bother with the numbers... by yacineparis.com · · Score: 1

      All these names are quite confusing for noobs. Mozilla, Mozilla Firebird, Thunderbird, Firefox, etc... I think they should focus on developping Firebird. They need more users...
      Browser usage stats

      --
      Yacine.
  116. Super sweet by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's getting better all the time. The only thing I miss from Opera and IE in Firefox is the ability so smoothly scroll while pressing my mousewheel.

    Anybody know why they insist on scrolling at least one line at a time?

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Super sweet by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      Why do you want to scroll less than one line? Doesn't scrolling (for instance) half a line just make two lines unreadable?

    2. Re:Super sweet by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, that's not what I want. But I want the scrolling to be smooth, so that I can read while scrolling. Scrolling a discrete number of lines makes the scrolling jerky and unreadable. Just compare scrolling in IE and Mozilla.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    3. Re:Super sweet by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      I dunno - I guess I always scroll then read, not read while scrolling. Maybe most people do, so they just axed the feature, which to me would seem to slow down the actual scrolling process.

      I'd probably want to turn it off the same way I turn off "fade in menus" and, "window minimize animations" and "update during drag."

    4. Re:Super sweet by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      Nah, this isn't stupid eyecandy. It's actually very useful. It doesn't slow down the scrolling either. Perfect if you want to skim through a long text.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    5. Re:Super sweet by Eisenstein · · Score: 1

      You can switch it on/off in Options->Advanced->Use smooth scrolling.

    6. Re:Super sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks exactly the same to me - Firefox scrolls perfectly smoothly, pixel by pixel. Not sure what you're doing wrong, maybe there's a setting somewhere?

    7. Re:Super sweet by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      Ah, thanks. Embarrasing :) The smooth scrolling option didn't do anything in the previous version I had. It's still quite jerky though.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  117. Torrent for thunderbird? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I'd like to update my mail client but you tossers have obliterated mozilla.org. Little help?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Torrent for thunderbird? by waxmop · · Score: 1
      There's a .torrent link for the Windows Installer lower on this page. I used it, but before I install, I'd like to be able to verify the package with md5sum or some other tool, but I can't find md5sums posted anywhere on the mozilla site.

      BitTorrent is great, but it seems like a malicious user could fake out a lot of people by releasing a .torrent that points out at something completely different.

  118. Re:With the way these guys get into name disputes. by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    When asked about his favorite browser for the PowerBook he uses aboard Great Fox, Fox McCloud only said "Hi-yah!!!" and jumped a couple of dozen meters on the air with a nice fire effect.

    Fox McCloud rules. Mozilla Firebird rules. Therefore, Mozilla Firefox rules absolutely. =) I was already worried that Nintendo was going to take Firebird/Thunderbird/Icebird(?) and do something Pokemon-themed out of them (Moltres/Zapdos/Articuno), but now, they can focus on games that matter more. Thank God Nintendo hasn't trademarked the names of the moves or anything. Now excuse me, I need more coffee. =)

  119. What IS "Firefox" supposed to mean anyway?

    I used to tell people "Firebird" was a reference to Igor Stravinsky's seminal ballet. What the foque do I tell them now?

    1. Re:grrrr by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      Tell them it's a reference to a Clint Eastwood movie.

      Or don't.

  120. How about.. Xine for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Xtreme iKozilla is NOT IE"

    1. Re:How about.. Xine for by acebone · · Score: 0

      XiiNI ....?

      Cool !

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
  121. Ctrl-enter bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they finally fix the annoying Ctrl-Enter bug to make it consistent with Ctrl-tab, Ctrl-click and the way things are done in Mozilla Suite?

  122. Is Javascript broken in .8? by orthancstone · · Score: 1

    First page I loaded up (sports.tamu.edu) had a problem not showing the javascript that runs at the top of the page while Firebird and IE show it is still working fine.

    Grr...I want to put up a bug report but mozilla.org is slow.

  123. Muhaha, name change in the near future eh? by nempo · · Score: 1

    http://www.firefox.co.uk/

    --
    --- No, english is not my mother tongue.
  124. More info by sepluv · · Score: 3, Informative
    It looks like this name change (mainly to satisfy complaints from the Firebird DB guys) will be the last one.

    The name is being filed as a trademark and is apparently pretty unique. I was at first leery of another name change, but this should hopefully sort things out once and for all. Also the new fiery-fox-on-globe logo is really cool and firefoxes (aka red pandas) are just soooo cute.

    BTW, the long delay in the new 0.8 release -- which adds a MSWindows installer, a new default theme for MacOS X and improved filetype, XPI and download management and other stuff -- is explained by the time taken to verify that the new name was unique and to file the trademark.

    There is more info about the name change in the official FAQ and a lot of unofficial detail on Ben Goodger's blog

    --
    Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
    [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  125. Side buttons and gtk2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The side buttons on my Intellimouse Explorer 3.0 for going back and forward don't work using the gtk2 build. They work fine if I use the gtk1 build.
    I'm running Debian testing and the contents of my .imwheelrc are:
    ".*"
    None, Up, Alt_L|Left
    None, Down, Alt_L|Right

    1. Re:Side buttons and gtk2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Add this to your .imwheelrc:

      "(null)"
      None, Up, Alt_L|Left
      None, Down, Alt_L|Right

  126. New Abbot and Costello skit unearthed. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 0

    Abbot: Hey, I really like that browser you got there, it's something else!

    Costello: Yeah, well not anymore. I mean, it used to be. But not anymore.

    Abbot: [Pulls out gun and shoots Costello dead.]

    Finis.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  127. Why? by Mawbid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I still don't remember reading a good explanation of why Firebird-the-database was any reason not to have a Firebird-the-browser. Browser. Database. Database. Browser. I'm not the least bit confused myself.

    --
    Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
  128. Bad choice by jopet · · Score: 1

    Both the name and the icons look as if adolescent nerds had made this decision. Maybe it is their intention to establish Firefox as the browser for young geeks and nerds only.

    1. Re:Bad choice by linicks · · Score: 1

      Everytime I look at the icon in my quicklaunch toolbar, it reminds me of an embryo!

      --

      I got nothing...
  129. There must be Mozilla Gnomes by castlec · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1.)Change name of existing open source project with every release
    2.)????
    3.)Profit!!

    --
    When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
  130. Crash and burn by glpierce · · Score: 1

    The new download manager is terrible. Installing extensions has gone from a 3-click simple maneuver to a multi-window nightmare. Firefox crashed within 3 minutes while I was re-installing extensions (I wanted it clean). That's not a good sign

    --
    G
    1. Re:Crash and burn by Queuetue · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's not a sign of anything at all. Firebird(fox) is a technology preview. If you want a stable browser that installs clean, look at Netscape's Navigator.

      Both Mozilla and Firefox are intended for developers and testers that know that upgrading means lots of broken stuff, not end users.

  131. Dumbass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  132. Re:To mantain browser in memory... by Jisakiel · · Score: 4, Informative

    about:config

    Find "turbo"

    enable it :)

  133. One working mirror: by s88 · · Score: 2, Informative
  134. Yet another vote for Monster Island by frankie · · Score: 3, Funny
    As I said last time, the correct name for Mozilla Jr/Lite, aka Phoenix, etc, is obvious once you go back to etymological roots: Mozooki !!!

    C'mon Gerv, get with the program already

    1. Re:Yet another vote for Monster Island by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Well, I know the folks on the Firebird RDBMS were pretty ticked that they decided to adopt Firebird. But personally I like this new name better. I think I might suggest to the Firebird people to change to their name :-P. Seriously though, I am glad they did this. Its better for everyone this way.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    2. Re:Yet another vote for Monster Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who sings the old Godzilla cartoon theme song when the Mozilla splash screen comes up? MOZILLA! MOZILLA! MOZILLA! And Mozoooookiiiii

    3. Re:Yet another vote for Monster Island by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      pretty ticked maybe, but they sure got a heck of a lot of publicity and name awareness out of it. i vaguely recall looking into firebird rdbms about a year ago. never got into it for reasons i can't recall. then this mozilla name thing and everyone is saying "firebird, isn't that an rdbms?". so, i, like a lot of other free software leeches go to check it out again. it certainly won't wear off so quickly this time.

      iirc, this thing runs on windows natively and on unixes. most other free rdbms need some interesting work arounds to get to work under that MS os.

    4. Re:Yet another vote for Monster Island by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and they are working on a x86-64 port, and fixing to release v1.5 which is the RDBMS rewritten in C++. I'm really surprised people push MySQL over this.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    5. Re:Yet another vote for Monster Island by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      personally, i'm a postgresql fanboy for now. being a mostly unix only rdbms, it's limited as well. lots of people develop on the desktop and would benefit from a local rdbms system that's easy to install and configure. i never understand the MySQL interest myself.

      i would like to try out the 1.5 firebird. currently, gentoo portage only has 1.0? so it's a manual install. perhaps i'll give it a shot one day at work when i have a free 5 minutes.

    6. Re:Yet another vote for Monster Island by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Well, they are fixing to put out Release Candidate 9, and if no bugs are found within the first week then they will make that 1.5 final. 64-bit support is in the 2.0 experimental branch. Its coming along very well.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  135. You think you've got problems by davetrainer · · Score: 1
    The problem is, I am trying to get my family to use it as well, but trying to keep them straight on what it is called is getting a little ridiculous.

    You think you've got problems; I'm trying to get my corporation to use it. This will accomplish nothing but confuse end users and cripple adoption by making the product even more obscure. It shows a lack of direction and it makes all of us look silly. This is terrible news.

    1. Re:You think you've got problems by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      It's a pain but it was absolutely the right thing to do. The wrong thing for them to do was call it Firebird in the first place.

      What I don't understand for the life of me is why they thought it was a good idea in the first place. They were warned right from the beginning, before they even made the decision, that they were treading on the toes of the existing OSS project with that name (the database management system.) The excuse they used, that they checked it with their lawyer, is probably the most pathetic and anti-social reason they could possibly have thought of. It was an indefensable decision and I'm glad they finally back-tracked.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:You think you've got problems by Quintin+Stone · · Score: 1

      You're proposing a browser that's not even out of beta for corporate use? I wouldn't consider that a particularly good idea. If they were going to change the name, doing so before 1.0 is the best time to do it.

      --

      "Prejudice is wrong; you should hate everyone the same."

    3. Re:You think you've got problems by davetrainer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You're proposing a browser that's not even out of beta for corporate use? I wouldn't consider that a particularly good idea

      Oh really.

      Why You Should Switch to FireFox

      "Further improvements to IE will require enhancements to the underlying OS"

      Secunia Internet Explorer System Compromise Vulnerabilities. Solution: "Use another product"

      The Twenty Most Critical Internet Security Vulnerabilities IE: Number four.

      "we are not aware of any vendor-supplied patches for this issue"

      Patch for 'critical' IE vulnerability doesn't work

      IE full of holes, unsafe: Security experts

      AMS Vice President and CTO: Mozilla Firebird is a Tier 1, Best of Breed Open Source Application

      I don't care if it's a beta. Firebird/FireFox/Whatever is simply a better product than IE in every conceivable way - with the pertinent exception of branding, but including stability and security. So what exactly makes its use at a corporate level a "bad idea?"

  136. Why doesn't it catch on? by ignavusincognitus · · Score: 1

    Firebird, or whatever they choose to name it, is a great browser. Everyone I introduced it to liked it, including MSIE users. And that's not a big surprise, seeing how MSIE is all but EOL-ed Explorer. It's obvious how Microsoft sees it as a waste of money to keep maintaining their flagship browser - it's not sold for money and it doesn't create new markets for them. So there is a big opportunity here for open source. It seems like an appropriate marketing campaign should really widen the userbase. How can this be done? A paypal account to pay for banner ads (popups too :) )? Free CDs in public libraries? Post it as explorer.crack.exe to file sharing networks?

  137. A button campaign! Woohoo! by WWWWolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    So now there's a button campaign! Back in the day, we had Netscape Now!, then there was a MSIE Now!, and then there was a loooong silence. Way too long. Way way WAY too long.

    Party like it's 1996!

    In case you still have that personal homepage thing gathering dust in some corner of the web, or a blog that you think no one reads but several people actually do - DO the button thing! RELIVE the nostalgy! HEAR the whining from standards-brandishing people (who, gritting their teeth, will admit Firefox supports W3C standards well, unlike that other browser)!

    I'll try that page as soon as the mozilla site isn't completely slashdotted. I had to make my own stupid "Mozilla Now" button several months ago, glad Mozilla folks have finally done them themselves =)

    1. Re:A button campaign! Woohoo! by jonasj · · Score: 1
      I had to make my own stupid "Mozilla Now" button several months ago, glad Mozilla folks have finally done them themselves =)
      Actually they already did that more than five years ago.
      --
      You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
  138. Pokemon birds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a real shame. I had hoped they would introduce an "Icebird" program to the family. With Firebird, Thunderbird, and Icebird, they'd have the origianl three legendary birds from Pokemon Red/Blue/Yellow: Moltres, Zapdos, and Articuno.

  139. MOD PARENT BACK UP, YOU COMMUNIST MODS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  140. *fox by troon · · Score: 1

    They wouldn't want to use Starfox. The Firebird/Thunderbird duet were sometimes referred to as *bird, so now we just need Thunderbird to become Thunderfox (fear of Ford litigation?) and then we can use *fox to refer to the pair again.

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  141. Re:Jesus=Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans don't have a sense of humour about god/jesus/christianity. Bible thumping bastards.

  142. Performance enhancements by Petronius · · Score: 1

    the performance boost in this release is amazing. At least on Window$. I think that for the 1st time they can honnestly claim it *is* faster than IE. Keep it up!

    --
    there's no place like ~
  143. Maybe they should have called it the MicroFox? by darthcamaro · · Score: 0, Redundant

    MSIE sucks. Too bad they couldn't have chosen something more descriptive

  144. Mozilla Thunderbird release notes by MagicFab · · Score: 5, Informative
    (from http://www.mozilla.org/projects/thunderbird/releas e-notes.html )

    Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5

    Release Notes

    Mozilla Thunderbird is a redesign of the integrated Mozilla App-Suite mail component. Our goal is to leverage much of the existing functionality of that product to produce a stand-alone mail application that is simple and extensible. The Thunderbird Mail Product page has more information.

    Owing to the maturity of the foundational code of the app-suite, Thunderbird is very usable; however, it is considered a Preview Release, and as such is assumed to have defects. To help find the defects, the developers happily receive user feedback (via comments in the Mozilla Thunderbird Support forum kindly hosted by MozillaZine, or via bugs filed in Bugzilla.) Please carefully read these release notes before filing any bugs in Bugzilla.

    The focus of this fifth milestone release was on stability and bug fixing. This milestone is based on the recently released Mozilla 1.6 Application suite. Read the Thunderbird Roadmap about the goals of this release. While there is much more work yet to do, the developers are excited about recent progress and are anxious to share their latest efforts with the community. Enjoy!

    This document covers the following topics for the Thunderbird 0.5 milestone release:

    What's New

    Here are the highlights for this Thunderbird release:

    * New Features

    We now support the notion of multiple identities per mail account. This makes it easy to have several email addresses which end up going into the same account. Read More about how to hook this up.

    Thunderbird 0.5 includes Secure Password Authentication using a new cross-platform NTLM authentication mechanism for POP3 and SMTP.

    Option to turn on the Mozilla 1.x style folder columns in Thunderbird (Tools / Options / Advanced / General Settings).

    A new Palm Sync Address book conduit is now available for 0.5. You can now do a one way sync, PC -> Palm or Palm -> PC, by changing the hot sync conduit setup. We now prevent duplicate cards in Thunderbird address books when syncing with Palm categories. Numerous improvements with the initial sync.

    A new, improved version of the offline extension is now available for 0.5. Please read the installation notes in this document about how to first uninstall old extensions.

    Improved Spell Checker including a new US dictionary.

    Ability to paste names or addresses from a spreadsheet directly into the addressing widget of a new compose window.

    Improved profile migration from Netscape 4.x.

    * Recently Fixed Bugs

    If a new message arrives while you are reading a message, we no longer scroll the message body back to the top.

    When saving an IMAP attachment, we no longer re-download the attachment from the server.

    Saving an attachment now brings up a standalone progress window.

    Copying a message to a Sent Folder now shows progress in the progress window.

    When saving or opening an attachment, the progress dialog now reports accurate progress information.

    We now mark IMAP messages read in a folder if they are deleted or moved to another folder. This fixes incorrect unread counts when checking folders other than the Inbox for new messages.

    LDAP searches now honor the directory search filter property.

    Ability to paste a single cell of data from Microsoft Excel into the compose window body.

    Problems with IMAP folders three levels deep not showing up when you are not using the IMAP subscription model.

    Tools / Options / Attachments / Attachment Folder setting is now remembered.

    Linux builds no longer crash when viewing HTML messages requiring a JAVA plugin.

    Improved handling of apple double encoded attachments from OSX clients.

    No more

    --
    Notepad specialist & FAT administrator, group training available
  145. Confused about names by perdelucena · · Score: 1

    Maybe even Firefox people are somewhat confused about their name. Selecting about Mozilla Firefox in my Win32 box, I get "About Firefox 0.8" with a Firebird logo in it!!!

    1. Re:Confused about names by perdelucena · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correction. It was a theme bug. When I changed theme to default logo became OK. And the scrollbars are back too...

    2. Re:Confused about names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, try clicking on the credits and enjoy the old FireBird logo again.

      I think they should name it FireMammal. Not hits at all on google.

  146. Mirrors by The_Systech · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few mirrors that aren't (yet) saturated... http://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.mozilla.org/ pub/firefox/ ftp://mozilla.mirror.pacific.net.au/mozilla/firefo x/ ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/mirror /ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox

    --
    To err is human, but to really foul things up requires a computer
  147. Firefox technology secret orgins unveiled. by rafael_es_son · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet you didn't know the technologies underlying Firefox (or .8) were initially developed by the soviet military during the early 1980's. "A prototype jet fighter that can be partially controlled by a hyperlink."

    --
    HAD
  148. Re:More Confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cock. Cock and balls.

  149. MOD PARENT -1, spoiled brat by gumpish · · Score: 1

    I had 1% transferred in 5 seconds, file complete in 105 seconds. None of the mirrors were responsive.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT -1, spoiled brat by gid · · Score: 1

      Heh, I sucked it down in 40 seconds, the parent poster just needs to wait for a bit longer, or the torrent had just been posted and hadn't matured yet. Hadn't matured yet meaning everyone's downloading from one seed, who can't possibly keep up with demand, in that case, all you can do it wait a bit for the single seed to get the data out to more people, who hopefully won't hop off once they have the file.

  150. Less mature? by ComaVN · · Score: 1

    You mean like 18-year olds? You must be new to this internet-thing, if you think those are bad connotations.

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    1. Re:Less mature? by Fembot · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not buisinesses generaly want proven reliable technology for their buisness, NOT the latest and greatest trend. To them a webbrowser or other application is really just a tool needed for whatever money making schemes they run. Keeping up with the latest fashions is NOT what they want at all.

    2. Re:Less mature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you see, it was a joke, about "mature", or lack thereof, being used to describe a certain type of porn, and...

      Aw crap nevermind.

    3. Re:Less mature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D'oh im asleep today :-)

    4. Re:Less mature? by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      In that case we should call it "Mozilla Pro 2004" :-)

  151. Serenity & random thoughts by catphile · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So far so good with the new Fire*. I'm using it to post this, and since I couldn't sleep out here on the west coast, I got it just before the site went down.

    Name suggestion: contact Joss Whedon & Mutent Enemy and see if the 1.0 version can be called "Serenity." At the very least, some clever chap please make the Firefly Theme!

    Obviously, not all my extensions made the successful transfer. One essential extension is the one (sorry no credit) which allows me to switch between tabs using my mouse wheel.

    Great idea to include the link/ad buttons. I already have the Firefox ad on my blog, and the logos are fantastic.

    Question: after Firefox replaces Mozilla, are we still going to have a Composer? I use that to create & upload (my amateur, pathetic) web pages. I could always keep my regular Mozilla for that purpose, but it's too great a piece of software for the foundation to abandon.

  152. Re:OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    > "Do you use Mail?" "Yeah, I get mail all the time." "No no, do you use Mail?" "Well, if I get it, then I must use it, right?"

    Just for laughs, Apple should rename their mail program "racial slurs."

  153. so, after... by neko9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ten name changes we will just call it Fire!Fire!Fire! eheheheeeheeheheeeeehhhh

  154. You all know how to do this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google cache of mirror list: mirror list cache

  155. mod parent up... by caino59 · · Score: 1

    for the assisted linkage for us lazy people :oP

  156. Who keeps modding this nonsense up? And why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly BT is working where the mirrors aren't. I smell an organized troll-promotion...

  157. UK Mirror up and running. by rafael_es_son · · Score: 1

    This mirror is up and running.

    --
    HAD
  158. Ooops... /. ed? by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    Apparently it's timing out now.

    Ooops

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  159. BS by catphile · · Score: 0

    I get complains all the time from my Mom while she uses ie and gets slammed with popup windows. No complaints? Sheesh. And I've walked her through Firebird installation over the phone. She has firebird on her computer, and she still uses ie, like some horrible habit.

    1. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, did you read my comment? I said install the Google toolbar. It blocks popups with haste.

  160. thank god I got there before the rest of slashdot. by Kid+Zero · · Score: 1

    I was up early this am getting this. Thank God slashdot is slow sometimes!

  161. WebBrowser by macemoneta · · Score: 1

    They should have just called it WebBrowser. :-)

    Maybe we need an open source name registration site, so folks can self-register their software names and avoid conflicts.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  162. Updated FTP, HTTP, RSYNC mirror by David+McBride · · Score: 4, Informative

    We updated our mozilla.org mirror this morning in anticipation of a slashdotting.

    http://www.sunsite.org.uk/package/mozilla.

    Hmm, I'll have to update our summary...

    1. Re:Updated FTP, HTTP, RSYNC mirror by EventHorizon · · Score: 0

      Ahh! You must be the fabeled non-evil twin. The next time you see Darl, please tell him his website appears to be down. We didn't do it, but to be totally honest, SCO is making us a wee bit miffed.

      Sincerely,

      The Linux Community

  163. They ARE registering it as a trademark by marnanel · · Score: 2, Informative

    And, they should f'n register a trademark...

    They are indeed registering it as a trademark.

    --
    GROGGS: alive and well and living in
  164. about:mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    about:mozilla -- whats this gibberish?

    am I missing something?

  165. They STOLE the name by mnmn · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had a go-kart for racing that I named firefox and applied for trademark protection. I thought firefox was unique enough and I believe the courts will stand with me on this one.

    So I will have to sue these guys, in case my friends confuse a browser with my kart.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  166. thunderbird wish by catphile · · Score: 1

    I just wish thunderbird had a function for seperate users. (The hugely crappy) incredimail has this handy function, and it couldn't be that hard to integrate, could it? And yes - we could create different windows logins, but I happen to live in a house where the residents trust each other, and it's easier not to do this.

    1. Re:thunderbird wish by tttonyyy · · Score: 1
      I just wish thunderbird had a function for seperate users. (The hugely crappy) incredimail has this handy function, and it couldn't be that hard to integrate, could it? And yes - we could create different windows logins, but I happen to live in a house where the residents trust each other, and it's easier not to do this.

      In that case, you might be pleased to find that there is a way to do this.

      If you start ThunderBird with the -p switch, it will start the profile manager. Just create a seperate profile for each user - the next time ThunderBird runs it'll ask you which profile to use.

      --
      biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    2. Re:thunderbird wish by catphile · · Score: 1

      tttonyyy, you are my new favorite person. If I had mod points, I'd mod you to the roof. Thank you!

  167. Obligatory thundercats reference by McLoud · · Score: 1

    Thunder... Thunder... Thunderfox! hoooooooo!!!

    --
    sign(c14n(envelop(this)), x509)
  168. Tab timeout address bug by silverfuck · · Score: 1

    I thought the bug with the address being wiped from a link timing out when you open it in another tab was supposed to be fixed? It's still here, and still as annoying as all hell...

    --
    You know you've been IMing too long when you almost say 'lol' out loud to a non-geeky friend...
    1. Re:Tab timeout address bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  169. How about Mo-Zookie by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    or Should that be Mozuki, I forget the spelling to Godzilla's little sidekick.

  170. Not Lite by Patik · · Score: 1
    "Lite" implies a slimmed down version with features missing. Many software programs that are sold are accompanied by a free "lite" version that doesn't do as much. Technically Firefox doesn't do as much as the Mozilla suite (no mail, IRC, etc.) but in comparison with the Mozilla suite browser component it is not stripped down (it actually does more).

    When new users come looking for a browser they may forego the "lite" version and get the "full thing", then be discouraged when they have to install all this other stuff they don't want.

    In short, "lite" would be a misnomer.

  171. Roaming bookmarks!!! by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

    When, o when will Mozilla.org release some kind of software that supports roaming bookmarks? How many years has this feature been MIA?

    1. Re:Roaming bookmarks!!! by falsification · · Score: 1

      Should be in place quite soon. Bug 124029 at bugzilla dot mozilla dot org tracks the recent progress of those working on it. You are welcome to contribute time or money to the effort.

  172. Mozilla Mail / Thunderbird on Windows by Daath · · Score: 2, Informative

    Be warned that if you use Mozilla Thunderbird on windows that there is a very serious bug! More on in here...

    Some spam/virus mails has mangled invalid headers that Mozilla Mail/Thunderbird chokes on. When receiving mails, it simply stops when it encounters the bad mail, but it doesn't mark the previous mails as received or anything. So next time you check mail, you get every mail again until the bad mail, and so on...

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:Mozilla Mail / Thunderbird on Windows by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Note that this is not unique to Thunderbird. I had the pleasure of finding out the even the excellent fetchmail had run into problems recently. I had to use pine to remove mail from the server. Ick.

  173. Error launching browser window: no XBL binding for by gav1n · · Score: 1, Informative

    Error launching browser window: no XBL binding for browser. If you get this error when starting Firefox...go into Firebird and disable all extensions and switch to the default theme. You may have to do the same for Mozilla if you have that installed too.

  174. Mandrake packages available by G�tz · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've uploaded a package named mozilla-firefox for Mandrake Cooker, if you have Mandrake 9.2, you can get a version from my page:

    9.2 packages.

  175. Ignore me... by orthancstone · · Score: 1

    Figured out I needed a Flash reinstallation :|

  176. Must think in Russian... by Mondoz · · Score: 1, Funny

    A thought-controlled browser? Sign me up!!

    --
    /sig
  177. Explanation by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Only three of those folders are the result of name changes. "Chimera" is now Camino(tm). "Phoenix" and "Firebird" are now Firefox(tm). Because I can't seem to connect to Mozilla.org as I write this (congestion?), I had to look in Google's cache for a couple of them: Minimo is apparently something like Firefox optimized for size for handheld devices. "Grendel" is a mail/news user agent for the Java platform, apparently completely unconnected to the Gecko underpinnings.

  178. Unbelievably Dumb by anonicon · · Score: 0, Troll


    Firefox? Firefox? What, did they put 10 trademark-eligible names in a hat and pull this one out? It's nifty that they have a trademarked name, too bad they trademarked a name that sucks.

    Thank God when I support the project by buying their merchandise here: http://snipurl.com/4drd , I'm not stuck buying something that says or displays a frigging Firefox. Is there some reason they couldn't compound their names like nearly any other business in the world? Mozilla Phoenix or Mozilla Firebird would have been a much better solution than this. Heck, cannibalizing Mozilla once the Suite is discontinued would have been better, soooo, once the suite hit 1.8 and then ceased, they could have come out with Mozilla 1.9 the browser and Mozilla Mail 1.9.

    Yes, in the big picture, it's not the end of the world - no product name is, even if they'd decided to call this the Edsel. Still, if anyone asks me what I recommend for mail and browsing, I'll be forwarding them to Mozilla.

    Peace,
    Chuck

  179. Changes since Firebird 0.7 (new stuff in 0.8) by Jack+Zombie · · Score: 2, Informative

    (from Burning Edge)

    New features

    * Windows installer
    * New download manager
    * Work Offline
    * Add Bookmark dialog: recent-folders dropdown and folder-selection tree (replacing a single dropdown listing all folders)
    * DOM Inspector is now included in zip builds
    * IDN support
    * IPv6 support on Windows 2000/XP/2003

    Major improvements

    * 220807 - prompt user about invalid text/plain content. (Solves most problems like "Firebird tries to display some .rar files instead of downloading them.")
    * 214266 - Find should wrap by default
    * 217286 - Cookie whitelist should override session cookie option.
    * 142459(?) - Shift+click and middle-click on scroll bar should jump to that location
    * 214260 - XPInstall UI improvements
    * 33282 - enable external scheme handlers (like aim: and telnet:) in Linux
    * 6% faster page loading (comparing December to September on a Tp (pageloader time) graph)

    Important bug fixes

    * 210910 - Right-clicking a file within a bookmarks folder in the bookmarks menu or toolbar makes that folder inaccessible.
    * 203102 - URL typed into address bar lost after switching tabs; "Open in new tab" should prefill URI in address bar.
    * 222157 - View Source: Find and Save don't work.
    * 213250 - Autoscroll prevents middle clicking on links in XML (XHTML) documents.
    * 224416 - Tabs don't remember focused element.
    * 216170 - Send Page (as Link) omits query string
    * 98564 - caret overlaps the last character in textfield (if positioned after the last char).
    * 212366 - Make -moz-opacity apply to descendants as a group, as required by CSS3 opacity
    * 219705 - Linux: Blackdown Java crashes, saying "Internal error on browser end".
    * 102578 - Linux: Clicking wrongfully fires onmouseout (breaks some dhtml menus, css/edge menus)
    * 201209 - GTK2: -moz-opacity makes things invisible.

    ... and much more!
    You can also download a non-installer (.zip) build based on official installer build here and if you look around in the MozillaZine Firefox Builds Forum there's some Windows/Linux Firefox 0.8 builds optimized for AthlonXP/P4/P3/P2/whatever you have.

    --
    "You should never doubt what nobody is sure about." -- Willy Wonka
  180. Re:You mean like like George W. Bush Jr by Squiddl3 · · Score: 1

    Sierra Square
    Delta Square

  181. 2 things I'd like to see in Firebi...fox by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

    1. Each tab should have a close button (like Galeon) 2. Have a scroll thingy for easy font size changes (like Galeon). It's a nice browser otherwise.

  182. firefox icon scandal by tippergore · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has anybody noticed that the new icon for the file extensions that firefox takes over (like .html, .gif, etc) is basically a gigantic fox humping the earth?

    Awesome. I see a slogan somewhere in there.

  183. Next name suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest the 0.9/0.6 versions be named FoxyPox and DrumBox (browser and mail-client respectively).
    Not for any particular reason other than being possibly even more confusing than the current names. Thank you for listening. I'm very serious.

  184. Democracy by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'll take an educated guess, based on democratic principles, that the slogan in the image that gets the most hits may become the official slogan.

    Why not "The browser, reloaded"? That slogan would almost encourage mocking a defect in the browser. I've had to reload Slashdot several times when the incremental layout made the left column way too wide (b.m.o bug 217527).

    1. Re:Democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for the heads up. i thought that was a bug in my proxomitron script.

  185. Mozilla name-of-the-week club by LordKazan · · Score: 1

    Every week mozilla when get a new name!
    When they run out of english words they'll switch to vulcan, then klingon.


    [I like Mozilla]

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  186. Re:To mantain browser in memory... by Anthracks · · Score: 2, Informative

    This has absolutely no effect in Firefox to my knowledge, I'm pretty sure the -turbo option has been deprecated.

    --
    Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
  187. Think of it as a release code name like "Chicago" by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1


    Don't worry too much about the name, as the name actually is "Mozilla".

    Think of it as "Mozilla Next Generation Browser code-named [Phoenix|Firebird|FireFly]".

  188. looks like... by caino59 · · Score: 1

    mozilla.org has gone to a 'lite' version of their site in hopes to alleviate some of the bandwidth issues...it's still going slow as hell tho

  189. slashdotted by balster+neb · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Mozilla.org seems to be real slow now. Try downloading from the mirrors. Out of the mirrors, this one seems to be updated.

  190. Re:Firefox for systems with less RAM - NOT!!! by mawi · · Score: 0

    I am also confused by the memory footprint, it does seem large. How come this comment (see parent) got modded down to -1 ? Historically there have been many discussions about mozillas memory hogging, but I cannot seem to find a good explanation or even a comparison to other browsers. I like firebird but it does reserve alot of memory and it is not that fast on my machine, even IE seems faster (which is odd). Any suggestions to info on this? Thanks!

  191. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  192. Mythology... or Pokemon? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Speaking of Nintendo, I think it's clear that they've abandoned mythological references and are instead going with a Pokemon theme.

    Firebird -> Firefox

    I predict a similar dispute will erupt over the Thunderbird name, leading them to go with Thundermouse instead, solving all of their trademark problems. ...What? Why is everybody looking at me like that?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  193. Obligatory Futurama Quote by ted_nugent · · Score: 1

    Hermes: According to government records the only names not yet trademarked are Popplers and Zitsels.

    --

    Free the West Memphis Three!

  194. WWF by pne · · Score: 1

    And here I thought they were referring to the "World Wildlife Fund" which became the "World Wide Fund for Nature".

    --
    Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
  195. 100mbit Firefox server by aldoman · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.tekwar.net/FirefoxSetup-0.8.exe

  196. Get your latest mail dump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So that the mail component will still sound like the browser, ThunderBird is also changing its name, to ThunderBox

  197. Firebert! by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 1

    Sources inside Strongbadia suggest that they considered changing the name to Firebert ... but apparently, it's just not a good commando name.

    Cheers,
    IT

    --

    Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

  198. Mozilla.org is down as I write this by bonch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't access the list of mirrors. However, I just now clicked the torrent, and I'm downloading at 160kb/s!

    BitTorrent is a good thing.

  199. Firefox is codename for Russian MiG 29 or 31 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox is codename for the Russian fighter MiG 29
    or 31, can't remember which.

  200. but they haven't updated the profile name... by bmfs · · Score: 1

    the profile is still called phoenix in the application data directory (windows) and ~/.phoenix (linux/unix).

  201. don't forget the laserdisc game 'Firefox' by Atari by Matt+Ownby · · Score: 2, Informative

    Firefox!

    The large crowd of laserdisc arcade collectors will surely be confused over a browser named after this famous game :)

  202. So what name will it report to the OS? by edremy · · Score: 1
    I'm here running Firebird 0.7, but checking the Task Manager there's no process with that name. The image name is still phoenix.exe.

    Perhaps Firefox will finally report as Firebird?

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  203. Mmmm... Beer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brauzilla... mmmmmmmmmm.

  204. Doesn't a FireFox kinda look like a... by CritterNYC · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it just me? Or does a FireFox kinda look like a badger?

    Maybe they should have named it Mozilla Badger. They'd have an instant theme song.

    1. Re:Doesn't a FireFox kinda look like a... by CritterNYC · · Score: 1

      Here's the fixed link to a picture of a FireFox

    2. Re:Doesn't a FireFox kinda look like a... by bobmatnyc · · Score: 1

      The toolbar icon has an unfortunate resemblence to a fetus...

      --
      -- this sig beneath your current threshold
  205. Ishzilla, heh by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    Good luck, even the browser "with few dependencies" is a PITA to compile.

    I think the "compile your own lightweight browser on something other than Linux" thing is going to be mighty difficult until Mozilla Foundation makes an offical very-light-weight, browser-only derivative. The current SeaMonkey Full Blown Mozilla is a pig. FireFox isn't really that much better anymore. They need to trim a lot of fat or someone is going to need to make a standalone Konq/KHTML browser. The idea of recycling old Sun Ultra 1's or PII-350 PC's into web surfing stations will remain a (slow) pipedream.

    1. Re:Ishzilla, heh by Bazman · · Score: 1

      I can well believe it. What I really want is an Xt wrapper round the gecko rendering engine :) I don't want skins, I dont want sidebars. I just want something that looks a bit like xedit, but with web pages beautifully rendered, and a big smiling face on the central admin.

  206. settings still under pheonix folder by hypermegachi · · Score: 0

    i just find it odd how after so many name changes, settings are still stored under ~/.pheonix and under windows doc&set\user\appdata\pheonix

  207. Close, but... by Ieshan · · Score: 1

    Athena is a greek godess in her own right. Nike is not an alternative name, but rather a lesser known godess representing Victory personified.

    The ancient greek word 'Nike' simply means victory.

    While the two may be closely related (Athena may be depicted as holding a statue of Nike, for instance), and clearly, Athena is the godess of strategic warfare, she does not represent the same type of thing that Nike does.

    And, Nike could certainly sue Mozilla for naming a product "Mozilla Nike", as recognition of their brand clearly outweighs any potential confusion with an ancient diety, just as the Bush and Gates family could sue Mozilla if they named their new browser "Mozilla: The First Choice of both the Bush and the Gates Family", then argued that they meant shrubs and entryways.

    1. Re:Close, but... by advid · · Score: 1

      I always got the impression that Nike was an aspect of Athena. Thus the temple of Athena Nike by the Parthenon in Athens.

      --
      - "I'll probably get modded down for this."
  208. Any issues with upgrading from .7? by illegalien · · Score: 1

    Are there any issues when upgrading from .7? (I've backed up all my Firebird info, but just wanted to be sure before I install Firefox)

    1. Re:Any issues with upgrading from .7? by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      In OSX Panther my tabs no longer work. I can't seem to get them back. In Linux, I had the back & forward buttons missing even with the default theme. I backed up my bookmarks and removed the old .phoenix (Yes, I've been using it awhile) and it worked.

    2. Re:Any issues with upgrading from .7? by megamouse · · Score: 1

      Before upgrading you'll want to disable all of your extensions. Once upgraded to 0.8 I had a few UI issues, but they were remedied once I switched to the default theme -- Firefox (default).

      --
      apple nipple hungry
  209. Again? by greygent · · Score: 1

    When will the Firebird project change their name again? When they realize that Firefox was a crappy movie put out by a heartless corporation, and starring Clint Eastwood in one of his most forgetable roles?

    Why can't they just pick something simple and non-tacky for once?

  210. This is new technology ... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

    When a project is not just about developing yet another ; but a brand new technology in some field, it has to have an stable branch, and one, or many, development trees, the Linux kernel hacker has a nice way to name and separate those: there is only 1 product name, the X.odd.X versions are development, when they reach some version where they think the new product is relatively mature, it becomes the new stable; and a new development appears. Mozilla has been doing the same for years, only they haven't made their mind about what they want, so they are starting over with every release, they will at some point develop what they want and keep one name, and do all the development on it ... NOT

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  211. eMule link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For FirefoxSetup-0.8.exe
    ed2k://|file|FirefoxSetup-0. 8.exe|6500352|521C93B4 157BC6F76434771DA939807B|/

    For thunderbird-0.5-win32.zip
    ed2k://|file|thunderbir d-0.5-win32.zip|7895930|04F D0BF91A40F9B37C464204CAFCF6A5|/

  212. Someone's got to update the book of Mozilla now. by IllogicalStudent · · Score: 1

    And so at last the beast fell and the unbelievers rejoiced. But all was not lost, for from the ash rose a great bird. The bird gazed down upon the unbelievers and cast fire and thunder upon them. For the beast had been reborn with its strength renewed, and the followers of Mammon cowered in horror.

    from The Book of Mozilla, 7:15

    Umm, and then a great fox ate this bird and, uhh, gained its firey breath or something? Yah, that'll work. Oh yeah, and Mammon's more fearful than ever.

    Man, name changes are annoying.

    --
    But Maaa! Everyone else has a .sig !
  213. MORE MIRRORS! by spin2cool · · Score: 1

    As exepcted, the official site has been slashdotted - here's the complete list of secondary mirrors from the Mozilla site. Not all of them are current, but you should be able to find one to get you your fix.

    * ftp://ftp.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/pub/mozilla/ (Mozilla releases only)
    * http://www.zentek-international.com/mirrors/mozill a/ (Mozilla only)
    * ftp://ftp.cin.nihon-u.ac.jp/pub/net/www/mozilla
    * ftp://ring.aist.go.jp/pub/net/www/mozilla/
    * ftp://ring.exp.fujixerox.co.jp/pub/net/www/mozilla /
    * ftp://ring.so-net.ne.jp/pub/net/www/mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/Mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.lab.kdd.co.jp/Mozilla/
    * http://ftp.kaist.ac.kr/pub/mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.kaist.ac.kr/pub/mozilla/
    * rsync://ftp.kaist.ac.kr/mozilla
    * http://mymirror.asiaosc.org/mozilla/ (Mozilla releases only)
    * rsync://mymirror.asiaosc.org/mozilla/ (Mozilla releases only)
    * http://www.opensourcecommunity.ph/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://mirror.averse.net/pub/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * ftp://mirror.averse.net/pub/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * ftp://ftp2.sinica.edu.tw/pub3/www/mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.nctu.edu.tw/WWW/mozilla/ (out of date)
    * rsync://ftp.nctu.edu.tw/ftp/WWW/mozilla
    * ftp://ftp.belnet.be/packages/mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.uni-sofia.bg/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * ftp://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/mirror/mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.cvut.cz/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://ftp.cvut.cz/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://www.artfiles.org/mozilla.org/
    * ftp://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/ftp.mo zilla.org/pub/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * ftp://ftp.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/pub/www/mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.uni-bayreuth.de/pub/packages/netscape/mo zilla/
    * ftp://ftp.leo.org/pub/comp/general/infosys/www/bro wsers/mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.rhein-zeitung.de/mirrors/mozilla.org/ (Mozilla releases only)
    * ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/mozilla/ (Mozilla releases and nightlies only)
    * http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/mozilla/ (Mozilla releases and nightlies only)
    * ftp://ftp.rediris.es/mirror/mozilla/
    * http://ftp.rediris.es/mirror/mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.etsimo.uniovi.es/pub/mozilla/ (out of date)
    * http://www.etsimo.uniovi.es/pub/mozilla/ (out of date)
    * ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/ftp.mozilla.org/pub /
    * ftp://ftp.oleane.net/pub/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://ftp.oleane.net/pub/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * ftp://ftp.ntua.gr/pub/www/Mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://ftp.fsf.hu/Mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.fsf.hu/Mozilla/
    * http://mozilla.szentimre.hu/ (out of date)
    * ftp://ftp.EUnet.ie/mirrors/ftp.mozilla.org/pub/
    * ftp://ftp.uninett.no/pub/network/www/mozilla/
    * ftp://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/mozilla/
    * http://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/mozilla/
    * ftp://ftp.task.gda.pl/pub/mozilla/
    * http://mozilla.tsuren.net/mirror/
    * ftp://ftp.fredan.org/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://www.mozilla.sk/pub/ (Mozilla releases only)
    * ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.mozilla.org/pub/
    * ftp://mozilla.teleglobe.net/ftp.mozilla.org/pub/ (out of date)
    * ftp://mozilla.mirror.pacific.net.au/mozilla/
    * http://mozilla.mirror.pacific.net.au/
    * ftp://ftp.planetmirror.com.au/pub/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://public.planetmirror.com.au/pub/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://mozilla.fresh.co.il/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://mozilla.gnusoft.net/
    * ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/infosystems/WWW /clients/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/infosystems/WW W/clients/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/net/mozilla/ (not Mozilla Firebird)
    * ftp://sunsite.utk.edu/pub/netscape-source/
    * ftp://archive.progeny.com/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://archive.progeny.com/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * rsync://archive.progeny.com/mozilla/ (Mozilla only)
    * http://mirrors.xmission.com/mozilla/

  214. Firefox is a web design company. by Yogurt+Earl · · Score: 1

    checkout firefoxweb
    Does there name imply that the web sites they design are fully compaatible with Mozilla Firefox?
    Do they release the source of the web sites they design under an open source license?
    By the looks of there website I don't think I'd pay them to design mine.


    YogurtEarl

  215. You would think w/ Panther here now, the OSX version of Firefox "designed for OSX" would sport a brushed metal look ala Safari instead of the old pinstripe theme.

  216. Name NOT changed by The_Systech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know the one thing that bothers me about this name change?.. Why is it that two name changes later the profile directory is still created as ~/.phoenix. I mean I can understand the whole "backwards compatability" thing, but AFAIK it's always been recommended to wipe your profile and start over with a new milestone of phoenix/firebird/firefox anyway, and even barring that how hard would be to if ( dir_exists( ~/.firefox ) ) { // Use ~/.firefox } elseif ( dir_exists( ~/.phoenix) ) { // Migrate ~/.phoenix to ~/.firefox } else { // Create a new profile directory in ~/.firefox }

    --
    To err is human, but to really foul things up requires a computer
  217. So 1997 by malx · · Score: 1

    A new web browser beta, that we're all going to use immediately as our main browser.

    A new mail client beta, that we're all going to use immediately as our main browser.

    And both sites completely slashdotted, with some mirrors not yet updated.

    Let's party like it's 1997!

  218. Just add water Confusion by radoni · · Score: 1

    It was a mistake to change the name away from SeaMonkey. duh.

    Phoenix, Firebird, MozillaFirebird, now Firefox?

    name the damn binary anything, and stick with it, at least. i don't care what you call it. just keep the programatic nomenclature consistent.

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
  219. Incredibly Stupid Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox is an incredibly stupid and adolesecent sounding name. Haven't we learnt anything form Ogg Vorbis? A dumb name is a sure way to kill the future of your product. When you constantly change your name you make all of us who have been promoting your browser look like fools. Nobody cares about Firebird the database and nobody ever will.

  220. Re:With the way these guys get into name disputes. by TheTomcat · · Score: 2, Informative

    NSFW warning!

    S

  221. New Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like that story about one "John Shit" who changed his name to "Peter Shit".

  222. This is stupid. by pclminion · · Score: 0
    This just makes the team look like a bunch of unprofessional egotists. They've already had to change the name twice because they were stomping on someone else's toes. I'm sure they still haven't learned, and "FireFox" is going to turn out to be taken by someone else.

    I guess they figure, it's a Mozilla product, therefore they are more 31337 than anyone else and can just pull names out of a hat.

    Stupid, stupid stupid. Why not call it "Mozilla Streamline," since that's the point of the fucking thing anyway, and just get the stupid naming problems over and done with?

    Oh, and not to mention, referring my friends to use a browser which keeps changing its name every couple of months makes me look like a retard. I'm going to stop referring people to it.

    1. Re:This is stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      makes me look like a retard.
      You're acting like a retard, so why not look like one for consistency?

  223. Working Mirror 4 Firebird 8 by falltime · · Score: 1

    Here is a good mirror for Firebird 8

  224. How about Mike Rowe Fox by sebol · · Score: 1

    Maybe Microsoft will buy it

    --
    -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
  225. Good mirror for Firebird 8 by falltime · · Score: 1

    Here is a good mirror for Firebird 8 http://fthefrench.com/FirefoxSetup-0.8.zip

  226. Eh: Name Games, Version Games by Space_Soldier · · Score: 0

    Take a look at the history of Mozilla before 1.0. It is impossible to know which version is newer than the other. They had so many version styles: - alphabetical - numerical - alphanumerical - milestones Mozilla is the most confusing project ever, still the GUI needs some threading, too damn slow compared to something native like Opera 7.5.

  227. Well to stay consistent w/ Japanese monster movies by spineboy · · Score: 1
    Does anyone remember Godzillas little "son"?
    Godzuki?

    So I propose the new name for Firebird to be...


    Mozuki !!!!

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  228. New book of mozilla quote coming soon? by pridkett · · Score: 1
    This could mean that we're going to have a new book of Mozilla chapter coming out soon. The current passage is this:

    And so at last the beast fell and the unbelievers rejoiced. But all was not lost, for from the ash rose a great bird. The bird gazed down upon the unbelievers and cast fire and thunder upon them. For the beast had been reborn with its strength renewed, and the followers of Mammon cowered in horror.

    from The Book of Mozilla, 7:15

    However, now it appears that the fox ate the birds eggs or something like that. Unless of course this fox can fly, which is just silly.
    --
    My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
  229. Yiffy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, I like this name! Yiff! Yiff! Yiff!

    1. Re:Yiffy! by Dahan · · Score: 1

      It's certainly the only reason I downloaded it... fox==yiff. Oh, a firefox isn't a fox? Never mind then... *uninstalls*

  230. Re:OS X by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    This is fine most of the time, however both NeXTSTEP and GNUStep also include a Mail.app, so sometimes you need to specify `The OS X Mail.app'.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  231. Bugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is full of bugs. I would hold on to Firebird, before I *switch* to FireFox.

    I have been using it for 15 minutes, crashed once already, and I have found at least 5 problems with it.

  232. Dilution of the brand, this could be bad by robstarr · · Score: 1

    There are so many variants now I don't know what to choose! I'm not talking your everday techie either, I'm talking about everyday people who I believe should be using this great compliant browser. But it's not SO confusing! What can be done?

  233. Most of the users have no technical background. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Respectfully, you have given great reasons why technically oriented people should like the name. However, that's not the point. We would use Firebird FireFox browser no matter what it is called.

    Most of the prospective users have no technical background. The name must be appropriate to interest them.

  234. Thank you to the Mozilla Firefox Team. by Jemm · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to say a hearty Thank You to the wonderfull folks working to bring us Mozilla Fire*.

    You Rock.!!

  235. The name game by mysticgoat · · Score: 0

    I still think the better name would have been "Browser Without A NAme" (case is significant). That would acknowledge an important aspect of the Phoenix/Fire* history, but it would also certainly avoid any further name hassles.

    And it would support interesting conversations like this:

    [Alice] How did you find this info?

    [Bob] Well, first I googled on this keyword, and then I told Bwana where to go.

    --
    If you're just surfing the web, any newer browser will do. But if you want to maximize the efficiency and enjoyment of your surfing safaris, then go with Bwana.

  236. OK, so if the browser is "Firefox"... by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    ...what about the mail/news client? Without another "___bird" to go with, "Thunderbird" seems pretty random (and has the added negative of being associated with low-quality "wine"), so Mozilla is going to need a new identity framework.

    Continuing the "___fox" pattern is something of a dead end, without many good choices. But "Fire___" is a promising model. Bugzilla could become "Firebug". "Firefly" would be an obvious option for the mail client, maintaining the "lightweight" metaphor (and delighting fans of the TV show, I'm sure). Other possible trademarks would be "Fireplug" "Firelight" "Firetruck" "Fireproof" "Firealarm" "Firedrill" "Firebomb" "Fireplace" "Firehose" "Firesale" "Firestarter" "Fireman" "Firewalker" "Firewall" "FireEscape" "Firearm" "Fireball" "Firestorm" "Firecracker" "Firebrand" "Fireworks". Oops, the last one's taken by another software package, but "Fire___" is still a fairly rich pool to draw from. It also fits well with good ol' Mozilla, usually depicted as a fire-breathing lizard, giving it some continuity with past branding.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:OK, so if the browser is "Firefox"... by wadeb · · Score: 1

      Hello, I think you might be missing out on the car references, and the speed implications.

      Regards,
      Wade

    2. Re:OK, so if the browser is "Firefox"... by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 1
      I think you might be missing out on the car references, and the speed implications.

      When I think of Firefox, "speed" isn't the first thing to come to mind.

      Firebird and Thunderbird were a nice "fast car" pair, but if there's a Firefox car out there, I'd never heard of it, suggesting that the reference a bit pointless in terms of branding. Going with a "fire___" theme from here on out seems like a good idea to me.

  237. If I was being really cruel.... by sepluv · · Score: 1
    I'd say the reason that the developers of tbfkaMFtwgtbkaM(B)twfkaM(T)FiUAs&ctwfkfafhaFBbotFD BpctwfkaFbPTIttstwfkaP have not given the 0.8 release a special codename on the roadmap is because they figure those codenames seem to be redundant as they probably change the browsers name every 0.x release anyway.

    Seriously though, I think this looks like the final name and I like it.

    --
    Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
    [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  238. IM by the+web · · Score: 1

    That just opens the door for microsoft to compete using names like Internet Moth-splorer.

    They already use a butterfly.

    --
    __
    Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
    1. Re:IM by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Maybe we could name the mail client "Rodan-zilla"?

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  239. Debian packages? by Lord+of+the+Fries · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know a repository one can point at to get regular up to date debian packages of Firebird, now named Firefox?

    --
    One man's pink plane is another man's blue plane.
  240. The logo...is it just me? by apoplectic · · Score: 1

    Or does the icon residing on the desktop look something like a blue bowling ball taking out a poor little fox?

  241. Name Suggestion by EqualSlash · · Score: 1

    What's the confusion with naming?
    Better name it 'eyeE' so that it sounds like something popular.

  242. Broken under Mac OS 10.2 by andfarm · · Score: 1

    Firefox doesn't seem to run under Mac OS 10.2:

    Command: firefox-bin
    PID: 811

    Exception: EXC_BREAKPOINT (0x0006)
    Code[0]: 0x00000001Code[1]: 0x8fe01220

    Thread 0 Crashed:
    #0 0x8fe01220 in halt
    #1 0x8fe10654 in link_in_need_modules
    #2 0x8fe129c4 in _dyld_bind_fully_image_containing_address
    #3 0x900052b4 in _dyld_bind_fully_image_containing_address
    #4 0x9000520c in sigaction__
    #5 0x005ac8c0 in nsProfileLock::LockWithSymlink(nsACString const&)
    #6 0x005acc24 in nsProfileLock::Lock(nsILocalFile*)
    #7 0x005a0cb0 in nsProfile::SetCurrentProfile(unsigned short const*)
    #8 0x0059e5c8 in nsProfile::LoadDefaultProfileDir(nsCString&, int)
    #9 0x0059d884 in nsProfile::StartupWithArgs(nsICmdLineService*, int)
    #10 0x00682ca0 in nsAppShellService::DoProfileStartup(nsICmdLineServ ice*, int)
    #11 0x008491a8 in InitializeProfileService(nsICmdLineService*)
    #12 0x00849cec in main1(int, char**, nsISupports*, nsXREAppData const&)
    #13 0x0084a5e0 in xre_main(int, char**, nsXREAppData const&)
    #14 0x00009850 in main
    #15 0x000094e4 in _start (crt.c:267)
    #16 0x00009358 in start

    Thread 1:
    #0 0x9002568c in select
    #1 0x0151f77c in poll
    #2 0x0151bfc8 in _pr_poll_with_poll
    #3 0x000bde98 in nsSocketTransportService::Run()
    #4 0x0504614c in nsThread::Main(void*)
    #5 0x0151d410 in _pt_root
    #6 0x90020c28 in _pthread_body

    PPC Thread State:
    srr0: 0x8fe01220 srr1: 0x0002f030 vrsave: 0x00000000
    xer: 0x20000000 lr: 0x8fe09bd8 ctr: 0x8fe293ac mq: 0x00000000
    r0: 0x00000004 r1: 0xbfffeb10 r2: 0x8fe0b794 r3: 0x00000171
    r4: 0x00000000 r5: 0x00000171 r6: 0x0000000a r7: 0x2e64796c
    r8: 0x2f6c6962 r9: 0x00000000 r10: 0x8fe4850c r11: 0x0000001a
    r12: 0x8fe71b98 r13: 0x009f0000 r14: 0xbffff570 r15: 0x009f0000
    r16: 0xbffffd90 r17: 0xbffff400 r18: 0x009e0000 r19: 0xbffff670
    r20: 0x00000000 r21: 0x00000000 r22: 0xbffff410 r23: 0x7f000001
    r24: 0xbfffed10 r25: 0x010864d0 r26: 0x00000011 r27: 0x005ac424
    r28: 0x8fe4841c r29: 0x8fe484ec r30: 0x8fe484ec r31: 0x8fe0995c

    Looks like some sort of library problem.

    --

    TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

  243. Re:Error launching browser window: no XBL binding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks. It finally works. :)
    What the hack is XBL?

  244. Prior Art (if I can find it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI, I wrote a game back in the 70s for the Pet computer that was called firefox..I wonder if I still have a print out of the source still lying around.

  245. 80's Saturday Morning Cartoon reference ahead by sadangel · · Score: 1

    netscape -> mozilla -> phoenix -> firebird -> firefox
    And people say open source software is too confusing to use.
    I was hoping they might call it Firecat for which they might have renamed the email client to match and then it would have been Thundercat.

  246. Problems for Moz users by Sanga · · Score: 1

    (running under XP)

    1) Shuts down your Moz (even though it asks to kill Firefox instances only -- thunderbird instance was spared)
    2) Has the "additional browsing enhancements" choice (under custom install) greyed out
    3) usurped my default profile and would not let go even after uninstall (Moz would complain that the profile is under use)
    4) set itself up as the default browser even though I clicked "No". At least Moz asked me to confirm it as the default when I was able to start it up again.

    That said, I have had good experiences with Firebird/Phoenix before and will certainly use it on a non-Moz machine.

  247. Wow I love it by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    Suzaku will inmediatly become the browser of choice of the otaku (or japanese animation fanatic if you dislike the term) and all the pheonix thing will keep consistent, but the new firefox logo is really cool (wasn't it made by weboso? best icons ever!) But seriously why change the name? Who complained first or what?

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  248. dinosaur to phoenix to panda to ... ? by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

    I got it off of ftp.mozilla.org, interestingly enough. Guess the slashdotting is starting to die down.

    I wish they hadn't changed the name, much like many of the other posters here. They went from dinosaur (cool!) to a phoenix (leet!) to a panda... ? Why not a dragon? Imagine using a browser called Firewyrm!

    What's next, 0.9 to be called Badger, and the default homepage to be BadgerBadgerBadger.com?

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  249. Never underestimate the general public! by djkitsch · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A person should not EXPECT a search engine to magically know what they are looking for.
    You say that, but then again the vast majority of Web users (and I include home users here) think that either AOL or Yahoo! is the Internet.
    We might know the difference, but there are enough people who don't to make a difference.
    --
    sig:- (wit >= sarcasm)
    1. Re:Never underestimate the general public! by catbutt · · Score: 1

      You say that, but then again the vast majority of Web users (and I include home users here) think that either AOL or Yahoo! is the Internet.

      And exactly why are they doing a search for Firebird the database?

  250. Bleh. Stupid default. by Snowspinner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why the hell did they default Firefox to dump downloads on the desktop, instead of defaulting it to letting you pick a directory?

    Other than that, shiny, but wow... what a stupid default.

  251. Re:With the way these guys get into name disputes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's still Lugia (legendary bird of the sea) to contend with.

    Any ideas?

  252. My review of Mozilla Firefox by NXprime · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mozilla Firefox 0.8 Review

    Some of the best things I like about Mozilla Firefox 0.8:

    1. Two words - Bookmark Management

    Wow! I was able to modify/delete/rename/move 450 bookmarks in a few short hours. It was a combination of being able to edit bookmarks off the menu bar easily and opening a whole folder of websites in seconds. It makes Internet Explorer's 'Organize Favorites' look like a sick joke. Actually it is and I consider it one of the very weak things about Internet Explorer (lets call it IE for short). I simply cannot check all 450 bookmarks to see if the website still exists while using IE. With Mozilla Firefox, it only took like a half hour to get that part done. Tabbed browsing works. Big time. I used to use Tabbrowser Extensions to add some additional tweaks but found it hindered things more than helped. I'll mention what those are in my what I dislike about Mozilla Firefox section.

    2. It doesn't crash

    Oh Mozilla Firefox can still crash if there's bad code written for a web page, make no mistake about that. Still, it's very very rare and it's so much more stable than any Mozilla 1.x Application Suite release. Perhaps its because I have more confidence in Mozilla Firefox than with the Mozilla Application Suite (call it App. Suite for short), due to some previously bad experiences doing real web development with Composer with the 1.5 release. However, this whole crash issue is more of a release-by-release kind of thing. It's my hope that the Mozilla development team continues to focus on making Mozilla Firefox as crash proof as possible. Keep up the good work!

    3. Mozilla Firefox loads up fast

    It is way faster than the App. Suite due to it not preloading several applications I don't use at all. I have no confidence in using Mozilla Mail, nor do I use an email account with POP access. I've tried Composer and it crashed on a regular basis that it was a totally useless program. I also have no clue on how to use ChatZilla, and I keep my small address book in a text file. So my main focus has always been on how well the Mozilla web browser was. Now with Mozilla Firefox I have a web browser that loads almost as fast as IE and to me it's important that it loads fast because it greatly hindered me from switching over for good.

    4. Properly displayed webpages

    There's always going to be one minor annoyance per website since it was built with IE in mind, but all in all, Mozilla developer team finally nailed it. It's good enough for most webpages and when I can't view a webpage properly in Mozilla Firefox , I switch over to IE quickly. There's an extension called 'IE View' that adds a right-click menu option that'll open IE for whatever webpage you are currently on at the moment. Very handy feature and its something I use every now and then. Certain webpages that just don't work well include any Microsoft/MSN website, pages like this http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime .php?id=1825 (try to click on the details link in the middle where they rate the anime, note the website seems down at the moment). MBNA payment page won't work anymore.. ect. Little things like this.

    5. Options dialogue box

    This was one of the things I always thought were desperately needed for a Mozilla web browser. The Application Suite way only shows a directory name (which is sometimes truncated), and you have to double click to see more directories underneath it in order to get to the specific preferences you wanted to change. First of all, you can't at a quick glance get to the section you want right away. There needed to be a visual aid to help guide you to the section you wanted. I always thought the most *ideal* way was a combination of icons and a word or two to describe the general section of preferences. I couldn't believe what I was seeing with the first release of Mozilla Firefox that I tested. Icons plus a short word or two that's not truncated plus I didn't need to do anymo

    1. Re:My review of Mozilla Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >4. Unneeded warning messages

      In about:config look up

      browser.xul.error_pages.enabled

      Set it to true and you'll get error pages instead of error message boxes. That was annoying to me too.

      I always hated that when a page failed, the reload button didn't try and reload the failed page. But with the error pages there is a link to retry the webpage.

    2. Re:My review of Mozilla Firefox by jsebrech · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With regards to your dislikes:

      5. Some plug-ins/extensions need to be added to the Mozilla Firefox setup file

      Bundled extensions is planned for the next release (0.9), as demonstrated in the firefox roadmap.

      7. Download manager clutter

      In options, go to "Privacy", then "Download manager history". You can set it to erase download entries on completion, which is the setting I prefer.

      8. Exporting bookmarks problems

      Actually, replacing & with & is the correct behaviour, since html 4 does not allow & in url's. Firefox stores its bookmarks as html, so I expect that this doesn't happen on export, but on import. If you link to a url containing an ampersand, you need to escape it, always. Yes, it's sort of annoying, but I expect there are good technical reasons (which I'm too lazy to look up). Besides, every browser out there opens url's with & in them correctly. What exactly is the problem?

      9. Default sorting of bookmarks.

      Strange, it sorts them the way you want it in my install. Don't understand why you're seeing this.

      10. Auto-update

      It's called smartupdate, and it's planned for firefox 0.9. See the roadmap again.

      11. Uninstall plug-ins/extensions

      Firefox 0.9. Yeah, I know, they're keeping all the cool stuff for the next version. But believe me, they know.

      12. Autoscroll problem.

      This is only a problem for you, due to your dependancy on autoscroll. I use a scrollwheel, and disable autoscroll. This is actually a fixed bug. In previous versions middleclicking a link would sometimes activate autoscroll instead of opening the link. Firefox doesn't do that anymore. I believe the current behaviour is the correct behaviour, since it doesn't neuter the middle mouse button's ability to open new webpages.

      2. Major issue with the Flash Click to view extension

      This is annoying indeed, but it is predictable. Any other implementation would either require micromanagement or trigger flash displaying when you don't want it. And besides, anyone using flash for website navigation is a callous retard and deserves to have their site break in real browsers. (To anyone doubting this: think about what happens when a blind person tries to visit a website that depends on flash for navigation.)

      The flash blocking code has been updated by the way, but it hasn't trickled back to the extension. See jesse rudderman's xbl flash binding page.

    3. Re:My review of Mozilla Firefox by jacobito · · Score: 2, Informative
      And after you've set browser.xul.error_pages.enabled to "true," you should install the Show Failed URL extension so that the URL for the failed page will show in the address bar.

      I really do wish this behavior would become default behavior soon, and I also wish that error page would get a makeover. This seems like a pretty big usability issue to me; I'm not sure why it hasn't received much attention from the developers.

      That said, I'm very happy with the 0.8 release!

    4. Re:My review of Mozilla Firefox by NXprime · · Score: 1

      1. So specifically Java, Flash, Shockwave player, real one player plug-in, quicktime plug-in will be in the bundle? Is there a bug tracker for this feature?

      2. Thanks for the tip for the Download manager.

      3. Well the bookmark name issue goes like this. An inport and export of the file should stay the same.

      Lets say you export to IE & then export that to Mozilla & then export back to IE &

      get my drift? I don't care if it's a standard it's dataloss to me and messes up my bookmark names. *shrug*

      4. some url's will be on top the folders in IE Favorites list. All URL's should go below the folders. some folders are spread out between bookmarks. By default it needs to go like this
      folder1
      folder2
      folder3
      URL1
      URL2 .... ect.

      This is the way it's shown in IE but not in Mozilla. It's difficult to descibe the issue if you don't have a lot of bookmarks but it happens to me on a constant basis.

      5. For my autoscoll problem, try this link buddy. :)
      http://www.shacknews.com/screens.x/hd2/Hidden+ &+Da ngerous+2/2/thumbs/1560Central_Eur_Tommy_Gun.jpg

      So you're telling me that you can use your scrollwheel to move horizontally and diagonally? Wow, that's some great scrollwheel you got. Seriously, I'm right on this complaint and I guess I should be asking someone to make a quick extension for this or has someone already done it?

      Anyhoo, thanks for the response! I just wish I could send you a private message instead of posting here. :/

    5. Re:My review of Mozilla Firefox by jesser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is annoying indeed, but it is predictable. Any other implementation would either require micromanagement or trigger flash displaying when you don't want it.

      Not really. I could make it so shift+clicking a placeholder acts like clicking all of the placeholders on the page.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    6. Re:My review of Mozilla Firefox by BZ · · Score: 1

      > And after you've set browser.xul.error_pages.enabled to "true,"

      Which you really shouldn't do. If you _do_ set it, don't file bugs about it. It's broken. We know. That's why it's a debug-only preference.

  253. You're actually right by jeti · · Score: 4, Informative

    AFAIK it's still planned to name version 1.0 of Firefox "Mozilla Browser". Thunderbird will become "Mozilla Mail".

    1. Re:You're actually right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that was the old plan, back before the bigwigs suddenly discovered that there's a huge amount of people who prefer Mozilla itself, thus ditching the plans to replace Mozilla with the birds.
      Firefox is _the_ name for this browser, the main brand that really, really is going to stay this time. Honest.

    2. Re:You're actually right by niker · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the Firefox brand name FAQ, concerning their current name:

      Will this name be permanent?

      We sure hope so. We've learned a lot about choosing names in the past year (more than we would have liked to). We have been very careful in researching the name to ensure that we will not have any problems down the road. We have begun the process of registering our new trademark with the US Patent and Trademark office.

      I suppose they changed their minds

      --
      Moderators: Don't agree? pray tell why.
  254. New Mozilla Project? by ReadParse · · Score: 1

    I think Mozilla should release they project-naming software as a separate open source project. We could perhaps eliminate some of the more obvious bugs that way.... like the one that always picks a name that is probably taken by something else the first time around, the the other bug that changes most new projects' names before they have a chance to really get adopted.

    RP

  255. Settings wipeout? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    Anyone else have problems where installing FireFox0.8 wiped out their Mozilla SeaMonkey settings?

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    1. Re:Settings wipeout? by falsification · · Score: 1

      Apparently yes. See bug 225500 at bugzilla dot mozilla dot org.

  256. Enough about the name already.. by Agent_Number_4 · · Score: 1

    The best part of this entire operation is that it is starting to be a viable alternative to IE. If my job *1000 employees* is willing to put this on the desktop for workers to use; everybody else - ie. the rest of the world will hear about the goodness that is Firebird. Just my two cents.

  257. What happened to unique naming? by ReadParse · · Score: 1

    Remember how we got used to strange an obviously-new product and company names because of the domain name craze? Yeah, it was kind of stupid, but it seems to me it was a little less stupid than Mozilla projects having to change their name all the time. Firebird? Come on. Why not just come up with something very obscure that we're pretty doggone sure is not in use.

    Like Netscape. Oh wait, that wasn't fair (get it? "not in use"). Ahem... But you know what I mean. "Mozilla" itself is a good example. At the time Netscape came up with that word, they had no doubt whatsoever that it wasn't being used by anybody, because they created the word themselves.

    One could argue that it's harder to get "mindshare" (sorry for the flashback to 1999) with a very obscure name, but it seems to me that it's better to have to go through that process once than take the time to explain why your whole project had to change it's name, and never mind all the code references to the old name. I still have quite a few Chimera references left over on my disk that Camino uses.

    RP

  258. Sounds like a job for slashdot by GussT · · Score: 1

    Why not use the power of slashdot to create a new thread dedicated to coming up with the best name for the firefox browser? Certainly slashdotters will come up with something brilliant, yet not previously adopted.

  259. Firefox by kotj.mf · · Score: 1
    In the intereset of thematic unity, and also because it would just fucking kick ass, I humbly submit that they change the name of Thunderbird to Thundercat .

    Then again, apparently some morons would try to send emails on their collectible toys from the 80's.

    --
    hang brain.
  260. Support site down by samael · · Score: 1

    Sadly the site that hosts all of the extensions is down. Which means I now have FireFox, but none of my extensions and can't browse 'properly' until it stops being slashdotted.

    Nice

  261. Enough about the name change.... by jsebrech · · Score: 1

    Apart from the name change firefox 0.8 is a really excellent browser. I've been using it all day now, and am posting this comment from it. It's faster than 0.7 (about 6% in pageload, but I've noticed it's faster at loading multiple sites in parallel too). Almost all of the bugs that irked me have been fixed, like the bug where what you typed in the url bar was erased if you switched tabs (making it hard to copy/paste url's over from one site into the next when they're cut into pieces due to lame space-inserting comment engines *hint* *hint*). The download manager is silky smooth (I love the little notification that pops up on download completion), with good integration with extension installation. Extension installation finally "feels" right, and no longer a crude hack. Now they just need to add extension uninstallation. I also really like that they include the dom inspector in the installer now (just choose custom install). That I had to install that separately annoyed me greatly.

    Frankly, I'm running out of things to criticize it for. It's becoming very close to the perfect browser for me. The only things I want are extension uninstallation and smaller runtime memory use (just having this page open is using 38 megs of ram, which seems excessive).

  262. The question is have they checked with FOX... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is have they checked with FOX...

    being in the LA area, I know how much FOX likes to "defend" its "IP"....

    Fox News
    Fox Network
    Fox Sport

  263. Release notes? by thedillybar · · Score: 1

    Where are the release notes for Firefox 0.8 hiding?

    1. Re:Release notes? by falsification · · Score: 1
  264. hilarious by pangian · · Score: 1

    After several attempts using Firebird 0.7, I couldn't download the Windows installer.

    With IE it worked on the first try.

  265. I use firebird every now and then... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1
    ...but I still think galeon is the better browser.

    reasons:
    • faster, faster, faster (no xul, even LOTS of tabs don't slow it down as much as fb)
    • better bookmark handling (not perfect but better)
    • smarter popup-handling, generally more smartness

    Maybe this gets modded flaimbait but I'd like to read others opinions.
  266. Software names don't matter by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1

    Frankly, names for software don't matter. Look at some successful ones. What the fuck is an ICQ? I seek you, I know, but it's stupid. What the fuck is a Kazaa? An Edonkey 2000? A Linux? GNU is fucking unpronouncable so anything with GNU in the title is out.

    Even the evil empire isn't immune from bad software naming choices. .NET was a branding nightmare, as evidenced by the switch from "Windows .NET Server" to "Windows Server 2003." Which by the way, switches around the year and the product: "Windows 2000 Server" is followed by "Windows Server 2003." And don't forget Microsoft's completely fucking random method of using version numbers, letters, or years for products: Windows 3.1 -> 95 -> 98 -> 98SE -> ME, and NT 3.5 -> 4.0 -> 2000 -> XP -> 2003. Any bets on what the next desktop OS "Longhorn" will be named? Could be Windows 2005, Windows XPSE.NET, Windows 6.0 Professional, hell, they're even considering Windows RG. My bet is on Windows FX though.

    Come on though, at least FireFox is pronouncable. Unlike such winners as SUSE, Linux (I know YOU know how to pronounce it but chances are your mother doesn't), Kazaa, and EVERY FUCKING KDE APP. What happens when you put a fucking K in front of everything's name? You get a koffice, and a kbrowser, and a kmicrowave, and a kshutthefuckup.

    1. Re:Software names don't matter by janeil · · Score: 1

      gnu - pronounced "new" or "nu" with a straight line over the u. See? Not so bad after all. Hearty agreement on the KDE-kprograms, but at least you know which of the dozens of menu items on a default kde desktop probably aren't worth trying out.

    2. Re:Software names don't matter by HybridJeff · · Score: 1

      or just read it as G.N.U. since its an abbreviation anyways Whats evreyones problem with saying letters?

    3. Re:Software names don't matter by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      It's pronounced "ga-new", actually.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    4. Re:Software names don't matter by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 1

      I think we're all jaded by unpronouncable acronyms since Berners-Lee picked the only three letters that take nine syllables to pronounce: W-W-W.

      Also, self-referential acronyms fucking blow.

    5. Re:Software names don't matter by Blimey85 · · Score: 1

      ICQ comes from ham radio... that's a common call using morse code that basically means "anyone wanna chat?". It's much easier to tap out three letters than a whole sentance... especially when you are first trying to make contact. Your signal may be weak or whatever, so it keeps things simple until you make contact, then you get down and dirty and start tapping at fifty or sixty words a minute or whatever. So ICQ makes sense, but the others you offer as examples are pretty dumb, and I agree with the rest of what you say. :)

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    6. Re:Software names don't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are the knights who say ... GNU!

      No, no ... GNI! GNI!

  267. Re:OS X by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

    Among the target audience you just say "check your mail, me send you the .psd". ;)

  268. Shucks, they ruined it by MimsyBoro · · Score: 1

    "A Windows Installer" -- I loved the fact that it was just one big happy zip file!

    --
    God made the natural numbers; all else is the work of man - Kronecker
  269. Funny, from the news source by McLoud · · Score: 1
    --
    sign(c14n(envelop(this)), x509)
  270. Multiple Slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Theme Site for Firefox

    The Extension Site for Firefox

    Extensions on Mozdev

    Forums for mozilla

    Surprizingly the red panda site (Firefox) isn't down yet.

  271. Chimera was an awful name, Minotaur too. by phuller10 · · Score: 1

    If i recall Chimera aren't pleasent things and there always used to suggest pestilence etc in literature. Now that I think of it Minotaur isn't so hot either. He spent all his time trapped in a maze. Do you really want that connotation with a software product?

  272. Can I dump the google search in Firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Firebird 0.6 has an in-page search in the upper right corner. But now they say it's a google search. I don't want google in my toolbar. Is there any way to get rid of it? I can't find any documentation about it.

    Thanks.

    1. Re:Can I dump the google search in Firefox? by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      Right click on the toolbar, hit customize, and drag the google box into the window that popped up.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  273. With all of these name changes... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    I think that I'm just going to have to start referring to it as the browser-formerly-known-as-Firebird. Hey it worked for Prince... wait he is called Prince this week isn't he?

  274. Settings by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    OK, I downloaded 0.8 (Win32), and installed it.

    It trashed my SeaMonkey 1.6 settings. Anyone else see this behavior?

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  275. what will 0.9 be named? lets have a vote by Splork · · Score: 0

    Flamingrabbit

    Furryfox

    Flyingsquirrel

    Fark

    Feenicks

  276. Re:don't forget the laserdisc game 'Firefox' by At by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you missed #4 in the grandparent's list?

  277. What about the mail client? by rocketfairy · · Score: 1

    I'd be much happier using an email client named Thundercat ...

  278. Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, what name change is next? Fire "K-meleon"? Oh wait, that one's taken too...

  279. texturizer.net by Phil1 · · Score: 1

    I've had problems accessing texturizer.net for weeks - doesn't look like the problems are related to the recent release of Firefox.

    --
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
  280. fuck branding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know, the whole GPL world is where I go to escape the garbage I have to deal with everywhere else.

    What I love about the open-source world is that you get something that's not crammed down your throat, does what it says without cheating or spying, and functioning better than CommercialCutiePieApp(tm) is often its raison d'etre.

    Word of mouth made all this happen so far - why do some people still measure open source success by how well it imitates crappy proprietary commercial shit?

    I don't really care what or how many times mozilla changes its name. I'm going to hear about it from the community, I'm going to download it and use it if it's better than the version I have. I don't care if Theodore Asshole III thinks it looks close enough to a TV commercial he saw on his yacht to give it a try.

  281. Why don't they name it by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Faxbot?

    (Points to anyone who gets the reference; but trust me, Dennis Miller would go "whatever" and beat feet rather than admit he's clueless on this one.)

  282. remembering Phoenix by Erratio · · Score: 1

    I had actually forgotten about Phoenix (probably because it was one of the heaviest lightweight browsers ever), but it still seemed familiar. Upon inspection, it turns out that there's still code in Firefox (or at least Firebird) since that's the directory name it creates in your home directory. Hope they remember to clean that up.

    --
    I don't try to be right, I just try to make people think
  283. Error launching browser window: no XBL binding ... by PJ+Kix · · Score: 1

    Maybe I just need to restart but, I just downloaded and installed the windows installer and i get the following error when trying to launch FireFox.
    ---
    Error launching browser window: no XBL binding for browser
    ---
    anyone else have this problem or have suggestions?

  284. Pyrobird by g-doo · · Score: 1

    I know...how about pyrobird? Same meaning, different prefix.

  285. mozilla version? by rawshark · · Score: 1

    Question:

    Is Firefox 0.8 based on Mozilla 1.6 or 1.4?

    Thanks!

    1. Re:mozilla version? by JonathanF · · Score: 1

      I would say "neither." Firebird/Firefox uses code ahead of the last official Mozilla build, so the most accurate description would be that you're using Mozilla 1.7a (in a sense) if you're using Firefox.

    2. Re:mozilla version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040206 Firefox/0.8

  286. Re:With the way these guys get into name disputes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Falco is better. They should change it back to Firebird, or whatever Falco's version of the move is called.

  287. Mozilla by Osmosis_Garett · · Score: 1

    I dont know what the hype is for Mozilla/Firebird/Firefox/Netscape. I gave this browser a month to win me over, and aside from tabbed browsing and being able to actually save tabbed window layouts, I hated how it couldnt manage to actually become a default browser without me changing file associations myself... it was prone to crashing (yes its beta, I know), used a larger memory footprint on average (because I opened many more 'tabs' than I would normally open windows), has a messy bookmark system, and a longer startup time than IE. I am now currently giving opera the same chance, and although I still prefer IE in general, Opera is MUCH better than Firebird.

    1. Re:Mozilla by falsification · · Score: 1

      In the Mozilla Application Suite, you can associate file types with Mozilla under Edit | Preferences | Advanced | System.

  288. Re:Firefox for systems with less RAM - NOT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is XUL. Imagine having to interpret javascript everytime you interact with a GUI object. That's what it does. All of this overhead slows the computer down. In turn it eats up memory and CPU. IE's faster because its GUI is compiled. There's no background interpreter having to chug out calculations when you click on a widget.

  289. Re:Error launching browser window: no XBL binding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You MIGHT not have to go to such lengths. IF you have tabbrowser extensions, disable that specific extension in Firebird, then fire up Firefox and see if it works. If it does, you can reinstall the extension and it should work. I did have some funkiness on the second start, but killed the app in process mangler and restarted it and everything seems to be the same as I had it in Firebird.

  290. but why firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can kinda understand why they would change the name but couldn't they come up with something better?

  291. Re:OS X by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1

    for a while I was using both mail and Mail.app. Was funny trying to explain the distinction between the two.

  292. Re:Error launching browser window: no XBL binding by Tukz · · Score: 0

    Because you forgot to disable your plugins before upgrading to FireFox.

    It's mentioned in the FireFox install FAQ

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
  293. Re:what will 0.9 be named? lets have a vote by Tukz · · Score: 0

    If you had read the announcement, you'd know this is the final name.

    Firebird was a project code name, and Firefox is now branded as the offical name.

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
  294. Minimo by AT · · Score: 1

    There was a project to make a low resources mozilla called minimo. There is a webpage here, but I'm not sure how active the project is now.

  295. I say. by readpunk · · Score: 1

    They should just rename the newly renamed Firefox to: Moz' Bizzy and Thunderbird to: Moz' Mizzy.

    Problem solved.

    --

    ./revolution
  296. Not good enough. by lostchicken · · Score: 1

    It scares me to see that Firefox is going to replace Seamonkey when Firefox is not feature complete, and it seems to me that they aren't really making an effort to include everything that you could change on Mozilla in the name of "simplicity". Damnit, I don't like autocomplete. I don't want anything popping up, changing while I'm typing. It distracts me, and it's irritating. I know what I want to type, and I'll type it. But, to get rid of it, I have to go hack it away by removing the chrome piece that runs it. (it's in a JAR file somewhere. it's a really huge pain)

    Firebird has the feel of a vendor product, not a flexible open source one. If it's going to be good, I should be able to turn off every feature that you don't absolutely need to browse a web page.

    --
    -twb
    1. Re:Not good enough. by falsification · · Score: 1

      You will be relieved to learn that it was recently decided that Firebird/Firefox will NOT replace the Mozilla Application Suite. Rather, they will be developed concurrently.

    2. Re:Not good enough. by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      You are my hero. This is some of the best news I have heard in a long, long time. Open source is about choice, and I'm so sick of hearing people say that "everyone thinks the monolithic suite is bad". I happen to like it.

      --
      -twb
  297. Moving up the Food Chain by girish · · Score: 1

    Atleast they are moving up the food chain..
    firebird
    firefox
    firelion?

    1. Re:Moving up the Food Chain by Jonavin · · Score: 1

      So what's next? Fireman?

  298. Err, what is *not* opaque about those? by timothy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Since none of these names are opaque (so I can ignore your explanations in parentheses), I'll guess what each one does:

    Powerpoint -- a powerful hand-shaped icon, for when quadruple clicking isn't enough

    Access - allows one to make spy-movie-style effortless break-ins to computers, buildings, locked safes ... anything, really.

    Outlook - provides an 8-ball style simple fortune telling device.
    .
    Visual Studio - nifty painting tool

    And though you didn't mention it, Word -- a dictionary application with a limited vocabulary. Watch for the sequel, coming soon, called "Words."

    Also, Excel, the application that's really, really good at whatever it is that it happens to do.

    My point is (and I do have one) that these program names are fine and dandy, catchy even, but in no way are the programs' functions anything more than hinted at by the name. If you *know* that Access refers to *database* Access, then great, Access may then seem awfully intuitive. If you don't already know that, "access" is a pretty ambiguous term. Access would also be a great name for a financial records application, or a password generator, or a password-keyring type application, or a tool for analyzing computer security. Likewise Word ... it's a cool name for a word processor, but in fact still pretty ambiguous. If it wasn't a word processor, maybe it would be a Bible study tool ("In the beginning was the Word"), or a scrabble player's lookup tool, or a rhyming dictionary, etc etc.

    On the other hand, "Internet Explorer" and "Windows Media Player" (there is something called that, right?) seem clearer to me, even if not perfect. ("OK honey, I'm going to play some media now" would be a strange sentence, because the word "play" doesn't act cleanly on "media" ... )

    On the other, other hand ... "BackOffice" is IMO a pretty good name for that suite. Not perfect, just good.

    My thought: pretty much all names suck -- either they're hopelessly and boringly descriptive, or not descriptive enough -- unless they catch on, in which case people may even think of them as being intuitive :) (One frequently dragged-out fact: I liked "WriteNow" as a word processor, and as a name for a word processor.)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  299. For fuck sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they just fix the existing bugs in Mozilla instead of working on 3 browsers at once?

    here's a clue: go into bugzilla and start fixing the bugs over 4yrs old.

  300. Serious Bugs in Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, i've mostly gone back to IE.

    1. No scroll arrows/buttons anymore!?
    2. where did the Forward and Back buttons go?
    3. when i try to download a file, i get weird box asking me how to download it, but then i can't click OK.

    1. Re:Serious Bugs in Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to reset your theme to the default theme. Many old themes are not compatible with this version. The same thing happened when version 0.7 was released.

    2. Re:Serious Bugs in Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for your help!

      (i coulnd't go back to IE, went back to Firebird 0.7 instead ;)

      - mike

  301. Re: Speed up loading of Sun Java plug-in by rolofft · · Score: 1

    To speed up loading Sun's JVM in Windows, open the "Java Plug-in" applet in the Control Panel and then select "do not start console". The Java console is for debugging but is enabled by default for some reason.

    --

    "Give a man a fish and he will ask for tartar sauce and French fries!"

  302. Re:what will 0.9 be named? lets have a vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefucked

  303. Re:With the way these guys get into name disputes. by jazman · · Score: 1

    Or they could get topical and call it StarMouse

  304. except that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the database only turns up under the "project" category, which happens to be headed up by Mozilla Firebird (which already has it's own "Mozilla" category).

  305. Re:"Official market share" - how big is your site? by wideangle · · Score: 1

    How about an art site that gets 22 million hits a month?


    Browsers:
    1 MSIE (all versions) 20,840,535 93.57%
    2 Netscape/Mozilla (all versions) 985,761 4.42%
    3 Opera (all versions) 141,673 0.63%
    4 Others 90,084 0.4%
    5 Googlebot/2.1 73,865 0.33%


    Pretty close to 95%, no?


    OS:
    1 Windows NT/2000/XP 14,658,286 65.81%
    2 Windows 98 6,025,951 27.05%
    3 Macintosh PowerPC 771,331 3.46%
    4 Others 634,325 2.84%
    5 Windows 95 122,386 0.54%
    6 Linux 50,865 0.22%
    7 SunOS 4,231 0.01%

  306. Geographic place names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they just do what Intel/AMD/etc. do for their product code names, and just name it after some obscure geographical location? There can't be any trademark issues with that.

  307. Re:what will 0.9 be named? lets have a vote by Dickolas+Wang · · Score: 1

    Mozilla Windows 98 SE
    or
    Mozilla The Beatles

  308. MD5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got d4eacce1814ae16660e499aa862309f9 and 6,500,352 bytes from the torrent.

  309. Re: [No probs in XP here] by bach37 · · Score: 1

    I ran the installer and boom: have my extensions from Firebird 0.7, and all of my bookmarks are there. Worked fine for me!

    Scott

  310. Re:To mantain browser in memory... by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

    I tried this, but could not locate "turbo."

    A quick Google search reveals that the -turbo feature was removed from Firebird around version 0.6.x, so I'd assume it is still out.

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  311. How about FireBox?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tee Hee ;)

  312. Mozilla Underground by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    The current hot word suffix is 'Underground', with the option of adding 'Super Bling-Bling Edition'... Xtreme? Puuuuhlease, girlfriend, get with the times! :p

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  313. if BROWSER is to SAFARI by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    then MAIL is to SPAMFARI!

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  314. Firefox on Bittorrent by plonk420 · · Score: 1

    here's a bit of what i posted to mozillazine: http://s91855708.onlinehome.us/temp/FirefoxSetup-0 .8.exe.torrent couldn't figure out how to get ahold of webmasters within a few seconds, so decided to come here... (could someone contact them? ..if at least to have them verify the CRC-32/MD5 of the official EXEs for the paranoid) MD5 : D4EACCE1814AE16660E499AA862309F9 CRC-32 : 88247ED4 more hashes in post @ http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=5090 3

    1. Re:Firefox on Bittorrent by plonk420 · · Score: 1

      just got the ok to mention and thank the www.torrentskickass.com for tracking it ^_^

  315. Re:To mantain browser in memory... by CapnGrunge · · Score: 1

    about:config
    Filter: turbo
    browser.turbo.enabled - user set, boolean, false

    --
    I see 57005 people
  316. ObFuturamaQuote by Poeir · · Score: 1

    Hermes: According to government records the only names not yet trademarked are Popplers and Zitsels. Fry: I know: We'll call them Popplers. Amy: You picked it. Fry: Swish. Zoidberg: Call them what you want. I call them a free meal.

    --
    Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    1. Re:ObFuturamaQuote by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      Bender: They're tasty, right? Let's call 'em taste-icles!

      --
      True story.
  317. Name changes = success by t0ny · · Score: 0
    Damn, maybe thats what has been keeping Mosaic/Netscape/Communicator/Mozilla/whatever from becoming the dominant browser all these years. Its the name! Eventaully, they will get just the right name, and they will once again become a mighty bastion of profitability!

    Maybe they should change their name to something catchy, like, hmmm... "Internet Explorer"

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  318. Re:OS X by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I think "Apple Mail" is the correct name. That's how it identifies itself in MIME headers anyway.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  319. They should change it again by stor · · Score: 1

    First let me say that I understand the difficulties of getting a unique name that doesn't suck: the company I work for is trying to release a new product and getting a unique name for it wasn't easy: you'll be suprised how many words are taken.

    So to prevent confusion I reccommend "FireFox" follow in Princ^H^H I mean Love Symbol's footsteps and change their name to: @

    "At Symbol: The Choice of a GNU Generation"

    Cheers
    Stor

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  320. Re:"Official market share" - how big is your site? by Tom · · Score: 1

    how big is your site?

    January:
    76979 visits (battlemaster.org)
    53209 visits (lemuria.org)
    268 visits (selinux.lemuria.org)

    Nowhere near 22 mio., but except for the SELinux part big enough to not be skewed by random "5 mozilla people came over" events.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  321. IMAP & Thunderbird make peace! by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    Thunderbird 0.3 worked fine with the IMAP implementation of Sambar Server, but got broken in 0.4. It's not mentioned in the Release Notes, but 0.5 works great with Sambar's IMAP again. Woohoo! I can put LookOut back in the closet now!

    --
    -Rich
  322. Re:"Official market share" - how big is your site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hm. What stats package do you use, Tom?

    Just wondering because there's a difference between hits (requests) and "visits", which is a euphemism for whatever the stats software maker wants it to be.

    This page explains the difference in more detail:
    http://www.analog.cx/docs/webworks.html

    BTW, Analog rocks, it's the fastest stats analyzer I've ever seen, takes a 600MB log file and spits back your report in less than a minute. (And it's open source! *grin*)

  323. Re:"Official market share" - how big is your site? by AoT · · Score: 1

    except your data is skewed by posting battlemaster on /.
    Thats how me, and my bad firebird using mac, found the game.

    OT:i like the game.

  324. Re:"Official market share" - how big is your site? by Tom · · Score: 1

    I use webalizer. I've toyed with analog as well, but I just like webalizer more.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  325. Re:"Official market share" - how big is your site? by Tom · · Score: 1

    True, but for the timeframe posted, /. is ranked at #10 in the referred list, with just 110 hits. Several search engines rank above it, as well as some webmail services, which indicates word-of-mouth propaganda.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  326. the slashdot effect? by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1

    i woyuld guess your site gets such a high percentage of mozilla users because it is advertised on every slashdot post you make..