From the Article: It is not clear how the Commonwealth's special treatment under the Copyright Act will be applied should SCO's claims on Linux be upheld in US courts.
Eric Deming (ericd@belkin.com) writes: Oh, one last bit, when upgrading firmware for the Routers that
originally shipped without the Parental Control feature, the new
firmware has this feature added. This was by popular demand. Our
customer install base began to notice the Parental Control feature on
new models that we are shipping, and wanted a solution for themselves
without having to buy a new product.
I can't believe this, this guy is trying to argue that the new firmware has this enabled because the userbase that is not tech-savy enough to copy and paste a URL is going to upgrade their firmware to get this feature.
Not to nitpick here, but 'Fluid' is not misleading at all. The common definition of a fluid is a substance that will take the shape of its container. Both liquids and gasses will do this.
Wouldn't wrapping all the network communications in SSL be sufficient to thwart many hack attempts? or do some type of aimbots do some dynamic patching of the executable?
I don't know... but it would be possible to block some unwanted traffic. If the whole thing was NAT'd, then you'd only be able to set up your leet w4r3z server on the wireless network. SPAM would be a problem, but I'm sure that most big providers would block that netblock and not accept anything from them. Just my $0.02.
There's a flag in sendmail FEATURE(`delay_checks'). This has some side effects that and you should consider reading the help page for delay_checks
With qmail, this behavior is the norm. Additionally, vrfy only returns a "252 send some mail, i'll try my best." But I'm sure that most people turn off VFRY and EXPN in sendmail.
I'm not sure if Windows98/se is vulnerable since microsoft's knowledge base specifically states that Windows ME is not vulnerable. The vulnerability is based on a buffer overflow of the RPC service. Does windows 95/98 even offer the RPC service?
Not to sounds like a telemarketer sympathizer, but they clearly have a viable industry, otherwise they wouldn't exist. The true key to eliminating this major annoyance would be to stop buying goods from all telemarketers, no matter how good the offer sounded.
The game could unfold something like this: after 57.... Rxd5 58. exd5 Kd6
White has b4! forcing another passed pawn the queenside. Perhaps play would continue 59. b4 axb4+ 60. Kxb4 Kxd5
Now black cannot ignore the a-pawn since it will queen before black can push his e and f pawns through. Whereas white will simply let black kill the a-pawn and ensure that he queens the h-pawn by moving his king back to the kingside.
From the Article:
It is not clear how the Commonwealth's special treatment under the Copyright Act will be applied should SCO's claims on Linux be upheld in US courts.
Could me a moot point very soon.
I think this is the one you mean... HOWTO: Annoy a Spammer
Eric Deming (ericd@belkin.com) writes:
Oh, one last bit, when upgrading firmware for the Routers that originally shipped without the Parental Control feature, the new firmware has this feature added. This was by popular demand. Our customer install base began to notice the Parental Control feature on new models that we are shipping, and wanted a solution for themselves without having to buy a new product.
I can't believe this, this guy is trying to argue that the new firmware has this enabled because the userbase that is not tech-savy enough to copy and paste a URL is going to upgrade their firmware to get this feature.
The 'Fluid' is slightly misleading.
Not to nitpick here, but 'Fluid' is not misleading at all. The common definition of a fluid is a substance that will take the shape of its container. Both liquids and gasses will do this.
Wouldn't wrapping all the network communications in SSL be sufficient to thwart many hack attempts? or do some type of aimbots do some dynamic patching of the executable?
I don't know... but it would be possible to block some unwanted traffic. If the whole thing was NAT'd, then you'd only be able to set up your leet w4r3z server on the wireless network. SPAM would be a problem, but I'm sure that most big providers would block that netblock and not accept anything from them. Just my $0.02.
There's a flag in sendmail FEATURE(`delay_checks').
This has some side effects that and you should consider reading the help page for delay_checks
With qmail, this behavior is the norm. Additionally, vrfy only returns a "252 send some mail, i'll try my best."
But I'm sure that most people turn off VFRY and EXPN in sendmail.
I for one welcome our new snake-like robot overlords. :)
I'm not sure if Windows98/se is vulnerable since microsoft's knowledge base specifically states that Windows ME is not vulnerable. The vulnerability is based on a buffer overflow of the RPC service. Does windows 95/98 even offer the RPC service?
Not to sounds like a telemarketer sympathizer, but they clearly have a viable industry, otherwise they wouldn't exist. The true key to eliminating this major annoyance would be to stop buying goods from all telemarketers, no matter how good the offer sounded.
I thought that all P2P networks were used for illegal activities.
It depends, many believe that many companies use a modem uplink, but check out:
http://www.highspeedanywhere.com
They have a bi-directional offering.
Perhaps the best solution is:
FORMAT C:
Additionally, it will be almost as fun to stand next to that lathe during manufacture as riding the dark ride itself. Kinda like double-mint gum.
The game could unfold something like this: ... Rxd5 58. exd5 Kd6
after 57.
White has b4! forcing another passed pawn the queenside. Perhaps play would continue 59. b4 axb4+ 60. Kxb4 Kxd5
Now black cannot ignore the a-pawn since it will queen before black can push his e and f pawns through. Whereas white will simply let black kill the a-pawn and ensure that he queens the h-pawn by moving his king back to the kingside.
I guess they'll have to wait for napster to recover financially before scripting a sequel.