Slashdot Mirror


Baltimore Inner Harbor To Go Wireless

An anonymous reader writes "The City of Baltimore has made free wireless internet available in the Inner Harbor in hopes of bringing in more tourists and business conventions. According to this article on Sunspot Internet service will be available free of charge to portable computers from the Baltimore Science Center to the World Trade Center along the touristy waterfront. Need to check your e-mail when sailing the Chesapeake Bay? Just dock at the Rusty Scupper and whip out your laptop."

230 comments

  1. Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Warsailing here I come... I'll bring a new meaning to piracy on the open seas.

    1. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...just wait until real pirates board your ship and slit your throat for you laptop.

    2. Re:Woohoo! by notsewmit · · Score: 0

      Arrr! Me loves me Wi-Fi

    3. Re:Woohoo! by Swift(void) · · Score: 0, Troll

      Except for the fact that a harbor isnt open sea

    4. Re:Woohoo! by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      I bet you're a lot of fun at parties.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    5. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no problem, just get a large enough Pringles can and you can be out in the ocean warsailing pendant free.

    6. Re:Woohoo! by Kosi · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You mean doing some heavy P2P filesharing from a boat?

    7. Re:Woohoo! by lommer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now there's an idea: Get a tricked out antenna with which you can reach the harbour wireless (you might need to set up a shore-based repeater in order to recieve signals going the other way). Then, you sit out in international waters with a multi-terabyte mp3 collection just sharing away. Let's see the RIAA try to sue you now...

    8. Re:Woohoo! by Kosi · · Score: 5, Funny

      They'd send you this baby over.

    9. Re:Woohoo! by fussman · · Score: 0

      You don't get laid much, do you? Being picky about language usage is a real turn off.

      --
      Support Israeli punk bands. Man Alive.
    10. Re:Woohoo! by hal9000 · · Score: 1

      And you could hoist the skull & crossbones up on the antenna. :-)

      --
      Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
    11. Re:Woohoo! by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      Except that to get to international waters from Baltimore, you have to head out through the Key Bridge, across the Chesapeake, across the DelMarVa peninsula, and then however many miles out into the Atlantic. That'd be one hell of an antenna, and it'd surely be cheaper to go buy your music at BestBuy on those round silver discs.

    12. Re:Woohoo! by matzim · · Score: 1

      Just promise me there won't be an International Talk-like-a-Warchalker Day...

    13. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, beat me to it! Good one.

  2. that is very cool by FinalCut · · Score: 1

    I always enjoy my time at the inner harbor when in Baltimore. Now I can get work done while I lounging as well. I like it.

    1. Re:that is very cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chowing down at Phillips and fragging at the same time. Sweet!

    2. Re:that is very cool by ClarifyAmbiguity · · Score: 1

      People use the Internet for more than bitching about movies and downloading porn?

    3. Re:that is very cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work on the Inner Harbor, right across the street from the ESPN/B&N building. Above Fuddruckers.

      No way in hell would I take a laptop out there, especially a wireless one. Too many niggers in Baltimore. They'd grab it and run. Hell, I don't even carry my wallet around that filth-hole.

      Don't call me a rascist or a bigot. Facts are facts - black steal things in Baltimore. Get ripped off enough and they're not blacks anymore, they're niggers.

  3. Sweet! by whitelabrat · · Score: 0, Funny

    Now the homeless in Baltimore can be geeks too!

    1. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The homeless in Baltimore already ARE geeks. They're laid off tech workers.

    2. Re:Sweet! by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      Wow. Hooters at the Inner Harbor *and* wireless.

      Isn't life great for a Charm City Geek.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    3. Re:Sweet! by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      That is pretty funny, but Bmore has never struck me as a big tech heaven, *hun*

      But then again, I live in Frederick, Oops, I mean Fredneck...

  4. Free internet by dkoudijs · · Score: 1

    Is this going to be a recuring theme? Free internet outside of Starbucks?

    --
    Rants done the right way www.koudijscanada.com
    1. Re:Free internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be happy enough with free internet inside of starbucks.
      wtf? $4 for the coffee just so I can pay $30/month + 20 cents/minute to use the internet in their store? I don't even own an notebook with wifi and I avoid starbucks because of that.

    2. Re:Free internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they offered a flat fee service. I'm close to a couple of Starbucks (well, who isn't, but really close), and they have WiFi. I wonder if I could get access at home with a good antenna.

    3. Re:Free internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Last time I checked (about 6 months ago) I think it was like that. I just looked it up now; if you sign up for a 12 month term, it's $30/month for unlimited access. If you go month by month, it's $40/month.

      Even if you pay the $40/month, you have to pay a $25 "early termination" fee if you want to quit after less than a year. There's more fine print here than a typical MS EULA.

      They also $10 for unlimited access for 24 hours, or 10 cents/minute on a by the minute plan. Even that has a catch though...60 minute minimum charge, so you're out $6 as soon as you check your email.

      My broadband account is only $40/month for month by month service and I certainly spend a lot more time at home than at a coffee shop. For how little it costs to set up a hot spot, starbucks could do it for free for the people paying for those coffees.

      As I said, I don't have a wifi card for my notebook, but if they'd offer a reasonable service, I'd buy the card just to use the service and I'd go to starbucks everyday. Instead I go out of my way to go to Tully's or SBC (the other major chains in Seattle) just because of starbucks wifi.

    4. Re:Free internet by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I prefer cafe ladro myself. Their hazelnut lattes are divine. But when i'm going to a chain I prefer tully's... especially now that SBC is owned by starbucks. The only time I go to starbucks is when I'm taking someone to the market and we stop in to the original store.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    5. Re:Free internet by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      I'm close to a couple of Starbucks (well, who isn't, but really close),

      We don't have Starbucks all over Baltimore like they do in the rest of the world.

    6. Re:Free internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I haven't been to SBC much since I heard about the takeover. It's too bad since SBC really was the best.

      Interestingly, I do like hazelnut lattes though. Lately I have had to have drip with a hazelnut shot more often than a real latte (lousy economy).

      With foods, I'm a sucker for the bigger chains. I love experimenting with other stuff, but with food I prefer a more familiar environment.

  5. St. Louis has had this for a bit... by KodaK · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't say it's helped draw in business yet, but it's here.

    --
    --J(K) DOS is like Unix in exactly the same way that a pinto is like an aircraft carrier.
    1. Re:St. Louis has had this for a bit... by pavon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I don't see how something like this would bring in tourists. "Travel hundreds of miles to use the same internet you can at home." Wireless acces might make things more convient for the tourists once they got here, but I doubt anyone would choose to come because of it.

      Business conventions, however, make a lot of sense. This could also be a good idea for cities working on revitalizing parts of the town. It would both increase the value of the land to businesses, as well as making it a more plesent place for people to hang out. I for one would much rather work on a laptop at a park than in my danky apartment.

    2. Re:St. Louis has had this for a bit... by caudley · · Score: 1

      ...Yeah, I don't see how something like this would bring in tourists....

      ...Business conventions, however, make a lot of sense. This could also be a good idea for cities working on revitalizing parts of the town....

      Baltimore's convention center is right next to the Inner Harbor, I'm sure by tourists, they mean conventioneers. Baltimore's Inner Harbor was one of the countries first successful urban revitalization projects, and still one of the best IMHO (being from Bal'mer, and having not seen any others)

  6. Dock? by nate1138 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just dock at the Rusty Scupper and whip out your laptop

    Why bother? Just make sure you pick up a can of pringles before you set sail.

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  7. Security by MIKE+HAWK+TROLL · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How long before some idiot who assumes a level of security and has his/her credit card numbers sniffed, sues the City of Baltimore? And since there's no disclaimer given to people before they get access, there might actually be a case given most juries understanding of technology.

    1. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's worse, is if someone uses it to post child porn to Usenet or something -- they'd be untraceable wouldn't they? That'd shut down the free access really quick.

    2. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the city could say "Were you using encryption? Was the cert listed with a cert authority?"

      If the answer is yes to both, then there is a larger problem that would happen on wired networks almost as easily.

      Besides, who sues a city and actually wins? I am positive that the case would cost far more than the credit card theft, which would be covered under theft protection from the credit card company anyway...

    3. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the browser is using SSL encryption on most sites taking the CC info it doesnt matter whether the channel itself is encrypted. No different from changing your NIC on a LAN off passive mode and sniffing the traffic. If you can break a 128bit RSA key breaking a WEP key would be easy street.

    4. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      128 bit RSA key? Jesus. What a fucking retard.

  8. Leechers by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder how long it's going to take for someone to suck up all the bandwidth by using this for warez uploading or spam? It's a nice idea otherwise.

    --
    Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
    1. Re:Leechers by tlovie · · Score: 1

      I don't know... but it would be possible to block some unwanted traffic. If the whole thing was NAT'd, then you'd only be able to set up your leet w4r3z server on the wireless network. SPAM would be a problem, but I'm sure that most big providers would block that netblock and not accept anything from them. Just my $0.02.

    2. Re:Leechers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a decent firewall, just block port 25 outgoing access. People in the harbor can use webmail or a ssh tunnel.

  9. Is this completely non-secure? by sixteenraisins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, can you really take a Wi-Fi equipped laptop and download mp3's to your heart's content without being tracked down to your IP? Or launch a DDoS attack anonymously?

    Again, I guess you hafta take the good with the bad. I can imagine it won't be long before these wireless providers start paying attention to security on these networks.

    William

    --
    When you're not looking, this sig is in Latin.
    1. Re:Is this completely non-secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean kinda like the Internet at large? No one's making the claim that this is a secure, private network.

    2. Re:Is this completely non-secure? by lanswitch · · Score: 1
      That depends. If it is a network without real authentication based on real credentials it will be pretty secure. But if it is a real open netork then there is a major hole.
      On an open network you can login under an untracable name and do what you want. All the isp can find in his/her logfiles is a mac-address and a phoney name, and if you take care that the mac cannot be traced back to you, you are safe. This is indeed the security-issue with the current wireless technology. The only way around this would be if people really authenticate on the network, but that's against the principle of an open network.

      www.wirelessleiden.nl

  10. I've got it in my town... by NineNine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've got free wireless broadband in my town, too. I had to get an antenna to get it to my building, but it works great, and it helps my business a lot by saving $100+/month on a (slower) DSL connection.

    1. Re:I've got it in my town... by KodaK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know if I would rely on a free service for a business. You don't have any uptime gaurantees, and you don't know that it's going to be there tomorrow. If you don't absolutely have to have Internet access you could get away with it, but if you rely on it at all for income you may be setting yourself up for a huge disapointment.

      Good luck with your business though, seriously.

      --
      --J(K) DOS is like Unix in exactly the same way that a pinto is like an aircraft carrier.
    2. Re:I've got it in my town... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir,
      we at our organization appreciate your opinion but would like to ask you to refrain from being so pessimistic.

      Sincerely,
      Mr Blinky

    3. Re:I've got it in my town... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I have a retail store, so it's not essential, but so far, uptime in my town has been excellent. The nice thing that I can do is settle credit card transactions online instead of over a modem, which cuts the settlement time from about 20-30 seconds to about 2 seconds. Very nice. I'm lucky. A $75 Yagi directional antenna, and that was the only expense, ever!

    4. Re:I've got it in my town... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The nice thing that I can do is settle credit card transactions online instead of over a modem, which cuts the settlement time from about 20-30 seconds to about 2 seconds.

      what the hell is wrong with you? sending cc's over a PUBLIC wifi? /me whacks you with a clue-by-four

      moron

    5. Re:I've got it in my town... by KMAPSRULE · · Score: 1

      The nice thing that I can do is settle credit card transactions online instead of over a modem, which cuts the settlement time from about 20-30 seconds to about 2 seconds.
      At my previous job (IT for a Chain Store), I spent a month replacing the 9600 baud modems with higher speed networking(Frame Relay) and we went from 30 second Credit card transactions to about 8 seconds. the frame relay went back to the main office and from there we had a reletively high speed connection of some sort to validate the credit cards with. I'm not sure what they were using for it as only the Network admin was allowed to work with or know about that line.
      anyhow my point is that there was no way that anyone from the internet could hack and steal credit card numbers and I hope that there is some sort of security in the way you transmit over the community wireless.

      --

      --Im an oven mitt, not an engineer! (SLArbys Radio Commercial)
    6. Re:I've got it in my town... by Molt · · Score: 1

      Show me where he said 'without encryption' and I'll agree you've got a point.

      In fact show me any CC settlement service which can be connected to in an unencrypted way and I'll show you the real morons.

      It's generally best when using the Internet to assume that anything you send/receive, whether via. Wifi, wired, or bongo drums, can be compromised if anyone can be bothered.

      Put your trust more in encryption and good security practises than wires, my young friend. That data goes through other people's systems, you know.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    7. Re:I've got it in my town... by CaptBubba · · Score: 1
      I would assume that the cc #'s are encypted to hell and back by the hardware.

      At least I hope that they are.

    8. Re:I've got it in my town... by NineNine · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh yeah... I think it's 1024 bit encryption, or something as ridiculous. Either way, I'm working with a very very large merchant bank, and I trust them to handle the encryption end of it, since they'd be liable if something went wrong.

  11. Public Wireless Access by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 1

    I love this idea. I hope we see more of it in more public places, like parks and libraries nationwide.

    --
    uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
  12. Sweet for Otakon! by 2Flower · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Every year Otakon holds one of the biggest east coast anime conventions at the Baltimore Convention Center, right on the Inner Harbor. If the WiFi reaches that far, I might be able to wank my inner geek by not only attending a japanese animation convention while wearing a schoolgirl costume with mechanical power-up accessories, but actually posting live cosplay photos back to my website at the same time.

    Life is good. Or sad. Or good!

    1. Re:Sweet for Otakon! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Haha, imagine, an iSight + iBook + Darwing Streaming Server + scripts + .Mac

      Live feeds of the con :)

    2. Re:Sweet for Otakon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you think the wireless network at Harborplace will reach all the way up to Camden Yards and the Convention Center, then I've got a bridge to sell you.

    3. Re:Sweet for Otakon! by pavon · · Score: 1

      wearing a schoolgirl costume with mechanical power-up accessories

      I hope that this is a female posting. You just gave me had horrible mental image of Richard Stallman in a mini-skirt, and a evil-looking mini-display over one eye.

    4. Re:Sweet for Otakon! by c4seyj0nes · · Score: 1

      If it reaches to Camden Yards I could check out how my fantasy team is doing while I'm at the Ravens game. Or "work from home" while attending an Orioles day game...

      naw, i doubt it would reach that far...and i dont even know if they'd let me take my powerbook in.

      --
      "In wine there is wisdom. In beer there is strength. In water there is bacteria." --Old German Proverb
    5. Re:Sweet for Otakon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehh, even if it doesn't reach the Con center, the Harborplace is just a walk down the street :D
      It's pretty much the main place to go and eat during Otakon, heheh.

      -Oshi

    6. Re:Sweet for Otakon! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Sadly, you might not be that far off. From the background, it looks like these pictures were taken at Katsu instead of Otakon though.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  13. Re:Oh great. by Dead_Medic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just wait till you have to register for the service, and a bill is passed that all your records are accessible for the governement, or better yet Baltimore sells info about your surfing habbits to a 3rd party. But i still think it is cool though.

  14. Also good for otaku by Cutriss · · Score: 1, Informative

    Otakon always holds its conventions in Baltimore Inner Harbor, just off the waterfront. This would be nifty for running portable netcams and updating weblogs/fan pages with details about fanmade works and cosplay.

    I mean, if you're going to geek, geek out fully, right?

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:Also good for otaku by Professor+Bluebird · · Score: 1

      The Convention Center is about a city block west of the harbor. Since it is also a big tourist spot, it would probably make perfect sense if they included the Convention Center in on this as well, although mmaybe not initially.

    2. Re:Also good for otaku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The intial plan DOES NOT appear to cover the Convention Center; As a matter of fact, it looks to stop about a block west... Go figure. It'll cover the Trade Center, the Hard Rock and Aquarium, though. I imagine that BACAVA might push to get it in the BCC.

    3. Re:Also good for otaku by Professor+Bluebird · · Score: 1

      Of course they will likely expand it beyond the initial area, and certainly they'll do BCC. The place sits empty so much (except for Otakon), they need a new feature like wireless to attract business.

  15. Whew! by RealErmine · · Score: 1

    Just dock at the Rusty Scupper and whip out your laptop.

    I almost didn't make it to the end of that sentence. I'm glad the last word was "laptop".

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    1. Re:Whew! by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you can whip out the other thing once you've surfed to an appropriate URL.

  16. World Trade Center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't it collapse a couple of years ago? I mean, it'll be nice having wireless internet from Baltimore all the way up to New York, but couldn't they at least have said "Lower Manhattan" or "Ground Zero" or something?

    1. Re:World Trade Center? by TheShadow · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a World Trade Center in Baltimore. Which is the world's tallest pentagonal building.

      Right now it's closed for a month because of flooding caused by the hurricane.

      --

      --
      "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    2. Re:World Trade Center? by LinuxThis · · Score: 0
      Interesting.. if i recall from md2600 meetings (held at the Barnes+Noble at the harbor across from the world trade center) there was already a distant access point in the trade center somewhere. It would be quite cool if we now had wifi at the meetings without antennas.

      Now if only they could do this kind of thing out in Towson, or better yet, Perry Hall.. GODDAMIT.

    3. Re:World Trade Center? by Gunzour · · Score: 1

      Most large cities have a world trade center. The one in New York was just the most well known.

    4. Re:World Trade Center? by Professor+Bluebird · · Score: 1

      Though it'll probably reach my place in Canton (about a mile east of the harbor, just past Fell's Point) if I put a Pringles can on the roof. Then I could set up some kind of repeater, and beam it up your way, though the FCC might not be too happy about that.

  17. Redundant... :) by AriesGeek · · Score: 1
    --
    Insert offensive troll-style sig here. Please mod or respond appropriately.
  18. Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by Darth+Fredd · · Score: 1

    Down here, the big thing is the Beach, aka Ocean City, asseteque, etc. Tourism in baltimore? Well, lets see..theres an airport..and its a big town/small city.

    Who here would go to a big town/small city just for free wireless when theres a beach a couple hours away??

    --
    "The most looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict"
    1. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by Skater · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've lived in DC for four years. I've been to Baltimore many times during that stretch (a couple times a year), but I haven't made it to the beach once.

      Baltimore has a great aquarium, the (currently closed) B&O railroad museum, Fort McHenry, the science museum, and on the waterfront a lot of shopping and restaurants. I've also gone to Baltimore to see shows like Penn & Teller. There are plenty of things to do in Baltimore.

      So, I would go to Baltimore before the beach. Even without free wireless, which is irrelevant since I don't have a wireless network card and my laptop is too old to run one.

      (And I love beaches, too.)

      --RJ

    2. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      dont forget Oriole Park at Camden Yards, a great place to watch a baseball game. Unless you're a fan of the 20-games-under-.500 Orioles.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    3. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by aflat362 · · Score: 1
      Baltimore is a cool place to visit.

      Hanging out in the Inner Harbor is alright for lunches and stuff

      There's a Hard Rock and an ESPN Zone. The ESPN Zone there has a pretty awesome batting cage game.

      - Fell's Point at night is much better. I could spend a couple nights of any vacation at Rex's Tavern. That place rules - literally hundereds of kinds of beer from all over the world to choose from.

      You can catch an Oriels or a Ravens game pretty easily (more so for Baseball)

      You can also visit Fort McHenry which was an important location for the Revolutionary War. I didn't get to go there last time I was there but next time I get to Baltimore I'm going for sure.

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    4. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by aflat362 · · Score: 1
      Ok, well I guess Fort McHenry didn't see any action in the Revolutionary war - but probably cause the Brits knew it was there and didn't want to mess with it.

      It first played an important role in the war of 1812. Lookey Here: http://www.bcpl.net/~etowner/history.html

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    5. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by Dr.Enormous · · Score: 1

      Maybe you aren't aware, but Baltimore is an honest-to-god city. It was one of the largest in the nation, but has been hemorraging people. However, most of those people are going to the suburbs--which aren't counted in the city population thanks to an unusual city/county split. Tourism is, IIRC, the second-largest official industry behind shipping (drugs being the actual largest). OC, on the other hand, is a tiny strip of yuppies and self-important teeny boppers, and most of the people who go there are from Bmore anyway, not out of state.

    6. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by ahbe · · Score: 1

      This really is a great thing Baltimore is doing. I often have long lay overs at Baltimore Airport on my way over seas, and I always take the train down town and check out the water front. I wasn't planning on doing this next trip, because I have already seen it all. However, if they start offering free internet, I'll be back at the water front on my next lay over. Killing time on a park bench with my Powerbook. But what will also happen is that I will end up spending my money while I'm there. Will this have a great effect? Probably not. But kudos to any city who will embrace new technology.

    7. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unusual city/county split

      I think I remember reading someplace a while back that Baltimore was one of only 2 cities in the country that was a completely independant political body, not a subdivision of any larger county or such body. Anyone recall the other, I think it might have been Detroit, not sure. Of course, I could be completely off my rocker as well

    8. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1

      "The city and county of San Francisco" is like that too. There are some other local governments where the city and county (or equivalent) are the same (Nashville maybe?), but those are more recent changes I think.

    9. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by Looks_Like_A_Penguin · · Score: 1

      I've lived in southern MD for 2 years now and I couldn't agree more, Baltimore has a ton of stuff to do. Can't quite compete with DC, though (I'm cheap and basically everything downtown is free, except for food).
      As far as the beaches go, you're not missing much, the closest thing to a decent beach would be out in Ocean City. Even then, you might as well just make the trip down to Virginia Beach for the nicer beaches.
      Randy

    10. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      What's most likely to happen is that people living in the surrounding area will be more likely to come spend time and money at the Inner Harbor. Right now the Inner Harbor is a nice part of town to visit, and it's where you go for some shopping or to show visitors from out of town around, but once you've been there a few times you don't have a lot of incentive to go there. With wireless access, free or otherwise, we'll be able to go sit and work (or play) in a lovely setting. Attracting people in the middle of the week all year round, instead of just on weekends and during the summer when tourists are around, will be a great boon to local businesses. It'll probably create some jobs, and just make it a more vibrant, interesting place.

      Don't get me wrong: a little free Wi-Fi isn't going to fix all the problems in the city. In order to really attract corporate business, Baltimore will have to continue to reduce crime, improve schools, and rejuvenate some of the ailing neighborhoods. But the city is doing those things too, and the Wi-Fi sure won't hurt.

    11. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by Leebert · · Score: 1

      Anyone recall the other, I think it might have been Detroit, not sure.

      The other would be St. Louis, IIRC.

    12. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by Dr.Enormous · · Score: 1

      I've been told it was St Louis. In any case, the upshot is that Baltimore is much more populous, safe, and wealthy (still not rich and crime-free or nuffin) city than the official stats would lead you to believe, because most of the people who can afford wifi laptops live in the county and therefore aren't counted. But they commute to/visit the harbor plenty.

    13. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by Skater · · Score: 1

      What part of Southern MD? I lived in Waldorf for two years, but I moved to Alexandria two years ago.

      I still drive to Waldorf at least once a week though, for skating.

      About the beaches: I'm spoiled. I love the Outer Banks and Charleston, SC beaches, so I'm half afraid to try any of the more local beaches. ;)

      --RJ

    14. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      Fell's Point at night is much better. I could spend a couple nights of any vacation at Rex's Tavern. That place rules.
      We, The soggy residents of Fells Point, Heartialy agree with the first part of your statment. As to the second part, there are a few inaccuracies that we cannot let pass without correction. After a few seconds thought, it was detirmined that you were speaking of Max's, which while alright for tourists, lacks the distinctive personality and character of the rest of Fells point. I would proudly mention The Wharf Rat (Fells Point not Downtown), Fletchers, Coopers, John Stevens (Temporarialy closed due to flooding), and perhaps even Miss Irene's which was voted the best place to get drunk by The City Paper. While on the subject, I would be remiss in my duty not to mention Thf Fells Point Festival which is this weekend. A few hundred thousand drunks turn the place into one huge party.

    15. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by Looks_Like_A_Penguin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I live in Waldorf now. You must be talking about the rink behind the Pizza Hut?
      Randy

    16. Re:Baltimore? Tourism? Muahaha.. by Skater · · Score: 1

      Yep. They have an adult night on Sundays, so I'm there.

      (I lived behind the mall in the Lancaster neighborhood, in the Hunter's Run apartments. ARMC or whatever they're called are crooks. E-mail me for horror stories if you live in one of their apartment complexes.)

      --RJ

  19. Travel Advisory by techsoldaten · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just in case you're thinking of going out to try this, Baltimore's Inner Harbor is notoriously expensive and you will be paying for access, just not to an ISP.

    At most garages, it costs more than $10 to park, the restaurants in that area serve tasty but expensive food, moderately overpriced shopping stores surround consumers, and random Orioles fans, despondent over the team's performance, may accost you at any time in that area.

    You would be better served going to Fells Point and playing video poker at any one of the dozens of bars.

    1. Re:Travel Advisory by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Dont forget to stop by the hard rock cafe, and spend 15 bucks on *the crappiest* hamburger you'll ever eat in your entire life.

      Strangely enough, the food at the Hard Rocks in Toronto and Niagra is actually palatable. What's the deal with the B-mo Hard Rock?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Travel Advisory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You went to the Inner Harbor and DIDN'T eat a hamburger at the cheesecake factory? or johnny rockets?

      I have no son. No really I don't.

    3. Re:Travel Advisory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in:

      Being a tourist visiting a major attraction may require spending of money.

    4. Re:Travel Advisory by Professor+Bluebird · · Score: 1

      Even Fell's Point is becoming ungodly expensive, by the way. And the parking there is just as bad.

    5. Re:Travel Advisory by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Once Baltimore gets a Hard Rock Cafe, they are no longer cool.

      Before anyone mods me down, I should mention that I live and work in Baltimore.

    6. Re:Travel Advisory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After Hurricane Isabel, you'd better bring your scuba diving gear!

    7. Re:Travel Advisory by humblecoder · · Score: 1

      If you think $10 is a lot to pay for parking, you've never been to New York City...

    8. Re:Travel Advisory by default+luser · · Score: 1

      What's the deal with the B-mo Hard Rock?

      Perhaps it is related to the fact that you can go into ESPNZone and get the second-crappiest hamburger you will ever eat in your life.

      This is just how they do things in Bmore, lots of effort and shouting, little real results. This would explain why, despite millions in city improvement dollars, over half the city is still a slum, and anything outside the waterfront is sketchy.

      Even this current project fits in with the "lots of effort and shouting, little real results" paradigm. Anyone who knows the inner harbor knows that there's only a few blocks between the Maryland Science Center and the World Trade Center, and that's mostly made up of two shopping centers. Many of the inner harbor's actual attractions, including the Convention Center, the National Aquarium, Maritime Museum AND Port Discovery, plus entertainment venues like Power Plant Live are all outside that area.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    9. Re:Travel Advisory by Skater · · Score: 1

      Or DC, or Atlanta. I think most of the major metro areas are getting bad. Baltimore's parking is actually pretty reasonable.

    10. Re:Travel Advisory by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      I work in DC, just between the White House and the Capitol. Parking here is about $18 a day.

      My original comment is for the uninitiated who aren't used to having their wallets emptied while looking for a humble place to park their car.

      Speaking of wireless, however, I have seen a good bit of warchalking in other parts of the city - Canton, Highlandtown, I even saw some marks up on Bunker Hill. These are mostly residental areas, which is what surprised me. You can park free in any of those places, just look out for the stray Orioles fan jonesin' for a title.

    11. Re:Travel Advisory by isaac · · Score: 1
      Just in case you're thinking of going out to try this, Baltimore's Inner Harbor is notoriously expensive and you will be paying for access, just not to an ISP.


      Amen, only one place worth going down there - the Wharf Rat. Same beer and better food than the Fells Point location.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  20. Rusty Scupper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know there was a Rusty Scupper there.

    Anyway, go to Phillip's instead. Or if you can afford it go to that art deco place in Little Italy (if it is still there - it's bee 10 years since I ate there).

    1. Re:Rusty Scupper? by Spirilis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's on the (south?) side of the harbor, away from all the action (think of the Science Center as sitting right in the middle between the Rusty Scupper and the rest of the stuff near Pratt St.)

      And while you're at it, take a stroll down Charles St. (south of the harbor) and eat at Kirby's Szechuan Restaurant. Quite simply the most ORGASMIC General Tso's chicken I've ever experienced.

      --
      the real at&t mix
    2. Re:Rusty Scupper? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      [...]eat at Kirby's Szechuan Restaurant. Quite simply the most ORGASMIC General Tso's chicken I've ever experienced.

      In that case, I think I'd prefer take-out...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    3. Re:Rusty Scupper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      take a stroll down Charles St. (south of the harbor)

      Charles St. is north of the harbor. I'm pretty sure it starts around Pratt St. and runs up to Towson.

    4. Re:Rusty Scupper? by Spirilis · · Score: 1

      Make that "S. Charles St." then--it's near Cross St.

      --
      the real at&t mix
  21. Big Brother Factor? by lugar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It'll be interesting to see how closely the wireless access is monitored. A government-provided portal to the Internet. Scary thought. It's got to be monitored to some degree, right? Otherwise it's simply a great open portal for spammers.

    1. Re:Big Brother Factor? by applemasker · · Score: 1
      Suppose I were to whip out the laptop and start filesharing/downloading without any fear of being identified?

      Seems like the RIAA would have a heck of a time trying to track me down from a public hotspot, no?

      --
      Bush Lies On the Record.
    2. Re:Big Brother Factor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most /.'ers i think would be ok with a city government network than one operated by the feds.

    3. Re:Big Brother Factor? by cuiousyellow · · Score: 1

      In the shadow of the worlds tallest five story building and a pyramid shaped aquarium with a submarine next to it, who wouldn't fear big brother?

  22. Traffic Wireless by LegendOfLink · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I live in Chicago, and let me tell you, what they (all big cities, not just Chicago) need is wireless connectivity through rush hour. It would be damn skippy to be able to read a few stories on Slashdot while sitting 45 minutes on the Ike without moving three inches.

    Of course, I'm neglecting to think about all the accidents that might be caused...oh well, I guess we can sacrifice safety to read /.

    1. Re:Traffic Wireless by PW2 · · Score: 1

      good idea -- especially with /dev/speech available on the car's PC

    2. Re:Traffic Wireless by sklib · · Score: 1

      A better bet than wifi would be just to use a GSM celphone and a PDA or something. With a bluetooth connection between the two, you wouldn't even have to hold them next to each other like IR -- just stick the phone back in your pocket and you are reading /. on the ike. ...or you could take the metra and avoid the traffic altogether :)

      --
      -S
    3. Re:Traffic Wireless by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Uhmm, I don't know if i want people in their cars using wi-fi. Now maybe having such as system opperated on city buses and trains would be a good idea.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  23. WiFi by rf0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So this means that I can be floating on a boat, enjoying the sun, the smell of the harbour and reading /. What more could a geek want apart from a girlfriend, faster laptop, respect from hispeers

    Great :)

    Rus

    1. Re:WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir,
      we appreciate your opinion but wish to advise you that from now that you please refrain from posting your personal dreams.

      Thank you,
      Mr Blinky

    2. Re:WiFi by sharkey · · Score: 1
      What more could a geek want apart from a girlfriend, faster laptop, respect from hispeers

      A spell checker?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  24. You know... by Meowfaceman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think maybe the crackheads and quite regular shootings I see every time I drive through that asshole of a city might need a little more attention than wireless at the Inner Harbor. I live 10 minutes from Baltimore, by the way.

    1. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "quite regular shootings I see every time I drive through that asshole of a city" -- ?

      you see a shooting every time you drive through?

      that's a lot. hardly believable though.

  25. The direction for the future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been deploying WiFi hotspots in the greater New York area for the last 12 years and I'm glad to see that the acceptance of wireless technology is so strong. After the WEP decryption fiasco it has forced the manufacturers to make 802.11g (and the upcming 802.11k) protocols inherently more secure.

    Our main client is a national bank that uses the WiFi technology to transmit transaction details securily from ATMs to the central datacentre. It has reduced TCO (total cost of ownership) by approx. 65%.

    Which is nice.

    1. Re:The direction for the future? by coldnight · · Score: 1

      Our main client is a national bank that uses the WiFi technology to transmit transaction details securily from ATMs to the central datacentre. It has reduced TCO (total cost of ownership) by approx. 65%.

      Which translates not into lower ATM fees, but into PROFIT!! *cough*

  26. What inner harbour? by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isabel blew much of into the bay.

    Seriously, though, B-mo needs to do more than just provide free wireless. Cleaning up the panhandlers, crackheads, pot peddlers and other assorted dirtbags would go along way to revitalizing the district's nightlife.

    It's a cool place to go, it's a shame the city's so dirty and crime ridden. Working in the public safety field, and living in the area, I've spoken with lots of b-mo cops, and morale there is so low. They're just so overwhelmed with typical inner city crime that they've become completely apathetic.

    Last year when that crack dealer burned down some ladies home (because she supposedly called the cops on him), and killed her and her 5 children, it should have sent a wake-up call, but the b-mo police just hit the snooze button.

    Oh well, wireless is pretty cool, but it's not an area that you'd want to sit in the open with your two thousand dollar laptop.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:What inner harbour? by Greg+McGreggor · · Score: 1

      No joke. I was in Baltimore in the inner harbor area for a SANS network security training. My hotel was about 3 blocks away. Twice I was verbally threatened and promised with immediate physical harm while making this this 3 block walk in the week I was there.

    2. Re:What inner harbour? by mosch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The inner harbor isn't that terrible. There always seems to be one or two bums asking for money or cigarettes, but it's not more prevalent than it is in any other major city, really. It's simply what happens when you put relatively affluent and impoverished areas near each other. I've never felt unsafe carrying cash for tasty food at Hampton's, Brighton's or the Rusty Scupper, as the tourist zone always seems to be fairly well policed. Personally, I'd love to be able to sit by the harbor and take care of my work while in Baltimore, instead of having to hole up in a hotel room that may or may not offer a relaxing view of water and boats.

    3. Re:What inner harbour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crime is way down thanks to O'Malley and what's left of Norris' legacy. Besides, all the panhandlers and bums hang out in the mini-park next to the Legg Mason building and Verizon.

    4. Re:What inner harbour? by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I was gonna say - instead of providing gimmics like this, they should pick up the trash in and around the harbor. That might help attract tourists and customers! I have been all over the counrty, and Baltimore and the inner harbor was almost the dirtiest place I have seen (excluding New Orleans during Mardi Gras).

      I don't know much about the crime rate, since I was only there one day . But the homeless people will enjoy the free internet access!

      Seriously though, if the harbor were clean and nice, I would just go there to sit and work!

      I have used several hotspots here in Portland, OR to just sit outside and enjoy the day while I am working on stuff. Not everyone using it will be on vacation...

    5. Re:What inner harbour? by dnaboy · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but for those geeks that can put the laptop down for a second and look for a little loving, you get the added bonus of being in the STD capital of the country. Though they may have lost their status of thaving the higghest Syphilis incedence, they picked up the slack with gonorrhea... One in 100...not so good...

    6. Re:What inner harbour? by Admiral1973 · · Score: 1
      I was at Inner Harbor the Saturday night after Isabel blew through. Most of the shops and restaurants were open and there were plenty of people enjoying the late summer weather. The harbor and downtown areas were well lit and enough people were out that I would have felt comfortable but conspicuous using my laptop out in the open. (I've gotten funny looks while surfing wirelessly from parks in NYC, and we've had open wireless networks here for a long time now. Non-techies who don't know about wireless networks tend to stare at you while you check your e-mail.) My brother lives a few blocks north of the harbor and while he says that he wouldn't walk home alone from there at night, the crime isn't that bad.

      I agree that it's important for the city to clean up its "quality of life" crimes, but the situation didn't look as bad to me as the original poster makes it sound.

      --
      Lousy minor setbacks! This world sucks! -- Homer Simpson
    7. Re:What inner harbour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleaning up the panhandlers, crackheads, pot peddlers and other assorted dirtbags would go along way to revitalizing the district's nightlife.


      And that's just the ownership of the Ravens.

    8. Re:What inner harbour? by Thag · · Score: 1

      Seriously. This year at Otakon was especially bad. Way more pandhandlers, and more security incidents.

      It made an impression when a parking lot attendant told me that for my own protection I really needed to leave my car in a garage if I was going to leave it overnight. The parking lots aren't safe, apparently, and there certainly were lots of street people hanging around.

      Jon Acheson

      --
      All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    9. Re:What inner harbour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's up with all these inane oversensationalized reports of baltimore? there's no way this report is true unless you were provoking this kind of behavior.

    10. Re:What inner harbour? by mosch · · Score: 1

      If the harbor is one of the dirtiest places you've been, you haven't travelled much, and you definitely haven't travelled internationally (except western europe and singapore).

      It's not disneyland clean, but it's really not bad either.

    11. Re:What inner harbour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have travelled to 25 of the largest 30 cities in the USA, and a few more in North America. But your statement is like saying - "You might have cancer but that's not near as bad as bacterial meningitis and I am sure you haven't ever had the bubonic plague.
      Cancer isn't flu easy but it's not really bad either."

    12. Re:What inner harbour? by mosch · · Score: 1

      You're either trolling or obsessive-compulsive.

    13. Re:What inner harbour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the latter... ;) If I were trolling I would have included some crap about an operating system, a political party, and maybe a religion or two.... What we really need to know is how long it takes to copy a 17 meg file from a beowolf cluster in Baltimore for our soviet loving overlords...

  27. Re:Oh great, now the Coast Guard will get involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but to blow the MV Hillary out of the water. Service people must like their free music while patrolling the coast :).

  28. The wrong attitude by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    But Paul Dowling, owner of Believe Wireless, a Towson-based company that charges customers $29.95 per month for wireless Internet access in Canton, Fells Point and elsewhere in the city, said he's worried that too much free service could drive companies such as his out of business or away from the Baltimore area.

    "It's hard enough to compete against other companies. If the city starts providing for free what we make people pay for, it could really hurt us," Dowling said.

    This is exactly the kind of attitude that hurts technology and customers. It results in monopolistic companies trying everything possible to stick to the existing model, and try and kill of competition (albeit superior in technology and better for the customer).

    Microsoft's been trying to hurt Linux as much as possible, because it's a free alternative to their OS, which could potentially kill them.And ofcourse, our beloved RIAA's been trying to kill away a newer, technologically better solution, rather than trying to innovate and provide alternatives that people would pay for.

    The right attitude should be to enhance their product so that customers would be willing to pay them for it, over the other cheaper (or free) alternative. Sheesh.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:The wrong attitude by div_2n · · Score: 1

      Being that I operate a WISP I know the frustration felt when someone offers something for free that you are selling. It is extraordinarily difficult to convince people your service is better. They don't always understand the reason they should use us.

      They don't comprehend that we guarantee them the bandwidth they pay for. They don't always understand that they are more secure on our network than than they might be on the local coffee shop's network. It doesn't always occur to them that we offer tech support when the coffee shop may or may not and at quite possibly an inferior quality.

      If someone can invent a business model that makes running an ISP with free service to all customers profitable I will gladly get on that boat. Until then I am sad to say that we must charge for our service. Our backbone connection isn't free. Neither are our servers, routers, switches, firewalls, WAPs and personnel. Make all of that free then we can talk about what should and should not be free.

    2. Re:The wrong attitude by vees · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I called them to get service to my house two months ago and they never returned any of my calls. I think that's more likely to hurt their business than a wireless harbor.

    3. Re:The wrong attitude by spudchucker · · Score: 0

      I own a bottled water distribution company. I would appreciate it if various municipalities would remove drinking fountains and install my vending machines.

      Thanks

  29. Coming soon to a convention center near you by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This will be a great benefit for people visiting Baltimore for conventions. The convention center (as I recall) is just a short walk from the inner harbor, so while taking a break from seminars and trade floor groupies, you can plug in without having to tromp back to your hotel...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  30. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The N-Gauge kinda sucks.

    Maybe if it was $150, and had about 10 times as many games.

    But this thing is a middle-ager toy, has the erogonomics of turd.

    How you can push it is beyond the understanding of human beings.

  31. Re:Waste of air. by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

    They were all just trying out the new wireless service using a quick message. They simply forgot to post it as

    WiFiFP or FP.11b

  32. Expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not by tourist standards. It certainly costs the same as any other major city in the US. Perhaps you live in Dundalk and grow your own food?

    I dunno. The inner harbor is fun, although you've kind of exhausted the fun after you see the science museum and see and Orioles/Ravens game.

    But the Inner Harbor is very good; there are a lot of local seafood shops that will server you crabcakes along with a natty bo.

    1. Re:Expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can grow food in Dundalk?

      I always envision Dundalk as Maryland's answer to Secaucus, NJ.

    2. Re:Expensive? by wcb4 · · Score: 1

      You envision Dundalk correctly.

      --
      I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
  33. Why no hot spots in St Petersburg, FL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read that there are tons of hot spots popping up everyday around the country but here in St. Petersburg, FL. Why?

    Where are the (legal) free hot spots?!

  34. What is the point? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


    When I go someplace, I want to do things I can't do from home. And when I'm there I rather enjoy the weather/sights/activities rather than checking out the Internet.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:What is the point? by jot445 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would you like to book your next hotel room a little cheaper than you can by calling? Use the internet to book it, buy it at auction even, which can save you 60%-80%.

      Maybe you want to know whether the marina has all of their boats rented for the next day? Luckily the marina just came online with their inventory system and it's now available on the web.

      Just two fine examples of why you want the internet around even if you are vacationing. The internet is (also) a tool to be used to make your life easier. It is applicable in all walks of life, vacationing included.

      --
      The preceding comment has been reviewed and declared to be compliant with HIPPA Phase II regulations.
  35. You live where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I live 10 minutes from Baltimore, by the way."

    Note to /. readers: This means he lives near the Cockeysville Dump.

    Bal'mer has its faults, but its a fun old-style city.

  36. bfd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jacksonville did this over ayear ago at the St. Johns River harbor. This is nothing new, friends.

  37. $29.95/month hot spot service by deander2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    haha! this is a quote from a company that sells a $29.95/month hot spot service, and is upset with the city's new offering:

    "It's hard enough to compete against other companies. If the
    city starts providing for free what we make people pay for, it
    could really hurt us," Dowling said.

    DUH! ;-p

    i do think that metered wifi access will fail as a business model. virtually every business where the cost of tracking and billing access is MORE than the cost of providing said access becomes just another gratuity. (like a public water fountain)

    1. Re:$29.95/month hot spot service by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      $29.95/month is not metered access. $29.95/GB or something is metered.

      </pedant> (man, i do this a lot)

    2. Re:$29.95/month hot spot service by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

      You would think the various places where you can park for free or significantly cheaper than the private lots/structures would be bad too no? Doesn't look like anyone is hurting to me...

      Our work provides free coffee, and we used to have cappuccino machines as well. (The coffee machine was provided by starbucks, and we use starbucks coffee beans). But guess what? People still drive over to Starbucks for coffee...

      We have drinking fountains all over the place here, but people still buy bottled water from the vending machine in the break room...

  38. dig cam by nitz7978 · · Score: 1

    I can see it now... The Big Dig cam.

    1. Re:dig cam by nate1138 · · Score: 1

      Um, that's Boston, not Baltimore.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  39. Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Montgomery County will wind up paying for another Baltimoronic boondoggle.

  40. Security and QOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hope that they don't just simply roll out completely open and un-monitered wifi.

    I'd imagine that at the very least they'd want to use some level of firewalling and packetshaping to make sure the network is useable by all and doesn't simply attrack wireless spam servers or 0 day warez servers.

    Has anyone setup one of these types of networks? What has your experience been? Did it really "help business"?

  41. I think Doug is behind all this. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    It's just a clever ploy to reduce the bandwidth bills on the Badtz Maru.

  42. Arr! A pirate's life for geeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would ye be liking some sea fries with that crabby patty, matey? SPONGEBOB! I'm not paying you to lie around leeching the bandwidth.

  43. You must be so confused! by goldspider · · Score: 1
    It's free (beer), so it's good!

    It's provided and monitored by Big Brother, so it's bad!

    It's free (beer), so it's good!

    It's inherantly insecure, so it's bad!

    It's inherantly insecure, so it's good!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:You must be so confused! by murphyslawyer · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...Does it come with a free Frogurt? Is the Frogurt cursed?

      --
      I ain't evil, I'm just good looking.
  44. The Right Attitude by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Your point MIGHT be valid if we weren't talking about the Government competing with a private business. That's not supposed to happen. A business can only use funds that have been voluntarily given to them by customers/investors to stay in business while the Government can force you to hand over tax revenues to fund whatever they want.

    If the company who donated the equipment to the city was running a free hotspot as an advertisement for themselves that'd be one thing, but by getting the city government involved in the project they've probably set themselves up for a lawsuit. The Government is supposed to help along private business, not compete with it. A Government is always unfair competition... Because in the end they can always make you being in business illegal.

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    1. Re:The Right Attitude by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Your point MIGHT be valid if we weren't talking about the Government competing with a private business. That's not supposed to happen.

      Government roads compete with private roads. Medicaid competes with private insurance. Public universities compete with private ones. Public housing projects compete with private housing.

      The government can provide whatever services the people want it to, no "not supposed to"s about it.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:The Right Attitude by Morgon · · Score: 1

      How is it competition when it's a free service?

      --
      [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
  45. Secure Anonymity by barryfandango · · Score: 1

    Once these sort of wi-fi areas become more pervasive, it should be incredibly easy for the Adrian Lamos of the world to do their work - drop anchor, drop bomb, sail on.

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
  46. Ain't Socialism Great? by goldspider · · Score: 1
    Ahh yes, another triumph for Big Government (tm) over private industry!

    And if this is administered as inefficiently and with as much incompetence as most other government beaurocracies, is this 'free' (actually paid for by Baltimore/Maryland taxpayers) service really going to be worth not having to pay for reliable service that thrives on remaining high-quality? I think not.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  47. Hmm by Erwos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Being a long-time resident of Baltimore, I must point out that the crime in the Inner Harbor is not as bad as you think during the day. I'm not sure if I'd use it as a safe spot at night, but for standard touristy stuff, it's fine.

    I like the idea of free wi-fi. Go to (Hooters|HRC|whatever) grab some food, find a nice spot to sit down outside, and surf the web while enjoying a decent lunch. Combine that with a few fun attractions (boat tours, science center, ESPN Zone), and it has the makings of a fun day out that doesn't require you to give up all contact with the outside world.

    Why you're bringing the laptop on a fun day out is beyond me, though... sometimes, we should just unplug, I think. Maybe it's for PDAs with wi-fi (and lots of batteries)?

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    1. Re:Hmm by StressedEd · · Score: 1

      From my brief (week) visit to Baltimore, my impression was that the inner harbour area was angelic in comparison to north of the harbour (where I was staying). It is certainly an "interesting" city.

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
  48. Tourism? What Do You Base Your Trips On? by H8X55 · · Score: 2, Funny

    come for the orioles, stay for the WiFi.

    PS - Last time we checked, there were enough open business networks available, city sponsered ones aren't necessary.

  49. New bumper sticker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Baltimore- It's not just the stink that's wireless!"

  50. That sounds like a really stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With wireless, given sufficient response time, not only can the police block a particular interface from using network, but they can triangulate precise location.

    If you are going to be trying to use a government network for illegal activities, lets hope you're ready to run real fast.

    A payphone would be safer in terms of tracking...

    1. Re:That sounds like a really stupid idea. by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      A payphone would be safer in terms of tracking...

      Careful there, some payphones have cameras! A couple of years ago, some highschool students thought it funny to phone in an "anonymous" bomb threat. Unfortunately, the call only stayed anonymous until police reviewed the tape of the phone booth...

    2. Re:That sounds like a really stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big brother is watching you!
      Ok, plus he's probably tired of people vandalising his payphones for fun and profit...

  51. That's right, you have the wrong atitude... by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 1
    Dowling is complaining about exactly the same thing as you - a monopolist abusing his powers. Look at it from his point of view, a large organization - the government - comes in. It used its deep pockets -- tax revenue -- to undercut his price structure. Selling the product at a loss. Dowling is unable to compete with someone who is willing to give the product away. He goes out of business.

    This is very similar to what Microsoft did to Netscape. And it is generally agreed that Microsoft was in the wrong. What the government is doing in Baltimore has similar ramifications.

  52. I'm at UMBC and.... by FluffyG · · Score: 2, Funny

    this will keep me from being at school because now i can sit in hooters all day with my laptop.... THANK YOU BALTIMORE!

  53. Well, there's always the Cold War solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >This is exactly the kind of attitude that hurts technology and customers. It results in monopolistic companies trying everything possible to stick to the existing model, and try and kill of competition (albeit superior in technology and better for the customer).

    Baltimore should know better than to resort to Socialism. It is Un-American.

    The population of Baltimore is discontent. Perhaps a CIA-orchistrated coup will show them the benefits of corporate governance. We all know that worked wonders for the sluggish Chilian economy.

  54. And they even have the gall of calling it by TheMidget · · Score: 3, Funny

    Penguin! Oh the insolence!

  55. I hate to be a pendant... by TheMidget · · Score: 1

    ... and even to be a pedant, but pedant is spelled without an n before the d

  56. Obligatory "Blazzing Saddles" quote by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    Anybody think of immediately after reading the story?

    Sherrif: "'Scuse me while I whip this out"

    Crowd screams as the sheriff reaches for his front pocket

    --
    Sig it.
  57. Navigation / Tourist Tool by merger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've thought about this for a while. By putting a transmitter out near the channel buoy and a notifier that users should try connecting at that point they can point people to navigational charts, highlight hazards that may not be on charts, show weather and tides, point them to the appropriate guest slip and handle payment for that slip. Ultimately, the idea is to create a portal specific to the needs of the maritime community.

    The big issues then arise is that do you really want people running the boat and operating a laptop at the same time. This could be combatted somewhat by building text-to-speech tools on the web site so it says everything I mentoned.

    1. Re:Navigation / Tourist Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about they just use radio? You know that old fashioned AM/FM stuff?

  58. Home Depot by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else remember the story about Home Depot? I think it was like 2 years ago, where they made their cash registers wireless using 802.11b. It was setup so that the cash register used wireless to talk to the main server, which had a hard-line connection to the database. Apparently, this wasn't secured, and a bunch of news stories popped up about how one could park their car in the parking lot, and retrieve CC#s. Though the articles did point out that the problem was quickly rectified.

    If this story was indeed true, I wonder how prevalent this sort of thing is...

  59. Yes, but the real trick.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    will be surviving the three blocks between the parking garage and the inner harbor with your $2000 laptop.

  60. New! Wireless 'hood, yo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real way to attract more tourists to Baltimore is to stop the crackwhores from selling their children:

    http://www.insidebaltimore.com/news/local/bc-mom-t rys-to-sell-son-for-bail0903.shtml

    Yay, Baltimore.

  61. We pay for the whole damned state anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be worse though...could live in PG and pay more taxes and have a really really suck-ass government.

  62. Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " You can grow food in Dundalk?"

    Yeah... mushrooms.

  63. spam? by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    What about spam? Someone could just sit out in international waters, run his own mail server, and start dumping out tons of spam onto the net. And unlike mp3's and movies, spam is very small.

  64. Re:Security (and content filtering) by wturky · · Score: 1

    True. The whole thing looks like a lawsuit just waiting to happen.

    The other question that one has to wonder about is whether there will be any content filters on it?

    I mean, if you think about it, in schools and libraries that have Internet access, typically, they're required to have filters to try to keep out "inappropriate" content from minors. Will this service be filtered? Or will it be unfiltered?

    If you filter it, the adults will scream censorship.

    If you don't filter it, then who's responsible when little Johnny starts browsing porn? Will the city go after itself for providing porn to a minor? And can parents sue the city for facilitating it?

  65. Need to DoS your h4x0r rivals by Mordant · · Score: 1

    while sailing Chesapeake Bay?

    Now you can! ;>

  66. Is Annapolis Next? by geethree · · Score: 1

    First, the Baltimore Harbor...
    Next, Annapolis?!?

    Lots of boat-folk there who would love on-water wireless while docked in the harbor.

  67. It's actually a nice area by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    I've been to the Inner Harbor several times in the past few years... each year is nicer and nicer. More and more touristy... but a nice weekend away from home.

    With Camden Yards so near, it's a good weekend if you love baseball, and your favorite team is in town.

    I wouldn't consider it to be dangerious for the most part. Fromt the stadium to the harbor is well lit, and crowded before/after the game. The convention center has good security.... and the waterfront is well kept as well.

    Unless your somewhere that you shouldn't be... not exactly dangerious.

    I would feel more unsafe in Timesquare with the large crowds than at the waterfront. And I'm in NYC a fair amount, grew up in the suburbs of NY.

    1. Re:It's actually a nice area by Kevinv · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was there a couple of months ago (in a hotel with really sucky internet access, why didn't they put this in before that?). I liked it a lot, nice walks, nice waterfront. Little too much of the "upscale" chains -- Hard Rock Cafe, etc.... but still nice.

  68. Hit and run hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one thing to surf from the safety of your home / office behind a firewall. It's another to take a WiFi enabled laptop into the wild. How many people will leave shares open, etc...

    A person could park themselves under a tree and anonymously unleash a pile of automated hacking tools on the unsupecting public.

  69. YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we can check up on our favorite anime p0rn sites!

    Now if only they gave out free klenix boxes.

  70. Crusty Supper by seniorcoder · · Score: 1

    That's what the restaurant is more popularly known by.

  71. security is a blanket term. by lysium · · Score: 1
    You are not talking about security, you are talking about authentication. You can still launch a DDOS over an encrypted connection, using a dynamically-allocated IP address. Likewise, you will be able to download an mp3 (or a http page for that matter) using 128-bit encryption. There are basically two choices: give every user a traceably-unique identifier, or just live with the consequences of providing a public service.

    ============

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  72. first things first... by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    Now if only they could assure people that they won't get wounded by random Baltimore gunfire while they surf the internet...

  73. Too far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that international waters are 12 miles out, and the Baltimore inner harbor is many miles up the Chesapeake Bay from the ocean.

  74. 2600 Meeting... by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    I wonder if they realize that they just wireless-enabled a 2600 Meeting ?

    Should be plenty of fun this friday !

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  75. The coolest inner harbor thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best thing I remember about my last trip (besides the aquarium) was the American Visionary Art Museum. Lots of cool eye candy and a really good restaurant that served me some very rare tuna. It was a most excellent surprise.

  76. Harbor for criminals... by sammaffei · · Score: 1
    "...bringing in more tourists and business conventions..."

    ...and hackers who need a free haven to deploy their next Windows worm.

    Just buy a used laptop from wherever, 802.11b PC Card, write your worm code, deploy, and throw the laptop in the harbor (heck, they even supply the disposal mechanism).

    --

    Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

    1. Re:Harbor for criminals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you also grab some CC#'s before you toss the laptop so you can purchase your next one?

    2. Re:Harbor for criminals... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Or walk into a cyber cafe, pay cash, and do it from there.

      Dweeb.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  77. Re:Security (and content filtering) by cyberlync · · Score: 1

    Thats easy. Morally little Johnny's parents are responsable for little Johnny. Of course, in the modern us where they parents are unwilling to take responsability for thier children they will probably sue the city.

    --
    I'm a programmer, I don't have to spell correctly; I just have to spell consistently
  78. Wireless access a plus, gun to the head a minus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first time (about a month ago) I ever went to Baltimore's inner harbor, to meet a friend, I had a gun put to head and was carjacked. The car was subsequently used in a successful bank robbery the next day.

    I suggest that if the City of Baltimore wants more tourists to come, they should do something about the crime instead of the 802.11

    1. Re:Wireless access a plus, gun to the head a minus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit.

  79. Verizon by istartedi · · Score: 1

    The Washington Post says Verizon just announced they are rolling out high-speed wireless internet for $80/mo in Washington DC and San Diego. Industry analysts are skeptical that Verizon can make any money. Hmmmm... <sarcasm>I wonder why.</sarcasm>

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  80. Whip out your laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Promptly be mugged and have it taken. Baltimore is a dump, ask anyone who has ever been there. Terribly nasty city, and the inner harbor, while nice, is surrounded by decay and urban rot.

    1. Re:Whip out your laptop by sammaffei · · Score: 1

      Wow sounds a lot like Philadelphia, except our decay and rot surrounds more decay and rot. Wouldn't dare use my Powerbook G4 in public.

      --

      Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

  81. Underwater Wireless? by wedgehead · · Score: 1

    So who's going to be the first to study the underwater propagation of 802.11 signals? Unfortunately, I don't imagine that a Pringles can would last for too long underwater... then there's the added problem of keeping the fish from moving in and calling it home. ...and if Verizon was managing the hotspots, would they put buoys out to see with "You're Hot" signs, like the phone booths in NYC?

  82. As A Sailor by bodland · · Score: 1

    I would really dig having wireless available along western Lake Michigan shoreline....constant radar updates would be excellent as conditions change rapidly and passages are up to 30 miles. Rather than pumping the porn in harbor wireless is more useful when boats are underway.

  83. The Wire-less by wembley · · Score: 1

    For those who watch HBO, now Avon Barksdale and his crew can see which cans the dockworkers are smuggling drugs in, realtime.

    --

    Share and Enjoy!

  84. coverage area? by sparx · · Score: 1

    i was at hooter's today in the inner harbor and i couldn't get a connection of any kind. they're going to have to expand some for it to be of any use, i think

    1. Re:coverage area? by TheUnwiredGuy · · Score: 1

      The antenna is wedge so it covers more outside rather than inside. If restaurants want inside coverage, they need to get a repeater and it will work wall-2-wall.