I'll have to type fast, since you'll likely be arrested and executed for step 9 momentarily.
1. 9/11 terrorists are external enemies of the United States of America. The detention of enemy combatants is legal and assumed to be applied in good faith. Thank goodness a system exists to challenge its legality.
Unspoken Islam as an...invoked enemy? Failboat.
2. May want to look up the definition and history of GULAG. You may be surprised it's not actually a place, and has almost nothing in common with Gitmo.
3. Damn, and I thought this Thug Life tattoo was helping.
4. Yes, because the FBI amending its policies equates to the creation of a nationwide integrated surveillance system. Maybe the Guardian was confused by the cameras mounted to the surrounding buildings.
5. Roger Moore's portrayal as an international spy makes him slightly biased. Granted, he did a terrible job.
6. The No-Fly list means...you can't fly. How does this have anything to do with detention and release?
7. I hope it's happening! But then I believe the sentiment here would be to target key dissidents and revolutionaries, and as far as I can tell, Michael Moore is still making movies. Targeting individuals is, well, the whole point of investigating a crime in a reasonable way.
8. Bullshit. The press is controlled by wealthy individuals and corporations. Television in the United States is not programmed by Uncle Sam. It may be biased, but it certainly isn't fascist.
Yeah, except you've obviously never tried this. It's insanely unstable, and the cable company just 5C encrypts everything anyway. And you get the pleasure of paying for that cable box.
I ran MythTV for years on nothing but a digital cable in. HD and SD worked great, but I was screwed if they ever decided to move the channels around and I got tired of spending all my time administering.
You may be surprised to learn that money works a little differently than that. The total amount of money is not limited, and you can actually create money today.
How? Go to a bank and get a loan. Any loan will do. The money that they deposit into your account does not come from another account or vault. The bank does not have that money on hand. They manufacture it (though not physically). As you spend that money, it ends up in the hands of businesses and individuals, eventually landing in savings accounts, investments, etc. It may also, however be used to pay off other debts, in which case that money disappears.
I don't do nearly as good a job explaining it as Paul Gringon's video, Money As Debt. It's on YouTube and I totally recommend checking it out. I remember seeing it for the first time and thinking it was all garbage, but it's helped me appreciate the complexity of the financial world.
And so one of the many restrictions of post-9/11 flight security goes the way of the dodo in the name of convenience. I predict that we'll see more and more of this in the coming years. Soon, we'll not be required to X-ray our shoes when people forget why we started in the first place.
This is an illustration of how a knee-jerk reaction to tightening security instead of innovating causes us to be less secure than we were before. If we had rethought airplane security from the ground up as opposed to ramping current practices up, we might have actually learned something from 9/11 in terms of air security. As it stands, I don't think we learned very much at all.
Well now, let's be clear. I didn't ask anyone to do my homework for me. A claim was made and I questioned its validity. I asked someone to back up their bullshit and they couldn't because it was a fabrication. It's clear from your source that there was no formal agenda trounced upon by the democrats.
The only point I was trying to make is that WinPimp2K is full of shit, and got modded +4 informative for it. For what it's worth, thanks for doing some digging. I was curious as to what he'd meant.
The talk-in was more spontaneous than planned. Mike Pence , R-Ind., said that as the Houseâ(TM)s regular session neared its end Friday morning, he and Price were talking about staging more than 100 five-minute special order speeches when Price said that if the House adjourned, âoeWe should just stay.â(TM)â(TM)
Sounds like a case of shoulda, woulda, coulda. They weren't signed up for anything.
You know, there are some of us that are glad that oil is getting expensive. Basic economics are forcing people to buy less, and that's a great thing when we're dealing with a non-renewable resource.
Seriously, it looks like 7 dollar gas is just what this country needs to start really changing the way we do this. I say bring it on.
(B) For purposes of subsection 8(B) [1] of this section, "sexually explicit conduct" means- (i) graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex, or lascivious simulated sexual intercourse where the genitals, breast, or pubic area of any person is exhibited; (ii) graphic or lascivious simulated; (I) bestiality; (II) masturbation; or (III) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or (iii) graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;
I think you misread my comment. I think Apple's market share should be five times what it is now, and I think that it should be because of its UNIX foundations.
And yes, I'm actually on the command line quite a bit on my Mac Book Pro. rsync is a great way to keep an iTunes folder up to date on other machines. It's just one of the many ways they've managed to really bridge the gap between guts and presentation.
Here's what I meant; Linux won't gain popularity simply because Apple's UNIX-based OS gains popularity. That's because Apple's popularity comes from style, a desirable product line and a unified marketing message. The cult of personality surrounding it doesn't hurt either.
Linux doesn't have cool people using it, nor does it have flashy commercials. It could be better than anything else out there, but it wouldn't matter. If people don't believe it, they won't use it. Apple makes people believe it.
Will the pearly gates of acceptance open up for them once they reach the magic 10%, and will that have a positive effect on desktop Linux adoption?
Wow, talk about a strange corollary. Linux desktop adoption has nothing at all to do with Mac market share. It would have been just as valid to write, "Will the pearly gates of acceptance open up for them once they reach the magic 10%, and will that lead a surge in kitten adoptions?"
Slashdot Mirror
One time I used a microwave. Very effective.
I'll have to type fast, since you'll likely be arrested and executed for step 9 momentarily.
1. 9/11 terrorists are external enemies of the United States of America. The detention of enemy combatants is legal and assumed to be applied in good faith. Thank goodness a system exists to challenge its legality.
Unspoken Islam as an...invoked enemy? Failboat.
2. May want to look up the definition and history of GULAG. You may be surprised it's not actually a place, and has almost nothing in common with Gitmo.
3. Damn, and I thought this Thug Life tattoo was helping.
4. Yes, because the FBI amending its policies equates to the creation of a nationwide integrated surveillance system. Maybe the Guardian was confused by the cameras mounted to the surrounding buildings.
5. Roger Moore's portrayal as an international spy makes him slightly biased. Granted, he did a terrible job.
6. The No-Fly list means...you can't fly. How does this have anything to do with detention and release?
7. I hope it's happening! But then I believe the sentiment here would be to target key dissidents and revolutionaries, and as far as I can tell, Michael Moore is still making movies. Targeting individuals is, well, the whole point of investigating a crime in a reasonable way.
8. Bullshit. The press is controlled by wealthy individuals and corporations. Television in the United States is not programmed by Uncle Sam. It may be biased, but it certainly isn't fascist.
9. Secret Police bagging you now?
10. Fail. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boumediene_v._Bush
He's an American. He'd ask about the DeLorean ;)
You're doing it wrong.
Are you afraid I'll think the particle is equivalent in diameter to a completely unrelated, unspecified device?
If something is a micrometer across, then it's one millionth of a meter across. That's just common sense given the context.
Yeah, sadly Comcast in Houston designates everything except HD OTA as "premium."
But I'm not worried. CableCARD, er, tru2way, er, Sonic Death Monkey will make it all better someday...
Yeah, except you've obviously never tried this. It's insanely unstable, and the cable company just 5C encrypts everything anyway. And you get the pleasure of paying for that cable box.
I ran MythTV for years on nothing but a digital cable in. HD and SD worked great, but I was screwed if they ever decided to move the channels around and I got tired of spending all my time administering.
Increase your civil disobedience! I'm tagging everything "signed" until I get an explanation.
You may be surprised to learn that money works a little differently than that. The total amount of money is not limited, and you can actually create money today.
How? Go to a bank and get a loan. Any loan will do. The money that they deposit into your account does not come from another account or vault. The bank does not have that money on hand. They manufacture it (though not physically). As you spend that money, it ends up in the hands of businesses and individuals, eventually landing in savings accounts, investments, etc. It may also, however be used to pay off other debts, in which case that money disappears.
I don't do nearly as good a job explaining it as Paul Gringon's video, Money As Debt. It's on YouTube and I totally recommend checking it out. I remember seeing it for the first time and thinking it was all garbage, but it's helped me appreciate the complexity of the financial world.
Correction: Apple Can Remotely Disable iPhone Apps from the App Store. Cydia and Installer are a-okay.
Clearly, they have lost there's, which is why their bare.
Sorry may, that was bugging the shit out of me.
And so one of the many restrictions of post-9/11 flight security goes the way of the dodo in the name of convenience. I predict that we'll see more and more of this in the coming years. Soon, we'll not be required to X-ray our shoes when people forget why we started in the first place.
This is an illustration of how a knee-jerk reaction to tightening security instead of innovating causes us to be less secure than we were before. If we had rethought airplane security from the ground up as opposed to ramping current practices up, we might have actually learned something from 9/11 in terms of air security. As it stands, I don't think we learned very much at all.
Design a video game. Then you can dictate what "should" be.
Well now, let's be clear. I didn't ask anyone to do my homework for me. A claim was made and I questioned its validity. I asked someone to back up their bullshit and they couldn't because it was a fabrication. It's clear from your source that there was no formal agenda trounced upon by the democrats.
The only point I was trying to make is that WinPimp2K is full of shit, and got modded +4 informative for it. For what it's worth, thanks for doing some digging. I was curious as to what he'd meant.
From your source:
The talk-in was more spontaneous than planned. Mike Pence , R-Ind., said that as the Houseâ(TM)s regular session neared its end Friday morning, he and Price were talking about staging more than 100 five-minute special order speeches when Price said that if the House adjourned, âoeWe should just stay.â(TM)â(TM)
Sounds like a case of shoulda, woulda, coulda. They weren't signed up for anything.
Cool. Should we continue to try to lower the price of gas by subjugating the poor of a culture other than our own? Does that make it okay?
Oh, right. It's not a simple issue.
Fuck you for assuming I revel in the suffering of others.
Yep, you missed the story.
When the motion to adjourn was made, over 100 Republicans were signed up to speak for 5 minutes each on oil/energy.
Link?
You know, there are some of us that are glad that oil is getting expensive. Basic economics are forcing people to buy less, and that's a great thing when we're dealing with a non-renewable resource.
Seriously, it looks like 7 dollar gas is just what this country needs to start really changing the way we do this. I say bring it on.
Congressman 1: I move to adjourn.
Speaker: Do I have a second?
Congressman 2: Second.
Speaker: All in favor, all opposed.
*vote*
Speaker: The aye's have it. The House stands in adjournment.
Democracy. The House is adjourned. Premature is an irrelevant modifier.
Me.
Quake's already on the iPhone.
http://www.zodttd.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2793
It runs great!
Why not? If you have to reinstall or get a new computer, and if iTMS was gone, you'd be up the same creek.
2.B. of course:
(B) For purposes of subsection 8(B) [1] of this section, "sexually explicit conduct" means-
(i) graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex, or lascivious simulated sexual intercourse where the genitals, breast, or pubic area of any person is exhibited;
(ii) graphic or lascivious simulated;
(I) bestiality;
(II) masturbation; or
(III) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(iii) graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;
I think you misread my comment. I think Apple's market share should be five times what it is now, and I think that it should be because of its UNIX foundations.
And yes, I'm actually on the command line quite a bit on my Mac Book Pro. rsync is a great way to keep an iTunes folder up to date on other machines. It's just one of the many ways they've managed to really bridge the gap between guts and presentation.
Here's what I meant; Linux won't gain popularity simply because Apple's UNIX-based OS gains popularity. That's because Apple's popularity comes from style, a desirable product line and a unified marketing message. The cult of personality surrounding it doesn't hurt either.
Linux doesn't have cool people using it, nor does it have flashy commercials. It could be better than anything else out there, but it wouldn't matter. If people don't believe it, they won't use it. Apple makes people believe it.
Will the pearly gates of acceptance open up for them once they reach the magic 10%, and will that have a positive effect on desktop Linux adoption?
Wow, talk about a strange corollary. Linux desktop adoption has nothing at all to do with Mac market share. It would have been just as valid to write, "Will the pearly gates of acceptance open up for them once they reach the magic 10%, and will that lead a surge in kitten adoptions?"
Personally, though, adopt a cat anyway.