Well, just wait half a minute or so and then point your favourite browser towards http://127.0.0.1:8888 - and off you go! The Freenet-thingie is running in the background.
Is G5 a good marketing name though? I've understood that the whole Gx-line is thought of as slow and stagnant processors. Perhaps a name not associated with Motorola would be a better idea.
Thoughts, anyone?
Re:in case of slashdotting....
on
Linus on DRM
·
· Score: -1, Offtopic
Look, I believe you got this all wrong. And tell me again WHY Fink is a problem? Because you think the Fink-developers should spend their time improving Darwin?
And why on earth do you say that the Fink-developers wouldn't like Apple? Think about it - by making all those applications available to the Mac OS X users they're actually helping Apple. What about Apple's X11 port? Users running X11 on Mac OS X heavily rely on Fink for their software.
Why should the Fink-developers run PCs instead of Macs? Why should they abandon the opportunity to run their favourite X11 applications on top of a killer OS? (and not only X11 apps but all the other great software the Fink-developers have made available)
I think liking the Mac OS is an intelligent reason enough.
I believe a lot of Mac users aren't obsessed with speed and I can't blame them. As long as your computer doesn't slow you down in your work - why use anything else?
Sure, my iBook 700 running OS X isn't as snappy as my Windows-desktop but to me, personally, OS X is such a joy to use and it packs plenty speed for my everyday usage. It's lightweight, easy to use and batterylife is excellent.
Look, troll-hunter, save your bullets. This is exactly my point:
"In the extremely miniscule probability that any of our enemies could have tampered with the shuttle, that "half of the world" you refer to would be conquered in a way never before seen on Earth."
So obsessed with enemies. We and them. Good and evil. Conquering and warfare with great force.
But you're right - the probability of this being a terrorist-act is very small.
Also, when people use phrases like "their f*cked-up religion" one can clearly see that these persons haven't understood much. Islam is not very different from Christianity. However, there are Muslim fundamentalists, as well as there are Christian fundamentalists, who interpret their belief and holy books in a destructive manner.
And also, what is crucial to understand is that our view of Islam is defined by how our Western media pictures it. It's the same thing in the Middle-East. Muslim media show Christian fundamentalism.
So, the core of the problem is media coverage and interpretation.
Now it doesn't really matter to such a person that the shuttle ALWAYS comes in over Texas and therefore goes over the town of Palestine every time - to that person, it's clearly a sign from Allah.
Your analysis really suck and is a perfect example of functionalistic thinking coming from a very narrowminded individual.
No, you're wrong. If you would have been travelling through Middle-Eastern countries the last couple of years you would, too, see that the majority of the muslim population is against terrorism.
The problem is that Western MEDIA doesn't show us this. Clearly you can understand that.
Slashdot Mirror
In other news, the Indian president announced that they'll from now on will go by the name GNU/India.
Easier to setup? Smaller foot-print?
What is brave about not thinking for yourself?
Well, just wait half a minute or so and then point your favourite browser towards http://127.0.0.1:8888 - and off you go! The Freenet-thingie is running in the background.
Thoughts, anyone?
Oh my God! A community-dupe!
XMMS.
Seriously though - Fink allows me to do this.
Serioulsy, is this a good thing or is there some kind of trick behind the scenes?
And why on earth do you say that the Fink-developers wouldn't like Apple? Think about it - by making all those applications available to the Mac OS X users they're actually helping Apple. What about Apple's X11 port? Users running X11 on Mac OS X heavily rely on Fink for their software.
Why should the Fink-developers run PCs instead of Macs? Why should they abandon the opportunity to run their favourite X11 applications on top of a killer OS? (and not only X11 apps but all the other great software the Fink-developers have made available)
You don't make sense.
I dis-gree. Competition is always good in situations like this. And both KDE and Gnome are both very capable desktop environments.
Sure, but why should I? I don't need it to be any faster. It works for me and that is, contrary to popular belief, what really matters.
I believe a lot of Mac users aren't obsessed with speed and I can't blame them. As long as your computer doesn't slow you down in your work - why use anything else?
Sure, my iBook 700 running OS X isn't as snappy as my Windows-desktop but to me, personally, OS X is such a joy to use and it packs plenty speed for my everyday usage. It's lightweight, easy to use and batterylife is excellent.
I'd say these are reasons enough.
I caught a glimpse of Johnny Mnemonic in there!
Well, then I suggest you head over to Apple and give some feedback on this one.
"In the extremely miniscule probability that any of our enemies could have tampered with the shuttle, that "half of the world" you refer to would be conquered in a way never before seen on Earth."
So obsessed with enemies. We and them. Good and evil. Conquering and warfare with great force.
But you're right - the probability of this being a terrorist-act is very small.
And also, what is crucial to understand is that our view of Islam is defined by how our Western media pictures it. It's the same thing in the Middle-East. Muslim media show Christian fundamentalism.
So, the core of the problem is media coverage and interpretation.
Now it doesn't really matter to such a person that the shuttle ALWAYS comes in over Texas and therefore goes over the town of Palestine every time - to that person, it's clearly a sign from Allah.
Your analysis really suck and is a perfect example of functionalistic thinking coming from a very narrowminded individual.
The problem is that Western MEDIA doesn't show us this. Clearly you can understand that.
So, do you realize that half of the world is rejoicing?
iMovie 3.0.1 - 84,5MB
iPhoto 2.0 - 33,3MB
That's nearly 120MB to download..
Ximian or not, everyone still uses XMMS. And why not spice that one up a bit with the kick-ass Ximian-South-skin which can be found here.
A screenshot would most definately say more than those 1843 words.
Apple being involved and all that would be iKermany, now wouldn't it?
Amen.