Slashdot Mirror


User: cpotoso

cpotoso's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
415
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 415

  1. Re:They can be tried again, I think? on Manslaughter Conviction Overturned For Scientists Who Didn't Predict Earthquake · · Score: 1

    You are certifiably insane :)

  2. Re:They can be tried again, I think? on Manslaughter Conviction Overturned For Scientists Who Didn't Predict Earthquake · · Score: 2

    Have you eaten in Italy vs. in Germany? Enough said.

  3. Re:It's time to throw out the entire college syste on Is It Time To Throw Out the College Application System? · · Score: 1

    You must be smoking some really serious weed. I have yet to see (in the US) any medical doctor who is not in the top 10% of income of the country (at the very least!). Get a specialization and you are easily in the top 2%. All of this "insurers set prices", "having to pay the lights" is complete BS. They see you for 6 minutes because they can... that way they can see 10 patients/hour and make 200-500 k$ salaries. Compare that to any other highly qualified professions (at > 10 years education) and you see that they have a pretty sweet deal. If this were not the case, you would not see so many applicants to medical schools, eh?

  4. Re:Make SATs optional on Is It Time To Throw Out the College Application System? · · Score: 1

    Very well said. All this "oh, we want a well rounded education" is BS from the humanities departments and/or covered discrimination. If a kid works hard and has straight A's through HS, he/she deserves a lot of credit for it and should be granted admission. No ifs or buts.

  5. Re:Boo on Fooling a Mercedes Into Autonomous Driving With a Soda Can · · Score: 1

    Let's see... a tire with a radius of ~0.3 m, in a car traveling at 100 mph ( 45 m/s) experiences a maximum centripetal acceleration of ~6700 m/s^2). A 1 in^2*0.5 in piece of rubber (assuming density to be ~ 1 g/cm^3) experiences a "centrifugal foce" of ONLY ~4.7 pounds! That is only 4.7 psi. So over-inflating by 20 psi MAY BE A PROBLEM.

  6. Re:Boo on Fooling a Mercedes Into Autonomous Driving With a Soda Can · · Score: 1

    I once put 70 psi on a tire rated for 45 (and designed to be inflated at 24 for normal ops.). Only noticed that a few days later (hey the car is really bumpy, mother said). Never had any other issue :)

  7. Only $0.0175? That was cheap! on Sony Agrees To $17.75m Settlement For 2011 PSN Attack · · Score: 1

    m = 10^{-3}, M = 10^3.

  8. xprotolab or teensy 3.1 on Ask Slashdot: PC-Based Oscilloscopes On a Microbudget? · · Score: 1
    xprotolab or teensy 3.1

    Check out xprotolab (http://www.gabotronics.com/development-boards/xmega-xprotolab.htm) from Gabotronics. Not too fast or too easy to use but it is very capable and Gabo provides very good support. It is self-contained (small oled screen) but can also send info to PC over USB.

    Also, the "arduino" teensy 3.1 could be used to make a USB-based scope for ca. $20 (plus some additional parts) and can have a lot of other cool uses too. Check it out: http://www.pjrc.com/teensy/tee... and http://forum.pjrc.com/threads/....

  9. Re:Not "Nature", a lesser journal of the Nature gr on Siphons Work Due To Gravity, Not Atmospheric Pressure: Now With Peer Review · · Score: 0

    Agree! LOL!

  10. Re:Not "Nature", a lesser journal of the Nature gr on Siphons Work Due To Gravity, Not Atmospheric Pressure: Now With Peer Review · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is a BS factor, to some degree. But Scientific Reports is not Nature... that is for sure.

  11. Not "Nature", a lesser journal of the Nature group on Siphons Work Due To Gravity, Not Atmospheric Pressure: Now With Peer Review · · Score: 3, Informative

    The 2012 Impact Factor for Scientific Reports is 2.927. For comparison, that of Nature is 38.597. Still impressive, but please lets be precise.

  12. Re:Milk that cow! on Netflix Plans To Raise Prices By "$1 or $2 a Month" · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What are you smoking?? WE pay for the internet service (monthly bill, anyone?). So why should Netflix have to pay on top of that?? The infrastructure? Yes, coming from your monthly bill. Duh!

  13. Re:Does it really cost $100k? on The $100,000 Device That Could Have Solved Missing Plane Mystery · · Score: 2

    Your posting is close to non-sense. Who is saying that every Cessna 172 should have this device? We are talking about AIRLINERS, and in particular those that go transoceanic routes where radar tracking is not possible. On a 767-sized plane (and above) the $100k cost IS negligible when compared to other operational costs (fuel, crew, maintenance, insurance).

  14. Why aren't big planes PERMANENTLY monitored? on China Deploys Satellites In Search For Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight · · Score: 1

    I am not talking RADAR, but rather satellite-linked transponders relaying (at least) once per minute the plane "vitals" (coordinates, velocity, altitude, attitude, cabin pressure and temperature, fuel levels, any error codes or warnings). I mean, this may not be cheap, but it is meaningless cost-wise compared to the operational cost of a plane.

  15. Re:Learn to freaken drive. on Atlanta Gambled With Winter Storm and Lost · · Score: 1

    4 wheel drive dowes *not** equal 4 wheel STOP.

    And I thought all cars had breaks on all wheels... (4 wheel stop). Was I wrong? Maybe I should check my car again.

  16. I will donate for a giant spaghetti strainer on Satanists Propose Monument At Oklahoma State Capitol Next To Ten Commandments · · Score: 1

    Viva the pastafarians, viva the giant spaghetti monster!

  17. Re:Even worse... on Death to the Trapezoid... Next USB Connector Will Be Reversible · · Score: 1, Redundant

    What a S T U P ID reply. What is the orientation of the connectors in the back of a computer? In a random USB hub? Why the need to look for the logo when the shape of the connector could convey the correct orientation? (or even better, be orientation neutral). Do they pay you to use your brain in your work, or just brute force?

  18. Even worse... on Death to the Trapezoid... Next USB Connector Will Be Reversible · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the fact that the standard USB connection (rectangle) is not really 180 degrees symmetric (despite a shape that indicates it should be), usually takes 3+ attempts to get it in. Damn it, Jim, a spin-1/2 connector!

  19. Re:900 bucks on Microsoft May Finally Put Windows RT Out To Pasture · · Score: -1

    Mod parent up! LOL

  20. I gave it as a gift, it is VERY NICE. on Gift Review: Strandbeest Model Kit · · Score: 1

    Took about 30 min to build by a 11 year old. Mechanism is nice, looks nice too. Played with it for 10 minutes and then it is now on the shelf (a nice ornament ready to show to some friends). Overall I really liked it. Reasonable price too (though I found it for $15 on a chinese site).

  21. Re: Good Engineering Tesla on Man In Tesla Model S Fire Explains What Happened · · Score: 1

    Source?

  22. Re: Good Engineering Tesla on Man In Tesla Model S Fire Explains What Happened · · Score: 1

    Considering the very small number of tesla's out there, I would say the safety record is thin. Yes, other manufacturers had their problems, but with a baseline of MILLIONS of cars, their safety record is not so bad. It is always a matter of ratios.

  23. Re:Whar is wrong with programmers? on Mac OS 10.9's Mail App — Infinity Times Your Spam · · Score: 1

    You are literally demanding perfection. Exactly how many professions are there where people don't make mistakes?

    Well... programmers seems to be among the worst...

  24. Re:Whar is wrong with programmers? on Mac OS 10.9's Mail App — Infinity Times Your Spam · · Score: 1

    The comparison is absolutely nonsense. When you write a book you almost always start from scratch, so yes... errors can creep in on book 10^9 at the same rate as on book 10^0. When you write code that is an update to an old software, you re-use a lot of the old code. So, there is no excuse for that.

  25. Whar is wrong with programmers? on Mac OS 10.9's Mail App — Infinity Times Your Spam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, it is a MAIL program, not a revolutionary new product. The protocols have been out there for years (esp. IMAP). Why is it still buggy? Even worse: why is it buggier than the previous version? If it worked before THERE IS NO F*ING EXCUSE FOR IT NOT TO WORK NOW. Very very very lame.