Slashdot Mirror


Atlanta Gambled With Winter Storm and Lost

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Kim Severson reports at the NYT that by keeping schools and government offices open, and by not requiring tractor-trailers to use chains or stay out of the city's core, metropolitan Atlanta gambled and lost. "We don't want to be accused of crying wolf," said Gov. Nathan Deal, who pointed out that the storm had been forecast to just brush the south side of the city. If the city had been closed and the storm had been as light as some forecasters had told him it was going to be, he said, money would have been lost, and people would have complained. Tuesday's snowfall, that brought only 2-3 inches of snow to most of the Atlanta metro area, and the hundreds of thousands of motorists who flooded the metropolitan area's roadways as the storm moved in — created travel nightmares for commuters, truckers, students and their families. Some commuters were stuck in their vehicles up to 18 hours after they first hit the roads. Others abandoned their cars in or beside the road. Hundreds of students spent the night at school. Some surrounding cities, including Hiram, Woodstock, Sandy Springs and Acworth, opened emergency shelters for stranded motorists. "It's an easy joke made by Northerners," wrote Joe Sterling and Sarah Aarthun. "A dusting of snow shuts down an entire city and hapless drivers white-knuckle their way through a handful of flurries." Further North streets are salted well in advance of a coming storm but Atlanta doesn't have the capacity for that kind of treatment. "We simply have never purchased the amount of equipment necessary," said meteorologist Chad Myers adding Atlanta had plenty of warning. "Why would you in a city that gets one snow event every three years? Why would you buy 500 snowplows and salt trucks and have them sit around for 1,000 days, waiting for the next event?""

723 comments

  1. Pffft by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    You should try over here in the UK where the mere suggestion of snow seems to shut everything down

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:Pffft by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's what they SHOULD have done. You may not be prepared for your one snow event every three years, but if you're not, you fucking shut your city down when the forecast calls for 2 inches! If that costs more than keeping that fleet of 500 vehicles and stockpile of magnesium chloride on hand, then maybe you should be better prepared the next time it happens!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Pffft by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was in England a decade or two back for reasons.

      We were in London, and there was a day of freezing rain. Nobody cared. The next day, there was snow. Not even a millimeter. A dusting. The city literally shut down.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Pffft by Megane · · Score: 5, Informative

      you fucking shut your city down when the forecast calls for 2 inches

      "We don't want to be accused of crying wolf," said Gov. Nathan Deal, who pointed out that the storm had been forecast to just brush the south side of the city.

      That was part of the problem. The forecast didn't call for 2 inches, it predicted that the ice/snow would miss Atlanta, though not by much.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Pffft by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      You should try over here in the UK where the mere suggestion of snow seems to shut everything down

      Not everywhere. Up in the Pennines things keep moving, but people and councils are prepared.

    5. Re:Pffft by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why? 2-3 inches here and the only things we do different are leave earlier and drive slower. No chains. No pre-salting the roads. Just slow the fuck down until the roads get plowed or melt.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    6. Re:Pffft by VVelox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shutdown for 2 or 3 inches of snow? From a Chicago perspective the idea of even rolling plows for that is considered a bit laughable.

    7. Re: Pffft by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      You must be in a quite cold area, we definitely pre salt our roads here, not because the 2-3 inches is so bad (we usually wouldn't plow that), but because meltband refreeze would happen.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    8. Re:Pffft by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      True but in Russia (Prepares for BS Barrage) they get six feet of snow and things keep going.

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    9. Re:Pffft by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      True but in Russia (Prepares for BS Barrage) they get six feet of snow and things keep going.

      Same in parts of Canada and the USA - its all down to how much you spend. We make do with snow plows on the front of grit tucks, for several feet you need snow blowers. We put enough grit to melt ice at down to about -20 C, whereas many Canadians and Russians wouldn't bother putting on a coat for that weather!

    10. Re:Pffft by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      What part of Russia? It's a big place. Over how long of a period did the six feet fall? It makes a big difference.

    11. Re:Pffft by rlwhite · · Score: 0

      We don't plow for it, but we do salt.

      There's a great deal of difference between a light snow somewhere north like Chicago and somewhere down south like Atlanta because our temps during a snow are typically close to the freezing mark, resulting in a wet snow and a cycle of melting and refreezing as ice.

    12. Re:Pffft by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 2

      Well.. It is Russia. They probably look at the Northeast US and think 'Pussies... suck it up.'.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    13. Re:Pffft by SacredNaCl · · Score: 2

      Shutdown for 2 or 3 inches of snow? From a Chicago perspective the idea of even rolling plows for that is considered a bit laughable.

      Being from St Louis, Missouri - I have to agree. I have Z-chains if I need them because I have a RWD pickup with a big engine and it sucks in the snow even with M+S tires, but this past snow of 12" with -15F temperatures was the first time I have had to put them on in a couple years. I remember being in Florida one year when it snowed maybe 1", and there were tons of wrecks from that. People don't have M+S tires down there, and aside from the snowbirds they don't know how to drive in it. That definitely contributes, but I suspect the real problem was something more typical of the south.

      I suspect the real problem for Atlanta, and for much of the south isn't snow as much as it is freezing rain leaving a layer of ice on everything. It wasn't the snow that shut things down, it was the transition where it laid a layer of ice on everything first, and they had not treated their roads in any meaningful way in preparation for it. If you have a sheet of ice to drive on, that is much much worse than snow.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    14. Re:Pffft by bunratty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Surely they knew there was a significant probability for the snow to hit Atlanta. You don't have to make 100% accurate predictions to be able to prepare for the future. That's why weather forecasts give a probability of precipitation, rather than a binary rain/no rain prediction. If you know rain is likely, you can carry your umbrella just in case. The attitude should not be "You need to prove something bad will happen before I prepare for it," but rather "Let me know if something bad might happen so I can prepare for it."

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    15. Re:Pffft by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem in Atlanta isn't just the snow. It was the fact that they let everyone out to go home all at once. Ever been in rush hour traffic in Atlanta? Even without snow and ice, it's a fucking nightmare. That city has some of the worst rush hour traffic I've ever seen, even compared to L.A. Add to that icy/snowy roads that haven't seen even a hint of salt, a generally incompetent/corrupt city government, etc. and you can understand why it turned into a disaster.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    16. Re:Pffft by VVelox · · Score: 1

      Nah. That is not the problem. The problem is crappy drivers ed and people coming away with the inability to deal adverse driving conditions. From the time I spent living in Amarillo, TX, I would see similar issues with them and rain. I see no reason one should not be expected to have a basic understanding of driving in diverse conditions given wide climate differences housed in the continuous continental US.

    17. Re:Pffft by captainpanic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The actual problem is that the weather forecast is unreliable. In comparison to much of the EU, the weather forecast in the USA (not just Atlanta) is rather poor.
      The National Weather Service (that's the US weather prediction) has no funds, and old computers. Their predictions just don't have sufficient resolution. That's not just a problem with snow, or other weather-related disasters... It is a problem every day.

      Source:
      http://news.nationalgeographic...

    18. Re:Pffft by VVelox · · Score: 2

      That is actually fairly common for Chicago as well. Interestingly enough we don't salt much either when it happens.

    19. Re:Pffft by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Shutting the city down isn't free. Parents have to leave work to get home to children. What do you do when that parent is an ER nurse? Businesses have to close, city workers will cause traffic jams on the way home... and if nothing happens, everyone starts talking about how much money and time was wasted for nothing. You can't win.

    20. Re:Pffft by Wookact · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is not true either. The NOAA released a warning at 3 am saying it was going to hit Atlanta. The snow did not hit until noonish. The city either knew or should have know they should prepare the plows and salt trucks and start pretreating the roads. They then could have eased much of the burden by canceling school and having government workers stay home.

    21. Re:Pffft by VVelox · · Score: 1

      Icy/snow roads: check
      Incompetent/corrupt government: check at city and state level
      no salt for that amount of snow/ice: check

      Nah. The disaster here is bad drivers ed not properly preparing people for driving in diverse conditions, which should be must given the wide variety of climate found in the continuous continental US.

    22. Re:Pffft by demonlapin · · Score: 0

      This. It doesn't get cold enough for snow to remain snow, it just turns into sheets and sheets of ice.

    23. Re: Pffft by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

      One state up from Texas, so not especially blizzardville. We do plow it though because we're not likely to get another foot or two on top of it when we get 2-3 inches.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    24. Re:Pffft by biometrizilla · · Score: 5, Informative

      Patently false. The problem is that the city leaders ignored the National Weather Service and relied on local forecasters. The 4AM NWS release clearly stated 1-3 inches of snow for Atlanta area and upgraded the Winter Storm Watch to a Warning. That was plenty early enough to have schools closed and the local TV/radio stations to warn people to not venture out. SNOW/SLEET AMOUNTS WERE INCREASED A LITTLE OVER NW GA TO CATCH FIRST BAND THIS MORNING...BUT STILL 0.5-1.0 INCH. IN MAIN BAND FOR THE AFTERNOON AND TONIGHT...HAVE SNOW/SLEET AMOUNTS OF 1-3 INCLUDING ATL METRO. GREATEST AMOUNT ALONG A BROAD LINE FROM LA GRANGE TO THOMASTON TO LOUISVILLE. BUT SOUTH OF LUMPKIN TO MACON TO SWAINSBORO LINE...ACCUM WILL BE 0.1-0.3 INCH MIX OF SLEET AND FREEZING RAIN WITH UP TO AN INCH OF LIGHT SNOW ON TOP. ALL THESE ACCUMULATION... OTHER THAN THE NW GA LIGHT BAND...WILL MEET WARNING CRITERIA SO HAVE CONTINUED WARNING AND EXPANDED THIS TO ANOTHER TIER OF COUNTIES INCLUDING ATL METRO AREA.

    25. Re:Pffft by TheMattRay · · Score: 1

      Wow - credit to you for actually citing a source rather than just "saying so." Very nice.

    26. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they could have put plans in position to rent some equipment

    27. Re:Pffft by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      It's a simple cost-benefit analysis. You think there's a 50% chance of snow: so if the cost to shut down the city is less than half the cost of damage that may occur you shut down. Half the time you'll be wrong, but you'll be paid off the other half. Taking into account some of the softer metrics like the damage to your reputation after an incident like this, makes it quite a simple decision to play it safe.

    28. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect the real problem for Atlanta, and for much of the south isn't snow as much as it is freezing rain leaving a layer of ice on everything.

      Yep. Most southern cities are not equipped for a quick slam of snow/ice, and if the temperatures remain low for days it just leads to a constant cycle of refreezing into a nasty layer of ice.

    29. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is London they are fucking pussies who cant even drive in rain. The north of the country manages in snow easily.

    30. Re:Pffft by njnnja · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. maybe every three years is too infrequent to have 500 snowplows ready, but that's a false dichotomy. The choice isn't between having 500 snowplows and turning into a disaster move every 3 years; surely there is a middle ground where you have an action plan that takes into effect when snow *might* hit the area (e.g. position resources so they can react quickly, and get you DPW personnel in their trucks and pay them overtime), and an action plan that goes into effect once the snow starts falling (do schools shut down? send kids home? shelter in place? What about police? Firefighters? What do you ask private business to do? And most importantly, what's the plan with the DPW?). Proper planning and intelligent deployment of resources is cheap (relatively speaking) but requires local authorities to think about more than just, "how do I get my brother in law a six figure do-nothing job" or "How do I accept that cheap mortgage as a gift without running afoul of bribery and corruption laws." But to claim that this is to be expected in a first world nation every 1000 days because you don't want to staff up like they do in the northeast is irresponsible

    31. Re:Pffft by c0d3g33k · · Score: 5, Informative

      you fucking shut your city down when the forecast calls for 2 inches

      "We don't want to be accused of crying wolf," said Gov. Nathan Deal, who pointed out that the storm had been forecast to just brush the south side of the city.

      That was part of the problem. The forecast didn't call for 2 inches, it predicted that the ice/snow would miss Atlanta, though not by much.

      Not true. *Early* forecasts suggested that, but subsequent updates by the National Weather Service *did* call for several inches of snow, and *did* include metro Atlanta in the impacted area, well in advance of the actual storm (by early Monday morning). There was plenty of time to prepare, had officials been paying more attention to the forecasts and less to the political impact of "crying wolf".

      From The Weather Channel (emphasis mine):

      Sunday 3:12 p.m.

              First winter storm watch issued for Tuesday morning through Wednesday afternoon.
              Includes south metro Atlanta counties Fayette, Coweta, Clayton, Henry, Rockdale into central Georgia.
              Impacts: Snow accumulations of two or more inches. Sleet accumulations of a half inch or more.

      Monday 4:54 a.m.

              Winter storm watch now includes much of north and south metro Atlanta for Tuesday morning through Wednesday afternoon.
              Impacts: Snow accumulations of 1/2 to 2 inches. Snow-covered roads could make travel difficult.

      Monday 3:22 p.m.

              Winter storm watch upgraded to a winter storm warning for south metro Atlanta into central Georgia. Winter storm watch remains posted for north metro Atlanta for Tuesday morning through Wednesday afternoon.
              Impacts: Snow accumulations of 1 to 2 inches with locally higher amounts. Sleet accumulations around a half inch. Snow and ice covered roads will make travel difficult or impossible.

      Monday 9:36 p.m.

              Winter storm watch changed to a winter weather advisory for north metro Atlanta for Tuesday morning through Wednesday morning.
              National weather service notes: Please understand that even a slight shift in the moisture could result in significant differences in snow amounts and may require an upgrade to warning.

      Tuesday 3:38 a.m.

              All metro Atlanta under a winter storm warning starting 9 a.m. Tuesday
              Impacts: 1 to 2 inches of snow. Snow expected to begin mid-morning and last into Tuesday night. Snow-covered roads will make for hazardous driving conditions through Wednesday morning.

    32. Re:Pffft by Calinous · · Score: 1

      You're probably running on winter tires - something that probably doesn't happen in Atlanta.

    33. Re:Pffft by Altus · · Score: 1

      One of the larger issues is that the vehicles in Atlanta are not equipped for snow. People don't even have all weather tires down there, why would they. Snow tires and chains are unheard of. So not only are they unfamiliar with how to drive, they lack the most basic equipment to do so. That makes a small amount of snow a big problem.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    34. Re:Pffft by c0d3g33k · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's another timeline that's even more interesting because it interleaves the NWS advisories with the actions of various government/municipal entities and school officials:

      Winter Storm 2014 Timeline (from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution)

    35. Re:Pffft by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

      You're forgetting the ice. It wasn't so much the snow but the wonderfully slippery layer of ice which coated everything. Since traffic was blocking the roads, the limited number of trucks couldn't lay down salt or sand. Thus, every road, including the highways, were coated in ice and unable to be treated because the trucks themselves were stuck in the traffic jams.

      I am from up north and while I laugh at the idea of 2 inches of snow affecting anything (we've had that amount and more in the last two weeks), I do understand those in the South who only experience this every decade are out of their league when it comes to dealing with this type of event.

      Should treatment have started earlier? Absolutely. Should better preparations regarding traffic control been implemented? Absolutely. Should Southerners learn to drive in bad conditions? Absolutely. Would any of the above have prevented what occurred? Most likely not.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    36. Re:Pffft by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 2

      Nope, just the regular ones. Oklahoma doesn't get enough snow to make snow tires worth it, just enough that we're not all total noobs when some happens to fall.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    37. Re:Pffft by psypher69571 · · Score: 1

      BS. The weather forecasters put out a warning for definite ice and snow 8 hours before. That was plenty of time to notify all parents not to send kids to school and notify government workers not to come in. Stop taking in all the BS the mayor and governor's office is dishing out.

    38. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd say that is the issue in the south. The inability to go a proper speed for the weather. While going to work, I'd be on the access road [1] of a highway going 20-30, safe enough to minimize any chance of spinning out on the ice. A 4x4 pickup would periodically zoom past, lose control, and wind up part of the scenery.

      Since there are little to no consequences for causing a wreck, people just don't care, period.

      [1]: Most drivers take the highway proper, so the access road bypassed the 12 car bumper-car carnage.

    39. Re:Pffft by psypher69571 · · Score: 2

      EXACTLY! But the mayor's and governor's office is basically trying to keep that underwraps.

    40. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also see the giant plows with side blades to knock back the snow banks for the next snow.

    41. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in: the weatherman is sometimes wrong.

    42. Re:Pffft by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I lived in Chicago for 14 years. That amount of snow was normal, and nobody even owned winter tires, much less put them on their car.

      The real problem here is that driving on ice and snow requires practice and skills that most people in Atlanta don't have. Then add in probably 0 plows to clear streets, and the result is chaos.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    43. Re:Pffft by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      Nailed it you did.

      Now I am a boston driver accustomed to snow. Plows and salt are not out yet? Fine whatever, I will drive without white knuckles in 2 inches of snow and enjoy it. It really isn't that bad if you are used to it. Oh no the car slid a little....big deal. Get used to it, its even fun if you aren't an idiot.

      However, if they close the city down once every 3 years that would be.... well shit, we are used to snow and don't shut down for much less than 6-12 inches...and we shut down several times a year. So maybe shutting down once every 3 years isn't so bad if they can't handle it.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    44. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The National Weather Service (i.e., the Federal Government's weather agency) has a 90% record of accurate prediction.
      Several private weather services have a 90-95% accuracy rating.
      Atlanta is home to Delta Airlines. Some airlines have their own weather predicting services (I worked for one that did). The company meteorologists' accuracy was 95% or higher. The company meteorologists predicted weather for the airline, its feeder systems and for truckers that fed into our system. The company gave the predictions to the city/county governments so that the Governments would have the best possible weather predictions (and for free). Why didn't the Government of Atlanta contact private weather services for better predictions? I don't know--sometimes past weather performance makes one complacent to all the possibilities.

    45. Re:Pffft by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      It was really 2-3 inches of snow, slush, and re-freeze. Snow is easy to drive in. Slush and ice make travel difficult. Even people up north forget how to accelerate in the snow every year; imagine an entire city of snow newbies and all the truckers who might remain exclusive to southern states.

    46. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Atlanta even have snow plows? I doubt it. The airlines at the airport do but they need the plows for the airport runaways, etc.

    47. Re:Pffft by couchslug · · Score: 2

      Local forecasters don't forecast nor do they own their own weather satellites.
      Anyone using anything but the National Weather Service for weather information is a fool consuming altered data proffered with the intent to draw eyeballs to adverts.
      I do on my home PC exactly what they did in Ops facilities when I was in the Air Force. They had the appropriate NOAA page refreshing on one monitor for local reference.
      Of course mission data was provided by the USAF weather folks but that's a considerable additional level of detail ground users don't need.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    48. Re:Pffft by nwf · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Where I live, we have tons of snow plows and salt. We maybe need it 10-15 days a year. So in three years, we don't use our equipment about as little as they give for justifying why they don't have them. That's the dumbest justification I've seen. Most places that have snow removal equipment don't use them very often, but they aren't dumb enough to hope that things will just work out. If you know you get snow every three years or so, that sounds like enough justification to purchase equipment. Down there you could get buy with some large tanker trucks to brine the streets before hand. This greatly reduces the chance of icing, even if you aren't going to plow. It comes down to: equipment is expensive and we just don't want to buy it.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    49. Re:Pffft by tibit · · Score: 1

      Who the heck would put chains on for 2-3 inches of snow? You don't need it, unless maybe if you're in the mountains. That's barely enough for the chains not to damage the pavement. Same goes for snow tires. Yes, they help, but I've driven for a decade without bothering with snow tires, and I manage. It's a bit harder maybe, but it shouldn't paralyze a city. The whole problem was only in people's heads, it had nothing to do with snow. It suddenly turned OK drivers into idiots. There seriously was nothing that anyone needed to do, nobody was at fault except people on the roads.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    50. Re:Pffft by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      See all those caps? From teletypes, probably. Captain Panic was right - old equipment.....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    51. Re:Pffft by Minwee · · Score: 1

      It's a simple cost-benefit analysis. You think there's a 50% chance of snow: so if the cost to shut down the city is less than half the cost of damage that may occur you shut down. Half the time you'll be wrong, but you'll be paid off the other half. Taking into account some of the softer metrics like the damage to your reputation after an incident like this, makes it quite a simple decision to play it safe.

      Where have I heard that logic before?

      "A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall?"

    52. Re:Pffft by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      You should try over here in the UK where the mere suggestion of snow seems to shut everything down

      Shoot, down here in Florida things stop when we hear the northerners are getting their snow. After we stop, we take pictures of palm trees and beaches to send to our friends up north.

    53. Re:Pffft by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > True but in Russia (Prepares for BS Barrage) they get six feet of snow and things keep going.

      Russia has a lot of mass transit and was (re)built with the idea that the proletariat would not have their own personal vehicles.

      Some people that have cars now just give them up for the winter.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    54. Re:Pffft by div_2n · · Score: 2

      That's not quite right. Fully 8 hours in advance of the storm hitting (i.e. before everyone started their morning commute), a very direct and confident warning went out that Atlanta was going to get hit. Al Roker did a timeline of the warnings and there's just no way you can watch that and not conclude that the authorities were asleep at the wheel.

    55. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA just say salt you a*hole

    56. Re:Pffft by Megane · · Score: 1

      I was just quoting TFS for the weather report, since I have no particular reason to go looking at the details of Atlanta weather myself.

      On the other hand, there was a similar (though less spectacular) error made by the Round Rock ISD (school district just north of Austin) the other day. They made a decision at 3AM to keep the schools open because they basically stuck their heads out the window and said "Nope, no ice on the roads and it's above freezing!", when the hourly forecasts had been predicting freezing temperatures AND precipitation from 5-7am. So the school buses ran at 6AM, started to pick up a few kids and got stuck on the ice, resulting in a bunch of hungry stranded kids (they're all on freebie breakfasts now) and angry parents.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    57. Re:Pffft by Altus · · Score: 1

      yeah I'm sure you have driven without snow tires, but you probably were using some decent all weather tires. You know those things that people in Atlanta would never, ever bother putting on their cars for the one day every 3 years that it snows. I am guessing you weren't using summer tires for all your driving because summer tires in the snow and ice are just this side of useless.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    58. Re:Pffft by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      Local forecasters don't forecast nor do they own their own weather satellites. Anyone using anything but the National Weather Service for weather information is a fool consuming altered data proffered with the intent to draw eyeballs to adverts.

      Your comment would be relevant if they were calling it the storm of the century but the local news called for little to no snow, that simply is not going to draw eyeballs to adverts.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    59. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Salt trucks traveling 1 mph in one lane and blocking all 3 lanes of the major roads was the root cause of the gridlock here that cascaded into the mess.

    60. Re:Pffft by Megane · · Score: 1

      I was taking in the BS that TFA was dishing out, and was being spread on the news. IDGAF what anyone in Atlanta or GA government says, nor do IGAF to go out of my way to look up the hourly details of weather a thousand miles away from me.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    61. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lesson learned.. forecasters aren't always right. whether it's a 'few inches of snow' that turns into a few FEET of snow in the upper midwest, to horribly missing on what became 30+ inches of rain in south texas causing some of the worst flooding in memory. san antonio, btw, shuts down the city and freeways whenever there's even a hint of snow or ice in the forecast (which doesn't happen often there).. all those elevated highways are death traps when precipitation follows below freezing temperatures, and when that happens all the h-e-b stores are raided and subsequently emptied of just about everything.

    62. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a local weather service "radar" they used, I remember I was there. The US weather service is administered by the US Air Force & NASA and a few other agencies it most certainly has funding and computers. Add thousands of armature weather stations and home computer models its pretty solid.

    63. Re:Pffft by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      Anyone using anything but the National Weather Service for weather information is a fool consuming altered data proffered with the intent to draw eyeballs to adverts.

      That may be true in Atlanta, but here in Oklahoma where the location of severe weather can change from one minute to the next, they have MUCH better equipment than the NWS, and much better live coverage. You could get yourself killed watching the weather channel or waiting on an update from the NWS.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    64. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Slightly different.

      I lived in Nebraska most of my life. When I 'moved south' I found it strange how everyone shut down. Then I realized. They do not have plows/trucks/salt/sand. They literally do not buy it. They *might* put down a brine mix beforehand so it melts off in 2-3 days.

      My dad called me up laughing I was staying home a few years ago when something similar happened. Until I told him 'it is 1/2 inch of ice all the way from my house to work with no sand/salt. His next words were 'oh yeah stay home'.

      So yeah you *can* drive on that. You probably shouldn't. Also take into account many people in the area drive on ice maybe every 4-6 years. So would you drive on ice with no sand on it AND with a bunch of people with 0 exp doing it?

      Also on top of that everyone in the south like to think they are nascar drivers because they saw it once on TV and like to 'draft' off the car in front of them. Yesterday while driving on ice I was doing about 20-35mph and the traction control was going nuts. The guy behind me was *maybe* a half a car length away because I was in a 45mph zone I was not going fast enough for him. The road was solid ice no sand or salt.

    65. Re:Pffft by Megane · · Score: 1

      Those of us down south would be happy to drive on 2 inches of actual fluffy snow with at least a little traction instead of glazed black ice that leaves the roads as slick as if a Zamboni had just gone by. That's what happens when you get freezing rain, or if the roads are already damp from rain or melted snow when the temps go back below freezing. And then we have a lot of freeway flyovers and elevated lanes because it's usually only a problem one day a year, if that much, and they freeze up much easier from the cold air blowing under them.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    66. Re:Pffft by tibit · · Score: 1

      I never bothered with summer tires. I really don't see what you'd need them for unless you're into racing or something like that. Driving speed limits on dry hot pavement doesn't require summer tires. Neither does driving on said pavement, at speed limits, during or after a summer rain. Neither does summer driving on unpaved or poorly paved roads. I think that summer tires are one of those things that are more for entertainment value than anything tangible.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    67. Re:Pffft by ninjagin · · Score: 1

      To go a little further, You don't need a special truck to do plowing -- a sanitation truck with a blade mounted will suffice. Flatbed heavy trucks can be equipped with gravel/salt spreaders. The notion that one needs to keep a cityful of special equipment that's specialized for snow is a bit of a red herring. Most cities already have the trucks they might need -- they just need the ability to equip them for snow/ice remediation when the need crops up. Also, maintenance for snow/ice-fighting equipment is a little bit of occasional metalwork and a coat of paint -- not high-dollar, and already well-within what most cities already have to do for the equipment they use on a regular basis.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    68. Re:Pffft by ShaunC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      NOAA/NWS may be underfunded, but they do an absolutely outstanding job. They are the only government agency that I trust, implicitly, up to and including with my life (I live in "tornado alley"). NOAA/NWS has no political bent, they use real science to make increasingly more accurate forecasts, and better products come out almost every year. Huge portions of the US population and economy rely upon NOAA/NWS, not the least of which being every single person in an aircraft at any given time, from airline transport pilot all the way down to cropdusters - and of course the passengers.

      You can insult my government all day, every day; I do it too. But don't question the ability of NOAA/NWS.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    69. Re:Pffft by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't have to make 100% accurate predictions to be able to prepare for the future. That's why weather forecasts give a probability of precipitation, rather than a binary rain/no rain prediction. If you know rain is likely, you can carry your umbrella just in case. The attitude should not be "You need to prove something bad will happen before I prepare for it," but rather "Let me know if something bad might happen so I can prepare for it."

      While you're right, I also think there is a more specific problem here. People are bad at making estimates based on probabilities -- "70% chance of rain? 30% chance of snow? Should I take action?"

      The thing is -- the National Weather Service tries its best to keep the guesswork out of major weather events by issuing watches, advisories, and warnings. When a winter storm WARNING is issued, it means that there's a general consensus that this thing WILL occur and you should behave as if it will.

      In this case, the NWS issued a winter storm warning at 3:38am on the day of the event, roughly 9 hours before snow started falling in Atlanta. Here's the official meaning of a winter storm watch and warning as put out by NWS in Atlanta:

      Watch: Issued when the potential exists for 2 inches or more of snow in 12 hours, or 4 inches or more of snow in 24 hours. Also issued for potential of a quarter inch or more of freezing rain, or half an inch of sleet. In the North Georgia Mountains, the criteria are 3 inches in 12 hours or 4 inches in 24 hours.

      Warning: Issued when a combination of snow, blowing snow, sleet, and/or freezing rain is likely to exceed warning criteria. Warning criteria are those detailed in the Winter Storm Watch.

      In other words, a "warning" means it's pretty darn likely the thing is coming. Having lived in the northern U.S. for many years, I can think of a few times that a "warning" didn't really pan out, but not very many. A "watch" (or an "advisory," which is an intermediate level of sorts) is one thing, and can sometimes be wrong. A "warning" is meant to convey reasonable certainty that a major weather event will happen.

      So, the average citizen doesn't need to necessarily concern himself/herself with probabilities -- these weather bulletins already contain significant information about how likely things are to happen.

      Most people probably don't pay attention to these weather distinctions -- they just think "oh, there's some sort of weather alert." But they generally have very precise meanings.

      For the general population to be ignorant of these meanings is perhaps expected. That's why governments and school officials need to understand these things and make reasonable calls -- but it appears they did not seem to know what "warning" meant in this case.

      That's the disturbing thing. The NWS had stuff out saying there would be "dangerous" road conditions and that travel was not recommended well in advance of the snow.

    70. Re:Pffft by Brickwall · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, snow falls on you! ... er, no, that's not it.. In Soviet Russia, you fall on snow! .. no, that's not it either.. In Soviet Russia, Eric Snowden falls on you! .. there, got it!

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    71. Re:Pffft by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

      That's some quality irony there.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    72. Re:Pffft by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was in a clever movie, and it is indeed what people like me do every day. Would you prefer everyone to hide under a blanket their entire lives?

    73. Re:Pffft by Jon_S · · Score: 1

      Because there is another car immediately in front of them stopped because everyone left work at exactly the same time creating the world's biggest traffic jam. Then everything got covered in ice and no salt trucks could treat the road because see above.

      That's why.

    74. Re:Pffft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'm sceptical. Any modern computer can do both upper AND lower case letters. The appear to be using a 1960s teletype.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    75. Re:Pffft by Kythe · · Score: 1

      I'd give this a "6" if I could. The mayor is lying about the warnings they received.

      --

      Kythe
    76. Re:Pffft by rts008 · · Score: 2

      Not in Oklahoma where I live.

      'The Mighty Buzzard' is also in Oklahoma, and his comment was 100% accurate and truthful.

      Hardly anyone uses 'snow tires' here in OK, they are a waste of money.

      OK does not get snow very often, when we do, it rarely lasts more than a day or two.

      What we have to worry about is ice storms. Winter/snow tires will not help you on ice, so we(just as The Mighty Buzzard suggested), just slow the fuck down until the roads are clear.

      I moved from PA to OK in 1990, and the winters here are totally different than they were in PA.
      I have seen significant snowfall here only twice since I moved here. (significant >3" snowfall)

      Ice storms? Every winter!

      Now I will admit that the traffic anywhere in OK is probably less that in Atlanta, but I can counter with 'common sense' scales up well.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    77. Re:Pffft by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      Why was this even the mayor's call? Decisions like this should be made by someone in an engineering or public safety role. That individual should have the technical qualifications to make such a call. If an engineer, they should be licensed. Appointing the right person to this post should be a political position - which is what mayors are for. Making up-to-the-minute calls on technical matters that affect the safety and welfare of the citizens should not be a political decision. Remember the Challenger shuttle when the person making the call was told to "take off their engineering cap and put on their manager cap"? Have we learned nothing?

      After a technically competent official has made the call, it should then be the mayor's responsibility to make the announcement and coordinate his staff to deal with the situation, preferably following a written procedure designed for just such an event.

    78. Re:Pffft by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

      The big elephant in the room, is: why do you pussies get all slow-witted and complainy and say "it's hot" when it's only 105 degrees? Another elephant in the room, is why do those other people, get all scairdy when there's a mag 4 earthquake? And what's with the people who claim their cars get .. rust?! Are you really trying to tell me there's enough humidity in air to rust a car? And what's with those pansies who get all winded, at the thought of jogging at only 8000 feet? Just get some fucking red blood cells. What's the problem? And you don't even have the pop density to be able to afford 10 gigabit fiber to your house? WTF kind of third world are you living in? And don't get me started on those people live in that place where the native food is bland. And why are you complaining about the cost of groceries, anyway? If you need an ear of corn, just walk out into your back yard and pluck one. WTF, people! Next, you'll be telling me the view from your patio is only a few miles.

      The elephant in the room, is that there's a bunch of people pretending that we're not all the same, that we don't all have the same experiences and resources and equipment. That's laughable. Everyone knows we all live in seacoastal mountain desert jungles, in rural highrises, where we all park our 3 cars and 3 bikes downstairs, driving the car on the 180 days of the year when it's snowy and below freezing, and biking through the farm fields to the subway station on the other 180 days when it's above 120F.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    79. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, Chicago? Must be nice. http://imgur.com/llaPpYZ

      Note: Yes, I agree Southerners can't drive on snow/ice. But don't try to insinuate that driving on flat terrain with ice is at all the same as trying to navigate hills with ice.

    80. Re:Pffft by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      It shuts things down here when it hits areas that haven't had snow for years; they no-longer have the infrastructure in place to deal with it for exactly the same reason Atlanta doesn't - it doesn't make economic sense to have the equipment sat around most of the time doing nothing. Essex contracts out all of its gritting and clearing; they got caught on the hop one year but has since started pre-gritting when there's a possibility of snow or ice (now if they'd just fix all fucking pot holes).

      Some people are just ridiculously risk averse though. When we had snow in the South East last year (uh, I think it was last year) I was living up in Cambridge and I still travelled down to the office in London by train; people who lived in London were staying home. HR sent a company wide warning because of that (i.e. "don't do that again").

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    81. Re:Pffft by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      Depending on the source, at the time of the incident the city owned between 10 and 40.

    82. Re:Pffft by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2

      In other words, a "warning" means it's pretty darn likely the thing is coming. Having lived in the northern U.S. for many years, I can think of a few times that a "warning" didn't really pan out, but not very many.

      I use to live in the north, now I live in the south. It's different here.

      I can't speak to this specific warning, but meteorologists in the south have a comically difficult time forecasting winter precipitation type. Up north, if it's winter and there's probable precip, it's going to be snow. In the south, our winter temperatures typically hover between 30-35 degrees, so even if precip is highly probable, it's really, really difficult to forecast if it's going to be snow, ice, or rain because very small changes in temperature can foul up the entire forecast. Forecasts get busted here routinely.

      I'd be interested to see what percentage of NWS snow warnings wind up being busts in Georgia. Something tells me that the percentage is higher than what you experience up north. Those warnings probably sound more like cries of wolf in Atlanta.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    83. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "While you're right, I also think there is a more specific problem here. People are bad at making estimates based on probabilities -- "70% chance of rain? 30% chance of snow? Should I take action?"

      This is why people get paid (fairly well I assume) to plan and make decisions about how to best use city/state/federal funds to ensure the safety of citizens, and make infrastructure as available as is possible during foul weather situations. Generally speaking, decisions of this type should be subject to a cost/benefit/consequence analysis and a consensus should be reached amongst decision makers. If the people in charge are doing their job properly, a general framework for this sort of analysis should be made well ahead of time and the particular circumstances for any one event should be plugged into that framework.

    84. Re:Pffft by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      Local forecasters don't forecast ...

      Sure they do. That's their job. Forecasting local weather.

      nor do they own their own weather satellites.

      That's true. He's got his own thermometer though and one of those thingies that measure air pressure.

    85. Re:Pffft by afidel · · Score: 1

      Exactly, between the local stations here in NE Ohio they have about 10x as many doppler radars available than the NWS which means if you're looking for the most up to date info scanning the local stations during a severe weather update is going to be better than looking at the 5 minute NOAA sweep.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    86. Re:Pffft by RustyTheCat · · Score: 1

      It would be great to have the right equipment on hand when there was significant snow or ice to deal with, but in my experience such events only happen every three to twelve years, or more or less. That's a potentially long time to keep expensive equipment standing around not being used. Try that and then listen to people whine about the "waste" and how all that money could have been better spent on schools, police, and just about anything else you have a personal interest in, instead of a once in a decade (they always exaggerate) event. Oh, and be prepared for the news teams to fiercely total up the cost of storage and maintenance as they rabidly struggle to make news and justify their jobs (yeah, they do that). The fact is that the forecast from NOAA was for a light dusting to possibly a half inch of snow. Instead it was two and a half or more inches and it came sooner than we were told it would. Even as it happened the storm tracking new shows with their three dimensional real time radars couldn't tell us how bad it was going to be. In fact there were plenty of people saying stay home, don't go out if you don't have to, if you were willing to listen. That said, the single biggest problem was that all the schools and businesses let out at once and the roads were jammed up. Add that to the pavement getting slippery and you had the makings of a disaster. When this happens again in 2019 people will have forgotten they don't know how to drive in the snow, the new government will lament the previous governments inadequate preparations (but it's not in the budget for next year either) and people will go to work/whatever planning to get as much done as possible before the storm hits. And when the storm does hit they'll all rush home jamming up the roads, getting in accidents, etc. and everyone will whine about how things should have been done differently and point fingers everywhere but themselves. Ah, humans, they're just so ... human.

    87. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. maybe every three years is too infrequent to have 500 snowplows ready, but that's a false dichotomy. The choice isn't between having 500 snowplows and turning into a disaster move every 3 years; surely there is a middle ground where you have an action plan that takes into effect when snow *might* hit the area

      Exactly. And that's exactly what they have. There are 40 snowplows in Atlanta (up from 8 during the 2011 Snowpocalypse), and they were loaded and in position to move when the snow started. I don't know the details, but I'm pretty sure they picked 40 as the number required to cover major city streets and interstates in a reasonable time.

      This year, apparently everyone made the last minute decision to close schools, universities and businesses at lunchtime and send everyone home. The result was that, by the time the snow actually started, and the plows tried to hit the roads, they were already mired in gridlock like Thanksgiving eve. If folks had taken the whole day off, things would have been very different. If folks had waited until 5pm to leave, things might have been very different (ie: bad areas plowed, salt & sand on many roads).

      City of Atlanta had a plan. They didn't count on local school systems, the various universities, or private industry making last-minute, panicked decisions.

    88. Re:Pffft by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, the vast majority of them take in income feed, and change it to be more 'local'.
      The vast percentage of news outlet do not have the money to be running their own computer models.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    89. Re:Pffft by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2

      Anyone using anything but the National Weather Service for weather information is a fool consuming altered data proffered with the intent to draw eyeballs to adverts.

      That really depends on the metro area.

      For instance, in the DC area, we have the Capital Weather Gang. Read some of their blog posts and form your own opinions, but in my view, they are a valuable asset to the region. They present the NWS reports, but they also read and interpret other weather models and do a fantastic job explaining complex weather concepts to average Joes like me. They are introspective, always publicly evaluating their performance forecasting major events.

      As for me, I read CWG and I get NWS alerts on my phone. That's about as accurate as you can hope for in this area.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    90. Re:Pffft by turp182 · · Score: 1

      It is clever when you reply to Big Hairy Ian, due to the sigs (and vise-versa):

      Big Hairy Ian:
      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

      Greyfox:
      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    91. Re:Pffft by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read and learn...or else!

      2.1 Characters, Case, and Punctuation for Narrative Text. Narrative text uses upper case and only the following punctuation marks in the text: the period (.); the three dot ellipsis (...); the forward slash (/); the dash (-); and the plus (+). Use of other characters may inhibit the proper dissemination or automated processing by certain users’ systems.

      http://www.nws.noaa.gov/direct...

      2 points:
      A) Who cares if it's in all caps?
      B) It's an international service, so it need to support many systems, several of which are older systems in poorer countries.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    92. Re:Pffft by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Nice link. Thanks.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    93. Re:Pffft by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you drive and how much you push the limits. The summer sport tires offer better handling but if you aren't having fun on cloverleafs you probably wouldn't notice under regular driving conditions. The difference between winter tires and all season are night and day though in the snow and on ice with sport tires being completely worthless. Then again where I live snow tires can stay on for close to 6 months so I figured why compromise and have some nice Dunlop sport tires on fatter aluminum rims for the summer and some Canadian made snow tires (really soft tread with a chunky aggressive pattern) on skinny steel rims.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    94. Re:Pffft by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Then why in the hell did you post? You intentionally made shit up about something you don't give a fuck about?

      Why would you do that? If you didn't care about the issue, but correct a factual mistake, I could understand. But just making shit up?

      Maybe you need to get back to work?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    95. Re:Pffft by geekoid · · Score: 1

      also, pretty much everybody took to the roads at the same time.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    96. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to know how you think the mayor/governor could stagger letting people go home early.
      Once the schools were closed every parent in the city needed to go to the school and get their kids or their kids had to stay there overnight. Sure they could have closed the schools one system at a time but you would've ended up with the same situation. Once the first schools started to close the businesses would have shut down and everyone would have been leaving at more or less the same time.

      I agree that they could have closed the schools for the entire day and pretreated the roads but this is one of the dumbest complaints that I've heard about how the situation was handled. As if the mayor/governor controls when people are allowed to leave their job.

    97. Re:Pffft by pepty · · Score: 1

      There is a much cheaper alternative when you have a warning 30 hrs in advance: flood all of the regional TV stations with PSAs that show how easy it is for vehicles (especially SUVs!) to lose control in just a little snow or ice, and how to control for it. Cutting down on the frequency of accidents by even a fraction would help keep traffic moving quite a bit.

    98. Re:Pffft by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Why? 2-3 inches here and the only things we do different are leave earlier and drive slower. No chains. No pre-salting the roads. Just slow the fuck down until the roads get plowed or melt.

      Maybe because there's more traffic in Atlanta than in the entire state of OK? Maybe that was an exaggeration, but I doubt that I exaggerated by much.

      But since we have Google, let's see how OK does when y'all get your once in a blue moon snow. Oopsie!

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    99. Re:Pffft by ApplePy · · Score: 1

      I live in snow country (Colorado)... and I've never bought snow tires or chains. 20 years and I've never had a need for them. No 4x4 either, I'm fine with front wheel drive. I don't think I even know anyone who owns a set of chains for their daily driver.

      In other words... it's not the failure of vehicles to be equipped that's Atlanta's problem. It's people who don't know what to do or how to drive on slippery roads. And true, it's not like people who've never left the deep South have any reason to have ever learned those skills, so it's not some kind of failure on their part. That's just how it is.

      --
      That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
    100. Re:Pffft by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      And we respond back by making fun you when your temps are in the 40s and everyone digs out the winter parka .

      --
      Time to offend someone
    101. Re:Pffft by denobug · · Score: 0

      Shutting the city down isn't free. Parents have to leave work to get home to children. What do you do when that parent is an ER nurse? Businesses have to close, city workers will cause traffic jams on the way home... and if nothing happens, everyone starts talking about how much money and time was wasted for nothing. You can't win.

      Right. So does letting thousands of people stranded on a freeway for 18 hours and children stay in schools overnight. Anybody thought about the overtime pay and economic loss of getting people stuck in a hazardous situation? What IF someone died during this fiasco? Should there be a class action lawsuit against the City, the Sate? If people died because of official decision should there be a criminal probe and charge the Mayor and the Governor with criminal negligence?

      Compare to criminal and civil lawsuits the money lost to shutdown a government seems minimal. That is, unless, you want to put a price tag on a human life. If we do, can we start with yours?

    102. Re:Pffft by Altus · · Score: 1

      Well for one thing, they are cheeper than all weather tires of a similar quality. Also they provide better wet and dry traction at the cost of snow traction. Some people around here in New England use them in the winter and snow tires in the summer, particuarly on light cars that don't get particularly good snow traction.

      The point is, in Atlanta, nobody bothers with all weather tires. They can get similar performance for less money and all it costs them is traction once every 3 years. This is also why Atlanta should have been shut down because neither the state, city nor citizens had the equipment on hand to deal with the road conditions.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    103. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Here's a better idea. How about people who never drive in snow stop thinking "Driving in snow is just like driving in sunshine, right? I'll be fine!" and actually realize that its their own damn fault for getting screwed over in a snow storm. You can see it's snowing. You know what will happen if you drive in it. Call in to work.

      I am from the northern US but you should realize that, jokes aside, we have just as many idiots driving in snow when they don't know how as everywhere else...

    104. Re:Pffft by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      That's not true either. At least on the most popular radio news (WSB), they were predicting at least an inch. That was more than enough for me, as a native Atlantan, to know to stay home.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    105. Re: Pffft by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You don't have to deal with hills.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    106. Re:Pffft by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I am from up north and while I laugh at the idea of 2 inches of snow affecting anything (we've had that amount and more in the last two weeks), I do understand those in the South who only experience this every decade are out of their league when it comes to dealing with this type of event.

      I grew up in the north, now I live in the south. Here is why 2 inches of snow paralyzes us:

      1. We don't get light, fluffy snow like back in the old country. 2" in North Dakota will blow right off the road before the plow can even get there. And anyway, actual snow is easy to drive in.

      In the south, we get what's referred to as a "frozen mix", which means some combination of sleet, freezing rain, ice, and snow. Ice is very difficult to remove (you can just plow it to the side), and it's near impossible to drive in. This is the single biggest reason why winter weather destroys us.

      2. No dedicated snow removal equipment. It just isn't worth the money for us.

      3. Improper winter driving technique. But I really think that this is a distant 3rd cause, because see #1. Ice.

      So what should Atlanta have done when NWS issued a snow warning?

      1. Cancel school. They get like 1 snow day every 3 years. They can afford to be wrong sometimes.

      2. Pretreat the interstates and major roadways. I realize that they lack the equipment to do much more than that, but there is inexcusable that the interstates were impassable. They had all damn day.

      So that is one northerner turned southerner's perspective.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    107. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they should have done is picked up the phone and called some people up North to ask if they could send some plows down the night before the expected snowfall so they would be ready for it. There are plenty of privately owned plows that would have gladly picked up more work for the season.

    108. Re:Pffft by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Since traffic was blocking the roads, the limited number of trucks couldn't lay down salt or sand. Thus, every road, including the highways, were coated in ice and unable to be treated because the trucks themselves were stuck in the traffic jams.

      This is not an excuse. First of all, the trucks should have been out there salting/sanding before the traffic jams started. Second, they could have gotten help from the state patrol to keep people out of the way of the trucks. Third, the only reason everybody panicked and caused the traffic jam in the first place is because GDOT's reputation is so bad that everybody assumed they'd fuck it up!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    109. Re:Pffft by osgeek · · Score: 1

      Not sure which forecast they're using as an excuse. I think that line is just typical CYA.

      Tuesday morning, I looked at the forecast, I saw a big line of snow heading right for all of Atlanta. I was really surprised that based upon that forecast, the main county still hadn't canceled school.

      When the snow started accumulating, I stopped waiting for the county to get its collective head out of its butt and I picked up my kids. Managed to get them home before the real circus started.

      It's just a reminder of how you really have to be careful about putting your trust in certain systems. Each person has to take some level of personal responsibility because when big systems fail, they tend to fail in a big way.

    110. Re:Pffft by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      well recover the losses off the forecasters. It might prompt them to get their act together...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    111. Re:Pffft by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Up north, if it's winter and there's probable precip, it's going to be snow. In the south, our winter temperatures typically hover between 30-35 degrees, so even if precip is highly probable, it's really, really difficult to forecast if it's going to be snow, ice, or rain because very small changes in temperature can foul up the entire forecast.

      Seriously? You do realize there are things call "spring" and "fall" in the north, too, right? You know -- when "temperatures hover between 30-35 degrees" and you might end up with a rainstorm or an icestorm or whatever? Just because there might be a period of anywhere from a few weeks to a few months -- depending on the region -- where temperatures are almost always low enough to guarantee snow doesn't mean there isn't lots of time every year where temperatures hover around freezing in the north. In fact, I'd say it's probably pretty likely that most locations in the north experience MORE time each year and MORE weather events in that freezing range than people in the south ever will... just because it's more likely given temperature ranges throughout the year.

      Guess what? In the north, when they are calling for "freezing rain" or "sleet" and put out a winter storm warning, people drive with great caution. Now, most places in the north have salt to handle these scenarios, but -- even with the salt -- nobody wants to be driving on the roads during freezing rain, even in the north. A warning about something like that happens, and people leave work early. Schools close. I'd say those storms are the MOST likely in the north to result in public officials erring on the side of caution and cancelling school or putting out extra salt JUST IN CASE -- because an error in a storm around freezing could paralyze a city in the north. An error ignoring the possibility of only a couple inches of snow, on the other hand, is less likely to result in disaster with people used to dealing with that. You can drive slowly in a little snow, even without special equipment. There's nothing you can do to prevent sliding around with a car on ice.

      I'd be interested to see what percentage of NWS snow warnings wind up being busts in Georgia. Something tells me that the percentage is higher than what you experience up north. Those warnings probably sound more like cries of wolf in Atlanta.

      I'd be interested in this too. If that's actually true, that's an issue. But my guess is that a lot of this problem has to do with people -- and the news media -- not understanding the details of the weather warning information I mentioned in my post. I'd bet there are lots of winter storm "watches" and "advisories" every year, just as there are in the north. A decent percentage of those get cancelled or never materialize or whatever.

      But "warnings" -- not so much. Unless the weather people in Georgia are significantly more incompetent, my bet is that every time a "watch" or an "advisory" comes on, people in the south go a little crazy, and then nothing or very little happens. Then when an actual "warning" comes up, they don't realize that means something different.

      But that's only my guess -- and yes, I have lived a number of years in the southern states, and I don't recall a lot of excess "winter storm warnings," but I could be wrong.

    112. Re:Pffft by bsolar · · Score: 1

      Winter tires are advised even if there is no snow since they provide a far superior performance in low temperature conditions. Not sure about the climate in Oklahoma, but if you have many months with temperatures falling under about 7C/45F you should switch tires in the winter.

    113. Re:Pffft by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Chicagoian here: I recently drove back from Tampa, FL to Chicago on Sunday. Drove through Atlanta at the right time. Got to Indiana and followed plows back from Indianapolis up to the state line. In a 2 door coupe with 300hp and stock tires.

      Be prepared. Slow down. Don't drive like an asshole. Most importantly, *don't go out if you don't need to*.

    114. Re:Pffft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That whooshing noise you hear isn't the wind.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    115. Re:Pffft by bsolar · · Score: 1

      Skill and experience are of course very important but I guarantee you that driving on snow with winter tires vs normal tires makes a huge difference.

    116. Re:Pffft by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      Cities like Birmingham and Atlanta are different. The ground surface temperature is warmer, so any amount of snow generally melts and converts to ice quickly. The people up north don't know/understand this, so they make ignorant comments to feel superior.

    117. Re:Pffft by osgeek · · Score: 1

      The problem wasn't so much the amount of snow. It was that the roads started freezing up quickly and the government authorities that are supposed to take action on closing schools and forcing trucks to use chains or divert around the city failed massively.

      Once cars and trucks lost traction (we don't really buy winter tires here), stuck vehicles created enormous gridlock.

      I have several friends who either spent 9+ hours getting home or just had to sleep at their offices rather than drive 20 miles.

    118. Re:Pffft by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      But there wasn't a 50% chance of snow. Even Monday evening we already knew that there was an 80% chance of snow for southeast Atlanta; the only question was whether it would miss the northwest suburbs or hit the whole city.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    119. Re:Pffft by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And that's exactly what they have. There are 40 snowplows in Atlanta (up from 8 during the 2011 Snowpocalypse), and they were loaded and in position to move when the snow started.

      Yes, and the key there is "when the snow started." What the fuck were they doing the entire morning before, when they should have been out pre-treating?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    120. Re:Pffft by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why was this even the mayor's call?

      Because he's the boss? The guy in the hotseat? The person they're paying to make decisions?

      The mayor may be advised by his engineering or public safety guys, but, in the end, it's his decision.

      And if he says it's not his decision to make, the wrong guy got elected mayor.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    121. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you yell "America Fuck Yeah!" after that too?

      Did you even read the link? Do you even understand the issues?

    122. Re:Pffft by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      And we respond back by making fun you when your temps are in the 40s and everyone digs out the winter parka .

      Only fools wait till it's that cold. I put mine on this morning, it was 52.

    123. Re:Pffft by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yes, absolutely.

      Look, if there were a hurricane warning (I'm in Western South Dakota), I'd really kind of expect an "oh shit" reaction. We don't have hurricanes here (... technically - more on that in a second), so I'd expect a proportionate response.

      "Northerners" may bawk a bit at Southerners and hteir response to snow, but having lived in the Northeast and in VA, as well as having lived out here in the Black Hills for the past 8 years or so, I can say that the kind of snow you get when it's warm and cools quickly is entirely different than something in the Northeast, where the snow is thick and clingy. The elevation of the originating snowfall also seems to change things.

      For instance, we've had a relatively uncommon winter here, for here. :P We've had week-long cycles since December where it'll get up to 50F, then drop in the next day (to eg. 20 or even -20) and rain/snow in the process. You'll get slick, dangerous roads from the rain, which then get powder coated. It's hellish.

      This is part of what happened to us last October; we had a thundersnow and osmething like 3' of snow in a matter of a day (an uncommon event for us) with winds >50MPH. So, like a land locked winter hurricane, of sorts. It was unexpected, and it caught a lot of people off guard (wasn't said to be as bad as it was) - but we're used to winter storm events like Floridians are used to hurricanes, so we knew to prepare. But still, we weren't ready for it - it was in mid-October and most plows didn't have eg. winter fuel in them, chains on the tires, etc. and nobody was truly ready.

      They should've shut the city down simply because they weren't prepared. This seems like a no-brainer. Having school on a day like this should result in any injuries to children result in criminal charges against the politicians: after all, it's a crime for parents to simply not send their kids to school if school is being held.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    124. Re:Pffft by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Some people up north forget every year, others don't. I spent 4 years outside of the snow belt and still knew how to drive in the ice and snow when I ended up coming back north. This whole week has been below zero (in F) and there has been constant ice on the roads, but we didn't see huge jumps in accidents. Though I will admit a certain number of people do seem to require time to remember how to drive in winter each year...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    125. Re:Pffft by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Houston shut down twice in the past week. The first time there was ice aplenty, and hundreds of cars slamming into guardrails. The second time there was no ice, but you didn't hear people bitching about "crying wolf." They learned their lesson the first time. You do the best with the information you have. Slow the hell down, and avoid overpasses. If the officials make the wrong call, and you lose a day's pay? Well, fine, it's still cheaper than totaling your car and a trip to the ER.

      In Atlanta, some of the forecasters were calling for 1 to 2 inches. Even if there was just a 20% chance of snow, they should have had the salt trucks (all 40 or 50 of them that they have) in the city proper, hitting the overpasses BEFORE the clusterfuck. Not waiting for the gridlock in the afternoon, and not halfway to Macon. Doesn't do anybody any good if the salt truck is stuck in the traffic they were supposed to prevent.

    126. Re:Pffft by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Seriously? You do realize there are things call "spring" and "fall" in the north, too, right? You know -- when "temperatures hover between 30-35 degrees" and you might end up with a rainstorm or an icestorm or whatever?

      Yes, I realize this. I grew up in the north and learned to drive in the north. It was snowing for my first behind-the-wheel driving lesson.

      Please understand that "hovering between 30-35" is the norm for the entire winter down south, not just for a few weeks here, a few weeks there. Also, to tell you the truth, I don't remember the temperature being 30-35 much at all. I remember it being 60 degrees one day and 10 the next. Because the only terrain there to slow down those oncoming weather systems was about 1,000 miles of prairie grass. Sound familiar?

      Guess what? In the north, when they are calling for "freezing rain" or "sleet" and put out a winter storm warning, people drive with great caution. Now, most places in the north have salt to handle these scenarios, but -- even with the salt -- nobody wants to be driving on the roads during freezing rain, even in the north.

      Whatever. I never looked at a weather report in the north unless I was waxing my skis. I certainly didn't check the NWS before hopping in the car.

      Driving works in the north for 3 reasons:
      1. Snow is not difficult to drive in, and snow is what mainly happens in the north.
      2. Dedicated snow removal equipment. If snow or ice or whatever is in the forecast, the entire bloody state is instantly covered in chemicals. Hell, some bridges even have deicers built into the bridge.
      3. More experienced drivers. But I list this last for a reason: last is least. You can dismount that high horse whenever you're ready.

      A warning about something like that happens, and people leave work early.

      What? You're joking. If we left early for snow, we'd never be at work.

      Schools close.

      Um, no. My kids' school district down here has more snow days in a single academic year than I had my entire life, growing up. Northern districts will close for extreme cold, but not for snow.

      There's nothing you can do to prevent sliding around with a car on ice.

      Chains will improve grip and reduce stopping distance. It is entirely possible to drive with chains on glare ice at low speeds. Done it dozens upon dozens of times (former ski racer here). Sucks driving that slow when you're a speed demon at heart, but you get there eventually.

      But my guess is that a lot of this problem has to do with people -- and the news media -- not understanding the details of the weather warning information I mentioned in my post.

      Southerners speak slowly, but that doesn't mean that they're stupid. A meteorologist at a large market news station is going to understand, much better than you do, what to make of NWS alerts.

      Unless the weather people in Georgia are significantly more incompetent, my bet is that every time a "watch" or an "advisory" comes on, people in the south go a little crazy, and then nothing or very little happens. Then when an actual "warning" comes up, they don't realize that means something different.

      Well, I don't live in Atlanta, but this is not my experience. My experience is that local meteorologists are constantly analyzing all available data sources, including NWS alerts, and tweeting out updates as the various weather models change or converge (increasing forecast confidence). I enjoyed your mental image of a bunch of confused southerners running around like decapitated chickens, but I'm telling you that that's not what it's like down here.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    127. Re:Pffft by litehacksaur111 · · Score: 2

      The city government was not the problem. Most people made it out of Atlanta because salting tucks were on the streets. Its the interstates and local roads in gwinnett and cobb county that were backed up. That is the responsibility of the state government not the city of Atlanta.

    128. Re:Pffft by Wookact · · Score: 1

      I get marked troll for this comment? What facts and opinion based upon those facts are trollish now?

    129. Re:Pffft by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      We call that "penny wise and pound foolish" as I have NO doubt that when you crunch the numbers Atlanta just pissed down the drain several times what it would have cost to just show some common damned sense and shut things down when they should have.

      In my area when the ice hit last month we went the exact opposite, we had salt trucks ready to go, we had city workers cutting down any limbs near lines, we had the local hotel full of electric company workers, did this cost money? Yep but ya know what? While other counties were having to send police to pick up little old ladies and ferry them to makeshift shelters because the power was out we didn't lose squat, we all sat in our nice warm homes and enjoyed Xmas.

      If you fail to plan you plan to fail and because Atlanta was counting pennies they now will end up losing millions. Smart move Atlanta, maybe next time you'll err on the side of caution!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    130. Re:Pffft by Sorny · · Score: 1

      "Cities like Birmingham and Atlanta are different. The ground surface temperature is warmer, so any amount of snow generally melts and converts to ice quickly. The people up north don't know/understand this, so they make ignorant comments to feel superior."

      No, we have 4 real seasons. 2 of which are exactly like your "winter". Spring and Autumn often have ground temps high enough that snow immediately converts to ice, or ground temps below freezing such that rain instantly freezes to ice. We feel superior because we don't panic, and know that when a winter storm warning is issued by the NWS, you pay attention. Listen up, the NWS knows what they're about, if they issue a watch it is like 50/50, a warning is better taken as gospel.

      A little bit of ice and you freak out. Come up to MN and I'll show you something to freak out about. Black ice. Can't see it. Looks like dry pavement. Will cause your vehicle to lose control with the slightest change in direction or speed. Worse by far than normal ice on the roads because there is no indication there is anything wrong until the car/truck gets very loose. If you panic on black ice, you're in the ditch or worse before you can blink.

      --
      OSX pwns.
    131. Re:Pffft by Sorny · · Score: 1

      Black Ice is very different from what you southerners get. Trust me on this, you have no idea what black ice is.

      --
      OSX pwns.
    132. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare 1% chance of criminal and civil lawsuits arising from not shutting down the city, the 99% chance of money lost to unnecessarily shutdown a government seems minimal.

      FTFY. The specific numbers may have been pulled out of my ass, but they are merely meant to demonstrate that you failed to account for the fact that the probability of it being this bad was low, and if you had been mayor and were shutting down the city every time the probability were the same, you'd quickly find yourself out of a job.

    133. Re:Pffft by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Most southern cities don't have dedicated snowplows, but they do often have blades that can be attached to regular dump trucks and also feeder systems that can be attached to the back to dispense salt or sand. In the south, sand is a lot more common than salt.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    134. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^THIS! F**KING THIS

    135. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well put. I live in Kansas and a way to tune into the NOAA/NWS updates is a must from March - June. I teach evening classes at a community college...on the really bad days, I run the NWS's radar loop on the overhead projector so my students (many who commute from up to 50 miles away) can make their own decision on when to leave or call to check on family.

    136. Re:Pffft by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I live in Oklahoma, too. We got a couple of inches dropped on us in the middle of a school day what, 6 weeks ago? And I got stuck in traffic for maybe an hour and a half. School didn't even let out early. I'd say we are probably about as prepared for winter weather as Atlanta. We have dump trucks that they put blades and sand dispensers on. And not a whole lot of those. The difference here was everybody slowed down and drove carefully and eventually got where they were going.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    137. Re:Pffft by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I also lived in Chicago about 15 years and never owned snow tires. Up there, they usually kept the roads clean enough where it wouldn't have mattered. Chains? That is illegal.
      I remember one time while I lived there that people got stuck for about 10 hours on Lake Shore Drive due to particularly heavy snow in a short time frame They can't keep the roads clean if there are already people stuck on them.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    138. Re:Pffft by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Winter tires are nice to have, but by no means necessary. Where I'm at, in Anchorage, plenty of people drive around with all season tires in the winter. They just need to drive slower and be more cautious.

      If you mash on the gas and the tires spin, don't continue to stomp on the gas pedal. I went to school in Atlanta, they don't know how to drive on anything other than clear asphalt. Once you get a few terrible drivers like that abandoning their cars on the road, how are the people that can drive supposed to get around them?

    139. Re:Pffft by internerdj · · Score: 1

      To top it off, if you ask a southerner where the worst drivers are then they will say almost without hesitation: Atlanta.

    140. Re:Pffft by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      There's a great deal of difference between a light snow somewhere north like Chicago and somewhere down south like Atlanta because our temps during a snow are typically close to the freezing mark, resulting in a wet snow and a cycle of melting and refreezing as ice.

      A lot of people keep saying things like this, but it doesn't make sense. You are saying that storms that occur at around the freezing mark cause a lot of ice issues. That I can agree with. You say these conditions don't occur in northern places. That is wrong. Sure there are times of the year in northern places where the temperature is generally well below freezing, there are also times in the Fall and Spring where temperatures are right around the freezing mark and they would see the exact same sort of ice issues. It has been all around the freezing mark in Anchorage for the past week or so in the middle of January. That's plenty of melting and refreezing to deal with. This argument just sounds like a defensive attitude because people in Atlanta can't drive very well.

    141. Re:Pffft by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Ultimately the responsibility for your safety resides with you. if the government has not declared an automatic snow day, but you think there is a strong possibility of blizzard-like conditions, then it is your duty to safeguard your children and yourself and stay home.
      Smart business would have told their employees to work from home. The only people that had to show up was government employees and if your life may be on the line, I think it is worth taking a personal day.
      Everybody is worried about who is at fault, but to me it is pretty obvious. Don't depend on Big Brother to look out for you. Big Brother looks out for himself, and only looks out for you if it is ultimately of benefit to him.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    142. Re:Pffft by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Sweet! All it needs is Law and Order music!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    143. Re:Pffft by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Atlanta traffic is some of the worst crap I've ever had the pleasure of being stuck in. Cars completely blocking intersections so no one can get through on a green light. Generally terrible driving that only gets worse on any snow or ice.

    144. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem here is that driving on ice and snow requires practice and skills that most people in Atlanta don't have.

      This. If you've ever driven in Atlanta you know people down there drive like fucking retards to begin with. Throw in two inches of snow and you're just asking for exactly what happened.

    145. Re:Pffft by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Oh sure! I did some car-skating to work on a sheet of snow no less than 2 inches deep! They don't so much plow here as pack the snow down and polish it. They claim to put some shit down on the road that causes the snow to melt and keep the roads clear, but it doesn't!

      I've lived down South though, and you have a lot of people who don't know how to drive in the snow trying to drive in the snow. Many of them don't have tires that are at all good for it. You don't really need snow tires for it, just a good set of all-season radials, but keep in mind down there the city's not able to do anything to clear the snow off. So your road conditions are a lot worse, people don't have the right tires (or they had the right tires and wore 'em down too much) and have no experience driving in snow.

      What I find fascinating is that people will sit in their cars for 12 hours or more in gridlock traffic. At some point don't you think "Hey, maybe I should get off the damn road and seek the nearest shelter?" Apparently they don't, in Atlanta. It seems like very bad judgment on the part of millions of people...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    146. Re:Pffft by lgw · · Score: 1

      Just like the only part of a newspaper likely to be accurate is the sports page, the only government pronouncements likely to be accurate are those from the NWS. Funny how things change when everyone cares if you're wrong.

      Fun fact, the NOAA includes one of America's 2 non-military uniformed services (the other is within the public health service - both wear naval uniforms, and use naval officer paygrades).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    147. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefer if people like you could read a book once in a while without waiting for it to be made into a movie.

    148. Re:Pffft by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      I suggest before reading this, you go back and look at your original reply to me, in which you were talking about 30-35 degree temps. Most of your reply is about your experience living in a place where you admit that you rarely encounter these things, so I don't see why you think that's particularly relevant to a discussion that you started about weather in temperatures around freezing.

      Seriously? You do realize there are things call "spring" and "fall" in the north, too, right? You know -- when "temperatures hover between 30-35 degrees" and you might end up with a rainstorm or an icestorm or whatever?

      Yes, I realize this. I grew up in the north and learned to drive in the north. It was snowing for my first behind-the-wheel driving lesson.

      Please understand that "hovering between 30-35" is the norm for the entire winter down south, not just for a few weeks here, a few weeks there. Also, to tell you the truth, I don't remember the temperature being 30-35 much at all. I remember it being 60 degrees one day and 10 the next. Because the only terrain there to slow down those oncoming weather systems was about 1,000 miles of prairie grass. Sound familiar?

      Yeah, it sounds familiar if you grew up in North Dakota or maybe Nebraska. If you grew up in eastern Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, etc., not so much.

      In states that do have mountains and particularly those closer to things like the Atlantic Ocean where cold air masses frequently slam into more moist air that is moderated in temperature by the ocean, a large portion of the fall-winter-spring is spent with days in the 30-35 degree region. Much, much more time than in Atlanta, where it's basically just nights (and only a few days) in late December through February when that's likely.

      Guess what? In the north, when they are calling for "freezing rain" or "sleet" and put out a winter storm warning, people drive with great caution. Now, most places in the north have salt to handle these scenarios, but -- even with the salt -- nobody wants to be driving on the roads during freezing rain, even in the north.

      Whatever. I never looked at a weather report in the north unless I was waxing my skis. I certainly didn't check the NWS before hopping in the car.

      You just admitted that you rarely experienced weather in the 30-35 degree region while growing up. If the day is clearly above or clearly below freezing, I can see why you wouldn't care so much unless a major weather event was happening. But if a major weather event -- as in something out of the ordinary like a blizzard -- was happening, I'd bet you might check the weather advisories, no? That's the equivalent of what was issued in Atlanta in terms of likely impact for where you grew up: MAJOR BLIZZARD ON THE WAY -- DANGEROUS ROAD CONDITIONS -- EMERGENCY TRAVEL ONLY RECOMMENDED. Those sorts of warnings only happen once in a while in the north, but you are meant to heed them. That's what happened in Atlanta this week.

      Anyhow, for people who actually do live in places where the temperature is frequently around freezing, that IS when you're most concerned about being on the roads. There's no "Whatevah!" about it.

      A warning about something like that happens, and people leave work early.

      What? You're joking. If we left early for snow, we'd never be at work.

      Who's talking about SNOW?? The previous sentence was talking about freezing rain and ice. And yes, people in PA or NY or NJ or CT or MA do consider leaving work early when there is ice in the forecast. Light snow, not so much. Ice -- heck, yeah.

      Schools close.

      Um, no. My kids' school district down here has more snow days in a single academic year than I had my entire life, growing up. Northern districts will close for

    149. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically the city has no stockpile of road ice, nor the equipment to quickly disperse it. What most of you don't seem to realize is that the (on average) tri-yearly snowfall is usually just a dusting of white stuff that melts away shortly after the sun rises. And who is in charge of calling the Mayor or Governor at 4AM saying "We may have a problem we've never had before"? ...Right...no one.

    150. Re:Pffft by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      For the general population to be ignorant of these meanings is perhaps expected. That's why governments and school officials need to understand these things and make reasonable calls -- but it appears they did not seem to know what "warning" meant in this case.

      That's the disturbing thing. The NWS had stuff out saying there would be "dangerous" road conditions and that travel was not recommended well in advance of the snow.

      The crux of this is that they said it happens every 3 years. That's much more frequent than every 30 or every 300. Government and populous alike should have some basic understanding of what that means already. Other places that get a good snowstorm or ice on the roads infrequently ( 1/yr) still have their fair share of dumbass drivers, but they don't make national headlines with gross incompetence. The story is so sensationalized it makes those 3 inches to be 3 meters. I've lived in Albuquerque and when they get 1 inch, the whole damned city shuts down. One year we got 11 inches and I didn't leave my house for a week, not because I couldn't, but because I didn't want to. The weather made news, a 3000 car pileup didn't, and no students were stuck at school.

    151. Re:Pffft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The problem may be that the political climate is such that a warning for something that did not occur would have caused the local government to be voted out of office for being irresponsible and causing harm to businesses.

    152. Re:Pffft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It depends on the city. In some places the mayor has very little power to do these sorts of things.

    153. Re:Pffft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's also an area where snow is rare. I'm in California, and I'm sure if we had 2 inches of snow in the Bay Area or Los Angeles that we'd just as messed up right now as Atlanta. Even if the local governments warned people to stay home the citizens might just ignore it, or treat it as not very severe. I'll be honest here, to me two inches of snow sounds like a trivial amount until I stop and think about it and its implications.

    154. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Top Gear actually presented a solution to the problem: rent farm equipment to do the job.

    155. Re:Pffft by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Nope, just the regular ones. Oklahoma doesn't get enough snow to make snow tires worth it, just enough that we're not all total noobs when some happens to fall.

      Pretty much true, although my dad has snow tires, there's never enough need to put them on. I myself have driven in my little car while delivering pizzas to put myself through college (shout out to Pizza Shuttle in Norman) in many inches of snow. However, Oklahoma is pretty much flat and so long as you can get some traction, you can go slow and make it near anywhere. One ice storm however, I did find myself at the top of one of the few hills and managed to slide sideways down the street and ended up with the car stuck in somebodies driveway for the night.

    156. Re:Pffft by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      What we have to worry about is ice storms. Winter/snow tires will not help you on ice, so we(just as The Mighty Buzzard suggested), just slow the fuck down until the roads are clear.

      True, but OK is pretty much as flat as it gets (well, west TX is as flat as it gets, but anyway...) and driving slow works. I've delivered pizzas in 6 inches of snow while in college in OK. Not sure what Atlanta is like, but add any sort of hills into the equation and things change drastically.

    157. Re:Pffft by bonehead · · Score: 1

      Winter tires are advised even if there is no snow since they provide a far superior performance in low temperature conditions.

      Let me guess, you're a tire salesman?

    158. Re:Pffft by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      > Let me know if something bad might happen so I can prepare for it

      I'll let you know what's coming down the pike:
      - asteroids
      - solar flares
      - gamma ray bursts
      - supervolcanoes
      - megaquakes

      Interspersed with locusts.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    159. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their forecast site is also actually readable, unlike the vomit that the commercial forecasting sites throw at you.

    160. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, or maybe we should accept a bit more risk on our lives in return for a bit more liberty. People can make their own judgements about these things rather than rely on their government masters to direct their every move.

      Like the article said, Atlanta gambled and lost, but we need to end the every escalating risk-mitigation culture that has taken root in America.

    161. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting it's Atlanta.

      FTFY

      Oh, and the many images that Atlanta brings to mind....

    162. Re:Pffft by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      It doesn't happen. No place that I know of in the city even keeps them in stock.

    163. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your local guys pretty much are NWS - the National Weather Center, the National Severe Storms Lab, the National Weather Radar Testbed - pretty much all of it is centered at University of Oklahoma.

      Your local guys may work well with NWS and get the news out faster than the teletype, but claiming that they have better equipment seems disingenuous when they're relying a set of combined resources that includes NWS and partners.

    164. Re:Pffft by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 1

      Tyres are the most important part of a car, since they're the bit that actually interfaces between the mechanism and the medium.

      Normal tyres aren't as grippy in the cold since they harden up. This might be fine 99% of the time since you'll be more careful in these temperatures anyways. The last 1% of the time, the grip you get could help avoid an accident.

      It's cheap enough as a form of insurance; $100/corner if you don't have a monster of a car. And they last for several years.

    165. Re:Pffft by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      I'm an Atlanta native and yes, we aren't used to driving on ice, but from what I've been reading from people in Northern states over the past few days, they even say driving on ice is dangerous. First, Chicago is relatively flat, but Atlanta grew up in the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains. Yes, our government failed us, but how are the residents supposed to drive up our hilly terrain when the roads weren't even pre-treated and covered with 1/4" inch of solid ice. None of us have winter tires, mainly because it would be a waste to buy them to use one or two weeks in a decade. If you tried to buy them inside the city, you will get odd looks and a few chuckles, because no place I know of even sells them. If it was just snow, we would have been fine, because we're used to driving in heavy summer rains. So, just don't get pissed when we laugh at you for saying 85 is "too hot".

    166. Re:Pffft by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      The news today commented that we could have 5,000 plows and sand trucks, but even that would be useless if they aren't cranked up in time.

    167. Re:Pffft by lothos · · Score: 1

      When it finally warms up to 52 here in Minneapolis I'll have shorts on.

    168. Re:Pffft by Zynder · · Score: 1

      Hey I'm just glad we dodged that whole Mayan Universe-destroying Calendar thing. That one had me on the edge of my seat for a whole year!

    169. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and more Republicans / Democrats *

      * delete as per your preference

    170. Re: Pffft by iamhassi · · Score: 2

      If nothing happened we would not be talking about it. But something did happen and now it's major headlines across the world. "Cry wolf" and no one will remember the day off next month, but say nothing and they will never forget sitting in their freezing car for 18 hours straight.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    171. Re:Pffft by Zynder · · Score: 1

      A flat place does not exist in the ATL. As a matter of fact, right at the outside edge of the downtown area (everything inside the I285 loop), they have their own mini-Mt Rushmore.

    172. Re:Pffft by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      What do you do when that parent is an ER nurse?

      The same as when the city shuts down for a hurricane, duh.

      Businesses have to close, city workers will cause traffic jams on the way home

      Which is exactly what happened. If schools and government were closed and businesses encouraged to stay closed and people to stay home, this mess never would have happened. Atlanta knew the snow was coming at 4:AM (the National Weather Service is pissed off about the Atlanta Mayor's lies to the public) and should have taken action instead of waiting until the snow was actually falling.

      The mess in Atlanta was caused by incompetence and political cowardice.

    173. Re:Pffft by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      A cold front in those conditions with 1" of snow would cripple any city that can't salt/sand every road. In the south, the ground is 40F when the snowfall starts. The first 1/4" melts, then freezes as the snow/cold air cools down the ground. So you have a perfectly smooth undercoating of ice (might as well be polished) with 3/4" of snow on top. If you don't have a road cover to lay down or studded tires, you aren't going to have any control. Yes, in those conditions, I've seen a car come to a complete stop on a flat surface, and have the wind blow hard enough to move it. Or look up all the youtube videos of busses and such on light gradients sliding around with all-4 wheels locked. Yes, I know you have more traction when rolling than locked, but you'll never get any better than when you are at a full stop with all 4 wheels locked.

      In the north, the ground is already below freezing when the snow falls, so the conditions are often very different.

    174. Re:Pffft by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Chicago's been shut down for two inches of snow when the snowfall started as rain, because NOBODY can drive on ice (and I've been driving in a northern climate since 1968).

      Also, do you remember the first time you ever drove on a slick surface? Now, imagine thousands of people who have never once experienced it getting on the hIghways all at the same time! Didn't you see the videos? It was every bit as bad as it gets up here (I'm only 200 miles south of Chicago). Experienced truckers couldn't navigate it.

      And they have no salt or plows or any of the other equipment we northerners have.

      I wonder how YOU would react if Chicago somehow got hit by a category 2 hurricane? Chicago would be closed for a month, because we're not used to hurricanes here. They're not used to snow and ice.

    175. Re:Pffft by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Tires don't matter as much as people think. I ran summer M+S tires (no, not "all season", though many consider summer tires M+S rated to be "all season") all year round in Alaska, with no issues. The conditions after a snow storm are different in the north from the south.

    176. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefer if assholes like you weren't able to post on /.

    177. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just a one trick pony, son. How many times are you gonna keep screaming about how awful black ice is, how no one but you could even know, and how you're so much better than a redneck? I think it's time you walk on home, boy. No one wants to hear your yappin' anymore.

    178. Re:Pffft by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I never bothered with summer tires. I really don't see what you'd need them for unless you're into racing or something like that.

      They are quieter and usually give better mileage as well (stiffer treat with fewer, larger tread gaps).

      And there's nothing like a turn that is so tight your passengers cry. The average person is "uncomfortable" at about 0.2g of lateral acceleration in a car. Most will do 0.7+g, with nice tires, lots of cars will approach 1g lateral acceleration. Those kinds of numbers are entertaining, and don't require that one speed or otherwise break the law to experience regularly on the road.

    179. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DAMMIT!! I posted and have 2 mod points! I'd give them BOTH to you if I could! That shit was funny right there :D

    180. Re:Pffft by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If the road is 3 lanes wide, it only takes 1-3 bad drivers to block a few million behind them. Someone had to be at the front, and the people caught in the middle mentioned the roads weren't a problem with going, but the driver in front of them.

    181. Re:Pffft by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You still have to have the blades to put on the front. And usually the trucks prefer some permanent modifications, like stronger front suspension. And the spreaders for the back aren't trivial.

      Since almost nobody does it the way you suggest, it seems unlikely to be an overall optimal solution.

    182. Re:Pffft by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Try that in Alaska. I remember going to work the day after a record snow (About 3' in 24 hours), I had to find a rut to follow, but made it to work, as did most everyone else. I hear it's similar in places with more snow that Alaska (like Buffalo with all the lake effect).

    183. Re:Pffft by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      The mess in Atlanta was caused by incompetence and political cowardice.

      I'm not inclined to disagree with you on Atlanta's governance, but 4 AM is pretty late to sound the call to shut down a city. I go to work at 6:15 and don't listen to the news before I'm in the car. Realistically, you can cancel things the night before - or not at all. The uncertainty regarding this storm was enormous. Hurricanes give you time to do things - much more than eight hours.

    184. Re: Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. We were given at least a days notice that there would be 1-3 inches of accumulation with > 80% probability. But we get a lot of false positives on snow because of where Atlanta lies geographically, and our citizens, which includes a lot of transplanted Yankees, discounted the reports. The problem with ATL is not how we deal with snow, though - the problem is that we have too many cars and no real alternative.

    185. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They think that regardless of the subject at hand.

    186. Re:Pffft by Calinous · · Score: 1

      M+S stands for "Mud and Snow". As such, in my country (Romania) only tires with M+S, MS, M.S. rating are legally accepted as winter tires

    187. Re:Pffft by Calinous · · Score: 1

      If the roads are sanded, winter tires will grip sand grains in the small creases/cuts, and this will help even on ice. Lacking sand, only chains (in they break the ice under them) and studded tires help.

    188. Re:Pffft by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      As such, in my country (Romania) only tires with M+S, MS, M.S. rating are legally accepted as winter tires

      Which doesn't indicate that any tire with M+S would be banned from being a "summer tire". Yes, all winter tires will have M+S rating, but not all M+S tires will be winter tires.

      In the US, there are summer, all-season, and winter tires. M+S is a separate rating. All-season are more like summer tires with design in them for colder temperatures and such, rarely without M+S rating. M+S can be had in a summer tire if it has sufficiently self-cleaning tread (so the mud/snow doesn't get stuck, but instead falls out as the tire goes around, improving performance in deeper snow and mud. All-season would to better on ice, sand, and packed snow, and possibly in the rain. winter would beat them all for very cold temperatures, and in snow and ice. Studded can give better grip on ice than summer on dry pavement.

      Just because M+S on summer (non all-season) is rare, doesn't mean you can't get it.

      But all that's a distraction from the original point. The driver makes much more difference than the tires. The tires matter, but only within a skill level, not across it.

    189. Re:Pffft by Altus · · Score: 1

      Work on your reading comprehension. You made the same mistake as the guy above you.

      You are driving on all weather tires. They are driving tires that are made only for wet and dry conditions with no consideration for snow and ice. You don't buy those in your part of the country because you have regular snow and ice. The only people in colorado who would buy summer tires are the ones who will put snow specific tires on in the winter (usually on sporty cars to get the best summer ride and not be fucked in the winter). While your all weather tires are not as good as snow tires in the snow they are still miles better than the summer tires that people in Georgia buy.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    190. Re:Pffft by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Where I live in NY (an hour north of NYC) they dont even really salt or plow until; we have 2 inches down!

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    191. Re: Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez. Take responsibility for your own life. No need for big brother or a nanny state.

    192. Re:Pffft by sunsurfandsand · · Score: 1

      That was part of the problem. The forecast didn't call for 2 inches, it predicted that the ice/snow would miss Atlanta, though not by much.

      That is partly right. On Monday, that was what the weather advisory predicted. However, at 3:39 AM Tuesday, my wife, who works at a DeKalb County school, received a weather alert that said the advisory had been upgraded to a warning. The warning stated that there would be dangerous winter storm conditions, and that only emergency vehicles should be on the road. Everyone in state, city, and county government, and school systems, knew what was coming.

      Why were the schools not closed? Several years ago, I forget which year it was, there was a weather forecast for a few inches of snow. The schools closed. Not a flake fell. The school systems were heavily criticized for pre-emptively closing. After that, they have been reluctant to close until they see the snow. This time, that proved to be a mistake.

      Hindsight, as the cliche says, is always 20/20. Here in the ATL, even when foresight is 20/20, making the right call is, at best, 50/50.

    193. Re:Pffft by deadweight · · Score: 1

      I am a pilot and no not rely on NOAA. I do not need the government telling me what the weather is. Hey - can you wait - I am getting a call from my insurance company. They seem to be mad about the three airplanes I wrecked last year. WTF is up with them?

    194. Re:Pffft by SiChemist · · Score: 1

      And yet you posted a reply to the article correcting another poster. Sounds like you GAF to me.

    195. Re:Pffft by njnnja · · Score: 1

      I agree that ultimately the person responsible for your own safety is you, but in my parenthetical the examples are things that only the local government can do. I can keep my kid home from school, but I can't cancel classes. You and I can't put more police on the streets or tell firefighters to be ready for gas main breaks. Like it or not, local governments have a lot of power, and with that power comes responsibility to use it correctly. Even if all of those functions (schools, firefighters, even police) were all privatized then whoever is in charge of them had better manage them effectively or else expect to take the heat, regardless of the (ir)responsibility of the customers of that service.

      Isn't part of being responsible for your own safely (in the long run) the responsibility to hold screw ups like this accountable?

    196. Re:Pffft by niftymitch · · Score: 1

      Why was this even the mayor's call?

      Because he's the boss? The guy in the hotseat? The person they're paying to make decisions?

      The mayor may be advised by his engineering or public safety guys, but, in the end, it's his decision.

      And if he says it's not his decision to make, the wrong guy got elected mayor.

      No not the boss of it all.
      Following your logic Obama should have canceled Atlanta.
      Others would reach higher had demand the Pope cancel Atlanta.

      School bus drivers... and schools should have their own criteria
      and should be responsible for acting in a timely manner.

      Offices and office workers, if your boss required you to stay and you
      asked to exit in a timely manner put the additional travel time on your time card.
      Stay in a hotel or motel... bill the company.

      Highway patrol could have seen trouble and placed chain-up or get off restriction
      on all public carrier (truck) traffic. Chains on 5% of the highway traffic would have
      chopped up much of the ice and that alone would have helped keep traffic moving
      in many places.

      The reality is warm ice is slippery like mayo on glass.
      Common tires and even most snow tires are simply
      round runners.

      --
      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
    197. Re:Pffft by niftymitch · · Score: 1

      Nope, just the regular ones. Oklahoma doesn't get enough snow to make snow tires worth it, just enough that we're not all total noobs when some happens to fall.

      You might be correct but not because of snow depths or frequency.
                  http://downloads.newsok.com/kn...
      However it is clear that chains or cable chains are worth the
      investment. Snow tires are near worthless in an ice storm
      and a great rain tire can work just as well.

      Minnesota snow at 10F and colder is almost a dusting of light sand.
      However in the temp range of 30-34F things can get slippery to
      a degree that is just difficult.

      Winter.... some days are simply chess and checkers walk over to the
      neighbor weather.

      --
      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
    198. Re:Pffft by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Did you yell "America Fuck Yeah!" after that too?

      No, I yelled "NOAA to save the motherfuckin' day, yeah!"

      Did you even read the link? Do you even understand the issues?

      Yes Mr. Mayor, I read the link, and yes, I understand the issues. Mismanagement and apathy on behalf of city government caused a huge clusterfuck in a major metropolitan city. The mayor is blaming the state, the governor is blaming the NWS, nobody is willing to say they fucked up. It was not a forecasting error. The mayor and governor were both chillin', eating, and accepting awards while this shit was bearing down.

      When you don't have the equipment to handle a winter weather event, you beg/borrow/steal from neighboring municipalities or even farther out, from nearby states. I'm in Tennessee, and when we get our annual ice storms, the cities and state are out there salting. If the local utility can't cope, there are people from Arkansas, Missouri, Kentucky, and Mississippi all coming in to help get the power back on.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    199. Re:Pffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, about 75% of all those dependent for security of life and limb on NOAA/NWS have no idea of the fact, so will happily vote down funding for NOAA/NWS. Oh well :(

    200. Re:Pffft by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Oklahoma, almost in the middle of nowhere, Atlanta, business hub of the South. You did notice how many of the vehicles on the road were eighteen wheelers. Traffic is almost bumper to bumper all day long at 60 mph. The mid-day business traffic was on the road with the school and commuter traffic at the same time and only going 20 mph.

      Schools and business should have closed on the 4 am warning and I blame the people who put their kids on the bus and went to work. They should have put on some hot cocoa and waited to get enough snow to build some snowmen and do some sledding. In 05 I had to stay at work making hurricane preparations and got caught in the evacuation traffic for two hours. The business was closed for five days and my power was off for 10. Next storm we did the same thing but it turned at the last minute and we didn't get any wind. You never know.

    201. Re:Pffft by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      As someone who's lived in Atlanta for the past 15 years, I have to agree with you on all points.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    202. Re: Pffft by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      I still hear people here in MN complaining because the Governor closed all the schools in the state "for nothing" on a day with -50F wind chill.

    203. Re:Pffft by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they're damned if they do and damned if they don't.

      Of course, they're politicians.

      The Damned.

      ---

      Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company - Mark Twain

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    204. Re:Pffft by Cramer · · Score: 1

      I'd say 90+% is the simple fact that it happens so infrequently no one living there has any clue what so ever on how to drive in snow (and ice.) I (in Raleigh NC) drove home Tuesday night in 1-2" of 19F sand-like snow. I had no problems at all with it -- the few other drivers out were apparently flat-out terrified, even when they were on dry pavement.

      (It was nice to have a 4 lane interstate all to myself.)

  2. I grew up in Atlanta... by mbone · · Score: 2

    Let's just say that the city has a long history of not dealing with snow well, and leave it at that.

    1. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by judoguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I lived in Atlanta for 8 years and now in Minneapolis for 23. Believe me, Atlanta and the other Southern cities I grew up in are much harder to drive in with a winter event of any size.

      Here in Minneapolis, each and every year, the first 2" snow and everyone acts like they've never seen the shit before. Unbelievable commute tie ups and panic reigns. I was surprised at how much easier it was to get around in the winter when I first got here. Not because the drivers are better, but because of how dry it is in the winter. In the South, winter means wet ice. Driving on -10F snow is much easier.

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    2. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      I was going to say. The person defends their self with the reason for the issues was not having plows and salt trucks. The issue was 2-3 inches causing such chaos. I've done my fair share of driving in 6"-8" of unplowed snow and some times freeezing rain in both cities and on highways

    3. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by rvw · · Score: 1

      Let's just say that the city has a long history of not dealing with snow well, and leave it at that.

      Five years ago we had one snow storm that shut down the country mostly over here. It was the first in a long time and nobody was prepared, with people stuck in their cars for 15-20 hours, entire highways filled with cars which couldn't move anymore. Now we get weather warnings that mostly can be ignored because too often it turns out to be nothing serious, and people complain. Train schedules get cut down by half, because otherwise 10% of the trains might get stuck somewhere, or one in five years we might have a serious storm and people get stuck for half a day.

    4. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by unimacs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      hmmm. I've lived in the Minneapolis area for close to 50 years and I'm tempted to call BS on this one, - at least partly. The first snowfall of the year does lead to more spinouts and traffic delays than usual because at least some people have forgotten how to drive in that kind of weather.

      But "panic reigns"?

      Uh no

      If you lived in Minneapolis proper you'd know that in residential areas (outside of snow emergency routes) you may not even see a plow for that small amount of snow. Most streets within a mile of our house have had layers of compacted snow and ice on them for weeks. Yes it is dryer here on the whole but we get plenty of days with precip when the temp is hovering around freezing. It is quite common to go from rain, to freezing rain, then to snow and have the whole mess freeze over.

      My guess is that a big reason you find it easier to get here around in winter is that the other drivers know what they are doing. But the other reason is that city has the equipment and know how to deal with snow and ice.

    5. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the solution: "Slow the fuck down"

    6. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by Marillion · · Score: 1

      That's been my observation too. Having spent winters as far south as Cincinnati and as far north as Ottawa, Canada I completely agree. When snow is cold and stays cold, it's very similar to sand. Plowing is unnecessary. Chemical de-icing (salt or other) actually makes it more hazardous. I also have to say that no one handles snow as well as Montréal. They have giant snow throwers attached to tractors and pump it into dump trucks and cart it off to snow disposal sites.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    7. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      Bingo. My problem is that we are getting more residents moving in from out of state who are not familiar with how to navigate in winter weather and they are causing more and more problems. It also probably compounds the issue that we've had some weak winters for at least the last decade or so. What you need to do is to allow adequate stopping distances, moderate your speed as needed, and be prepared to correct for inevitable minor fishtailing (which is actually quite fun once you're good at being prepared and correcting for it).

      I really suspect that this mess in Atlanta comes down to driver skill. I think that drivers going to fast and not allowing appropriate stopping distances caused accidents which plugged roads basically. It's not plowing equipment (for 2 inches, HAH) or even salting/sanding/brining (again, like we don't get icy roads up here?) or vehicle equipment, tires, etc. Most of us up here drive with regular year round tires all the time. Don't even get me started on how unnecessary 4 wheel drive is, you can do 6+ inches of snow in 2 wheel drive just fine and 4 wheel drive does nothing to help you stop any faster which is really what the problem is 99% of the time, not needing more traction to get going.

    8. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by unimacs · · Score: 1

      I think all the problems were caused by multiple factors but we shouldn't be all that surprised at what happened. Even a single accident can cause traffic delays for miles under good driving conditions. So yesterday in Atlanta you have a situation where every major road is untreated and filled with people who aren't used to driving in those conditions. There's a good chance that at least a few on each road are going to lose control of their car and cause an accident leaving the rest of them stuck.

    9. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This 100x. Living in seattle, it rarely snows and when it does it is pretty horrible. It isn't because people don't know how to drive in it (but that doesn't help) it's because it is barely freezing and wet snow is slippery business. The slickness of snow/ice is that ultra thin membrane of water that thaws under pressure. When you are nearly at or above freezing, this membrane forms quickly. In many other northern parts of the US, the air is so cold that membrane of water never forms and the snow/ice are dry.

    10. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      If you lived in Minneapolis proper you'd know that in residential areas (outside of snow emergency routes) you may not even see a plow for that small amount of snow.

      I've lived in several northern cities, and I can confirm. There's no way in hell they'll drop a plow and tear up the asphalt over a measly 2". They'll throw down some sand and call it a day.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    11. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      Don't even get me started on how unnecessary 4 wheel drive is, you can do 6+ inches of snow in 2 wheel drive just fine

      With you so far...

      and 4 wheel drive does nothing to help you stop any faster

      Aaand this old fallacy shows up.

      Look, I grew up in northern Minnesota and I have commuted to work in the Twin Cities for nearly 30 years. My commute these days is about 25 miles one way and used to be about 50. Trust me, I know driving in bad conditions. :-)

      I've driven rear wheel drive mini-pickups, front wheel drive sedans, all wheel drive mini-SUVs, and a couple of 1/2 ton pickups (one two wheel drive, one 4 wheel). The little all wheel drive SUVs and the 4x4 were by FAR the best vehicles in snow for both acceleration and stopping.

      You don't rely on just the brakes, use the engine. Downshift!. The extra braking force applied through the second axle can make all the difference.*

      Granted, it's easier to manage with a manual transmission and clutch than an automatic. However, even the cheapest automatic tranny has at least one low gear below Drive. Use it!

      *Note: Most vehicles are sold with open differentials so a two wheel drive is really a one wheel drive in bad conditions while a 4WD is really a 2WD. However, the extra axle not only means twice the force applied, but the force is applied on two different parts of the road surface. This can make all the difference in some circumstances.

    12. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen pavement on my street in SW Minneapolis since Thanksgiving. Yeah they plow every couple weeks, but it's still 2 - 3 inches of hard pack ice that the plows can't get up.

    13. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      We're going to agree to disagree about 4 wheel drive having any substantial assistance for stopping. If you need to use it to stop you're either following too closely or going too quickly. There is no question that 4wd is an advantage in certain circumstances and when used appropriately. My farm truck has 4wd and I wouldn't have it any other way out there. I have never had 4wd on a daily driver though and seriously doubt the few times it might come in handy outweigh the reduction in gas mileage year round. Also do you really think all those SUV drivers from some suburb barreling down the highway are using engine braking? I suspect that in most cases 4wd is just causing them to be unnecessarily reckless. Streets are almost always plowed within 12 hours of snowfall at the latest. I just don't see that there's any justification for 4wd for the vast majority of people who have it in Minneapolis/St. Paul and like I said it probably causes them to be reckless.

      I am firmly in the camp that you can learn appropriate winter driving skills in a sedan and be much better at getting around than all the idiots with fancy SUVs who don't know how to use them. I also believe that's the majority of SUV drivers.

    14. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      ... 4 wheel drive does nothing to help you stop any faster which is really what the problem is 99% of the time, not needing more traction to get going.

      I am shocked every time I find someone that thinks a 4x4 can stop better than 2-wheel drive. I try to tell them that both types of cars have 4 wheel braking. Sure there is a minor weight difference and different drivetrain loses that can effect the stopping distance, but for all real purposes a 4x4 and 2x4 stop in about the same distance (assuming the same make and model vehicle)

    15. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Panic reigns" may be a bit of an exaggeration, but when I was there, the first big snowfall of the season ALWAYS resulted in an ungodly number of accidents all across the metro area. It seemed like everybody was in denial, driving as if the roads were dry and clear, forgetting everything they had ever learned about driving in wintry weather. Of course, by the next snowfall people had come to their senses and the accident level returned to normal levels. It always amused me.
      Don't believe it? Check these stories out:
      first snow 2011
      http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2011/11/19/saturdays-snow-causes-nearly-450-crashes-in-minn/
      first snow 2012
      http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2012/12/09/twin-cities-gets-its-first-big-snowstorm/
      first snow 2013
      http://www.startribune.com/local/234457321.html

    16. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      The little all wheel drive SUVs and the 4x4 were by FAR the best vehicles in snow for both acceleration and stopping.

      You don't rely on just the brakes, use the engine. Downshift!. The extra braking force applied through the second axle can make all the difference.*

      Not for stopping. We are talking about snow - limiting factor in stopping is the friction between tyres and surface on which you are driving. Brakes are capable enough to send enough torque to tyres which the tyres are unable to pass on as braking force to the surface. Having extra stopping force applied on the tyres from the inside of the vehicle is doing exactly nothing.

      It is like a chain with 2 links -
      1. Tyre-surface
      2. Tyre-vehicle

      On snow, first link is weaker. Strengthening the second link will not do anything to increase the strength of the chain.

      Second link can be strengthened by either or both of engine braking (through axle) and traditional brakes (through wheel). But the strength of this link of the chain is not what is deficient on snow.

      Engine braking, to those who are used to it, is convenient to slow down, because when you downshift, the "braking" force applied to the tyres automatically stops when you have slowed down sufficiently for the gear you are in. With the traditional brakes, one has to remember to release the brakes after the desired speed has been achieved. Not a big deal in the effort of "remembering", but it is nice when you don't have to, using engine braking.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    17. Re:I grew up in Atlanta... by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      While it may be counterintuitive, my experience has been that using engine braking is generally more forgiving than the traditional brakes. For me, it's a lot easier to manage the friction coefficient with the engine than the brakes because braking force tends to be much more binary in nature. When slippery conditions exist, you're either on the brake pedal or you're not (although ABS helps here).

      In fact, one reason that I really like a manual transmission is that manipulating the clutch and engine RPMs in combination with the transmission goes a long way toward getting just the right balance to slow down without losing traction. Newer computerized automatic trannies and engines do the same thing. So far, though, I haven't found a combination in a mass produced vehicle that does a very good job of it. Maybe we'll see some additional improvement in this space in the future.

  3. Heard a story on NPR this morning... by TWX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...about this topic. They do cite that the National Weather Service had only issued a winter weather advisory for the area, not a watch or a warning, until 3:30am the day that all hell broke loose. Apparently local meteorologists disagreed with the NWS, but without their formal statements I'm not exactly surprised that public officials and employees didn't feel comfortable making statements.

    Unfortunate situation all of the way around. What I don't get is why it took so incredibly long to resolve. It's almost like the city's traffic engineers were asleep and couldn't figure out where to start clearing first in order to unclog the logjam...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by crash1krr · · Score: 1

      The traffic engineers were probably stuck in the logjam trying to get out of the city

    2. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We had an unfortunate but not quite as bad situation here in Indiana a few weeks ago. After several large snow storms (including a 12 inch) we had a forecast for a light dusting of snow. Due to salt reserves being low, plow crews being exhausted, and an even bigger storm on the horizon the decision was made to not re-salt and have the plows out. The dusting ended up being heavier (something like 2-3 inches) and was at just the right temperature to be as slick as possible. Semi's were unable to make it up even slight grades, passenger vehicles were spinning out of control and piling up, and once the highway was gridlocked the salt trucks couldn't even get out on the road.

      It was cleared up in about 4-6 hours but was educational on how much a little bit of snow can stop things up when it's not expected.

    3. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile over here in Houston, TX it was going to be the winter apocalypse with sleet and snow and hail and hell starting at 3AM and continuing through the day so schools were closed and the government closed its nonessential offices and so on.

      Then it was supposed to start at 8AM

      Then maybe it was supposed to start sometime during the day.

      All we got on my side of town was a little drizzle at 10AM that froze on the overpasses for a few hours before the day warmed up above freezing.

      Damned if you do,. damned if you don't.

      couldn't figure out where to start clearing first in order to unclog the logjam.

      Yeah, they should have just rammed the cars off the road, that'd teach the idiots who abandoned them in the middle of the road without even bothering to pull over.

    4. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by lophophore · · Score: 5, Informative

      The NWS nailed it. They described exactly what was going to happen.

      The travesty was that **everybody** ignored the Winter Storm Warning that was issued in plenty of time to cancel school, make other arrangements for work. That was compounded with a situation where the roads went from dry to impassible in one hour, and then 5 million people all tried to drive home at once.

      Disaster.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    5. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

      Note that we got pretty much the same warning in the NOLA area. Out local governments decided to cancel schools for the whole day, since, while the weather was supposed to be fine in the morning, by the time the kids had to go home, it was going to be a nightmare.

      Sure enough, it was a fine morning, but by mid-afternoon (when the kids would normally be coming home by bus) the freezing rain had started and the roads were getting increasingly unsafe (there are a LOT of elevated roadways here, what with the bayous and all, so freezing rain is a more serious problem here than it might be in other places).

      And things stayed shutdown through Wednesday.

      Of course, it's Thursday now, and temps are expected to be in the 50's today (and 70's by Saturday)....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re: Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Houstonians can't even drive in the rain, let alone icy conditions. We stayed home to avoid the other drivers. Otherwise, it would be 'carmageddon'.

    7. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What time did NSW "nailed it"?

      From what I understand, they upgraded to a warning too late by then (10am?). Most people already arrived at work.
      When I checked the weather at 8am at weather.com, it was predicted to have 1" light snow. The map showed a much greater snowfall in the center-south of Alabama-Georgia. But by then, it didn't matter what time you made an announcement since it takes about 1.5 hrs to get through regular rush hour traffic. Anything after 6am will be chaos.

      I agree they should've just shut down the city, even though northerners would just make fun of us either way. But in the south, we're used to cat1-3 hurricanes and have great logistics in fixing up the state, whereas Sandy (cat1) crippled northeast.

    8. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Snow around here is rarely slick. In order to be slick, it needs to be slushy, which typically requires really cold temps and lots of salt mixed in keeping it in a partially frozen state. Another way is for the ground to be really really cold and the air to be warm, so the snow melts from the air, then refreezes. I'm sure there are other ways, but those are the ones I'm most familiar with.

    9. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      They do cite that the National Weather Service had only issued a winter weather advisory for the area, not a watch or a warning, until 3:30am the day that all hell broke loose. Apparently local meteorologists disagreed with the NWS, but without their formal statements I'm not exactly surprised that public officials and employees didn't feel comfortable making statements.

      Yes -- 3:30am. That is more than enough time to get major warnings and announcements out on the 5:00am or 6:00am news.

      In case you don't realize this -- most weather scenarios are unpredictable. You often don't get official weather WARNINGS of major thunderstorms, tornados, winter storms, whatever until a few hours before they hit -- sometimes even less.

      If the NWS had issued a warning at NOON on the day the storm hit, and it came in at 2pm, sure, I can see people saying "We didn't know."

      But they put out an advisory over the weekend. And then they issued a WARNING (which, in weather-speak means, "it's time to believe this and get seriously prepared") something like 10 hours before the storm hit.

      Unfortunate situation all of the way around.

      Yes, but the point is that a significant part of this could have been prevented. Lots of cities and towns in the north don't make decisions about calling off schools or things until 4am or so of the day when a weather event is supposed to happen. And even later, in dire circumstances, when something unexpected goes on, they will make a decision to dismiss almost immediately and turn the buses around (or at least dismiss as early as possible, even at 11am or whatever).

      None of that was even necessary here. The warning was issued well in advance, and even if it had only been a small amount of ice or snow in a city without plows and salt trucks, they should have issued warnings immediately -- even in the late morning, if they screwed up and didn't make a decision before the morning rush.

      Waiting until the snow was actually falling for people to respond is just not reasonable, given the warnings and timing.

    10. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then "what you understand" is wrong. They issued the Winter Storm Warning at 3:39 AM, which left ample time to close schools and businesses.

    11. Re: Heard a story on NPR this morning... by mlts · · Score: 1

      I've been in Houston under extreme rain/heavy electrical storm conditions. No wrecks leaving there. Come into Austin, and I had to take a number of detours due to people smashing up everywhere.

      So, Houston drivers might not be great, but they are definitely a notch above Austin. If Austin gets a sprinkle of rain, the main interstate will be shut down due to wrecks.

    12. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The southern version is that the ground is warm, but the air is cold - the first bit of snow melts and then refreezes as more snow is added on, leaving a lovely layer of ice hidden below (especially on asphalt, which is warmer due to its color).

    13. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Wookact · · Score: 1

      The warning was updated at 3 am. That is plenty of time.

    14. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time, yes. Ample, no, unless you live in a small burg. Look at what happened to Houston with Rita and how much warning did they have? Large number of people leaving at the same time. I doubt you can plan lunch with that much time. There were issues with the reaction, but the NWS didn't warn for days that

      Still doesn't refute the forecast changing back at least once before the event. People saw that at dinner and bedtime and made their plans then. The NWS should have never backed off from the watch, which the did. Everyone is making it sound like the NWS predicted 3-4" on Sunday. They did not.

    15. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing that it wasn't a disaster, but so far, in the comments I've seen that the NWS changed from a Winter Storm Watch to a Warning sometime around 3 or 3:30am. I'm not sure about Atlanta and surrounding areas, but that's awfully close to the cut-off time where schools can be cancelled. My father was a teacher, and from what I recall, if the call didn't come in that school was cancelled by 3 or 4am, it was on, regardless of what you woke up to.

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    16. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Freezing rain is a problem for everywhere... some sand and salt can melt them but it's still dangerous as hell.

    17. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much time do you need to close schools?

      I understand that things are a bit "slower" in the South. Believe me, I get that. But for God's sake, it's 3:30 in the blessed AM and you're sitting on top of a forecast of two inches of snow on top of a layer of ice. If the mayor had canceled school for the Atlanta metro area -- with a single 30-second phone call -- much of this chaos would have been averted.

      You may live in a fantasy world where meteorologists are able to predict snow and ice accumulations with pinpoint accuracy four days in advance of a storm. Weather doesn't work that way. But the fact remains that the 3:30 forecast was accurate and left plenty of time for officials to react. The Rita comparison is basically nonsensical -- nobody had to leave or evacuate the metro area. All that was needed was some phone calls to keep people at home. That these calls never happened is a failure on the part of local and state leadership (from both parties, if you think I'm being political) and any attempts to shift the blame to scientists is disgraceful.

    18. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Minwee · · Score: 1

      What time did NSW "nailed it"?

      I will take "4:11 AM on Tuesday" for $200 please, Alex.

      From what I understand, they upgraded to a warning too late by then (10am?). Most people already arrived at work.

      Then they were showing up very early.

      NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PEACHTREE CITY GA / 411 AM EST TUE JAN 28 2014

      IN MAIN BAND FOR THE AFTERNOON AND TONIGHT... HAVE SNOW/SLEET AMOUNTS OF 1-3 INCLUDING ATL METRO. [...] ALL THESE ACCUMULATION... OTHER THAN THE NW GA LIGHT BAND...WILL MEET WARNING CRITERIA SO HAVE CONTINUED WARNING AND EXPANDED THIS TO ANOTHER TIER OF COUNTIES INCLUDING ATL METRO AREA.

      FINAL NOTE...WE REMAIN CONCERNED ABOUT IMPACT WITH ONSET OF PRECIP AROUND RUSH HOUR AND SCHOOL RELEASE. [...]

      And that wasn't even the only forecast that predicted doom for Atlanta. The only forecasts which predicted clear weather came from a Ouija board in Nathan Deal's office.

    19. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      We don't have that issue at all with cold air + warm ground. Cold snaps during the Fall and early Winter are the easiest snow to drive in. I wonder if it has to do with asphalt instead of concrete. Asphalt roads are horribly slick during rain, but I have no issues with concrete, which is what most roads around here are. Asphalt roads are typically associated with cheap back roads to poor neighborhoods.

    20. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      And when I was in school it was possible for school to be canceled when walking to the bus stop. I was the first stop and it took about 5 minutes to get there and the district I was in was always one of the last to cancel class (they miss out on state money if they do). Then again about the only time school was canceled was when it was too cold for the buses to start or there was too much snow for them to drive in.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    21. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      When I grew up in a city of 30,000 people, 45 minutes of notice was enough time to close schools. How would 4 hours not be enough?

    22. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I should have added a disclaimer that it, of course, is highly dependent upon the school district and/or individual school. I just thought I'd bring up the possibility that there may have been that caveat when it comes to cancelling schools in the area.

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    23. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Thank you, that was the case in Baton Rouge as well. I'm really surprised at how well we handled this.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    24. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Freezing rain is noticeable worse on elevated roads. Even the raised areas before and after bridges are much worse than the road at ground level. The actual bridges are typically horrible. You need to be careful of bridges in general because they easily swing with air temp and/or sun exposure, causing snow to melt then freeze, even when below freezing temps for several days.

    25. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Yeppers.

      The Causeway (a 26 mile long bridge across Lake Ponchartrain) was described yesterday by the highway patrol as a "26 mile long iceberg", since all lanes were covered by a sheet of ice for the entire length of the bridge.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    26. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by Wookact · · Score: 1

      I remember growing up in Atlanta, school would sometimes be canceled at almost the last minute for snow. I can remember many times Clayton County being canceled after 7 am. In fact we used to guess that they canceled it then so the administration has time to drive in to work themselves and get a first hand look at the roads. It drove my parents nuts, because they couldn't plan. Shoot I remember school getting canceled an hour after it started, they sent everyone home. That was circa early 90s though.

    27. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      I know one local station here, immediately after the Governor said that this was "unexpected", ran down a list of exact times over the previous 24 hours where they reported it would be bad. It took about 2 mins to make it through the list, while she had a wry smile on her face the entire time.

    28. Re:Heard a story on NPR this morning... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      If the mayor had canceled school for the Atlanta metro area -- with a single 30-second phone call -- much of this chaos would have been averted.

      The mayor can't cancel school -- that's the job of the superintendent, as far as I know -- and even if he could, the City of Atlanta contains only 10% of the population of metro Atlanta (and probably less than 10% of the students).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  4. Snow happens! by beltsbear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Stuff like this is just going to happen. It is pointless to buy all of the equipment needed to fight snow for Atlanta as it won't pay off. The city had to make a call and they used their best available data. They were wrong. If they err on the other side and are constantly making the more conservative call money will also be lost.

    Schools, churches and even the Home Depot acted as overnight shelters for people who were stuck. The only thing they could really have done is had a traffic team (cops and tow trucks) that understands traffic better and unsnarled key positions and TRIED to keep vehicles moving. Not easy.

    1. Re:Snow happens! by OffTheLip · · Score: 2

      If you live in a region where snow and ice are an infrequent occurrence eventually a day like this will come. It's happened in other communities and while folks should be angry it will happen again. Perhaps not in Atlanta again but somewhere.

    2. Re:Snow happens! by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      They should err on the side of caution and point out that the money being ``lost'' is only x percent of the money saved by not buying and maintaining snow removal equipment.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    3. Re:Snow happens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not a government issue, that a city issue.

    4. Re:Snow happens! by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah here in Galt's Gulch we've actually just put snow out of business. People said it was "inevitable" but it turns out that without government subsidies, snow just couldn't even keep frozen anymore. Things finally working right.

    5. Re: Snow happens! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I assume this is a troll, but the reason the free market doesn't handle snow is that the damages of being open on a snow day aren't particularly recoverable by employees. You risk your job if you sue for the boss making you come in, though that law suit is the free market solution to having the market predict weather.

      The unpleasantness of the 18 hour commute is not felt by the owner.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:Snow happens! by VVelox · · Score: 0

      For that amount so snow? From a northern perspective this is all entirely laughable as that is not a amount of snow you take any actual for, even salt or plowing the street.

      I see this as much more of a comment on drivers ed there is sorely lacking.

    7. Re:Snow happens! by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      No snow? So what. Male bovine manure is even more slippery.

    8. Re:Snow happens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It snows more in Seattle & Portland. But we are weak on snow removal here too.
      To be honest, if it starts snowing heavily by 1pm and does not let up, it can shut down even Chicago. Been there, done that. Took 6+ hours to get home that night. But the City puts a snow plow on just about anything called a truck, including garbage trucks, there is no mercy given for covering cars on streets, even if it just got shoveled out.

    9. Re:Snow happens! by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, the cost of being prepared would be minimal compared to this cluster fuck. They don't even need plows or specialized trucks. They needed salt spreaders that bolt onto the back of a pickup truck in a matter of minutes and a few hundred pounds of salt per spreader. When it looks like you might have ice in the next few hours you send out the trucks to salt the major intersections and places like bridges and overpasses where ice will form first. Then once the salting is well underway you tell people to go home and stay until it is safe. This is a highly likely event compared to plenty of other things like terrorism. How much you want to bet that Atlanta spends millions of dollars a year for anti terrorism.

    10. Re:Snow happens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Driver's ed. That's the problem. Everyone in Atlanta was born and raised there and no traffic from other states ever flows through it to bring the knowledge of fire to the savages. From a Floridian perspective, the reaction to Sandy was just as laughable. We call that Summer.

    11. Re:Snow happens! by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Libertarian utopia in "full of hot air" shock.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    12. Re:Snow happens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't Atlanta have a partnership with another state that can send in help for these once-every-three-years events? This whole event stinks of victim mentality. It wasn't an either/or. There are lots of solutions. Thinking about them ahead of time is key. Put out a request for solutions to the public, make a plan, stick it in a folder and give it a run in three years. Tweak, wait three more and go from there.

    13. Re:Snow happens! by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Driving on two inches of snow is easy if it stays snow. But at the temperatures involved, it rapidly turns into slush that freezes into a sheet of ice that melts under the pressure of the tires, and it's basically impossible to drive on wet ice. Besides, exactly what sort of drivers' ed are they supposed to do? "Here, we'll simulate conditions that you will encounter perhaps once a decade, please try to remember them perfectly"?

    14. Re:Snow happens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that amount so snow? From a northern perspective this is all entirely laughable as that is not a amount of snow you take any actual for, even salt or plowing the street.

      On the other hand, southerners don't freak out in the summer because the temperature reaches a blistering 89-degrees.

    15. Re:Snow happens! by Megane · · Score: 1

      It's not the snow, it's the ice. You can't plow black glaze ice. Plows are for moving piles of snow around, not that you can even trust a plow that's been sitting in a shed doing nothing for three years since the last time it was used. All that was necessary is for freezing rain to glaze the roads long enough to block them with disabled vehicles, and then it doesn't matter how much snow you might get on top of it.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    16. Re:Snow happens! by Megane · · Score: 1

      Male bovine manure is even more slippery.

      SEXIST!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    17. Re: Snow happens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You risk your job if you sue for the boss making you come in, though that law suit is the free market solution to having the market predict weather.

      "THE" free market solution?

      What an asshole. To your childish understanding of libertarianism, their only solution is to sue.

      What a fuckwit. A dozen other solutions EASILY come to mind. Where did you learn about libertarianism? At dailykos? Over bong hits in the dormitory. Seems like it.

      Pro tip: Don't just type stuff. THINK!!! Take pride in your cerebral cortext! Make your words seamless, FFS.

    18. Re:Snow happens! by Kythe · · Score: 1

      You do realize that government issued the warning of the impending weather event, right?

      What you may not realize is that Alabama has one of the most regressive tax structures in the nation -- meaning they have the highest effective tax rates on those with the lowest incomes. It's not terribly surprising several places in Alabama are facing bankrupt budgets.

      In other words, the problem may just be lack of government, not government itself. I guess it all comes down to priorities.

      --

      Kythe
    19. Re:Snow happens! by Kythe · · Score: 1

      Oh, and if you think you have the right to squat on U.S. land for free, YOU'RE the thief, not government.

      --

      Kythe
    20. Re:Snow happens! by RustyTheCat · · Score: 1

      And a few years ago when they closed the schools just to be safe and the weather was fine everyone whined about how dumb the administrators were and all the money wasted, etc.

    21. Re: Snow happens! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I actually got it from Harry Browne's website in the 2000 election, and from interviews. He very much seemed to think that spillover costs were to be handled by the courts.

      The free market involves making people pay for the costs they inflict, the government making decisions removes that's cost (EPA license to pollute, government deciding to keep the city open), the business owner doesn't have incentive to make the right choice for society (not having people drive in dangerous conditions), the torte system is part of how you align their interests, eliminating the corporation, and lawsuits are how libertarians would disinsentivise bad behavior, as I gather from reading their writings.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    22. Re:Snow happens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stuff like this is just going to happen. It is pointless to buy all of the equipment needed to fight snow for Atlanta as it won't pay off. The city had to make a call and they used their best available data. They were wrong. If they err on the other side and are constantly making the more conservative call money will also be lost.

      FYI - the equipment used for winter weather treatments is also used for many other things. You don't buy 1000 trucks for dumping salt and let them sit there 6 months of the year. You buy attachments to the trucks that you use for basic road maintanence. The same dump truck that you use for delivering sand to the playground, etc can also be used for the salt/sand treatments in winter with a simple spreader connected on its tailgate.

      However, that's not the problem. The problem is also the investment of land to keep the sand and salt to load into those trucks - and in that it doesn't make sense, nor could you get it delivered fast enough when you do need it.

      So no, I don't blame them (as a Northerner now living just north of Atlanta) for not having that stuff.

      And honestly, I'm not sure Atlanta any different from many other places along the I-20/I-26 corridor that were also hit (e.g Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina).

    23. Re:Snow happens! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It happened in Atlanta 3 years ago. It'll happen again within a decade.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  5. Re:Full retard by TWX · · Score: 1

    You are aware that most tires on new vehicles have "M&S" emblazoned on them, which means Mud and Snow, right?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  6. Canadian driving by NapalmV · · Score: 2

    Well it would take some 10 inch of snow or some serious freezing rain / ice to deter canucks from driving. This being said, it also has to be mentioned that winter tires are mandatory in some provinces. And since the white season can take up to 6 months, not only are people experienced with driving in such conditions, but they are also choosing their vehicles according to their winter driving experience and skills.

    1. Re:Canadian driving by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 0

      Well here in PA, snow tires are not required (And I don't have them on my car, I cannot afford $1k on tires every winter). And with the whole -15F this week meant icy roads all around (with light snow falls most nights and clear days). 'Salt' trucks were out, but have limited success in the rather extreme cold for this area. Even so on icy roads I got around in my front wheel drive car with it's all season tires just fine. I just had to pay attention to the road I'm driving on.

      I lived in Columbus Ohio a dozen or so years ago and they got a dusting of snow that made my then 1 mile commute take 6 hours... And people simply refused to pay attention to the road and went off it left and right. It's amazing how people that rarely drive in wintery weather seem to blame everything except themselves for such things...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    2. Re:Canadian driving by minogully · · Score: 2

      Being a Canadian, I feel I should weigh in on this topic.

      When you say that Canadians will drive in much worse conditions, that's only partially true. In the winter, we have salt trucks and snow plows going (seemingly) constantly. So, the 2-3 inches of snow dumped on Atlanta would have been cleared simply because we're prepared for that kind of snow. Also, Canadians are well experienced in dealing with snowy roads so we would have faired better for that reason too.

      Don't be so hard on Atlanta, this is quite a lot like what happens to us every year on the first snow fall, BEFORE the salt trucks and plows have gotten out and before people have remembered what it's like to drive in the winter.

      What sucks for them is that they can't recover as quickly as we can due to lack of experience and infrastructure.

    3. Re:Canadian driving by Sqweegee · · Score: 1

      Also, who the heck salts streets ahead of time? Maybe if you're expecting some freezing rain, but not snow. Might work on the first inch of snow but after that it gets washed away and you end up with a great ice/slush base under the new snow. You put it on top, either to melt thin sheets of ice or the fallen snow that gets compacted into ice by traffic.

      Where I live, most of the time during the winter temperatures are too cold for salt (and other compounds) to be effective anyway. I don't even bother cleaning the driveway until there's 4-6 inches of snow on it.

    4. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up in one of the coldest parts of Canada (Winnipeg), and I have never heard of such a "mandatory winter tire" rule. People who live out of town and need to drive the highways a lot during the winter tend to buy SUVs or small trucks, but those of us who lived in the cities typically drive the exact same vehicles that your typical Atlantan might drive. I grew up driving a Nissan Sentra with all-season tires year round.

      As for the remark from the article about northern cities salting the roads *before* snowfall, I'm not too sure about that. Of course, in Manitoba it gets too cold for salt to be effective and they therefore do not use any salt at all. They typically let cars pack the snow down for a few days, then eventually get around to clearing it over night. Near intersections, they sprinkle sand on the streets to cause some friction when you're trying to stop, but this can only be done *after* the snow falls. Major roads are often cleared within a day or two of snowfall, whereas residential streets can go weeks (or even all of winter) without ever seeing a plow. People just deal with it. I currently live in a warmer province where they do indeed use salt, but they still have to wait until *after* the snow has fallen before they spread it. Otherwise, it's going to be very effective at destroying the streets but essentially useless for melting the snow.

      Interesting thing to note: Between Kindergarten and grade 12, I had exactly *one* snow day, because we get about 50cm of snow in JUNE when nobody was prepared for it.

    5. Re:Canadian driving by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm currently down in Georgia on work-related travel. I'm in Columbus, but (hopefully) will by flying out of Atlanta later today. I've been here all week. I live in New Jersey.

      Yesterday morning, I experienced perhaps the most dangerous driving conditions I've ever seen, and I've lived in Maine. What most people don't understand is that places that handle this type of weather regularly are prepared for it. I've been told that there are eight salt-spreading trucks in Georgia. Eight, for the entire state. How the fuck were they supposed to prepare? Purchase more snow management equipment on short notice? Maintain a large fleet of trucks for the rare occasions that stuff like this happens?

      When I was driving in to work yesterday, the roads were nearly deserted. The few cars that were on the road were flying all over the place. While it's possible to drive [relatively] safely in such conditions, it's a skill that I don't expect Georgians to have. This just doesn't happen that often down here.

      The roads were entirely covered in a solid sheet of ice. Ice, with no road salt, no gravel, no sand. If you live in an area that regularly receives some snowfall, you've never driven on anything quite like this, because you've got snow crews prepping roads before the snowfall, plowing for the duration of the snowfall, and then conditioning the road surfaces after the snowfall. Georgia has none of that. After having experienced this shit for myself, as a "yankee", all I can say is that I will never again make light of how the south "shuts down" for what I would consider to be mild flurries. Without any of the snow management gear, mild flurries (followed by a deep freeze) make for some truly horrendous driving conditions.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    6. Re:Canadian driving by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      -15F in PA? Are you sure about that? I live a good bit north of you, and the coldest we saw this week was about +5F.

    7. Re:Canadian driving by beltsbear · · Score: 1

      It is now the norm in Maryland to pre-treat roads before almost any snow/sleet event. I am not sure what they use but three even lines per lane of white stuff about an inch wide. It appears before almost every snow/sleet event on roads like I95 and 695 and many of the larger thoroughfares.

    8. Re:Canadian driving by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Of course, you really can't compare driving on snow to driving on a sheet of ice. Folks far north rarely get the kind of ice that occasionally causes snarls in the southeastern US. I grew up driving in the mountains, snow driving no problem, icy patches no problem. But nobody can drive in these ice conditions in a typical 2wd car that has no winter tires.. If you think you can, you haven't never experienced it.

    9. Re:Canadian driving by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Informative

      You don't need new tires every winter. They easy last 5 or more. Nd you should get 4 for far below $400.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:Canadian driving by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Being a Canadian, I have to say that I really don't think things are that much different, except that most cities have the equipment needed to clean the snow. In Ottawa we had 7.6 cm of snow on monday, and 3.6 cm the day before, so maybe total snow was around 11 cm, which is just over 4 inches. For some unknown reason the city was really lazy about cleaning it up, and the roads/traffic was terrible. Had they not cleaned it at all, I could seriously see the entire city coming to a standstill. Every time it snows more than 5-6 cm, you pretty much have to plan 25-50% extra time to get to work. It may not take you extra time, but odds are things will not go at their usual pace.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    11. Re:Canadian driving by NapalmV · · Score: 1

      British Columbia and Quebec have such laws. In certain BC areas you must use winter tires or carry tire chains. In Quebec you must use winter or studded tires from December 15 to March 15. There's a funny province too - Ontario does NOT allow studded tires in the south of the province ($1000 fine). Only non-studded winter tires.

    12. Re: Canadian driving by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      We pre salt, there's a gel (I think) they put down that hardens on the broad and lasts for up to a week. It helps a lot, by making the roads better when the snow just starts, allowing people to get home.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    13. Re:Canadian driving by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      How does a one mile commute take six hours ever. You could walk it in 15 minutes, in normal conditions, and say 20 in bad weather.

    14. Re:Canadian driving by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Being a Canadian ... Don't be so hard on Atlanta

      Boo! Hiss! You're really not in the spirit of things. Us Yanks north of the Mason-Dixon line are saying that if Atlanta can't even handle a little snow, Sherman did them a favor by burning the place down.

    15. Re:Canadian driving by bws111 · · Score: 2

      Where I live (upstate NY) they have started putting brine on the roads well before a snow event, and it works great. For one thing, the first one or two inches that you shrug off are exactly when all the accidents occur. People are out doing their normal stuff, it starts to snow, and they try to get home. Prevent that first one or two inches from causing a problem and you have made an enormous difference.

      Also, preventing the first one or two inches from sticking (when people are actually out driving) PREVENTS that 'great ice/slush base' from forming and makes it much easier for the plows to do a thorough job of removing the remaining snow. Then you don't have that base of compacted snow that needs salt dumped on it.

      There was recently an article in the local paper that said pretreating with $200 of brine saved almost $2500 of salt per event, AND the roads are safer during the snow and get cleared quicker after the snow.

    16. Re:Canadian driving by AlterEager · · Score: 1

      And I don't have them on my car, I cannot afford $1k on tires every winter

      Do they only last one winter?

    17. Re:Canadian driving by operagost · · Score: 1

      I have experienced that in the north, on I-380 in Pennsylvania. It was over 20 years ago. There was freezing rain, and for whatever reason PENNDOT was totally unprepared. I was riding with my family in our conversion van, and as you crept forward at 5 MPH your vehicle would slide sideways with the banking of the road.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:Canadian driving by Bradmont · · Score: 1

      No. My car is seven years old with 170 000km on it (a little over 100k miles), and we're on our 2 1/2th set of tires (long story why, but we wind up replacing 2 at a time). This is in a province where winter tires are required from December 15 to March 15.

    19. Re:Canadian driving by ClayDowling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We get black ice on the highways here in Michigan all the time. The difference is that we don't panic. My truck loses its grip, I quickly stop doing the thing that made it lose its grip. If heavy snow starts, we don't all rush out into the streets at once. We tend to stagger our leave so that traffic has a chance to clear, and we have a chance to not be in the worst of it. We check road conditions before heading out. I've driven across multiple states during ice storms and blizzards without problem, and without plows or salt trucks providing any relief.

      A million salt trucks wouldn't have saved Atlanta. The key is keeping your head and knowing what to do. Everybody in Atlanta buried their heads in the predicted snow, pretending it wouldn't happen, then lost their heads when it did. Their emergency management response was poor to non existant, and they paid the price. They're going to need a leadership change if they don't want this to happen again.

    20. Re:Canadian driving by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I'm currently down in Georgia on work-related travel. I'm in Columbus, but (hopefully) will by flying out of Atlanta later today.

      I work at the airport. The roads around here are good now. Flights are operating, just have to worry about passenger backlogs from yesterday. You should have a decent chance of getting out. Good luck though. I've been stuck here at work since early Tuesday afternoon becuase I live on the north side.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    21. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well here in PA, snow tires are not required (And I don't have them on my car, I cannot afford $1k on tires every winter).

      I'm using the same set of snow tires for the third winter now and they got more than enough tread to last a fourth. Are your streets paved with broken glass or something?

    22. Re:Canadian driving by compro01 · · Score: 1

      I cannot afford $1k on tires every winter

      The hell? You don't need new tires every winter.

      And what the heck do you drive that tires cost $1k for a set?

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    23. Re:Canadian driving by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the heads up! :)

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    24. Re:Canadian driving by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This wasn't black ice. It was a solid sheet of ice, curb to curb, sitting on every paved surface in the area. Without a single grain of salt, sand, or gravel sitting on top. Without a single gap of cleared road surface peeking through. If you've seen conditions like that in Michigan, you guys have the shittiest snow management system in the country, because unlike Georgia, you should be prepared.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    25. Re:Canadian driving by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 1

      Ottawa is one of the best cities in the world for salting and snow plowing. The difference you noticed Monday is simply that it was quite cold and the salt didn't work as well as it usually does.

    26. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ohh so you know that you have a problem once in 3 years, you do not prepare for it and all is fine? I mean preparation does not even mean purchasing heavy HW but for instance organizing help from other states that can equipment that they do not need at the moment. Or maybe even thinking about alternatives and arranging for tracks that go over ice too (the tires with spikes) and deliver food etc to all stranded folk. Anything better than the show of incompetence and negligence. But then again I am not US Citizen. I am still happy US shows us all the ways we should not act as society.

      Thank you USofA!

    27. Re:Canadian driving by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Also, I like your website. I too am fond of woodworking (really, more carving and whittling), software development, and general geekery. Keep up the good work!

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    28. Re:Canadian driving by iONiUM · · Score: 1

      If they knew it was coming couldn't they ask other states who have fleets to borrow the trucks temporarily? I don't understand why this wasn't an option.

    29. Re:Canadian driving by DarkAce911 · · Score: 1

      Virginia does it too, works pretty good unless it is a Rain to Snow event. We had about 3 inches here from this storm and it was a little slower on the ride home, but not that much. The trucks are pretty pricey however.

      Atlanta very easily could buy a bunch of salt and spreaders, then just pre-treat the roads and they would be fine.

    30. Re:Canadian driving by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      What surprises me is that, knowing that this was a possibility, couldn't they just borrow trucks from northern states? I know we do it all the time in Canada. Every time there's a big snow storm somewhere, the trucks from the neighbors help lighten the load, which dramatically improves road conditions on short notice.

      If the NWS had a report out by 3:30AM, that's enough time to get trucks from another state (please do correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not particularly familiar with US states) down before noon to start laying the salt. It wouldn't be enough to cover everything, of course not, but highways and major streets? Most likely. Of course, they could also plan ahead and get the trucks in a day or two ahead. Even if the snowstorm did not hit, it wouldn't have been as expensive as this unmitigated disaster will be.

    31. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're going to need a leadership change if they don't want this to happen again.

      In four years? The roads in Atlanta might get like this for maybe a week or two every three or four years. That doesn't happen often enough for people to be prepared and know how to drive under such conditions. Unless you're suggesting they build a training center with simulated icy roads to slide around on and mandate driver training.

    32. Re:Canadian driving by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1

      They do that here in Kentucky, too. I believe it's just streams of highly-salted water, where the water evaporates and leaves those lines of salt, which won't be "brushed" off the road by traffic like normal salt crystals tend to be.

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    33. Re:Canadian driving by tibit · · Score: 1

      Given that $800 is a rather normal price for a set of good all-seasons, it's not that far off the mark, I'd say. Anything with a bit larger tires, like an SUV, can easily cost $1200 for a set of 4 all seasons.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    34. Re:Canadian driving by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      10 ply light truck tires cost me about $250 apiece - but they last more than a year. Maybe where the OP lives they're in high demand and people steal them or something.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    35. Re:Canadian driving by tibit · · Score: 1

      You have no idea of the scale of the U.S. It doesn't help if you get to know in the middle of the night (literally) that the weather is going to turn to shit. There is no snow equipment within the driving distance allowed to make any difference. They would have needed trucks out on the roads by 3-4AM, at the latest, if those were local crews who knew where the heck they are going. For out of state crews to be effective, they'd have needed to get the people and equipment on the interstate, going towards Atlanta, at least 24 hours in advance - and they didn't have such advance notice.

      So, to sum it up, you're just talking out of your ass.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    36. Re:Canadian driving by tibit · · Score: 1

      1. You have non-local crews that will take longer to figure out where they are going and what to do there.

      2. You need to drive those crews into Atlanta from hundreds of miles away.

      3. Those trucks don't really go above 65mph.

      4. They knew it's going to turn bad ~4 hours before the morning commute started.

      So, now you understand.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    37. Re:Canadian driving by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      "Hello, Maine DOT, how can I help you?"
      "Hello? Hello? This is the City of Atlanta Department of Transportation, we've have a major snow even and we're just drowning in the snow! You need to help us!"
      "Uhh, what can we help you with?"
      "We need dozens of snow plows! Sand Trucks! Extra sand! Can you send them to us? Right away, please!"
      (Maine guy looks at map.)
      "Atlanta, as in Georgia?"
      "Yes! Hurry! It's snowing!
      (Maine guy) "Hey, Bob, that crazy guy is on the phone again, should we call the mental health help line?"
      - click -

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    38. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ottawa was a mess on Monday because the previous day's snow wasn't enough to trigger ploughing, and Monday's snow was more than forecast and fell just as the morning commute started. Complicating matters was the high winds, causing a lot more accidents than usual.

      Ottawa didn't used to be so slow during snowy days, but then the road capacity got eaten up, same as most Canadian cities (which have worse congestion on average than the US). With the slack eaten up, any decrease in capacity caused by blowing snow will cause traffic flows to become unstable and fail. The only fix for this is to increase road capacity and/or switch more users to other modes, particularly public transit. Ottawa already has a high public transit share (way beyond any US city), so things are likely to only get worse in future.

    39. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, less accidents causes less congestion, preventing even more accidents. Pre-wetting is a huge advantage for anywhere with the equipment and good forecasting.

    40. Re:Canadian driving by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If it had been -15F in Atlanta, they would have been fine. It's the accumulation of snow and ice that is constantly thawing and refreezing at ambient temperatures just below the freezing point that caused this. It's nothing like snow in a cold climate; it's a sheet of ice.

    41. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I can. But I can't with performance/summer tires, and a lot of people have them on year-round in the south.

      I was once a passenger in a car with performance tires where the town in northern Quebec had been dusted with the lightest dusting possible - only enough to half-fill the tiny cavities of asphalt. The car was completely useless, only able to climb a 2% grade less than 100 feet long after several attempts. Then that car drove the James Bay Road (ice grooved), and amazingly didn't crash, the grooves being the only grip. The crazy driver was from... Atlanta.

    42. Re:Canadian driving by bmxeroh · · Score: 1

      Have you not seen any national weather forecasts in the last couple of weeks? It was -15F in Columbus Ohio Monday, with some areas just north of Columbus seeing -20F. Before the wind. We've seen lows at or around 0F all week.

      --
      Central Ohio Home Theater Installation - The Theater People
    43. Re:Canadian driving by minogully · · Score: 1

      you really can't compare driving on snow to driving on a sheet of ice

      I'll admit, I didn't RTFA since I had heard news reports about this on my local radio station. And those combined with this summary only mentioned snow. So, I wasn't talking about driving on ice. But now, let me talk about that.

      Folks far north rarely get the kind of ice that occasionally causes snarls in the southeastern US

      Just this month we had freezing rain. And I would not say that we "rarely" get it.

      But nobody can drive in these ice conditions in a typical 2wd car that has no winter tires

      My car, in fact, matches your 2wd and no winter tires description (it's not required by law in Ontario to have them). The winter experience I was talking about would have us AVOID driving in these ice conditions, but, it still is possible, if you give yourself enough time to stop. The key is to never use your brakes (only coast) and turn your wheel as little as possible. This requires a lot of patience, which is why I would rather avoid driving until the salt trucks have gone by.

      But as I was saying, we would bounce back from these conditions quicker, since we have loads of salt trucks to deal with it. So, I feel for Atlanta, I really do.

    44. Re:Canadian driving by bmxeroh · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess if you don't want to bail on your car...Seriously it's hilarious in Ohio. Every year people apparently forget that snow and ice is slippery.

      --
      Central Ohio Home Theater Installation - The Theater People
    45. Re:Canadian driving by bmxeroh · · Score: 1

      Yep, Ohio brines the roads like crazy if they even think it's going to be wet and cold.

      --
      Central Ohio Home Theater Installation - The Theater People
    46. Re:Canadian driving by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

      Thank you for saying that! I am a native, but have lived up north and did learn to drive in snow and had no problems once I did, but down here again I just stay off the roads until the slipping and sliding is over. It is just not the same.

    47. Re: Canadian driving by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Holy crap. I didn't realize it was THAT cold.

    48. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So don't fucking drive on it. That's what we do up here when it happens. We stay home.

    49. Re:Canadian driving by GoJays · · Score: 1

      What you mean like this?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2...

      Trust me, Canadians are well versed in driving on sheets of ice as well as snow.

    50. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been told that there are eight salt-spreading trucks in Georgia. Eight, for the entire state.

      I find that hard to believe. We've got more than that just up the road in one SC county, and we don't get any more severe winter weather than Atlanta. We also pre-treated our roads and cancelled school. It isn't that difficult to act competently.

    51. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you have never heard of freezing rain, nor know what black ice really is.

      Southern drivers have less skill and forethought, they don't need it most of the time. This time they did and the situation went miserably. There is no reason to be offended.

    52. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been told that there are eight salt-spreading trucks in Georgia. Eight, for the entire state. How the fuck were they supposed to prepare? Purchase more snow management equipment on short notice? Maintain a large fleet of trucks for the rare occasions that stuff like this happens?

      Resources are limited, but not that limited. There are 40 trucks owned by the city of Atlanta alone. One thing that I (as a carpetbagger) continue to find astonishing about Georgia's response to snow is that their spreader trucks are loaded almost exclusively with gravel intended to provide texture and break up ice, rather than any form of salt intended to melt ice. Ice is absolutely the problem: roads are always warm enough when the snow falls that the first half hour or hour it all melts. If the snow keeps up longer, it eventually sucks the heat out of the tarmac, and all the collected water freezes. Salt is exactly what they need, and exactly what they don't have. Maybe it all melts during the humid summers. Maybe the economics or hazards of maintaining tons of salt for use 3 times each decade just don't work. But I've driven on aggregate-covered ice, and that definitely doesn't work.

      Atlanta was further hampered by gridlock preventing the few trucks they do have from actually getting to the problem areas.

    53. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Also, who the heck salts streets ahead of time?

      It's actually a brine solution. Pennsylvania does it, too. It kicks ass. You can tell that they have done it because it leaves vertical stripes about a foot apart on the roads.

    54. Re:Canadian driving by blackanvil · · Score: 1

      How the fuck were they supposed to prepare? Purchase more snow management equipment on short notice? Maintain a large fleet of trucks for the rare occasions that stuff like this happens?

      I do wonder if they could have rented some snow/ice gear from areas not expecting snow for a few days but which had the equipment and supplies on hand. Wouldn't even have had to be government-owned equipment, there's plenty of companies around that keep plows and salters/sanders ready for snow, who contract out to remove snow and ice from driveways and parking lots, private roads and similar. Yes, it would have cost quite a bit -- fuel for the trip from the snowbelt to Atlanta and back, hotels, logistics to make sure salt and sand made it down, time and materials for the vehicles, but if it's only once every 3-5 years, it should be doable with a few calls and cash in hand.

    55. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it may be true that us Canadians are ready for it, I can say from experience that when it is still snowing or it just finished snowing before rush hour, those plows and trucks are busy dealing with highways, with little to no attention to local and side streets. Driving through those are no much different than driving in a city that has little to no snow-removal preparation.

    56. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are the eight trucks for?

    57. Re:Canadian driving by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but 3 sentences later they say they drive a "front wheel drive car". $1k is some rather large car tires, unless they're looking at fancy performance tires or something. 18" of the tires I use would come to like $700-800, and that's with Canadian prices.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    58. Re:Canadian driving by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. Although mine usually only make it ~3 years but I do drive a lot. Also paying for a set of steel rims to have them permanently mounted on instead of have to get the summer and winter tires mounted when you want to change them pays for it self after the second year. Although maybe I should go and buy some tires in ND since the best I can seem to do is about $120 each for nice snow and ice tires.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    59. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did reach that low, but it was not sustained for the entire week.

    60. Re:Canadian driving by Bengie · · Score: 1

      And I thought paying $80/tire for high end all-seasons was expensive. WTF do you people drive that have such expensive tires?!

    61. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your commute is only one mile you should have walked home. Why waste 6 hours when a mile walk takes about 20-25 minutes??

    62. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key is to never use your brakes (only coast) and turn your wheel as little as possible.

      I remember driving after this really bad freezing rain when I was in college. I was going 50mph in a 45mph, but I started slowing early and watched for potential vehicles that could pull out. I was coming up on a light that was green for a while and decided to slow down. I was able to come to a complete stop well before the lights and they turned red. Some person that I passed, who was going about 20mph, went sliding sideways right through the intersection, almost hitting another car.

    63. Re:Canadian driving by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, the blizzards hit late at night, and the county is cheap, so you're dealing with the roads you've got. Not every place is urbanized, especially between Fort Wayne, IN and Lansing, MI.

      If you've never dealt with black ice, let me assure you that you don't want to. What you had was visible ice. Easy to behave right because it's visible and obvious. The black kind, it looks like safe pavement, but isn't. The gentlest touch of the brakes and your traction slips. A gentle touch to the gas and the rear end of the truck wants to come around. No pre-warning it was going to happen. So you stop doing whatever you were doing when the slipping started. You downshift to slow down, or back off the gas.

      And mostly, as mentioned, you don't drive on it if you can avoid it. Because it's ice and without skates it's hard to move on it.

    64. Re:Canadian driving by bsolar · · Score: 1

      You don't buy new tires every winter, you just keep them and swap them with your normal tires every year. This also means that you will distribute the wear on the 2 set of tires, making the normal tires last longer.

    65. Re:Canadian driving by Sorny · · Score: 1

      "This wasn't black ice. It was a solid sheet of ice, curb to curb, sitting on every paved surface in the area. Without a single grain of salt, sand, or gravel sitting on top. Without a single gap of cleared road surface peeking through. If you've seen conditions like that in Michigan, you guys have the shittiest snow management system in the country, because unlike Georgia, you should be prepared."

      Apparently you've never experienced black ice. Regular ice, from curb to curb, I've seen, driven on, and all that good stuff. Even in MN, where we have winter every year, it happens from time to time. See, even though we've got all the equipment, sometimes the rain just up and changes to freezing rain. Had you pretreated the roads, the rain would have washed it away before it started freezing. The key point you southerners fail to grasp is that you've just got to slow down, modulate the throttle, and not be a total moron. Hard to do, I know, but it works.

      Black ice, however, looks exactly like dry pavement. No sheen, no indication of it being there except any change of velocity (be it the slightest turn of the wheel, or most insignificant change in speed) causes your vehicle to want to switch front for rear. Black ice is scary shit, but you deal with it the same way as regular ice. SLOW THE FUCK DOWN, avoid any changes in velocity, accelerate and decelerate as though there is an egg under the relevant pedal, LEAVE 3x car lengths OR MORE of space between you and the car in front and don't panic.

      --
      OSX pwns.
    66. Re:Canadian driving by c · · Score: 1

      And since the white season can take up to 6 months, not only are people experienced with driving in such conditions, but they are also choosing their vehicles according to their winter driving experience and skills.

      We'd like to think so, but I live next to a stretch of highway 401 that's been shut down about 3-4 times this week due to major accidents. There was a 70-ish vehicle pileup yesterday, and a 15-20 vehicle pileup Monday. I've driven past something like 15 vehicles that went off the road the few times I've went out since Monday, and there's many more tracks in the snowbanks and ditches where someone spun off and got hauled out.

      The roads haven't been great, but you can generally get around okay if you aren't doing anything stupid and keep speeds reasonable (which, actually, isn't much below the speed limit), and be aware of the crazy amounts of blowing snow.

      But people are doing stupid, stupid shit, getting into accidents, and I'm pretty sure most of them are Canadians.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    67. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you live in an area that regularly receives some snowfall, you've never driven on anything quite like this, because you've got snow crews prepping roads before the snowfall, plowing for the duration of the snowfall, and then conditioning the road surfaces after the snowfall."

      Maybe this used to be the case, but the Michigan budget situation since ~2000 means there is no pre-treatment. (at least in Lansing area) IF they deem it worthwhile to plow, I think they start at about 4am so the main roads are clear for commuting. Secondary roads might not see a plow until afternoon. And my rural dirt road it might be three days.

      My Beetle only has about 4" ground clearance, I can drive thru snow up to about 6" generally. I have all season tires, would like to have winter tires like my wife's car, they really help a lot on ice and snow.

    68. Re:Canadian driving by Wookact · · Score: 1

      The only place I have lived that did not pretreat with salt was Fairbanks AK. Colorado, Washington, Nebraska, Kentucky I know all pretreat with salt, because it works. The only reason Fairbanks didn't was because with the temps you are fighting a loosing battle.

    69. Re:Canadian driving by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      In the south, it doesn't snow. It ices. Winter tires (the kind without studs) won't do a damn thing on ice.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    70. Re:Canadian driving by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Here -15F means iced roads, because it's to cold for the 'normal' mix of 'road salts'. So when the sun is on them (it rarely snows during the day) they 'warm up' and the snow from the last night becomes ice. Just like your warmer temps there.

      I'd rather have ~30F and get slush, it would be solidly mixed with salt and be a none issue. Really cold weather though and they get cautious and reserved with the special low temp mixes that they don't buy as much of.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    71. Re:Canadian driving by Wookact · · Score: 1

      It didn't snow in Tennessee, and that is a short drive away. They are also much better equipped because of the mountains. Chattanooga is less then two hours away.

    72. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...When I was driving in to work yesterday, the roads were nearly deserted. The few cars that were on the road were flying all over the place. While it's possible to drive [relatively] safely in such conditions, it's a skill that I don't expect Georgians to have. This just doesn't happen that often down here...

      To be fair, Georgians drive like that all the time, whether or not there is ice on the road.

    73. Re:Canadian driving by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      So you know I own a '99 Chrysler LHS and yes, $1k was quoted just this year for a set of 17 inch winter tires. The car itself is only bluebooked for a couple times that these days, so that price for tires is silly. My car does fine without them snow, ice, or sleet.

      Also on the 'they last more than 1 year' well that works if your not doing alot of mixed driving. Typically though here just south of Lake Erie we can go 2 or 3 weeks of dry roads, then get a blizzard for the next month, then it all goes away again and the roads are bare another couple weeks.

      The mixed driving for a winter (because I'm certainly not switching out sets of tires every few weeks) has worn them down considerably. So, in those few years I have splurged on winter tires, when I have them switched back after snow season however takes them off tells me I shouldn't use them again because they are worn down and have a negligible tread. It shouldn't be a surprise if these super expensive winter tires seem to always wear out I'm highly reluctant to purchase them. More so when I've gone through truly horrid weather with 'simple' sets of $300 all season tires.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    74. Re:Canadian driving by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      I live in PA and we don't plow until the snow stop falling... And we stopped salting the roads because it's been too cold for the salt to matter. So yes, the roads get pretty shitty and we have these nice mountains that become impassable by normal cars when covered with ice.

      They also delay/close our schools at the drop of a hat (too much, I think) and if the roads were shitty, I would sit at work for a bit and see if clears. Or have my husband come get me with his truck. I wouldn't venture out into it to just to get stuck.

      The difference is Atlanta said "oh look there's a storm coming. Should we close the schools? Nope. Oh SHIT! the storm really is coming! EVERYONE RUN!"

      Had Atlanta not collectively panicked, it would have been fine. The NWS gave them 9 hours of warning. I get calls at 5 AM telling me school is closed/delayed all the time. They have called to announce a delay at 10PM the night before because it was going to be cold. Someone wakes the fuck up and makes that call BEFORE you end up with a city full of kids stuck.

    75. Re:Canadian driving by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      The cars that day were moving an inch every 5 minutes or so at worst and at best a car length over the same time. Columbus has a circular outer set of interstates, an inner 'cross' of interstates, and a set of local streets. All the roads were identically backed up with miles of traffic even before I was on the road at 6 am that day. I would have been better off walking if Columbus had consistent sidewalks along my path. Columbus though when I was there hated pedestrians and many stretches of road existed with no sidewalks.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    76. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This wasn't black ice. It was a solid sheet of ice, curb to curb, sitting on every paved surface in the area. Without a single grain of salt, sand, or gravel sitting on top. Without a single gap of cleared road surface peeking through. If you've seen conditions like that in Michigan, you guys have the shittiest snow management system in the country, because unlike Georgia, you should be prepared.

      Living in Duluth, GA and being a yank (having been in Virginia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, New Jersey) I 100% agree with you.

      My Mazda3 was no match for the roads - engine too light, no grip; I probably could have driven my Grand Caravan without a problem (having driven this kind of stuff before), but the roads were solid ice. Couldn't even get out of my apartment complex. Someone came buy and threw down some sand on the hills in the complex; but pretty much everyone just stayed inside.

      And yes, there was nothing for vehicles to grip onto - curb-to-curb ice and nothing on them for grip. People don't put snow tires on their vehicles; nor do they keep tire chains around. And yes, it doesn't make sense for the municipalities to keep around even the required supplies to fill the trucks with if they did keep enough attachments for the trucks. (Do you really want to dedicate several hundred acres of land to keeping millions of tons of salt around for the rare snow events?)

    77. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In much of the North recently, especially around the Great Lakes, it has actually been too cold for ice to melt on our roads with salt, we still dont have these problems. We have just had the coldest month on record, and snowiest month on record in the Detroit area, and we seem to make it home just fine, despite getting 1 inch of snow an hour in the tri county area. Salt cant work at below zero temperatures, and that is what we have had days of. Also, when it snows here, the roads aren't pre-treated, and we still make it.

    78. Re:Canadian driving by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      The key is to never use your brakes (only coast) and turn your wheel as little as possible. This requires a lot of patience, which is why I would rather avoid driving until the salt trucks have gone by.

      Your right, staying home is best & the only smart thing, but the quote above is making my point. Keep straight and don't use your brakes applies for most normal ice conditions, but extreme conditions without proper equipment that doesn't even help. If the road has even the slightest incline side to side, your vehicle is going to slide that way. Its physics, and there is no way around it. I don't see ice like that very often, maybe 6 or so times in the last 30 years, but that is what we had in front of our house this week.

    79. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, we just know how to drive, and there's really nothing you can do when it's below zero, salt trucks cant melt the ice, the salt won't work. We are just acclimated to it, yearly, you're not. Hopefully, now you will be.

    80. Re:Canadian driving by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      No, not like that. That's a typical ice storm,seen plenty of em. Road ice is very bad under those conditions, but not like what we just had here this week. Its rare, and I didn't say you never get it, but if you tell me you can drive it without the right equipment, then you've never driven in it.

    81. Re:Canadian driving by randallman · · Score: 1

      While I agree one should keep a cool head and I agree with your driving suggestions, you should understand that many of the roads here you could ice skate on. No gravel. So Salt. Not even snow. Just pure slick ice. There was absolutely NOTHING to get traction on. Short of having chains, no tire or drivetrain could help. I had the pleasure of sledding down a hill this morning despite inching forward carefully. Luckily, I got into some snow on the side and regained traction.

    82. Re:Canadian driving by Drethon · · Score: 1

      I'm in west Michigan and have the original tires for my 2008 car and haevn't been rotating them like I should so the fronts are wearing. Handling has been getting a bit worse but its just a matter of don't do anything suddenly and maintain enough distance to make that possible.

    83. Re:Canadian driving by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      This wasn't black ice. It was a solid sheet of ice, curb to curb, sitting on every paved surface in the area.

      The phrase "black ice" refers not to a special type of ice, but generally to ice that is invisible on the road at night time, catching drivers by surprise. It is no different than the "solid sheet of ice" that you describe. Ice is ice. Although it isn't much fun, I have driven on ice, that hadn't yet been salted or gravelled, and it is treacherous, but by driving slowly and understanding how to control your vehicle, it can be done. People in Canada and the northern states do it all the time. I won't say I've never seen cars in ditches here in Canada during such conditions, but I've never seen the kind of 24 hour traffic jams that occurred in Atlanta.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    84. Re:Canadian driving by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Well when the temperature is below zero (heck when it is below 15f) the salt dosen't work so well... at all. Also didn't see any sand on the road that morning, possibly because the snow fall was quickly covering it. When we get an inch+ an hour snowfall at times for hours at a time even Michigan snow clearing equipment has trouble.

    85. Re:Canadian driving by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

      The northerner solution to that situation is to park our butts at home and wait it out. Hills + polished/wet ice = trapped at the bottom of the hill.

    86. Re:Canadian driving by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      That's funny of you, calling a New Jerseyan a southerner. Well, I did mention that I spent some time living in Maine, so I guess I can call you Minnesotans southerners as well?

      But alas, you're right. If only those southerners could learn to violate the laws of physics just like us yankees, or at least be able to turn up the coefficient of friction on the icy roads without using any snow management gear... Perhaps Georgians should have all bought up a bunch of kitty litter and fixed the roads themselves.

      You come across as an unreasonable person with either poor reading comprehension skills or an amusing ignorance of other states. To suggest that NJ and ME are devoid of black ice (which had nothing to do with the story we're commenting on) is absurd.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    87. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need new snow tires every winter. The damn things melt every summer and frankly my freezer isn't big enough for them.

      (Captcha: 'rubber', really.)

    88. Re:Canadian driving by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Just stop this excuse for the inability of Atlanta drivers to handle the conditions. They are not used to it, they don't necessarily have vehicles with a lot of winter features either. Those are valid reasons for the situation. Trying to say that the precipitation that fell in Atlanta is somehow magical and unlike any other weather condition seen further north is asinine.

    89. Re:Canadian driving by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      At least you guys get salt trucks. Where I'm at in Anchorage they send out dirt trucks to throw gravel all over. No salt used. I think it had something to do with massive rust issues on older cars.

    90. Re:Canadian driving by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously suggesting that every road in the state of Minnesota should be plowed/salted/graveled within hours of a snowfall? I imagine Minneapolis would be quick to respond, but there're probably countless smaller roads, rural roads, etc. that sit for quite a while before any treatment is done.

    91. Re:Canadian driving by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      We occasionally get black ice here in Texas. But most often it will be patchy ice, and overpasses will be frozen. So there are millions hitting the road presuming they are driving properly for the conditions, then hit a patch of black ice they couldn't see or anticipate, and they skid out. I've driven in such conditions, but success was largely in part due to the fact I was one of the few souls on the road.

    92. Re:Canadian driving by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      This wasn't black ice. It was a solid sheet of ice, curb to curb, sitting on every paved surface in the area. Without a single grain of salt, sand, or gravel sitting on top. Without a single gap of cleared road surface peeking through. If you've seen conditions like that in Michigan, you guys have the shittiest snow management system in the country, because unlike Georgia, you should be prepared.

      I live in the "snow belt" and have driven through Michigan and several other northern states. High priority areas get prepped/cleared first, then other areas in order of descending priority. As such, there are many areas where the road conditions were even worse while waiting for the crews to get to them.

      It just isn't affordable to have the kind of coverage you seem to think those states should have.

      On the other hand, those of us in the snow belt should not be making fun of those who don't, so are prepared.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    93. Re:Canadian driving by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You could fill the city with Minnesotans and they would not be able to drive in it. NoI'mNotNineVolt covers this well.

    94. Re:Canadian driving by compro01 · · Score: 1

      So that would be 225/55R17. The only tires I'm finding that get into the $1k/set price range are high-performance winter tires built for going way faster than you should in winter.

      In that size, the winter tires I use (Goodyear Nordics) would run about $728 for a set (or about 2/3rds that if you snap them up when they're on sale in February/March). And my previous set of them lasted me for 4 years, and probably would have lasted at least another 4 if some asshole hadn't stuck a knife in them.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    95. Re:Canadian driving by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      While I'm not looking at the quote I got a couple months ago, but including switching them in for my all-season tires the tire place wanted $950. So far I've never had a set of winter tires last more than 2 years before the tread is gone. I blame the dry roads, roads here are generally only snow covered for a short time (unless it's frozen like this week has been). So most of the time your driving on roads that don't match the conditions the tires were designed for.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    96. Re:Canadian driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ask other municipalities for help and pay them well to have the drivers and a few trucks drive down to the area and spread some salt. You don't need to take many trucks away from cities within 7 hours away to make a big difference. Then you have to have a few salt piles in reserve. Salt doesn't really go bad. Have the DOT put some piles in rural areas that the trucks can get to and back to the city easily.

      You also warn people to dress for the weather. It isn't crazy to park in some parking lot and walk home 4-5 miles. It wouldn't take as long as some of the commutes did on Tuesday.

    97. Re:Canadian driving by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      Please don't equate the residents with failures by our government / city to prepare and implement a plan.

    98. Re:Canadian driving by RedBear · · Score: 1

      There is another aspect to this that nobody seems to be mentioning (or maybe not aware of): Tires. I would suspect that a lot of the people in southern places where it is normally quite warm all year round (and very hot in the summer) are driving on what are called "summer" tires. Out of the three general grades of tire (summer, all-season, and mud+snow/winter), summer tires use the hardest rubber formula to maintain a useful lifetime and have the appropriate level of road grip in high temperatures, and on top of that they have relatively smooth tread patterns with few edges to present to the road surface.

      Unfortunately in colder temperatures the rubber in summer tires becomes very hard and inflexible, like plastic. They're basically completely useless below about 45-55 degrees F. You might as well be riding a plastic sled down the road when it's icy. Your winter driving skills make very little difference when you literally have no traction whatsoever. You can slide hundreds of feet down any slight grade on summer tires with the brakes on all the way, and all the traction control and ABS in the world, and never even slow down until you physically hit something. I believe this tire issue is a hidden but important contributor to the relative chaos that occurs when it snows or ices up in southern latitudes.

      Meanwhile, people living in more northern latitudes almost exclusively drive on what are referred to as "all-season" tires, which are a compromise tire using slightly softer rubber and more complex tread patterns with more angles and edges. They wear out faster in hot weather, but if one drives slowly and is _very_ careful, it is usually possible to drive fairly safely in cold weather, even in bare ice conditions (as long as the road is fairly flat). With most all-season tires you'll still only have about 10-20% of your normal warm-weather traction in freezing weather, but the difference between 10% and 0% traction is huge.

      Note that if you live in an area where temperatures are mostly within 15-20 degrees of freezing (or below), you really should be driving on true "winter" tires during the colder parts of the year, even if the temperature rarely drops near or below freezing. This is especially true if the weather is often wet in your area. Also note that a lot of "mud+snow" tires are often just all-season tires with certain tread patterns and many M+S tires can't hold a candle to the traction of many of the true winter tires that have come out in the last decade. The best winter tires that have come out in recent years make driving on wet ice feel almost like driving on dry pavement. They are truly amazing. Educate yourself if you live in a colder climate. It could save your life.

      An instructive video is here, showing just how useless summer tires are on ice:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

      My favorite winter tire video, a new tire from Nokian Tyres (the Finnish company that supposedly created the world's first winter tire back in the 1930s) which has its own built in grit(!):
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    99. Re:Canadian driving by semilemon · · Score: 1

      I drive a half ton... 6-ply LT245 70R17 tires... replaced them this this summer with all seasons: $1155

      --
      Why do today what you can put off until tomorrow?
    100. Re:Canadian driving by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      For the geographically challenged ACs responding to me en masse:

      Maine is pretty far north. Probably farther north than where you live, unless you're in Alaska or outside the United States. You're not acclimated to your balmy ass winter because there's nothing to acclimate to. You've just never driven on a sheet of untreated ice before, but you're plenty arrogant because you don't realize that you've got sand and gravel when it's too cold for salt.

      The sheer arrogance in these comments makes my point better than I ever could myself.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    101. Re:Canadian driving by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      "Hello, Florida? Can we borrow 3000 salt trucks, please? What's that? Florida doesn't have any salt trucks to help out with? Oh, then maybe we'll try Alabama."

      Or were you suggesting that Minnesota just shoot some trucks through the wormhole?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    102. Re:Canadian driving by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Minnesota doesn't often receive 2" of snow @ 35F followed by an immediate deep freeze to 18F. When you get snow, you get snow. When you get ice, it's either frozen snowpack or black ice from meltwater pools, not a road-engulfing layer of slush-turned-ice.

      You have to understand that the south gets hit with trivial amounts of snow occasionally, and while it's usually funny to watch the resulting mayhem, any objective observer should be able to immediately notice that this weather system was different. School buses don't normally stay on the roads until well past midnight. 185 doesn't usually stay backed up in both directions for a day at a time. i understand that it's always a good time laughing at the southerners for their lack of winter driving ability, but that doesn't exactly provide a sufficient explanation for why this time was so much worse than the previous times.

      I know it's hard to believe, but trust me, the road conditions in Georgia last week really were that bad.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    103. Re:Canadian driving by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      When you're driving slowly, how do you prevent your vehicle from sliding laterally into the gutter on a banker road?

      Also, I'd like to point out that black ice is very much different than the solid sheet of ice I described. Black ice is [necessarily] formed from frozen meltwater pools that exist on paved road surfaces. This limits its extent to that which is supported by the topography of the road surface. For black ice to extent curb-to-curb, the road must be designed very poorly and must lack any and all forms of drainage and must be inundated with a truly unrealistic amount of meltwater. Basically, it's not possible for black ice to exist in the quantities I describe. Black ice is something you hit, perhaps slide on, and then depart from as you regain traction. With a solid sheet of ice covering the road surface, the only way you depart from the ice is by leaving the road surface. There is no regaining traction. The issue in Georgia was that it was quite warm, and the snowfall accumulations on the road turned to slush immediately. Slush doesn't drain from a road surface very well (if at all), nor is it quite as limited by road surface topography, nor is it as compact as liquid water. This generous layer of slush was then subject to a deep freeze, turning it into a sturdy layer of easily visible ice. The upside was that nobody was surprised to hit unexpected patches of ice. The downside was that there was ice everywhere.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  7. Lots of false threats this year... by ThisIsAnonymous · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live here in Atlanta. I work from home and I convinced my wife to stay at home (she's 7 months pregnant). So we didn't have to deal with the mess. One thing I would note though, there were probably 3 times in the last month where we were told we would have snow and it never happened. I think that might have made people feel like this was another false threat.

    1. Re:Lots of false threats this year... by sandytaru · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's a vicious cycle. I saw a political cartoon once that showed the cycle of snow threats in Georgia: It might not snow, but it might, so close everything. Oh no, it didn't snow, we'll know better next time. Next time: It might snow, but it might not, so let's keep everything open. Oh no, it snowed and wrecked the city for a few days. We'll know better next time. (Rinse, repeat.)

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:Lots of false threats this year... by ThisIsAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Yeah. This is very much true. Normally if there is the threat of snow, people rush the grocery stores to buy milk, bread etc. Even if the weather reports says it will be half an inch and gone the next day, it is still the same thing. The interesting thing is that even if you have lived in a snowy region and you know that you probably shouldn't panic for such a minor amount, you can still get caught up in this cycle. My parents are from Michigan originally (lived there for 30 years) and they have been living in North Georgia for around 30 years now -- they usually head to the store as well. The problem is, if you don't also rush to the store with everyone else, then there's a good chance you might not be able to get anything that you need from a grocery store for several days even after the snow is gone. So in the end, even people that aren't really worried, or people not in an area that is supposed to get snow, end up going out on the roads because they are worried that they might not be able to get any food supplies...

    3. Re:Lots of false threats this year... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      When I was in high school 10 years ago here in Atlanta, it seemed like school was cancelled if even flurries were predicted. Yet when a winter storm is expected, not a single metro area school system was closed. This is the biggest failure and the major cause of what happened in my opinion.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Lots of false threats this year... by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Yeah. This is very much true. Normally if there is the threat of snow, people rush the grocery stores to buy milk, bread etc. Even if the weather reports says it will be half an inch and gone the next day, it is still the same thing. The interesting thing is that even if you have lived in a snowy region and you know that you probably shouldn't panic for such a minor amount, you can still get caught up in this cycle. My parents are from Michigan originally (lived there for 30 years) and they have been living in North Georgia for around 30 years now -- they usually head to the store as well. The problem is, if you don't also rush to the store with everyone else, then there's a good chance you might not be able to get anything that you need from a grocery store for several days even after the snow is gone. So in the end, even people that aren't really worried, or people not in an area that is supposed to get snow, end up going out on the roads because they are worried that they might not be able to get any food supplies...

      Except in South Michigan. A/K/A Florida (Michigan actually had a welfare office in Miami).

      RIght after Xmas 1990 snow hit Florida, and we're not talking the once-every-4-years flurries sometimes seen as far south as Tampa. This was a full inch or 2 that actually stuck to the ground and covered roads.

      They closed the Interstate highways as far south as Daytona and even the convenience stores were closed. Because Florida has absolutely no equipment or even training for snow. And many of the bridges were vaulting, so lots of luck if the road gets slippery.

      They dumped sand in critical places. No shortage of that down there. Salt is plentiful too, but it's mostly in the water.

    5. Re:Lots of false threats this year... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      One thing I would note though, there were probably 3 times in the last month where we were told we would have snow and it never happened. I think that might have made people feel like this was another false threat.

      Here's the thing, though -- there are significant differences in the way the weather services categorize threats. Having a winter storm "watch" or "advisory" is one thing -- and many times these things will turn into nothing. The news media, particularly in the South, often gets over-excited at the prospect of snow, so when one of these things pops up, everyone gets concerned.

      I've heard other people make the claim about previous predictions of snow in Atlanta this season. But did you actually receive a winter storm WARNING at those other times? I've tried to find this answer, but it's difficult to find information on that question. My sense is NO -- that previous predictions were NOT actually "winter storm WARNINGS," but merely forecasts or maybe "watches" or "advisories."

      In this case, there was a warning issued something like 8-10 hours before the storm hit, which would have allowed plenty of time for people to act.

      I think the problem is that people don't generally understand the difference between the various weather terminology. But "warning" means that it's really quite certain that something is going to happen. (Yes, it's occasionally off, but usually in terms of severity, not whether it's going to happen at all.)

      Average people may be excused for not understanding what "warning" means, but that's no excuse for government and school officials.

    6. Re:Lots of false threats this year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To give Florida some credit, they'd probably handle a hurricane event better than Michigan, not necessarily without trouble, because Hurricanes are capable of devastating the best plans of mice and men, but they'd have some training and experience with it.

    7. Re:Lots of false threats this year... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      And for the slashdot crowd, that is the problem with a binary feedback loop. An analog feedback look is much more effective.

      First step is to discourage unnecessary commuting for the day: if you can work from home, please do; if you don't need to be out, stay home.
      Second step is plan for action on highest impact arteries: salt the freaking highways, or whatever routes are most critical.
      Third step is to encourage delayed start-times for businesses.
      Fourth is to delay start times for schools...
      and so on.

      It isn't a decision between 500 snowplows and none, it is increments for how you deal with things. Have a few to address your most critical routes. You will never be well enough prepared for a major snowstorm, but hopefully you can be well enough prepared that you can function through a 3-year event and not turn into post-Katrina NOLA for a 20-year event.

    8. Re:Lots of false threats this year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a vicious cycle.

      I live in Virginia Beach, VA and we have the same problem here, not just with preparing for forecasted snow and ice storms, but with hurricanes. Compound that with the fact we have coastal and inland areas that can have drastically different weather at the same time, plus the effects of the Chesapeake Bay and the Atlantic Ocean, we often don't know WTF will happen. Twenty-four years ago, I was trapped in my neighborhood for a week because the city lacked the equipment to dig us out; the Army Corps of Engineers finally sent equipment to do it.

  8. Risk management by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm amazed that a politician of all people took the gamble in that direction. Maybe it'll come up at the next election that you blew through a cool couple of million for a snow day that never happened, but everyone will remember the time they wasted a tank of gas trying to travel two miles and their kids were trapped at school overnight.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:Risk management by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      and their kids were trapped at school overnight.

      That wasn't the worst of it. The worst was that some kids were trapped on school buses overnight. The National Guard had to go out Wednesday to rescue multiple busloads of kid who had spent the night stuck on the highways...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Risk management by NapalmV · · Score: 2

      Didn't Nassem Taleb already debunk "risk management" in his book "The Black Swan"? It basically says that the whole "risk management" thing is based on the wrong understanding of statistics. The fact that an event has a very low statistical probability does not preclude it from happening at any time. The probability of drawing an ace from a deck of cards is low yet it does not preclude the possibility that the first card you draw is an ace. The economists did not understand this (maybe intentionally - some people get paid to not understand / misunderstand) and decided that if an event has a low probability then it would never happen.

    3. Re:Risk management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always impressive to me that the National Guard is able call up all of their part-timers in advance of an event like this. It is definitely not free to bring those soldiers in for duty.

    4. Re:Risk management by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      It sounds like he debunked bad risk management, for sure. The economists you're citing sound like the sort of people who don't have life insurance.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    5. Re:Risk management by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      They weren't called up in advance, or they wouldn't have had to wait till wednesday morning to rescue those school buses full of kids.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re:Risk management by McGruber · · Score: 1

      That wasn't the worst of it. The worst was that some kids were trapped on school buses overnight. The National Guard had to go out Wednesday to rescue multiple busloads of kid who had spent the night stuck on the highways...

      It was even worse than that. The bus drivers were not allowed to let kids off their buses for safety reasons, so they ended up having to use the back row of seats as toilets.

  9. Salted in advance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Come on, I have lived in North Dakota and Minnesota my whole life, and I have never seen pre-emptive salting. Heck, most places up here don't even use salt because it doesn't do anything beneficial when temperatures are 0F and lower for weeks at a time.

    The only answer is to get comfortable driving in wet conditions, and then be more careful. I drove through two winters with summer tires because I was too lazy to change them, and I still had little issue starting, stopping, and turning on icy roads. People who only drive on dry pavement become complacent about paying attention to the way their vehicle is balanced.

    1. Re:Salted in advance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pre-salting is common in the Twin Cities area, especially in the last few years. There are a handful of trucks that are equipped with drips/sprayers that deposit a layer of saltwater on the roadways. The water evaporates, leaving the salt adhered to the roadway, which helps a lot when the snow first starts to fall and the temperatures are >= 4F. You're right about salt being useless at 0F or below. Having said that, for the first time in my life I saw the salt trucks loaded up with *sand* a few days ago when the highs were -10F dropping sand on the on- and off-ramps - the salt wouldn't work (too cold) and those were the places people really needed some traction after the snow.

      I will also say this, though: we have had 3" of snow without pre-salting and we still drive through it. It makes commutes jump up to a max of 2-3 hours, though, not 10-18 like they were in Atlanta. I guess repeated experience with snowy driving results in a realization that snow = ice = slippery, so more caution, fewer accidents to hold up traffic, maybe?

    2. Re:Salted in advance? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Come on, I have lived in North Dakota and Minnesota my whole life, and I have never seen pre-emptive salting. Heck, most places up here don't even use salt because it doesn't do anything beneficial when temperatures are 0F and lower for weeks at a time.

      First of all, it never got into single digits here, so salt and chemicals would have still worked. Also, up in Minnesota and North Dakota, the government has plenty of snow plows and salt trucks. Atlanta barely has any. When your entire fleet consists of a handful of trucks for an entire metro area of a major city, you have to preemptively salt roads. This whole mess was a result of poor planning, slow reactions, and a lack of infrastructure. The first 2 are easy to fix. The third one would be too expensive to fix, considering the rarity of an event like this.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Salted in advance? by halexists · · Score: 1

      You must have missed what clogged all the roads in Atlanta: semi trucks that couldn't make slight grades. Personal vehicles were certainly having trouble too, but this doesn't all fall on "inexperienced in the snow" Atlantans. I lived in the upper midwest for several years, and I DID see pre-emptive salting.

    4. Re:Salted in advance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TIL getting a CDL doesn't even require a basic understanding of a vehicle's capabilities.

    5. Re:Salted in advance? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      that is actually a sand/salt mixture. the salt will work when the sun comes out as the sand being dark will heat up the surface letting the salt start melting. It's how they cleared the highways down to dry pavement here in michigan.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re: Salted in advance? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Does it occur to you that there may not be pre salting, because the salt often doesn't work?

      Maybe there are regions (like where I live for example) that they are salt, because it's not so cold perhaps? The is placed as a bunch of lines going down the road, and lasts up to a week (it's applied as a gel that hardens).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:Salted in advance? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well most of the plow trucks here they take the plows and salt spreaders off in the summer for road construction when they haul materials for that. The good old orange MN DOT trucks.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  10. deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see http://raleighskyline.com/content/2006/11/21/the-half-inch-of-snow-that-paralyzed-raleigh/

    It happened here, and now, even the remote possibility of snow/ice shuts everything down.

  11. Learn to freaken drive. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok granted Atlanta dropped the ball. But the drivers are being complete idiots. Probably due to poor basic science education.
    Yes the road are unsalted. and most of the cars have summer tires... However to be dead stopped for days is just retarded.
    Boadcast these instructions over the radio.

    1. Keep Calm, don't panic.
    2. Accelerate Slowly
    3. Decelerate Slowly
    4. Drive Slowly
    5. Double or Triple your distance that you normally are between you and the car in font of you, to allow more time to stop.

    I am seeing on the news complete idiots just hitting the gas spinning their wheels and driving out of control. The it is a Gas Pedal not a Gas Button, you can use it to drive at various speeds.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by space_jake · · Score: 1

      I dunno I live in the north and these simple facts are apparently not understood here either.

    2. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by pspahn · · Score: 5, Funny

      5. Double or Triple your distance that you normally are between you and the car in font of you, to allow more time to stop.

      I don't think 8 or 12 feet is going to be enough.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    3. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by halexists · · Score: 1

      Semi trucks are what blocked the roadways. A cluster of semis that can't make a grade brings all the cars behind them to a... wait for it... dead stop.

    4. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      I get these idiots in the suburbs who think that 4 wheel drive makes them God or something. I usually see them in the ditch later. I drive a Jeep, but I grew up in the country and I know better than to be an idiot - 4 wheel drive dowes *not** equal 4 wheel STOP.

      --
      C|N>K
    5. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by DamnRogue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I live in Atlanta but grew up in Boston. I fully agree that southerners can't drive in the snow. Your advice is good. However, it is also totally useless for what happened here.

      People were stuck in their cars because a million vehicles tried to exit a ten square mile area simultaneously. It was instant gridlock. Proper acceleration technique means nothing if there is nowhere to go. Once the inevitable handful of accidents occurred, even the lucky folks that were on the front of the traffic wave couldn't get anywhere.

    6. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this advice works SO well when the entire road surface is a massive sheet of black ice for miles. Yeah, okay.

    7. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They they should learn to "freaken drive" and stay the fuck out of the leftmost lane. Especially on a grade.

    8. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      But it's required to drive 6 inches from the guy in front of you. If you can see their tail lights, then someone else might get in that spot!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by cpotoso · · Score: 1

      4 wheel drive dowes *not** equal 4 wheel STOP.

      And I thought all cars had breaks on all wheels... (4 wheel stop). Was I wrong? Maybe I should check my car again.

    10. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bull. Shit.

      I'm a northerner down here on work travel. Your advice is a serious fail. Good luck making it up even the slightest hill if you "drive slowly". Good luck not sliding into the gutter on any banked road if you "drive slowly".

      You've never driven on unconditioned roadways after a snowfall. You're used to grippy snow, or slushy ice. You have a large fleet of snow management vehicles that make sure your roads are safe to drive on when it snows. There was none of that down here. The roads were a sheet of ice. A sheet of unconditioned ice. No salt, no gravel, no sand. Just solid ice. Not patches of ice, but a good solid sheet of ice, curb to curb.

      I myself was laughing about how the whole state of Georgia entirely shut down for what I consider to be a mild flurry. Then I drove to work. While the indigenous drivers didn't come across as well-prepared or skilled ice drivers, I can honestly say that to blame them is wrong. The roads really were unbelievably shitty, possibly worse than anything I have ever driven in. And I've lived in Maine and have driven through blizzard-like conditions in Canada on many occasions.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    11. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Yes it does work for black ice.
      Low friction != No friction.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    12. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 wheel drive dowes *not** equal 4 wheel STOP.

      You still don't have brakes at all four wheels? I know some of those Jeeps and SUVs and tractors are primitive compared to modern road cars, but really?

    13. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, last time I checked on ice 4 wheel drive just means all 4 wheels spin while you slide off the road.

    14. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by idontgno · · Score: 1

      More importantly, "4 wheel STOP" can mean jack shit on glaze ice, no matter what your drivetrain is. It's not how many wheels have brakes, it's how the driver knows to use them.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    15. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      6. Drive extra slowly on curves
      7. Keep in the tracks of the vehicles that have gone before you

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    16. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      What the OP means is that your 4-wheel drive will not magically enable you to stop on snow and ice like it was dry pavement. Many people in 4-wheel drive vehicles seem to be under the impression that it gives them an exemption from all the laws of physics.

    17. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am used to winter driving, but for a number of years I was stationed in Texas. One year it lightly snowed and highways all were closed and almost everyone stayed home. All of that melted by noon, but my job was deemed essentials, so I still had to show up. Let me tell you, I have seen some AWFUL Southern Winter Driving.

      In Texas a lot of people drive RWD trucks, they are difficult, but not impossible, to handle on slippery roads. I have seen intersection blocked by a pickup truck driver flooring and burning tires while his unloaded truck spun the wheels. I have not seen conclusion of this, so I don't know if he ended up launching his truck into the ditch, I simply drove around him on a curb and went on my way.

      I had some idiot tailgate me on a downhill slope that ended at the stoplight. I pulled over to let them pass, only to see them slide through the red light and hit the curb at the bottom of the hill.

    18. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agree with you 100%

      I recently drove from Ontario to Mass in the winter, part of the drive was in the classic "white out" conditions you experience around watertown (NY). The kids were bored so I had them count the cars in the ditch on the way. I think they gave up when they were close to 100.

      The bulk of them were your "4x4" type vehicles and they usually ended up in the ditch upside down of facing the wrong way as a result of a spin out.

      4x4 gives you a false sense of security as you can stomp down on the gas and it gets up and runs, but the second you touch the brakes you find you have nothing....

    19. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a state that sees a lot of snow storms every Winter. Still we have a ton of people that never freaking learn endangering everyone else on the road. It's not even predominately young people like one would think, it's people of all ages that have lived here their whole life or enough of their life that they should know better. It's really unforgivable for people driving modern cars that have traction control and ABS systems; as long as you drive like your suppose to the car does all the work for you.

    20. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      studded tires ;) I do indeed stop when I want to... of course, I also plan out half a block ahead of time.

      --
      C|N>K
    21. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by NapalmV · · Score: 1

      It actually works very nicely:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    22. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Boston and we had several inches of snowfall predicted a few weeks ago and tons of people tried to leave work in the late afternoon. Even with all the mad northeastern driving skillz and road treatment, I saw a 30 minute evening commute along I-95 turn into a >3 hour bumper-to-bumper traffic jam. It's better than Atlanta by far, but still doesn't give much evidence that "Northerners" are better snow drivers. If MASDOT hadn't been presalting the roads I bet that it would have been several times worse.

    23. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't assume that most of the cars have summer tires - think most new vehicles come with all weather which are more than capable of handling a few inches of snow. Even ice if you take it easy and don't tailgate.

    24. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But black people can't drive.

    25. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and most of the cars have summer tires...

      I, in fact, think that people who live in places where "snow and ice" are possible and are still on summer tires in winter should get their driver's license taken away.

      The money saved is not worth being a danger to your and (more importantly) other people's life, health and property.

      You do not randomly point a loaded gun at people. You do not leave unisolated cables with high current in the open. You don't drive in winter with summer tires. Some things in life are actually that simple.

    26. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by jandrese · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also, stop and go traffic is the absolute worst for snowy roads. It's the stopping and starting that are the most difficult, especially on a hill. Maintaining an slow even speed is what you want. People in the north know that if you stop while going uphill on a snowy road, you may not be able to start again.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    27. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1

      No doubt this false sense of security (and driving talent/experience) comes standard with most 4WD/AWD/4x4 vehicles.
      When I had a 4x4 SUV, I even found myself having trouble keeping in mind the fact that I wasn't invincible.

      My girlfriend and I were in Illinois a few Christmases ago when we found ourselves having to begin our 5-6 hour drive after 5-6 inches had already fallen. Even in IL, those country roads were not cleared one bit. We were in a Hyundai Sonata (4-door sedan, front-wheel drive), going maybe half the speed limit. We encountered numerous vehicles in the ditch, almost all of which were SUVs. We did end up doing a 180 in the middle of a straight road (presumably hitting some hidden ice under the snow), but we were able to at least make it to a major city in Indiana where we gave up (having gone half our distance in 5-6 hours) and stayed the night.

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    28. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way cool video.
      However, it's all done on a broad flat surface and is irrelevant to anything in the real world.

      Atlanta is nearly all hills and slopes and especially in North Atlanta.

      BTW, almost no one has studded tires here because they're illegal in GA except when ice is already on the road.

    29. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Not when it's 28 degrees, because at that temperature the weight of tires is sufficient to melt the ice. And there is no traction to be had on a sheet of wet ice.

    30. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who lives in the north MUST drive on unconditioned roadways after a snowfall. First, there is a threshold volume of snow below which no plowing will occur. Second, the plows have to prioritize the main network, so smaller roads have to wait hours or days to be plowed.

      But because everyone must drive in unconditioned snow, they must learn how to do so*. That of course cannot be expected of drivers in Atlanta.

      * first snowstorm of the winter is exempt, when drivers appear to have never seen snow before. Apparently, memories are short.

    31. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I think he meant is this...

      Sure a 4WD will give you a better ability to get moving. That is where the advantages end. Once they are moving, 4WD handles very similar to 2WD. Also, the driver seems to forget that 2WD also have brakes on all 4 wheels just like he does. The moral is that, everything else being equal, the stopping ability of a 4WD is no better than a 2WD. Add to this the fact that most 4WD vehicles are freaking heavy means that they actually are worse at stopping because they have more momentum.

      Now add to that the fact that 4WD drivers drive like they think they are invincable, well is a crash waiting to happen. 2WD drivers know that when the conditions are slippery, it means SLOW DOWN, IDIOT!

    32. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      THANK YOU!!!

      You have no idea how frustrating it is as a Southerner to be constantly condescended upon because of our supposedly lousy driving skills. I don't care HOW skilled you are at driving on snow or ice, when you crest an ice-covered hill with a curve at the bottom, even if you're driving 1 MPH, you're going to go off the road or crash into the curb (or the car) at the bottom.

      Every time I see one of these "lrn2drv" smug posts, I want to invite that person to come on down and drive on a road that is completely untreated in a car that is completely unequipped for snow/ice driving. In this case, I'd love to get them to try it in the middle of an Atlanta rush hour that was as popped out on steroids as it has ever been in the history of the city. Yes, we're not used to driving on ice. Yes, there are some fools who do it wrong. But I've seen people who are the most careful of drivers creeping along at a snail's pace still have wrecks because, believe it or not, when your roads have no snow or ice for 999 out of 1000 days in a row and no one has prepared for the eventuality that they might, and your government is run by "don't spend money for any reason"/"let's err against the side of safety" idiots, shit happens.

    33. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Megane · · Score: 1

      Many of the semis were indeed in the leftmost lane. And the middle lane, and the right lane. When you go sideways on black ice in a semi, you go SIDEWAYS, and can even jackknife. That was one of the things that made this so bad.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    34. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      We don't get much snow at all here. But when we do, if you see a crashed vehicle in a ditch, chances it will be a 4x4 vehicle.

    35. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, if they had decided to maintain a *normal* schedule and not let school or government offices out early, would this probably not have happened?

    36. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, on many vehicles, only the front wheels have enough weight on them to effectively stop the vehicle.That's one huge advantage of RWD that people miss; since the transmission sits further back, the weight distribution is closer to 60 40 than 80 20

    37. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unconditioned *snow* is not that bad. I drove through blowing unconditioned snow in Wyoming. There were enough trucks to blow ruts in it. This was unconditioned *ice* we're talking about, possibly with snow on top of it. Fuggedaboutit. BTW the worst thing about unconditioned snow was truckers who pass cautious little cars. These guys are 20 ton honey badgers. They don't give a shit, because the momentum will just carry them through anything. They pass you, slush flies up onto your windshield and one time it froze *instantly*. I was blind for a few seconds at 30-40mph. No panic. Just keep the heater blasting, work the wipers, take your foot off the gas and roll down the window if necessary. Pray to God another truck doesn't pass and fill your FACE with slush. I will do everything I can to avoid driving across Wyoming ever again.

    38. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I thought all cars had breaks on all wheels... (4 wheel stop). Was I wrong? Maybe I should check my car again.

      Only old and poorly maintained cars have breaks on all wheels. They all should, however, have brakes on all wheels. Brakes are great for stopping a wheel from turning, they don't do shit for keeping that wheel from sliding on an icy surface, especially after 4 wheel drive has got the vehicle up to a nice speed.

    39. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by bsolar · · Score: 1

      Yours is good advice but if the road conditions are actually bad it could very well not be enough. In some road conditions winter tires and/or snow chains are simply not an option.

    40. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Everyone in Atlanta hit the roads at once. Atlanta traffic is... interesting. The problem wasn't excessive speed.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    41. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      and most of the cars have summer tires...

      Umm, I doubt that. Every car I've ever owned, going back to 1990, has had all-season tires. The car I bought in North Carolina came with all-season tires. I am sure some companies still make specialized snow tires, but regular people in regular places (outside the mountains and south of Alaska) generally don't change their tires every winter like my parents used to. They don't have to.

      However, even with all-season tires, I would have a tough time driving through 2-3 inches of slush and snow. The reason we Northerners think it's easy to drive in the snow is that the Highway Department makes sure there is never more than a quarter inch of the stuff on the actual road surface.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    42. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously are a terrible driver. I drove on black ice 2 weeks ago, the difference is I anticipated it based on news reports of there being black ice. Despite sliding 15 feet to stop, I did stop, and did not rear end anyone because I knew well enough to keep a safe following distance. I also made my way up a hill covered in ice thanks to a little thing called momentum and parked my car safely on top of ice. The idiots that get into accidents are the idiots that ignore speed limits in the first place and tailgate every car in front of them.

    43. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      1. Keep Calm, don't panic.
      2. Accelerate Slowly
      3. Decelerate Slowly
      4. Drive Slowly
      5. Double or Triple your distance that you normally are between you and the car in font of you, to allow more time to stop.

      Ummm, none of these tips help you if you're boxed in on all four sides by cars that have been abandoned by their drivers.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    44. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Drethon · · Score: 1

      And as soon as you wait for a large enough gap to the car ahead of you that you can maintain a slow speed, someone pulls in front of you.

    45. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Even up north when the snow is coming down over an inch an hour and the plows haven't been through my road in the past few hours the road conditions are nasty. It is still drivable, mostly. I'll admit three times in the past decade (that I can remember off hand) I've been driving along plenty careful on a snowy road only to have the car go dead straight into a corner when two feet ago it was turning just fine.

      Just my uneducated opinion but I suspect part of the problem is cars remaining at the scene of a fender bender. In that weather if your car rolls at all, exchange contact information and get the heck off the road. Respectfully :)

    46. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by internerdj · · Score: 1

      Moderation +4 100% Funny Hey look. I just found four people who have never driven in Atlanta.

    47. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I usually prefer:
      Even though 4WD doubles your traction doubling almost nothing (you are on ice) still means you have almost nothing for traction.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    48. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That is why you drive slowly. Don't spin the wheels to melt the ice, you just get bast the static friction.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    49. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies and gentlemen! We have found the magical zero friction surface, a sheet of wet ice! There is absolutely no traction at all to be had.

    50. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Weight alone will do it. Not frictional heating.

    51. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU!!!

      You have no idea how frustrating it is as a Southerner to be constantly condescended upon because of our supposedly lousy driving skills. I don't care HOW skilled you are at driving on snow or ice, when you crest an ice-covered hill with a curve at the bottom, even if you're driving 1 MPH, you're going to go off the road or crash into the curb (or the car) at the bottom.

      Every time I see one of these "lrn2drv" smug posts, I want to invite that person to come on down and drive on a road that is completely untreated in a car that is completely unequipped for snow/ice driving. In this case, I'd love to get them to try it in the middle of an Atlanta rush hour that was as popped out on steroids as it has ever been in the history of the city. Yes, we're not used to driving on ice. Yes, there are some fools who do it wrong. But I've seen people who are the most careful of drivers creeping along at a snail's pace still have wrecks because, believe it or not, when your roads have no snow or ice for 999 out of 1000 days in a row and no one has prepared for the eventuality that they might, and your government is run by "don't spend money for any reason"/"let's err against the side of safety" idiots, shit happens.

      If the situation is like that then the smart choice is to stay home (or where you are at the time). I'm in MN, and there are conditions from time to time where you DO NOT TRAVEL, such as freezing rain or whiteout blizzards. If you do, you endanger your life as well as the other idiots on the road with you, AND the emergency personnel that have to try and rescue you.

      TL,DR version: Stay off the ice.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    52. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      You are so right, thank you for expressing in words what thousands of truckers expressed with jackknifed rigs. Truckers are professional drivers and if they are crashing conditions are officially undriveable.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    53. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by atomicxblue · · Score: 1

      6. Do what I did and go to the store a day before and haven't cranked up the car since I parked it. (But then, I was lucky that I didn't need to go anywhere Tuesday...)

    54. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bollox , flooded roads mud covered, snow covered , untreated snow covered, 1" inch thick black ice Ive driven on all of them Hell Ive even done it on a bike all year round.

      Though I will grant you its hard work and very tiring mentally.
       

    55. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by l810c · · Score: 1

      Not even close.

      I've lived in Colorado Mountains and other places and have driven on plenty of snow. Things are different in Atlanta.

      Most of the major choke points happened on hills and steep off ramps. They ice over and your not getting up with 8 wheel drive.

      Another major issue on the Interstates is the amount of truck traffic the Atlanta Metro Area has. Thousands and Thousands of 18 wheelers going to/from Florida. A car slides sideways and a lane is blocked. There were several 18 wheelers blocking the Entire Interstate in one direction. A blocked Interstate in the metro area completely cripples the entire road network for dozens of miles.

    56. Re:Learn to freaken drive. by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      You obviously are a terrible troll. Black ice has nothing to do with this. The ice in Georgia was clearly visible, as it formed from slush, not meltwater, so anyone with eyesight anticipated it. Your off-topic anecdote is not applicable to a situation where the road was covered in an uninterrupted sheet of ice as opposed to mere patches of black ice.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  12. Re:Full retard by NapalmV · · Score: 4, Informative

    It means nothing. Recommended reading here:

    http://www.1010tires.com/store/content/winter-tires-guide.aspx

  13. Why? Umm, let's do some math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why would you buy 500 snowplows and salt trucks and have them sit around for 1,000 days, waiting for the next event?

    I wish I had the details to do the math on this. What is the cost of 500 snowplows that just need to be warehoused for 999 days then rolled out once every three years? What is the cost in salt, labor, maintenance? Now compare that to the cost of hundreds of thousands of people stuck in gridlock for up to 18 hours? Answer that and maybe we'll know why they should buy and store all those trucks to roll out on those once in a blue moon snow-storm type scenarios.

    My gut tells me the actual cost of the last few days of hell in the Atlanta area is greater than the cost of 500 trucks and some warehouse space.

    But I am willing to admit I'm wrong if someone can show me the math.

    1. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by halexists · · Score: 1

      for reference, Minneapolis (a much smaller city, but one that gets more severe storms) spends about $9 million a year maintaining:

      "39 tandem-axle dump trucks with sander units and plows
      15 tandem-axle dump trucks with plows
      15 single-axle dump trucks with sander units and plows
      3 motor graders
      12 front-end loaders with spade-nosed buckets or plows
      To round out the fleet, 15 motor graders and four front-end loaders equipped with front and side plows are rented for the winter season and staffed by City operators
      Finally, to accomplish the alley plowing in the shortest time frame, 20 front-end loaders with operators are contracted on an as-needed basis"

      From http://www.minneapolismn.gov/s...

    2. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As expensive as having someone in a management position in the city that is so incredibly stupid to believe you have to buy special trucks to plow snow. Even more stupid, believing you have to plow 2 inches of snow. even a sports car can easily go through 2 inches of snow if the owner is not a complete moron and has good tires, unlike most of the idiots in the south that ride on baldies.

    3. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Don't forget all the roads you're going to tear up trying to plow them. Which seem ludicrous anyway. 2 or 3 inches? Snowplows? What is there to plow?

      You seriously do not need 500 snowplows for a couple inches of snow. Does anyone even realize you don't just "roll out 500 snowplows"? Hell, why not convince people to buy some snowmobiles also ... you know ... just to be safe!

      For the record, a Denver Public Works tweet mentions 70 snow plows were out for a recent event (about the same 2 or 3 inches).

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    4. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      and the thing is a Grunty Truck that CAN BE BUT DOES HAVE TO BE a salt/snow plow is very useful for various reasons.

      so all you really would need is the salt spreader and snow plow rig warehoused.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    5. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Really, does the number 500 come out of thin air?

      Denver Fleet. -- Keep in mind this is a city of fairly comparable size to Atlanta.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    6. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      So why not get multi-use vehicles?
      Dump trucks that can get modular salt/sand dispensors attached to the back of them?
      Pick up trucks that can have plows attached to the front of them?
      This stuff isn't rocket science. It also doesn't cost millions for specialized vehicles.

    7. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you use sand and salt trucks. And those trucks are not single purpose like the moron with the city was implying.

    8. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I found a news article that stated that Atlanta had only 10 vehicles to handle snow, augmented (?how?) to 22 (or maybe 68) before the storm hit. They have about 200 miles of road considered critical. The population is 432,427, but 5,457,831 in the metropolitan area.

      Figure $200,000 for a big dedicated plow/sander. 500 trucks means a big hit for taxpayers. Building the fleet up to 30 vehicles is a more reasonable goal. Scramble crews early and get ramps sanded; make sure they're trained in the effective use of the vehicles.

      Paying a lot to remove all inconveniences of major rare events is unwise. Paying less to reduce problems substantially and clear the roads more quickly seems better.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    9. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      In Denver, snow is light and dry. If you pack it, you can drive on it. In the South, snow quickly melts when it hits the ground, then slush accumulates, and only after it's been cold for hours does the ground get cold. Then the whole thing freezes into a block of ice, except that it's a block of ice at 28F rather than, say, 15F. And so it's warm enough that the weight of the tires is enough to melt the top of the ice, and so you're trying to drive on a wet sheet of ice.

    10. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by Megane · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that all those trucks still need maintenance even during the years they never get used. You can't just throw an internal combustion vehicle into a shed for three years and expect it to be drivable as-is. Batteries, fuel (gasoline goes bad after a few months), fluids (motor oil becoming sludge), rust, tires (only 5 years or shelf life even if you never use them), etc. It wouldn't be so bad if you had attachments for vehicles that are already used for something else during the summer months.

      Besides, snowplows are for moving piles of deep snow out of the way, not 1-2 inches that will probably be gone (and the roads dry) within 24 hours. More importantly, you can't plow black ice.

      But seriously, the main problem is that you are assuming that all winter weather is the same. Protip: it isn't. Down south, even if it comes out of the clouds as snow, it can still melt on the way down to form freezing rain. The worst kind of winter weather (aside from a white-out blizzard) is when liquid precipitation hits frozen ground. Do you know how a Zamboni works? The last thing it does is pour water on the ice to give it a nice smooth surface. The difference is that rink ice is a lot colder (16-24F), so you might even get some traction on it. And there are no hills in an ice rink.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    11. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had the details to do the math on this. What is the cost of 500 snowplows that just need to be warehoused for 999 days then rolled out once every three years? What is the cost in salt, labor, maintenance? Now compare that to the cost of hundreds of thousands of people stuck in gridlock for up to 18 hours?

      You should compare apples to apples: cost (in tax dollars) of maintaining and using the fleet versus loss of tax revenues due to reduced private sector productivity. That's what drives public policy. It's why residential streets are never plowed except by private contract.

    12. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Why buy a fleet of special purpose vehicles when they probably already have a fleet of regular large dump trucks that could be fitted with a plow and salt/sand spreader.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    13. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Light and dry snow? As I look out the window this evening, it sure seems pretty wet and slushy to me. (currently 34 and snowing)

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    14. Re:Why? Umm, let's do some math by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      That's just Denver. All the other cities in the metro area have their own fleets, plus CDOT has maybe a hundred plows.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  14. re snow by freddieb · · Score: 1

    There is no way the gov. authorities could have prevented the problem. Business and schools let out early and created a huge traffic problem and temperatures dropped well into the 20's (F). All most all roads despite traffic became iced over. The city and state did not possess enough sand, salt to cover the affected areas besides by this time there were abandoned cars and trucks. It took my daughter 7 hours to go about 10 miles from work to home mostly due to blocked streets and jammed up traffic.

    1. Re:re snow by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2

      There is no way the gov. authorities could have prevented the problem

      Try again:
      http://www.wunderground.com/ne...

      All they had to do was cancel school that day.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
  15. If only there were some way to... by WWJohnBrowningDo · · Score: 1

    "Why would you in a city that gets one snow event every three years? Why would you buy 500 snowplows and salt trucks and have them sit around for 1,000 days, waiting for the next event?"

    I shall become rich and famous by inventing a novel type of financial transaction whereby one makes a payment in exchange for the temporary use of goods or property. I shall name it... "Compensated borrowing". Nobel Prize in Economics, here I come!

    1. Re:If only there were some way to... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Borrow from where? All of the other cities in the area that also don't generally suffer snowstorms? More northerly cities that are probably busy using their equipment, thank you very much?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:If only there were some way to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of places. We are here in Ohio and didn't use our trucks this week. It is only 8 hours on I-75 to Atlanta. I would bet Kentucky, Indiana, and Virgina have quite a few trucks they could spare too.

      I would hope that our cities here would take the money from Atlanta if they needed the help and expertise to get the job done...

    3. Re:If only there were some way to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The serious snow removal equipment (large graders capable of plowing two lanes at once for miles at a time) are both heavy and awkward to move.
      An 8 hour drive to haul a grader would probably be costly in itself.

      Then there is the issue with how do you move heavy equipment on large trucks to plow the roads when they are unplowed in the first place.

      You could try to drive the grader there without loading it on a truck, but their top speeds are really low and they are pretty thirsty.

  16. Wunderground has timeline, makes governor look bad by hamjudo · · Score: 5, Informative
    Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal Calls Winter Storm That Snarled Atlanta 'Unexpected.' Really?

    This wouldn't be so embarrassing if the weather service would just delete all that old incriminating information.

  17. 2 inches/5cm? by guruevi · · Score: 2

    The city here doesn't even plow or salt for 2 inches of snow. We've been having 2 inches of snow almost on a daily basis all winter, some days we have had 18 inches and still the city doesn't come to a standstill, there are no snow days at work even though there was a state of emergency and the city didn't start plowing until 8am.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:2 inches/5cm? by irussel · · Score: 1

      Not sure what happened in ATL, but in central Texas when precip is falling while below freezing, we usually get sleet/ice, not snow. Driving on ice is a different story altogether.

    2. Re:2 inches/5cm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first few hours of snowfall melted onto the roads, and the temperature had started dropping below freezing at that point. Once that moisture froze into a sheet of ice on the roads, the snow started sticking. In my area (suburbs west of Atlanta) it snowed until after dark. It wasn't a heavy snow, maybe five inches in my area, but it packed down hard when people tried to drive over it. It becomes nearly impossible to drive on, even with a 4x4 or off road vehicle. Just on my road I saw several 4x4 trucks and Jeeps off on the side of the road, and more than once a four wheel ATV would go sliding sideways past the house.

    3. Re:2 inches/5cm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your city doesn't have a population anywhere near Atlanta's. The snow didn't directly cause the problem, but the massive traffic jam from a shitty road system getting super-taxed under inclement weather.

  18. Repurpose existing equipment by dj245 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why would you buy 500 snowplows and salt trucks and have them sit around for 1,000 days, waiting for the next event?""

    That's why you repurpose existing equipment. Snowplows themselves aren't a huge investment, and they last basically forever with little maintenance. Put a clause in your purchasing specs that all newly purchased garbage trucks and DOT dump trucks must have hookups for a plow. Retrofitting is expensive but if you're buying a truck anyway, the additional cost isn't much. Even dump trucks without special spreading equipment can be used; some dump trucks have small sliding gates on the main gate like this one. This is normally used for shoveling out small quantities of asphalt when patching roads, but in a pinch you could open them up and spread salt/sand on the road. Get creative! Making plans is cheap.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Repurpose existing equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the problem is "cheep" is a weasel word. and atlanta struggles with its budget.

    2. Re:Repurpose existing equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey you have brains - you are possibly a dangerous terrorist - where is NSA when one needs it?

    3. Re:Repurpose existing equipment by couchslug · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quite right!
      Snowplows do get chewed up in the North, but they'd survive just fine in the South and last many, many years.
      Plow mounts could be swapped easily as generations of trucks are replaced. Both dump and garbage trucks already have hydraulic power takeoff systems so adding plows is is but mounting and plumbing.
      The bed modification shown in your pic is easy to retrofit at a cost of a few hundred dollars per truck, and easy to repair if it gets bashed. Local fab shops and possibly the DOT shops could spit them out easily.
      Spreaders can be purchased and fitted with quick-attach mounts.
      If it were my tasking I'd set aside warehouse space and have plows spreaders palletized on steel frames with forklift pockets for easy handling and maintenance. One or two forklifts could feed the gear to a line of trucks staged outdoors. Lift the gear, attach the gear to the truck, move to the next truck while hydraulic hookups and functional checks proceed. That's faster than storing them on the ground outdoors and would involve less wresting to connect if done right.
      When operations are complete, reverse the process, pressure wash and lube the gear on the pallets, then fork them back into the warehouse for the next adventure.
      Have each device carry a set of printed maintenance forms in an attached container as is done with military ground support equipment to facilitate easy review and entry of discrepancies. No need to invent a new system as the military has done it this way for decades and it works well.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Repurpose existing equipment by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Cheep is a bird word.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    5. Re:Repurpose existing equipment by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      Snowplows themselves aren't a huge investment, and they last basically forever with little maintenance.

      One of our snow plows just caught fire the other day.

    6. Re:Repurpose existing equipment by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Or put a guy in the back of a dump truck and have him fling gravel with a shovel. That's how it was done before there were special rigs.

      I don't blame 'em for not knowing how to cope or not having the 'correct' equipment (it would be silly and wasteful to maintain a stable of winter gear). But ordinary equipment can be repurposed. Frex, some places that routinely get really deep snow use an ordinary road grader to remove it (in fact for big drifts, it works much better than a truck-and-plow). It's not a special-purpose machine; it's the same one used to scrape gravel roads in the summer.

      If your problem is underlying glare ice, you're better off to NOT plow it, since the snow on top provides more traction than the ice (which you can't plow off).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Repurpose existing equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bonus, your garbage men are the snow crew. Just pay them overtime rates on snow days.

  19. It's just dump trucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Salt trucks up here aren't single purpose trucks. They are just dump trucks/pick ups with sanders on them. The sanders can't be terribly expensive and the city could buy them and contract out with private companies to do the sanding. Sand and dump trucks/pick ups are used in building everywhere. The sanders are the only thing you need sitting around and those can be added on as you need them. This drives down the costs and lets you spend on only the things you need to spend on.

    1. Re:It's just dump trucks by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      Well that is wierd... because the salt trucks here are simply dump trucks they use year round. they use them for construction on the warmer months. What wierdo city do you live in where they have special salt only trucks?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:It's just dump trucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What RETARD modded him down? because that is what they have here as well, standard dump trucks with plows and they slide in the back a salt dumper. summertime they grade dirt roads and do construction.

  20. Stop the Hate Child!!! by Major+Blud · · Score: 3, Informative

    The comments sections on quite a few sites were filled with degrading comments for us "sutherns" freakin' out about 2 inches of snow. There are a few things I'd like to point out before this thread fills with the same stuff:

    1) I'm in Louisiana. I can count the times it's snowed like this on one hand in my 36 years here. We don't get much of a chance to practice winter driving.

    2) We're simply not equipped to deal with the snow. We don't have snow plows or salting/sanding machines. Yes, I still feel that purchasing this type of equipment is a waste of taxpayer money to prepare for an event that happens maybe for one day every 5 years at the most. Do you see Rhode Island spending money on earthquake proof buildings for example?

    3) It was more of a problem with ice than snow. The roads had started to form a pretty thick layer of ice on Monday morning (I know because I had to drive through it).

    That said, here in Louisiana roads and schools were closed starting on Monday afternoon. I'm not sure what Atlanta was thinking to wait until Tuesday to do this, but like the article says, there could have been uproar if they cried wolf.

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    1. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      " We're simply not equipped to deal with the snow. We don't have snow plows or salting/sanding machines. "

      I have 6 feet of snow in my front yard right now, the roads have been CAKED in 6 inches of hard packed ice and snow for weeks and Salt doesn't work at 3 degrees F. and I can easily drive the 45 miles to work and back every day in a minivan that has crap all season tires, new ones but crappy cheap bottom of the barrel tires.

      One thing I know about the south is that you guys are happy to drive around on worn out bald tires, I work regularly in the south Huntsville, NOLA, etc and you guys think that buying tires is a sin. Get real tires and you too can drive on ice and snow easily that is 4X of the worst you got this year.

      It is the drivers and their lack of driving ability. I've been to Atlanta many times, they barely know how to stay in their own lane let alone understand what those speed limit signs mean. I am thinking in the south a speed limit sign means that is as slow as you can go, and you should try to drive at 100mph 5 inches from the guy in front of you. And that is why when it get's slippery they all crash.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't get much of a chance to practice winter driving.

      Don't worry. I've seen people practice winter driving for three months every year and still fail at it.

      I'm living in the motherfucking Alps, and most drivers are still incapable of driving in snow...

    3. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by inode_buddha · · Score: 2

      THIS is so true... (I'm from Buffalo) Good tires makes all the difference along with learning how to drive. And yes its been in the single-digits here too, with caked snow and ice.

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by flogger · · Score: 1

      Yes, I still feel that purchasing this type of equipment is a waste of taxpayer money to prepare for an event that happens maybe for one day every 5 years at the most.

      5,10,15,20,25,30,35 -- seven times in 36 years. Check.

      I can count the times it's snowed like this on one hand in my 36 years here.

      Says the seven fingered driver.

      --
      ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
      "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
      -- The Doctor, "Doctor
    5. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      "every 5 years at the MOST"

      FTFY.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    6. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      You can drive on 2 inches of ice?!.

      It was ice not snow that got Atlanta

    7. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) I'm in Louisiana. I can count the times it's snowed like this on one hand in my 36 years here...

      2) ...to prepare for an event that happens maybe for one day every 5 years at the most...

      You must be great at piano

      1 event/5 years in 36 years = 7 - 8 events.

    8. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      As stated in my post and earlier in this thread, it was "every 5 years at the most". There are some 8-9 year intervals in there.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    9. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by hendrips · · Score: 3, Interesting

      get's

      Apparently, however, "you guys" think grammar is a sin...

      As someone who's lived in the Deep South myself, I'll accept your criticism - as soon as everyone up north learns to handle tornadoes, hurricanes, and earthquake proofing just as well as we're supposed to handle driving in snow. I currently live in an area where tornadoes can occur, and a distressing number of New England transplants don't understand why they're not safe in their cars, or why hiding in a windowless basement is a sound idea. For a while I lived in a hurricane prone area, and the northerners that I knew didn't understand basic concepts like storm shutters, or evacuation preparedness.

      I never blamed the northerners I knew for their ignorance. These were situations they had never encountered before. Likewise I'm not sure why you're blaming the people from Atlanta for reacting poorly to a situation that they basically never have to deal with, and that they can't practice dealing with.

      Besides, the main problem that the storm caused in Atlanta was gridlock. Which is the opposite of driving too fast.

    10. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      never had to deal with and once every 3-5 years is hardly the same thing.
      Gridlock because of accidents, which is caused by people not driving correctly.

    11. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      As long as the ice has enough snow on top of it, you can drive just fine. Snow has more grip than ice. Been there done that in the ice storm of 1998... the one that blacked out a chunk of the northeast. Took a couple hours but I made it the 15 miles into work that day.

      --
      C|N>K
    12. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      This. This is what most aren't understanding about this. We really don't get snow here....more like sleet that barely accumulates. Most of the roads and almost all the bridges had 2-inch thick sheets of ice on them with hardly any snow (can't speak for Atlanta).

      I've driven in place that have 6-inches of snow or more, and it was definitely easier than driving to go through what we got the past few days.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    13. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, kindly explain to everyone how in the FUCK southerners are supposed to magically conjure up "driving ability" - specifically, the ability to drive in conditions where the entire road is a sheet of ice - when this sort of thing happens once a decade or less.

      Do you berate your kids as well when you put them on a bicycle for the first time and they have trouble riding in a straight line or not falling off?

    14. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Right now I drive on 3-6 inches of it. so yes.
      and no I dont have studded tires.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 1 stop driving like assholes on normal days.
      Step 2 Learn how to drive to begin with. Atlanta drivers are all complete and utter morons.
      Step 3 start again at step 1

      THAT alone will make a giant difference.

    16. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Serious question......3-6 inches of ice, with no snow on it? Similar to an ice skating rink?

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    17. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Serious question.....3-6 inches of ice without snow? Like an ice skating rink?

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    18. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      I lived in New Orleans for two or three decades. They don't really get snow. When freezing weather comes in, it usually only brings ice. I remember getting excited as a 10 year old at seeing snow for the first time in my front yard. It was so thin, the lawn was mostly green and we had to scrape it off the cars to make actual snowballs. They were rust colored snow balls. (We didn't have the latest and greatest cars.) I've also lived in Indiana where we got both snow and ice in varying layers. The cheapest and most effective solution for people in Louisiana is to stay off the streets for a day or two until the ice melts. I have family and friends in Indiana, Atlanta, and New Orleans and I'm following the cold weather closely. I know what they are going through and how well prepared they are -- both on a personal level and on a city level.

    19. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1) I'm in Louisiana. I can count the times it's snowed like this on one hand in my 36 years here. We don't get much of a chance to practice winter driving." ... and 2), and 3)...

      Thus: stay off the roads if it snows. Don't "drive through it" if you can't handle it or your gear isn't equipped for it. Get a clue and know your limits. It's basic physics that snow is going to cause problems on roadways. Don't treat it as "business as usual". It's what we do in Canada if there is a full-scale blizzard, and we have tons of snow-clearing gear and experience driving in horrible winter conditions. The RCMP recommends people stay off the roads, businesses shut down, schools close, etc. The last blizzard a couple of weeks ago (24hrs of high winds, 40cm of snow), I spent about 2 hours shovelling the driveway the day after the storm. The car sat there all day during the storm because I knew better than to go out. My workplace was closed in anticipation of the storm, but even if it wasn't I would not have gone in to work that day. Too risky.

      While I sympathize with the Governor and the great difficulty of deciding what to do when forecasts are uncertain, if it's a choice between a potential false alarm and saving people an insane amount of hassle or worse outcomes, then you make the call. Maybe you don't declare a state of emergency, but at least close the schools and strongly advise people to either stay off the roads or monitor the weather and road conditions carefully before going out. Tell people that if they can make alternative plans that day to stay put, do so.

      It's not about investing in expensive and rarely-used equipment, it's about informing people and asking them to please modify their behaviour to make the situation easier to handle regardless of the gear you've got on hand.

    20. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do you suggest people get practice driving in winter conditions when this happens once every several years? Maybe we should put you in the Grand Prix and then make fun of your lack of diving skills compared to the other drivers.

    21. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Prepped, packed ice at 3F is a drivable surface. Unprepped ice at 28F is not. At 28, the ice melts from the weight of the tires. How well can you drive on a block of wet ice?

    22. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 6 feet of snow in my front yard right now, the roads have been CAKED in 6 inches of hard packed ice and snow for weeks and Salt doesn't work at 3 degrees F. and I can easily drive the 45 miles to work and back every day in a minivan that has crap all season tires, new ones but crappy cheap bottom of the barrel tires.

      Hard packed ice and snow isn't a bad driving surface at all. What happens down south is that the warm roads melt the snow, and the water eventually freezes under the continued chilling of more snow. We usually end up with a 0.25-0.5 inch layer of ice with a little bit of snow on top of that. Any texture that develops is quickly filled in with melt, which freezes back over, just like an icicle. The result is basically rink-quality ice. You can get around on it, if you're careful, and never come to a complete stop. Or never have to go up a hill.

      Snow that falls at 5 oF, onto roads that are already 15 oF is a perfectly drivable surface. Snow that falls at 25 oF onto a road that's 35 oF is not the same, by any stretch of the imagination.

    23. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      It is the drivers and their lack of driving ability... I am thinking in the south a speed limit sign means that is as slow as you can go, and you should try to drive at 100mph 5 inches from the guy in front of you.

      Um... that does not denote a lack of driving ability. Why don't you stay in the right lane, grandpa, and leave the driving to the continent.

      Also, your tires would not have allowed you to traverse any significant hill in metro Atlanta. Maybe snow chains could, but otherwise you're completely full of shit.

    24. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Snow that falls at 5 oF, onto roads that are already 15 oF is a perfectly drivable surface. Snow that falls at 25 oF onto a road that's 35 oF is not the same, by any stretch of the imagination.

      I agree they're not the same but it doesn't just toggle between 80 and 15 in the North. In the late Fall and early Spring, - even some times in the dead of winter, we get conditions exactly like what you've described.

    25. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by randallman · · Score: 1

      Driving on snow is fine. The snow at least gives you some traction. Driving on an ice rink ain't so easy. I live in Meridian MS (also have nice new Bridgestone's) and there were places I slid through with absolutely no exposed road and no gravel, sand, or even snow to get traction on.

    26. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      ... as soon as everyone up north learns to handle tornadoes, hurricanes, and earthquake proofing just as well as we're supposed to handle driving in snow.

      Are you implying that the risk of earthquakes is higher in the South than in the North? That one's really a West coast rest of the country thing.

      Besides, the main problem that the storm caused in Atlanta was gridlock. Which is the opposite of driving too fast.

      I thought gridlock was just a weekday in Atlanta. And a lot of the gridlock is caused by driving too fast. Maybe not physically being too fast, but impatient driving not willing to wait another second to move. People start blocking intersections because they don't want to wait for another green light then people get mad and run red lights because they had to sit at a green light because the intersection was blocked, and it grows from there.

    27. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by McGruber · · Score: 1

      THIS is so true... (I'm from Buffalo) Good tires makes all the difference along with learning how to drive. And yes its been in the single-digits here too, with caked snow and ice.

      November 21, 2000 newspaper article titled "Buffalo Snowstorm strands workers, students"

      What excuses do you guys still left in Buffalo use when the same thing happens to you?

    28. Re:Stop the Hate Child!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, I drive on ice all the time as well, same way how people drive across lakes with 18-20 inches of ice on them. The trick is you don't mash the gas pedal and wonder why it's not moving.

  21. My experience by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I live 20 minutes north of the city, and work at the airport south of the city. It started snowing at my apartment at 9:30 am Tuesday. I was stuck at work tuesday night, worked all day wed, got put up in a hotel by my company wed night, and am working all day today before I go home tonight at my regular work time. No one here with any sense is really mad that we didn't have enough equipment: we can't justify spending millions of dollars in equipment for something that happens so rarely. The biggest issue was they did not close the schools on Tuesday. Businesses started letting people leave early afternoon because the weather was starting to get bad. Then schools closed early and everyone with kids had to leave as well. We literally had probably 85-90% of the commuting workforce on the road at the same time, and 2 of our major highways-I-75 and I-85-are actually the same road through downtown Atlanta. If schools had been closed on Tuesday, a lot of people would have stayed home, and traffic would have been very manageable. Also, considering the fact that these events are so rare, the government should have started treating roads as early as Monday night. They predicted that it would hit the south side. If they had treated the south side monday night, they could have recovered and treated the north side tuesday morning when they realized it would hit the north side hardest.

    As a side note, snow in Atlanta usually falls as large wet clumps that are already melting. This week was the first time in decades where Atlanta has gotten true, powder snow. So a lot of people here have no idea how to drive in this weather, and it only takes a handful of cars not being able to make it up a hill or hitting an ice patch to shut down an entire interstate.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re: My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Atlanta on a normal day is one stalled car away from a two hour mess.

    2. Re:My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 100%. The schools not closing way the key driver (no pun intended) for this problem.

  22. Re:Full retard by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure, sure. Southtown got its snow, but on the plus side, Santa gets a day of Spring at the North Pole. That's the deal.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  23. Logical fallacy used to mislead his public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, this mayor is either stupid or has stupid advisors. Either way he's misleading the public. Atlanta COULD have been prepared.

    You don't buy 500 snowplows. That's ludicrous unless you're in the Arctic. You put enormous plows on dump trucks and (relatively inexpensive) sanders on the back. You buy a warehouse and fill it with sand (tip: it won't go bad). You pay private contractors (who may come down from the North) with snowplows. It may be expensive but your people will thank you for it at the end of the day when they are home instead of squatting at a Home Depot, and you haven't done something stupid like owning 500 snow plows.

  24. Why would you buy snowplows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same reason you would buy and maintain external offsite backups for your computers. Techies know things go wrong, it's a matter of when. When, precisely, will normal people learn this too? Hopefully before killing ourselves.

  25. dunno what to say by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    Yeah Atlanta could have prepared better for the occasional storm... there should be some kind of equipment lending program among several southern states for the occasional event like this... that said, I'm from Buffalo. It takes a several feet to shut us down, and in the summers it can reach 99 def F. And yet, we seem to do just fine, I took my driving test 30 yrs ago in worse stuff than this.

    --
    C|N>K
  26. This says a lot about atlanta's priorities... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    "money would have been lost, and people would have complained."

    Money is a LOT more important than public safety and life. Honestly I really hop that people start suing the crap out of the city of atlanta for their lack of care about the public safety.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:This says a lot about atlanta's priorities... by judoguy · · Score: 1

      From Wikipedia: "By U.S. Census Bureau standards, the population of the Atlanta region spreads across a metropolitan area of 8,376 square miles (21,694 km2) – a land area comparable to that of Massachusetts."

      It ain't just a matter of buying a few trucks. This is HUGE area with a boatload on separate government entities to deal with. A huge investment that would have to compete with black hole public school money demands as well. Just in case it was needed every decade or so.

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    2. Re:This says a lot about atlanta's priorities... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Where did anyone talk about buying a few trucks? I'm talking close the freaking schools the day before and issuing massive warnings to all businesses that they are strongly encouraged to NOT be open.

      They knew it was going to hit, they chose $$$ over safety.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:This says a lot about atlanta's priorities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I see it is that they're wanting to both eat the cake and keep it:
      The obvious balancing act is between the cost of rarely used equipment that would keep the city operating and cost of shutting the city down for events like this.
      But the politicians want to cheat - save money by not investing in the equipment AND ALSO save money by not shutting the city down in the face of warnings...
      When they get caught out, lots of citizens suffer and the cost is much higher than for a planned shut down. Tough - but you don't win the weather lottery every time.

  27. Us damn yankees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's quite a few of us Northern transplants down here in metro Atlanta. Tuesday morning at about 11am, it was snowing hard and from growing up in this crap, I knew it was going to bad. I called my wife to get home ( she ignored my warning and spent 13 hours in traffic - and I was worried sick.) . At 10:30 am, I was in the super market and it was packed with folks. A bunch of us knew it was gonna hit hard and there must have been in state government who knew.

    1. Re:Us damn yankees by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      I sure hope things turned OK for your' family in the end.

      Here in Baton Rouge, LA schools were closed Tuesday and Wednesday, and the interstate on-ramps for I-12 and I-55 were closed starting Monday morning. We didn't play the same gamble here. Seems like ATL could have looked a few states over and decided to close everything on Tuesday.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  28. only two inches?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The traffic jams were caused by every woman fleeing the city at once, in a desperate search for some real men.

  29. It never ceases to amaze.. by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    I live in the South and every time there's a tornado or severe thunderstorm around here people from other parts of the nation gasp "How can you live there, it's terrible." While we in the South chuckle when folks up North go sliding into each other on iced over roads. It comes down to dealing with what you're used to. If you have snow rarely in an area, there's no justification for heavy snow removal equipment rather just some common sense. Sure, there's always a social impact to these kinds of events, schools closing, people unable to get to their jobs etc. but it's much better than getting stuck out on a road with thousands of others in the same predicament. Oh, I can also recall back in 2010, getting stuck in DC in a Hotel for three days during a blizzard and its aftermath. It was called Snowmageddon. Stores, restaurants and public transit was shutdown. Also, you couldn't get a cab to get yourself out. Sure the snowplows came through but they left 6 foot drifts along the sidewalks that you had to climb over. That wasn't a great business trip to say the least but it pointed out to me that even in DC, where Snow does fall in the Winter, once in awhile you can get a bad storm and it can shut things down. Thousands of people were stuck trying to get home as well, so Deja Vu?

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:It never ceases to amaze.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Dakota. Tornadoes, snow, ice pack, thunderstorms, and 70 mph winds. Sometimes all at the same time.

      I am laughing at all of you. You don't impress many northerners with tornadoes and thunderstorms. Except for that small bit in New England maybe. But even Brooklyn gets tornadoes.

      That being said, I can forgive not knowing how to winter drive. These are the same areas where if I go to park, people ask me what the plug on my car is for.
      I can forgive not having all these plows and presalting (salt? presalt? absurd! Sand after the storm is good enough for your grandpa and it's good enough for me!) your roads. I can even forgive bad tires.

      But I can't forgive simultaneously leaving the schools open and then shutting down the entire city at the same time. You don't need any warning about weather. That's just bad city management. If I were to be in his situation, and let's say I ignore all the large and obvious warnings, I still wouldn't shut down schools that quick. I'd close businesses first. Children can be carted at all hours, staff can wait around. You can feed kids to their destinations in dribbles. OR make it mandatory that everyone keeps clear of certain lanes until the children are taken care of. Then close everything else. You put out a warning to all tractor trailers to go to the nearest rest stop if it's X distance away, or pull over, or face fines. You don't want semis rolling downhill smashing up traffic.

      But, like we've learned at Katrina, and elsewhere across the nation in this week's storm: You err on the side of caution. If you're worried about losing income you makeup the day or write it off. But you don't endanger people's lives for a few bucks.

      Rant over. I'm going back to watching the replays of Atlanta traffic with Benny Hill music playing.

  30. workers/management fault this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw a salt truck driving at 1 mph, I know what parade speed is 3mph and it wasn't going that fast. It was salting one lane of a 3 lane road. But the assholes had the other 2 lanes blocked so no passing the truck. Things would have been to let traffic through and drive on the snow and not done anything.

    They took the worst possible course of action.

  31. I live in metro-ATL and noticed several points by mpercy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Several things seemed to make this event different from similar snowfall events that I've seen here in the last 20 years or so.

    When snowfall occurs here it is usually a passing cold front event in an otherwise seasonable temperature period with daytime temps in the 40's or high 30's. So when snow falls, it pretty much melts in the streets until after 5PM or so when the temps start to drop. This time, we had several days of very cold weather preceding the snowfall and it was as if the streets' thermal mass had already been depleted. Snow hitting the streets initially melted but started to freeze into ice sheets quickly, more quickly than usual. By about 1PM many streets, especially surface streets with plenty of shade, were already covered with a thick ice sheet.

    Atlanta has lots of creeks and small rivers with bridges. Atlanta is also quite a hilly place. Bridges ice before the main road, and bridges here are often at the bottom of a hill in both directions. So all the bridges and all the low-lying areas at the bottom of hills froze first. Many cars could not make it up the icy slope. Even minor slopes on surface streets especially became impassible due to the ice. Again, all this happened much earlier in the day than people have come to expect.

    I live 4.5 miles from work, normally an 8-12 minute commute. I left my office at 12:45PM and it took me 2.5 hours and I had to use multiple alternative routes as I encountered several places where bridges and low-lying areas were impossible to get through. Luckily I know multiple routes home and was able to mentally plot the flattest route home and wind my way through interconnected neighborhoods. Even still, I used the GPS to avoid the dead ends that are common in neighborhoods. A co-worker left 15 minutes after I did, and 4.5 hours later made it as far as my house--he stopped for a bathroom break and made it home a full 12 hours after he left. My brother-in law left downtown at 2:30PM, two hours later managed to pick up his wife who works 1 mile away from where he works. At 8:30PM we used the computer traffic reports and google maps to get them off the interstate through neighborhoods, and by 1:30AM they had made it to our house. We figure it was another 8 hours to their house. Good thing he had taken his 4-wheel drive "hunting pickup" to work that morning.

    Everyone started leaving offices after about 12PM-3PM, which normally would have been plenty soon but by then it was already too late on too many surface streets, so even the main roads which had been pre-treated and the interstates which have enough traffic to provide hot exhaust and tire friction heat to keep lanes open backed up--people exiting onto surface streets had no where to go.

    Businesses and schools took a chance, given that the forecast had called for the snowfall to be south of the city. With much of the population in metro-ATL actually being north of the city, to forecast made many people in north metro-ATL figure there would be no real problem.

    Schools in particular did everyone a disservice by staying open, then announcing early dismissals at 12:30PM or so. So tens of thousands of overwrought mommies and daddies jumped on the roads at the same time to make sure their precious offspring didn't have to risk a bus ride.

    Also, the cell phone system was overloaded. So many people stuck in their cars for so long panicking chewed up all the bandwidth.

    1. Re:I live in metro-ATL and noticed several points by TwentyCharsIsNotEnou · · Score: 1

      Genuine question - if you live only 4.5 miles away, did you consider walking?

      I know nothing about Atlanta, so I know there could be a genuine reason - just wondering if it was because there are no pavements on the route, because it was too cold, because you just thought walking might be more dangerous than driving, or something else??

    2. Re:I live in metro-ATL and noticed several points by mpercy · · Score: 1

      About 3.5 miles of the route would be safe enough. But even on a nice sunny day, the first mile I would have had to walk would be a very dangerous one with no sidewalks along a major 4-lane feeder road.

      Fortunately, I was dressed appropriately, able and fully prepared to walk home should I have come to some point were I was stuck. I also had a fully-charged non-cellphone GPS that has pedestrian mode. Just in case.

    3. Re:I live in metro-ATL and noticed several points by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I was living in North Carolina when an unusually bad snow then ice storm passed through. Raleigh is quite undulating, and one of the funniest sights I saw was in one of the dips in the road, all the big ass RWD cars getting about halfway up the other side then sliding gracefully back down to the bottom of the dip (including a big ol police Crown Victoria). Luckily I had a front wheel drive Ford Contour which made it up the hills just fine (although I did have to dodge a few cars sliding backwards).

      The next day was after the ice storm. The few vehicles that had gone through before the freezing rain fell had made tracks in the snow, which were then encased in a couple of inches of ice. You could let go of the steering wheel and let the ruts guide you like rails (and whatever you did, you couldn't get out the ruts so you could only go on roads on which someone had gone before the freezing rain fell). Our car park at work was empty when all this happened, so it got a nice smooth layer of snow capped with 2 inches of ice. It turned into an ice rink. With it being empty we had tremendous fun with it. Incidentally, someone at work who lived in the same apartment complex block stayed home though all of this. It was only 1 mile from work. I walked. (We had to, we had a bit of a deathmarch project on so we were the only group still in work. Half of the group came from Houston and were even less used to seeing snow and ice, but still made it in).

      I left the US over 10 years ago now so I don't know whether most people still drive rear wheel drive cars these days, but certainly a lot of people had RWD pickup trucks which are just about the worst thing to drive in a snow/ice storm.

    4. Re:I live in metro-ATL and noticed several points by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I know nothing about Atlanta, so I know there could be a genuine reason - just wondering if it was because there are no pavements on the route, because it was too cold, because you just thought walking might be more dangerous than driving, or something else??

      Atlanta is a city of cars with massive amounts of suburban sprawl. Sidewalks are missing from many stretches of road that go through residential and other non-commercial areas, and bike lanes are almost non-existent. The terrain is very hilly too.

      Plus, very few people were dressed appropriately for being outside in sub-freezing weather for hours at a time. I wasn't, because I was not expecting this. Had I been, it would have taken me a third of the time that it did take me to drive. I kick myself for not bringing appropriate cold weather gear to work (and for not just staying home that day).

      If I had any idea what I was going to get into, I might have tried it anyway (which would have been DUMB, because I didn't know how long it took to walk that distance until one of my roommates had to the next day). But I didn't, and at the time I left I had the delusion that I was going to make it home before my driveway iced over. I wasn't worried at all about the drive itself; surely it wouldn't take me more than an hour, right?

      I was so, so naive.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  32. Re:Full retard by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    It means nothing.

    I believe it refers to tread design. Tread compound, not so much...

  33. Re:Full retard by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    It means nothing. Recommended reading here: http://www.1010tires.com/store...

    Personally I think the graph underestimates the difference between all-season and summer tyres. I have driven with summer, all-season and winter tyres, and all-season tyres really are much better than summer tyres. Admittedly they are not a patch on winter tyres - but summer tyres are just useless in snow and ice.

  34. Why Why Why? by westlake · · Score: 1

    "Why would you in a city that gets one snow event every three years? Why would you buy 500 snowplows and salt trucks and have them sit around for 1,000 days, waiting for the next event?"

    You don't.

    You buy them as a state or regional co-operative as an emergency reserve to be drawn upon as needed.

    Lease them out to others when they are not needed at home.

    If it is only a one-in-three year event, you accept the inevitability of snow days and shut-downs, plan and budget for them --- and take the heat for closings under conditions that a northern pre-school would regard as perfectly safe for kids and staff.

    1. Re:Why Why Why? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      "Why would you in a city that gets one snow event every three years? Why would you buy 500 snowplows and salt trucks and have them sit around for 1,000 days, waiting for the next event?"

      You don't.

      You buy them as a state or regional co-operative as an emergency reserve to be drawn upon as needed.

      Lease them out to others when they are not needed at home.

      Hmm, a state or regional coop. And what happenns when the whole region gets the same weather (as happened Tuesday).

      Lease them to others when not needed at home. So, we lease them to more northerly States, then when we need them they need to drive from, say, Ohio to Atlanta starting the morning they are needed? Remember, the Winter Storm Warning went out ~9 hours before things went to crap. If they'd had them, and they were leased out to more northerly States, and they'd all managed to get to Atlanta between 3AM and Noon, they'd have been too late.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  35. Don't mind me... by OakDragon · · Score: 1

    ... I just came here for the global warming trolls.

  36. "..Money would have been lost.." by essbase_nerd · · Score: 1

    Didn't close the city because, "..money would have been lost, people would have complained."

    Aren't people of power in power because they can make decisions that might not be popular the the greater good? Look at the complaints and money lost now.. You're a worldwide laughing stock, and the economic impact is massive. Nice going.

    1. Re:"..Money would have been lost.." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they were in power due to their ability to tell most of the voting public what they wanted to hear?

  37. Not usually salt in ATL, mixture of sand, gravel by mpercy · · Score: 0

    stone dust. Usually pre-spread over bridges, overpasses, where freezing is most likely.

    Atlanta is a very hilly region with many small bridges over creeks. Lots of interstate overpasses create artificial hills. In this case the several days of low temps meant that the road surfaces were already very low, so almost immediately all the bridges and overpassed iced over. Any low-lying area in shade iced over. Pretty much any hill or sloped road section quickly because impossible to drive up, trapping cars at the bottom and closing that artery. Pretty soon every possible way around town became clogged due to jams at the bottom of some hill that was too iced over for minivans and Hyundais to get up. People with 4-wheel drive trucks did OK *if* they could squeeze by the packs of cars (many empty and abandoned in the middle of the road).

  38. I LOLed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fantastic comment. Sorry I have no mod points.

    1. Re:I LOLed by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Just don't mess with Mother Nature. =]

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  39. truest statement ever made by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    "It's an easy joke made by Northerners. A dusting of snow shuts down an entire city and hapless drivers white-knuckle their way through a handful of flurries."
    It was -15 here yesterday with ice everywhere and more snow than them. We don't close a damn thing even when there's a foot of snow. They need to put on their big boy boots and get the fuck over it and learn how to drive.

    1. Re:truest statement ever made by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      It was -15 here yesterday with ice everywhere and more snow than them. We don't close a damn thing even when there's a foot of snow. They need to put on their big boy boots and get the fuck over it and learn how to drive.

      OK, cool. Where do you live? We can just bring up all of Atlanta and stay at your place for a couple years while everyone in Atlanta learns how to drive on snow and ice. It's hard for people to learn how to do that when we only get snow and ice every couple years. It's much easier when you have to deal with it on a daily basis for years.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:truest statement ever made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're cool man, real cool. You think this entire fiasco happened simply because the lack of snow driving skills in the south? How ignorant.

    3. Re:truest statement ever made by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Learning to drive on ice and snow doesn't take a lot of experience. It's really common sense. Don't drive too fast for conditions. What does that mean? Go really slow if you are unsure of the road surface.It's a lot easier to speed up if you're driving too slow than it is to slow down after you're already in a ditch. Leave a lot of space to stop as well. And finally, I'm not suggesting you spend a lot of money preparing your vehicle for rare weather, but at least have tires that aren't bald.

  40. Re:Full retard by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 0

    Yeah, which is sadly meaningess when the snow hits. They're fine for mud, useless in the snow. Proper studded snow tires are the only thing that are going to get you anywhere when the flakes fall.

    --
    The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
  41. Small gambler by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    The ones that are gambling big time are the ones that are trying to hide that there is a climate change, and investing large sums into that. Atlanta problems are nothing compared with what will come next decade. And we will all (ok, at least the 99% of us) lose.

  42. Do it like Athens by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    I usually joke about the Athens (Greece) snow situation, but it works. You see in a city that can get an inch or two of snow for a day every 3-4 years you don't need any planning. You wake up in the morning and you see some snow. Hey, no school! You can switch on the TV/Radio to verify, but when people wake up and it is snowing they stay home, no prior warning required.
    Then, there are a few snow-plows, which are obviously parked outside the city since they are almost never needed in the city. And equally obviously, the one day they are needed there is no way for the drivers to actually go there and fetch them. So, you have to wait for the snow to melt by itself (quickly), and you go to work/school the next day.
    Having lived in NY, I used to make fun of the fact that Athens is paralyzed with half an inch of snow, but after seeing the Atlanta mess, I guess they are doing pretty good!

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Do it like Athens by Megane · · Score: 1

      You wake up in the morning and you see some snow. Hey, no school!

      Great. So what do you do when it starts at noon? That's what happened to Atlanta.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Do it like Athens by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Apparently they dismissed schools more than an hour and a half after the snow started. But the point is they had a severe weather warning. I was saying that in Athens usually you don't even need a warning, but when there is a warning it is even more obvious that schools won't open...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  43. Re:Full retard by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

    It means nothing. Recommended reading here: http://www.1010tires.com/store...

    Yes, all of that is true, but all season tires are passable in the snow. If fact, for Canada, only about 50% of the people put on snow tires in the winter, yet we all get around fine. I have snow tires on my current car, but left all season tires on my previous one, so I've done both. Snow has never stopped me from getting to work.

    --

    "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
  44. Saw many sides of human nature, too by mpercy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Saw many people helping push stuck vehicles at least to get them off the road if nothing else. Saw just as many people screwing over the pushers by driving around the vehicle being pushed and then getting stuck themselves now in front of the original vehicle. So the pushers have to move forward to help this asshole before they can help the original person. And the process repeats!

    After I managed to make it home (2.5 hrs to go 4.6 miles), I went outside and started try to help. I had some bags of sand left in my garden from a previous project and hauled those out to the road by my house as people were spinning their wheels there. I spread the sand over the closest patches of ice where I saw people stuck. Almost everyone rolled down their windows and said thank you, even though it meant they could move only about 20 yards further up the road. But one guy, who had to see me spreading sand in front of and under the 4 or 5 cars in front of him, as soon as I got done with the car in front of him and it pulled forward he immediately pulled forward and nearly clipped me *as* *I* *was* *spreading* *sand* to help him!

    Out of sand, I started helping neighbors and other drivers push some vehicles. One lady was practically crying as she rolled down her window "Thank you thank you thank you". Most people a smart enough to roll down their window and take the advice we're giving them --"Cut you wheels over here toward the curb, there's some traction there." One guy *stayed* *on* *his* *phone* the entire time we were trying to help him and didn't do anything we asked him to do. Idiot.

    1. Re:Saw many sides of human nature, too by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      Helping out and pulling through together is for Hippies and Commies. That was me on the phone, and it was a very important call. I lead the claims department for a major health insurance company. One of my junior managers was about to approve three separate claims for surgeries that I didn't think were necessary given the age, health, and occupation of the covered patients. I saved the company over $100k in that one call. Given that the economic benefits of my actions will eventually trickle down to you, you should be thanking me for letting you direct traffic that night. Oh, and I have an MBA, so I don't think I'm an idiot.

  45. Screw the salt trucks by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

    Just invest in snow plows, they won't complain about sitting unused for four years. Just make sure that the trucks you have can use them. Having one is an insurance.

    Salt spreaders are an expensive luxury in most cases, if your car isn't prepared for ice you shouldn't be driving. Proper winter tires is better than salt.

    And look at the weather report, if the report says 4" of snow and windy, you will sure have 4' of snow in some places and no in other, causing problems.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:Screw the salt trucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an Alaskan currently living in Atlanta, I can tell you that snow plows would have been completely useless this time. The combination of wet snow, humid air, and just-below-freezing temperatures when the snow was falling meant that the snow turned to water and then ice as soon as it hit the road.

      The only thing that could have helped was to have salt down on all the major roads before the snow fell. And to have most people stay at home, rather than trying to go home while the snow was falling.

    2. Re:Screw the salt trucks by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      I can get more traction from snow than I can from the layer of ice left behind after the plow pushes through. So bring SALT, SAND, or stay out of the way.

    3. Re:Screw the salt trucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just invest in snow plows, they won't complain about sitting unused for four years. Just make sure that the trucks you have can use them. Having one is an insurance.

      Salt spreaders are an expensive luxury in most cases, if your car isn't prepared for ice you shouldn't be driving. Proper winter tires is better than salt.

      And look at the weather report, if the report says 4" of snow and windy, you will sure have 4' of snow in some places and no in other, causing problems.

      For 2" of snow, you have that backwards: screw the plows, buy some salt spreaders and fill them with a mix of sand & salt.

  46. Re:Full retard by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    It's not the snow. It's the ice. Canada gets cold and stays cold. These cities sat within a couple of degrees of freezing for hours on end. Pressure melts snow, snow plus water equals slush, slush freezes to solid ice, pressure of tires is enough to melt top layer of ice, and now you're driving on water-covered ice. Short of actual spikes, how are you supposed to get traction on that?

  47. Re: "Everybody ignored the Winter Storm Warning" by sfm · · Score: 0

    In a CYA move, the weather service always gives the worst case scenerio. We have been conditioned to expect weather to not be as bad as stated.

    On the few occasions when it is, you get the "Great Atlanta Snowstorm of 2014"

  48. One more thing making matters worse by mpercy · · Score: 0

    All the surface street traffic lights were still running their normal midday cycles and not the rush-hour cycles that vastly favor moving vehicles in one direction. So every stoplight had 100 vehicles behind it even before the roads became impassible with ice.

  49. Re: Full retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not all of Canadian cities stay cold. Calgary, for instance experiences regular freeze-thaw cycles resulting in a significant amount of ice. They only plow and salt main streets and a significant majority of vehicles are only rolling around on all season tires. Yet seems to get along just fine.

  50. At most. Know what it means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the figures could have been

    5, 12, 19, 24, 30.

    Five times.

    Shortest interval: five years.

  51. Buy snowplows? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    Talk about deflecting blame. What does NYC use? Garbage scows. So metro Atlanta couldn't manage to outfit some of their trucks to take a plow and handle the main roads/hiways? Sounds more like sticking your head in the ..snow?

    1. Re:Buy snowplows? by Megane · · Score: 1

      How do you plow ice? Also, how do you either plow before snow falls, or how do you plow when the roads get blocked with stranded semis that can't even get up a slight slope on the ice that formed in 30 minutes? This was a salt-and-gravel problem.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Buy snowplows? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      Ice can be controlled by dumping salt (if available), sand or dirt - or a mixture of any of them. In fact, in more northern areas dirt is frequently used as most available followed by sand.

      Again, Atlanta is completely lame. They have trucks and can mostly certainly afford plow attachments for a relatively small percentage of them. Likewise hoppers for material to put on ice. They don't need to do every road, just the hiways and primaries.

    3. Re:Buy snowplows? by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      The primaries I was on were perfectly driveable without any issues. The issue was that the primaries were backed up because hills on the side roads iced to the point where cars were sliding back down them if they didn't have steady momentum all the way up them. People did figure this out, but it took volunteers coordinating people to keep traffic moving at a slow but steady pace over these trouble spots.

      Under saturation conditions (i.e.nearly every possible square foot of road occupied by a car), the flow of traffic is reduced to the rate of flow at the outer bottleneck points, which was less than 3 miles per hour. The issue was the capillaries not the arteries.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  52. Not really any different by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    You think that never happens up north? That's par for the course much of the time. Folks down south (and yes I've lived there) have this notion that temperatures in the northern states go down to somewhere around the freezing point of nitrogen and stay there until April. Doesn't really work like that. The difference is that we have appropriate and adequate snow removal equipment and we are accustomed to dealing with snow and ice. I grew up in the heaviest part of the snow belt along Lake Erie and I didn't have a single snow day in four years of high school despite annual snowfall of between 60-80 inches per year. When I lived down south the only snow removal tool they had was a calendar.

    1. Re:Not really any different by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I lived 15 years in Chicago and never once saw the issues that we see every year in the south as far as ice and snow. When I lived in Chicago, it would snow, and that wasn't a big deal. Down here, it will be above freezing aloft but below freezing on the ground, so rain will fall down and immediately freeze on everything. Eventually the temperature aloft cools down and we will start to get first sleet and then finally snow. But by that time you have already half an inch of ice on the ground. I NEVER saw that in all of my time living in Chicago, nor when I lived in New Jersey.
      I think it was 1989 or 1990 where we received 2 inches of ice in Oklahoma, and then snow on top of that. It was so thick, you could literally ice skate on your back yard.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:Not really any different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the northern states go down to somewhere around the freezing point of nitrogen and stay there until April.

      Just got back from Chicago. Can confirm it was around the freezing point of nitrogen.

  53. how many trucks to buy? that's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How much did the city spend or lose during this man made disaster? That is how much you spend and if not enough then determine the worst roads or most important and be sure to assign those few trucks to clear those roads first.

    idiots

  54. Re:Full retard by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    A good set of tires can make a difference but that's not enough you also need to know how to drive in the conditions. A quick set of rules that help me.

    Maintain your speed. {Slow down but not a crawl. You need momentum go through drifting snow}
    Give yourself room to stop.
    At Stops lights or stop signs, stop back from the drifts that accumulate on the corners. {if you roll up and stop in a drift you are probably stuck even in a 4x4}
    try to limit acceleration or braking on bridges. {they are notorious for cross winds and ice}

  55. Pathetic and Laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Atlanta's excuses are pathetic and laughable. The governor shows some really weak logical abilities. Limit traffic into the city and lose money...yeah, some will complain OR Let people become stranded on the roadways and all traffic into the city get blocked...many more will get much more angry. I know which path I would take.

    I grew up in suburbs of Jackson, MS. Ever since the big Ice Storms of the early 1990s, Jackson and all surrounding municipalities salt the high-volume roads whenever snow or an ice storm is predicted...even if it's predicted to be a light snow or ice storm...even if it's supposed to barely miss the Jackson area. If Jackson, MS can keep equipment and supplies around to do this, Atlanta can too.

    Also consider the recent severity of storms further north and the recent polar vortex. Atlanta's leadership is simply incompetent.

  56. There's a song about it by jennatalia · · Score: 0

    The Snow Devil went down to Georgia...

  57. Lots of nonsense by onyxruby · · Score: 3, Informative

    I read story after story about how most people don't have 4 wheel drive, snow tires and they don't have salt for the roads. Most people from the north don't have 4 wheel drive and they don't have snow tires (all season are most common). The amounts of snow that shut down the south doesn't even justify putting salt down up north, it simply snows small amounts like that too often to justify it.

    Really, you don't need a 4x4 SUV with snow tires just to tackled a couple inches of snow. In fact a vehicle like that is more likely to lose control and roll over in the ditch. A regular 2wd car with all season tires is perfectly fine for typical winter driving in the north. If you can afford snow tires those are preferred, but hardly required. Applying more gas if your stuck will never get you out, it will just make you more stuck. Slowly rock your car out sideways and back and forth and you can free yourself most of the time.

    What you do need to do is remember to slow the hell down. You need a lot more stopping distance than normal. You also need a lot longer to start and if you pull into traffic like normal your going to get T-boned. When you do slow down do so before the curve and don't slam on your brakes. Most people lose control and spin out when they are braking. Try braking when you are in an isolated area to know how long it will take your car - not you - to respond.

    There is no excuse for that kind of thing other than people being reckless. If the conditions aren't familiar to you, than slow the hell down until you become familiar, it's that simple.

    1. Re:Lots of nonsense by BradleyAndersen · · Score: 1

      Agree with you - and one thing that helps to slow down is to stay in a low gear. You can handle snow and ice on bald tires even, as long as you stay in a low gear.

    2. Re:Lots of nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that sounds good, but you seem to be talking about driving on snow.
      Re-read the previous posts, and explain to us how we can drive up hills covered in glare ice.

    3. Re:Lots of nonsense by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1

      Two things often cause loss of control on slippery roads - brakes and improper gear ratio in the transmission. Using low gear on your transmission (not "D" position) to maintain slow speed or to slow down instead of using brakes gives you better control of a 2WD vehicle on slippery roads. The lower gear ratio combined with higher engine RPM keeps your tires from spinning because the RPM is easier to maintain in higher ranges. Especially on any hill. Downshifting works much better to slow the vehicle down than brakes. I learned this from years of driving standard transmission in snowy weather, you can do this with automatic transmissions. Some vehicles with automatic transmission have an engine that idles too high and you have to use the brakes to prevent the car from going too fast. Nine times out of ten, brakes will cause you to lose control of the vehicle. Using low gear and downshifting is a much better option.

      New cars have to be lightweight to meet federal fuel efficiency standards and that is a catch-22 on slippery roads. Extra weight over the axles - a couple of cinderblocks is often enough - will increase the traction of your tires. It even works in my compact Saturn.

      But ice is very dangerous. Even as a hardened winter driver from the northeast, I will not drive on ice. Most states no longer allow snow tires with spikes, which was the only tool that worked on ice.

      --
      Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    4. Re:Lots of nonsense by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      I'm not oblivious to how things are in the south in the winter, I've spent a year in Texas and traveled the south extensively. It's quite possible to drive on ice and do so safely, you only need to google pictures of ice fishing to find all kinds of vehicles that are driven onto frozen lakes. The third responder to my post gave a fairly decent description that would work quite nicely for streets that are covered in ice.

      The bottom line is to make your tires /barely/ move and ensure that they aren't spinning. This requires feathering the gas very gently, and as long as you do so you can climb hills covered in ice. Start your entry to the hill with momentum from before the hill and once your momentum starts to slip let off the gas keeping just enough to barely move. Once you are moving you can slowly add more speed, however as soon as your tires start to slip you have to let off the gas.

    5. Re:Lots of nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "4x4 SUV ... In fact a vehicle like that is more likely to lose control and roll over in the ditch. "

      Your comment is mostly right-on, but I think you are dealing with old information on this factoid. (I also thought this, until a recent review of IIHS.org)

      Since about 2006, SUV's come with stability control, they have become the safest vehicles on the highway.

    6. Re:Lots of nonsense by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Most states no longer allow snow tires with spikes, which was the only tool that worked on ice.

      These tires also leave nice ruts in the road where the vehicle tires wear down the pavement. The work fantastic on ice though.

    7. Re:Lots of nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a house in Midtown Atlanta, and one in the far northern suburbs that is Alpharetta. The entire metro area was a sheet of ice. It took me 4 hours to drive from Downtown to Midtown. Usually 20 mintues. I am really sick of all these "northerners" scoffing at us playing armchair quarterback. I defy you to even on the best day of the year keep your cool in our "normal" rush hour. Or in rush hour with biblical thunderstorms, which we got a lot of and I would say are quite good at driving in them.

      Any idiot can drive in a foot of pure snow and slush like a cool truck commercial. But has been said repeatedly, Atlanta does not get snow, we get ice and sleet. I don't care how skilled you are, you cannot drive, much less with hundreds of thousands of others trying as well, on interstates with inclines and declines and overpasses that is an inch of solid ice. No asphalt to be seen. So please all your "northerners", take you precious rules on how to drive in the snow and shove them up your ass. Thank you.

    8. Re:Lots of nonsense by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find a hell of a time finding idiots that can drive in a foot, much less half a foot of snow. We get ice and sleet up here as well, or even the fun combination of freezing rain covered by a sheet of snow that hides the ice from visibility.

      If you live outside of a main corridor you probably won't get your road salted before a storm. Even in major cities you probably wont see a plow for a few days after a storm and the streets are left covered in snow and ice for months at a time with no pavement visible. If you live in the country you might not see a plow for several days or a week after a storm. Anything less than 4 inches in many places isn't considered enough to bother sending out the plows at all.

      You can drive up and down hills covered in ice, and we routinely do so. You sound like a whiny pretentious child. However in my years of travel I have spent quite a bit of time with southerners that are not whiny pretentious children and who routinely asked me for advice for how to drive in winter weather conditions. The advice wasn't for you, it was for those with a desire not to crash their car or get stranded the next time this happens. I know your conditions quite well. I have experienced winter weather in the south everywhere from Texas to Georgia. I have even driven in Atlanta during rush hour.

  58. Prepare by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I've been told that there are eight salt-spreading trucks in Georgia. Eight, for the entire state. How the fuck were they supposed to prepare? Purchase more snow management equipment on short notice? Maintain a large fleet of trucks for the rare occasions that stuff like this happens?

    I should think the answer to that is rather obvious. Buy more trucks ahead of time. You cannot use equipment you do not have. But instead they did an expected return analysis and came up snake eyes. You tell me which is cheaper, shutting an entire major city down for a day or investing in a bit of infrastructure to deal with a rare but serious weather conditions. Nobody expects them to have the same snow removal equipment as say Cleveland or Buffalo but they under-invested even for Atlanta and what happened is perfectly predictable. It's a bit like how they built much of New Orleans below sea level when the inevitable flooding occurs they claim they never could have predicted this.

    When I was driving in to work yesterday, the roads were nearly deserted. The few cars that were on the road were flying all over the place. While it's possible to drive [relatively] safely in such conditions, it's a skill that I don't expect Georgians to have. This just doesn't happen that often down here.

    That is an important part of the problem. I lived down south for a while and quite frankly the people down there are generally very very bad at driving in sloppy conditions. They either panic and creep along very slowly to the point where they impede traffic or they try to drive like it is dry pavement and get in trouble.

    The roads were entirely covered in a solid sheet of ice. Ice, with no road salt, no gravel, no sand. If you live in an area that regularly receives some snowfall, you've never driven on anything quite like this, because you've got snow crews prepping roads before the snowfall, plowing for the duration of the snowfall, and then conditioning the road surfaces after the snowfall.

    Not true at all because lots of roads simply don't receive immediate attention, particularly in rural areas. I live in the outskirts of a major city and after a recent snowfall we had people at my office that didn't get their road plowed for 2-3 days in an area that by and large has adequate snow removal equipment. I drive regularly on roads that might not see a plow for 3-5 days after a snow fall and certainly do not get prepped in advance.

    1. Re:Prepare by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Not true at all because lots of roads simply don't receive immediate attention, particularly in rural areas. I live in the outskirts of a major city and after a recent snowfall we had people at my office that didn't get their road plowed for 2-3 days in an area that by and large has adequate snow removal equipment. I drive regularly on roads that might not see a plow for 3-5 days after a snow fall and certainly do not get prepped in advance.

      Sure, and when I lived in Maine, in a town of about 1500 people, we had to plow the roads ourselves. Seriously. And I still haven't seen conditions as bad as what happened down in Georgia this week. Driving on snow isn't nearly as bad as driving on a sheet of ice.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  59. Funny... I actually live near Woodstock and... by Assmasher · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...I remember both the county (Cherokee) and the City of Atlanta talking about this 3 years ago when another light snow storm shut everything down. There were lots of words and phrases like "we'll be prepared next time" and "this won't happen again", followed by a few weeks of local news articles about how millions of dollars had been spent on new road treatment equipment and trucks and how materials had been stockpiled so that they'd be "ready" the next time.

    I left my office at 5:15PM, luckily in a 4WD jeep, and got home (12 miles away) at 8:40 - and I gave quite a few people rides to various destinations who had already abandoned their cars (this one kid had walked from Southern Polytechnic to almost Wade Green [this is a long ways] without gloves and a light coat.) Mostly I ferried parents who had to walk to the local middle school/high school to pick up their kids when the schools shut down the buses (which was smart.) I went back out and got onto the local parking lot usually known and highway 92 to pick up some neighbors who were trying to walk home and eventually got back around 1:45AM - the roads at this time still PACKED with cars.

    It wasn't until 1:15PM when I was almost home with my last pickup that I FINALLY saw a snow plow truck driving around (like an a**hole by the way) and his plow was up and he wasn't dropping any sand or salt.

    It was the traffic nightmare from hell - and not only did the local governments utterly fail to plan for this event that everyone was aware of for days, they didn't react worth a sh** either.

    The good news from all of this is that I saw an amazing number of good Samaritans helping out anybody they possibly could. There were people on quads ferrying people around and having a good time doing it. There were clumps of people all walking from their abandoned cars laughing and making the best of it. On most of the side roads, people were coming out of their houses in neighborhoods to help people navigate the zombieland-like fields of abandoned cars. My favorite was this old couple on Hwy 92 that were simply walking through the traffic handing out bottles of water to people stuck there. They were walking hand in hand lugging the water behind them (it was very sweet.) I saw lots of frustration, but surprisingly no hostility towards other people.

    --
    Loading...
  60. THINK Dammit by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    OK, so you have made the choice not to put in the salt storage and buy the plows. Fine.

    BUT when you make that choice you have to keep the consequences of that choice in mind when you make the choice of whether or not the city stays open when there is a threat of a storm.

    EPIC FAIL.

  61. Re:Wunderground has timeline, makes governor look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting as if you went to bed planning with the Monday P.M. forecast, you saw the NWS downgrade from watch to an advisory. On Monday morning it was a "light dusting". Tuesday morning it was 1" of snow. Actually number was 2.5" It's also interesting that that post doesn't have forecast past the Tuesday 3:38 a.m. forecast that supports their case. I wonder if there were later forecasts, or was it too late by then? You may want to read the forecaster discussions associated with those forecasts and you can see the forecast change from South of Metro Atlanta to Metro Atlanta back to South to Metro Atlanta.

    If you you think the NWS and NHC nails it, maybe you can ask them about Charlie or Wilma or just the 2005 Tropical season.

    Here are some real facts to consider:
    People chose to be out. If you were on the road you were responsible, too. The mitigating factor was school's being let out early and parents having to leave.

    Business and Government simultaneously decided to send everyone home. There was no coordination and there should have been.

    The timing changed so the plans to salt and treat the roads was toast as the roads were full of cars. Can't treat what you can't reach. If you aren't aware of Atlanta traffic, normal rush hour is from 4PM to 9PM and that's with 8 lanes one way.

    Some places "up north", e.g., Chicago are fucking flat. Atlanta is not. You can't go 1/4 mile without a significant incline. In addition, overpasses are public art in Atlanta https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....

    So the alternative is to shut down I75 somewhere south of Macon or just go to Valdosta, close down the perimeter and I85 to prepare for this?

  62. You can't plow a road that is covered with semis by mpercy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Any snowplow that might have been sent out would have quickly become mired in the traffic jam that coincided with the first few flakes.

    By the time there was anything to plow, the main roads were already deadlocked because the surface streets (which would have been plowed last anyway) were jammed due to traffic lights timed for mid-day rather than rush-hour operations and many many many iced-over low-lying areas that created car traps. Bridges over every minor creek sit at the bottom a tiny valley (it's up hill both ways!). These iced over almost immediately making it very difficult if not impossible to get through.

    Many people abandoned their cars in the middle of the road. By morning the next day, there were still miles of interstate with bumper-to-bumper semi trailers interspersed with a few cars.

    1000 plows would have done nothing. It was over (traffic wise) almost as soon as the first flakes of snow hit the ground. The hilly terrain combined with the below average temps for several days meant that roads, especially the various "feeder" surface roads, iced over almost immediately at least in the low-lying areas. Once a few cars failed to make it up some iced-over hill, that road was jammed. It took about 1 hour from the first few flakes before the traffic jam on surface streets backed up onto the interstates.

    Realizing that the bridges would be a chokepoint, I managed to get home by plotting the flattest route with fewest bridges I could think of using interconnecting neighborhood streets. Once I got off the feeder roads and the main arteries, I was only facing snow and ice and not 100's of jammed-up cars. Still, it took me 2.5 hours to drive less than 5 miles. I still ended up reversing a hundred yards or so when I came out of one neighborhood and could not cross the feeder road due to traffic. Was able to get to a different outlet and get across. I also parked once (in a church parking lot) and scouted ahead on foot.

    Fortunately, I was dressed appropriately, able and fully prepared to walk home should I have come to some point were I was stuck. I also had a fully-charged non-cellphone GPS that has pedestrian mode. Just in case.

    Not like people I saw walking later. One woman was still trying to walk in stiletto heels. Men in dress shoes could barely stand upright. One woman had shopping bags over her shoes to protect them I guess, but this of course made everything very slippery (seriously plastic bag on snow?).

  63. Re: "Everybody ignored the Winter Storm Warning" by lophophore · · Score: 2

    actually, no.

    when the NWS issues a "watch", that means something could happen. when they issue "warning", they mean business.

    case in point: we get a lot of "tornado watch" alerts around here. That means pay attention, somthing might happen. when we get a "tornado warning" than means it's time to go into your hidey hole.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  64. Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First World Problems... down here in my tropical land the weather is beautiful, thank you very much!

  65. Re:Full retard by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the advice on skidding is only half-right. The basic physics here are that the rear of the car is moving forward faster than the front of the car, and picked a direction (left or right) to move to get around the front of the car which is blocking its way.

    So:
    1. Steering into the skid is always correct (provided you can safely move that direction), because it puts the front of the car in front of where the back is trying to go, which slows down the back.
    2. Never hit the brakes in a skid if you can at all help it. (I've had to once because I went round a curve and discovered that the highway had gone from moving about 75km/h to stopped with no time to slow down, luckily I didn't hit anybody when I ended up in the next lane over)
    3. In a RWD car, decelerating will help, because it will slow down the rear of the car, allowing the front to move forward faster relative to the back (think of the effect of attaching a string with a weight to the back of a toy car).
    4. In a FWD car, accelerating slightly will help, because it will pull the front forward faster. Again, if you want the model car version of this, it's like pulling on the front end of the car with a string. Skids are also a lot less likely because the FWD is pulling the front forward rather than pushing the back forward. Of course, decelerate again as soon as you're on more solid surface.
    5. In a 4WD car, my understanding is that skids are both unusual and pretty easy to correct, but I think there are techniques involving switching into FWD mode or only braking the back wheels.

    But you'd be very surprised how many people live in snowy parts of the country and also don't know anything about handling skids. They're usually pretty easy to spot, since they're driving about 15 km/h when road conditions warrant closer to 50 km/h. My general view on driving in winter conditions is that the flakes I'm worried about aren't the ones falling from the sky, but the ones behind the wheels of other vehicles!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  66. Be prepared - no excuse not to be for a major city by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Yes, I still feel that purchasing this type of equipment is a waste of taxpayer money to prepare for an event that happens maybe for one day every 5 years at the most.

    So shutting a major city down for several days and calling in the national guard isn't a waste of money? You think there are no dual purpose vehicles (earthmovers, pickup trucks, etc) that could be used? Salt isn't hugely expensive to stockpile and it's a rock so it's not going to disappear as long as you keep it dry. Have city vehicles equipped with plow mounts and keep the plows and salt spreaders in a storage lot somewhere.

    It was more of a problem with ice than snow. The roads had started to form a pretty thick layer of ice on Monday morning (I know because I had to drive through it).

    This is always the problem in more southern climes, the snow comes down and then becomes ice. So, duh, invest in salting equipment and contingency plows and be prepared for the occasional ice storm. It WILL happen and southern cities NEVER prepare for it.

  67. Disaster planning by sjbe · · Score: 1

    If you have snow rarely in an area, there's no justification for heavy snow removal equipment rather just some common sense.

    That's not true for a major metropolitan area. They have to be prepared for situations like this which are occasional but severe. They have to stockpile equipment that they won't need very often and have contingency plans in place. They also need to exercise appropriate caution when they know a weather event is coming (and they were warned by the weather service) and yet they fail to act upon that information in a timely manner. Some people died needlessly because they waited to long to tell everyone to stay home.

    1. Re:Disaster planning by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      And people die from falling down. Sometimes you have to take personal responsibility and your own safety into account. If people are foolish enough to believe that they'll be safe when a bad weather system bears down on them, then it's their own fault if they don't get out of the way. Sure, there are situations where advanced warning isn't always feasable but still, it's not like there are weather reports and warnings that could have been heeded here.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  68. Re:Full retard by tibit · · Score: 1

    Never mind that if it's cold, a layer of packed snow on a road quickly turns into a layer of ice. It's for the same reason that we have glaciers made of ice when it's only snow on top. Tire loads slowly change the structure of the snow, eventually making it mechanically similar to a polished layer of chrome (hard stuff) on plastic.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  69. Also, when I left conditions were not obvious yet by mpercy · · Score: 1

    I left within about 1/2 hour after the snow noticeably started falling. On a normal snow day, I plan to leave around 3PM because the icing doesn't start normally start until it gets dark and temps drop. I left at 12:45PM. I normally do not have to drive on the interstate and take about 4 miles on fairly leisurely 4-lane feeder roads (45MPH limit), then about 1.5 miles on 2-lane surface streets (35MPH limit) to get home.

    The first mile I drove was easy and took about 5 minutes. When I hit the second stoplight I realized the timing was still set for mid-day traffic and not rush hour. But the road I was on was still flat and not iced over yet. Exhaust heat from cars idling at the stop lights and enough traffic was moving to keep things from freezing at first. But that didn't last long. After 40 minutes or so to go the next mile, still mostly due to traffic lights, I made it close enough to my normal exit to see that no cars were able to turn onto it any more. Several cycles of lights turned and only 1 or two cars had made the turn.

    I realized then that the bridge at the bottom of the hill was probably iced over and preventing any one from getting through. I was able to u-turn and go back a 1/2 mile or so and use a alternate route. That was better for awhile, then I hit that route's bridge over the same creek and it was impossible. I reversed course and went through several interconnected neighborhoods (15MPH limits). Was able to cross the creek on one of their roads using momentum and good tires in low gear, after avoiding two other areas I didn't think I could make it through. I eventually came out on my normal road about 1/2 mile from my house and since the jam was behind me at the bridge I was able to get home easily from there.

    The road running past my house has quite a bit of normal traffic as a secondary feeder road. We could tell from time to time when the bridge backed up because no traffic was there. After hours of having cars stuck outside my house, we started getting people ringing our bell begging to use the bathroom. Then I looked out and there were no cars. I walked down toward the bridge and a UPS truck was sideways--made it partway up the hill and slid back down sideways and was blocking traffic in both directions.

    I still have cars abandoned in the street outside my house.

  70. Re:Full retard by rotaryexpress · · Score: 2

    That's true, but there's something else at play here.

    Many people in the Atlanta area get 3-season tires (aka Summer tires, not to be confused with Ultra High Performance Summer tires) because they tend to be FAR better in the rain than all-seasons.

    See:http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/how-to/products/know-your-tires-all-season-vs-summer-9647443
    http://www.tirereview.com/arti...
    http://www.edmunds.com/car-rev...

    So, here's the decision: Buy all-seasons to be safe for the 3 days every 3 years you need them, or buy summer tires to be safe for the 345 days every 3 years you need them. (Source: http://www.sercc.com/climatein...)

  71. Most of the equipment in ATL was moved south by mpercy · · Score: 1

    Toward Macon and the areas NWS predicted would be hardest hit. ATL was not supposed to get much of anything, just the southern edges. Northern suburbs not supposed to get anything at all. By the time NWS changed their official reports (about 3AM) equipment was in the wrong place.

    Plus, see my other posting about how plows would not have helped!

    1. Re:Most of the equipment in ATL was moved south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, I suspect the 500 snow plows is just a rhetorical example, and not a serious number.

      At least, I don't think he was especially trying to be accurate with that figure or representation.

      Unlike say, the recent political speech where a certain politician claimed something happened, but the facts didn't support it.

  72. atlanta raised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well since im from atlanta I guess I can say that honestly no one cares about the snow its is the black ice that doesnt end giving you a ice dragstrip. In the past 15 years i have seen 2-3 inches a handful of times and it usually stays in the yard for a few days and on the street till the afternoon the day after. Why in the world would i invest in snow tires when a week ago I was in shorts. I would use those snow tires once a year and im not putting them on and taking them back off next day. I sure as hell don't want the govt. wasting any money on snow plows just because people didnt keep their ass at home.

  73. Re: Full retard by Minwee · · Score: 1

    Calgary, for instance experiences regular freeze-thaw cycles resulting in a significant amount of ice. They only plow and salt main streets.

    Actually, Calgary plows residential streets too, but they are a lower priority.

    And it's rarely salt, it's gravel and sand whenever the temperature drops below -5. Depending on how concentrated it is even salt water will freeze somewhere between 0 and -20 degrees. Dumping salt on the roads in those conditions just makes a bigger mess with no benefit.

    It would be nice if people who dump entire bags of road salt on their sidewalks in the middle of winter would learn to apply this basic chemistry first.

  74. Bull-fucking-shit by gman003 · · Score: 1

    The forecast for Atlanta was "it'll miss us to the south"? That's a load of crap - I live in Richmond, a couple hundred miles to the north, and our forecast was "we'll get hit, with the storm moving in from the south or southwest". That was the consensus not only of the actual NWS, but of all the media forecasters. There's no way that storm could have hit Richmond and failed to hit Atlanta.

    Also, Richmond managed to deal with our inch or two reasonably. Before the snow even started sticking to the ground (which happened around 4PM), they'd put schools on a two-hour delay for the morrow, and many people had headed home from work early. I left work at normal hours, and the drive home was actually easier than normal rush-hour traffic, save that all the good parking spots were taken when I got there. The only reason I worked from home the day after the storm is because I'd stayed up too late playing Guacamelee and wanted to sleep in a bit.

    I won't fault Atlanta for not having the equipment to deal with the snow once it was there, because they don't need it, but they definitely are hiding behind a bullshit excuse to cover their incompetence.

  75. As someone who spent 12 hours getting home in ATL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some major things being missed:

    1. The city of Atlanta streets were already getting better by late afternoon on Tuesday. The city of Atlanta was out salting & sanding a lot. On Wed morning when we finally made our last & successful trip to home (about 20miles away) the city of Atlanta roads were mostly good.

    2. The interstates were a complete mess. No traffic was moving. The two times we were forced on the Interstate (I285S on the west side & I20W on the west side) the interstates were ice rinks. Nothing at all had been done. This was a failure of the state, not the city.

    3. The problem were the tractor trailers. While many were stuck on the right lanes more than a few decided that where their buddy's could not pass they would pass on the left and get through. Then failed to make it. On a 3 miles stretch we were stuck NINE TIMES because of a wall of 18 wheelers. Only in ONE case was it a jack knife. All the rest were just blocking the way. We went on shoulders and even on the grass to get around them.

    4. Trucking companies sending drivers through the city, and 18 wheeler drivers in the left lane should be ticketed & fined heavily. Having spoken to co-workers all of them saw the same thing repeated over and over.

    While yes there were a lot of dumb rednecks with 4x4s confused why four wheels spinning on ice got them nowhere the biggest problem on the interstates was the truck drivers.

    Just my on the scene perspective. We tried to leave Tuesday, gave up after four hours, went back to our office and slept there. Then Wed morning we went out again and a 20 minute drive took us more than 3 hours.

  76. You weren't there. I was. by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why? 2-3 inches here and the only things we do different are leave earlier and drive slower. No chains. No pre-salting the roads. Just slow the fuck down until the roads get plowed or melt.

    The problem was twofold: every single business and government agency let their people go home at the exact same time (roughly 12:30-1:00 PM). Even in good weather, this would have caused an hours long snarl in the city, but when you have masses of people struck with the sudden realization that if they don't leave now they may not be able to get up/down their driveways, then yeah, you get a complete traffic clusterf--k.

    The second problem was that we weren't dealing with whatever dainty light fairy powder you Northerners deal with in which you think a snowplow would help. We were dealing with sleet and slush. "Wintry mix," you hear it called on weather stations. By the time sundown hit, most of the roads were covered in a solid, eighth-inch think sheet of ice except for those parts kept warm and shielded by the constant gridlock over them.

    I know, because I was in it for 13 1/2 hours to only go 8.5 miles. There was no "drive slower" option for any of us on my route home, and I never passed a single accident on the way. We moved a car length every 2-3 minutes, and having to restart going uphill after dark meant that some people we sliding, because you need freaking *momentum* to drive uphill on ice. People were running out of gas and having to abandon cars. A lot of people were camping out in cars in parking lots or sheltering at stores that stayed open, like Home Depot.

    I have a roommate who had to walk home the next day, and his time revealed that I could have walked home, walked back to work, and walked home again with a half hour break in between each leg and still beaten myself home.

    So don't freaking patronize us. There's stuff that could have been done better in terms of planning by the city and in terms of more people keeping an eye on the weather (the midday snow took everyone at our office by surprise), but it wasn't a matter of just driving better. There was literally *nothing* many of us could have done from that angle. 99% of the people I saw drove sensibly. (Well, more like self-entitled jackasses who wouldn't spit on a man if he was on fire because it might make them thirsty, the way they refused let people over or tried to skip ahead using the middle lanes, but generally safely.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  77. Snow in Atlanta isn't the same as in the North by benro03 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I was in Marietta (west side) at a dental appointment when it started to hit at about 11:00. Just flurries at first, but by 11:30 when I left it was starting to come down so I headed for home in Tucker on the east side. By 12, I made the decision to jettison my other errands and make a quick stop at the post office at Northlake then go across the street to pick up my contacts at my eye doctors. Just after I left there at 12:30 I got an email from my son's teacher letting us know that school was closing early.

    By then, it was really coming down, but the major danger at that time were the people slowing down "just because". Traffic started to snarl as I picked my son up at his school and headed straight home. I began reading the horror stories of people stranded in cars on the freeway, kids trapped at schools because the parents didn't get the message until too late, school buses diverting from their normal routes and heading to the nearest school to pick up kids and get them home ASAP. Home Depot stores all over Atlanta opened their doors to people stranded and gave them a warm place to sleep.

    Yes, the city and state government should have cancelled school and closed everything down to emergency services. They didn't and the Atlanta mayor and Governor Deal will pay politically for that. They had warning enough from the local meteorologists that have decades of experience in forecasting winter weather in Atlanta and they chose to ignore it (and later lie about knowing). Parents could have made the decision to keep kids at home.

    Coulda, woulda, shoulda.

    And now I see "experts" from all over pontificating about how "we should buy more plows and salt trucks", "how stupid Southerners are because we don't know how to drive in the snow", or other inflammatory rhetoric. Here are a few thoughts for those people to chew on.

    "Why weren't you prepared?" - Preparing for a once every 5 year event is not possible. If the mayor of Atlanta (who isn't blameless in this) prepared for Boston levels of snow, he/she would be out of a job *quick*. It's like New York City preparing for a hurricane. (*BURN*)

    "It's only 2-4 inches! I drive in that all the time!" - No you don't. You drive on roads that are prepared CONSTANTLY with salt and gravel, using 4 wheel drive, snow tires or chains. Snow in Atlanta almost immediately melts when it hits the pavement and then turns to ice from the air temperature. ICE people. It's not snow it's ICE.

    "Southerners can't drive on snow!" - Actually, we don't have experience driving on snow and that would hold true if it were only southerners driving here. According to the US Census, Atlanta is the 8th most popular city for to migrate to. In 2010 to 2011, 82 people a day moved to Atlanta, foreign and domestic. I meet far more people from the northern states than I meet other southerners that moved here. I'd guestimate about a third of the people driving yesterday were born somewhere that uses snowplows on a regular basis.

    "You stupid f*ing rednecks!" - Excuse me? Are you talking about the city where anesthesia first came into use (Dr. Crawford Long)? Where the largest beverage company in the world is located (Coke)? Where some of the most technologically advanced aircraft in the world are designed and built (Lockheed)? Where the Center for Disease Control is located? Georgia Tech? Emory University? Morris Brown College? The Carter Center? If that's stupid, I'd love to see what you have to offer.

    --
    I am Homer of Borg, resistance is - Ooo Donuts!
    1. Re:Snow in Atlanta isn't the same as in the North by vantagec · · Score: 1

      "It's only 2-4 inches! I drive in that all the time!" - No you don't. You drive on roads that are prepared CONSTANTLY with salt and gravel, using 4 wheel drive, snow tires or chains. Snow in Atlanta almost immediately melts when it hits the pavement and then turns to ice from the air temperature. ICE people. It's not snow it's ICE.

      Yes, we do. Those same air temperatures and conditions occur where I live (Colorado). We call the worst of it - when exhaust and road dirt is mixed in - Black Ice and it is especially dangerous because it can look just like asphalt.

      Nobody around here uses chains except semis-crossing mountain passes, or in the most extreme blizzards (like the century storm we had in 2003). We use front-wheel drive and all season tires, and complain about the idiots who immigrate here from California and think 4-wheel drive makes them immune to the laws of physics.

      "Southerners can't drive on snow!" - Actually, we don't have experience driving on snow and that would hold true if it were only southerners driving here.

      So by your logic, at least two thirds of the people on the roads don't know how to drive in snow. Clearly you don't get the recurrent practice in it that we do around here, but since it does snow there at least a little each year, you should still be prepared for it. The aforementioned front-wheel drive and all weather tires are a good place to start, plus maybe a survival kit, a decent jacket, and sensible shoes. Weather warnings exist for a reason.

      So in short, while I empathize with the people who had harrowing experiences, I don't have a lot of sympathy for people who were apparently so drastically unprepared. And I scorn the elected officials who failed your city (cue "Arrow") in the interest of saving money.

      --
      Myths are things that never were, but always are.
  78. Politics, Snow, Hills and Incompetence by Gim+Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am a rare breed. I was born in Atlanta and lived here much of my life. However, I did live up in the snow belt for several years, and I can assure you that, while I wouldn't think twice about driving in snow in Ohio, I try to avoid it if at all possible here. It IS different. One thing that Atlanta has that most northern snow belt areas lack is an abundance of hills. These do make a difference. Atlanta has always had problems with winter weather, but the other thing about Atlanta and this area in general is that the weather changes very quickly. It was 11 degrees here this morning and this afternoon it may be in the mid 40's. By Sunday the mid 60's are forecast. The cost of providing for extensive snow or ice removal is just not worth it.

    Those not familiar with the region don't understand that Atlanta is in Georgia and those might as well be two different countries. After a 2011 snow event the CITY of Atlanta did invest in snow removal equipment and did have a better plan to deal with it this time. From what I have seen and heard the CITY really did handle it better than it has ever been handled in the past. That said, most of the traffic problems and grid lock seen around the world was NOT on Atlanta city streets, but on Interstate highways and State roads. These thread all though Atlanta and they are maintained EXCLUSIVELY by the State. This is where the politics and incompetence comes in.

    State government here has been on a mission to downsize itself and transform itself into a jobs program for friends of well connected state politicians since about the year 2000 or earlier. The state highway department which is the organization that is responsible for all of the STATE roads, whether in Atlanta or not, has shrunk from over 7,000 employees to just over 4,000 just in the last few years. Many of the departures were by experienced people who left for the private sector or to county and municipal employers who now provide better compensation and benefits than does the State of Georgia. The head of the State Highway department, has traditionally been an engineer with experience. The current head is a political appointee who has no engineering degree and no experience in this area at all. This is just one example, but throughout the state, for well over a decade, there has been an erosion of competence in providing the services that the state is responsible for providing. This is not due to the remaining employees, who do the actual work, but due to poor planing, incompetent management and complete lack of understanding by the elected officials of what is required to run the largest state East of the Mississippi river.

    1. Re:Politics, Snow, Hills and Incompetence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Largest state East of the Mississippi river"

      Huh?

      NY is larger in area and population. Maybe you mean East of Miss, and South of DC? But, then wouldn't Florida be it?

      What are you trying to say?

    2. Re:Politics, Snow, Hills and Incompetence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Largest state East of the Mississippi river"

      Huh?

      NY is larger in area and population. Maybe you mean East of Miss, and South of DC? But, then wouldn't Florida be it?

      What are you trying to say?

      Good point - Largest in what?
      Largest in land area, it's Georgia. Counting water, it's Michigan or Florida depending on what East of Mississippi means.
      Population it's New York by census in 2012, but now it's probably Florida and especially if there was some way to count all the "undocumented workers".
      Perhaps by "largest" they meant average waist size.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L... - the columns are click-sortable.
      The columns are click-sortable

  79. No, I'm not bitter. Why do you ask? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed that a politician of all people took the gamble in that direction.

    I'm not. You have to understand that Georgia is a very conservative state. People will forgive you for "acts of God" if you didn't "waste" tax dollars (even if you ended up spending more later). People will crucify you for impeding business, running a nanny state, and wasting taxpayer dollars if it turns out *not* to be a disaster.

    Oh, and the people hurt worst by it? Probably the most liberal counties in the state, so who gives a flying f--k for electoral purposes? It's not like you're going to win votes by getting rural voters to pay for salt trucks for the city. It's barely even considered part of the state by a lot of people -- just a Yankee colony.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  80. Rent them from up North, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the last time this happened in Atlanta, I know they were sourcing snow plows and salt trucks from the Indy area... why didn't they do that ahead of time? Our event was over, and our next big snow isn't until Monday...

  81. Salted in advance? No way. by asylumx · · Score: 1

    Further North streets are salted well in advance of a coming storm

    No they aren't! We're lucky if they're salted within 24 hrs AFTER the storm. I waited for 3 days for my road to even be plowed after a big storm earlier this month. Where do you get this crap?

  82. Talked to my parents in South Carolina last night by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

    They live close to Myrtle Beach and our town got about 1" of snow and ice. The town subsequently shut down for 2 1/2 days. People down there simply do not know how to deal with ice. Even if you're a carpet bagger from the North, you're better off staying inside and not getting t-boned by some guy who thinks you can drive full speed so long as there's no unplowed snow on the road.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  83. Perspective from a City of Atlanta resident by McGruber · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are actually two Atlantas: (1) The City of Atlanta and (2) The Atlanta Metropolitan Area.

    The City of Atlanta has a population of 432,000 and its mayor is Kasim Reed. Reed is an up-and-coming politician in the Democratic Party; he has been on "Meet the Press" and other Sunday morning talk shows a lot. Reed looked very bad during the 2011 Snowstorm, so since then the City has purchased approximately 70 snowplows & salt trucks. It has also trained its crews to operate that equipment. City crews were out and about on Tuesday and City-owned arterial streets were pretty passable.

    The City of Atlanta also owns the Atlanta airport, so the City actually has weather forecasters on its payroll.

    The Atlanta metropolitian region that surrounds the City of Atlanta has a population of 4.5 million spread over 20 suburban counties and a couple dozen small cities. The majority of these suburbs are very Republican and are the base of voters that elected Governor Deal. For example, Cobb County, where the Atlanta Braves professional baseball team are planning to move to, is the home of former Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. The Suburban counties and cities have not invested in snowplows and instead rely of the statewide Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT). GDOT does a really good job given what they have to work with -- they only have something like 120 snowplows for the *entire* state of Georgia. It never snows all over Georgia at once, so GDOT just moves its plows to where they are needed.

    The other complicating factor is that about 1.2 million of the 4.5 million suburbanites commute into the City of Atlanta every day.

    What happened Tuesday was the perfect clusterf---. About noon, all of the 1.2 million commuters all attempted to leave Atlanta at about the same time.... this was actually documented by the Georgia Navigator traffic system (http://www.511ga.org). These commuters managed to leave the City of Atlanta because the City had treated its roads, but then they hit the Interstate highways and expressways that are plowed and sanded by the GDOT. .... GDOT simply could not keep up because GDOT's statewide crews were also being used elsewhere around the state. The roads clogged and then what GDOT snowplows and sanders that were out got stuck in that traffic.

    1. Re:Perspective from a City of Atlanta resident by McGruber · · Score: 1

      Two updates:

      (1) The storm did not seem to effect the US Postal Service. My mail was delivered yesterday and today, at its normal time.

      (2) The local TV Meteorologists are all defending the National Weather Service. The on-air TV personalities have created fabulous graphics showing what the NWS announced prior to the storm and how accurate it was. They are going out of their way to defend the NWS. A meteorologist on the local FOX affiliate even said he is dependent on the NWS -- the NWS does the forecasting that the broadcasters use. He then said that what he does as a broadcaster is to explain to the public how weather conditions are changing; he does not do forecasts himself. (In his first press conference, Georgia Governor Deal claimed that local meteorologists he had talked to had done a better job forecasting the storm than the National Weather Service.)

      I think it is AWESOME that the popular on-air TV personalities are all standing up and defending the NWS geeks. (I presume the term 'geek' is appropriate given how much data collection and computer modeling the NWS does.)

    2. Re:Perspective from a City of Atlanta resident by sstamps · · Score: 1

      I live in the far north part of the state, and we had no issues dealing with the snow / icy conditions on the roads. We saw the front coming in, and people either didn't go in to work, or left work early. No disasters that I am aware of occurred.

      What you say is a significant part of the problem, but this particular storm and the circumstances and actions of the state and local government offices made it far worse than it otherwise would have been.

      First, the system was difficult to predict; the NWS only upgraded its forecast to a "warning" a few hours ahead of the morning rush hour. While, in theory, it should have been plenty enough time, the way such things get to the most people usually take more time than that.

      Second, the local TV news didn't take the NWS warning to heart, with local meteorologists disagreeing with the NWS and making their own forecasts that were less severe.

      Third, the state and local governments were completely asleep at the wheel. Part of it was the standard "well, if we cry wolf, and it doesn't happen, it'll cost millions of dollars in lost business/revenues/blahblahblah" (whereas, if it DOES happen, and we're not prepared for it, it will cost far more, and it did -- a typical failure of risk management demonstrated over and over again by both conservatives and AGW deniers -- usually the same people, in fact). So, they didn't take it seriously, failing to advise GDOT as well as the local news to tell people to also take it seriously.

      Fourth, the weather system itself was particularly dangerous because of the prior days' weather, and the time in which the storm arrived. People don't get that it wasn't the SNOW that was the problem, but the ICE that resulted from the SNOW partially melting / getting compacted. This snow was a loose aggregate powder snow, it came down in very small flakes that you couldn't compress well in your hands into a snowball. However, when you compressed it harder, like under tires, it instantly formed into an ice sheet, which adhered to the road surface like glue.

      Fifth, road preparations weren't made because of the short timeframe, not because of the lack of snow/ice road equipment and supplies. GDOT has plenty enough equipment and supplies stockpiled to handle this kind of storm, but it takes /time/ to get it deployed in advance of 1) rush hour traffic, and 2) the weather system itself. At 4AM, which would have been the absolute fastest they could have gotten started deploying salt/gravel, they would have had about 2-3 hours before the morning rush hour gridlock started and that is simply not enough time to get it done. Further, putting down salt/gravel 8 hours in advance of any precipitation would mean that the vast majority of it would have been swept clean of the majority of the road surface by traffic, so it would be almost useless by the time the snow started falling in earnest, and they'd have to do it all over again -- in the middle of the day when everyone started panicking and clogging up the roads again.

      All in all, I fault the local media and the governor for this failure. I don't blame the people -- they did EXACTLY what I would expect a disorganized, uninformed, and leaderless mass of people to do in any similar emergency - panic and make bad judgment calls based on complete lack of information or coordination. So, yeah, I award the 2013 Atlanta Snowpocalypse Fail Awards to Gov Nathan Deal and WSB-TV, WXIA-TV, and most especially FOX-5 for their dismal bungling of their core roles and responsibilities. Runner-up awards go to the some of the mayors of local municipalities who also did nothing.

      --
      -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
  84. Re:Full retard by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cold ice is a drivable surface. Ice two degrees below freezing is not. The surface melts from tire contact.

  85. Winter storms are unpredictible. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    I've never lived up North for any length of time, so I don't know about how it is up there, but it seems like South of about 38 deg. latitude, winter storms become very difficult to predict. That is to say, that it is normal for meteorologists to have a difficult time pinpointing things right up to 12 hours in advance. As you get further South, the prediction seems to become more difficult. Therefore, you have to plan for the worst, and hope for the best.

    Now, Atlanta may not get much snow or ice, but they damn sure have to KNOW that the above is true. It is true of almost every city at about that latitude East of the Rockies (I know, I live in one). Therefore, you have to plan for the worst, and hope for the best. If you plan for the worst, and the forecast is off, people will grumble about it, but they will blame the forecasters, not the civil authorities. However, if you take a gamble, as they did in Atlanta, and the worst happens, people will NOT be blaming the forecasters, but they will blame those in charge.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  86. Re:Full retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the 50% of Canadians that don't have snow tires mostly live in Southern ON and BC, where winter tires are marginal. For the rest of Canada, winter tires are a big help.

    Why? Stopping distance. Some all-seasons do well with accelerating and cornering on snow, not so much on ice. Winter tires win hands down though on stopping distance.

  87. Re:Wunderground has timeline, makes governor look by Kythe · · Score: 1

    Weather forecasts are sometimes wrong, to be sure. But all things considered, they've gotten amazingly good over the last 10-20 years, especially when it comes to short-term events.

    It's your choice whether to ignore a warning. But Alabama was warned.

    --

    Kythe
  88. Re:You weren't there. I was. by unimacs · · Score: 1

    "Wintry mix" is very common here in MN. It's not -5 all the time. Especially in November/early December and then again late in the season when temps hover around freezing. We get exactly what you got and we get it a few times a year if not more

    Aside from that, we've had layers of ice and snow on the streets around my home in Minneapolis for weeks as is typical for this time of year. Snow will melt somewhat and then get compacted into ice over time. Snow emergency routes are kept cleaner in Minneapolis but side streets not so much.

    Yes, sometimes roads are just impassable no matter what depending on what you're driving, but technique plays more of a role than you probably realize. For example, many inexperienced drivers spin their tires when trying to climb a slippery hill when all that does is cause them to slip more and make the road itself slipperier.

  89. depends greatly on what you drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even minivans have big-ass tires now.

  90. This is a public safety issue by sjbe · · Score: 1

    And people die from falling down. Sometimes you have to take personal responsibility and your own safety into account.

    Ahh yes the classic macho "personal responsibility" response. You know what? There are some things you just can handle yourself. Sometimes disasters happen that you simply cannot protect yourself from. Situations that require a community effort to respond to. Bad snowstorms are one of them. Cities have snow removal equipment because it is a PUBLIC safety issue. (see the emphasis there?) The city leadership in Atlanta has failed in multiple ways - inadequate equipment, ignoring weather forecasts, inadequate communication with the public, bad planning, underinvestment, etc. This is not a personal responsibility issue beyond a person exercising prudent common sense regarding their immediate surroundings but that is not enough. When an entire city is shut down, that is not and cannot be merely a question of personal responsibility. Even if you are able to take care of yourself there are other people who are not so capable and need help. Saying it is merely a matter of personal responsibility here really is a way of saying you don't give a crap about your fellow human beings or their safety.

    If people are foolish enough to believe that they'll be safe when a bad weather system bears down on them, then it's their own fault if they don't get out of the way.

    And if the information you are being given is bad information then what? The city leaders should have been telling people to take this seriously. They should have shut schools and non-essential government operations down. Unlike a hurricane or earthquake there is plenty that can be done to prepare for a snowstorm in advance but this seems to have been largely neglected.

    1. Re:This is a public safety issue by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Oh please spare me the "save me save me" rhetoric. People in Atlanta could certainly watch TV, listen to the news and judge for themselves what the risks were. It's quite clear a lot didn't make the right decision and it's time to stop blaming incompetent politicians for the fact that people are sheep and will follow the herd mentality wherever they go; even if it is to the slaughterhouse. It happens everywhere, even when the government says "Get Out" like in Hurricanes. You still see idiots having Hurricane parties or telling themselves that they went through one before and it wasn't that bad. There the ones on the news sitting on their roofs in the aftermath waving their hands in the air for somebody to come and get them. To quote one of my favorite movies: "They knew what they were getting into. I say let'm crash!" - Airplane!

      Of course the incompetent politicians can always drum up news to avoid taking responsibility for their incompetence too. Like the former mayor of New Orleans Ray Nagin, a truly dumb retard if there ever was one elected to office. He's the guy on trial right now but back after Katrina hit New Orleans to get attention he made up a whopper just for headlines: ""They have people standing out there, have been in that frickin' Superdome for five days watching dead bodies, watching hooligans killing people, raping people." - Ray Nagin..

      Of course all of it was made up and none of it could be substantiated. Now if I had that "leader" telling me it was "safe" then I'd say "fuck off" and make my own plans. Macho? No, just common sense because none of these politicians and experts can predict exactly what will happen with the weather. You're a fool if you believe otherwise.

       

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  91. it's the ice, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Northerners don't realize is the south gets ICE STORMS. Every inch of road surface is COVERED in ice. You can't get traction. We don't get true snow storms very often in the south. That's why everything stops - we don't get snow compacted which you could drive in. We get ice. There's not much you can do on ice.

  92. Northern Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heres a joke for you. I was working a part time job for min. wage ($80 per week). I had to drive home (20 miles away) at midnight... through a FOOT of snow. No money for temporary lodging, no shelters (because this is a normal storm). Plows don't typically hit the roads til 3 or 4:00 am. It took 4 hours to travel those 20 miles. I have nothing but sympathy that you can't drive in a dusting of snow.

  93. City of Atlanta is small, 400K people by mpercy · · Score: 1

    Metro Atlanta area is about 5M people living in about 2 dozen different cities and unincorporated county sections. The City of Atlanta can no more tell the City of Smyrna what to do than NYC mayor can tell Connecticut and New Jersey what to do, even though many commuters in the City are from there.

  94. Not new for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News to make nerds angry, stuff that matters somewhere to some people.

  95. 4x4s by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    And yet isn't it amazing that a state full of so many self-proclaimed manly men driving 4x4s that can get through anything should be so unmanned by a skiff of snow? Here's an idea. Buy chains. When it snows, put them on. Help pull your neighbors out. You know, actually be a man.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  96. Not prepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right. And there are no dump trucks in all of Atlanta they could have used, with some blokes on the back flinging out sand. Or farmers with fertilizer spreading machines, or whatever those things are called.

    Even if you only do this on the overpasses, bridges and inclines the night before you expect the snow and ice you'll solve most of the problems.

  97. And here I'm wondering by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    If the increasing incidence of odd climatic events in the South has moved any minds about climate change? Are any of the televangelists now crowing about how much God hates the South that he's visiting such calamity upon them? Because I sure recall that happening when Katrina hit New Orleans and Sandy hit NYC. And I'm also wondering how many microseconds it will take before the South, which cries and moans endlessly about federal spending, applies for federal disaster relief funds. Man up, ye Southerners. Like the other man said, buy some good tires and drive sensibly and quit yer bitchin'.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  98. Re:You weren't there. I was. by Sorny · · Score: 1

    "So don't freaking patronize us."

    I'll patronize you when it is called for. It is called for in this case. 3" of wintry mix is a mild inconvenience, not a shut the whole city down natural disaster. Oh yeah, slush/sleet DOES plow out of the way with no problems. Drive slow is the right response to such conditions. As to the whole needing momentum to go up hill on ice; yeah, not so much. Proper throttle modulation to avoid tire spin works better since you'll be in control. Then again, I drive through worse conditions every year, so I wouldn't know how to handle such things...

    We get wintry mix worse than what hit Atlanta several times a year here in MN. Usually in October & November, and then from March-May.

    Perhaps you southerners should heed NWS warnings. When there is a watch, it's about 50/50 if it'll happen. If it is a warning, take the warning as gospel.

    --
    OSX pwns.
  99. It's about knowing how to drive in snow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand that without snowplows and salt, it can be more difficult... But I've often lived in places too rural to have either, and I managed just fine. You really can't chalk this up to much more than inexperience in snow. Granted, it's rare enough in Atlanta to understand that, but this isn't the first time I've seen excuses articles with excuses about lack of snowplows and salt. It's like they're doing their best to say "Oh no, it's not at all because I can't drive in the snow. As long as it's cleared away."

  100. Re:You can't plow a road that is covered with semi by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    1000 plows would have done nothing. It was over (traffic wise) almost as soon as the first flakes of snow hit the ground. The hilly terrain combined with the below average temps for several days meant that roads, especially the various "feeder" surface roads, iced over almost immediately at least in the low-lying areas. Once a few cars failed to make it up some iced-over hill, that road was jammed. It took about 1 hour from the first few flakes before the traffic jam on surface streets backed up onto the interstates.

    This was not my experience at all. Nobody needed a plow, but every hill needed salting/sanding. Both 75, 575, Hwy 92, and 285 could have been salted AFTER traffic starting crawling. In fact, this is what happened on 400 northbound. It was treated AFTER the bad traffic started.

    Off ramps and on ramps could have been treated as well (this is where the majority of the issues were on 75 and 575) and the many dips and hills of 92 could have been treated as well (I personally was driving people up the median to get them home.) There was virtually no eastbound 92 traffic, very little southbound 575 traffic, and I've heard (but only heard) that the situation was the same on 75. It would have been simple (though slow) to get spreader trucks to the problem areas of those roads. If the police and emergency services vehicles could get to those hills to move cars help other cars get through, a spread certainly could.

    The really annoying thing isn't that people were stuck crawling along for 3 or 4 hours, it was that they were stuck for 8-14 hours when it could have been mostly avoided.

    --
    Loading...
  101. Re:You weren't there. I was. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    in terms of more people keeping an eye on the weather (the midday snow took everyone at our office by surprise)

    Really? WSB radio reports on the weather every 10 minutes or so, all morning. There's really no excuse.

    Hell, I looked at noaa.gov and made the call to work from home Tuesday before I even left work Monday afternoon!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  102. Re:Talked to my parents in South Carolina last nig by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    Lol, you've got that right. I was telling dozens of people that we were helping move their cars - "I know you want to stay in the middle of the dark 'pavement' but that's all ice - that white fluffy stuff just off to your right near the gutter? Your tires will work better in that..."

    --
    Loading...
  103. Snow chains make more sense. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Salt spreaders are an expensive luxury in most cases, if your car isn't prepared for ice you shouldn't be driving. Proper winter tires is better than salt.

    No one was expecting the ice, and dropping hundreds of dollars for all new tires twice a year is more appropriately called "an expensive luxury" for people in a city that gets an event like this only twice a decade or so. Snow chains make more sense.

    (But if, like me, you only apply them only once every few years, and the ones you have have a non-standard design that was just the last thing in the store before the last big event with some sort of crazy cross chain hook thing that you can't find instructions for after 30 freaking minutes of Googling and seeing example after example of more logical designs, then that means eff all too.)

    (Yeah, the replacements are already on order.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  104. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except Atlanta bought a fleet of sand trucks and snow plows after the 2011 debacle. My mockery still stands.

  105. Apples to oranges comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This wasn't 2 inches of snow. This was Sleet and ice followed by snow. Also, I suspect in your city that has regular snow all winter long, they city road maintenance department would be preparing your roads on a continuous basis by using salt, sand and plows.

  106. Just enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to buy enough equipment to handle every street. But you do need to buy enough to cover the main arteries. You need to have something for a snow day. Right now would be a good time to ask for some money while this is fresh in people minds. Before the snow melts.

  107. Re:You weren't there. I was. by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

    So don't freaking patronize us. There's stuff that could have been done better in terms of planning by the city and in terms of more people keeping an eye on the weather (the midday snow took everyone at our office by surprise), but it wasn't a matter of just driving better. There was literally *nothing* many of us could have done from that angle. 99% of the people I saw drove sensibly. (Well, more like self-entitled jackasses who wouldn't spit on a man if he was on fire because it might make them thirsty, the way they refused let people over or tried to skip ahead using the middle lanes, but generally safely.)

    The issues with how the forecast was handled and what preparation was done before the snow have been addressed by others. What I'll add is, what could have been done once the snow started is, 1) don't send everybody out on the road at the same time! Other cities in other storms have made this same mistake. And it always causes the same issues. Once the decision is made to keep schools and offices open, not sending everyone out on to the road before the plows and salt spreaders have a chance to clear the roads is something that should have been obvious.

    You close early to avoid people driving in bad weather/on bad roads. Once it's start snowing, closing everything early sends people out to drive in bad weather/on bad roads.

    2) My mind literally cannot comprehend some of the reports coming out of Atlanta. 13 1/2 hours to only go 8.5 miles? We're talking about automobiles, right? Not trains on tracks?

    People down south know cars have steering wheels, right? I don't want to freaking patronize anyone, but what about sitting in the car for hour, realizing traffic isn't moving, and heading back to wherever you came from? Even if traffic is twice as bad going the other direction, that's 3 hours to get off the road.

    I know many people listen to podcasts and other non-live forms of entertainment, but cars in the south still have radios, don't they? At some point, doesn't the thought occur to check a traffic report? And didn't those traffic reports give an accurate assessment of the situation? And upon hearing that assessment, did the thought arise to just head back to your point of origin or just pull off where you are?

  108. /me shakes head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Further North streets are salted well in advance of a coming storm but Atlanta doesn't have the capacity for that kind of treatment."

    Oh really? I like how these people from down south keep using this as an excuse. So this morning we received nearly 3" of snow in Minneapolis. Were there plows on the road? Nope. Was there salt placed on the roads prior to this snow storm? Nope. Did the Twin Cities shut down the entire metro area? Nope. Today was business as usual. We drove through multiple inches of snow. What is the key to driving through snow. Slow down, keep your distance and don't slam on your brakes.

  109. Re:You weren't there. I was. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I'll patronize you when it is called for. It is called for in this case. 3" of wintry mix is a mild inconvenience, not a shut the whole city down natural disaster. Oh yeah, slush/sleet DOES plow out of the way with no problems. Drive slow is the right response to such conditions. As to the whole needing momentum to go up hill on ice; yeah, not so much. Proper throttle modulation to avoid tire spin works better since you'll be in control. Then again, I drive through worse conditions every year, so I wouldn't know how to handle such things...

    You keep saying "drive slow" like there was some other option being taken. Did you miss there part where I described bumper to bumper traffic for hours on end? Excessive speed, sliding, and spinning out weren't exactly problems here. Just masses of people tying up roads that were overloaded with mild slipping issues going uphill from a complete stop every now and then. Most people had the sense to stay off the roads that were completely iced over. (And I think you're nuts if you think you could have driven up them without chains regardless of throttle control.)

    Like I said, most people were driving sensibly. (By default, if nothing else.) I only saw maybe 15-20 incidents of people spinning their tires in the whole 13+ hours, and every one of them got it under control after a few seconds without needing a push. Moderating the throttle is not a hard skill to learn, and yesterday was good practice for a lot of Atlantans. I did see one guy fishtail in the opposite lane (while driving one-handed so he could smoke), but that was an outlier.

    Driving skill was not the primary issue for why my commute took so long and certainly not excessive speed.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  110. Re: "Everybody ignored the Winter Storm Warning" by Wookact · · Score: 1

    You misunderstand the difference between advisories, watches and warnings.

    Advisory: Issued a few days in advance, it means there is a good chance of bad weather.
    Watch: It means it is looking likely that bad weather will happen, often dispursed a day or so ahead of time if possible.
    Warning: A warning means this will almost assuredly happen. Start acting on the advice now if you haven't already. Issues as far in advance as possible.

    The warning was issued at 3:30 am and the snow hit at noon. That means more then 8 hours to prepare for this. That is plenty of time to close the schools, government offices, suggest that businesses have workers stay home, and get whatever salt trucks you have to start pretreating.

    This was the local government and the state government that failed to not only act but had no plan in place to start with. I grew up in metro ATL. This is par for the course and has been for years. We can also certainly place blame on the drivers. In fact I remember driving in those conditions with the ATL drivers. You have half of them thinking they can speed like usual, and the other half going ten miles an hour. Once the lane markers get covered you often see 4 lane roads reduced to two, one for the aholes who think they can drive 70 and a slow lane for those going 10. Cars start bouncing off each other like pinballs. Then no one clears their accident from the road and traffic just snarls as traffic behind tries to squeeze by.

  111. Speaking from Canada, eh? by johnnys · · Score: 1

    REAL northerners are NOT making fun of the grief and hassle that the good people of Atlanta are facing. We've all seen what happens when the weather gets bad, and we're having problems right now ourselves so we can all relate. See: http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Ca...

    So I wish you the best of luck and hope you get sorted out soon!

    --
    Sometimes the "writing on the wall" is blood spatter...
  112. So they saved some money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, Atlanta didn't want to shut down business and government because of lost revenues. They didn't want to prepare ahead of time for such an event because of the high cost of plows and salt that might only be used once every three years. So I wonder, how much did it cost to bring in the National Guard, all the police, emergency personnel, and to keep all of the businesses open that became shelters overnight. I imagine that the cost was close to if not more than what it would have cost to be prepared. Especially if it happens again.

  113. Re:You weren't there. I was. by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    I wish I hadn't already commented in this thread, because this needs to be modded up.

    I grew up in the north and now I live in the south. And while I nearly 100% agree with the following quote:

    The second problem was that we weren't dealing with whatever dainty light fairy powder you Northerners deal with in which you think a snowplow would help. We were dealing with sleet and slush. "Wintry mix," you hear it called on weather stations.

    My quibble is that this is not the "second problem". It is the first and main problem. It is well over 50% of the entire problem. All this business about people leaving at the same time is a red herring. Had they left over a period of half the day, the same thing would have happened. Because it is damn near impossible to drive on ice. In North Dakota, 2" of snow would have blown off the roadway before the plow could even get there.

    Stay warm!

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  114. Hmmm by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    "Why would you buy 500 snowplows and salt trucks and have them sit around for 1,000 days, waiting for the next event?"

    If only the same thinking were applied to defense spending.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  115. Re:You weren't there. I was. by Sorny · · Score: 1

    I'm not nuts, I have a 320HP RWD car and I drive up iced over hills every year in the winter (Cadillac STS). Sure, it's easier in my Yukon with it in 4x4, but no chains needed; FWIW, chains are illegal in MN because they damage the road. Here's a hint, keep some kitty litter in your trunk. Throw it down on ice. Trust me. Rock your vehicle out if you can't get moving; don't just floor it in D. Try to get it rocking back and forth and eventually you'll move.

    All season tires are what you need at a minimum. If you run summer tires on pavement below about 45 degrees, you're a complete fool. I suspect that is where the majority of issues came from. Summer tires need HOT pavement to work well. Cold pavement might as well be ice, say nothing about real ice and snow...

    Hell, I don't even run winter tires in MN. Good all-seasons are all you need (blizzaks and other dedicated winter tires are the best, but I put on too many miles to use them). That and a brain cell or two.

    You guys would really freak out if you ever came across black ice.

    --
    OSX pwns.
  116. There's Ice, and then there's southern Ice by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I've lived both in Houston and Colorado, mostly in Colorado. I've had a lot of driving experience, including some with black ice.

    In the north you find black ice in patches, it's dangerous because you can't see it, and you can't see it because it's so perfectly smooth.

    Well imagine that every inch of road for miles is the smoothest black ice you have ever seen. That is what you get in the south with moisture that freezes, the sheerest most slippery ice you will ever find. The humidity or the heat or both mean that the frozen water seems to have a little sheen of water upon it, making it that much more slippery. No ice I've ever found in Colorado, in the mountains or otherwise compares to the few ice storms I went through in Houston.

    You are wrong to compare "unconditioned" roads, because even icy roads in the north are not much like the essentially Zambonied southern icy roads.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  117. Cry Me a River... by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    "It's an easy joke made by Northerners," wrote Joe Sterling and Sarah Aarthun.

    Perhaps if the region had not developed a reputation for constantly thumping their chests about how much more rugged and manly they are than people in the north, they'd get more sympathy from us. There was no small amount of mockery from those parts in 2012 when the Northeast freaked over Hurricane Sandy.

    Well, payback is a dish best served artic cold.

  118. Are they retarded? by Cammi · · Score: 1

    3 inches of snow and they cannot drive with a 2WD vehicle? Are they retarded?

  119. Well my family's experience was different from by mpercy · · Score: 1

    yours. Here in east Cobb and coming home from downtown.

    Power's Ferry. Lower Roswell. Old Canton. Robinson. Piedmont. Johnson's Ferry. Riverside. Northside Drive. I-75. 285.

    All iced over at bridges and low areas. Bumper to bumper by 1PM. Car's that could not make it up even gentle slopes.

    1. Re:Well my family's experience was different from by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      ? I didn't say it wasn't iced over, I was pointing out that it could have been salted and sanded, that road treatment vehicles could have gotten there.

      --
      Loading...
    2. Re:Well my family's experience was different from by mpercy · · Score: 1

      How? At 3PM I saw an ambulance driving on the sidewalk and through yards to get around the packed in cars.

      You'd have had to have a buttload of vehicles that started pre-treating all the surface roads and the interstates before the snow started falling. Once roads like Powers Ferry and Johnson's Ferry and Northside Drive clogged, which was within the first hour or two, there was no way to get heavy equipment without removing stuck cars one at a time. Once those clogged, there was little hope of getting more cars off the interstate.

      Maybe farther north around 92 it wasn't so bad. My friend who took 4.5 hours to get from our office to my house (4+ miles, and he left 15 minutes after I did) did manage to make it to his house in Cumming around midnight and said it got better the farther north he went.

    3. Re:Well my family's experience was different from by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      How?

      Simple. Drive the dumper down the median, or on the other side of the road until you get to a hill (either side of it), then get into traffic there, salt the downslope in a lane, salt the up slope in that lane. Rinse/Repeat. How do you think the cops got around?

      I'm sure there are certain roads where traffic was snarled in both directions, but that salting would just take longer.

      I'm sure Johnson Ferry was a nightmare (I used to work where 400 and 285 met so I cut down Johnson Ferry/Riverside all the time unfortunately) but the major thoroughfares/highways/freeways could have easily been taken care with some initiative. They managed it on 400 northbound and you know what a nightmare that road is in good weather ;).

      --
      Loading...
    4. Re:Well my family's experience was different from by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      Maybe farther north around 92 it wasn't so bad.

      It was so bad that a neighbor of mine walked from Holcomb Bridge Road to where I could pick him up (13 miles.) So yeah, it was as bad or worse than anywhere else.

      In fact, I got onto Crabapple and 92 by driving from the 575/92 on backroads that had been cordoned off (I have new found respect for lakes located at the bottom of hills) and I was about a mile west of him on 92. He caught up to me walking about 20 minutes later. Cars were covering about 50 yards every 15 minutes - all because of the downslope/upslope issues.

      --
      Loading...
  120. We'll be back when Upstate NY folks are browning by mpercy · · Score: 1

    out their grid because it's 85 degrees and 50% humidity.

    ATL folks can say "Call us when it's 95 and 95, and shut up until then.:

  121. Re:Wunderground has timeline, makes governor look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you think NOAA keeps getting its funding cut? They refuse to play nice and have "server errors" that wipe inconvenient truth.

  122. I drove in Atlanta at 5am just fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in the metro Atlanta area and drove just fine with a rear-wheel drive SUV, but I did it at 5am when everyone was home, stuck at work, or off in the ditch. My SUV is like a pickup truck and light in the back-end. It is not 4WD and 4WD wasn't needed. The big problem on Tuesday was that so many people hit the roads all at once. Then 5% of the people are complete idiots and/or don't know how to drive on snow and ice, or they have bald tires. That 5% screwed everyone.

    I lived in Michigan and learned to drive on snow and ice. It really is not that hard, if you know what to do. I drove home 11 miles and didn't slip once and it was 13 degrees F and everything had hard frozen. Sure there is black ice, got to be extra gentle on that. The problem was that the 5% screwed it for everyone because the blocked the hills and intersection sitting there spinning their wheels. I just drove around them slowly.

    So, to all the people of Atlanta: GO FIND A WEB PAGE OR YOU TUBE VIDEO AND LEARN HOW TO DRIVE ON ICE!!!!!!!! It is not hard. Really.

    Rule #1: YOUR WHEELS HAVE TO ROLL TO HAVE TRACTION!

    If you are spinning your wheels, LET UP ON THE GAS. If you are sliding due to using your brakes, then LET UP ON THE BRAKES!! If you are sliding down a hill with your brakes locked up and sliding into the other lane: LET UP ON THE FREAKING BREAKS! If your wheels are rolling you can steer and aim the car down hill. If you're on ice, you're going to go down the hill -- accept that -- and let up on the brakes and let the wheels roll and aim the car somewhere that is not bad. If you keep the breaks locked up then you slide uncontrollably, and as we all just learned: THAT IS FREAKING BAD. Just drive slow and easy. Very easy. Easy on the gas and easy on the break. If you're sliding, let up off the brakes. Got it? It is easy.

    Rule #2: SLOW DOWN AND SPREAD OUT!!!!

    It is not a race out there. You need to slow down and go gently. You need a lot of clearance between you and everyone else. If you are hauling ass down the road and hit ice, it takes a long time and a lot of distance to stop. If something goes wrong you can't stop in 2 car lengths. DON'T DRAFT LIKE IT IS A NASCAR RACE ON ICE. GOT IT?

  123. Bill Clinton Said It Best.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Cause you can!!!

  124. shit happens by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    People just love to throw around blame in this litigious country. Wanna blame someone? Blame God. Shit happens. Just deal with it.

  125. Re: Pffft Plows and such by icebike · · Score: 1

    For snow, pre-treatment is preferable to plowing, because with even modest traffic, the roads will stay clear and you won't have to plow.

    For Atlanta, a great deal is made of not having plows, and not wanting to buy them.

    But pre-treatment can be done with bolt on (or drive under) spreaders that fit on the back of existing city owned trucks or hired dump trucks.

    The best pre-treatment isn't rock salt these days. Most places with other than than freeze-solid temperatures opt for deicer liquids sprayed on the road from small tanker trucks, of the kind that are already in many city inventories, or which can be pulled by any Semi-tractor. Atlanta only has to look as far north as Virginia to see how its done.

    You don't need special trucks, you need attachments for existing equipment. The tankers can be multi-purpose, delivering water for fire-fighting needs away from hydrants, flushing streets, etc. The sand/salt spreaders come in sized for pick-ups all the way up to dump truck size. You literally back your truck up under one of these and lower it into the bed. Any truck. Not a special truck.

    You also don't need dedicated trucks to plow. Even in northers heavy snow country , they bolt plows onto standard highway department dump trucks, and keep the main highways clear. Its rather impressive to see a gang of plows, usually 3 to 6, running down the freeway, at speed, in a diagonal phalanx clearing three or 4 lanes at once. They are just dump trucks, with heavy duty mounts on the front and hydraulics for lifting. Often with a drive-under sander in the box. They use the same trucks all year around for other purposes.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  126. UK Top Gear showed the solution by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Just buy a few snowplow blades for farm equipment and use those.

    Only plow the freeways or routes with NO CARS since the force is too strong, or use a wire mesh exhaust diverter to cut the snow blown away so as not to puncture car windows.

    They tested it in Norway.

    Here endeth the lesson.

    Oh, and stop burning coal. It makes extreme weather events like this MORE likely. If you live along the Atlantic Coast it could shut down the Gulf Stream in a few years (e.g. 2020 to 2050) and you'll get even colder winters.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  127. Make some sort of agreement with a "snowy" city by JTsyo · · Score: 1

    Wonder if it would be feasible to have some sort of agreement with a city that does have the equipment to come by and salt roads and Atlanta pays some kind of fee each year for help with upkeep. Though you probably have to go pretty far north from Atlanta to get to a city that's snowy. Might need to just have a collective or maybe the state or Georgia have them available.

  128. Re:You weren't there. I was. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Rock your vehicle out if you can't get moving; don't just floor it in D. Try to get it rocking back and forth and eventually you'll move.

    Yeah, I figured that trick out pretty quickly too on the second patch of ice. (The first was just a matter of easing slowly onto the gas.) It's not rocket science. Just a skill that needs exposure to develop. Like I said, most people figured things out pretty quickly. I never saw anyone who just couldn't get through the ice (though I did see a couple of idiots just brute force through it).

    All season tires are what you need at a minimum. If you run summer tires on pavement below about 45 degrees, you're a complete fool. I suspect that is where the majority of issues came from. Summer tires need HOT pavement to work well. Cold pavement might as well be ice, say nothing about real ice and snow...

    It's a common problem in Georgia. Most people I know run all-season tires, but since the weather is generally good, tires don't get changed out until the tread is a bit lower. That bit a lot of people (including myself). I can't remember the tire guy's logic for leaving the older tires on my front wheels when I had to get a new pair last instead of rotating them to the back (something about wanting to keep good grip on the back tires in an emergency lane change), but it turned out to be a bad decision on ice.

    You guys would really freak out if you ever came across black ice.

    Trust me, we did run across it. Most of the ice I ran into was black ice, since the dense traffic kept the snow itself off the road except at intersections, where it was allowed to freeze in a visible layer. There was a decent amount of it still on the roads today under underpasses. You just had to keep an eye out, let off the power a bit, and maintain your lane, and it was all good. Thankfully didn't run into any around curves, but that's just a matter of not oversteering into a skid.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  129. Re:Full retard by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Friends call me Snow Mizer...

  130. Snow plow drivers by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    The plow drivers don't know how to drive in the snow, either.

  131. Bad timing + listening to the wrong people did it by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    As of Monday evening, half the local weather people were predicting we'd get what we got. The other half were pooh-poohing it and predicted we'd get nothing to worry about. As I went to bed Monday night, the pooh-pooh parade was full on. Nobody was planning to be closed on Tuesday. Had there been consensus at that moment, things would have been fine.

    Since it was not unanimous, the bosses and agencies and schools all said, heck yeah we will be open normal on Tuesday. And everybody went to bed thinking that.

    Sometime in the middle of the night, the NWS reaffirmed the snowfall and pretty much agreed with the locals who were saying watch out. But by then it was already too late. The notice needed to have been given four or five hours earlier.

    Meanwhile the city and state, both of whom suck at normal maintenance and utterly fail at emergencies, both sat on their hands and hoped for nothing. They did nearly no prep work even though they had from 3:30AM until about 1:00PM to lay down salt or sand. They didn't do it.

    And by the time they realized they actually needed to do it, it was already too late. The governor and mayor were off at event slapping each other on the back.

    Kasim Reed always has been a bit of a doofus. This is just par for him. Nathan Deal is a country boy befuddled in the big city. His answer to most things is to get back on a horse and ride home asking what the problem is, if his horse can make it just fine.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  132. You don't need salt trucks by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

    Just spread cheese brine like they do in Wisconsin. This could be done with ANY milk or septic truck. They HAVE to have a couple of those around.

    http://www.jsonline.com/newswatch/milwaukees-latest-antidote-to-icy-streets-cheese-brine-b9995766z1-223291751.html

  133. Self Responsibility is 50% of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Atlanta and keep good All Season tires with a M&S ratings on both my cars and have been able to drive around fine (plus my car has All Wheel Drive). I can't believe the number of people who are trying to drive on ice and snow with tires that are obviously bald. The mild climate here has allowed them to get away with it. Perhaps a tire a check should be implemented alongside the mandatory emissions testing for the Atlanta metro area ?

  134. Re:You weren't there. I was. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    I live in Minnesota, and I'm not intimidated by a few inches of snow.

    On the other hand, I $(^&^ hate wintry mix, and sympathize with anybody who has to drive on it.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  135. But we will by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    But we will patronize you, because you in that region are so incredibly hostile and intolerant of others. You strut and preen especially when the subject turns to your masculinity. Yet when the slightest amount of precipitation strikes you handle it with less ability than our younger sisters. You are silly girls. You cannot manage when even the slightest weather wrinkle disrupts your soft existence.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:But we will by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      But we will patronize you, because you in that region are so incredibly hostile and intolerant of others. You strut and preen especially when the subject turns to your masculinity.

      And the clear difference between us is expressed by your application of a strange stereotype to me... how?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:But we will by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      But we will patronize you, because you in that region are so incredibly hostile and intolerant of others. You strut and preen especially when the subject turns to your masculinity. Yet when the slightest amount of precipitation strikes you handle it with less ability than our younger sisters.

      "Storm of the Century" mean anything to you? Where I live, we call that a Tropical Storm, and since we basically ignore anything short of a full-blown hurricane (Cat-3 or higher), we got a lot of laughs out of that one.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  136. How did cars get stuck in 2 inches of snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can only think that one Atlantan was stupid enough to drive at his normal speed of 70-80mph on the freeway and crashed and blocked the exit, which prevented everyone else from getting off.

  137. Sounds just like 1982 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lived in the Atlanta Metro Area in the early 80's and the exact same scenario happened, except the predicted storm arrived early. Everyone was warned and schools and businesses sent everyone home early, but while they were on their way home the snow (and ice) began. Cars abandoned, people stranded, schools converted to shelters. Every year after that until I moved ANY predicted snow storm caused a full mobilization.

  138. Wall O Text WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HOLY. FUCKING. SHIT. Shut the fuck up, AshtonKutcher. You have to argue about every damned thing. The sky appears blue. You wanna fucking argue about that too, ya bastard? SlashdotParent saw what you were doing there. You just wanted an excuse to bash on some rednecks. You suck at it.

    TL;DR: You don't know shit

    1. Re: Wall O Text WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shut shut up.

  139. Re:You weren't there. I was. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are an ass. You just wanna be all smug like you're better than Southerners. I highly doubt you're better at anything other than running your cocksucker. I'm gonna make a deal with you- you keep your self righteous ass up in Minnesota, and I'll stay here in Georgia, umkay? Come rollin' through my hood and I'll make ya squeal like a pig.

  140. Winter driving in the Twin Cities by sgtrock · · Score: 1

    I won't argue that most people in the Twin Cities with 4WD and AWD vehicles don't have a clue how to drive them. I've passed enough of them sitting forlornly in the ditch on Hwy 10 over the years! :-D

    That said, though, we're not talking about the loose nuts behind the wheel but the inherent capabilities of the vehicles themselves. When I was living northeast of Elk River up near the Isanti-Anoka county line and commuting to the south side of St. Paul, I traded in the 2WD pickup for the 4WD and was glad that I did. The 4WD was MUCH better at handling deep snow, which in turn made using back roads as an alternative to jammed up freeways at least plausible. Engine braking with 4WD also made avoiding the idiots who were overdriving a lot easier. ;-)

    We lived far enough out back then that about 1/3 of the drive home was well off the freeway, too. More than once I had to tackle the last 10 miles or so on unplowed county roads with up to a foot of snow on the road. I hated that stretch in my 2WD pickup. In those conditions the truck had a tendency to break traction even with 150 lbs of sand behind the rear wheels. BTW, I tried my wife's Saturn a couple of times but it wasn't much better as it was too low to the ground for the deep stuff.

    Now that I'm living in Woodbury and commuting to Richfield, I no longer regard 4WD as a necessity. I never see more than the 4-6 inches of the white stuff that you mentioned. I sold off the 4WD pickup a couple of years ago and I'm driving a front wheel drive sedan. I still miss the extra traction of that old 4WD pickup, though.

    My next vehicle is probably going to be a smaller SUV with a towing package. Something that I can get up to the lakes with, out in the woods hunting, and reasonable gas mileage. Now, if Tesla would simply build a 4WD vehicle with a decent range... Hey, a fella can dream, can't he? ;-)

  141. Event names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -Hothlanta
    -Snow Jam 2014
    -white peach fuzz

    the jokes almost write themselves...

  142. Elected cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Governor of Georgia is a coward, he proved it this week. This wasn't a matter of ignorance, it was a failure of nerve. The question is whether the voters will hold him to account in the next election. If they don't, then they deserve the ineffective leadership they've got. As for the mayor of Atlanta, well, the best you could say was that he got caught up in the proverbial "blind leading the blind" situation, or that he also lacked the courage to do the right thing (assuming he knew what that was). When the last big snowstorm hit New York the Governor there closed the NY State Thruway and the mayor of NYC closed the schools and major highways. That Thruway has been closed only a handful of times in the last 40 years, and the NYC schools closed even less. NY State and NY City have veritable ARMIES of snow plows with incredibly experienced operatiors available to clear the roads, so when they decide to close things down you can bet it's serious. The main difference is that in NY they've got the courage to make the right call. Just to show that I'm not singling out any region, let me add that the school district here in the North Carolina county where I live in made the call early to keep the schools closed, and buses full of kids off the roads. Sure, there are lots of morons questioning that decision, but the school district leadership deserves credit for having the courage to stand up and do the right thing.

  143. ban DHMO by bingoUV · · Score: 1

    All this discussion is rubbish. The simple fact is that DHMO is a dangerous chemical that causes this, and many other kinds of disasters. What are we waiting for? It should have been banned, like, before the Roman empire!!

    --
    Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  144. Re:You weren't there. I was. by chaim79 · · Score: 1

    Southern WI got hit with 2 inches of "Wintery Mix" yesterday, along with blowing/drifting snow from the 2-3ft of it already on the ground (winds were around 20mph).

    However, this is a state of people who have experienced the above a couple times a month during the winter season. We know how to drive and handle the conditions, and WI has really amazing road crews that work very Very hard to keep the roads drivable and are very well equipped for what they are doing. I wouldn't want to be in your shoes, that same "wintery mix" with millions of people inexperienced in driving in those conditions and road crews who have rarely if ever faced such a mess and are ill equipped to make much of it. I am not patronizing you in any way, those conditions are legitimately terrible.

    Were I down in that area during the storm, I'd likely have taken the day off or worked from home. If I had been at work when that hit and told to go home, I'd probably have found the closest friend to work and crashed their couch instead of trying the full trip home.

    Then again I'm usually driving with a blanket or sleeping bag in the car in case I get stranded in the snow. Northern winters are not something to take lightly. It doesn't have to be snowing for there to be white-out conditions, all we need is snow already on the ground and a good wind. We also get a decent amount of real cold around here, while this year is especially bad, it's a rare year that we don't go down to -20f for a few days or a week. Most people here who do any driving outside the cities/towns will have gear in the car to survive being stranded in the snow overnight in -10 to -20 conditions, it's part of living here.

    --
    DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
    AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
    Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
  145. Re: "Everybody ignored the Winter Storm Warning" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True enough, but they issued the warning about nine hours before snow began to fall. There was plenty of time for schools to cancel, businesses to close, etc.

  146. Re:You weren't there. I was. by RandyOo · · Score: 1

    I can't remember the tire guy's logic for leaving the older tires on my front wheels when I had to get a new pair last instead of rotating them to the back (something about wanting to keep good grip on the back tires in an emergency lane change), but it turned out to be a bad decision on ice.

    Look it up, it's standard practice to put the tires with the best tread on the back--I learned that a few years ago, renting a car visiting Alaska. It does go against intuition on a front wheel drive vehicle... I think the logic is that it's better to get stuck, rather than spin and (probably) crash.

  147. gambling? by Bust0ut · · Score: 1

    I have been rolling the dice in regards to the zombie apocalypse for for too long then. Also, "he who purchase random goods will see good futures" (Chinese proverb I think).

    --
    He is crazy if you think about it; I am not.
  148. Who needs a fleet of snowplows? by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

    The problem is one of planning not of vehicles. Where I live, snow is a common occurrence every winter, certainly during the warmer days of winter.

    The city does have a fleet of snowplows, but when a heavy snow falls, it's not the city's snowplows that handle the load but the graders and other earthmoving equipment of the local contractors. While graders are better with additional pusher attachments, just the basic blade will do wonders.

    The main thing is getting organized so that the city can mobilize quickly the equipment of the local contractors in times of need. While it is always costly to hire those guys, it's certainly less costly to do it this way than purchasing your own fleet of vehicles that will rarely get used. Graders get used all the time.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
    http://youtu.be/dw9dVWpcAIE?t=...

    --
    I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
  149. Buying snowplows and salt trucks is unnecessary, by Druegan · · Score: 1

    and a total waste of money.. typical bureaucrat thinking.

    I work for a snow removal company in a more northerly city. We service some 300 commercial properties in our area, and a have a contract for servicing city streets when the city's crews can't keep up. In additon, we have a constant pool of subcontractors that we can tap for extra help when events require it.

    The only difference between a "salt truck" and a "dump truck" is a salt spreader attached to the back gate. Ties right into the PTO system. Buy a stack of those, subcontract with some of the local haulage or construction companies that have dump trucks, and in that rare event of a winter storm, have a plan in place where these companies report to various city maintenance yards for outfitting and loading with salt, and get them out on routes covering the major roads. Highways being the priority.

    Instead of $55,000,000 worth of trucks added to a city's fleet, all you really need is under $1m worth of salt spreaders and a bit of logistical coordination. That itself would make a world of difference. And they could use the money saved for some Public Service Announcements like "What is that white stuff falling from the sky?" and "No, it's not cocaine, get back in your cars and quit trying to snort it." and "Snow is slippery, drive a little slower."

  150. Re:Full retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With good summer tires typically outperforming winter and all season tires above 37 degrees in wet conditions it makes sense to get summer tires even if there's a small risk of snow in winter. Some of the best all season and winter tires have good wet performance, Goodyear's all-seasons and a couple of others in their price range are as good as the average brand summer tire in wet and as good as a fairly good winter tire on snow or ice. If you just by budget ones you sacrifice performance in all seasons for little gain.

  151. Re:You weren't there. I was. by jwhitener · · Score: 1

    There was literally *nothing* many of us could have done from that angle.

    Well, except own tire chains.

    The same thing happens in Portland OR. We get snow very, very rarely. And it is often very icy when it does come down, and our city is really hilly. It is so rare that very few people have snow tires, 4wd, or chains. So when it does hit the hit, even an inch, the entire place shuts down.

    If people were required to own chains or have winter tires installed from Nov-Feb, the city wouldn't have to shutdown.

  152. Happens in the Northwest Also by jwhitener · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCoxOReXlHI

    Portland OR. We rarely get snow, so no one has chains, snow tires, or 4wd. When the snow does some, it is often icy. And the city is really hilly. The result is basically a shutdown even if we get one inch of snow.

    However, our city government and businesses seem to be much more attentive to weather services, and we usually get notice that "everything" is closed early in the morning before we head in to work.