I just ported a large amount of code to windows, and I was very surprised to notice that snprintf() is _snprintf() on windows.
Calling their function 'snprintf' before snprintf was adopted into the C standard would have been a mistake. What if the Standard specified it differently?
And I doubt they use "%13s" or directives like this in sprintf()
You mean "%.13s".
, or if their version even supports these constructs.
But you obviously didn't bother to check. Never mind - if your port is crap, you can just blame it on Windows.
I also appreciate Slackware's approach, but quite frankly you will pollute your system quite badly over the years as you install all sorts of new stuff by hand
You're supposed to use makepkg.
Oops. s/You're/Your/ - I forgot where I was posting for a moment.
Calling their function 'snprintf' before snprintf was adopted into the C standard would have been a mistake. What if the Standard specified it differently?
And I doubt they use "%13s" or directives like this in sprintf()You mean "%.13s".
, or if their version even supports these constructs.But you obviously didn't bother to check. Never mind - if your port is crap, you can just blame it on Windows.
Then I guess he ripped it off Bill and Ted.
Or died in 9/11. Then they might have all run around with arms outstretched making aeroplane noises.
You're supposed to use makepkg.
Oops. s/You're/Your/ - I forgot where I was posting for a moment.
Looks more like HAL
Given the British penchant for inconsistency and convoluted spellings of what should be easy-to-spell words
Huh?
tap vs. faucet
lift vs. elevator