In the US, political speech has always been no-holds-barred. You can't successfully sue someone for keeping you out of elective office by lying about you, nor can you sue for any other libelous damages incidental to lies told about you while you were running for public office. Trump appears to want to change this, and it looks very much like his political opponents will be in danger of losing all their property if he's elected.
The Clintons are more direct, you're likely not to wake up ever again.
You've got the overview correct but the details wrong. On one side there's status quo moderate Republicans and on the other batshit crazy leftist Democrats. Missing from the mix is a sufficient number of supporters of freedom.
Before 1965's immigration act there was much less immigration. There have been periods of fierce opposition to Italian immigrants and oriental immigrants.
Historically, English and Scottish immigrants have exhibited high levels of industry and low levels of crime. Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans have generally been quite good. The same cannot be said of immigrants from south of the border, who often come from corrupt and drug-laden countries and bring those problems with them. The desire to send them away and keep them away is based on the simple observation that they're causing lots of trouble.
The single income family is an anomaly of post WWII America, and it is collapsing with higher expectations and government-imposed inefficiencies. Do you think that farmer's wives didn't work in 1850?
If we want things to be different from the status quo, we need to feel the bern!
Calling for change without evaluating what we're changing to is how we got to the mess we're in now. Sanders is a communist, and he'll make everyone poor.
Get in line to get into the park early, more than an hour before the park opens. Plan ahead to do the most popular rides first, and rush. Usually, you can get in 4 rides in the first hour, before crowding starts to be a problem. Stay until closing time, lines are short late at night. Persevere, and you can do every ride in the park in one day.
Stay alert and flexible. Not all rides start running when the park opens, and some will be closed for repairs for all or part of a day.
Even the small (formerly A ticket) rides have long wait times on busy days. Figure a half hour for Mr. Toad's Wild Ride or Peter Pan. I've never seen a long line for the really cruddy ones like Pinocchio.
The google car was going 2 mph. It could have stopped in inches. It should have stopped, and waited for traffic to clear. Going over sandbags might not be physically possible, and attempting to go over them would likely have damaged them, opening the driver for charges of deliberately damaging government property.
Collection of light and conversion to electricity are not the same. A good black paint captures 97% of visible light, and turns none of it into electricity.
There are some examples of startling success. First in my mind is the high temperature superconductors that started hitting the news in 1986, and the dam broke in 1987. Superconductors have found use in a power plant (Detroit Edison), MRI, and physics research.
Let's see. I can work 6000 hours to develop a better photocell, to which I will have no rights and will benefit me to the extent of perhaps $5 over the course of my life. Or I can open another can of beer. Choices, choices.
Those who oppose property rights do not understand the concept of incentive.
Some of the women that have been raped have apologized, so they obviously disagree with you. They recognize that the rape was the fault of society and not the victims that committed it
I see three possibilities here:
You're lying
They were apologizing under duress
There's something analogous to the Stockholm Syndrome going on here.
There is never any valid justification for rape. Never.
Needing help and deserving help are two very different things. The perfect illustration of this is Al Wilson's "The Snake".
I'm proud of advancing arguments that protect my myself, my neighbors, and my country. People like you who claim I should endanger myself to help primitives in the name of a perverse moral code are disgusting.
Considered as a group, Jews have been engaging in suicidal politics for over half a century. Hardworking and intelligent, and consequently financially successful, they vote for the Democrats who would tax away their wealth. They're disproportionately represented in extreme leftist organizations like the Communist Party. Consider, for example, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Go figure.
Slashdot Mirror
In the US, political speech has always been no-holds-barred. You can't successfully sue someone for keeping you out of elective office by lying about you, nor can you sue for any other libelous damages incidental to lies told about you while you were running for public office. Trump appears to want to change this, and it looks very much like his political opponents will be in danger of losing all their property if he's elected.
The Clintons are more direct, you're likely not to wake up ever again.
You've got the overview correct but the details wrong. On one side there's status quo moderate Republicans and on the other batshit crazy leftist Democrats. Missing from the mix is a sufficient number of supporters of freedom.
The three leading candidates - Trump, Sanders, Clinton - are all mental defectives.
Before 1965's immigration act there was much less immigration. There have been periods of fierce opposition to Italian immigrants and oriental immigrants.
Historically, English and Scottish immigrants have exhibited high levels of industry and low levels of crime. Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans have generally been quite good. The same cannot be said of immigrants from south of the border, who often come from corrupt and drug-laden countries and bring those problems with them. The desire to send them away and keep them away is based on the simple observation that they're causing lots of trouble.
The single income family is an anomaly of post WWII America, and it is collapsing with higher expectations and government-imposed inefficiencies. Do you think that farmer's wives didn't work in 1850?
You're sitting on the moist, dark hole that lie came out of.
Calling for change without evaluating what we're changing to is how we got to the mess we're in now. Sanders is a communist, and he'll make everyone poor.
Get in line to get into the park early, more than an hour before the park opens. Plan ahead to do the most popular rides first, and rush. Usually, you can get in 4 rides in the first hour, before crowding starts to be a problem. Stay until closing time, lines are short late at night. Persevere, and you can do every ride in the park in one day.
Stay alert and flexible. Not all rides start running when the park opens, and some will be closed for repairs for all or part of a day.
Even the small (formerly A ticket) rides have long wait times on busy days. Figure a half hour for Mr. Toad's Wild Ride or Peter Pan. I've never seen a long line for the really cruddy ones like Pinocchio.
IIRC, when Disneyland annual passes were first introduced, they were $100. Now they're $1049.
1 year passes have been sold at different prices depending on which days were blacked out for at least 25 years.
The bus was going 7 times as fast as the google car. The bus sideswiped the google car, not vice versa.
The google car was going 2 mph. It could have stopped in inches. It should have stopped, and waited for traffic to clear. Going over sandbags might not be physically possible, and attempting to go over them would likely have damaged them, opening the driver for charges of deliberately damaging government property.
There's more than just a speed consideration for prohibiting farm vehicles on public roads. Some farm vehicles have steel wheels that tear up roads.
They're worth what people are paying for them.
Collection of light and conversion to electricity are not the same. A good black paint captures 97% of visible light, and turns none of it into electricity.
There are some examples of startling success. First in my mind is the high temperature superconductors that started hitting the news in 1986, and the dam broke in 1987. Superconductors have found use in a power plant (Detroit Edison), MRI, and physics research.
Let's see. I can work 6000 hours to develop a better photocell, to which I will have no rights and will benefit me to the extent of perhaps $5 over the course of my life. Or I can open another can of beer. Choices, choices.
Those who oppose property rights do not understand the concept of incentive.
Citations provided
http://www.examiner.com/article/twitter-fury-after-1-000-muslims-rape-sexually-attack-women-cologne-germany
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/01/06/stories-on-cologne-assaults-face-censorship-on-reddit
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/01/its-not-only-germany-that-covers-up-mass-sex-attacks-by-migrant-men-swedens-record-is-shameful/
http://newobserveronline.com/media-conspiracy-over-cologne-mass-sex-attack/
Four of the first five results from google search ---- censorship cologne | koln muslim attacks
We're talking about now, rather than the most egregious historical examples. Your context dropping is dishonest.
A religion that encourages murder is inferior in that regard to a religion that does not encourage murder. Islam encourages murder.
I see three possibilities here:
There is never any valid justification for rape. Never.
What does the mathematician Niels Henrik Abel have to do with racism?
Needing help and deserving help are two very different things. The perfect illustration of this is Al Wilson's "The Snake".
I'm proud of advancing arguments that protect my myself, my neighbors, and my country. People like you who claim I should endanger myself to help primitives in the name of a perverse moral code are disgusting.
Considered as a group, Jews have been engaging in suicidal politics for over half a century. Hardworking and intelligent, and consequently financially successful, they vote for the Democrats who would tax away their wealth. They're disproportionately represented in extreme leftist organizations like the Communist Party. Consider, for example, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Go figure.