I am no lawyer, but I have been in a class action before. I had to do all of nothing. In fact it would have taken more effort to be excluded from the class.
To go to small claims court requires at least one day off work, several trips to the courthouse and might end up being more than one day.
The money grab is the point, it hurts the company at fault it was never meant to compensate customers. Their claims are trivial or they would have their own lawsuits.
The internet does no such things when companies use legal moves to remove such complaints.
Just because she is a christian? So all other christians who were not spouting off hate speech are also being threatened?
If you feel so strongly that you want to use the force of law to oppress one group then you should be willing to accept people will be unhappy. Youtube is a private service. If they want to remove videos for any reason or not remove them for any reason that is their right.
I support youtubes selfish motive. They should not be forced to broadcast speech that they do not like. I also support this poor ignorant childs right to spew hate speech in public.
I fail to see how that is hypocrisy.
Your insane theories on christians and whites being attacked are pretty humorous though. Oh noes I can't use my religion to pass laws impacting others rights, help help I am being oppressed.
It is hate speech and youtube can take it down if they want to. I suggest she go speak it in public, where she has that right. I fully support her right to do that, but I will not force youtube to carry material they do not want to.
Many peoples opinions are hate speech, there is no difference. The fact that excuse for this is a very old book of myths makes it no better.
You like the GP are a moron. Not everyone impacted can take the day off to go to small claims court. This means the company can abuse untold numbers of customers and never pay a dime. A class action is to punish the company while not over burdoning the members of the class as their each individual claim is very small.
So because Hate speech is in her holy book youtube should keep it up? What if I make a new holy book filled with hate speech about cpu6502 should youtube keep that video? I fail to see what book it was that contained this vile speech has to do with it.
Can you not see the difference between speech that targets a whole group vs 1 person?
Youtube would rather lose one ignorant user than a large group of users.
No, it does not. Walmart prices are based on what the market will pay. This has little to no relation to costs. This means that if cameras would raise their costs to the point at which TV sales were a money loser they would either ditch the cameras or the TV sales.
There was a recent Supreme court case that made this legal.
Now all 3 of our branches of government have officially sold out. We might as well replace all civil courts with a comparison of the defendants and plaintiffs net worths. Would not change the outcome much and save us a lot of tax money.
Or we could just euthanize anyone with a $ in their name and anyone stupid enough to interview them. If this person with a $ in their name exists and they chose that name, it is the trashiest thing I have probably ever heard of.
Why should Google pay so little? They are a private business. If they want to pay $200k/year/head to screeners and then bill the RIAA that is their right.
They already do that. Those apps are very easy to trick. If someone other than the 1 artist they have on file for that song is singing it will not catch it.
That software is not free either. Well the software is pretty trivial, the huge database of songs to analyze and the results to compare to are not. The results might even be considered to be derivative works. Who knows what that could cost to license.
The Apple articles are often negative because Apples often does bad things. Yet, they make very good hardware (Typing this on my macbook air). Android gadget articles do also cover the expensive devices. The fact that you found one article does not prove much.
I dismiss Hacker News because it is crappy. Slashdot is no longer the forefront of technology, it just isn't as crappy as Hacker News. Heck, slashdot was always days behind, even years ago. Reddit is even worse.
Slashdot Mirror
What kind of power lines do they have were you live that transmit ionizing radiation?
Corian just looks cheap though. I really prefer commercial stainless steel counters. Way more practical.
The granite one, it will last longer and look better.
The levels of radiation you get from one are nothing to worry about.
You must never get a dental xray or dare go near the fruit in the supermarket.
Too horrible to contemplate?
A few cases of thyroid cancer?
Way to blow this out of proportion.
I am no lawyer, but I have been in a class action before. I had to do all of nothing. In fact it would have taken more effort to be excluded from the class.
To go to small claims court requires at least one day off work, several trips to the courthouse and might end up being more than one day.
The money grab is the point, it hurts the company at fault it was never meant to compensate customers. Their claims are trivial or they would have their own lawsuits.
The internet does no such things when companies use legal moves to remove such complaints.
Just because she is a christian?
So all other christians who were not spouting off hate speech are also being threatened?
If you feel so strongly that you want to use the force of law to oppress one group then you should be willing to accept people will be unhappy. Youtube is a private service. If they want to remove videos for any reason or not remove them for any reason that is their right.
I want a way from the OEM to flash a new OS or make any modifications I want without any cracks.
I want to use my money to support only those who sell what I want. Is that really so hard to understand.
The phone companies are why I own a nexus, and my next phone will be a nexus as well.
Shazam is not that good. Try using it the next time your neighborhood bar has a cover bad playing.
Billing issues or service issues?
So you mean the minor details of not being cheated out of money or the service you are paying for?
What other interaction does one have with these companies than getting service and being billed?
I support youtubes selfish motive. They should not be forced to broadcast speech that they do not like.
I also support this poor ignorant childs right to spew hate speech in public.
I fail to see how that is hypocrisy.
Your insane theories on christians and whites being attacked are pretty humorous though. Oh noes I can't use my religion to pass laws impacting others rights, help help I am being oppressed.
It is hate speech and youtube can take it down if they want to. I suggest she go speak it in public, where she has that right. I fully support her right to do that, but I will not force youtube to carry material they do not want to.
Many peoples opinions are hate speech, there is no difference. The fact that excuse for this is a very old book of myths makes it no better.
Youtube is a private business and can ban any speech they want.
My handle is not my name. I do not use it when interviewed on TV nor would I.
I would make a new one, but then my UID would go way up. I made this one when I was a younger man and leet speak was trendy with my peer group.
The databases and the analytics are easy, the licensing for the transforms are not. Nor is getting all those music samples to make them from.
You like the GP are a moron.
Not everyone impacted can take the day off to go to small claims court. This means the company can abuse untold numbers of customers and never pay a dime. A class action is to punish the company while not over burdoning the members of the class as their each individual claim is very small.
Or course not, but they at least kept up the pretense. They no longer even bother with that.
So because Hate speech is in her holy book youtube should keep it up? What if I make a new holy book filled with hate speech about cpu6502 should youtube keep that video? I fail to see what book it was that contained this vile speech has to do with it.
Can you not see the difference between speech that targets a whole group vs 1 person?
Youtube would rather lose one ignorant user than a large group of users.
No, it does not.
Walmart prices are based on what the market will pay. This has little to no relation to costs. This means that if cameras would raise their costs to the point at which TV sales were a money loser they would either ditch the cameras or the TV sales.
There was a recent Supreme court case that made this legal.
Now all 3 of our branches of government have officially sold out. We might as well replace all civil courts with a comparison of the defendants and plaintiffs net worths. Would not change the outcome much and save us a lot of tax money.
Or we could just euthanize anyone with a $ in their name and anyone stupid enough to interview them. If this person with a $ in their name exists and they chose that name, it is the trashiest thing I have probably ever heard of.
Why should Google pay so little? They are a private business. If they want to pay $200k/year/head to screeners and then bill the RIAA that is their right.
They already do that.
Those apps are very easy to trick. If someone other than the 1 artist they have on file for that song is singing it will not catch it.
That software is not free either. Well the software is pretty trivial, the huge database of songs to analyze and the results to compare to are not. The results might even be considered to be derivative works. Who knows what that could cost to license.
The Apple articles are often negative because Apples often does bad things. Yet, they make very good hardware (Typing this on my macbook air). Android gadget articles do also cover the expensive devices. The fact that you found one article does not prove much.
I dismiss Hacker News because it is crappy. Slashdot is no longer the forefront of technology, it just isn't as crappy as Hacker News. Heck, slashdot was always days behind, even years ago. Reddit is even worse.
Little disposable income?
That is why we constantly have apple articles and things about the latest android gadgets?
I would suggest that you would have been right a long time ago, but slashdot these days skews older.
I know you are just trying to shill for your crappy slashdot alternative though.