Slashdot Mirror


User: Wire+Tap

Wire+Tap's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
274
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 274

  1. The ISS is currently visable with the naked eye. on Keep An Eye Out For The ISS · · Score: 1
    I submitted this information to slashdot several weeks ago when it first became visable - it just didn't make it to the page. :-)

    If you take a look into the South East Sky (and are located in the North Eastern US) you will see a very bright dot in the sky; that is the ISS. When looking at it I get a sense of accomplishment, just because I am part of the human race, and we have accomplished something so amazing. We now have a permanent presence in space - and that is phenomenal.

  2. Re:REGISTRATION = NOT REQUIRED on Will .coop Be Regulated Better Than .com Et Al? · · Score: 1

    We just found that out - I did not know when I posted. And furthermore, just because I have something worthwhile to post, that makes me a karma whore? What a joke.

  3. REGISTRATION = NOT REQUIRED on Will .coop Be Regulated Better Than .com Et Al? · · Score: 1

    The /. crew is a bit slow. Go Here instead (you don't have to register). Happy Holidays!

  4. Actually, you don't have to register with them!!!! on Digital Movies and The Big Screen · · Score: 1

    http://partners.nytimes.com/2000/11/26/arts/26SABI .html

  5. Y2K as a disaster? on Geomagnetic Storm To Begin Tonight · · Score: 2

    Whoa.... you are calling Y2K a disaster? Were you up at midnight man? Did anything happen? NO. It is just a bunch of overexadgerated hubris! It will be the same thing, no matter if it is a EM storm, or an earthquake... there is no "taking a step back" - that is just stupid. We must progress to find the solutions... not pause.

  6. This is completely serious on What If There Was No Copyright Law? · · Score: 1
    Okay, first: moderators, this is meant to be serios, and not just a critical attack on the current state of slashdot. I truly believe this, and while it may be offtopic to this particular thread, it would be such for all the others. It simply needs to be said, however.

    -Begin Semi-Rant-

    Slashdot crew: What the hell is going on? This is a new website, correct? So, one could reason that the staff is comprised of journalists. Journalists tend to be fairly skilled in the use of grammar... Take a look at the title of the article "What if there was no copyright law?".

    It makes my head hurt. It should read "What if there were no copyright law?". This is called the subjunctive. It deals with refering to something that is contrary to what is.

    I find it appaling that the crew of slashdot does not take more pride in their work - mainly because I know many of the visitors to the site take much pride in viewing the site! Please, improve the quality - not only of the grammar and mistakes that should not make it to the front page, but the stories too! It seems now that every month the same three or five stories pop up under a different title. There is a general decline occuring here at slashdot, and it is truly sad... Slashdot used to be such a great place.

  7. Imbecile! on Election Wrapping Up (Part 2) · · Score: 1

    If you were watching the CNN coverage, you might have surmised that this has _nothing_ to do with the KKK. I believe it is refering to the three branches of our federal government, which the Republicans would dominate if Bush gets in.

  8. My night has been a living hell on Election Wrapping Up (Part 2) · · Score: 1

    Okay - I just felt like sharing this with everyone here on slashdot, because as of now, I am going on about 4 hours of sleep in two days, and can't think straight. The election: how exciting! After returning home from karate class early last night (8:30 est) I am taunted by an even race between the Texas Govna' and the VP. This battle raged for hours, until 2:18 est, Bush was declared the president of the United States of America. How sweet! Tax cuts for me! The plot thickens: all the while I was sitting up watching the tube, I was chugging Jolt cola, and studying for Two, yes TWO social science tests that I must take today. One just happens to be on the Constitution. So, I actually UNDERSTOOD what was going on in the election! Fancy that! Anyhow, after Bush was declared the winner, some adrenaline in my system went away, and I sat down and took a few minute powernap. What happens when I wake up? I shower. Then, I run upstairs, and look at CNN, and I see what looks to be "Too Close" at the bottom of the screen. I scream. I then feel like a piece of lint, because I already emailed all my friends and teachers and bragged about Bush winning. :-) At any rate, It is now almost 6:30, and I am off to school. Time to take my tests. Hopefully I hear that Bush beat out Gore by one point. That would make me smile. Oh! And let's not forget the electoral college! Do I hear Congress discussing the revamping of the election system? I ceritnaly think so! This country is too divided to stand! United we stand, divided we fall! Now... where was my parachute?

  9. BUSH WINS? WRONG! on Election Wrapping Up (Part 2) · · Score: 1

    ... Can't anyone read? Pat Buchanan won the election! Silly slashdotters... *cynical laughter* Hoo boy, I need to get some sleep.

  10. Re:Good news for the loser... on Election Wrapping Up (Part 2) · · Score: 1

    After watching CNN for the past nine hours, I want to kill you for saying "mandate". :-) Please refrain from using such language for at least 4 more years!

  11. Re:Bush Wins on Election Wrapping Up (Part 2) · · Score: 1

    Not all three - Gore snagged one of them about an hour ago. Made my heart flutter. Yay for Bush! :-)

  12. Re:BUSH Wins, Nader's fault on Election Wrapping Up (Part 2) · · Score: 1

    You are assuming that all the people who voted Nader would have voted Gore, and, frankly, that is not the case at all. Nader was certianly above Gore on my list of candidates - and it was quite probably the same for others. In addition, many Nader supporters claimed that they would not have voted for anyone had it not been for Nader - so, Gore would not have gotten (many) more votes. At any rate, let's hope Nader get's his 5%. It certianly will be interesting.

  13. THE WINNER!!!!! on Election Wrapping Up (Part 2) · · Score: 1

    BUSH WON!

  14. Re:Hey something new to chagne my mind! on Technology Issues by Candidate · · Score: 1

    So you are saying that you knew there was a socialist party running? :-) Anyhow, I certianly didn't know some of the off-the-wall things a few of the "lesser candidates" were for... like the complete removal of social security, and the ending of federally funded schools. Very drastic stuff.

  15. Re:This is why this site sucks. on Technology Issues by Candidate · · Score: 1

    Actually, I just wanted to let people know what the link was... I could very well have typed the HTML, but, I chose not to, because I feel most people who use slashdot are educated enough to type it in themselves.

  16. A very informative website on Technology Issues by Candidate · · Score: 2
    Just in case anyone out there wants a somewhat more indepth look at *all* the candidates (and other political bodies), I reccomend you go to this website.

    http://www.issues2000.com

    or

    http://www.issues2000.org

    I can't remember which it is. They have a LOT of information. So, if anyone out there is *still* undecided, check out the site, and make sure you are part of the election tomorrow!

  17. Re:Typo... on Flying Wing To Run On Sun-Replenished Fuel Cells · · Score: 1

    And the moderators need to realize that my post was meant to be PRODUCTIVE.... god... I am going to bed.

  18. Re:Ohh where have I seen this before?? on Mars May Be Dry After All · · Score: 1

    /. sure has been (-1 Redundant) lately. I think the posters should really communicate more often... or maybe they just need to read their own website more often. Who knows. Just my two cents.

  19. Re:um.. HELLO? on Is the PS/2 A Disappointment? · · Score: 1
    Yeah, right. You are no better than those who write the slander that makes people believe lies. Now, I don't know where you got that picture - but it is certianly a bad example.

    If anyone is interested in a GOOD example of what the PS2 can do, check this: http://www.gamestop.com/large-screen-shots/992021l 6.jpg

    Thank you.

  20. Re:Sadly... on Pioneer 10 Finally Dead After 28 Years? · · Score: 1
    *grins*

    Gosh... some poophead moderator didn't like my joke!!! *cries*

  21. Giant Robots and Nanotech??? Nah... on 20 Ways The World Could End · · Score: 1
    Because, we all know darn well the creators would load them up with the latest release of Windows CE.

    Just as the robots are about to make the decisive strike againt humanity, their eyes will turn blue and they will fall to the floor, begging for a reboot.

  22. Thanks AC! on Discovery Docks At International Space Station · · Score: 1
    Heh, I have just been saved by an AC! This is a first! :-) Bravo!

    In all honesty, I could go on talking about the pros and cons of welfare all day long - such as: "who cares if you hurt the rich, if you can help only one deserving poor" - and other similar cases. Personally, I am not in favor of welfare because I don't see a tremendous need for it. It simply wastes too much money - money that the American people deserve to have in their pockets, or put to some worthwhile use. Now, don't get me wrong - improving the lives of people is a very noble use of the money - BUT it should be moderated.

    Email me if you actually care to hear my idea on moderated welfare.

    Caio!

  23. I'll tell you why... on Discovery Docks At International Space Station · · Score: 1
    Because they should not be pampered and babied. They should have to do what everyone else in the world does to make a living: WORK. I am so SICK AND TIRED of hearing about how we should give all this money to people who are just too damn lazy to make something of life. Of course, I am not talking about those who are not ABLE to work - just those who are, but don't.

    Sorry for the rant, but that really bothers me.

  24. "Shouldn't survive?" on Hawking On Earth's Lifespan · · Score: 1
    So, if I am correct in your logic, you would also surmize that Earth shouldn't survive?

    Human beings are indeed a clever bunch, and while we may be able to adapt to new things quite well, unless there is a huge push for colonization in space, we might be too late.

    As of now, colonization seems more like a dream than anything else. With all the legislation in the way, and all the religious fanatics who are against the colonization of space - it will be a wonder if we get there in another 500 years.

    I know I'm hopin' though. :-)

  25. The question is... on Napster Back in Court · · Score: 1

    ...would that $4.95 be going to the RIAA, the "big" artists, or the small artists who could really benefit from the money. Methinks it will be going to the RIAA. *sighs* If that's the case, I don't think I would pay.