Slashdot Mirror


User: dcam

dcam's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,958
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,958

  1. Re:Country First? on Election Dirty Tricks About To Begin · · Score: 1

    Nice one, well spotted.

  2. Re:dirty tricks on Election Dirty Tricks About To Begin · · Score: 1

    Are you stupid? I mean seriously.

    A) They don't pay taxes

    Don't you have sales taxes some states? Besides that they might well pay income taxes (more below) and the many areas of tax.

    B) They don't own land

    They might (see below). Besides that is a pretty stupid classification, it exludes people who might own a unit (no land). It also excludes everyone who is leasing a place.

    C) They don't have families

    What crap. Let me tell you that there are three classifications of homelessness.
    primarly - literally living on the streets
    secondary - boarding houses
    teriary - staying with friends or relatives but no place of their own

    Some of these states are temporary.

    You are only addressing primary, I'll bet there are a lot of people in secondary or teriary with families. Even people in primary homelessness can have families. I've had a little to do with the Salvation Army here in Sydney, Australia (largest city in Australia for the geographically challenged Americans). They have classes for homeless mothers (including primary homeless mothers).

    D) They don't have any interaction with most laws (from cars to copyright) ...and so on...

    Haha. Biggest laugh ever. That would explain why the salvation army runs a legal service. That would explain why in a course in introduction to community service, ~10% of the training was spent on legal issues.

    Are you seriously saying that people who are homeless are not affected by the same laws as everyone else?

    This has to be one of most stupid things I have ever read, and that includes comments on youtube videos. Take heed:

    "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
    -- Mark Twain

  3. Re:Country First? on Election Dirty Tricks About To Begin · · Score: 1

    And don't even get me started on their spelling (half-breed muslin? wtf?).

    They are saying he is part muslin and part something else. Silk possibly?

    It isn't entirely clear why they might say he is made of cloth, but the spelling is fine.

  4. Re:Unless gas prices are affected... on $700 Billion Bailout Signed Into Law · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Regulate fuel prices to a reasonable level

    How would increasing fuel prices help you? Unless it forced you to other forms of transport...

  5. Re:Prior art. on IOC Trademarks Part of Canadian National Anthem · · Score: 1

    I believe trademarks are specific to domain.

    Also I thought you couldn't trademark numbers?

  6. Re:Goto is good on What To Do Right As a New Programmer? · · Score: 1

    1 or 3. But this is a significantly simplified example. Often the functions might need more parameters, which would tend to require more documentation.

    The problem with 1 is that pretty verbose. The comment could be "minutes before launch".

    I don't like 2 because you are embedded the units in the function name. This makes it harder to maintain, you can'y switch to units in hours at a later date without renaming all instances. Also it might imply that there is a setSecondsBeforeLaunch or setHoursBeforeLaunch.

    I'm not completely sure I like 3, I'm not a fan of typedefs, but I think it is clearer. Probably the best of the three.

    In this (simplified) example, I'd be inclined to go for:
    In LaunchActions.h:

    void setPreLaunchTime(LaunchEventStruct *event, double minutes);

    That way seeing the header file would document the units.

    A better example of the kind of issue I am talking about is more in calling code.

    Suppose you have some code where threads run at scheduled intervals and sleep for a time period. Here is an example of what I would consider good practice:

    sleep(1000 * 60 * 5); // 5 minutes

    The problem is that even when you know all the functions/APIs etc, it is easy to forget something. Documenting it makes life a lot easier.

  7. Re:Always think about maintenance on What To Do Right As a New Programmer? · · Score: 1

    There is a variation on an old chinese proverb:

    May you be condemned to maintain your own code.

    I've been maintaining my own code for ~8 years, sigh.

  8. Re:Goto is good on What To Do Right As a New Programmer? · · Score: 1

    I largely agree however, comments can be really handy in a number cases:
    - Units (eg time in seconds, milliseconds or minutes)
    - explaining why this is done this way
    - highlighting debugging code that was left in (possibly commented out)
    - explaining something that might appear odd at first glance

  9. Re:What is so dangerous about gambling anyway? on State of Kentucky Seizes Control of 141 Domain Names · · Score: 1

    What the hell is so fundamentally wrong with gambling?

    It is a tax on the stupid. Typically they are the people least able to defend themselves.

  10. Re:Let the flood gates be opened on RIAA Loses $222K Verdict · · Score: 0, Troll

    So kinda like the FBI and every terror suspect arrested post 9/11?

  11. Re:This doesn't work! on EA Hit By Class-Action Suit Over Spore DRM · · Score: 1

    Maybe you need some decent consumer protection laws. In this country (Australia) you are always legally able to return to the place of sale.

  12. Re:DNS doesn't help on China To Run Out of IPv4 Addresses In 830 Days · · Score: 1

    In my house they will look like:
    lightbulb1.uberconcept.com
    mail.uberconcept.com
    wife.uberconcept.com

    Actually I'm thinking my wife might object to having a fully qualified domain name.

  13. Re:It's a Dog on Microsoft To Buy Back $40bn of Its Shares · · Score: 1

    I don't play the market. I've had the same stocks for a long time -- some for over 35 years (mostly stuff like Exxon and Philip-Morris).

    Haven't you found that the share certificates become sentient and try to kill you if you own them that long?

  14. Re:what am I missing here... on Is There a Linux Client Solution for Exchange 2007? · · Score: 1

    IMAP is fundamentally broken, so most Exchange admins don't want to encourage users to use it.

    Broken in Exchange or broken more generally?

  15. Re:gmail on Email-only Providers? · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, I grew past that stage and went onto bigger and better things and didn't need to be bothered by the latest sendmail, apache, webmail exploit

    Were you building from source? Generally this can be handled with updates (which you could add as a cron job) from your package management system.

  16. Re:HOTMAIL on Email-only Providers? · · Score: 1

    Echoing that, I find the same.

    Running my own mail server was (at the time) a financial decision. The cost of hosting it myself was about the same as 1 year of paid hosting. Sounds like a good deal to me.

    Plus I can run some really neat filtering against emails that come in.

  17. Re:HOTMAIL on Email-only Providers? · · Score: 1

    I run my own mail server. Backup isn't that hard to manage. rsync to a local box, rsync to a remote box, email the results of the backup jobs to yourself. What is more of a problem (alluded to in your comment) is the time needed to get it back up and running when the HDD dies. Of course it helps if your backups actually work... as I discovered recently.

    The expense of backup options is pretty minimal. I have fairly modest needs when it comes to storage 100GB ATM, so the cost for me was ~$70 per box (2nd hand box) + (at that time) $100 / HDD. At the time I bought more than one box to have one spare box if I needed spare hardware.

    At some point in the future I'd rebuild the whole thing (mail server, file server, onsite backup, offsite backup) with some new boxes, RAID 1 etc.

    This is pretty much the same problem as storing your own local files, just with emails.

  18. Re:Wait .... on Scott Adams's Political Survey of Economists · · Score: 1

    To be fair, I don't think that the R stands for republican either...

  19. Re:The realm of what shouldn't be... on Apple Declares DRM War On Sneaker Hackers · · Score: 2, Funny

    bash, which appears to be down for now, had the best explanation of web 2.0.

    You generate the content, we make the money.

  20. Re:Pfff on Rosetta Disk Designed For 2,000 Years Archive · · Score: 1

    Don't put words into my mouth. There is certainly that range of books, the question is where the bible fits.

    I think that you need to eloborate on your point. For example, the bible contains a large number of different styles of writing, calling some fiction is akin to calling this fiction: it doesn't make sense. Are you using bible as a shorthand to refer to the gospels?

  21. Re:Pfff on Rosetta Disk Designed For 2,000 Years Archive · · Score: 1

    You are just restating your point. That doesn't add anything to the discussion.

  22. Re:Gender difference? on Software To Provide Astronaut Counseling · · Score: 1

    Then (and this should be your mantra) show no interest at all in wooing.

    This cannot be stressed enough. Women want what they can't have. Chasing a woman will ensure that she will be completely uninterested in you.

    /happily married slashdotter.

  23. Re:Pfff on Rosetta Disk Designed For 2,000 Years Archive · · Score: 1

    Anyone who treats the Bible as anything other than a work of fiction is missing the point of Christ.

    Anyone who treats the bible as a work of fiction needs to go talk to a historian.

  24. Re:As to crackpot theories... on NIST Releases Report On WTC 7 Collapse · · Score: 1

    The bush administration has one wild card that got them all that: Look out TERRORISTS!

  25. Re:No scripting language is going to solve on Was Standardizing On JavaScript a Mistake? · · Score: 2, Informative