"There's nothing disastrous in that message. The icon doesn't even have a red exclamation point. It states quite clearly what's gone wrong and offers the option to get past that."
It is an error message diplayed where should be a web page, it has a very technical threatening tone (that stops being threatening once you know what it is about) that provides you with the choice of following just near the "get me out of here!" option and have no obvious comming back once you accept a self signed cert (and, as far as I know, no comming back at all).
Yeah, no problem with it. Things get worse once you acknowledge that plain http pages have the same security that self signed certs, but there is no warning for them. Why are they treated differently?
There is almost no added security from #2 compared to #1. But Firefox could simply render the page like a normal, non-encrypted one. That means, no lock, no yellow bar and no security warning.
For 4 digit id people, 5 digit id people and even I (6 digit id) it is usual to get mod points, so we tend to no care about it.
I remember being a newby, and I tought it was easier to see an alien than to get mod points here (not that I cared about that then, most of the time I was not even wiling to moderate). It is just normal that newbies care more about karma.
I'd be pretty surprised if you could just take an coal fired powerplant and just plug a diesel tanker into it.
I'm not buying the oberal theory, but, be surprised if you want, a coal plant can runt out of about anything. Yes, you can change a coal plant to diesel with minor modifications, and most plant already have those modifications because they usualy run on diesel for small periods.
When you redefine your distance measurement, the distances will increase proportionaly with their original size, just like our observartion.
Also, if you postulate that the shrinkage is due to variation on the strenght of the electro-weak force, the speed of light will change acordingly and you'll see old photons red-shifted, just like we experience.
As far as I know, if other constants followed the change of the electro-weak force, that model would be completely equivalent to a growing universe. So, there would be no experiment that decides what was really happening. If the other constants don't follow, we'll see changing constants, exactly like we observe, but I don't really know if they are still equivalent.
Yep, a good support for macros may be the best feature a language can have. It replaces all the OO features, with several advantages.
But, also, a good support for macros may be the worst feature a language can have. It leads to an unmaintenable mess where each part of a software is written on a different (unique) language and only the compiler can put it all toguether.
I really think that source control systems should have client side hooks. That way you could run ident autmaticaly on every commit and update, and decouple your style from the team's.
Of course, if your entire team uses an editor that will correctly ident the lines, like emacs or vi, putting the braces on single lines isn't necessary. If someone just insterts a line there, they will make it clear that the line isn't on the loop.
Now, why lots of IDEs insist on requiring TAB and BKSPACE clicks is a mistery to me.
I have a problem with the '}}' at the end. It is very easy to lose one of the braces.
I can understand why people use it with Lisp, parenthesis are easier to read (or I'm more used to them, I don't know). Also, Lisp has shorter routines than C-derived languages.
Slashdot Mirror
It is an error message diplayed where should be a web page, it has a very technical threatening tone (that stops being threatening once you know what it is about) that provides you with the choice of following just near the "get me out of here!" option and have no obvious comming back once you accept a self signed cert (and, as far as I know, no comming back at all).
Yeah, no problem with it. Things get worse once you acknowledge that plain http pages have the same security that self signed certs, but there is no warning for them. Why are they treated differently?
There is almost no added security from #2 compared to #1. But Firefox could simply render the page like a normal, non-encrypted one. That means, no lock, no yellow bar and no security warning.
You can use the quotes if you want. No problem.
If so, please explain why MS doesn't deliver the keys to the user (like GPLv3 code do)?
Until they let the owner of the computer have the keys to it, they are just protecting themselves.
For 4 digit id people, 5 digit id people and even I (6 digit id) it is usual to get mod points, so we tend to no care about it.
I remember being a newby, and I tought it was easier to see an alien than to get mod points here (not that I cared about that then, most of the time I was not even wiling to moderate). It is just normal that newbies care more about karma.
< leads to <
I duno. I guess just sliglty faster than ordinary is enough.
Well, if it is Linux, you please do make sure it is accessible from CLI.
There is no sense on teaching math before any kind of science, neither after. Math should be always toghether with some science that uses it.
They always were. But now they (we) are rich idiots, who can fullfill their desires.
By the way, capitalization is a good thing, start using it...
Why shouldn't it be almost entirely iron (like Earth)?
I'm not buying the oberal theory, but, be surprised if you want, a coal plant can runt out of about anything. Yes, you can change a coal plant to diesel with minor modifications, and most plant already have those modifications because they usualy run on diesel for small periods.
Now I disagree. 2-3 is the optimal size for a team of peers. If you want the sirurgical team of the Mithical Man Month, you'll need more people.
Also, take in mind that computers replaced lots of the roles of the cirurgical team.
It is possible to do that in Eclipse, as it is possible to replace Svn, Git or watever to do it. It is just too much trouble to do for an entire team.
When you redefine your distance measurement, the distances will increase proportionaly with their original size, just like our observartion.
Also, if you postulate that the shrinkage is due to variation on the strenght of the electro-weak force, the speed of light will change acordingly and you'll see old photons red-shifted, just like we experience.
As far as I know, if other constants followed the change of the electro-weak force, that model would be completely equivalent to a growing universe. So, there would be no experiment that decides what was really happening. If the other constants don't follow, we'll see changing constants, exactly like we observe, but I don't really know if they are still equivalent.
Hey, that is a nice way to get atractive.
But you can't have superconducting without them...
I guess you are thinking about the wrong gender here...
As an anedonct, here where I work we've authorized updating to IE7 only last week. And only because we had problems with a bug from IE6.
Well, FACTOR is a problem, not a computing device.
Yep, a good support for macros may be the best feature a language can have. It replaces all the OO features, with several advantages.
But, also, a good support for macros may be the worst feature a language can have. It leads to an unmaintenable mess where each part of a software is written on a different (unique) language and only the compiler can put it all toguether.
As aways, the outcome depends on your team.
I really think that source control systems should have client side hooks. That way you could run ident autmaticaly on every commit and update, and decouple your style from the team's.
Of course, if your entire team uses an editor that will correctly ident the lines, like emacs or vi, putting the braces on single lines isn't necessary. If someone just insterts a line there, they will make it clear that the line isn't on the loop.
Now, why lots of IDEs insist on requiring TAB and BKSPACE clicks is a mistery to me.
I have a problem with the '}}' at the end. It is very easy to lose one of the braces.
I can understand why people use it with Lisp, parenthesis are easier to read (or I'm more used to them, I don't know). Also, Lisp has shorter routines than C-derived languages.
You are right, but there is the small detail that all the other routines of the program, excluding FACTOR, must have polinomial time.
Also, a lot of people started to belive that FACTOR is not, in fact, np-complete since it was proved that primality tests have polinomial time.