Let's see, ICANN abuses the power it have as a not for profit body to create a monopoly for a for profit business.
Yes, this does not look like abuse of economical power, it is more like normal corruption and abuse of *(political) power, that give jail time to the people, instead of regulations.
Oh, yes. If a phisher could access my bank servers and do anything he want with them, then, I think he'll have enogh information to phish me... But just at this bank's account.
I also have seen some news being created, and I never saw a reporter getting the facts right. Worse yet, I never saw a reporter who seems to care to get it right, they just want to get something.
No, it is very easy to overlook. Like the signals we are trying to find, our signals are hard to see.
Well, maybe for an advanced technology it is easier, but it may be that the aliens don't even use radio waves and don't try searching something on them.
I use libtrash, it is a very good trash implementation at the system call level, so, it works with any terminal you want it to.
Also, if you decide to use it, I sugest taking a look at Cleartrash, that you can use manually to clear the trash or put at your crontab to remove the files after they are kept at the trash for a while.
No, Pascal has pointers, you can reference the memory that 'pointer' points with '^pointer'. I can't remember how to declare them, but they surely have pointers. Also have better strings (Pascal strings are much simpler to deal with). And have that 'var' modifier that C is missing, but C++ implemented with '&'.
I still prefer C/C++, mostly because of its sane type conversions, but Pascal has a lot of usefull features.
Answering my own question (Google is my friend), it can be done. It is possible to read the keys using X-rays, it is also expensive, very expensive. But the problems don't stop there, there are researches trying to detect the X-rays emissions to destroy the data if one does that.
I wonder if there isn't a way to read the key using X-rays or some kind of ressonance. If we can do that, we can break any given TC plattform, independent of how well designed it was.
This is (as far as I know) the very first Trusted Computing platform that we can put our hands on. Very, very interesting. And it is well done (no obvious flaws).
If somebody can break that, we may be safe! That or they may build a more secure one, but we'll be safe for more time anyway.
And when somebody tries to change the status quo on the DNS, people start complaining: "It isn't broke, don't fix it!"
And no, this is not the first time someone abuses the DNS system, people should know better.
Re:LibraNet helped me overcome my fear of Linux
on
Libranet On The Rocks
·
· Score: 1
I never used it, but it was a shock to me that one could recompile the kernel as easily as clicking on a button.
Why not, most of the trouble people have compiling the kernel is to make it small, add some weard functionality and making sure it works before completely switching. You know, doing usefull stuf.
If you just want to recompile it, yes, I can create a script for that on much less than a day.
Well, thse showers are probably safer than you though, but they kill a few people on a million. But the ones made of plastic and with covered switches are safe, unless you start to playing with the connectors, of corse.
Well, it seems to me that China's government is in fact corrupt and evil. But I never saw anything about this "west" country. Probably its governemnt is also corrupt and evil, I never listened about one that wasn't, but now I am very curious about this country, where is it?
"IP holders of the world, unite to defend from FOSS!"
Obviously, this is a Microsoft's manifesto, and if they are sucessfull (if they can unite with other IP defenders), we'll have a declared war. That is everything we need to make the other (normal?) people share our cause, isn't it? I would say that this is a very bad move from them.
If I understod it right, you just described quantum entanglement. So, looking for that single gear will change the spin of all the other gears.
The GP had a very good point, because what the submiter says is known to be impossible. That is also why I'm reading the comments, to discover what the researches really did. But it seems that I'll need to RTFA.
So, they send trunks of servers to near you to reduce the latency, and when you need more responsive systems, they send servers to your building, and if you need to reduce the latency even more, they send the servers to your desk.
Yes, I see where it goes, very inovative. But ignore the rant, I don't want to stay on the way of a nice buzzword.
You didn't realize that those computers will not be distributed to let the children "do their homework" as you say, but to let them learn how to deal with computers (become computer literate persons) and access the internet. And children have a lot of free time to spend learning how to get their systems to do some funny stuf.
Those who will try to use the computers to help with their homework may not even get good grades because of teachers clueless (can't deal with the data) or because of their excessive clue (not making the children dependent on the computers).
My guess is that XP is working only because it banished the "good on paper" metodologies and because of the refactoring formalism. All the other points you cite are a description of "good management", and as so, don't change just because the company adopted another metodology. But getting ride of a lot of useless paper (by letting the programers decide what is usefull) is the way to go.
"Just like the random Chevy is good enough for most people. Saying "but but but it's not a porsche!" all the time just makes you look like an elitist geek."
And it happens even if the Chevy is in fact less available and more expensive than the Porsche, how sad...
"If quantum computing will come around, I'll just switch to quantum encryption. Then you'll have to break the laws of QM to "break" the scheme. There are already rudimentary quantum encryption devices but there are no quantum computers that can take on even a 64 bit key space."
Yes, but quantum criptography has only deployed simetric algorithms for now, so, if quantum computing comes around today, we are doomed.
At economics, it's called a "self fullfiling profecy" and is very well known and described (as far as an aconomical model can be). It differs from the measurement modifying the result of a quantum experiment because its results determinable, while at the quantic case, they are not.
That said, the funny part is that it makes no difference if the readers realise or not the it is BS, even if they know that it is not a bubble, they may think that other ones are convinced that the bubble exists, so they'll not invest for a while.
That happens unless everybody knows that everybody knows that it is BS, and everybody knows that everybody knows that everybody knows that it is BS, and so on...
"Heck, while we're at it, why not put automotive companies out of business by having government-funded and operated initiatives to build and sell cheap or free cars in regional co-ops?"
What would be an exceptional idea if it was viable. Small car manufacturing plants is exactly what is needed to restore compatition at the cars market and reduce the power of current companies at gevernement bribes^W negociations.
Slashdot Mirror
Let's see, ICANN abuses the power it have as a not for profit body to create a monopoly for a for profit business.
Yes, this does not look like abuse of economical power, it is more like normal corruption and abuse of *(political) power, that give jail time to the people, instead of regulations.
Oh, yes. If a phisher could access my bank servers and do anything he want with them, then, I think he'll have enogh information to phish me... But just at this bank's account.
I also have seen some news being created, and I never saw a reporter getting the facts right. Worse yet, I never saw a reporter who seems to care to get it right, they just want to get something.
I, for one, welcome our new blogger overloads!
No, it is very easy to overlook. Like the signals we are trying to find, our signals are hard to see.
Well, maybe for an advanced technology it is easier, but it may be that the aliens don't even use radio waves and don't try searching something on them.
I use libtrash, it is a very good trash implementation at the system call level, so, it works with any terminal you want it to.
Also, if you decide to use it, I sugest taking a look at Cleartrash, that you can use manually to clear the trash or put at your crontab to remove the files after they are kept at the trash for a while.
No, Pascal has pointers, you can reference the memory that 'pointer' points with '^pointer'. I can't remember how to declare them, but they surely have pointers. Also have better strings (Pascal strings are much simpler to deal with). And have that 'var' modifier that C is missing, but C++ implemented with '&'.
I still prefer C/C++, mostly because of its sane type conversions, but Pascal has a lot of usefull features.
Answering my own question (Google is my friend), it can be done. It is possible to read the keys using X-rays, it is also expensive, very expensive. But the problems don't stop there, there are researches trying to detect the X-rays emissions to destroy the data if one does that.
I wonder if there isn't a way to read the key using X-rays or some kind of ressonance. If we can do that, we can break any given TC plattform, independent of how well designed it was.
This is (as far as I know) the very first Trusted Computing platform that we can put our hands on. Very, very interesting. And it is well done (no obvious flaws).
If somebody can break that, we may be safe! That or they may build a more secure one, but we'll be safe for more time anyway.
And when somebody tries to change the status quo on the DNS, people start complaining: "It isn't broke, don't fix it!"
And no, this is not the first time someone abuses the DNS system, people should know better.
Why not, most of the trouble people have compiling the kernel is to make it small, add some weard functionality and making sure it works before completely switching. You know, doing usefull stuf.
If you just want to recompile it, yes, I can create a script for that on much less than a day.
Well, thse showers are probably safer than you though, but they kill a few people on a million. But the ones made of plastic and with covered switches are safe, unless you start to playing with the connectors, of corse.
Well, it seems to me that China's government is in fact corrupt and evil. But I never saw anything about this "west" country. Probably its governemnt is also corrupt and evil, I never listened about one that wasn't, but now I am very curious about this country, where is it?
"IP holders of the world, unite to defend from FOSS!"
Obviously, this is a Microsoft's manifesto, and if they are sucessfull (if they can unite with other IP defenders), we'll have a declared war. That is everything we need to make the other (normal?) people share our cause, isn't it? I would say that this is a very bad move from them.
If I understod it right, you just described quantum entanglement. So, looking for that single gear will change the spin of all the other gears.
The GP had a very good point, because what the submiter says is known to be impossible. That is also why I'm reading the comments, to discover what the researches really did. But it seems that I'll need to RTFA.
Shouldn't they? What is the reason to sign a code if you don't at least test it before?
Never underestimate the power that this fact have on the market.
So, they send trunks of servers to near you to reduce the latency, and when you need more responsive systems, they send servers to your building, and if you need to reduce the latency even more, they send the servers to your desk.
Yes, I see where it goes, very inovative. But ignore the rant, I don't want to stay on the way of a nice buzzword.
And how do I get a IPv6 subnet to deal with if my ISP is not cooperating?
You didn't realize that those computers will not be distributed to let the children "do their homework" as you say, but to let them learn how to deal with computers (become computer literate persons) and access the internet. And children have a lot of free time to spend learning how to get their systems to do some funny stuf.
Those who will try to use the computers to help with their homework may not even get good grades because of teachers clueless (can't deal with the data) or because of their excessive clue (not making the children dependent on the computers).
My guess is that XP is working only because it banished the "good on paper" metodologies and because of the refactoring formalism. All the other points you cite are a description of "good management", and as so, don't change just because the company adopted another metodology. But getting ride of a lot of useless paper (by letting the programers decide what is usefull) is the way to go.
"Just like the random Chevy is good enough for most people. Saying "but but but it's not a porsche!" all the time just makes you look like an elitist geek."
And it happens even if the Chevy is in fact less available and more expensive than the Porsche, how sad...
"If quantum computing will come around, I'll just switch to quantum encryption. Then you'll have to break the laws of QM to "break" the scheme. There are already rudimentary quantum encryption devices but there are no quantum computers that can take on even a 64 bit key space."
Yes, but quantum criptography has only deployed simetric algorithms for now, so, if quantum computing comes around today, we are doomed.
At economics, it's called a "self fullfiling profecy" and is very well known and described (as far as an aconomical model can be). It differs from the measurement modifying the result of a quantum experiment because its results determinable, while at the quantic case, they are not.
That said, the funny part is that it makes no difference if the readers realise or not the it is BS, even if they know that it is not a bubble, they may think that other ones are convinced that the bubble exists, so they'll not invest for a while.
That happens unless everybody knows that everybody knows that it is BS, and everybody knows that everybody knows that everybody knows that it is BS, and so on...
"Heck, while we're at it, why not put automotive companies out of business by having government-funded and operated initiatives to build and sell cheap or free cars in regional co-ops?"
What would be an exceptional idea if it was viable. Small car manufacturing plants is exactly what is needed to restore compatition at the cars market and reduce the power of current companies at gevernement bribes^W negociations.
But how does it relate to socialism?