Slashdot Mirror


Time Saving Linux Desktop Tips?

dan_polt asks: "I currently use a Linux desktop system, at work. One of the great things about the Linux desktop is that there are lots of ways to save a lot of time from useful widgets and configuration to minimize the pain of repetitive tasks. Most of my work involves web/e-Mail/SSH access, and I have a very high spec'd machine with dual-head 1600x1200 screens. What software or configuration tips might Slashdot have for me to: make better use of my time; make the most of my screen real estate; and make my use of the desktop more effective?"

565 comments

  1. Outsource by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Give me your machine.
    2. You have more free time.
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

    1. Re:Outsource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Bill? Is that you?

    2. Re:Outsource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy, I have never seen so many -1 in a person's profile. You just made my day XD .

    3. Re:Outsource by Janitha · · Score: 5, Informative

      First find a good window manager (initially spend the time if you have some exploring gnome, kde, enlightenment, twm, fluxbox, *box, what ever). Find something you like from that. Simple is good. Bling Bling is bad. I personally choose enlightenment. Multiple desktops! Use them. I have a 3x3 array setup with edge flipping so hitting the edge of the screen would push me to the adjacent desktop and have wrapping around. So within any desktop, I can access any other. Of course this is a personal preference. (I would imagine this taking someone a long time to get used to, but once you do its like gold). Create a convention on how you would use your desktops, for example the top row for work, middle for shells/web/information, middle last for email, and bottom row for shells. Something that you will feel good with. Learn your shortcuts (either for window manager, editor, or what ever software your using). Things I find useful are scrolling through desktops, autocomplete, saving/copy/paste, locking computer, open applications, change music. Personalize your enviornment and applications. Configuration files are there for a reason. Set up shortkut keys and use them. Of course when you are customizing it, do it only once (or twice) initially not everyday tweaking more than you edit your actual work. If its a work computer, do not even think about installing games. And get rid of those bookmarks, my productivity shot up as soon as the slashdot and other bookmarks went away. Organize all the work related bookmarks in a way thats easiest for you. Lot of other things I was planning to say are already written below. Enjoy.

    4. Re:Outsource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrm, About the virtual desktops thing, I have the exact same setup on KDE, 9 desktops, 3x3 with screen flipping, and you can do the same thing in gnome, it is not really an enlightenment only feature, but I do agree that it is extremely useful.

    5. Re:Outsource by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1, Funny

      1) Find an early troll in a popular (i.e., Linux-related) thread. 2) Post a totally unrelated reply. 3) ??? 4) Karma!

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    6. Re:Outsource by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1, Funny

      5) Learn to use the
      tag before posting random nonsense on /.

      ;)

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    7. Re:Outsource by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, i didn't read out the "only enlightenment has it" from the second post above, overreacting perhaps ? He just had 2 clauses in a row, he didn't claim that enlightenment is superior with this feature that everyone actually has (even windowmaker ...)

      Anyway, last time i checked, enlightenment was much rocket science about much nothing, for the speed choose sawfish/sawmill or the fluxbox ... twm is just a disaster in the 21st century, so keep your fingers away from that.

      If you like lots of features choose kde or gnome. I chose kde, i chose life ...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    8. Re:Outsource by Eideewt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Virtual desktops are pretty awesome. I've moved from minimizing programs to just leaving them where they are and switching to another virtual desktop. I've also got a 3x3 setup, but I find that using ctrl+alt+numonthenumpad is the quickest way to work with them, since the numpad positions correspond to the layout of my desktops.

      I also used the Ratpoison window manager for a while. I think that, depending on your computing habits, a tiled window manager could really be productive. If I were writing more code and switching between fewer windows I would definitely consider switching back to one.

    9. Re:Outsource by ^me^ · · Score: 0

      6.) Learn XHTML (with the right MIME type) and start using

      --
      No one ever says, 'I can't read that ASCII E-mail you sent me.'
    10. Re:Outsource by inflex · · Score: 1

      Your 3x3 matrix didn't make sense to me at first until you mentioned how every other desktop is thus 1 desktop away, ingenious! Nice tip, now I have to work out how to make Fluxbox do that.

    11. Re:Outsource by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Oh and give ion a shot.
      It's very different but actually made me more productive (no more shuffling windows around only to get to
      what's beneath them...).

    12. Re:Outsource by Taladar · · Score: 1

      I second Ratpoison. It is the best, most efficient window manager you will find if you don't care about eye candy and run all (or almost all) programs maximized all the time anyway (you can tile the screen and have two or four windows on one screen but who needs more than the two windows you see with two screens at once?)

    13. Re:Outsource by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      why, because, like 2 days ago, slashdot decided to move from html 3.2 to xhtml? :)

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    14. Re:Outsource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, don't you know, it is all about the exesability and the semontick web. ASUX-time, rapidly prototyping NG-webapps and getting FUD-funded start-p capabilities that improve long-term customer satisfaction.

      And of course, you can listen to an podcast of this post on your favorite Apple-branded iPod-music player.

    15. Re:Outsource by mildgift · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks for the 3x3 workspace tip! It works great.

      My productivity tip is to keep some index cards and tape around. Make little labels for your keyboard, and tape them in place, so you can learn the keyboard shortcuts.

    16. Re:Outsource by masklinn · · Score: 1

      True dat, banishing Internet Explorer from your website rawks

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    17. Re:Outsource by Cally · · Score: 1
      Simple is good. Bling Bling is bad. I personally choose enlightenment.
      This is some sort of joke, right? Personally I've recently returned to WindowMaker after giving KDE a good 12 month run.
      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    18. Re:Outsource by mc_barron · · Score: 1

      Technically the diagonal (from the current) desktops are TWO desktops away - unless dragging to the corners is different than dragging to the sides?

    19. Re:Outsource by guillebot · · Score: 0

      Why is important the keyboard layout matching with the virtual layout when you are switching desktops through hotkeys?

    20. Re:Outsource by jd142 · · Score: 1

      Heh. I thought it was funny that someone would say that bling bling is bad and then choose Enlightenment, which I've always thought of as having cutting edge graphics effects. E17 is especially cool looking when everything is working. If you don't know, E17 is the latest, not even beta yet version.

    21. Re:Outsource by Janitha · · Score: 1

      Just moving the mouse to say top-left would push me to desktop in top left. Pressing SHIFT+ALT+(UP+LEFT) does the same in one hit. Its executed as two, but its one action for the user.

    22. Re:Outsource by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      Depending on the window manager, you are often able to simply slam the mouse into the corner to move diagonally. I'm pretty sure it works on Afterstep, FVWM, and Enlightenment.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    23. Re:Outsource by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      It lets me think of my desktops spatially when I select them, which I find helpful. A 3x3 grid of keys corresponding to a 3x3 grid of virtual desktops. That may not be an advantage to everyone, but I like to be able to think of "that desktop over there", rather than remembering names or numbers. Also, it makes them feel more concrete to me when they're arranged as I have them.

    24. Re:Outsource by IamSaved · · Score: 1

      yeah!

  2. My advice... by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't be posting to Slashdot and reading the trolls you will receive in response instead of working on that high-spec'd dual headed monster you got.

    That'll save you a ton more time than any of the advice given here ;)

    Personally, I have tried to use as much as I can via Putty (SSH+screen) and keep everything I do in one window. It cuts down on how much I have taking up my real estate and it seems to make me more productive.

    Even with a 23" LCD it's nice to have everything in one place.

    1. Re:My advice... by sloanster · · Score: 1

      putty is not a linux program, it's only for ms windoze - it's not needed on linux though, we just use ssh.

    2. Re:My advice... by novakreo · · Score: 4, Informative

      putty is not a linux program, it's only for ms windoze - it's not needed on linux though, we just use ssh.

      Putty is actually available for both Linux and Windows (even NT on Alpha!).
      While it probably is overkill for just 'ssh hostname.tld', it is useful if you need to use features like port-forwarding and want to use a saved profile instead of supplying command-line options or hand-editing ~/.ssh/config, or for migrating from Windows while keeping the same SSH client.

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    3. Re:My advice... by McCarrum · · Score: 1

      Where's my damn MOD points when I need them.

      PuTTY under Linux can be annoying, but there are times when it's gold.

    4. Re:My advice... by karearea · · Score: 1

      Take your hand off your dick?

    5. Re:My advice... by richlv · · Score: 1

      for saved sessions kde konsole is pretty neat - i have created a sessions where i have servers in one location in one windows as tabs, servers in another - that's another window.
      i log into them automatically with ssh keys, so it's just a matter of clicking on the correct icon - and i have all the servers accessible.

      the problem is, when a session is run this way, konsole for some reason doesn't recognize function keys, special characters and alike correclty - even though all settings are the same as for local sessions. i haven't been able to find out what's wrong and my kde issue has had no response :)

      so it's not all that great, but for simple usage it's great - and i hope that i will be able to resolve key/character problem some time soon.

      --
      Rich
    6. Re:My advice... by digidave · · Score: 1

      I have found Putty on Linux to be quite buggy. However, SecPanel does pretty much the same thing in a slightly uglier GUI.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    7. Re:My advice... by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      Port forwarding?
      ssh -L 666:127.0.0.1:666 host will forward 666 from remote to localhost
      ssh -R 666:127.0.0.1:666 host will forward 666 from localhost to remote

      putty is a half crippled ssh-client clone for windows.

    8. Re:My advice... by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ssh -L 666:127.0.0.1:666 host will forward 666 from remote to localhost
      ssh -R 666:127.0.0.1:666 host will forward 666 from localhost to remote


      Yeah, and that's ever so much more convienent to type than just setting it up in a GUI, saving it as a profile, and typing "putty -host xyzzy".

      Nice to see that you still play Doom though.

      putty is a half crippled ssh-client clone for windows.

      Your fanaticism is showing. putty is open source, cross platform, and damn good. If you're going to claim that it's "half crippled" then you'd best back that up with actual facts rather than just looking like a knee jerk anti-Windows fanboy. I don't suggest that you use putty for all tasks, but it's certainly a good alternative for many of them. Right tool, right job.

    9. Re:My advice... by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      >> Your fanaticism is showing. putty is open source, cross platform, and damn good. If you're going to claim that it's "half crippled" then you'd best back that up with actual facts rather than just looking like a knee jerk anti-Windows fanboy. I don't suggest that you use putty for all tasks, but it's certainly a good alternative for many of them. Right tool, right job.

      Sure,

      The colours are broken, often vim syntax highlighting is unreadable and many irssi themes show text in black on black when that doesnt happen with ssh under any terminal emulator I tried.

      Refreshing after resize is unreliable and sometimes makes the application permanently unviewable.

      Line crop often breaks and line does a \r instead of a \n\r so you end up typing over what you just typed.

      Connection drops from time to time, seems not as reliable but may be due to Windows' limited network capabilities (*shiver*tcpstack errors*shiver*)

      Plink the command line clients managed to somehow crash some Windows machines I tried it on, never found out why.

      Cant do X forwarding or many other nifty things

      I think I even saw putty plain not run certain terminal applications. Its not bad considering its emulation, but about as good as wine emulates windows software :)

      For the record, I do hate windows, but mostly for technical reasons: http://hackeron.dyndns.org/hackeron/index.php/Linu x_or_Windows_-_A_Practical_Comparison

    10. Re:My advice... by EvilNebby · · Score: 1

      I have a lot of screen real estate (3 21" 1600x1200) but I've found that the best thing for me recently is the use of tabs in the Gnome Terminal rather than a bunch of terminals open all over the place. I changed my config to put the file I'm editing in vim as the tab title, otherwise the current directory and it saved a stupid amount of time for how simple it was. As for what goes on what monitor, I prefer to have Firefox in one, code in the other, and databases in the other. Sortof an MVC pattern.

      --
      --- Nebulous
    11. Re:My advice... by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the colours are broken, often vim syntax highlighting is unreadable

      Then you have vim doing the wrong highlighting -- most likely vim is defaulting to background=light when you should use background=dark. Solution? Either change putty to use a light background (e.g. -- white/grey with dark text instead of the default black w/ grey text) or do a :set background=dark in vim or .vimrc.

      The black on black bit is almost certainly the same issue -- the apps are presuming what color your background is and they're simply wrong. That's not a putty issue.

      Refreshing after resize is unreliable and sometimes makes the application permanently unviewable.

      Sorry, never had that issue.

      Connection drops from time to time, seems not as reliable but may be due to Windows' limited network capabilities

      I leave my putty sessions up for days or weeks at a time. The only time it times out is if the connection on one end drops -- the general case is that my DSL modem drops. Not much putty can do about that. You do have TCP keepalives turned on, right? If not, then the remote host is probably booting you for being idle.

      Cant do X forwarding or many other nifty things

      Funny, I guess that "Connection->SSH->X11, Enable X11 Forwarding" checkbox is a thing of my imagination. I highly recommend that if you enable that then you also click on "Enable compression" on the "Connection->SSH" page. This is analogous to the openssh -X/-L and -C options.

      I think I even saw putty plain not run certain terminal applications.

      Most likely a termcap issue, but I've seen putty used to replace commercial clients and do a better job.

      As for your website -- do you really want me to dissect it? There's a lot of utter crap on there, varying from outright lies to improper parallels. There are some truths as well, but they're buried in the muck.

      And no, I'm not a Windows fanboy -- but I do use the right tool for the right job. I have both Windows and Linux systems at home, and I'm a professional C++ coder on Unix platforms.

    12. Re:My advice... by Hackeron · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about using the same background in xterm and putty with putty breaking colours and I wasnt able to run any X applications under putty, maybe I'm doing something wrong..

      As for the website, please do dissect it.

    13. Re:My advice... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Aside from migration there's no reason to use putty. I actually used the putty command-line tools to set up port forwarding from a script for an ex-employer too cheap to set up a real VPN. Formerly they were sending unencrypted customer data over internet links :( However it is much more user-friendly than ssh for sure, and it's nice to have one app to ssh/telnet/rlogin. Not that I ever use the other two any more.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:My advice... by Teach · · Score: 1

      Hey, a completely offtopic question here, since you seem to be an experienced PuTTY user, and one who uses vim.

      I'm ssh'ing to a Linux server from a Windows box using PuTTY. When in vim, I can't seem to get the numeric keypad to actually do numbers. I've tried several of the options in both PuTTY and vim, and no combination seems to do the trick. Any suggestions?

      --
      Graham "Teach" Mitchell, computer science teacher, Leander HS
    15. Re:My advice... by sloanster · · Score: 1

      Well, that's interesting - the putty site now has a "putty for unix" source tarball available. I had never heard of it being ported to linux. But, like I say, in the unix world we just use ssh, so I'm not sure that putty would really buy me anything, apart from the novelty factor...

      Maybe if I run across putty in a package for my distro one day when I'm feeling exceptionally bored, I'll check it out...

      Thanks for the tip

    16. Re:My advice... by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      I can't seem to get the numeric keypad to actually do numbers

      Just tested it here -- no problems. I'm using bash on FC2 on the Linux end, PuTTY 0.58 on the Windows end. TERM is set to "xterm".

      Potentially relevant settings:

      Terminal->Keyboard:
      Home and End keys: Standard
      Function keys and keypad: Linux
      Initial state of cursor keys: Normal
      Initial state of numeric keyboard: Normal

      Connection->Data:
      Terminal-type string: xterm

    17. Re:My advice... by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      I wasnt able to run any X applications under putty, maybe I'm doing something wrong

      I'd have to guess so, although I don't know what. I run X apps off my Linux server to other boxes on the network and to my work machine (although even w/ SSH compression it's ungodly slow -- only a 128 kbps uplink). I use Cygwin's X server. I've also done it via Cygwin's openssh.

      As for the website -- this is hardly a full and indepth dissection, but here's a start:

      Installation section:

      Yes, installing Linux is easy now (and yes, I installed Slackware back in the mid 90s; I know how much better it is now). But it's not any easier than installing Windows in the vast majority of cases. The statements in (1) conflict directly with those in (2) -- sorry, but if Windows installation is "typically beyond the scope of a typical PC user" then so is installing Linux. They are not radically different in how you install them.

      While the number of bundled apps with Linux is vastly higher, some of your statements in (4) are incorrect. Gimp, while powerful, is nowhere near the level of Photoshop. And gnucash (that's a bad link you have there) is not "accounting software". It's a poor man's Quicken/Money at best (there is better than gnucash nowadays; but it's not bundled with any distro I know of).

      Your continual harping on hardware drivers, both in this section and elsewhere, is simply bogus. Windows comes with the vast majority of drivers, and it's easy to update drivers -- in most cases you can even do it through Windows Update. Stop implying that Linux always has the drivers needed -- it simply does not. Wireless support is seriously crappy, ACPI/APM support is barely any better (extremely important for laptops), and 3D graphics support is essentially non-existant (and recompiling the kernel to add support, if there is any, is well beyond the capabilities of most PC users). Sound support is sketchy at best, particularly anything more advanced than basic audio out. There are certainly areas that Linux is better (the biggest being "outdated" hardware, which is hardly a concern for the average user; the second being SATA drive support, which has been an issue w/ Windows installation for awhile now, but is becoming a non-issue now that BIOS's are making it irrelevant).

      As for Windows Activation (in (5)) -- it's hardly time consuming. It takes a few seconds. Even the time I had to use the 800 number it took no more than a minute. If you have network connectivity it's as difficult as clicking "Next".

      And, finally, you are simply wrong about the requirement for anti-virus and anti-spyware on Windows and Linux. I have run a Windows PC for years w/o either, and had no problems. I know of others that do so as well. I didn't download from untrustworthy sources, I didn't open unknown or potentially dangerous attachments, etc. I do run AV software now, but only because my work required it for VPN access. Sure, I probably could've continued not doing so, but it really wasn't worth the chance of being fired. On a similar note, Linux is not immune from virus/worm threats, it simply isn't being targeted yet. A well written virus that is capable of dealing with a variety of distros could do quite a bit of damage simply because many Linux users aren't expecting to be vulnerable. As for spyware -- you're telling me that nobody ever gets rooted on Linux, or that there aren't rootkits out there for it? Where do you think the name comes from? Intrusion detection existed long, long before Windows got a TCP/IP stack.

      Software Installation:
      The strongest point you have is that there is no equivalent to yum/emerge/etc. for 3rd party Windows software. A rather large part of this is due to the commercial vs free software attitudes in the underlying OS's -- none of the Linux update tools have methods for non-free software. You cannot get Java via the update tools (at least not legally), or Oracle, or much other software. But still, it is generally better in Linux vs Windows. But saying that "All updates a

    18. Re:My advice... by Hackeron · · Score: 1
      Firstly thank you very much for analysing my text, I do wish for it to be accurate and list Linux' faults as much as its merits. If you come up with any more suggestions, dont hesitate to just edit the wiki or go to the discussion page.

      Yes, installing Linux is easy now (and yes, I installed Slackware back in the mid 90s; I know how much better it is now). But it's not any easier than installing Windows in the vast majority of cases. The statements in (1) conflict directly with those in (2) -- sorry, but if Windows installation is "typically beyond the scope of a typical PC user" then so is installing Linux. They are not radically different in how you install them.

      Some distributions maybe, but have you tried Lindows or Arklinux? -- They have a choice of 3 options:

      1) Wipe pc and install Linux
      2) Make space and install Linux
      3) Use available space and install Linux

      On Ark, thats it, next question is to remove CD from drive for the reboot (Lindows will ask for your name and stuff, but also trivial). Windows requires partitioning, network configuration, antivirus installation, software installation, etc.

      Yes the difference isnt grand but I on more than one occation let friends try installing Windows and Linux and they always phoned me stuck with the windows installation (some early one, many after first boot) but never stuck on the Linux installation.

      While the number of bundled apps with Linux is vastly higher, some of your statements in (4) are incorrect. Gimp, while powerful, is nowhere near the level of Photoshop. And gnucash (that's a bad link you have there) is not "accounting software". It's a poor man's Quicken/Money at best (there is better than gnucash nowadays; but it's not bundled with any distro I know of).

      Thats debatable. Gimp is more powerful than Photoshop in many ways (i.e. pythonfu) but lacks a couple of major things Photoshop has, granted. I wouldnt call it inferior on any level though, just very different to the point of being frustrating when referred to as a photoshop replacement. As for gnucash, I'm not an accountant, I'll correct the mistake. As for better than gnucash, and accounting software, if you have information about these I'm all ears.

      Your continual harping on hardware drivers, both in this section and elsewhere, is simply bogus. Windows comes with the vast majority of drivers, and it's easy to update drivers -- in most cases you can even do it through Windows Update. Stop implying that Linux always has the drivers needed -- it simply does not. Wireless support is seriously crappy, ACPI/APM support is barely any better (extremely important for laptops), and 3D graphics support is essentially non-existant (and recompiling the kernel to add support, if there is any, is well beyond the capabilities of most PC users). Sound support is sketchy at best, particularly anything more advanced than basic audio out. There are certainly areas that Linux is better (the biggest being "outdated" hardware, which is hardly a concern for the average user; the second being SATA drive support, which has been an issue w/ Windows installation for awhile now, but is becoming a non-issue now that BIOS's are making it irrelevant).

      * Intel wireless on centrino based laptops wasnt available at the start, but has now cought up. What other wireless devices dont work for you? - Whatever obscure ones you can name are surely supported by ndiswrapper?
      * ACPI/APM support was poor. Nower days I'm seeing more and more processor features supported by Linux but not by Windows and ability to reduce processor speed way bellow what is possible on Windows. There are some resume from suspend issues like some usb ports not restarting but its a work in progress that believe it or not has advantages on some laptops to Windows.
      * What desktop oriented distributions dont come with binary nvidia and ati drivers these days??
      * Audio support is fantastic provided you ha

  3. Two 1600x1200? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Try watching Star Wars and working at the same time! Wait a sec, maybe that wouldn't work...

    1. Re:Two 1600x1200? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Of course it wouldn't work. One of the monitors needs to be at least 16:10 aspect ratio for the full movie experience. A 24" widescreen would do just fine. Or, if you have the desk space, a 80" DLP would work too.

    2. Re:Two 1600x1200? by megrims · · Score: 1

      No no no. All he has to do is watch 3 movies at once. Maximum efficiency. :)

    3. Re:Two 1600x1200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bottom sixth of the screen is for the interface for your multimedia player of choice and the top 1600x1000 is used for your 16:10 aspect ratio movie display.

    4. Re:Two 1600x1200? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      you're one of those people who has like a dozen tool bars in their web browser aren't you?

    5. Re:Two 1600x1200? by harryman100 · · Score: 1

      Try watching Star Wars and working at the same time!

      That's not as crazy as you might think. I too have a dual headed computer (the machine itself isn't much of a monster anymore though! - I'm poor!). I quite frequently run MythTV on one of the monitors, and work on the other one. With actually very little productivity hit. In fact, now i have a laptop as well, I do this even more, just using the laptop instead of the second screen.

      It takes a little while, but it's fairly easy to learn how to watch something in the background like that. Eventually you get to treat it the same way as background music.

      --
      .sigs are for losers
    6. Re:Two 1600x1200? by dan_polt · · Score: 1

      I also have a mythtv setup at home, however i'm not sure watching tv at work is really the way to increase productivity :)

    7. Re:Two 1600x1200? by harryman100 · · Score: 1

      That's what makes being a student, and having a job which requires me to work from home, oh so sweet!

      --
      .sigs are for losers
    8. Re:Two 1600x1200? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      It works quite well with Hollywood Movies. You usually lose nothing important if you only look at the movie every 5 minutes or so. If you don't believe that to be true watch the short movie parodies here and tell me which important part of the stories are missing.

  4. Time saver by dfjunior · · Score: 4, Funny

    make better use of my time

    Quit f-ing around on Slashdot and get back to work!

    1. Re:Time saver by gatzke · · Score: 5, Funny


      In /etc/hosts

      127.0.0.1 www.slashdot.org
      127.0.0.1 .slashdot.org

      Helps me at work...

    2. Re:Time saver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In /var/www/.htaccess:

      Redirect http://66.35.250.150/

      Back to square one. :'(

    3. Re:Time saver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea. Caching things locally speeds up browsing.

    4. Re:Time saver by optikSmoke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your strategy is broken. Observe the following steps:

      1. Type some random letters, eg klshdfas
      2. Type .slashdot.org
      3. Press enter
      4. Watch productivity disappear!

      Slashdot's DNS servers appear to give a usable IP for any garbage you throw at them that isn't assigned to something else.

    5. Re:Time saver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried it, but fail to see how. -- Hemos

    6. Re:Time saver by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      But of course that doesn't help, since the 2nd time in a minute you type slashdot.org and it doesn't work, you'll be annoyed and edit it to put a # in front of those lines before you're even conscious of it.

      Somebody has a script out there, that changes the root password to something random, and uses cron to put the old password back at some specific time. You can use that to lock yourself out of your /etc/hosts file for a time, if you don't need root access in the meantime. Yay, managed to Google it - http://thomer.com/lockout/lockout.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    7. Re:Time saver by Ours · · Score: 1

      Well I guess this proves it doesn't work. You've learned the IP address or something?

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    8. Re:Time saver by leuk_he · · Score: 5, Informative
      YOu should realy use
      0.0.0.0 www.slashdot.org
      0.0.0.0 .slashdot.org
      I wonder how this habit of using 127.0.0.1 came into fashion if 0.0.0.0 is the more correct solution.
    9. Re:Time saver by hey! · · Score: 1

      1. Type some random letters, eg klshdfas
      2. Type .slashdot.org
      3. Press enter
      4. Watch productivity disappear!


      Simple, really. He's running Linux after all.

      1. install BIND on his box
      2. in /etc/named.conf, tell bind it's authoritative for slashdot.org
      3. repeat with every other time wasting site
      4. edit /etc/resolv.conf setting nameserver to 127.0.0.1
      5. enjoy hours of additional productivity time!


      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:Time saver by Strixy · · Score: 0

      Can I get that as a bumper sticker?

    11. Re:Time saver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mm...

      $ ping 0.0.0.0
      PING 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0): 56 data bytes
      64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms
      64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.0 ms

      So isn`t 127.0.0.1 faster ;)

    12. Re:Time saver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, when i ping 0.0.0.0 on my mac I get a reply from the default gateway...

    13. Re:Time saver by JPriest · · Score: 1

      0.0.0.0 is often used to represent anything else not found in the local routing table. Traffic for it could be sent out expecting a reply or sent to the default gateway. So it makes more sense to send traffic to loopback becasue the application could hang if it is waiting for 0.0.0.0 to reply.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  5. Turn it off by daeley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First thing you do to increase productivity is turn off all the blinkenlight widgetry. Even if the frenetic distractions every second don't give you seizures, they'll certainly slow your mental processes down.

    Then, open a web browser in one window and a terminal in the other and get to work you slacker! ;)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:Turn it off by Tom · · Score: 1

      Some of the gimmicks are useful, though. I have a CPU monitor open everywhere (just current load, no fancy histograms) because it tells me when a process goes bonkers. Same for mem and swap.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:Turn it off by speaker4thedead · · Score: 1
      Then, open a web browser in one window and a terminal in the other...


      I have a triple-headed system and strongly suggest getting ion3 or ratpoison. I use ion because it's more customizable and also lets one jump in and out of a "normal" window manager mode. Just be sure to rebind the keys right away. The default bindings must have been made by a cracked out baboon. I rebound all of my windows manager functions to chords involving the two windows keys since no linux programs seem to attempt to grab those keys.

      Then get firefox, gnu screen, mc or git and your choice of emacs or vim and learn how to use them without the mouse. You'll be amazed at how much this speeds up your ability to work.

      I started using ratpoison after I noticed that I tended to jump back and forth between a couple of full-screened apps, or I was spending time with two or three apps tiled on the screen. I figured that it didn't make sense to have all the bling when I never cared about it.

      This works particularly well with a multi-headed setup. I keep mail and aim open on one monitor, emacs and other primary applications on the center monitor and web and documentation readers on another. This has made me //much// more effective in getting things done online. I never spend any time futzing with the windows, and instead just do the damn work I intended to accomplish when I sat down at the computer.

      HTH
      --
      "My religion is to live --and die-- without regret." -- Milarepa
    3. Re:Turn it off by daeley · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. While I'm on OS X, I'll sometimes fire up X11 in fullscreen mode, using ion as the window manager. Nothing like clearing out the visual+mental space to get some coding or writing done.

      Although it's an older version, ion is available in Fink unstable, as is ratpoison.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    4. Re:Turn it off by speaker4thedead · · Score: 1

      I also just discovered this web page: http://wmii.de/

      It's another tiling wm, but this is the first I've ever heard of it. I can't make any comments on it since, well, I know almst nothing about it.

      --
      "My religion is to live --and die-- without regret." -- Milarepa
  6. Sidebars by imstanny · · Score: 1
    ...I use the google desktop side bar, which minimizes conveniently in the tray. (I think they have a linux version). It keeps track of news, weather, stocks, emails, post-it notes, etc... plus instantly searching your harddrive is great.

    1. Re:Sidebars by computergeek6933 · · Score: 0, Informative

      Widgets work wonders. You'll have all the info you need spread out before your eyes.

      --
      return 0;
  7. Linux Desktop by B+Man · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I use Linux mostly at work as well, I do work in a Windows-centric environment so I use VMWare to run Windows. Otherwise I would rather just use the virtual consoles, with ssh, elinks (for browsing), and rarely X. I do find X to be useful for things that I must use it for, but for the most productivity, nothing beats a console.

    1. Re:Linux Desktop by Ramses0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can mostly agree with this. Untold hours of productivity when you only have a 486 laptop on the couch ssh'd into a remote machine and only basic cable (not expanded basic, you lucky ducks). Tunning full console since getting X even to come up was painfully slow (not that bad, but not that good, either. didn't help that the old laptop video card had buggy drivers).

      Anyway, I broke down and got a powerbook when I couldn't do css/html development from the console without a GUI. Remarkably fat-free situation, and highly recommended that you try it sometime.

      --Robert

    2. Re:Linux Desktop by cbr2702 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I do find X to be useful for things that I must use it for, but for the most productivity, nothing beats a console.

      It's quite nice to be able to have multiple terminals visible at the same time and have quick cut-and-paste. I like X a lot, mostly as a way to hold many xterms.

      I do find, though, that as everyone writing for the web expects you to have a GUI browser, firefox is quicker than elinks for most things.

      --


      This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
    3. Re:Linux Desktop by B+Man · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's quite nice to be able to have multiple terminals visible at the same time and have quick cut-and-paste.

      Try using gpm and you can do a quick cut-and-paste. Just hold the mouse left button down and highlight text to copy, then just click the middle mouse button (or both left and right or the scroll on a scroll mouse) to paste.

    4. Re:Linux Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      multiple terminals visible at the same time

      The utility screen will let you split your terminal space between an arbitrary number of applications (and each one recognizes that it has its own tty).

      quick cut-and-paste

      Once again, screen has you covered, and will allow you to transport text between hosted applications; it even provides a spiffy vi-like interface for selection, and freezes the program output (no, it doesn't suspend) while you're doing this.

    5. Re:Linux Desktop by spuzzzzzzz · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree strongly with this comment. And although sibling points out that it is possible to copy and paste with gpm, I still find X useful because I can see so much more stuff (in different windows) at the same time. And if you're one of those people that uses X as an Xterm container, a tiling window manager is essential.

      PS: I find that wmii isn't very mature yet; I still prefer wmi-10.

      --

      Don't you hate meta-sigs?
    6. Re:Linux Desktop by cbr2702 · · Score: 1
      multiple terminals visible at the same time
      The utility screen will let you split your terminal space between an arbitrary number of applications (and each one recognizes that it has its own tty).

      Can you really do this with screen? That is, be able to see more than one terminal at the same time? I've only used it for keeping things running after I log out and having multiple shells (not all simultaneously visible) in the same terminal. This would be something useful, especially if my eyes get bad enough that I have to switch back to terminal full-time.

      --


      This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
    7. Re:Linux Desktop by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can you really do this with screen?

      Of course! Screen can do anything!

      I'm not sure exactly what you're shooting for, but you can "split" a screen session like this:

      In a console, run screen. This will create a new session inside screen. Tell screen to split the window by sending the keystrokes CTRL+a S (that's a capital 's'. If you send a lowercase 's' you will freeze the display. Resume it by sending CTRL+a q).

      The screen should split into two vertical windows. Tab into the lower window by sending CTRL+a <TAB> . Now create a new shell by sending CTRL+a c. You can go back and forth using CTRL+a <TAB> . Once you have a shell running in each you can do and/or run anything you want to. To close a split session, give it focus and send CTRL+a X (note the capital 'x').

      Gentoo's Wiki site has a nice writeup of screen. It makes it real easy to get up and running with screen. It includes the above example as well as instructions on how to resize the split and do many other things.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    8. Re:Linux Desktop by shadowzero313 · · Score: 1

      Damn, that's awesome. Didn't know you could do that in screen. Thanks for the tip.

    9. Re:Linux Desktop by peterpi · · Score: 1
      Ah, a post mentioning 'screen'.

      Screen is wonderful for command line stuff, and I use it daily. Does anybody here know if there is a conceptual equivalent for X? I want to be able to fire up an X session at home, disconnect from it but leave the clients running, and then reattach to it from elsewhere. Ideally I'd want it tunneled over ssh.

      I'm sure I'm not the first person to want to do that.

    10. Re:Linux Desktop by peterpi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google answers my own question. It's called xmove

    11. Re:Linux Desktop by HuxleysGhost · · Score: 1

      You are now my screen god! Thanks for the link.

    12. Re:Linux Desktop by leoboiko · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you want to run X programs but hate managing so-called "windows", try ratpoison, the mouse-less, window-less window manager. It's screen(1) for X. No more space lost with decorations, no more time lost resizing and moving windows.

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    13. Re:Linux Desktop by Taladar · · Score: 1

      If you like screen behaviour (other than the detach part) you might like ratpoison as window manager. It uses screen-like keys (obviously with a different prefix-key) and is the ideal window manager if you mostly use X11 as a place to access lots of xterms (or aterms,...).

    14. Re:Linux Desktop by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

      The wiki was slow as hell for me, so use this instead:

      http://gentoo-wiki.com.nyud.net:8090/TIP_Using_scr een

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    15. Re:Linux Desktop by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Can't you attach your X session to a remote server and just set the display locally? That way, all the processing is taking place on your fileboxen.

      ~W

      --
      sig?
    16. Re:Linux Desktop by pixelbeat · · Score: 1

      That wiki is very slow!
      Here's my summary of screen:
      http://www.pixelbeat.org/lkdb/screen.html

    17. Re:Linux Desktop by jnik · · Score: 1
      I want to be able to fire up an X session at home, disconnect from it but leave the clients running, and then reattach to it from elsewhere. Ideally I'd want it tunneled over ssh.

      I use X11VNC. Of course, for a conceptual equivalent to screen (which requires you to start all applications inside of it), just run a VNC server on your local box and fullscreen the viewer.

    18. Re:Linux Desktop by Mignon · · Score: 1
      Can't you attach your X session to a remote server and just set the display locally?

      I've been doing this (with X -query to a faster box with lots more RAM) from a couple of different Pentium laptops (craptops) over a 802.11b connection. Mostly I just run xterm and/or Mozilla. Adblock'ing some more aggressive flash makes Mozilla much more usable with a remote display. One problem I've been having is that they're both 8-bit displays. At the very least I get that annoying colormap flashing when I also run something like xmms or xv, but I think it's related to some Mozilla crashes as well. I haven't gotten to the bottom of that, though. As long as the X server works adequately, I would assume that the network traffic is the bottleneck and that a 486 doing the same thing wouldn't be much different.

      To get back to the original question - having arm's reach access to a computer is a "productivity" boost. By "productivity" I mean that I get more use out of it, so it's really more like increased utility or something. Just as an example, I look stuff up on Google all the time. For lots of those times I either wouldn't need to know right then if at all and wouldn't bother if I had to go to the other room to do it.

    19. Re:Linux Desktop by Anthony+Liguori · · Score: 1

      The utility screen will let you split your terminal space between an arbitrary number of applications (and each one recognizes that it has its own tty).

      M-x shell

      In emacs let's you have as many shells as you want and to easily copy-paste between them (without using the mouse).

    20. Re:Linux Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try ION.

    21. Re:Linux Desktop by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Ah.

      When you said "crappy laptops", I wasn't aware that you really meant it.

      Yeah, dude, upgrade time.

      --
      sig?
    22. Re:Linux Desktop by speaker4thedead · · Score: 1

      Just a quick note on usability with screen:

      I rebound the Ctrl-a binding to Ctrl-z after almost a year of the default binding. I've found to to be immensly easier to use. Having Ctrl-a bound to move-to-beginning-of-line in so many applications just made it a hassle to switch mental modes. Ctrl-z is rarely used in applications, infrequently used on the command line and is generally something that involves a mental pause anyways.

      --
      "My religion is to live --and die-- without regret." -- Milarepa
    23. Re:Linux Desktop by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      M-x shell is nice, but it doesn't provide a real terminal to the client apps. M-x term does, but it necessitates using funny key combos to talk to normal emacs stuff (C-c before any regular emacs command IIRC). Both are highly useful, for different purposes.

    24. Re:Linux Desktop by munpfazy · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. ctrl-z is rarely used on the command line?

      I suspect it's one of my top 5 most often used keystrokes.

      Funny how different people behave so differently when performing the same sort of tasks.

      I've got the screen key bound to backtick, since I almost never use it for anything, and on those occasions when I do use it, it's always a conscious decision.

      And, at the risk of being both off topic and redundant, I have to ask: where the hell are all the extra buttons we ought to have on our keyboards?

      There's room for another 20-30 touch typable buttons along the margins of a standard keyboard, and at least 5-10 nice big control key sort of buttons. Why are we stuck with a twenty year old interface + a "windows" key?

      The chording gymnastics we have to go through in order to make a set of letters, numbers, and a half dozen control keys do everything is just crazy. I want big, sloppy thumbswitches under the space bar labeled ctrl2 and ctrl3, and a row of sticky mod buttons to the left of the tab row. And don't even get me started on the insanity of making both "caps lock" and "\" easier to hit than ctrl on most modern keyboards. I mean, come on - caps lock? Why not just rip out the key entirely and put a little note that say, "wouldn't it be nice to have a useful key in this incredibly handy place?" (Yeah, I know you can remap keys, and I do on every machine I control. . . but sometimes I have to use other people's machines, and in some of the more primitive operating systems there's no user specific way to remap keys.)

      Ah well, enough ranting, I guess.

    25. Re:Linux Desktop by tehshen · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain! I am stuck here on college computers, typing capslock instead of control all the time. If anyone knows a way to remap the two on Windows as a standard user, it would me much appreciated.

      I think that the reason why we don't have the extra buttons is, sadly, that stupid people would get confused by them, "Why do I have buttons that don't do anything?"; and we're stuck like that because people don't want to change. Then again, Menu, Super (Windows), and Pause/Break are practically made for remapping to things, so use them (for me they're remapped to Home/Browser/Terminal respectively)

      Just one thing though: What do you use C-z for? Before I set it to the screen command, I never used it for anything.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    26. Re:Linux Desktop by cthulhubob · · Score: 1

      C-z suspends the running process and gives you a prompt.

      If it's something you want to keep running, type bg at the prompt to continue it in the background.

      When you're ready to continue in the foreground, type fg.

      --

      In post-9/11 America, the CIA interrogates YOU!
  8. The /. effect by richdun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Get Slashdot to space the posts 10 hours apart. That'll increase geek-productivity worldwide in no time.

    1. Re:The /. effect by SeanMon · · Score: 1

      Could /.'s servers handle the combined bandwith-demand of 20 million nerds accessing the site all at once?

      --
      "Scud Storm!" -- Jeremy of PurePwnage.com
  9. 10 hours and 26 minutes? by bl1st3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I realize this is offtopic, but I do believe it needs to be said.

    There were 10 hours and 26 minutes between front page posts. And people wonder why we're bleeding users to other sites? It's the BS editors. The BS dupes. The BS factual errors. Seriously, wtf are we paying Slashdot for? If you're buying a subscription, what are you getting? What are the advertisements on the page doing for us? Where does this money go?

    I've always left ads on Slashdot because I 'support' the culture, but this is the final straw. Until this shit is fixed, I'm non-existant. This is my last post.

    Fuck slashdot. (This is not a troll. This is a serious rant of someone who wanted to spend Sunday afternoon catching up on tech news.)

    --
    hrrm.
    1. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Funny

      See, Taco! I told you if you started filtering dupes, people would find a way to complain!

      Back to the drawing board...

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    2. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Lifewish · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of the four or so high-content-rate sites I frequent, none of them had anything happening in the last 10 hours. Would you prefer that Slashdot lower their content standards even further? Is that even possible?

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    3. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're just mad because you aren't reading the cool stuff at TotalSlashdot.org.

      --
      "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
    4. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There were 10 hours and 26 minutes between front page posts.

      Given a choice between a few articles of high quality and many articles of low quality, I'd take fewer articles.

      Of course, that's a false choice, in two senses. First, there's no correlation between the number of articles and the quantity of articles. Second, it's not a choice Slashdot offers.

    5. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by daviddennis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, it is Thanksgiving weekend. Most people are out doing stuff with their physical world friends.

      Some of the ads are actually useful. My business partner's going to get a gift from ThinkGeek (better not say what it is here since he might be watching!) And it looks like I'll be using ServerBeach for my next venture. So I wouldn't give up on ads, and as you say I like supporting Slashdot.

      As for your substantiative criticisms, are we really bleeding users? I certainly haven't noticed any lack of comments. In fact, it might not be so bad if we did. It sure was nice when I could actually read every comment on the articles that interested me. Now I'm lucky if I can finish the first page of ten!

      Digg is so different from Slashdot in my experience that I don't see them as competitors. I visited there, didn't see what the fuss was about, and came back here.

      That being said, to me it's always been about the comments, and the rich experience they bring us here. For example, I've wanted to learn about on-demand water heaters for some time, and all someone had to do was post an article about some bogus new on-demand technology, and whammo! I found out pretty much everything a person could conceivably want to know about them.

      The moderation system is clever, and really works, and that seems to be the main value added that Slashdot's founders have created. Other than that, it's been being in the right place at the right time and having the right idea.

      As long as there's a good and active user community here, I'm still loyal to it. The founders aren't the most literate bunch in the world, and they make all kinds of silly mistakes, but this place seems to work and generate interesting stuff, and for that I'm happy.

      D

    6. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oops... actually, there's a very strong correleation between the number of articles and the quantity of articles. However, there's no correlation between the quality of articles and the quantity of articles.

    7. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by fatboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I've always left ads on Slashdot because I 'support' the culture, but this is the final straw.

      Culture? Hahaha, you make me laugh. Hahahaha! It's almost as funny as the tards that were bitching that /. was not balanced with their coverage of Windows about 5 years ago. Or how about the ones before that, they felt betrayed because Taco "sold out" to Andover. Hahahaha!

      --
      --fatboy
    8. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >There were 10 hours and 26 minutes between front page posts.

      Man, you need a life badly!

    9. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm going to ignore the other blatant shill comments, but this one I can't ignore:

      As long as there's a good and active user community here, I'm still loyal to it. The founders aren't the most literate bunch in the world, and they make all kinds of silly mistakes, but this place seems to work and generate interesting stuff, and for that I'm happy.

      Mistakes generate interesting stuff? What? Trolls, "insightful" comments, and +5 Funny's about duplicates and suggestions on how the "editors" could find duplicates on their own site (including using the scrollwheel to go down two articles)?

      Give me a break. You are an "old-school" user, you should remember the days when Slashdot wasn't a pile of suckass shit. Where they didn't seem to be 7 days, 7 months, and 7 duplicates behind the rest of the technews sites.

      I'm unimpressed with most of the comments these days. People don't take the time to do a simple search so that they can have the opportunity to be FP or post some unintelligent bullshit under another high rated post for them to get their Karma shots.

      Blah.

      Slashdot has been sucking bad and the "editors" just don't give a fuck. Hopefully that 10.25 hour break was them having a sit down meeting to discuss their serious breakdowns recently.

      I have little faith.

    10. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by bradbeattie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've mentioned it before and I'll mention it again. I think we could use moderated stories. You could browse at +5 stories to cut out the crap or at 0: fark style. Moderate a story -1: dupe or +1: headline. Any reasons not to implement this?

    11. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by jshare · · Score: 1

      Just a passing comment about ServerBeach.

      They block certain ports (hundreds, not just a few) from your server, and refuse to tell you which ones.

      E.g. you can't run a bittorrent tracker on the default port, because they block it.

      I would never use them again.

      Also, Managed.Com is total ass (most recently, 12+ hours of downtime, due to some random network problem), so don't use them. If anybody knows a good non-managed server host, I'd love to hear about it.

    12. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As for your substantiative criticisms, are we really bleeding users?

      Yes. Six to twelve months ago, there were a few news stories about the Slashdot effect losing its power, and since then, the traffic analyses a few companies do have shown Slashdot to be receiving less traffic. To add my own anecdote, I've noticed a number of the smarter users who used to contribute here no longer do, and I've certainly been coming less often.

      The type of users that are staying is of crucial importance. I've noticed the same thing happen to quite a few Usenet newsgroups. A bunch of newbies come in and annoy people, the signal:noise ratio goes down, the regular contributers/experts leave, and a year later, the place is full of newbie noise and no real answers.

      Slashdot can survive pretty much anything, except for one thing: losing the smart contributors. In the past year or so, I've noticed the quality of comments declining rapidly, and if this continues as it has been, I fully expect Slashdot to be a complete joke a year from now.

    13. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "What are the advertisements on the page doing for us? Where does this money go?"

      Keeping the server up so you can bitch and people can spend mod points.

      "Fuck slashdot. (This is not a troll. This is a serious rant of someone who wanted to spend Sunday afternoon catching up on tech news.)"

      Yeah, yeah. The Sunday after Thanksgiving and April Fool's day was mostly garbage. I can't believe we're only getting new stories 363 days a year. Fuckin slackers.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moderation system is clever, and really works,

      I am sorry but I must disagree with you. The problem with the moderation system is that everything tends towards groupthink and maintaining the status quo. If there is an incorrect belief held by most people and a poster makes a comment supporting that belief he ends up getting modded up. If a user makes a comment that goes against that belief he gets modded down. I see this all the time on Slashdot, completely "wrong" comments being modded up.

      I would much prefer a system like they have at the somethingawful forums. They have mature intelligent mods who monitor the forums, if a person trolls (or does something else that is disruptive to the forums) then the mods will put him on probation for X number of hours and if he continues to be a problem or his offense is grevious enough then that user gets banned.

      The quality of the average comment on the SA forums is far far better than the average comment on slashdot. That is pretty much proof that, as far as web forums are concerned, a benevolent dictatorship works better than a democracy.

      If Slashdot had some mods/admins who were more knowledgable (and non-partisan, completely neutral, etc.) about the subforums they manage (Games, Politics, Science, etc) and they took a more active role in the community, handing out mod points to the obviously clued in users while outright banning the obvious trolls, it would go far in improving the quality of comments and discussions on Slashdot. Also get rid of the whole Anonymous Coward thing. That would cut down on trolls and bullshit posts right off the bat.

    15. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your comment regarding serverbeach.

      Since I'm only interested in Port 80 and whatever port SSH uses for my venture, I think that's OK. I'm pretty sure they can't block either :-).

      Did you have any other problems with them?

      Many thanks.

      D

    16. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ev1servers.net ... they don't block anything.

    17. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      There is a correlation between the quantity/quality of articles when Zonk is on a rampage; lots of shitty articles. Other than that ... be realistic. A /. article is a user-contributed link to a couple of web sites with a poorly spelled/factually incorrect/misleading rant to go along with it. The /. janitors only work is clicking the reject/accept button, which takes the same amount of time for every article. There can't be a meaningful correlation as is the case with people that actually spend time producing content.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    18. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "Mistakes generate interesting stuff? What? Trolls, "insightful" comments, and +5 Funny's about duplicates and suggestions on how the "editors" could find duplicates on their own site (including using the scrollwheel to go down two articles)?"

      Maybe not interesting but still sometimes amusing and definately "watchable". That's the point really, /. is an entertaining site and as long as people continue to be entertained that it will continue to be popular. There are sites that try to be more serious but somehow they don't seem to catch on despite the fact that they post more often, are more accurate, have less dupes etc. Why? Because they are not entertaining. /. is the foxnews of geekdom. Definately biased, not too concerned with factual accuracy, designed to entertain the masses, preaching to the choir.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    19. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oops... actually, there's a very strong correleation between the number of articles and the quantity of articles. However, there's no correlation between the quality of articles and the quantity of articles.

      Actually you were right both times. Posting the same article 6 times (as was done a few days ago) shows there is no correlation betwen the number of articles posted and the quantity. It was 1 article (number) posted 6 times (quantity). It's slash-math. Don't try to understand it - it'll give you a brain aneurism :-)

    20. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: get rid of the articles, and just let people browse the highest-rated journals (yeah, talk about a way to get yourself subnet-banned in 10 minutes when 500 people mod your journal as a troll because you posted something good about the FSM :-).Actually, if you could never be banned from posting in your own journal, it would work.

      It would all tie in with the whole "blogging is the new paradigm" thing.

      Bonus points: This way Roland Piqsqueak could never happen.

    21. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot has a first-mover advantage, probably created because it gained a critical mass geek audience at the time when there were fewer sites to distract them. Like Microsoft software, it's very difficult to dethrone a network effects king once it's established. Slashdot's an excellent example of this.

      Incidentally, in my post you quoted, I was trying to say that the interesting stuff existed despite the mistakes, not because of them. Hope that clears up any confusion.

      D

    22. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Hehe I think your comment woke someone up. Their are now a plethoria of articles bwteen this one and the two xbox articles.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    23. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by jkauzlar · · Score: 1
      I don't see what the big deal is with 'dupes.' I've hit slashdot several times a day for the past four or five years and hardly noticed it. When I do it doesn't bother me. It usually links to a different article or it brings out commenters that didn't see it the first time. CNN.com and every other newspaper has a whole page of dupes everyday. Libby, Alito, blah blah blah. Same information, different language.

      Now, a 10 hour gap between articles is something I've never seen before. Even overnight. And the polls, which used to be funny, almost daily entertainment, have updated wayyyyy less frequently. And when I submitted a book review recently, it took two months for them to publish it. So I have a few complaints, but where do you draw the line between saying "this is a free service so enjoy it or don't read it" and saying "This is a really great thing that a lot of people have come to depend on and the editors owe it to the users to do an outstanding job, or they can get another job"?

      Apparently you've been here for quite awhile, so maybe the good ol' days were actually way cooler than I can remember.

    24. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I typed appropriate terms into Google and found a few articles:

      http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar 2005/tc2005032_0932_tc119.htm
      http://www.richardfrench.net/?p=4

      It looks like the traffic flowing to Slashdot has continued to grow, but fewer people are following the links. I think the hypothesis that people use RSS to discover important updated stories before Slashdot picks them up is plausible, especially considering how late Slashdot often is in picking up major stories.

      I haven't done any detailed analysis on the decline of comment quality, and if true that certainly would be a concern.

      D

    25. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xbox 360 crashes Slashdot, too?

      How much string would it take to hold up Slashdot?

    26. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Any reasons not to implement this?

      It would require effort.

    27. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe I think your comment woke someone up. Their are now a plethoria of articles bwteen this one and the two xbox articles.

      LOL, yeah, it is like they just inserted a bunch of articles that should have been there earlier but just hadn't shown up.

    28. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by poohneat · · Score: 1

      Case in point http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/28/044323 2&tid=159&tid=1 i love lego... but
      http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink =1777233 :: Posted on nov 25th ...makes u wonder abt the whole boost your karma with lame comments/articles thing... if you look at last 7 days of slashdot... theres almost a keyword phenomenon
      -- :) poohneat

    29. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by saskboy · · Score: 1

      They were watching the Grey Cup pre-game show on CBC, then the best Grey Cup in recent memory after that. That accounts for a lot of the time there was no new news anyway.

      For a while, I thought both Slashdot and Fark were cached and I was getting stale Internet until I checked Digg to see new stuff.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    30. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by jkauzlar · · Score: 1

      Unless they deleted it right away, I didn't see any article posted 6 times in at least the last 12 days. The only dupe was about colored bubbles and multiple different articles about sony rootkit.

    31. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by wingsofchai · · Score: 1
      This is a serious rant of someone who wanted to spend Sunday afternoon catching up on tech news.
      This site actually has tech news??? Where? All I've seen is gripes and wise-ass cracks like this one!
      --
      Reading at high threshold levels is group-think.
    32. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      I believe you are looking for http://www.digg.com/ and/or http://www.kuro5hin.org/.

      --
      Why not fork?
    33. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by saskboy · · Score: 1

      It's starting to appear as if there was a block in the blog queue. There are a pile of stories up now, with old time stamps that were supposed to be posted hours ago. Is there a Site News page where Taco gives us system status reports?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    34. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      Dupes drive the interesting stories off the front page faster, which is one reason people miss them the first time around. If you're so worried about missing an article, subscribe to the RSS feed or make sure to click "yesterday's news."

      If you think the discussion here is good--and I do, in general--imagine how much better it would be if so many people hadn't stopped participating due to all the dupes and shit stories.

    35. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Temporal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm... Some articles posted within the 10 hours before this one include this one, this one, this one, this one, and this one.

    36. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The "cell-phone used to monitor traffic flow" - the last 2 dupes have only 1 story between them http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=168794&cid =14070720 or http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=168794&cid =14070568> and follow-up posts mention.

      A lot of us immediately went "Dupe!, then , :"Hey, this was also on yesterday - Tripe!" then, as people checked, sure enough its been run to death.

    37. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      And it's rather odd that you're the first to notice, since there's clearly no way the editors could have retroactively timestamped these posts. Nice critical thinking there, buddy. Somewhat ironic a juxtaposition with your sig.

    38. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Trolls, "insightful"

      Strange as it may seem, there are a lot of trollish postings that generate interesting side discussions, to the point that they take on a life of their own.

      I'm not talking gnaa or penisbird or the swastika ascii-art crapfloods. But take out all the posts that have gotten a -1 troll mod, and you're going to be left with a very bland, very dull, and very monocultered board.

      Fess up - there's nothing quite like the smell of burning karma when an astroturfer gets outed.

      People have complained about the trolls on usenet for years, but one thing you have to give to people who adamantly take the other side, no holds barred, out-and-out flamefests - they make you get all your ducks in a row, and sharpen your debating skills. Go through a few of those, and you can make minced meat out of a lyin' politician without working up a sweat.

    39. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by pez · · Score: 1

      Bah. Slashdot has just about as many trolls, dupes, and other worthless garbage as it ever has (trust me). And it's still just as great as it ever was.

    40. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by stray · · Score: 1
      Dupes drive the interesting stories off the front page faster

      ... unless it's a dupe of an interesting story, in which case it is being pushed higher up on the front page if there was at least one other story posted in the meantime.

    41. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by ooh456 · · Score: 1

      Gee, really gonna hate to see you go.

    42. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      They could easily block them inbound, in fact. When you connect to a website, you're connecting to port 80 on their end, not on yours. A firewall could easily block traffic destined for port 80 one way and not the other. Same thing with ssh.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    43. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we could use moderated stories.

      Such a thing already exists, and it's in the process of eating Slashdot's lunch. Go look at Digg.

      Seriously, I'm not sure why I still read Slashdot. Especially when Digg has a live story queue which shows stories as they are submitted (only when they are moderated up do they show on the front page).

      Alexa says that Digg is approximately 1/2 as popular as Slashdot, but it's quickly catching up and is on par to surpass Slashdot within a few months. And if anything of interest every shows up on Slashdot, it'll get posted on Digg. So go read Digg - it's a lot more fun than Slashdot is these days.

    44. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

      Well, I am aware that Slashdot has a worldwide audience, but you might consider that this weekend is a major holiday in the United States. Perhaps the American editors were spending time with their families? I don't know whether or not the editors are paid for their time, but if they're not, I certainly don't begrudge them one day to spend with their family. Also, given that today is a US holiday, maybe it's a slow news day. I'm sorry it couldn't accomodate you today, but there is a world beyond Slashdot, you know.

      --
      Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    45. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, and my front page has had articles regularly, with no gap larger than four hours between. Go to Preferences, and set the front page to display all the articles, not just the "best". There were articles posted, you just didn't bother to look.

      --
      Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    46. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      I'm sure somebody with a single-digit slashdot ID could argue the trolls point.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    47. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by PeteDotNu · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I've certainly been coming less often."

      Two possible responses to this:

      1. Quiet, you. I've been noticing your account posting thousands of times per day!
      2. You should see your doctor. He may be able to help you out.

      --
      My other processor is big-endian.
    48. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by abdulwahid · · Score: 1

      Well, it is Thanksgiving weekend. Most people are out doing stuff with their physical world friends.

      When you say most, I presume that you mean people in the US. Slashdot has a international following and readership so the editors should keep that in mind and should themselves be balanced from an international point of view. If that is not possible then perhaps we should fork off a slashdot international and leave this for US biased news. ;)

      What the hell is Thanksgiving anyway? (Rhetorical question) Does anyone else actually celebrate it apart from US/Canda?

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    49. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Plunky · · Score: 1
      Give me a break. You are an "old-school" user, you should remember the days when Slashdot wasn't a pile of suckass shit. Where they didn't seem to be 7 days, 7 months, and 7 duplicates behind the rest of the technews sites.

      Well, I'm not an old school user but here is a point you might consider. If you dont read any other technews sites, you wont know about being 'behind' anybody else! I find slashdot to be very interesting, but frankly I waste too much time on it already. If I were constantly searching out other sites so that I could be the first to know something, I'd never get any work done!

      I'll not mention dupes, thats just silly.

    50. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn newbies...

    51. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by caluml · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Well, it is Thanksgiving weekend.

      Only in the US. Don't forget that there are 4.7 billion people that haven't got a clue about/don't give a shit about Thanksgiving. And before everyone starts banging on about Slashdot being a US site, (which I think it is becoming less and less true all the time), it's not so hard to employ an editor in Europe, and possibly one another in Japan so that all timezones are covered, is it? I'm sure a dedicated geek would do it for the kudos of it - you wouldn't even need to pay them.

    52. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      If that is not possible then perhaps we should fork off a slashdot international and leave this for US biased news. ;)

      That's the best idea I've ever heard. I am an American (living outside America) and I'm sick to death of American centric viewpoints. Time for Slashdot to mature and go international.

    53. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Umm... Some articles posted within the 10 hours before this one include this one, this one, this one, this one, and this one.

      Look at the timestamps on the article, then of the comments.

      Eg:

      The Mother of all BIOS Guides
      Posted by Hemos on Monday November 28, @03:27AM
      First post: Monday November 28, @12:41PM
      (All times in my TZ, of course.) Almost 9 hours from the stated live time to the first comments. So somethng is quite wrong.

    54. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Tom · · Score: 1

      are we really bleeding users?

      Any users or good users?

      I certainly don't see a lot of the people I found useful in the early days around anymore. My friends list would've been 2-3 times as long if that feature had existed from the start. Even though, I feel like it's shrinking rather than growing.
      I also find that I comment to the story more often than to other comments nowadays, while it were the comments that originally sold me on /. years ago. And that was before moderation was introduced!

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    55. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by gotroot801 · · Score: 1

      There were 3 months and 25 days between bl1st3r comments. And people wonder why we're bleeding users to other sites?

    56. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, wtf are we paying Slashdot for?

      # echo "10 hours and 26 minutes? (Score:2, Insightful) by bl1st3r 464353) eric.ryan.harrison@k03.SAFE> on Sunday November 27, @10:40PM (#14126382)(http://www.k03.org/)" | grep -i \*

      I see no asterix. You pay nothing. No money = no moaney. Maybe you already know this and that's why you're shutting up.

    57. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
      I've mentioned it before and I'll mention it again. I think we could use moderated stories. You could browse at +5 stories to cut out the crap or at 0: fark style. Moderate a story -1: dupe or +1: headline. Any reasons not to implement this?

      The editorial process seems to work pretty well at weeding out the chaff. It's certainly weeded out all of my submissions so far!

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    58. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      It's a pause to give thanks to all of the positive things about our lives. I think it's a good idea.

      Canadians actually have it a bit earlier than the US, so you could say this holiday at this time is entirely US-centric.

      That being said, I don't think there's anything wrong with a US-based site continuing to reflect US attitudes. The fact that it's popular in other countries simply says that people everywhere in the world are interested in the subject matter.

      My impression is that Slashdot is run by a bunch of friends and any tampering with that is likely to change its unique quality. So unless they travel internationally and select their own editor from face to face meetings, I don't think an International Slashdot would really work.

      Forking off a Slashdot International as a separate site, though, is something I'd probably support, at least on principle.

      An interesting counterpoint is The Register, a UK-based source of tech news. For a while they were running a US version, which was basically the same as the UK site but with all the funny UK stories stripped out. Since I find the UK-based stories entertaining, I always read the UK Register instead of the US version. I think most people did the same and they discontinued a separate US Register shortly thereafter.

      Of course if International Slashdot posted more stories more efficiently than the real thing, it might gain American readers who could then be treated (fairly!) like second-class citizens.

      D

    59. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I fully expect Slashdot t be a complete joke a year from now.

      Slashdot is a year away from being a complete joke, and it always will be. /. sucked just as much in 2000 as it did today.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    60. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by jkauzlar · · Score: 1

      Holy cow, I stand corrected.. can't believe I didn't notice that.

    61. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder how many dupes I didn't notice ... because I know I've missed a shitload of them.

    62. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by kmartshopper · · Score: 1
      ... there were a few news stories about the Slashdot effect losing its power...
      Well we can fix this if all the Firefox users install the Fasterfox extension and keep "Enabled Enhanced Prefetching" on...
    63. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Psyrg · · Score: 1

      How about modding towards their appropriate sections? For example +5 Games or +5 YRO? Further, if an article gets +5 anything it becomes a main article.

      Of course, -1 Advertising and -1 Dupe would be useful too.

    64. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by bradbeattie · · Score: 1

      I like. Had I mod points, good sir. :)

    65. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by rodoke3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, K5's voting system only determines which stories make it to the front page. After it makes it out of the queue, there is no way to discriminate between two different stories other than by category. Unless of course, I misunderstood what the grandparent was talking about...

      --
      There's nothing like a good gunfight to uplift the spirit--Calvin
    66. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes? by Psyrg · · Score: 1

      Ironic, as I have mod points... :)

  10. 1600x1200? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    Unless those 1600x1200 screens are giant (most aren't, I think my 17" monitor here can go that far), your text becomes tiny. Put one of them into console mode instead of graphics and keep your SSH session on there, then use X11 forwarding if you need apps on the other screen.

    1. Re:1600x1200? by Wizarth · · Score: 1

      In my experience, fonts in Linux are in points, not pixels, unless its because I properly measured my monitor for my xorg.conf file.

    2. Re:1600x1200? by RandomJoe · · Score: 1

      I *wish* my 17" and 19" LCD panels did 1600x1200! I love having the small fonts. My Dell laptops (C840s) have 1600x1200 native resolution on a roughly 15" FP. I can still read things just fine on them and love having that much info on the screen at once. I *hate* having to stack windows!

      Unfortunately, it appears for an external FP you have to get up to 21" before you get 1600x1200, so my desktop system has three FPs on it (just because I could! ;). A 19" in the center, and a 17" to either side. Using the desktop metaphor, I compare this to the difference between the crappy desks in the older buildings in college, where you could hardly balance your notebook let alone a textbook on the small fold-out platform, and having a whole table to spread things out on. The high res on the laptop lets me do that even with just a single display.

      Granted, my eyes appear to be better than many, even though I do wear glasses (astigmatism). My coworkers often comment that they can't see a darn thing on my laptop!

    3. Re:1600x1200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about? Points are a physical measurement, pixels are a virtual measurement. Any font in any system is "in" both points and pixels simultaneously. You might as well say "my height is in inches, not centimetres".

    4. Re:1600x1200? by htmlboy · · Score: 1

      why not just use a bigger font in the xterm? it seems a good bit simpler.

    5. Re:1600x1200? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      A point is 1/72nd of an inch.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    6. Re:1600x1200? by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

      Uh no, the 20" Dell 2001FP does 1600x1200.

    7. Re:1600x1200? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      You might as well say "my height is in inches, not centimetres".

      No, this is more like saying "my weight is in kilograms, not Newtons": my weight (my mass, actually) is constant, but my weight in Newtons depends on what forces are affecting me. Similarly, a size in points is constant (72 pt = 1 in), but a size in pixels depends on your device. A 100x100 px image will display at the same quality on all monitors, printers, etc., because it will scale to fit the dot pitch of the device; a 72 pt (1 inch) letter will display at the same physical size on all devices, assuming you set up your monitor's sizing correctly.

      Most people leave their font scale at 96 dpi for monitors regardless of actual dot pitch, so a 12 pt font always has a 16 pixel height, even if you change resolutions. GP apparently fixed his to work the way it's supposed to. I don't because I'm used to a 12 pt font being shaped like a font hinted to 16 px on all monitors.

    8. Re:1600x1200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly, a size in points is constant (72 pt = 1 in), but a size in pixels depends on your device.

      Yes, but wherever text is displayed you could say that it's "in" both points and pixels. It makes no sense to say something like "no, that isn't in points, that's in pixels", does it?

      GP apparently fixed his to work the way it's supposed to.

      So you think he meant to say that X is usually misconfigured, or what? I really can't see what he's trying to say.

  11. gentoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gentoo with xorg, openbox, and torsmo.

    btw: tangent pager ftw!

  12. The one useful script by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Funny

    #!/bin/sh
    rm -f /usr/local/bin/games

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:The one useful script by jZnat · · Score: 5, Funny

      I use Debian you insensitive clod! It's /usr/games and /usr/local/games

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    2. Re:The one useful script by eosp · · Score: 0

      I use Slackware you insensitive clod! It's /usr/games and /usr/local/games

    3. Re:The one useful script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know how to properly use the rm command!

    4. Re:The one useful script by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny

      make better use of my time; make the most of my screen real estate

      apt-get install pr0n;

    5. Re:The one useful script by hamsterspeed · · Score: 1

      rm: cannot remove `/usr/local/bin/games/': Is a directory
      $

      --
      pants
    6. Re:The one useful script by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      you can always test it by logging in as root and typing "rm -r /usr/local/bin/games/../../../../../"

      It'll at least cut down on time wasted browsing slashdot.

    7. Re:The one useful script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      surely you meant to say

      #!/bin/sh
      rm -f -R /usr/local/bin/games

    8. Re:The one useful script by zerocool^ · · Score: 1
      "rm -r /usr/local/bin/games/../../../../../*"
      There, fixed that for you
      --
      sig?
    9. Re:The one useful script by Xamataca · · Score: 1

      where do I click? there's no fkin button... ffs!

      --
      ***Game Over***Insert Coin***
    10. Re:The one useful script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      could you please post your apt/sources.list?

      thanks,

  13. Don't worry...... be happy. by wangotango · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Just run Windows and remain as clueless with 90% of the others.

  14. Big one by NineNine · · Score: 0, Troll

    Insert Windows CD. Reboot.

    1. Re:Big one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Inquiring minds want to know:
      1. Do you actually make money from your "regularly post mindless, controversial drivel to Slashdot to promote porn site" business model?
      2. If 1) is true, how do you not feel like a weasel all the time?
    2. Re:Big one by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1, Funny

      Here, I'll fix that for you.

      "Insert Windows CD. Reboot. Reboot. Reboot. Reboot. Reboot..."

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  15. Corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the great things about the Linux desktop is that there are lots of ways to

    save a lot of time from useful widgets
    spend a lot of time installing useless widgets

    and configuration to minimize the pain of repetitive tasks.
    and obsecure configurations to maximize the pain of maintaining a complex computer system.

  16. Term Productivity by digitaltraveller · · Score: 3, Informative

    GNU Screen is a featured packed window manager that multiplexes a physical terminal between several processes. You can detach from remote screen sessions and the program will continue to run. You can then re-attach later; an essential feature if you use ssh alot.

    1. Re:Term Productivity by wahgnube · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I can attest to the coolness of Screen because I use it almost all the time. Also, to augment what the parent mentioned, the detaching remote screens isn't just a bonus, it's almost a necessity on a flaky coffee shop wireless connection.

      My biggest problem is I almost always use Emacs as well. Does anybody know how to prevent Screen from capturing the C-a keystrokes when in programs like Emacs?

      I find it extremely annoying and it often ends up doing something I don't want. Even if it is nothing serious, I'm distracted for a few seconds.

      Somebody, anybody, please?

    2. Re:Term Productivity by prog-guru · · Score: 1
      Does anybody know how to prevent Screen from capturing the C-a keystrokes when in programs like Emacs?

      Do ctrl^A A to send ctrl^A to your app. I do wish they chose a different default sequence, I'm sure it can be changed, but why use the same default as every other program?

      If you're like me, you'll find yourself forgetting the ctrl^A trick in screen once in a while, and doing it outside screen once in a while too :/

      --

      chris@xanadu:~$ whatis /.
      /.: nothing appropriate.

    3. Re:Term Productivity by daeley · · Score: 1

      My biggest problem is I almost always use Emacs as well. Does anybody know how to prevent Screen from capturing the C-a keystrokes when in programs like Emacs?

      Do a man screen and read about flow-control.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    4. Re:Term Productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flow control? Pass the crack pipe, dude.

      Search the man page for "defescape" to change the control key sequence in your configuration file, or use the -e switch on the command line. Otherwise, as the other poster said, get used to using "^a a" to send a literal ctrl-a through screen. I had to learn to do this to operate nested screens...

    5. Re:Term Productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put this in your ~/.screenrc:

      escape ^[[

      This maps the C-A key to C-[ instead. Hopefully C-[ is too obscure to interfere with much.

    6. Re:Term Productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used xmodmap and made one of my windows keys a "^Y". Then launch screen with -e "^Y^Y". One-touch escape key that doens't conflict with anything else... Unless of course you use your windows key already. I did this because I didn't like having to hit two keys to get into command mode. Could also explain my attachment to vim over emacs ;)

    7. Re:Term Productivity by macshit · · Score: 1

      Does anybody know how to prevent Screen from capturing the C-a keystrokes when in programs like Emacs?

      Set the screen escape/command-char to something else. I use ^\ (which is normally "toggle-input-method" in Emacs, but that's less useful in a terminal anyway, due to lesser font support).

      In your .screenrc file, put:

      escape ^\^\

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    8. Re:Term Productivity by heanol · · Score: 1

      screen -e^Ww Changes it to C-w

    9. Re:Term Productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In my .screenrc I have
      escape ^Za
      I find that I rarely use ^Z (suspend signal) when using screen.

      On boxes that I ssh into often I added the following to the end of .bash_profile:
      exec screen -xRR
  17. Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by gtoomey · · Score: 5, Informative
    You can mount a remote filesystem in KDE without using NFS, ftp, rsync, Samba etc

    Just enter in Konqueror
    fish://user@yourdomain.com
    (yes that is fish) and you will be asked for your ssh password.
    Your remote files appear in Konqueror & you can then copy/paste etc to your local filesystem.

    1. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by Obliquitous+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      That's really cool...makes me happy to have KDE installed, even if I never use it as a desktop.

    2. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by Yrrebnarg · · Score: 5, Informative

      You missed the real power-feature here. Try using fish (or ftp or even http) while you're attaching something in kmail or editing a file with kate, or even koffice. Now try doing a drag-and-drop into a konsole...now try it with a URL. Now try it while in a ssh -X session. Or maybe man:screen or info:glibc as a URL in konqueror. One last trick is KDE's alt-f2 dialog. It does integer arithmetic and opens URLs. KDE really is cool if you use it, but nobody here in the USA ever seems to give it a chance.

      And for the flamebait part, why is kde so unloved here in the USA?

    3. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by Dan+Farina · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course, unless you actually wanted your remote file system mounts to actually be something more than a hack and used something like Fuse (http://fuse.sourceforge.net/) where file system syscalls can be handled by behavior defined in user space.

      sshfs and smbfs work like a charm, although they have some...amusing "file systems" listed as well. (Such as a representation of a relational database as directories and XML files....)

    4. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by tardigrades · · Score: 1

      Didnt know about the integer math. Thats the coolest thing ive seen since crtl+shift L in konqueror to have a split view web brower. I makes attaching files in gmail super easy via drag and drop.

      --
      really bored? My blog
    5. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by jone1941 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a follow up to this, the secret to my success has been using the "fish" protocol in Kate for browsing/editing remote files. All of my work is balanced between web programming and C/C++ application development. Since neither of these tasks were meant to run on my fairly tweaked desktop system it helps to be able to edit remote files. I no longer worry about any kind of network lag that plagued my remote X emacs windows. For the record I actually run a GNOME desktop but for the reason stated above I use kate and for performance reasons I use konsole as my default terminal.

      --
      Fear trumps hope and ignorance trumps both
    6. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by ananke · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not to mention the quickie acronyms. Type 'gg:whatever' in that alt+f2 dialog, or any konqueror, and you'll be taken to google. Same thing for imdb, fm [freshmeat], etc.

      --
      --- d'oh
    7. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by ananke · · Score: 1

      Let's clarify something here. First, it's not the 'real' mounting. The filesystem will be available only to kde apps, not everything else. Second, you can use the same method for ftp/rsync/samba. Instead of using 'fish', you use 'ftp', 'smb', and so on.

      --
      --- d'oh
    8. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by wclacy · · Score: 1
      KDE has tons of cool features, but there is one thing that I could do with Windows 95 that still does not work in KDE.

      Use SMB:// or fish:// to access a remote system. Then try to open a .mp3 file. It will not work unless it is copied to the local file system. Try opening a .avi .mpg file and it will not open unless you copy it to the local system.

      Sure I could mount the smb share to the local file system, but why should I? I didn't have to map a drive to do this in Windows 95. If Microsoft could figure this out 10 years ago why can't the KDE people figure it out now.

      This hasn't stopped me from running linux, it has just limited the amount of music I listen to when I don't feel like mounting the remote file system.(If I have to mount I Wish I could just right click on the remote file system and select mount.)

    9. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 1

      I've always been using sftp:// to do this. Maybe I'll see what fish:// can do for me.

    10. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually you can almost right click and mount a folder...
        i too am distressed about the lack of streaming media support over smb:\ (for .avi files in my case) although some apps handle it they are few. mplayer does not :-\
      but i digress...
        Check out an app called smb4k for quick and dirty mounting of samba shares. Oh and for your MP3s if you can run it you should try Ampache (www.ampache.org i think). i'll let the website explain it. ;-)

    11. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      My personal reason was that when I first looked at Gnome and KDE, I got the impression that KDE was basically trying to ape windows... while there are compelling reasons to do that, part of my reason for switching to Linux was to get away from Windows so I chose Gnome... I've never heard a compelling reason to switch to KDE since then.

    12. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by zerocool^ · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      haha gg newb no re pwnedj00

      --
      sig?
    13. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by 21chrisp · · Score: 1

      I use smbfs with automount (autofs) to mount my share. That way I can work with mp3s etc normally on the share. It just works like a normal filesystem. It's not all that hard to set up. My entire mp3 collection is on it. I can even play them through itunes on OSX.

    14. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I have tried switching to KDE but there's WAY too much eye candy that took too damn long to disable. There are a few core KDE apps that I can't find substitutes for (partitcularly Konqueror file manager with dual vertical panes - nothing else in linux does it) so it is installed, just never used beyond those one or three apps.

    15. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fish and reading a PDF on the ssh server works for me; I don't see why an mp3 would behave differently.
      It's of course possible that the PDF has been transferred to my local machine in the background, but even then, it's still a cool feature.

    16. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by 00lmz · · Score: 1

      From the Fuse webpage...

      Runs on Linux kernels 2.4.X and 2.6.X

      I don't think it's a hack because KDE runs on other platforms too. kioslaves provide their functionality in a non-platform-specific way (but OTOH, you need to use the KDE libraries).

    17. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by Dan+Farina · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that I can use kioslave to, from a terminal, go and run mplayer on some random video file over ssh, using plain old system calls?

      Unless kioslave implements something like fuse, I surmise the answer is no. That's why I think it's a hack. It tries to give the illusion of local file-system-like access, but the moment I try say, writing a python script to take a file over ssh and say file('foofile') I'm SOL. Correct me if the answer is yes, but I don't see KDE installing any kernel modules these days.

      It's better to just actually solve the problem than rely on the likes of kioslave and its spiritual equivilent, gnome-vfs.

    18. Re:Mount remote filesystems in KDE via ssh by 00lmz · · Score: 1
      What you said:

      So you are saying that I can use kioslave to, from a terminal, go and run mplayer on some random video file over ssh, using plain old system calls?

      What I said above:

      kioslaves provide their functionality in a non-platform-specific way (but OTOH, you need to use the KDE libraries). (emphasized for your convenience)

  18. Wot a Dorothy Dixer by femto · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  19. Quicksilver by bennyp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    QS is a great app for OS X. One of it's many functions is as a launcher.
    Say I want to start inkscape. I press apple-space,i,n,k. by that point, qs has figured out that i want inkscape and has displayed it's icon, then i press enter and inkscape launches.

    or say i want Jack Johnson's phone number. I press apple-space,j,c,k,j,n,s,n. his contact icon pops up, i press the left arrow and his phone number is highlighted, then i press enter and the number fills the screen on a transparent window.

    it saves me a whack of time, and i'd love to see a free program with this functionality
    http://quicksilver.blacktree.com/

    --
    could it be?
    1. Re:Quicksilver by m()p3s · · Score: 5, Funny

      I press apple-space,j,c,k,j,n,s,n.

      sounds pretty good but typing all of those commas would just frustrate me.

    2. Re:Quicksilver by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I never really got on with QS, but I wrote a small app for launching applications under OS X. It is nothing more than a text box with (case insensitive) autocompletion, and a list of all of your applications (picked up from the common locations). It doesn't automatically re-index or anything clever, and is light on resources. Most of my apps can be launched in one mouse click and under three key strokes. Don't expect anything too polished - it's something I hacked together in a few spare minutes, and it doesn't do anything other than launch applications, but I find it to be the fastest way of launching the few apps I don't use frequently enough for them to be in my dock.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  20. What has always worked for me. by suso · · Score: 1, Redundant

    3x3 virtual desktops with a web browser in the middle one. Of course, I think what you end up doing should depend on what you are trying to do with your computer. For me, I do a lot of system administration so I tend to use a lot of terminals. I got used to using a 160x60 sized terminal for my suso.org screen session (which runs things like mutt, etc.). I think gkrellm makes good use of space and I like it for controlling the volume. Figure out what programs you use the most and put them in the panel (gnome, kde, xfce or whatever). Don't put everything in the panel or on the desktop, it will just make common icons harder to find. And use tabs for web browsing of course. Its all good.

    I think making good use of virtual desktops is a must. And you can't use too many. I think a lot of people get turned off by programs like the Gimp because they don't use virtual desktops properly and think too much about the way things work in Windows and Mac OS X. Its different here.

    1. Re:What has always worked for me. by emurphy42 · · Score: 1

      gkrellm is way too "noisy" for me. Learning curve, I suppose. Panel buttons are absolutely a good thing; give them keyboard shortcuts if you're into that sort of thing.

      Virtual desktops are great because you can click-drag windows within the thumbnail - does anyone know a way to do this in Windows (for my corporate laptop) without eating up a huge chunk of screen real estate? VirtuaWin is my favorite, but it's still not quite as good as Gnome/KDE (moving a window takes two clicks and picking from a non-visually-sorted list).

      I disagree with the "keep everything open on virtual desktops" crowd; if I did that, I would invariably leave something on the back burner and forget about it, as it gets lost in the shuffle. Besides, it would consume extra resources. Instead, I stick to a 2x2 arrangement, open only the programs and documents that I'm actually doing something with Right Now, use Alt-Tab for a couple of things, use the virtual desktops for a lot of things.

    2. Re:What has always worked for me. by SpammersAreScum · · Score: 1
      Virtual desktops are great because you can click-drag windows within the thumbnail - does anyone know a way to do this in Windows (for my corporate laptop) without eating up a huge chunk of screen real estate? VirtuaWin is my favorite, but it's still not quite as good as Gnome/KDE (moving a window takes two clicks and picking from a non-visually-sorted list).
      enable Virtual Desktop does it for me. Simple drag-n-drop of a window's thumbnail in the mini-window moves the window within and across desktops. You can resize, reposition, auto-hide, and adjust transparency of the mini-window. It was a bit flakey on Windows 98, but I've been very happy with it on Windows XP.
    3. Re:What has always worked for me. by emurphy42 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, but that's firmly in "huge chunk of screen real estate" territory, at least for me. I'm looking for something that fits within the taskbar.

    4. Re:What has always worked for me. by SpammersAreScum · · Score: 1

      You want to drag-n-drop window surrogates inside soemthing that's inside the task bar? Wow, you've got good eysight. I've got my miniwindow set to autohide (takes up 0 screen space unless I'm actually using it), small, and partially transparent. Not exactly "huge chunk". If drag-n-drop _wasn't_ your goal, then yeah, there are _plenty_ of tools that simply let you switch desktops using icons in the taskbar.

  21. Just approach it differently. by linuxpyro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What window manager/desktop environment are you using? In general, I would say make use of what you already have. Assuming you use FireFox, make liberal use of the tabs function; I prefer about five per window on my 1280x1024 single screen system, so you could probably do more without the tabs becoming too small. Also, when SSHing or doing general terminal work, use a terminal with tabs. The Gnome terminal will do this, but multi-aterm is less of a resource hog. (For some reason I can't seem to copy and paste into multi-aterm, something I can do in the Gnome term. If there's a way around this I would be interested; the copy and pasting is helpful.) I know this is not much, but I usually find that making more efficient use of your environment is more something to sit and think about a bit. It's better to try to work with what you have than to go and install a bunch of applications that may or may not help.

    --
    Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
  22. Slashdot Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just come here for the comments. What other sites have the volume (if not quality, har har) of public comments posted to Slashdot?

  23. Easy... by colonslashslash · · Score: 2, Funny
    make better use of my time; make the most of my screen real estate; and make my use of the desktop more effective?"

    Hardcore nudity on the left monitor, Slashdot front page auto-refreshing on the right. What more could a geek at work ask for?

    Oh wait.. for work you say? Well, how liberal is your boss?

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
  24. SuperKaramba by deReuter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just install superkaramba, works like konfabulator with widgets and stuff. http://www.superkaramba.com/

    1. Re:SuperKaramba by p0z3r · · Score: 2, Informative

      The website is really: http://netdragon.sourceforge.net/
      We don't have the ability to maintain the superkaramba.com site as Adam is not available currently to help, and he owns the superkaramba.com domain.

      Themes can be found here: http://kdelook.org/index.php?xcontentmode=38

  25. Kinda Hard for Your "Work" by MoThugz · · Score: 1
    Most of my work involves web/e-Mail/SSH access, and I have a very high spec'd machine with dual-head 1600x1200 screens.


    For one thing, according to the "work" you do, most of the things there require interactive user input.

    For another, all of the things you've stated as example, doesn't really require much desktop real estate. ie. For web browsing, almost all modern browsers have tabbed browsing nowadays; e-Mail, most modern email apps (GUI or command line) supports multiple mailboxes anyway; SSH, many have mentioned screen before my post.

    Like I said, your examples don't really require much screen estate. Other than web browsing, the other activities you're performing can to an extent be automated. ie. Email: use filters and/or auto-responders and/or forwarders; SSH: shell scripts are your friends.

    If you provide specific examples of your day-to-day work, then maybe us Slashdotters can help you more.
  26. Bind everything to a key combination by elconde · · Score: 5, Informative
    Bind everything! Use the spare windows key to bind every application that you use regularly.

    http://hocwp.free.fr/xbindkeys/xbindkeys.html

    Some good ones from my .xbindkeysrc:

    "xmms --stop" Mod4 + Up

    "xmms --play-pause" Mod4 + Down

    "xmms --fwd" Mod4 + Right

    "xmms --rew" Mod4 + Left

    "emacs" Mod4 + e

    "firefox" Mod4 + m

    "oocalc ~/aspreadsheet.sxc" Mod4 + c

    1. Re:Bind everything to a key combination by Mr.+Spontaneous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with parent. Honestly, I'd just stick to one monitor for what you do. I'd put email on one desktop, shell on another, and so on, then assign hotkeys to switch between desktops. (window + 1 would bring up the shell, + 2 brings up email, etc.)

      A lot of time is lost when you switch between keyboard and mouse.

      And, other than a popup notifier for email, try and avoid widgets. You should try and keep your workspace as simple as possible.

      --
      Its all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then its just fun.
    2. Re:Bind everything to a key combination by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use GNOME's Keyboard Shortcuts. The media keys are picked up by either XMMS or totem, depending on which I have open.

    3. Re:Bind everything to a key combination by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of real uses for dual monitors.

      Its the same as multiple desktops - once you get used to it, you wouldn't want it any other way.

      Its nice to be able to see your edits on one screen, and your results simultaneously on another. Ditto with man pages, graphics editing, css file changes, etc.

      I'd rather have a slower machine and dual monitors than a faster machine and a single monitor any day.

    4. Re:Bind everything to a key combination by kerasineAddict · · Score: 3, Informative
      Simple binding save you a couple seconds here and there, but if you can type fast you might as well use it to your advantage. The standard reply would be to learn vim/emacs/full-featured-editor.

      If you have taken the time to do that, why not do the same for your window managment? No two windows are more than 3 keystrokes away. Ratpoison, or (as I would see it) better Ion, allows you to completely control and automate your window mangement. The ability to add keyboard shortcuts to tasks as you prefer it (chording and/or chaining), and scripting certain events (no more annoying dialog popups, move them to a specified portion of the screen) saves a lot of time.

      Also, tabs are where they belong. In the window manager, so you can have few terminals, browsers and whatever in tabs. And Ion's tiling capabilities allow you to see the information you need to on screen, without wasting screen real estate. (Though for dual-head 1600x1200 screens that's admittedly less of a problem)

    5. Re:Bind everything to a key combination by LokiSnake · · Score: 0

      oh, and also bind one where Firefox opens /. to expoentially increase your productivity!

    6. Re:Bind everything to a key combination by Mr.+Spontaneous · · Score: 1

      I do see the advantages of having two monitors, however I'm just expressing my opinion. My work machine (I do video and web editing) just got upgraded and now has 2 17 inchers. This works perfectly, as I have a large workspace, and have to use the mouse repeatedly.

      Using the programs the poster mentioned, though, I feel that he can avoid using the mouse all together. This will improve his speed, not his computer's speed. Which is quicker: control + i or taking your hand off the keyboard, placing it on the mouse, moving the cursor to the Italicize button, clicking it, and returning your hand to the keyboard? Sure, dual head could work just as well with the use of keyboard shortcuts, and is really awesome for web design, but I think he'll see more improvement working on those shortcut keys than nitpicking over his two screen layout.

      my $0.02.

      --
      Its all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then its just fun.
    7. Re:Bind everything to a key combination by lixee · · Score: 1

      Better yet! Use Amarok as your media player. It offers binding using the windows key by default.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    8. Re:Bind everything to a key combination by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      You're right. What I'd like to see is web sites implement keyboard shortcuts properly.

      Its a bit of a pita, but its doable - javascript traps all the keypresses - even F10 (at least under linux), and I've written the code to trap it and route the hotkeys to the appropriate onclick event (maybe I'll post it some day when I've had a chance to clean it up - code is like underwear - you really don't want people to see it if its dirty).

    9. Re:Bind everything to a key combination by kerch · · Score: 1

      I don't have a Windows key, you insensitive clod! :)

      (IBM Model M)

  27. Use a small windowmanager by Myrkur · · Score: 1

    Use something like fluxbox or any of the other *box windowmanagers. No bloat, No blinkenlighten, No distractions. Make keyboard shortcuts for everything you use frequently. Terminal, Browser, Maximize, Close, etc. Learn to appreciate workspaces, if you're adept at switching between them you won't need multiple screens.

    1. Re:Use a small windowmanager by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

      I second the use of the fluxbox window manager. You can easily modify the right click menu and run various KDE widgits (i.e.: KNotes). It would also be a good idea to use a Termial console like aterm or eterm instead of xterm, Konsole, or the GNOME Terminal.

      --
      The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  28. Depends by miyako · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Setting up an efficient workspace depends a lot on what exactly you do most of the time and how you prefer to work.
    Keeping in mind that these tips might not be at all applicable to you, here are a few things I've found that help me to be more efficient.
    When doing software development, I like to keep code open in one window and documentation open in another. This is much more useful if your working with an unfamiliar language or API.
    When I'm doing web design or coding in PHP I like to keep code open in one window and a web browser open in the other for testing.
    Avoid keeping email or IM clients open at all times one one monitor. Even if you are in regular communication with co-workers having these things open all the time is a great distraction.
    Choose a good Desktop Environment. While I like KDE for regular non-work stuff, I find that I'm often a lot more productive using WindowMaker, not really sure why this is though to be honest.

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  29. Workspaces by Compholio · · Score: 1

    Get accustomed to the "Workspace Switcher" and then make some hotkeys to switch between workspaces (I use CTRL+ALT+). If you have a beefy machine it's as if you have 2,4,6,+ monitors rather than just one.

  30. A few things you're bound to figure out over time by b0r1s · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Don't be afraid to use newer versions of software, but don't try upgrading when you have deadlines pending. Switching from things like XTerm to more modern terminals (Gnome terminal, KDE's term app, whatever) will benefit you in the long run, but there's always quirks that will pop up, especially if the change requires installation or upgrading libraries. Be willing to try new software, but don't be too anxious.

    2) Just like your desk, find out what needs to be where by trying new things. I find that email needs to be full-screen on a second monitor, and 'everything else' belongs on my l arger primary. I keep a few SSH terms open in virtual desktops so that I can have an open console when the poop hits the fan, but they're out of the way the rest of the time.

    3) Use rsync or tar to backup your home directory frequently, because when you need to restore, you'll be glad you did. Most programming conventions in Linux make this much easier than in (say) Windows, as you don't have to worry about app config stored in weird places (registry), but you still need to be anal about backups.

    4) Turn off the silly services to save CPU and Memory. 'chkconfig' in many modern distros (primarily redhat-based) will show you what's going to start at boot - turn off telnet, ftp (if you can use sftp), and the nfs daemons if you won't be serving NFS. Defaults suck, spend a few minutes tweaking these things and it'll help you much in the future.

    5) Learn your favorite window manager well. If it's Gnome, or KDE, or whatever, learn it. Those of us who have been using Windows for a decade know the ins-and-outs of the Explorer interface, and it really saves us time - learning their equivalents in Linux will also save you time.

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android
  31. Virtual Desktops by dorkygeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Group your running applications by tasks (i.e. browsing, email, development, etc.), and assign each of these tasks a virtual desktop (by remembering on which virtual desktop you grouped these applications). Then switching between different task domains becomes extremely fast, because you just have to click on the correct desktop in the virtual desktop app, and you have all apps you need to complete the task at hand instantly.

    This is ways faster than switching between single applications or having them all on one single desktop, and having to dig your way through tons of windows to find the rigt program.

    Oh, and use the session manager to save the session before you log-out, so the next time you log-in, you have all the apps you need already running, and on the same virtual desktops as before.

    --
    Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    1. Re:Virtual Desktops by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Virtual desktops are also known as workspaces, or whatever your desktop environment calls it. Just in case somebody wondered what the fsck I was writing about.

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
  32. Wrong question by Mac+Degger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The question you should ask is why the hell your company is giving you a "very high spec'd machine with dual-head 1600x1200 screens." if your work only "involves web/e-Mail/SSH access".

    Really; is your company's IT department stupid? Is your company run by dot-com-bubble-wanna-be's who want to repeat the past? When your tasks are so system-resource-undemanding, why did they pay for that machine for you? You could do your work on a 486! Literally!

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    1. Re:Wrong question by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Funny
      The question you should ask is why the hell your company is giving you a "very high spec'd machine with dual-head 1600x1200 screens." if your work only "involves web/e-Mail/SSH access".

      My guess is this is just a fantasy question designed to press the buttons for Slashdot, with as much relation to the submitter's real life as a "Letter to Penthouse"; i.e. techno-porn wish fulfilment. "If you had a Lamborghini/a million dollars/a longer dick/..."

    2. Re:Wrong question by TerminaMorte · · Score: 1

      Two monitors would seem to increase work productivity, and he did not mention the specs of the machine.
       
      For all we know, he considers 1GHz, 256mb RAM, and a 60gb HDD a 'high spec machine'.
       
      Why would work give you a 486? Besides the high chance of it failing in the near future (since you'd be using old parts), you want a machine that is new enough that it won't be prone to hardware failure. This usually means a fairly inexpensive Dell, or some other recent machine.

    3. Re:Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Most of my work involves web/e-Mail/SSH access

      Most of my work involves web/e-Mail/SSH access

      Come on. Maybe a small minority of his work needs that power, and dual screens is useful in so many ways if you're doing anything related to web design or programming. Or perhaps his employer knows that one way to keep your tech staff happy is to give them decent machines to play with, even if they're not necessary. It's not like they drain dollars just by being more expensive at purchase time.

    4. Re:Wrong question by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      a 486 that is still working will probably also be working in 10 years. no "fairly inexpensive" dell you buy now will still be aorund in 10 years

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:Wrong question by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Really; is your company's IT department stupid? Is your company run by dot-com-bubble-wanna-be's who want to repeat the past? When your tasks are so system-resource-undemanding, why did they pay for that machine for you? You could do your work on a 486! Literally!


      Have you tried actually using a 486 recently? And I'm not talking about with modern software, but with software we used back then. It isn't pretty. Things were a lot slower and more annoying than you remember, we just didn't notice because we were busy comparing it to a 386 instead of a Pentium 4 or AMD Dual Core. People used to live without electricty too but who wants to now? You can't go back.

      There are many other reasons than that why a company wouldn't put this guy on a 486 (or a P1, or...) : Higher total cost of ownership and admin (Say a RAM chip blows, it'll cost you more overall in terms of time and money to aquire 8 megs of old-school SDRAM than it would to get 512Megs of DDR2). Not to mention the very simple fact that most organizations define a baseline system that meets most everyone's needs and just buy that system for everyone when they need a new one. It is easier and cheaper to do this (one install image, etc) than to try to fit everyone to their minimal needs. And good luck getting support on any old 486 software, even in the Open Source realm.

      Those are just things off the top of my head and I'm not a system admin.

    6. Re:Wrong question by TerminaMorte · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. A 486 that is still working has probably had upgrades, or atleast has had hardware replaced. Just because it worked well for 10 years doesn't mean it'll work well for 20.

      The "fairly inexpensive dell might not last 10 years, but it will be under warrantry long enough that in the odd chance something goes wrong, your employer wont pay for it out of his own pocket.

      Are you honestly suggesting a company go around to garage sales, picking up 486s, instead of spending a bit more on a computer they know will work for quite some time?

    7. Re:Wrong question by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      no i wouldn't use a 486 for anything critical but not because of reliability. the bigger concern is running into a taks that needs more capacity than a 486, such as needing to SSH into N+1 macines where N is the number of SSH connecitons a 486 can handle. for predicatable and constant tasks like filling out forms an old 486 would be fine.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    8. Re:Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      STFU. I do mostly web, email and ssh and having two large monitors with a tonne of CPU & RAM behind it is a godsend. Have you seen how much RAM gnome-terminal uses these days? Firefox? Thunderbird? Being able to have half a dozen or more terminals on screen/s at once is invaluable. Let alone juggling huge datasets from databases, logs, etc. I expect these PCs will be updated to dual core intel's at around 3ghz, 2gb ram and 2x19" LCDs when the lease is up next year.

    9. Re:Wrong question by Catcher80 · · Score: 1

      mod parent down, off-topic? he didn't answer a single question, just ridiculed a random person's random company policy.

      Will you mods stop modding it "insightful" just because of your personal opinions, and start doing the right things?

      --
      I sell out to The Man every day.
    10. Re:Wrong question by TerminaMorte · · Score: 1

      When is the last time you've used a 486? Nostalgia has a time and place; that place is not work.

      For email, he'll need a fairly modern web browser (assuming the employees are checking gmail/yahoo/company webmail/etc.).

      He'll need a WM for most day to day tasks (and if he does programming, I doubt he's only developing CLI programs).

      He'll also probably want to multitask, and not waste precious time waiting for things to load.

      If he were only using SSH, you'd have a point... maybe. For work, it's ridiculous to suggest this.

    11. Re:Wrong question by eyeball · · Score: 2, Informative

      The question you should ask is why the hell your company is giving you a "very high spec'd machine with dual-head 1600x1200 screens." if your work only "involves web/e-Mail/SSH access".

      Really; is your company's IT department stupid? Is your company run by dot-com-bubble-wanna-be's who want to repeat the past? When your tasks are so system-resource-undemanding, why did they pay for that machine for you? You could do your work on a 486! Literally!


      I don't know. My tasks at work are split roughly 50/50 between serious coding and sys admin work, which I do on a medium-spec'd dual-head Linux desktop. The sys admin part alone can get pretty resource intensive, especially when using multiple terminal sessions, X11 clients, and web-based monitoring and system administration applications (some with Java, javascript, ajax, etc). I'm constantly amazed at how much resources all that takes up.

      Anyway, my favorite time saving tip is to use GNU Screen, a nifty virtual terminal multiplexer. You start it from a terminal window like xterm (or rxterm, or gterm...), and it immediately gives you your regular shell prompt. With a few key combinations you can start new terminal "windows," each with a new shell prompt, then switch back and forth between them. All this within one Screen process running in xterm.

      While you're viewing one "window," Screen will track any changes to the other windows, and restore their state when you switch to them. So for example, if you start Pine on one, create another window and log in to ssh, you can then switch back and forth between Pine and ssh without loosing any of the text or having to manually refresh.

      Sure you can do all that with multiple xterms, but Screen gives you many extra features. Terminal names can be set for each window, which can be presented in a list. Windows can be monitored for activity or bells. A status-line can also be configured to tell you various information (i.e.: current window name, cpu load, date..).

      The biggest feature for me is the ability to attach to a single Screen process multiple times from different xterms, or even disconnect from and reconnect to a Screen process. I typically ssh to a half dozen development boxes, and `tail -f` various logs on each. Then if I need to check a log quickly I switch to the appropriate screen. If I need to actively monitor one or more logs, I start up new xterms, connect to the Screen instance, and switch to different windows with logs.

      Of course you can use it for more than ssh: Pine, foreground apps that log to the console, local logs, top, console based IRC or IM clients, etc. You can also connect to your Screen process remotely via ssh. Since Screen will continue to run in the background if you disconnect, you can restart or crash your window manager or X server, and reconnect to your Screen session (a bonus for some of us bleeding edge early-adopters).

      BTW, I've been using Screen since the mid 90's. My last Screen process was up for almost 400 days. I modified it slightly at compile-time to support 60 windows, up from the default max of 40, and typically had almost 60 windows running at any given time. I also run it on a dedicated headless small bsd box outside my linux desktop. The system is so stripped-down and bare-bones, it will only run screen, ssh, and sshd. Still, I can connect to it using multiple xterms, remotely, etc.

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    12. Re:Wrong question by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      *cough*

      Our secondary nameserver is a P133 that's been running continuously for the past 11 years. Anytime we install new hardware on our network, we cross our fingers and pray it doesn't die horribly in the first 3 months, because it has a tendency to do so.

      Either they don't make 'em like they used to, or because the thing has been around that long, it means it will be around for quite a lot longer. We want hardware that refuses to die on our network, and some of the applications aren't that resource intensive.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    13. Re:Wrong question by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. Personally, I work as a sysadmin for an ISP, and most of my real work is done in SSH and a web browser. Firefox by itself is a heavy-duty application, and requires something at least 1Ghz to run it without stupid wait times. Another heavy hitter is our customer database, which runs on Filemaker. I wish I didn't have to use it at all, but it's big and bloated and sucks back CPU time like popcorn. It needs a fast machine.

      Aside from that, yeah, I could probably work on a 486.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    14. Re:Wrong question by Lars+Arvestad · · Score: 1

      People here really seem to love screen. Yet I cannot understand its lure. I use konsole and use tabs, giving my one terminal in each tab. It is easy to walk through the tabs with a keyboard shortcut and I can click to get the tab I want. What does screen have that konsole does not have? I just don't see it.

      --
      Reality or nothing.
    15. Re:Wrong question by fishbot · · Score: 1

      I mainly use screen when one of these conditions is true:

      *) I don't want my session to die if the terminal HUPs (flaky net connection, etc)
      *) I am doing something that will take a while and I want to detach it to get rid of an essentially redundant window
      *) I want more than one terminal in a window on a low resource machine - Konsole and gnome-terminal are monster apps compared to xterm and aterm

      On my highly over-specced desktop machine I use gnome-terminal unless one of those conditions exists, purely because I can't be bothered to reconfigure gnome to use a different terminal.

    16. Re:Wrong question by dan_polt · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      The work is not a simple black and white tasks, I just simplified for the slashdot post. As 90% of my time is spent inside multiple terminal windows (where the real estate comes useful), it would not be helpful to add every detail of what my work entails.

      Other tasks involve the use of vmware, supporting h323 videoconferncing with gnomemeeting and generally doing a bit of everything. My IT department actually realise that more screen space can increase productivity and providing a better working environment breeds better work..

      We do a bit of everything round these parts & it'd bore you all to detail the tasks.

    17. Re:Wrong question by el_womble · · Score: 1

      Hear! Hear!

      I got my hands on a legacy PIII 533 with 64MB RAM, that was running Windows ME. That machine would have been a screemer back in 1997 but by todays standards it was totally unuseable. I thought it was the operating system, so I upgraded to a headleass Debian box and it flies! So long as the web browser is lynx and the mail app is pine!!

      Firefox, Evolution, Thunderbird are SLOW in 64MB RAM, and to be honest the PIII isn't helping much either. It's not that you couldn't be productive with the system its just that you'd be living in a world of lag and be less productive. I looked into upgrading the RAM, and because there were issues SDRAM, (i.e. it wasn't as interchangable as DDR on older motherboards) I could either payout for a new BIOS and some cheap RAM, or pay about the same for the more expensive, but compatible RAM. The stupid part is that this would have cost me ~$100 and I could buy a system that was significantly faster from Best Buy for ~$250.

      In a world where hardware is cheap and software is free the only thing that really makes an impact to the bottom line is the human time spent on a task. I agree with the GP that there was no point spending money on a top of the range system for such mundane tasks, but to say that a 486 would be adequate is miserly and folly.

      --
      Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
    18. Re:Wrong question by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      Because most companies try to spec the same desktop for all employees to reduce the overhead of IT support.

      If most of his company is made up of web/graphics artists most of the employees will need a high end machine. an extra $1000 is nothing compared the extra expense of supporting another platform.

    19. Re:Wrong question by macshit · · Score: 2, Informative
      What does screen have that konsole does not have?

      1. Detachability / crash-resistance (especially useful for remote operation; you can also detach locally and later re-attach remotely)
      2. No bling-bling
      3. Probably about 1/10 the resource usage
      4. Name not painfully contrived to start with "k"

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    20. Re:Wrong question by macshit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Firefox, Evolution, Thunderbird are SLOW in 64MB RAM, and to be honest the PIII isn't helping much either.

      It's mostly the RAM though.

      My home system is a PIII 450MHz with 512MB of RAM (running an up-to-date debian unstable/experimental), and I've absolutely no problem with firefox, gnome, etc. I even do ray-tracing on that box (though to be honest that's pushing it... I mostly do smaller test scenes there :-).

      I use much more up-to-date systems at work, and honestly, the difference in usability isn't all that huge. I haven't upgraded the home system simply because it hasn't been worth the bother so far, though I admit the ray-tracing thing has made me at least think about it.

      A crucial factor, I think, is that recent versions of linux (2.6 era) have an absolutely great scheduler for interactive use -- the CPU load can be pegged at 100% for hours and it simply has no perceivable effect on interactive use, as long as you've got the memory to avoid paging.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    21. Re:Wrong question by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why would you need a web browser for email? Use an email client for email, and a web browser for the web. There are several very capable text mode email clients, mutt being the best.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    22. Re:Wrong question by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      few months ago i rebuilt the operating system on a 486 with nothing but command.com installed. It worked just fine to convert some files to mac floppy format and plentyof games worked on it.

      when have YOU used a 486

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    23. Re:Wrong question by Willis+Wasabi · · Score: 2

      Ok, some find the 'K' naming thing in KDE offensive, some of us just think it's cute or clever. At least pick a good example. Konsole is not painfully contrived. Akregator is painfully contrived. Incidentally, that's where I'm posting this from, wrapped in a Kontact shell, obviously running the KHTML part used by Konqueror for display...

      --
      All true wisdom can be found in sigs.
  33. Very Simple by Limburgher · · Score: 1

    1. Use WindowMaker. 2. Do everything in xterms, no actual x apps. Mutt, Lynx, you get the idea. MySQL command-line client for DB work. 3. Spend Sunday reading /., since nothing new will be posted, and you'll actually have to work. ;)

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:Very Simple by Otter · · Score: 1
      1. Use WindowMaker.

      My suggestion was going to be "Buy a Mac!", but that's the second-best idea...

  34. Switch... by CodePyro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You want to save time on Linux Desktop... Switch to Windows XP...and save your self from hardware incompatibility issues...among other things...

    "Let He Who Is Without Sin Cast The First Stone"

    /me ducks

    1. Re:Switch... by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

      Yep, if you're looking for ways to save time, Windows is the way to go, since it tries to simplify everything, which is good for average businesses. Linux is good for places that do things like custom content and web servers.

      Goes to show you that both Linux and Windows each have their strong points.

    2. Re:Switch... by arabagast · · Score: 1

      heh,, there's an oddball.

      --
      Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
      Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.
    3. Re:Switch... by Janitha · · Score: 3, Informative

      He already has the operating system set up... you should really read the post before replying.

    4. Re:Switch... by dan_polt · · Score: 1

      Actually, the linux desktop was surprisingly pain free.

      Debian testing worked with all the (dell) hardware out of the box.

  35. Personal Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am faily new to linux, but maybe these will help...

    I do everything on my Ubuntu laptop so and hibernate instead of logout... so I get lots of "personal" clutter in my "business" windows. Most flavors of Linux have 4 desktop spaces I believe. I use the desktops to sort these things. I usually have two for business stuff, the third for personal stuff, and the 4th as a "scratch" area. Aside from switching back and forth between business desktops both with IDE, shell, etc, it seems to save a lot of time.

    I am not sure if it is a GNOME feature or what, but being able to easily customize panels is really handy. One of the premade panel tools you can add is the "sticky notes" which seem to save me a lot of time. Normally, I make lots of "to do" type lists and keep them in unsaved buffers in my IDE. If I let my battery die or restart without thinking, they are gone. The sticky notes thing just seems to help a lot.

    I use IM for work. On windows, Trillian seemed to be very space and time efficiant. GAIM doesn't seem to be a good replacement. So... no help there.

    Also, I waste lots of time getting my wireless running after switching locations (which I do a lot it seems). If that were more streamlined, I believe I would save a lot of time.

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:Personal Tips by muszek · · Score: 1

      on note-taking... try Tomboy. It's sticky notes combined with wiki-like crosslinking. It's not very mature app yet, but I use it a lot since I found it couple of days ago.

  36. Less is more by tahpot · · Score: 1

    As always, less is more (except for terminals). Have no desktop icons or fancy buttons, save the space for the applications that are open. A right-hand click on your desktop should give you access to your favourite apps across various categories (internet,programming,multimedia etc).

    I typically have 5 desktops that I mouse scroll between each with one major application always open. The first three are firefox for web surfing, firefox for gmail, thunderbird for other email and then that leaves two for the task at hand (typically an editor and some terminals for programming)

    Having a widescreen laptop is most useful for having normal applications open (like firefox/openoffice) on the left 2/3rds of the screen and terminals/irc/etc. open in smaller windows down the right hand side. This allows me to focus on the task at hand, but quickly perform other tasks as required.

    1. Re:Less is more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. You can page up with the arrow keys with less.

    2. Re:Less is more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $ ls -li `which more less`
      489663 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 26520 2005-09-18 00:04 /bin/more
      753159 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 99692 2004-07-01 05:45 /usr/bin/less

      Nonsense! Less is not more!

  37. two monitors? by tlynch001 · · Score: 1

    I do all my web/e-Mail/SSH crap in a black and white terminal, and I LIKE IT!

  38. On the matter of dual head displays by suso · · Score: 1

    I should follow up about the dual head thing. I have a dual head setup at work and I find that one monitor ends up being used for the most part and I just end up bleeding windows into the other monitor and leaving them there. Maybe its just that I'm not used to having dual monitors or something. So what I end up doing is putting the main monitor directly in front of me and the supplimental monitor off to the right. Then I put my email client (I use thunderbird at work) on the supplimental screen.

    The only thing where I find dual monitors to be really useful is for running Qemu or VMWare in one screen and some terminals or other programs in the other. Also, its really nice if you need to run a 3D program like Blender. Especially since Blender's interface is so customizeable I ended up putting a quad TFR Camera view on one screen and free roaming view on the other.

  39. a couple of little things by carcosa30 · · Score: 2, Informative

    alias su="xterm -fg white -bg darkred -e su" so when you su, you get a new xterm in colors to remind you that that xterm is root.

    Use fluxbox. The tabs mean that you can stack up things like xterms.

    If you run gnome panel, you can put drawers on it. The drawers can contain swallowed apps, such as xterms running top, tail syslog, watch processes, etc. So you can pop open a monitor drawer and xterms running text monitors emerge.

    Check into 3ddesk. It's an applet that maps your desktops onto a 3d cylinder that can be rotated with the mousewheel for desktop switching. Much more useful than it sounds. The visual preview and positional awareness that it gives make it possible to use many more desktops than you ordinarily could without them becoming useless clutter like they can with traditional pagers.

    I don't know why you're concerned about maximizing real estate with a dual-head display. I get by just fine with a 19 inch display.

    That said, there are some technologies emerging that will allow you to use x11 functionality to use a laptop or additional workstation as a second (or third) screen controlled by the same desktop. Check into x2vnc.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  40. Automation by zorander · · Score: 4, Informative

    Learn ruby/perl/python/something and automate *everything* the each time you find yourself repeating a task that could be easily parametrized. Most of this is an attitude thing. If repetitive tasks don't annoy you, then you're not going to be able to eliminate them from your life. It will never seem worth the effort.

    Also, get a decent window manager like ion and learn its shortcuts. Developing more than a passing knowledge of Ion and Vim has doubled my productivity when debugging code. Ion makes one monitor feel like two, so I can imagine that on two it would be pretty damn good.

    1. Re:Automation by swarsron · · Score: 1

      I can only agree with the previous post. Ion was a big change for my way of using a computer. It is a real window*manager*, not just a toolkit for displaying fancy borders around windows and letting me deal with placing them. It's very good for dual-head setups and is scriptable via lua, which is something i wouldn't want to miss anymore since it gave me the power over my wm which i got over my shell via perl/ruby.

      To give an example how you can use lua in your wm: I wrote myself a "goto_or_run" function (which i replaced by a script from the ion repository because it was better than mine but anyway) which starts a program if its not already running or takes me to the frame if it is. That changed the way i used my wm because before that i used to memorize where my applications where. Now i just use my keybindings and get where i want to go without thinking or searching.

    2. Re:Automation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Learn ruby/perl/python/something and automate *everything*" ok so I should write a script to open liferea? I do this at least 10 times a day.

    3. Re:Automation by joib · · Score: 1


      "Learn ruby/perl/python/something and automate *everything*" ok so I should write a script to open liferea? I do this at least 10 times a day.


      No, you should write a script that opens 10 instances of liferea at a time.

    4. Re:Automation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also, get a decent window manager like ion and learn its shortcuts.

      I agree completely. I've been using ion3 for about a year now, and i don't think i could bear going back to some clunky 'desktop' window manager. While on the subject, does anyone know where i could find some examples of lua scripts for use with ion3?

    5. Re:Automation by speaker4thedead · · Score: 1

      Every week, I run "sort ~/.bash_history | less" and take a look at how often I use various commands. I'm not sure if I've managed to save any time, but using the command line has become much easier and less mentally demanding.

      --
      "My religion is to live --and die-- without regret." -- Milarepa
  41. Don't minimize. by jonadab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're like I used to be, you waste half to two-thirds of a second hundreds of times every day on minimizing and restoring windows. Less than a second each time sounds like nothing, but it can easily add up to half an hour or so every single shift.

    Got icons on the desktop? Replace them with panel launchers. Use drawers if you have to; it's still faster to get to a launcher in a drawer than an icon on the desktop, and you aren't left with all your other windows minimized afterward. Keep the launchers you use with any frequency directly on the panel. I like to run one panel along the left side of the screen dedicated mostly to launchers (I do also keep a memory/swap/cpu meter there), and then keep the task list in another panel on the bottom edge of the screen, where I also keep a clock applet; many people would keep a new-mail-notification applet there.

    Many window managers will also let you configure global keyboard shortcuts for launching certain applications and other common activities, such as maximizing or lowering the current window. I happen to use sawfish, but I'm sure many other window managers also provide this functionality.

    Second thing, take your phone off the hook. Okay, maybe not. It *would* save a lot of time, though.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  42. high spec'd, huh? by gadzook33 · · Score: 1

    Man, SSH must really fly on that thing. Here's what you do: find a software developer who actually needs a high spec'd machine and trade him straight up for his Dell Attitude 6900. In my day (about a year ago) we called what you're using now a dumb terminal.

  43. I found that KDE increased my productivity. by CyricZ · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I found that using KDE vastly increased my productivity.

    I used to use Enlightenment and a mix of Mozilla, XFMail, OpenOffice, and a variety of other random programs. But then I took a week and learned how to effectively use KDE. It's very well integrated, and that level of integration pays off. Once you learn how one application works, the others become quite intuitive.

    I also found it to be far more responsive, too. Konqueror flies like a bullet, and KMail is quite swift. The best part is that KDE keeps getting better. Every new release brings substantial improvements. And those are improvements and innovations upon what is already extremely usable! The great keep getting better, it would seem.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  44. Get into a few habits by ignoramus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've found that, once you've covered the very basics:
    • learning to touch type;
    • learning to get the most out of command line;
    • mastering favorite shell features (expansions, for loops, etc.);
    • learning to use screen.

    The main trick is to keep your thoughts focused by getting into a few habits. I also use a dual head system but with 8 different workspaces setup in the workspace switcher (so a total of 16 virtual screens). In order to get the most out of this system, I actually use the switcher's facility for naming the workspaces and change them from the usual 1,2,3..8 to something meaningful. When I work on a new project, I rename the workspaces if necessary and then, for instance, always open the libraryXYZ project in my IDE in the correctly named space.

    If you use Gnome Terminal, learn to use the Profiles facility and color code or at least name different terminal windows/tabs. You can even associate custom commands to run, rather than the shell (for instance, one of my profiles launches something like "ssh -C -L3128:localhost:3128 -L10025:localhost:25 -L... remotebox" to tunnel important activity through SSH so all I need is double click an icon). Pretty much every terminal app has facilities for doing this. Create Profiles for repetitive tasks and use shortcuts on your desktop to activate them.

    You might also consider reserving blocks of time in which to shutdown gaim, your email client and phone.

    HTH

  45. I found this link helpful... by bogaboga · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here we go...http://kegel.com/linux/comfort/, but was surprised to read that OpenOffice2.0 takes 5 minutes to save a 12MB file. This to me is unacceptable.

    1. Re:I found this link helpful... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      And how long does it take you to save a 12MB file? Even if you were allowed to use hexadecimal notation, I don't think you could write fast enough to do it inside a month. OpenOffice is a huge timesaver.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  46. good news... by b17bmbr · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have a very high spec'd machine

    you'll be able to run OpenOffice.org and get work done before you have to clock out.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  47. few tricks... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nothing profound here, but...
    I have a Gnome desktop, dual-display, but with a laptop, so I keep all my controls on one desktop. I have a window list on the bottom, with just the windows, desktop switcher, show-desktop button. On top, I have the application menus and such, shortcuts to terminals that I often use (quick-launch ssh sessions and such), and the nifty toys (volume meter, screenshot, et cetera). On the left side, I have this little panel on auto-hide, so that if I can mouse over it I can see all my shiny CPU/network/etc usage meters, and a few obscure but useful shortcuts.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:few tricks... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, a Gnome man, I see.

      If you're using Gnome, and happen to know Emacs well, try opening up gconf-editor, drill down into Desktop -> Gnome -> Interface, and change the gtk_key_theme from "Default" to "Emacs". When you do that, anytime you're editing text under gnome, the following commands apply:

      Ctrl-P : previous line
      Ctrl-N : next line
      Ctrl-F : forward a space
      Ctrl-B : back a space
      Ctrl-D : Deletes the character immediately in front of the cursor.
      Ctrl-U : Kills the entire line your cursor is on.
      Ctrl-K : Kills all text to the right of your cursor.
      Ctrl-A : Move cursor to beginning of current line.
      Ctrl-E : Move cursor to end of current line.

      Text editing has a very emacsy feel when you do this. I tend to overextrapolate sometimes. For examples, accidentally trying to use Ctrl-x-o to move between fields on web forms, or Ctrl-x Ctrl-s to "submit", or expecting the text that I just Ctrl-k'ed to come back when I hit Ctrl-y. Also, when I sit down in front of a box where these things don't happen, I might end up with four or five print dialogs in front of me before I realize what happened. Despite the occasional gaffe, it's a huge, huge timesaver for me.

      Note that these bindings work as advertised when the GUI's focus is on a text section (like a web form or the location bar in your browser), but when focus is elsewhere, the old keybindings work fine (Ctrl-P to print, Ctrl-D to bookmark, etc.)

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  48. A Quake Like Console : Yakuake by unixmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try Yakuake. Its a Quake like console for KDE. The best thing it can be hidden/shown with one key ( F12 default) so it doesn't steal your screen estate and can be enabled instantly when you need it.

    --
    Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again
  49. Two by 1200x1600? by Sly+Mongoose · · Score: 1

    I tried that once. The machine was called 'zaphod'.

    My recommendation would be to buy another monitor and go triple-headed.

    I've been very happy with 'triphod' for the last three years..... ;-)

  50. Konsole by gatzke · · Score: 1, Informative


    I keep a konsole window open with 5-10 shells open. shift-left shift-right to swith between.

    Stay logged in on multiple machines and it is easy to swap between.

  51. Increase productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I found that I could get an extra five hours work a day out of our Linux engineers by making the following change to their workstations.

    echo " 207.46.250.119 slashdot.org" >> /etc/hosts

  52. Three Words... by wernst · · Score: 5, Funny

    Install Microsoft Windows.

    1. Re:Three Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No...That is what you do if you intend to decrease productivity. BSOD's and reboots aren't very productive IMHO.

    2. Re:Three Words... by spiko-carpediem · · Score: 1

      Moderation: 20% Insightful Who did it ?

  53. linux time saving tip! by digitallysick · · Score: 0

    how about instead of every linux program being named blah_01-.52a_file.whatever maybe they could just name it Blah.tgz? gets to be a pain in the command line having to type out every detail

    1. Re:linux time saving tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tab is your friend

    2. Re:linux time saving tip! by digitallysick · · Score: 0, Redundant

      nevermind, i was offtopic, as far as making the best of a linux desktop, you could always install the xp background, and make the hole thing look like XP to confuse co workers, tell them all you got converted to a windows box

  54. Make one big Beefy Man-Sized Desktop by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 1

    If it's spec'd like you say, then I'd use xinerama (or the like) and cook up one huge desktop, i.e., 3200x2400...

    --
    Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
  55. 1. Use very small fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    By using smaller fonts, you'll be able to fit more text on screen, thus saving you valuable screen real-estate.

    Also consider using KDE's "Mac like" menus feature. This will save you time, as it makes the menus easier to hit, but it will also save you more screen real estate.

    Finally, don't use KDE or GNOME, instead use the crudest WM you can find coupled with a bunch of XTerms. As true hackers know, only the command line is your true path to the force that is Unix-like computing. Trust your instincts, learn how "find" and "grep" work (remember, your final test will be when you build your own find and grep commands.)

  56. Some simple things by lheal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. Set up Ssh to allow you in to your usual haunts without a password.
    2. Settle on a window manager, and stick with it until it's not supported any more, and then stick with it some more (until it's just not available). Just pick one, and over time you'll learn all of its little time-savers and other gimmicks.
    3. Learn a scripting language such as perl, bash, or python, depending on what it is you usually want to automate. If you do much sysadmin work, you may need several languages.
    4. Keep your files organized in whatever way allows you to find things without searching for them. Get in the habit of storing things in the place where it will be easiest for you to find them. Make your web browser ask you where to put things, and then force yourself to put them in the right place when saving them.
    5. Keep your current work files backed up where you can get to them without relying on someone (even yourself) to change a tape. Since Linux lacks a Recycle Bin, the wrong mv, rm, or tar command can mean hours of finger-drumming waiting for a restore. (Pet peave: why doesn't unlink(2) move stuff to a filesystem-wide deleted area?)
    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:Some simple things by Jeff+Mahoney · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Pet peave: why doesn't unlink(2) move stuff to a filesystem-wide deleted area?

      UNIX lacks a recycle bin, but so does the Windows NT kernel and the MacOSX kernel. "Recycle Bins" are typically a GUI function, not a kernel function. Try doing an "rm" or "del" using the OSX or Windows command line and see if your files end up in the recycle bin.

      KDE and Gnome have a "recycle/trash bin" as well. It's just that a lot of users prefer the command line.

      This may be getting too nit picky, but unlink(2) shouldn't do things like that. I've thought about how to implement an automatic undelete cache in a file system, but it just ends up being way too much in-kernel maintenance so that it ultimately detracts from performance. But, flexibility is always there. You're perfectly welcome to override unlink(2) with your own function and LD_PRELOAD, and get exactly the behavior you're asking about - even on the command line. Just make sure you have a "realrm" that uses the stock unlink(2) ;)

    2. Re:Some simple things by magefile · · Score: 1

      On MIT's Athena network, there's a command called "delete". The command "delete foo" moves foo to .foo and deletes it after three days. At the "Athena 101" workshops, they don't even mention rm.

    3. Re:Some simple things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The file system Novell NetWare used did a pretty good job of this. I really don't know the technical details of how they implemented it. After using it for some years, it appears that instead of actually deleting the file, it would hang around the file system tree until the OS needed more free space. It would then reclaim space by actually deleting the files in a FIFO manner. Unless the space had been reclaimed, you could recover files you owned that were deleted (even previous revisions by date of a file edited multiple times). It was quite handy and I never understood why none of the popular OS and or FS ever implemented a similar system.

    4. Re:Some simple things by filament · · Score: 1

      You could knock up your own shell script that does that very thing. Just make it keep a log of "deleted" files with dates and set up a cron script (if you want it automatic) to periodically check the log and rm any old files then remove those items from the log. I guess you could even call it "rm" and let it use your "recycle bin" unless you use a switch to override, in which case it just passes your arguments to the usual rm.

      --
      This sig is covered under the GPL.
    5. Re:Some simple things by Nailer · · Score: 1

      > (Pet peave: why doesn't unlink(2) move stuff to a filesystem-wide deleted area?)

      libtrash makes your system do exactly this. Start it when your shell does.

    6. Re:Some simple things by strider44 · · Score: 1
      Not long ago I spent days, perhaps a week, writing a nice interface in Java for an assignment. When the time came to package everything up I decided to remove the extra bloat by removing the class files. I brought up my trusty command line and ran
      rm *.java
      No backup for those files. Thank god I still had the class files and I could decompile them!
    7. Re:Some simple things by Taladar · · Score: 1

      What is your point? That you should have used a version control system like cvs or subversion? I can only agree to that.

    8. Re:Some simple things by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      I use libtrash, it is a very good trash implementation at the system call level, so, it works with any terminal you want it to.

      Also, if you decide to use it, I sugest taking a look at Cleartrash, that you can use manually to clear the trash or put at your crontab to remove the files after they are kept at the trash for a while.

    9. Re:Some simple things by SamHill · · Score: 1

      Set up Ssh to allow you in to your usual haunts without a password.

      By which, of course, lheal meant that you should use a strong passphrase for your SSH key, and set up ssh-agent so you only have to type it once a day or so.

      The Gentoo folks wrote a tool called Keychain, which works in terminals (and, presumably, consoles). For Mac OS X, SSHKeychain hooks into Apple's Keychain password manager, screen saver, and so forth. I use it on my laptop -- when it sleeps, the machine drops my SSH keys. When it wakes up, I run an ssh command, it asks for my Keychain password, and the agent takes over again.

      For X in Linux, I just use the standard ssh-agent. The agent is started when I log in (check your X session scripts), so I have two buttons on my top panel. One runs ssh-add to add my SSH keys to the agent's keyring. The other runs ssh-add -d to drop the keys. (I could have them time out, too, but haven't bothered thus far.) By setting SSH_ASKPASS to /usr/libexec/openssh/gnome-ssh-askpass, I even get a nice graphical passphrase dialog.

      Also, as a quick comment on Keep your current work files backed up where you can get to them without relying on someone [to change a tape], I have two suggestions.

      First, version control (CVS, Subversion, arch, or whatever else you like) is your friend. If it's important, it's probably important enough to be kept in version control, preferably with the repository on a different machine (e.g., work, for home, or another machine at work).

      Second, it's pretty easy to set up a hard-drive-based backup system that uses cp -al to duplicate the archives, and rsync over SSH with the -W flag (among others) to overwrite an entire file if it changes. That way you get multiple backups with only the changed files taking up additional space. Run it with cron and you're good to go. Oh, and make sure it's a different machine, just in case.

      Again, though, if it's important, having tapes that you can take offsite is a very, very good idea. They're also nice for preserving large amounts of data you aren't using right now, but that someone will ask for as soon as you delete the last copy from disk.

    10. Re:Some simple things by gseidman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Two words: LVM snapshot

      You can even automate the snapshotting. It only keeps track of pages that differ, so it doesn't use up much disk space unless/until the writable filesystem and the snapshot diverge a *lot*. The snapshots are presented as readonly block devices that can be left mounted somewhere so you can grab older versions or deleted copies of files. It isn't quite as nice as the Veritas .snapshot directory in every directory, but it's still really nice.

    11. Re:Some simple things by belg4mit · · Score: 1
      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    12. Re:Some simple things by colin_s_guthrie · · Score: 1

      Erm.... this is possibly the oldest trick in the world.... Just put a script called "saferm.sh" (or whatever) somewhere in your home directory, and (as $PATH ususally specifies system paths first), put an alias rm='path/to/my/saferm.sh' in your .bashrc. The script can then move the file your are deleting to your e.g. /home/me/Trash folder or something. if you really want to go crazy and do it system wide, just slap the scripts in a common folder and slap the alias definition in /etc/profile.d/ or similar. If you want the real rm command, just use the full path. While not 100% perfect, this technique will work on 99% of accidental deletes. That said I still don't use it as I tend to prefer teaching myself a lesson when I mess up and "rm -rf /".....

  57. WIMP is dead. by thre5her · · Score: 1

    Want to make the most of your screen real estate? Try using a tiling window manager, such as ion or (my favorite) wmii. If you're an emacs fanatic, try ratpoison; the keybindings are similar. You'll never resize again.

  58. The Single Most Timesaving Tip: by repruhsent · · Score: 0

    ...use a different operating system.

  59. No eye candy by Fred+Nerk · · Score: 1

    I got the biggest productivity improvement by getting rid of the eye-candy gnome or kde window manager, and switching to ION (http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/). This is a tabbed window manager that defaults to showing one full-screen window per screen.

    It uses keyboard shortcuts for everything, like switching windows, opening terminals resizing windows, etc. I don't need to touch the mouse, and I never spend time lining up my windows so I can see 3 things on screen at once without overlapping.

    --
    Anything is possible, except skiing through revolving doors.
    1. Re:No eye candy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem, then, would be that you don't see three things at once without overlapping. To be productive, I don't want to waste my time switching active windows.

  60. Bliss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignorance is bliss,
    Happiness is mandtory,
    See how it all works out?

  61. Shell by lagerbottom · · Score: 1

    Use your shell, and learn to be deft and efficient with the keybindings and GNU userland tools. There is no substitute in the GUI world.

    --
    "He was a wise man who invented beer." - Plato
  62. 10 hours and 26 minutes?-Going to the dogs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That being said, to me it's always been about the comments, and the rich experience they bring us here."

    Yeah! Rich food and heartburn go together. Pavlov would have a field day with this site.

    Microsoft! Arf! Arf! Arf!

    RIAA/MPAA/Government/Business/Copyright! Arf! Arf! Arf! Arf! *damn I wet myself* Arf! Arf!

    Linux/LISP/XML/AJAX! Arf! Arf! Arf! Arf!

    Women:

    Taco/Cowboy Neal/Dupe! Arf! *burp* Arf! Arf! *blat!* excuse me.

    1. Re:10 hours and 26 minutes?-Going to the dogs. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Rich food and heartburn go together.

      Fortunately you're here to provide us with diet brainfood.
      Thanks...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  63. Automation and Environment by p0z3r · · Score: 1

    Setup your environment to be productive. We use linux on our desktops and most have dual head systems as well. Normally we have to work on multiple products that require different toolkits, python paths and libraries. Since we use bash as our shell, we have functions that can be easily executed to switch environments on the fly, which also setup our CMS clients (i.e. cvs, svn, perforce, etc.). Write scripts that do all the repetitive tasks. ftp'ing, telnet'ing can almost always be automated via python or some other script language. You can also do some fancy ssh automation by setting up keys for your machines. That will eliminate at least all the user/pass login procedures for you.

  64. Let me explain your *BIG* mistake: by Hosiah · · Score: 5, Interesting
    You posted this question during the annual four-day-weekend flamefest, in which thousands of bored cubicle slaves have Thanksgiving holiday off and overrun Slashdot like a horde of goblins. Think Quake Deathmatch with flame-throwers and infinite ammo. Now to address your actual question: (and watch, because I'm the only person providing a helpful answer, I *WILL* be modded down!)

    Making better use of your desktop real estate means getting rid of a lot of junk. If you haven't already, I'd try saying goodbye to KDE/Gnome and getting the lightest possible window manager for the job: That's Fluxbox, ICEwm, Fvwm, or the desktop environment Xfce. (I'm low on sadism, so I won't recommend TWM. Anybody that 1337 wouldn't be posting this question.) This doesn't sound like much, but trust me, when you do away with that extra time waiting for KDE to load, you'll be faster and only have (in Fluxbox's case) a tiny slit in your way. No icons cluttering things up (yeah, we need a home directory icon on the desktop when it's in our menu, too! Sheesh!). Every Linux program on your system can be started from any window manager's menu, it's just a matter of editing the menu to launch the program. Too bothered to edit text menus? Then from the console, try "kicker" for KDE's panel, "gnome-panel" for Gnome's, and "xfce4-panel" for Xfce's, depending on what you have installed. I've tried them all and they work even from TWM!

    As for time-saving: the key here is "automate". Anything you type in a terminal more than once is grounds for automation. Simply take the same commands you type and save them on a line each in a plain text file with the line "#!/bin/bash" at the top and the line "end" at the bottom. Save that file somewhere in your executable path (type "echo $PATH" if you don't know), and type "chmod +x [name of your program]". You can now execute it just like any other system program.

    The next level of automation is programs that require interaction. Two work-arounds exist for this: "Here" documents are little scriptlets you can slip into Bash scripts to do simple keyboard commands for interacting with command-line programs that insist on recieving input. The more sophisticated approach is Tcl/Tk's "expect", which can be used to script damn-near anything (take a command-line web browser like lynx and feed it an expect script with the right instructions, and you can auto-post B1FF comments to Slashdot, even! (Provided you had a nick signed in.), sorry, guys, the secret's out!) I can't think of anything having to do with ssh and email accounts that couldn't be handled with all of the above.

    This might be overkill, but anybody who's read "Beginning Linux Programming" by Neil Matthew and Richard Stones, courtesy of www.wrox.com, wouldn't have to post this question. I promise you could skip the GTK and Qt parts and brush up on Bash, at least, which is easier than BASIC on the Apple ][.

    Doubtless, part of the indiference/hostility in here is because this is also the kind of question spammers ask, and you wouldn't find any people on Slashdot who deal with too much spam, now would you? I don't mind answering because, if you're a *good* wizard, you deserve to know this stuff as well as I do, and if you're a *bad* wizard, I haven't given you a damn thing you couldn't have gotten from a few hours of Googling.

    1. Re:Let me explain your *BIG* mistake: by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Automation: it will save you time if you add a directory owned by you to the path so you don't have to keep typing your root password to add scripts. 'export PATH="${PATH}:/home//bin"` in your .bashrc works well.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  65. Three Quick Points by cab15625 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Learn to use rsync to backup between one computer and another (or synchronize the contents of a couple of computers) Once you're happy with how it works, set it up as a cronjob.

    Get proficient with screen (lets you use one xterm as if it were more than one ... let's you keep consoles open even when you kill the xterm and you can reconnect to them later)

    CHOOSE between emacs and vi. Don't spend more than five minutes making this decision. Become proficient in the editor of your choice. Don't talk to anyone about your choice once you've made it.

  66. 10 fingers are faster than 2 by morcego · · Score: 1

    That is why I reduce my mouse usage to the minimum.
    Using a high productivity WM (IceWM in my case, but there are others) enables me to make use of several keyboards shortcuts, multiple desktops and so on.

    I also use Mutt to read e-mail. It enables me to read and reply to e-mails much faster than with anything else (Thunderbird etc etc). I would recomend, tho, that you fully understands its features, otherwise your productivity will drop. Quick search and display limiting, as long as color and folder hooks can save you a lot of time.

    All in all, I try to take the best of both words (GUI and CLI). I have, most of the time, about 8 xterm's along with Firefox opened in different virtual desktops. Using bash's autocompletion makes it easy to find the host I want to ssh to (start typing the hostname and hit tab).

    Also, I try using my notebook as often as possible. The location of the touchpad allows me to use it without removing my hands from the keyboard, which also gives me another speedboost.

    I have keyboard shortcuts to all aplications I use often. CRTL+ALT+T open a regular xterm, whicl CRTL+ALT+W opens a verticaly maximized one. And so on, and so forth.

    I have tried to use all the "nice" window managers, like KDE and Gnome. In all cases, I suffered a severe drop of productivity, since I had to use the mouse much more often.

    --
    morcego
  67. Ion3 Window Manager + Screen + xclip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use Ion3 (a tiled window manager) to take advantage of screen realestate.
    Bind all the awesome keys
    Use screen to have multiple terminals which can be destroyed
    Use xclip to copy from clipboard into apps, vim, mozilla, etc.

  68. Reasons not to implement this by weierstrass · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It might embarrass the editors.

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
    1. Re:Reasons not to implement this by crull · · Score: 1

      Hm, I thought it would work the other way around since not as many people would read -1 moderated stories.

      --
      this is not my signature.
    2. Re:Reasons not to implement this by bradbeattie · · Score: 1

      And there wouldn't really be much of a need for editors at that point anyway. User submitted stories would do just fine.

  69. Jealous by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

    You get to use a Linux workstation at work. You suck. :)

    --
    I was raised on the command line, bitch

    "Nemo me impune lacesset"

  70. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  71. scren and quake by gidzero · · Score: 1

    Use screen, have it "raise" windows on events... useful once you have mastered things like expect... Now since you have less xterms open, more room for Quake III areana :-d

  72. I like to plaster the root window... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With log watchers. Transparent aterm's running "watch tail -n 10 /var/log/apache/server_log" and the like. Evven when partially covered by your terminals and web browsers and such, you'll notice when something new or unexpected pops up. Some heavily scripted tcpdump could also be useful if you keep an eye on security, too.

    On my laptop, depending on whether the relevant watcher is better suited to vertical presentation (top, netstat) or horizontal (most log files), I can arrange 4 or so that don't get completely covered with my windows all over the place. Two big screens would at least double that.

    1. Re:I like to plaster the root window... by mikeage · · Score: 1

      watch tail -n 10 /var/log/apache/server_log
      Try tail -f /var/log/apache/server_log instead

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  73. same set up, these two variants work for me... by pixel+fairy · · Score: 1

    i actually have 3 monitors, and high spec is relitive but im also at 1600x1200. anyway, one screen for irc/email/web/chat/gkrellm etc. the other screen has a bunch of ssh windows open. window manager is blackbox but thats out of lazyness, i actually prefer enlightenment. gnu screen is your friend.

    the other set up is x2vnc to go from mac to linux to windows (linux in the middle) usually when doing this, from windows ill run gaim and firefox over X11 back off the same linux box because i dont give windows a default route(1) that way i can still use that screen to save space. in this case, i usually have web and sometimes other docs (like pdfs) on the mac so its all spread over differnt spaces. again, all the work(or at least the ssh sessions) itself is on the center screen (linux)

    for the X11 apps on windows, cygwin with X11 over openssh. the private key is protected by EFS instead of sshs built in. on startup, it launches a gnome-panel on top. speakers are still plugged into the linux box so sound still works, ive even run xmms from cygwin this way.

    even though im using x2vnc here, i keep a usb extention cable from all three near the monitor, and the keyboard and mouse on a tiny 4 port hub. that way its easy to change which one the hardware goes to (linux is running x2vnc since its in the middle in both cases) this has the added bonus of the mac as a convinient guest terminal from time to time. (just grab a mouse and keyboard from the pile)

    but most of the time, its just the linux box turned and two monitors. i have done 6 on linux by using 2 pci cards along with the agp one, but dont have any real need for that.

    (1) i dont feel safe letting widnows access the internet directly. yes, i realize there is a simple 165 step method to armor windows to deal with the internet, but i dont know windows all that well and really have better things to do with my time.

    1. Re:same set up, these two variants work for me... by B5_geek · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't mind but I was hoping I could pick your brain a little.

      I have been trying to run a 3-screen - 2-video card setup for some time now. I have had luck using 2 PCI cards but no luck running APG + PCI.

      Regardless of which BIOS display option I choose (AGP first display vs PCI first display), whenever I boot with AGP & PCI video cards, I only get black output on my screens.

      I am running Nvidia cards only.

      If you could help, or if anybody else in this forum could provide me with a little insight as to what I am doing wrong, I would be very gratefull.

      Reply here or email me.

      o2kewl[at]gmail[dot]com

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    2. Re:same set up, these two variants work for me... by pixel+fairy · · Score: 1

      it depends on the motherboard/bios. alot of them are buggy. its kinda random. some wont take a pci card at all if theres an agp card, some will take multiple some will take all of them. its consistant across os on the ones ive tried, so im pretty sure its a bios/hardware thing.

  74. Doesn't everyone have a desktop like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In engineer friendly Google, everyone has a linux or G5 workstation with dual 24" flat panel monitors (in addition to a sweet Mac laptop)... Except for Legal, Sales, HR, and Marketing that is... they just get an IBM thinkpad laptop.

  75. Suggestions for two monitors by FingerSoup · · Score: 1

    Consolidate all your widgets to one monitor and use the other for your work. this lets you focus on work with one screen, while having your widget-fix on the other screen. Keep your XMMS (Or other MP3 Jukebox program) over there as well. One clutter screen and one clean screen is the best way to work for me.

    Use that second display for copy/pasting from one application to another, without having to scroll around a tiny window. Likewise, you could also have one screen for coding and debug output and the other for runtime programming. Of course, I haven't done this in Linux, but it is something i've done in MS Visual Studio... The concept should work there...

  76. My best by nerdwarrior · · Score: 4, Informative
    In no particular order:
    • ion | ratpoision; Pane-based (v. window-based) window managers. Little to no wasted screen real estate. Significantly reduced mouse usage.
    • emacs: Wickedly powerful text editor/operating environment.
      • WhizzyTeX: Updates DVI in another window as you edit TeX/LaTeX.
      • AUCTeX: Very powerful emacs extensions for TeX/LaTeX.
    • fetchmail + procmail + mutt + spamassassin + msmtp: No-nonsense mail reading and sending.
    • bash completions: Quasi-telepathic tab completion.
    • Firefox
      • Adblock: Saves an astonishing amount of screen real estate.
    • screen: Among many other abilities, screen+ssh can provide VNC-like capabilities for your terminal sessions.
    1. Re:My best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fetchmail + procmail + mutt + spamassassin + msmtp: No-nonsense mail reading and sending.

      for some of us, stringing so many poorly named fragments of poorly supported applications together in a complicated, unintuitive array of interoperability concerns...

      well, that's the very definition of nonsense.

    2. Re:My best by AT · · Score: 1

      emacs: Wickedly powerful text editor/operating environment.

      Emacs shell-mode is a hugely powerful part of emacs. All you shell command output ends up in regular emacs buffer that you can nagivate and cut/paste using the regular emacs commands. This is especially useful for interactive sessions (e.g. mysql, python) since cutting and pasting commands and their results is so easy. It also saves mousing between editor and shell windows.
    3. Re:My best by doodleboy · · Score: 1
      # fetchmail + procmail + mutt + spamassassin + msmtp: No-nonsense mail reading and sending.
      Interesting! I have nearly the same setup, though I use postfix to alias user@localhost to my external email address and smtp-auth to my ISPs outbound mailserver. It is overkill, but I know postfix fairly well and it's pretty easy to set up. If I was starting from scratch though I'd definitely use something like msmtp.
      # Firefox * Adblock: Saves an astonishing amount of screen real estate.
      Even better is to use the Adblock Filterset-G Updater in conjunction with Adblock. The filters update themselves automatically. I very rarely ever see an ad, and even better I never have to bother writing my own filters.

      I'll add a couple of my own:

      Vim! Because it's VI, only better!

      For those who use gnome, gnome-terminal has tabs! Ctrl-Shift-T and open as many as you want. For some reason it took me a year or two to discover this. I typically have a couple of tabs open, including a root window. It's great for quickly checking logs or for installing software or whathaveyou, and it's much neater than having multiple windows open all over the place.

  77. Get a tiling window manager by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

    Switch to a window manager such as Ion. It's a far more natural way to manage your windows than a conventional window manager. Honestly, words can't describe how much better Ion feels...it's something you have to use to understand. I only came to the realisation that Ion beats conventional WMs after I started using Ion.

    The learning curve is somewhat steep (hint: read the man pages, and then learn how to redo your keybindings...eliminate the ones you won't use and rebind the ones that clobber other things to other keys), but if you're really serious about efficiency, Ion is the way to go. This goes double for a 1600x1200 dual-head setup, where you have plenty of space to set up your tiles (note: I'd recommend using a true dual-head setup instead of Xinerama, which tends to fuck with Ion).

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    1. Re:Get a tiling window manager by Taladar · · Score: 1

      If ion doesn't work right with Xinerama you might want to try ratpoison, another tiling wm which works flawlessly with xinerama.

  78. Apps by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Stop fooling yourself thinking that spending hours tweaking everything will save time. Just admit that you like tweaking :P

    I'll echo the "Use WindowMaker" mantra. The only reason I'm running Gnome now is for the little graphical workspace switcher. I'm still upset that the window thumbnails don't dynamically update their contents anymore like Enlightenment or even older versions of Gnome.

    I usually configure my window managers to use Meta + various mouse keys to move/resize windows. Gnome's Metacity does not allow you to move the window title above the top of the screen - very annoying when you want to put, say, a web browser's various rows of buttons off-screen so you can fit more precious content onto your screen (more so than you could get with using the full screen view, which isn't available for all apps). Window Maker does the right thing, and allows you to move the window off the top of the screen (but only if you use the Meta-click technique, so the titlebar only disappears if you prove that you know how to move the window back without it).

    I also configure focus-follows-mouse, and disable raise-on-click. This allows me to organize my workspace and have more control, say, copying and pasting stuff between windows without the "behind" window popping to the foreground unless I tell it to (by Meta-clicking on it or clicking on the titlebar/frame).

    Configure a larger virtual desktop in the Xorg.conf if you really want more scrollable space. I imagine this would be more complicated with your dual-monitor setup, though... maybe you just want to add a few pixels to the top of each screen. I trust that you've read and configured the extra Xorg directives that came with your Nvidia / ATi drivers to optimize your Xorg.conf already.

    Also useful to configure some means of "pushing" windows back, usually by middle-clicking on the titlebar/frame or Meta-down.

    I've heavily configured gkrellm - it works great as an app launcher that works under any window manager, in addition to doing all of its normal monitoring. It can really give you a good feeling for what your computer is doing, when it's finished downloading or compiling or transferring to USB drives, how well your RAID throughput is behaving, etc From the default, I usually tweak it to use a better theme (the default wastes a few columns of pixels on the sides!), show system CPU time and network TX / disk writes as inverted, and of course set it to sticky so it's always in its corner when I switch virtual desktops.

    Learn to use gnu screen. It's indispensible for managing multiple consoles. I usually start mine as "screen -e ^Zz", since I use Ctrl-a quite more often than Ctrl-z... what a silly default.

    Give the Galeon web browser a serious try. It has much better tab management than Mozilla, even with Mozilla's tabextensions plugin. Plus, it remembers the last tab state after crashes by default... why isn't that a standard Mozilla feature yet??!

    Check out Hotkeys for making use of those extra multimedia button keys on your keyboard for launching apps.

    Does anyone know of a mechanism for launching apps using keystrokes like Win-e for explorer.exe under MS windows? Best I could do outside of mapping "extra" keys with hotkey is to map the Super key to gnome's "Run command" dialog and then type in the app ... weak.

    Well, have fun.

    1. Re:Apps by 00lmz · · Score: 1

      This comment by elconde has info on using the Windows key to run programs (short version: use xbindkeys).

  79. Control-R by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Informative
    IMO, the single biggest timesaver in bash is the Ctl-R history recall search feature. (It was quite a while before I found out about it, and I wish I had found it sooner.)

    If you crank up your history list to a few thousand entries and set it to forget dupes, you can recall any command you've issued in the last couple of months with just a couple of keystrokes.

    1. Re:Control-R by rafa · · Score: 3, Informative

      control-R is very useful, but you can complement it with some other goodies. For example, you can make bash automatically search in your history based on what you've already input. For example "ls foo" would get you to your previous command that starts with ls foo, even if it wasn't the last command you typed. In your .inputrc:

      "\e[A": history-search-backward
      "\e[B": history-search-forward

      If you just want to insert another option after the last command you wrote, but before the filenames etc (uses alt-o) put this in your .inputrc:

      "\M-o": "\C-p\C-a\M-f "

      Make tab-completion case insensitive, and make it stop matching hidden files (in your .inputrc):

      set completion-ignore-case on
      set match-hidden-files off

      Make your history immediately available from all your bash instances - in your .bashrc:

      shopt -s histappend
      PROMPT_COMMAND='history -a'
      --
      [Science] is one of the very few things that raises human life a little above farce and gives it the grace of tragedy.
  80. Translucency by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you can do it without crashing, that is!

    I gave it up because of stability issues, but using window translucency, tinting, and shading (via Xorg's Composite and Render extensions) REALLY helped improve my productivity.

    Seriously.

    It allowed me to keep an eye on multiple window levels at once, yet everything but my current window being tinted darker ensured that my focus stayed where I needed it. That and the shadowed windows also helped me identify things much faster.

    If it's just used for eye candy, it can be distracting, but used properly I found it helped me a great deal.

  81. save time and look kewl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get enlightenment.

  82. Working efficiently under Linux by talexb · · Score: 1

    I also have a two headed machine at work -- very handy (just wrote about this recently on Perlmonks). Here's how I have my system set up using Windowmaker:

    1. Mail (mutt) IM (Gaim)
    2. Nagios, company wiki (Firefox), qstat (local ssh), various xloads on my Production servers
    3. Browser open to various Production servers (Firefox), sometimes logins (ssh)
    4. Browser open to development machine (Firefox), logins to development machine (ssh)
    5. Spare
    6. Spare
    7. Spare
    8. Sometimes an additional browser
    9. Browser open to GMail, Slashdot, Perlmonks, Groklaw, Google news

    When I get in, I start the xterm for mutt, but first run ssh-add so that any future ssh operations just go straight through without a login.

    Anytime during the day I can go directly to the screen I want with a keystroke -- none of this peering at a little group of boxes and trying to click on it with the mouse. And I have to say the dual-headed thing is dynamite .. I'd much rather have two 19" screens than one monster screen. It just works.

  83. In all fairness... by Create+an+Account · · Score: 1

    ... your calm levelheadedness is not welcome here :)

  84. Screen Real Estate by Apreche · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want to maximize use of screen real estate there is nothing better than the ion window manager, especially if you have multiple monitors. It's the only manager I know of that lets you have a separate set of virtual desktops for each monitor that can be switched independently of one another. You will lose a lot of time, however, reconfiguring all the keyboard commands to not suck.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Screen Real Estate by 0x00 · · Score: 1

      e17 is another window manager that supports a separate set of virtual desktops for each monitor.

      --

      0x00

    2. Re:Screen Real Estate by gnomeza · · Score: 1
      there is nothing better than the ion window manager

      Ah, but there is. It's called wmii.

      Get one of the latest snapshots. It's a slight adjustment from using Ion (you like vi, right?) but I just can't live without it now.

  85. Productivity Tips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I got a twin turbo V8 Ferrari with a custom leather interior, fully sick sound system and a lot of chicks in the back seat, and I was wondering how I might be more productive with it. All I do is drive it from my moms place to the pizza store. It goes from 0-60mph in about .05 seconds. It has a $30,000, 7 speed electronic shift transmission installed.

    Any tips? Hello slashdotters? You might want to re-read how fast it is and how many chicks I got in the back seat.

    What a stupid topic this is.

  86. Re:Automation 2 screens by clockwise_music · · Score: 1

    1. I reckon two screens is just a complete waste of time. You can alt-tab (or whatever) quicker than you can move your neck and eyes across.

    2. Learn a scripting language, then a programming language. Automate your repetitive tasks. Geez does someone even need to explain this?

    3. Ditch the mouse - or at least attempt to. Learn keyboard shortcuts for everything. This will save you a LOT of time! Well worth the effort involved.

    4. Learn to delegate and prioritise your work.

    5. Learn to ignore things (and people) that waste your time.

  87. Binding window/desktop tasks by pasv · · Score: 1

    As said before for every application you use frequently: bind it. but dont forget to bind desktop management shortcuts and window management shortcuts such as shadow, send to desktop, , minimize, resize, change dekstop, etc.. I find that I usually need only one screen and 5 different fluxbox workspaces to carry out my tasks imagine what you could do with 2 screens! Fluxbox has tons of interesting window management commands that can be binded to keys, such as:
    Stick, shade window (makes only the window's bad visible), Toggle Decor (removes the pesky window bar from the window), Kill, and others.

  88. My setup by Cytlid · · Score: 1

    I don't have a dual-headed setup at work, (although I could if I wanted to), I use mostly a wireless laptop. Most of my wireless clients (laptop, pda) are Windows... using programs like putty, filezilla, and vnc, and the best multi-desktop util in the world called AltDesk. (http://www.astonshell.com/ - not free but only $15 to register). Vim for windows (or another good text editor, emeditor free) also comes in handy.

    But my machine at home is linux (and actually my first workstation at work was a Win2k machine until the power supply blew up, switched to Linux and had it dual-headed for a while).

    But my Linux workstation at home is mostly fluxbox with about 5-6 desktops, things like ssh, screen (of course), firefox, thunderbird, umm vim, gkrellm, grdesktop, to name a few. Fluxbox is small, fast and awesome. It's easy to configure and the "mouse wheel through desktops" comes in handy, available via keys if your hands are nowhere near the mouse. Of course VMware (player or otherwise) can be a help too.

    I'm a big proponent of "the right tool for the job". And when it comes to popular key-combinations (alt-arrow keys to cycle through desktops for example), my setup makes it nice to use the same keys to change desktops on Linux in fluxbox that I use in Windows under AltDesk.

    And screen+ssh is definitely a killer combo. I had took a class over the summer at a local university, and they had Windows 2000 Server PCs. I downloaded the putty, filezilla, and vnc viewer executables, that's all I needed. None of these utils installed, they kept their configurations in a neat place, and when I left, everything was removed and cleaned up. It makes it extremely easy for remote management from anywhere when the majority of your work is on the internet.

    --
    FLR
  89. Ummm.... by dcapel · · Score: 1, Funny

    root@box:/etc# echo "slashdot.org 127.0.0.1" >> /etc/hosts

    --
    DYWYPI?
  90. Synchronize your Firefox bookmarks by andyatkinson · · Score: 1

    One way to save a little time is to synchronize your Firefox bookmarks between your new Linux machine and your other machines (like the Windows PC you use at work).

    http://paininthetech.com/synchronize_your_bookmark s_between_different_computers

  91. Good Tip by woolio · · Score: 3, Funny
    What software or configuration tips might Slashdot have for me to: make better use of my time...


    Easy

    execute the following as root:

    echo "127.0.0.1 slashdot.org www.slashdot.org" >> /etc/hosts

    After this one command, you will start making better use of your time.
  92. Firefox + mplayerplug+Yahoo Music! by RompeRatones · · Score: 0
    while firefox is running an embeded video (with greasemonkey extension+pklauncher script so you can access yahoo Music site)
    a usefull command :

    mimms "`cat /tmp/mplay* |grep mms`" -o Video.output.asf

    now, go visit yahoo music site
  93. Shared file systems by Crouty · · Score: 1
    I know I could save some time on my dual-boot (Win/linux) box if I only could access my partitions from both OS. There are reiserfs drivers for Win and NTFS drivers for linux but none of them seems to be stable enough for reliable read-write operation.

    Does anyone have a (serious) suggestion for me?

    --
    On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
    1. Re:Shared file systems by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      How about using a FAT32 partition for your home directory?

    2. Re:Shared file systems by Crouty · · Score: 1
      That's what I do now, but I need much more than 32 GB.

      And FAT32 has many more problems, like no users/groups and fragmentation.

      --
      On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
    3. Re:Shared file systems by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I guess so. I think there are some decent ext2/3 drivers for Windows XP. I used one (I don't remember which) for a while before going Linux only, and didn't seem to have problems. Still, I didn't any prolonged testing. You might take a look at those.

    4. Re:Shared file systems by Crouty · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I did try a few ext2 drivers for Windows and an ext2 plugin for Total Commander. They work ok, but I don't have a good feeling doing write accesses when the docs say these are not safe. Maybe I just have to wait a few more years for the drivers to mature. The problem is most of these file system driver projects stop being developed further once they reach the state of "works-for-the-author".

      --
      On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
  94. screen is your friend by rjoseph · · Score: 4, Informative
    Set your login script (.bashrc or whatever) to:
    exec screen -D -R
    Will reattach a remote session or create a new one if none exists: allows you to continue screen sessions across logins completely transparently. Brilliant!
    1. Re:screen is your friend by Serpent+Mage · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work so well when you normally open 4 terminals to the same remote server.

    2. Re:screen is your friend by rjoseph · · Score: 1

      In screen, type CTRL+A, C to get new screen windows... as many virtual terminals as you want, all within the same physical terminal. Again, brilliant!

  95. enlightenment.org? by allelopath · · Score: 1

    I had never heard of enlightenment, so i googled and found www.enlightenment.org, but firefox says it can't find it. is it usually there?

    1. Re:enlightenment.org? by bob+whoops · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, and it does seem to be down. Try enlightenment.org.au, enlightenment.sf.net, or http://get-e.org/ (thanks to the helpful people in ##enlightenment at freenode)

    2. Re:enlightenment.org? by absynce · · Score: 3, Informative

      Go Here, I think that enlightment.org is down,but definitely check it out. It's my fav. Linux. Go to EliveCd to get a nice live version that you can install to the hard drive if u like it enough. Then check out this review for some good tips. Enjoy:)

    3. Re:enlightenment.org? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try http://www.get-e.org/ this is the new version I have been using it and seems to be rock solid

    4. Re:enlightenment.org? by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      If you're running FC3, you can get Enlightenment using yum.

      Just add the following to /etc/yum.conf

      [Didier]
      name=Didier's yum repository for e17 apps/lib
      baseurl=http://sps.nus.edu.sg/~didierbe/ fedora/3/en/i386
      http://fedora.oceighty.net/e17/fedora/3/en/i386/RP MS.e17/
      http://dr17.saaf.co.uk/fedora/3/en/i386/RPMS.e17/
      You'll have to edit out the spaces from the URLs (thanks /. )

      It's up to version 0.16.999.019 as of now, but beware of losing any config changes after it has updated. The graphics are cool and fast, even on an onboard agp shared memory setup (64MB).

      You can also use gdmflexiserver to jump over to E17 from gnome and back without closing your sessions.

    5. Re:enlightenment.org? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  96. Flux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fluxbox!
    Set your screens to 72DPI as well.

  97. Re:My best - Screen by draxbear · · Score: 2, Insightful
    screen: Among many other abilities, screen+ssh can provide VNC-like capabilities for your terminal sessions.


    I can't stress enough how elegantly simple and yet useful screen can be:

    -Lost connectivity to the server? SSH back in and "reconnect" to your previous session.

    -Kicked something off on your laptop and want to leave? Disconnect the running ssh session and reconnect tomorrow (or later at home) to pickup where you left off.

    -Crap, what was that filename I wanted to use again? Start another screen session instead of another SSH session and flip back when you find out what you needed. You can even mark/cut/paste between sessions.

    Kick screen off in your profile and never look back...
    --
    --- I've completed diagnosis of your problem and can classify it as a YOYO...You're On Your Own
  98. Stop Trying to Save Time by logicnazi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Almost every nerd I know (myself included) wastes more time trying to set up the machine 'just so' to make every task super conveinent and easy than they actually save. I suggest getting the machine in a minimally working configuration and only trying to save time when a task becomes really burdensome and repetitive. Even then I would think twice and ask how much time it really takes and how much time it would take to make it faster.

    Of course that wouldn't be anywhere near as much fun. That's what you should do if you are really interested in saving time. If you just want to have the enjoyment of knowing your machine is optimally set up to do whatever it is you do then follow the other suggestions you find here.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    1. Re:Stop Trying to Save Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Very good advice.

      If you really want to save time in the long run, invest a bit of time soon (and regularly) learning things like shell scripting, regular expressions, PERL, high level languages like Ruby and Python, make etc.

      Practice makes perfect. Every time you discover that you're doing something repetitive, try to script it (in shell - I recommend bash) or write a program in something very high level.

      Take the time to read other people's code and scripts.

      Read the HOWTOs and guides at tldp.org.

      Get some good books. Dip into them regularly. Get to know wise and learned people and ask them intelligent questions.

      Never underestimate your own ability. ${DEITY} helps those who help themselves, so to speak.

      These are all worthwile investments in time. It may sound silly if you are impatient and want to get stuff done _now_ but cutting corners on learning hurts in the long term.

      If you learn to use your tools wisely you will become orders of magnitude more productive in the medium term.

  99. Always on visible workspace by dindi · · Score: 1

    ... is your friend AKA sticky.

    I usually have firefox sticky on my left monitor. the middle is an editor (of choice), or mail, or gaim/irc (bitchx) optionally other..

    I just feel like I must have a browser with all, as links come from all these ...

    on the 3rd head I have a browser as well. and the 4th it is winamp an explorer ..
    now the 3rd and 4th head is an other machine with that other "w" system that is a necessity ... ahm connected by x2vnc or synergy.... (oh right now it has a blue screen and does not start ... crap)

    I am kinda getting sick of gnome with dual and looking into enlightenment (remember windows properties suck in gnome, and I am tired restarting things and organizing, even that it happens once a week or so - yes we have power outs here, and my ups is crap)

    1. Re:Always on visible workspace by ChrisJones · · Score: 1

      Gnome is getting a lot better at this - the session management will remember many of the settings now, especially for gnome-terminal.
      I find I can put a terminal on a specific desktop, mark another as visible on all desktops, etc. and when I log out and save my session, these settings are obeyed.
      Or there's devilspie if you really want to manually force things.
      Anything is better than farting around with the nonsense that is Enlightenment (which really will be released soon, honest!) ;)

      --
      Chris "Ng" Jones
      cmsj@tenshu.net
      www.tenshu.net
  100. Been there by lanced · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was, once upon a time, a young developer in the same position. I had a fast computer, dual flat screens, and free reign to do as I pleased. Here is what I found to be most helpful (assuming you are using KDE/Gnome, but should be appropriate to most desktop environments):

    * Create key bindings. If you don't go to the mouse as often, not only will you be more productive, but you will also prevent RSI's. I could open a terminal window, browser, maximize both, and move either to another virtual desktop with just two fingers on the left hand.

    * speaking of virtual desktops, Use virtual desktops. I like having everything maximized, but I quickly run out of space that way. Normally, I have the terminals on one desktop, the code on another, my reference documents/browser windows on the third, and then the forth for everything else --normally a running version of the project I'm fixing. Figure out what apps you use most, and designate a v.desk to each which makes it easier for the mind to find that information it was looking for.

    * Love the terminal window. By making use of aliases, scripts and various other 'hacks,' most tasks can be boiled down to a handful of keystrokes. It is worth the time to learn either shell scripting and/or perl so that more complicated tasks can still be done rapidly with a reduced chance of error.

    * Thing about the ergonomics. You are obviously a professional computer jockey, otherwise you wouldn't have dual monitors being driven by linux. Until your computer responds to 'computer,' you're going to need your wrists, so take five minutes to consider how you could improve the layout to minimize the chances of an RSI or other strains and pains -- this includes neck strains which is a very common pain resulting from dual monitors. Although this is not a time saving tip per se, it will add years to your useful geek life.

    Well, that is all of the advice I can think of right now. The most important thing you need to consider is ways to eliminate repetition. Anytime I type anything more than 3 times, or click an icon that is more than 2 levels deep, I will consider, if only for a second, alternative means to envoking that task.

    Good luck and good hunting.

  101. I'd recomend root-tail by Vrejakti · · Score: 5, Informative
    Root-tail home page and freshmeat link. random screen shot.

    About: root-tail is a program that allows printing of text directly to the X11 root window wherever you choose, much like running rxvt with a pixmap background but without the hassle and with more features.

    Some code I use with it (there's TONS of options):

    sudo root-tail --justify -g 600x250+20+350 /var/log/messages,lightblue
    1. Re:I'd recomend root-tail by unixbugs · · Score: 1

      This is ok if you don't mind not being able to cut and paste from the output. I just use a script with fluxbox that places these logs around the screen, removes the borders, etc., that way I can move them or resize them or whatever. root-tail is nice if you have 16 colors and no RAM.

      --
      You are about to give someone a piece of your mind, something which you can ill afford...
  102. Learn to use bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Do you know that you can incrementally search history with CTRL-r ? That alone saves me a bunch of time, you have access to really powfull line editing (ie cutting whole words backwards and pasting them with only 2 key strokes) but the shortcuts are weird. You must learn them to fully enjoy how a shell is more efficient than a GUI. Hint: try the emacs shortcuts.

  103. Yes, but. . . by munpfazy · · Score: 1

    . . . as far as I know, you can only tile them with no overlapping parts, and sometimes funny things happen when resizing terminals.

    If all you want to do is stack two or three terminals in a vertical column without rearranging borders often, then it works great.

    I've never been able to get anything more complicated to work reliably.

    (And then again, half my terminals are usually logged into remote machines and running screen anyway. Even with compatible key-bindings, running screens within screens is something my brain just can't handle without constant goofups. So, keeping multiple xterms around is hard to avoid.)

    1. Re:Yes, but. . . by Taladar · · Score: 1

      Why would you want terminals to overlap? Seriously, why do people use overlapping windows in GUIs? I can understand it with fixed-size windows like dialog-boxes but for windows where you can change the size arbitarily? Could someone please name me one good reason why you would want to do this?

    2. Re:Yes, but. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seek help, dipshit.

    3. Re:Yes, but. . . by mildgift · · Score: 1

      I'm using ion right now :-)

      Overlapping windows are useful if you have to manually copy some data from one window into another -- like typing in an ip address or something. Windows that overlap don't suffer from having the text re-wrap (and moving the data you want out of the window).

      That said, I maximize most of my windows, including the terminals.

    4. Re:Yes, but. . . by Anomylous+Howard · · Score: 1

      On one monitor, I keep my mail client behind my browser window. Just enough of it shows to let me see the From: and Subject: of any new emails that arrive. The other monitor is full of overlapping xterms loggged into various servers (up to 12). The least recently used is at the bottom of the stack. The two or three I'm curently working with are on top. It works for me.

    5. Re:Yes, but. . . by munpfazy · · Score: 1

      There are three reasons I do it.

      The most common for me (but also probably the least common generally and least relevant to this discussion) is to have a terminal up in which I'm tinkering with data and a couple of small plotting windows in which to display it. I find it handy to use a single full screen terminal (usually broken into internal columns in screen or emacs) and then to let the plotting windows float over the top of it in a place that doesn't get in the way much. That minimizes line wrapping and maximizes screen real estate. It also makes it possible to have dozens of plotting windows sitting in the background and to only stick those you are interested in at a particular moment in front of the main window without having to cycle through them hunting for the right ones.

      The second is that there are lots of console programs out there that go nutso if you give them anything smaller than an 80xN terminal and don't treat resizing well. Sometimes it's handy to be able to keep an eye on a small section of one of those terminals without having to see the whole thing. Admittedly, this is probably kind of rare. I can only think of one or two examples.

      The third is that one occasionally has to copy data from one place to another, as others have mentioned. True, it would usually be possible to do that in a tiled environment, although with small monitors one is limited to vertical columns to avoid lots of badly wrapped lines.

      That said, I'm actually something of a fan of tiling window managers, particularly larswm. If it weren't for the first case (which unfortunately includes something like 50-60% of the time I spend at a computer), I'd switch over to it entirely.

  104. three heads are better than two by rcpitt · · Score: 1
    OK - everyone else has either told of their personal system or their "wish-list" system.

    Here's what I have on my desktop as I write this:

    4 monitors on 2 systems:

    1 on a Windoze box with a TV card in it running Win2000 on a V95 Optiquest 19" at 1280x1024

    2 NEC Accusync LCD71VM at 1280x1024 on a nVidia dual-head and another V95 Optiquest at 1600x1200 on a 3D Rage (for editing graphics sometimes but see below for normal use)

    Ignoring the Windows box as a necessary evil for times when I have to debug a customer who hasn't switched yet, we move on to the Linux box (still running RH9 but in the process of moving to FC4)

    I run 3 separate desktops instead of a unified one - mostly because I have not found a way to have enough virtual desktops to satisfy me any other way. I run 2x15 (30) in each screen for a total of 90 virtual desktops - and have seen times when I have something in all of them - but not always.

    I'm generally in one of 3 mental modes - and use the screens differently for each:

    1 - general system monitoring and maintenance - read e-mail, watch logs, read documentation, etc.

    2 - major system updates/maintenance - configuring and copying software, etc.

    3 - working with graphics and web site creation and updates

    In 1 I have system monitoring visuals on the right (1600x1200) monitor of various flavors - xload, xosview, eximon - started from a single script (showall - see below), working screens (xterms, web browsers, etc.) with things like slashdot and groklaw plus other documentation and web sites I'm working with in the middle (and sometimes on the left) and e-mail on the left. I'll preempt the e-mail for more screens if necessary but tend to have it back most times.

    In 2 I'll have screens on the left on a new system, on the right on the old and documentation in the middle

    In 3 I'll do editing on the V95 because it has reasonable color fidelity compared to the LCDs, while I select and categorize (gThumb) on the central screen and do command line stuff on the left LCD (ImageMagick etc.)

    I start programs in the various desktops in a consistent manner all the time. Each of the 3 monitors has a slightly different mix with most consitency at each end and the central ones more "ad hoc"

    In general, the right screens on all desktops are used for access to the major servers I monitor. Most active on the right, second most active to its left, and so on toward the left (currently 8 machines are showing)

    On the left screen's desktops I start at the left with e-mail and local root and personal items, then web screens and on the right, xterms to systems

    On the center screen's desktops I start on the left with local (to my workstation) xterms, then web screens and on the right xterms to systems

    On the right screen's desktops I start with music (xmms and volume control) upper left with the "showall" screen next right. Bottom left is vmWare with another Win2k instance in it, used for "dangerous" stuff because I can restore it with a copy command from the command line. Other vmWare sessions to it's right as necessary. In the center desktops I'll have more web screens and on the right are xterms

    In the center portion of each screen I start a browser as necessary. I'll typically have one each of Mozilla, Firefox and something else up on the 3 screens, with Firefox in the center one with as many as 8-10 sessions (press ^N 7 times and use the mouse to distribute the screens to desktops) on each of the center 8-10 virtual desktops.

    Left-most top web screen (5th from left actual desktop) has Slashdot and below that is Groklaw. Next right to each of them are Nagios and MRTG on my main monitoring machines and to the Nagios' right is a session into the main e-mail configuration machine. The rest home on Google or my main web menu (which times out to refresh to google after 2 minutes) and may have anything that strikes my fancy on

    --
    Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
    and didn't get it
  105. Don't pretend it's 1970 by mnemonic_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Use Xsu to get a graphical su login automatically when you need it (configuration varies). Instead of opening a new terminal and typing "su [enter] password [enter] vi /etc/mpd.conf [enter]," you'll just be typing "password [enter]" whenever you need to access something as root.

    Use a graphical file explorer like Rox to navigate and sort through directories quickly. Don't rely on ls for everything; it is far faster and more flexible to organize files graphically. Dragging a box and one click-drag can replace dozens of keystrokes across multiple commands.

    If you always startup X after you login, then have X startup automatically. No reason to type "startx" every time.

    Use Conky for system monitoring.

    Let normal users halt or reboot the system if appropriate. In many, many cases it's silly to maintain the *nix default behavior of only letting root shutdown/reboot the system. If you're running a server with dozens of remote users then yes, this would be unwise. If it's your personal workstation though, it's completely reasonable.

    Use "slocate" instead of "find." Pardon me if this is obvious, but I still see too many *nix diehards waiting for "find" to finish when there's a perfectly up to date slocate DB ready for searching. "find" is nearly obsolete.

    Have your drives automounted with Submount. It's pretty sad that something like this is not standard in the 2.6 kernel. Typing a command every time you want to read a CD looks pathetic to the average Windows user used to autorun or clicking "My Computer."

    That's all I have for now. Basically, I liberally automate outdated procedures (which many *nix users still tolerate). This makes day-to-day operations much smoother overall, and doesn't disrupt tasks by having to constantly bring up new terminal windows.

  106. You can't have too much screen real estate by Artana+Niveus+Corvum · · Score: 1

    I have found that no matter how much screen real estate you have, it isn't too much. Once you get used to it is really rarely even "enough". The desktop setup I've come up with and use universally across all of my machines has become by far the most useful and usable of any I've ever used on any OS.
    It's sawfish, straight sawfish (sawfish used to be used as the default underlying window manager in a lot of distros' gnome builds) with a custom (and readily availabe on the internet) theme called "Lines" that loses you all of your borders and all of your widgets and replaces them with a single pixel border. Sawfish is crazily configurable and scriptable. The user config file is written in Scheme (really easy to figure out just from looking at it but also frighteningly powerful once you start trying things).
    Everything's a keystroke for me, I have a keystroke to pop up an X-term, one for a web browser, one for an email client, one for my favorite media player, one for gaim, one to increase the volume, one to decrease it, etc. ad infinitum. I have a keystroke set up that lets me hold control and click any window to drag it (from anywhere in the window, not limited by borders here), another to resize it (again from anywhere in the window). Want a keystroke that does a whole series of things? Fine, it's all perfectly legible in the config file. Font stuff, printing stuff, it's all in my setup. Setting it up requires a little work the first time around after which point you just keep a tarball of your settings backed up somewhere so you can just unpack them when you have to migrate between boxes. Sawfish has no no taskbars of its own(in the context menu one of the submenus is an open window list that includes minimized things, etc and if you really need a taskbar you can choose any number of ones that are available out there. A friend of mine with a similar setup uses xfce4's taskbar whatsit... I personally hate taskbars taking up my screen real estate).

    Yup, can't have too much screen space. Always have to make the best use of it that you can. I often end up with many 10s of xterms open doing various things and any number of browser windows each of which contains a various number of tabs, etc. I've really never been more productive.

    --
    -----------------------------------------
    Remove the Greed which plagues mankind.
  107. use an ssh agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For starters, run an ssh-agent on your machine, and then use public key authentication when you authenticate to ssh sessions. That's one of my favorite time savers, prevents needing to enter a password with each log in.

    Here's a decent resource on how to set up pub key authentication:
    http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-8.0-M anual/custom-guide/s1-openssh-client-config.html

  108. VNC by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I run vnc with icewm, so I Can keep xchat, rtin, gaim, ssh terminals that never close. Very nice.
    Then you can play with KDE or Gnome, and never have to worry about losing your active sessions.

    IceWM also can snap window edges, support gnome and kde. So its my favorite for vnc.

    Added benefit, you can vnc from another computer on the net and have your desktop, like using your laptop on wifi from the living room.

    And you even run multiple VNC servers on the same machine, have one with kde, or gnome, etc, but you loose accelerated gfx.

  109. hyphen by muhgcee · · Score: 1, Informative

    No, I will have to disagree. I don't think time is saving Linux desktop tips. Anyone care to discuss?

    1. Re:hyphen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. You're a dumbass.

  110. Multi-monitor management by toastydeath · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recommend running Xdmx and xmove. Possibly NX as well.

    Xdmx will allow you to have very, very flexible control over how your dual monitor setup works. It not only supports your local two monitors, but will allow you to strap network pc's/monitors on to your existing setup with little fuss. I ran a six induvidual laptops as my primary display at work for some time with xdmx, and it worked very well. The only downside was my desktop was not quite beefy enough to handle a display size of 3072x1536. It also handles bezel sizes, if you prefer the "looking through a window" perspective versus xinerama's standard continuous desktop. It will support just about any monitor layout you want.

    xmove gives you screen-like functionality for your desktop. Get up from your workstation, jump on a laptop with wifi, and xmove will pull the display output across the network - just like screen. Send the applications back to your desktop, and shut your laptop down. Bazing!

    NX suppliments this with fantastic compression and will allow you to do stupid things, like do xmove/remote x work at home. Or resume a particularly stunning game of bejewled.

    1. Re:Multi-monitor management by agm · · Score: 1

      I have been using 2 17" monitors (with KDE) set at 1280x1024 for quite a few years and I recently shifted to a triple monitor setup. Initially it was a bit gimmicky but I've noticed my productivity increasing. I am considering moving from 6 desktops to 4 as I never use the last 2.

      Another tip: I have set the "double click on window title bar" action to set the window to all desktops rather that the standard maximise. Makes it much easier to "stick" a window to all desktops while moving to another desktop to view a browser or NXClient session.

  111. How does it compare to scripts? by AnEmbodiedMind · · Score: 1

    Is it ever better than just writing a few lines in some scripts in your ~/bin directory?

  112. Two more letters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Un

  113. simply say "I'll be modded down" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the quickest way to get modded up...

    crazy backwards /. people.

  114. foreign technologies by namekuseijin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "why is kde so unloved here in the USA?"

    I'm guessing it's the very american "Not invented here" syndrome.

    Good technologies don't have a chance in the USA if it isn't to be actively developed there. KDE is from the germans. OCaml from the french. Pascal never got a chance against USA own C, even having the same capabilities but much nicer language features, like being a real block structured language with real lexical scoping.

    Python was to die a slow death against Perl hadn't Guido Van Rossum moved over to the country. Perhaps the japanese guy behing Ruby should move over to so it can be considered the intelectual property of an american? perhaps then ruby would get a boost...

    Examples abound...

    --
    I don't feel like it...
    1. Re:foreign technologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you even bothered to look at the KDE developers map? There are quite a lot of developers for KDE in the US (just as much as there are in Europe), so I don't see where people get this 'KDE is unloved in the US' stuff. We're sharing this technology, whether it's Gnome or KDE, it doesn't really matter where it's made as long as it pleases its users.

    2. Re:foreign technologies by Dorm41Baggins · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "why is kde so unloved here in the USA?" I'm guessing it's the very american "Not invented here" syndrome. Good technologies don't have a chance in the USA if it isn't to be actively developed there. KDE is from the germans.
      And yet KDE and GNOME are both most commonly found running on top of the Linux kernel which was developed be a man from Finland. And yes, I'm well aware of the fact that Torvalds now lives in the U.S. Doesn't help your case any- he only moved here last year and Linux gained quite a few American followers before that!

      Oh, and KDE's major competitor, GNOME? Developed by Mexicans.

      (Don't even get me started on the Japanese hardware and software that floods the US market.)

    3. Re:foreign technologies by pjrc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By that logic, none of us would use a certain OS from Finland, in preference for one developed at the University of California.

    4. Re:foreign technologies by opqdonut · · Score: 1

      Well, kde isn't exactly loved here in finland either, so I guess the dislike has got to have something to do with the bloated clunkiness of kde that most people dislike.

      --
      yes > /dev/dsp
    5. Re:foreign technologies by Sunsetbeach · · Score: 1

      Since the car is a german invention...

      You don't use cars in the US?

    6. Re:foreign technologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But the supersized SUV with the supersized driver drinking his supersized cola and eating his supersized burger and fries to bolster his supersized triglycerides level in the supersized drive-thru lane is very much a US-centric invention.

      No other country has adopted this invention at any where near the rate of the US.

    7. Re:foreign technologies by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Well, kde isn't exactly loved here in finland either


      There are plenty of KDE-users in Finland. Or are you in a position to speak for all 5 million Finns? No? That's what I thought. So please: don't try to pass your personal opinions as facts that cover an entire country.

      I guess the dislike has got to have something to do with the bloated clunkiness of kde that most people dislike.


      Examples please? Do you have any hard facts to back up your claim ("KDE is bloated!")? To what are you comparing it to? If you are comparing it to GNOME (KDE's closest altnernative. No, Fluxbox or the like is not comparable) you would notice that there are many places where KDE is actually leaner.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    8. Re:foreign technologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Pascal never got a chance against USA own C, even having the same capabilities but much nicer language features, like being a real block structured language with real lexical scoping.
      I personally much prefer C to Pascal because of the language. I find Pascal is strict and verbose and not fun to work in.
    9. Re:foreign technologies by mangu · · Score: 1
      Pascal never got a chance against USA own C, even having the same capabilities but much nicer language features, like being a real block structured language with real lexical scoping.


      Perhaps the japanese guy behing Ruby should move over...


      Pascal and Ruby both suffer from the same problem: too much typing. You need five keystrokes to write "begin", against only two for "{", and so on. This may seem insignificant to a beginner or a professor who only works with tutorial examples, but when you do a lot of professional coding, all that typing gets in the way.

    10. Re:foreign technologies by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      The car is a German invention, but plenty of cars are US-made.

      Similarly, the computer is arguably not a US invention, yet plenty of them are made in the US. Likewise programming languages; in fact, that was pretty-much the point of the OP.

    11. Re:foreign technologies by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      Doesn't help your case any- he only moved here last year and Linux gained quite a few American followers before that!

      AFAIK he has been living in the US at least since the late 90s. IIRC he only moved inside the US last year, maybe you mixed that up.

    12. Re:foreign technologies by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More keystrokes for begin and end than for { and } is only half of the problem. The human brain is very good at recognising matched pairs of symmetric symbols. If you see a { on one line, and then a } a few lines down, then your brain will automatically associate the two. This doesn't happen with begin and end (well, it does, but it has to go through the linguistic part of your brain which is incredibly slow in comparison).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:foreign technologies by Dimitri-san · · Score: 1
      You need five keystrokes to write "begin", against only two for "{", and so on.

      True. However, you need to consider the difficulty of those keystrokes. I've been touch-typing for over 15 years and I can tell you for certain, I'd much rather type b-e-g-i-n all day long rather than the sequence of hit and hold shift key on left side, stretch out on the right side to hit the ]/} key, then release shift key. Yeah, technically it's only two keystrokes, but they are more stressful than the combined five keystrokes for "begin".

      but when you do a lot of professional coding, all that typing gets in the way

      When you do a lot of professional coding, all that symbolic typing can start to hurt... ;)

    14. Re:foreign technologies by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

      Linux was just started by a finland guy. It was hacked by hundreds of people from all over the world. Many americans thought it to be a legitimate kernel for the very american GNU system. It was also working great while the BSDs were still starting.

      "GNOME? Developed by Mexicans."

      Using GTK+, by american students. Icaza is living in america for a long time and was even offered a job at M$. Besides, his best friend Nat is a legitimate american. Still another case a foreign technology absorbed because it's now perceived as a legitimate american IP...

      "(Don't even get me started on the Japanese hardware and software that floods the US market.)"

      Japan is nowadays just a shadow of the once proud warriors they were. A mere american colony in the overseas...

      --
      I don't feel like it...
    15. Re:foreign technologies by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

      "Pascal and Ruby both suffer from the same problem: too much typing."

      Well, that never stopped american Java adoption. Yes, it uses { and }, but too much typing is all around its design. Have you ever tried passing a callback in Swing? You'll understand what i mean...

      --
      I don't feel like it...
    16. Re:foreign technologies by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

      The car ( and TV AFAIK ) were german.

      But you don't use a car, you use a FORD. You don't use Volkswagen.

      You don't use a desktop environment, you use GNOME. You don't use KDE...

      --
      I don't feel like it...
    17. Re:foreign technologies by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      "why is kde so unloved here in the USA?" I'm guessing it's the very american "Not invented here" syndrome.
      I'm guessing it's a couple people with very small sample sizes talking about what they perceive to be reality. I use KDE. I'm in the USA. 'nuff said.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    18. Re:foreign technologies by masklinn · · Score: 1
      Pascal and Ruby both suffer from the same problem: too much typing. You need five keystrokes to write "begin", against only two for "{", and so on. This may seem insignificant to a beginner or a professor who only works with tutorial examples, but when you do a lot of professional coding, all that typing gets in the way.

      You'll need 5 keystrokes for Ruby's begin versus 2 for C's {, but your Ruby routine will be done in 2 lines while you'll be writing your 20th line of C...

      Sry mate, they don't play in the same field, and trying to diss Ruby saying that it requires more keystrokes than C is beyond retarded.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  115. Rotate This! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take one of your screens and rotate it 90 degrees. Then dedicate it to a full-screen web-browser. Most websites benefit from extended vertical size. I have a 1600x1024 SGI LCD that I use just that way and it is great - I rarely ever have to scroll web pages anymore because most are less than 1600 pixels tall.

    1. Re:Rotate This! by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That sounds like some mighty-small text in that browser window.

      As it is, I have to increase the font size defaults in Firefox on my 1280x1024 screen. I'd have my screen resolution at 1024x768 but it's a 19" LCD which (as you probably know) has optimal resolution at 1280x1024.

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  116. sed/xargs/etc and ION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with everything the above said, but I would add:
        * SED is the shiznit

    I thought I "knew" UNIX, but until you know SED, and every other freaking cool command you are just getting by. Proper use of the command line has saved me enourmous time. I never took the time to read a UNIX command book page by page, and that was a mistake.

    Take everything you know about unix and throw it away once a year to (re)read a comprehensive manual.

    Also:
        * ION is indeed the shiznit

    ION is fanastic as long as you are not doing GUI programming. That is the only reason why I don't use it now. Now I use gnome, with keybindings to vaguely approximate ION.

  117. no slashdot by the.Ceph · · Score: 1

    Don't allow you computer to connect to slashdot. This is the best way to improve efficiency on any computer for anyone reading this.

  118. Use ion3 by tuite · · Score: 1

    The single most effective thing for me getting more efficient at work was to change from gnome to ion3. ion3 is always fullsized windows, so you cant move windows around, they are always maximized and that makes me work instead of clicking and resizing and moving the window about. Go for ion3 --tuite

    --
    -- My site
  119. Do *NOT* install Gentoo by Temujin_12 · · Score: 0

    While Gentoo can be an extreemly powerful and FULLY customizable distro, I found myself spending a large portion of my time compiling/tweaking/fixing my distro rather doing my work.

    I've since switched to a debian-based distro (http://www.kubuntu.org/) to minimize the amount of time I spend installing/tweaking/fixing my distro.

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    1. Re:Do *NOT* install Gentoo by dan_polt · · Score: 1

      Actually I had the exact same problem...

      Gentoo Screwed XOrg up one day, and I lost a whole day reconfiguring it, went to debian testing which works and I love apt.

    2. Re:Do *NOT* install Gentoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really? I'm using gentoo in work right now and I've spent less time trying to get it to work as I like than I ever did any other OS.

  120. Holy shit... worst ask slashdot ever by robbo · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Check yr email once a day.
    2. Ditch the dual head for a single 19 inch monitor (save some money and yr neck).
    3. Browse the web after work.

    --
    So long, and thanks for all the Phish
  121. The ION window manager! by Hackeron · · Score: 2, Informative
  122. screen or vnc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any links to how-to's on screen, besides the recent one on Newsforge/Linux.com?

    I'm using a client booting off a knoppix cd, where I then ssh into my file server and also monitor web server logs from a web server on a different public ip address. Logging into my file server (which was once my desktop) allows me to use konqueror with my old bookmarks, along with all the other configuration settings in konqueror, kmail, and all the other kde and non-kde destkop config settings. So what I'm basically doing is starting a knoppix bash screen on the knoppix desktop, and ssh'ing into the file server, logging on as my normal user on the file server, then starting konqueror, kmail, and other apps from the command line while ssh'd in. This allows me to start konqueror with a titlebar caption that includes the date and time of starting, which allows me to figure out which instance of konqueror crashed, so I can go into /tmp/kde-myusername to check the crashed log file for what tabs I had open prior to crashing, which allows me to duplicate the crashed session of konqueror.

    Thanks to the long uptimes (measured in months), I can keep konqueror sessions open as long as I want. With multiple desktops, I keep frequently visited sites on one konqueror session on one desktop, a second desktop with additonal frequently visited sites on konqueror, a third desktop when using konqueror for ssh/fish drag and drop between ssh'd boxes, etc.

    The problem I run into, and which I thought screen could solve, is that I'd like to be able to shut down my desktop from time to time, while still keeping the konqueror sessions running. I thought I could do this with screen, but from my trials it appears that the screen session remains, but the konqueror/X app dies when detaching screen sessions.

    Thinking about it further, I'm guessing that vnc or tightvnc would be a better solution for what I'm trying to do. Run everything on the file server (which has X running 24/7 anyway), log into the desktop through a vnc session, pickup the konqueror session sitting on the file server desktop, then shutdown vnc, shutdown the knoppix client, while keeping the konqueror sessions running. Then when logging back in, use vnc to re-establish the connections to the currently running konqueror sessions.

    Is screen the solution to my problem, or am I better off with vnc? Links to how-to articles?

    1. Re:screen or vnc? by BKX · · Score: 1

      I believe you may be interested in a little program called xmove. It's like screen but for X-apps.

  123. Re:WTF by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

    Then fucking switch for real and stop whining here.

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
  124. Spend less time on slashdot? by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    I mean, you asked slashdot... surely there is a witty thing I coudl say about that *if* I had some nice coffee this morning.

    But I haven't, but for all you family guy lovers:

    In Soviet Russia, Linux Saves Time With You!

    please type the word in this image: poured
    random letters - if you are visually impaired, please email us at pater@slashdot.org

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  125. Re:10 hours HUH?? by bscott · · Score: 1

    I dunno what your pref settings are, but here's what I see - both via my account, and with a default view (not logged in, different browser):

    ----
    Ask Slashdot: Time Saving Linux Desktop Tips?
    Posted by Cliff on Sunday November 27, @07:32PM
    ----
    Developers: Ubuntu Certified for IBM DB2
    Posted by Hemos on Sunday November 27, @03:44PM
    ----

    Less than 4 hours. Try some decaf? Or if you really want to suck away your free time (and this is not a plug; I'm very careful with my use of this site... it's dangerous unless you really have nothing useful to accomplish) try Metafilter.com.

    But I suspect your prefs simply locked out a bunch of stories this afternoon, and you didn't bother to check the real front page while logged out.

    --
    Perfectly Normal Industries
  126. Use... by squoozer · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... MS Windows instead.

    Ducks and runs away (very) quickly....

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  127. Desktop is home dir! by Nailer · · Score: 1
    Open Gnome's Configuration Editor. In the Nautilus prefs, click enable 'desktop is home dir'. Gnome's desktop becomes your home dir. This:

    Means when you scp a file to your machine, it appears on your desktop.

    When a shell starts, it's in your desktop.

    Encourages you to organize your home dir.

    Means you're a lot faster at particular file operations which can be done quicker with the mouse keyboard shortcuts than with shell commands (eg, dragging a bunch of files onto a dir, deleting stuff).

    1. Re:Desktop is home dir! by diogenes57 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with keeping the home dir organized and using it as a desktop. So why oh why do so many programmers decide to put directories in the home dir without asking me permission? For example: the sidenet config for wine places a 'c' directory in the home dir; iPodder puts a 'data' dir in the home dir. Don't these programmers realize what the dot is for at the beginning of the rest of my programs' data directories? If they all could use this convention it would make life so much easier.

    2. Re:Desktop is home dir! by paving-slab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is one of my pet hates with linux:- Why oh why didn't they put an "etc" directory in the home directory for applications files? Is there a good reason? Anyone know?

    3. Re:Desktop is home dir! by budgenator · · Score: 1
      I don't know why not just,
      ./configure --prefix=~/; make; make install
      never tried it personaly, but it seems like it would work, might have to do
      ./configure --prefix=/home/user
      instead. so then it would want a
      ~/bin ~/etc ~/lib ~/tmp
      .
      if you could
      ./configure --prefix=/user/local;
      you can
      ./configure --prefix=/home/user
      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  128. Try another wm by mentat1978 · · Score: 1

    Heres a window manger (http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/) i really haven't tried myself but i saw some other person use it and i'm quite impressed. It's a new approach to doing GUI's and i think it must be perfect if you want to optimize screen real-estate.

  129. Launchmenu by lightweave · · Score: 1

    If you want to save screen estate there is a little tool here http://sourceforge.net/projects/launchmenu which can help you. On Windows there was a tool named RunIt, which is quite handy. You can configure your most often used applications and then it's gone. When you want to start one you simply put the mouse cursor to the rightmost position on the screen and press the right mouse button. The menu pops up and you can start your aplication. This is a replacement I wrote which runs on Windows and on Linux and it is one of the application that I couldn't live without it anymore. The Windows version has some drawbacks because of the way how the windows are managed, but the linux version works great.

  130. Email Customization is a MUST for a business env.. by trims · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the biggest productivity saps for a sysadmin is dealing with the massive volume of email that we get. In even a moderate-sized business, it's easy to get 1,000 mails per day, with a couple 100 actually from a person, not an automated script.

    Now, what I'm about to say is predicated on the assumption that your external mail server already runs SPAM filters, and that virtaully everything that you actually get is "real" mail. If this is not the case, FIX THIS FIRST. Get your company to pony up for some serious anti-spam software. It saves EVERYONE a ton of time, and at the same time, cuts down on your (the company's) exposure to the nasties that inhabit email.

    First, pick an email client which has filters. My preference is for Evolution or Thunderbird, but there are many out there. Pick one. As a previous poster noted, GIVE IT ITS OWN DESKTOP - that is, in your window manager which has virtual desktops, dedicate one solely for the email client. Now, configure it with lots of filters to sort your mail. Personally, I have a reasonable hierarchy with 3 folders at the top level: NOW, LATER, and WHENEVER. Underneath these, there should be folders for every type of email you get: ones from your boss, ones from the company HR, ones from the monitoring scripts running on your servers (you do have these, right? RIGHT?). Take a good long time figuring out how to get these down cold - you want a good balance of sufficient sorting without going overboard. I find that having about 30-50 folders total is optimal for me. If you can, also have the email client tag your mail with "importance" color coding (most clients have this, and it's really useful).

    Now to reading: obviously, your should read the NOW, well, NOW. However, you don't want to be completely interrupt-driven. I would turn off any biff-style mail notification, or at best, turn down its check time to no less than 10 minutes between check. Instead, train yourself to periodically check the NOW folder. Read and deal with the NOW stuff during your normal workflow.

    The LATER folder should probably be read every couple of hours, or if you truly haven't anything else to do. Resist the temptation to open it and look. Finally, the WHENEVER shouldn't be read until the end of the day (or maybe while your eating lunch at your desk ;-)

    Email is one of the great things about networks; however, it can be an enormous timesink if not properly handled. -Erik

    --
    There are always four sides to every story: your side, their side, the truth, and what really happened.
  131. Fix Less and vim by TopSpin · · Score: 4, Informative
    in .vimrc:
    set t_ti= t_te=
    from any of the various places sh/bash/etc source:
    LESS='X'; export LESS
    Now, Less and vim won't restore the @#*$!%ing terminal on exit, permitting you to cut/paste/transcribe whatever you were just editing/viewing.

    (whomever caused this behavior to be default; a pox on you)

    p.s. Some bonehead in Usenet advises frobbing your terminal type to vt100 to get the same result. Do not do this. If you don't know why then especially don't do this!

    --
    Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    1. Re:Fix Less and vim by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Some bonehead in Usenet advises frobbing your terminal type to vt100 to get the same result. Do not do this. If you don't know why then especially don't do this!

      Yeah I know the keys on the VT100 really hurt my fingers....

    2. Re:Fix Less and vim by cerberusss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Now, Less and vim won't restore the @#*$!%ing terminal on exit

      This is highly useful, except when you're editing an encrypted file in vim. I can't find the syntax for .vimrc. Anybody know the solution? I've gotten as far as this, but it doesn't work:

      " Don't clear terminal after exiting
      if &key == ''
      " we're not encrypted
      set t_ti= t_te=
      endif

      Anybody got the solution?

      (Yes, I know it shouldn't be used since it's trivial to defeat, but it's useful to prevent the occasional viewer).

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    3. Re:Fix Less and vim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kind of like the default. I have very poor short-term memory and so I forget exactly what it was I was doing in the shell before opening an editor. Seeing my command history again reminds me. Yay for short attention span!

      Now, what was I talking about?

    4. Re:Fix Less and vim by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1


              set t_ti= t_te=

      from any of the various places sh/bash/etc source:

              LESS='X'; export LESS

      Now, Less and vim won't restore the @#*$!%ing terminal on exit, permitting you to cut/paste/transcribe whatever you were just editing/viewing.


      My Vim doesn't restore, even without this t_ti= t_te=
      How do I make it restore the screen?

      For less I like it not to restore (I use export LESS='-X -F -M -R -f'), but for vi I would like just that.

  132. best way to spend a lot of time by god64 · · Score: 0

    in fact not only on linux, i use it on linux/(i386|ppc) and solaris/sparc:

    the ion windowmanager ( http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/ ) and your favourite shell (bash in my case, but zsh or csh are as good )

    most time on a desktop you spend with resizing or moving or focusing windows, so why using windows anyway?

  133. Re:Email Customization is a MUST for a business en by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

    Am I missing something here? What does this have to do with desktop Linux. This guy doesn't sound like a sysadmin to me.

    --
    Scott

    ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  134. Don't do that in the kernel... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Unlink?

    Create a shell script containing a tar --remove-files command which dumps the archive in the users trash folder and alias del, delete, remove, trash to it.

    Create a move command which performs a cp then tar --remove-files.

    use these new commands instead of the defaults. Hell, alias the default rm,mv,cp in your shell.

    --
    Deleted
  135. Drop the mouse by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    Using a mouseless window manager (I read a great review about that one which uses an emacs style windowing system or real window/desktop distribution)

    Organise your time and tasks outside of your computer.

    I am interested to see what everyone else said, and if they agree with me in that software won't save you time you cannot save yourself. (I don't think software can make your thinking more efficient at that granularity)

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  136. Use the keyboard, not the mouse. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Set up or learn the keyboard shortcuts for everything you do. That's it. Much time saved.

    --
    Deleted
  137. ^R in Bash! by zmooc · · Score: 1

    The most important Linux Desktop (uh-huh) Tip I can give you: use ^R in Bash as much as you can;-)

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  138. Configuration and useability tips: by lkcl · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) install KDE 3.4 (it's faster, it's better all-round).

    2) run prelink -v --conserve-memory -q -a
          but first add /usr/lib/mozillaNNNNN and /usr/lib/kde3 to
          prelink.conf (and any other software such as openoffice)

    3) on debian, edit /etc/default/rcS and replace
          FSCKFIX="n" with FSCKFIX="y"

    4) on debian, install hal, dbus-1 and udev, and then edit /etc/default/hal and make sure DROP_DAEMON_PRIVS is
          commented out (this will make it possible for you to
          mount auto-detected USB drives etc.)

    5) cd to /etc/hal/device.d and do this:
            ln -s /usr/bin/fstab-sync 50-fstab-sync.hal

    5) edit /etc/profile and add this:
          export KDE_IS_PRELINKED="1"

    these simple things will make your system faster, more robust in the face of complete technically incompetent blithering idiots who would otherwise blindly press ctrl-d when faced with a prompt saying "your filesystem is corrupted. give root password for maintenance or press ctrl-d", and also provide automatic access to USB devices that is otherwise bloody inconvenient.

    1. Re:Configuration and useability tips: by lkcl · · Score: 1

      KDE 3.4 is faster... than KDE 3.2 or KDE 3.3.

      obviously, KDE 3.4 isn't faster than say fluxbox, icewm or fvwm2.

      gnome is a sick puppy that should have been shot at birth
      for its own good.

      personally i love fvwm2, with the default debian configuration from when it had a 3x3
      desktop grid thing, so i've resisted upgrading ever since in order to avoid losing that default config: i just _love_ the 1 second startup time and the fact that it runs xterm, and i then
      type the name of programs to run (mozilla-firefox, gaim, mutt) in the xterm and go from
      there.

      for personal use/preference: bugger KDE and Gnome :) p.s. i _love_ superkaramba and kroller, though (see kde-look.org).

    2. Re:Configuration and useability tips: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fantastic tips. I've just done prelink on my system and it positively flies. KDE loads in THREE seconds! And everything else fires up like lightning.

    3. Re:Configuration and useability tips: by lkcl · · Score: 1

      oh - another one i forgot (but it's probably slash-dot-too-late...)

      in debian (testing/unstable), hotplug has recently been superceded by udev and hal.

      this is GREAT news because hotplug is a pig that adds oh, what... 20 seconds to your boot time.

      i recently set up a desktop system that now takes only 15-20 seconds to boot up (and i moved the /etc/rc2.d priority of xserver and xfs to 16 and 15 respectively to make their startup overlap the services that _so_ won't be needed whilst x is starting and someone's logging in).

      all you have to do is add testing and unstable to your /etc/apt/sources.list, and then:

              apt-get install udev hal

      hurrah.

  139. Whatwhatwhat?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finland isn't part of the USA? Damn!

  140. Enlightenment == simple?! by Fross · · Score: 4, Funny

    Simple is good. Bling Bling is bad. I personally choose enlightenment.

    You just literally made me choke on my breakfast. Bad!

    Well, choke laughing, so it's not all bad.

    1. Re:Enlightenment == simple?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By today's standards, the "ancient" enlightenment DR16 is pretty lightweight. :-)

      I recently switched from longtime favorite FVWM to e16 because I wanted some effects. I do use it as a pretty light desktop.

      Now, the DR17 which has been in "development" status forever, I have not tried that. Maybe it's just as bloated as the older ones in 1998, but with today's hardware bloated in 1998 is not bloated at all.

  141. Because you do it to us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Install Windows! Now sing with me, "A spoonful of sugar, makes the medicine go dowwwwn..."

  142. I've got a tip for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use OS X. Problem solved.

    1. Re:I've got a tip for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your tip is ludicrous. While I agree that OS X is a fine operating system, remember that we are talking about a work computer. I use Linux at home and Win2000 at work. I work a 7/7 schedule offshore so I'm stuck with this goddamn thing for a week at a time. But weather I like it or not, do you think the company I work for would be pleased if I formatted the hard disk and installed Linux ? Standing in the unemployment line is not my idea of being productive.

  143. This is like setting your clock fast by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting
    and other methods for tricking yourself.

    The problem I have with these tactics is that obfuscation strategies don't work against a sufficiently clever and determined opponent. And I'm very clever and determined when it comes to avoiding work.

    No, the important thing to do is to sap your determination for wasting time. The reason people waste time is that they have so many commitments they can't keep them straight, although they're rattling around somewhere in their head.

    The mind is like a thick, opaque stew -- you can only be aware of what happens to boil to the surface at the moment. We toss all the commitments we make to ourselves and others into the pot, and pretty soon its beyond us to know all the things that are in there. It's very common to harbor a unnamed suspicion that that something nasty like a severed human finger could surface at any second. This creates a tremendous resistance to even looking at the stew, much less stirring it up to find something important you've lost.

    The secret to productivity is to change your mind from stew to consommé. To do this, you have to find some place other than your mind to put all your commitments. Then you have to look at all those things on a regular basis, because they'll sneak into your head if you don't. That's what people miss when they "get organized".

    Simple program to clear your mind of frightening junk:

    1. Refuse every commitment that is not essential.
    2. Place every commitment you make, no matter how trivial, into a tracking system.
    3. Review everything in you system without fail every Monday, refactoring undoable items into doable steps.
    4. Review the doable items you have without fail every day.


    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:This is like setting your clock fast by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm committed to pooping in the next couple of hours, were do I put that in my tracking system?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:This is like setting your clock fast by Willis+Wasabi · · Score: 1

      For a more detailed process than what was outlined in the parent, buy Getting Things Done, a book by David Allen. Or at least google it. 43folders.com is also an interesting place to start.

      This stuff can change your life. I'm just starting, but so far so good.

      --
      All true wisdom can be found in sigs.
    3. Re:This is like setting your clock fast by budgenator · · Score: 1

      definately should go in the china circular file

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  144. Web Developers startup session. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    use 800px width on your primary browser and put it to you upper right of your desktop. But your secondary browsers in other virtual desktops (You are not going to be successful if you only test for 1 browser). Then have a terminal/ssh client/texteditor/WYSIWYG editor (In which you will need to be beaten up for being a complete looser) open parallel to the browser on the left taking as much width as possible because when you are typing code having width is useful to prevent word wrapping or trimming where you can still see the relevant information on the browser. Both of these should be about 2/3 the screen height.
    On the bottom have 2 terminals open (sshed into the server?) One would be for compiling/copying/(S)FTPing or whatever if you have to. And the second one will be connected to the webserver you are testing on with a tail -f /usr/local/apache2/logs/error.log (Or where ever your log file is).
    On your other virtual desktops have a some terminals open one to the system other sshed into the server and also alternative browsers, Including say a vmware session, in 800x600 mode to Windows to check out IE. The trick is to have all the information you need handy and in front of you. Try not to over lap windows much so you can see all that is happening. I personally like to have the windows focus follow my mouse so I just move the mouse down to the next window and I just can type without clicking but other people don't care for it.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  145. Get the best desktop by axonis · · Score: 1

    Why not install a cracked version of OSx86 .... before its too late !

    --
    bæ8Ã0sÃOE?5r©oÂÃ?âz:ÃÃAÃ?ÃOEÂ6fXÃ?]Â
  146. File Backup Tip by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

    A simple alias or function can be helpfull in backing up a files. Where I work, we have the standard of:

    cp filename.YYYYMMDD.username.X

    So when backing up /etc/hosts use:

    cp /etc/hosts{,.YYMMDD.un1xl0ser.1}

    Where YYYYMMDD is obvious and X is used if there are multiple changes to the files. This helps us to keep track of changes easily. SCCS/CVS is another option, but kind of a pain to setup and get used to.

    If you want, you can go as far as to make a function so you can just type "mkbackup /etc/hosts" or something similar. In the long run, this will save you time in tracking changes on your system.

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  147. Huh? by lheal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GNOME is the default in Redhat.

    C got the rep for being fast and cool, because it was all about Unix, which was fast and cool. Every Unix machine (well, most) had a C compiler.

    Pascal has a hand-holding feel, like you're in a little box constantly fighting the language. No pointers or similar mechanism. Abstracted strings.

    Why do race cars use a manual transmission? That's why programmers use C(++): more control.

    But your basic idea that Americans have a "not invented here" bias against some software is just wrong. If there is documentation in English, we don't care where it originated.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:Huh? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      No, Pascal has pointers, you can reference the memory that 'pointer' points with '^pointer'. I can't remember how to declare them, but they surely have pointers. Also have better strings (Pascal strings are much simpler to deal with). And have that 'var' modifier that C is missing, but C++ implemented with '&'.

      I still prefer C/C++, mostly because of its sane type conversions, but Pascal has a lot of usefull features.

    2. Re:Huh? by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

      >^pointer

      Oh yeah, I forgot.

      >better strings .

      Hrrumph! :-)

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    3. Re:Huh? by Anomylous+Howard · · Score: 1

      The pointers in Pascal came MUCH later. They may have been a Borland invention for all I know. Niklaus Wirth's oiginal Pascal was very strict and limiting. It was a teaching language. Man, I hated it!

    4. Re:Huh? by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

      "GNOME is the default in Redhat."

      GNOME is now no more a mexican product as linux is a finland one. BTW, the main developers of GNOME nowadays aren't even Icaza and his mexican fellows, but the likes of american companies like RedHat, Sun and Novell. I think the LGPLd american-made GTK+ also contributed to its large adoption...

      "Pascal has a hand-holding feel, like you're in a little box constantly fighting the language."

      Well, C has no "hand-holding feel" whatsoever and still, there you are fighting its basic design all the way, specially string handling...

      "No pointers or similar mechanism."

      I see you never programmed Pascal and is talking things out of your ass.

      type TSomeRec = record
                    foo: string;
                    bar: string;
                end;

      var somerec: ^TSomeRec; (* pointer to TSomeRec *) ... later ...
      somerec^.foo = "foobar";

      etc

      "Abstracted strings."

      And that is a bad idea because...? It's lack in C is one of the most annoying things, something that C++ rightly got right...

      "That's why programmers use C(++): more control."

      Pascal and its Borland superlative ObjectPascal has got all that C/C++ got, except for macros ( there are compiler directives though ), coupled with a better designed and more readable syntax overall...

      "But your basic idea that Americans have a 'not invented here' bias against some software is just wrong."

      Well, if you say so...

      --
      I don't feel like it...
    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off topic:

      Race cars have transmissions based on the type of driving done and horsepower available. The biggest drawback of the automatic transmission is the torque converter, not the ability to select the gear you are in. Drag cars still use automatic transmissions because of the overabundance of power available that the power lost inside the transmission is inconsequential, just that they stick a shifter on top of it to control exactly when the shifts occur.

      With the advent of highly sophisticated computers and sequential gearboxes, the need for a manually shifted transmission has decreased dramatically. Comparing laptimes between a shifted sequential gearbox, and a computer shifted sequential gearbox gives approximately the same laptimes over a short race. However with a long race the laptimes of the computer shifted car start to improve because of driver fatigue.

      So, the analogy you used works, but like the old C++ vs. Java debate, as technology marches on and "overhead" becomes less important, then the individually tweakable and powerful C becomes less important than coding ease. Eventually the manual transmission will go away as a necessity and live on because of those of us who prefer to drive it that way. Same may hold true for C/C++... there are many of us who like C++ and will continue programming in it until we are forced out (e.g. cobol).

  148. Install windows xp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insert windows xp disk. Format. Install windows. Save countless hours messing with the configuration and get some work done with real productivity software.

    (face it you evangelists, Linux is just not there.. yet)

  149. FTFM by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    Find the fine manual for desktop settings. And when you do, please tell me where it is. I've been using the Gnome desktop for several years, and occasionally I'll stumble across a neat feature, set it, and then it'll get unset, and I can't find how I set it in the first place.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  150. Save time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One of the great things about the Linux desktop is that there are lots of ways to save a lot of time from useful widgets and configuration to minimize the pain of repetitive tasks"

    Shouldn't that read "One of the bad things about the Linux desktop is that there are lots of ways to spend hours setting up your configuration to gain seconds of your time each year."?

  151. Easy answer by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    How about stop posting on Slashdot.

  152. Shell by Cally · · Score: 1
    Try replacing bash with zsh for while. (Read the docs, of course, so you know what features are there to try out.) After a while you'll wonder how you did without it.

    Alternatively IIRC Dave Korn has been quoted as saying they've removed Perl from all the machine in his lab because Ksh does it all. Hmmmmm.

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  153. Slashdot cannot survive without trolls by mangu · · Score: 1
    Slashdot can survive pretty much anything, except for one thing: losing the smart contributors.


    No, the one thing Slashdot cannot survive is losing the trolls. The kind of news one sees in Slashdot can be found in a number of other places, but the really funny trolls were a Slashdot exclusive. Now that they are gone, thanks to a very active site policy, there aren't any compelling reasons to read Slashdot.

    1. Re:Slashdot cannot survive without trolls by spiko-carpediem · · Score: 1

      So, what's keeping YOU here =?

  154. The car is a *french* invention by mangu · · Score: 1
    The first self-propelled car was invented by Nicolas Cugnot, who was French.


    OTOH, who created the first "practical" car is a debatable argument. If one considers the very popular thing almost everybody uses that's called a "car" today, I would say the invention was made by Henry Ford. Before the model T, all cars were very expensive, very impractical, or both.

  155. Purdue had this by gatzke · · Score: 1

    Back about a decade ago the Unix systems at Purdue had some semblance of rm with a cache / recycle bin. You would think it would not be that difficult to do, but we still have the same old rm command.

    1. Re:Purdue had this by BeesTea · · Score: 1
      It was entomb.
      You can get it here

      file entombing - 3.9
      unrm, libtomb, entomb, rmfile, preend

      Helps recover lost files, must be installed and configured before you run "rm". Also you must have source to the programs you want to protect (viz. rm, mv and cp).

      --
      2b2b2b415448300d
    2. Re:Purdue had this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just move anything I want to delete into /tmp, where it'll get deleted/wiped eventually.
      On single-user system that's OK. On multi-user chmod 600 the file(s) first.

      Why is there no way to wipe all *free* space a la shred on Linux?

  156. Suggestions by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 1

    1. Give that high-powered desktop with dual LCD panels to someone who isn't going to waste CPU cycles and gigabytes of RAM running only a web browser, email, and some ssh sessions. Perhaps a developer?!?!

    2. Get yourself an old Pentium 400Mhz box, don't bother installing X-Windows, Gnome, nor even KDE. Replace your 2 LCD panels with one VGA 19" or 20" monitor that you've probably got just collecting dust somewhere.

    3. Run Pine (novice) or Mutt(pro) for email, ssh, vim or emacs, and Links2 (with Javascript & Graphics) http://links.twibright.com/

    4. Use GNU Screen to manage the 3 applications you need to run with unlimited windows including the ability to name and split your screens. Get someone to put screen on those remote boxes if it's not already there so you can keep your session running on the server when you disconnect. This way you can just exit out of screen and logout of your console then return and login again and restore the screen sessions. Heck you could even dial into work and resume all your sessions from home too!

    5. Figure out what scripting languages you have available on all those boxes you monitor via ssh and then write scripts in that language.

    6. Run your console in high res FrameBuffer mode and use a nicer font, gives you more room to split GNU Screen.

    There, productivity problem solved. Also approach your boss and ask for a raise for the amount of money you just saved the company. i.e. they bought an over priced, over powered machine for someone who really doesn't need it.

    This is what happens when you ask stupid questions on Slashdot and then brag about how great your workstation is. Well buddy, got news for ya many of us have better workstations!

    I've got one of these babies sitting on my desk:

    - http://www.sun.com/desktop/workstation/sunblade250 0/images/I1_hw_ppworksblade2500_mon_img_lg.jpg

    Which is about to be replaced by this:

    - http://www.apple.com/powermac/dualcore.html (Quad CPU's Baby!)
          - 76.6 Gigaflops / 16 GB's of RAM
          - Dual 23" Displays http://www.apple.com/displays/
    - Down the hall will be a few of these http://www.apple.com/xserve/workgroupcluster/

    To top it all off, my team will be able to compile XCode 2.2 apps utilizing all the workstations and even a few G5 XServes (non clustered) in the server room. That alone will cut down our compile time considerably!

    Yeah, Yeah, I could build a quad Athlon monster that will be cheaper but I am not paid to build boxes, my company buys them for me.

  157. Don't use VI / VIM by ysegalov · · Score: 1

    Use xemacs.

    Oh, and use sunscreen.

  158. Oh so many. by drunkennewfiemidget · · Score: 1

    First, while this is a personal preference, I use xfce4 for my desktop. It's fast, it's lightweight (relatively) and its infinitely configurable.

    Then, download devilspie. This allows you to set up various programs like XMMS and gaim to not show up in your tasklist, pin windows to the screen regardless of desktop, etc, and makes ALT-TAB skip programs.

    Then, download xbindkeys, and bind all those extraneous keys most new keyboards have to actual functions. If your system doesn't understand the keys (you're getting setkeycodes messages in /var/log/messages), then man setkeycodes, and map all those keys to something, and make xbindkeys use them to do various things. I have a Microsoft Multimedia keyboard here at work, and I've mapped every key to do something useful. Sleep enables my screensaver, log-off, calculator, messenger, web/home, mail all do what you'd expect, media runs xine, mute, play, stop, volume up and down, next song, and previous song all do what you'd think in xmms, my music runs xmms, my pictures runs gimp, and my documents runs xffm (xfce's file manager.)

    Learn (or change so you know) the key combinations for switching desktops, swapping applications, etc.

    Put SSH keys on all the servers you normally log into, and put ssh-askpass and ssh-agent into your xinitrc file.

    Something I use that I find *INCREDIBLY* useful is:

    xmodmap -e "remove lock = Caps_Lock"

    Which makes X ignore the caps lock key, because in reality, I *never* use it, and the only time it's on, it's on by mistake, and learning that it's on by accident whilst running vim is *never* fun.

    alias su to sudo su, so you only have to enter a password every once in a while.

    Map one of your keys on your keyboard (if you don't have a multimedia keyboard, make it a ctrl-key combination of some sort) to xscreensaver-command -lock, and make it a habit to hit that button every time you walk away from your computer, so any logged in root shell is never a problem as far as physical security goes.

    Also, if you do a lot of programming, and/or use vim a lot, I've found this function I threw together pretty useful in my .bashrc

    if [ "x$DISPLAY" != "x" ];
    then
    function vim () { /usr/bin/vim.perl -g $@; }
    fi

    If I type in 'vim', it runs vim.perl (debian package) in X, since vim for x is generally more useful than console.

    Also, I've set up my ssh to automatically forward X11 sessions (I only log into hosts I trust) so that if I run vim, and have my bash profile the same on the server I'm logging into, I get pretty graphical vim windows that make proper use of my :set mouse option.

    That's all that immediately comes to mind, but it's also 9:25am on Monday.

  159. Yep, keyboard shortcuts are the way to go. by zCyl · · Score: 1

    That's probably the single most important time-saving suggestion. Essentially every program you use regularly should be a keyboard shortcut. Set up one for web browsers, terminals, calculators, email, basically every command you use on a daily or weekly basis. The overhead of remembering a few shortcuts will pay you back many times over when they become habit.

    Also, use keyboard shortcuts for closing windows, and for tabbing between multiple windows. The best way to help this, is to keep the number of windows on one desktop screenspace under control. So use multiple desktops and use a command like alt-F1 through alt-Fwhatever to switch between them. Also, establish habits like using one desktop for certain categories of use. One desktop space can be for instant messaging and email, one for web browsing, one for programming, etc. This will enable you to switch from one task to another with relative ease.

    When you are doing something like looking up functions or command references on one desktop space, programming on a second desktop space, and testing on a third, then good organization like this can greatly improve your efficiency.

  160. Nice tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignoring the typical flames and trolls. It's been a while I've seen such a collection of excellent tips & advice. For those that succesfully made the crossing, productivity (at least here) has increased by a factor of 10. If however your stuff is playing the latest directX games, or installing pirated software - there is no need to migrate. Most flavours of Linux is hard to administer hence best enjoyed if someone else does it for you. Useability / User-friendliness then surpasses that of Windowze on the whole. But why should I convince you? I feel a slight tinge of sadistic satisfaction when the Windowze OS, people extol, suddenly turn nasty against them after a mere 6months+ of using. Time to reinstall I guess (but don't do it too many times - you do know you will lose the right to activation?) .. Enjoy :)

  161. Teach a man to ... well, you get it by gosand · · Score: 1
    You can mount a remote filesystem in KDE without using NFS, ftp, rsync, Samba etc

    Just enter in Konqueror
    fish://user@yourdomain.com
    (yes that is fish) and you will be asked for your ssh password.
    Your remote files appear in Konqueror & you can then copy/paste etc to your local filesystem.


    OK, now this f'n rocks. There have been many times where I didn't want to set up a mount in order to get files from one computer to another. I usually just use scp, but sometimes it would be easier to just SEE what I need. This is awesome. I use the shell all day, but sometimes using a gui file manager is easier. This helps immensely.


    I have to say, this is one of the better articles I have seen in a while on Slashdot. I don't agree with some people's assessments or suggestions, but all it takes is 1 or 2 tips. Fish is definitely one of them. Now I actually have a reason to use konqueror. :)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  162. Is that really helpful? by gottabeme · · Score: 1

    Don't take this the wrong way, and I could be completely wrong, but I have to wonder if that is really that useful. Wouldn't a better solution be a script/daemon/whatever that reads the logs for you and alerts you if there's something you actually need to know?

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    1. Re:Is that really helpful? by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      MOD UP

      Having your log watching depend on your actual eyeballs is bad. Using something like logcheck to sift threw the junk and highlight the critical is much more effective.

      Just make sure your email subsystem is rock solid.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    2. Re:Is that really helpful? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Well, yes I think it is. Not that I wouldn't also do what you suggest... but that will only alert you to things you can think of beforehand. I expect to notice something unusual that I couldn't anticipate... and I don't want every unanticipated USB hotplug driver fart setting off alarm bells.

      I didn't post this as some grand revelation, just a little quirk that seems to help me. I've only been using linux for my home server for 7 years now, and as my sole desktop OS since sometime last year. I won't have anything guru-ish to offer for another few decades, I suspect.

  163. Launching w/Keyboard by gottabeme · · Score: 1

    "Does anyone know of a mechanism for launching apps using keystrokes like Win-e for explorer.exe under MS windows? Best I could do outside of mapping "extra" keys with hotkey is to map the Super key to gnome's "Run command" dialog and then type in the app ... weak."

    You could use KDE, which makes it very easy. :)

    Short of that, use xbindkeys.

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  164. OSD by Cinquero · · Score: 1

    You can use the xosd library for all sorts of monitoring purposes, ie. to warn you when disk space gets low or someone tries to log into your computer. Just let a script run in the background and pipe the messages to the screen by using the osd_cat binary.

  165. simplify! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Simplify your work experience. If you're using KDE or some other "bloated" wm/dm, consider stripping as much of the 'fluff' away as possible.

    I personally prefer using xfce4 as it's lightweight and simple, but still featureful enough to have a 'modern' look. It's also quite fast compared to gnome and kde, taking very little memory. All I have for a "user interface" is the launchbar on autohide (which contains all the programs I run) and a taskbar with all the regular applications I run - and only those.

    Also, it's quite keyboard-friendly. reducing your reliance on the hairless rodent will increase your ability to get work done quickly, I've found. Using hte mouse takes a lot of time!

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  166. the easiest way: by CFerguson · · Score: 0

    KDE. V (watch out its probably gonna get hot) V

  167. What works for me by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    Learn perl and bash. Learn some of the more common unix command line utilities (you learn these just by learning bash) Mix in some windowmaker dynamic menus and rox appdirs. Reconfigure gtk2 to allow you to dynamically set shortcuts for all of your apps. Learn to use rox's minibuffer. productivity++

  168. Profiles? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    We call them scripts in UNIX/Linux worlds.

    I have used putty to forward ports. Being versed in Human User Interface design my opinion is that putty is sorely wanting in user friendliness.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  169. Luke! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Use screen!

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Luke! by EvilNebby · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you didn't take note of the screen realeastate bit. 4,800 x 3,600 on 3 21" monitors. Screen is nice if I'm SSH'd somewhere, but please, I've got to justify these things somehow!

      --
      --- Nebulous
  170. You haver an over specs machine. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Enjoy, you can do whatever you wasnt.

    You don't need oozles of power to run email, ssh and a web browser.

    If I was your manager I would take the toy away from you :-P

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  171. screen -x by evarlast · · Score: 1

    Screen was mentioned before, but what wasn't suggested is this:

    Use 2-3 or more xterms (rxvt, gnome-terminal, kterm, whatever) and use screen on each of them. If screen isn't already running, start it with "screen -U". If it is already running then connect to it with "screen -U -x -R". Do this in each of your terminals. You will be able to use the screen windows separately in each xterm.

    Each terminal window becomes a window into screen's windows. So while screen can have 10 or so windows running in it, you have 2-3 windows into these windows.

    It really is very manageable, and the great thing about screen is that you can do it remotely just as easily

  172. Kuake by bcmm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Try kuake (http://www.nemohackers.org/kuake.php) if you use KDE (there are similar apps out there for other desktops). It's a terminal emulator which lowers on a keyboard shortcut like the console in Quake. It saves me a lot of time which I used to spend opening and closing xterms. I keep a screen session in it normally.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  173. C-z screen by kalaleq · · Score: 1

    nice. i decided on the same binding for the same reasons within a few hours of first using screen, and never looked back. one other nice thing: in those rare instances when you're working on some machine without screen, it rarely if ever hurts that you hit C-z twice automatically when you want to suspend something.

    life before screen... hard to imagine. it's part of my middling complex .profile on any machine i use regularly, with a three-second pause just in case i want to hit C-c if something's buggy. i never do.

  174. Re:sane?! by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

    "prefer C/C++, mostly because of its sane type conversions"

    i have moderation permission right now, but won't be giving you a "Funny" because am already discussing... ;)

    --
    I don't feel like it...
  175. Optimise your kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get terrific speed increases by re-compiling your kernel. The one that your distro ships is generic so can't take advantage of all of the features of your CPU and is often quite conservative with optimisations.
    Start by getting the compiler to build code for your processor, for example -march=athlon64
    Then add some useful changes: -funroll-loops -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer
    And next, something that will get me flamed: -O3. Now I know everybody says that going above -O2 for a kernel (and almost everything else) will make your system unstable, but I've been running my machines with kernels compiled with -O3 for over a year and never had any problems with instability.

    A rough idea of how much faster a system will run with these optimisations, I tried cleaning up a 15 minute audio sample using GWC with the original kernel and the optimised one; originally it took 1 minute 13 seconds, after the kernel optimisations it took 32 seconds.

  176. It's the little things by PCM2 · · Score: 1
    And for the flamebait part, why is kde so unloved here in the USA?
    I can't speak for all of the USA, but if anyone wants me to give KDE a decent chance, the first thing they'll have to do is a serious round of UI beautification in the default install, beginning with that nasty faux-digital clock in the lower righthand corner. It's like the KDE designers took everything users love(?) about Windows and spackeled it over with a veneer of Ugly. (Yes, I know you can replace the clock applet, but why should I have to spend so much as ten minutes of my life doing something so trivial?)
    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  177. Re:The one useful script (working) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #!/bin/sh
    rm -f -R /usr/local/bin/games

  178. Needs to be a KDE app to support it by gottabeme · · Score: 1

    I think if you use a KDE app, say Kaffeine or Amarok, to play those MP3s, it will work. Non-KDE apps naturally don't support the KDE-only smb:// and fish:// ioslaves.

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  179. Re:Install windows xp ...... sorry, confused by chawly · · Score: 1

    Just where were you suggesting our friend should insert the Windows XP disk ? That's supposing he had enough money to get himself a copy - above all after paying for his work-station. I hope that your post is not a sadistic invitation to indulge in computer assisted masochism. If such were the case, I'd have to report you (to the computer assisted masochism police)!!! And just what "real productivity software" have you in mind .... please stop confusing me.

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  180. screed -DR by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

    instead

  181. Re:The one useful script (working) by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Please submit as a patch.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.