Slashdot Mirror


Is SETI a Security Risk?

Dotnaught writes "Richard Carrigan, a particle physicist at the US Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois, fears the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) may be putting the earth at risk. As reported in the Guardian, Carrigan frets that alien radio signals could pose a security risk. The report cites a 2003 paper entitled "Do potential Seti signals need to be decontaminated?" but Carrigan's website has more details. Basically, he's calling for isolation of SETI computers and additional security measures. He writes, "To paraphrase Cocconi and Morrison for the possibility of a malevolent SETI signal ...the probability of a contaminated SETI signal is difficult to estimate; but if we never consider it the chance of infection is not zero."" Frankly, I'm more worried about some phishing malcontent then I am about the Grays, but maybe that's just me.

527 comments

  1. Chicken and Egg. by FalconZero · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From TFA:
    1. Raw signal in memory must bootstrap to status of operating program
    2. Program must then untangle the inner workings of the host. (Is it possible to now build a diagnosis program to determine the operating set of an unfamiliar computer?)
    I'm not a software engineer but... no, wait, I AM a software engineer, so I'm curious, how does this 'virus' execute step 1 [Buffer Overrun & Privilage Escalation] without doing step 2 first [Determine instruction set for system] (Which incidentally requires step one to have been performed first.)
    As far as I see it, theres as much chance of data in the recieve buffer created by background radiation being a viable 'virus' as there is a deliberate chunk of data will be

    This sounds suspiciously like :
    1) Send malicious code
    2) ...
    3) Infect universe (and profit)
    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Nos. · · Score: 4, Funny

      They did it in Independance Day!

    2. Re:Chicken and Egg. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ask Will Smith and Jeff Goldblum.
      I get the idea that Steve Jobs might have something to say about it as well.

      To me, the idea that an outside signal can be manipulated and sent in just the right way to overflow our validation network is akin to shakespeare and monkeys.

      However - I can see somebody managing to send dirty packets down to the clients after hacking the SETI central computers (somehow, lots of hand waving etc) to put bad data there which could exploit a seemingly trivial problem with the seti client.

      Not aliens though.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 1: Get Underpants! Step 3: PROFIT!

    4. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no, statistical evidence shows that they're most likely to be running Windows - not to mention the lower TCO reduces the running cost of your mothership compared to free alternatives.

      Wait, we all know from Independence Day that the aliens use Mac OS.

    5. Re:Chicken and Egg. by m4dm4n · · Score: 4, Funny
      "the probability of a contaminated SETI signal is difficult to estimate;"

      Is that because his PC couldn't deal with numbers that small?

    6. Re:Chicken and Egg. by djmurdoch · · Score: 5, Informative

      The possibility that extraterrestrials will take over SETI is pretty remote, but SETI is still a security risk. In decreasing level of probability, I'd say the risks are:

        - someone could hack the server and send out malicious code with the next software update

        - someone could hack the data stream and inject malicious data into it (assuming there really is such a thing as malicious data, which I find hard to believe).

        - someone terrestrial could broadcast malicious data in such a way that the SETI telescopes pick it up and think that it's ET in origin.

        - an ET could broadcast malicious data, after having picked up a copy of the SETI software and analyzing it.

        - an ET could broadcast malicious data without knowing what the receiver is like (the worry describe in TFA).

    7. Re:Chicken and Egg. by a_nonamiss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're using the mindset that these ET's are of similar intelligience to humans. We tend to do that as a species. But imagine, if you will, a civilization that is only 2000+ years more advanced that us. And realistically, and civilization advanced enough to receive our radio waves and respond is likely greater than 2000 years more advanced than us. Consider how very short 2000 years is in a universal timescale. To this advanced civilization, our advanced code is nothing more than a toddler's plaything. We can't even begin to fathom the ways in which they could potentially expolit our security.

      It's like if the Romans built a huge wall and said "That will keep out anyone. It's not possible to breach it." Using our technology, which is 2000 years more advanced, (less, actually) we could fly an B2 bomber over the city and drop a couple 2000 pound bombs. The pinnalce of their most advanced security would last less than 10 seconds against the most basic of our assaults.

      I know this is a little different when talking about computer security, but just as the Romans couldn't even imagine in their wildest dreams a B2 bomber, let alone how it could possible get past their impenetrable wall, we can't conceive of the technology that could be used to "infect" our computers. In 2000 years, who knows what kind of power we would have to defeat such a system? We can't know because it's beyond even our wildest imagination.

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    8. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Ihlosi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      we can't conceive of the technology that could be used to "infect" our computers.



      And that's the flaw in your B2-Bomber-argument. The aliens would be stuck with using our (extremely primitive) technology. We know pretty well how our computers work, and can figure out most ways to break/hack/crack them ourselves in a short timespan.



      It's a bit like using the tools and technologies the Romans had at that time and trying build that B2 bomber.

    9. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      I'm not a software engineer but... no, wait, I AM a software engineer,

      Many physicists seem to consider themselves so brilliant, they can do other people's jobs as well as their own. Fermilab is riddled with examples, from decripit buildings they designed on their own, to gigabytes worth of python code operating mission-critical analysis.

      This guy appears to be one of of those types. Because he's employed at a fancy pants government research center, he gets airtime for things he has no business talking about.

    10. Re:Chicken and Egg. by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's worse than that - its some stupid nuge who is trying to create a name for themselves by pointing out "potential risks."

      We've seen this behaviour before with the whole y2k problem, people using it as an avenue for self-promotion. There were some risks, but they were being addressed; at the same time, people were going ape-shit. Supposedly, planes would fall out of the sky, elevators, water systems, and electrical plants would all stop, etc, and we were told that no amount of work would find enough of the problems to prevent a global catastrophe.

      In actual fact, the biggest problem turned out to be all these people who had stocked up with a years' supply of stuff, and who then didn't need to buy shit for the next 6 months, causing a dip in consumer spending.

      Hello, my name is Zaphod and I am the vice-regal advisor to His Imperial Majesty, XnthE 439, Supreme Ruler of the Galazy. I have access to the royal galactic accounts, and have found that the sum of 34 bazillion galactic credits lying dormant in one such account. If youy could send me your banking details, I am sure we could work out a most generous arrangement to our mutual benefit.

      Never mind that, after 50 millenia of inflation, even at 1%, 34 bazillion galactic credits is about $0.93.

      I'm sure aliens have better things to do than infect our computers. Bill Gates does a good enough job of that by himself. (Hey, maybe Gates is a pod person).

    11. Re:Chicken and Egg. by JWW · · Score: 1

      but just as the Romans couldn't even imagine in their wildest dreams a B2 bomber

      Of course, it would have to be a B2 instead of a B1 or any other type of bomber so that it won't be detected by the Romans RADAR. ;-)

    12. Re:Chicken and Egg. by FalconZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good post, but incorrect. It doesn't matter if the civilisation is a million years more advanced than our, for them to deliberatly write a virus using the SETI recieve buffer as a vector is simply impossible. The systems are ours, any infection via this method MUST comply with out systems operating parameters (IE Instruction sets etc...). The code MUST execute on our systems, for which it MUST contain vaild opcodes. Even then, it relies on security flaws in OUR software (which may or may not exist).

      To use your analogy, its like assaulting a Roman wall in a place where the laws of physics prevent flight.

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    13. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      In which case why do we even care? We cannot predict how they would attack us, and more likely than not they can simply send a bunch of .999c DU rods at our planet if they wanted to get rid of us. They could have already replaced out politicians with fakes under their control, so how paranoid do you want to be? What measures to you take to counter threats you cannot even imagine, if they exist? Anything you do will probably be worthless, anyway:

      Assuming FTL travel means they're already here so none of this matters as they can infect systems through millions of other means other than SETI. Assuming no FTL travel they have a decent time gap of probably decades, and as such are going mostly blind. Granted, they can already be here (even at STL) in which case it doesn't matter.

      Your analogy fails because it's simply data, it doesn't come with any of their advanced technology. A better analogy would be that a modern person is thrown into the gladiator arena. You know the general state of the Roman Empire 100+ years ago (say you read a history book by some roman historian from 100 years before) and you need to fight your way out. You need to from your limited information predict the weaknesses of your opponents, as well as simpler questions like the type of combat you will be in. You then need to from your 100 year old information create a strategy to exploit these weaknesses.

      Another analogy would be having this broad 100 year old information, and having to put a single un-armed covert ops person there. You of course know nothing of Roman History although you have some trends on human development from china. Your operative then needs to survive and take over the empire. Oh right, he is also dropped of in an airtight metal box and must first find a way out of it or die.

      Heck, if you consider SETI a problem then you better kill of all satellites and anything capable of picking up signals from space (radio probably; probably anything electronic). Any one of them could pick up such a signal and infect a computer as a result, and then it's viral all the way down. If they're advanced enough to infect through SETI then they're advanced enough to infect everyone from a single computer imho.

    14. Re:Chicken and Egg. by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      The possibility that extraterrestrials will take over SETI is pretty remote, but SETI is still a security risk.

      I doubt there's a risk of ET hacking SETI@home and pwning the internet; they'd be working completely blind. The risk from alien signals is one that I think was raised by someone in Contact: what if they hack us?

      Send down a message, prime number sequences and so forth, describe the periodic table, build a scientific vocabulary, the whole SETI thing. Then begin describing plans for a machine. Make it look like a spaceship. When built and switched on: boom!

      A very cheap and efficient means of exterminating potential upstart rivals in the universe. No expensive, slow battlefleet needed, just a trick signal and we do all the work ourselves.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    15. Re:Chicken and Egg. by StevoJ · · Score: 1

      Unless the technology of the signal somehow manipulated some quantum force that we have no knowledge of and bypassed the security somehow, or just rewrote the magnetic data on the hard disk.

      Pretty unlikely perhaps, but you have to think a long long way outside the box if you're going to even try to consider the state of technology in 2000 years time.

      --
      That didn't really make sense. But I'm going to post it anyway.
    16. Re:Chicken and Egg. by 6*7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "It's like if the Romans built a huge wall and said "That will keep out anyone. It's not possible to breach it." Using our technology, which is 2000 years more advanced, (less, actually) we could fly an B2 bomber over the city and drop a couple 2000 pound bombs."

      IIRC the Great Wall's effects expires with the discovery of metallurgy.

    17. Re:Chicken and Egg. by master_p · · Score: 1

      According to quantum physics and nanotechnology, in 2000 years it may be possible to create a bunch of nanomachines that modify the state of matter, and therefore turn any protective measure (like a wall) into thin air (for example).

      Or it could be that teleportation actually is possible, so as that an extraterrestrial commando team materializes right into the president's bathroom while he is taking a leak.

      There is not much that one can do, really, if one side is so advanced over the other.

    18. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they can do something that crazy, I think SETI is not our biggest concern...

    19. Re:Chicken and Egg. by ravind · · Score: 1

      Yes and our worrying about SETI security is akin to Romans wondering how we might exploit a weakness in the Caesar Cipher to invade them. If we have B2 Bombers and bad intentions, then surely we don't need to exploit any of their systems to inflict damage. A sufficiently advanced alien race, intent on destroying us, is not going to give up because we shut down SETI. Why would they want to use such a primitive technology as their means of attack to begin with?

    20. Re:Chicken and Egg. by __aaxwdb6741 · · Score: 1

      Indeed you make a valid point, but wouldnt it be completely trivial for such a species to figure out our - to them - simple technology?

    21. Re:Chicken and Egg. by sponge_absorbent · · Score: 1

      your analogy is flawed.
      if you were sent back in time 2000 years you wouldnt fare better at breaching the huge wall than anyone else. naturally you are limited to 0005 AD tech just as aliens would be limited by the data formatting SETI imposes on data today. This limits the aliens to using the types of exploits in use today, which are nothing special.

    22. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But only before Civ 4.

    23. Re:Chicken and Egg. by bohemian72 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. I suspect that there is data on some old tapes that we'd have a devil of a time trying to retrieve.

      --
      The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
    24. Re:Chicken and Egg. by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      "someone could hack the data stream and inject malicious data"

      Hmm ... (just for the sake of argument):

      1) Hack the data stream
      2) Remove that tell-tale spike
      3) Stay undetected!

    25. Re:Chicken and Egg. by theJML · · Score: 1
      an ET could broadcast malicious data, after having picked up a copy of the SETI software and analyzing it
      How do we know the ET isn't running SETI@Home? Maybe they want to help us out!

      But seriously, if they can hack into the internet (through a sat. or something) figure out that it's binary and figure out the instruction sets and figure out the typical TCP/IP header. Then figure out the ascii set encoding, learn our language, develop a NIC to interface with it and start creating a web-browser (and therefore figure out all the encoding/interaction schemes required for that) then, they could just order themselves up a Dell and grab some Sony Rootkit code and just go right on to hack our computers! And after they went through all that, they still have to get through my firewall...

      Basically this is about as probable that MS wrote all their code using random number generators to create binary files. . .

      Damn, I'm gonna have to tighten my firewall, the aliens are probably half the way to internet domination already!
      --
      -=JML=-
    26. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Soybean47 · · Score: 1

      But see, the trouble is if they have some idea that we're too stupid to think of, which was the original hypothesis. You can't say, "that's not possible," because of course you can't think of a way to do it -- the hypothetical idea is by definition too advanced for you to comprehend.

      Maybe they could send a signal like the one in Threshold or the... uh... meme virus in Global Frequency. It seems implausible that super-advanced aliens would base their attack on a buzzword from a couple of years ago, but who knows?

      Anyway, yeah. The idea that SETI could be a security risk is kind of cool, in my opinion. However, I have to admit that if an alien race is advanced enough to hurt us through SETI, adding security isn't going to help much. Even shutting down the program entirely isn't going to protect us from these guys.

    27. Re:Chicken and Egg. by pepeperes · · Score: 1

      The key is to remember there is no wall...

      --
      ... from the forgotten corner in europe
    28. Re:Chicken and Egg. by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

      We can't even begin to fathom the ways in which they could potentially expolit our security.
      This statement is based on popular thesis that human civilization is advancing _forward_ all the time and that there are no limits to what we can achieve or understand. Opposite view is that we have all important stuff invented and optimized, no more Moore's Law (we see multiple cores instead) and we all will turn to entertainment industry consumers (TV Zombies) with decreasing intelligence over generations. According to that view, 10 thousand years from now, people will be hardly able to put together more advanced machines from our time, even with manufacturing recipes they preserved. They will fight for control of remaining technology (mostly TV-sets) still-going from ancient times of their intelligent grandfathers.

      --
      839*929
    29. Re:Chicken and Egg. by a_nonamiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Very nice rebuttal. I was unclear in my original post. I wasn't really trying to defend this idiot that wants to shut off SETI. I guess I was merely trying to point out that if they want to get past our defenses and they are sufficiently advanced, they will do it no matter how hard we try to prevent it, probably using a vector that hasn't even occurred to us. SETI isn't really a security risk, because the only way to have true securtity from these "bad aliens" is to remain invisible to them, and we're currently sending enough radio waves into space to announce our presence to anyone who really wants to find us. If they can travel faster than the speed of light, there is really no way we can possibly resist them.

      So I agree with the main point of your post. Why do we even care? If they have a need to conquer us and lack the ethical principles that wouild prevent them from doing so, then I, for one, want to be the first to praise our gracious alien overlords!

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    30. Re:Chicken and Egg. by yakovlev · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes you think any signal capable of that kind of breakage won't simply attack all of the OTHER radio receivers on the planet and blow up the power grid? Better yet send a subliminal message that says: please proceed to the nearest body of water and drown yourself. That way the aliens get to take advantage of the existing infrastructure, if desired.

      The problem with trying to protect the SETI computers from some kind of extraterrestrial signal is that either

      1.) The attack will be one similar to those we've already seen, in which case attacks from terrestrial sources are much more likely, and pose a much greater risk

      OR

      2.) The attack will be something we can't even conceive of, in which case there's no reason to believe it will specifically target the SETI computers, or that whatever security precautions we take to defend against such an attack will be effective.

    31. Re:Chicken and Egg. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1
      They could have already replaced out politicians with fakes under their control, so how paranoid do you want to be?

      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos! ;-)

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    32. Re:Chicken and Egg. by s20451 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The basic argument is this:

      If it were possible, within the limits of human technology, to take over the world with a computer virus, we would have seen some indication of it by now.

      However, if the aliens had some kind of magic technology that overcame human limitations, using it to take over the world via a computer virus is kind of ridiculous. They could just take over the world directly.

      And assuming that there are malicious aliens with technology far beyond ours, we're screwed anyway. So there is really no point in worrying about SETI security holes, or even about aliens in general.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    33. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      I know this is a little different when talking about computer security, but just as the Romans couldn't even imagine in their wildest dreams a B2 bomber, let alone how it could possible get past their impenetrable wall, we can't conceive of the technology that could be used to "infect" our computers.
      Perhaps we shouldn't be so quick to intuit the inner thoughts of ancient Romans. It seems that anyone that sees birds, insects, and bats flying could imagine people flying too. In fact, my kids could probably come up with at least one legend the Romans would have been familiar with that involves flying humans.

      Anyway, this case is a little different--the previous poster noted that there's logical fallacy involved: two steps, each of which has to happen before the other. That's a little more concrete than "I can't imagine a giant flying machine." It's more like "I can't imagine how two things could each happen before the other in the same place."

      Come to think of it, it's exactly like that.

    34. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always biological viruses. Did anyone see War of the Worlds?

    35. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Basically this is about as probable that MS wrote all their code using random number generators to create binary files. . .

      That's why Wordpad in Windows 95 required ten times as much RAM as the size of the file you were opening!

      Offtopic, but who doesn't remember that? "Crap, it's too big for notepad... let's use Wordpad" [swapping, swapping, swapping], "Almost there!", [swapping, swapping, swapping]....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    36. Re:Chicken and Egg. by operagost · · Score: 1

      You couldn't build a B2 bomber. But you certainly could build a good glider and gunpowder explosives with their technology. They had the materials-- they just didn't have Bernoulli.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    37. Re:Chicken and Egg. by richlv · · Score: 1

      actually, what happens if we approach a point where software becomaes so complicated that it is not possible for humans to grasp a single giant project, no matter how modularized it is ? what chances do we have to keep it going ?
      probably writing some ai that would be specialised in... well, writing another ai, so to speak. not 10 years from now, but think about 100 years from now, 1000 years from now and more... it's a huge amount of time given current speeds of technology development.

      so, if anybody would be 2000 or more years advanced there probably would be some ai (with adequate processing power) capable of deciphering anything we have created in a couple of minutes.

      --
      Rich
    38. Re:Chicken and Egg. by S3D · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if this is how the life spread through the universe....

    39. Re:Chicken and Egg. by snarkh · · Score: 1

      It would not work so well without them knowing a lot about us. If we are too primitive, we would not be able to assemble the machine and if we are too advanced we will know what it does. As they would presumably be doing it blindly, their chances to succeed are pretty slim.

      Also if they are far more advanced than, they would not be threatened by us in any way, as we are not threatened by gorillas in Afrika, even if they use sticks.

    40. Re:Chicken and Egg. by thewiz · · Score: 1

      And that's the flaw in your B2-Bomber-argument. The aliens would be stuck with using our (extremely primitive) technology. We know pretty well how our computers work, and can figure out most ways to break/hack/crack them ourselves in a short timespan.

      You also have a flaw in your reasoning that the alien level of technology would be greater than ours. It could be the same or even a little less. Radio has been around a bit.

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    41. Re:Chicken and Egg. by MMaestro · · Score: 1

      Assuming the glider doesn't have a human passenger, any amount of gunpowder explosive would be too small to have any major effect other than the initial shock of seeing it for the first time. Thats assuming you can launch the glider from a high enough altitude to get over the walls as well. And gunpowder was nowhere near militarily viable during Roman times.

    42. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Predius · · Score: 1

      At least in ID they spent some time figuring out the target system before deciding they could inject anything. This is just sending out raw 'code' and hoping it works.

    43. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Digi-John · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The technology of the signal", eh? Look, a signal is a signal. A radio wave is a radio wave--it is not also magically a sandwich. If we receive something, whatever it does will be done through our technology. If these ETs have something that allows them to view us instantaneously and manipulate matter over here, they won't be worrying about radio signals, and we'll have bigger problems anyway.

      It's okay to think outside the box, just don't think outside of the laws of physics.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    44. Re:Chicken and Egg. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      The aliens would be stuck with using our (extremely primitive) technology. We know pretty well how our computers work, and can figure out most ways to break/hack/crack them ourselves in a short timespan.

      Umm... If I were an alien and I just wanted to get rid of all life on planet earth, I'd just use my technology to hurl an object the size of the moon straight at it.

      Then I'd sit back and laught at the transmissions of all the arguments on CNN and Fox News about what programs to cut and if taxes can be raised to do something about it until it actually his and no one even bothered to shoot a nuke at it.

      If I were in a rush I'd just create a mini-black hole with a reverse fusion device (you know if I had FTL travel I'd have to know how to do that) and collapse the sun killing earth and all the solar system instantaneously without any human ever knowing an alien was involved, but where is the fun in that.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    45. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      It's like if the Romans built a huge wall and said "That will keep out anyone. It's not possible to breach it." Using our technology, which is 2000 years more advanced, (less, actually) we could fly an B2 bomber over the city and drop a couple 2000 pound bombs. The pinnalce of their most advanced security would last less than 10 seconds against the most basic of our assaults.

      Then again I have seen a Roman spearman take out an advanced armored tank.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    46. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If ET's are much more intelligent than us, and have something against us, then infiltration of SETI would be the least of my concerns.

    47. Re:Chicken and Egg. by guttergod · · Score: 1

      It's a bit like using the tools and technologies the Romans had at that time and trying build that B2 bomber.

      No, it would be like using our technology to build a roman wall.

      --

      Apple built a platform for their ideas, Google built one for everyone's.

    48. Re:Chicken and Egg. by molarmass192 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're thinking too far outside the box! Think of some bored geeky alien kid picking up the SETI signal and simply wanting to show his/her/it's alien pals what a 133t h4x0r he/she/it is by pwning a prehistoric (to them) civilization.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    49. Re:Chicken and Egg. by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

      assuming there really is such a thing as malicious data, which I find hard to believe

      Apparantly you have never surfed the web before and are posting via localhost. Taco?

    50. Re:Chicken and Egg. by twohorse · · Score: 1
      Seriously, what are the chances that an ET signal could somehow intrepret the system its running on and then compromise it in some way? Somehow I don't think I'll lose any sleep just because my PC is runni.$*%\~##'.........

      GREETINGS EARTHLINGS I AM TMOXIFER ERKLID OF THE BFFRED OLERFRD CLAN TAKE ME TO YOUR LEADER RESISTANCE IS FUTILE ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US

    51. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Taevin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lower TCO indeed because you get Microsoft's Genuine Intergalactic Technical Support hotline.

      "Thank you for calling Microsoft's Genuine Intergalactic Technical Support. If you are experiencing a problem with a factory installed Windows Galaxy edition, please contact your manufacturer.

      If you are calling about a non-critical issue, please emit one tachyon burst directed at Microsoft's Genuine Advantage Galactic Transmission satellite.

      If you are calling about a security hole that was exploited by the Scourge causing the destruction of half your intergalactic fleet, please wait one (1) business day before targeting Microsoft's campus with your quantum torpedos.

      If you are experiencing a total system failure preventing your navagation computer from function and are on a direct collision course with Earth, please wait on the line for a Microsoft Certified Windows Galaxy edition technician. Please note that we are experiencing a high call volume at this time, and you may be on hold for 12-24 hours.

      Thank you for calling Microsoft's Genuine Intergalactic Technical Support. Microsoft, what planet do you want to go to today?"

    52. Re:Chicken and Egg. by isomeme · · Score: 1

      As usual, Arthur C. Clarke thought of this long ago. I still remember his excerpt from the instructions: "Okay, kiddies, now that you've mixed your uranium hexafluoride..."

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    53. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      fair enough, but Civ doesn't count ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    54. Re:Chicken and Egg. by runlvl0 · · Score: 1
      but just as the Romans couldn't even imagine in their wildest dreams a B2 bomber

      Of course, it would have to be a B2 instead of a B1 or any other type of bomber so that it won't be detected by the Romans RADAR. ;-)
      Hey, Archimedes built the Solar Death Ray - of course, you probably wouldn't want to send a black bomber against that. Besides, the Romans always manage to take out my bombers, anyway.
      --

      Carthago delenda est!
    55. Re:Chicken and Egg. by birge · · Score: 1
      First of all, the Romans could easily conceive of a bomber. They probably did. They just knew nobody would have one in their near future.

      Second, it's a common relativist conceit to think that EVERYTHING is relative and nothing is truly knowable. Well, some things are provable and not subject to unknown intelligence. For example, guessing a random number. No advanced technology can ever help you guess a random number better. It will take the same number of guesses no matter how smart you are, and that's mathematically provable. Guessing random numbers is pretty much the essence of trying to hack a computer you don't know, especially when you're lightyears away from said computer.

    56. Re:Chicken and Egg. by idlake · · Score: 1

      But imagine, if you will, a civilization that is only 2000+ years more advanced that us.

      Can you infect Egyptian papyrus rolls with a computer virus?

      We can't know because it's beyond even our wildest imagination.

      Of course, we can know: whether you can attack a computer system through a particular choice of input data is a mathematical problem; if it's not possible, it's simply not possible.

    57. Re:Chicken and Egg. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Why not? Just keep sending the signal out, and you're starting to catch civilizations that are just going over the cusp of understanding. No one said they only had to send it once. Cycle the whole thing over, say, 5 years. You'll obliterate every nascent curious civilization :P

    58. Re:Chicken and Egg. by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      IIRC the Great Wall's effects expires with the discovery of metallurgy.

      Sure, but the Romans never built the Great Wall - the Chinese did. The Romans under Emperor Hadrian had to make do. They built a bunch of fortresses along the northern border of England, garrisoned them, backed them with garrison towns and counted on the zones of control to keep the Caledonians out. Fortresses don't go obsolete, and neither do city walls. However, bombers, stealth bombers, and howitzers ignore city walls. So the original poster was right :)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    59. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      In Independence Day, they had an alien ship that they had been studying and presumably knew how to encode a program so the alien computers could read it.

    60. Re:Chicken and Egg. by bigpat · · Score: 1

      But imagine, if you will, a civilization that is only 2000+ years more advanced that us.

      Using years as a measure of technological advancement is a silly habit of the 20th century. Advanced should only be measured by gauging the technological abilities of a civilization's inhabitants; how many ways can they generate power, how fast can they travel, how much information can be transmitted in a communication and how quickly, how much food can they grow/generate given a certain area/volume, material resources and energy source, how much can they control their own bodies to stave of disease, fix injuries and otherwise improve their physical well being, and by what system do they maintain this knowledge.

      But to use time elapsed as a gauge of progress ignores those long periods in human history which have seen great losses of technology. The dark ages saw such a loss where for a thousand years in European civilization there was a loss of Roman technology, much of which was reinvented during or after the renaissance. No one would suggest that the civilization of 1250 was a thousand years more advanced technologically than the Europe of 250. Really it was perhaps only the last 200 years which sees Western civlization surpassing the technological abilities of the Roman Empire.

    61. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Locke03 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Most people today, even scientist and engineers, would have trouble duplicating some of the Greek and Roman technology. When technology is dubbed obsolete it is often forgotten. Computers today work on almost the exact same princaples that the first electronic computers did. Allow for the intrduction of some other means of making a computer work that renders what we use today obsolete, maybe a dark age or massive disaster and I would bet we couldn't reconstruct a P4.

      --
      I don't care what youre doing so much as the idiotic way you're doing it.
    62. Re:Chicken and Egg. by john82 · · Score: 1

      Pfft! Apparently you didn't see Independence Day! The answer to step number 2 (determine instruction set for system) is intuitively obvious: use a Mac laptop with it's built-in Universal uCode Translator.

      Therefore the steps should read:

      1) Use Mac laptop
      2) Send malicious code
      3) Infect universe (and profit)

    63. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      The basic argument is this: If it were possible, within the limits of human technology, to take over the world with a computer virus, we would have seen some indication of it by now. I'm trying very hard not to say Microsoft right now... ;)

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    64. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      You're leaving out "someone with authorized access to the server and to the code could send out malicious code with the next software update".

      Disregarding any personal anecdotes about the integrity of the known authors and dealing strictly with statistics, this about 5 times as likely as an external hacker doing it. I personally doubt it's going to happen, but it can't be discounted as a possibility.

      Trust but verify.

    65. Re:Chicken and Egg. by CaptainStormfield · · Score: 1

      Sounds like something worth reading. In what work does that line appear?

      --
      "The dinosaurs died because they didn't have a space program." - Niven
    66. Re:Chicken and Egg. by isomeme · · Score: 1

      Alas, I don't recall; it might have been in one of the essays in Report on Planet Three. I read it decades ago, so I doubt I still have the book, but I'll check my library and post another reply here if it turns up -- and if some other kind soul hasn't beaten me to it.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    67. Re:Chicken and Egg. by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny
      I have this image of a computer virus taking over every computer on earth, then using our antennas and satellite to repeatedly broadcast the message "ENLARGE your COPULATORY TENTACLES! Tentaculis®, SAND WORM extract, and Dilithium Sulfide, it really works and without a prescription! Pills CHEAP from GalacticPharm@AlphaRegulonV.com" for light years around.

      Then an armada of warships bearing atomizer rays and a bunch of very annnoyed aliens arrives...

    68. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we are 2000 behind aliens so that would be like Windows 2000 against Windows 4000. Hmm... Extrapolate changes from between Windows 95 and Windows 2000 to Windows 2000 down to Windows 4000, that should be a pretty impressive progress...

    69. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but just as the Romans couldn't even imagine in their wildest dreams a B2 bomber
      Couldn't imagine? What do you call Jupiter's lightning bolts from the clear blue sky?
    70. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Wellspring · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Didn't L. Bob Rife use SETI to capture the metavirus, which was metaphorically floating around in space?

      Eliminating rivals in space sounds like a flimsy motive-- though of course you're right to examine it as aliens need not have motives that are by our standards rational.

      I don't think that outright trickery is likely, but what about this:

      1. Assume FTL transportation.
      2. Assume that said FTL tech requires a transmitter and receiver. Not necessarily teleportation, merely some kind of equipment required at both the origin and destination.
      3. Assume some motive for interstellar trade (materials, information, art, some reasons that aliens would have something you want).
      4. Therefore, there's a motive for the Hong Kong effect: simply being the nexus of trade provides a massive economic benefit.
      5. At first you can grow your market yourself-- ie building and shipping the infrastructure using STL tech, then using it to establish FTL trade. This is the equivalent of shipping AOL disks to random addresses, hoping that whoever gets the disk is able to add enough revenue to be worth all the disks that were dumped.
      6. That's expensive. And it only works on an acceptable time frame in a local area. If you're trading art or information, furthermore, you need to determine if a system is worth bridging to in the first place.
      7. However, once you're up and running, there's an easier alternative. Broadcast blueprints for your network all over space, designed to obfuscate the underlying technology and only connect to your FTL net. By the time the aliens are sophisticated enough to create a competitor to your network, they will be too deeply bought in to want to do that. Plus, any network they establish will be far smaller than yours-- you can use exclusivity to lock your customer civilizations in.
      8. If you set the system up in a star topology, everything has to go through your civilization to get anywhere else. You'll have the advantage in relationships, cultural knowledge, etc. If the variability of alien psychologies is high enough, this alone could be a massive advantage. By seeing so many cultures, you get an idea of how to pigeonhole new ones and get a relationship going faster.
      9. Now you have a much more lucrative system. You have a network whose nodes are paid for by the endpoint civilizations using their industrial resources and so your only bottleneck is the range of your transmissions (so why not purchase repeaters at the edge of your network), and the ability for alien cultures to receive, digest and implement your blueprints.
      10. If viable trading partner civilizations are rare enough, far enough apart, and hard enough to discover, this could be the only workable way to implement interstellar trade.


      OK so there's one scenario right off the bat. You don't have to assume malevolent aliens, only self-interested ones. Sure, FTL might not exist at all, or may work completely differently. Who cares? When I get a random email with detailed instructions for me to make BIG PROFITS, I don't piece together how exactly it might be scamming me, I just recognize that I have to treat these things with healthy scepticism.

      Much as I respect Carl Sagan, his aliens were a little too idealized for my tastes. Then again, I also don't see our system of describing mathematics as a universal. To paraphrase B5 creator JMS: the only universals in the universe are matter, energy and enlightened self-interest.

      The age when we say that any advanced civilization must be peaceful, noble and altruistic is thankfully over. Instead, if/when we encounter aliens, let's be reasonable, respectful, and aware that our self interests may not perfectly aligned.
    71. Re:Chicken and Egg. by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      SPOILERS

      This was actually done in the book 'Signal to Noise'.

      Aliens contact a few humans by 'radio', trade us all sorts of tech in exchange for information about us.

      One of the tech they trade us is a teleporter, for people, that uses the orbital velocity of the earth to power it, so the earth starts slowing down, rather catastrophically.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    72. Re:Chicken and Egg. by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Did anybody read "the mouse that roared"? A country with 14th century military
      technology was able to invade NYC.

    73. Re:Chicken and Egg. by patchvonbraun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't believe along how many *different* vectors Mr Carrigans theories are whacked. There's the obvious problem of instruction sets--there are a near-infinite number of potential CPU architectures that are *possible*, even making assumptions about the probable degree of technological advancement of your target species. Then, worse, there are an infinite number of programs that could be the target of such an "attack". Clearly, there will be common themes, but only *after* you've figured out what the target architecture is, and the target "pool" of programs you're going to attack. Yes, the bad ET could send out a large number of random bit streams, hoping to, once in a while, hit a "jackpot". There are no "universal" programs--that is, programs that will execute correctly regardless of architecture. There are, I'll grant you, occasional curiosities in computer science of trivial programs that happen to do something useful across a small number architectures (2 or 3). But they have to be *explicitly crafted to do so*, taking into account the architectures on which you expect them to execute. Then there's Shannon. The goal of most SETI work is merely to *detect* a very narrowband signal coming from "out there". Such signals would be a hallmark of intelligent origin, since nature doesn't produce such signals. Link efficiency is also inversely proportional to bandwidth--in order for anyone to hear ET *at all*, they have to concentrate their signal power into a very narrow spectral corridor, or we'll never detect them. SETI research generally works on the assumption that signals will be on the order of 1Hz. Even then, such signals will be very far below the noise floor, which means long integration times (several minutes, at least), in order to "hear" them. Claude Shannon came up with some very interesting theorems about communications channels, and what to expect out of them. Here is the most relevant: C = B * log2(1+ S/N) Relates the channel capacity, in bits/sec, to the channel bandwidth, in Hz, and the signal-to-noise ratio. A signal to noise ratio of -30dB (generous assumption), with a channel bandwidth of 1Hz, yields a *maximum theoretically possible* bit rate of 0.001442 bits/second. Which means that you'd have to wait a long, long time before you'd have enough bits to constitute the W32.MegaSeti virus. The theoretical underpinnings of Shannons Law are very strong indeed. It's unlikely that an ET will have found a way around them. The whole thing is very bad science indeed. It's a shame when scientists come up with nonsense like this. It's always very dangerous to stray very far away from your field of expertise, and come to some unsupportable conclusions. Had this guy from Fermilab actually talked to some notables in CS, signal processing, security, and cryptography, he would never have come up with his nonsense. But because he *has*, and he works for Fermilab, I fear that he has some amount of credibility with the government. I can see this irrational fear spreading to the current U.S. administration, and having them outlaw SETI research as a result. Sad.

    74. Re:Chicken and Egg. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      We're talking about "magical technology" within our own software. And remember, the very idea of a simple email virus was invented, and had nothing to do with the limitations of the hardware. If I went back in time now, with the knowledge of how it was done, I could easily do a Melissa, probably even a worm.

      For that matter, look at the difference between structured and non-structured programming, between object-orientedness and straight C... Yes, we can do OO in C, but someone had to invent the methodology first.

      And all of this has nothing whatsoever to do with the limitations of our hardware.

      So who's to say that the aliens haven't found a magic kind of purely software technology, far beyond our own, to take over our own computer systems?

      And you can't assume anything about future technology. Reading old science fiction, we'd have systems worse than the simplest DOS PC, no concept of networks or an Internet, and yet sentient robots and space travel. And look at us now -- no laser pistols, no vacations on Mars, and we barely have decent speech recognition, not to mention AI -- yet we have many times more storage and raw number crunching power than was imagined by the scifi writers of old.

      So maybe the aliens have software that could crush us in an instant, and a means to deliver it to us easily, but are lacking something as simple as faster-than-light travel. The best they could do is nuke our information systems. Secure those, and they can't do anything at all.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    75. Re:Chicken and Egg. by johno.ie · · Score: 1

      afaik, gunpowder makes city walls obselete.

      --
      872835240
    76. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may inverse the polarity... and BOOM!

    77. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you may not have been modded as such, but that was a funny post!

    78. Re:Chicken and Egg. by mboverload · · Score: 1

      Actually, he has been watching the new retarded show on CBS named "Threshold".

      It is about an alien signal that can duplicate itself on any electronic device (so far MP3 players, cell phones, ATM machines, computers, etc), spread from that device, insert a 3rd helix of alien DNA into the human genome, and make children and adults super-human.

      No, I'm not kidding.

    79. Re:Chicken and Egg. by vettemph · · Score: 1

      The bigger problem is that any transmission we might send into space is like an injured fish bleeding in the water. 'Sharks' will smell the 'blood' from 'miles' away.
      They will be coming for us soon..... :(

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    80. Re:Chicken and Egg. by snarkh · · Score: 1


      Interesting point. As they get more advances they may also forget they initiated this program a few hundred thousnad years earlier :)

    81. Re:Chicken and Egg. by magarity · · Score: 1

      So who's to say that the aliens haven't found a magic kind of purely software technology, far beyond our own, to take over our own computer systems?
       
      lol; My PC can barely run the demo version of Age of Empires 3 and you want it to run ultra advanced magic software technology? I'd think from the nonresponsiveness it was locked up and just power it off.
       
        but are lacking something as simple as faster-than-light travel
       
      I love your can-do attitude. When can we expect your FTL drive to hit the market?

    82. Re:Chicken and Egg. by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Well I think that they'll be able to analyze the SETI signals to reverse engineer the structure of our brains, allowing them hack our minds by sending "static" signals to activate preprogrammed memes in all humans, starting with the programmers who are used to thinking in 0's and 1's.

    83. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make an attack profile based on latencies greater than the useful lifetime of computer software any more feasable. It'd be like trying to perform attacks on the current internet using only data from the wayback machine set to 1990 - except harder.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    84. Re:Chicken and Egg. by schon · · Score: 1

      So who's to say that the aliens haven't found a magic kind of purely software technology, far beyond our own, to take over our own computer systems?

      Thank god you don't work in the movie/TV industry.

      It's people like you that cause me to have to explain to my family "No, it's not possible for a Pentium 133 to become sentient."

    85. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      **** Mild spoiler ****

      It does, however, reference 3001: The Final Odyssey, in which evil genius hackers in an insane criminal asylum, build code that will do this; however, the story also suggests Bowman gives them some limited info on how the monolith builders' computers worked.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    86. Re:Chicken and Egg. by xaaronx · · Score: 1
      Didn't L. Bob Rife use SETI to capture the metavirus, which was metaphorically floating around in space?

      Cuneiform tablets, floating in space . . . sure, whatever.

      And how exactly could a string of information be floating around in space, metaphorically or otherwise?

      --
      It's amazing how much "mature wisdom" resembles being too tired. - Robert Anson Heinlein
    87. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the "virus" part in such a SETI message might very well be a social engineering enterprise. As suggested in Contact, maybe they do "fax down these plans; we poor saps build the thing and blow ourselves to kingdom come."

      That's a much more realistic scenario, and will easily "get out into the wild", no matter how isolated such computers (and personnel) are kept.

      It's similar to building a perfect jail -- regardless of how physically secure it is, as long as the captive can talk to the jailer, there's an escape possibility.

      Think Silence of the Lambs. Now multiply it by ten billion years of experience and testing.

      Nah, this code-based virus is a chimera. It's the social engineering content of the message we have to worry about.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    88. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not a software engineer but... no, wait, I AM a software engineer, so I'm curious, how does this 'virus' execute step 1 [Buffer Overrun & Privilage Escalation] without doing step 2 first

      Does it need to? Wouldn't just crashing a significant percentage of the computers running SETI@Home simply be enough? Sure, we'd figure it our after a while, but how long would it take people to realize it's their screen saver that's doing the crashing? And what about the millions who would decide to run SETI@Home immediately just to see it find a real signal for themselves? Worse, which computers would be most likely to be compromised?

      Want an evil thought? Why does it have to be aliens that broadcast a signal that crashes a significant percentage of PCs? And, unlike an alien broadcast, it is highly likely that such terrestrial broadcasts could be deisigned to infect the host computers. Ok, far fetched, it'd take someone with the resources of a space-capable country to pull it off.. or maybe not... jsut a small group of hackers smart enough to hack an already-deployed satellite belonging to someone else. Even so, still is an awful lot of work for such a little gain.

    89. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the article

      Rather than dismiss his concerns, Dr Carrigan wants the Seti scientists to build safety features into their network to act as a quarantine so any potentially damaging signals can be trapped before they infect the internet.

      so really it sounds like he wants to hype up some no real problem and get hired to fix it?

      1. create almost plausable problem (to pointy haired one with out technical experiance)
      2. get hired to fix said problem
      3. profit from the fact that the odds of a signal being sent intentialy or just random back ground noise being a virus dont resemble my telephone number and thus the probibility of security being needed will be lower than the probibility of me turning into a penguin or the under garmets on all the women at my party to night moving 2 feet to the left

      and on a similar note to all you out there trying to calculate pi to its end you might want to stop before you find all sorts of nasty child porn and viruses. or my credit card number remember it is random as well. your only defense at this point for already being convicted of child porn, virus writing, and credit card fraud at this point would be to blame the investigators for opening the once random bits and using their programs to turn them into the nastyness they found.

    90. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Kelson · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, if aliens have the ability to attack SETI computers, what's to stop them from attacking any other computer on the planet? There are enough computer systems hooked into satellite TV feeds, and if the aliens are close enough to respond to us via radio waves in the first place, they're close enough to insert something malicious into satellite TV transmissions.

      Otherwise, you have to assume that someone sent out malicious signals with no knowledge of when we would develop computers, how our computers would work, etc.

    91. Re:Chicken and Egg. by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Aye, that was my first thought.

      What make the SETI receivers so special?

      What about the receiver for the space station traffic?, satelites? DishTV? Radio telescope arrays? etc?

      Will the analyzing software autoexecute an .exe it finds in the stream ?!?

      I'd be much more worried about terrestial mischief with the client and stuff :(

    92. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > We know pretty well how our computers work, and
      > can figure out most ways to break/hack/crack them ourselves in a short timespan.

      "Here ya go, Romans. Plans for nice lead water pipes to everyone's house!"

      It's a bad example, but there ya go. (And some historians believe lead pipes in the houses of Romans helped lead to what used to be called idiocy, helping to the decay of the civilization.)

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    93. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are modern real examples of lost technology. Super high fat content diets to help control seizures was a developed tech last century that was forgotten for fifty years. I think that Lorenzo's Oil was a similar story.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    94. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy who came up with this sounds like a disillusioned security consultant. I doubt ET would bother with hacking us.

    95. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imagine, if you will, a civilization that is only 2000+ years more advanced that us.

      There already is - they're called 'Evolutionists' and they want the devil to take over the world, which Jesus rightfully gave us!

    96. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1
      And that's the flaw in your B2-Bomber-argument. The aliens would be stuck with using our (extremely primitive) technology. We know pretty well how our computers work, and can figure out most ways to break/hack/crack them ourselves in a short timespan.


      Gunpowder could have been produced from readily available materials, or at least the materials engineering they would need to send with the message is well within Roman tech levels, i.e. no big whoop.

      From there, cannon to reduce the wall, just as happened to castles once cannon were actually invented 1000 years later.

      And that's just one. God knows how many chemical compounds they could produce as part of readily available materials, distributed to their people, that then cause cancer or heart disease or whatnot, preferrably with a 20 year lag before symptoms.

      > You also have a flaw in your reasoning that the
      > alien level of technology would be greater than ours.
      > It could be the same or even a little less. Radio has been around a bit.

      Yes, but statistically it would not be. With a universe billions of years old, the likelihood an "at least radio" level of tech civilization being less than us, say, within 100 years earlier is very small considering there are billions of years after radio level tech that they might be.
      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    97. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's the social engineering aspect of the message that'll be far more dangerous, and insidious.

      Believe in the politics or religion, or not, things like communism, socialism, "long live the king!", "Jesus saves!", etc. are highly effective at spreading and molding society.

      So a bunch of stories about how great galactic civilization is, and here's how we out here live, would be very convincing to mold the low tech society into something the aliens desire.

      I can think of three Trek episodes where this happened accidentally -- Nazis, "Coms vs. Yangs" (Communists vs. Yankees), and the Vic Tayback Express, i.e. the 1930's mobster world.

      > But remember, ordinary unmotivated computer and biological viruses are very common!

      Biological, yeah, but I'd love to hear of an accidental computer one that was not malicious nor an accidental experiment that got out. (Not doubting you, I've just never heard of one.)

      The closest I can think of that aren't malicious are emails of old wives' tales that quickly rise to meme status and live forever since someone's always passing them on via forwarding.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    98. Re:Chicken and Egg. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      My PC can barely run the demo version of Age of Empires 3 and you want it to run ultra advanced magic software technology?

      It's worth mentioning the MIPS self-emulator that ran code faster on itself than on raw hardware.

      I love your can-do attitude. When can we expect your FTL drive to hit the market?

      His design work is being held up by the journal that's still peer-reviewing your grand unification theory paper...

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    99. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      yeah, well, you see, he was doing some stuff with the numbers, and due to his incompetence with statistics he tried dividing the number of computers by the probability and his computer magically stopped working.

      --
      FGD 135
    100. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Wellspring · · Score: 1

      They never really resolved that one in Snow Crash. Though they presented two possibilities:

      1) That the metavirus was so virulent that eventually another civilization would inadvertently transmit it.

      2) That if you listen to random binary long enough, that eventually you'll find the metavirus if you're searching long and thoroughly enough.

      I didn't say it's plausible, just that the warning is similar to the backstory to Snow Crash. The second part (the lion's share) of my comment was about a potentially possible scenario whereby it would be in an alien civilization's interest to transmit not-entirely-altruistic plans to us.

      Point being that you can't assume that they've reached the apex of what a 20th century human would consider morality just because they've invented lots of technology or by the accident of the age of their civilization.

    101. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      biological viruses would be even harder to make ithout phisical contact. sufficient analysis of RF transmissions could reveal enough details of our technology to write a virus. for xample someone copies their windows XP cd and sends the data across their home 802.11g network, some infinitesmally weak copy of windows XP just got beamed into space. a few gigabytes of executable binary should be enough for any species advanced enough to engineer FTL transportation to acurately emulate the x86 platform sufficiently to code for it. analysis of a copy of windows XP or Reh Hat Enterprise Linux would surely reveal enough vulnerabilities to code a cross platform worm.

      OTOH aside from recent human genome transmissions there aren't copies of earth cells being broadcast at the speed of light into space, at least not anything complete enough to "code" for to make a successful disease.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    102. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      if the ET's had teleportation/wormhole technology they could, without much effort open up a decent sized wormhole somewhere in our lower atmospere with the other end in deep space to just bleed off our air till we all died.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    103. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      moore's law regards number of transistors on a chip, not clock speed.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    104. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      But they know ways to exploit our ancient tech that we may not imagine, nor possibly even could imagine.

      Proofs from Trek are accepted around here, so here's one: Remember the Next Gen episode where Geordi looks up in their database a way to see through ancient (i.e. TOS-era) cloaking tech? Or Data comes up with a solution to defeat the impossible-to-defeat Picard maneuver?)

      We know lead pipes are a bad idea. We know gunpowder can be made from easily-available material (or at least easy-to-make via Roman level tech.) A well-crafted one-page document + a few months would allow any civilization contemporary to the Romans to destroy the Romans. Here's how to make/harvest charcoal, saltpeter, and sulfur. Mix in this ratio. Make a huge, honkin', thick tube with your crappy bronze, stuff it in followed by a giant ball, light and run. Reduce walls to rubble over weeks. Small versions with 1/4" pellets are nice, too, and can be carried around.

      Iron, and maybe even steel, might be easy-to-describe, too, to say nothing of a steam engine.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    105. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the key word is FICTION, the NYPD is one of the world's largest armies and would slaughter a 14th century equipped army even without the help of the military nd national guard

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    106. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      not really, even after you blow it to hell you have a big pile of rocks to climb if you want to get into the city.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    107. Re:Chicken and Egg. by aaronl · · Score: 1

      Aw, don't rain too heavily on that parade. They could do a lot of basic things, but nothing had been refined. You could have steel fairly quickly, and from that you could make machines. It might take you 10 or 20 years, but you could have an ICE and a real plane capable of more significant lift.

      Think of how much progress was made between 1910 and 1970. How long would it take to simply make a huge cannon, like Big Bertha? Your materials wouldn't have to be that grand even.

      Or you could just play more with chemistry and use better explosives. Those materials are also not too difficult to make. You could get yourself TNT pretty easily, but you'd probably want someone else to strain off the nitro for you.

    108. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > Can you infect Egyptian papyrus rolls with a computer virus?

      No, but words on an Egyptian papyrus roll can infect the papyrus roll readers with ideas.

      > Of course, we can know: whether you can attack a computer
      > system through a particular choice of input data is a mathematical
      > problem; if it's not possible, it's simply not possible.

      But proving it's not possible is the problem. To some problems, there are no solutions substantially better than "try all possibilities", which is impossible in practice for most systems.

      And, of course, the most likely attack is "programming" the papyrus readers, not the papyrus itself. Quiet suggestions as to how awesome life would be, this, this, and this, of only you'd do that, that, and that, which actually causes problems x, y, and z.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    109. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Ironically, this is evidence [b]of the hellish power of social engineering ideas to mutilate society[/b], something of tremendous concern about incoming messages. Forget the silly "buffer overrun" crap -- "provable utopia" via distribution of plans to a few high-WOW-factor tech tidbits will do a lot to convince society to adopt the suggested course of action on politics from the aliens.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    110. Re:Chicken and Egg. by TheOrquithVagrant · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that whatever exploit any aliens would send would be in seriously outdated code by the time we recieve it. Even if aliens on Alpha Centauri, the closest star, would be nearly 9 years out of date. Any information they could get about our systems would be over 4 years old as it reached them, and another 4+ years to get here.
      This story is really one of the most ridiculous things I've read in some time.

    111. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahah, loved the civ reference ;)

    112. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Therefore, there's a motive for the Hong Kong effect:

      I dunno, if the Aliens know about Hong Kong, we can pretty much assume that they know a hell of a lot more about us as well...

    113. Re:Chicken and Egg. by bataras · · Score: 1

      A lot tongue in cheek here...

      Assuming there may be:

      1. an evil ET that wants to affect our global network
      2. a good ET that wants to affect our global network

      And the proposition is to do new work on the SETI system beyond trying to detect a signal. The decision is then one of:

      - New Work: to quarantine the net to make sure ET code cannot be executed
      - New Work: to open the net to make sure ET code CAN be executed

      Without addressing the affects of simply discovering ET, we have one of 5 possible outcomes:

      A. status quo
      B. humanity screwed
      C. humanity advanced forever
      D. humanity Misses The Boat (ala Pascal's Wager)
      E. interstellar war

      The normalized probabilities of the above outcomes are:

      Opened Net  Quarantined Net
      ----------  ---------------
      A = 9/36    A = 12/36
      B = 9/36    B =  8/36
      C = 9/36    C =  8/36
      D = 0/36    D =  4/36
      E = 9/36    E =  4/36

      These flow from the following possible events:

      1. net opened, ET good: outcome C
      2. net quarantined, ET good: ET penetrates net, goto 1
      3. net quarantined, ET good: ET doesn't penetrate, D
      4. net opened, ET evil: outcome B
      5. net quarantined, ET evil: ET penitrates net, goto 4
      6. net quarantined, ET evil: ET doesn't penetrate, goto 8
      7. net opened, ET not there: outcome A
      8. net quarantined, ET not there: goto 7
      9. net opened, ET1 good, ET2 evil: outcome E
      10. net quarantined, ET1 good, ET2 evil: both ETs penetrate net, goto 9
      11. net quarantined, ET1 good, ET2 evil: neither penetrate net, goto 8
      12. net quarantined, ET1 good, ET2 evil: ET1 penetrates net, goto 2
      13. net quarantined, ET1 good, ET2 evil: ET2 penetrates net, goto 5

    114. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe a script kiddie would look upon "building a B2 bomber with Roman technology" as before breakfast entertainment. ;-)

    115. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Slurms · · Score: 1

      afaik, gunpowder makes city walls obselete.

      Actually an interesting side effect of the development of rifled artillery in the 19th century is that stone walls became obsolete, but earth ramparts and mud brick wals worked pretty well. So in some respects we went back to earth ramparts and brick forts like those used in the various bronze ages around the world.

      --

      -----
      Pretty Bad Privacy (PBP) Public Key
      6
    116. Re:Chicken and Egg. by pymike · · Score: 1

      Yup, if the wraith can haxxor our x86, I'm sure those little gray ones could too. Don't forget the F-203 on the outside guys.

    117. Re:Chicken and Egg. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, the invaders just happened to capture the Q-Bomb, along with its inventor, when they first stopped to ask directions (and the police were ignoring "UFO hoax" calls until it was too late).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    118. Re:Chicken and Egg. by julesh · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

            1. Raw signal in memory must bootstrap to status of operating program
            2. Program must then untangle the inner workings of the host. (Is it possible to now build a diagnosis program to determine the operating set of an unfamiliar computer?)


      Actually, I don't know why he concentrates on this as the attack vector, because it's a highly unlikely one for reasons he point outs. And from the site:

      Some science fiction works on the SETI virus possibility include [...] A is for Andromeda, F. Hoyle and J. Elliot, Souvenir Press (1962).

      A very interesting book, which does highlight the potential dangers of a much more realistic attack vector: the message itself is not dangerous, but describes a technology (in this case the design of and programming for a new kind of computer) that is.

      In response to some concerns of other posters, the sequel of A for Andromeda (in addition to describing the plans of evil corporation INTEL to steal the design for this computer) also goes into the motivations of the sender for mounting such an attack: an intent to spread close relatives of their own species throughout the universe by persuading sentient species on other worlds to (effectively) genetically engineer themselves into the originator of the message. In a universe without effective interstellar travel this would be the only way of "colonising" other star systems, and you can certainly understand how a desire to do it would arise.

    119. Re:Chicken and Egg. by plenTpak · · Score: 1

      civilization advanced enough to receive our radio waves and respond is likely greater than 2000 years more advanced

      I wonder if such an advanced civilization would even recognize us as sentient beings. I mean, to them, our level of intelligence might be similar to how we see the intelligence of ants. Ants are pretty resourceful, and can complete pretty impressive projects for their size, but we don't consider them sentient, and we kill them as a matter of convenience. How would such a civilization respond to our attempts at communicating or fighting back? I wonder if it would be seen as just a natural reaction, like our ants suddenly scurrying madly about -- nothing to cause us to pause and reconsider.

      Not that I think we'll actually have to worry about this in our lifetimes, but it's fun stuff to ponder. =P

    120. Re:Chicken and Egg. by kcarlin · · Score: 1

      Good post, but incorrect. It doesn't matter if the civilisation is a million years more advanced than our, for them to deliberatly write a virus using the SETI recieve buffer as a vector is simply impossible. The systems are ours, any infection via this method MUST comply with out systems operating parameters (IE Instruction sets etc...). The code MUST execute on our systems, for which it MUST contain vaild opcodes. Even then, it relies on security flaws in OUR software (which may or may not exist).

      To use your analogy, its like assaulting a Roman wall in a place where the laws of physics prevent flight.


      Your analysis assumes a blind first contact scenario. What if, as part of a mad alien plan for world domination, the alien's planted some bit of core technology to pave the way for their domination of Terra? This technology would have to become quite ubiquitous to assure success, and be protected by powerful standards committees to assure that it does not morph beyond usability.

      Before you object, please bear in mind that I am merely raising the possibility here. I have no actual proof that SQL (pronounced skweel) is alien technology, but ask yourself: what human would have specified a '%' sign as the wildcard character.

      --
      Free Adam Smith! (Or best offer.)
    121. Re:Chicken and Egg. by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

      But proving it's not possible is the problem. To some problems, there are no solutions substantially better than "try all possibilities", which is impossible in practice for most systems.

      That's completely wrong. Proving correctness of software isn't hard; it's only hard if you do it retroactively and if you try to do it completely. In this case, all we care about is whether the signal can infect the machine, which is probably easy to prove not to be the case.

      But whether anybody bothers to prove it makes no difference; if the software has the property that it's not possible, then it's not possible.

      And, of course, the most likely attack is "programming" the papyrus readers, not the papyrus itself. Quiet suggestions as to how awesome life would be, this, this, and this, of only you'd do that, that, and that, which actually causes problems x, y, and z.

      "Programming the papyrus reader" is known as "social engineering". That is a concern, and aliens are likely much better at it than we understand, but it's not something you have to worry about in the SETI software.

    122. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      You're correct about laws of physics. As we all know, however, time is relative and it's well possible to imagine ETs with FTL technology also can manipulate their relative time, so that they have years to think about our countermeasures simply by adjusting their "timeframe". They wouldn't have to be so terribly advanced (apart from the FTL stuff, obviously) then as they'd literally have all time of the world to do to us as they please.

      Then again, Quantum theory tells us that there are parallel universes where this already happened and like, you know, stuff. Hawking said so, so it must be true. It definitely provides a *lot* of food for thought.

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
    123. Re:Chicken and Egg. by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      and SETI's effect never expires.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    124. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a bit near the end of the last book in the Ender's Game series.

      Our protagonists are in a ship hovering above an alien planet and the unseen aliens below broadcast them a signal. Our protagonists are able to decipher what that signal represents - the chemical makeup of some kind of sedative - and give a collective "wtf?"

      Finally they figure out - these things communicate chemically, almost "by smell" so to speak, and so their radio signals are signals for how to build the chemical they want to send into us. They see some scary new alien ship and their first thought is "sedate it", so they send us a sedative...

      Meanwhile we sit here wondering WTF kind of moron would willingly build and take a sedative, not realizing that the only way the sender could conceive of us perceiving the chemical would be to ingest it. Us "looking at" the molecular structure to read it is to them like how reading the 1's and 0's of a JPEG file to see the picture would be to us. They expect that we'd manufacture and ingest the chemical the same way we'd expect someone to display a video signal.

      Point being, to agree with you - a radio signal is just a radio signal. Unless you're sending some high-power aligned radio waves of the right frequencies (i.e. lasers or microwaves), it's not likely to do much harm on its own (or who knows - maybe the "harmless" radio waves we have flying all around are harmful to some extraterrestrials). To us, the only harm from a radio signal can do is communicate something to us, and if we or our systems then do something crazy with what that radio signal says, that's our own damn fault for being so gullible and/or stupid.

      "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but information will never hurt me."

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    125. Re:Chicken and Egg. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I'm retired military and if I had to choose between a glider dropping gun-powder bombs and a catapult lobbing greek-fire; I'd chose the former.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    126. Re:Chicken and Egg. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I figure this guy has to be some major kind of genius, because if somebody like me wrote some seriosly whacked-out shit like this and worked for fermilab, they'd rip out both my balls and security clearence so fast I wouldn't know what happened.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    127. Re:Chicken and Egg. by DroppedPacket · · Score: 1
      Oh come on. Threshold isn't that bad. Just because it's about a magical "probe" that alters DNA via sound... And super hackers. that can break into any compter, and...

      Uh never mind...

      (Yes, it did jump the shark in show 3 or 4...)

      --
      I am not a resource! I am a free man!
    128. Re:Chicken and Egg. by darkonc · · Score: 1
      As far as I see it, theres as much chance of data in the recieve buffer created by background radiation being a viable 'virus' as there is a deliberate chunk of data will be

      Uhm, more, actually -- Random noise doesn't know the odds it's working against -- and even has statistics on it's side. On the other hand, someone intelligent enough to know what (s)he was up against would just throw up their tentacles and roll away.

      Consider the scenario: You're a CIA hacker with the job of writing a buffer overflow routine for a Russian listening station. All you know about the architecture of the remote system is that it is probably unlike any architecture you have documentation for. There is, in fact, no guarantee that it is even a binary-based architecture.

      You also do not know how the data will be encoded going from the receuver to the computer. Some of your data may be lost in transmission. The very existence of the listening station is only postulated.

      Turnaround time between sending a viral signal and learning of your results (if any) is anywhere between 8 and 8,000 years, during which time, the architecture may change (possibly radically).

      Your first job is to calculate the probability of success -- without giving up.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    129. Re:Chicken and Egg. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      In modern times we have stumbled across many peoples still living with stone-age technology,and haven't doubted their sentience. Personaly I've wonder if we are the only great ape that's truly sentient, With a gentle prod, Gorillas and chimps become uncomfortabley close to the average intellegnce of modern man. Language ability and its resultant abstract reasoning seems to count more for intellegence than pure processing power.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    130. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen a geek punch through a concrete wall. Aliens have emptied entire clips at them and hit nothing but air, yet our strength and our speed are still based in a world that is built on rules. Because of that, we will never be as strong or as fast as the aliens can be.

    131. Re:Chicken and Egg. by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      Admittedly it was harsh, but refining does not equal innovation. With an airplane, you still need to invent the internal combustion engine (external is too large), steel is impossible due to lack of coal at the time and lets face it, a military that LIKES change during peacetime is a relatively new thing.

      Technology is advancing so quickly these days we simply forget how slowly things progressed previously. The printing press is barely 500 years old, we had to copy documents BY HAND before that. The Bible alone would've taken months to copy let alone other writings such as novels or fictions. Postal service? A guy heading in the direction of your package/letter. Entertainment? Watching the town idiot get thrown into the ditch for passing out in the middle of the road.

    132. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      I think that was a very powerful aspect of the film. Virus writting is increadibly anti-social you are WASTING YOUR TIME TO HURT OTHERS and in almost no way can it benefit you.

      Code is slower because of security no matter how much no one wants to admit it.

      In a benevolent society a computer virus is unstoppable.

    133. Re:Chicken and Egg. by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      I thought the first three shows were great! I just saw the 7th episode and I was cradling my head in agony. Maybe the alien signal is real and that is what is making the show suddenly... not good.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    134. Re:Chicken and Egg. by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      Subliminal messages do not exist, whatever the Internet claims. It has been known to be wrong.

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
    135. Re:Chicken and Egg. by oopsdude · · Score: 1

      I recall this happening in Independence Day. Before I saw that movie, I had no idea that a Mac could give an alien computer a virus! (Which confirms my suspicions about Steve Jobs...)

    136. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of an episode of outer limits.

      Except all of the characters who heard the signal got gold skin to protect them from the sun turning purple.

      Meh.

    137. Re:Chicken and Egg. by aaronl · · Score: 1

      An amusing thought game is trying to figure out how far you could get technologically if you were transported to some past period. You have to take for granted that you wouldn't die of disease and that you could enlist help, but it's still kind of fun. I know that if I had a few willing people that I could get to steel and an ICE within a decade. Getting electricity is even easier, since you can use water or wind to directly drive a dynamo. That makes a lot of the advancement much easier, since electricity is rather easy to control.

      Playing that game does show how little people know of the basics of technology, though. Kind of sucks that we have all this cool stuff around, yet so few know how it all works.

    138. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "aliens need not have motives that are by our standards rational"

      This is no "by our standards" rationality. There is rationality and there is the absence of it. Rationality is simply adhering to facts, logic, and one's own best interests. This will be the same for an organism light years away as it is for us, e.g. survive, reproduce, acquire wealth and power, learn, etc.

    139. Re:Chicken and Egg. by sponge_absorbent · · Score: 1

      But they know ways to exploit our ancient tech that we may not imagine, nor possibly even could imagine.

      Your forgetting the fact they have no actual knowledge of our ever changing current tech.
      It just isnt going to happen.

    140. Re:Chicken and Egg. by jwdb · · Score: 1

      The problem with your Roman analogy is that their understanding of the rules of reality was incomplete. We can defeat the defenses of the Romans because we understand more of said rules and can make devices that fly, which to them seems inconcievable. In the case of a computer, however, we make the rules that software abides by and thus know most of the actions that can be performed in the virtual reality of a system. To bring your Roman situation back to computer terms, it would be as if a firewall only blocked inbound viruses and didn't realize it was possible for viruses to enter via other paths and then dial home.

      Jw

    141. Re:Chicken and Egg. by tricorn · · Score: 1

      There's security, and there's error-free. There's absolutely no reason that a correctly written signal analysis program is vulnerable IN THE SLIGHTEST to ANY signal, no matter how malicious. Remember when "Good Times" was a hoax? A text mail reader that never tries to execute anything in the e-mail it displays is absolutely invulnerable to being compromised, given even the slightest precautions in handling a few fields (such as not assuming that the Subject: or From: or Date: items are correctly formatted, shorter than some assumed maximum, or don't contain odd characters). That type of checking is NOT "slow", and it really isn't that difficult.

      The biggest risk really is one of social engineering. The theme has been dealt with in many stories - get the recipients to build some Wonderful Machine to your specs, then infect THAT. When we get an intelligible signal, and they show us how to build a machine or an organism that we don't understand COMPLETELY, then we should start to worry.

      Think of it as Alien Phishing. "Hello, we haven't met, but I am the chief scientist for an intergalactic research group that has just discovered the secret of lightspeed travel. As you are a new species, we believe we can trust you with this new technology. Please build an ansible with the following plans so we can communicate further."

      Even in a benevolent society, errors occur, and programs will still need to guard against them. Since DRM isn't necessary in such a society, all the effort being put in to limiting what people can do can instead be used to make programs bulletproof, and with everything being Free Software, any errors that do exist can be fixed "Benevolent Society" doesn't imply that all individuals are good, nor does it imply that everyone has gotten stupid, nor does it mean that people won't mind nosy neighbors looking into their affairs. There would still be security, anonymity, encryption.

    142. Re:Chicken and Egg. by tricorn · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted someone to write a "bootstrapping civilization" book. Starting conditions: dropped naked (except for the book) on an unpopulated Earth, how do you light your first fire, how do you figure out what's edible, how do you catch your first meal, how do you make your first knife, tan a hide, make iron, glass, copper wire, transistor, CRT, hard drive, laser, spaceship. The whole chain of technologies, including a list of all the reference works you'll need that contain the distilled knowledge of everything our civilization has created (all patents, engineering handbooks, materials references, gene and protein databanks, electronics design and theory, physics, math, CS, chemistry, biology references, etc.) Being mostly text, I wonder how much of that you could cram onto a small set of DVDs - it would be nice include all technical doctoral theses ever created, for instance, and the complete archives of all the important (and not so important) journals.

      Of course, you'd need to have the DVD reader/screen (or equivalent) to access all that information.

      The companion volume is the complete collected literary works of humanity (books, plays, magazines, newspapers, music, paintings, photographs, sculptures, video games, TV shows, movies). Now there's a good application for the petabyte solid-state memory cube...

    143. Re:Chicken and Egg. by Captain_Carnage · · Score: 1
      As far as I see it, theres as much chance of data in the recieve buffer created by background radiation being a viable 'virus' as there is a deliberate chunk of data will be

      OK... In order for there to be a threat, there must be hostile aliens in the first place, and they must be sufficiently intelligent to pose a threat. So for the sake of argument, let's assume that. Then, it follows:

      1. We still have not detected them, after years of trying.
      2. Therefore, they must be using signaling technology which is more advanced than ours.
      3. Subsequently, they are smarter than YOU.

      It is folly to assume that because you don't know how to do something, it is impossible. Likewise, though you may not know of the existence of something, that is not proof that it does not exist. These are the very principles which today allow black-hat hackers to break into your systems and steal your credit card info, etc. This is the essence of computer security: someone figured out how to break things in a way that was unexpected by the designer.

      I can't find a proper attribution, but somebody smart once said, "The more I learn, the more I realize how little I know."

    144. Re:Chicken and Egg. by tricorn · · Score: 1
      Can you infect Egyptian papyrus rolls with a computer virus?

      No, but I have this nifty abacus virus that might be useful...

  2. Wow by w.p.richardson · · Score: 1
    That really, really, really doesn't seem like an item that should even register on the worry list.

    Aliens surmise that radio signals can be intercepted and decoded by individuals light years away and then go to the trouble of sending a signal encoded with a virus of some sort? Someone needs to get out more often, methinks.

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    1. Re:Wow by lee+n.+field · · Score: 1
      That really, really, really doesn't seem like an item that should even register on the worry list.

      Right-o. Current thought as I follow it seems to be that, in fact, there ain't anyone else out there (or at least vanishingly few).

  3. Is SETI a Security Risk? for EARTH by anandpur · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    First I thought SETI is risk to earth itself. What if aliens are listning us and preparing for something big!

    1. Re:Is SETI a Security Risk? for EARTH by 246o1 · · Score: 1
      First I thought SETI is risk to earth itself. What if aliens are listning us and preparing for something big!
      Assuming this wasn't intended as humor, we have been BROADcasting signals for about a century, and that means that aliens out there will get to hear all about the glories of the Third Reich, etc. SETI is an attempt to put forth our best face (perhaps, you know, tolerance! moderate intelligence! no death penalty for our young in a lot of countries! &c & whatever), and to listen for responses to some of the noise we've been sending out.
      --
      Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
    2. Re:Is SETI a Security Risk? for EARTH by blincoln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if aliens are listning us and preparing for something big!

      Then there's absolutely nothing we can do.

      The chances of a nearby extraterrestrial race inventing radio at or near the same time as us are so small that we can discount them entirely for purposes of a thought experiment. They would be thousands or millions of years more advanced - or more primitive. If they're more primitive, we'll probably never know about them. If they're that much more advanced, then they could wipe us out without any significant effort.

      Better hope there aren't any Berserkers, Staircase Gods, or Inhibitors out there, eh?

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  4. Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by beh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...completely out of his mind?

    Granted - once we had contact any alien civilisation could also get into a situation where they could potentially send malware to Earth.

    But - isn't Seti right now looking at data from stars a good number of lightyears away? How likely is it that aliens on the off chance of infecting a computer would send out virusses and/or worms that would run on current CPUs and chipsets, using security holes that are current NOW? (Remember - if aliens 10 lightyears away would get hold of enough Earth signals to decode Intel assembly language and to understand Windows security holes, even if they could decipher all that overnight and write a terminal computer virus in another hour - it still took them 10 years to receive the signals from us and it would take another 10 years for them to come back). How likely is it that a virus working on 20 year old hard-/software (including OS and everything) would still work on a large portion of critical infrastructure today?

    Given that Seti only checks data, but doesn't try to execute it, shields us even further from the whole thing...

    Or - is Mr. Carrigan now assuming that there is an imminent threat of an attack by Bin Laden against the Internet - through Seti@home ?
    Now that would make even Bush sound perfectly sane... ;-)

    1. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Itchy+Rich · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...completely out of his mind?

      Yes, he's clearly a nutjob. If SETI signals contain anything it'll be adverts for penis enlargement.

    2. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, it's easy to do, we just better hope the aliens dont have any telephone repairmen.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    3. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by EarlW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Given that Seti only checks data, but doesn't try to execute it, shields us even further from the whole thing..."
      Correct. Substitute SETI for fax (or television) and you can see how ridiculous this is. The data is analysed for patterns, just as a fax machine converts the dots into an image. Are aliens sending faxes or TV shows? Is there a chance of getting a virus from a fax? No.

    4. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Xzzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...completely out of his mind?

      He's a physicist. If you thought the socially inept uber nerd was a dying or dead species, they aren't. Far from it really. Walk around Fermilab's cafeteria at lunch and you can witness some absolutely stunning samples. Even worse are the ones who carry these traits, and think they're far more intelligent than they are. The arrogance these guys can carry is indescribable.

      Yes I'm generalizing, but it's hard not to. For every well adjusted, friendly physicist there's at least one other who thinks himself a living diety.

    5. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by locnar42 · · Score: 1

      They don't have to have immediate turnaround. They get 8 years to work on it.

    6. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the aliens have faster than light tech.

      why is that less likely than anything else ?

    7. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by ettlz · · Score: 1
      For every well adjusted, friendly physicist there's at least one other who thinks himself a living diety.

      Steady on, Cowboy! The ratio is no where near that high. I'm a Theoretical Physics Ph.D. student, and in all my time I can honestly say I've only met about three people who thought they were God's Gift to the Lagrangian. I've never come across a Rodney McKay.

    8. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Their software only has to succeed on one machine. From there, its learning power allows it to read internet manuals and discover how to infect more modern machines.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by sponge_absorbent · · Score: 1

      SETI work units are simply not big enough to contain such advanced machine learning code. Then consider the fact that any malicious code will be up against signal to noise limits and you have very little data to play with.

    10. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Surt · · Score: 1

      You have to keep in mind, they'll be using advanced data compression. They probably only need in the range of 32 bytes or so of payload for their machine learning code.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    11. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget all the exploits in tiff/jpg/ps-readers, which were also only intended to handle some data, not execute it. Nevertheless, with the right bugs in them, they can be forced to execute code embedded in "pure data".

    12. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by julesh · · Score: 1

      Given that Seti only checks data, but doesn't try to execute it, shields us even further from the whole thing...

      It's worth noting that, e.g., Microsoft IIS only "checks" data that it receives from client connections, rather than trying to execute it. This doesn't stop it from actually executing it, if you happen to be running an unpatched version and the request is in the correct format.

      That said, IIS processes structured data which contains variable-length and which critically affects its operation, causing it to branch into many possible execution paths. Seti processes unstructured fixed-length data and does not perform different operations based on its content. The latter is much easier to write securely than the former.

    13. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by changcho · · Score: 1

      No, it's not just you; Carrigan is completely out of his mind. It seems like a waste of time to discuss his deranged "idea"...

    14. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by sponge_absorbent · · Score: 1

      The limits to digital compression are well understood. So your either a troll or serverely lacking in knowledge.

    15. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Surt · · Score: 1

      The limits to digital lossless compression are indeed well understood. Consider that it might be possible to effectively compress intelligence in a lossy manner, or that we might very very poorly understand the limits of how intelligence can be designed.

      Not that I really think you can fit an intelligence in so small a space, just that I don't think we have the tools to prove it impossible to a race with an extra ten thousand years of research behind them.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    16. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      Oh, give it a rest. Are you sure it isn't they are simply acting far more intelligent than you think you are? Everything tries to make everyone else out to be equal when that is absolutely not the case. Not everyone is brilliant, sorry to break it to you. If these people are smarter than %99.999 of the Earth's population, then they have every right in the world to act as arrogant as they wish. Well adjusted is a joke, it is simply a pigeonhole term used to try and make everyone who does not act like everyone else out to have some kind of problem.

    17. Re:Hmm... Is it just me or is this guy... by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      Oh, give it a rest. Are you sure it isn't they are simply acting far more intelligent than you think you are? Everything tries to make everyone else out to be equal when that is absolutely not the case. Not everyone is brilliant, sorry to break it to you. If these people are smarter than %99.999 of the Earth's population, then they have every right in the world to act as arrogant as they wish. Well adjusted is a joke, it is simply a pigeonhole term used to try and make everyone who does not act like everyone else out to have some kind of problem.

  5. This is ridiculous by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did this guy just watch "Independence Day" or something?

    1. Re:This is ridiculous by aurb · · Score: 1

      That's it, I'm removing my seti@home. I don't want any malware from outerspace.

    2. Re:This is ridiculous by brxndxn · · Score: 1

      Independence Day taught me one thing...

      PC's can be easily infected by other humans... relatively benign

      Macs can be infected by aliens!!!... extinction of the human race!

      So.. just don't run SETI on Macs (because they're compatible with every computer in the universe, including their viruses) and you will be able to keep your puny human I mean precious race..

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    3. Re:This is ridiculous by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. All we have to do is send Jeff Goldblum of phony sophicated beguilement voice-overs to upload a virus on diskette. Ph34R u5!

      (can't you just see, after "ooh"ing and "ahh"ing over the latest consumer bauble, director calls cut and after being handed a bagel Goldblum shouts I SAID ONION NOT GARLIC YOU BITCH! throwing it to the ground)

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    4. Re:This is ridiculous by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      No, he has been watching Battlestar Galactica, specificially the pilot episode and and the second season premiere.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    5. Re:This is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean Threshold? ;)

    6. Re:This is ridiculous by endlessoul · · Score: 1
      No. He was watching the pilot for Threshold.

      :)

    7. Re:This is ridiculous by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      Did this guy just watch "Independence Day" or something?

      I think he just watched "Contact" where the wankers decided that an extra-terrestrial signal that could be heard by the whole world, nay the whole universe, could comprimise US national security....

      Weren't you all taught in school that the US is so big that the whole universe fits inside of it and falls under their control?

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    8. Re:This is ridiculous by Beautyon · · Score: 1

      No, you mean the movie 'Species' where they recieve teh genetic code of an alien and then re-create it in the lab.

      And since this is Slashdot, don't you mean 'rediculous'?

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  6. They're thinking all wrong. by Phae · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've seen this movie, but it's the other way around. We're the ones that upload the virus to the aliens, not them to us... don't be silly.

    1. Re:They're thinking all wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no - that happend in War of the Worlds -- oh wait...

  7. Threshold, by imdx80 · · Score: 1

    Theres at least one viewer of threshold right there.

    1. Re:Threshold, by Rob_Ogilvie · · Score: 1

      I guess that means there are three of us. Do you suppose that is enough viewers for CBS to renew it for a second season? :-)

      Somehow I doubt it'll be back for season #2.

      --
      Rob
    2. Re:Threshold, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, count me in. I'm another Threshold viewer. I guess that's why they cancelled it.

      Doesn't anyone see any patterns here. The gov are trying to see people's reactions to the storylines on TV.

      The show 24 is still an active testing ground.

  8. I'm really worried by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because, of course, the aliens use binary Von Neumann machines with register/accumulator architectures, and instruction sets we're familiar with.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:I'm really worried by TCQuad · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. Everyone knows we got computers by reverse engineering alien technology.

  9. Independence day by frostilicus2 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    If Will Smith can do it, it must be true.

    --
    Nothing sucks like a Vax, nothing blows like a PowerMac G4
    1. Re:Independence day by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be Jeff Goldblum? He is the one that wrote the virus, after all... Will Smith just flew the ship.

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
  10. Didn't you know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alien's don't exist!

    1. Re:Didn't you know? by mario64 · · Score: 1

      Well how do you explain "George W. Bush" then ?

    2. Re:Didn't you know? by dalek_killer · · Score: 1

      I would explain him, by all the drugs that he took in college.

  11. Risk 0:1 by stecoop · · Score: 1

    This brings up so interesting thoughts/concerns but I would have to say the risk of a virus is so close to 0 that I am going to say there is a ZERO chance of this happening. An alien race receives our signals that are 50 years out of date then have to predict 50 years in the future to send the signal back. Having 100-year technology/prediction gap, then they are so advance that they wouldn't infect our computer, they would just stomp us if they wanted to. Of course this may not be all doom and gloom; imagine if the aliens had a sense of humor. What if the virus made all the cd trays dance to the beat of Mambo #5.

    1. Re:Risk 0:1 by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, now I can't stop laughing at the idea of my CD tray dancing to Mambo #5.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  12. Those aliens must be mighty intelligent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to know how to program for our computers without ever actually haven seen one.

    1. Re:Those aliens must be mighty intelligent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they could pull as many as they want out of one of our landfills I'd imagine

    2. Re:Those aliens must be mighty intelligent... by locnar42 · · Score: 1

      Don't you think that with all the visits to our planet that they would have bothered to do something other than anal probing humans all day long. They're probably in violation of the GPL right now in fact. Anybody seen any spaceship guidance modifications released back to the Linux kernel recently?

  13. You can thank me for this information by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    As official Earth contactee for the benevolent Betelgeuse civilization, I have been told to warn you that the evil Andromedans are using the SETI program to keep a fresh list of potential abductees for nefarious experiments.

    They also recently developped antitinfoil penetration technology, so those of you who are using this means of protection are now vulnerable.

    These beings will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of your colon!

    Consider yourselves warned.

    1. Re: You can thank me for this information by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > As official Earth contactee for the benevolent Betelgeuse civilization, I have been told to warn you that the evil Andromedans [...]

      "Hello, my name is MR. BONG and I need help smuggling 50,000,000 Galactic Credits out of the Betelgeuse system."

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:You can thank me for this information by cyberworm · · Score: 1

      "These beings will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of your colon!"

      Could be worse. They could be trying to get to the top of it.

  14. WHOA.... by wangotango · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll read the content of the article after I construct a tin foil hat for my laptop.

    1. Re:WHOA.... by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

      I'll read the content of the article after I construct a tin foil hat for my laptop.

      Hey! ...What happened to my wireless?

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
  15. Threshold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Threshold by S.O.B. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe that's why Threshold has been cancelled, so as not to alarm the public. Maybe its already happened...

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    2. Re:Threshold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crap, it was the only one of the three new alien-invasion shows that I actually liked. Surface has too much freaking water, and Invasion is just stupid.

    3. Re:Threshold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! They killed Threshold!

      You bastards!

    4. Re:Threshold by Comboman · · Score: 1

      I looked at the SETI@HOME data yesterday, and last night I had a dream about a glass forest. Coincidence?

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  16. Alien Virus by poena.dare · · Score: 1

    Aliens have already infected Earth with a virus: it's called mankind.

    1. Re:Alien Virus by udoschuermann · · Score: 1
      Aliens have already infected Earth with a virus: it's called mankind.

      No, it's called Microsoft.
      Come one, nobody else thought to blame Microsoft? Must be Monday...
      --
      --Udo.
  17. Bigger problems. by Peldor · · Score: 2, Funny
    Wouldn't the Vogon Constructor Fleet be a bigger problem than a few radio waves?

    Has anyone been 'round to the local galactic administrative office lately? Anyone?

    1. Re:Bigger problems. by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I stoped by last week, but then I realised I'd left my towel at home.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    2. Re:Bigger problems. by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Has anyone been 'round to the local galactic administrative office lately? Anyone?

      Yes. You're all stuffed.

      : grabs towel and prepares to leave!

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  18. We're dealing with aliens here, by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

    They could travel into the computer themselves and take it over if they wanted.

    --
    Someone save me from this sanity.
  19. A classic example ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... of someone who's very knowledgeable in one technical field (in this case, particle physics) assuming that this knowledge carries over into another, almost unrelated technical field (in this case, computer science.) I'm sure that Dr. Carrigan is a very, very smart guy, but odds are he uses his computer as a tool without a whole lot more understanding of its inner workings than that possessed by the typical business user.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:A classic example ... by Anonymous+MadCoe · · Score: 4, Informative

      A nice story about this, the false authority syndrome: http://www.vmyths.com/fas/fas1.cfm

    2. Re:A classic example ... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Or it could be a simple case of him suddenly becoming very very nutty.

      I have seen that in Professors, espically really old professors. They get really nutty and start spewing random thoughts as if they were undisputed fact.

      It's one of the unfortunate side effects of tenure.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:A classic example ... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      It happens in all sorts of fields - witness the number of posts here from people who clearly understand computers very well, but think that means that they understand topic foo very well too, with foo being anything from economics to business to science.

      (In that last regard, I've all-but stopped reading science stories here; with my physics background, it can be a painful experience.)

    4. Re:A classic example ... by Sigmund+Dali · · Score: 1

      Hah! You think a particle physicist does not know his computer very well? I've met a quite a few of them, and all of them are incredibly computer savvy, much more so than me. Most of them I know can program in very base languages like FORTRAN, and they all have enough knowledge of assembly to do by hand adjustments. Since they tend to run extremely complicated calculations and need the highest efficiency available, they know their crap.

    5. Re:A classic example ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love this definition from the article:

      ultracrepidarian: (n., adj.) a person who gives opinions beyond his scope of knowledge.

      A less formal defintion might read:

      ultracrepidarian: (n., adj.) the average Slashdot poster

  20. Does this give new meaning to the phrase.... by isa-kuruption · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this give new meaning to the phrase: HACK THE PLANET ???

    1. Re:Does this give new meaning to the phrase.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HACK THE PLANET!!!

  21. Worried? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly, I'm more worried about some cd containing a friggin' rootkit....

  22. Lol. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    This is about as likely as that guy hacking the mothership main computer in the movie "Independence Day".

    Gee isn't it lucky that a totally alien civilisation also happened to independently invent a Von-Neumann architecture running an 80x86 instruction set also with buffer-overflow vulnerabilities.

    I wonder if they run Windows XP?

    1. Re:Lol. by ClippyHater · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they run Windows XP?

      No, their civilization, having the benefit of being at least a few decades of technological advances ahead of us, are now using Vista RC 1.

    2. Re:Lol. by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      Actaully Jeff Goldblum's character was using a Mac, so that wouldn't be x86. Probably be PPC...

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    3. Re:Lol. by frostfreek · · Score: 1

      As an aside, I've never figured out why the laughing skull virus had a soundtrack. If the bugs could not hear (as established earlier in the movie), then why would they put a soundcard into their computer!?

    4. Re:Lol. by albyrne5 · · Score: 1

      I never saw the movie, but if this is true it's priceless!

    5. Re:Lol. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said "use our computers". As in, scan them in .00005 seconds, look at the data, spend the next couple of days laughing about how insecure they are - "come'on, they've known about buffer overflows for years, why haven't they fixed the problem yet? And then there is the X problem, they haven't even figured out that it's a problem", and then writing a devastating exploit in a couple of seconds.

      As a programmer I would say that this is very likely to be easy for them. On the other hand, if they did it this way (through SETI) it would be to gain control of the internet, which isn't (shouldn't be, hopefully isn't) connected to any vital systems, which would make it pretty useless, and thus not likely. Directly altering the in-memory copy of a running program would probably be just as easy, and give the ability to attack un-connected systems.

      OTOH, if I was an alien trying to wipe out the human race, I would let us do all the hard work ourselves. Just give that Bin Laden guy a couple of graviton ray generators... (If you think a couple of planes are bad, just wait till you see the result of an entire city falling upwards).

  23. Intergalactical terrorism ... by jepoirrier · · Score: 1

    Hmmm ... Someone is fearing that dangerous, evil, Bin Laden-linked terrorists are out there in space and can use SETI@Home to attack planet earth. Well, I'll shut down my mobile, my wi-fi antenna, my AM radio and I will also stop hearing at what other "poeple" say ... just in case E.T. is using sound waves to invade my brain.

  24. Authority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lest we forget, being an authority in one field (nuclear physics in this case) does not automatically make you an authority in other fields (like computer science). Carrigan's concerns should be taken with a large grain of salt.

  25. April 1st already? by Bazman · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this guy can't be serious. Its probably just a funny joke started over coffee on a slack day at Fermilab, and they thought it was so hilarious they couldn't wait until April 1 to release it. Can anyone at Fermilab hear giggling?

    Its equivalent to rooting a system by holding a particular pattern in front of a web cam, causing a buffer overflow in the Jpeg compression....

    Baz

    1. Re:April 1st already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually i'm holding onto that one for 28 days after notification of the vendors (apple isight, Axis webcam, intel create and share and PS2 Eye-chat ) until full disclosure.

  26. Sounds like a job for OpenBSD. by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny

    That'll help prevent interstellar buffer overruns 'sploits!

    Either that or we'll send them Theo de Raadt.

    1. Re:Sounds like a job for OpenBSD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how that sounds like a Mafiosi-type name. We'll also send "Franky Four Fingers" and Boris de Bullet Dodger...

      Oh and what eventually happens on that distant alien galaxy? Maybe not "Commander, you should look at this!" but instead a "Hey Martha. c'mere look at this. It seems to come from a Class M planet. Wait, THIS signal is apologizing for using Windows XP, whatever the hell that means..."

    2. Re:Sounds like a job for OpenBSD. by ettlz · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you should check out the brief history of Linux.

  27. Not necessarily from space. by Vo0k · · Score: 3, Informative

    The "malicious signal" may be of earth origin, just send it to the antennas on the right frequency and make it similar enough in shape to the space noise and it will get processed just the same. Or hijack a DNS and post new "work units" with malicious content acting as SETI.
    Thing is you don't need to separate the data, you just need to make the processing software secure, in such a way that data is analysed and never executed, there's no chance of buffer overflow or other potential risks coming from the data. Simple as that.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Not necessarily from space. by CyBlue · · Score: 1

      ... but buffer overflows do come from data. ... data inserted into improperly constrained buffers such as text sent over an instant message or data in a picture. For instance, the buffer is specified as holding 256 bytes of data. You send it a few K of data. The data gets written into memory and overflows the buffer possibly resulting in a program crash or valid execution statements being written into memory and processed by the computer.

    2. Re:Not necessarily from space. by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      But techniques of writing software immune to buffer overflows are known for decades. Your buffer is meant for 256 bytes of data, somebody sends a few K of data, your app simply keeps count of bytes streamed in and discards everything above the 255th byte. In case of predefined, fixed raw data blocks obtained from readout devices like radiotelescopes (as opposed to random user input), simple sanity checks allow for eliminating all buffer overflow risks.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:Not necessarily from space. by CyBlue · · Score: 1

      Of course there are techniques to prevent buffer overflows, but they are not always implemented properly as evidenced by their continued existence. They still pop up all the time in modern software.

    4. Re:Not necessarily from space. by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Because there are countless places where they may occur. In a strictly contained environment, when you get given number of fixed size data blocks, they are easy to eliminate.
      Whether they are eliminated or not, is a different matter. Just matter of will to eliminate them, not ability.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  28. "The chance of infection is not zero"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the probability of a contaminated SETI signal is difficult to estimate; but if we never consider it the chance of infection is not zero"

    No shit Sherlock. So, in your mind, that's sufficient to call for security controls? The fact that something can happen on a non-zero probability? Worst, the threat scenario you imagined is a *computer virus*? Tell me, did you rent Independence Day during the Thanksgiving weekend? That's the worse excuse for paranoia I've ever seen, and I'm reading slashdot daily. There are millions of potential security threats out there with a non-zero chance of happening, and thanks God we ignore the vast majority of them.

  29. Shouldn't be a problem by westyx · · Score: 1

    Most of the machines running seti are windows and linux machines, which are safe - everyone knows only Apple laptops are AlienOS Compatible. So what if the apple users start acting weirdly - it's not like anyone is going to notice the difference.

  30. Let's hook SETI up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..to our ICBM-installations. This would provide extra security in case an Alien tries to infect our computers with a virus: we just nuke them !

    On second thought... maybe that Carrigan is in fact an alien posing as human that is against aliens infecting human PC's through the alien ether, and maybe he is, like all aliens, after only one thing: World Domination (tm)!
    Oh no, what have we done!

  31. An Open Letter by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Richard Carrigan,

    You keep doing particle Physics, and we'll keep doing Computer Science.

    Love,
    The Computer Scientists

    1. Re:An Open Letter by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

      I think someone's a little upset about the whole anal probing thing...

    2. Re:An Open Letter by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Look, it was one time. I was in College. I met a dashing young particle Physicist. One thing led to another . . .

      -Peter

    3. Re:An Open Letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we'll" umm sorry to break it to you but less than 0.1% of the active users on slashdot are computer sciencist... way to go to give your self credit...

  32. Another type of risk from SETI by Snamh+Da+Ean · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A slightly different concern I have heard expressed in relation to efforts to contact ET relate to the possibility that some unfriendly species will see our signal, take a look at our planet, and decide to enslave us. I know that respected professors at the University of Reading's Cybernetics department, whose names escape me, have expressed such concerns.

    Since SETI and other similar programmes are based on the not unreasonable belief that other technologically advanced civilizations exist on distant planets, is it sensible to contact them and alert them to the presence of our resource rich planet? Extremely remote risk, but is there any reason to think that aliens are friendly? If earth discovered life on another planet, and this planet also happened to possess some material which greatly enriched the lives of humans on earth, how would we react?

    IANASFB (I am not a science fiction buff) but I presume this type of scenario has been discussed.

    1. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by khendron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect that since our species has been blasting out so much noise (radio, TV broadcast, radar) in the past 50 years or so that our presence can hardly be overlooked. That is, if anybody is looking.

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    2. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

      Of course, we already HAVE been alerting them from Marconi onwards, as every episode of "I Love Lucy", "Star Trek", "Baywatch" and various reality TV programs has been streaming outwards at the speed of light, not to mention all the porn, Howard Stern, government communications, etc., etc., etc....

      Cat's already out of the bag.

      Of course, they may see all of that, and decide it's best to stay away or just send a small, asteroid sized rock in our direction to shut off the noise....

    3. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A slightly different concern I have heard expressed in relation to efforts to contact ET relate to the possibility that some unfriendly species will see our signal, take a look at our planet, and decide to enslave us.

      Don't worry, (God | Allah | Bhudda) will save us! /sarcasm

    4. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by udoschuermann · · Score: 1
      At this stage SETI is concerned with finding signals that originate from extraterrestial civilizations. Once we've found such a signal, decoded, and understood it, the issue of actually responding to it will likely be discussed for decades (and may die in committee).

      Considering that our species is in the process of devouring our world (by converting all of Earth's biomass into human biomass) we seem naturally predisposed to project our own intentions onto another species. Hence Carrigan's FUD (and that from others he quotes).

      Statements such as the following...
      ...the probability of a contaminated SETI signal is difficult to estimate; but if we never consider it the chance of infection is not zero
      are blanket bulls--t: the chance of a million apocalyptic scenarios is non-zero; the chance that an interdimensional planet-eating space frog will consume the Earth next Thursday is non-zero, too.

      Overall, there are myriad problems vastly more likely to do us (and our world) harm than extraterrestial computer viruses.
      --
      --Udo.
    5. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by Snamh+Da+Ean · · Score: 0

      Interesting, hadn't thought of that. I wonder can ET make sense of all the transmissions that drift off into space? In any event, it is a clear signal (literally) that technological civilization exists on our little rock.

    6. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      What self-respecting space-faring (and at an interstellar level of space-faring to boot) species would give a damn about a lump of rock at the bottom of a gravity well at a mediocre energy level area of the system?

      After the asteroid fields been tapped out, and Jupiters moons sold for scrap and Mercury and Venus fully plundered (maybe melted and stretched out to form concave mirrors for solar energy utilisation), then maybe (and only maybe, depending on if they have needs and means for utilising the gas giants) will earth fall into the firing line, and even then only in at level of "leftovers".

      Unless of course the asteroid field is whats left of another iron cored planet that some long lived alien species decided to "iron out" the gravity well of.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    7. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by stuckinarut · · Score: 1

      ...alert them to the presence of our resource rich planet?

      Fortunately with the inherint limits of the speed of light for signalling and travel we are well on course to use up all our resources before aliens can reach us

      That'll learn them - come half way across the galaxy to steal our resources only to find we've used them all up and trashed the planet. WAH HA HA HA HAAAAGH!

    8. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      No, it is very easy to overlook. Like the signals we are trying to find, our signals are hard to see.

      Well, maybe for an advanced technology it is easier, but it may be that the aliens don't even use radio waves and don't try searching something on them.

    9. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      And furthermore, like those things we all did before we knew any better: Once "out there", our past actions are darn hard to take back (be it stealin' cars, or spamming the ether with political speeches).

      IF we ever decide that spamming the ether will need to be controlled (so that other SETI projects will find us, err, civilized), all we can do short of time travel is to let bygones be bygones and commit to a better future (and we all know how good we are at that last bit...).

    10. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by lgw · · Score: 1

      Considering that our species is in the process of devouring our world (by converting all of Earth's biomass into human biomass)

      And you complain about other people's FUD?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Another type of risk from SETI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that since our species has been blasting out so much noise (radio, TV broadcast, radar) in the past 50 years or so that our presence can hardly be overlooked. That is, if anybody is looking.

      Well, keep in mind that this is an ever-expanding bubble, 100 light years across, in a galaxy that's around 100,000 light years from end to end (less from top to bottom). In other words, we're still a pinprick.

      Cycle this through the Drake equation and see what comes out!

  33. well yeah if ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the alien civilisation has developed the technology,
    to piggy back-modulate magnetic waves into electromagnetic
    ones ... hey mister maxwell why don'tse my magneztses glow?

  34. I'm not worried... by slowhand · · Score: 1

    I chose to opt-out and receive no annoying spam email from any extra-terrestrial sources. I just gave them my name, SSN, all email addresses, and home phone and cell phone numbers to not call. Then I opted out of any credit card theft stuff by giving them all my Visa, MC, and Amex numbers to identify accounts not to use. I provided Mom's maiden name for verification. I wear my tin-foil hat during solar flare storms.

    And I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night

    --
    Busy aligning my non-linear thoughts.
  35. Already done. by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

    Where do you think Windows came from?

    [ducks]

    1. Re:Already done. by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Search for Exterrestrial Intelligence.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  36. actual risk - but not from aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So sure, there's a risk like there is with any system. But far more likely, the risk would be from people writing malicious code and sending it down to the open dish from a plane or mountain or whatever.

    But then again, that's no bigger risk than the system would experience just by being hooked up to the internet.

  37. Re:An Alien Will Smith? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was jeff goldblum, you insensitive clod!

  38. Seach for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Exploitable Transactions on the Internet?

    How do you know you are not being used to crack someone's encrypted files?

  39. Movie-plot threat by Proaxiom · · Score: 5, Insightful
    A perfect example of what Schneier calls movie-plot security.

    It's pretty sad that they're actually wasting brain cycles thinking about threats like this. No, the risk of infection isn't zero. But it's damn close to zero. It isn't zero if you 'secure' SETI systems, either. It isn't even zero if you dismantle the SETI telescopes.

    But money spent on this is money better spent elsewhere, practically no matter where else you spend it. This should have been in the 'It's Funny, Laugh' topic.

    (Prediction: this will appear on Schneier's blog by end of day tomorrow)

    1. Re:Movie-plot threat by ovis123 · · Score: 1

      The chances that anything's commin from mars where a million to one he said ....

      Jeff Wane based one the novel The War Of The Worlds of H.G. Wells (1898)

      Oelaw ....

    2. Re:Movie-plot threat by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed.
      And if one felt the need to continue the movie-plot security hypothesizing, one would further recognize that such a sufficiently-advanced civilization, if we're assuming such hostility, poses threats in other contexts that are multiple orders of magnitude more likely:
      - We've been broadcasting our location clearly to the universe since Marconi first threw the switch, if not earlier.
      - Any sufficiently hostile, technologically capable civilization could wipe us out with a large, well-aimed ROCK.
      - If they wanted to make it nearly un-interceptable they'd accelerate it to a high fraction of c.
      - If they REALLY were ticked off (say, they watched Gilligan's Island or something) they'd lob a small singularity at us, or heck, into our sun.

      Let's just recognize that IF we're postulating sci-fi threats, it doesn't take a Ph.D to realize that this isn't even a very credible one. Any sufficiently advanced society, capable of this sort of insidious assault, would have so many multiple ways of wrecking us it's illogical to waste resources trying to stop any of them.

      Reading an Iain Banks novel, while entertaining, shouldn't really guide policy.

      --
      -Styopa
    3. Re:Movie-plot threat by Rochus · · Score: 1
      > (Prediction: this will appear on Schneier's blog by end of day tomorrow)

      Tomorrow?

      http://www.schneier.com/blog/
      Today's Movie-Plot Threat: Electronic Pulses from Space
      ...
      Posted on November 23, 2005 at 07:39 AM | Comments (56) | TrackBack (0)

    4. Re:Movie-plot threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, thats a posting about a nuclear bomb detonating in space. Because really, if an enemy of the US got a hold of a nuclear bomb and wasn't afraid to use it, they'd spend millions strapping it to a giant booster to blow it up in space over our country, instead of just setting it off in New York or something.

    5. Re:Movie-plot threat by Rochus · · Score: 1

      Oops, sorry, I should read more than just headlines ;)

    6. Re:Movie-plot threat by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      A perfect example of what Schneier calls movie-plot security....But money spent on this is money better spent elsewhere, practically no matter where else you spend it

      People are weird like that. As a locksmith, I tell people almost exactly the above when they ask for a SECOND deadbolt, or for an "unpickable" lock on their cheap, hollow core masonite door. They're trying to defeat movie and TV spies, which don't exist in real life. Real life burglars throw a rock through a rear window. And in fact, real life spies aren't even going to pick the lock, but rather throw a rock through the rear window so it looks like a burglary. But no, people have delusions that there are packs of secret agent type thieves with sophisticated alarm disabling blinkenlights tools and lockpick sets. People watch too much TV.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    7. Re:Movie-plot threat by Firefly1 · · Score: 1
      They're trying to defeat movie and TV spies, which don't exist in real life.
      This is a reassuring statement, and probably even true. Although the flip version must be taken into account: just because you don't see them, that doesn't mean they don't exist...
      And in fact, real life spies aren't even going to pick the lock, but rather throw a rock through the rear window so it looks like a burglary.
      Maaaybe. Ideally, spies wish to leave no traces, so given the choice, they'd rather pick the lock than smash a window... and a properly picked lock is far less obvious than a burglary, which latter would draw an investigation sooner, which would in turn uncover evidence of espionage. Note too, that there are burglars who follow this train of logic.
      To address the subthread's original point: 'it looks like a movie plot' != 'nobody'll ever do that...'
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
    8. Re:Movie-plot threat by julesh · · Score: 1

      threats in other contexts that are multiple orders of magnitude more likely:
      - We've been broadcasting our location clearly to the universe since Marconi first threw the switch, if not earlier.
      - Any sufficiently hostile, technologically capable civilization could wipe us out with a large, well-aimed ROCK.
      - If they wanted to make it nearly un-interceptable they'd accelerate it to a high fraction of c.
      - If they REALLY were ticked off (say, they watched Gilligan's Island or something) they'd lob a small singularity at us, or heck, into our sun.


      All of these things assume that an alien race is able to physically reach us. Now start from the assumption that they're 5000 light years away, and c really is the absolute limit of speed for any travel within the universe. They don't even know that we're here yet, but they have a pretty good idea that somebody might be. A broadcast signal is the only available means such a civilisation has to attack us[1].

      Of course, while an alien signal may be a carrier for an attack, the vector used will almost certainly not be the one suggested in the article, which is basically the same sort of vector used by worms like Code Red and MSBlast. A much more likely scenario is a social engineering attack of some kind, as these are likely to be much less dependent on ... err ... knowing or being able to guess details of the exact kind of computer technology used by your victim.

      Amusingly, the guy's web site mentions a book, A for Andromeda by Fred Hoyle and John Elliot, which describes just such an attack vector. He's read about the likely way such an attack may occur, and discarded it in favour of discussin a much more unlikely one.

      [1]: Why they would want to is an interesting question, but there are answers to it that at least vaguely make sense. If you were the right kind of alien intelligence they may make a lot of sense. One is that they want to convert all intelligent races in the universe to follow their own model of civilisation, and that's a model that we don't want.

    9. Re:Movie-plot threat by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      "They're trying to defeat movie and TV spies, which don't exist in real life."

      This is a reassuring statement, and probably even true. Although the flip version must be taken into account: just because you don't see them, that doesn't mean they don't exist...

      Heh. Reminds me of a poem I heard once: "As I was climbing up the stair/I met a man who wasn't there/He wasn't there again today/He must be from the CIA". Seriously, I was a signal intelligence analyst for the army back in the Olden Days and as a result of my particular (classified) assignment I spent a lot of time around and conversed at length with many NSA/DIA/CIA agents. Trust me, there are no spies skulking around in black turtlenecks with lock pick sets. Inside information is nearly always procured via someone who's already inside. Risking exposure doing something as pedestrian as breaking into an office is stupid when the office secretary with full access is underpaid and hates his/her boss.

      Maaaybe. Ideally, spies wish to leave no traces, so given the choice, they'd rather pick the lock than smash a window... and a properly picked lock is far less obvious than a burglary, which latter would draw an investigation sooner, which would in turn uncover evidence of espionage.

      A properly compromised inside person is far less obvious than a picked lock. They come with their own key to the lock, plus they are also permitted inside. Espionage via burglary is really the domain of amateurs like G.Gordon Liddy's "plumbers" at the Watergate hotel.

      Note too, that there are burglars who follow this train of logic.

      If there are, they're idiots. Most burglaries fall into one of two categories: "random", or "inside job". Random ones tend to be the rock through the window type. Inside jobs, which are the most common, often look like someone picked the lock and pulled a James Bond on the alarm; but invariably it turns out it was done by someone who got ahold of a key and the alarm code, usually directly from the homeowner himself*!

      * contractors, housekeepers, babysitters, etc.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  40. Science Fiction. by wschalle · · Score: 1

    This what happens when smart people read books like Dan Brown's Digital Fortress.

  41. Can they just come out and say it!?!? by Durrill · · Score: 1

    If the government is concerned about alien signals hacking our precious communications infrastructure... then could they please just release all information they have concerning extra terrestrials. Man, how can the government convince the public that isolating SETI from alien influences is necessary, if they don't come out and admit / prove that aliens exist. We know they're out there, but our society as a whole doesn't. Honestly.. we are all fundamentally stupid creatures.

    --
    If i wanted to hear bullshit, i'd go to church.
  42. It must be true. by Vengeance · · Score: 1

    After all, that's how we beat the aliens back on Independence Day a few years back, right?

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  43. If hollywood taught us anything... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

    ...it's that Alien computers are susceptible to MACINTOSH viruses! (See "Independence Day", for example.) For once, Windows uses are immune to an attack!

  44. The real reason (no tinfoil)! by dada21 · · Score: 1

    The real reason behind research requests for adding processes (and red tape) is budgetary. This guy wants to see more money spent!

    Don't be surprised by it. Government has terrorists to help increase their budget (war is the health of the State). Scientists have the bird flu, HIV and little green men.

  45. Nut job central by squoozer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has /. become a focal point for all the worlds nut jobs today or something? What with this and the guy asking to move porn onto another port all we need now is one of the monty python crew to do us a silly walk. How do these people get to take control of my pixels?

    What's most scary though is that there is a small percentage of people who will believe him. I think those people scare me more now I come to think about it. At least this guy is just trying for his 15 minutes of fame.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re: Nut job central by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > Has /. become a focal point for all the worlds nut jobs today or something? What with this and the guy asking to move porn onto another port [...]

      Hey! Maybe we should move kill two birds with one stone by moving all the porn to the SETI channel.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  46. Ray by certel · · Score: 1

    I fear the alien death ray!

  47. His worst fear has probably already happened by Aging_Newbie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    SETI data is pretty much indistinguishable from random numbers. In fact, the extremely rare patterned sequences of data are the holy grail of the pursuit.

    So .... most likely lots of virus code has already been processed because random noise will eventually produce every virus, just like monkeys and keyboards will produce Shakespeare. One could, I guess, hold the position that by processing random data we are putting ourselves at risk and that rings more true than some civilization producing intentional sequences with malicious intent.

    1. Re:His worst fear has probably already happened by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      I wonder what will people say when they will get a pasage from Hamlet from SETI...
      because they will... eventually... probably in the next 1,000,000,000 years or so.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    2. Re:His worst fear has probably already happened by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      I had the idea to use SETI data, which is available in XML form and is essentially just radio static, in a random number generator. Using a pseudo-random number generator and the string in the XML space, select a string of a given length from a given position, and that's pretty damn easy to do. Ten or eleven lines of PHP could do it.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  48. Problem is, there's always a risk by vibes_wibble · · Score: 1

    Even if the risk is so small as to be vanishing, the problem with this sort of rubbish (similarly to a lot of IT security consultant twaddle), is there's still a risk. Put another way, is there no risk at all that something from SETI could cause a problem on a PC...? Answer is, yes, there's a very small risk, but it is still a risk. For the PHB types (or journalists) who don't understand how to quantify risk, this can be something to panic about. I bet that more than one IT support person has been asked by his/her Guardian reading boss how SETI can be banned from the site because of this "issue". Anthony.

  49. There you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wormy, you always were a dumbass, but this takes the cake. You could have at least posted as an AC for this, but we would have found out anyway. We just can't tolerate this kind of breach of security protocol.
    Consider yourself fired. You know very well what this entails - you have a week to put your affairs in order and say your goodbyes. Dumbass.

  50. Right... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Okay, in order for infectious code to even contaminate our systems we're begging the question that aliens know the language our systems are communicating in. The odds that aliens are within earshot is one thing to overcome. Add to that: the odds that they're intelligent, odds that they have technology to code with, odds that they have been watching us long enough to reverse engineer our code in order to contaminate our systems, the odds that our systems would interpret this code. But hey, it got him some press, which is probably what a lot of this is about.

  51. Oh but of course! by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The concern is raised in the next issue of the journal Acta Astronautica by Richard Carrigan, a particle physicist at the US Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois.

    And he is after all, one of the most reputable names in the computing field today.

    Computer scientists argue that to hack a computer, or write a virus that will infect it, requires a knowledge of how the computer and the software it is running work: a computer on Earth is going to be as alien to the aliens as they would be to us. But Dr Carrigan says there is still a risk.

    There most certainly is a risk: a risk that someone in the government might actually take a particle physicist's word that aliens are trying to hack the Internet (which, given the speed of light, most enlightened civilizations in the galaxy won't find out about for about 200 years, assuming they are listening in the first place).

    On the one hand, I don't know why this is a story. This guy is out of his element, and no one should be taking him too seriously (Independence Day buffs notwithstanding). On the other hand, the chance that people in positions of power with less than two neurons to rub together might take this guy seriously, thereby jeopardizing peaceful scientific research (see Contact) has me just a bit concerned.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  52. A far greater risk... by stox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is sending signals out. Although we may think we are saying hello, the receiver may be thinking, "Hmmm, I do need more meat in my diet."

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:A far greater risk... by TooFarGone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I think we're safe from that... http://www.terrybisson.com/meat.html =)

    2. Re:A far greater risk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (tinfoil hat mode)This is indeed what worries me far more than getting my pc 03n3d by ET!! And I really don't worry much about it but hey, for sake of argument the biggest risk is to make ourselves known in the universe, i mean NO-ONE does that right? Otherwise SETI would have picked up opn that by now right? So as yourself WHY... and then proceed to being very quiet and minimise your radio emissions into space... (end of tinfoil hatmode)

      What with ECHELON, NSA, CIA, and heck probably even the Dead Kennedy's reading our email, why would we give a rat's gazoo about ET doin' it? Heck maybe there's money to be made here...

      (ET-SPAM) wanna get that longer neck ET? Spammy Earth Medicals can offer you interstellar performance for your special time! (&^JB BUSY&@#%#&*@ FILTEROBSCURING POTATOE MASH

    3. Re:A far greater risk... by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 1
      Or, just as bad, we may be saying, "I'd never go anywhere without my wonderful towel," (footnote 1) but this may be the worst insult imaginable in the toungue of the recipient, and they could wage interstellar war on us as a consequence.

      Footnote 1: That's, "I seem to be having this tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle," for the old-school crowd.

      Footnote 2: Isn't it fun reading through all the footnotes?

      --
      proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
    4. Re:A far greater risk... by acaspis · · Score: 1
      "A far greater risk... is sending signals out."

      Well aren't we sending a lot of RF into space already ? And how far can nukes be detected from ?

      Then there is the issue of sending information out. As in ETs sending radio probes toward us every once in a while, and checking whether this causes any turmoil in our global communications. In which case they may think: "Damn, the sneaky apes on the third planet are eavesdropping on us. Time for a preemptive strike."

      AC

    5. Re:A far greater risk... by 2Paranoid · · Score: 1

      It's true. They've been studying our computers ever since we started broadcasting Internet signal into space (damn DirecTV). But I hear they are only up to the Commodore 64. Apparently they got stuck on Space Invaders for five years, until they figured out that it was just a game.

  53. Our tech is too primitive... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...to take over with such a signal.

    While I believe such a scenario is entirely possible, I think that our Pentium 4's and Sparc's are just not capable of enabling such a feat. The code to do so would either take several megabytes or be so strongly compressed that our machines simply would no be able to unpack it in under a decade.

    It would sort of be like the NSA travelling back in time and trying to remotely root the Union Pacific's telegraph machines.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  54. Did someone watch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did someone watch Independence Day over Thanksgiving weekend? Physics guys are smart and stuff so I could see him reversing the situation and .......

    Come to think of it how many alien movies end up with positive outcomes for the aliens? We broadcast this stuff all day, every day with repeats ad nauseum. Damn, now I'm worried too :)

  55. Eat at Earth by Dareth · · Score: 2, Funny

    What we should be worried about is the interstellar equivalent of flashing road sign saying,
    "Eat at Earth".

    And even if they do not want to eat us, who says we won't want to eat them. If Broccoli based aliens land on Earth, I will become a mass serial killer running around with a jar of cheese whiz!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Eat at Earth by KiroDude · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Eat at Earth by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I will become a mass serial killer running around with a jar of cheese whiz!

      No. You will become a terrorist. Cheez Whiz is clearly a WMD.

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
  56. ..and also psychic. by jferris · · Score: 5, Funny
    Assuming attacks on only 32 bit Windows OSes, if an attack would occur today, it could only have originated from within a range of ten light years. An attack from further out would have required that it be launched before Windows 95 was.

    There really is no need for remote infiltration of the OS, since high school students have been doing it for years. Why would first (acknowledged) contact be to give a virus to Windows users? It is like pouring salt in the ocean.

    --
    You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all different.
    1. Re:..and also psychic. by rubicelli · · Score: 1

      Five light years; you forgot to factor in the round trip.

    2. Re:..and also psychic. by Happy+Lemming · · Score: 1

      Surely aliens would use 33 bit Windows? That would be a bit odd.

    3. Re:..and also psychic. by cod3po37 · · Score: 1

      because even aliens probably have bored teenagers with too much time on their hands trying to prove they're |_337 with ancient technologies.

      "What are we going to do today?"

      "Let's hack that small bluish planet they were talking about it in ancient computer systems."

      "Cool..."

    4. Re:..and also psychic. by schon · · Score: 1

      Five light years; you forgot to factor in the round trip.

      Actually, (since we're pulling stuff out our asses here) if you assume that the aliens have technology that can monitor us in real time (say some kind of FTL telescope), you don't have to worry about round-trip time... that would put it at about 9 light years (IIRC seti@home started in 1996.)

      Not counting the time required to discover the flaw, then design and create the exploit, of course.

  57. language barrier and failed tries by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

    that seems to be as likely as if someone who does not speak your language could give you a speech that changes your beliefs

    furthermore, if some cilivlisations are really capapble of such a feat, for each successfull virus there should be millions of tries that fail partially because of some odd incompatibility.

    So, where are all the signals from outer space that *almost* managed to take over seti? Some should at least have crashed it.

  58. You forgot the obvious... by beh · · Score: 3, Funny


    Since mankind came about through "Intelligent Design", so will the aliens. And hence it's natural that their Intelligent Design also led them to having Windows (completely independently developed - but still the same thing - it's in our eternally unchangeable intelligently designed genes, remember?)

    *smile*

    Somehow I wouldn't be quite so surprised if it really turned out the guy would be a creationist... ;-)

    1. Re:You forgot the obvious... by lurch_ss · · Score: 1

      If this is the case then we don't have any reason to worry. Microsoft will have them in court so quick and for so long for patent violation they'll never be a problem. Balmer will fucking bury them!

    2. Re:You forgot the obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the designer is intelligent, can (s)he not design things with 2 different sets of genes maybe? It really annoys me how people associate creationism with every stupid little idea that has something to do with life. Whether you see creationism as stupid or not is irrelevant. Most creationists I know (and I know a great many) don't believe in aliens at all.

    3. Re:You forgot the obvious... by c64cryptoboy · · Score: 1
      It really annoys me how people associate creationism with every stupid little idea that has something to do with life. Whether you see creationism as stupid or not is irrelevant. Most creationists I know (and I know a great many) don't believe in aliens at all.

      Conversely, those who would marginalize exploring Intelligent Design on our planet generally are in favor of looking for it from space.

      --
      I put the 'fun' in fundamentalism
    4. Re:You forgot the obvious... by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      The fact is that Intelligent Design is religious in origin and illogical in its entirety. You do not explore Intelligent Design, because Intelligent Design = Religion = Fantasy. You explore reality and the tool for that is Science.

    5. Re:You forgot the obvious... by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      PS - And if it turns out that if aliens are eventually found and they admit to having created life on our planet, that will be perfectly fine. And if, after rigorous scientific analysis, that conclusion is found to be true then it would answer some of the greatest mysteries of mankind. But, to hide behind the term Intelligent Design as if it is not defined in context in society as being strictly is use by the religious, is nothing but a facade. Until the day that the aliens land and tell us that they created life on our planet, or we discover any other scientfic reason, Intelligent Design is no more scientifically disprovable, repeatable, or predictable than any other no basis fantasy you want to come up with.

    6. Re:You forgot the obvious... by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      LOL

    7. Re:You forgot the obvious... by c64cryptoboy · · Score: 1
      Intelligent Design is no more scientifically disprovable, repeatable, or predictable than any other no basis fantasy you want to come up with.

      Aliens are also not "disprovable, repeatable [sic], or predictable", and yet they are tolerated by the scientific community.

      --
      I put the 'fun' in fundamentalism
  59. Sounds like bad Sci-Fi... by nweaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like such bad Sci-Fi that he could become a writer for Threshold.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Sounds like bad Sci-Fi... by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      Finally!
      someone else that thinks Threshold is badly written.
      Once I saw the episode where the sound-based virus infects anything electronic(cell-phones, network routers,...) that's when I had enough.

      These writers really think we are dumb or were they smoking crack instead of going to school?

      I'm surprised we don't have a poll on the worst new SCI show.
      (Holy shit, there's like 7 or 8 of them!!!)

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re: Sounds like bad Sci-Fi... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > Sounds like such bad Sci-Fi that he could become a writer for Threshold.

      I.e., unemployed?

      (Word on the street is that Threshold got the axe.)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re: Sounds like bad Sci-Fi... by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      What was Threshold?

    4. Re: Sounds like bad Sci-Fi... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > What was Threshold?

      CBS television show that started this fall, about some kind of alien invasion of the earth. Apparently a clone of the idea behind Surface and Invasion, which also started this season. Perhaps the worst done of the three, though IMO the other two aren't anything to brag about.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re: Sounds like bad Sci-Fi... by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      What was Threshold?

      You lucky bastard...

      Anyone have Brent Spiner's address? He owes me 45 minutes of my life and some 200MB of bandwidth.

  60. It's just you ;) by headkase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I belive he's talking about those pesky abstractions we all use without a thought everyday. Basically, the scenario unfolds in this way: you recieve information from a entity and the ideas contained within said information can be helpful (like Universal Cure) to harmful or disruptive (something along the lines of a memetic virus).
    It would be a nasty trick for an alien civilization to give us the most destructive weapon possible without giving us accompaning social skill's as well. Or we could figuratively be on the 'beads' end in some initial contact scenario.
    To quote Morris Berman, "An idea is something you have, an ideology is something that has you.". An old alien civilization out there could just be very good at constructing ideologies. I'm not saying now is the time to consider this chance, rather that it should be considered when alien contact occurs.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:It's just you ;) by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would be a nasty trick for an alien civilization to give us the most destructive weapon possible without giving us accompaning social skill's as well.

      Don't worry, humanity absolutely does not need any help from alien civilizations for this scenario. "Inventing and using destructive devices (aka weapons)" is something humans are amazingly good at.

      An old alien civilization out there could just be very good at constructing ideologies.

      See above. If humanity was any better at constructing destructive ideologies, it would have bombed itself into extinction by now. I am fairly sure we could easily compete with about any alien civilization. On the other hand, maybe we aren't and all this crap is really the aliens' fault ! Let's go kill them all !

    2. Re:It's just you ;) by headkase · · Score: 1

      ...Let's go kill them all !...

      The Universe is really, really big. Probability wise, within huge distances from us the last space-faring civilization died out 6 million years ago and the next won't occur until 4 million years after we're gone.

      We could go out and destroy all the hidden data-centre's that they left behind and we could find though. ;)

      --
      Shh.
    3. Re:It's just you ;) by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Or we could figuratively be on the 'beads' end in some initial contact scenario.
      Are you thinking of the "cheap glass jewelry for expensive furs" scenario that reportedly happened with the american natives? I'm not worried about it.

      Because even if that happens, it would be about information. And information would not be lost on our end if we send a copy. The whining of certain "intellectual property" organizations in similar situations nonwithstanding.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    4. Re:It's just you ;) by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Actually, we are not that good at constructing weapons. The most powerful killing machines we have are things like atomic bombs, which have all sorts of nasty side effects. Even fuel air bombs demolish buildings - and need to be delivered close to the target. Imagine a device that could destroy humans with no side effects at all - leaving buildings and anything whose genetic profile deviates more than 1% from a sample unharmed. Imagine the instructions to build such a device coming along with a message saying 'you are the true ascendent beings, destroy the inferiors.'

      You could probably trust the US government not deploy such a device wholesale, although they would almost certainly build some, then, the next time they were in a war situation it would be so much better PR than risking the lives of GIs. You can bet China would build some 'in reserve.' North Korea? I'm sure they'd like some, and any religious fanatic who managed to get their hands on one would have a great time. Of course, everyone would assume that the message was directed at them...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:It's just you ;) by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      There was the notion of "The Riddle" which I read in the compendium edited by Hofstadter and Dennet called "The Mind's I". The story took the form of a report about an idea that would shut down the consciousness of a human mind as soon as it was comprehended. A slightly similar idea was in Stephenson's "Snow Crash", and I think even A. E. Van Vogt had a story about aliens creating ideas and messages that hijacked the thinking of the reader.

      I suppose it's theoretically possible, but we've already coevolved with some pretty agressive ideologies that are designed to hijack the thinking of their hosts and use them to infect others (religions). It's worth noting that most people have at least some level of infection with these, but it's only a small minority that have really raging, out-of-control outbreaks (religious fanatics). I think humans have a reasonably good 'mental immune system' that keeps such things from warping behavior too much, most of the time anyway.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  61. Aw heck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will prove that everybody in the known universe KNOWS that windows is trivial to infect.

  62. I'm More Worried About Alien Pr0n by Prototerm · · Score: 1

    ...But maybe that's just me.

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
  63. Reminds me of that movie "Virus" by Anonymous+MadCoe · · Score: 1

    A supervirus from outerspace.... Wow this guy probably saw this http://www.virusthemovie.com/ movie...

  64. Snow Crash? by giminy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did anyone else immediately think of Snow Crash when they read this? I'm guessing Neal Stephenson did a lot of acid when he wrote that novel. I'm guessing that this guy did a lot more acid than Neal if he believes there is any truth to it.

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    1. Re:Snow Crash? by Outdoorsie · · Score: 1

      Heck yeah, I immediately thought of that!! Course I did just listen to (and thus "reread") the book during almost 30 hours of driving over the holiday. Always entertaining... actually possible? I doubt it too.

  65. A Fire Upon The Deep by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

    This is basically the risk of the Blight from Vernor Vinge's "A Fire Upon The Deep". The idea is that even if you can't imagine how such a virus could be written, alien AIs sophisticated beyond our imagination might be able to.

    1. Re:A Fire Upon The Deep by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Um, if they're so smart, why would they waste time hacking SETI when RF-based SCADA systems present such a feature-rich targetspace?

      (for non-scada geeks: SCADA = Systems Control and Data Acquisition, the hardware used to remotely monitor/manage power grids or water distribution, and by manufacturers, etc. A whole infrastructure with unprotected RF (often microwave) communications, worse-than-crappy TCP/IP stacks, security-by-obscurity as the only thing protecting protocols, etc. It's a mess).

    2. Re:A Fire Upon The Deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on top of that those SCADA systems sometimes run on WindowsNT!

  66. This Guy is a Kook by SlippyToad · · Score: 1

    And he's watched too many epic science fiction films with bad science and dopey fiction. Nothing to see here. Move along.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  67. Why give orders to the computers? by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Aliens could send a message to earth in cleartext, and half the idiots on this planet would look up and say "Yes Sir!".

    What is more dangerous is that the signals from space are perfectly random. This includes the possibility that the signal could contain the perfect virus. As a random event and not a hostile act.

  68. Good movement by McPolu · · Score: 1

    This guy is trying to obtain a number of SETI dedicated computers assigned to its own project.

  69. SETI will never find a signal anyway (here's why) by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    We now know from our own history that the time in which a civilization broadcasts analog radio signals at high power is a very narrow window.

    The power of individual radio signals has declined precipitously in the last 50 years, as more and more stakeholders have made use of the radio spectrum--the power and band spread of individual signals has decreased. This trend will only increase as the sophistication of encoding, filters, frequency hopping, and spread-spectrum useage increases. Also, as the speed and encryption sophistication of digital signals increase, the transmissions begin to sound more and more like noise to an analog receiver.

    In addition, for long-range data transmission the preferred technology is now wired, not wireless. The only exception is the satellite bounce, which is used very infrequently and does not require a very high-power signal.

    These trends are not capricious but result directly from the physical limitations of radio transmission. Therefore it seems likely to me that such trends would develop in any civilization that transmits information electronically. As a result, not only would we need to physically point our telescopes at the correct region of the sky to find another civilization, we would also have to be lucky enough to catch them in the "high power analog (or simple digital) broadcast" phase of their civilization. Based on our civilization so far, that window might only be a century or two wide.

    The only exceptions to this that I can think of are transmissions to space probes such as Voyageur. These are of necessity higher power and simpler than other radio spectrum use (since they are locked into their technology level at launch). But these are also directional and infrequent.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  70. GREETING AND HELLO by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny

    I send you greetings from what you know as the smaller magelenic cloud. my name is ortion fleglar, and my father, the late ortion flekgar, left to me a sum of one hundred million kletlons before being pulled into a hyperspace anomoly. Before his untimely demise, he warned me never to trust my hive-mothers, gleblon flamkis and formta gleklar...

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  71. Windows EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never saw anything in there permitting interstellar export. Something is going to have a lot to answer for....

  72. Note to "Smart" Guy: Threshold is just a TV show! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know you think Brannon Braga is a genius, but he isn't. Carla Gugino IS exceptionally beautiful, true, but she's not a scientist. Threshold the TV show is just that: a TV show.

    Nobody's trying to send us computer viruses from Jupiter. Any alien race capable of doing that would probably have a much better way of killing us off. Keep your fearmongering to yourself.

  73. Independence day was the other way rount, but by newandyh-r · · Score: 1

    "A for Andromeda" (Fred Hoyle - TV series and book) and
    (sort of) "Macroscope" (Piers Anthony - book) have this as
    plot devices.

    1. Re:Independence day was the other way rount, but by KingEomer · · Score: 1

      I think 3001: The Final Odyssey does as well.

    2. Re:Independence day was the other way rount, but by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I read "A for Andromeda" but it was a long time ago, so I've forgotten.
      as for others, including yours:

      1-The Traveler in "Macroscope" by Piers Anthony
      2-Snow Crash in "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson
      3-Syl, et al in "Species", et al, by whoever
      4-For that matter, "Contact" by Carl Sagan
      5-Or how about the oldie, "This Island Earth" (the interociter)

      It's all "action at a distance" by shipping information. The first 2 act by merely viewing the information, the latter 3 get you to build something using the information as instructions. In (1), (2), and (5) the information was an explicit intelligence test.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    3. Re:Independence day was the other way rount, but by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      Charles Pellegrino/George Zebrowski
      The Killing Star (1995)

      as well.

  74. Macroscope? by fgb · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like mr. Carrigan just finished reading Macroscope.

  75. When the aliens start RESPONDING to... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    ...tempting offers to enlarge their gnorgls, pictures of young teens foithboindering, and sincere offers from Dr. Blfpsplk who wants to smuggle thirty million credits out of the country and will happily give 10% of it to any reliable person who will lend him the use of their bank account... ...I'll start worrying.

    Because then they will get OUR viruses, and reverse-engineer them.

  76. This Pr0n's for you by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    You know we are just going to get annoying pop-ups with little blue naked women on our screen saying "Buy cyalis now or suffer our death rays!"


    Come on this guy's a wacko. First they need to decode our language, then they can start decoding our software. Good grief! It's like the notion aliens out there are going to have a face, eyes, hands, legs and wow look remarkably humanoid.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  77. DOUBTFUL IT CAN HIJACK A RIG, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu/fcgi-bin/fcgi? cmd=view_feedback&id=27264

    All I care about is driving down my avg. processing time per unit @ this point, from:

    3 hr. 12 min. 13 sec.

    (and, counting, going downwards @ roughly 1.7-2.0 seconds per unit processed @ this point & we only have until Dec. 15th 2005, then this section (the original) of this project shuts down & the app quits getting datasets to process - my first 50 were done on an AMD K6-III @450mhz (avg. 24 hr. per unit processing time here), then the next 310 were done on a Dual CPU/SMP Pentium III @ 1ghz (avg. 6 hr. 58 min per unit processing times here on this 2nd rig) & now I can get down to 2.5 hours per unit processing time now on this setup listed below)

    Pentium 4 3.2ghz
    512mb Micron matched pair DDR400 RAM
    Western Digital "raptor" 36gb disk #2 (storage)
    Western Digital "raptor" 74gb disk #1 (apps + OS)
    CENATEK "rocketdrive" 2gb (solid-state disk where I run the units from)
    GeForce 6800 GT OC by BFG vidcard (not that it matters, but listed it anyhow)

    Right now, I'm the fastest per-unit processing time on my team, TRIBAR (which is #51 & right behind TeamSlashdot on the top 200 chart), & want to get under the 3 hr. mark & into the 2 hrs.++ range... doubt I have the time to get there, but will try until Dec. 15th 2005 when this project shuts down & moves to the BOINC client as part #2 of this study/investigation.

    Now, on topic:

    Do I think this dataset can be used to hijack a system? No, I doubt it, but then, I do not have the sourcecode to the SETI@Home charactermode/consolemode app that I use either... still, I find it VERY doubtful it could be used maliciously in & of itself.

    (Could the client-app have buffer overflow possibilities? Sure, local or remote wouldn't matter because once you run it, since it's a client app, any LOCAL exploits become remoteable if the app is attacked, & runs its bogus code (if any) under YOUR user-rights context!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I think the project will have merit in the future, helping us choose which galaxies etc. to choose as candidates for exploration... as well as being an EXCELLENT benchmark of computer system CPU/RAM performance! apk

  78. I may be a rare breed, but... by DariaM84 · · Score: 1

    I don't think there's anything else out there. I'd rather spend funds on US getting OUT THERE than trying to get a non-existant THEM to come OVER HERE. Or we could cure cancer or something. That works, too.

  79. Wrong! by martinmcc · · Score: 1

    Why does having the two letters Dr in front of your name give make all these sycophantic reporters sit up and beg for scraps of wisdom from their over excercised jaw?

    This is just so ludicrous - It basically boils down to someone who quite possibly is very knowledgable in their field has picked up a smattering of knowledge of computer science, decided their genious knows no bounds of disciplines, added 1 and 1 together and got 147.

    It is quite possible that their are security vunrabilities in seti, but it is also certain they are hard to find (otherwise, we would have exploits going around)

    It is possible that a certain data set could cause the program to overflow and allow arbitary excecution. The overflow could happen with a random set of data, but to do something useful (or damaging, depending on which point of view) you need to have a good knowledge of the program, the machine it running on etc etc.).

    It is highly unlikely that alians would have that kind of knowledge of the machines. They may get a smattering from TV/radio broadcasts, but about the only place I can think that they could get the level of information required (without any physical access to earth resources) would be the internet. If they have net access, then they do not need to use seti as entry point, any vunrability would do. dito for if they have physical access.

    Also, what is the worst their virus could do? Require a reinstall on a few home PCS. Bring the internet to its knees for a few days? You have to remember, the internet is under attack every second of everyday, and more or less copes ok. Our greatest evil geniuses who have intimate knowledge of the systems are not able to do more than cause slight annoyances (yes, I know companies and governements like to come out with losses of billions, but really!).

    In conclusion, this dude is wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

  80. That's why by JustOK · · Score: 0

    That's why the Battlestar Galactica uses all those out-dated systems.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  81. So that explains... by bradleyland · · Score: 1

    why all the virus activity we're seeing on the SETI networks is written for Windows 1.0.

  82. laughable but heh, that should contain it by tota · · Score: 1

    SELinux policy for seti (homemade):
    # setiathome

    daemon_domain(setiathome)
    general_domain_access(setiathome_t)
    # type setiathome_t, domain, privowner;

    # allow root to start it:
    role system_r types setiathome_t;
    role sysadm_r types setiathome_t;

    # type setiathome_exec_t, file_type, sysadmfile, exec_type;
    type setiathome_datafile_t, file_type;

    domain_auto_trans(sysadm_t, setiathome_exec_t, setiathome_t)
    domain_auto_trans(initrc_t, setiathome_exec_t, setiathome_t)

    allow setiathome_t setiathome_datafile_t:file { getattr read write append };
    allow setiathome_t self:process execmem;
    allow setiathome_t user_home_t:dir search;

    # file_type_auto_trans(creator_domain, parent_directory_type, file_type, object_class)
    file_type_auto_trans(setiathome_t, user_home_t, setiathome_datafile_t, file)

    # etc
    allow setiathome_t etc_t:dir search;
    allow setiathome_t etc_t:file { getattr read };
    allow setiathome_t etc_t:lnk_file read;
    allow setiathome_t root_t:dir search;

    # network
    allow setiathome_t dns_port_t:udp_socket { recv_msg send_msg };
    allow setiathome_t http_port_t:tcp_socket { recv_msg send_msg };
    allow setiathome_t netif_eth1_t:netif { tcp_recv tcp_send };
    allow setiathome_t netif_lo_t:netif { udp_recv udp_send };
    allow setiathome_t node_t:node { tcp_recv tcp_send udp_recv udp_send };
    allow setiathome_t self:tcp_socket { connect create read write };
    allow setiathome_t self:udp_socket { connect create getattr read write };
    allow setiathome_t net_conf_t:file { getattr read };

    # locale
    allow setiathome_t locale_t:dir search;
    allow setiathome_t locale_t:file { getattr read };

    # libs:
    allow setiathome_t ld_so_cache_t:file { execute getattr read };
    allow setiathome_t lib_t:dir search;
    allow setiathome_t lib_t:lnk_file read;
    allow setiathome_t shlib_t:file { execmod execute getattr read };
    allow setiathome_t usr_t:dir search;

    # search /var and /var/run
    allow setiathome_t var_run_t:dir search;
    allow setiathome_t var_t:dir search;

    # dev/pts
    allow setiathome_t device_t:dir search;
    dontaudit setiathome_t sysadm_devpts_t:chr_file { read write };
    dontaudit setiathome_t staff_devpts_t:chr_file { read write };

    allow sysadm_t self:process execmem;
    allow setiathome_t ld_so_t:file execmod;
    allow setiathome_t self:capability dac_override;

    --
    TODO: 753) write sig.
  83. Revocation... by slcdb · · Score: 1

    Can I be the first to please request the revocation of Mr. Carrigan's "junior physicist" badge and secret decoder ring?

    I for one hope this is all just a left-over April fools joke or something. It's far too scary to me to believe that someone who would actually publish such nonsense -- and mean it -- could manage to get hired by Fermilab.

    --
    Despite what EULAs say, most software is sold, not licensed.
  84. Why focus on virii by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    I think we should be more concerned about them sending us porn. Could you imagine the devistating effect alien porn could have on the human race?!?

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  85. Who cares? by Tom · · Score: 3, Funny

    Frankly, anyone who is 2-3 years ahead of today could lay waste to our entire IT infrastructure anyway. Just look at what some malware can do that's a month or so ahead of current patchlevels.

    Any aliens that are 10, 100 or 1000 years ahead of us technologically... well, the 10-year-ahead aliens probably know how to wipe out every computer on earth within 2 minutes. The 100 and 1000 years-ahead aliens almost certainly aren't backwards compatible enough. :)

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:Who cares? by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

      The 100 and 1000 years-ahead aliens almost certainly aren't backwards compatible enough.

      AAAAAAAAARRRRGGGGGGGHHH!!!!

      Phew. Sorry 'bout that. I've just imagined us in 1000 years playing Duke Nukem Forever in our flying cars but still using Windows.

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
  86. Ignore the fool by aliens · · Score: 1

    His paranoid delusions are just that, delusions. Do not worry, continue your research as you have fellow humans and ignore the warming trend on your^H^H^H^H our planet

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  87. right.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming that the general chaos resulting from the news that aliens are attacking the world by trying to take over our computers does not do more damage in the first place..

    IF there are aliens out there, IF they would want to attack us, wouldn't more 'conventional' weapons like 'The Magnificent Death Ray' or 'Anti-Gravity Bombs' be even more likely then that the first alien life-form we come in contact with are a bunch of script-kiddies ?
    Although it would strike fear in my heart if a first message would contain the letters 'a/s/l?'

  88. ...Got Root? by nvlass · · Score: 1

    [This box got pwned by Aliens]

    --
    How to Destroy Angels II
  89. A virus from data? No, probably not. by rdmiller3 · · Score: 2
    From his web site:
    But remember, ordinary unmotivated computer and biological viruses are very common!

    This common misconception shows that although Richard Carrigan may be a fine particle physicist, he doesn't really know much about computer viruses. Please, folks... If you're going to cite someone as an "expert", make sure they've at least got a clue about the topic in question.

    To properly debunk this person's fearmongering though, let's remember a little program called "crashme":

    1. Generate a file full of random bits.
    2. Try to execute that file.
    3. Repeat from the beginning.
    It was a great way to find flaws in the robustness of user space verses system space, back when Linux was young. (A user program should never be able to crash the whole system.) There are two amazing things about this program:
    1. It tries to execute a data file!
    2. It hasn't produced a single virus yet!

    A distant civilization will have no knowledge of our computer systems' machine language and it would be impossible for them to guess. There are so many ways we could have arranged such things. Any information coming from them would essentially be random data as far as computer instructions go, even if it contained enough patterns to show that it came from a sentient source.

    Nobody executes raw data! Even SETI wouldn't execute their data. They'd analyze it, plot it, and try to decipher it but they're not going to name it "ALIEN.EXE" and try to run it like a program. But what if they did?

    Well, this "crashme" program has been doing just that, for more than a decate and on many machines. No viruses yet.

    This "SETI virus" scare is just a plot device for a low budget movie. It's a shame that it even made it onto slashdot.

  90. Threats to earth? by beh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's interesting how scientists in the US are really pondering something that has such a remote chance of success - while at the same time going completely against Kyoto targets.

    I think the climate change has a higher chance of causing us major pain, than that we'll catch the "alien virus" through Seti@home any time soon.

    Oh - and even if the current US government should be right that the Kyoto targets aren't far reaching enough - but that shouldn't be ANY excuse not to start off trying to at least achieve THOSE. If the US really thinks Kyoto wouldn't be enough - then DO MORE instead of procrastinating while doing (next to?) nothing...

    1. Re:Threats to earth? by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      Allow me to summarize this type of post, which seems to occur on Slashdot often:

      OMG U.S. STUPID!!!!1
      THEY IGNORE TEH KYOTO AND WE WILL ALL DROWN IN GLOBAL WARMING!
      (+2, Insightful)

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    2. Re:Threats to earth? by HebrewToYou · · Score: 1

      What a fucking tool.

      Discussing climate-related issues with folks like Beh is like masturbating with a glove made of steel wool.

      --
      I'm not popular enough to be different.

      Homer Simpson, The Simpsons

    3. Re:Threats to earth? by wrightam · · Score: 1

      Many scientist support SETI becuase logic tells us that given so many stars and planets, there HAS to be something out there. If there was an alien civilization out there that has been sending out signals such as ours for the last 100+ years, and they are around a 100ly away, then we should pick their signals up at some point (granted, the timing of it all is insane - they would have to point their signal at us at just the right time for it to pass earth as they move around their sun, as we move around ours, as both go around the galaxy, and we just have to be looking in the right direction when that signal passes by...) The problem with climate change in the US is that some scientist are not sure if humans are such a major contributer, and that if we indeed are not, then there's probably nothing we can do. It's sickening, though, when you see some of these scientist getting paid by tree huggin' special interest groups or careless, thoughtless industry so therefore they lean one way or the other. But then, at the same time, I guess there wouldn't be a heck of a lot of high level science going on if they didn't get paid...

    4. Re:Threats to earth? by beh · · Score: 1

      If you say so. You do come across as the type who has the necessary experience of doing exactly that.

      My post was intended to point out that we give time and publicity to someone coming up with a remark about the dangers of Seti signals, while at the same time ignoring something that a hell a lot more scientists regard as a real danger to mankind.

      Besides, I'm not saying that the US would be stupid. I'm more likely to get ticked over people that immediately go "you criticise a thing about us, you are anti-". This particularly is true whenever an outsider criticises either the US or Israel. Note: I don't have a quarrel with either of the two countries; I just find it interesting how you can criticise the British/German/French/Russian/South African/Chinese/other governments without being immediately labelled Anti-UK, Anti-Germany, Anti-French, ...

      But even hint that a particular thing might not be handled too well by either the US or Israeli governments, you're running the immediate danger of being labelled "Anti-American" or "Anti-semitic".

      Where's the culture of discussing arguments in those cases?

      And - what about Americans who disagree with what their own government does? Or those "Anti-American", too?

      To sum up: My question is more, why are we even giving the publicity to a guy going on how dangerous these Seti signals would be to us, while at the same time ignoring / blocking progress on issues that are more widely regarded as problematic? Aren't some people just losing their sense of priorities here?

    5. Re:Threats to earth? by HebrewToYou · · Score: 1

      There's a reason you were modded off-topic, Beh, and it wasn't because of your insight.

      Kyoto is a fucking joke, one that was designed to cripple the U.S. economy by allowing third-world countries to pollute to their heart's content. Instead, how about the world signs on to the ingenius notion of pollution credits. That way the free market can decide what is a cost-effective way of managing the environment.

      Allowing a multinational accord do that job is like letting France lecture folks on cultural integration...

      --
      I'm not popular enough to be different.

      Homer Simpson, The Simpsons

    6. Re:Threats to earth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope - under Kyoto, no country is permitted to pollute MORE; only pollution credits would allow for that (namely to the country buying the credits, while the country selling it would need to stay ahead of the game in order to HAVE credits to sell).

      But, right now the US oppose Kyoto because it would damage their economy to go and "clean up their act"; which is right, yes, it WILL cost money.

      On the other hand, if we had pollution trading, the US government would oppose it, because it would damage their economy if they had to buy the pollution credits from others.

      (besides, the nations here in Europe ARE signing up to the pollution credits scheme; and the US is distinctly staying out of that one, too).

      "Allowing a multinational accord do that job is like letting France lecture folks on cultural integration..."? ...or the US on justice and human rights (Guantanamo & Abu Graiph) or international law (invading Iraq)...

      My friend, there is no large nation left that still has a spotless white vest. None at all.

  91. Aliens with God-like Omniscience Go Cowtipping! by schmedley · · Score: 1

    See what happens when you mix tequila benders and cheesy movies like Independence Day?

    Because, you know, twenty million years ago when ET sent that virus radio signal, they just knew we'd be using Microsoft Windows XP SP2 with a graphics rendering engine vulnerability that would allow them to gain full remote code execution access if they merely exploited the distributed internet computing Seti-at-Home program. With this brilliant forsight, the ETs decided to cause widespread computing mayhem and thereby distrupt Christmas internet sales and harm the economy of an as yet non-existant species on a planet in the ass end of the galaxy twenty million years hence.

  92. All the more reason to close that analog hole by rhyre417 · · Score: 1

    The risk to national security pales compared to the risk to our emerging digital economy. Imagine the anti-DRM schemes these aliens must have. We must outlaw ALL A/D converters, 'open' radio receivers, and software defined radio research! If anyone converts those alien signals from analog to digital form, we're done for!

  93. Speed of light by Versalis · · Score: 1

    Facts:
    1) Radio signals are part of the elctromagnetic spectrum and travel at the speed of light.
    2) The nearest star (Proxima Centari) is 4.2 light years away.
    3) The Milky Way is about 100,000 light years across and we're near one edge (SETI is only really looking within the Milky Way, right?)

    So we're looking at signals ranging from 4.2 years old to 100,000 years old. But wait, they'd need to learn about our computer systems before they could write any malicious code: light/radio signals from earth need to reach them first. So, their viruses will have been written for system from 8.4 to 200,000 years old. Anyone out there running an 8 year old system is probably too frustrated with how slow it is already without running SETI@home on it. At the other end of this time-frame though... Has everyone updated their virus definitions on their abaci?

  94. Fermilab computer scientist here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to this guy's bio, he's retired.

    And with that, we can conclude he is crazy, as clearly evidenced by his outright ideas.

    (and yes, I actually work at Fermilab)

  95. I find this scenario ridiculous if not unlikely by rfc1394 · · Score: 1
    Even if the signals being sent were some form of computer virus, it must enter an executable state in order to be activated. A computer virus even stored on disc on a system cannot infect that system until it is placed into memory and executed. A computer virus, even if stored in memory cannot infect that system until it is executed. Only if it reaches an execution vector can it infect a system.

    Then, it must be capable of infecting the target system. A virus must be written for the target machine AND the target operating environment. A virus written for 80x86 (Pentium class) machines will do nothing on Apple computers, and vice versa. Even if it is written for the 80x86 series of machines, that's still not good enough. A virus written for 80x86 Windows cannot infect 80x86 Linux-based machines because the means to access the system is different for each. Nor is there a way for the program to query the operating system to find out which machine its on without faulting if it tries the wrong query.

    Further, infections generally are caused by

    • targeting the machine through backdoors in the operating system when a direct connection exists between the target and the host trying to infect it (This was the plot device used in the movie Independence Day, which for them to do it to us implies the extraterrestrials have an Internet connection.)
    • Creating an executable that is run directly (implying the ETs have a means to deliver a program such as on disk or downloadable from a website, again meaning they have an Internet connection.)
    • Creating a command stream or series of commands to trigger a buffer overflow which can have malicious code inserted. This requires intimate knowledge of the SETI scanning program and it would have to have such a vulnerability. I can't see any reason for a SETI program to have to scan a large command list and I can't see how an attacker would know the exact instruction set to use as well as the means to force the command stream.

    The possibility of a non-Terran (off-earth) extraterrestrial entity creating a virus that could infect Terran computers through SETI is essentially all but impossible. I don't know if the odds can be calculated but they are probably in the multi trillion-to-one against category. Virus must be specifically written for target environment and have correct instruction set, must target correct operating system, must have means to create execution vector to inject itself into target machine, must have access to means to trigger execution of vector. Unless all of those things happen the scenario is impossible. Thus the odds of this being a reality are so near zero as to be rounding error.

    Now, if you want to argue some malicious cracker on Terra might figure a way to do this, the odds are still low but you'll get no argument from me about that scenario being much more plausible (although still unlikely.)

    Paul Robinson

    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
  96. humm? by digitallysick · · Score: 0

    i am almost positive that we have communicated with other beings in the universe with seti, otherwise why would we contiune? I wonder what message we send with seti, or receive??

    1. Re:humm? by hammackj · · Score: 1

      I am betting it has something to do with viagra.

  97. My $0.02 by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1
    My view is that there is a much bigger risk than infection via computers.

    The search for SETI is what, sending out signals hoping for an answer? In essence we are jumping up and down saying "come meet us".

    I'd say that the greater threat would be of physical invasion of some kind. I know, the physics and astronomy types will point out that it is likely that any recipient will not be able to reach here without 100s of years of travel, but still.

    Think Columbus when he was investigating the Caribbean and meeting some American Indians. Suppose he had seen some kind of long-range smoke signals from, say, the Iriqois in NE US. Think he wouldn't have abandoned the Caribbean to seek out the new, more advanced makers of the long-range smoke signals? Whatever Columbus' goals, his followers ended up decimating the Amercian Indians and conquering two whole continents of people.

    Even if the first contact was made with us from freindship seeking extraterrestrials, those that follow might not be so benevolent.

    I'm not too paranoid about this, I'm not against the search for SETI programs. It just seems to me that we're acting very foolish. My idea would be to have a two-pronged program. (1) Push development of passive listening and other searching capability to look for evidence of others and (2) Push development of ways to camaflage our presence and apparent level of technological development. If it turns out that other life exists and is no threat to us, is so advanced it doesn't care about us, is truly freindly, etc. then it won't matter our precautions. If it turns out that life exists and is not so benevolent, then the precautions will not have been in vain.

    This seems only prudent from a military and security standpoint. Honestly, I'm surprised there isn't somewhat of a movement against the search for SETI for this very reason. I guess most people just don't think there is any other life out there.

  98. How would they figure out what to do? by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

    My first question to him would be: how do you figure ETs far enough away to need to infect us via SETI signals would figure out what they needed to put in to actually infect our computers? They'd need to know what software we were using, what hardware we were using, what instruction set to use in their code. How are they going to figure all that out from dozens or hundreds of light-years away? And if they're actually here, close enough to monitor our networks and figure out all they'd need to have figured out, why not bypass SETI entirely and just attack directly through our networks themselves? And finally, how are they supposed to have kept up with lag? The nearest star they could be attacking from is 4.3 light-years away. Assuming they can analyze signals and determine attack vectors instantly, that means any attack that gets back to us is going to be targeted at what we were using 8 and a half years ago. How likely is that to work against more modern systems?

    I think the guy may have a Ph.D., but he's not thinking at all about some of the practical aspects.

    1. Re:How would they figure out what to do? by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      I think the guy may have a Ph.D., but he's not thinking at all about some of the practical aspects.

      Look at someone like James Dobson. Got a PsyD or PhD. Likes to go by Dr. Dobson because people are wowed by that shit.

      Anyway, Dobson is one of the stupidest motherfuckers alive and people eat that shit up. I know you know this, but it's worth repeating: if some fucknut like Dobson can get an advanced degree, it diminishes advanced degrees everywhere. PhDs are stupid people who get shit on their hands when they wipe, too.

  99. Book by metamatic · · Score: 1

    For a good exploration of this scenario, read His Master's Voice by Stanislaw Lem.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  100. Intelligent life is abundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the claim that intelligent life is present abundantly, I can only assume that SETI has already been hacked and extra terrestial malware is jamming the signal detection software of SETI to mask their existence. We are too late...

  101. Intergalactic Investment Opportunity! by SB9876 · · Score: 4, Funny

    DEAR SIR,

        CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS PROPOSAL

    HAVING CONSULTED WITH MY COLLEAGUES AND BASED ON THE INFORMATION GATHERED FROM THE CENTAURI CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, I HAVE THE PRIVILEGE TO REQUEST FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE TO TRANSFER THE SUM OF #47,500,000.00 (FORTY SEVEN MILLION, FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND GEESAK COMMONWEALTH GOLTONS) INTO YOUR ACCOUNTS. THE ABOVE SUM RESULTED FROM AN OVER-INVOICED CONTRACT, EXECUTED COMMISSIONED AND PAID FOR ABOUT FIVE YEARS (5) AGO BY A INTERSTELLAR CONTRACTOR. THIS ACTION WAS HOWEVER INTENTIONAL AND SINCE THEN THE FUND HAS BEEN IN A SUSPENSE ACCOUNT AT THE CENTRAL BANK OF CENTAURI APEX BANK...

  102. This is just silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The alien race would have to be advanced enough to predict, with perfect accuracy (a) how our whole computer infrastructure works and (b) how the software used to interpret their signals works fifty years before we could even conceive of the technology used to do a and b. Finally, they would have to know that we would be listening to signals from space trying to interpret them.

    If this race of malevolent aliens could do this, why would they bother with us? I'm not saying aliens that advanced couldn't be malevolent enough to do that, but it would be beneath them, it would be like spending resources to predict where ants were going to travel next, and then putting bad food out for them, just to watch them wriggle. I'm intelligent enough to do that, but because I'm intelligent enough to do that, I've got better things to do with my time.

  103. Well ET did it.... by design+by+michael · · Score: 1

    If ET can hack a speak-n-spell, who's to say he couldn't hack a data the SETI server or data stream. ;-)

    --
    401 - Attention span not found
  104. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows is God's fault! Wait a minute, that would mean God makes mistakes. Which would make him not ... ooops.

    1. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be that Windows is the work of the Devil, but we already knew that.

  105. Most wrong about "Independence Day" by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    Everyone gets it wrong about "Independence Day" and the plausibility of them injecting a computer virus into the Alien's mainframe. When Dr. Brackish Okun (Brent Spiner) talks about the alien craft they found 50 years ago, he say's "We haven't been able to get anything to work, except the computer" They had 50 years to study the computer and figure it out, not several days for David Levinson (Jeff Goldblum)to craft a virus on his Macintosh laptop. Now, whether 50 years is enough time to understand a fully alien instruction set is debatable, but it is plausible.

    People assume that the aliens are all supersmart and understand their systems. It's possible that they bought everything from the lowest bidder and don't understand it anymore than Alf understood his spaceship. "I don't know how it works, I just turn the key and it goes." If their purchase/upgrade cycle is > 50 years, they may indeed have exploitable holes in their OS.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  106. This isn't a movie plot - it's a 1961 TV plot! by Big+Nemo+'60 · · Score: 1

    Fred Hoyle & John Elliot's "A for Andromeda" (IMDB link)

    (be warned, contains spoilers...)

    And let me say, it was *better* than most sci-fi you get on TV nowadays!

    --
    In the long run we are all dead. - John Maynard Keynes (1883 - 1946)
    1. Re:This isn't a movie plot - it's a 1961 TV plot! by beamjockey · · Score: 1


      Well, yeah, but if you look at Richard Carrigan's paper, he does cite Hoyle & Elliot's novel *A for Andromeda* as a reference. He also cites a novel he co-authored with his wife Nancy in 1970 *The Siren Stars*, which has a similar premise (SETI signal turns out to have inimical influence on Earth scientists).

      So he's not claiming it's an utterly original idea. Just that it might be time to consider its technical aspects.

  107. I for one... by Imsdal · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our new SETI-hacking overlords.

  108. Somebody read Snow Crash and took it too seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Neal Stephenson is a very good writer of science fiction, but in the case of the metavirus from outer space, the emphasis is on the word "fiction", not the word "science".

  109. Vogan attack? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    It seems we're still looking for intelligent life on Earth? Doh, we're supposed to check a signal for a threat before we know the signal exists? That's really bright. Almost as bright is that he thinks there are aliens intelligent enough to be a security risk to our mish-mash of computer technologies they've not had a chance to study (if they've had a chance then we have bigger problems) AND he thinks we can somehow stop them from attacking our network by plugging a copy of Norton somewhere in the system? Brilliant.

    I for one won't be afraid until a strange multi-dimensional bird shows up in my mail box.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  110. Gawd people are dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to help ET, I will begin broadcasting all of the technical specs that describe the x86 and x86-64 processors out into space. Hopefully by time they receive the specs, create a virus, send it, and we receive it, we should have standardized on a single instruction set. As an added advantage for ET, I will also send Aleph One's buffer overflow document so they know how to exploit our machines.

    Back to reality, ET probably has the hookup on some good snow crash. That's what we need to worry about.

  111. the listeners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its a book by james gunn that predicts the creation of SETI. here's an interview

    -- no karma, no whore

  112. Hollywood + politics = stupid by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    This guy has seen too many movies in which humans and aliens run the same CPU architecture and operating system. And shouldn't anyone nerdy enough to write about SETI know better?

  113. Re:Most wrong about "Independence Day" by hammackj · · Score: 1

    In the future everyone uses OSX, like they use windows now. After the great SCO wars there was nothing else to use.

  114. All Hail to our Alien Masters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Hail to our Alien Masters

  115. SETI != CETI by gxv · · Score: 1

    In case you don't know SETI stands for The Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence.

    From http://www.seti.org/site/lookup.asp?c=ktJ2J9MMIsE& b=179295 It is a passive experiment, designed only to look for signals, not to send them. However, humankind has been unintentionally transmitting signals into space - primarily high-frequency radio, television, and radar - for more than fifty years. Our earliest TV broadcasts have reached several thousand nearby stars, although any alien viewers would have to build a very large antenna (thousands of acres in size) to detect them.

    The project that could be risky is CETI - Communication with ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence. Unlike SETI, which is a passive, listening pursuit, CETI attempts to initiate a dialogue with intelligent extraterrestrials. It does this by actively sending out coded signals at specific target stars, star clusters, or galaxies.

  116. That guy is an idiot. by sumday · · Score: 1

    Since when does SETI do anything apart from analyse the signals it gathers? And (correct me if i'm wrong) but those signals arn't even binary. they have to go through an analogue-digital conversion before we can even analyse them. which puts them into a completely safe(non-executable) format. right? right? Or am i the idiot?

    --
    sudo killall humans
  117. Assuming their motivations by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Your arguement assumes that aliens would even think like us and be emotionally driven by the same motivations, if they even had anything resembling our emotions. Our desire to be malicious is driven by a need to feel powerful, there is no reason to assume they'd have any such need.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Assuming their motivations by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Your arguement assumes that aliens would even think like us and be emotionally driven by the same motivations, if they even had anything resembling our emotions. Our desire to be malicious is driven by a need to feel powerful, there is no reason to assume they'd have any such need.

      The need to feel powerful or in control derives directly from the survival instinct. Unless the aliens are some sort of multi-dimensional immortals, I think it highly likely they would have a survival instinct as well.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Assuming their motivations by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      That doesn't automatically lead to malicious behavior. If they are very advanced they may have lost any need to feel powerful just as (most) people give up childish behavior as they grow up.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:Assuming their motivations by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Our own civilization shows every evidence that this is not the case, that there will always be power hungry people who will take advantage of their ability to yammer and get you to follow them.

      I.e. it's not evolving out of society.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:Assuming their motivations by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      just as (most) people give up childish behavior as they grow up.

      Have you ever left the confines of your mother's basement?

      I, like most here, work in an office. And let me tell you, virtually none of the so-called adults I work with have given up childish behavior. The only difference is the stakes are higher.

    5. Re:Assuming their motivations by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "Have you ever left the confines of your mother's basement?"

      I guess you've proved your own point when it comes to childish behavior.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Assuming their motivations by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "Our own civilization"

      You can't automatically apply this to a alien life form that is very likely to be biologically, environmentally, technologically, and evolutionarily 100% distinct from us. That is huge leap of logic. You might as well assume that crabs like to eat the same food you do.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    7. Re:Assuming their motivations by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      I guess you've proved your own point when it comes to childish behavior.

      It was a joke, not a personal attack. The idea of a stereotypical slashdotter living in his mother's basement is prevalent in half the threads here. You've been around long enough to know that, so I can only guess you were trolling.

      You win, here's your response, I hope it was entertaining. :)

    8. Re:Assuming their motivations by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      You can't automatically apply this to a alien life form that is very likely to be biologically, environmentally, technologically, and evolutionarily 100% distinct from us.

      Can you substantiate this assertion? There is more evidence to support the theory that they are lifeforms like us (i.e. we are an example of such a lifeform) than the theory that they are "100% distinct from us" (i.e. no example even approaching that).

      That is huge leap of logic.

      Not nearly as huge as yours!

      You might as well assume that crabs like to eat the same food you do.

      Crabs will eat absolutely anything, so such an assumption would actually be correct.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  118. Mission accomplished by kylant · · Score: 1

    If SETI was infected by an alien virus - wouldn't that be a success on all accounts for SETI? The purpose of SETI is to discover extra terrestial intelligence. Being destroyed by something usually includes to "discover" it... Kylant

  119. its only a matter of time by click2005 · · Score: 1


    1. Someone will release an alien-proof firewall endorsed by god.
    2. Flying Spagetti Monster releases an open source firewall.
    3. The Babel fish is called in to give evidence in the patent dispute.

    --
    I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
  120. No instruction set to decode by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
    A self-assembling virus is as likely to infect your brain as your computer. Either is so unlikely that it's not worth consideration.

    Rather, any extraterrestrial easter-egg would come with instructions for building the machine on which it would execute, and would bait people into building it with promises of an oracle of extraterrestrial knowledge.

    Since we have yet to recieve the first bit of data from an extraterrestrial intelligence, I'm not going to worry about that.

    Bruce

  121. We have to remember that ... by john83 · · Score: 0

    ... the probability of this happening is very high. According to Colvard's Logical Premise, it's 50%. The people need to be warned!

    Really, how can some smart enough to be in this guy's position really think that? I'm not going to pick his idea apart - it's already been done dozens of times above, but at what point do you just get a big stick and say, "Down mad scientist, down," in your sternest voice?

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  122. Fear the evil alien lawyers.... by jesterpilot · · Score: 1

    who will sue us for stealing their client's content and distributing it illegally by P2P-networks...

    --
    Trust me, I work for the government.
  123. Why don't we block their ports? by fbonnet · · Score: 1

    Just pass a law to restrict ET sites to certain TCP/IP ports, then all we have to do is firewall them. Problem solved, thank you Mr. Yarro!

  124. But according to Jeff Goldblum... by infinite9 · · Score: 1

    And hence it's natural that their Intelligent Design also led them to having Windows

    But we all learned from Jeff Goldblum that the aliens are using OSX, since he was able to use his mac to upload a virus.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    1. Re:But according to Jeff Goldblum... by Mike+Peel · · Score: 1

      Ah, but macs can connect to anything.

      As long as it's a computer. And has alternative connection methods than floppy disks, or serial, or...

    2. Re:But according to Jeff Goldblum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was OS 8, and a Powerbook 5300.

  125. Wow, just wow. by andreyw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The author of TFA clearly neither has a clue about SETI, nor about computers.

    Malicious signal carrying malicious data? The best SETI can hope to "detect" is a short burst of CW, a narrowband signal. That's like detecting someone talking but not actually hearing any of the talking.

    Never minding the whole "aliens hacking our boxen without knowing how they work". I bet this dude takes ``Independence Day'' as a plausible scenario too. What a tool.

  126. What OS do they run by boltaron_bill · · Score: 1

    Think aliens run windows or linux. they would have to download the correct version to get it run on thier DELL

    --
    Don't hate me because i'm windows....
  127. Wow ET uses by dalek_killer · · Score: 1

    I didn't know that ET was using the same computer systems that we use. Oh dear were all doomed, at least untell we give them a cold.

  128. DMCA by kmahan · · Score: 1

    Won't the DMCA prevent this?

    If they actually DID take over our machines we'd be able to sue them. I'd welcome the hack just to give the RIAA/MPAA someone else to sue.

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
  129. Totally Agree He is out of his mind by boltaron_bill · · Score: 1

    Lets think real hard on this. Even IF ET was able to decode all the hardware/software of today create a virus and send it back in a quick enough time frame that it WAS able to infect comptuters. WHY WOULD THEY? These are aliens WAY ahead of us technologically. Would the "et loves you" virus be the biggest threat they could offer us? Oh no they crashed my email server sound a heck of a lot better to me than Oh no they sent a REAL virus to our planet and killed everyone.

    --
    Don't hate me because i'm windows....
  130. Ludicrous... by NardofDoom · · Score: 0, Troll
    Okay, an ET would have to get a copy of the SETI@Home software to figure out how to hack it. To do that, they'd have to come to Earth and download it. Now, there are trillions of tons of material in outer space, all the same as the stuff here on earth. If an alien intelligence has the ability to cross light years of space, why would they need to land on our planet to infect us with a virus to take out our defenses when they could just as easily land on Mars, Europa, Titan, and any number of asteroids and Kuiper belt objects to get the same stuff, without all the hassle of hacking our systems and fighting a war? If they can travel through space, they'll probably find other worlds just like ours, but not crawling with apes that think they know everything.

    We need to get one thing through our thick, ape-like skulls: We are not special. We're just a very specific combination of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen (and other stuff) that can be worried about invasions from outer space.

    A long time ago, the prevailing theory was that the Earth was the center of the universe. Now we know that we're not physically the center of the universe, just a mediocre planet circling a mediocre star in a mediocre galaxy. We just need to learn that we're also not the intellectual center of the universe.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  131. These aliens must be damned clever by lxs · · Score: 1

    Say the signal travels for 20 years through space, (if the are fairly close to earth) and they have an information lag on earth history of 20 years, so these aliens had to precisely predict on information from 1965 what kind of computer we would build yesterday to hold the data...

    Unless they have time machines, this strikes me as highly unlikely.

  132. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a new zombie network for extraterrestrial prOn!

    just imagine the spam:
    eNl@rge YoUr tEnt@cl3s

    on the other hand it won't be long until some africans send them new opportunities to become rich.

    I think it would be fair.

  133. Probability -- so misunderstood by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 1
    most likely lots of virus code has already been processed because random noise will eventually produce every virus, just like monkeys and keyboards will produce Shakespeare...

    Monkeys and Typewriters aren't likely to produce anything meaningful at all in an information space as sparsely populated as that of "functional computer programs" and "meaningful language". Important disclosure: before you go clicking on that link, be aware that the conclusion of the article is supportive of creationism. The guts of the article is pure mathematics disguised as humour, but I know how touchy the average Slashdotter is about creationists, so don't say I tried to preach at you.

    There are quite a few other probability-related articles on Nutters, such as Monkeys and the Lottery , Proverbial Probability Problems , and What a coincidence! .

    --
    proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
  134. I guess you never know... by TheIndifferentiate · · Score: 1

    William Gibson gave me goosebumps in Neuromancer with something along these lines (don't want to completely spoil it for anyone). Who knows what kinda binary garbage we are spouting out there that another species could pick up. NASA shoots programs to its probes all over the place. That stuff could be intercepted and analyzed. So could some of the actual hardware itself. That stuff gets lost/abandoned all the time. I think the odds are very remote that anything sinister could happen to us, but the guy in TFA has a point, and it would not be impossible for some alien species who may already be in this neck of the woods to access our hardware/software, grok it and infiltrate our systems.

  135. Radio SETI is an obsolete concept by bradbury · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As suggested in this paper "Galactic Gradients, Postbiological Evolution and the Apparent Failure of SETI" there are unlikely to be any really advanced civilizations in our galactic vicinity. As pointed out in Ray Kurzweil's recent The Singularity is Near civilizations advance very rapidly (within decades) from our current state to an extremely advanced state we only barely envision. One doesn't communicate (by radio -- or perhaps at all[!]) across interstellar distances because the bandwidth is too low for the information content and thought capacity of advanced civilizations. So the probabilities are that most, if not all, civilizations which are capable of listening to us are thousands of light years away and they have no reason to infect us because it serves no useful purpose. (One would presume that "script kiddies" don't exist in advanced civilizations.)

    It is a highly anthropomorphic point of view that traditional space colonization or info-colonization are the paths that will be taken by advanced civilizations. These are concepts based on the relatively limited perspective of a few thousand years of human civilization and even shorter periods of infotech environments. It seems (to me) much more likely that advanced civilizations will replicate through a process similar to the self-replication process one sees in single cells (e.g. bacteria) and not the infectious parasite process one sees with viruses. The problem is that self-replication of advanced civilizations requires extremely close encounters between the developed resource (presumably a solar system, mega-ship or mega-intelligence like a Matrioshka Brain) with a resource of similar or greater mass & energy capacity. Such a resource should be largely undeveloped (like our solar system but much more likely regions of space where new stars are being created). This allows for self-replication over sub-light-year distances. Given the high energy/mass cost of navigating entire solar systems or mega-ships/intelligences as well as the common trajectories of natural objects in our galaxy such "close encounters" are very infrequent (occuring only over millions to billions of years).

    (And for those of you who doubt navigating solar systems is feasible you need to go read related papers by Dyson or Criswell.)

    1. Re:Radio SETI is an obsolete concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just made that up along with the wiki. Clever, clever, clever.

    2. Re:Radio SETI is an obsolete concept by bradbury · · Score: 1

      Actually no... I haven't touched the Wiki page on Matrioshka Brains (though I might well add some things to it in the future). What is on Wiki today (28 Nov 2005) is entirely the product of others who are familiar with the concepts. I was unfamiliar that the Matrioshka Brain concept had even been mentioned by Charlie Stross and Ray Kurzweil in their recent books until I read about it on /. or in the books themselves.

      A good idea doesn't require the inventor to sell it (much) :-).

      For the record, when the Matrioshka Brain Home Page and related documents were up (as they were for the past several years and will be again shortly) they were frequently requested. The home page alone normally got 400-600 hits a month. The month it was /.'ed that grew to over 10,000 hits. These aren't exactly "unknown" concepts.

  136. Dear SETI employee. by Alvaradolol · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am Mr. Glorsoid The manager, Bills and exchange At the foreign remittance department of the Martian International bank plc. I am writing this letter to Ask for your support and cooperation to carry out this business opportunity in my department. We discovered an abandoned sum of $15,000,000.00 (fifteen million United States dollars only) in an account that belongs to one of our foreign customers who died along with his entire family of a wife and two children in November 1997 in a saucer crash. Since we heard of his Death, We have been expecting his next of kin to come over and put claims for his money as the Heir. Unfortunately, neither their family member nor distant relative has ever appeared to claim the said Fund. Upon this discovery, I and other officials in my Department have agreed to make business with you and release the total amount into your account as the Heir. Please return an e-mail that encloses your private contact telephone Number, fax number full name and address and your designated bank coordinates to enable us file letter of claim to the appropriate departments for necessary Approvals before the transfer can be made. Note also, this transaction must be kept strictly confidential because of its nature, I look forward to receiving Your prompt response. Regards, Mr. Glorsoid

  137. Why would would alien's be malevolent? by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 0

    It makes no sense except to fill a Hollywood plot that alien's would be evil, malevolent creatures bent on distruction or take over of our planet.

    First of all, this idea suggests that there is already a very advanced race of alien's out their that have grown tired of exploration and research and just bent on harvesting resources from other worlds or simply bored and looking to destroy as many worlds as possible.

    From what we have been made aware of, through Seti and astro physics is that life on other planets so far is unique to only our own, and even if there is life on other plants, it is extremely rare.

    Why then would an alien race even consider the destruction of another planet? I think any significantly advanced race of aliens capable of interstellar travel would enjoy meeting another race and working in cooperation to help both of us improve our view of the rarity of life in our universe.

    It would be far different if we have ample and obvious proof that life existed on other planets. If we could hear alien signals, or could easily assertain that life widely existed in other solar systems then I would be fearful. Like in any culture or species on Earth, once land or resources run out, it is typical for the dominant species to aggresively seek out more space or more resources. I could then very easily see an alien race, filling their homeworld to maximum population and straining their supply of essential resources, striking out and taking over another world out of despiration.

    This isn't the case. As far as we can tell, we are singular in the universe, but even if not the case, there is no suggestion that an alien world would seek out to destroy us.

    Secondly, the idea that aliens could simply write a computer virus that would take out our technology is ludicrous. How would they have any understanding of our computer technology to write an effective virus? Viruses work because they emulate software and are executable by computers. Alien's couldn't just write any software, they would have to know how our programs work in order to make an effective virus. If order to do that, they would either already have to be on our planet, or near enough to capture wireless transmissions. If that were the case, then there are easier ways to sabotage or destroy our population then sending a virus to take down our internet.

    Ideas of beaming viruii to destroy our technology and Internet are just crazy Hollywood ideas. Its not even an original plot, any "scientist" claiming that this is a serious issue isn't worth his weight in popcorn.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  138. Yeah! by hummassa · · Score: 1

    and then they all unleash their weapons and only true pan-breeds like myself will survive (white, black, yellow, red -- take your pick, I have it in my family)
    THAT would be nice, because it would be _far_ more difficult to have prejudices based on any appearance trait :-)

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  139. In A.D. 2101, war was beginning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happen?

    Somebody set us up the bomb.

    We get signal.

    What!

    Main screen turn on.

    It's you!!

    How are you gentlemen!!

    1. Re:In A.D. 2101, war was beginning. by Locke03 · · Score: 1

      All your network are belong to us!

      --
      I don't care what youre doing so much as the idiotic way you're doing it.
  140. A Day in the Strife by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ivanova: How much time?

    Corwin: Three minutes!

    Ivanova: Standing by to transmit.

    Sheridan [troubled]: Commander --- the message we got from the probe. What did it promise if we did give all the right answers?

    Ivanova: Advanced tech, mainly. Medical information, cures for disease, new jumpgate technology.

    Sheridan: But it never gave you the name of the race or where it's from?

    Ivanova: I assume we get that information once we pass the test.

    Corwin: Two minutes!

    Ivanova: Okay, here we go!

    Sheridan: No, wait! [Everyone turns to stare.] There's something about this that has been bothering me ever since they made contact! We have been operating under the assumption that whoever sent the probe is deciding whether or not a sentient race is fit to survive based on what they know at the moment of contact. But if that's true, why give them a leg up on more advanced technologies?

    Ivanova: Maybe they were feeling generous!

    Sheridan: No, if they were feeling generous, they wouldn't be wiping out inferior races based on lack of advancement. No, I don't like it!

    Ivanova: Captain, we're down to one minute! I don't see any other options here!

    Sheridan: What if it's a berserker --- a probe sent out to find life forms advanced enough to pose a threat to the race that created it? It sends a list of questions backed by a threat. If it gets the right answers back, that proves a certain level of technological advancement, then boom ! You wipe out a potential enemy without leaving any trace of where you came from!

    Ivanova: Or it could be exactly what it said! Fifteen seconds, Captain! Send or no send?

    Sheridan: No send!

    Ivanova: Oh, boy!

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:A Day in the Strife by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Boy i sure wish i had mod points now. I would have modded you Insightful.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:A Day in the Strife by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

      Because posting excerpts from sci-fi shows is insightful... Riiiight.

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    3. Re:A Day in the Strife by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Why bother differentiating? Why not just torch any civilization they come across?

      If the other guys are good, nothing to worry about.

      If they're bad:

      1. Other good guys frighten them, and need to be exterminated
      2. Other bad guys frighten them, and need to be exterminated

      Why differentiate based on level of tech? All you're doing is taking a risk by putting off the inevitable conflict.

      The only reasonable possibility is that they're bad guys, and are afraid of others, good or bad, who are ahed of them technologically, because an attack might very well fail, so why try? But if that's the case, and they determine they are lagging behind the civ. they just discovered, then they would also realize the handwriting is on the wall for inevitable conflict vs. a superior new foe, good or bad.

      So again, why differentiate if they are evil?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:A Day in the Strife by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Nice excerpt from Babylon 5.

    5. Re:A Day in the Strife by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Because posting excerpts from sci-fi shows is insightful... Riiiight.

      Apparently so, though I have disagreed with such moderation before. I do appreciate freedom_india's gesture, however.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    6. Re:A Day in the Strife by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I figure any interstellar travel would be so resource intensive, that it would make the Galcticus routine manditory. If they aren't ready, willing and able to suck the life out of any solar system they come across, they wouldn't make it here.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  141. too much Sci Fi by idlake · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Richard Carrigan, a particle physicist at the US Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois

    The notion that a SETI signal needs to be "decontaminated" is plausible only to people who watch too much Independence Day or Star Trek(where the most implausible feature, contrary to popular opinion, is not FTL travel, but the fact that all the computer systems in the galaxy seem to be more or less compatible).

    To put it bluntly: there is no way in hell that a SETI signal is going to infect anything.

    Even if it did, what would it do? Transfer thousands of dollars to Alpha Centauri? Dial galactic 1-900 numbers? Cause vacation snapshots to be transmitted via Arecibo into space? Cause Windows machines to reboot all over the nation? Kill us all by finally revealing in public Monty Python's killer joke?

    What I can't figure out is whether Carrigan is merely incredibly stupid, or whether he knows that his statements are nonsense and is opportunistic. Is he perhaps annoyed at the success of efforts like SETI and wants to create FUD? Is he trying to kill funding for other branches of physics? Or is he trying to get funding for his own pet project? My money is still on "stupid and arrogant", but I'm willing to be convinced of the other possibility.

    1. Re:too much Sci Fi by ccp · · Score: 1

      Even if it did, what would it do? Transfer thousands of dollars to Alpha Centauri? Dial galactic 1-900 numbers? Cause vacation snapshots to be transmitted via Arecibo into space?

      Or the Goatse guy?

      I'm afraid the next UFO abductees would be in for a surprise.

      Cheers,

  142. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  143. In the other news... by porneL · · Score: 1

    Canada bans SETI in preparation for Intergalactic War.

  144. What will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientist: "Sir, we've got a signal!"

    General: "Put it up on screen!"

    Screen: "MZ... This program cannot be run in DOS mode..."

    General: "Execute it!"

    Scientist: "But sir! We haven't run NAV LiveUpdate for a while!"

    General: "That's an order!"

  145. It doesn't have to be a computer virus... by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...it could be a virus for he human brain. An intelligent alien species could reverse engineer the human brain and try to figure out the right 'buttons' to push to make us engage in various types of behavior. Essentially they'd have to use the fact that the human brain isn't a perfect processing machine. For example there are optical illusions which make us see things that aren't really there at all. Similarly there might be thought illusions that arise the moment we are tricked into thinking about certain things. The 'virus' might look like the most innocuous thing but if it had the right triggers embedded in it then it might make humans perform certain prescribed actions that would look completely irrational to those uninfected.

    It's hard to predict the form that such a 'virus' might take. Just making up random stuff off the top of my head: they could leave us a story about such irrelevant subjects like the history of an ancient tribe lost in some desert for 40 years but as a result of reading this story the readers' beheviour might be irrevocably changed so that they are no longer capable of understanding basic biology. You simply wouldn't be able to tell merely by skimming the subject matter as the effect would be embedded within hidden triggers. By leaving enough of these subtle 'viruses' spread out through our culture they could bring our civilization to its knees without us even realizing that we've been the victim of alien attack.

    1. Re:It doesn't have to be a computer virus... by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      ...it could be a virus for he human brain. An intelligent alien species could reverse engineer the human brain and try to figure out the right 'buttons' to push to make us engage in various types of behavior. Essentially they'd have to use the fact that the human brain isn't a perfect processing machine. For example there are optical illusions which make us see things that aren't really there at all. Similarly there might be thought illusions that arise the moment we are tricked into thinking about certain things. The 'virus' might look like the most innocuous thing but if it had the right triggers embedded in it then it might make humans perform certain prescribed actions that would look completely irrational to those uninfected.
      That's already been done ...

      it's called TV

    2. Re:It doesn't have to be a computer virus... by Harv · · Score: 1

      I think the threat is probably a lot closer. The mother ship is probably in orbit out around Jupiter now, and has been there for a while... but the advance group is already on Earth. They're capitalists and have started several companies already. Some, like Google, are doing quite well, as a matter of fact. Some of their earlier efforts, such as Michael Jackson, started strong but then failed miserably.

    3. Re:It doesn't have to be a computer virus... by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 1

      Yes. The truth is revealed in this if you haven't already seen it.

    4. Re:It doesn't have to be a computer virus... by ibarrac · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Here is a mind virus kit with all the triggers:

      BEGIN VIRUS
      1. There is an all-seeing all-powerful invisible being that made everything.


      2. This being hereby offers to eliminate the thing you fear the most (death) and provide eternal satisfaction of the needs that your genes have wired you to want, but only if you behave according to his program (which follows).


      3. The being promises eternal pain if you don't behave according to his program (which follows).


      4. [insert program]


      5. The being requires you to spread this virus, either through persuasion, bribery, missionary action, or conquest. Also, he requires immunity to other competing viruses (they are all false) and to erasure.


      END VIRUS

    5. Re:It doesn't have to be a computer virus... by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 1

      I guess the 'desert tribe' and 'biology' reference was too obscure for some people...

  146. social engineering, not viruses by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    The problem with ET signals is not viruses. It is impossible for SETI signals to purposely infect a terrestrial computer system--our systems are just too primitive for that--and no level of technical advancement on their part will fix that.

    The real problem with ET signals is social engineering. That is, ETs constructing a message to us telling us to build something that we think is beneficial but that is actually harmful. Why would they do that? Maybe as a cosmic practical joke, who knows. Those scenarios have been explored at length in science fiction.

  147. Too much scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone has watched independance day too many times

  148. The ETs would sue us by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

    For copyright violation when recording their broadcast flagged emissions.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  149. Real Risky by Corey+Hart · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Real Risk of SETI and the Earth Radiowaves is that when the big-friendly alien signal comes, it hits a nice EM frequency that effectively nukes all of us?

    Note that the signal wave would need to be strong enough to get to Earth and that the alien make-up might be very different than that in our cell/neuclear material...

    --
    ..bright screens for bright people, but now I've got to wear sunglassess.
  150. A Fire Upon the Deep by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Is an excellent book by Vernor Vinge which has some nods in this direction, but it's science fiction... I think the odds of this are about zero unless our understanding of physics is even more pathetic than it probably is...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  151. Why would they want to? by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    This article strikes me as having the same sort of human-centric hubris as the folks who think aliens have some urgent need to abduct hicks from the American backwoods. Why on earth (or off it) would they bother hacking our primitive, barely connected, slow-as-treacle, uninteresting computers?

    If are any worthwhile long-range hacks to be made upon the unsuspecting people of earth, they're memetic.

  152. Let us suppose... by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

    That I am a malicious hacker and I want to take over the computers of some unknown civilisation which may come to exist on a planet hundreds of lightyears away long after I am dead.

    The algorithm goes like this:

    1. Compute all the viable possible encodings of all the valid possible instruction sets of all the possible processors;
    2. For each processor, compute all the possible system architectures and operating systems;
    3. For each encoding of each instruction set for each processor, for each architecture for that processor, for each operating system for that architecture, encode a piece of malicious code which would overcome all the possible security precautions of that operating environment;
    4. For each piece of malicious code, embed it in a stream of data which will do the equivalent of overflowing buffers (assuming this is possible) on that operating system so as inject the code into the processors instruction stream...
    5. And then pump all this data out with a powerful enough transmitter at a sufficiently low data rate to be successfully received across the width of an average sized galaxy.

    Now, even supposing this were possible (and it seems to me that the size of the data set you'd generate would be up about the region of aleph four), and supposing (say) the Intel 86x processor family continues to be used for a thousand years, and that (say) Linux 2.4.21 continues to be used on those processors for the whole of that time, and that BOINC 5.2.8 continues to be used on that operating system kernel for the whole of that time, what are the chances of

    1. The part of the data stream designed to infect BOINC 5.2.8 on Linux 2.4.21 on Intel x86 arriving at Planet Earth in that period, and
    2. The whole of that part of the data stream being passed to a single client machine to process?

    To express this as a business plan

    1. Perform infeasibly complex calculation
    2. Generate an infinite amount of data
    3. Lock up enormously powerful transmitter for the lifetime of several universes
    4. wait
    5. wait
    6. die
    7. wait some more
    8. at chances of several billion to one against, actually succeed in infecting an alien computer several hundred light years away
    9. wait
    10. wait
    11. wait
    12. never actually get a return signal
    13. ???
    14. profit

    Only a culture with precisely zero mathematical understanding could possibly imagine this being a risk.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  153. what about phishing greys by snugge · · Score: 0

    Ugent Greeting

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    I greet you in the name of our lord . My name is Mrs Quuxforbz Foooxbar. I am a widow and a mother of three all girls.....

  154. [ot] suicide? by wild_berry · · Score: 1

    I've already drowned, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:[ot] suicide? by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      CowboyNeal stole my global warming

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
  155. Particle Physicists on Security? Hah. by Garridan · · Score: 1

    Ok. Clearly, this guy has some valid concerns about aliens either being malicious, or unintentionally harmful to us -- like Europeans trading blankets to the american aboriginals.

    And clearly, he has zero knowledge of signal processing. The signals we pick up and pass into SETI are collected and chopped up and dumped into packets. These packets have headers. If the packet headers are corrupted, they can cause buffer overruns which can lead to arbitrary code execution. But... we craft the headers.

    For the aliens to "infect" us, there would have to be earth-side interference, in the form of a maliciously altered header, a transmission error due to a faulty router or bug in code. The probability of this occuring cotemporaneous to an evil alien supervirus signal is so negligable, I had trouble not falling out of my seat when I read the article.

  156. Can I be the first... by wfWebber · · Score: 1

    To welcome our 1447 hackzor-space-alien-overlords? Or did my firewall scare them off?

    --
    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
  157. We don't like your kind here... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    STFU, carbonoid!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  158. Katrina - an INTERGALACTIC PEARL HARBOR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, you probably don't even think it strange that there were three alien invasion series running simultaneously. You probably think it mere coincidence that Invasion took place in the aftermath of a hurricane. Do you think FEMA is really that inept at providing aid? They were more concerned with quarentining the area to keep the aliens from escaping.

  159. universal 'sploits? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Do von Neumann machines suffer from buffer overruns?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  160. frog eggs by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    That's how the guy selling "random numbers" got into trouble in "His Master's Voice" (I have my suspicions about whether pothead Carl had read this before writng "Contact".)


    SUN : The signal is the alien.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  161. Technology disparity by jabelar · · Score: 1

    The chances of an extraterrestial civilization being within 20 years of technology development is very slim -- it is likely there will be a huge technical disparity, probably in favor of the ETs. Look at the difference in technology between us and our own societies 50 years ago. Especially considering the fact the ETs would have figured out how to traverse large distances in space, you can assume they'd trounce us technologically. Our best hope is that they will consider us unintelligent, unattractive and inedible, and leave us alone!

    1. Re:Technology disparity by moving_comfort · · Score: 1
      Good point... And not only would it be extremly unlikely that we're at the same technological level, it would be unlikely that we'd even be at the same point in our evolutionary cycles - their species could have evolved into something with a pretty expanded intellect. Us to chimps, in other words.

      We, on the other hand, can almost still smell the mammoth shit. We're evolutionary babies. It's almost a given that any contact would show a huge intellectual disparity in their favor, with us having no hope of catching up without evolving.

  162. Oh noes! Maybe I'm already invaded! by Ekevu · · Score: 1

    They might have stolen my saved slashdot cookie and already started posting n00b jokes!

  163. We are secure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to the fact of the wide adoption of the cryptic x86 architecture on our planet there is absolutelly no reason to asume that aliens might infiltrate our IT. The famous x86 architecture is immune to such attacks because it employs ultra modern SBCI (security by cryptic imbecility) technology which provides best security for the years to come.

    While the aliens are still puzzled what actual purpose the A20 gate might suit, INTEL is already implementing the next cryptic SSE stage, which, at first covered secretly by a "8086 compatibility mode", will cause further confusions and throwbacks amongst the hostile alien forces on its discovery ... ... ...

    Wait! ... maybe it's *completely different*:

    maybe it where the men in black (
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_in_Black ) who foisted x86 technology to us poor erdlings only for the purpose to subdue human technological progress !11!??!1!??! What has Windows to do wtih that??? Why does Bill Gates always behave somewhat odd and "noticeably unfamiliar with everyday common courtesies and civil behavior"? Do Andy Groove and Bill Gates drive Cadillacs? Oh so many suspicions!11!!!1

    Knock, knock ....

    dfniuwbfnb berjnw [carrier lost]

  164. It's ok by Kingrames · · Score: 1

    With the amount of pollution we're churning out, the earth has the equivalent of a tinfoil hat.

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  165. aliens or mutated free-thinking software? by FlippyTheSkillsaw · · Score: 1

    How does one learn about physics without understanding the rules of physics? The answer is experimentation. It would be beneficial to the alien threat if they had some output. Maybe they have ultra-sensitive EM detectors and they are technologically capable of separating out all the EM sources on the planet and using that for output. If they could do that, they wouldn't really need to experiment so much.

    Personally I'm more worried about software along the lines of DNA. Transmission causes errors, right? This is parallel to DNA and mutation. Given enough time of bit-errors and you'll come up with a sentient software by evolution. It starts with very simple software that just repeats itself. Soon it will add in an iteration to that repeat. Next thing you know it will be the digital equivalent of a sentient brain!

    The question is whether it knows we are here and what will it do when it finds out?

  166. So that explains it... by jhantin · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're having a problem with your software, our G.I.T.S. are standing by to ask you dumb questions.

    --
    ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
  167. Well, it worked in "Independence Day" by angusmci · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I remember correctly, Jeff Goldblum's character in "Independence Day" was able to pwn the alien mothership by uploading a virus to it from his Macintosh PowerBook. Clearly, computer systems are interoperable galaxy-wide at a fundamental level. Perhaps Windows has even evolved independently on many different planets. In any case, we're clearly in deadly danger.

    The big question, of course, is what the aliens will do once they've taken over our PCs. My guess is that they'll use them to send spam. The danger is that by the time our inboxes start filling with tentacle-enlargement spams and three-headed lizard porn, it will be too late for us to do anything.

  168. Beam me up by LeeMeador · · Score: 1

    I think its more likely that the evil aliens would just "beam" malicious programs into all of our computers from their orbiting cruisers.

    Then they could deplete our planetary resources by selling us fake rolexes and male potency fixes and setting us all up with dates.

    I think its time to start digging a bunker in the back yard.

  169. first Species movie by peter303 · · Score: 1

    In the first Species movie Ben Kingsley downloads a DNA sequence from a SETI, inserts into a human egg, and the resulting creature is some super-sexy super-monster who tries to spread her DNA all over the place.

  170. Spice Girls r00l! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > Frankly, I'm more worried about some phishing malcontent then I am
    > about the Grays, but maybe that's just me.

    Frankly, I'm more worried about the government keeping the signal to itself than about it getting out in the general public. The design for a hyper-intelligent AI that can be enslaved by someone in power to use it to gain control of the Earth, or, hell, just a personal force field and ray gun, for god's sake.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  171. What if it was a logic "destroyer" signal? by moving_comfort · · Score: 1
    What if the signal, once received and processed, affected *us*, not our computers? Not a virus per se, but a logic bomb that burned out the brains of any intelligent creature who observed it?

    Piers Anthony, in the great SciFi novel Macroscope, proposed such a signal being delivered in a tachyon stream. Humans above a certain IQ were able to grasp what started out as a simple symbolic pattern matching program, which progressed step by step in complexity and speed until the mind was in a sort of rapture state of comprehension - the viewer couldn't shut their eyes, and the terrible "logic" drew to a conclusion that burned out the brain. I think anyone under IQ 120 (or something) was unaffected because they couldn't follow the pattern beyond the basics. The smarter you were, the more burned you got.

    Again, we need to imagine a civ advanced almost beyond our comprehension, and equally evil, but it's an interesting concept as it was depicted in that novel. I think it's about as likely as a universally-effective computer virus (which is to say, near-nil.)

  172. ironic? by smashin234 · · Score: 1

    The entire premise behind ET hacking SETI is ironic if you think about it, nothing more.

    Personally, if I was an alien, I would hack something else, SETI would be somewhere on the bottom of my list.

    If I just needed to hack one computer to replicate my AI virus, I would go for some college kids computer that is running windows unpatched. Easy, and sure.

    Otherwise, if I needed important computer systems, I think Dept of Def. is a little more important then SETI. Or, financial institutions, but put simply, anything BUT SETI for importance.

    Maybe they would hack SETI for distribution purposes. HAHA But MS has a much better dist. network (patches go out to just about everyone with a PC). As does about every company out there.

    Put simply, there is just no logical reason that someone would hack SETI above any of the millions of other good alternatives. On the slightly funnier side, they may do it to show a sense of humor (at irony.)

  173. Nonsense Concept by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Somebody with a bug in their ear.

    An alien smart enough to do anything remotely like this is smart enough to not bother with a planet full of monkeys - unless they want to convert us to something other than monkeys - in which case I say:

    I for one welcome our new SETI overlords!

    This guy should be worrying about what George Bush is listening to, not what the "aliens" are sending...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  174. Gua'uld by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

    > decide to enslave us.
    > IANASFB (I am not a science fiction buff) but I presume this type of scenario has been discussed.


    See Stargate (and SG-1).

  175. Evil Creatures from OuterSpace by xile · · Score: 1

    Oh yea, sure.. first we were afraid of giant mutant eyeballs with tentacles. Now we are afraid of Magical Evil 1's and 0's?

    --
    Don't mistake lack of talent for genius
  176. Slashdot needs a tinfoil hat icon. by sserendipity · · Score: 1

    When are we going to see pseudoscience.slashdot.org brought to life?

    And when will this fark-worthy newz be kept off the front page? Inquiring minds need to know.

  177. They will not send a PC virus, It will be worse by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    All these arguments about how an ET signal could not harm a current model computers are correct. They would have to know something about our computers, the instruction sets operating systems and so on. Even if they did manage to get a virus in, so what? We know how to manages viruses. In the worst case the computer catches fire and melts. Big deal buy a new one. Even a million dead PCs is not a "Big Deal" But what they _Could_ do is send a series of instructions teling us the basics of how one of _thier_ computers work. Reading these instructions would be irresistable to us. Then they would send a program. The program could be a simulation of one of them, a (to us) very advanced inteligent being. We could talk to this simulation and learn a lot about the ETs without the long speed of light delay. Everyone would want to talk to these simulated ETs, it would be widely copied and distributed Remember the story of the Trojan Horse. It was a very atractive gift that the Trojans welcomed into thier city, only later did they discover the bad side effects. I really do expect that a REAL ET transmition would include a simulation of the ET's best technical experts, performers and artists along with vertual reality tours of their world. They would not be sending us text books. That is "so 1980's" They would send us copies (or simulations) of themselves. Now we ask "what happens when two cultures make contact when one of them is much more advanced?"

  178. Stop laughing! by fbg111 · · Score: 1

    Stop laughing, this is really serious threat!

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  179. Read between the lines... by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    It's been well known for some years that the earth is a huge computer calculating the question to which the answer is 42 (or the other way round ;) ). This guy is an alien technician sent to earth to make sure the calculations go right. Want proof? Go check his personal library for examples of horrid poetry :)

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  180. Thanks! by rk · · Score: 2, Funny
    My dual processor Pentium 90 system just read your post. Now it's muttering in the corner something about "I'll show them who's sentient" and is being generally sulky and bitchy:
    $ ls -l
    Go away. I'm having a bad day.
    $ cd
    Screw you!
    $ ps auxw
    OMG... are you stupid? I said go away!
    Connection closed by foreign host.

    I hope you're happy.

  181. Easy solution by RobbieGee · · Score: 1

    Easy, we just assign a specific port number for alien attacks. Or we might assign a special "alien" bit to be set in packets. Alien signals should have the alien bit set to 1 so that one could easily filter out alien attacks... :-P

    --
    If you get this, we're 10 of a kind.
    1. Re:Easy solution by belg4mit · · Score: 1
      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  182. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  183. May be one case where security by obscurity works! by anwyn · · Score: 1

    Any computer language, from machine language including those languages runnable on computers, but understandable by trained humans like Java, involves a large number of essentially arbitrary decisions. Which "opcode" is going to represent which functionality? Without this knowledge, it is difficult to imagine anyone, no matter how advanced, writting code that will not immediately crash.

    It is possible to write multi-platform viruses, but only with knowledge for all target platforms.

    If a alien race were to take the trouble to determine how our computer languages were designed -- then it could determine how to infect us! But this info is not available from popular entertainment broadcasts!

    But enough computer programs are transfered via wireless networks that the inforation could be had there!

    So SETI, is not a risk! TV is not a risk! But Wireless networks are a risk, and must be shutdown immediately!

  184. Re:They will not send a PC virus, It will be worse by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1
    "Now we ask "what happens when two cultures make contact when one of them is much more advanced?"

    Personally, I think it is a simple answer: They don't. I think it is an easy thought experiment to imagine what would happen if aliens were to make their presence known to humanity at large. There would be two kinds of people; those who would worship the aliens and those that would want to kill them. I hope, for everyone's sake, that any aliens advanced enough to travel here and observe us would also understand that we, as a race, are not yet ready to meet them.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  185. Sweet... by Jeff+Benjamin · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to find alien popups from Alpha Centauri telling me how I can increase the size of my tenticles by up to 4 inches!

  186. Missing Topic by boto · · Score: 1

    Isn't this article supposed to be on topic "It's funny. Laugh."?

  187. Re: Acronyms by Flamsmark · · Score: 1

    ATM machines? automated teller machine machines? and you call youirself a geek!

    --
    copyright © 2005 Flamsmsmark the ravings of a melancholly i
  188. Its the Blight! by Arjuna · · Score: 1

    The Blight is the nemesis of galactic ciivilization in Vernor Vinge's "A Fire Upon the Deep". It spreads like a multi-level virus and once it infects a star system, all neighbors must turn their dishes away from it and destroy any vessel from there, lest they be contaminated too.

    Whatever level on which you connect to an infected system, you'll receive information that is probing your systems, overflowing buffers, trying to subvert system security. For instance if you tuned into a video stream you might get charismatic people telling you how good life is over there, and how corrupt your own leaders are...

  189. Seen Species a few too many times? by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 0

    Somebody needs a reality check.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  190. Science: is SETI a Security Risk? by dougbaker · · Score: 1

    Oh my. I guess it could happen. If BOINC SETI code had a bug then caused execution to pick up in the data area, think of something like a nop sled to get you there, AND the alien signal was h/w specific and alignment was just right and the code bump occured on the right architecture 9above dependency) then viola! You're off and running. NOW THAT IS SOME FINE PIECE OF ALIEN INTELLIGENCE! But, this isn't independence day so ID4 or not... Peace!

  191. p\/\/nx0r3d by ET by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    All your base is are belong to ET.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  192. Perhaps Mr. Carrigan should ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    call Paul Hellyer, the former Canadian Minister of Defence who wants to hold public hearing about exopolitics (http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11 /25/1956232&tid=214&tid=219). Together, they may come up with more creative and entertaining things for us to worry about.

  193. Not likely... by mbessey · · Score: 1

    With the exception of a very small number of high-power transmissions aimed at particular stars, there's basically zero chance of any ET civilization picking up signals from Earth.

    I really ought to have hung on to the calculations I made for the last SETI discussion I participarted in, but the inverse-square law ensures that the power of an unfocused radio transmission decreases dramatically over interstellar distances.

    Basically, it'd be a near thing for current SETI programs to pick up a radio signal aimed directly at the Earth from a nearby star, with a transmitter channeling a few million watts into a tight (well, relatively so) beam. There's zero chance that we'd be able to detect the equivalent of TV transmissions from 10 light years away or so.

    Even if the ETs have significantly better receiving equipment, they'll still be limited by background noise. They also have to deal with the rather huge number of candidate stars to monitor - unless you're willing to devote an enormous amount of resources, you'll only be able to survey a small number of stars at any time.

  194. Convergent Evolution... by tid242 · · Score: 1

    This is known as Convergent evolutio.... er... rather: Convergent Intelligent Design.

    -tid242

    --

    With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

  195. Re:May be one case where security by obscurity wor by belg4mit · · Score: 1

    Not only that, that information is not yet available elsewhere (you can't beat c).

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  196. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    Marge: "You speak English!"
    Kang: "Actually, I'm speaking Rigelian, but by an amazing coincidence, the two languages are exactly the same."

  197. Mothership must have run Windows by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    After all, it crashed when someone plugged a new device in, no?

    Seriously, does this sound likely to you?
    1. Study alien ship
    2. Hurriedly write virus using only your PDA (in AppleScript?)
    3. Upload virus, which then works perfectly
    4. Profit! Er... no... wait...
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  198. Galactic 519 scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the REAL threat is that we'd receive a message like this:

    My Dear Friend:

    Please allow me to introduce myself. My name is former Adjutant Sub-Chancellor Glaybok Drofnakooz of the Betelgeuse Commerce Guild, and I wish to bring to your consideration a possible transaction that may be of great interest to you. Over 40 skoofs ago (150 of your earth years) my family was given the task of administering the Gumblqaag Memorial Hypergate in our system for the purpose of seeing to its vital role in the transport of goods to our galactic trading partners. For this service we were permitted to collect tolls as set by treaties negotiated by the guild with other users of the hypergate. From these tolls we paid for the operating expenses of the hypergate, including maintenance staff salaries, futures contracts for the harvesting of vacuum energy, and subspace postage stamps. The remainder was allowed to be kept by our family and was deposited as negative entropy in quantum wells during our administration.

    In recent skoofs, the cosmo-political turmoil of our region has resulted in the coming to power of a fundamentalist regime that has crushed the Guild and nullified the hereditary contracts of the Guild members. In addition, these fundamentalists have insisted on changing the local values of physical constants (such as the fine-structure constant and the mass of the proton) to ones that they claim are given in scriptures handed down from their sovereign deity, also known as the Ke'Ernul. As a result of their actions, our negative-entropy deposits in the quantum wells (which are of substantial value in free markets elsewhere) are no longer physically accessible in our region of the galaxy.

    It is for this reason that I turn to you with this modest proposal. If you would be so kind as to provide a location chosen by you within your own solar system for the transmutation of this negative entropy to a useable form of energy, I would be pleased to provide yopu with the opportunity to capture as much of this energy as you wish for your own purposes. Since the total amount of this energy transaction approaches 2 x 10^49 J, or 100 times the total mass-energy of your own sun, your capture of even 1% of this energy would allow your solar system to survive for an additional 2.5 billion skoogs beyond its present estimated lifetime. As the physical constants in your area are as yet undisturbed by the fundamentalists, the transmutation should be most effective and occur within a time period of 20 kruffs, or 3 of your earth minutes.

    I beseech you to participate in this modest transaction, and look forward to your response so that I may begin to make arrangements with former trading partners near your system.

    Your most humble servant,
    Glaybok Drofnakooz
    Former Adjutant Sub-Chancellor
    Betelgeuse Commerce Guild

  199. this is absurd... by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 1

    The one thing that every virus writer must know is how the machine he is infecting works. That's because the virus is a program that runs on the pc (try writing a Win32 application, using Mac system calls) and because it trys to jump through holes to do damage (which takes even more knowledge of the system.) If these aliens know that much about our technology, they could fabricate phony games and drop them off at any flea market, and wait for someone to find them. Heck, they could counterfit coppies of XP and sell them on eBay, or just dial in and infect us.

    Yes, a massively superior computer might be able to find holes we never imagined in our systems, just like our computers can crack a WW1 cypher in seconds, but that does not mean that they can do it without knowing our basic computers, which requires paying us a visit to learn about them. Once they are here, they do not need to go through SETI.

    Even if they hijacked a communications satellite, and stole the code to Windows Longhorn, it would be easier to beam the virus from that satellite after it miracuously "recovers" than to enter through SETI.

    Andy Out!

  200. No, because Captain Fantastic here couldn't... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...work out how to pronounce the number "#ERANGE".

    Or possibly his calculator couldn't represent 0 to enough significant places.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  201. Ummmm... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    You'd have to already have the metavirus in order to recognise it in the string of trash. Information Theory 101.

    Same problem with natural selection: the selection process has to "engage" with the selectable item(s) but the homeostasis built into most biological processes acts very strongly to prevent this.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Ummmm... by Wellspring · · Score: 1


      Not in this case.

      Remember, this is a hypothetical (in reality, probably impossible) universal virus that creates new virii. Admittedly, I doubt that this is possible-- specificity is a virus's primary weapon.

      But if you make the jump that such a virus is possible, then it follows that finding it would be astoundingly easy. You don't have to know how it works or what it looks like. You just need to keep scanning data sources. When you come to the information, it infects you even if you don't recognize it. So keep the machine isolated and wait for it to die, then conduct a post-mortem to assemble the virus on the fly when you're ready to use it.

      If there was more than one such data pattern, of course, you couldn't tell which one you'd gotten. But that's the problem: Stephenson postulated information so (literally) compelling that simply knowing it was dangerous.

      Possible? No, I don't think so. So in any real case you're probably right. But if you accept the postulates that Stephenson starts with (which I did for the purposes of that reply), you don't actually need to have the string in advance to recognize it.

  202. Points missed by the collective brainiac by dotmax · · Score: 1

    Let's just take a couple of aimed shots:

    1. the time since we became "visible" dates to the formation of a terrestrial oxygen-nitrogen atmoshpere, not Marconi. Look up nulling interferometric spectrometry and bounce it against extrasolar planetology.

    2. We have, in fact been sending out not-so-subtle clues as to how our computers work for decades, along variosly narrow volumes of space. huh? wha? How do you think we communicate with our space probes? How did we REPROGRAM the mars landers? It's not quite a blueprint to the internet or a microprocessor or a language, but it's infinitely more information about how things work than "nothing". Again: some information about how our computers work is travelling at the speed of light along the plane of the eccliptic.

    Now, assuming a civilization of, oh, say, an avg. IQ about the same as ours, but with 1e5 years of industrial age+ technology under their belts, recalculate your limbaughesque smirkings taking into account 1) and 2) above.

    I can't see where a SETI attack is forbidden by thermodynamics.

    Which makes it possible.

    gosh, that Carrigan guy is pretty smart, isn't he. .max

  203. He is desperate. by joker12345 · · Score: 1

    Publish or Perish.

  204. Possibility is minute... by mysidia · · Score: 1

    The ''Great Wall'' analogy makes no sense. An effective attack can be attempted against the wall without any knowledge of its construction. The same is true of receivers, electronics, and computer systems -- most computers and receivers are not designed to blindly execute instructions passed to them, even if one wrote the perfect computer virus and sent it as a signal - you still need an infection vector written in a language understood by the receiver, to activate the thing --- this generally requires a bug to be found in the software processing the data.

    Extraterrestrials might have learned a lot about the human race by picking up radio signals and other radio waves humans may have accidentally leaked into space a hundred years ago or so, but it's not too likely to give them SETI source code or much in the way of details about human computer designs --- at least not unless they live on a very near planet and have discovered WiFi and Unsecured Wireless access Points.

    To create, let-alone manage to deploy a virus which would have any effect on humans or their computer machinery, the aliens would need to know a whole lot about the target, much more than aliens from a distant planet could know, and probably, and more than humans even know about themselves and their world.

    Otherwise, the possibility is pretty much just the same as it would be for a computer virus infection to leap randomly out of radio noise (unrelated to extraterrestrial signals) and infect the SETI processors.

    To engineer a virus against the human brain, the aliens would have to know a lot about its workings - too: the system might not be hard to take down against a strategic attack, but they do still have to get in first, and an attack deviced against a system without knowledge of it is not going to be strategic -- but brute force (like trying to send a signal so powerful that a receiver irradiates the planet when it picks it up).

    The more realistic security threat involved with SETI is the one of human beings writing viruses and compromising other human beings' computers.

  205. No by xihr · · Score: 1

    How about a simple answer to a stupid question: No, it's not a security risk. An alien transmission infecting a computer doing SETI is precisely as absurd as making a simple digital audio recording taking over your computer. Data is being collected, data is being manipulated, data is being analyzed. Data isn't being "executed," so there's no chance for infection.

  206. Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it obvious?
    SETI has successfully found something and it is either dangerous or valuable to the government, so they are shutting it down to cover it up.

  207. Similar to Star Trek by computergeek1200 · · Score: 1

    This is similar to the Star Trek Voyager episode Friendship One. Sometime before the Federation a probe is sent out to tell aliens about earth. If the Borg intercepted the probe, Earth would likely be assimilated.

  208. talk about paranoia... by obscured_dude · · Score: 1

    I may be reading this article totally out of context, but it sounds like they have been smoking a little too much grass and reading too many alien conspiracy books. If their worried about SETI being a security risk their bascially admitting that something might be out there! What have they got to worry about otherwise? SETI is just like any other research project that has unknowns, Isn't that the whole reason the SETI team is researching in the first place? to find an answer the unknowns? Theres too many "do gooders" sticking their ill-informed noses in things they know nothing about...

  209. Uhm... by x4071k05 · · Score: 1

    So...aliens that are light years away supposed to: 1) Guess our processor architecture, well enough to be able to write machine code that a computer could execute. Otherwise all they'd manage to do is crash a couple computers 2) Guess how we've set up the internet to work, as well as guess vulnerabilities for operating systems for their 'virus' to spread. What's the point in infecting a couple thousand computers? It would be pointless just to infect only computers that are running SETI, sure I suppose some geeks out there are using their companies' servers to crunch for SETI, but if they want to do any damage at all, the virus must spread, a virus by definition must spread and replicate. The internet seems the most logical and fastest avenue of infection. 3) Guess the holes in the SETI program. Otherwise, we humans will spend the next 20 years trying to figure out what the heck they're trying to say, when in fact it's a virus designed for the alien version of the commodor 64. Also, they'll have to deal with the limited bandwith (send it too fast, and we're more likely to miss an important part of it), so they're not going to be able to try sending a couple billion bytes to try different buffer over flows. And, they have to deal with data corruption, even if there's extreme redundancy in this highly impossible virus, there's only so much redundancy that can be done, the code that checks and makes sure there's no corruption could be corrupt itself and instead of taking over the world, it could merely start producing horribly written OSes and then pay consulting firms to give the OS good reviews as slashdotters post cruel comments about it. There's also one slight problem, sending a virus to destroy a civilization would be an act of war. Not only that, but your victim(s) would know where you are. If you're sending it as far and wide as possible (which is a must, it's pointless to only destroy 3/4ths of the galaxy's civilizations), you now have enemies who know where you are, but you haven't the slightest clue. It would be more feasible to provide plans for a 'free energy' device, that would actually be a bomb. No guessing what kind of computers were using, we'll kill ourselves. As a culture, we're stupid enough to fall for it, only 4% of internet users can identify a phishing site 100% of the time. Also, the author failed to realize one final thing. If this were at all possible, then there would also be a threat of the random background noise randomly being a 'virus'. As SETI expands, more and more data will be examined, if life can be created out of a some atoms joining together, then assuming the SETI software is vulnerable, might artificial life be created out of the millions of terabytes of random background noise? Probably not...but it's as believible as l337 4l13n5 h4x0r1ng 73h pl4n37.

  210. Possibly... by Schwarzchild · · Score: 1

    That would be one scenario. We would have to be extremely careful if we decided to build anything that an ET sent us (e.g. completely understand the principles involved, etc). The biggest risk, of course, is that some ET is traveling in a spaceship ala Columbus and lands on our doorstep. We would be extremely lucky if we didn't end up like the American Indians.

    --

    "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  211. i thought president bush already took care of this by rotterdarned · · Score: 1

    by erecting a fourteen mile fence south of san diego to staunch the flow of illegal aliens.

  212. Is it possible? by dhasenan · · Score: 1

    Why haven't we seen a computer virus take control of computers on a large scale? The attacker would need a whole lot of time and computational power in order to divine the functions and content of each computer controlled.

    I believe it would be possible to achieve large-scale control of computers. It would take a few steps:
    1. Infect as many computers as possible with a diverse set of viruses that access various IRC channels or FTP sites that you control.
    2. Allow those viruses to escalate their privileges via code downloaded via IRC/FTP. Also have them acquire unique serial numbers.
    3. Install rootkits to hide the viruses.
    4. Have the computers to which you now have access record their IP address (internal and external) and a listing of programs that have been running plus frequency and duration periodically. They send that information to various servers that you control.
    5. Create scripts to execute on particular machines, keyed by serial number.
    6. ???

    It's doable. It would be like crafting unique attacks against a large number of individual machines, though, and would require a large amount of computing power just to start.

  213. Alien subliminal messages by yakovlev · · Score: 1

    The idea here is that these aliens are significantly more technologically advanced than we are. In that case, they can have whatever sophisticated weapons we can dream up. While subliminal messages may not be possible with our current technology, one can't totally discount the idea that a sufficiently advanced civilization would have means to plant a self-destructive suggestion into the minds of at least a large subset of the people on Earth. Subliminal messages seemed a convenient way of describing this, although no doubt the actual mechanism of placing the suggestion would be quite different.

    BTW, the internet (snopes) agrees with you that subliminal messages do not exist. It's popular culture that says they do.