Not crappy at all. Most of the times, it has a bigger battery life, is lighter and has a more confortable keyboard than any laptop available.
The problem is that laptops are very crappy desktops, and what they bring to the table over a tablet does not matter at all for creating text. (But it does matter for other uses.)
Problem is that what should be the next good version of Windows become 8.1.
Maybe Microsoft will get the memo when corporations start migrating from Windows, because they've already showed that they couldn't care less about personal devices.
That expression has no meaning in the context of quantum mechanics. You measure a neutron, and then you measure a neutron. You can't apply "same" or "another" to those phrases.
It's still better to avoid the bear, and not think about your friend getting killed.
That's exactly the GP compaint. They are recommending that a bank outrun the others (by procedures that'll reduce the overall security of the app users, be assured of that), instead of avoiding the bear.
The few companies who are too important to politicians to be allowed to [not?] collapse are very much the exception
I don't know about Europe (as that's not something one can learn from the newspapers), but here at Brazil, those are the only big corporations that survive. However exceptional they are when the governemnt starts protecting them does not matter, because it accumulates.
Yep, there are some natural monopolies, and anti-competitive practices too. Normaly the corps that get to exploit those are the same ones that are protected by a government. When an unprotected corp tries to exploit those, the government corrects the situation (as it should).
But why is[n't] the background radiation ALREADY Doppler shifted?
It is already Doppler shifted, and the GP either knows too well what he's talking about and simplified it into something unrecognizable, or simply has no idea at all.
In theory, you can calculate a "universal" rest frame from the background radiation if the Universe is planar enough. I have no idea if this is actualy the case.
3. Deregulation - Make the governments stop protecting corporations that can't compete in a level market. So the shareholders dumb enough to be played by those boards at #1 just lose their money, and can't do any extra damage to society, while the CEOs and boards run out of their supply of rich victims. But that also won't happen.
That's because robots are not safe, so we keep them in huge boxes, separated from humans.
In 2013 there was massive improvement on that area, and people are already starting to mix robots and humans on factories. Ater that, mixing them at home requires only time and bug-fixing. I gess he was only a bit early with that prediction.
I've already seek advice from experts. Don't expect to get out with anything but a lecture about how you must weight costs and benefits, and the best way to do that is though math improvements, not by "brute-forcing" it using larger keys, and if you do resot to large keys, your best hope is to put all your bits on the best algorithm. Or, in other words, experts trust the math. They are almost certainly right, of course, but there is that almost nil chance that they are completely wrong... Anyway, I'd be more actively researching composed algos if I had anything worth using them on. Up to now, I've only looked enough to confirm that they are possible, just in case.
Anyway, crypto researchers don't like to increase their key-size without a clear need. Although I can understand why, I think they are too strict on that, and that we should start adopting multi-algorithm (composed) algorithms... but we just won't.
Please, just tell me the remainings are incinerated after grinding. Because that's completely stupid, as it won't protect your terrritory against external plages.
You must also not have one of either salt, power outlets or wires. And there ought be a way to reach the couch with N2, I'm just not good enough to come up with it.
Some of it, and making lots of assumptions because you can not simulate the solvent.
But the most important impact is that chemistry is a tool for many other kinds of experiments. Ban chemistry and those are gone. (Also, there is applied research - creating a startup on chemistry is about as impossible as it gets.)
If it can be fun, with no loss in quality, why make it boring?
Kids certainly learn better a subject if they like it, by the way, thus all else being equal (what I'll grant you that never is), being fun increases quality just by itself.
Slashdot Mirror
Not crappy at all. Most of the times, it has a bigger battery life, is lighter and has a more confortable keyboard than any laptop available.
The problem is that laptops are very crappy desktops, and what they bring to the table over a tablet does not matter at all for creating text. (But it does matter for other uses.)
Besides all the problems with disk encryption usability, would you trust it? I wouldn't.
Just reimage one. Like we do with PCs.
Problem is that what should be the next good version of Windows become 8.1.
Maybe Microsoft will get the memo when corporations start migrating from Windows, because they've already showed that they couldn't care less about personal devices.
That expression has no meaning in the context of quantum mechanics. You measure a neutron, and then you measure a neutron. You can't apply "same" or "another" to those phrases.
It's still better to avoid the bear, and not think about your friend getting killed.
That's exactly the GP compaint. They are recommending that a bank outrun the others (by procedures that'll reduce the overall security of the app users, be assured of that), instead of avoiding the bear.
And as a second tough, it would also be a quite local "universal" referential. Probably bigger than a galaxy, but not an overall constant.
I don't know about Europe (as that's not something one can learn from the newspapers), but here at Brazil, those are the only big corporations that survive. However exceptional they are when the governemnt starts protecting them does not matter, because it accumulates.
Yep, there are some natural monopolies, and anti-competitive practices too. Normaly the corps that get to exploit those are the same ones that are protected by a government. When an unprotected corp tries to exploit those, the government corrects the situation (as it should).
I stand for the freedom of those stars to choose a neighborhood.
It is already Doppler shifted, and the GP either knows too well what he's talking about and simplified it into something unrecognizable, or simply has no idea at all.
In theory, you can calculate a "universal" rest frame from the background radiation if the Universe is planar enough. I have no idea if this is actualy the case.
3. Deregulation - Make the governments stop protecting corporations that can't compete in a level market. So the shareholders dumb enough to be played by those boards at #1 just lose their money, and can't do any extra damage to society, while the CEOs and boards run out of their supply of rich victims. But that also won't happen.
Looks like it's not that much decentralized.
Well, that's because they are. As also are the ones within borders.
About distribution, that only works if you don't do it too much. Make enough people have nothing to lose, and they'll make the next rational step.
That's because robots are not safe, so we keep them in huge boxes, separated from humans.
In 2013 there was massive improvement on that area, and people are already starting to mix robots and humans on factories. Ater that, mixing them at home requires only time and bug-fixing. I gess he was only a bit early with that prediction.
Hey, thanks. Quite an iteresting algorithm.
I've already seek advice from experts. Don't expect to get out with anything but a lecture about how you must weight costs and benefits, and the best way to do that is though math improvements, not by "brute-forcing" it using larger keys, and if you do resot to large keys, your best hope is to put all your bits on the best algorithm. Or, in other words, experts trust the math. They are almost certainly right, of course, but there is that almost nil chance that they are completely wrong... Anyway, I'd be more actively researching composed algos if I had anything worth using them on. Up to now, I've only looked enough to confirm that they are possible, just in case.
What post-quantum assymetric crypto is there?
Anyway, crypto researchers don't like to increase their key-size without a clear need. Although I can understand why, I think they are too strict on that, and that we should start adopting multi-algorithm (composed) algorithms... but we just won't.
Nope. That'll only work while Congress is not looking.
Please, just tell me the remainings are incinerated after grinding. Because that's completely stupid, as it won't protect your terrritory against external plages.
Ok, I should have written GNU/Linux.
First half of the XX century.
Most of the previous generation of scientits were already scientits when they could get a job doing science. And that's all over the world.
You must also not have one of either salt, power outlets or wires. And there ought be a way to reach the couch with N2, I'm just not good enough to come up with it.
Some of it, and making lots of assumptions because you can not simulate the solvent.
But the most important impact is that chemistry is a tool for many other kinds of experiments. Ban chemistry and those are gone. (Also, there is applied research - creating a startup on chemistry is about as impossible as it gets.)
Gotta love a grammar nazi that does not know grammar. Take a look on the section about possessive next time.
If it can be fun, with no loss in quality, why make it boring?
Kids certainly learn better a subject if they like it, by the way, thus all else being equal (what I'll grant you that never is), being fun increases quality just by itself.
Yep, that's exactly what everybody said about the Japanese and Koreans before acknowledging that their products were good.