That may be just the best position for him. If your companies has any employee, hiring is one of the most important tasks for it (at the same level as marketing).
And when they ask me to engage in meaningless work so they can judge me, I tell them they're welcome to judge my portfolio, but if they want me to start problem solving, the meaningless of the task is irrelevant... they're still going to have to pay for it.
So, you refuse to answer the one question that correctly evaluate your technical habilities? How do you expect the employer to discover if you are good or not? Most of the times a portifolio just isn't good enough.
But HR drones won't ever think about that. Sometimes smart people ask that question, but let's be honest here, most of the times it is asked just because it is on the "script", and the interviewer can't think for himself.
That should be a great way of avoiding the Peter Principle, but are pay levels equivalent? Normaly they aren't, so companies are again at ground stage.
When searching for an MBA, you'd better select for habilities that are rare, but important, instead of ones that are nearly universal, but not as important. If you select people that can think, instead of selecting the ones that can BS, you'll end with a much better team. Even when selecting MBAs.
Also, MBA speack is getting old... People just don't trust it anymore.
The wires are composed of doped silicon, and features of doped silicon are at least several atoms big. It may be made of bunch of atoms of dopants, but they are embebed on a crystal dozens of atoms wide. Also, the wires ccertanly an't work without those dozens of atoms, and another wire can't be as close to share some of those atoms without being connected. For all practical porposes, the wire is dozens of atoms wide.
Why can't/. just anounce a semiconductor breakthrough for what it is? "Smaler wire made of silicon" would make it, for exemple.
And, by the way, Ohm's law holds at the atomic level as well as it holds for big conductors. People learned that by studying organic conductors ages ago. The problem is how to make silicon work the same way. That is what TFA seems to be about (don't really know because it is behind a pay wall).
It is doped silicon, like nearly any semiconductor out there, so it won't face the problems of increasing the number of steps and different substances in fabs.
But it is still a very precise fabrication. Big fabs aren't up to the task, so expect at least a decade before that gets mainstream.
Thus standard OS permissoins can keep the recovery image safe (priviledge escalation bugs notwithstanding).
Yes, except for everything that could corupt the media, it should be safe. By the way, if OS permissions could keep it safe, you wouldn't need to reinstall the OS.
The image can be verified using the public key, if it fails, the recovery fails.
Except if the same bugs that corrupted the image also corrupted the public key. If you are arguing for Safe Boot, yes, it could be used like that, but no, MS won't have you best interest in mind when working the details, so it won't do that well.
There are some top level keys in the register. One of those is something like HKEY_MACHINE_CURRENT_USER. That one keeps data of the current user, and he has write acces to it.
1 - Boot Linux in a live CD or pen drive 2 - Mount external or network drive where you want to make the copy 3 - cat/dev/sda | gzip >/mnt/external-drive/windows-image.gz 4 - ???? 5 - Profit
Of course, that assumes you don't operate in a "MS Shop", and can use real tools.
See, the worst thing about not talking on your fisrt language is that sometimes you are sure of the meaning of one word, just to discover you were thinking about another one that is quite near, but different.
Or, in other words, forget it, my post was wrong. Very wrong.
If you want to make a reverse proxy, Nginx is the way to go.
But unfortunately, most software that people want to speed-up with a reverse proxy are of bad quality. If it wasn't, it would also probably be fast and wouldn't need that proxy.
Name a single software company that has been "devastated" by Open Source? As opposed to, say, failing to adapt their business model to a changing world, and increased competition from others?
UN inspectors were being denied access to numerous facilities
So was in Brazil. You can't just send your spies to look at everything in every country witht he guise of working for the UN. After both sides agreed on a "looking" methodology, the inspectors were permited in. In both of those countries.
When the US invaded Iraq, the UN inspectors had access to all the countries infrastructure.
As a comercial embargo is an act of war, the replaced headline would be acurate. Remember that the US is still discussing if it should embargo Iran... Now compare to the decision about Spain.
If you only threatened countries to do things that are good for their populations, those populations wouldn't think you are a bully, and would laugh every time their media or government claims so.
The reality is that rarely the US gets involved on the internals of another country to make its people better. But they get involved daily in things that makes other country's people worse.
Or a doctor whining that it was unreasonable to expect him to use MRI scanners, because he hasn't had the training?
Oh, they don't have to whine. They don't even have to refuse. Docotors simply don't pursuit working with MRI scanners when they think they aren't able, and don't try to prove that they are.
Well, it does not take anything from your point. Just the analogy was a bad one.
Session ID doesn't need to be in the URL. As you said, it can go to cookie, so as to not polute the URL.
It is better to keep in the URL just the information you need for selecting what you'll display, so it stays a resource locator. Session information is not one of those. Putting session ID on links or bookmarks disrupt some things (caching for example).
Slashdot Mirror
That may be just the best position for him. If your companies has any employee, hiring is one of the most important tasks for it (at the same level as marketing).
So, you refuse to answer the one question that correctly evaluate your technical habilities? How do you expect the employer to discover if you are good or not? Most of the times a portifolio just isn't good enough.
Plans != drive
But HR drones won't ever think about that. Sometimes smart people ask that question, but let's be honest here, most of the times it is asked just because it is on the "script", and the interviewer can't think for himself.
That should be a great way of avoiding the Peter Principle, but are pay levels equivalent? Normaly they aren't, so companies are again at ground stage.
When searching for an MBA, you'd better select for habilities that are rare, but important, instead of ones that are nearly universal, but not as important. If you select people that can think, instead of selecting the ones that can BS, you'll end with a much better team. Even when selecting MBAs.
Also, MBA speack is getting old... People just don't trust it anymore.
The wires are composed of doped silicon, and features of doped silicon are at least several atoms big. It may be made of bunch of atoms of dopants, but they are embebed on a crystal dozens of atoms wide. Also, the wires ccertanly an't work without those dozens of atoms, and another wire can't be as close to share some of those atoms without being connected. For all practical porposes, the wire is dozens of atoms wide.
Why can't /. just anounce a semiconductor breakthrough for what it is? "Smaler wire made of silicon" would make it, for exemple.
And, by the way, Ohm's law holds at the atomic level as well as it holds for big conductors. People learned that by studying organic conductors ages ago. The problem is how to make silicon work the same way. That is what TFA seems to be about (don't really know because it is behind a pay wall).
It is doped silicon, like nearly any semiconductor out there, so it won't face the problems of increasing the number of steps and different substances in fabs.
But it is still a very precise fabrication. Big fabs aren't up to the task, so expect at least a decade before that gets mainstream.
If it works like Android, crapware is included.
He retired, and /. retired the logo.
But they ould have replaced it by something better.
Android has it, and probably iOS too.
It comes as a need-to-have feature once you start locking everything into DRM.
Yes, except for everything that could corupt the media, it should be safe. By the way, if OS permissions could keep it safe, you wouldn't need to reinstall the OS.
Except if the same bugs that corrupted the image also corrupted the public key. If you are arguing for Safe Boot, yes, it could be used like that, but no, MS won't have you best interest in mind when working the details, so it won't do that well.
There are some top level keys in the register. One of those is something like HKEY_MACHINE_CURRENT_USER. That one keeps data of the current user, and he has write acces to it.
1 - Boot Linux in a live CD or pen drive /dev/sda | gzip > /mnt/external-drive/windows-image.gz
2 - Mount external or network drive where you want to make the copy
3 - cat
4 - ????
5 - Profit
Of course, that assumes you don't operate in a "MS Shop", and can use real tools.
See, the worst thing about not talking on your fisrt language is that sometimes you are sure of the meaning of one word, just to discover you were thinking about another one that is quite near, but different.
Or, in other words, forget it, my post was wrong. Very wrong.
Yes, and saving time for not having to deal with the Microsoft's support channel available... That kind of things.
If you want to make a reverse proxy, Nginx is the way to go.
But unfortunately, most software that people want to speed-up with a reverse proxy are of bad quality. If it wasn't, it would also probably be fast and wouldn't need that proxy.
Yes, by not using IIS you save way more than the licesing.
What is the difference?
So was in Brazil. You can't just send your spies to look at everything in every country witht he guise of working for the UN. After both sides agreed on a "looking" methodology, the inspectors were permited in. In both of those countries.
When the US invaded Iraq, the UN inspectors had access to all the countries infrastructure.
As a comercial embargo is an act of war, the replaced headline would be acurate. Remember that the US is still discussing if it should embargo Iran... Now compare to the decision about Spain.
It seems like Spain needs a nuclear program.
If you only threatened countries to do things that are good for their populations, those populations wouldn't think you are a bully, and would laugh every time their media or government claims so.
The reality is that rarely the US gets involved on the internals of another country to make its people better. But they get involved daily in things that makes other country's people worse.
I guess that will build a nice reputation for the US gathering more alies (and keeping their present ones) while it enters a war with Iran.
With that kind of posturing, people will think twice before choosing if they cooperate with the US or China...
Oh, they don't have to whine. They don't even have to refuse. Docotors simply don't pursuit working with MRI scanners when they think they aren't able, and don't try to prove that they are.
Well, it does not take anything from your point. Just the analogy was a bad one.
That insight is quite a bit more general than what you state. The quality of anything is not a result of the amount you spend on it.
That is just more accentuated on governments, but is a general truth.
Session ID doesn't need to be in the URL. As you said, it can go to cookie, so as to not polute the URL.
It is better to keep in the URL just the information you need for selecting what you'll display, so it stays a resource locator. Session information is not one of those. Putting session ID on links or bookmarks disrupt some things (caching for example).