I imagine ssh would implement the new feature, or you'd use a stand-in. For instance, call an "xterm" with an rdp command. It's all theoretical at this point:)
I don't see why any of those things precludes Wayland. It looks like it will go the route of per-app RDP. RDP works fine with copy/paste and doing it per app should let you have fine grained control over the users those apps run as.
Huh. I change all my shells to tcsh. I set up my configuration the way I like it in 1996 or so, so it's the path of least resistance for me.
Re:only recommended if you need to stay on 8.x
on
FreeBSD 8.4 Released
·
· Score: 1
I love the legacy support even for my home machine. I set up my server 2 years ago with the 8.x series, and their continued support makes it easier to maintain than if I had to upgrade to 9.x. For a new build, I'd definitely go with the 9.x series.
That list is... interesting! Obviously incomplete and some really obvious omissions (earthquakes?) , yet they have the recent building collapse of a building under demolition in Philly! Anyway, cool link, thanks...
Like I said, it's not about stupidity - it's all about corruption. I am certain that the Chinese are "smart" enough to build a tall building safely... they are people, after all. That, and the knowledge is already available to anyone who wants it.
My concern is that they will be depending on someone scaring the corruption out of the system for this project. That is why I used the Manhattan crane example... NYC is fairly corrupt for a US city, but it absolutely pales in comparison to China.
Yes, if you were in the US the numbers would be flopped around. Current average is $3.57 per US gallon ($0.94/liter) for gasoline and $3.93 per US gallon ($1.04/liter) for diesel. Payoff time for a diesel car in the US is very, very long - both because of the low price of fuel and the fact that diesel costs more per gallon (though you get more energy). Hybrid cars have similar economic problems in the US market, but the "green" image still sells cars. Diesel is cool in some circles, and we have some models available for those people. VW seems to do a fairly decent job selling them, and of course they are popular in trucks, where torque and efficiency really stand out.
In something like a diesel hatch back, "a bit more efficient" translates to more than twice as efficient,
I think you are trying to compare MPG between diesel and gasoline. Diesel is a more energy-dense fuel, IIRC by about 10-15%. The engine itself is probably about 10-15% more efficient, depending on the type of driving. Remember that diesel uses more crude oil to produce than gasoline, per unit volume. What type of engine is most economical probably depends on your country's refinery infrastructure - in the US, the refineries are largely set up to handle crappy Venezuelan crude - not the light sweet stuff from the Middle East. As a result, they are cracking our crude anyway and it is easy for them to tune the refinery stack towards gasoline. In Europe, they get diesel as a byproduct unless they want to take the additional cracking step. So in the US, diesel is priced more or less in line with it's energy content vs. gasoline and it makes it harder to recover costs. Diesel also goes up relative to gasoline in the winter, as many American homes use it for heat.
There is a difference between a building collapsing because it was the first of it's kind 100 years ago and a building collapsing because the inspector was paid off by the guy selling substandard cement, 100 years after the materials and architectural engineering have been worked out. There were some high-profile crane collapses in Manhattan in the past few years that demonstrate stupidity and corruption if you want a US example.
Diesels are the torque king and they are a bit more efficient than gasoline, but the penalty is weight and/or cost. For "cost is no object" kind of sports cars, they are a non-starter.
Pushrods and low RPMs, mostly. V8s are all about torque, though. GM actually has some pretty impressive pushrod engines these days, but they do have an RPM disadvantage.
It's a bit simplistic to say they are "in power". Anyway, how would Osama bin Laden have liked their adherence to the peace treaty with Israel? If the Muslim Brotherhood represents extremism in modern Egypt, then the West can rest quite comfortably because they seem fairly pragmatic.
I'm no expert on bin Laden but I doubt his goal was to get 100% of Muslims into al Qaeda. Bin Laden was a mujahideen and was fighting on behalf of other Muslims. It's like saying the goal of a general of the US army must be to get 100% of Americans into the army.
What I mean is, you don't have this mass movement towards Osama bin Laden's style of Islam. Sure, he'd be thrilled that the Brotherhood has as much influence as it does in Egypt - but he'd be less enthusiastic about how they went pragmatic once they actually got some power.
This judge says that this evidence can't be considered because they'd previously asked for the keys and he'd refused.
No, he has several drives. Before they cracked one of them, there was no evidence even tying the drives to him. Now they apparently have some evidence tying him to the drives, and they apparently have some evidence to support him collecting child porn on the other (still encrypted) drives. The evidence already uncovered is fair game.
It's a tricky problem... on the one hand, it seems easy to equate it a physical key and a physical lock. In reality, it is more complex, since the "key" is really knowledge and the "lock" cannot be picked, pried, or otherwise forced open in the traditional sense. In the past, if a suspect had some documents ferreted away in a vault, the prosecutors could get a subpoena to crack the vault. Now they have the subpoena, they have the "vault", but they are frustrated because the vault is practically unbreakable.
How about measuring him by his own words and stated goals? The man's whole dream for the Middle East went up in a puff of Arab Spring. "His" own people rejected his methods and goals.
Communism works, it just has never been done correctly.
Also, anyone using the term "scrum" in the US is probably just parroting what it says to do in the book, since that is a soccer term. If you were actually thinking about what you were doing, you'd probably say "huddle" to make the concept seem less foreign to a skeptical "team".
The only people who benefit from such meetings (can we call them meetings?) are micromanagers, since anyone doing the work already knows. Meetings should be reserved for when one person wants to inform many, not for when many need to inform one.
Seriously? I had an 11-second-to-60 truck and it was horrible. Just, horrible. I generally try to get up to around highway speed on the ramp, which is impossible if you have such a slow vehicle (especially when the idiot in front of you waits until the last second to accelerate).
I was thinking more along the lines of: if you are married, don't go out for drinks with the cute girl from work:)
And yes, that does make me slightly more boring - but that's rather the point! Not all kinds of excitement are good - get to know yourself and your weaknesses.
Just because biology is talking, doesn't mean you have to listen.
If that's your strategy, you probably are destined for disappointment. IMHO, it's best to learn how to identify and avoid situations that force you to confront your biology.
Slashdot Mirror
I imagine ssh would implement the new feature, or you'd use a stand-in. For instance, call an "xterm" with an rdp command. It's all theoretical at this point :)
I don't see why any of those things precludes Wayland. It looks like it will go the route of per-app RDP. RDP works fine with copy/paste and doing it per app should let you have fine grained control over the users those apps run as.
Here you go!
I don't know how any of you people get streaming to work over wireless.
Huh. I change all my shells to tcsh. I set up my configuration the way I like it in 1996 or so, so it's the path of least resistance for me.
I love the legacy support even for my home machine. I set up my server 2 years ago with the 8.x series, and their continued support makes it easier to maintain than if I had to upgrade to 9.x. For a new build, I'd definitely go with the 9.x series.
When a phone is stolen, another phone gets purchased.
No, the same phone gets pawned off for a much lower price.
That list is... interesting! Obviously incomplete and some really obvious omissions (earthquakes?) , yet they have the recent building collapse of a building under demolition in Philly! Anyway, cool link, thanks...
Like I said, it's not about stupidity - it's all about corruption. I am certain that the Chinese are "smart" enough to build a tall building safely... they are people, after all. That, and the knowledge is already available to anyone who wants it.
My concern is that they will be depending on someone scaring the corruption out of the system for this project. That is why I used the Manhattan crane example... NYC is fairly corrupt for a US city, but it absolutely pales in comparison to China.
Yes, if you were in the US the numbers would be flopped around. Current average is $3.57 per US gallon ($0.94/liter) for gasoline and $3.93 per US gallon ($1.04/liter) for diesel. Payoff time for a diesel car in the US is very, very long - both because of the low price of fuel and the fact that diesel costs more per gallon (though you get more energy). Hybrid cars have similar economic problems in the US market, but the "green" image still sells cars. Diesel is cool in some circles, and we have some models available for those people. VW seems to do a fairly decent job selling them, and of course they are popular in trucks, where torque and efficiency really stand out.
In something like a diesel hatch back, "a bit more efficient" translates to more than twice as efficient,
I think you are trying to compare MPG between diesel and gasoline. Diesel is a more energy-dense fuel, IIRC by about 10-15%. The engine itself is probably about 10-15% more efficient, depending on the type of driving. Remember that diesel uses more crude oil to produce than gasoline, per unit volume. What type of engine is most economical probably depends on your country's refinery infrastructure - in the US, the refineries are largely set up to handle crappy Venezuelan crude - not the light sweet stuff from the Middle East. As a result, they are cracking our crude anyway and it is easy for them to tune the refinery stack towards gasoline. In Europe, they get diesel as a byproduct unless they want to take the additional cracking step. So in the US, diesel is priced more or less in line with it's energy content vs. gasoline and it makes it harder to recover costs. Diesel also goes up relative to gasoline in the winter, as many American homes use it for heat.
There is a difference between a building collapsing because it was the first of it's kind 100 years ago and a building collapsing because the inspector was paid off by the guy selling substandard cement, 100 years after the materials and architectural engineering have been worked out. There were some high-profile crane collapses in Manhattan in the past few years that demonstrate stupidity and corruption if you want a US example.
Diesels are the torque king and they are a bit more efficient than gasoline, but the penalty is weight and/or cost. For "cost is no object" kind of sports cars, they are a non-starter.
Pushrods and low RPMs, mostly. V8s are all about torque, though. GM actually has some pretty impressive pushrod engines these days, but they do have an RPM disadvantage.
It's a bit simplistic to say they are "in power". Anyway, how would Osama bin Laden have liked their adherence to the peace treaty with Israel? If the Muslim Brotherhood represents extremism in modern Egypt, then the West can rest quite comfortably because they seem fairly pragmatic.
I'm no expert on bin Laden but I doubt his goal was to get 100% of Muslims into al Qaeda. Bin Laden was a mujahideen and was fighting on behalf of other Muslims. It's like saying the goal of a general of the US army must be to get 100% of Americans into the army.
What I mean is, you don't have this mass movement towards Osama bin Laden's style of Islam. Sure, he'd be thrilled that the Brotherhood has as much influence as it does in Egypt - but he'd be less enthusiastic about how they went pragmatic once they actually got some power.
This judge says that this evidence can't be considered because they'd previously asked for the keys and he'd refused.
No, he has several drives. Before they cracked one of them, there was no evidence even tying the drives to him. Now they apparently have some evidence tying him to the drives, and they apparently have some evidence to support him collecting child porn on the other (still encrypted) drives. The evidence already uncovered is fair game.
It's a tricky problem... on the one hand, it seems easy to equate it a physical key and a physical lock. In reality, it is more complex, since the "key" is really knowledge and the "lock" cannot be picked, pried, or otherwise forced open in the traditional sense. In the past, if a suspect had some documents ferreted away in a vault, the prosecutors could get a subpoena to crack the vault. Now they have the subpoena, they have the "vault", but they are frustrated because the vault is practically unbreakable.
Personally, I think I side with the defendant.
That is a stated method, not a stated goal.
By any measure, Osama won on 9/11.
How about measuring him by his own words and stated goals? The man's whole dream for the Middle East went up in a puff of Arab Spring. "His" own people rejected his methods and goals.
Communism works, it just has never been done correctly.
Also, anyone using the term "scrum" in the US is probably just parroting what it says to do in the book, since that is a soccer term. If you were actually thinking about what you were doing, you'd probably say "huddle" to make the concept seem less foreign to a skeptical "team".
The only people who benefit from such meetings (can we call them meetings?) are micromanagers, since anyone doing the work already knows. Meetings should be reserved for when one person wants to inform many, not for when many need to inform one.
Seriously? I had an 11-second-to-60 truck and it was horrible. Just, horrible. I generally try to get up to around highway speed on the ramp, which is impossible if you have such a slow vehicle (especially when the idiot in front of you waits until the last second to accelerate).
Yes, you got it...
I was thinking more along the lines of: if you are married, don't go out for drinks with the cute girl from work :)
And yes, that does make me slightly more boring - but that's rather the point! Not all kinds of excitement are good - get to know yourself and your weaknesses.
Just because biology is talking, doesn't mean you have to listen.
If that's your strategy, you probably are destined for disappointment. IMHO, it's best to learn how to identify and avoid situations that force you to confront your biology.
Even though it's a PITA, restricting the character set makes things slightly less annoying around here most of the time.