Maybe I'm missing it, but when you look at their main developer page, there is no mention of such limitations. Even when you dig into the documentation a little, you need to counter-intuitively hit the section about UWP API documentation to see the chart of limitations.
Even then, the task of tediously looking through the list of APIs to determine which ones your app is likely to hit is not going to be fun, especially if it is a kitchen sink app like Office.
We really and truly have become a throw-away society, haven't we?
I've never thrown away a laptop because it stopped being pretty. Hell, I've never thrown away a car because it stopped being pretty. Then again, I've never purchased a laptop with fur on it.
Oddly enough, the stuff I get the most praise for is stuff that I simply started doing because it filled a void that I felt was present. Full disclosure: I have a cool boss.
Austria's leader is a giant douche. He rapes babies. Once I saw him watching hardcore bestiality porn in his car, stealing WiFi from a nearby cafe. I hate him. This is hate speech.
No, I hear you loud and clear. You really are beating a dead horse. I've stopped advocating for manned space travel in this conversation because I already made my position clear and don't have anything to add. I think it is worthwhile and you don't.
It's exactly like a filing cabinet. You can refuse to give them the combination, but in time they will cut through it. The phone has a similar protection, but they don't know how to cut into it. What phones really need is a delete combo so that you can give them a number that wipes out key areas but unlocks the phone.
Despite these positive opinions of the space program, just a two-in-ten Americans in the 2012 GSS survey said that the U.S. spends too little on space exploration. Four-in-ten believed the current spending was adequate, while three-in-ten believed further cuts should be made to the program. Instead, Americans strongly preferred increased spending on programs closer to home, including education (76%), public health (59%), and developing alternative energy sources (59%).
I'm very confused by your comment. I say that one problem with this measure is that it does not include production costs (in terms of CO2). You then quote the part that agrees with my statement and call me out on my statement? Why?
My problem with this article is that the author misinterpreted the original data and makes value judgements (e.g. "good news", "bad news") based on too-little information. This study simply says what you likely already know - changing from a high-carbon-content fuel to a low-carbon-content fuel also reduces the amount of carbon sent into the air when it is consumed. Unless you were unaware that cars ran on gasoline in 1975 and continue to do so today, it should not be a revelation. It should also not surprise you that the switch to natural gas from coal has resulted in less carbon emissions in the electric industry. We've read many, many stories on here about that - and that fact was made clear without a new bullshit metric.
Don't get me wrong, this metric could even be useful in a broader article trying to explain historical trends in carbon emissions. But in isolation, it doesn't tell you much of anything beyond the carbon content of various fuels (sort-of bullshit adjusted for renewables), which is a constant.
Slashdot Mirror
When people say "the universe is expanding", they don't mean in absolute size. It's more like "inflating" - spacetime itself is expanding.
Haha... touche.
Maybe I'm missing it, but when you look at their main developer page, there is no mention of such limitations. Even when you dig into the documentation a little, you need to counter-intuitively hit the section about UWP API documentation to see the chart of limitations.
Even then, the task of tediously looking through the list of APIs to determine which ones your app is likely to hit is not going to be fun, especially if it is a kitchen sink app like Office.
Thanks for the LOL before I took a sip of coffee :)
We really and truly have become a throw-away society, haven't we?
I've never thrown away a laptop because it stopped being pretty. Hell, I've never thrown away a car because it stopped being pretty. Then again, I've never purchased a laptop with fur on it.
I'm betting on "not ready yet" and that the claims of Centennial being a panacea are a little inflated :)
What does that tell you? :)
Oddly enough, the stuff I get the most praise for is stuff that I simply started doing because it filled a void that I felt was present. Full disclosure: I have a cool boss.
Exactly - for me the acid test is how well they do with the Office port. In theory it is due in June.
Excellent. Much better irony than my post.
Well, sure she's a she NOW, after her surgery. Hate!
Austria's leader is a giant douche. He rapes babies. Once I saw him watching hardcore bestiality porn in his car, stealing WiFi from a nearby cafe. I hate him. This is hate speech.
Mozilla is complicit in shipping browsers which load Neo-Nazi websites.
I have no idea what "agenda" you think I'm pushing. If you think I'm anti-AGW, you are completely off-base.
The study attempts to track emissions back to primary fuels. It specifically comments on "indirect emissions".
While I see the mention that you speak of, I do not see any evidence for accounting for indirect emissions. In fact, your next line proves that out.
The study does not measure CO2 emitted as a result of burning Ethanol.
You are correct - and I say elsewhere that this is very misleading because ethanol takes CO2 to manufacture.
You get an "attaboy".
That is a bad implementation, then. You should not be able to tell that the phone was wiped.
How would you prove which code I gave you?
No, I hear you loud and clear. You really are beating a dead horse. I've stopped advocating for manned space travel in this conversation because I already made my position clear and don't have anything to add. I think it is worthwhile and you don't.
What if you wrote your diary in a code that only you knew? Could they compel you to translate it?
It's exactly like a filing cabinet. You can refuse to give them the combination, but in time they will cut through it. The phone has a similar protection, but they don't know how to cut into it. What phones really need is a delete combo so that you can give them a number that wipes out key areas but unlocks the phone.
Well, you're sort of right, in that people have other priorities. They are very pro-humans-in-space in general, as mentioned in the link here. There isn't a lot of support for increasing NASA's funding, but there is broad support of around 60% for current levels of funding (or more).
I'm very confused by your comment. I say that one problem with this measure is that it does not include production costs (in terms of CO2). You then quote the part that agrees with my statement and call me out on my statement? Why?
My problem with this article is that the author misinterpreted the original data and makes value judgements (e.g. "good news", "bad news") based on too-little information. This study simply says what you likely already know - changing from a high-carbon-content fuel to a low-carbon-content fuel also reduces the amount of carbon sent into the air when it is consumed. Unless you were unaware that cars ran on gasoline in 1975 and continue to do so today, it should not be a revelation. It should also not surprise you that the switch to natural gas from coal has resulted in less carbon emissions in the electric industry. We've read many, many stories on here about that - and that fact was made clear without a new bullshit metric.
Don't get me wrong, this metric could even be useful in a broader article trying to explain historical trends in carbon emissions. But in isolation, it doesn't tell you much of anything beyond the carbon content of various fuels (sort-of bullshit adjusted for renewables), which is a constant.
Correct, if it was in America it would still say Mexican Student.
Thank you for sharing my frustration. I took the mod bashing for the team.
It's a Dr. Seuss quote. :)