It depends on how you phrase it. If you say, "She might be lying, I won't believe her until evidence comes up" then yeah, that's bad. If you say something like, "What an awful situation. I feel so sorry for her, and everyone involved. I will wait until the evidence comes out before judging" then you're good.
If you lead with sympathy, you're good. If you lead with accusations, then you're bad.
I don't know, I feel like it happens every single time one of these stories comes up. It's important to figure out the truth in these situations, but the rest of us who are not involved can calm down, step back, and wait until the truth actually comes out instead of trying to blame.
No, many objects sell for much more than the labor required to produce them.
The only value an object has is what someone is willing to pay for it (Economically speaking, of course. It might have sentimental value or educational value or just plain beauty, as well).
Let's focus on the USA for the moment to avoid an overly-broad discussion.
Sure, good idea.
Wages have fairly flat in the USA for about two decade
Nah, total compensation per hour is up. People are being compensated in other ways (mainly, healthcare).
and the percent of adults working is also flat or down.
You choose statistics that are misleading. As baby boomers retire, the percentage of people working will continue to drop. Why would you include those people in any labor statistic? The only reason to do so would be to mislead, and many news sources indeed intend to mislead.
When you look at the statistics that matter, the percentage of people who can find work among those who actually want to work, you'll find the rate is trending downward.
And again, there have never been more jobs ever than now. More people working. When are robots going to start taking those jobs?
Yeah, actually I was surprised how much Amazon stuff actually went down. I had a coworker who had previously worked at Amazon, and he assured profusely me that AWS was not stable. Clearly he was right. (I don't know why this is big news all of a sudden, AWS has a big outage every year on average).
Here's the evidence: nobody can identify the new fields that are replacing the old ones, unlike the past.
Lies. In the 30s, no one knew where the jobs would come from. They were searching desperately. But come about, they did.
but they not appearing in sufficient quantity to replace those lost.
Again, this is a lie. In the US, there are more jobs than there have ever been. More people working than there have ever been. Poverty is dropping across the globe.
In fact without such a large dumping ground creating jobs in Britain, the Industrial Revolution might have fizzled out. Hungry mobs would have rebelled and destroyed everything.
No, if Britain gave up industrialization, then the Dutch or the Germans would have overcome them.
That's the second time you've equated money with labor........it's not just labor, it's also goods. Marx made a similar mistake with looking at the labor-value of goods: he assumed that if X amount of labor went into an object, then it's worth X (whatever X is in inflation adjusted dollars). But he was wrong, even if it takes three hours to make a widget, if no one wants to buy that widget, then it's not worth three hours of labor. Likewise, many objects are worth much more than the labor required to produce them.
Nah, just that when it gets cold, scientists say, "It's going to be cold even more in the future because of global warming." If it snows unusually in a place, they say, "We're going to get even more snow in the future because of global warming."
Yeah, it seems like it's something he doesn't care about either. He probably thinks, "it's a reasonable way to stop terrorists" and it hasn't caused him any problem personally, so what's the big deal?
I thought so too at first, but it's only a function to check if it's balanced. That means count the nodes in the left sub-tree and the nodes in the right sub-tree and make sure they are the same (or close enough to the same). That's not too hard to write.
If I have to write a full red-black tree, then I'm in trouble.
Given that most Americans favor the surveillance, including both Republicans and Democrats, it would be rather foolish politically to try to change them. Something bad is going to happen that's bigger than LOVEINT or even spying on politicians, because the NSA has done both of those things.
I had the exact same experience with Google in no less than two interviews, just last year. I thought it was something they'd gotten recently, but I guess it's been a problem there longer.
Slashdot Mirror
It depends on how you phrase it. If you say, "She might be lying, I won't believe her until evidence comes up" then yeah, that's bad. If you say something like, "What an awful situation. I feel so sorry for her, and everyone involved. I will wait until the evidence comes out before judging" then you're good.
If you lead with sympathy, you're good. If you lead with accusations, then you're bad.
Victim blaming happens far less than false claims
I don't know, I feel like it happens every single time one of these stories comes up. It's important to figure out the truth in these situations, but the rest of us who are not involved can calm down, step back, and wait until the truth actually comes out instead of trying to blame.
I'm having trouble keeping track of all the sexual harassment claims at car companies.
No, many objects sell for much more than the labor required to produce them.
The only value an object has is what someone is willing to pay for it (Economically speaking, of course. It might have sentimental value or educational value or just plain beauty, as well).
Let's focus on the USA for the moment to avoid an overly-broad discussion.
Sure, good idea.
Wages have fairly flat in the USA for about two decade
Nah, total compensation per hour is up. People are being compensated in other ways (mainly, healthcare).
and the percent of adults working is also flat or down.
You choose statistics that are misleading. As baby boomers retire, the percentage of people working will continue to drop. Why would you include those people in any labor statistic? The only reason to do so would be to mislead, and many news sources indeed intend to mislead. When you look at the statistics that matter, the percentage of people who can find work among those who actually want to work, you'll find the rate is trending downward.
And again, there have never been more jobs ever than now. More people working. When are robots going to start taking those jobs?
Yeah, actually I was surprised how much Amazon stuff actually went down. I had a coworker who had previously worked at Amazon, and he assured profusely me that AWS was not stable. Clearly he was right. (I don't know why this is big news all of a sudden, AWS has a big outage every year on average).
Here's the evidence: nobody can identify the new fields that are replacing the old ones, unlike the past.
Lies. In the 30s, no one knew where the jobs would come from. They were searching desperately. But come about, they did.
but they not appearing in sufficient quantity to replace those lost.
Again, this is a lie. In the US, there are more jobs than there have ever been. More people working than there have ever been. Poverty is dropping across the globe.
In fact without such a large dumping ground creating jobs in Britain, the Industrial Revolution might have fizzled out. Hungry mobs would have rebelled and destroyed everything.
No, if Britain gave up industrialization, then the Dutch or the Germans would have overcome them.
That's the second time you've equated money with labor........it's not just labor, it's also goods. Marx made a similar mistake with looking at the labor-value of goods: he assumed that if X amount of labor went into an object, then it's worth X (whatever X is in inflation adjusted dollars). But he was wrong, even if it takes three hours to make a widget, if no one wants to buy that widget, then it's not worth three hours of labor. Likewise, many objects are worth much more than the labor required to produce them.
Like you would have given your bonus to employees in that situation. Or maybe you would have, but in that case you are quite a rare person.
Nah, just that when it gets cold, scientists say, "It's going to be cold even more in the future because of global warming." If it snows unusually in a place, they say, "We're going to get even more snow in the future because of global warming."
Well aren't you an irate one. Check this out.
Makes sense. You should apply at Amazon: their tech writers need help.
I think you're making an argument against something that no one has written.
Nice strategy.
Yeah, it seems like it's something he doesn't care about either. He probably thinks, "it's a reasonable way to stop terrorists" and it hasn't caused him any problem personally, so what's the big deal?
I always wonder why we were taught AVL trees in CS, but not red-black trees
Might have been your particular professor didn't like them?
I thought so too at first, but it's only a function to check if it's balanced. That means count the nodes in the left sub-tree and the nodes in the right sub-tree and make sure they are the same (or close enough to the same). That's not too hard to write.
If I have to write a full red-black tree, then I'm in trouble.
"Make sure you bring writing samples", but they never asked to see them.
What?
Not to mention there's video of the Kamal incident, and the full version makes him look worse than the merely edited version.
Lyft is absent from serious media promotion
They were pushing hard in Las Vegas last year. Hired a bunch of street promoters to hand out coupons for free rides.
Given that most Americans favor the surveillance, including both Republicans and Democrats, it would be rather foolish politically to try to change them. Something bad is going to happen that's bigger than LOVEINT or even spying on politicians, because the NSA has done both of those things.
Fascinating.
I normally use, "raving loon," figuratively, but in this particular case we're getting dangerously close to literally.
Literally? As in she is actually a bird? Was her aunt a mallard duck or something? Your use of literally here fascinates me.
I had the exact same experience with Google in no less than two interviews, just last year. I thought it was something they'd gotten recently, but I guess it's been a problem there longer.