That's exactly right, I was asking you to come up with an experiment we could perform at a smaller scale. You agree that Texas doesn't match what you are trying to do.
The scientists in the article are complaining that people conclude two things are the same when there is no statistical difference between the two. You can't conclude that: all you can say is "we aren't sure."
The real problem is when scientists aren't interested in finding something significant, they are interested in getting published. In that situation, even setting the threshold at.0005 will end up with p value hacking.
That's not really true, SF has been doing a lot with the homeless recently. If you walk down Market street, or down the Mission, you'll see that the number of homeless people has dropped.
Right to repair laws definitely will put burdens on manufacturers to do stuff, change stuff, provide stuff, and manage stuff that they are not otherwise obligated to do.
These changes are pretty minor. We're not talking about a huge expensive design effort or anything, and I say that right now as I am working at a manufacturing company.
That's making assumptions. Another hypothesis is that people in developed countries have fewer kids because they aren't worried about their kids dying.
My great grandma had 15 siblings but only one of them survived. With that kind of survival rate, it's only natural too have extra just in case.
Is the tree killer angle poes law? Or a disingenuous representation of actual concerns about deforestation?
Killing trees was a primary environmentalist concern not long ago. Now it's not, but it will be again.
Cutting a tree down isnt a problem if you plant one.
You don't make paper out of just any wood. There are huge plantations of monoculture trees that make your paper, displacing the natural biosphere of the area. Cutting down a tree to make paper is without a doubt killing a living object.
in Japan they meticulously sort the recyclables and deliver to community bins
That's overly optimistic. The recycling categories in Japan are confusing, varied, sometimes contradictory, and different people have different ideas of what's optimistic.
The only reason a consumer would not want the ability to repair is if it made the device more expensive. In some cases that might be true, but generally, it's not.
There is absolutely zero reason to have any database on the open internet. "nmap $hostname$" today, make sure your IPs are not exposing things they shouldn't.
Normally when there is a polarizing debate, where I find both side to be exaggerated (which is easy to get on American News, and flipping sources to weed out the truth from hyperbole)
That's the distance giving them perspective. The BBC can be completely biased when it comes to British news.
Slashdot Mirror
What's the difference of difference error?
That's exactly right, I was asking you to come up with an experiment we could perform at a smaller scale. You agree that Texas doesn't match what you are trying to do.
Texas has property tax. Do you have a more realistic example?
Can you think of an experiment we could try to test the consumption tax that wouldn't screw us royally if your hypothesis is wrong?
That's a false dichotomy.
Everyone needs to understand statistics in the modern world. People who don't get lost and very, very confused.
The scientists in the article are complaining that people conclude two things are the same when there is no statistical difference between the two. You can't conclude that: all you can say is "we aren't sure."
Best description of narratives ever. It also explains why marketers like them so much.
The real problem is when scientists aren't interested in finding something significant, they are interested in getting published. In that situation, even setting the threshold at .0005 will end up with p value hacking.
If you don't have a timer, you don't know if you've sped things up or slowed them down.
Facebook says an ongoing investigation has so far found no indication that employees have abused access to this data.
The CEO himself admitted to using this data to hack users' email.
The incompetence of these people is astonishing.
But if I had to choose, I'd choose the e-cigs any day.
e-cigs are so much better for you than cigarettes that everyone should switch to them immediately. For reasons you mentioned, like tar.
If someone wants to quit, then quit later, but switch to e-cigs now.
That's not really true, SF has been doing a lot with the homeless recently. If you walk down Market street, or down the Mission, you'll see that the number of homeless people has dropped.
Right to repair laws definitely will put burdens on manufacturers to do stuff, change stuff, provide stuff, and manage stuff that they are not otherwise obligated to do.
These changes are pretty minor. We're not talking about a huge expensive design effort or anything, and I say that right now as I am working at a manufacturing company.
That's making assumptions. Another hypothesis is that people in developed countries have fewer kids because they aren't worried about their kids dying.
My great grandma had 15 siblings but only one of them survived. With that kind of survival rate, it's only natural too have extra just in case.
Is the tree killer angle poes law? Or a disingenuous representation of actual concerns about deforestation?
Killing trees was a primary environmentalist concern not long ago. Now it's not, but it will be again.
Cutting a tree down isnt a problem if you plant one.
You don't make paper out of just any wood. There are huge plantations of monoculture trees that make your paper, displacing the natural biosphere of the area. Cutting down a tree to make paper is without a doubt killing a living object.
I would assume they want to try to hold management to a 40 hour work week for the employees
That likely means timecards and clocking in and clocking out. No thanks.
in Japan they meticulously sort the recyclables and deliver to community bins
That's overly optimistic. The recycling categories in Japan are confusing, varied, sometimes contradictory, and different people have different ideas of what's optimistic.
Glass and paper are not a problem
Paper's not a problem? Tree killer!
Glass is not a problem? Broken pieces of glass everywhere on the ground. I'm glad those days are over.
The only reason a consumer would not want the ability to repair is if it made the device more expensive. In some cases that might be true, but generally, it's not.
You can lay down and die now and no one will help you. That has nothing to do with being homeless, white, or male.
This defect can be mitigated with a proxy that provides authentication and URL filtering.
I strongly suggest setting up a VPN, there are several free packages and it shouldn't take more than a day to set up.
There is absolutely zero reason to have any database on the open internet. "nmap $hostname$" today, make sure your IPs are not exposing things they shouldn't.
Normally when there is a polarizing debate, where I find both side to be exaggerated (which is easy to get on American News, and flipping sources to weed out the truth from hyperbole)
That's the distance giving them perspective. The BBC can be completely biased when it comes to British news.
I know plenty of homeless white males in the US. I've known some in other countries, too.