Slashdot Mirror


Kickstarter's Staff Is Unionizing (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: The staff of Kickstarter announced plans to unionize today. If recognized, Kickstarter would be the first major tech company with union representation in the United States. Members of the union, which goes by Kickstarter United, say they want to improve inclusivity and transparency at the company. To unionize, they're working with the Office and Professional Employees International Union (OPEIU) Local 153. In a statement, the union said: "Kickstarter United is proud to start the process of unionizing to safeguard and enrich Kickstarter's charter commitments to creativity, equity, and a positive impact on society. We trust in the democratic process and are confident that the leadership of Kickstarter stands with us in that effort. Kickstarter has always been a trailblazer, and this is a pivotal moment for tech. We want to set the standard for the entire industry. Now is the time. Come together. Unionize."

In a world of Facebook and Twitter, Kickstarter feels almost quaint in its mission -- "to help bring creative projects to life" -- and in its charter as a public benefit corporation, which means that the company is "obligated to consider the impact of their decisions on society, not only shareholders." Its staff unionizing means the company will also have to consider more seriously its responsibilities to its employees. It also means that its fellows in Silicon Valley and beyond could be next. Kickstarter is fundamentally a tech company, and its staff unionizing with the OPEIU shows a way forward for other employees in the space. Kickstarter's staff is unionizing because they want to "promote our collective values: inclusion and solidarity, transparency and accountability; a seat at the table," the organizers write, noting that in the decade that Kickstarter has been around, it's democratized crowdfunding and brought more than 150,000 projects to life. "Kickstarter's efforts are incomplete, and these values have failed to manifest in our workplace. We can do better together -- for ourselves and our industry."

145 comments

  1. The Betting Pool is Open... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...how long will this one last? Until the first round of contract negotiations? Until the first quarter of declining growth and/or revenue?

    Pessimistic, I know, but I bet the likes of GM, Ford, Chrysler, etc felt the same way in 1955 that Kickstarter does now. However, when the pressure came down in the 1970's-1980s, the automakers' tune(s) began to change radically. I suspect Kickstarter will do the same.

    After all, there's a reason why the otherwise progressive leadership at Google, Apple, and the other longer-established tech companies reject any attempts at unionization - often ruthlessly.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Informative
      Say "hello" to bad employees you can never fire....

      ...and goodbye to Kickstarter in the long run.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      >Say "hello" to bad employees you can never fire....

      Kickstarter already had a CEO, dude.

    3. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unionization is probably death for anything with thin margins like automotive, but not sure that's the case for an online platform.

    4. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Until, for some reason, they need ionized water.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say "hello" to bad employees you can never fire....

      ...and goodbye to Kickstarter in the long run.

      Yup, I work in a union shop. Good place to find lazy worthless entitled people. A few work, but they are the minority.

    6. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never heard of shareholders forcing a CEO out?

    7. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bad start, when the headline writer and the article author feel the need to lie to their readers from the very beginning.

      All of the "kickstarters staff" isn't unionizing, the article writer tries his hardest to claim this is on behalf of all of their staff, but it's obvious from the end that there are some people who work at Kickstarter (how many exactly isn't stated... hmmm.... wonder why?) who want them to unionize, but they haven't actually unionized yet. That requires and actual vote of the staff who would be effected, which apparently hasn't happened yet.

      As far as I can tell from the various articles, there are some members of staff who are working on "forming" a labor union called Kickstarter United.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    8. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've never heard of shareholders forcing a CEO out?

      I would love to be 'forced out' with the type of golden parachute that CEOs get.

    9. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Neat. I love anecdotal data. I work in a union shop as well. We all bust our asses and receive a 10% contribution to our 401k's and a 10% cash bonus each Christmas. Your workers are lazy because you work for a shit company with shit hiring managers and pay bottom-of-the-barrel salaries. Have fun being treated like bitch your whole life.

    10. Re: The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agree, all these shitlords come out at the slightest whiff of a union and start spewing their tropes. What they forget is that every Union has its own rules, decided by the union members. All a union means is that employees will collectively bargain the terms of their employment. You can still fire employees who are working unethically, you can still have different pay grades, low union fees, etc.

    11. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by roman_mir · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would ruthlessly reject any attempt at my staff unionizing as well, that's because there is no reason for developers that I hire to be a 'union', they are paid very well for where they are and what they do and I have 0 interest to talk to groups of people, if I wanted to talk to groups I would talk to governments and I hate governments.

      People will negotiate with me on their own, not as groups, it sounds like coercion and oppression by groups and I won't stand for it. The greatest problem of-course is government laws created for protecting unions.

    12. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is the problems of today are not the problems a hundred years ago, however, the Unions are structure roughly the same way.
      100 years ago most communities were centered around one or two factories. People had limited transportation available to them, the idea of transporting from one town to the next one 10 miles away was a big deal. So you worked for the company, lived in company housing (which your rent came out of your pay), having to buy food at the company store. If you got injured and couldn't work, you have lost your job and your access to housing and the company store, which is a big part of the community you lived in. In short, the company owned you, and you were really one step above being a slave.
      Today (and thanks to the effort of these unions of the past) The conditions are now much different, we have the ability to find work in different towns and cities, even go across states for commuting isn't unheard of. There is a social safety net where there are unemployment payments where you can pay you enough to keep your home for a while, where you can find another job.
      However, Unions play on the idea that you are stuck to your job. Where today being stuck, just means, we don't want to risk getting another job. But It is a different environment. While today's economy and the workers need support in negotiating with the company, today's Unions are seeming more fixed on gaining a power base, then actually helping the employees with useful things like wage parity, health care, benefits.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    13. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy enough to move to Indiegogo or countless other crowdfunding sites.

    14. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad start, when the headline writer and the article author feel the need to lie to their readers from the very beginning.

      Consider the source - Verge is part of Vox - both are fake news sites derived from Daily Kos

    15. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Berkyjay · · Score: 4, Informative

      Say "hello" to bad employees you can never fire....

      This is a very misinformed myth. It's the same myth as the welfare queen. Someone finds a handful of examples and then misrepresents those individuals as representative of the entire group.

    16. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I know that there's a tendency to look at it from a perspective of an old boys' club giving a fat paycheck to one of their chums, but from another perspective, the huge chunk of money is less costly than the damage an idiotic CEO could do if left in place. If you've got a multi-billion dollar company, $20 million to get out of a contract early could be worth every penny.

      But a lot of times it's also giving a fat paycheck to one of your chums, so that he'll do the same for you.

    17. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cops in any state and NY teachers come to mind. The former have plenty of examples of outright massive fuck-ups or corruption that don't get addressed because of the strength of the police unions. NYC teachers are so infamous for this that there are numerous stories about it, and it even has a Wikipedia article.

      I'm not one of those people who believe all unions are evil or that they shouldn't exist. I personally wouldn't be likely to want to join one, but if other people want to start one, that's their business and not mine. However, it's not a misinformed myth that unions will keep people around who really should be fired. Nor are the infallible in their decision making and they're as capable of any vice as the company board.

    18. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Berkyjay · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cops in any state and NY teachers come to mind.

      Like I said, a handful of examples.

      However, it's not a misinformed myth that unions will keep people around who really should be fired..

      The poster I responded to implied that the unionized Kickstarter employees would be immune to firing. The underlying implication was that this is a fact for all unions. It is not, by a long shot. You provided two examples out of thousands. So you're right, this isn't a misinformed myth. It's just pure misinformation.

      Nor are the infallible in their decision making and they're as capable of any vice as the company board.

      Not sure why this is relevant. I never implied that they weren't.

    19. Re: The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the Corporate Progressive nazi!

    20. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but from another perspective, the huge chunk of money is less costly than the damage an idiotic CEO could do if left in place. If you've got a multi-billion dollar company, $20 million to get out of a contract early could be worth every penny.

      OK, fine. Now apply that reasoning to all workers.

    21. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Selection and confirmation bias at work for prejudice!

      It's like Americans in strife for freedom, must forgo their freedoms. It just doesn't make any sense!
      Of course, the conglomerates may organize to their heart's content.
      As a nation, it's suicidal.

    22. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already applied. As opposed to your 'partner in crime' CEO buddy you don't get huge bribes/murky deals money from normal worker, so he isn't worth shit to you.

      Next question.

    23. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would ruthlessly reject any attempt at my staff unionizing as well

      Of course you would, it is antithetical to your religion, even if you cannot articulate why.
       
       

      they are paid very well for where they are and what they do

      Anyone who has read your comments where you brag about not paying your employees at all knows that this line is bullshit. You have bragged many times about what you have done to avoid paying your employees.
       
       

      I have 0 interest to talk to groups of people

       

      People will negotiate with me on their own, not as groups, it sounds like coercion and oppression by groups and I won't stand for it

      You really don't understand how union negotiations work, do you? If you had 10 employees and they were all unionized, you would negotiate with one union rep and you'd be done. You wouldn't negotiate with all of them in one giant meeting, it would be you and the union rep - and then what you decided with that rep would be passed down to the unionized employees.

      In fact, it would actually save you time compared to negotiating with all of the employees individually. Granted, you wouldn't get the opportunity to completely screw over some as the rep would set a wage floor, but you would spend less time negotiating and more time doing whatever the hell you think you do with the rest of your time.
       
       

      if I wanted to talk to groups I would talk to governments and I hate governments that are not led by the leader of the cult that I spend so much time recruiting for

      There, fixed that for ya. You're welcome.

    24. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Don't generalise. It destroys your argument. There is still an imbalance in power between an employer and employee, so unions are still terribly important. If one looks at countries with functioning unions (Germany, for example), you'd see they work and work well. They're not going to magically fix shitty business cultures, but they give the employees more of a chance to fix them.

    25. Re: The Betting Pool is Open... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      ...So you're saying one side has ACTUAL examples, and the other side (with no basis whatsoever except their own ideals) disputes the applicability of those examples?

      Then it's clear who is winning the debate.

      --
      -Styopa
    26. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No. The GP did not say all employees are going to be bad and you won't be able to fire them. What the GP said is say hello to bad employees you can never fire. Bad employees are universal. The inability to fire them is something that is enabled by shitty unions.

      It would be a more accurate rebuff to the GP to say that not all unions defend bad employees, but at no point was the GP applying individuals to the whole in terms of employee performance.

    27. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      We all bust our asses and receive a 10% contribution to our 401k's and a 10% cash bonus each Christmas.

      Hmm....back when I worked W2 jobs...our company MATCHED our 401K contributions. I had some jobs with Xmas bonus and some not, but the 401K thing was at most W2 jobs I had in the not too distant past.

      Sounds like your union needs to do more for you....get you up to at least non-union benefits.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    28. Re: The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a standard debate tactic used by people who can't defend their position.

      "People can't breathe water."

      "It's a myth! Lies! You're a lying liar!"

      "Here's a bunch of stories about people who drowned."

      "So what, you found a handful of examples out of 7 billion people. It proves nothing!"

      And so on. It works because enough people believe that there is no middle ground between absolute certainty on either side. It's like the CSI effect mixed with "correlation does not imply causation" on steroids, in a blender, in bizarro world. Even if there is a proven causitive link and a large set of examples, you can't prove your point unless you account for every single case in an unreasonably large set. You lose by default because the rules have been redefined to remove the possibility of winning. That's how debating works when the people you need to convince are complete imbeciles (i.e., the general public) (don't tell them that though, stupid people hate being called stupid).

      And yes, I have seen a terrible union employee who was impossible to fire. The best they could do was, after years of documented poor performance and outright incompetence, reassign him somewhere where he could do less damage. A bad union employee who can be dismissed quickly and easily? I'm pretty sure I'm more likely to find a person who can breathe water around here.

    29. Re: The Betting Pool is Open... by Berkyjay · · Score: 1

      Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This is also not a debate. It's a refutation of a lie. But if you need evidence then sure. Chew on this. http://haveyouheardblog.com/wp...

    30. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Berkyjay · · Score: 1

      That's not at all what I implied. The OP implied that the Kickstarter union will prevent any bad employees from being fired. That's it, nothing more nothing less.

      As for shitty unions, you seem to lack understanding of their purpose. Let's compare them to a public defender. Public defenders are forced to defend some people who most would consider shitty people who did bad things. But the PD isn't there to judge his client, nor should the PD be judged for defending him. He's there to make sure that he is provided proper defense under the law.

      So, yes there may be a "bad employee" that was fired. It is the union's job to insure that he was fired properly and with just cause. That's it. This is where the myth comes from. There are laws and contracts that govern unions and regardless of the character of their member, they are required to defend him.

    31. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      So by not generalizing and giving examples, such as skilled labor getting laid off from a company after working there for 30 years, just so they can bring in 12 more unionized employees. Or negotiation to get rid of the IT Staff from a company, so the can bring in more unionized labors.
      But then I am just giving Anecdotal evidence.
      I have seen companies getting unionized. Where they had problems before, but after the unionization the problems didn't go away but they amplified, rises in Salary went mostly to Union Dues. Safe jobs became at risk. Any problems with the Union has to be spoken in hush tones, otherwise you are considered a Union Buster!

      American Unions are not like German Unions, right now American Unions are a shady organization, who are running off an old mind set.
         

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    32. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say "hello" to bad employees you can never fire....

      This is a very misinformed myth. It's the same myth as the welfare queen. Someone finds a handful of examples and then misrepresents those individuals as representative of the entire group.

      It has been true for all schools my wife has worked for as an educator. There's even a term "lemon dance" where poor performing teachers are transferred to different schools within a district in an attempt to get them out of a particular school's hair.

    33. Re: The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just know you never worked a day in your life. You certainly never employed anyone.

    34. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's compare them to a public defender.

      Yes, let's compare unions to a concept that is good in theory but tends to fail to achieve its intended purpose due to implementation flaws exploited by those in positions of authority that result in essentially the same fate for all those who have to deal with them, regardless of their individual merits. Good choice.

    35. Re: The Betting Pool is Open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my union shop, it's called freeway therapy. Place them somewhere with a two hour commute and hope they quit.
      They don't usually.

    36. Re:The Betting Pool is Open... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      There are pros and cons to unions. However I will comment on your power base comment which is totally a thing.

      Call it power base, call it membership, call it self-perpetuation. That's ta unions #1 goal, everything else is secondary. It really comes down to motivation.

      In the same way that a real estate agent really has little vested interest in getting you a better deal, their interest is their time so the faster they can sell it the better, but since they get a percentage, the more it costs, the more they get paid. So their incentive is to sell expensive houses as fast as possible. Period.

      For a union that is membership, and more specifically membership dues. The more members, the more dues, the more dues the more money they get. I had one very illuminating experience where I felt that I went through an interview process that was very clearly unfair, the outcome ridiculous, and the process obviously flawed and gamed. I had though if ever there was a reason to go to my union this is it (first, last). The problem was is there are a couple unions involved for employees. At the time my current was union A, while the position I had applied for was in union B. When I went to go talk to my union rep, they basically said this: Listen, your situation may be grossly unfair, however we're not going to help you. If we did and you got that position, we would lose you as a member, as you would then be a member of Union B. However you can't get any help from Union B, because technically you are not a member. Suck it up and move on.

      Which I did, and if I'm honest I didn't really want the job, and was more of proving a point about how rigged the competition was. In the end it was good that I didn't get it anyway. However it did fundamentally teach me about the motivations of unions. It has nothing to do with the altruistic betterment of employees, but rather the self-preservation and growth of their membership, which many times have similar goals, but not always. The problem is that the employer is able to take advantage of where those goals don't exactly align to do whatever they want basically, which really isn't in the employees favor (particularly because you belong to a union you give up certain rights as well).

  2. Where Can I Donate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The staff of Kickstarter announced plans to unionize today.

    Anyone know their GoFundMe page so I can donate to the cause?

  3. This will end well by grasshoppa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    say they want to improve inclusivity and transparency at the company.

    This reads like a train wreck in progress. I can't wait.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:This will end well by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. Inclusively in tech is almost exclusively a demand-side issue. If activists want to see more minorities in IT, they need to focus on increasing the size of the pool of qualified applicants (preferably beginning at a very early age!) instead of badgering and harassing companies into compliance. The problem is that organic solutions like that take awhile to work, and that flies in the face of the instant-gratification crowd doing all the screaming.

    2. Re:This will end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware, you are casting a spell to summon AmiMoJo.

    3. Re:This will end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep, nothing improves company morale faster than bringing in a bunch of under-qualified/over-sensitive women and minorities who will immediately start throwing the racism/sexism card anytime they screw up, cause a 1,000% increase in drama, and contribute little-or-nothing to the team except making meetings twice as long because they want to waste time discussing their feelings and political issues. And get ready to waste a lot of time that you could be doing actual work in new mandatory "sensitivity training" classes and dealing with a bunch of new in-office drama. Oh, and as a bonus, you get to walk on egg-shells now all day too. Remember that even the most innocuous statement within earshot of one of your new diverse colleagues can now get you fired if they take it the wrong way, white boy.

      Yep, diversity is our strength.

    4. Re:This will end well by grasshoppa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is diversity of skin tone and gender preferable over meritocracy?

      Allow me to rephrase that.

      Why is racism/sexism preferable over meritocracy?

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    5. Re:This will end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because John over there is on his period and the doctor said that wouldn't happen when he took those pills.

    6. Re:This will end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Improving inclusivity probably means that any offended employee will be able to kick any creator off the platform. The only projects allowed will be the few to which no employee objects..

    7. Re:This will end well by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Inclusivity has nothing to do with hiring or diversity.

      It's about making sure that the people already at the company are not excluded, directly or systemically.

      It actually enhances meritocracy by ensuring that merit is measured in an unbiased, accurate way.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:This will end well by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      It actually enhances meritocracy by ensuring that merit is measured in an unbiased, accurate way.

      https://www.thecollegefix.com/...

      I'm sorry; you were babbling something about inclusivity being a good thing?

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    9. Re:This will end well by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You really need to learn to google before believing the first thing you read about a controversial event like this. There are people out there looking to mislead you for their own ends.

      Here's a more factual, straightforward article: http://www.citypages.com/news/...

      As it explains it wasn't even a one-off event, it was an issue over two years, and the suspension was as the result of many other issues:

      As of last month, Adamo had been âoeunilaterallyâ removed by Augsburgâ(TM)s provost, citing a âoerange of issuesâ raised by students: âoebias and discrimination,â âoerespect for students,â âoeteaching competenceâ and âoeprogram leadership.â These âoeissues,â a release from the university said, go beyond âoethat specific eventâ in October.

      I can't be bothered to spend more time investigating the incident but it doesn't seem to be what that article you linked to suggests it is. And even if it was, mistakes by one group do not render an entire idea that was incorrectly applied wrong. If that were true the first miscarriage of justice would invalidate the law in question.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:This will end well by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      I can see why you don't want to research this incident anymore; your data is just as damning as mine.

      Hurrah for inclusivity!

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    11. Re:This will end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, nothing improves company morale faster than bringing in a bunch of under-qualified/over-sensitive women and minorities who will immediately start throwing the racism/sexism card anytime they screw up, cause a 1,000% increase in drama, and contribute little-or-nothing to the team except making meetings twice as long because they want to waste time discussing their feelings and political issues. And get ready to waste a lot of time that you could be doing actual work in new mandatory "sensitivity training" classes and dealing with a bunch of new in-office drama. Oh, and as a bonus, you get to walk on egg-shells now all day too. Remember that even the most innocuous statement within earshot of one of your new diverse colleagues can now get you fired if they take it the wrong way, white boy.

      Yep, diversity is our strength.

      8chan is that-a-way, dude --->

  4. From VentureBeat... by Virtucon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Kickstarter management announced that it will be offshoring it's operations to Bangalore."

    In a statement from the CEO: "We needed to focus on our core competency and will continue to make Kickstarter great by offshoring non-essential operations to a third party. This will maximize the equity of the founders, senior management and the board of directors."

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:From VentureBeat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay!

      Speaking as a USA-side tech who coordinates with what is probably their offshoring company **cough**OfficeTiger**cough** I say this is a fantastic move.

      Welcome aboard!

  5. Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure we'll hear all the arguments about shipping jobs overseas or whatever.

    That's already happening. The fact that we're making LESS today than we did years ago (inflation adjusted) should tell you something. And it's NOT all offshoring or H1-bs.
    And it's not just making less- it's longer hours. I remember when you could work 9-5 in this industry and NOT have to be "available" 24/7 - even on vacations.

    I miss having a life. A life where I could leave work, go exercise, learn some crazy technology that has no marketable value on my free time (like Python when it first came out), have friends outside of work and who weren't techies, ... not always having to show my "value" compared to some third world worker who is so desperate that they'll do anything to keep their job! ....er, that's were I am now!

    Spiral to the bottom.

    We're getting there!! There's a 4 or 5 digit Slashdotter who predicted this 20+ years ago. I wonder if he's still around.

    1. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Completely agree. Tech used to be a job where you added so much value by the end of a normal work day you could happily go home at a normal hour. Now they want you to wear 15 hats and stand behind you Agilely with a shotgun to make sure youâ(TM)re always afraid of missing your manager inflicted deadlines...

    2. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lament of the incompetent. I make much more now than I did at the peak of the .com boom. About 3 times as much. The reason is that unlike most people in IT, I know what I am doing. I also work fewer hours. A union would just get in my way.

      If you actually knew what you were doing, you would be doing better as well.

    3. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the Precariat social class.

    4. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what kind of job you work at, but I make 400k total comp and take five weeks of unlimited vacay a year. We have free food, free massages, and an open bar in the kitchen. I think you should find a new job.

    5. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none of the above actually happened because libertarians don't actually ever make anything of value

    6. Re: Good! by OwP_Fabricated · · Score: 1

      stdh.txt

  6. Kickstarter's Staff Is Unionizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should put this idea on Indiegogo.

  7. Kickstarter: Home of Online Scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > " We want to set the standard for the entire industry."

    I sure as hell hope that they do not.

  8. I worked in a union. Wouldn't do it again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I worked for a large auto maker and was in a union for a few years after I started. I ended up leaving the union once I realized that it was an option. That plant is now shut down.

    Bad things a union brings:
      Terrible workers getting paid the same as great workers.
      Unsustainable compensation for workers.
      Taking dues and giving them to political causes that some of their members may not support.

    Would never want to be in a union again.

    1. Re:I worked in a union. Wouldn't do it again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad things a non-union "Right-to-Work" shop brings
      All workers never getting a raise because "F-'em!"
      Non-existant compensation AND benefits for workers because "F-'em!"
      The owners/shareholders taking what would have been your raise and giving them to political causes that some of their members may not support because "F-'em!"

      I've worked under a Union and I've worked without a Union. Give me a union shop any day, and if you are so tender that you can't stand the idea of someone you personally think is a "terrible worker" getting paid as much as you feel free to f-off and work somewhere there is no Union.

  9. So not to help the workers or users then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the summary, it says the goal of the unionization is to:

    improve inclusivity and transparency at the company

    But the summary also says:

    Its staff unionizing means the company will also have to consider more seriously its responsibilities to its employees

    Well which is it? Because unionizing is not helping the employees, at least not with the stated goals - in fact it is implying the current workforce needs to be "improved" through inclusivity.

    More transparency is also nice, but will there really be more transparency for the average worker, or just for the non-working people compensated by the workers, whose only job is to talk with management about the workers?

      Basically what you can count on being an employee of Kickstarter now:

    1) You will get less effective pay due to union overhead.

    2) You will be "inclusive" (tolerate substandard hires that meet a diversity quota) or GTFO.

    3) Now you have two bosses to please...

    Good luck with that! At least the market is hot so you can easily move to a company that values productive happy people over virtue signaling.

    Certainly the move means worse service for actual users of Kickstarter. What a shame, kind of enjoyed the place. Oh well, all good things must end, will look to see who picks up the pieces.

    1. Re:So not to help the workers or users then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the inside - the people pushing for unionization want to see promotions happen on the basis of social equity instead of competence. It's mostly a bunch of man haters who talk a lot about 'whiteness' and all the problems it brings to the world. They've been chasing away anyone with serious engineering skills for the last couple years and I've been interviewing.

  10. lolz unionizing in IT by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't want the pay cut

    collectively bargain your way out of employability

    1. Re:lolz unionizing in IT by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Why is American so vulnerable to this happening? It doesn't happen in Europe where unions are fairly common.

      What is it about America that allows employers to make unionizing a losing proposition for the employees?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:lolz unionizing in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They pay us well for performing well. I happen to know that software engineers on average are paid much better in the US than in Europe. I also know that union shops at least in the US tend to pay on seniority. I'm a good performer, I'm paid better than a fair number of people who are more senior than me. Why would I want to vote myself a pay cut?

    3. Re: lolz unionizing in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No sane company will ever hire a Kickstarter employee after this. They are now unemployable. No wonder they are socialists.

    4. Re:lolz unionizing in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CEO's will burn it down, to proof that unions lead to failure...

  11. Money laying on the floor by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone should start a Kickstarter fund to get a non-union competitor up and running.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Money laying on the floor by greythax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why? For ideological zealots who are offended by every attempt to better ones station in life?

    2. Re: Money laying on the floor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For people who don't want to support uptown socialists who never had a real job in their lives, yet speak for the supposed "workers" they don't actually care about.

  12. Oh you missed a big one by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Until they demand Kickstarter get even stricter and more biased in who they fund. Chasing even more business to other platforms.

  13. Bezos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just turned deathly pale and is trembling...

    1. Re:Bezos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His 'girlfriend' just started soaking the rattan cane?

    2. Re: Bezos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you realize Amazon will just shut shops where the entitled unionize. All this is doing is accelerating outsourcing and automation. Which is why the new socislist talking point is an old one - anti-industrializaton.

  14. Maybe a bad idea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the employees want to use their union to tell their company "you cannot do business w/ US Government or Military!" then I say don't allow this union!!!

  15. Ah, the FREE MARKET wingnuts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know their chatter when I see it.

  16. Well here's a questio: by Noishkel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fucking WHY? You take people's money and solve the occasional dispute. That's about it. In what reality does the inclusion of a union aid in this task? There is literately not a single fucking task that is performed at Kickstart that is either dangerous or dirty; which is about the only legitimate reason why you would need actual union protection.

    Forming a union is in no way a magic panacea for creating a better working environment, no matter how many far left retards try to tell you otherwise.

    1. Re:Well here's a questio: by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would assume they want to try to hold management to a 40 hour work week for the employees -- that's likely one of the biggest complaints you'll hear from tech and one which a union *might* be able to do something about. I'm not a labor law attorney so I'm not sure how this will work out in practice.

      But yeah, why would tech workers actually *want* to join a union? They typically already make much more than people in other industries, so I'm not too sure that collective bargaining for salary and benefits is going to be very interesting to most people there. And a lot of the political participation that unions do is going to piss off about half the people working at that company -- and now they will get to pay for it against their will.

      Some of the other stuff -- "inclusivity," for example -- the union will be powerless to affect. How would they force a company to hired qualified non-white / non-Asian / non-males if such people aren't already available to be hired from the pool in large numbers? Etc.

      Unionization in tech sounds like a solution looking for problems to justify its existence.

    2. Re:Well here's a questio: by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      They typically already make much more than people in other industries, so I'm not too sure that collective bargaining for salary and benefits is going to be very interesting to most people there.

      Sports also have unions, and I'm sure the athletes in them make way more than even techies do. Basketball players, hockey players, etc., their unions have gone on strike which leads to an abbreviated season.

    3. Re:Well here's a questio: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the Industrial revolution - it wasn't generally pay that brought on unionization. It was safety issues, education (unions provided basic education - not the state or employer - now you know), child labor, AND working hours. Coupled with the employers not having to give a shit so failing in common human decency was the clincher.

      It will come around again once the anti-humanity propaganda starts failing more and more people - or if people bother looking into history at all.

    4. Re:Well here's a questio: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The chief benefit I've found after reading over my union contract boils down to an inversion of the consequences of management inaction. In essence:
      -If the manager does not respond to a vacation request in a timely manner, consider it approved.
      -If the manager does not submit performance reviews on time, consider it a passing grade. This is important because...
      -If the employee has no negative performance reviews, they:
      --cannot be denied the annual raise
      --cannot be fired
      --cannot be denied perks (work from home, flex time, etc).

      The other benefit of debatable value is seniority rights: in the event of a disagreement, first crack at vacation times, shift choice, desk choice and parking space goes to whoever's been with the company the longest. The dude who started work a week later than the other 9 guys hired 10 years ago because he was getting over the flu? Forever dicked over.

    5. Re:Well here's a questio: by aybiss · · Score: 1

      Before we had unions there weren't even toilets at workplaces, let alone toilet breaks. You RWNJs want to drag us back to those days then fine, but don't expect us to go willingly.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    6. Re:Well here's a questio: by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I would assume they want to try to hold management to a 40 hour work week for the employees

      That likely means timecards and clocking in and clocking out. No thanks.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:Well here's a questio: by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      In what reality does the inclusion of a union aid in this task?

      Go read some history, you fucking dipshit.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    8. Re:Well here's a questio: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Unions are about more than collective bargaining. They provide a forum for employees and can take concerns to management. Remember that HR works in the company's interests, where as the union rep works in yours.

      A lot of people seem to be confused about what "inclusivity" is. It's nothing to do with hiring, it's about making sure that e.g. people with disabilities have a voice.

      An example of both these things is the union asking for things like adjustable desks and better chairs. If an individual asks for a standing desk or a fancy chair to help with their back problems it can look like favouritism or a benefit and create resentment, but if the union asks for everyone to be accommodated or makes the case for individuals with specific needs based on the relevant laws it's different. Unions are a useful buffer between employees and corporate management.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Well here's a questio: by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      There is literately not a single fucking task that is performed at Kickstart that is either dangerous or dirty; which is about the only legitimate reason why you would need actual union protection.

      I'm no fan of unions but my god that is wildly off base. In fact I would argue the opposite, dangerous tasks are not the ones that should be defended by a union since they are already defended by the state. Why whine to your colleagues when you can bring in OSHA.

    10. Re: Well here's a questio: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "where as the union rep works in yours"
      Incorrect. They work in the union's interest, which depends on the agenda of the union.

    11. Re:Well here's a questio: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you would really prefer working 60 or 70 hours a week to punching a timecard and only working 40?

    12. Re: Well here's a questio: by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That's a false dichotomy.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  17. Until the outsourcing/offshoring starts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will last until people get booted out the door and some world class contractors like Infosys, Deloitte, Accenture or others brought in who can do the same work for a fraction of the cost... or the operation would be offshored for just as good quality code... but pennies on the dollar in costs.

    1. Re: Until the outsourcing/offshoring starts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, Accenture and neither quality nor low cost belong anywhere near each other, you liebertarian stooge.

    2. Re: Until the outsourcing/offshoring starts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a shitty manager and/or code reviewer. ðY£ Accenture is a mixed bag, but quality depends a lot on the process, from what I've seen.

  18. Exclude Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As someone with a disability which lets companies tick off their inclusion and diversity check marks if they hire me, I wouldn't unionize for this. Discrimination is already illegal. Sure it still happens, I've lost multiple jobs due to it, but you end up not wanting to work there anyway. As long as you aren't dirt poor, any organization discriminating against you during the hiring process is a good thing because you won't want to work with those people. Forced inclusion only works over generations, it doesn't work overnight. Working at a place with artificial inclusion is a horrible experience. Even if you are good at what you do, people will assume you only got the job to meet the metrics. So not only will the discriminators still discriminate against you, more people will join them and the discrimination becomes more insidious because they can no longer just say it to your face.

    If you have an issue, disclose it right before signing the acceptance letter and ask if they think there might be problems and mention you don't want to waste their time and hopefully they aren't trying to waste your time.

  19. That's the problem - bettering One, not All by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Troll

    Why? For ideological zealots who are offended by every attempt to better ones station in life?

    Who benefits? Not the workers, that's for sure. The only person this benefits is the person who is paid to head the union for the workers.

    A person who does no actual work, but just talks to management about the workers. Which each side could easily do on their own, for free.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That's the problem - bettering One, not All by greythax · · Score: 0

      That's an interesting take, but not very representative of history. They largest period of wage growth in america coincided with the largest percentage of union participation. As union participation dropped, wages stagnated. While there is no guarantee that this is causation in action, it's certainly harder to logically argue the reverse. People these days have no perspective on what things were like in this country prior to unionization, and how easily we are getting rid of protections that our forefathers literally lost their lives to win.

    2. Re:That's the problem - bettering One, not All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, let me get this straight ... Unionization led to stagnant wages because:
      1. Unionization increased the cost of labour by sending "the cut" of workers paychecks only to union leaders

      2. Employers outsourced the cost of labor to China because it was cheaper there. This brought the price of labour down "regardless of the efforts of unions"

      3. Factory after factory closed because ... local labour costs were stagnant ... ?

    3. Re:That's the problem - bettering One, not All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many of us that are against unions don't disagree that they once had a positive impact. What we argue is their time has come and gone. Much of the impact they had got codified in to law and regulations. Now they're a corrupt manifestation that's more about money for the union coffers than helping the employees. They're also far more political these days too, often in the opposite way of half their membership.

      You can't just look at union membership numbers against the metrics you raise. A big part was the rise of globalization. The opening of the Chinese market starting in the 70's. The rise of the Japanese auto manufactures as the US manufacturers got lazy and bloated. Free trade deals with countries with vastly cheaper labor. The global economy shifted and manufacturing (the big chunk of union jobs) became cheaper to do elsewhere while the ability to import vastly improved. While these market forces were at work, unions kept striking and insisting on higher and higher wages, sealing the fate or their workers. In the 80's you saw unions striking against employers who were losing money. How can a union expect to keep jobs if they raise the cost of labor for a company teetering on the edge of bankruptcy? The unions were not interested in a symbiotic relationship that prompted a healthy employer and thus job security. They only wanted a quick dollar now, jobs in a year be damned. Labor refused to look long term and make wise decisions. They hastened the demise of American manufacturing.

      Today many of the workplace issues that unions splendidly helped fix don't exist. Yet unions still advertise that they're needed to protect workers from such things. They're clinging on to the past because they can't offer new reasons to exist. They're nothing more than a partisan arm of the DNC at this point. They turn workers in to a collective where everyone is just a number, performance and individual value is irrelevant. They promote a workplace where everyone's performance balance lower because trying harder does not reward

  20. You are part of the 1%, you just don't know it by Solandri · · Score: 2
    The only reason off-shoring works is because you're part of the privileged 1%. Of the world. Your labor is priced higher than the labor of some underprivileged person in the developing world, creating an economic incentive to shift jobs away from you and to them. The jobs there raise their productivity, increasing their purchasing power, creating more demand, which creates more jobs, which increases their productivity more, etc. The positive effect of all that on the global economy outweighs the negative effect of a 1%er (you) losing their job. Which is what creates an economic pressure to offshore your job - it 's a net economic benefit.

    Every argument you've come up with for why the top 1% of the U.S. is terrible and needs to be torn down and their wealth redistributed? Those arguments also apply to you relative to the rest of the world.

    Spiral to the bottom.

    It's not a spiral to the bottom. It's lifting up the rest of the world. Unfortunately for the 1% (you and me), the process of lifting the rest of the world results in downward pressure on the 1%. That's what creating economic equality does. You're just used to always thinking about "equality" from the perspective of the underprivileged being raised up. You've never thought of it from the perspective of the privileged being brought down, even though that's your true station in the global scheme of things.

    We won't get back to pre-equality levels of wealth and job security until after the rest of the world has become as developed as us, and the lowest-hanging economic fruit shifts back to improving our productivity. You can accept that that's our fate - how we have to "pay our fair share" to helping the rest of the world. Or you can oppose it, hypocritically demanding things from the 1% in the U.S that you yourself refuse to give up to the rest of the world.

    1. Re:You are part of the 1%, you just don't know it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck rest of the world ... fuck the globalist econ-101 turds. BANGBANG. Issue resolved. Get the picture BOSCO ?

  21. Closed my KS account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not conduct business with scoundrels and leftists.

  22. Don't bet on this starting a trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been a resident of Silicon Valley for 40 years. I've worked as a design engineer the entire time.

    Ain't going to happen. Hasn't happened when unions where stronger - why would it happen now?

  23. Re:lolz de-ionizing in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How do you tell the difference in a plumber and a chemist? Ask them to pronounce unionized.

    /me *ducks*

  24. Idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, they have no compelling reason to unionize beyond political dogma. They're just putting their SJW ethos front and center. And for what gain? Simply to pay parts of their paychecks to union leaders. I guess they're at least putting their money where their mouth is. I wonder how long until they realize they're not actually gaining anything of value. It will just be one more bureaucracy to deal with.

  25. Good for them by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    All IT workers should Unionize and do it at least nationally if not Globally.

    You can't win by yourself against a mega corp unless you happen to be in the .01% of math whizzes which, statistically, you're not. Time to stop playing at John Galt and join the real fight.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Good for them by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 1

      If you don't like the enterprise you work for, just leave. Period.

      Or better, start your own startup, take risk, spend your money and hire employees. I hope your employees will unionize and probably drive you to bankruptcy.

      --
      Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
    2. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather be a in the top 0.01% of legal brains if I was taking on MegaCorp Inc. When push comes to shove in the USA it usually comes down to who can hire the best lawyers.

  26. Quality will start to drop by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 2

    Best employees will leave and worst ones will stay there because they are protected by the union. I saw this millions times in my career (not just in IT). I'm a freelancer for 9 years now (25 years of experience) and companies contract me to fix the mess of unmotivated "I'm here for to pay/conditions" unionised employees.

    --
    Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
  27. A union is TRYING to unionize Kickstarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story and the headline are misleading. A union has said it has formed a group to ATTEMPT to get Kickstarter employees to join a union. So it's very premature to say the Kickstarter "staff" is unionizing. The union might or might not attract enough members from the employee base to be recognized.

  28. Alignment on goals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Kickstarter's charter commitments to creativity, equity, and a positive impact on society"

    Were these actually measurable, I'd say "maybe." But when they sit across the collective bargaining table, how are they gonna negotiate for better or more of any of these?

    Sniffs like the AOC green new deal: nice intents, but childish and thoughtless in construction.

  29. Speaking of "shitlords" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People like you come out and start lying about how each union "has it's own rules", like that means they are completely different and won't destroy any company or industry they are formed in. History says otherwise.

    Unions are useful in the short-term, but long-term the result is always the same: Shitty employees can't be fired, and corporations outsource their "production" to lower-cost countries.

    captcha: "desserts"

    1. Re:Speaking of "shitlords" by Uberbah · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's just repeating borish anti-union tropes that are powered by willful dumbfuckery. Any union is utterly dependent on the long term success of the company and industry it is in. As opposed to executives and unique Randian snowflakes like yourself, who only plan to work at a position for a year or two before applying for a different position with a different company.

    2. Re:Speaking of "shitlords" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power tends to corrupt.
      This observation of human nature has proven to be true for political parties, politicians, corporations, CEOs, religions, religious leaders, and of course also for unions among others.

    3. Re:Speaking of "shitlords" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Ubershitlord, I've been at my non-union company for 25 years. We are very successful and have good pay and benefits.

      Funny how the leftists keep trying to use the "snowflake" epithet against rational people. It's so "inclusive"!

      captcha: hilarity!

    4. Re:Speaking of "shitlords" by whitroth · · Score: 0

      Unions destroy companies? Really? So, are you working as a troll and getting paid for this propaganda, or are you just a sucker for the propaganda?

      Example 1: Eastern Airlines. Before Lorenzo took over in the late '80's, the unions opposed him, with smoking gun letters they'd obtained, showing his goal was to destroy the unions. HE RAN EASTERN INTO THE GROUND, and it went under SOLELY BECAUSE HE WANTED TO BREAK THE UNIONS.

      Example 2: The coal companies, a few years back, spun off another coal company, with *it* having all the union contracts, oh, and the payments to the health and pension funds. They *knew* it couldn't succeed, and it went under a couple years ago... and they're trying to use bankruptcy to break the union contracts.

      Overwhelmingly, it's management who have always hated unions, and they have destroyed companies, rather than work with unions.

      But that's ok, go to your job for 60 hrs/wk, and not be allowed to take vacation time, because you're "so important" (rather than being understaffed), and they expect you to answer phone calls and texts and email *all* of your time off, weekends, and evenings, and....

      Fool.

    5. Re:Speaking of "shitlords" by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Hey Ubershitlord, I've been at my non-union company for 25 years. We are very successful and have good pay and benefits.

      Uh huh. Does your company have to compete for labor with companies that are unionized, and thus forcing up your wages and benefits despite your being a class traitor?

      Power tends to corrupt. This observation of human nature has proven to be true for political parties, politicians, corporations, CEOs, religions, religious leaders, and of course also for unions among others.

      Union power is distributed amongst its membership, not concentrated in a handful of individuals the way a CEO and a corporate board is. No comparison.

  30. Learn to code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry, the outsourced union employees can always learn to code.

    Wait a second...

  31. Fallout from the gig economy by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 2

    As economics once again shifts, there are even more people without enough competence to work in that economy so they have to sponge off people who are competent enough to do the work but not smart enough to avoid the leeches.

    1. Re:Fallout from the gig economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are ~150 employees of Kickstarter. Unions generally form when an employer is abusing the employees. So the first question that comes to mind is what is so bad about working for Kickstarter. It may be low pay, long hours, uncompensated overtime, harassment, or various other issues. I am not sure what the union dues will be or how much they will accrue for a strike fund, but the pool of candidates seems fairly small. I would also differ in my opinion about Kickstarter being a "major tech company" as opposed to a finance company.

  32. Fucking pull your corporatist head out by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Unions act as a pushback against corporate greed. You do know that corporate greed affects workers at all ends of the pay scale, not just those at the bottom, yes? There is a reason why professional athletes, actors, screenwriters and directors are union members, even when they make six or seven figure salaries. It's so they don't get fucked over by those making eight, nine or even ten figures.

  33. Randian BS + anecdotes + confirmation bias by Uberbah · · Score: 0

    Terrible workers getting paid the same as great workers.

    This anti-union bullshit is predicated on the notion that you are just dying to do not only your own job, but Billy Bob's over there when he starts to slack off. Human beings simply aren't built that way.

    Unsustainable compensation for workers.

    Unions will accept cutbacks to save their jobs. Because, dipshit, their long term existence is utterly dependent on the long term well being of the company. As opposed to executives who DGAF if the company goes bankrupt in five years, if they can take their bonuses now and get off the ship before it sinks.

    Taking dues and giving them to political causes that some of their members may not support.

    Then vote to change what political causes the union engages in, or doesn't engage in. Contrast that to when a non-union shop takes the output of your labor, uses some of that for lobbying, in which you have absolutely no say whatsoever.

    Would never want to be in a union again.

    Don't let the door hit your dumb libertarian snowflake ass on the way out.

    1. Re:Randian BS + anecdotes + confirmation bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. OAC here. Tell me my experience isn't true. Good job. I stand by what I said. Your anger and attacks at me only make you look frustrated, and don't help your argument.

      This anti-union bullshit is predicated on the notion that you are just dying to do not only your own job, but Billy Bob's over there when he starts to slack off. Human beings simply aren't built that way.

      I saw hardworking people get constantly called up by lazy managers who would always go to that one maintenance guy to get work done out of a group of 5 sitting down in a workshop. Just because he knew that one guy was a hard worker and knew what he was doing. Lazy old Joe and Bob would just sit in the corner (actually their comfy chairs) on their hands 90% of the time.

      Unions will accept cutbacks to save their jobs. Because, dipshit, their long term existence is utterly dependent on the long term well being of the company. As opposed to executives who DGAF if the company goes bankrupt in five years, if they can take their bonuses now and get off the ship before it sinks.

      The unions didn't accept cutbacks to save their jobs in my case. It was fairly obvious the plant was shutting down for about 5 years. All that time they kept pushing for pay rises and other benefits.

      Then vote to change what political causes the union engages in, or doesn't engage in. Contrast that to when a non-union shop takes the output of your labor, uses some of that for lobbying, in which you have absolutely no say whatsoever.

      Yeah, good luck with that. How about they just don't support political causes, and instead just take less of my money. I made a transaction for my time with the company, and they paid me an amount that I deemed acceptable for my time (otherwise I would have left there and gone somewhere else) what they do with their money is their business. The union on the other hand, when I got employed, basically pulled all us naive 18 year olds into a room and said, sign here. Then they took my money and gave me very little benefit in return. One or two shop stewards got a cushy job where they basically talked crap with people all day, but I didn't get anything out of it.

      Don't let the door hit your dumb libertarian snowflake ass on the way out.

      Glad to be out. I now make much more money, at a company who compensates me based on my own merit. It feels good. Thanks!

    2. Re: Randian BS + anecdotes + confirmation bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communists agent playing interference against reality. You are unemployable, NPC.

    3. Re:Randian BS + anecdotes + confirmation bias by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I saw hardworking people get constantly called up by lazy managers who would always go to that one maintenance guy to get work done out of a group of 5 sitting down in a workshop. Just because he knew that one guy was a hard worker and knew what he was doing. Lazy old Joe and Bob would just sit in the corner (actually their comfy chairs) on their hands 90% of the time.

      So you have a beef with unions but are.....ranting at management? You spend a few too many years huffing fumes at your non-union job?

      The unions didn't accept cutbacks to save their jobs in my case.

      Uh huh. Is that because workers were expected to make all of the cuts while the executives would continue to see their annual 15% increase in compensation while they drove the company into the ground? And for some reason the union refused to take it all for the team? In any case, it's telling that you don't have a problem with dying companies paying out executive bonuses or securing golden parachutes in the event of bankruptcy.

      Yeah, good luck with that. How about they just don't support political causes, and instead just take less of my money.

      Infinitely more luck in a place where you have a vote, as opposed to place where you are a nobody with no power. Which you don't seem to have a problem with - because you're a bootlicking scab operating on anecdotes and confirmation bias.

  34. Kickstarter Scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several years ago, I was living in South Florida and would repeatedly get almost run down by cars as I was crossing the street. (One time much later I actually did get hit by a car which was making a right turn from the left lane just behind another car. Fortunately, I was ok.) South Florida has the worst drivers I have ever seen, combined with cops who don't seem to care. I saw an article about a new Kickstarter project for eyeglasses which record video. Great, I thought, that would help me record bad drivers and if I ever got hit by a car, could track the car's license plate in case the driver did a "hit and run" which is also common in South Florida.

    I had never used Kickstarter before and I was concerned about what would happen if the project backers fail. So instead of using Kickstarter, I placed a pre-order and paid the same amount of money (~$200) directly to the eyeglasses start-up itself.

    Not using Kickstarter would end up being the best decision I could have made in trying to purchase these video-recording glasses. After months and months when there were no signs of the eyeglasses shipping, I saw messages from other angry backers and that company's response. The eyeglasses start-up said they were still finalizing the design. But that was already after manufacturing was supposed to have begun!

    So I politely requested a refund from them. I got some push-back, like "what, you don't want to miss out on our great upcoming product, right?" I replied, "just send me a full refund." And they did! I got my ~$200 back from them before they went completely bankrupt or before they had just gone silent and pocketed everyone else's $200.

    As far as I know, none of the backers for the video-recording eyeglasses ever got their $200 back.

    Moral of the story: do not ever use Kickstart. And do not ever live in South Florida.

  35. US workforce whipped generations ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right wing politicians and the bosses whipped the US workforce generations ago. They won by convincing the average grunt that unions were "bad" and its been believed by the bulk of the unwashed forever. Even when people from other countries tell you that unions have a place in the workforce you can't bring yourself to believe it. Likewise the average US citizen still can't get it into their heads that universal health care is good thing. Sad really.

    1. Re: US workforce whipped generations ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get it, you don't have the skills to get the job you want.

  36. Youngsters... Sheesh... by Temkin · · Score: 1

    Unionizing has never worked in tech. They'll just spin up a new company, license the code & intellectual property, let the shell fold, and your contract isn't worth the paper it's written on.

    What you young people should be gunning for is stock options. Sometime in the early 00's they changed the rules with regards to how stock options were accounted for and taxed, and unless you get in at start up time, they've pretty much disappeared. Back in the day, big companies were handing them out to MTS2's... Imagine ending the usual marital "you work too much" spat with "I know... Here's a check for an extra year's pay, why don't you finish your Master's degree, and buy yourself something nice."

    It's fun! :)
     

  37. Fire them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outsource to India.

  38. I'm not surprised by this by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    Kickstarter's moved from "interesting tech stuff" to "another graphic novel about a gender fluid couple living as elves on mars".
    How could they NOT unionize?

  39. Re:lolz de-ionizing in IT by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    In USA a chemist's salary goes up to $55 an hour or $114K a year, my friend who graduated high school with me makes almost twice that with his own business and a couple apprentices.

  40. Re:lolz de-ionizing in IT by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    To be clear, he's a contracting plumber who works on a lot of schools and municipal buildings, though also custom renovation for homes