Was there a great need for race-baiting here? They're NOT pulling people aside because they're nonwhite. This has never been done. They've been doing a good job of pulling aside crippled grannies and infants, though.
All his "input" is balanced toward the unions. He's appointed THREE union bosses. It's long overdue, as Andy Stern had practically been living in the White House like a clingy girlfriend since the inauguration.
And a lot of new cars beep when you open the door with the keys in - SO WHAT?
This isn't new. Old cars used to have an even more annoying buzzer instead of the bell, so many of them were removed by the owner. That could be why you don't remember them. Anyway, it's to keep you from locking your keys in the car.
In PA, safety and emissions are two different tests (although nearly every station does both for practical reasons). Cutting off the cat would be an emissions issue, while disabling a warning device would be a safety issue. That being said, I'm not aware of any laws that require seat belt alerts and the such either.
If the bill changed, then it wasn't the same bill. This has been tried in the courts; they have to make sure there are no differences other than trivial misspellings. Also, it's a revenue bill, because it includes a tax-- and shucks, I guess that's what their argument is for attempting reconciliation!
So I'm a racist because I don't care where you came from? Talk about Newspeak!
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. - MLK, Jr.
The Constitution says that all bills must originate in the House. This bill actually originated in the Senate; therefore, it is unconstitutional. A silly technicality, I know.
No, it says "in such manner", which means they can go door-to-door, send a letter, use email, ask you to visit your polling place, etc. It doesn't redefine the word "enumerate", which means "count".
They asked about race and sex because, at the time, women did not have universal suffrage and slaves were counted as 3/5 of a person for the purpose of representation. Two amendments to the Constitution ended any possibility for argument of this, and the remaining questions (like, "Do you own or rent") have never been constitutional.
Slashdot Mirror
You need a password to boot into Windows safe mode, too. GP is wrong.
... from real racists, who like to bring up race ("The TEA parties just hate Obama because he's black") to shut down debate.
It probably has something to do with the fact that the islamic world doesn't consider you "the Great Satan."
Was there a great need for race-baiting here? They're NOT pulling people aside because they're nonwhite. This has never been done. They've been doing a good job of pulling aside crippled grannies and infants, though.
All his "input" is balanced toward the unions. He's appointed THREE union bosses. It's long overdue, as Andy Stern had practically been living in the White House like a clingy girlfriend since the inauguration.
Obama standing up to unions? Not bloody likely.
Unions like it that way, though-- and they're the darling of the progressives.
Independence Day 2: Electric Boogaloo
I'll assume that you're not an American and don't realize that both houses meet in the Capitol.
It's called "patriotism"; there is a difference and BTW, didn't you notice them teaming up with IRANIANS?
Law and Order: Virtual Crimes Unit? CSI: Zion?
Thank U?
I used to enjoy "Instagib" on Q3A-- rail gun only.
This isn't new. Old cars used to have an even more annoying buzzer instead of the bell, so many of them were removed by the owner. That could be why you don't remember them. Anyway, it's to keep you from locking your keys in the car.
In PA, safety and emissions are two different tests (although nearly every station does both for practical reasons). Cutting off the cat would be an emissions issue, while disabling a warning device would be a safety issue. That being said, I'm not aware of any laws that require seat belt alerts and the such either.
No, it excludes those because of economic realities. But then, that's why I said "just about", Captain Straw Man.
If the bill changed, then it wasn't the same bill. This has been tried in the courts; they have to make sure there are no differences other than trivial misspellings. Also, it's a revenue bill, because it includes a tax-- and shucks, I guess that's what their argument is for attempting reconciliation!
The constitution does not say they can collect it for that information; therefore, they cannot collect it. It says they can collect it for the House.
Who gets to pick which rights you lose, anyway? You? Congress? The President? The courts? Why is torture not OK, but disenfranchisement is?
There's a fine for misleading info, and it's bigger than the fine for not answering.
The Constitution says that all bills must originate in the House. This bill actually originated in the Senate; therefore, it is unconstitutional. A silly technicality, I know.
Don't need to. See the 10th amendment.
No, it says "in such manner", which means they can go door-to-door, send a letter, use email, ask you to visit your polling place, etc. It doesn't redefine the word "enumerate", which means "count".
They asked about race and sex because, at the time, women did not have universal suffrage and slaves were counted as 3/5 of a person for the purpose of representation. Two amendments to the Constitution ended any possibility for argument of this, and the remaining questions (like, "Do you own or rent") have never been constitutional.