very little, but he did try to change things he didn't think to be correct, hence the cosmological constant introduced because other wise the equations would predict the expansion of the universe, which offended his sensibilities as well as accepted notions of the universe at the time. I don't think he was too happy about the photoelectric effect after the further development of quantum mechanics relied on it. He didn't retract that but he did invent a system of hidden variables that was complete crap.
Granted, but what if we reroute power form the rear deflectors? Shouldn't that give us enough power to bring the forward phaser array back on line? Or maybe they've forgotten to protect the sleep command? What about introducing a logic puzzle that has no answer? The tic -tac toe game is missing, tell it to play with zero players.
Right, but if you could take back control of a command and control bot temporarily just to provoke the response, and then just sit back and watch the fireworks as it tries to destroy itself. Probably wouldn't do any net good other than tying up its resources attacking itself and possibly making it more difficult to defend itself against probing.
I guess I'm less optimistic than you. I just assume anytime I give my information to any entity they will sell, or give it to someone else. Which is why, I don't do it very often... with my own name.
Starbucks is expensive, so are monthly fees for games. I like the gp, prefer to invest my scarce resources in more rewarding pursuits. Not to denigrate any who are of differing opinions upon the optimal ratio of movement of light on various display surface in response to jocular motions of one's extremities in the electronic imitation of various endeavors in proportion to monetary coffers.
That has been proven for established artists. It has not been proven for new bands that have never signed with a label. Once that happens, it will be the death of the record industry.
Re:This is HIGHLY illegal in the US
on
eBay The Vote
·
· Score: 1
True, and technically a quid pro quo of campaign donations for specific votes on specific bills is illegal. I'm pretty sure it is. But you can as an entity, donate based upon an issue that may be reflected in any bill.
Apparently you've never had to follow a 30 step process, hour long process five times to create a five new skus, because you fixed a typo in the documentaition for your software. Man, oh man I hated that.
Its a difficult economic question of how to jumpstart a new market. The first devices are always more expensive, and are adopted by people who just want the functionality. The problem in this case is that those who would be first adopters, have already adopted the rental system. There aren't any innovative devices that provide any benefit over the rental units, hence no early adopters, no price drops. Now people will pay stupid money for negligible benefit, but only if there is a large advertising program to make them feel special for being so stupid with there money. The article is sort of bemoaning the lack of this advertising push. No one wants to enter the market for these devices as the demand hasn't been proven, and no existing manufactures wants to handle customer problems, and they have an established business selling them at high margins to the cable companies.
But all of those facts, shouldn't get in the way of yelling at the monopolistic cable companies. They deserve more scorn for their business practices. In the next decade, their business will be reduced to High speed internet. All content will emanate from there, from a variety of providers.
Sorry, I don't really know that much about Argentina. I thought it was multicultural. I've been told they speak Italian, German, Spanish, Native languages. Always wanted to go there. You raise some good points. You could be right, but I still think its not the smartest move.
Don't do business here. We will screw you over with taxes. Please find another country near us that has better laws and let them reap the economic benefits. I hear Argentina is nice this time of year. I'm sure their blend of multiculturalism and straight forward laws will suit you tastes better.
Cooperations have thus far resisted the temptation to upgrade the clients, hopefully they will exercise the same caution in upgrading the mission critical servers as well. One can hope. Are you sure about that 70% metric? I guess I should be glad I'm in the minority, if thats true. Coincidently today I had a problem with a server that required me to change ( small tweak) the source code. Rare ( the second time in 5 years), but man I can't imagine working any other way now.
I absolutely agreed with you before this vote. It was clear that microsoft was deliberately trying to subvert the standards process. Its clear that their collateral damage from this failed attempt will take some time to clear up. If you don't get the right decision, it is not with in your rights to break any ethical barrier to get your way. Two wrongs don't make right. ect ect.
I'm afraid thats a little naive. Terrorism laws have been used quite frequently to prosecute ordinary crime. So you might not be building a bomb, but have you been downloading copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright holders? That might also be of note at some point to someone that may believe they own said copyright. I don't like terrorism, and I disagree with many people here about the ethics of downloading music, movies and tv shows with out explicit permission of the copyright holders, but I don't want to throw out the wisdom embedded in the bill of rights. I would rather 10 guilty persons go free than one innocent one.
My next line: However, this world is far from ideal.. I agree with you entirely. The problem lies in peoples everyday choices to use there time, talent and treasure.
The owner of the property. Obviously. Nothing should be dictated, in an ideal world. However, this world is far from ideal. So some oversight is required. And there should be some healthy debate as to where the line should be drawn. European countries have a higher degree of government oversight, than the more free market approach of the US. However, the desired outcome should not be in debate. The point is that even in an ideal world private ownership and care for the less fortunate should not conflict.
I can't believe that was modded as flamebait. What is up with that?
From the first hunter gather groups our speicies hall mark has been the care for all of the individuals of the group. Of course the needs of the many must be weighed against the needs of the few and visa versa.
Of course private property needs to be protected, but one should not use his own resources solely for his own benefit, but for the common good.
Interesting question. Should we require elected politicians to meet certain levels of health, and mental capacity? I think that might be a good thing, but it could set a dangerous president for the rest of society. I certainly wouldn't want to be denied a job due to my Alzheimer's, heart disease, or cancer risk factors.
Yes they do. I canceled my subscription long ago when I got sick of their reviews of computers. They actually gave a higher score to a dell machine that had trial software, because it had trial software (crapware). And the buying guide had an incredible amount of grammatical, spelling and just plain strange errors. It repeated the same paragraph several times in a chapter. It only didn't fit in any of the spots. If I know they don't know what they are talkng about in my area of expertise, I can't trust them to tell me about anything I know less about.
Slashdot Mirror
Whats wrong, the payola you get from the labels isn't enough?
very little, but he did try to change things he didn't think to be correct, hence the cosmological constant introduced because other wise the equations would predict the expansion of the universe, which offended his sensibilities as well as accepted notions of the universe at the time. I don't think he was too happy about the photoelectric effect after the further development of quantum mechanics relied on it. He didn't retract that but he did invent a system of hidden variables that was complete crap.
Granted, but what if we reroute power form the rear deflectors? Shouldn't that give us enough power to bring the forward phaser array back on line? Or maybe they've forgotten to protect the sleep command? What about introducing a logic puzzle that has no answer? The tic -tac toe game is missing, tell it to play with zero players.
Right, but if you could take back control of a command and control bot temporarily just to provoke the response, and then just sit back and watch the fireworks as it tries to destroy itself. Probably wouldn't do any net good other than tying up its resources attacking itself and possibly making it more difficult to defend itself against probing.
I can't believe Bohemian Rhapsody didn't make your list.
Beelzebub has a devil put aside for me,for me,for me
I guess I'm less optimistic than you. I just assume anytime I give my information to any entity they will sell, or give it to someone else. Which is why, I don't do it very often ... with my own name.
Starbucks is expensive, so are monthly fees for games. I like the gp, prefer to invest my scarce resources in more rewarding pursuits. Not to denigrate any who are of differing opinions upon the optimal ratio of movement of light on various display surface in response to jocular motions of one's extremities in the electronic imitation of various endeavors in proportion to monetary coffers.
That has been proven for established artists. It has not been proven for new bands that have never signed with a label. Once that happens, it will be the death of the record industry.
True, and technically a quid pro quo of campaign donations for specific votes on specific bills is illegal. I'm pretty sure it is. But you can as an entity, donate based upon an issue that may be reflected in any bill.
Apparently you've never had to follow a 30 step process, hour long process five times to create a five new skus, because you fixed a typo in the documentaition for your software. Man, oh man I hated that.
Its a difficult economic question of how to jumpstart a new market. The first devices are always more expensive, and are adopted by people who just want the functionality. The problem in this case is that those who would be first adopters, have already adopted the rental system. There aren't any innovative devices that provide any benefit over the rental units, hence no early adopters, no price drops. Now people will pay stupid money for negligible benefit, but only if there is a large advertising program to make them feel special for being so stupid with there money. The article is sort of bemoaning the lack of this advertising push. No one wants to enter the market for these devices as the demand hasn't been proven, and no existing manufactures wants to handle customer problems, and they have an established business selling them at high margins to the cable companies.
But all of those facts, shouldn't get in the way of yelling at the monopolistic cable companies. They deserve more scorn for their business practices. In the next decade, their business will be reduced to High speed internet. All content will emanate from there, from a variety of providers.
Sorry, I don't really know that much about Argentina. I thought it was multicultural. I've been told they speak Italian, German, Spanish, Native languages. Always wanted to go there. You raise some good points. You could be right, but I still think its not the smartest move.
Don't do business here. We will screw you over with taxes. Please find another country near us that has better laws and let them reap the economic benefits. I hear Argentina is nice this time of year. I'm sure their blend of multiculturalism and straight forward laws will suit you tastes better.
Sincerely,
The country of Brazil
Cooperations have thus far resisted the temptation to upgrade the clients, hopefully they will exercise the same caution in upgrading the mission critical servers as well. One can hope. Are you sure about that 70% metric? I guess I should be glad I'm in the minority, if thats true. Coincidently today I had a problem with a server that required me to change ( small tweak) the source code. Rare ( the second time in 5 years), but man I can't imagine working any other way now.
I absolutely agreed with you before this vote. It was clear that microsoft was deliberately trying to subvert the standards process. Its clear that their collateral damage from this failed attempt will take some time to clear up. If you don't get the right decision, it is not with in your rights to break any ethical barrier to get your way. Two wrongs don't make right. ect ect.
If you are using Vista as a server, you pretty much deserve what ever happens to you.
I'm afraid thats a little naive. Terrorism laws have been used quite frequently to prosecute ordinary crime. So you might not be building a bomb, but have you been downloading copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright holders? That might also be of note at some point to someone that may believe they own said copyright. I don't like terrorism, and I disagree with many people here about the ethics of downloading music, movies and tv shows with out explicit permission of the copyright holders, but I don't want to throw out the wisdom embedded in the bill of rights. I would rather 10 guilty persons go free than one innocent one.
No dumb ass we don't worship a corpse on display. We eat it. But its cool, he told us to.
My next line: However, this world is far from ideal.. I agree with you entirely. The problem lies in peoples everyday choices to use there time, talent and treasure.
The owner of the property. Obviously. Nothing should be dictated, in an ideal world. However, this world is far from ideal. So some oversight is required. And there should be some healthy debate as to where the line should be drawn. European countries have a higher degree of government oversight, than the more free market approach of the US. However, the desired outcome should not be in debate. The point is that even in an ideal world private ownership and care for the less fortunate should not conflict.
I can't believe that was modded as flamebait. What is up with that?
From the first hunter gather groups our speicies hall mark has been the care for all of the individuals of the group. Of course the needs of the many must be weighed against the needs of the few and visa versa.
Of course private property needs to be protected, but one should not use his own resources solely for his own benefit, but for the common good.
ok 100 Mb. Thats a reason for ditching a free Office suite and using one that starts at $150? Does that make sence in any parallel universe?
Interesting question. Should we require elected politicians to meet certain levels of health, and mental capacity? I think that might be a good thing, but it could set a dangerous president for the rest of society. I certainly wouldn't want to be denied a job due to my Alzheimer's, heart disease, or cancer risk factors.
Yes they do. I canceled my subscription long ago when I got sick of their reviews of computers. They actually gave a higher score to a dell machine that had trial software, because it had trial software (crapware). And the buying guide had an incredible amount of grammatical, spelling and just plain strange errors. It repeated the same paragraph several times in a chapter. It only didn't fit in any of the spots. If I know they don't know what they are talkng about in my area of expertise, I can't trust them to tell me about anything I know less about.
Yes, sure. I Ditched Open Office in favor of Microsoft Office 2007, because Open Office was too big at 300 Mb. Thats it.