Now, check the addressing schemes for IPv6. You'll find out that one of the mechanisms to create an IPv6 address, extender EUI-64, is _precisely_ building it from a MAC address, which indeed is fully readable in the reslting IPv6 address.
The scope for these addresses is local, so they won't be routed off-net. Imagine a routing table with an IPv6 route for every single MAC address.
That's not really being funny, it's just watering down the intelligence of the argument and surmising what an ignorant person would say. Just stick with "Your fly is down. Ha, made you look!" please.
Then there's the managers that need admin privileges. Don't ask why if you want to keep your job.
And don't keep your job if you can't ask why
With just a little tact on top of some good results early into the job, I had no trouble convincing my CIO that that's actually *MY* notebook computer on his desk, not his. If I'm to take a large amount of responsibilty for something, I require control and full "ownership" of my domain.
I don't think you understand. Even when manufacturers do use underhand tricks to get you to upgrade, the inability to actually move your projects to the new version is not one of those tactics.
Believe me, some people really hate NAT. I was going to provide a list of the common arguments against it, but it's pointing-fingers-and-yelling-"Strawman" day here on/. today, so I'm actually going to have to wait for one of them to come along.
Plenty of NZ Pilots use R22s for Deer Recovery. One Pilot, one shooter, and one deer at a time in the sling. They're generally regarded as insane, but the R22 can just do this.
With no copilot you'd be fine as long as you had ground crew for the sling hookup.
Slashdot Mirror
The scope for these addresses is local, so they won't be routed off-net. Imagine a routing table with an IPv6 route for every single MAC address.
Heaven forbid the superuser have any say in what's going on.
That's not really being funny, it's just watering down the intelligence of the argument and surmising what an ignorant person would say. Just stick with "Your fly is down. Ha, made you look!" please.
^ Meth. Not even once.
If you were able to remember more than one sentence, his post would make sense to you.
Keyboard activity would be visible at the login: prompt, likely inconsequential but immediately revealing.
Like yourselves, I admit I was completely ignorant to this attack previously.
And don't keep your job if you can't ask why
With just a little tact on top of some good results early into the job, I had no trouble convincing my CIO that that's actually *MY* notebook computer on his desk, not his. If I'm to take a large amount of responsibilty for something, I require control and full "ownership" of my domain.
you might as well punch a random stranger in the face, key their car, throw a brick in a window, whatever.
Czech, mate?
I somehow doubt a nuclear blast is in the PCI spec.
You must be fun at parties!
YEP.
And their head engineer 'resigned' and they offered everyone free bumpers and the white iPhone 4 'took longer to make'
I don't think you understand. Even when manufacturers do use underhand tricks to get you to upgrade, the inability to actually move your projects to the new version is not one of those tactics.
Because opening a project created by a previous version is Windows-esqe.
Stop taking it so seriously.
You're bitter about capitalism, therefore any and all hairbrained analogies are valid. Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.
Wow, never seen two anonymous people wager $10,000 on the internet before.
That may be true, but you're a careless analogy-maker. Vehicle restraint systems and anitvirus software are utterly dissimilar.
But let's play your game: How many human lives have been saved as a direct result of antivirus software?
Quite a fine analogy, I must say.
Given the quality of cinema captures I've seen, I can't see this making an appreciable difference.
Hrmph. Good thing I didn't skimp on the dollars and got myself a Cisco ADSL router. Oh, what's this? It doesn't support IPv6 either.
Believe me, some people really hate NAT. I was going to provide a list of the common arguments against it, but it's pointing-fingers-and-yelling-"Strawman" day here on /. today, so I'm actually going to have to wait for one of them to come along.
They do, but the minute someone makes the connection between NAT and security the dead rise and chant repeatedly "NAT is not security".
With no copilot you'd be fine as long as you had ground crew for the sling hookup.