Find a map of the world. Find your country on it. Now go down. Keep going down, through the thin windy bit. Stay on the right hand side. Keep going along that side till you come to a big bit that bulges out to the right. Go rightwards across the blue stuff and you'll come to Africa. If it has a hole that matches the bulge you just left from, you're in the right place. Now go up the left coast and around a bit until you come to a little narrow bit of sea. Above that is Spain, mostly.
It used to be that any company who deigned to offer communication services to the public understood itself to do so on a non-discriminatory basis as to the ideological content of that communication.
Was this before the age of media barons - like William Randolph Hearst, Silvio Berlusconi, and Rupert Murdoch - or after?
It seems that you get organisations (I use that word deliberately, to include private sector and government) where once in a while somebody drops the ball and there's a bit of a balls-up but they fix it in good order, learn the lessons and move on.
Then there are others that lurch from one crisis into two more, like Hobbes' Leviathan made of Mr Bean clones.
"Use of the two logos (the âoeBMWâ logo, and the âoeMâ logo) would confuse the public as to who is actually behind the services coming from Technosport. It gives the impression that Technosport are official partners of BMW AG, and considering they are not, takes unfair advantage of BMWâ(TM)s reputation."
"the defendant's mark is likely to cause confusion in the minds of consumers about the source or sponsorship of the goods or services offered under the parties' marks [...] In addition to claiming likelihood of confusion, a trademark owner may claim trademark "dilution," asserting that it owns a famous mark and the use of your mark diminishes the strength or value of the trademark owner's mark by "blurring" the mark's distinctiveness or "tarnishing" the mark's image"
This. Somebody builds a perfectly good Tom Sawyer raft which is fine - until it gets extended, enhanced and fuck knows what, bit by bit, into an aircraft carrier.
You have got to be joking. Don't you remember the fuss made about that shirt?
You sound like you hate capitalism and free markets!
Depends how it rounds, doesn't it?
Let's try and teach her the difference between big letters and small ones before getting into the complex stuff, shall we?
Find a map of the world. Find your country on it. Now go down. Keep going down, through the thin windy bit. Stay on the right hand side. Keep going along that side till you come to a big bit that bulges out to the right. Go rightwards across the blue stuff and you'll come to Africa. If it has a hole that matches the bulge you just left from, you're in the right place. Now go up the left coast and around a bit until you come to a little narrow bit of sea. Above that is Spain, mostly.
Could it be stopped by making appropriate amendments to the Code of Conduct?
That word? You mean "your"? It apparently means something different here, that's for sure.
I think it's to do with the Earth's rotation. In the Atlantic the data is moving with the spin, whereas in the Pacific it's against it, or something.
Obviously this doesn't apply in Australia.
Not at all. No, no, no, no, no. Not even a little bit round the edges.
Oh, alright then, yes.
Bullshit. By definition you can't secede from something that you're not already part of.
He's not too brilliant at grammar, either.
On the subject of succeeding, you fail it!
Was this before the age of media barons - like William Randolph Hearst, Silvio Berlusconi, and Rupert Murdoch - or after?
It rarely is, is it?
Why yes, Britain, I did glance at you.
It seems that you get organisations (I use that word deliberately, to include private sector and government) where once in a while somebody drops the ball and there's a bit of a balls-up but they fix it in good order, learn the lessons and move on.
Then there are others that lurch from one crisis into two more, like Hobbes' Leviathan made of Mr Bean clones.
Is a campground hsot? Do they sing that "doo-dah doo-dah" song?
Why is that ironic? The Nazis were on the same side as Franco. They sent troops and aircraft - the Condor Legion - to help him in the civil war.
http://virtuosolegal.com/news-...
"Use of the two logos (the âoeBMWâ logo, and the âoeMâ logo) would confuse the public as to who is actually behind the services coming from Technosport. It gives the impression that Technosport are official partners of BMW AG, and considering they are not, takes unfair advantage of BMWâ(TM)s reputation."
https://www.uspto.gov/page/abo...
"the defendant's mark is likely to cause confusion in the minds of consumers about the source or sponsorship of the goods or services offered under the parties' marks [...] In addition to claiming likelihood of confusion, a trademark owner may claim trademark "dilution," asserting that it owns a famous mark and the use of your mark diminishes the strength or value of the trademark owner's mark by "blurring" the mark's distinctiveness or "tarnishing" the mark's image"
This. Somebody builds a perfectly good Tom Sawyer raft which is fine - until it gets extended, enhanced and fuck knows what, bit by bit, into an aircraft carrier.
In Soviet Russia, Netcraft only reads old people!
Then dissolving the ashes in acid, then drying them out and burning them again. And then dissolving them in a different acid.
How's the security? Perhaps they need a few baton-twirlers.
If from Alabama, you insensitive clod! We can't have pi day since there's no zeroeth of March, amen!
Look at it this way: if it wouldn't hurt consumers then why are they even proposing it?
You're treating base 28 to 31, 24 and several cases of 60 as if they're decimals.