Depends whether they like you or not. The corrupt masonic twats confiscated my kubotan when I lamped a car driver who'd knocked me off my bike and made the mistake of getting out to try and finish the job.
And I wasn't even using it!
That was before riding a bike was trendy. In fact, it was practically illegal - it meant you were poor or a greenie.
TFA says "People want to be associated with open source."
Translation: "Some twat in marketing read about it in an if-flight magazine and thinks it might sound cool, so let's stick it on everything from tomatoes to katas whether it makes sense or not".
There's a tendency for people to feel safer about meeting someone over the Internet because the initial correspondence is not direct.
Is there? Was there the same tendency back in the days when you had to write to a box number at the newspaper? I... ummm... heard it used to work like that.
Perhaps there should be a rating system to weed out the naughty boys. Five stars = best bottyshag ever. Three stars = if it's in a hole you scored a goal. Zero stars = totally murdered me and dumped me in a lay-by on the M6.
I saw a completely robotic greenhouse on TV once. All laid out in straight lines, so the machines could move along a sort of rails/gantry contraption to do their work.
Of course that's a bit easier - it's smaller and enclosed.
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps you just enjoyed making holes in cards?
This bullshit about secondary insurers wouldn't matter if they hadn't been trading recklessly in the first place.
By even bringing it up you're admitting the original theft.
So, despite the cuntbrain above bragging about how fucking hard they are, they basically won by crying to the Yanks?
Nothing on netcraft...
Depends whether they like you or not. The corrupt masonic twats confiscated my kubotan when I lamped a car driver who'd knocked me off my bike and made the mistake of getting out to try and finish the job.
And I wasn't even using it!
That was before riding a bike was trendy. In fact, it was practically illegal - it meant you were poor or a greenie.
If it was peer *replication* they wouldn't call it peer *review* would they, idiot?
TFA says "People want to be associated with open source."
Translation: "Some twat in marketing read about it in an if-flight magazine and thinks it might sound cool, so let's stick it on everything from tomatoes to katas whether it makes sense or not".
If I was starting a supermarket I wouldn't call it "Bunch of fishermen who started a bank and stole everybody's money, the fucking cunts.".
thickypedia.com/people-who-cant-tell-a-typo-from-simply-using-the-wrong-word-are-shitcocks
WTF is ÃZNational?
... a-with-a-hat, he added. C-with-a-little-tail, I responded.
Law suites? What the fuck are you a "pr0fessor" of? I'm guessing it's not Law or English.
Perhaps he should start reading the post he's responding to instead? Didn't see any mention of weapons in Jason Levine(196982)'s post.
Is there? Was there the same tendency back in the days when you had to write to a box number at the newspaper? I ... ummm ... heard it used to work like that.
You left out catholic churches and (topically) football clubs.
Perhaps there should be a rating system to weed out the naughty boys. Five stars = best bottyshag ever. Three stars = if it's in a hole you scored a goal. Zero stars = totally murdered me and dumped me in a lay-by on the M6.
If I zqnted q heqdqche
Thanks, Windows 8.1, for randomly fucking about with the keyboard layout AGAIN.
Where were we? Ah, yes. If I wanted a headache, I'd just bang my head against the wall.
I saw a completely robotic greenhouse on TV once. All laid out in straight lines, so the machines could move along a sort of rails/gantry contraption to do their work.
Of course that's a bit easier - it's smaller and enclosed.
Eben Emael? Where half a million Belgians *in a fort* surrendered to a German marching band and a dog, without firing a shot?
So they left off the ones that donâ(TM)t come up so often? They didnâ(TM)t do a particularly good job, did they?
It's kind of funny how it comes out as out as a-hat. Because that's exactly what manishs is.
Which says nothing, because the whole basis of the scam is moving where the profits are made.
You're barking mad.
True, for suitably "occasionally" values of "usually".
Welcome to the post-factual world. If they believed it contained Aloe Vera, that should be good enough.