Slashdot Mirror


Fidel Castro Is Dead (nytimes.com)

Striek quotes the New York Times: Fidel Castro, the fiery apostle of revolution who brought the Cold War to the Western Hemisphere in 1959 and then defied the United States for nearly half a century as Cuba's maximum leader, bedeviling 11 American presidents and briefly pushing the world to the brink of nuclear war, died Friday. He was 90. His death was announced by Cuban state television.

In declining health for several years, Mr. Castro had orchestrated what he hoped would be the continuation of his Communist revolution, stepping aside in 2006 when he was felled by a serious illness. He provisionally ceded much of his power to his younger brother Raul, now 85, and two years later formally resigned as president. Raul Castro, who had fought alongside Fidel Castro from the earliest days of the insurrection and remained minister of defense and his brother's closest confidant, has ruled Cuba since then, although he has told the Cuban people he intends to resign in 2018.

Kebertson shares an AP article which remembers a book proclaiming "Castro's Last Hour" -- in 1982. And Miamicanes jokes there'll be celebrations among Castro-haters in Miami, sharing a CNN article which notes that in the end, Castro "lived long enough to see a historic thaw in relations between Cuba and the United States."

279 comments

  1. Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIP?

  2. Is this a fake news also ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do we know now....

  3. Old News (As opposed to fake news) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This item hit the news feeds oh, around 15 hours ago.
    A bit late to the game eh?

    1. Re:Old News (As opposed to fake news) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    2. Re:Old News (As opposed to fake news) by wasted · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      That user does not exist

    3. Re:Old News (As opposed to fake news) by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      This item hit the news feeds oh, around 15 hours ago. A bit late to the game eh?

      Everyone was too busy watching the 30 minutes of porn that CNN was broadcasting.

  4. Cause of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A cyanide laced CIAgar?

    1. Re:Cause of death by ebvwfbw · · Score: 0

      Tried that, it didn't work. Only works on people that have a real soul.

  5. Meh by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Fidel has been out of it for years. His death is no surprise and changes nothing.

    1. Re:Meh by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Does Fidel's death end the agreement the US had with the Soviet Union not to take over Cuba?

    2. Re:Meh by tomhath · · Score: 2

      What is this "Soviet Union" of which you speak?

    3. Re: Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same as something called U.S.A.
      Texas will secede from your stupid dictatorship of liberal imbeciles.

    4. Re:Meh by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      This. Castro had little to none political weight for years now - he was basically a t-shirt symbol by now.

    5. Re: Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unless California beats Texas to the punch and secedes first.

    6. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      millennial much?

    7. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

      Reads as CCCP to us Muricans.

  6. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you should educate yourself on his actions.

  7. ...stepping aside in 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was 2008.

  8. FAKE... by product_bucket · · Score: 1

    But consider for a moment, if it was fake.

  9. Party In Miami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a huge Cuban community you can bet that celebrations will break out in Miami, Fl.. Many have waited eagerly to hear of his death.

    1. Re:Party In Miami by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Cuba is still firmly in the Castro regimes hands, though Raul does seen somewhat more pragmatic than his big brother.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Party In Miami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean the "Miami-Cubans" will finally return to Cuba and GTFO of the US once and for all? No? How did I know the answer before asking the question I wonder?

    3. Re:Party In Miami by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Yep

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:Party In Miami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cuba is still firmly in the Castro regimes hands, though Raul does seen somewhat more pragmatic than his big brother.

      Old people...

    5. Re:Party In Miami by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Some might do it once Cuba becomes a democracy. It hasn't - Raul Castro has been running Cuba, and ain't going anywhere until he too joins his comrades Fidel and Che up there

    6. Re:Party In Miami by fnj · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, there are plenty more evil bastards to take over when Raul kicks the bucket or retires.

    7. Re:Party In Miami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up there, huh? Low standards these days?

  10. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the 1% are stockpiling Zyklon-B. Wouldn't blame them in the least if they were.

  11. "Historic thaw"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cuba's hostility against America is legendary. President Clinton removed Gitmo's landmines due to international pressure, but Castro kept his in place (they're still there as far as I know).

    The only reason Obama even attempted that was to create some sort of legacy for himself. I don't know if it'll work. It depends on what Trump does. I'll figure he'll be a better negotiator than Obama and actually achieve normalized relations on fair terms, but Obama will get the credit for the being the first one. Casto's death ought to help the situation, since they're less crazy than North Korea.

    1. Re:"Historic thaw"? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Cuba needs investment badly. Despite the obvious bad blood between the Castro's and the US, I get the impression Raul would rather that investment come in the form of greenbacks than renminbi.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:"Historic thaw"? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      Cubans need freedom far more than they need investment.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:"Historic thaw"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the timing of this is suspicious with Trump about to become our ruler.

    4. Re:"Historic thaw"? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I don't disagree, but if that was the intent of the embargo, it has been a stunning failure.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:"Historic thaw"? by ilguido · · Score: 0

      Freedom worked so well in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria...

    6. Re:"Historic thaw"? by drnb · · Score: 1

      Freedom worked so well in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria...

      Cubans have a western culture more compatible with democracy, like the other peoples of the region. You cite countries where the people often have a greater loyalty to local tribes.

    7. Re:"Historic thaw"? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cuba's hostility against America is legendary.

      From a non-US perspective, USA's hostility towards Cuba is far more legendary. While most of the world have had diplomatic relations, trade and travel to Cuba, USA has consistently refused. This is not due to Cuba not wanting any relations.

    8. Re:"Historic thaw"? by drnb · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree, but if that was the intent of the embargo, it has been a stunning failure.

      The embargo was a reaction to Fidel's involvement with the Kennedy assassination, that's the reason all Presidents until Obama maintained it. Perhaps now the truth can come out. ;-)

    9. Re:"Historic thaw"? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Cuba needs investment badly. Despite the obvious bad blood between the Castro's and the US, I get the impression Raul would rather that investment come in the form of greenbacks than renminbi.

      The United States is the only country that has sanctions against Cuba. Cuba is free to trade, and get investments from any other country, and indeed did from some European countries, like Spain. Issue is that w/ a communist economy, nothing was ever gonna improve. It still won't, not until Raul is dead and what's left of the Cuban Communist Party implodes

    10. Re:"Historic thaw"? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Actually, Cuba is not infested w/ Islam, the way the other countries mentioned above were. Better comparison of Cuba is w/ similar Latin American countries, like Chile, Argentina and Nicaragua. Chile in particular is a fully functional democracy, and not a cauldron like Syria or Libya.

    11. Re:"Historic thaw"? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Well, Castro has survived 10 US presidents, who couldn't or didn't get rid of him. Trump gets elected, and before he even takes office, Comrade Fidel kicks the bucket. Just like in 1980, the day Reagan was elected, the Iranians released the hostages. In 2016, weeks after Trump is elected, Castro is dead!!!

      Trump is already a great success, and he didn't even get started on Cuba as yet

    12. Re:"Historic thaw"? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Good. So why is Cuba's economy still a basketcase, when it can easily get what it needs from any of the countries other than the US?

    13. Re: "Historic thaw"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take Haiti. The Dominican Republic. Jamaica.

      Oh wait.

    14. Re:"Historic thaw"? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      The rest of the world goes to Cuba for cheap vacations. They aren't hurting.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    15. Re:"Historic thaw"? by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      They get around 2 Billion USD from that alone. No idea on health tourism.

    16. Re:"Historic thaw"? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      President Clinton removed Gitmo's landmines due to international pressure, but Castro kept his in place (they're still there as far as I know).

      Seriously? It's easy for the world's biggest military that knows they won't be attacked to remove mines from another country. It's absurd that you would even dare to claim it's "hostility" for a small island nation to decline to lower its defenses against a superpower that has a large military force on Cuban land and has already tried to invade and has also made countless assassination attempts and tried to fund insurrections and done everything imaginably possible to harass you for 60 years... after basically owning and abusing your people for decades before that?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    17. Re:"Historic thaw"? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      So "democracy" and "freedom" like the way the CIA freed central and south america throughout the 20th century. That was lovely and sure isn't having any lasting negative effects today.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    18. Re:"Historic thaw"? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      riiiight, every country in the world that has a basketcase of an economy is because it doesn't trade with the US.

    19. Re:"Historic thaw"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Objectively, what Castro and others in the mostly white Cuban government have done with a majority Negro Caribbean island (where the average IQ is 85) is a miracle of modern statecraft.

      When it comes to Cuba’s social system and citizen well-being (education, housing, health care), measured by its Human Development Index, it ranks above some Eastern European countries, as well as large industrial nations like Brazil, Mexico and China.

      Cuba weathered the AIDS problem of the 80’s (one that many majority Negro countries are still grappling with today) by isolating homosexuals and cracking down on their anti-social, disease-spreading behavior.

      Last but not least, Castro took on a much bigger empire 90 miles away, and somehow won. He deserves special credit for driving out the Jewish mafia using his homeland as a den for vice and money laundering.

      Love him or hate him, the guy is going down in the history books.

      more at: http://www.dailystormer.com/fidel-castro-passes-away-at-age-90/

    20. Re:"Historic thaw"? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, if someone was in on trying to whack my mom or dad I think I wouldn't play with him any more either, regardless of how many other neighborhood kids did.

    21. Re:"Historic thaw"? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand what he was saying.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    22. Re: "Historic thaw"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you are ignoring Venezuela, Ecuador, Nicaragua... Chile and Argentina and Uraguy had their pre-democratic moments as well...

    23. Re: "Historic thaw"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cuba doesn't *need* USA investment (they can get that from Canada, Spain and China). They just need USA tourism and trade.

      Of course we aren't gonna let them get USA tourists and trade w/o *allowing* USA investment.

    24. Re:"Historic thaw"? by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      Cubans need freedom far more than they need investment.

      This. Any investment in a Communist dictatorship is a huge gamble that the dictator won't suddenly up and declare that your investment is Property of The People (i.e., him) and confiscate it. Cuba needs investment... but they're not going to get much as long as that Sword of Damocles hangs over anything invested there.

    25. Re:"Historic thaw"? by msi · · Score: 1

      The embargo was a reaction to Fidel's involvement with the Kennedy assassination, that's the reason all Presidents until Obama maintained it. Perhaps now the truth can come out. ;-)

      That's quite a claim as JFK was the president who signed the embargo into law

      President John F. Kennedy secured for himself 1,200 Cuban cigars just hours before enacting the Cuban trade embargo in 1962. Before signing the embargo, Kennedy requested his head of press, Pierre Salinger, to get him “1,000 Petit Upmanns.”

      Salinger first made the revelation to Cigar Aficiando magazine in 1992.

      Salinger recalled Kennedy summoning him into his office to see if he could provide "some help" in securing "a lot of cigars" by the following morning. In hindsight, it is evident that Kennedy wanted to stockpile the Cuban products before he banned their import.

      http://www.irishcentral.com/ro...

  12. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if the brutal dictator Batista, backed by the US Government, was a humanitarian. Apparently the US Government so loved this dictator that he settled in Florida and invested much of his ill-gotten wealth in Florida until he returned to Cuba and once again began a reign of terror. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Fulgencio-Batista

  13. Re: Castro dead by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you should educate yourself on his actions.

    As opposed to say .. Batista?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  14. Re: Good riddance! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is fake news to distract people from the fact that Donald Trump offered Fidel Castro a job in his administration to piss off Ted Cruz. He will make for an excellent Fed chairman, propped in the corner with sunglasses on.

  15. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One less commie in the world....

    ...but unfortunately we'll still have to live with the hateful fascist who wrote that post.

  16. Re: Castro dead by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    As opposed to say .. Batista?

    Barista. Starbucks is hot in Cuba.

  17. Sat Nov 26 16:36:52 UTC 2016 by fsagx · · Score: 2

    Castro is still dead.

    1. Re:Sat Nov 26 16:36:52 UTC 2016 by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Castro is still dead.

      Stay vigilant; send periodic updates.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Sat Nov 26 16:36:52 UTC 2016 by jlowery · · Score: 1

      I'd make a comment about how that SNL reference really dates you, but since I have a 5-digit user id I can't really talk.

      --
      If you post it, they will read.
    3. Re:Sat Nov 26 16:36:52 UTC 2016 by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I once bought a black-and-white television set, to keep in my dorm room, because of rumors that The Beatles were going to have a reunion appearance on SNL.

      And I have this clunky large UID on Slashdot.

    4. Re:Sat Nov 26 16:36:52 UTC 2016 by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I saw the Beatles live on a B&W TV Feb. 9th, 1964. By that I should have a negative UID.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    5. Re:Sat Nov 26 16:36:52 UTC 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Castro is still dead. Really.

  18. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weekend at Bernies?

    Just be sure not to play music around him.

  19. an unpopular opinion. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this isnt going to be a very popular opinion here, but the reason for the historic thaw is surprising. Typically the united states is content to hold trade embargos indefinitely against any nation that so much as thinks of challenging unfettered capitalism. The reason for this thaw is similar to the reason for the Iranian thaw. The US is losing geopolitical capital at an unprecedented rate early in the 21st century.

    central and south american leaders are no longer subscribing to the teachings or guidance of american politicians. instead theyre renationalizing their resources and divesting from markets typically dominated by american presence. Cuba was a last ditch effort by the state department to keep a foothold in trade agreements that are rapidly moving away from the dollar as their standard. Prior to this we had tried calling in our debts from socialist democracies, demonizing their policy in our media, and withholding world bank investment only to find these countries far more resilient and fungible than they were 35 years ago when we could routinely replace their leaders with a coup.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:an unpopular opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Look at the success in Venezuela!

    2. Re:an unpopular opinion. by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      Noam chomsky's take on us vs cuba: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      He's having quite extreme viewpoints in some cases, but nevertheless he is very smart and often it is interesting to see things in a different light.

    3. Re:an unpopular opinion. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      You're a loon. There isn't a nation on earth that has unfettered capitalism; there are only varying degrees of abuse and theft by government. Until 8 years ago, the US had a history of opposing those nasty dictatorships that did the most damage to US interests.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    4. Re:an unpopular opinion. by ilguido · · Score: 0

      At last a sensible comment.

    5. Re:an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1, Informative

      Noam Chomsky always seems to blame America for everything. Once you understand that this is his bias, they you understand why he says what he says. He is an excellent researcher in linguistics, but he outside that he survives on sophistry and pandering to people who also like to blame America for everything (this blaming the West for everything it has done or not done is called Cultural Marxist 'Critical Theory', and most people don't understand how the very widespread pushing of Critical Theory's memes from many sources has convinced many others to also think in these terms - which is not objective at all).

    6. Re:an unpopular opinion. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      It was never going to last, in the 20th century the US got it all laid out on a silver platter... the "Old World" fucked itself royally with two huge wars, the Soviet Union and China was stuck in a communist plan economy, many countries were colonies or stuck in old structures like caste systems or authoritarian structures or broken education systems and so on. It was not only that America had many opportunities but that other countries had few. Today I think most people feel there are opportunities at home and it's not like Americans are born smarter than other people, if other countries are achieving more of their potential the gap will narrow.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:an unpopular opinion. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      But is Chomsky even an excellent researcher in Linguistics, or has he already done his best work? Decades ago, actually.

    8. Re:an unpopular opinion. by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      As a South American (Argentinian) i cannot but disagree.

    9. Re:an unpopular opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... The US is losing ...

      I'd say the USA can no longer use military aggression (or it's absence, see Israel) to force a corporatist government on others. Countries that managed to ignore US interference (USSR, China, N Korea, Cuba, Vietnam) were embargoed from the world economy; at least until other countries forgave them (N Korea being the remaining exception) and USA had to play nice with their former enemy. Cuba was unusual because other countries didn't support the US embargo but didn't bring Cuba into the world economy either.

      Since Korea, Iraq I and Iraq II, the world is less interested in protecting US corporate interests

      ... far more resilient and fungible ...

      Thanks to globalization and comparative advantage, the USA losing its manufacturing monopolies (from comparative advantage again), socialist or capitalist-welfare governments creating a higher standard of living, the dependence on US money and finance has significantly reduced.

      People have been saying for 15 years that China will become a superpower but don't recognize that it means more than military and economic superiority. It means that China, like the USA, will control the economies of other countries. In addition, Chinese control, unlike the communist bloc under the USSR, will be competing against US corporate interests. That will cause the US empire to shrink much faster.

    10. Re:an unpopular opinion. by mvdwege · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Noam Chomsky always seems to blame America for everything

      Well, he seems to take the, to me, logical point of view that as a US citizen it behooves him to critcise his own government first.

      Cultural Marxist

      Oh. Never mind. Logic is wasted on you. Carry on then.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    11. Re: an unpopular opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      An excellent researcher? You're not really sure who Chomsky is, are you?

    12. Re:an unpopular opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would hold against that, the American hidden hand is not as weak and trembling as you (we all) might want it. Look at what
      they did in Ukraine. They destabilized the country right into civil war so that they could install their Poroshenko puppet and
      bring in NATO.

    13. Re:an unpopular opinion. by whodunit · · Score: 1

      I remember being told the dollar was a dead letter ten years ago, when the euro was going strong. So much for that. Call me back in ten years.

    14. Re:an unpopular opinion. by danieldids · · Score: 1

      My dear slashdoter, I would like your opinion to be true. I'm from Brazil, and we've just had a coup against president Dilma some months ago. Argentina has now a liberal president. Venezuela is walking into a bad path. More and more we se Trumps popping aroung in south america, and it really looks like US is comming again, as if to regain power in face of China and Russia growing in importance. And just as the new president (Michel Temer) rised to to power, he have open national oil reserves to all kinds of big companies (from US). He's trying to privatize more public companies, making education and health (public) services worse by taking money out from then, using as an excuse the lack of public funds to pay for it, but at the same time raising the salaries of high position politics and judges - so he can grant his position in face of public uprise against those policies. FIdel's death was commented on most big tv news, and he was depicted mostly as a dictator and bad guy. This goes well with the agenda we are seeing here, whre communism and marxism are intrinsically said to be bad for democracy (or whatever), the left wing is being demonized and linked with concepts that don't even make sense because the left party which raised to power in 2002 was not that left after getting the presidential chair. Freedom is being taking from individuals all around the world in a steady pace. For the sake of all this argument, see Naomi Klein and her's Shock Doctrine. It's available on youtube. And now there is a coup inside the coup being started. All around the world I feel this movement of great players taking their positions to begin a new cold war.

    15. Re:an unpopular opinion. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Noam Chomsky always seems to blames the US government for the bad things the US government has done of which there are many, many, many, well, don't want to write that too many times, things they have done wrong. The common saying for the US government, they always get it right, after they have found every possible way of doing it wrong. The failure is driven by US corporations using influence to drive solutions whose only purpose is to favour their profits, even when competing corporations force competing actions to be take, that undo each others efforts. Don't want the US government looking like a bunch of fuck ups with endless PR=B$ flowing around to try to cover it up, then get rid of the god damn corrupt useless corporate influence on it's actions don't just bullshit about it and hope the problems will automagically solve themselves in spite of US government actions.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    16. Re:an unpopular opinion. by jandersen · · Score: 1

      ...Cultural Marxist 'Critical Theory',...

      I guess what you mean is something like "I don't know what Marxism is, and I don't want to know because it's evil, evil, EEEEEVIILLL!!!", am I right?

      To everybody else, Marxism is a theory in economy; one of the things that distinguish it is the fact that it doesn't make unrealistic assumptions about resources being infinite or the effects of financial mechanisms being instantaneous, among other things, like many modern theories do. Marxist economic theory has seen a bit of a renaissance in the last decade - it is no longer dismissed out of hand. This doesn't mean that we are now headed for an era of stone cold Statlinism (after all, Stalin didn't know or understand (or care) all that much about Marx's theories) - it just means that we're seeing the many, fundamental problems in the theories underwriting modern consumerist capitalism.

    17. Re:an unpopular opinion. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      this isnt going to be a very popular opinion here, but the reason for the historic thaw is surprising. Typically the united states is content to hold trade embargos indefinitely against any nation that so much as thinks of challenging unfettered capitalism.

      Actually I'd say the US will hold indefinite embargo against any nation who has defied or disobeyed them. The US supported Batista over the communists in Cuba, the US supported the Shah over the Islamist's in Iran. There are a lot of bad things you can say about the Theocratic despotism that is the Iranian government... but they're far from socialist.

      Conversely the US maintains a lot of trade with nations that are significantly more socialist than Iran... Like Sweden or Norway.

      Whilst I've got no particular love for Iran, Cuba or the DPRK, the embargoes are based on "You've pissed us off in the past and we're not going to get over it" rather than any economic rationalisation.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    18. Re:an unpopular opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what worries me more is his apparent conflation of critical thinking with Marxism, as if to poison empiricism and critical thinking by implying that only them Commies use such evil tools.

      that's what worries me most.

    19. Re:an unpopular opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      say hi to Gospodin Putin for me.

    20. Re:an unpopular opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US right wing started exporting that economic model (Friedman/Chicago School) with Chile in the 1970s after they got rid of that pesky Allende*. Took them until the 1980s to inflict in on their own people (Reagan) but now we have the same mess inflicted along the way in Central and south America.

      Austerity, tax cuts, "voodoo economics" for the rich, "devil take the hindmost" for the poor.

      Captcha: inequity couldn't make that up if i tried

    21. Re:an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      Cultural Marxism is not the same as Economic Marxism. Perhaps you could use Google to do some research and discover The Matrix you are living in. You cannot see it yet.

    22. Re:an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      Cultural Marxism is not the same as Economic Marxism. Please use Google to find the difference.

    23. Re:an unpopular opinion. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're still in the Democratic bullshit mindset. Obama has been wonderful to the Republican party. People have seen his failures and that's why Republicans hold more seats since anytime since reconstruction (state, governors, legislatures, congress, etc). Obama has ruined more countries than anyone since Hitler. Syria, Egypt, ... and on and on... So bad that even the Chinese snubbed him recently, Greece rioted when the little fascist showed up. He's run the US into the ditch. It's a real wreck too. Trump has a lot of damage to fix. Big old deficit too. That's the only reason why anyone thinks Obama is anything, he charged up our credit card to 21T. Never passed a new budget, so we've been paying for that bailout every year since, to artificially prop up the economy over his terrible policies. Otherwise we would have had a hell of a crash. He's the worst in history.

      Someone should give you some jolt cola (or punch you good). Wake up dude. You've been lied to bigtime by the left. Time you realize you've been duped. Just look up Grubber and obamacare, he'll tell you how stupid you are. Could also look up iran deal - http://www.frontpagemag.com/po... . Wake up and realize that just about everything you believe is a lie. From the above to Global Warming - http://vernalutah.org/EnergySu... (a bit long, however you'll get really mad because he shows you facts you can't dispute because they're facts and not bullshit).

    24. Re:an unpopular opinion. by dywolf · · Score: 0

      you should probably take the time to learn precisely what the US has done throughout history to the Latin American countries and their peoples before you speak again. Che, Castro, Chavez, and the other revolutionaries were a natural result of our imperialism and interventions to protect American corporate interests.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    25. Re:an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      Thanks for repeating the Marxist talking points that are now prevalent throughout the West. Yes, the US has acted roughly to counter the Soviet actions. But no, Ernesto "Che" Guevara did not fight to end poverty, he fought because he was a psychopath who loved torture and murder. Fidel Castro was a fraud whose sex-drive was so strong it made him seek power so he could get all the women he wanted (women respond to fame and power). Everything else is a cover story for gullible fools who don't know the truth.

      Fidel Castro had his own private island, a luxury yacht, $88 million stolen from the Cuban people, and a harem of mistresses. But he told you that he lived on $25 dollars a day and you believed him:
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

      Che Guevara had his office sited so he could watch executions because he was a psychopath. He didn't join the Communist Socialists to advance the 'Revolution', he joined as it gave him a license to murder the people he was claiming to be helping.
      The Truth about Che Guevara
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      The Truth about Fidel Castro
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Does it never occur to you that perhaps it is you who doesn't know the TRUE history of these evil people? that perhaps you only know the widely-disseminated disinformation and propaganda of the Marxist-sympathizing mainstream media and actually believe the Marxist's false narratives - which fools you into advancing their evil agenda, which is not about helping people, it is about CONTROL by the 'elites' (sociopathic Collectivist leadership).

      I hope you take time to learn the truth. That way you can start to see through the lies you've been told your whole life.

    26. Re:an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      Please learn about 'Cultural Marxist Critical Theory'. At the moment you are still in The Matrix. You are controlled. Oh yes, they tell you that you 'think differently', but you do not. You think exactly as you have been indoctrinated to. Learn about the reality of the last century, learn about 'Cultural Marxist Critical Theory'. Until you do, you work against your own self interest. You work for THEM, and they don't care a whit about you.

    27. Re:an unpopular opinion. by mvdwege · · Score: 0

      I'm a Socialist. I know about the Frankfurt School. Which you obviously don't.

      'Cultural Marxism' is an easy shibboleth: it invariably indicates someone with a sub-Breitbart level of political sophistication. Also known as 'an idiot'.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    28. Re:an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      Are you a voluntary socialist or an involuntary socialist? I'm guessing the latter, so it means you are for using State power to conduct economic rape, right?

      Voluntary charity is moral. Have you ever heard of it? have you ever practiced it? this is what the "sub-Breitbart" folks advocate,.
      Involuntary socialism is using State force to economically rape the industrious and innovative to give to the politically favored as vote bribes so the self-selecting sociopaths of the political 'elite'c an gain and retain power. This evil and immoral system is what you are for, right ?

      'Cultural Marxism' is an easy shibboleth: it invariably indicates someone with a sub-Breitbart level of political sophistication. Also known as 'an idiot'.

      "Cultural Marxism" is a useful label to describe the deliberate subversion of Individual Liberty and the Free Market of voluntary exchange by retards who advocate economic rape - because they are too lazy and too greedy to generate the surplus required for voluntary charity - and too dumb to see how they are easily manipulated by the politically ambitious sociopaths with mere words.

      I'm a Socialist.

      Therefore you are evil and the enemy of every Free Person on the planet who believes in Individual Liberty where the individual should decide on their own affairs - not sanctimonious, indoctrinated, suib-par intellects like you.

      You are the Galactic Empire, prepared to use State force to crush dissenting opinion (look at you initiate ad hominems at millions of stranger just now). We are the Rebel Alliance who seek to preserve Individual Liberty from predators like you. The lazy, stupid economic rapists of the World. You are on the wrong side of history and clinging to failed ideas promoted by evil control freak collectivist elites. Your movement is dying as hundreds of millions around the globe utterly reject rule by stupid, vain and quite frankly immoral control freaks like you.

      Stop preaching about virtue with your virtue signalling about the economic rape and removal of Individual Liberty others and practice virtue YOURSELF. Sell your stuff to charity if you believe in 'socialism', and stop pointing guns at everyone else to take their stuff - all because you are a douchebag who wants to feel good about yourself without actually having to work hard so you have surplus to VOLUNTARILY donate to others. Sheeesh.

    29. Re:an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      Chomsky was great at linguistics. Thanks to the Dunning-Kruger Effect he cannot see the fundamental areas he mistakes he makes in areas outside his area of expertise. However, since he is articulate, and his audience often lacks great experience (eg. university students who lack decades of experience in the Real World), he persuades many that his bad ideas are god for them.

    30. Re:an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      Well, he seems to take the, to me, logical point of view that as a US citizen it behooves him to critcise his own government first.

      No, he should criticize bad ideas wherever they occur. It is logical to prioritize from greatest threat to least. The US has some fantastically bad ideas, but it is not alone in this. Chomsky's real problem is he is so focused on criticizing the US that he forgets that there are systems outside the US that are vastly worse. Hence, his valid but unbalanced criticism of the US is used by people who are worse to advance their terrible systems around the globe. That makes Chomsky a fool, and the people who don't understand this, or of the severe limits on his expertise (go and look up the Dunning-Kruger Effect, Chomsky is one of the worst examples of it) idiots.

      Oh. Never mind. Logic is wasted on you. Carry on then.

      I have a PhD in Physics. Because I try and use the Scientific Method extensively I would wager I respond to logic and *evidence* much better than you. The problem is, you have not provided any logical argument. And the evidence against socialism and Chomsky's idiotic positions are overwhelming - there are hundreds of millions of citizens slaughtered in peacetime by socialists in dozens of countries in the last century. Where socialism has not yet slaughtered its citizens it has instead corrupted the heritage of its societies, put their countries on demographic death spirals, frivolously spent the accumulated wealth of generations and enslaved the unborn in debt racked up for entitlement vote bribes.

      The empirical evidence is in, socialism is harmful to individuals, social cohesion, economies, future generations, and individual liberty. Despite the manifest failures of socialism the socialists do not learn from their mistakes and always want to try new victim countries to pillage. Socialists are also intellectually dead and have had no new ideas for DECADES.

      So I've taken the empirical route and used evidence-based reasoning to inexorable conclusion - socialism doesn't work because it cannot work. That does not stop clueless zealots from banging on about it though. Borg drones who think virtue signalling about 'helping people' when socialism is about State power (rule by the 'elites') which actively harms the people socialism is inflicted on. Rather than actually help people by practicing charity themselves they noisily rant about using the State to point guns at people who worked for a living and saved. of course, the socialists think they'll be the ones receiving the stolen goods and the ones pointing the guns. Despite them being greedy with the lust for the wealth others earned they call anyone who resists this tyrannous theft as 'greedy'. What evil and hypocritical people socialists are.

      Here's an experiment that has been performed twice. Destroy a country in a war. Utterly level the place. Then split the country in two and make one part of the country Free Market (or the Statist approximation thereof) and one part Socialist. Its the same environment, same people, same starting point. Then see which system is better. The system you are advocating for produced East Germany and North Korea. The system I'm advocating for produced West Germany and South Korea. Only idiots like you want to take North American and turn it in to North Korea where the 'elites' rule - since your are attacking Individual Liberty and the Free Market of voluntary exchange (which is always 'win-win' as either party can walk away if they don't think the exchange benefits them).

      So keep pushing your evil and failed collectivist ideology. The rest of the World are already voting to leave your madness behind. Free and sovereign UK/Brexit, Trump, and soon a Free Europe of sovereign states which will boot the parasitic collectivists out.

      You are on the wrong side of history. You don't have to be a chump and worship the State your whole life - because the elites don't give a dam

    31. Re:an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      Actually i think the problem is the same but the solution is achieved in the reverse order. The corporations only bother to bribe the politicians because the politicians have too much power and take too much tax. If an actual Limited Government is installed, as was intended, and it restricts itself to ensuring there is competition and NOT handing out tax money to the biggest donors then the problem will solve itself automagically. Note: the government uses corporations as scapegoats for its own corruption and failures.

      If you attack the corporations without decreasing the power of the Government all you get is more Government (socialism/fascism/communism). But if you limit the Government FIRST then the corporations can't use government power and can't pillage tax dollars when a small government is not collecting them. In short, the Government should shrink to 'fit in the box it came in'. No more $4 Trillion dollar expenditures to fund the vote-bribe system the government runs (and the corporations exploit).

      Don;t be fooled into attacking the scapegoat,. The corporations do not make the laws and they don't have the power to force you to do anything - all exchanges with them are voluntary. It is the Government that makes all the laws and they can force you into involuntary transactions such as when they point guns at you to take a portion of your earnings (which they then spent on whatever they want; vote bribes, wars, corporate welfare, propaganda and most of all, themselves).

      Shrink the power and pillaging of the government and the corporates have no use in bribing them and must COMPETE in the Free Market instead of CORRUPT using government cronyism. But if you shrink the corporates and leave the government then the government will grow to take over areas vacated by the corporates, and you end up with the economic system known as 'Fascism' - and that is even worse.

    32. Re: an unpopular opinion. by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Dear God, the crazy is strong in this one.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    33. Re: an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      This is not an argument. Of course you do this because you cannot refute my points and the cognitive dissonance is kicking in - the facts I have presented are conflicting with your indoctrination. So far, the indoctrination is winning. It is you that is insane, defending an utterly failed system that has slaughtered hundreds of millions of innocents. Inside you is a totalitarian screaming to get - I bet you fantasize about the socialist nightmare you wish to create. Hence you call people criticizing statist collectivism and its evils "crazy". That makes you very, very dangerous to Free People and Free Society. Mass murder is only committed by with the sanction of political enttiies, usually their own socialist governments that are full of hateful misanthropes like you. Look in the mirror before it is too late.

    34. Re: an unpopular opinion. by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      This is not an argument.

      Of course it isn't. Your posts are so drenched in the signs of stupidity that arguments would be wasted.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    35. Re: an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      Still not an argument. Look, I've pointed out that various flavors of socialism have slaughtered over 100 million citizens in peacetime and is rapidly destroying the First World (Europe and USA are being economically and demogrpahically destroyed by socialist policies), created North Korea and dozens of other hellholes, will turn Sweden into a Third World country by 2030 according to the UN, and socialist economics have turned oil-rich Venezuela into a country so close to starvation that people are hunting and eating their pets.

      It is you that is literally insane. You cling to your ludicrous utopianism despite the mountains of historical evidence and dead bodies. And your indoctrination leads you to HATE everyone who does you the favor of pointing out the truth. You are Borg Drone that is extremely dangerous to Free People. You are the enemy.

      Wake the fsck up, fool.

    36. Re:an unpopular opinion. by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      socialism is about State power

      See, and here is where you prove you're an idiot. Go read some Proudhon, or Bakunin, or Kropotkin, or if you want to stay in the US, Goldman.

      There is a whole lot more to Socialism than just Marxism-Leninism. But of course, you being an idiot with the political sophistication of an invertebrate wouldn't know any of that. You, a PhD? From what diploma mill did you buy that, moron?

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    37. Re:an unpopular opinion. by zapadnik · · Score: 0

      See, and here is where you prove you're an idiot. Go read some Proudhon, or Bakunin, or Kropotkin, or if you want to stay in the US, Goldman.

      What a poorly educated ignoramus you are. Go and read some Pacepa and Solzhenitsen and Kasparov and Hayek and von Mises and Sowell and Friedman to get a clue as to the what socialism is ACTUALLY LIKE, instead of the 'angels dancing on the heads of pins' bloviations of the intellectual masturbat0rs you have name dropped.

      Over one 100 million bodies slaughtered by people who think *EXACTLY* like YOU and you have nothing to say except your narcissistic attempt to name drop. You don't address the destruction of societies and economies in EVERY one of the dozens and dozens of times your ideology has been tried.

      All you would have to do is point out a SINGLE country that has lasted a century and got BETTER as a result of your Government-worshipping cult. But EVERY country has got worse, most massively so - and this is all so narcissists like you can feel a sense of unearned moral superiority at having transcended the common sense that normal people have, and ignoring all the historical evidence. It takes a special kind of stupid to worship Collectivist ideology as you do and resist the empirical evidence of its failure.

      They do say that insanity is repeating the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. From all the times socialism has been tried over voluntary charity the result is always the same - impoverishment and destruction of the host society that the socialists are parasitic on. By this definition you are INSANE, as well as having a sub-par intellect that cannot resist the indoctrination you have been fed.

      There is a whole lot more to Socialism than just Marxism-Leninism.

      And yet they all end up with the same result - because not only does socialism not work, it can never work. This is because socialists are economically illiterate as well as being ignorant of human motivations. You don't even know the reasons why socialism inevitably fails, do you? why it can never work? you are completely ignorant of the analyses of why you cult cannot work !

      Since you cannot address the mountains of dead that your ideology has caused, and the oppression and impoverishment you plan to cause in the future you instead turn to a lame ad hominem. What makes you think you are competent to judge my academic credentials given the fact you don't mention you are an undergraduate in Guatemalan lesbian dance therapy studies or something equally dumbed-down for the academically anemic? what makes you think I care what a brainwashed Collective-worshipping Borg Drone like you 'thinks' (which is not the result of thinking, but merely parroting the Big State collectivist indoctrination you were not smart enough to see through) ?

      You collectivists are all failures with no accomplishments who usually cannot manage your personal hygiene, and you arrogantly consider yourself so morally superior that you should run the planet? ROFL! such arrogance stemming from over-inflated egos of the 'participation generation'.

      At least a common thief has the personal courage to rob us to our face, but you pussie$ are too cowardly to do this so you instead demand to use State force to rob us on your behalf. But the reality is, you are still a douchebag thief who covets what others have created, earned and saved because you are too lazy and too stupid to create value yourselves that other people would voluntarily compensate you for.

      Either bring some facts to the debate that would justify your disgusting desire to steal and suppress the Liberty of others at State gunpoint or GTFO. The rest of the World is getting heartily sick of you intellectually sub-par indoctrinated whiners.

  20. Has it been confirmed? by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    I'll believe it when Netcraft confirms it.

  21. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you should educate yourself on his actions.

    As opposed to say .. Batista?

    Fascist, Batista, there is a difference?

  22. Re:Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hell does not exist you berky pillot! he will rot that's all

  23. Re: Good riddance! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Just be sure not to play music around him.

    Too late. The Rolling Stones already performed in Cuba earlier this year.

    http://www.rollingstone.com/music/live-reviews/rolling-stones-thrill-huge-crowd-at-historic-havana-show-20160326

  24. Re:Good riddance! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    Fidel Castro body count: 100,000.

  25. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most people are unaware of the US involvement in pre-Castro Cuba, and would be shocked if they did a little research.

    Castro and communism are not my choices for leaders or economic systems, but the US is responsible for overthrowing lots of governments around the world, then acting shocked when a dictator or religious zealot steps in.

    Hopefully Trump won't renew the economic oppression of the Cuban people. We have behaved shamefully.

  26. Resistance by snookiex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can say anything about Fidel, but he was a tough guy. Cuba resisted bravely (if you allow me to use the term) to an enemy way bigger and more powerful for many years. Curiously, the end of the Castro era could have arrived long before if the past presidents would have used the Obama approach: Embrace, extend and extinguish. Personally, I think he chose a wrong path and became the perfect example of why communist social structures are not sustainable. "Join together to share the lack of wealth", to use Stallman's words, simply goes against human nature. RIP, anyway.

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
    1. Re:Resistance by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      "Poverty is not socialism. To become wealthy is honourable." --Deng Xiaoping

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:Resistance by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 0

      He fought many years against a US enemy who tried to remove him and install a puppet in his place, and ironically lived just long enough to see Putin help get Trump elected.

    3. Re:Resistance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can say anything about Fidel

      Not in Cuba you couldn't...

    4. Re:Resistance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment is on target.

      The US finally changed the embargo and the political isolation of Cuba. They did so when the Cuban expats in Florida lost some of their support. They also did so because the embargo clearly hadn't worked, indeed the Cuban regime used the embargo for propaganda purposes for years.

      Normalizing relations with Cuba was and is smart. Now the Cuban regime no longer has the embargo as a whipping boy, and greater contacts with Cuba and Cubans mean that more reforms are coming. Of that I'm sure. It's like when the US established relations with China. The Chinese became a much more open society as a result.

      The thing is, I don't think you can question Fidel's patriotism. He selected Communism as his political model and it's no secret, Communism hasn't really worked out anywhere it has been tried. But Cuba had been treated like some party town by Americans, the Mob was fully established there, and I think the Cubans were entitled to dislike that, dislike the dictator Batista, and make some changes. Too bad they made some poor choices along the way, but they were Cuban's choices to make.

    5. Re:Resistance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brave? A coward murderer of his own people.

    6. Re:Resistance by NewYork · · Score: 1

      "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." --George Bernard Shaw

  27. Yeah I've read the news on Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Killed by Hillary Clinton. Sad story.

    1. Re:Yeah I've read the news on Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Killed by Hillary Clinton. Sad story.

      Yep, Fidel promised to deliver Florida.

  28. I'm skeptical ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... until I see it on Fox News (sic).

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:I'm skeptical ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. Is that all you really have? You remind me of the low life fucktards on the science boards that need to bring up religion even when the subject at hand doesn't touch on any of that. You want to shout to hear your own voice but you have nothing to say. A pretty hollow fucking existence, if you ask me.

    2. Re: I'm skeptical ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a Space Nutter. Nobody is going anywhere. Ever.

  29. Re: Good riddance! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    In other news, Francisco Franco is still dead.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  30. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Economic growth is not everything.

  31. One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...5,999,999 to go!

  32. "Fidel Castro" ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... comes to us from the Greeks (ca. bay of pigs) and is a concatenated corruption of the form, "infidel castration," and generally refers to a paynim in the ass with no balls.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re: "Fidel Castro" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't post when you're drunk.

  33. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Of course Batista was bad. Castro was worse; under Castro people risked likely death to escape.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  34. Re: Castro dead by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hopefully Trump won't renew the economic oppression of the Cuban people.

    Unsure how to respond. If you mean is Trump the heir to Fidel, the answer is no. If you mean the stupid embargo, that was the best thing to happen to Castro; he couldn't have asked for a better justification to continue his own oppression of the Cuban people.

    If you actually do think Castro was good for Cuba, you are sadly ignorant. Batista's Cuba was famous for literacy and doctors per capita, compared to the rest of Latin America, so Castro's improvements were pretty small, he killed far more people, and destroyed all chances for improvements.

    Maybe you are one of the who thinks Che Guevara was heroic and cannot see the irony of selling t-shirts with his picture.

  35. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got anything to back it up? Links to the Cuban-American Fascist Society of Miami don't count.

  36. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presumably the US economic sanctions for 50 years had no effect on the Cuban economy.

  37. Dies on Black Friday by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The most capitalist day of the year.

    1. Re:Dies on Black Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most capitalist day of the year.

      Or from the other side, he took one look at Trump's proposed cabinet, declared "Mission accomplished," and died knowing that he'd achieved his life's mission: A US with a Russian-backed dictator on top, and a higher per capita incarceration rate than his own tiny little prison island.

    2. Re:Dies on Black Friday by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      If the US executed people who critised the government like Castro did we'd have millions dead. You guys just keep on with the mindless drivel about Trump like he was Adolp Hitler and Joseph Stalin combined. He's a blowhard who was smart enough to realize that the American public are so fed up and tired of the endless lies of politicians like Hilliary and !Jeb that they'd pick anything that looked like something else. He's not a dictator you fucking idiot. He's a US President who has all kinds of limits on his power. Obama tried acting like a dictator and the country united behind a Republican congress to limit what he could do for the last 6 years he was in. If Trump acts like Obama he'll wind up the same way. Two years to act like a fool and 2 to 6 years trying to get anything at all done. Obama fucked up so bad he couldn't even make a SCOTUS appointment. All because he shoved the "Affordable Health Care" act through with Zero compromise. An Ultra Left agenda that swung Congress heavily right ending his power. This isn't Cuba.

    3. Re:Dies on Black Friday by skapunker21 · · Score: 2

      . All because he shoved the "Affordable Health Care" act through with Zero compromise. An Ultra Left agenda that swung Congress heavily right ending his power.

      So you think the ACA was and ultra left agenda shoved through with zero compromise. You keep using those words. I do not think they mean what you think they mean.

    4. Re:Dies on Black Friday by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      I recently visited Chengdu, China. In the center of the town square is a monster statue of Mao.

      Literally underneath him, in the last few years they have built an underground shopping center.

    5. Re:Dies on Black Friday by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      I guess you can debate ultra left. It depends on your viewpoint. Some people think free healthcare is a right and should be paid for by the government. I guess that might be even more left than the ACA. Zero compromise means no compromise. When Republican lawmakers met with the President all of their concerns were blown off. All of them. That's Zero compromise.

  38. Odd by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It doesn't feel as good as when Thatcher and Reagan bit the dust.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how they never killed and tortured tens of thousands of their fellow countrymen.

    2. Re:Odd by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      At least not directly. You can kill people by proxy, though.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. Re: Castro dead by ilguido · · Score: 4, Informative

    If a war torn banana republic is beating you that badly on growth, there is something seriously wrong with your economic policy.

    Let me guess... an embargo?
    That aside get your statistics right: Cuba GDP per capita is up 250% since 1970 and Honduras GDP per capita is up 230% in the same period and still half of the Cuban GDP per capita, life expectancy in Honduras is 73 years, in Cuba 79 (higher than USA by the way). Sen. Joseph McCarthy legacy still lives on.

  40. Re:Outlasted Raegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khrushchev would agree with you. If he or his dream were still alive.

  41. Re: Castro dead by bestweasel · · Score: 1

    What finished Castro off was a nightmare he had of dozens of gold-plated high rise Trump casinos looming over Cuba's beaches.

  42. Re:All the nation mourns.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got a chuckle out of me, but it looks like Communists (or MSM journalists) with mod points are unhappy with your post.

  43. Obligatory SNL Quote: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    "In other news, Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead."

  44. Re: Castro dead by Freischutz · · Score: 1

    If you actually do think Castro was good for Cuba, you are sadly ignorant.

    Don't put words in his mouth, he actually said the exact opposite: "Castro and communism are not my choices for leaders or economic systems..."

    Batista's Cuba was famous for literacy and doctors per capita...

    Cuba has a literacy rate of 99,7% and it would appear that despite the best efforts of the US, the Cuban govt, has managed to maintain a pretty good healthcare system: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... Much like the AC you are maligning I don't think much of communism but if you want to dump on the Castro regime at least pick something to complain about that they managed to mess up and not two things they actually seem to have managed to get right.

    Maybe you are one of the who thinks Che Guevara was heroic and cannot see the irony of selling t-shirts with his picture.

    First you put words in his mouth, now you are projecting thoughts into his mind.

  45. End of 2016 has been great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The end of President Obama, the end of the Hillary, and the end to Dictator Castro. What's not to like about the end of 2016.

    1. Re:End of 2016 has been great by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      It's all good! I'm loving it! I watched all the crying faces at Hilliary's campaign HQ on election night. I kept playing it again and again on my DVR. It warmed the cockles of my heart.

    2. Re:End of 2016 has been great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have a really shitty, empty life. Not inclined to feel sorry for you, though.

    3. Re: End of 2016 has been great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Butthurt much? It was HEEEEEEEEER TURN you deplorables sob sob. LOL!

    4. Re:End of 2016 has been great by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Actually my life is starting to look up. I eagerly look forward to a Trump presidency to Make America Great Again!

  46. Thanks Obama by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Troll

    it's actually more to do with Obama, the Democrats and how our presidential elections work.

    Cuban immigrants were a big part of winning Florida for the Republicans. They're why we've maintained the embargo. Anyone politician who tried was dead in the water on a national stage.

    That said time passed, those immigrants died and their kids didn't listen much to granddad's story and Obama formed a big anti-Bush jr coalition to put him in the Whitehouse.

    That left us open to normalizing relations. Businesses have wanted this for years but politics made it impossible. So at this point it's got more to do with the dems free trade policies and general progressivism than anything else. That and marginalizing the remaining anti-Castro voters left in Florida.

    So yeah, we embargoed a country for 30+ years because their refugees settled in a populous swing state. Take those same people and drop them off in TX and things would be completely different. Man, our politics are a mess. And don't get me started on Israel...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  47. Its like the Iranians and the hostages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the timing of this is suspicious with Trump about to become our ruler.

    Its like the Iranians and the hostages. They knew their time was up when Reagan was elected.

  48. Reagan didn't need guns to people's heads by drnb · · Score: 1

    Cuba is still communist while tricle down economics has been discredited. People die . Its if their ideas live on is what matters.

    Fidel's ideas only live on under the gun's of his government. Reagan didn't need to hold guns to people's heads. When the Cuban government's guns are put aside we'll learn the people's true opinion of Fidel.

    1. Re:Reagan didn't need guns to people's heads by dywolf · · Score: 1

      this shows a marked lack of knowledge of Cuba, Castro, the background history of both, and Reagan.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  49. Khrushchev thought Fidel insane by drnb · · Score: 1

    Khrushchev would agree with you. If he or his dream were still alive.

    And Khrushchev was the sane one of the two. Part of the reason he withdrew missiles from Cuba was that he thought Fidel was f'n crazy, willing to let Cuba suffer nuclear strikes if it would advance global communism.

  50. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Of course Batista was bad. Castro was worse; under Castro people risked likely death to escape.

    It wasn't so much escaping Cuba as wanting riches. Pretty much everyone wanted to go to USA, even though there were other countries they could travel to if escape had been the reason.

  51. Fidel - The little bully sidekick by drnb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You can say anything about Fidel, but he was a tough guy. Cuba resisted bravely ...

    Fidel was the little bully sidekick talking sh*t, sucking up to, the real tough bully, the Soviets. He was a useful idiot, nothing more. Once the Cuban people are allowed a voice he will be consigned to the dustbin of history.

    1. Re:Fidel - The little bully sidekick by snookiex · · Score: 1

      Soviets died in 1989 (if not before). Many other third world satellites were really dependent on the URSS and were assimilated by someone else shortly after the fall of the wall. Cuba managed to survive even being a few kilometers away from the US. Fidel has a place in History (not precisely in the dustbin) you like it or not.

      --
      Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
    2. Re:Fidel - The little bully sidekick by amiga3D · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He was a brutal dictator who murdered tens of thousands of his own people. The fact that Batista was a monster too hardly absolves him from the guilt of his murder and torture of his own people. To see people try to excuse this monster is incredible. Seldom do I truly rejoice in the death of another human being but it's hard not to feel good about Castro's demise.

    3. Re:Fidel - The little bully sidekick by snookiex · · Score: 1

      I read like 5 times what I wrote and I fail to see where am I defending his actions. I just saying that he's got a place in history, just like Hitler, Gandhi or the Homo Neanderthalensis. History is not a garden of unicorns, you know.

      --
      Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
    4. Re:Fidel - The little bully sidekick by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Oh he has a place I guess, like Franco. A bit player. You know I was surprised by a young coworker of mine about 7 months or so ago something came up about Castro and I mentioned it to him. He literally had no idea who Castro was. He could tell you every Heisman candidate any year but Castro he'd never heard of. I went around and did kind of a quick Leno style quiz and found that of the under 30 crowd at work maybe half had heard of Castro and most of them only had a vague idea who he was. I was pretty shocked. I wonder how much of that history they teach in school nowadays.

    5. Re:Fidel - The little bully sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit player? he was massively influential in many conflicts across the world including being an anti apartheid supporter of nelson mandela and without his aid Angola would have been run and controlled by a corrupt South african/US backed faction in the 70's. I am by no means a fan of Castro, but he stepped up to fight against a brutal dictator, sadly he become somewhat of one himself, but he was anything but a bit player in the world.

    6. Re:Fidel - The little bully sidekick by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      He outpaced Batista in the brutality contest. His opposition of US interests in Angola would have been wonderful except really there were no good guys in that civil war. The MPLA commited horrible attrocities although they were not alone in that. It was a hideous civil war that was made worse by foreign involvement of the US and Soviet Union and their proxies. So Castro became a worse tyrant than Batista and was used as a proxy to make a bloody civil war even bloodier. Yes, he was no more than a proxy for the USSR in a backwater action in the cold war between super powers. A bit player.

    7. Re:Fidel - The little bully sidekick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Castro became what the US Government forced him to be.

    8. Re:Fidel - The little bully sidekick by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Hitler became what the allies forced him to be. See how that works? Evil is as evil does. He didn't have to torture and murder his own people. He made Batista look like a sweetheart.

  52. I hear he was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...killed by Death, same as Lemmy.

  53. Soviet subsidies paid for Cuban progress by drnb · · Score: 1

    Economic growth is not everything.

    It is if you have to pay for your hospitals, schools, etc. Once the Soviet subsidies ended the Cuban "progress" started to fall apart.

  54. Re: Castro dead by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Communists don't have Hell. Castro is burning in Venezuela.

  55. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... a couple of orders of magnitude less than capitalist America, then.

  56. Re: Castro dead by ilguido · · Score: 4, Informative

    Batista's Cuba was famous for literacy and doctors per capita, compared to the rest of Latin America, so Castro's improvements were pretty small

    Life expectancy in Batista's Cuba was far lower than in the USA at the time, in Castro's Cuba it is higher. Literacy in Batista's Cuba was estimated between 60% and 76% (because there is no data for the neglect countryside), taking the highest esteem it was the fourth highest in Latin America at the time, today it is 99.7% according to Unesco data, highest in Latin America.
    Try harder.

  57. Pushed into comunism by Alomex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When Castro first came to power, he was inspired by the Mexican revolution of 1910-1920 who did not turn communist. Moreover the Cuban Communist Party had denounced Castro's revolution as pro-Western. He was pushed into the USSR sphere of influence by the aggressive CIA-led actions.

    Then the embargo provided the biggest excuse ever for Castro and his dictatorship. He could always blame his failed economic policies on the USA led embargo.

    1. Re:Pushed into comunism by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      There really is enough evidence to cast at least doubt on that theory. The more accepted wisdom is that he did harbour strong Marxist sympathies and that the US opposition to his revolution was a good excuse to implement Marxist policies.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    2. Re:Pushed into comunism by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, we're in the realm of alternate histories here. But just from a power politics standpoint Castro would have been forced to side with the Soviets no matter what his true principles were, or indeed if he had no sincere principles whatsoever. The Soviets were friendly and the Americans were hostile. American business interests preferred his genuinely odious predecessor Fulgencio Batista, who could be bought by anyone with sufficient money, even the Mafia.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Pushed into comunism by whodunit · · Score: 0

      "The communist dictator didn't really want to team up with that big, powerful communist nation making friendly overtures to them. They were forced to by those mean, nasty Americans, in self-defense!"

      How much shit can you people swallow?

    4. Re:Pushed into comunism by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Not initially. Later on he did fully embrace communism, but the internal debates with Che (who was always fully pro-communist) are well known. As someone else pointed out, Ho Chi Minh is another example of someone who was pushed into communism by CIA actions.

      Sorry that this doesn't match your simplistic conception of the world.

    5. Re: Pushed into comunism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ho chi minh was a communist from long before the *first* vietnam war (with France). By the time the next Vietnam war rolled around with the CIA he was on his death bed.

      I have no idea where you get that kind of ridiculous fake propaganda.

    6. Re:Pushed into comunism by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      I have some sympathy for Fidel because at least he wasn't Batista. But the narrative that makes him a mere plaything of forces beyond his control, as in 'he only turned communist because he got forced' does not square with my impression of a forceful man who was willing to do without support if need be for his cause.

      Whatever you say of Fidel, character he didn't lack.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    7. Re:Pushed into comunism by hey! · · Score: 1

      Of course, but that's not the narrative I'm pushing.

      I look at things from a game theoretical position here; we played a strategy which, short of armed invasion and occupation, was certain defeat -- at least if fighting a communist toe-hold in the Caribbean was our goal. It may be the way things worked out suited Fidel perfectly, but if so we made it easy for him.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Pushed into comunism by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      I wasn't referring to just you, but to OP in this thread too. It seems we agree quite a bit.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  58. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Batista wasn't just "bad". Batista ran the island as a giant criminal enterprise, using the Mafia as his enforcers, and looted the treasury of hundreds of millions of dollars in the process. He impoverished the people and killed at least 20,000 of them in a 7-year span.

  59. Re: Castro dead by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Maybe you are one of the who thinks Che Guevara was heroic and cannot see the irony of selling t-shirts with his picture.

    Che was a serial killer. There are ironic t-shirts with Charles Manson's picture on them, too.

  60. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, such an edgy comment.Careful so as not to cut yourself.

  61. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Batista's body count was 20,000 over only 7 years. They basically swapped a ruthless authoritarian corrupt dictator for another "brutal dictator:, Object lesson is: when you decide to drain the swamp, you may not get the result you were expecting,

  62. Re: Castro dead by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    What does McCarthyism have to do with any of this? The people practicing McCarthyism in most recent history were the hysterical 'Hillary is being hacked by Russia' fanatics.

    And anyways, McCarthy was an opportunist and unethical, but he made use of a legitimate issue to establish himself. The Russians WERE infiltrating the US government in the period when he was ranting. It was very well documented shortly after the USSR fell, during a short period when the KGB archives were accessable.

  63. Burning in Hell next to Hitler, Mao and Stalin by schwit1 · · Score: 1, Troll
    If this were a just world, 13 facts would be etched on Castro's tombstone and highlighted in every obituary, as bullet points - a fitting metaphor for someone who used firing squads to murder thousands of his own people.
    • He turned Cuba into a colony of the Soviet Union and nearly caused a nuclear holocaust.
    • He sponsored terrorism wherever he could and allied himself with many of the worst dictators on earth.
    • He was responsible for so many thousands of executions and disappearances in Cuba that a precise number is hard to reckon.
    • He brooked no dissent and built concentration camps and prisons at an unprecedented rate, filling them to capacity, incarcerating a higher percentage of his own people than most other modern dictators, including Stalin.
    • He condoned and encouraged torture and extrajudicial killings.
    • He forced nearly 20 percent of his people into exile, and prompted thousands to meet their deaths at sea, unseen and uncounted, while fleeing from him in crude vessels.
    • He claimed all property for himself and his henchmen, strangled food production and impoverished the vast majority of his people.
    • He outlawed private enterprise and labor unions, wiped out Cuba's large middle class and turned Cubans into slaves of the state.
    • He persecuted gay people and tried to eradicate religion.
    1. Re:Burning in Hell next to Hitler, Mao and Stalin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree, but you need to cite the editorial you copy and pasted from.

    2. Re:Burning in Hell next to Hitler, Mao and Stalin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four words: Guantanamo Bay detention camp

      Now stop throwing rocks from your glass windowed shack

    3. Re:Burning in Hell next to Hitler, Mao and Stalin by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

      This actually is a just world.
      You just have to wait until it's all over to learn the final outcome.

      I'm sure it'll be somewhat different than you're expecting.

      Just wait
      you'll see

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    4. Re:Burning in Hell next to Hitler, Mao and Stalin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not friend of Fidel but some of these claims are so obviously laughable

    5. Re:Burning in Hell next to Hitler, Mao and Stalin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he did some nasty shit through his life, but you could at least be balanced
      He ousted one of the most brutal dictators in modern history (inconvenient for the US as they were a supporter of that corrupt brutal dictator)
      He got rid of the extremely corrupt US influence in his country at the time, really was a shameful part of US history
      He actually gave humanitarian support to many countries ignored by the west as they didn't hold strategic value or have resources of significance
      He back Angola in their struggle for freedom including supplying doctors, teachers and humanitarian supplies while the US backed the Apartheid led South African faction.
      None of that excuses the nasty shit he did, but he was in many aspects no different from most other leaders of the time.

    6. Re:Burning in Hell next to Hitler, Mao and Stalin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish a few more countries tried to eradicate religion, the world would be a better place.

    7. Re:Burning in Hell next to Hitler, Mao and Stalin by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      tried to eradicate religion.

      So he had one redeeming quality then.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  64. Re: Castro dead by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Specifically, Castro's hell is in a supermarket in Venezuela. They've given him a can-opener, but there are no canned goods at all on the shelf.

  65. Re: Castro dead by BlytheBowman · · Score: 0

    He would need to "rot in hell" because of how he hurt other people and have to kill. Scince I am Athiest and don't believe in heaven or hell, I see another tyrant who lived out the rest of his life in relitave comfort, and has now ceased to exist entirely, save for the dead shell that was once his body. He will never feel any of the pain or suffering his victims did, nor suffer in any kind of prison scince you can't suffer when you no longer exist. Yet another villan gets away Scot free

  66. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by Altrag · · Score: 1

    What other countries? They certainly weren't making it to Europe in their little rowboats or whatever they could find to escape on.

    That leaves a bunch of tiny islands, many under US control anyway and those that aren't were in just as bad a shape as Cuba throughout much of the cold war era. Mexico, which might be a great tourist trap but not really where most people think of when they want to start a new life of dreams and unicorns. Or Florida.

    Not to mention Florida is also the closest of all of those to Havana so in addition to saving time on the water, there'd be significantly less travel time on land as well for most of the escapees, which would have had plenty of its own pitfalls (mostly in the form of being caught in the act.)

    Though that said, I'd be less than shocked if I found out that a bunch of Cubans had also escaped to Cancun. And I'm sure some did flee to Jamaica and Haiti and whatnot, though that would have been more difficult with Guantanamo (and US military presence) right there in addition to dodging the Cuban military.

  67. Re: Castro dead by BlytheBowman · · Score: 0

    Castro will never go to hell, because "heaven and hell" exists on Earth only, as a physical state/status that a person or place is in. Castro went to the exact same place that every single creature, including humans go, and that is nonexistance. What is really sad is the many people who don't fight these tyrants because they believe in a bunch of fairy tales that tell them that "God will get them in the end" and "if you suffer on Earth, you will relax and be happy in Heaven" (another storybookesque place that only exists in peoples minds) so they just sit back and let themselves and others including their loved ones to be abused in this manner

  68. Re: Castro dead by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    I've been to Cuba, and i wouldn't want to ever have to visit a hospital there.

  69. always fascinating to see such drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Batista was a bad guy, just like the Shah of Iran was a bad guy. Most places on Earth throughout all of human history have been run by bad guys.

    Sadly, there are always WORSE people who are eager and ready to take advantage of such situations to bring even worse guys into power.

    When the Shah fell in Iran, the "revolutionaries" brought-in Islamofascism and converted Iran into a pariah nation widely recognized as the world's worst state-sponsor of global terrorism. The Iranians who were outraged by the number of victims of the Shah, found themselves under the boot of the Iranian revolutionary guards who have racked-up a FAR worse record of murder and oppression.

    Castro arose to replace Batista, and ended-up creating a nasty police-state that massacred political opponents as a sport (Castro pal Che, of T-Shirt fame, had big windows installed in his office overlooking the execution area so he could enjoy the firing squads slaughtering his opponents). Under Castro, Cuba did not improve relative to Batista, it actually got WORSE. Nobody will ever know how many Cubans died at sea trying escape, but the number is certainly far higher than under Batista.

    1. Re:always fascinating to see such drivel by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      This is why the only way to fix such a broken system is to get the people so mad that they self-organize to overthrow the bad leaders and stick their heads on pikes as a sign to anyone else who would go down the same path. It worked reasonably well in France, among others.

      Unfortunately, that doesn't work very well if the government has tanks and fighter jets, which is why Russia's arms sales to various Middle-Eastern regimes represents such a grave threat to real, long-term stability in the region.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  70. 1 down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes Trudeau The world's top communist. We're number one!

  71. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2005 called. They want their hackneyed quip back.

  72. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Even before Cuba lifted its exit visa requirements a few years ago, it was not hard to get an exit visum to nearby countries, after which they could board planes and boats, not rafts. A very easy "escape" if that had been what they wanted.
    Almost all the Cubans in Florida are economic refugees, running to a place more than from.

  73. no he isn't by sucko · · Score: 0

    he's pining for the fjords.

  74. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that despite the best efforts of the US, the Cuban govt, has managed to maintain a pretty good healthcare system:

    Bullshit. They have a couple of Potemkin hospitals that they show to idiots like Michael Moore.

  75. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed a well respected leader who's people would do anything possible to escape the country. Including nailing some wood planks together and trying to drift 90 miles to America...but yea awesome guy

  76. Re: Good riddance! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    97,000 killed, backed up with substantiated reports and independent sources.You can choose to ignore it, but it's pretty well established data.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  77. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary is still a lady in my book, she has shown even good behavior after the last circus which the USA calls election.

    Obama is one of the most gifted presidents the USA has had (just MHO, but as a foreigner, I have no internal interests).

    The other two don't even merit any mention. Let's forget one and endure the other.

    PS: I'm particularly fond of how he advanced the Cuban question and how he opened an avenue to enlightenment regarding Japan. Also, Japan apologizing to China and the historical Sino-Japanese handshake also deeply moved my heart. I can only congratulate all the involved and have Faith in a better future.

  78. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the sake of perspective, it's important to note that the life expectancy in Batista's Cuba was influenced mainly whether or not you were white and lived in Havana. For a white family in Havana, life expectancy was basically the same as the US. For a rural black family, it was much, MUCH worse [mostly due to work-related injuries]. Castro worsened healthcare for white Cubans, but improved it for the rest of the country.

  79. Re: Good riddance! by mspohr · · Score: 1

    I thought that now that Trump and Putin are best bros that commies are no longer the bad guys.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  80. Re: Good riddance! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Nothing on netcraft...

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  81. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iran is a much better example of unintended consequences of a people's "revolution". While the progressive students at the forefront of the revolution were busy babysitting hostages while the hardline religious nut jobs, whose leadership had been hiding in Europe, swopped in, took power, and killed anyone who disagreed. And like Cuba it was the regular citizens who suffered the most after a revolution that was supposedly fought to make their lives better. And the cherry on the top was pissing off the one country in the world with the ability to basically prevent either country from using the international monetary mechanism need for trade. Cuba was stuck with driving around in cars built in the 60's and the Iranians got stuck with a fleet of F-15s and commercial jets that they could not properly maintain due to US sanctions and the country as a whole went from one of the most modern and prosperous ME states to a pariah drowning in fundamentalist dogma. .

  82. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes.. it is so hateful to hate brutal dictators.

  83. Re: Good riddance! by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    In other news, Francisco Franco is still dead.

    I just checked on this and it is true!
    Victor Frankenstein was not available for comment...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  84. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1995 called. They want their hackneyed quip back.

  85. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There aren't many places on earth where the poor are more oppressed than in Cuba under the Castro regime, dumbass. Why do you think they risk their lives to escape in makeshift, overloaded boats?

  86. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it was not hard to get an exit visum to nearby countries ...as long as you were OK with the government viciously persecuting your family and taking what little money or property you had left, sure.

  87. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if you were one of the many scrawny kids I brown-swirlied so many many times.

  88. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay! I found a way out of tyranny! It's called suicide! I'll be AN HERO! Suicide for teh win!!!

  89. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, the director of the National Security Agency says the elections were targeted by a nation-state, and you say that people having concerns about that are hysterical McCarthyism. You know what? Fuck you.

  90. Re:Good riddance! by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

    Let's not forget the "good guys" from the UK and the USA overthrew Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mosaddegh back in 1953.

  91. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whoa whoa whoa there cowboy.

    'IF' these numbers are to be believed....

    77,833 of that number are attributed to drownings of Cubans attempting to raft to the US. I don't care what kind of leader he may or may not have been, you can't count these as his body count. It's not even a real number, it's an 'estimated' number, based on US coast guard reports. There's very little facts involved here. Cuba is only 90 miles from the cost of Florida. 90 MILES! It's so close that anyone with dreams of living "the American Dream" will take a chance on it. So there goes 80% of your argument right there.

    2199 death in prison. From 1959 - 2005. 2,199 prison deaths over 46 years. The US had over 4300 deaths in local jails and state prisons IN 2012 ALONE! (https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/mljsp0012st.pdf) Given the amount of racial violence in the US, It's really hard to begrudge this number to Cuba. There's no break down of how many of those 2199 were attributed to Fidel directly, and how many were due to prison violence, guard grudges, or just plain health problems. Without substantiated breakdowns, there's no way to know.

    1,203 deaths from Extrajudicial assassinations. That's a fair number. Blame it on Fidel. Or maybe other countries just haven't been called out on it. Maybe this is actually low by comparison?
    5,640 deaths from Firing squad executions. That's a fair number too. But don't forget, it was revolution. Fidel overthrew a dictator (put in place by the US btw). Nothing about a revolution is clean. People from the other side are going to be executed. Do I need to dig up number on the lives lost during the American revolution? Oh, and did I mention it was 46 years? There's NO break down on whether those deaths happened during, immediately after, or over the course of those 46 years.

    But go on, keep waiving 97,000 around like it means something. What ever lets you sleep at night.

  92. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, using the term "edgy" is a millennial thing. They weren't even born back in 1995.

  93. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow you are an idiot. Putin is not a Commie. Sure he has a soviet past, so what? Look at the scum that is in power in America
    today and tell me a former low-level KGB employee is any worse. At least he doesn't have to field accusations of fucking little
    boys and girls all day, in contrast to the swine in America. Putin's party is United Russia ( /Yedinaya Rossiya) and
    not the KPSU or now the KPRF. Hey..btw, where is Trump's cowboy-hat? I thought ALL Americans ran around with
    cowboy-hats?!

  94. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary is a criminal who has had numerous people murdered. She is a pro-surveillance, pro-war fearmonger. As a president, she would have represented status quo and the USA would have continued to degenerate into the freedom-hating police state that it is becoming.

    Obama was a pro-surveillance, anti-freedom seatwarmer, nothing more. I understand that SJWs enjoy watching his hollow gestures but that doesn't change the fact that he has done absolutely nothing in eight years.

    GWB is a war criminal and belongs in front of a firing squad.

    I don't like Trump but at least he wasn't previously a politician and he's not afraid to shake things up. That could be exactly what the US government needs to get its act together.

  95. They don't burn in hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I have it on good authority that the shade of Adolf Hitler's dog Blondie has
    a new chewing toy.

  96. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, sure they are...

    Maybe you shouldn't rely upon movies as your sole source of information.

  97. Re: Castro dead by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    99.7, such a believable (and unverifiable) number. I'd like to know who dreamed it up and how they justified it. Was it people who recognized the alphabet?

    Any post relying on such a dubious statistic is suspect right off the bat.

  98. Re: Castro dead by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Another echo of the dubious 99.7. It shouldn't take 2 seconds to realize what nonsense that is. Did you also believe the reports of Fidel's popularity?

  99. Re: Castro dead by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    The Che fanbois are not ironic, they think he was a hero. You are just as naive if you don't recognize the difference.

  100. Irony: the icon of Cuban Communism died on Black F by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    Proving that ${deity} truly has a sense of humor, Fidel Castro -- icon and architect of Cuban Communism -- died on Black Friday... a/k/a "Adam Smith Day" -- the day Americans gather in our grand cathedrals of commerce and celebrate capitalism by shopping like there's no tomorrow.

  101. Not much on the good side of the bogeyman? by shanen · · Score: 0

    I think you're going too far by assuming that your opinion is unpopular. Yes, you got a couple of bad mods, but overall your post was rated insightful, and I even felt that it was one of the few insightful-rated posts that deserved the mod. In the absence of any meaningful notion of "identity" associated with Slashdot membership, I can just dismiss the negative mods as coming from sock puppet herders, though I suppose some of them could be from actual angry losers (like so many of those Trump voters).

    At least the funny mods were for posts that deserved it, though there were so few of them. The funniest idea is that the mod system could be fixed, eh? I'd like to see some incentivizing for humor, for example by giving double funny mod points to members who've earned lots of funny mods.

    On the actual topic, I did see a list of hate, but very little about the other side of the bogeyman named Castro. Can't recall that any of the hate lists mentioned the real reason the right wingers hated him so much: FEAR. They were really afraid that the bad example could spread to other countries in the hemisphere. Same sort of domino theory that brought us the war in Vietnam. From that perspective, the best things that Castro did were actually the worst, so I guess that means the Cuban medical system. Just shows what can be accomplished without much money (or computers or modern cars) as long as your priorities are on keeping people healthy? (Did some searches for mentions of that topic and couldn't find much in the visible parts of the discussion.)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  102. Re: Castro dead by whodunit · · Score: 1

    Because a communist dictatorship's own self-surveys are 100% trustworthy!

  103. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) I cannot discuss Hillary, as I wrote I'm not American and know little about the true nature of people (even over here!). That said, she showed a lot of class in past situations; regarding USA killing habits, well, let's be honest, do you think that will stop?

    2) IMHO it's undeniable that Obama did a lot: in quantity and in quality. Even outside the US that can be seen. I would say perhaps he could have had better results weren't the USA in such a deep crisis on his first term. The US spent a lot of resources trying to maintain its lead in the World Politics, maybe he should have toned that down a bit.

    3) About GWB, I'd rather think he simply wasn't the right man for the extreme times the US endured back in 2001. Maybe Obama would be more of a pragmatist, but we'll never know. What I know is that I posted many times here suggesting a war would only create unhappiness, but I was just an unknown voice, living faraway and didn't count for anything.

    4) About Trump, a friend of mine said he preferred him to her -- because he looked more sincere. I scratched my head a lot and came to the conclusion that he thought Trump had a behavior that matched better the image he had of Politicians -- more or less like "all of them are rotten inside, but this one shows a matching exterior." That guy is not against the USA, he just doesn't give a fsck whether the country sinks or float. That's not my view: the USA has been an ally and going backwards would be a loss for many, in many countries. I hope I'm wrong and things turn out to be OK -- even if by sheer luck.

  104. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Which would be different from moving to the US how, exactly?

  105. it's all about free cigars for Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the sole reason the trade embargo was lifted was so that Bill could get good cigars again ......

  106. Re: literacy rate by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    The very concept of a "literacy rate" is nonsense. Different people have different capacity to understand what they read. I'm not big on sports, but I can usually get some understanding from scientific papers. I may not fully comprehend what I am reading, but some understanding is usually accomplished. Reading ability is one big grey area.

  107. Re: Castro dead by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    All of reality is a record that eventually there will be a technology for people to peruse and copy it at their leisure.

  108. Dang it, I just bought the mask for next halloween by gearloos · · Score: 0

    Dang it, I just bought the mask for next halloween!

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  109. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1776 called, they want their language back!

  110. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by gwolf · · Score: 1

    Though that said, I'd be less than shocked if I found out that a bunch of Cubans had also escaped to Cancun. And I'm sure some did flee to Jamaica and Haiti and whatnot, though that would have been more difficult with Guantanamo (and US military presence) right there in addition to dodging the Cuban military.

    I was born and live in Mexico. Over the years, I have met tens of Cubans who came here for different reasons, some exiting legally, some... much less so. Most of those exiting legally returned to Cuba. Yes, not everybody was allowed out — but it was not as dire as you imagine. Now, out of those who left ilegally, basically all of them either had emigrated to the USA (and I met them later, as USA citizens) or were on their way to do so.
    Mexico is far from a first-world country, but it's also a place where an educated and skilled person can surely make a very good living. Many cubans have stayed here, of course, but there's nothing like Miami — I'd say, just an average Cuban community comparable to other Latin American national communities.
    As for Haiti and Jamaica... No, that's highly unlikely. In fact, it's way more probable for Haitians to try to immigrate into Cuba.

  111. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Said just like a 9-11 "pilot" before the "landed" their planes full of "passengers" and full load fuel.

  112. Re: Castro dead by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

    Another echo of the dubious 99.7. It shouldn't take 2 seconds to realize what nonsense that is. Did you also believe the reports of Fidel's popularity?

    Why is the statistic dubious? This poster even gave the source for the statistic, UNESCO. I looked up the literacy rate data on UNESCO's site and found this page with literacy statistics. The rates they publish for Cuba seems to match what both posters posted. Do you have data that contradicts this or does it just "feel" wrong to you? You've been around here for a long time, you should know data plays better with this crowd than emotion. Please present your data refuting the statistic or STFU.

    --

    Enigma

  113. Re: Good riddance! by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    And the US still imprisons a greater % of our people than Castro did his. So check your human rights violations in the mirror.

  114. Re:Irony: the icon of Cuban Communism died on Blac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is arguable whether Fidel really believed in communism (at least initially), he is even on the record many times stating before the uprising he did not believe in it. Cuba was given no other choice though as they were in the shit for revolting against a US backed corrupt dictator, So it was either befriend Soviet Union and Co or go it alone against a country who had shown no morals whatsoever when it came to dealing with Cuba and the Cuban people/.

  115. Re: Good riddance! by Joce640k · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the biggest genocide in human history - also by the US Government.

    http://www.ilknowledge.com/201...

    --
    No sig today...
  116. Re: Castro dead by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    Nothing dubious about it, actual socialist countries considered basic education being the most important thing they can and must provide. That was the way in the USSR, in GDR, in Cuba, in Yugoslavia and so on. GDR schools were quite a bit better than they are in any German state nowadays, I can tell you that from personal experience.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  117. Re:Bring back oppressing the poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> it was not hard to get an exit visum to nearby countries... as long as you were OK with the government viciously persecuting your family and taking what little money or property you had left, sure.

    > Which would be different from moving to the US how, exactly?

    Which would be different from moving from the US how, exactly?

    There, FTFY.

    Fidel wasn't a chosen leader. He took power by force. People died, people wanted him dead and he reacted more or less precisely. Probably some people were unfairly persecuted, others really tried something and had to flee to avoid being executed.

    The USA also had a bloody independence, but fortunately back then there were noble ideals (which totally is not the case with the shameful behavior the USA shows now). I'd say Cuba (and Fidel) improved (probably because Fidel got old) and Raul is much better than his brother. Luckily there was a good man at the White House and so peace talks could start.

    With Trump it certainly wouldn't work so well.

    Regarding Cubans in Florida, I don't know if y'all are aware of that but they speak Spanish. And what's more, the American continent has a few other countries speaking that language, too (i.e. almost 90%).

    It's harder to stay in the USA than migrating to one of these countries, so I really think it's an ideological thing -- these people probably wanted the USA "Freedom" instead of being oppressed by a not-so-benevolent dictator at their homeland.

    Fair enough, I'd say. Just don't say: "I love Cuba". Because, when one loves something or someone, the idea is to stay with it/her/him and endure the hard times.

    Better saying "I hate Fidel" than "I love Cuba".

    Sorry for being so blunt, but if I got a nickel for all the selfish people I've seen in life claiming they were self-made or have suffered, I'd have enough to pay a lunch for a lot of the ones who really suffer in life.

    I think now it's a golden opportunity for everyone:
    - for the refugees to finally return to Cuba;
    - for Trump and the nice American citizens that voted for him to send the Cubans back and get rid of Hispanics, which would be in accordance with his stated objectives of "dealing" with several minorities.

    Racism won't make anyone great.

    Not in America, not in Europe and neither in Asia.

  118. Re: Good riddance! by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

    Well they're not going to get it from here!

    --
    Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  119. Re: Castro dead by mjwx · · Score: 2

    Another echo of the dubious 99.7. It shouldn't take 2 seconds to realize what nonsense that is. Did you also believe the reports of Fidel's popularity?

    Why is the statistic dubious?

    Well obviously it goes against his preconceptions and biases.

    I'm inclined to believe that Cuba has a high level of adult literacy, but that just means they can read and write the native language (Spanish in Cuba's case) at an acceptable standard.

    The problem with Cuba's education system is not basic education, but advanced education. A collage degree from Cuba is worth less than a high school diploma from any western nation. Castro once joked that one of the good things about communism was "even our prostitutes have college degrees".

    And its not just Cuba, this kind of problem is common problem with third world nations including the extremely capitalistic ones like India and the Philippines. A Filipina nurse with a degree from a Filipino university will struggle to find work in Hong Kong as anything but a maid, however is she has one from a western university she'll have no trouble finding work in any number of developed nations as nursing staff are in demand almost everywhere.

    Most Filipinos can read and write English to a reasonable level (as well as Tagalog, Visyan or another Filipino language) but higher education is a lot more rare. What separates developed nations like the UK or Australia from developing nations isn't adult literacy, its higher education. We may have a lower rate of adult literacy but we have a much higher rate and quality of collage and university graduates.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  120. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually It was commItted by spaIn on soIl that would eventually become the USA.

  121. Re: Castro dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All McCarthy did was provide cover for the REAL spies by kicking up so much noise and dirt, destroying a lot of innocent lives in the process.

    How many Commies were in the State Department, Senator?

    Hint: that's not where they were...

  122. Re:Good riddance! by Black+LED · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Obama did so much that you can't name one legitimate thing that he did. Sorry but the man is a completely worthless blowhard.

    Like Michael Moore said, getting Trump into office would be like giving the government a big "fuck you" and would be like throwing a molotov cocktail into their midst. The current US government needs to be destroyed and Trump might be the man to start cleaning house.

  123. Re: Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well played, sir. well played.

  124. Re: Castro dead by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    Most people are unaware of the US involvement in pre-Castro Cuba, and would be shocked if they did a little research.

    Castro and communism are not my choices for leaders or economic systems, but the US is responsible for overthrowing lots of governments around the world, then acting shocked when a dictator or religious zealot steps in.

    Hopefully Trump won't renew the economic oppression of the Cuban people. We have behaved shamefully.

    It is healthy as sign and recognition of the crimes against the people of Cuba by the United States and the American embargo. Even with that embargo, the average Cuban has better health and education than the average American. Yes, the Cubans had oil problems, and thus they could not purchase American cars, partially because of the outlaw of Cubans to hold foreign money. As a citizen, you could be opposed to the policies of certain acts of legislature, but not promote policies against the individuals in the government. Even dictatorships had discussions about policies and situations that needed controversy to be resolved.

    Canada has a vigorous tourist trade with Cuba. We found crime much lower in Cuba than in the USA. You could walk anywhere and have no fear.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  125. Re: Good riddance! by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Let me spell it out. Ask yourself, why is Cuba regarded as a human rights wasteland when our record, comparably, is worse in many areas? How can we live with ourselves - no, how can we not even notice it?

  126. Re: Castro dead by Copid · · Score: 1

    Not that I think the embargo was a particularly good policy, but I have to point out that if your awesome alternative to capitalism specifically requires trade with the US in order to succeed, it's reasonable to wonder if you really have an awesome alternative to capitalism.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  127. Re: Castro dead by trenien · · Score: 1

    That has nothing to do with the intrinsic quality of the higher education there, and everything with preconceived biases.

  128. Re: Castro dead by rickyslashdot · · Score: 1

    Fidel Castro was supported by the (regime changing) CIA and military establishment - in what turned out to be one of their biggest fiascos - to overturn the anti-US Batista regime. With the furious infighting in Washington between Kennedy and the entrenched military, the Bay of Pigs was the crowning touch in Castro's consolidation of Cuba.
    Russia, fully aware of the Kennedy attitude towards nuclear weapons, 'blinked', and backed down on the shipment of additional armaments to Cuba. What is NOT widely known is that the launch sites were already operational when the naval blockade was enacted, and it was the Russian government that forced Castro to dismantle and remove the missile sites that could have reached about half of the south-eastern US.
    Gotta' love the Crazy Idiots Agency and their black-ops for handling the geo-political issues - even before they got their unlimited funding from drug trafficking during the Viet Nam debacle.

    --
    redneck geek
  129. Re: Castro dead by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Why don't you go and live there for a month and tell me how wonderful it is in Cuba. It's a sewer, except for Fidel. He lived like a billionaire while his people starved.

    I anticipate things will change now that the despot is dead. With any luck, that whole bunch will be out of power in another week. Then we can return it to a capitalist society, build it up and make it nice, like Hawaii. Hell, maybe they'll even be the 51st state.

  130. Re: Castro dead by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Che, like most things people like to take radically simplified black/white views of, was complicated.

    you would do well to learn a little bit of history.
    not just the part that justifies your simplistic view of the men, but all of the history.
    (in that way you are just like the t-shirt wearing fanboys, you just ignore the opposite parts of history than they do)

    Che and Castro both became who they were because of the rampant oppression of Latin American peoples, oppression that stemmed in large part from the protection of US interests or US-based business interests. specifically the Banana Wars (hint: there's a reason they're called "banana republics"), that didn't end until FDR instituted the Good Neighbor Policy in regards to Latin America. Batista was a brutal dictator, propped up by the US. The US Occupation of Nicaragua lasted from 1912 to 1932, only ending when the Great Depression forced the withdrawal of our troops.

    There was also: Spanish–American War, Santo Domingo Affair, Second Occupation of Cuba, Border War, Negro Rebellion (actual name), Occupation of Nicaragua, Occupation of Haiti, Occupation of the Dominican Republic, and the Sugar Intervention.

    Remember the Panama Canal? Well Panama wasn't a sovereign nation, but a part of Columbia. And we REALLY wanted to build a canal across the isthmus...but Columbia was not being very helpful in the plan, and even opposed it. So we backed the Panamanian Revolution in the Thousand Days War, and then dealt with the new country. Note that construction had already begun at the time of the conflict.

    Also note that the occupation of Nicaragua was related, in that it stemmed from our efforts to prevent any other country from constructing a similar canal across Nicaragua, a place we also almost constructed a canal before going with Panama.

    The point is there is a long and rich history here. It involves US imperialism, corrupt oligarchic governments (both opposed by the US and supported), and constant suffering of the people.

    So is it any wonder that Che, or Castro, or any of the other revolutionaries reacted with animus towards the US, towards the powerful, or rich, or corrupt, or sought independence of their own?

    We can talk all day long about whether they themselves fell under the corrupting influence of Power, about how they became supported by Communist Russia ("enemy of my enemy"), and whether or not they failed*, but first you need to correct your lack of education about their origins, about what made them change the paths of their lives (Che began as a medical student, was going to be a doctor) and become the men they did.

    .
    .
    .
    .

    (*note that we may think they failed by our metrics, based on how we view our citizen's lot in life compared to say Cuba's citizens... ...but then consider the mantra among many conservatives in our own country who, even knowing that socialized medicine is cheaper and more effective, that social safety net programs work (re: Europe), but even knowing all that, adopt the mantra of "I'd rather fail on my own terms than succeed by someone else's", and thus eschew ALL social programs or national healthcare etc... ...and consider how similar that worldview is to the view of revolutionary Cubans, Venuzleans, Hondurans, Nicaraguans, or others, who would rather fail without capitalism than succeed with it, even though it means a rougher outcome for themselves?)

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  131. Re: Castro dead by dywolf · · Score: 1

    also...you should probably learn what a serial killer actually is.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  132. Re: Castro dead by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Also, read the book 100 Years of Solitude. it is a fantastic piece of literature, though it may take a read through or two to make complete sense. its a surreal book, but that surrealism itself reflects life in Latin America. the climax of the book is a massacre of striking banana workers, essentially a retelling of the actual Banana Massacre.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  133. Re: Castro dead by ilguido · · Score: 1

    I have to point out that if your awesome alternative to capitalism specifically requires trade with the US in order to succeed, it's reasonable to wonder if you really have an awesome alternative to capitalism.

    There are two problems with this.

    The first one is that the implementation of a given idea can only work under certain circumstances, there is no absolute in this world. In this case the circumstances were against Cuba, since its biggest neighbour was openly hostile against them and that is a detrimental situation no matter what economic system you use. It is a situation similar to that of Ukraine and Russia, even though Ukraine is much bigger than Cuba and Russia is a smaller economy than the USA.

    The second problem is that it wasn't just for the US: the US embargo was meant to hinder any economic relation of Cuba, through retaliation against every subject (nation, company, individual) having business with Cuba. Basically, of all their closest neighbours, Cubans had relations only with Venezuela.

  134. Re: Castro dead by CommanderRyalis · · Score: 1

    Alger Hiss, convicted of perjury for Lying to the HUAC about committing espionage for the Soviet Union https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  135. Fake news site tip by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    Want to know if a site is a real news site or a fake news site? If the site refers to Castro as a "leader" or "controversial figure" but not as a dictator, it's a fake news site.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.