"User Acceptance Testing" is the birth of UXtadation. It's focused on users blindly using a thing with no training and assessing how they feel.
If that's the case then they've hijacked the term.
As I said, it was in use long before the UX fad. It meant, funnily enough, the project phase where the actual users, not the developers and consultants, test and (with luck) accept it. Sometimes they have different ideas from their betters on how things should work...
It could also mean a system dedicated to that purpose in a typical DEV, TST, UAT, TRN, PRD landscape.
However I've seen plenty of stories here that used an acronym with more than one meaning, and even in context it wasn't immediately clear which one it was referring to.
If you're Stephen King a bit of mystery is fine. If you're trying to write a factual article it's just annoying.
I've lived in Belgium, and I've never ever heard or seen a reference to "Belgian Dutch", which still isn't the same as "Belgian". On bilingual websites it's "nederlands" or "vlaams".
Why do Americans thing they know everything about countries they couldn't even point to on a map?
A team can simply have a "external liaison" hat that somebody has to wear, and whoever is currently assigned that function does the "explaining to the suits what is possible and what isn't."
Looks like they should take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.
Do you think that all the decisions of that officer should be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting?
Even the word is stupid. The site doesn't seem to give any explanation of where it came from. Perhaps they all greet each other in Spanish?
Now maybe it's due to other words (dem~, theo~, aristo~) or maybe I did too much chemistry, but I want to read it as "halocracy", which would mean rule by salt.
It's clearly not a zero sum game, and there are clearly not enough men with ten years' experience and a master's degree who are under thirty years old & willing to work for peanuts to fill all available jobs which is why companies are trying to get some many foreigners in on work visas.
Leaving aside the fact that the second sentence is grammatically shit, you're talking bollocks.
If the industry is close to an oligopoly, then inside information on one still gives clues about the others.
For example, if I worked for VW and had advance knowledge of the emissions shenanigans I could shorted VW or I could have bought into BMW and/or Mercedes.
Slashdot Mirror
If that's the case then they've hijacked the term.
As I said, it was in use long before the UX fad. It meant, funnily enough, the project phase where the actual users, not the developers and consultants, test and (with luck) accept it. Sometimes they have different ideas from their betters on how things should work...
It could also mean a system dedicated to that purpose in a typical DEV, TST, UAT, TRN, PRD landscape.
Fail. You forgot to ask him if he has the needful 27 decades of experience in JavaNetScript+-+- 38.
If you mean "User Acceptance Testing", it was around before most uxtards were born.
Anyone caught cheating should be transferred to the MBA program.
Those who can cheat without getting caught are probably already on it.
You're very clever, ho ho.
However I've seen plenty of stories here that used an acronym with more than one meaning, and even in context it wasn't immediately clear which one it was referring to.
If you're Stephen King a bit of mystery is fine. If you're trying to write a factual article it's just annoying.
He's probably smart enough to know where to put an apostrophe. And where not to.
If it's a test of English, you should probably hold on to your money.
I've lived in Belgium, and I've never ever heard or seen a reference to "Belgian Dutch", which still isn't the same as "Belgian". On bilingual websites it's "nederlands" or "vlaams".
Why do Americans thing they know everything about countries they couldn't even point to on a map?
That's Flemish, you stupid prick.
Liberal arts majors on the outside never have to deal with nuanced and subtle issues like that.
Either the customer wants fries with that, or he doesn't.
Looks like they should take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.
Do you think that all the decisions of that officer should be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting?
When referring to people - even Mexican ones - you should probably use "who", not "that".
Also, I'd have thought that it would make more sense to preferentially evict the non-slot-freeing ones?
Even the word is stupid. The site doesn't seem to give any explanation of where it came from. Perhaps they all greet each other in Spanish?
Now maybe it's due to other words (dem~, theo~, aristo~) or maybe I did too much chemistry, but I want to read it as "halocracy", which would mean rule by salt.
I doubt in practice that would be much worse.
I thought it was the other way round.
The bastards. At least with hipsters you know they'll be gone after a year or two, when it's gone mainstream.
There are tunnels in Brussels that branch.
But anyway, you don't need any external sensors - an accelerometer (or two) and a bit of calculus will do it.
If you're so dumb that it isn't obvious why it's greyed out you shouldn't be driving at all.
Obvious on what grounds? That some random fuckwad on the internet disagrees with them?
FTFY.
Classifying and indexing aren't the same thing.
FTFY
Unless it's bitcoin.
OST, they've been pretty quiet recently. Remember when there were two stories a day (sometimes the same one)?
Leaving aside the fact that the second sentence is grammatically shit, you're talking bollocks.
If the industry is close to an oligopoly, then inside information on one still gives clues about the others.
For example, if I worked for VW and had advance knowledge of the emissions shenanigans I could shorted VW or I could have bought into BMW and/or Mercedes.
In three years it will be totally forgotten, like Honda's sudden acceleration problem.
And if you could, you'd probably already be doing it.