Slashdot Mirror


User: Hognoxious

Hognoxious's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
33,194
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 33,194

  1. GP is probably c6gunner, although normally he manages to work guns into it somehow.

    The practice of defining anything he doesn't like - from sports umpires to the weather - as leftist is pretty much his trademark.

  2. Ob on How Microsoft's Windows Red Team Keeps PCs Safe (wired.com) · · Score: 3, Funny

    They found the "off" switch?

  3. Re:One problem: no normative definition of "Agile" on Should Developers Abandon Agile? (ronjeffries.com) · · Score: 1

    If you take the time to capture customer requirements at the start, and you did it poorly, that means you suck at capturing customer requirements!

    Right. It totally isn't possible that the customer sucks at describing them.

    Leaving aside the fact that it's possible for requirements to change for reasons outside the control of anyone involved in the project - and the longer the delay the more chance there is for that to happen.

  4. Re: Agile is bullshit on Should Developers Abandon Agile? (ronjeffries.com) · · Score: 1

    They nouned it?

  5. Re: Agile is bullshit on Should Developers Abandon Agile? (ronjeffries.com) · · Score: 2

    Theoretical principals

    As opposed to practical headteachers?

  6. Re:Agile is bullshit on Should Developers Abandon Agile? (ronjeffries.com) · · Score: 1

    You are simply an complete idiot.

    Pure gold.

    Pure comedy gold, that is.

  7. Re:One problem: no normative definition of "Agile" on Should Developers Abandon Agile? (ronjeffries.com) · · Score: 1

    You need a formal process. Before something's developed there's an outline proposal[1] and then somebody - ideally a group - decides if it's worth going any further with.

    But that looks like bureaucracy and overhead.

    [1] Length commensurate with the magnitude of the changes. Say the shipping lists are sorted in product code order rather than assigned vehicle order and because of that loading takes longer and things get missed. Half a side of A4 might cover it.

  8. Re:Not universal until it includes systemd on Systemd-Free Devuan 2.0 'ASCII' Officially Released (devuan.org) · · Score: 1

    Considering that I've had one problem with init scripts ever, and it was so long ago I found the solution in an actual paper book, I'd conclude that you're talking out of Lennart's arse.

  9. Re:Agile is for babies on Should Developers Abandon Agile? (ronjeffries.com) · · Score: 1

    I would say that agile is for very self-disciplined developers & customers. If I'm developing something for myself, it's agile all the way. And has been for 30 years, I might add.

  10. Re:One problem: no normative definition of "Agile" on Should Developers Abandon Agile? (ronjeffries.com) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I initially read that as "If it's working, you're not doing it right."

    I'm on the fence as to which is more accurate.

  11. Yes on Should Developers Abandon Agile? (ronjeffries.com) · · Score: 1

    Thanks to using tried and tested wartsandall I got a frosty pist!

  12. The thing is, you have years of accumulated business logic in C**** (I will not utter its name here). Do you reverse engineer and rewrite all that stuff in whatever language is bending on twatface and cackexchange?

    No. Because you daren't. You have no idea what the holy fucking Mary it does, but you know that if it suddenly stops doing it you're in big shit[1]. There's magic 12s and 20s and 240s scattered about like underwear in Ibiza that are probably something to do with converting old money into metric[2], and if they left it alone in 1972 you're about as keen to change it now as you are to eat your own cock. So you wrap the shiny around it using something like this evil motherfucking ratbastard. https://www.ibm.com/developerw...

    [1] Yes, TSB, I did glance at you.
    [2] It was just an excuse to put prices up, you know. Toilet rolls, 37p for two - that's over ten guineas each!

  13. Re:What could possibly go wrong? on Secret Pentagon AI Program Hunts Hidden Nuclear Missiles (reuters.com) · · Score: 1

    What are they going to use for a training set? It's not like there's a nuclear missile launch every week, is it?

  14. Re:No they didn't Rei and Bruce on Tesla Short-Sellers Lose $1 Billion (cnbc.com) · · Score: 1

    If you need "Stock market police" then get the government to do it

    I'm informed by the awesome cayenne8 that any form of government intervention will lead to compulsory gay marriage and death panels like they have in Venezuela.

    Are you telling me it ain't so?

  15. Re: an anonymous reader on Tesla Short-Sellers Lose $1 Billion (cnbc.com) · · Score: 2

    Perhaps he misread "Powertrain" as "Poettering"?

  16. Re: No they didn't Rei and Bruce on Tesla Short-Sellers Lose $1 Billion (cnbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Tesla did not hire the illegals. Sub contractors did.

    File that next to "Just following orders".

  17. Re: No they didn't Rei and Bruce on Tesla Short-Sellers Lose $1 Billion (cnbc.com) · · Score: 2

    I'm guessing that many shorts here can not cover what is coming shortly.

    That's between them and their brokers, isn't it?

  18. Re:Maybe talk to a young person.. on Copyright Law Could Put End To Net Memes (bbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Sorry. I was going for an ironic "use a meme to celebrate the death of memes" as a joke.

    Have you looked on Netcraft?

  19. Re:I think they'll succeed even if they fail on Bloomberg's Inside Look At Tesla's Model 3 Factory (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    Tesla has a road to profitability too.

    Better hope there's not a fire truck on it.

  20. an anonymous reader on Tesla Short-Sellers Lose $1 Billion (cnbc.com) · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Translation: Rei.

  21. Re:What about real ones for safety needs? on Emirates Planes Could Be Going Windowless (abc.net.au) · · Score: 1

    I always preferred a isle seat

    Man, you are totally Wight.

  22. Re:Safe to Open Emergency Doors on Emirates Planes Could Be Going Windowless (abc.net.au) · · Score: 2

    Which has nothing to do with the fact that looking through said window might be a good idea, to avoid sliding into a fire.

  23. Re:Very legitimate reason for this on Mobile Devs Making the Same Security Mistakes Web Devs Made in the Early 2000s (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    Well. there's something to be said f or consistency.

    Imagine you have a two-tier system where then front end's done in some retarded offshoot of VB and the backend's done on some retarded version of perl? Where's the bug?

  24. Re:License engineers have the power to tell thereb on Mobile Devs Making the Same Security Mistakes Web Devs Made in the Early 2000s (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    Most people make the mistake the other way round.

    Naval gazing:. #Sitting on the dock of the bay ... watching the ships come in ... /#"

  25. Re:We know all your searches... on Google Facing Billions in EU Antitrust Fines (axios.com) · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention how awesome you are because you're an independent contractor and you have a gun taped to the underside of your dining table and how you claim deductibles on your hobbies.