So the people who bought those usernames and passwords, well they were naughty people and knew full well what they were doing and yet in reality, once the actual holder of the username password finds out, they alter the account and the person who bought it has nothing, they can not lock the real user out because they will simply stop paying, so they knowing buyer is defrauded because they buy nothing, over the medium term.
If the Energizer bunny was a sentence it would be this one.
Power supplies are different. If one works, that's enough. For sensors, dual isn't good enough. You need a third one as a tie-breaker if the others disagree.
Or get into the business of selling filters/protective clothing/amulets.
In the days when CRT monitors were common some people had them on their screens. I found them to be very effective - for indicating who the nutters in the office were without even talking to them.
I think that pulling the stick back disables it - but only temporarily. It waits till the pilots think the problem has gone away, then starts shoving the nose down again.
Why anyone could think this is better is beyond me.
Well that rather depends on what type of Brexit happens. If it's a soft Brexit, i.e. staying in the customs union, then things probably won't change economy-wise that much.
A quarter of the globe, pink it was. And you could still buy potatoes by the pound. None of these so-called "kilograms".
Slashdot Mirror
What goes around corners comes around corners.
Better *than*. Superior *to*.
Is it really that hard?
No. A bodge may retroactively qualify as a design decision by dint of actually fucking working.
If the Energizer bunny was a sentence it would be this one.
You mean the one that doesn't work very well at night and breaks down completely in bad weather?
It's still cold at high altitude. If you ever get there...
Unless it has access to an extra set of control surfaces that aren't accessible to the pilots, how does MCAS get this authority?
Since we all love car analogies...
https://fsinfo.noone.org/dev/n...
Power supplies are different. If one works, that's enough. For sensors, dual isn't good enough. You need a third one as a tie-breaker if the others disagree.
But it was pilot error, right?
He doesn't understand what the "co" part of "copilot" means, that's for sure.
You keep babbling on about how complex the implementation is. Nobody's disputing that.
The point people are making is that it's a design problem. Not doing the thing wrong, but doing the wrong thing.
Or get into the business of selling filters/protective clothing/amulets.
In the days when CRT monitors were common some people had them on their screens. I found them to be very effective - for indicating who the nutters in the office were without even talking to them.
On my keyboard, you press shift and 4 together.
It's a button in the aft toilet under a locked flap with "beware of the leopard" written on it.
I think that pulling the stick back disables it - but only temporarily. It waits till the pilots think the problem has gone away, then starts shoving the nose down again.
Why anyone could think this is better is beyond me.
Don't gnocchit if you haven't tried it.
Zuck Shekels = Zuckels.
I think it was one government. We're all OK with one company doing it because yay for free markets111oneeleven1!!!!
The fact that on one occasion they did it manually doesn't disprove what I said.
How much Boeing stock do you own?
1965 is quite some time ago. It's closer to WW2 than it is to now.
Heck, it's closer to WW1 than it is to now. I'd hope the state-of-the art might have progressed somewhat since then.
Well that rather depends on what type of Brexit happens. If it's a soft Brexit, i.e. staying in the customs union, then things probably won't change economy-wise that much.
A quarter of the globe, pink it was. And you could still buy potatoes by the pound. None of these so-called "kilograms".
Because they expected that to happen automatically when they pulled the nose up, as it had done on previous versions of the aircraft.
It's right there in the article that crgrace ( 220738 ) posted.
So they pull the nose up, go "phew, that was close!" but the Mad Crazy Ass Suicide mechanism is still active and pitches forward again...
Now we know where Gnome usability specialists go to when they fancy a change.
Conclusion: IBM don't know what CentOS is.
XaaS - Xzibit as a service?