MX records are not really sufficient.
If I am a big ISP, I could have some servers to receive mail on, and some others to send the mails from my subscribers.
I just wonder when SCO SYS V code will become a part of the OpenSource as they have included many OpenSource code in it.. I see millions of lines copied or obfuscated...
Can't someone simply get the "pretended offending" code from SCO by whatever means, then linux hackers would just wipe it out and we would be at the end of this FUD war.
This FUD will stay as long as the litigated code is shown, wheter litigation is true or not.
I know getting the (true of false) evidence of offending code would probably put the one who did it in bad place against the law. But there are people who can do it.
Letting everybody look at the code whose can only be seen by signing a NDA would put an end on this neverending debate.
Why doesn't he asks the linux guys to get the doc? I mean, SUN could have given him the doc, but if they don't there should be some way to get it from the linux guys.
Slashdot Mirror
MX records are not really sufficient. If I am a big ISP, I could have some servers to receive mail on, and some others to send the mails from my subscribers.
Enemy territory kept my days busy...
Try to type "-->" in pwpoint XP, it just crashes your comp..
I just wonder when SCO SYS V code will become a part of the OpenSource as they have included many OpenSource code in it.. I see millions of lines copied or obfuscated...
If the password line is true, they know they have been cracked, so they probably have changed the pass anyway.
Can't someone simply get the "pretended offending" code from SCO by whatever means, then linux hackers would just wipe it out and we would be at the end of this FUD war. This FUD will stay as long as the litigated code is shown, wheter litigation is true or not. I know getting the (true of false) evidence of offending code would probably put the one who did it in bad place against the law. But there are people who can do it. Letting everybody look at the code whose can only be seen by signing a NDA would put an end on this neverending debate.
Wow, it's one of the first times MS recognize they make crappy software..
Why doesn't he asks the linux guys to get the doc? I mean, SUN could have given him the doc, but if they don't there should be some way to get it from the linux guys.