Why are people saying this is paid ad? They must either not have played either game or just want to post for the sake of good karma!
I for one enjoy playing both halo games and the DOA series (since the saturn) and am looking forward to seeing the spartan nicole in doa4 when it comes out early next year!
So, if one of the biggest problems faced by the original Dreamcast was that is was ahead of its time for some of its features like online play, then I'd say the timing for the 360 is just about perfect!
While RAV for Linux e-mail servers worked decently, the Windows Desktop version was less than acceptable... No centralized management, you had to be administrator to load updated virus definitions... a nightmare!
I think MS will have trouble getting people to actually use this product and might end up abandoning it, just like they did with the NGSCB...
I've worked as a purchaser for a large mid-west system builder where we were supposedly up there with the Dells and HP's and licensing cost, although considerably lower than retail, was never $45...
Slashdot Mirror
Why are people saying this is paid ad? They must either not have played either game or just want to post for the sake of good karma! I for one enjoy playing both halo games and the DOA series (since the saturn) and am looking forward to seeing the spartan nicole in doa4 when it comes out early next year!
So, if one of the biggest problems faced by the original Dreamcast was that is was ahead of its time for some of its features like online play, then I'd say the timing for the 360 is just about perfect!
While RAV for Linux e-mail servers worked decently, the Windows Desktop version was less than acceptable... No centralized management, you had to be administrator to load updated virus definitions... a nightmare!
I think MS will have trouble getting people to actually use this product and might end up abandoning it, just like they did with the NGSCB...
I've worked as a purchaser for a large mid-west system builder where we were supposedly up there with the Dells and HP's and licensing cost, although considerably lower than retail, was never $45...
If ATI will offer both AGP and PCIe versions of their cards throughout 2004, how is this bad for those that just bought the latest gen of AGP card?
So, how's this smaller, better looking or more efficient than the cappuccinopc reviewed by Ars Technica almost 18 months ago?