This law doesn't just pertain to IP traffic. Other proctocols going across it (SMTP is a good example here) also have to adhere to this law. I wonder: does this make AIM illegal, since you don't really know where your IMs are coming from?
With all this data recovery and such, the question becomes, what is truly secure? As a precaution I've begun overwriting all of my files with Slashdot articles...
The blog is slashdotted, but the pictures are all on Flickr and can be seen here: http://flickr.com/photos/segaamerica/
Go to webshots.com and search for "cheer camp shower". Need I say more?
That qould be -1 seconds in Perl time, but it's at 8pm... strange.
I just found the article by searching for the oldest /. article.
Maybe this will turn into another hidden sid?
F-Prot is what I use, and the DOS version is free: www.f-secure.com
They used to have slashdot listed as "profanity" and "message boards". I guess enough people sent in review requests that they changed it.
This law doesn't just pertain to IP traffic. Other proctocols going across it (SMTP is a good example here) also have to adhere to this law. I wonder: does this make AIM illegal, since you don't really know where your IMs are coming from?
It would probably be feasible to put only an x86 CPU on a card. It certainly won't do much by itself, but it could bring speedups to VPC.
one moment it's something about a napster 'insite', the next it's "new legit napster service coming"... very strange
It's called NT because it was originally designed to run on a (greatly delayed) Intel processor, codenamed the NTen.
With all this data recovery and such, the question becomes, what is truly secure? As a precaution I've begun overwriting all of my files with Slashdot articles...