Slashdot Mirror


Data Mining Used Hard Drives

linuxwrangler writes "One hopes the /. crowd knows the perils of discarding storage with sensitive data but this article drives home the point. Two MIT grad students bought used drives from eBay and secondhand computer stores. Among the data found on the 158 drives were 5,000 credit-card numbers, porn, love-letters and medical information."

684 comments

  1. Guess those pop up ads were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There IS pornography on your computer!

    1. Re:Guess those pop up ads were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fill a directory with goatse pics, so if your hd is data mined, whoever's doing it will have an unpleasant experience. :)

    2. Re:Guess those pop up ads were right by Peterus7 · · Score: 1

      You know, I oughta get a hard drive, fill it with utter crap, then sell it to some unfortinuate n00b just to be evil.... Hehe... Sell a middle schooler a hard drive o' porn! Ok, maybe that's getting a wee bit evil...

    3. Re:Guess those pop up ads were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe a wee bit illegal?

    4. Re:Guess those pop up ads were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats just plain wrong

    5. Re:Guess those pop up ads were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darn. Should have sold for twice as much on ebay as vintage porn.

    6. Re:Guess those pop up ads were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goatse pics? Like the ones here?

    7. Re:Guess those pop up ads were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was helping a buddy haul some stuff off to his storage room. We went to throw some stuff into the dumpster and saw a used computer along with a new computer box. Apparently someone had bought a new computer and trashed his old one. It looked as if he began to harvest parts from the old one, but didn't follow through. There were 2 HDs in there, one 20GB one 13GB, and a good deal of porn on them to boot. Not just images, but movies. In another directory was the guy's pics of his family and his online stock trading recommendations. Was it wrong for me to take it? Maybe. But I think the gist of this story is to that people are not careful with the way they go about disposing their crap.

  2. Oh, man. Hear it comes. by bmetz · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I smell some seriously interesting anecdotes coming in from slashdot readers. :)

    --
    What did you eat today? http://www.atetoday.com/
    1. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by bsharitt · · Score: 2

      I once got a 286 from my school, that they had gotten from Redstone Arsenal. The hard drive wasn't even erased on it. There wasn't any important information, most stuff contracts regarding missile building contracts. There were some that had stickers on them say they were cleared for processing classified material, but their hard drives were empty. Maybe I should take a second look at those drives, the military may not have known how to completely erase them back then. I've probably already said to much.

      Wait, were did those black helicopter come from? Uh oh.

    2. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by QuaZar666 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Now days the dod drills a hole through the platter on drives that are bad that have to be RMA'd and have contracts so all they have to return is the top of the drive with the label. as for drives they no longer need i do not know. im guessing they write 0 and 1 patterns on the drive 7+ times. (even then data recovery services could recover it)

    3. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have heard that the DOD way of "sanitizing" a hard drive is to open it up and dissolve the platters in acid.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    4. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7+ times (except for large values of plus) isn't enough. As the other guy says, dropping it in acid is a good idea.

    5. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Magnetic Speperator...

      I have one, honest to god..

      It literally removes the magnetic code/signatures from the HDD. I used to work at a data recovery shop (yes one with static room where we physically remove the data etc...) and even we couldn't recover anything off a HDD that has been passed through one...

      The only bummer is they draw lots of amperage on a 220... (meaning they literally dim the lights even on my very well powered home...)

      The NSA/DOD/Whatever probably uses these when they erase a HDD for redistro/etc...

      --
      Erutangis ym si siht.
    6. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      blowtorch will do it, too :-)

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    7. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by rela · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't forget degaussing. Someone is going to have to make the obligatory link to Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory, so there it is.

    8. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by wombatmobile · · Score: 1
      I have heard that the DOD way of "sanitizing" a hard drive is to open it up and dissolve the platters in acid.

      here we just drop acid and don't worry about the hard drives.

    9. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      That's harder to sell the drive after this, though.

      --
      blah
    10. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by wheany · · Score: 1

      No. If you just delete the files or fast-format the drive, people will be able to get data from the drive. If you format the drive properly, and/or fill it with junk, no-one will be able to get anything out of the drive.

      And before you say that there are companies that restore data from hard-drives that have been in a flood or a fire, please remeber that there is a big difference in purposely deleting data from disk and a disk that has been in an accident.

      Now, if you are paranoid, you can take a blow-torch and heat the disk to above the magnetic material's curie temperature. It will lose its magnetic properties completely and as it cools down, it will be "reset" to the surrounding magnetic field (most probably the Earth's). That way you ensure that if someone is to get any data out of the (now) lump of metal, they'll have to break the laws of physics.

    11. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by banesong · · Score: 1

      Actually, the official DOD/Navy policy for harddrives that have been used in a SBU or secure environment is multifold. Process is as follows:
      1. Determine if the HDD is SBU (Sensitive But Unclass) or Classified
      2. Degauss device
      3. Write random 0/1 to drive 2 times
      4. If Classified, remove top of drive and either take a sledgehammer to it, or in large quantities, use other methods of destruction (Industrial trash compactor or incineration).

    12. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (yes one with static room

      Clean room?

      (meaning they literally dim the lights

      and fuses don't blow?

      And what's a "Speperator"?

    13. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by Pheersome · · Score: 1

      Well, the rough outline of this document has been posted already, but check it out. A lot of it is bureaucratese, but there are some interesting bits. We (my labmates and I) started looking into this topic last summer, and found data on one of our HDs that was ~2 years old (cached search results for the IE4 installer). The drive had been through at least one erasure and OS install, and the machine had been in fairly regular use since then.

      --
      Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
    14. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by ghotiboy · · Score: 1

      I worked for the DOD for a couple of years, and we "disposed" of HDs by smashing them with a sledge. Brutal and effective. I never got to do this myself, but we instructed those doing the disposal in the correct methods.

    15. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by tssfan · · Score: 1

      lots of the dod use programs such as norton ghost to overwrite them, somtimes they use a program by big companies such as norton to DeGuass them. i take apart school computers when they are broken and often see hd's with a "certificate of Hard Drive Displacement" which tell how it was DeGuassed/Destroyed

    16. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      amperage

      The word you're looking for is "current".

    17. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amperage is simply current measured in amps, just like voltage is potential difference (or EMF) measured in volts and mileage is distance measured in miles. The term is not incorrect and is in fact less ambiguous in an international context -- the symbol "I" (as in V = I x R) actually stands for intensity (which is what the French among others call the thing you measure in amperes).
      It is true however that "drawing current" sounds more sensible than "drawing amperage" and a helluva lot more sensible than "drawing intensity".

    18. Re:Oh, man. Hear it comes. by Scud_the_disposable_ · · Score: 1
      My lights dim when a vacuum cleaner goes on.... He didn't say permanently, like with a dimmer switch.. And as for the fuses, If the house is well powered, then it's probably new, which means it doesn't have fuses.

  3. DPA by kylegordon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Another reason to securely erase your data. In the end, _you_ are responsible for data under the Data Protection Act (in the UK anyway)

    1. Re:DPA by reverse+flow+reactor · · Score: 2, Funny

      and the only secure method involves a woodchipper.

      --

      The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them. -Einstein

    2. Re:DPA by shepd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >In the end, _you_ are responsible for data under the Data Protection Act (in the UK anyway)

      Unless it's encrypted, then it becomes the government's business.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:DPA by tealover · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I remember working on my very first IBM pc. My girlfriend's mother was dating a guy and he gave her an old 8086 computer (this was back in '94 or thereabouts). Well, I started playing with the computer. He had an early version of Norton Utilities on it. I played with the undelete file utility and found that there were lots of deleted files. I recovered some of them and started to read them. Most were boring. One wasn't

      This guy wrote about my g/f's mom about how he was banging her for the last 15 years. She had only been widowed for 10 years. He also complained about how she only came around when she needed money and how he was tired of banging her wrinkly ass.

      Also, this guy was a principal at an elementary school. He was apparently fucking several women at the school, even getting blowjobs at work!

      I was simply amazed. My g/f didn't even really know that this guy was dating her mom (some women are so stupid). She just thought he was a family friend. I couldn't tell her about what I found because I knew she would have been really upset.

      I learned from that day on that simply deleting a file was not going to hide anything. I'm actually holding onto a defective laptop thathas been broken for months. I don't want to toss it out until I can either recover the harddrive data myself or until I can safely dispose of the harddrive.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    4. Re:DPA by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Funny
      and the only secure method involves a woodchipper.

      Actually, I find extensive use of sandpaper after attaching the disk to a high speed drill works wonders.

      Barring that, an old fashioned bulk tape eraser also has interesting effects.

      I'm thinking of other options, including battery acid, and use as a grounding rod for a Tesla Coil.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    5. Re:DPA by Shant3030 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Hahahaha that was great... mod this guy up

      --
      100% Insightful
    6. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Ever hear of a hammer?

    7. Re:DPA by tealover · · Score: 1

      Hahahah. To be honest, I really haven't been too proactive in trying to find a way to recover the harddrive. One of these days I'll get off my keister and find a computer repair guy...but for now...I'm too content watching my Farscape DVDs. :)

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    8. Re:DPA by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Informative
      Barring that, an old fashioned bulk tape eraser also has interesting effects.

      Nope. A magnetic field that would be strong enough to erase a hard drive would probably also compress it into a lump of twisted metal. from http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceed ings/sec96/full_papers/gutmann/:

      US Government guidelines class tapes of 350 Oe coercivity or less as low-energy or Class I tapes and tapes of 350-750 Oe coercivity as high-energy or Class II tapes. Degaussers are available for both types of tapes. Tapes of over 750 Oe coercivity are referred to as Class III, with no known degaussers capable of fully erasing them being known [19], since even the most powerful commercial AC degausser cannot generate the recommended 7,500 Oe needed for full erasure of a typical DAT tape currently used for data backups.

      Degaussing of disk media is somewhat more difficult - even older hard disks generally have a coercivity equivalent to Class III tapes, making them fairly difficult to erase at the outset. Since manufacturers rate their degaussers in peak gauss and measure the field at a certain orientation which may not be correct for the type of medium being erased, and since degaussers tend to be rated by whether they erase sufficiently for clean rerecording rather than whether they make the information impossible to recover, it may be necessary to resort to physical destruction of the media to completely sanitise it (in fact since degaussing destroys the sync bytes, ID fields, error correction information, and other paraphernalia needed to identify sectors on the media, thus rendering the drive unusable, it makes the degaussing process mostly equivalent to physical destruction). In addition, like physical destruction, it requires highly specialised equipment which is expensive and difficult to obtain (one example of an adequate degausser was the 2.5 MW Navy research magnet used by a former Pentagon site manager to degauss a 14" hard drive for 1 minutes. It bent the platters on the drive and probably succeeded in erasing it beyond the capabilities of any data recovery attempts [20]).

      The only way to be really sure is to use an acetylene torch.
      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    9. Re:DPA by ayden · · Score: 1

      In my last job, one of the last responsibilities I had before collecting my severance check and unemployment, was data security.

      Jeff (my boss) and I destroyed many hard drives. We kept and wiped anything over 6 GB, but there were many, many smaller drives. Jeff would drill through the desktop hard drives a few times with a 1/4 inch bit.

      But we saved the most interesting method of destruction for the laptop drives. When you hit them with a hammer, the platters literally shatter (they're made of glass). Jeff handed me the remains of one such drive. I shook the remains and it made the sound of pebbles sliding around a metal box.

      I could be wrong, but I don't think anyone would ever be able to recover anything from one of these drives.

      --
      "I'm The Bounty Bear. I will find him anywhere. I'm searching."
    10. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a set of ex-government computers
      recently from an auction. Two of the pc's I
      bought had had disks that had been formatted.
      Both were fully recoverable.

      The local government in question whome I
      contacted, didn't seem too concerned. They
      ignored my first email, then when I asked them
      for an acknowledgement of receipt [for the
      email], they informed me, that they would not
      discuss 'senstive' matters over email. They
      suggested if I wished to make a complaint
      or such, I could write to them, or phone them
      to arrange a conversation.

      They did not use my telephone number I originally
      provided.

      --
      Silvio

    11. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did your g/f ever tell you why she always got fantastic grades?

    12. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow - thanks for the 'days of our lives' update. homo.

    13. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An angle grinder is generally a pretty safe way of disposing of a HD. Add an oxy-torch if feeling particularly paranoid.

    14. Re:DPA by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      You can easily dispose of the hard drive if you do not mind loosing it. We work at a govt. facility (I don't do any secret stuff, but we have research that we would not like to let out - afraid that someone might get it and our research and beat us out of funding, again nothing secret). Old hard drives get a combination of the following treatments. 1) shooting: we go out to the local gun range on the plinking range and proceded to fire 'em up. 2) sanding: take a drill and a snading disk and sand both sides throughly (you can easily find flexible disks that are carbon and cut into the platter quite good
      ). 3) vise/pliers or hammer: bend those puppies into odd shapes.

      normally the disks will get the firing treatment, with maybe the sanding. If you have access to firearms, used platters, and a range to shoot it's quite fun (how many platters can this gun penetrate?). Sanding is a Good Thing if the data is really sensitive. Basically scramble everything you can and make it as hard as possible to move a read/write head over them, you can never raelly get 100% perfect but I bet the above is about as close as you can get (do all three for the best effect!).

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    15. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention you'ld probably also kill the heads magnetic bias field AND the permanent magnet used for moving the head.

    16. Re:DPA by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the data are responsible for YOU!

    17. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hdd works by lining up the little electrons on the platter one way for a 1, and another way for a 0. Zeroing the drive once will not flip all of those little electrons around, and a well-equipped enough shop will be able to go in and read the data that was zero'd over.

    18. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I have few hard drive, where have 9mm, 7.62 and even .338LM holes.
      To drill these holes was really therapeutic and releaving after all that displeause what those pesky, filthy hard drive has been caused...

    19. Re:DPA by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      I don't want to toss it [laptop] out until I can either recover the harddrive data myself or until I can safely dispose of the harddrive.

      Aluminium powder, rust powder, mix 50/50, and light with a blowtorch. Try not to enclose the mixture lest it explode (i.e. take the platters out of their case first), but you'll need to put some of the mixture in a short pipe to stop the flame blowing powder away as you light it.

      Magnesium is the easy way to light these, if you can get hold of a fuse.

      American readers: it's possible you broke some laws by reading that.

    20. Re:DPA by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Nope. A magnetic field that would be strong enough to erase a hard drive would probably also compress it into a lump of twisted metal.

      Hmm - I believe that.

      A few years ago I was in charge of erasing a bunch of hard drives before the machines went to auction. My first idea was to degauss them. So, I found the strongest magnet I could (from an old speaker, I believe) and stuck it on the side of one of the hard drives for more than 24 hours. Then I popped the hard drive back into the machine and to my amazement found absolutely zero corruption of the data.

      Heh - and to think I used to worry about using magnetized screwdrivers when working on computers.

    21. Re:DPA by jniver · · Score: 1

      Why go to extreme means (other then, because I can)... Now I know it may seem like a waste of good caffeine, but soak you drive in Coke for a few days...it does wonders to your data.

      Only drawback is you actually see what that stuff can do...

      --
      Jason
    22. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most decent disk formatting utilities(especially for Macintosh, I've found) have an option to do a low-level format or to "zero" the drive. Either one of these things will effectively b0rk any data on the disk. They do take time, though. A zeroing operation can take hours.

      Failing that, I would assume that a sledgehammer works well when actively applied to a disk.

    23. Re:DPA by photon317 · · Score: 2, Informative


      This is not good enough. Merely Zeroing the data prevents "undeletes" and reading raw sector data in conventional ways, but there are tools to recover data that was been zeroed.

      A simplistic way of think about it is this (this isn't remotely close to what really happens, but it's sufficient to get the point across): Each bit on the drive can have a real value of 1-100. 1-50 is interpreted as zero, 51-100 is a one. However, changing a bit from one to zero doesn't usually apply enough magnetic force to move it a full 100 points. Therefore it's common that if you zero a bit that used to be a zero, it will end up being very very low, but if you zero a bit that used to be a one, it will be in the higher one range, say a 40. Based on this, data recovery experts can get a pretty good picture of what the data used to be.

      The US DoD has a standard they established way back when for fully erasing data against these sorts of recovery techniques. I don't know how old it was, but it was well-known in the early 90's for sure. It may not be safe any more. It specified overwriting the data a total of 7 times with specific patterns (something like 00, FF, 77, 11, EE, 77, 00, FF .... I don't remember the actual sequence).

      The moral of the story is, don't trust any software method for destroying data. Use a blowtorch or an electric sander on the raw platter surfaces after removing them from the drive casing. While you're at it hit the electronics and the heads too. Or throw the whole thin in an incinerator that's hot enough to melt case platters and all into a lump of metal.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    24. Re:DPA by ianjk · · Score: 1

      "and the only secure method involves a woodchipper.

      don't hurt your woodchipper, the HD would probably jam it. A splitting maul works wonders, and lets you take out your aggression. Plus the HD lasts for at least a couple of blows. (I got frustrated at loosing my 10G Maxtor, while in the process of backing up my mp3 collection (back when a 10gig drive cost as much as my '88 Accord) I am sure that data was not recoverable.)

    25. Re:DPA by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      Aren't hard drive cases already made of aluminium?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    26. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard drive platters look very interesting when melted, the oxide layer holds the molten aluminum inside the platter. I melted old hard drives to do some aluminum casting. It's interesting to say the least. I guess it's a good way to get rid of your data if you really care.

    27. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh - and to think I used to worry about using magnetized screwdrivers when working on computers.

      Striking the metal shaft of a screwdriver hard and repeatedly against a metal surface is sufficent to magnetize it temporarily anyway (at least, if the screwdriver shaft isn't aluminum, plastic, or other special material found in DOD screwdrivers). The vibrations cause the molecules to temporarily align. Thank you, MacGyver!

    28. Re:DPA by cyber0ne · · Score: 1

      Why destroy it? Hard drive platters make excellent wind chimes. C'mon people, be artistic!

      --
      http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com
    29. Re:DPA by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I heard someone with a data recovery firm say that they wipe out their HD's with a simple drill. They drill a hole through the case, through all the platters, and out the other side. Try spinning THAT drive at 5400 rpm!

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    30. Re:DPA by ianjk · · Score: 1

      Heh - and to think I used to worry about using magnetized screwdrivers when working on computers.


      actually I am pretty sure that a magnetized screwdriver could do some damage to more delicate parts (cmos, ram, etc...)

      could someone back me up on this?

    31. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good thing human beings don't walk around with Coke in their mouthes for a few days, huh?

    32. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      CMOS and RAM data are stored using electricity to keep the bits flipped. They do not use magnetic fields. They're unaffected by any reasonable magnetic fields (in the case of RAM, one would wonder why you've got a screwdriver near your RAM when your computer's on in the first place).

      The storage most vulnerable to magnetic fields are cheap tape and floppy disks.

    33. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't stop someone serious about getting your data. You might destroy a couple gigs of platter space, but they can still easily (in the terms of data recovery) read the rest of the disk.

    34. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wood-chippers? Acetylene torches? What's wrong with a few low-level formats?! If you're really paranoid, you can get programs that will write random data over your files (or unused space, etc.) to make it impossible even for people with expensive data-recovery equipment to recover anything.

    35. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oxy-acetylene torch. Heats the magnetic coating above its Curie point. Reduces the platters to a lump of slag.

    36. Re:DPA by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1
      I don't want to toss it out until I can either recover the harddrive data myself or until I can safely dispose of the harddrive.

      Might I suggest a hammer? Useful for both "recovering" the drive from the laptop and then "disposing" of it unrecoverably.

      Doug

    37. Re:DPA by RallyDriver · · Score: 1
      The only way to be really sure is to use an acetylene torch.



      When I worked for the M.o.D. we had an engineering workshop on site. A 100-tonne press or an 18" angle grinder is also quite efficient at permanent erasure of most magnetic media.

    38. Re:DPA by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      You can easily dispose of the hard drive if you do not mind loosing it.
      Well I'm sure a lot of people would agree with you about loosing it before shooting at it ;)

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    39. Re:DPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had to get rid of the only two little hard drives that had ever had research data in the clear on them (all the rest were 3DESsed up - our budget didn't stretch to Dr. Evil stylee data-self-destruct mechanisms at the time). It was hinted that just binning them, or even smashing them and bulk erasing them wouldn't be a smart idea, so we were invited to come up with a more... shall we say, creatively destructive... way to "utterly and entirely" destroy the disc platters and heads and all data that was stored on them.

      We decided to have a little fun.

      dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=4096 was a good start, run twice just in case <grin>, followed up with sweeps of various "magic" bit patterns including some weird ones intended to screw up the bit pattern encoding and plenty of /dev/random sweeps (the boxen have entropy generators), something like 100 sweeps in all. Way overkill even for the most blackhat data "recovery" techniques we knew, but we wanted to go further.

      Bulk eraser. Followed by microwaves (no, not a microwave oven - still pretty though), followed by the biggest electromagnet we had (and believe me, that was big). Followed by a couple of blasts with the Big Fat Laser in the neighbouring lab (because we could - I guess it was set wrong or something, as it didn't have much of an impact beyond making a pretty pattern).

      A couple of hammers opened the case, and pliers extracted the heads and platters which we placed on top of the circuit board for further attention... with a blowtorch.

      Then we spotted something in the chem lab we might use.

      One little tip: don't use conc hydrofloric acid to eat really sensitive platters, especially if they're still warm.

      We had some knocking around... well, sloshing around very carefully, and it seemed like fun because of (A) all the warning labels on it, and (B) the last time someone spilled some, when the two people in the lab had to evac and then be taken to hospital. (Yes, they do still have both lungs.)

      Had to do it outside because we knew there would be seriously nasty fumes, but hell... that shit ate the platters, all right, and the heads, and the circuit board, and the casing... and the table... and the floor,

      That data is now a small dent (and stain) in the concrete floor of the car park where the acid ate it for a few centimetres before someone used a broom handle to introduce it to the wonders of sodium hydroxide.

      Now that's what I call a document destruction policy.

      (Posting as anonymous coward, in case the suits decide to do the same thing to me.)

    40. Re:DPA by shannara256 · · Score: 1

      > I found the strongest magnet I could (from an old speaker, I believe) ...
      > absolutely zero corruption of the data.

      Don't speakers use electromagnets?

    41. Re:DPA by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they have permanent magnets too. Not sure why - I've never really thought about it.

  4. Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I only sell broken ones.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by Filik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nope, even broken ones can be read with the right equipment.

    2. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by norton_I · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even broken hard drives can be recovered, though it takes some rather expensive equipment to do so. However, with a little creativity and some equipment you would likely find in a EE department, much of it could be recovered.

    3. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not if i've cracked them open and cum/shit/bled on the platters after perforating them with an awl

    4. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by ObviousGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd just like it to be known that I do not shit on my HDs.

      I do attempt to smear blood on the drives, though.

      And I may have once ejaculated on a platter, but I was young and I needed the money.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    5. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by broter · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Even broken hard drives can be recovered..."

      That's why it's the DoD way for me: scramble the data with many passes accross the media with a stong magnet, followed by hammer strikes until it's in small pieces.

      You may find this lowers its value slightly in the "Computers & Office Products" category, while raising it dramatically in the "Art - Sculpture, Carvings" category (as glue as needed).

      -RB

      --
      "One man can change the world with a bullet in the right place."
      - Mick Travis, "If..."
    6. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by deranged+unix+nut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I remember right, the DoD standard was to erase the file by writing random bits over it 7 times....although that was before some researchers found that you could still read the original data if you had a scanning electron microscope.

    7. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by WiPEOUT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not after they've been nuked for 10 seconds in a microwave oven set to "High". Trust me, or better yet, try it :)

    8. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      Besides... Most of the can be "repaired" by just giving them an old fashioned pimp-slap. I'd say that I've "fixed" at least 4 old, stuck drives that way.

    9. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a used HDD once from a coworker, (whoops, I smell a crook!), and when I installed the drive, the drive name was peezoshit. And it was, too. I took the %&*#@ drive back and asked for my money back from the bastard.

    10. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by AlexCV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Costly? Get two similar HD and swap the PCB. Chances are decent that only the PCB was dead, there ya go all the data and no need to load up some forensic software to read the deleted data since the drive is assumed "dead".

      Yes, I have done this and recovered valuable information. Of course, Both drives where mine anyway, but still.

      Alex
    11. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that email was dated Yesterday!
      Sick!

    12. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by linuxbert · · Score: 1

      In Canada there is a DND standard for the maximum size of a piece of a disgarded HDD. i belive it states roughly that no piece of the smashed HDD can be bigger then a half cubic centimeter (aprox). Im told they now have a shredder for disgared drives, so no more slegehammer.

    13. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by cosyne · · Score: 1

      followed by hammer strikes until it's in small pieces.

      Anybody know about pyrotechnic drive destriction? Thermite, magnesium, Estes D engines? Aside from some toxic fumes, it seems like a more exciting way to eliminate your data once and for all....

    14. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by cosyne · · Score: 1

      Especially if it was the circuit board on the outside that was broken, and you had a few hundred drives sitting around and could find an identical model to swap parts with. I imagine that the insides are harder to physically damage than the outside.

    15. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      [OP's hard drives won't be read, he claims] not if i've cracked them open and cum/shit/bled on the platters after perforating them with an awl

      Well, in that case, first they'll read your DNA, have uncontestable proof you (or your identical twin) had had possesion of them, and then they'll read your data.

    16. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by packeteer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Assuming a DNA sample is not old or degraded too much you can tell between identical twins. Twins have the same genes but not the same DNA. Same thing with clones. A clone would not be exactly the same... there are many ways to tell the differance between the two.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    17. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, I purposely break old HDs by taking them apart. Why? There's a set of cool ultra powerful rare-earth magnets inside usually. (I'm talking strong enough to hold a book to a fridge.) ;)

    18. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by archen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Think I'd use killdisk before I leave the company I work for (not that I do anything wrong, but just to make sure they don't dig anything up). It allows for up to 99 passes.

    19. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by randomtangent · · Score: 1

      Hammers nothing, I got a old drive from a office my mom worked at. it was like an anchor from some old system I'm to young to know about. but we desided to "retire it". So me a few friends and one of hte friends dad's guns took it and other random curplus up to the hills where we proceded to render it all un-usable.

      A few 30.06 rounds will due for a hard disk what no amount of rewriting can.

      My common responec to what is the best way to clean data off a hard drive is now either guns, or jumper cables...

      --
      -Mike
    20. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by SignoffTheSourcerer · · Score: 1

      HD platters are nothing like CDs, they are made of rigid metallic material (typically aluminium, or aluminium for those of you in the states), so they are not going to have a fit due to some small microwave radiation. The power requred to destroy the data by microwave is huge.

      --
      Ordo Militum Unix.
    21. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by cmallinson · · Score: 1
      Besides... Most of the can be "repaired" by just giving them an old fashioned pimp-slap. I'd say that I've "fixed" at least 4 old, stuck drives that way.

      There are at least 15 people who think I'm a genius because I took their hard drives home and recovered all of their "lost" data. I used recovery software on 2 of them, replaced the IDE cable on 1, and I gave the other 12 a good whack.

    22. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by akamoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Think I'd use killdisk before I leave the company I work for

      Or you could use Eraser.

      It's free, as a bonus, and it's floppy-based killer uses Gutmann's algorithim to do it's bit.

      -- R

    23. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

      You can salvage rare-earth magnets from cdrom drives, too! :) I have a few.

    24. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, just use a stick welder cranked up to 225 amps. If I were doing quantity I'd use an arc gouger, but a common welding electrode will blow through a hard disk laughing all the way.

    25. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by tsetem · · Score: 1

      Wonder if it's anything like microwaving a CD-R. Pop that sucker in for 5 seconds, and you see lightning dancing across the surface of the disc.

      On a side note, it's much more impressive to nuke them one at a time, rather than a bunch of them.

      One place I worked at went through CD-R's like candy. We had a whole, 50 disc spindle of bad discs, and nuked it. Wasn't that impressive to watch, until it started smelling like Ozone in the break room.

    26. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by hacker · · Score: 1
      Well, in that case, first they'll read your DNA, have uncontestable proof you (or your identical twin) had had possesion of them..

      Back to Biology class for you. Identical twins do NOT share identical DNA.

    27. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Guns only destroy a small area, and jumper cables form a circuit across the least resistant path, so it won't erase the whole drive. Scrape off the aluminum, powder it, mix it in a 1:1 molar ratio with rust powder, and ignite.

    28. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      You're right and wrong.

      Two seconds on google cleared that up.

    29. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you want to delve into the pedantic, these twins' DNA would become more and more dissimilar as they age due to telomeric DNA degredation and natural mutations.

      DNA profiling uses little DNA "scissors" that cut the molecule at "recognition sites" of between 3 and 8 nucleotides (the bricks of DNA). By measuring the size of the DNA fragments obtained, this gives a profile of the person which can be used for whatever. The twin's profile will be identical, and the profile between you and me will be very different. I think the probability is somewhere in the ball park of an identical match in one in 20 billion.

      This process is called RFLP - Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms.

    30. Re:Luckily for me, my Ebay'd hard drives are safe by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hdc

      Repeat as necessary.

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  5. How many credit cards per hard disk??? by kenthorvath · · Score: 1, Interesting

    5000 divied up between say 200 disks is 25 cards per disk, are these retail discarded drives? Perhaps this should be regulated.

    1. Re:How many credit cards per hard disk??? by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

      Actually, there were 158 drives, so the average comes out to about 31 cards per disk.

    2. Re:How many credit cards per hard disk??? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this story isn't so much a warning to hard drive discarders than it is a indictment of the American revolving credit infatuation/problem.

      These previous users had a problem.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    3. Re:How many credit cards per hard disk??? by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

      I hate to reply to myself, but:

      "Of the 129 drives that functioned, 69 still had recoverable files on them and 49 contained "significant personal information" -- medical correspondence, love letters, pornography and 5,000 credit card numbers."

      So I suppose they're saying there were 102 cards/drive. Sounds fishy to me.

    4. Re:How many credit cards per hard disk??? by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's much more likely that there were only a few of these retail drives with CC numbers on them, but the ones that did have the numbers on them would have had a shitload of numbers.

    5. Re:How many credit cards per hard disk??? by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Funny

      They are using the NEW, IMPROVED RIAA/MPAA counting system.

    6. Re:How many credit cards per hard disk??? by LostCluster · · Score: 2

      Sounds like one of the drives belonged to a business that left something like QuickBooks on their drive, and that accounts 98% of the card numbers found, with there being one or two on each of the remaining drives.

    7. Re:How many credit cards per hard disk??? by Jason1729 · · Score: 2

      Among the data found on the 158 drives were 5,000 credit-card numbers

      The RIAA/MPAA system recognizes that each digit is a number taken by itself. Since credit cards have 16 digit numbers, 31 numbers/person sounds about right, it's an average of just under 2 cards/person.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    8. Re:How many credit cards per hard disk??? by stellar7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In RIAA terms it'd be more like 156 credit card numbers were found, but since some of them had high limits, it was the equivalent of 5000 credit cards.

    9. Re:How many credit cards per hard disk??? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      You know, with 5,000 credit card numbers you could buy an awful big pile of used hard drives on ebay, which then might contain even more credit card numbers that you could use to... ...profit!

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  6. Full Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Discarded computer hard drives prove a trove of personal info

    JUSTIN POPE, AP Business Writer Wednesday, January 15, 2003

    (01-15) 13:17 PST CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) --

    So, you think you cleaned all your personal files from that old computer you got rid of?

    Two MIT graduate students suggest you think again.

    Over two years, Simson Garfinkel and Abhi Shelat bought 158 used hard drives at secondhand computer stores and on eBay. Of the 129 drives that functioned, 69 still had recoverable files on them and 49 contained "significant personal information" -- medical correspondence, love letters, pornography and 5,000 credit card numbers. One even had a year's worth of transactions with account numbers from a cash machine in Illinois.

    About 150,000 hard drives were "retired" last year, according to the research firm Gartner Dataquest. Many end up in the trash, but many also find their way back onto the market.

    Over the years, stories have surfaced about personal information turning up on used hard drives, raising concerns about privacy and the danger of identity theft.

    Last spring, Pennsylvania sold used computers that contained information about state employees. In 1997, a Nevada woman bought a used computer and discovered it contained prescription records on 2,000 customers of an Arizona pharmacy.

    Garfinkel and Shelat, who reported their findings in an article to be published Friday in the journal IEEE Security & Privacy, said they believe they are the first to take a more comprehensive -- though not exactly scientific -- look at the problem.

    On common operating systems such as Microsoft's Windows, simply deleting a file, or even following that up by emptying the "trash" folder, does not necessarily make the information irretrievable. Those commands generally delete a file's name from the directory. But the information itself can live on until it is overwritten by new files.

    Even reformatting a drive, or preparing the hard drive all over again to store files, may not do it. Fifty-one of the 129 working drives in the MIT study had been reformatted, and 19 of them still contained recoverable data.

    The hard-to-erase quality of hard drives is seen as a good thing by some. Many users like believing that, in a pinch, an expert could recover their deleted files. Law enforcement officers can examine a computer and lift incriminating e-mails or porno images from the hard drive.

    The only sure way to erase a hard drive is to "squeeze" it: writing over the old information with new data -- all zeros, for instance -- at least once, but preferably several times. A one-line command will do that for Unix users, and for others, inexpensive software from companies such as AccessData works well.

    But few people go to the trouble. Many ordinary computer users toss their old drives into the closet, or take a sledgehammer to it.

    As it turned out, most of the hard drives acquired by the MIT students came from businesses that apparently had a misplaced confidence in their ability to "sanitize" old drives.

    Tom Aleman, who heads the analytic and forensic technology group at the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche, often encounters companies that get burned by failing to fully sanitize, say, the laptop of an employee who leaves the company for a job with a competitor.

    "People will think they have deleted the file, they can't find the file themselves and that the file is gone when, in fact, forensically you may be able to retrieve it," he said.

    Garfinkel has learned his lesson. As an undergrad at MIT in the 1980s, he failed to sanitize his own hard drive before returning a computer to his father. His father was able to read his personal journal.

    1. Re:Full Article Text by Filik · · Score: 1

      Nope, writing over it with all zeros doesn't make it safe at all. You need to use random numbers, or tricks of magnetism makes it possible to see what other values than 0 has been stored recently.

  7. fuck the white man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    death to whitey!

  8. porno on ebay'd hard drives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cool - cheap porn.

  9. HD Abuse by helix400 · · Score: 3, Funny
    I have some fun with my old drives.

    Take them outside, and throw them as high into the air as possible. Then watch them land on concrete.

    I think that render the drive useless. =)

    1. Re:HD Abuse by mpcooke3 · · Score: 1

      Probably.

      But I doubt it destroys much of the data.

      Matt.

    2. Re:HD Abuse by Xeo2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Take them outside, and throw them as high into the air as possible. Then watch them land on concrete.

      I think that render the drive useless. =)


      Probably not. Most commercial harddrives are rated for at least 50gs of acceleration. My Deskstar is good for up to 100. You might dent the outer case, but it'll probably still work.

      --
      ___ alwaysBETA.com - Hey, you've got nothing better to do.
    3. Re:HD Abuse by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

      BAH! That's the lazy way. The proper way is to wire it up to an old 386 (not inside the case, get a long cable and put it a foot or 2 away), do something intensive on it (i.e. zeroing the whole drive), and then take your sledge, and BAM! I've always wondered what would happen if you did that.

      (I happen to have a 6.4GB drive sitting in my computer right now. I can't wait till the day I get a new HD and move the currently-primary 20GB down to backup duty, and SMASH that old Fireball)

    4. Re:HD Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's refine the technique a bit:

      Open the case, throw the drive platter stack into the air, watch/listen with satisfaction as the platters hit the concrete and are bent well past the ability to unbend them and use them with any current drive head kit.

      Yes, someone with the right magnetic scanning gear can still get at the data, but it's certainly no longer usable with ordinary disk drive hardware.

    5. Re:HD Abuse by phyrestang · · Score: 1

      I use my old harddrives to practice using my dremel tool... Not much use after that..

    6. Re:HD Abuse by kg4ghn · · Score: 1

      i wonder if they would last after a session with my Glock... Mike

      --
      I am the CheezWarrior AOL Sucks. It must be stopped I must stop it! [Insert Evil Maniacal laugh here] Mike the Ch
    7. Re:HD Abuse by idontgno · · Score: 1
      My Deskstar is good for up to 100. You might dent the outer case, but it'll probably still work.

      The irony approaches LD50 concentrations. Toss a Deskstar off a 3-storey building onto macadam and it'll keep working like Grandpa's Timex, but leave it in the comfort and stability of your computer's case and it'll self-destruct like Jim Phelps' tape recorder.

      Ah, well, back on-topic. We in the US military know about remanence security. (I think institutional paranoia is closer to the truth, but at least for once it works to our benefit.) The default behavior in our illustrious organization is "purge it completely (NSA-grade multiple overwrites) before it leaves your office."

      You can buy used US hardware (commercial-off-the-shelf-stuff, o' course) at auction, and it's really unlikely you'll find anything on the hard drive. Not even an OS, let alone someone's performance rating or sensitive Powerpoint slides.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    8. Re:HD Abuse by davidc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Take 'em apart and use the magnets as fridge magnets. They hold up an enormous amount of paper, although they do tend to nip one's fingers occasionally :)

    9. Re:HD Abuse by TropicalTexan · · Score: 1

      Ditto the fridge magnets...and my son really likes to play with the platters. After a day or two with a three year old, it'll take a scanning electron microscope and a lot of time to pick up and reassemble the pieces of the coating to get any of my useless data.

    10. Re:HD Abuse by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Funny

      My favourite method is to put them down, and run over them with a EMD SD90MAC...

    11. Re:HD Abuse by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1

      I think that render the drive useless. =)

      There's a company overseas that has been recovering data from many hard drives taken from the rubble of the World Trade Center with a fairly high success rate. Most (if not all) of these drives were packed tightly with dust and debris, yet the data remained intact. So if you don't want your data to be read, you should abuse your drives more thoroughly. :)

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    12. Re:HD Abuse by jlechem · · Score: 1

      Let alone my .357 mag, next time I go shooting I should see if I have an old HD to pack around and take some pics with the digital camera.

      --
      Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
    13. Re:HD Abuse by mlyle · · Score: 2, Informative
      Something doesn't have to be going very fast to cause a 50G deceleration. A few feet of drop onto concrete is plenty. That being said, chances are the platters and the data will be fine, even if the mechanism of the drive is screwed up.

      For a 25 foot fall with (nearly) no drag, the drive will get up to a speed of 40.0 ft/sec (27.3 MPH). If the drive stops over a 1/8" distance, with -uniform deceleration- (this is pretty generous for a fall onto concrete), this equates to 1600 G's. Halve the distance, and quadruple the force. Decelerate it in a non-uniform fashion (as it realistically would) and you'll get even more spectacular results.

      See this review of a hitachi drive. Note that they say a drive designed for a non-operating shock of 800G's can take a fall of -one foot- onto concrete. I destroyed a maxtor by dropping it 3 feet onto carpet in a past life, and I'd suspect it was rated for a non-operating shock of at least 50G's.

      I'd love to see you try it with your drive with your valuable data sometime though.

    14. Re:HD Abuse by CvD · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those are really strong... What are they made of? They seem ceramic, not even metal. Neodymium?

      I remember playing with neodymium magnets during physics class. Damn those things were strong. Will stick to anything remotely metal. Very cool.

      Cheers

    15. Re:HD Abuse by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ..i think he meant 'watch as they explode all over the concrete'...

      50g you can get by snapping the drive against wall..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:HD Abuse by ryanvm · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are they made of? They seem ceramic, not even metal.

      My guess would be a glass or ceramic. The first time I opened up a hard drive I assummed the platters were metal because of their reflectivity. After trying to bend one of them and having it shatter into a million pieces in my face, I discovered that they are not.

    17. Re:HD Abuse by wunderhorn1 · · Score: 1

      They are Neodymium. Neodymium Iron Boron (Nd2Fe14B), in fact. One of the strongest ferromagnetic materials known, but very brittle, unfortunately.

      --
      Karma: Bored. (Thinking about resurrecting the "Anyone else is an imposter" joke.)
    18. Re:HD Abuse by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      That must have been one of the older types of platters that were some sort of glass. Haven't seen that in any modern drive though. Newer ones are indeed some sort of metal.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    19. Re:HD Abuse by rpenguin · · Score: 1
      You have that backwards. newer drives are more likely to use non metallic platters than older ones.

      From PC Guide "Platter Substrate Materials":


      Uneven platter surfaces on hard disks running at faster speeds with heads closer to the surface are more apt to lead to head crashes. For this reason many drive makers began several years ago to look at alternatives to aluminum, such as glass, glass composites, and magnesium alloys . . . One obvious disadvantage of glass compared to aluminum is fragility, particularly when made very thin. For this reason some companies are experimenting with glass/ceramic composites. One of these is a Dow Corning product called MemCor, which is a glass made with ceramic inserts to reduce the likelihood of cracking.


      also see:
      Hardware Central HD info

    20. Re:HD Abuse by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Well, it's come full circle then, I remember clearly shattering ceramic/glass like platters out of an old huge (full height drive bay sized) hard disk.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  10. redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    redundant... redundant.... redundant... redundant...

    yeah, i've seen this whole "buy hds off people, find porn" thing before

    its not new, who cares?

  11. So... by cpuenvy · · Score: 0

    The moral of the story is: Purchase drives from EBay, harvest credit card numbers, get rich, then rule the world.

    I got it all figured out now...

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  12. Data worth more than the computer by blamanj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's long been know that laptop theives are often more interested in the data than the computer.

    Some computers sold on eBay are sold for the data.

    1. Re:Data worth more than the computer by stiller · · Score: 1

      Oh, so those Ukranian guys at the station weren't after my money at all, thought that's why they took my laptop...Still, strange to imagine them datamining my HD.

    2. Re:Data worth more than the computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bollocks. I only steal laptops for the hardware.

    3. Re:Data worth more than the computer by kdgibson · · Score: 0

      Not really, if you look closer, you see that were zero bids on that computer...

    4. Re:Data worth more than the computer by Reziac · · Score: 1

      No wonder.. it's a Tandy! [shudder]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Data worth more than the computer by geekoid · · Score: 1

      just be sure to use your own keyboard...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Data worth more than the computer by NomNet · · Score: 1
      It's long been know that laptop theives are often more interested in the data than the computer.
      Some computers sold on eBay are sold for the data [ebay.com].

      And if you look at the auction, you'll see it has zero bids.
      It's been relisted with a much lower price - and it ended with zero bids.

      You've just proved that data, to be worth almost nothing :)

  13. yes by Stanley+Feinbaum · · Score: 2

    nowadays most companies do not sell used systems anymore.. Since a simple format is not enough to protect sensitive data.

    Where I work we generally destroy then throw away the entire computer when we no longer need it, the only thing part we keep is the monitor.

    It's the safest way to go!

    --

    Stanley Feinbaum, professional journalist and master debater! God bless the USA!

    1. Re:yes by silas_moeckel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That was the Policy at the IBM facility I worked at in the early 90's. I tossed piles of computers into this big ugly compacting trailor once that was done with it I doubt you could recover anything. Funny thing about that is employies took piles of "compacted" parts home with them well I guess if they wanted the data in the first place they could have gotten it anyway in building security was light network wise untill you hit big iron.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    2. Re:yes by cbuskirk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why not remove the hard drive and donate the computer to a local school. Even at a couple of years old the computer is still useful for students and the school would be more than happy to pick up a new hard drive for it.

    3. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Safest for who ? For your company certainly, but not really for the environment (which mean all of us).
      I'm not saying that selling them would be safer for the environment in the long run, but it can't be worse, unless your company follows a serious policy regarding broken computer parts.
      There are certainly good algorithms to erase a HD safely (I'm thinking random overwriting several time, or perhaps writing the bitwise complement of the data before several random passes).

    4. Re:yes by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      It was excellent for me. My ten P133 16Mb Dells came from Japan without hard drives because fo sensitive data. They were difficult to sell, and so I picked them up really cheap for this market...using them for diskless X-terms. I saved about 2600 baht per client (US$55) over the ten clients.

    5. Re:yes by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, it just reeks of environmental friendliness. Instead of recycling cases, motherboards, etc, just send them to a dump.

      What an utter waster.

    6. Re:yes by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      why not open up the computer and smash the HDD then sell the computer without an hdd?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:yes by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Where I work we generally destroy then throw away the entire computer when we no longer need it, the only thing part we keep is the monitor.

      So, let's see, of three pieces of the computer that can permanently retain data, you keep one, and destroy the other two?

      What happens to those monitors anyways?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    8. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me *your* credit card number then. I can recycle plastic too.

    9. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends where you live. Around here (Santa Clara, CA), the more technically advanced schools are all running with fairly modern stuff, and the remaining school have their leftovers. If it's less than a P2 or so, they probably won't take it.

    10. Re:yes by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Three? HDD, Monitor, ...?

    11. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      nowadays most companies do not sell used systems anymore.. Since a simple format is not enough to protect sensitive data.

      Where I work we generally destroy then throw away the entire computer when we no longer need it, the only thing part we keep is the monitor.

      Why not simply use a cryptographic disk, e.g. NetBSD's cgd(4)? It is a bit of a waste to throw the computer away. Ensuring that all the information on the disk is encrypted should be good enough.
    12. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAY, don't give us your crappy hard drives!

    13. Re:yes by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Three? HDD, Monitor, ...?

      CMOS / BIOS chip, if one is desparate. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:yes by zx-6e · · Score: 1

      So does anyone know of cryptographic filesystem tools that are portable across Windows, Linux, and Mac OSX? Say I made an encrypted volume, burned it to CD and I wanted to be able to load the volume on my OS of the day? Is this possible?

  14. Gary Glitter by cornjchob · · Score: 3, Funny

    If only he had but known...

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    1. Re:Gary Glitter by Neologic · · Score: 1

      Reckon most readers here don't know who the hell Gary Glitter is. But if I had mod points, I would put you up as +1 funny.

      --

      "I hate quotations. Tell me what you know." -Ralph Waldo Emerson

    2. Re:Gary Glitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Next time, try English."

    3. Re:Gary Glitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If only he had but known...
      ... then he could've tipped off Pete Townshend.

  15. formatting by banka · · Score: 0

    so does formatting the harddrive not eliminate all past date? because i've read stories of how the fbi recovered sensitive material even on formatted drives

    1. Re:formatting by andih8u · · Score: 1

      yeah, formatting just wipes out the MBR (master boot record) so all your data is still there.

      --


      slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    2. Re:formatting by Kourino · · Score: 1

      formatting just wipes out the MBR

      Nah, it reinitializes the filesystem info (the FAT for, well, FAT, block groups for most Unix-style fses). Usually it doesn't touch the MBR, that would be repartitioning or something like "fdisk /mbr". Which would make getting data back less trivial but still pretty easy.

  16. scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's one thing to make sure you securely wipe any drive of your own you get rid of, but you can't do anything about old drives or paper files that a company or hospital might discard containing sensitive info about you.

    Occasionally there are new reports about someone finding a stack of files by a dumpster containing sensitive medical or financial information about a lot of people. The same surely holds true for old drives or computers disposed of by careless companies.

  17. I can relate by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Picked 6 or 7 old 4gig HDDs from my father's company a few years ago, found their company credit line information, personal (and some very erotic) email, and a surprisingly large collection of nudie photoshopped Gillian Anderson photos. Oh yeah, and like 100 different (and I must say, very well-done) quake2 "crackwhore" models and skins lol. I love the people who don't clear their HDDs, it's like treasure chests, you never know what you're gonna get.

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    1. Re:I can relate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost as much fun as browsing through the personal files that get e-mailed to me everyday with peoples first attempt at a game or some cute japanese girls screen saver.

    2. Re:I can relate by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2

      Do you have an FTP site for those Quake models?

      --
      Huh?
    3. Re:I can relate by Raiford · · Score: 1
      I love the people who don't clear their HDDs, it's like treasure chests, you never know what you're gonna get.

      No. It's people that don't clear their HDDs, it's like a box of candy, you never know what your going to get. Forest.

      --
      "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
  18. Must have been.... by vasqzr · · Score: 1



    Kevin Mitnick's laptop hard drive from eBay. He had stolen a couple thousand credit card numbers, didn't he?

    A legitimate reason for having 5,000 CC #'s on 158 drives could be, maybe one of the drives was a web server for an e-commerce site?

    1. Re:Must have been.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, could that be, maybe even a doctors office

  19. Data Layers by Artana+Niveus+Corvum · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many previous owners these drives had? If so, I wonder if they're using some sort of low level disk analysis software like the FBI does that can effectively peel back layers of data that were on there in the past. Theoretically anything that has previously been on the drive should be recoverable through such methods.

    --
    -----------------------------------------
    Remove the Greed which plagues mankind.
    1. Re:Data Layers by alienmole · · Score: 1
      Theoretically anything that has previously been on the drive should be recoverable through such methods.

      "Theoretically"? Which theory is that - the theory of infinite data storage? You're dreaming.

      The FBI has no magic. It's just that "formatting" is often not quite the irreversible, data-destroying operation people often imagine it is. Depending on exactly what technique you use to format, it can involve as little as writing a new root directory structure, leaving the rest of the disk's data intact, but just a little more difficult to get at. Even supposedly more destructive means of formatting aren't necessarily perfect. However, if you know what you're doing, you can clean a drive so that even the FBI can't get anything off it.

      I'd tell you how to do it, but then you'd have to put up with black helicopters buzzing around your house all the time...

    2. Re:Data Layers by topham · · Score: 1

      According to various reports (scientific papers, etc. not stories) it is quite possible to recover multiple generations of data from harddrives.

      Thats right, your 20gig drive can contain about 60gigs worth of data. Of course, it would probably take 8 months to recover it all, and a couple hundred thousand dollars... but, theoretically it is possible.

      (I'm pretty sure my credit limit isn't woth a few hundred thousand dollars to recover :)

    3. Re:Data Layers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on the state of the megnetic flux, it's either interpreted as a 1 or 0 (on or off). Your basic binary. In oter words, if you want to ensure all data is erased just have a program write all 1s across the drive, then another pass with all 0s. Simply applying a pass of all 0s won't ensure compleate megnetic flux change for each bit interpretation.

      "And the user was out"

    4. Re:Data Layers by WeaponOfChoice · · Score: 1

      Becomes sorta like a hot potato, gotta pass it on before you get arrested for something in it's history...

      Interesting point that by the DPA in the UK you are absolutely responsible for any data found on your PC drives (regardless of new or 2nd hand status) so technically when you buy a 2nd hand drive from a company (inc insecurely erased data) you may actually be legally purchasing that data...

      --


      It's not that I'm Anti-American - I'm Pro-Freedom
  20. everyone knows this by erax0r · · Score: 0

    well not to be a troll but oh well.. anyone that reads /. most likely already knows about this technology. data recovery has been around for ages...nothing new here.

    --
    .[[erax0r]]. .[[/burn.]]. .[[/bros.]].
    1. Re:everyone knows this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't use your +1 bonus to post redundant, stupid crap like this. Got it? Good. In fact, don't post it at ALL.

  21. Your old HD is safe. by missing000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can get creditcard numbers faster on kazaa.

    1. Re:Your old HD is safe. by deranged+unix+nut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like the stack of lost floppy disks sitting in the campus lab. One day I started looking through them.

      On the third disk I noticed a file named "Moms Credit Card". We can all guess what the file contained.

      Fortunately for that poor student, I'm a nice guy and I wiped the disk so that the information wouldn't be abused. However, the next disk contained Frat Party planning meeting minutes that were quite entertaining. (Someone was violating campus alcohol rules.)

      Anyway, I stopped looking after the 5th disk, and there were over 500 lost disks in that lab. All of the disks were found withing the last 4 months. If you want to get dirt to use on people, visit a college lab, shuffle through the lost disks, hold onto the information for a few years and then see how much that lost disk is worth to them.

  22. I don't beleave it by Niadh · · Score: 0, Troll

    Of the 129 drives that functioned, 69 still had recoverable files on them and 49 contained "significant personal information"

    thats 5000 cc numbers on 49 drives?
    102 credit cards numbers per drive?!

    i smell bullshit...

    maybe one of theose drives belonged to scripted kiddie with a cc# generator..

    1. Re:I don't beleave it by Filik · · Score: 1

      Nah, no bullshit. Just imagine, with 158 drives, wouldn't one of them have a high probability of coming from some CC cracker? CC's are common "hacker" currency...

  23. Not so bad. by Annatar2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thats not so bad. My dad happens to be a garbage man and often brings along an occasional system he's scavanged from the dumpsters along his route. Currently I have in my possession an old IBM Aptiva with some guys bank account information on it (He did his checking and stuff with it apparently), but worst of all I have what appears to be an old Gateway tower used to store Medical information for a major hospital in the area my father works. I have over 2 gigs of peoples medical history, including what they were put in the hospital for, insurance information, release dates ect.

    I should really do the honost thing and reformat it but its always fun to flip the thing on and just page through stuff.

    1. Re:Not so bad. by Compuser · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why reformat it? Contact people on the list,
      and if there is a class action suit, then be
      a witness.

    2. Re:Not so bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're getting a Dell.

      Dad, you're going to jail.

    3. Re:Not so bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      A goverment contractor donated some old PowerBook 140/180s to our school and one of them had an unformatted HD. Imagine my suprise when I booted it up and there were documents on there that said something along the lines of "This document has been classified Top Secret by the Department of Defense" at the top of them. I don't know what is more pathetic, the fact that this laptop was allowed to get out with confidential data on it or that it was unencrypted to begin with.

      Also that same year, the school councilor retired his trusty quadra 610(?) and he had all the psychological, academic, and disciplinary records on there from 1993 and up on there. No password. No encryption. No attempts to even get rid of data.

      A few months back, my brother picked up an old computer for $8 at a garage sale. He wanted me to fix it up for him and get it to do something. I was in for a nasty suprise when I found about 200 MB of gay pr0n jpegs on there.

      When I was taking my A+ class at my HS, we were given some old computers from the county office of education to get in working order to give to people who couldn't afford computers. There was a small text file on it that contained passwords for most of the servers in the COE.

      You can get quite a bit without even recovering files. People are idiots.

    4. Re:Not so bad. by Ben's+Conscience · · Score: 0, Troll

      Annatar gloats:
      "My dad happens to be a garbage man and often brings along an occasional system he's scavanged from the dumpsters along his route. Currently I have in my possession an old IBM Aptiva with some guys bank account information on it (He did his checking and stuff with it apparently), but worst of all I have what appears to be an old Gateway tower used to store Medical information for a major hospital in the area my father works. I have over 2 gigs of peoples medical history, including what they were put in the hospital for, insurance information, release dates ect. I should really do the honost thing and reformat it but its always fun to flip the thing on and just page through stuff."

      I'm amused that you attend a Christian school, Ben. Fitting, not really surprising. Do you realize that you're sifting through real human beings extremely personal information for your own personal enjoyment? You got into college so I have to assume you're at least bright enough to theoretically know what you're doing is wrong.

      So ...Ben Krygsheld, given your hometown and your extremely unique last name, how difficult do you think it would be for me to find out who your dad is, where he works, then determine the hospitals for which his employer provides service, inform them of this factoid, and let all higgeldy-piggeldy bust loose?

      Hiring a good admin:
      $80,000/yr.

      Disposing of a hardrive correctly:
      $5

      Telling the world on Shashdot that you engage in criminal activity and implicating your father in the process...

      Priceless.

      You are going to have a very interesting week, genius. Nevermind that this page will be in Google's archive -- complete with your full name attached to it -- in a matter of days.

    5. Re:Not so bad. by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      Heh - funny - I go to the same college. Using our people-lookup service (affectionately known as Stalkervision), I can find school address, home address, etc. Of course, I don't give a damn, and can't be sure that it's the same person, so it doesn't matter.

    6. Re:Not so bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is complete FUD. How exactly is what Annatar doing illegal? Bits are bits. When people throw stuff out, they have no guarantees of privacy. What if a dump worker found a bunch of records scattered over the trash heap? Illegal to peruse? These records are not even encrypted, apparently.

    7. Re:Not so bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often bring home computers from the trash too. A few years ago, I found an IBM 486 system with a 250 MB Western Digital hard drive that had belonged to a certain large corporation that has recently been involved in a major accounting scandal. The IDE controller card was bad and the drive wasn't bootable anyway, and judging from the file dates, it hadn't been touched since 1994. Most of the Word (2.0) documents on the drive contained information about the company's plans to improve the efficiency of their internal operations. There were also a few documents about some of their customers. The thing that looked the most interesting was an old version of Peachtree Accounting with a ton of data files...but unfortunately (for me) the program's .ini file had been deleted and it would not run. At the time, I was only 17 and didn't know much about computers, so I deleted everything on the drive, figuring I would never find a way to open those files. I've overwritten the entire disk so many times now that I doubt any of the original content can be recovered. However, this experience taught me why it is so important to erase everything before getting rid of any kind of computer disk.

    8. Re:Not so bad. by MarcQuadra · · Score: 2, Informative

      LOL! I had the same thing, from an old server at a medical center, giant 2GB SCSI-II drives full of insurance info, dental records, and who knows what else. I tossed the drives after a while because I didn't want the bad karma, but all I had to do was ask for them, they were willfully handed over to me by a doctor when I was 17.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    9. Re:Not so bad. by qnonsense · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, when you throw something away, it becomes property of the trash service/city/dump. Daddy dearest just stole from his employer.

      --
      There comes a time in every man's life when he must say, "No mother! I do not want any more Jell-O!"
    10. Re:Not so bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, according to police and government officials in Portland Oregon, once you place your garbage on the curb, it is public property.

    11. Re:Not so bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be difficult for you to actually check the regulation, now, wouldn't it?

      Doofus.

    12. Re:Not so bad. by mill · · Score: 1

      A related case.. http://www.wweek.com/flatfiles/News3485.lasso

    13. Re:Not so bad. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      "Hi there, I'm a hacker and I 0wn j00r medical records now. If you sue the hospital I got them from I'll testify on your behalf for five bucks."

    14. Re:Not so bad. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The right thing, might me to go to a local media agency, and tell them about it. Perhaps the hospital will be a tad more thoughtfull when it comes to disposing there systems.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Not so bad. by Annatar2 · · Score: 1

      [sarcasm] Oh no you mean I'm not totally annomyous when I use the internet, wow you've really taught me a lesson [/sarcasm] Damn there goes my 15 minutes of fame anyways. First off, it's not illegal that was the point of me posting it to begin with, to ~inform~ people that when they throw things away it does have a habit of popping back up again in unexpected places. Simply because you've placed something in the trash can is no sure fire gurantee that it's going to get compacted into a nice mushy mass. If you don't want someone else getting their hands on it, destroy it before you put it in the trash. This includes everything from recipts, credit card apps to computers. Recent slashdot articles about the cases in Portland, as well as FBI searches since the 80's show that Judges often cite in their rulings that your trash is open to trash pickers which include your garbage men, in defending their logic that it is also open to the government. My second point, is that these guys study is nothing new or surprising. As I mentioned it happens constantly with anyone who works as a garbage man. The few systems I end up getting from my dad to tinker with are generally nothing compared to some of the things that have shown up on other garbage men routes that I know. Lets make this point extremely clear then 'If you don't want information getting into other peoples hands destroy it before you throw it away' Secondly its not generally against company policy, except very few places where say a company specifically states in their contract that all their trash is to be compacted. Since I know exactly where this computer was gotten from I know it doesn't fall under this. If you've ever worked at a private scavenger you'll realize that all the men who work their take things back from their routes, its a common practice [Again harking back to the Point of my original post that you ignored]. These things include everything from boxes of old movies, TVs, VCRs, computers, one guy even found a dirt bike stuffed into one of the containers on his route. My conscience is pretty clean about the matter. I don't plan on selling the data, or the machine. I think getting the guy who discarded the machine fired by reporting him to his work is stupid, and eventually supposing I find a better use for an old 486 100 mhz machine I'll probably reformat its drive. In the meantime however, the information is very interesting to read through on occasion as I already mentioned. It doesn't harm anyone [Just like posting information about me thats easilly found on the web doesn't harm me] unless someone actually decided to do something criminal with it. If you can mine the information of the web your welcome to call his employer and complain, for the lot of good it'll do you. I'd post it and let you have at it, but seeing as its not me, I'd rather not put someone else through possibly unneeded aggrivation.

    16. Re:Not so bad. by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      YM, 'it becomes public property', HTH

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  24. PGP! by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 5, Informative

    PGP (for windows or mac, ie not GPG) has two commands related to this: wipe file and wipe free space. They overwrite the appropriate sectors of the disk with several patterns designed to ensure that no matter what (common) encoding scheme the hard disk uses, every bit will have been set at least once, zeroed at least once, and overwritten with pseudorandom data at least once. If you set in on a lot of passes, it does an even better job. This would be a cheap (free, except for time and bandwidth to download it) way to make sure your sensitive data doesn't get out.

    That said, experts would tell you that the only reliable way to make sure sensitive data doesn't get out is to thermite your drive.

    Also, what's the one-line unix command (running MacOS X here).

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    1. Re:PGP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      dd, probably: dd if=/dev/zero of=/drive/to/zero

      works well with a few 'dd if=/dev/urandom of=/drive/to/random'

    2. Re:PGP! by sam+the+lurker · · Score: 2, Informative

      $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda

      Note: This is a "Linux-centric" answer to the question since /dev/hda is usually the name give to the first IDE hard drive under Linux.

      You may also want to fill the hard drive with (semi)random data.

      $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda

      If you do this for a couple of weeks you should be fine :)

    3. Re:PGP! by delta407 · · Score: 5, Informative
      what's the one-line unix command
      Easy.
      # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda
      ...being sure, of course, to make 'hda' the actual drive you want to zero. (You could blank individual partitions by using the appropriate names, of course.) Also, you could use '/dev/urandom' instead to fill your disk with random data.

      Ah, the joys of *nix.
    4. Re:PGP! by Kourino · · Score: 1

      for N in 1 2 3 4 5 ; do dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda1 ; done

      That's assuming the partition in question is /dev/hda1. Yours probably isn't, but you can find out what it is by using the 'mount' command. Also, this will do it five times, which is theoretically more secure.

      Variations on this include using 'if=/dev/urandom' instead, which overwrites the partition with random data instead of zeroes. Also, if your shell doesn't like the above (not sure if it works under tcsh, but bash will accept it), just use 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda1'.

    5. Re:PGP! by jnik · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Also, what's the one-line unix command (running MacOS X here).
      for i in 1 2 3 4; dd if=/dev/zero of=filename bs=1 count=filesize; sync; dd if=/dev/random of=filename bs=1 count=filesize; sync; done
      Roughly speaking that'll do it. I'm sure there's nice trickery you can do to, say, get the equivalent of /dev/true (opposite of /dev/zero) and get the size from the file, etc. etc. Note the sync's so it actually hits disc rather than buffer. Technically there should be a sleep or two in there in case of a journalled filesystem....
    6. Re:PGP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called 'wipe'

    7. Re:PGP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my OS X system I got the gnu file system utils. from gnu.org (has the color version of ls among other nice things), and it includes the cmd line util 'shred'. Does a super job.

    8. Re:PGP! by kiolbasa · · Score: 3, Informative

      Several passes of /dev/random is certainly more secure. Writing a predictable pattern, such as /dev/zero (which, given HD encoding schemes does not actually mean all zero bits on the disk) only gives an attacker a pattern to subtract from the signal on the disk and recover the original data. Writing zero over a one looks different than writing a zero over a zero when you look at the disk on a low-level.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
    9. Re:PGP! by Francis+Avila · · Score: 1

      Also, what's the one-line unix command (running MacOS X here).

      There's dd, of course, but there's also shred, which is included in GNU's fileutils package that also includes stuff like chmod, so if you're running a system populated with GNU tools you probably already have it. (Don't know about OSX, since it's supposed to be BSD-based.)

      From the man page:

      DESCRIPTION
      Overwrite the specified FILE(s) repeatedly, in order to make it harder
      for even very expensive hardware probing to recover the data.


      From the info page:

      This uses many overwrite passes, with the data patterns chosen to
      maximize the damage they do to the old data. While this will work on
      floppies, the patterns are designed for best effect on hard drives.
      For more details, see the source code and Peter Gutmann's paper `Secure
      Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory', from the
      proceedings of the Sixth USENIX Security Symposium (San Jose,
      California, 22-25 July, 1996). The paper is also available online.

    10. Re:PGP! by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Also, what's the one-line unix command (running MacOS X here).

      srm [filename]

      HTH.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    11. Re:PGP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The threat of low-level data recovery is essentially bullshit. One of the people who knows a little something about the topic of a Slashdot article got pissed off by the ignorance and deliberated at length on this, the last time such an issue came up in an article.

    12. Re:PGP! by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      The magnetic value of or a part of the disk after XORing a sector with zero, will still be close to the original value. If you have a hard drive you used to care about and are now selling it, cat /dev/random > /dev/hda1 etc will be your best bet :)

    13. Re:PGP! by jsse · · Score: 1

      # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda

      This might not do the job. A technique called Magnetic Force Microscopy (MFM) allows any moderately funded opponent to recover the last two or three layers of data written to disk. Some companies even claim to be able to recover up to 16 layers.

      May be you'd like to try this:
      apt-get install wipe

      There're commercial expert grade disk eraser too.

    14. Re:PGP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      People will complain that this isn't good enough, but it stops anyone not willing to spend a lot of time and money. If someone with time and money wants dirt on you, they will get it anyway.

    15. Re:PGP! by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      There isn't one.

      The closest is to dd /dev/urandom onto the device you want to destory, as others have indicated. You'll want to do it a few times.

      Last time I sold hard drives I ran a repeating cycle of urandom and /dev/zero over the surface for a day. I imagine the spooks could pull stuff off, but it ought to be safe from the casual browser.

    16. Re:PGP! by bourne · · Score: 2, Informative

      PGP (for windows or mac, ie not GPG) has two commands related to this: wipe file and wipe free space.

      And for those wishing for only mid-grade free space wiping, check out "cipher" which comes with Win XP and Win2K SP3. 'cipher /w:c:' will wipe all the free space on c: with 0s, then with 1s, then with random data.

      I have mine cron'ned - er, "Task Scheduled" - to run several times a week, just to keep things on the sanitary side. You never know when the layoffs will leave you wondering who is looking at your old hard drive.

    17. Re:PGP! by timeOday · · Score: 1
      PGP (for windows or mac, ie not GPG) has two commands related to this: wipe file and wipe free space.... what's the one-line unix command
      # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda
      Uhh, that resembles neither "wipe file" nor "wipe free space" to my eyes...
    18. Re:PGP! by haystor · · Score: 1

      I use: /usr/bin/emacs

      --
      t
    19. Re:PGP! by firewrought · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but /dev/random will take forever because the entropy pool gets depleted very, very quickly. The kernel slowly fills it back up based on the timing of device interrupts, so you'll want to speed up the process by (1) tying a gerbil to your keyboard with enough slack so that it can thrash around and generate lots of keystrokes, or (2) fixing your mouse on top of a running treadmill so that the surface moves the little ball perpetually forward. Even then, it will still take forever for /dev/random to generate all those bits... which may prompt you to observe that, gee, computers sure have a hard time being random. [To observe this effect first hand, try `cat /dev/random` and watch gibberish scroll up on your terminal. After the inital burst, you'll have to move your mouse around to get more gibberish.]

      Ultimately, you'd be better off disassembling your microwave and pointing the gun at your HDD in a nice, well-ventilated area. :-)

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    20. Re:PGP! by jareds · · Score: 1

      /dev/urandom is good enough unless you're worried about SHA being successfully cryptanalyzed, in which case you can use a different PRNG based on the hardness of factoring or the hardness of the discrete log problem.

    21. Re:PGP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also, what's the one-line unix command (running MacOS X here).

      On FreeBSD rm -P ... overwrites files before deleting them, so I expect it will work on MacOS X also.

      Note that this approach might not work with journalled filesystems, since they are not guaranteed to use the same disk blocks when overwriting.

      S.

    22. Re:PGP! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Picky picky. :)

      KFG

    23. Re:PGP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try:

      shred -n 1000 -uz dodgyfile.mpeg

      *Tsk* Can't believe no-one's heard of GNU shred.

    24. Re:PGP! by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      Shred is useless on modern filesystems, which do not overwrite data in place.

    25. Re:PGP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod down the idiots. The one line command is

      shred

      DON'T USE DD unless you're an expert. Boot from a different disk and run

      shred --zero /dev/hdX

    26. Re:PGP! by juhaz · · Score: 1

      I've never, ever, seen a study made of this, yet people are always making noise about it.

      If anyone knows a story about recovering data from overwritten, even only once, with only one pattern, drive, please many people would like to see that link...

      It may, in theory, have been possible on old hard drives, but current monsters have so huge densities that reading any trace data would be very near impossible. Prove me wrong, though, if it is possible, I'd really like to know what kind of equipment it was done with and how many millions (billions?) did that thing cost.

    27. Re:PGP! by yourmom16 · · Score: 0

      wipe does up to 27 passes over the data with random information

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
    28. Re:PGP! by bughunter · · Score: 1
      There's a one-line command to thermite your drive in Unix?

      Damn, that is a secure OS!

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    29. Re:PGP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > shred --zero /dev/hdX
      >
      OK...just to be clear: does this wipe the entire drive hdX or just the free space (which seems to be what people are looking for here)?

    30. Re:PGP! by kiolbasa · · Score: 1

      If you can, with extra effort, go from "reading any trace data would be very near impossible" to "reading any trace data is mathematically proven to be impossible," that extra effort may be justified.

      Consider that 20 years from now, HD technololgy will most likely have increased, and today's monster drives will look old. Who knows what technology will be available.

      So the question is then: "For how long do you want your data to be unrecoverable?" For some the answer may be "Long enough," but for many, the answer is "As long as evil exists."

      --

      Beer wants to be free
    31. Re:PGP! by sirfuzz · · Score: 1

      I actually use "shred" or "fwipe".

      Shred has more options, and I can't remember what's especially cool about fwipe.... :-)

  25. On par for Ebay.. by nolife · · Score: 3, Interesting

    bought 158 used hard drives at secondhand computer stores and on eBay. Of the 129 drives that functioned

    Everyone knows that HD's contain data.. I would be more impressed if they broke down the numbers of where the BAD drives came from. That would make a much more informative story. I've bought as-is before in person but never online.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  26. Neather do I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eom

  27. Old news or not... by Ironica · · Score: 5, Funny

    People still don't get it. My old boss wondered why I was "wasting my time" doing stuff like writing all zeros to drives of computers we were giving to charity. "I only told you to format them!"

    I tried to explain the concept to her, but for an IT manager, she was woefully bad at technology.

    Actually, come to think of it, she was about average...

    --
    Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    1. Re:Old news or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      , but for an IT manager, she was woefully bad at technology.

      Say no more.

    2. Re:Old news or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah

      but was she hot?

      working under a hot boss i could deal with, but taking orders from of potato sack would suck.

    3. Re:Old news or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The director of IT where I work came and found me one day to ask me "What key do you hit to get into the bios on a Gateway?". A few minutes later it dawned on me, "why did I tell hit that and why didn't I go with him?". Luckely he was just trying to show a fellow employe how to change options on her home computer (First rule from the BOFH Guide is "Knowledge in the hand of a user is BAD".), I wanted to say something but then again, he "perverbly" signs my check.

      Tim

    4. Re:Old news or not... by Ironica · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Yeah, well, turns out I'm female too... so, what was your point again?

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    5. Re:Old news or not... by Ironica · · Score: 1

      that reminds me of a time when one of our old biddies who really, *really* missed her typewriter (you know, the kind that never quite understood the difference between turning off the computer and turning off the monitor) called up and asked "Which one is the Windows key?"

      I never did find out why she needed the Windows key... which is probably a good thing.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    6. Re:Old news or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Points are for squares.

      I'm a circle.

    7. Re:Old news or not... by Ironica · · Score: 1

      My husband says no, she most certainly is not. Me, I'm not usually qualified to judge...

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    8. Re:Old news or not... by junklight · · Score: 1

      Not quite sure what you are on about here. The point of the story was that his IT manager didn't know nuch about technology (a far to regular occurence in my experince) - tha fact she is a woman is nothing to do with anything (except for informing his choice of pronoun)

    9. Re:Old news or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of the story was that her IT manager didn't know nuch [sic] about technology. Read it carefully, pay attention to the poster's nickname. (Both places!)

    10. Re:Old news or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's really sad about that, is that the director of IT doesn't know enough to watch the screen while a computer is booting to see which key to press to get into the bios.

    11. Re:Old news or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you just proved his point again. Zeroing out a drive to protect it from data recovery? Bah! Something an idiot such as yourself or your boss might do. Anyone with a functioning brain knows that you need to write over everything with several random patterns. Otherwise, don't bother.

      Ironica, indeed.

    12. Re:Old news or not... by Jherico · · Score: 1
      Given a hard drive that has been 'formatted', not zeroed out, anyone can install the drive and with some special software look for old data. If you zero the data out, it takes special hardware to recover the old data. And 'several random patterns' isn't going to make a lick of difference in that regard. With sufficient hardware resources and funds, old data can be recovered from a hard drive that has undergone just about anything short of being melted down into slag.

      Zeroing out data is an order of magnitude better than simple formatting. But several random passes isn't that much better than zeroing out.

      --

      Jherico

      What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

  28. start an extortion & blackmail company.. by netnerd.caffinated · · Score: 5, Funny

    or do like this guy did...
    icanstilltellyourwifebill.com
    he brought a hard drive, found all this cool stuff on it.. & put it to DVD for the masses

    --


    You tried your best, & you failed miserably,
    The lesson is:
    Never Try
    1. Re:start an extortion & blackmail company.. by gribbly · · Score: 2, Informative

      *sigh*


      From the terms of use page on this site:


      "Please note, the content of this interactive movie, including characters and any and all elements, hereof, is entirely fictional, and is not based upon any actual individual or of any other legal entity"


      grib.


      --
      maybe
    2. Re:start an extortion & blackmail company.. by Guido69 · · Score: 1

      ...and they can title it Shelat & Garfinkles Greatest (eBay) Hits.

      Sorry.

      --
      - If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat? - Steven Wright
  29. Speaking of data recovery by bdigit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone happen to know any share/freeware programs out there for Windows 2k that will recover deleted files. I am intrested in running it on my computer to actually see what I can recover and see how well PGP's disk wipe function works.

    1. Re:Speaking of data recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Speaking of data recovery by saur0n · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try "Undelete 3.0" for Windows XP/NT/2000. It's freeware (and in English) if you're a home user.. :]

    3. Re:Speaking of data recovery by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 2

      I am intrested in running it on my computer to actually see what I can recover and see how well PGP's disk wipe function works.

      Even a non-PGP disk wipe (eg zeroing) should make it impossible to recover in software, unless there were fragments of the data outside its file (eg in swap). What the PGP wipe function does is make it harder for EE departments/major labs/G-men to recover your data by looking for signatures of what was there before. This cannot be done by zeroing it. In fact, if the stuff you're deleting is really important, the only perfect way to remove it from the drive is with thermite (or C4, or acid, or...)

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    4. Re:Speaking of data recovery by saur0n · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops, forgot to put a link. http://www.oosoft.de/english/products/ooue/index.h tml

    5. Re:Speaking of data recovery by Bobzibub · · Score: 1

      What about GNU tools?
      I don't mean undelete utilities, but say something that reads the drive at the hardware level?
      I remember there being a flag in the kernel...
      CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL

      Cheers,
      -b

    6. Re:Speaking of data recovery by Kalgash · · Score: 1

      PC Magazine published a freeware utility called Shred 2.

      Use at your own risk under Windows 95, 98, 2000, Me, NT 4.0, and XP.

      I use this to clean the free space on my hdd at least once a week after clearing out my webcache folders, cookies and 'temporary' *snrk* files.

      Enjoy.

  30. This isn't exactly news... by japhar81 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But the CC info bothers me. Presumably, this is a corporate drive that got resold (Unless you know of 170 ppl with 25 credit cards a piece, in which case it's time to re-evaluate the financial system in this country).

    Personally, I have a standing policy in my department to take apart every HDD, take a magnet to each platter, and send the platters to Iron Mountain for destruction. Then again, we deal with large financial institutions, so we have to be extreme and obsessive-compulsive, which brings me to my actual point;

    This stuff should be regulated. If you store personal info on an HDD for business purposes, you should have a legal responsibility (i.e. one that comes with repricussions if not met) to ensure that even after a drive is retired, the data is safe.

    Just my $.02

    1. Re:This isn't exactly news... by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      I once scrounged an old Mac they had tossed into a Dumpster. The person in charge of the machine had disassembled the hard drive, bent the platters, scratched the platters, and broken the heads off. When powered, the drive platters would spin, jam on the arms (platters were bent WAY out of shape), spin, jam, etc. Good thing I had a spare SCSI drive, or else the machine would have been useless...

      I'm surprised that the person hadn't decided to take a torch to the assembly and just sell it off to a metals dealer as slag...

    2. Re:This isn't exactly news... by tellezj · · Score: 1
      Regulation really isn't the answer. I'm not all that jazzed up to have my tax dollars wasted to ensure that companies do the things that they should be doing in the first place.

      Having said that, the best thing to do is to:
      • Publicize the issue
      • Identify the organizations (companies, charities, etc.) that have the problem
      • Let people react accordingly


      Individuals that act responsibly concerning their personal information will tend towards the more secure companies. Those that don't, or don't care or know, will continue to be victims of fraud (from a point of view where an individual is ultimately responsible for himself). It might be profitable for a trusted accounting or security firm to perform audits on information protection such that the company can then advertise as being "SecuFirm Certified" or whatever.

      Main point being, I would look towards governmental regulation as a last resort, and only after all other methods have failed.
      --

      End of Line.

    3. Re:This isn't exactly news... by Dave+Fiddes · · Score: 1

      This stuff should be regulated. If you store personal info on an HDD for business purposes, you should have a legal responsibility (i.e. one that comes with repricussions if not met) to ensure that even after a drive is retired, the data is safe.

      In the UK the Data Protection Act makes anyone who collects data on someone responsible for its safe keeping and destruction. It's backed up with heavy fines, prison sentences and raids on people who are suspected of breaching it....and I'll bet the same stupidity happens just as much here...but having the law probably helps.
  31. It's like Vegas by john_is_war · · Score: 1

    But with better odds!

    --
    Live life to the fullest. It's not that life is short, but that you are dead for so long.
  32. Stolen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has it occurred to anyone that at least some of these drivers could come from stolen computers ?

    1. Re:Stolen by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      And it should be even more important for a thief to erase the stolen disks he`s selling, incase the buyer recovers enough info to find who really owned the disks, and tells him where he bought the disk from.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  33. Shouldn't the title be... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Data Fishing? I mean, you never know if you'll catch anything.

    1. Re:Shouldn't the title be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a mine you might be interested in, and it's going cheap. Very reliable. You can guarantee diamonds and per square metre!

  34. This is the digital equivalent of trashing by arikb · · Score: 1

    Instead of spending time in a dumpster, just find out who upgrade the target's computers, and grab those disks.

    1. Re:This is the digital equivalent of trashing by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      your plan is to exchange handjobs for data?

    2. Re:This is the digital equivalent of trashing by arikb · · Score: 1

      Meant dumpster-diving of course

  35. You don't need any external software! by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right inside your Recycle Bin there's the option to recover any program that you've deleted.

    It's like magic!

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:You don't need any external software! by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 4, Informative
      Parent is troll, but I'll bite:
      grep --binary-files=text -A 500 -B 500 "A phrase from my paper" < /dev/hd0
      Used this the other day to save (most) a termpaper for someone in my dorm.
      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    2. Re:You don't need any external software! by shepd · · Score: 1

      > on Linux you need to recompile the kernel and use regular expressions in perl to recover accidentally deleted data. which is ok because it's open source.

      In windows you have to go out and buy Norton Utilities, download unbelievably sized updates, and hope to hell it works to undelete deleted files.

      Oh, sorry, I didn't realize you thought a "move" to the recycle bin was the same as deletion. It isn't. Hope that clears it up.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:You don't need any external software! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Right inside your Recycle Bin there's the option to recover any program that you've deleted.

      c:\>del foo.txt
      c:\>cd Recycled
      c:\Recycled>dir

      Volume in drive C has no label.
      Volume Serial Number is DEAD-BEEF

      Directory of C:\Recycled

      01/15/2003 09:41p <DIR> .
      01/15/2003 09:41p <DIR> ..
      0 File(s) 0 bytes
      2 Dir(s) 34,054,384,128 bytes free

      Looks like it didn't work.

    4. Re:You don't need any external software! by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you delete from a dosbox / cmd, it bypasses the recycle bin, but what's the point? just shift-delete something in windows for the same effect. And then you're back to square 1 anyways. You have an insecurely deleted file which would be trivial to recover.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    5. Re:You don't need any external software! by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the risk of overwriting your deleted data, either with your swapfile, or with norton utilities themselves when you install it.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:You don't need any external software! by jrest · · Score: 1

      You have a cool Volume Serial Number. It might explain why it isn't working as advertised...

      --
      (Score:5, Not Funny)
  36. Geez, I hate to do it but.... by The+Notorious+ASP · · Score: 1

    1. Buy hard drives off ebay
    2. Datamine CC numbers off old drives
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

    Wait a second, I just found the missing step...

    Sweet.

    1. Re:Geez, I hate to do it but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5. fuck you

    2. Re:Geez, I hate to do it but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. Make out with your sister

      fag.

  37. CIA by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Informative
    Thinking back to a Discovery channel show on the CIA, they dispose of hard drives with a good data wipe then they drill holes in them. Drives that held Super Top-Secret stuff (MS source code?) also got burned in a furnace. All of this on-site.

    In regards to Wiping data, do yourself a favor and check out http://www.heidi.ie/eraser/

    Beyond the wonderfull wiping the program does, there is the option to make an emergency boot floppy that wipes the HD with DOD style 7-pass or a GutherSomething 36 pass! Niffty for the paranoid.

    1. Re:CIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Man, I should take one of those floppies into bestbuy...see if they have bios passwords set up.

  38. we destroyed our harddrives right by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 3, Funny

    my old company had the best method for destroying our sensitive data (like the gig of porn some asshat left on the XML server) - leave them in the old building! god bless those terrorists and their whacky flight skills.

    btw, has anyone seen my old ti calculator? it was on the 21st floor of two.

    1. Re:we destroyed our harddrives right by b1t+r0t · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nothing beats the companies who decided that a great site for their "offsite backups" was in the other tower.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:we destroyed our harddrives right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
      I'm sure I'm not the only one who is a bit uncomfortable with "funny" stories about WTC. I lost a friend that day. It will never be +N, Funny. Not to me, not to his wife, not to his friends, not to his children.

      I assume you meant no harm, but it is harmful regardless. I don't see many Columbine jokes. Why are WTC jokes somehow appropriate?

    3. Re:we destroyed our harddrives right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe cause it isn't a joke about the WTC as much as it deals more to the "smart" IT people who really have no clue about some things... IE off site storage should be at least a mile away from the orginal data source.

    4. Re:we destroyed our harddrives right by Memetic · · Score: 1

      If you work at Boeing or Airbus that could be in the same building. *Grin*

    5. Re:we destroyed our harddrives right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because to the rest of the world Columbine is old news just like to the rest of the world 9/11 will be and is becoming old news. Unless you are directly affected I'm sorry to say your stories are passé now.

    6. Re:we destroyed our harddrives right by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      you know, after i wrote that i realized that some may take it as black humor, others frustration, and some may be offended. it was a kneejerk statement made in a fit of frustration and helplessness, which has been with me since that day. i didn't mean to make light of your loss, or anyone else's. for that i am sorry. consider my inappropriate way of coping with a situation i'll never really get over.

  39. Unfortunate by Kourino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since the only thing that's going to retain data is the hard drive ... what a waste. Come on, companies should sell the rest of the computer! Where do you think poor college students are going to get their "used to be high end hardware half a decade a go" supplies, huh? ;_;

    I mean, I agree, don't let the drive itself slip out, but ...

  40. Possible outcome of this: by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

    How much do you think sales of second-hand HDs are going to increase now?

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  41. Re:This is news? by yellowstone · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    Welcome to 1979 [...] a 50MB external Sun SCSI enclosure [...] hooked it up to my Linux box,
    Sun Microsystems was founded in 1982. And Linus didn't start Linux until 1991. What year was that again?
    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
  42. Above average. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Funny

    Most of mine never knew what "format" was...

    1. Re:Above average. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Goes the other way, too. I've heard of people who wouldn't give away ancient RAM because they were afraid someone would snoop in it. I suppose it might be not quite impossible, but it sure isn't practical!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Above average. by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Most people don't know what "format" really means. IDE HDs are formatted at the factory and cannot be reformatted using standard tools. Floppies are generally formatted too, now. But the "format" command in DOS and Windows is dual-purpose and also does file-system creation (what "mkfs" or "newfs" does in Unix). A "quick format", which is what "format" normally ends up doing, is just file-system creation and not formatting at all.

  43. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    porn

    Is this not an asset that should increase the value of the used hard drive?

  44. The MIT curriculum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Two MIT grad students bought used drives

    (...)

    Garfinkel has learned his lesson. As an undergrad at MIT in the 1980s, he failed to sanitize his own hard drive before returning a computer to his father.

    This school is cruel, in my opinion they should give people some sort of degree after a finite length of time. I've heard stories of people who actually never got out of the building!!!
  45. Your wayback machine is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1979? I was there, home skillet.

    50 MB? Try 5 MB.
    SCSI? Not in production.
    Sun? Sure...
    Linux? Try CP/M.
    hexedit? Try debug.
    Asian Students? First wave Vietnamese refugees, maybe.
    E-mails? If you were working on ARPA.
    Porn? Maybe PG rated adventure games...

    Tax dollars at work? In 1979, we had to walk
    10 miles up hill (both ways) to pay our taxes, and they only accepted krugerrands and virgins without
    herpes, both of which were in even shorter supply
    and higher demand than they are now.

  46. HDs... by GearheadX · · Score: 1, Redundant

    When you really want your privacy.. I know of only one way that really makes any old data on a drive more or less gone.

    The physical destruction of the recording medium.

  47. I sledge them! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 3, Interesting
    We go through a large # of computers a year, and I try to donate the carcass, or at least make sure it's recycled properly. (Charitable organizations, unless specially equipped to handle PCs, are wary of junk computer donations.)

    However, I *always* remove the hard disk drive, disassemble it, and give it the sledge hammer treatment. I just don't have the time to get them running again, and write the erase patterns to every track and sector.

    Maybe if there's ever a good, transparent, drive-level PGP available, I'll rethink this strategy, but until then, I put on the safety glasses and hammer away, after opening the drive case to expose the platters.

    Here's a sugesstion to drive manufacturers--make a convention where if certain pins on the IDE connector are jumpered together, and the drive powered up, it will do a low-level format automatically. Then I might choose to erase the disks, so long as I didn't have to hook them up to a computer and run a program.

    1. Re:I sledge them! by jasonditz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking of this, whatever happened to the BIOS lowlevel format option? My old Laser 386 allowed you to lowlevel format any of the harddrives through CMOS setup... it would seem like that's a pretty simple feature to add, and plenty useful.

    2. Re:I sledge them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM drives use platters made out of glass. Using glass is lighter. As an added bonus, when you strike them the platters shatter into very VERY thin and small shards.

      Also All IBM needs to do is include an explosive charge mounted to a pin inside the drive. Such an application would be perfect for the military. If you know your jet (or other equipment) is about to fall into the wrong hands, just set drive to "Self Distruct" and.... instantly you have a drive full of something like sand.

    3. Re:I sledge them! by kwalker · · Score: 1

      The reason for that is that each computer's BIOS will format the drive differently. I had a 486dx/33 with that option and I was actually able to use it to save a 170mb drive that my father had given me because his company said it was kaput. However when I tried to move that drive to another computer with a different BIOS, it threw up data errors left and right.

      The standard "IDE format" is BIOS agnostic so you can transport drives, and it doesn't cause problems with some cheap drives that (back when they took that option out) wouldn't read in ANY machine after a "BIOS-level format"..

      --
      Improvise, adapt, and overcome.
    4. Re:I sledge them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you have any 3D pictures of you sledging drives?

      Seriously, I've been a BIG fan of your low-budged 3D web movie work, and think that your 3D WebCam is the COOLEST thing I've seen on the web in a long time. Now if we could get good 3D pr0n

    5. Re:I sledge them! by ChocoboKnight · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen that feature in newer bioses, but as far as I've seen (which is not much), every Adaptec SCSI card has that feature.

    6. Re:I sledge them! by flonker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Back in the good old days, low level format actually did something. It rewrote the tracks and sectors on the platters. Nowadays, with high data density and whatnot, it's much more difficult to write the tracks and sectors, and special machinery is used to do so. The standard head isn't able to get enough accuracy.

    7. Re:I sledge them! by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Low level formats are a standard feature of SCSI drives tho, theyre far less standardized and reliable for IDE drives.
      Infact, the Amiga user manual used to warn you against low level formatting ide drives (the ide support in later amiga`s was presented to the OS via scsi emulation, so that existing scsi tools would work with it.. so the partitioning/formatting tool couldnt tell them apart)

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    8. Re:I sledge them! by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      You are talking about the low level format you could do on MFM and RLL drives, to get the interleave right. This was done by invoking the format program stored in the BIOS of your harddisk controller,
      most of the time it would the code would be at adress C0000 or C8000,
      C0000 = 784kb, thus well above the 640kb DOS used.
      with debug you could start running code at any memory address.
      After IDE and the 286 came along this was no longer necessairy, as the 286 was fast enough to work without interleave, and the harddisk BIOS was no longer a separate BIOS, but you could do your Harddisk settings in the normal BIOS, thus all HD's now ship with an interleave of 1, and you can no longer do a low level format on a drive.

      Adriaan

      also posted here:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=50351&c id=5057 672

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    9. Re:I sledge them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High density IDE drives generally can't be low-level formatted, so that BIOS option has been retired. iirc at densities used for the last decade or so, the drive isn't capable of laying down an accurate enough low-level format.It's done in the factory with special equipment, and the resulting low-level format can't be replaced. That's why a degaussed IDE drive is a doorstop forever after.

    10. Re:I sledge them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your partly right.

      With newer drives, calibration is achived with writing survo data to the actual platters themselves. Only survo data can be created or changed at the factory with special equipment (After the drives are put togeather, metal stickers are used to seal up the holes in various places used for the calibration machine). So when you hear the term "low level format" It's really nothing more then a mid level format. So don't worry about using utilites, you can't ruin the servo data.

      On a side note. Most referbished drives have had nothing done to them but have the servo data rewritten. Still, I personally would never buy one cause because you average user doesn't have the equipment to check for milage. (up-time that get's stored)

      Sorry for posting as AC, I'm just to damn lazy to setup an account. >;-)

  48. A lesson is "fully sanitizing your drive" by cscx · · Score: 2

    Always use one of these when installing a hard drive. That's sure to keep it sanitary.

  49. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep hoping for a moderation option like, "-1: Bitching about newsworthiness". Maybe this could be subsumed with a few other ideas into "-1: Whiner". :)

  50. RTFA by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you read the article you'll notice that many of the drives belonged to businesses; the CC#s were probably in customer lists. Now why was the parent modded "+5 insightful" rather than "-1 didn't RTFA"?

    1. Re:RTFA by ehiris · · Score: 2

      Because most likely nobody else read it.
      Are you surprised?

    2. Re:RTFA by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      The impression I got was that the CC numbers were on a hard drive out of an ATM (most are just running OS/2 or NT anyway)

      silly bank for using hardware level link encryption, then storing data locally in cleartext.

  51. Re:This is news? by unicron · · Score: 2

    What's sad is he didn't even HAVE to post a date, just say "there was this time".

    Homer: An F turns into a B so easily, you just got greedy.

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  52. Re:This is news? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    "Sun Microsystems was founded in 1982. And Linus didn't start Linux until 1991. What year was that again"

    -1, Bullshit? Heh.

  53. i didn't want to read about it when it _was_ news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nothing

  54. This is why I always mark my used drives... by achurch · · Score: 3, Funny
  55. I've always wanted to try this... by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

    But I want to know, HOW can I do this? Is there any free software that would let me read an HD after it's been reformatted?

    Actually, this reminds me of something I remember from playing with a 386 I have (well actually I destroyed it, but I still have the parts). When running a simple format c: from MS-DOS, it doesn't fully reformat, it leaves some files that can somehow be recovered, via a simple format switch. I wonder if that still works, with, say, the Win98 format tool.

    1. Re:I've always wanted to try this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's plenty of software that will do it if you don't mind shelling out a few bucks. Nearly all the tools have free demos that will let you see the names of the recoverable files.
      Just google "hard drive file recover". I'm pretty sure Powerquest is one company with these tools.

      Note that they only help if the data is still there. If it's been zeroed out, you're looking at dropping a wad of cash for some professionals to take the drive apart to get at the data.

    2. Re:I've always wanted to try this... by scubacuda · · Score: 1
      I've got some.

      If you e-mail me scubacuda & iname ) com

      I will send it to you. I've done it many, many times...

      The important thing to do is NOT install the software on the drive with the information you're trying to recover. Install it on another drive, then boot that fucked drive as a slave. E-mail me and I will hook you up with two very good programs.

    3. Re:I've always wanted to try this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try something like: strings /dev/hdb | less

    4. Re:I've always wanted to try this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Is there any free software that would let me
      > read an HD after it's been reformatted?
      http://www.freedos.org/freedos/softw are/lsm2html.c gi?file=base/unformat.lsm

    5. Re:I've always wanted to try this... by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you. It only works with /q but now that I think of it, the MS-DOS trick I spoke of only worked when the drive was formatted without the "full format" switch, whatever it was. The format command just had a different default.

      Or something. I'll try it, thanks.

  56. How NOT to do that.... by miketang16 · · Score: 1

    Luckily for me, I DO know the perils of non-secure deletion. Originally I used to use Evidence Eliminator, but that got too corporate, so now I use Eraser, a free open-source prog. Works great.. I use the 35 pass one... just to be safe... ;)

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
    1. Re:How NOT to do that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eraser is a great program. I also like.

      'Darik's Boot and Nuke' ("DBAN") is a self-contained linux boot floppy that securely wipes the hard disks of most computers. DBAN will automatically and completely delete the contents of any hard disk that it can detect, which makes it an appropriate utility for bulk or emergency data destruction.'

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/dban/

      Its always good to have a "boot and nuke" floppy for the day the black SUV's roll up.

  57. I just shoot mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I dont bother sanitizing them, squeezing or anything else. I just shoot them.

    They're great target practice when set up at 50 yards. Plus, they're rendered more or less ultra-highly unreadable, with half the platters coated in vaporized lead spall, and then with the platters dramatically warped, penetrated, stretched and shattered. Many areas are complete and totally lost, the ones that arent, would require precise magnetic microscopy to observe the actual state.

    These pictures were of a seagate 40mb eide, splashed with a 158grn jacketed hollowpoint in .357 magnum, after being accelerated to about 1700 fps from a Marlin 1894C lever-action carbine.

    1. Re:I just shoot mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Guns don't kill hard drives. People kill hard drives.

    2. Re:I just shoot mine. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      That rocks! I'll have to try something similar with 50 caliber BRI sabot slug out of my Winchester pump. Bet mine will be more unreadable than yours after that.

    3. Re:I just shoot mine. by WetCat · · Score: 1

      This is one of the good uses of a gun!

    4. Re:I just shoot mine. by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Can't you read?

      It said "Do not apply pressure to top cover!"

    5. Re:I just shoot mine. by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      It said "Do not apply pressure to top cover!"

      Yeah, watch out, you might damage it!

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    6. Re:I just shoot mine. by multiplexo · · Score: 1

      Cool. I'll have to try that. The problem is which gun to choose. I could use the .44 revolver or carbine, the .308 or my 10mm. At my old job we used to take the drives apart, cut the platters into four pieces with a bandsaw and then heat them until they were red hot with a blow torch, shooting them would have been much more fun.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    7. Re:I just shoot mine. by OldStash · · Score: 1

      I think we just discovered a new kind of Nerd(TM). I hereby name it "Red Pencil Neck"

    8. Re:I just shoot mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey - HE used an AK Assault Weapon!
      (look at the pictures)!


      I thought people wanted to ban such terroristic
      guns! The horror! Ban them now, think of the
      hard drives!

    9. Re:I just shoot mine. by hacker · · Score: 1
      Actually, no.

      The reason why this no longer works, is that it now takes less than a fingernail's sized chip of a hard drive platter to recover, say, 500 megabytes of data from the original drive itself, maybe more.

      With drive capacities getting larger and larger, and physical drive size getting smaller and smaller, you now no longer need to recover an entire platter to get prosecutable data in a large-enough bite to be useful. Just a small chip will do, and it's very easy to recover the data on the drive from that chip, microscopy or otherwise.

    10. Re:I just shoot mine. by Maeryk · · Score: 1

      These pictures [squeep.com] were of a seagate 40mb eide, splashed with a 158grn jacketed hollowpoint in .357 magnum, after being accelerated to about 1700 fps from a Marlin 1894C lever-action carbine.

      Amazing how much damage a lil piece of jacketed lead does, isnt it? I especially like how much penetration you get off the 7.62R rounds. (Im kinda partial.. I have two SKS', and a bolt action built on an old mauser action in 7.62R).

      WE have shot a number of computer parts.. HDD, floppys, cases, monitors (they are fun). But if you REALLY wanna have fun, find an old toilet and shoot that up. They throw up a HUGE cloud of smoke when you hit them, presumably from the vitreous china disintegrating en-masse.

      maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    11. Re:I just shoot mine. by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      and it's very easy to recover the data on the drive from that chip,

      Yeahhh...

      In fact, it's incredibly difficult to recover that data, for the same reasons.

      I've never read about or seen any sort of court case in which data was recovered this way. As far as I know, it's only a proposed method of data recovery.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:I just shoot mine. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Indeed the grandparent post doesn't seem to even BEGIN to comprehend how much noise there would be on something like electron microscope scan of a newest generation of hard drive, and how horribly expensive and time consuming it would be to try to extract the real information out of that.

      And that is assuming it hasn't been overwritten.

      I doubt you ever will see that court case, people won't pay billions of dollars to get piece of data, unless it's really something world-shattering...

    13. Re:I just shoot mine. by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "find an old toilet and shoot that up. "

      Don't destroy it - sell it! There's a burgeoning market for old 5 and 3.5 gallon per flush toilets.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    14. Re:I just shoot mine. by hacker · · Score: 1
      ...people won't pay billions of dollars to get piece of data, unless it's really something world-shattering...

      You're absolutely right, they won't pay billions, since the process costs only $7,000 to $10,000/drive to recover data from it.

      When I was working at [Largest Pharmeceutical Company in the World], we would regularly get requests from road-warriors who had damaged their laptop drives in irreparable ways, and had to have the data sent off for recovery, including drives that had been mistakenly formatted and used for months before it was realized that they contained data that was necessary for one process or another.

      The claim at the time (this was 1998/1999 timeframes) was that they could recover data up to 7 low-level formats deep, but anything beyond that was not guaranteed.

    15. Re:I just shoot mine. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      None of which was obviously _really_ irreparable?
      It's well known that some broken drives only have faulty electronics and can be fixed by replacing controller board with a part from another drive of some models, and recovery companies can obviously perform kludgery of same kind, but more demanding.

      I recently followed a usenet news story, somebody had a broken hard drive (40GB Maxtor, if I remember correctly) had taken his hd into one of those data recovery companies - they figured out it was one of those broken controller cases so they and the owner hunted for a replacement part for it, found one, and put it in. Now we had a perfectly working drive, but somehow it had corrupt maintenace track - it keeps calibration data or something there, so the drive still could not read itself. And what did they do next? Nothing, gave up. It was not possible to get anyt data at all out from a perfectly working hard drive with reasonable amount of work and/or money.

      You aren't giving any details so I have to guess that all of the drives were probably physically fine, not small fragments of platter you were so easily extracting data from? And if they broke in 1998/1999 when were they bought? Or more relevantly, how BIG were those?

      I'm no God so I may well be wrong, but if you've got news story or something about recovering data from physically broken hard drive in tens of gigabytes I'd like to see it.

      Formatting is a different story, as it doesn't overwrite data, and even long usage of that will leave some parts of the disk unwritten where the original data can be extracted.

    16. Re:I just shoot mine. by Dan+B. · · Score: 1

      I'm actually surprised how intact the drive was. Considering it's (relatively) sensitive computer equipment, it all looks rather unscathed by the hits.

      The 7.62 seems to have done it's usual and just punched a hole straight through, however a hell of a lot of the energy from the .357 seems to have been deflected. I guess that says something for the build quality of a Seagate drive (mechanically speaking).

      I remember a high school physics experiment I did once with a .357. The first round wasn't jacketed and the lead just sprayed off the target everywhere and almost destroyed the camera. The last round was a 250gn w/c and that was the end of the 'capture' device, as well as half the stand, and consequently, the experiment.

      --
      Dan. -- So what if it's spelt wrong, nobody's perfect
  58. It's not just hard drives by b1t+r0t · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A few years back I found some backup cartridge tapes (the big 4x6 kind) and a couple of tape drives at a Goodwill store. While there wasn't anything particularly useful on it, I could tell that it was the shell account machine used by half a dozen or so Ingres developers.

    No database code or data, just typical home directories and stuff. And they were running SCO, but boot blocks and stuff don't generally get written to tapes, so no chance of warezzing from it.

    I also snag SCSI hard drives and SyQuest cartridges when they show up for five bucks or less at thrift stores, since most of that is Mac stuff and I'm a Mac-head.

    Once I got a 6100 at a thrift store. I presume the owner stopped using it when the PRAM battery died. (When a 6100's PRAM battery dies, the video settings go with it, and unless you're using a fixed-frequency monitor, you get no video unless you hold down command-option-P-R. Looks like real bad a hardware problem when it's just the battery.) I could tell it was used by some college guy, studying to be a lawyer, I think.

    "Thrift store hard drives are like a box of chocolates... you never know what you'll find!"

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  59. Not so fast my friend. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2

    You can move the platters to another drive mechanism and read the data in that manner. There have been several articles on this very topic (for those who don't have data that is so critical it's worth $1000s to recover but it's still worth a shot).

    I'd look them up but it's willy's time from 6-6:30.

  60. I love it when companies toss pc's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather companies toss computers in the trash can, that way i get 'em for free. I filled me entire appartment full of computer hardware from computer shops and businesses trash back in the day before the great fall of the pc repair shops. Now adays, the people who used to repair computers now toss pizzas and flip burgers. Thank you "Computers new and used" i wish you still existed. You had the best dumpster in town. Or make that dumpsters, since you moved 3 or 4 times, each time getting smaller and smaller, then poof!

  61. in the cccp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hot boss works under you.

  62. Who's Bill? by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    I have a sneaking suspicion but...

    Whoa! That's one pissed off female!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:Who's Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's redundant

  63. who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has it occurred to you that this has nothing whatsoever to do with the story?

    moron.

  64. yeah right by adamruck · · Score: 1

    "Garfinkel has learned his lesson. As an undergrad at MIT in the 1980s, he failed to sanitize his own hard drive before returning a computer to his father. His father was able to read his personal journal."

    yeah right.. who the hell keeps a journal on there computer?

    journal *cough* *cough* porn

    --
    Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
    1. Re:yeah right by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      All the computer porn from the 80s was on Commodore tapes, which you don't need to worry about removing the data from, the passage of time doing it for you :)

      In mid 1980s, there were XTs and ATs, with CGA or EGA monitors. No BMP, GIF or JPEG. Mmm a 16 color PCX file!

    2. Re:yeah right by toasterlizard · · Score: 1

      :: yeah right.. who the hell keeps a journal on there computer?

      I do. Am I totally alone? I thought alot of geek-types, if they kept journals, kept them on their computer. Especially if they own a laptop. :]

      This is not a sig. :]

    3. Re:yeah right by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well, not to mention the amiga with 4096 colors in the same resolution as original VCD`s/mpeg.. looks ok from a distance on a tv set.. and i`m sure MIT had some high end machines which could do 1280*1024 in 24bit... i`m sure SGI made such hardware in the 80`s

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:yeah right by Flounder · · Score: 2, Funny
      yeah right.. who the hell keeps a journal on there computer?

      If it's good enough for Doogie Howser, it's good enough for me.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    5. Re:yeah right by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      True enough I guess ;) I work as a sysadmin at a university. I've got records of people using a $250k SGI Onyx to browse porn ;>

    6. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been meaning to ask this... What the hell is Doogie Howser doing kicking around the Galaxy with MacGyver, anyways? He's too young for gate travel.

    7. Re:yeah right by zx-6e · · Score: 1
      I keep mine on someone else's computer for safe keeping!

      Long live LiveJournal!

  65. this is also a problem for warranty. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have had 2 drives fail well within the warranty period, and did not return them for just this reason.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:this is also a problem for warranty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have had 2 drives fail well within the warranty period, and did not return them for just this reason.

      Pete Townshend, is that you??

      Regards,
      Scotland Yard.

    2. Re:this is also a problem for warranty. by Flounder · · Score: 1
      I have had 2 drives fail well within the warranty period, and did not return them for just this reason.

      When my IBM Deskstar 75GXP gave out, I didn't have a problem returning it to IBM. Since it was only 1/4 of a 4 disk RAID0 array, anything they recovered, they'd only get 1/4 of it. Besides, I never keep stuff like credit card numbers or bank info on the PC. That's what my Palm is for, and we all know how secure the encryption is on those.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    3. Re:this is also a problem for warranty. by Cyberdyne · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have had 2 drives fail well within the warranty period, and did not return them for just this reason.

      This is a big problem for DoD-type datacenters; for non-classified (as in "this stuff shouldn't get out") stuff, they open the disk up, sand-blast the platters to remove the magnetic material, then return the carcass to the manufacturer for a warranty claim. For the really secret stuff (as in "people will die if this stuff gets out"), they just destroy the disk completely, then buy a new drive.

      Of course, if you kept all the data on the disk encrypted, you'd be fairly safe, but once you're making a warranty claim, the disk probably isn't working well enough for you to wipe using 'dd'...

      Speaking of 'dd': Beware of sector remapping. Any sectors on the disk which the firmware has marked 'bad' won't be touched by any user-level command - and those 'bad' sectors could still be recovered if they open the disk up. For most people, 'leaking' a couple of sectors wouldn't be the end of the world, but for (say) VISA's customer records, there are probably a couple of valid CC numbers and other info in those sectors...

    4. Re:this is also a problem for warranty. by klparrot · · Score: 1
      I have had 2 drives fail well within the warranty period, and did not return them for just this reason.

      dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/disk has been mentioned several times as a way to wipe a disk. What information do you have on there that's so confidential that a pass (or several passes) with dd won't suffice? Seems like a waste of money to not take advantage of your warranty.

    5. Re:this is also a problem for warranty. by mr.+roboto · · Score: 1

      If the drive is dead (i.e. it won't spin up), you're not going to be able to write anything to it, not even random bits.

    6. Re:this is also a problem for warranty. by klparrot · · Score: 1
      If the drive is dead (i.e. it won't spin up)

      Whoops, guess I didn't have my brain in straight. I was thinking back a couple months ago, we had to send my girlfriend's Fujitsu HD in under warranty, because it was intermittently not being recognized. Disk was probably fine, interface was a bit shot, though, I guess. We still managed to mirror and wipe it when it did come up okay one time.

    7. Re:this is also a problem for warranty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since HD warranties are usually voided when you open them, I have a hard time believing your claim about unclassified drives being sandblasted and sent back for warranty claim. And besides, if the data were considered such that "this stuff shouldn't get out" as you say, it would be classified at least Confidential, and probably Secret or higher. In which case, it's not unclassified, duh.

      I work for a defense contractor and we always replace unclassified drives that go bad under warranty. Even if it's unclassified, there may be competition-sensitive data on it, so we do our best to wipe/scrub it, or evaluate whether it's too risky to send back.

      For classified systems, the dead drives just end up in a pile, never to be removed from the classified area. You just have to eat the cost of a new drive in that case. It's a real pain in the ass to get even dead drives declassified, so it's not even worth it for us to melt them down or whatever. Each classified area just has its own computer parts graveyard where old things sit til the end of time. :)

    8. Re:this is also a problem for warranty. by volve · · Score: 1

      Companies such as Dell have a warranty policy whereby if you have a dead drive and the tech comes out to replace it, you tell them that the drive is classed 'confidential' they will destroy it onsite for you. This is done after the drive is confirmed dead of course, but they do give you the satisfaction of not losing money or data... :) -VolVE

  66. Hard drives!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn! I just spent the last 4 years going through 1,487,932 floppy disks to find credit card details and someone goes and does it with hard drives!?

    Never thought of that...

  67. Data encryption by ehiris · · Score: 1

    Keeping a private key in a chip, which won't lose it (maybe 2 for redundancy) and having chips dedicated to encryption and decryption before hard drive operations could be a solution.

    Based on a previous article the data can be retrieved at the molecular level even if you overwrote it very many times. If you really want to protect your data like your customer's credit card numbers just don't ever write it plain text onto a magnetic disk.

    1. Re:Data encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SARCASM ON

      But that would be DRM/Palladium conspiracy, just like what Transmeta did!

      SARCASM OFF

  68. Data on Drives by sparkhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was it Pete Townshend's drive?

  69. Re:All Saddam's email are belong to us! by hazem · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I was in the army, we decommissioned a whole bunch of those old hard-drives with 8" platters. We took them apart, removed each platter and and used a belt sander to destroy the surfaces. The sanded platters were then sent to a facility on base that would melt them down.

    The bodies of the drives were mostly magnesium, and I came away with about $250 from the scrap metal dealer.

    Of course, who knows what I breathed by sanding those platters...

  70. Scary Thought by Sayten241 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So even if I take all the steps necessary to make sure my data is safe on my computer, odds there is a business throwing away hardrives that have my data on them without properly removing all the data? Wow, I can't believe this isn't a hotter topic. I also wonder how this affects certain websites privacy statements. Sure, they don't give your information away intentionally, but they may give away a harddrive full of personal data without even realizing it.

  71. Right Where It Hurts by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

    At the very end of the article:
    Garfinkel has learned his lesson. As an undergrad at MIT in the 1980s, he failed to sanitize his own hard drive before returning a computer to his father. His father was able to read his personal journal.

    Ouch.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  72. $1000s to recover?!? by GMontag · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No thanks, I will stick to USENET for my porn, thank you verry much!

    1. Re:$1000s to recover?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could always charge it to all the credit card numbers you get.

  73. This is why... by russh347 · · Score: 1

    I open up my old drives, remove the magnets, and bore holes in the remains with a 30-06. The magnets are powerful, I truly enjoy boring holes that way, and my data is secure. It's a win, win, win situation.

    1. Re:This is why... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      I hope you use genuine Winchester ammo.

    2. Re:This is why... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Except you LOSE the potential money you could have gained from selling the drive on ebay, so its just a win win, assuming a lose cancels out a win

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:This is why... by tkg · · Score: 1

      A clay pigeon launcher and a 12 guage work on the platters as well. Lots of fun!

  74. That's fake, bud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    See
    http://www.videopremiereawards.com/HTMLNews/News IC anStillTell.html

  75. What about STOLEN computers? by silvaran · · Score: 1

    They're a hot item in some parts... Break in somewhere, grab whatever you can (maybe one guy grabs the case, the other grabs the monitor) and high-tail it out of whereever you stole it from. Friends of ours across the street had their house broken into (sadly, they forgot to arm their house alarm).

    Anyways, not only did they steal their computer, but they stole their car. Repeat offenders like this likely don't need all the hardware they've stolen, so, much like stripping a car, they would be inclined to strip the computer for the parts and just sell the parts. They obviously don't care what data is on the hard drives.

    Does this call for password-protected encrypted hard drives? Maybe a loopback device in Linux? I don't know much about it, but the only post-protection you may have against theft may be to plan for the theft initially -- right on the hard drive.

    1. Re:What about STOLEN computers? by shepd · · Score: 1

      I've said it before, I'll say it again:

      If you won't let people see your data, put it on removable media.

      They make hard-drive caddies for exactly this reason. They're very cheap. Just take the HDD out when you're done, and put it somewhere secure.

      Problem solved without encryption.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:What about STOLEN computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... do you work as an IT manager or something?

    3. Re:What about STOLEN computers? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Actually ripping old computers apart, especially servers with lots of cards and scsi disks.. is often more profitable than selling them as complete machines.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:What about STOLEN computers? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Uh... do you work as an IT manager or something?

      No, but thanks for the compliment. It's always nice to be told you're actually more intelligent than the letters after your name would lead one to believe. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  76. a few minutes with tomsrtbt by g4dget · · Score: 5, Informative
    Erasing your disks before selling your PC is easy:
    • Get out your favorite Linux installer CD or download a copy of Tom's RTBT and write it to floppy or CD-R.
    • Boot from the floppy or CD.
    • Log in as root.
    • Run dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda to erase the master drive on the primary IDE controller (/dev/hdb etc. for the remaining disks)
    That's all. It erases all the blocks normally accessible by the disk controller and is probably safe enough for most people. Bad blocks that have been replaced may still contain a little bit of data, and inter-track data may be recoverable by analog means.
    1. Re:a few minutes with tomsrtbt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Run dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda to erase the master drive on the primary IDE controller (/dev/hdb etc. for the remaining disks)

      Good enough for casual snoopers, but not good enough for someone who Really Wants To Know. Just covering with zeroes still leaves residual mag signatures on the drive of the 'underlying' bits, and those residuals can be read by someone with the right kind of drive heads.

      You really want to be sure, source from /dev/urandom and do the dd a couple of times.

    2. Re:a few minutes with tomsrtbt by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      You call that easy? Just run Eraser. It makes a boot floppy that overwrites the disk with a 36-pass Guttmann code. Look, ma, no data!

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    3. Re:a few minutes with tomsrtbt by kerling · · Score: 1

      Erhm ..
      You are forgetting one thing. If you write zero's to the disk it's much easer to retreave the data.

      Also by writing noise to the harddrive you can still get the info back. Just by selecting a faint signal and ignoring all the stronger ones that make up the noise.

      When your credit card doesnt work. Place it in a plasting bag and try again. You will be suprised. The strip on your card is electromagnetic like your hard drive. So the same method will work on the harddrive.

  77. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be his father. Fuck doesn't anyone like this guy?!

  78. ahhhhh nothing like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...nothing like my system that will self destruct if you don't enter the right password in 30 seconds. It used to be less but one time I was drunk and I barely got back in.

    requirements:

    1 computer (add any hardware you want
    1 power UPS built inside of the case
    1 case welded shut
    3 bars of magnesium
    various circuits and ignitors (if you can't figure it out I can't help you)

    watch out it will burn a hole through your floor.

  79. Big deal, what does this have to do with Ninnle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Especially if it's not related to Ninnle Linux!

  80. This does not surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now for or something really scary.
    I run a computer shop in the southeastern United States, much of my work involves the local school systems.
    Several years ago (Long before 9-11) a local school received a donation of several pallets of computers, monitors, printers, and other equipment from a local military installation. The donation was properly processed through the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service (DRMS) and should have been cleared of any sensitive materiel.
    I was contracted by the school to take the entire load and build as many working systems as I could out of the parts. As I begin to put systems together and power them up I was staggered by the fact that at least half of the hard drives were FULLY intact and no attempt at all had been made to remove sensitive data.
    I of course had to take a closer look. Much of the data concerned simple day to day non-sensitive routine base operations (I am x-military so much of it was familiar to me). HOWEVER on one of the intact drives I found something that KNOCKED MY SOCKS OFF! Setting there on that hard drive spinning on my work bench was pile of data concerning the moving of NUCLEAR weapons and other nuclear materials and conventional weapons around the United States. The data contained information such as routes, schedules, manifests, and duty rosters. I WAS DUMBSTRUCK. How could this have happened? This drive should never have left a controlled area, EVER, it should have been destroyed. This was inexcusable!
    Of course in a situation such as this all manner of thoughts go though your head. Thoughts such as; What kind of damage could a enemy of the U.S. do with this data. What would this data be worth to someone unethically inclined. If they knew I saw this data they would probably lock me up and throw away the key just for good measure, and of course WHAT SHOULD I DO WITH THIS DATA?
    In the end I destroyed the hard drive and the data it contained and kept my mouth shut. That has been at least 8 or 9 years ago and until this day I have never told anyone and thank God that due to the passage of time I have forgotten most of the particulars of the data I saw.

    1. Re:This does not surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not fiction. I've had something like that happen at least 3 times. S__t happens, things slip through the cracks. 3 instances of finding sensitive data may sound like a lot but I've been working in the computer industry for allmost 30 years, so maybe not to bad. If you come accross something like that you should contact the F.B.I. so that a potential security hole can be closed. Do so as soon as you realize what you have, reading classified material is illegal.

    2. Re:This does not surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure... reading it is illegal and not possesing the info is illegal... of course the information was obtained legally it can't be all that classified now can it? Even if it was error? Just something to ponder in the post-9-11 anti-rights era... which may be good or it could be bad. Only time can tell.

    3. Re:This does not surprise me at all. by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      Well, during my legal 14 month period at army in the train regiment, I can tell you that route of whatever weapon is not a secret information and less top secret. They are just sensitive. Sensitive information is not secret, but if you shut your mouth up it is better. The top secret information is codes to activate them, codes to enter in the silo... The top secret information with weapons is not where they are and how they move, but how to use them...
      You can clear your conscience about that, you will be not killed to have get access to this information :-)

    4. Re:This does not surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now all that's left is data-mining your brain ;)

    5. Re:This does not surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      What did you say your address was again?

    6. Re:This does not surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please remain where you are. We are sending some gentlemen to discuss the issue with you.

    7. Re:This does not surprise me at all. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      You didn't do enough.

      Soon as you saw that kind of sensitive data, you should have alerted the military. Sure, you would have had to go through a debriefing, but more importantly it would have given them a chance to correct the procedural flaw that allowed the information to get into your hands in the first place.

      As it stands, the same kinds of idiots are probably STILL working in DRMS, and sending out top-secret data to organizations like yours. Sooner or later someone WILL sell that information to our enemies.

      I can't blame you for taking the actions you did, as back when it happened the idea of a terrorist attack within US borders was inconceivable, but if this ever happens to anyone reading now I hope they will behave properly.

    8. Re:This does not surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > WHAT SHOULD I DO WITH THIS DATA?
      >
      Post it here. Would give a whole new meaning to the "Slashdot Effect"...:-)

    9. Re:This does not surprise me at all. by M-G · · Score: 1

      Half the time, even when there are good policies in place, they don't always work. When I lived in Tulsa, I'd always go to the city's surplus auction. Usually tons of computers, mostly too old to be terribly useful, but sometimes some good stuff, like when they got rid of all their NeXTs.

      So a bunch of us are poking around at the various systems, and discovering that none of them have any RAM left. This was puzzling, as we couldn't understand what they would want with 5 more more year old RAM out of a PS/2.

      After some asking around, we were told that the city's policy was to remove the memory from surplus computers. I have to think that the intention was that the hard drives would be removed or blanked, but the policy said 'memory' and some drone was dutifully following the policy.
      The hard drives weren't even so much as reformatted.

    10. Re:This does not surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for DRMS several years ago and our policy was to remove all HDs from all computers and smash them. Don't know how long ago they instated that policy. Maybe the feds learned their lesson with you when they heard you talking on the phone with your wife about it. But, since you decided to spread the info to all these commies on /., I am going to have to call the boys over at DSA. Sorry.

  81. Once got some old computers... by jerkychew · · Score: 1

    ... From a potential customer. We paid him a visit, trying to get him to use our consultation services. On the way out he asked if we could dispose of some old puters for him. We said sure.

    Brought 'em home and fired them up. Lo and behild, there were all of his Quicken files (no passwords) from the previous fiscal year. You'd think that somebody that takes in half a million in revenue per year would know better...

    1. Re:Once got some old computers... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Which is nodoubt why he asked your consulting firm to dispose of them, rather than just disposing of them with all the other garbage.. he was assuming you would do the data destruction for him.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  82. Zero your data by TheRIAAMustDie · · Score: 1

    It's been said before.. zero your data. Up to 7 times if you feel safer.

    Jaguar (Mac OS X 10.2) will do this with the built-in Disk Utility.

    --

    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. it's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:Zero your data by Necronomicant · · Score: 1

      Windows 2000/XP/.NET can do this with the built in cipher utility.

      cipher /w:pathname

      All done, nice and zeroed.

  83. yeah...ummm by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    so why doesw the pentagon not sell all their computers again?

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:yeah...ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do sell some of them... they donate others to charity.

      I did some work on donated USN and USAF computers and there was all kinds of shit that they just left on the drives - no one even attempted to delete it. Given the kinds of stuff left on there I was shocked that they even donated the drives in the first place.

    2. Re:yeah...ummm by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      realy? I heard that they just stock piled them in a warehouse...go figure.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:yeah...ummm by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      When the government auctions off their old decomissioned computer equipment, they remove the hard drives and sell the remnants.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  84. Nothing Special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found 'sensitive' material on Air Force and Navy computers that were donated to educational programs... after we returned the drives they started microwaving the damn things.

  85. Hospital and Data Policy... by revcorrupt · · Score: 1

    At the Hospital I work at, we have a very strict policy about old hard drives, tapes and optical disks. The policy states:
    Hard drives must be demagnetized and physically destroyed before disposal (sledge hammer).
    Tapes and Optical Disks must be destroyed by incineration.

    Need I say more? Hour hospital has pretty good policy about data going outside the premises of the hospital, however their security administrator for the inside network is not very good. Guess that's what you get when you someone an important job like this and give him 40,000$ less than the industry standard salary.

  86. One business...one disk....5000 customers by djupedal · · Score: 1

    = 5000 credit card numbers...this kind of math too hard for you people?

  87. shred(1) will securely delete files by jrstewart · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not enough to write 0's to remove traces of a file. Writing random patterns is much better and for older drives you can even do better than random (i.e. more erasing in less passes). The shred(1) command from the GNU fileutils will take care of this for you in Unix-alikes.

    http://btr0xw.rz.uni-bayreuth.de/cgi-bin/manpage s/ shred/1

    See also http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_ del.html for an informative paper about the details of how secure deletion works.

    1. Re:shred(1) will securely delete files by Nintendork · · Score: 1

      you want to do it several times over and that takes a LOT of time.

    2. Re:shred(1) will securely delete files by jbrandon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most recent GNU/Linux distros use Ext3, so shred won't work:

      $ man shred

      [snip]

      CAUTION: Note that shred relies on a very important assumption: that the filesystem overwrites data in place. This is the traditional way to do things, but many modern filesystem designs do not satisfy this assumption. The following are examples of filesystems on which shred is not effective:

      * log-structured or journaled filesystems, such as those supplied with AIX and Solaris (and JFS, ReiserFS, XFS, Ext3, etc.)

      [snip]

    3. Re:shred(1) will securely delete files by jrstewart · · Score: 1

      by default shred overwrites the file 25 times. This is only the sort of thing you'd want to do with sensitive data, or just before tossing the harddrive (shred /dev/hda will shred the whole drive).

      It reportedly takes about 20 minutes to shred a 1.44 mb floppy, though of course it can write at a faster rate on a hard drive.

      There are other limitations to shred but if you do it to an entire disk before you toss it you can have a reasonable expecation of security.

      (btw a better link to the shred documentation)

    4. Re: shred(1) will securely delete files by Antity · · Score: 1

      mmh, the "CAUTION" passus is not included in my man shred(1) from fileutils.

      However, it is included in the .info texinfo page.

      I really hate it when important info is hidden from the casual reader. (And the standard info(1) reader sucks like hell - pinfo(1) is one of the first things I install on a fresh system.)

      Regarding ext3: If you really need it and you have root priviledges, remount as ext2, shred, and remount as ext3.

      --
      42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
    5. Re:shred(1) will securely delete files by juhaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would I want to do it several times?

      If someone is willing to toss millions of dollars into getting something out of my only-once-overwritten drive, then they are perfectly welcome to do so.

      Indeed, if someone is willing to give out that kind of money, they are welcome to give it to me and I give them that drive in perfect working order and all data fully readable without special tools!

    6. Re:shred(1) will securely delete files by spydir31 · · Score: 1

      I personally suggest THC's secure_delete toolkit, which works very nicely for me.
      it uses Peter Guttman's deletion algorithm and happilly scrubs file, free block, swap and memory

    7. Re:shred(1) will securely delete files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thus a single file on Ext3 filesystem can't be securely removed using shred, but you can shred /dev/hda when you're getting rid of your hd.

  88. FYI: HOWTO: Secure HD for Donation or Disposal. by dameron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Backup all important data to both magnetic and optical media (another HD/tape -and- cd/dvd).

    Re-format HD using the NTFS file system if the drive is larger than 2 GB, otherwise install NT Server from the earliest available service pack.

    Install Windows NT 4 Server, apply service patch 6. Make sure you use a meaningless administrator password.

    Upgrade MS Internet Information Server to version 4.0 from NT Option Pack. Create a default web site using the following as the index page (*.htm, *.html, *.shtml):

    Why are Chinese, Dutch, German, and Russian Hackers So Homosexual?"

    Chinese, hackers, IIS rules, Counterstrike, Dutch, mothers, US ALL THE WAY, Germany sucks, script kiddie, porn, pr0n, disable X10 ads, warez, firewall, Bill Clinton, rar, zip, romz, roms, direct downloads, Long Live Pakistan, How do I secure III?, index of, Ronald Reagan Library

    Boot the HD in a computer with an internet connection.

    Wait about four days.

    Repeat the process three times.

    Reformat the drive.

    Donate/Discard.

    Hey, at least it won't have -YOUR- important data on it.

    -dameron

  89. What about RAM? by n3rd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At a former employer who will remain nameless they had secure areas. To get in you needed a clearance and if you didn't have a full government clearance all of the people in there would power off their boxes until you left. You were also constantly watched and doing sysadmin stuff in there was an adventure because they could do whatever they wanted since they weren't hooked up to the regular network.

    When they moved some of these labs all of the equipment was shrinkwrapped and escorted to the new location to prevent tampering while in transit.

    I think I had something to say. Oh yeah. Ok, when hard drives and backup tapes got old they had to format them X number of times (I forgot the exact number), then physically smash them and then burn the remains. All in a secure manner (ie: not taking them to the local Springfile Tire Fire).

    Anywho, a friend of mine had to replace RAM from one of their Suns, and I went with him. They let us leave with the RAM and didn't think twice about it. 2 or 3 minutes after we left my friend realized he may be able to take the RAM and actually read the data off of it somehow, assuming it was still saved.

    Perhaps this could be applied to other things including external processor caches and VRAM as well.

    1. Re:What about RAM? by andfarm · · Score: 1

      As RAM stores data with capacitors, it loses its contents within a few refresh periods. For example, 150ns RAM would lose its contents entirely in <450ns. VRAM and processor caches are usually even faster. No way you're going to recover anything from THAT...

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

    2. Re:What about RAM? by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

      2 or 3 minutes after we left my friend realized he may be able to take the RAM and actually read the data off of it somehow, assuming it was still saved.

      Excuse me for interrupting, but would you consider it rude... if I called you, your friend, and the person who modded your post up, all boneheads?

      ;-) I mean no offense, really... I'm sure you meant to say "ROM" or "Flash RAM" or something...?

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    3. Re:What about RAM? by kylegordon · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can recover data from that. It involves a scanning electron microscope though, and reading every bit of data individually.

      As the storage capacitor flips state, the electromagnetic field that forms at its junction stresses the thin oxide layer around the junction, and stresses it even more the longer the data is held for. This feature can last for a few hours at least, it all depends on how long you have just stored your data for. The only way that you can really prevent this from occurring is to implement continuous bit-flipping in memory.

      Read Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory if you don't believe me.

    4. Re:What about RAM? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Get your hands on a microcomputer that will let you turn off the refresh on a bank of DRAM. Fill the DRAM with some recognizable data and turn off the refresh. You will be surprised at how long it takes for the data to disappear. You can see recognizable chunks of data, interspersed with garbage, in the DRAM for several minutes. If you have sophisticated equipment, there are voltage shifts in the output of the DRAM cells that last even longer.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    5. Re:What about RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am sorry, but you do not know what you are talking about. You can recover data from SRAM and DRAM ... well after it has been powered off!

      Take a look at this paper or this posting for examples.

      No offense implied either. I just thought you might like to reconsider your opinion on this topic.

  90. The proper way by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny
    Idiots!

    Everyone knows you must write zeros over old drives 137 times, then bulk erase them then dip them in acid, smash them to teeny tiny bits, incorporate those bits into construction concrete for buildings on three separate continents and only then your data will be safely gone.

    Though there is this one data recovery firm in Wisconsin that can get data off the drive even after all that...

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  91. Random Bit Overwrite by akamoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    US DoD Spec: 3 passes
    German DoD Spec: 7 passes

    (from http://www.ontrack.com/library/dataeraser.pdf)

    -- R

    1. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pete Townsend Spec: 10 passes, with 2 boys!

      Important Stuff:

      Please try to keep posts on topic.
      Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

    2. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone tell my why there has to be numerous random-bit passes when one could do something like this:

      dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda bs=512

      What's wrong with just zeroing out the drive once?

    3. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 1

      I guess the real question is: What in the hell are those Germans hiding?

    4. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by Scaba · · Score: 1
      US DoD Spec: 3 passes
      German DoD Spec: 7 passes

      It's no wonder the Germans won the war

    5. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by jareds · · Score: 2

      A hard drive is not an abstract mathematical entity. A 0 written over a 0 is magnetically distinguishable from a 0 written over a 1.

    6. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Informative


      Can anyone tell my why there has to be numerous random-bit passes when one could do something like this:
      dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda bs=512
      What's wrong with just zeroing out the drive once?

      Say the child porn file has a one bit and a zero bit. You overwrite it with two zero bits. The magnetic domains where the one bit was are presumably weaker or smaller because they were flipped, not reinforced like the zero bit domains. Of course the drive's read head itself won't be useful for extracting this information, because it's only designed to determine the last bit written by the write head- a binary zero/one determination. But with special equipment you can measure domain strengths carefully, and pull more information than a single bit out of them. You can tell which domains were flipped by the zero-out process and which were reinforced. (Of course this is a simplification because each bit is composed of multiple domains.)

      So there are a few trivially obvious considerations when writing an erasing program-

      -Don't write zeroes, write ones and zeroes.
      -Go in more than one pass. A single pass leaves the bits in 4 possible states- (0,0), (0,1), (1,0), and (1,1) (where (c,r) are the child-porn and random-overwrite bits, respectively). An attacker can in theory tell all four states apart by close physical examination, so he knows c. Two passes (c,r1,r2) leaves 8 possible states- (0,0,0), (0,0,1), (0,1,0), (0,1,1), (1,0,0), (1,0,1), (1,1,0), and (1,1,1). Now the attacker's equipment needs more than twice as much precision, because some of them, like (0,0,1) and (1,0,1), are starting to look physically similar. 10 passes leaves 1024 possible domain states, many of which are indistinguishable.
      -Writing zeroes over the file ten times is much better than writing zeroes over it once, but still leaves it in one of only four possible states. (Which are admittedly harder to tell apart, but you never know.)
      -Do not allow the content of the file you're erasing to influence your decision of what bits to overwrite it with. You avoid a whole class of problems this way.
      -Be aware that when you are writing random numbers, you are actually encrypting, not erasing, the file. The seed you used for your random number generator becomes a key for decrypting the file (given special equipment).
      -You want to prevent the attacker from knowing what bits you wrote and in what order you wrote them. You will favor erasure over encryption if you can continually introduce entropy into the process. But entropy is scarce in most software environments. The variations in the timings of the drive's mechanical movements, ping responses from remote servers, mouse movements, and keypresses are well-known sources.
      -Don't use a lousy random number generator. There are many ways for a random number generator to be bad. The simplest type produces numbers where n-tuples fall on a regular lattice when plotted in n dimensions. Generators like that are used a lot in scientific and graphics applications, but have no business being in security applications. If an attacker gains access to a few of the numbers in the generator's sequence, he can predict the rest of the sequence. They also loop after generating 2^N numbers.
      -If applying this process to a single file, hide the size of the file.
      -Ideally you should hide all traces of the file's existence. This means clean up after yourself by writing zeroes in the last several passes, so that even the domain randomness is physically removed (its presence implies that something was erased).

    7. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      US DoD Spec: 3 passes. German DoD Spec: 7 passes

      Seems reasonable. The US government is worried about spies from 'rogue states' whose available technology is in inverse proportion to their available sand. Everyone else is worried about spies from the US. Naturally, therefore, they're a bit more thorough about deletion...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by DohDamit · · Score: 1

      How about a 1 written over a 1 versus a 1 written over a 0? Are they different?

    9. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by numark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And then you got Guttman deletion, which uses 35 passes, each of which, when combined together, basically flips the bits so much that the data is really unrecoverable. It's even designed to get around caching and the various encoding standards for hard drives.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    10. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the census used 9 passes for its drives.

    11. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by Suidae · · Score: 1

      The magnetic domains where the one bit was are presumably weaker or smaller because they were flipped, not reinforced like the zero bit domains

      Also note that the head positioning within the track is an analog process. Each time a particular track is written, there will be small sidebands that are not overwritten, providing more clues as to the previous data. Research indicates that multiple sidebands are present, each containing information about previous writes,

    12. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Germans probably just use their new microwave

      Seats 500.

    13. Re:Random Bit Overwrite by root+66 · · Score: 1

      > What in the hell are those Germans hiding? ...that we have some norms and standards for just about anything :)

      --
      -- I love the smell of Blue Screens in the morning.
  92. It's called "free publicity" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put a link on Slashdot, along with a bogus story about how it's relevant to the current topic, and watch the traffic roll in.

  93. happens a lot by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I have a friend that is high up in the IT dept for a large resteraunt chain.
    They bought a lot of used computers and found all kinds of crap on those things - largely very strange porn.

    I can recall the research group my dad was in when he was getting his phd at VA Tech - this was back when disks were the wider floppy ones - the huge ass ones, and then the revolutionary 5.25 ones (eventually everyone was astounded by those 3.5s).
    Well, they needed disks and they found a place to get them cheap - by the hundreds. A few of the guys decided to check the disks prior to writing over them, and sure enough, tons of info on there.
    No porn since there weren't really jpgs and such back then on the 8088s (but once CGA came out on the 286, I recall an amazing strip poker game).
    They were nice and called the place selling these disks and let them know that there was still a lot of data on them. Lots of software and business data.

    I've only had one hard drive die on me so far (with a wonderful *SPROING* sound) - I promptly tore it open and marveled at the shiny surfaces inside (and my cut hands from tearing it open).

    but if I ever do sell a drive, I'm definitely going to fill it up with Pete Townsend porn.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:happens a lot by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Trust me - no one wants to see Pete Townsend nekkid

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  94. Re:This is news? by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

    Hey, hey, God^H^H^HBowie didn't say that the event occurred in 1979.

  95. Computer porn in 1979... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was pretty much relegated to ASCII versions of Raquel Welch that printed on five feet of continuous feed paper in a dot matrix.

    About as pathetic as using a cell phone for porn...

    1. Re:Computer porn in 1979... by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      [Computer porn in 1979] [W]as pretty much relegated to ASCII versions of Raquel Welch that printed on five feet of continuous feed paper in a dot matrix.

      Yeah, but with a print-out, you could just throw out whatever got, uh, "messy".

  96. Use encryption such as Linux Crypto API by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because I pretty much run my life by computer I end up with all kinds of info on my computer. And it is for this reason that I use the Linux Crypto API (formerly the international kernel patch). I have an encrypted volume (a big file which gets mounted on loopback fs) on my machine where I keep any sensitive information including all of my email once it has been read. Every so often I mount it, copy the stuff in, and unmount it. It works great and is so easy to use that I actually use it. The only chance someone has of catching sensitive information is if they get it before I copy it into the encrypted volume (passwords, keys, company private data, etc. all go straight in) or if they can somehow recover it from the raw device from when it was written in cleartext. My disk has enough activity and accidentally fills up often enough that I'm not too worried. It's not like I'm protecting national secrets or anything.

  97. That Rarely Works Any More by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    At today's densities, all drives have many many bad sectors that are mapped out in a sector translation ROM on the drive's logic board and no two are the same. Swap boards and it's almost always lights out. I guess you could swap the ROM if you can identify it and have the right surface mount rework tools.

    1. Re:That Rarely Works Any More by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

      Just curious, at what density would you say it will not work past? I have done the pcb swap on a couple 40GB drives, and I was able to recover the data.

    2. Re:That Rarely Works Any More by Herkules · · Score: 0

      I thought that infomation was writen to the disk (why use a rom when you have a 40gig disk).

      --
      CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
    3. Re:That Rarely Works Any More by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's another good point that this article doesn't mention:

      If you have a HD that has sectors that go bad, many HDs (or operating systems) will mark the block as bad and off-limits so it doesn't get used any more.

      This of course poses a problem with most "erase" type programs, as there may not be a way that the eraser can override either the operating system "bad block" mark, or the drive's "bad block" internal mapping.

      If something critical happens to be in a block marked bad on the HD, there may not be any way to securely erase it 100% via software and you'd need to destroy it physically.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    4. Re:That Rarely Works Any More by packeteer · · Score: 2

      The process of locating bad sectors is done dynamically. Bad sectors just appear after manufacturing and all kinds of things happen before it gets to you. A modern drive is made with "extra" space where it translated bad sectors to so that you dont feel conned by losing data space. Personally i would rather have that extra space and deal with the bad sectors since not all of the "extra" space is taken BUT because of the marketing of hard drives i wont ever get to see that happen.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    5. Re:That Rarely Works Any More by greenrd · · Score: 1
      It's not just because of marketing. Modern operating systems simply aren't designed to deal with drives that can dynamically shrink their capacity at any time - even reiserfs would have a fit.

  98. multiple writes by Forgotten · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There doesn't seem to be much point in overwriting more than once with the same zero pattern (the article makes this mistake too, though the original authors probably don't). There are really two levels of sophistication we're hoping to elude here:

    a) People using the drive's own interface to retrieve "deleted" data
    b) People doing direct signal analysis of the magnetic media to find successive generations of overwritten data

    Once you've overwritten the disk once (whether with dd, a real SCSI low-level format, or some other means), you're in regime (b). Assuming you're paranoid and/or justifiably concerned enough to bother with repeated writes, using the same bit pattern does little - and zeroing is especially non-optimal, from what I've read. Random bit patterns seem a likely candidate, but randomness is actually particularly easy to divine in a signal.

    People have experimented with instead writing various repetitions of constant strings with good success, but what might be ideal is a chaotic pattern that approximates the look of the expected data without divulging anything real (interesting thought - perhaps this is what some of the porn they found was for!). Write that a few times and you have a honeypot that might mislead a naive investigator into thinking there's nothing more to be found - but even this is difficult because the "freshness" of the bit patterns can be determined by their relative signal strength, and you can't simulate age using the default write current no matter how many new patterns you lay on. You can only hope you've made the old, real data so faint that it disappears into the background noise. Since there's no real way to guarantee this, people with real secrets to hide have to physically destroy the media. So much for reduce, reuse, recycle. ;)

    The technique of extracting the data is akin to the work of deep-sky astronomers, military listening posts, or even sedimentary archaeology. It's quite an interesting problem, as is making the data unrecognisable. The parallel with copy-protection is obvious, and the outcome is the same - an escalating war of technique between intrigued hackers, where the party acting later in time (the deprotector / signal analyst) always has an advantage.

    As an aside, when using dd to copy large amounts of data to disk you can often speed things up immensely by tailoring the (output) block size to the destination device.

  99. This is NOT Data Mining! by Commykilla · · Score: 5, Informative

    Data Mining is NOT the process of recovering or otherwise retrieving data. Data Mining is the process of discovering knowledge through data that has already been obtained (usually through statistical and/or AI techniques). I.e., data retrieval/collection is a prerequisite for Data Mining.

    --
    Communism was just a red herring.
    1. Re:This is NOT Data Mining! by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      Do you have a better name for it? Seems to fit the general description of the term.

    2. Re:This is NOT Data Mining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a lad, we called it "dredging" the drive. On RSTS/E on the old PDP-11, you could actually create a big empty file and read everyone else's deleted files in the EDT text editor.

    3. Re:This is NOT Data Mining! by Commykilla · · Score: 1

      There are several definitions here along the lines of knowledge discovery. Data mining is actually a burgeoning field -- governments and corporations have tons of data and no idea what to do with it. Some applications include targeted advertising (such as direct mailing and click-stream analysis) and credit card freud detection (ever get a call after a large or out-of-state purchase?). I have heard the IRS uses it to detect tax freud and other criminal behavior. Oh yea, and in case you ever wondered why Wal Mart is in business textbooks and K-Mart filed for bankruptcy... supposedly, Wal Mart even uses it to decide product placement within each store!

      --
      Communism was just a red herring.
    4. Re:This is NOT Data Mining! by nurightshu · · Score: 1

      "Tax freud" -- is that where you give your money to your mother?

      --
      They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    5. Re:This is NOT Data Mining! by beat.bolli · · Score: 1

      I'd call it data diving! Goes nicely with dumpster diving...

      --
      Karma: none (due to not believing in reincarnation)
  100. GNU shred is your friend by fo0bar · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm going to be sending a company HD to Dell to RMA since it's starting to fail (stupid IBM DeskStar 60GB drives)... From what I've heard (and contrary to a few other posts in this story), it is still possible to retrieve some data from a hard drive where you've done "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda" (I still don't get how, but I err on the side of caution).

    Enter GNU shred. Its default operation does 25 passes at the drive, with passes such as random data, random patterns and all zeros. Theoretically, the drive has been overwritten so many times that there is almost no chance of recovering data.

    Of course, just to play it safe I'll also run it across my stereo speakers a few times too :)

    1. Re:GNU shred is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Foo,

      Why would I want to install anything from GNU? Do you not know the evils that come from GNU? The next GPL will have a clause that states any work derived on any machine running any GNU software must be made avaible under the GPL.

  101. That's exactly what I do, except more so: by enkidu · · Score: 1
    I disassemble, keep the interesting peices (uber strong magnets, brackets and servos), and then take some 100 grit sand paper to the platters. Making recovery economically unviable and (hopefully) operationally impossible. Of course, I'm such a pack rat, the last harddrives I threw out were a 80MB and a 20MB drive from one of my Macs.

    EnkiduEOT

    --

    There is no trap so deadly as the trap you set for yourself
    -Raymond Chandler, The Long Goodbye
    1. Re:That's exactly what I do, except more so: by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

      no kidding. i'm still whording 1 gig drivees for an old system i'm building...don't trash, re-use!

      anecdotally: I've found some interesting 256-color pictures of girls on an old 386. Orange skin isn't quite sexy somehow...hmmmm....

      --


      Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  102. Got a big woofer? by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Ever heard what happens you syick a old cassette in front of a big woofer?

    1. Re:Got a big woofer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about yours, but when I stuck an old cassette in front of MY big woofer, he played tug-o-war with it and then nipped at my hand.

  103. Secure deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is no substitute for destruction, but if you want to re-sell, use:

    Autoclave

    Autoclave is a boot disk w/ a Linux distro that will securely delete on five levels:

    Zero fill
    One random pass
    3 binary overwrite passes
    10 passes, some structured
    25 structured passes

    For *true* secure deletion. Policy at the University of Washington requires level 3 at least. Of course, I've bought some UW surplus computers with still-functioning Win98 on the drives...

    1. Re: Secure deletion by Antity · · Score: 1

      From the Autoclave website:

      Have you ever bought a used computer, possibly at a failed dot-com auction or Boeing Surplus? Ever taken a look at what's on the hard drive? When the last dotcom I worked for went out of business, all the computers were auctioned off. I heard a few weeks after the auction that a bartender had been asking one of my former co-workers about the details of another co-worker's love life, details he picked up from reading the personal email which had been left on a computer sold at the auction.

      --
      42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  104. This is not data mining by rev063 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Data mining is statistical analysis of structured or unstructured data to discover unknown relationships.

    At best, this is voyeurism. At worst, it's espionage.

    1. Re:This is not data mining by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      How is it espionage if they sell you the drive?

  105. Re:This is news? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    Are you Ekrout's dad?

    Say hi for me.

  106. Interesting reaction on hard drive wiping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Last year, my employer of 12 years went out of business. The company was secretly being run improperly for quite a while and the owner closed the doors the same day he found out about the mismanagement.

    Being the IT director, I helped the owner, my friend, with the office computers. I planned on wiping all the hard drives and I informed the owner of my plan. He agreed that it was a good idea.

    From the next three months, watching the bankruptcy process unfold, I got questioned left and right as to why I wiped the data. The accountants wanted to know why...the lawyers wanted to know why...the liquidators wanted to know why...the court wanted to know why. I understand that a system with an installed OS is more valuable than one that has been wiped clean(the data had been backed up so there was no question of whether data had been destroyed) but this should not be unusual. Nobody asking me these questions were newbies--their jobs involved dealing with bankrupt companies and it was as if they had never seen this before!

    1. Re:Interesting reaction on hard drive wiping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Did you work for enron by any chance? :-)

  107. destruction is only way to be sure by Wansu · · Score: 1


    Floppies, zips and tapes should be burned. Hard drive platters should be ground down with grinder wheel or belt sander.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  108. It's the same everywhere.. by euxneks · · Score: 1

    I used to work at a small-town computer store and I had a bunch of customers that would come in with some minor problem, and "oh can you clear my history too?"
    Lo and behold, porn links, very strange S&M and things that a normal looking guy like that should *not* be looking at!
    Sometimes they would ask for a reformat, and I would look at their stuff just for heck of it ;) Man there is some very nasty, disturbed people out there!

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  109. HIPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have posted as AC if I were you. That seems like something I wouldn't want known.

    On a more serious note, how would this fall under HIPAA? Would the hospital be liable even if they took (what they thought were) adequate means of destroying the data?

  110. ROFL by nlinecomputers · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    They moded me offtopic. I love it. Thanks for the laugh. Worth the karma hit.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome. How would you like to cherish my balls in the name of the .test community?

      Talk about some self righteous shit. Like your crappy comment was worth a damn. hmmmm.

      Insightful. NO
      Funny. NO
      Ass-Hat YES

    2. Re:ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like your crappy comment was worth a damn.

      It wasn't yet you blew a mod point on it just cause you got pissy. That is what was funny.

  111. That's a nice piece of fiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a slow day are we?

  112. PORN??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's PORN on computers??? Who'd a thunk it.

  113. Rendering HD's unreadable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over the years I've had a bunch of drives fail, which almost always is a big inconvenience, even though I'm religious about keeping good backups. To vent my frustration, I take the dead drive in to the woods near my house and drive several large spikes right through the case and platters. I leave it nailed to the tree for a week or so, as a warning to the other drives.

  114. Government departments are the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they routinely deal with highly sensitive data, and often dispose of older computers when they no longer can run the latest version of MS Office.
    Some computer guy here bought some ex-govt hard drives 2nd hand, and on them was a catalogue of sexual-abuse victoms, their detailed records, and police comment about them. These institutions just don't have the computing know-how to handle such information digitally (even schools don't).
    The TV station did a story on it, and must've seen the address of one sexual-abuse victom flash across the screen. They visited her house with cameras en-tow (!!).
    The station got badly flamered for abusing their position like that.

  115. Simson Garfinkel by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not as if it's just any "[t]wo MIT grad students". Garfinkel has written more than a handful of security books over the years.

  116. Re:2nd Post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1337 (adj.) ["leet"]

    1. gay.. just gay

    e.g.: i am uber l337! [TRANSLATION: I am very gay!]

  117. How do I destroy an HD? by HeyBob! · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just wait for my warantee to run out - it becomes unreable shortly thereafter!

  118. RAID 0+1 by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    No need to do any shredding at all. Just take the drives apart and mix up all the platters. The more drives the better!

  119. Data Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See those tiny little screw heads on top of your hard drive? Undo, disassemble, burn and scatter all the individual components.

    Kind of like an incineration of your past logged life.

  120. How to overwrite free space in unix? by donutz · · Score: 1

    dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda ...will blank the whole hard drive, but what if I want to just overwrite the empty portions of a mounted partition?

    1. Re:How to overwrite free space in unix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/someplace/largefile
      sync
      rm /mnt/someplace/largefile
      sync

      Be aware that you should not be saving stuff to that HD at the same time unless you want to risk out of memory errors.

      A second note, I know of no program that resolves the issue of slack space (the space in the last cluster of a file which is allocated but normally unused) which is normally left untouched. While it used to be a means of copy protection, just like the recent report of "garbage" data in buffers being written out by many NICs on various sends which are not a full packet big, slack space can also contain "garbage" data which could be just as bad.

      The only real security is to a) disable core dumps, b) use an encrypted file system (crypto loopback, for instance), c) make sure /tmp is pointed at either memory or the encrypted file system, d) make sure anything sensitive is written there, and e) disable swap space (if one of the programs you're using ends up being written to the swap...). The last is unavoidable with all encryption systems I've heard of. The only resolution would be to have an encrypted swap space, but that means an encryptor that preallocates space for the encryption process when one is out of physical memory.

    2. Re:How to overwrite free space in unix? by Bishop · · Score: 1

      dd if=/dev/zero of=foo

      Look at me! I'm a genius. I can read a man page.

    3. Re:How to overwrite free space in unix? by zenyu · · Score: 1

      The only resolution would be to have an encrypted swap space, but that means an encryptor that preallocates space for the encryption process when one is out of physical memory.

      I think Mandrake supports this. Though I'm not sure, I haven't used swap in years. Might have to start again to when I get to 4Gigs.. Hopefully I'll have a better computer by then, if not I'll look into an encrypted swap.

    4. Re:How to overwrite free space in unix? by Loki · · Score: 1

      e) disable swap space (if one of the programs you're using ends up being written to the swap...). The last is unavoidable with all encryption systems I've heard of. The only resolution would be to have an encrypted swap space, but that means an encryptor that preallocates space for the encryption process when one is out of physical memory.

      There are two feasable ways to do this (that I can think of at 3 in the morning):
      A: Use a swapfile on an encrypted partition. This will be slow, of course. Very slow.
      B: losetup -e (cypher) /dev/loop0 /dev/hda3 (where /dev/hda3 is your swap partition.) Then mkswap /dev/loop0, swapon /dev/loop0. You will want to use the international kernel patch as the standard losetup & kernel only does XOR or DES. I think the blowfish cypher would be ideal for this, it's fast and secure.

    5. Re:How to overwrite free space in unix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! You sure are clever!

      Pity you forgot about that ext2 (at least) reserves 5% of disk space for root by default. Other filesystems (especially with some configurations of quotas switched on) may do the same thing.

      Other filesystems may have other quirks : Reiser with tail-packing for example. Large files aren't necessarily stored in the same way as that three-line text file with your ebay details. How do you clear out the inodes as well hmmm?

    6. Re:How to overwrite free space in unix? by Bishop · · Score: 1

      Wow! You sure are clever!

      Neat. A smart-assed answer to my smart assed answer. Can you feel the love?

      you forgot about that ext2 (at least) reserves 5% of disk space for root

      Not at all! I assumed stateing the obvious wasn't necessary. I also left out the warning about the nasty things that can happen on a running system if all the disk space it used up.

      You points regarding ResiserFS are just yet-another-example why securely deleting files is more complicated then writeing zeros to free space. Many other posters have already beaten this to death.

  121. WDClear wipes IDE drives quickly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Western Digital put out a free DOS utility called WDClear that will completely wipe an IDE drive with zeros in a relatively short time. Although it was intended for use only with Western Digital drives it will work with any IDE drive. You can find and download copies of WDCLEAR.EXE at many different web sites if you search google.

  122. EBay? by DeadBugs · · Score: 1

    "Two MIT grad students bought used drives from eBay .... Among the data found ..... were 5,000 credit-card numbers, porn, love-letters and medical information."

    I think that was MY hard drive.

    That's it I'm giving them negative feedback!

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  123. IRS by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    My cousin works for the IRS. He takes the hard drives and down to an iron mill of some sort. Personally watches them all get destroyed.

  124. well by dsanfte · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    For a fee, of course.

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
  125. Some info found on Hard Drives .... interesting by adzoox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I once found out crucial recruiting info for a university sports team. Ended up there were recruiting violations and I could have ruined the athletic department with the evidence on the laptop I had. But technically, I "wasn't suppose to have seen that" - Also, it is illegal to view "known" private data. Even if in one's possesion. I think these "lookers" in this story should be prosecuted. They give people like myself who buy surplus a bad name and cause problems with buying surplus as MOST items require original hard drive data to function.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  126. Better options than dd by alansz · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually, using dd from /dev/zero is not a highly secure way to wipe a drive (though it's a lot better than nothing!)

    For stuff like medical data, financial data, etc., I'd seriously consider looking into wipe instead, which uses Peter Gutman's patterns.

  127. One way brownian encryption by xixax · · Score: 1

    The spooks here used to feed hard drives and tapes into a nearby iron smelter. One way brownian crypto...

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  128. In other news... by rzbx · · Score: 1

    Hard drives on eBay get a sudden boost. Hard drives sold for ridiculous prices on eBay. Coincidentally, credit card fraud increases as well.

    --
    Question everything.
    1. Re:In other news... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Large numbers of used hard drives purchased from ebay with fraudulent credit cards!

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  129. Definitive whitpaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok how can no one post the definitive whitepaper on secure deletion. this really lets you know that no secure deletion *software* is good enough if someone (big brother, nsa) wants the data off your magnetic media bad enough, and how it can be done relatively cheaply:

    <a href="http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/s ecure_del.html"></a>

    http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secur e_ del.html

  130. Easy way to make sure no data will be recovered by raider_red · · Score: 1

    This will destroy any possible resale value, but it will make sure that NO data can be recovered.

    Find a suitable outdoor rifle range. Place the hard drive on the 100 yd. berm. Shoot the hard drive at least 10 times using a suitable high powered rifle. (An AR-15 is well suited to this activity.)

    This will insure that no data will ever be recovered from any part of the hard drive. It's also great stress relief.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  131. Sig theft? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    How long have you had your sig? DMCA violator! :)

  132. A more humorous case of this... by rawshark · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/2822956.html

  133. I built a time capsule! by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Last summer I was building a two foot high poured-concrete wall ... extending one, actually, at the edge of my patio, where a big oak tree had been taken down. Well, I poured the concrete in and it turned out that I hadn't bought enough.

    So I went down into the basement and pulled out all the old computer crap I could find -- old hard disk drives, AOL CD's, ISA boards of various types, etc. and just threw them into the cement mix until the level rose to where I wanted the wall to be.

    Perhaps someday after I die (or move) someone will dismantle that wall. When they do, they'll unearth some hard disk drives, complete with a 1997 or 1998 vintage of Red Hat Linux and other software of the time.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  134. A hammer may not be enough! by dragonsister · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Depending how much someone is out to get you.

    There was a quote somewhere saying that a heap of data could be recovered from even a square millimetre of hard disk platter.

    So let's have a think about the maths. I don't know what the physical interior of a hard disk is like, but the exterior is in the vicinity of 10cm (4in) across. If the platter were square, that'd be 100*100 square millimetres. (It'd be round, so the actual number would be about 25% smaller.) Suppose we were talking about a 40gig disk. That's 4 meg per square millimeter.

    Now if hard disks were made up of lots of layers, say 1000 of them, that's still 4K per square millimeter per layer, and you've got one hell of a pulverising job ahead of you!

    There's good reason why high-security areas go through their elaborate sequences of electronic shredding (multiple data overwrites), physical shredding (makes the hammer look weak) and thermodynamic shredding (I daresay *someone* can get data off a hard-disk after you've treated it with thermite!)

    Rachel

    1. Re:A hammer may not be enough! by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Ultimate method- Open up the HD case, hook it up to a PS, and scrape the surface off with a chisel/screwdriver/something hard enough to dig a little into the platter. NO data will survive that.

      Well, I imagine a nuclear furnace may be marginally more secure than my reccomendation, buit how many of us have one of those around?

  135. Re:used to work with the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I used to work for the Queensland Police's IT department. We had to take used HDD to the dump personally and arrange for one of the bulldozers to crash them. Basically anything that had a memory chip had to be physically destroyed, old ram, old NICs, everything.

  136. Broken harddrive becomes alive ! by MaGGuN · · Score: 1

    A friend of my replaced a defective HD controller card, that is mounted on the harddrive. He luckely had two identical drives, and the card was easy to replace. From what was a totally dead harddrive, became a fully functional one, without the use of expensive hardware/tools at all.
    So when you toss your harddrive thinking no one can recover the data, only by using expensive hardware, it just might be a trivial task.

  137. Book and Nuke by scubacuda · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Use Boot and Nuke.

    Burn the ISO, boot to the CD, then wait a *really* fucking long time for it to scamblefuck the drive. (You can also use a floppy disk...but nowawayd why use something that a magnet could possibly fuck?)

    (I have no idea whether or not this is military-grade. Can anyone comment? And if not, provide something *better*?)

    1. Re:Book and Nuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well according to this posting, your boot and nuke tool might not be enough.

    2. Re:Book and Nuke by scubacuda · · Score: 1
      Ever since reading this /. post on securely wiping a hard drive, I've started looking at various tools. Some of the tools I've found/used are:

      New Technologies M-Sweep
      Paragon Disk Wiper.
      Eagle Disk Wipe.
      DTI Data Disk Wipe.
      East-Tec Disk Sanitizer.

  138. Similar story by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Funny
    Ok, this is offtopic because it doesn't really involve undeleting, so mod me off topic if you want, but its still a good story.

    When I was 14 or 15 (long ago), I took a trip with my friend to visit his father and step mother for the day. We would have to help his father in his print shop for the day, but my friend promised in return we would be able to sneak access to his dads porn collection.

    After we ended up working in his dads shop all day, we had dinner, went to his dads house, and his dad left us alone with his computers to play games on. We had brought a palette of 100 disks to hopefully sneak our porn home on, so we began copying all those pcx and gif files onto disks as fast as we could. We couldn't risk looking at them for fear of being caught. It wasn't that unusual to have a huge pile of disks because that was how things got copied in the olden days, his dad thought we were copying some of his games.

    Low and behold, we fill all 100 disks with porn (an incredible stash in like 90 or 91). We go home for the evening to each of our houses, divide up the stash, and we both head straight to the computer to um, count our booty.

    I get home, pop the first disk into the computer, and just about then I get a phone call -- its my friend, he says "dude, don't look at the pics, trust me." But he's piqued my interest so I have to. I load one up and what do I see? A big juicy cock. We had copied his dads gay porn stash.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Similar story by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well, nodoubt you can blame MS-DOS for forcing short nondescriptive filenames.. BIGJCYCK.PCX isnt immediately obvious unless you already know...
      back in those days i did porn viewing on the amiga tho, so no such problem :)

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    2. Re:Similar story by puto · · Score: 1

      The scary thing is that YOU referred to the cock as "JUICY". I wonder are you and his dad still in contact?

      Ewww, who describes a cock as juicy. That just ain't right.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    3. Re:Similar story by zhadu · · Score: 1

      Ewww, who describes a cock as juicy.

      A puto, maybe? Look up the word in a Spanish dictionary.

    4. Re:Similar story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well... if there are juices all over it...

    5. Re:Similar story by Dman33 · · Score: 1

      It should have been an indicator when you learned that his step-mom's name was Roger.

    6. Re:Similar story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, us Amiga users got glorious 4096 colour HAM mode porn, too. Those pleby PC users were stuck with 256 colours, if they were lucky! Bwahahahahaha!

      Ahem. Sorry.

    7. Re:Similar story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess the real $1,000,000 question is: Did you end up being influenced and fuck your friend up the ass?

    8. Re:Similar story by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      YOU referred to the cock as "JUICY"

      Fight Club reference. Go see it :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    9. Re:Similar story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all you know, the author could be a girl. There /are/ girls here you know...

  139. Used computers from the office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My wifes company - health care company - gave away the old office computers a few years ago. With out wiping the hard disks. We got two computers - both the co-owners with all of the memos intact. It made for some interesting reading - filling in those awkward questions about people who didn't come to the company picknick.

  140. Oh yeah? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

    Well, what do you think they're going to get off of THIS hard drive?

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  141. Uses for your destroyed drive by Brad1138 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I disassemble my old drives. The Magnet makes one hell of a good Refrigerator magnet and the discs make good pocket mirrors for wife or frisbies for kids.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  142. how hard is it to smash platters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    i get rid of numbers of hd's every month and prying open the case, putting a paper towel between your finger and the platter and just lightly pressing on them to smash them is all it takes.

    the platters are fairly rigid so when you smash them they disintegrate into tiny tinty pieces usually never possible to recover (most of the platter ends up in 1/32nd bits or smaller, thats why the paper towel is there, to prevent micro splinters getting wedged in your skin ).

    otherwise, just wedge a screwdriver between the casing and platter, and smash platter by leverage.

    no one can read data off of dust.

  143. Here's a question: by nightherper · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Say you are working on an uber secret project (or miltary plans or viewing gay pr0n) and the "men in black" come running in your house. Assuming you are more than 5 seconds away from being on the floor with a knee on your neck, how would you keep intruders from getting your data? (Or looking at what you were viewing, you sick freak)

    Some sort of explosive device on a trigger next to your mouse?
    A shotgun blast? (Hoping you hit the drives and don't get shot...)
    Fast acting fantasy software to write random data 144 times over the disk in mere milliseconds?

    --

    ...

    1. Re:Here's a question: by enziarro · · Score: 1

      since you see those 'hard drive coolers' on ebay all the time, you know, the heatsink / fan combos that sit on top of the drive, i suppose you could make something to do the opposite. if my memories of the anarchist's cookbook from when i was 12 serve me well, you can make 'thermite' from rust and aluminum filings. that stuff supposedly turns molten instantly if you have something hot enough to set it ablaze. leave that in some packaging on top of the disk, and have some electronic igniter, should just melt straight through the drive. i remember reading a story, maybe on usenet 10 years ago or in an old TAP/YIPL about some guys who made tons of blueboxes in the late 70's, for some gambling ring. it mentioned that they had thermite self-destruction thingers built in.

      --
      You used to have a really crappy sig, but then I stole it.
    2. Re:Here's a question: by gaspar0069 · · Score: 1
      Go watch Conspiracy Theory. Mel Gibson's character has a pretty sweet set up to toast his whole apartment when it gets raided. It should be relatively easy to construct a switch-activated device that ignites a flammable liquid and/or high explosive encased with your HD.

      Of course, using an external hard drive is best. That way you can attach as many explosives as you want and you won't lose your main computer in case of a false alarm.

    3. Re:Here's a question: by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Assuming that you have at least a few seconds to react when they come knocking then planning takes care of a lot of this. The system in question which I'll I call the Naughty Super Secret System or NSSS for short needs to be specially configured. It should have no swap files or swap partitions of any sort. The /tmp directory or any equivalent should be a ramdisk formatted with an encrypted filesystem. Any permanent datastores should also be on encrypted filesystems. The best part is that the NSSS also has a "panic script" thats triggered with a hotkey combination. There will be no time to actually type a command. The panic script will lock the terminal, unmount any ramdisks, change the filesystem password to a random collection of characters if possible and clobber the control structures of the encrypted filesystems with random data (superblocks, fat tables, etc). This is not a lot of data and won't need more than a few seconds to royally bollix. Actually, random data sprayed across an encrypted filesystem will do far more damage than a conventional filesystem. If the clobber script has enough time to hit those control structures with seven passes it should then spray random bytes across the remainder of the partition as long as it's permitted to run. In any case, the clobber script will run until some quick thinking MIB pulls the power cord. That can be made a pisser as well. Remove any obvious way to quickly power off the machine and make it necessary to spend a few more seconds getting at the power cord or UPS. Hmmmm....how's this? Put the UPS inside the machine and rig the physical power switch well inside the case. The machine can be powered up or down by sticking a screwdriver into a hole to operate the switch. LOL, put lots of extra screws in the case too.... That should buy more than enougn time for the panic script to do it's work.

      I suppose what remains of those filesystems will be subject to cryptanalyis but it should be a bit more difficult at least. The only other option would be coming up with something to physically destroy the hard drive in a hurry that won't physically destroy the operator as well.
      I like the idea of digging a fire pit in the basement and having the system rigged to be burned by a panic trigger. The shotgun would work too but it needs to be permanently mounted on the machine. You won't have time to aim. You'll be lucky if you have time to reach over and pull the trigger.

      In all though, if the MIBs bust your door down you have much larger problems than what they are going to find on your computer.

    4. Re:Here's a question: by DjMd · · Score: 1

      Simple, read
      Cryptonomicon
      and do what they did...

      It is actually a really cool idea, main doorway had local magnetic field generator...

      Anyone know why this wouldn't work??

      --
      DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
    5. Re:Here's a question: by johnjtrammell · · Score: 1
      Assuming you are more than 5 seconds away from being on the floor with a knee on your neck, how would you keep intruders from getting your data?
      1. Use an encrypted filesystem.
      2. Pull the plug.
    6. Re:Here's a question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wont work - you would need a magnetic field far more powerful than what could be feasably generated. This was discussed a ways up. Thermite has my vote.
      -Az

    7. Re:Here's a question: by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      Use workstations.

      Put a decoy server box next to the switch. (switch has a UPS with a high rating so it could run for a day or so without AC). For fun, only run a DARE program website on the decoy. For extra fun, mirror an ACLU web site as well. (Imagine a slashdot ACLU WEB SITE SEIZED story)

      Disconnect the switch's leds for the connection to the real server.

      Hide that server WELL with a UPS. After all, there really isn't any reason to physically access it unless there is a hardware failure. Put it under the garage floor or something. Even if the Men In Black are very well trained, it's not likely they'll find it, or at least it will be hours before they do.

      The well trained officers will be inside the house anyway unless they can't find what they are looking for. (They'll have the newbies checking the garage and property at first unless it's a murder/kidnapping investigation)

      When the Men In Black show up, if you don't have time to pull the cable for the server (which will trigger the server to start wiping), say something like "PLEASE DONT THROW MY SWITCH IN THE BRIAR PATCH MR WOLF IM CLEANING UP MY HARD DRIVES AND YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCONNECT MY EQUIPMENT WHICH WILL STOP IT FROM FINISHING THE JOB"*


      *Dirty Harry's Law: If you tell Law Enforcement Officers that they don't have the right to do something to you or your belongings, they will ahead and do it if the only witnesses are other officers.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  144. Degauss? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

    Some spook (don't remember which one) degaussed a hard drive once. He might as well have just destroyed it, because he bent the r/w heads.

    Doesn't work anymore. The magnets in the disk are too "hard" and can't be degaussed by any reasonble-sized magnet. Thermite is the approved method of secure disposal, although that's messy.

    If you're going to stop short of total physical destruction of the disk (not just some pansy break-it-into-pieces thing), you might as well just overwrite it with Guttmann codes, followed by random data, followed by more Guttmann codes. If they can get it after that, they can get it if you smash it into a thousand pieces.

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  145. Arc welders by polygl0t · · Score: 1

    work pretty well for erasure

  146. By the time I get rid of a HDD... by j3110 · · Score: 1

    it's completely worthless anyhow. I just take it apart and use the different parts for random things. I gave away the platters to friends (they will be damaged pretty badly, but probably recoverable). The platters are usually used for toys or coasters or decoration. It would be a headache for even me to track them down. An untrained eye can hardly distinguish them from eccentric decor. I just love to play with the motors and magnets though. I still want to use a dead IBM drive's 10K RPM motor to make one of those LED clocks. I would have the worlds loudest digital clock probably :)

    --
    Karma Clown
  147. HD - Manufacturars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't the HD manufacturars add a jumper that completely erases the drive when crossed and the power is on (this would be a very appealing feature for business hds)

    the can even hide the jumper underneath a sticker or something - erasing a whole drive properly is a royal pain

  148. Prove it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would it be possible to prove those files were yours in a court of law?

    I mean, conceivably you could create false information on a drive about the president, then sell that drive on ebay. Sometime later someone comes across that drive and scarfs the information off of it, then WOW a story, but it isn't real.

    Prove that pr0n is mine!

  149. Secure disposal? - One word ... by Curl+E · · Score: 1
    --
    Backups are for wimps. Real men post their data in comments and have slashdot mirror it
  150. shit i pull the platters by Sir+Spank-o-tron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had to RMA a drive (Seagate, I think) that had all our magic encryption keys. So I opened it, pulled the platters, and sent it in.

    They didn't say a damned thing, and sent us a new drive. Each of the engineers took a platter and did away with it. No problem!

    --
    -- Spankmeister General
  151. A tip for the paranoid by xtal · · Score: 1

    "They" will cut the power to your house or apartment before a raid to make sure you can't make use of any such niftiness. Get a UPS.

    --
    ..don't panic
  152. Re: sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/radius/diameter

  153. You don't really want none of this... by Mulletproof · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unfortunately, I suspect you're gonna have an unplesant time getting your hard drive to that state...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:You don't really want none of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do it from the command line

    2. Re:You don't really want none of this... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, I suspect you're gonna have an unplesant time getting your hard drive to that state...

      lynx -dump http://goatse.cx/hello.jpg >hello.jpg

      i=0; while [ $i -lt 500 ]; do cp hello.jpg hello$i.jpg; i=`expr $i + 1`; done

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  154. I guess you really SHOULDN'T sell anything on eBay by saskboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    This only goes to prove that selling on eBay comes with certain unavoidable risks. You never know who your buyer is going to be...

    It could be some smart ass college kid who is going to get your old porn collection you thought was lost.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  155. Shoot a drive while it is spinning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Has anybody tried applying +12&+5VDC to an old hard drive, allow it to spin up to full operating speed (pref. 15KRPM), and THEN shoot it?

    Should produce some interesting results. It'd be interesting to see the different effect from hitting dead center on the hub as compared to (on a different, identical drive) the outermost rim.

    1. Re:Shoot a drive while it is spinning? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Now that is a nice idea.. i have a few old scsi drives, only 7200 rpm.. theyre dead but they do spin up (fucked controller i guess)
      If i can get them running from a +12V car battery, i will give it a shot

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  156. how many credit card #'s? by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 1

    Wait a sec, 5000 credit card #'s...on 158 disks. So, somehow each disk had over 30 numbers on it ON AVERAGE. Or did one have 5000 and thats it.

    At least we know what those people using your credit card number arent being very careful when they throw out the trash, and apparantly the really big balls go to the guy who sold his old drive on ebay, the same drive he used to purchase his new computer with your credit card info...

    1. Re:how many credit card #'s? by zonker · · Score: 0

      yeah, but consider this...

      say it were a business's old machine they used in the accounting dept. where they keep track of all the biz cards...

      also home user's with quicken...

      lots of people aren't very smart about their data.

  157. Credit card numbers by LinuxOnHal · · Score: 1

    My question is, what were 158 hard drives doing with an average of more than 31 credit card numbers each? Sounds a little shady to me.

    --
    Trying is the First Step to Failing --Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Credit card numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fully agree. Corporations and businesses that store credit-card data and then sell their stuff on _E-BAY_ most definitely _ARE_ shady.

  158. mod parent up! by scubacuda · · Score: 1

    I caught that reference...

  159. Lost HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dammit. I just misplaced a drive with 5,000 credit-card numbers, some porn (mosty of Briney spears) and my old love-letters to my 8th grade music teacher. Not to mention my personal info medical information.

    Any way I can claim that drive back? I have no idea how it ended up on ebay.

  160. DOD has specific guidelines that define Overkill. by Forge · · Score: 1

    Actually. DOD has specific guidelines that define Overkill.

    1. format drive
    2. Triple overwrite security erase. (All 1s all 0s then all 1s again.)
    3. Degauss with powerful magnet.
    4. Crush with road roller.
    5. Melt in furnace.
    6. Bury in secure area under 15 feet of cement.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  161. East-Tec Sanitizer by chefren · · Score: 1

    The company I work for uses East-Tec's Disk Sanitizer to erase hard drives before selling any old computers. It's available for windows, linux or as a dos-based boot disk and there is a fully functional 30-day demo, so anyone can download it and clean some hard drives. We finally licensed it, after some 25 computers over a year. Better late than never, I guess.

  162. MOD PARENT UP PLEASE by io333 · · Score: 1

    Please someone mod parent up. I'm really curious!

  163. Re:Data Layers debunked by alienmole · · Score: 1
    According to various reports (scientific papers, etc. not stories) it is quite possible to recover multiple generations of data from harddrives.

    Yes, I'm familiar with some of those, starting with Guttman's now-ancient 1996 paper Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory. The OP's sentence that I was responding to was "Theoretically anything that has previously been on the drive should be recoverable through such methods." But it's nowhere near as simple or as "reliable" as that. Besides, I haven't seen any papers in the last few years that talk about doing this with today's drive capacities. Guttman's paper talks about the more advanced drives at the time as being easier to securely erase:

    The latest high-density drives use methods like Partial-Response Maximum-Likelihood (PRML) encoding [...] Since PRML codes don't try to separate peaks in the same way that non-PRML RLL codes do, all we can do is to write a variety of random patterns because the processing inside the drive is too complex to second-guess. Fortunately, these drives push the limits of the magnetic media much more than older drives ever did by encoding data with much smaller magnetic domains, closer to the physical capacity of the magnetic media (the current state of the art in PRML drives has a track density of around 6700 TPI (tracks per inch) and a data recording density of 170 kFCI, nearly double that of the nearest (1,7) RLL equivalent. A convenient side-effect of these very high recording densities is that a written transition may experience the write field cycles for successive transitions, especially at the track edges where the field distribution is much broader [15]. Since this is also where remnant data is most likely to be found, this can only help in reducing the recoverability of the data). If these drives require sophisticated signal processing just to read the most recently written data, reading overwritten layers is also correspondingly more difficult. A good scrubbing with random data will do about as well as can be expected.
    In addition, remember that many parts of a disk undergo a *lot* of reading and writing of different bit patterns. Recovering a prior generation of data may in fact mean recovering what was written at a particular spot thousands of writes ago. That's just not always possible.

    And even when it is, it can be guarded against, as I alluded to in my post. The thrust of the abovementioned paper, in fact, is how to delete data so that it can't be recovered, even with the use of advanced techniques.

    In short, the notion of realistically recovering data that's been properly erased - not just by an OS-level format - even with hundreds of thousands of dollars at your disposal, is more of a myth than anything else. It's a possibility for security wonks to scare each other with and try to guard against, not something that's happening in practice. Companies that do professional recovery don't even remotely get into this kind of thing, for example, and they're the ones who might have the financial incentive to do so.

  164. Darik's Boot and Nuke by Darik · · Score: 1
    Feeling paranoid about the contents of your hard disk? Get Darik's Boot and Nuke:

    http://dban.sourceforge.net/

  165. Be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply possessing that data might be a crime.

  166. Best File Recovery Utility by Dopeskills · · Score: 1

    Ok, so I was wondering what everyone's favorite utilty for restoring delete files is...

  167. Re:This is news? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1


    You toddlers need to read more clearly. But, since your mom exercised while she was pregnant with you, and now you have ADHD, i'll explain it for you.

    "Welcome to 1979." = People have been doing clandestine data recovery on discarded computer media for decades. This story is nothing new.

    My dumpster-diving adventured were limited to about 1996-1999. The 50MB Sun SCSI enclosure was from circa 1990 or so, the data on it was from '94-95.

    Happy, girls?

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  168. Is this the CIA company message board? by switcha · · Score: 1

    I love how half the posts here have become describing how everyone take their drives out in the street, pours acid on them, shoots them, sledghammers them, drills holes in them and them drips melted pokki sticks on them. WTF do you people have on your hard drives? I don't think people are mining drives for anime these days.

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  169. erasing those drives... by syukton · · Score: 1

    how about magnets? Big ones, made from NdFeB (Neodymium-Iron-Boron) ... they aren't too expensive, and boy they do the job. Hop over to ebay and get one.

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    1. Re:erasing those drives... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I've got some of these NdFeB magnets and if you don't have some now, go order some! They are incredibly powerful and a ton of fun to play with. I got mine from a user on ebay who calls himself Pie. He also runs a website called WonderMagnet.com.

      Don't ignore those safety warnings, these suckers are STRONG and will hurt you if you're not careful. I bought a whole stack of them and sold two to a co-worker - within minutes he had let them slam together and they shattered sending little sharp pieces (they're a metallic ceramic and break like glass) flying in all directions. To mis-quote A Christmas Story - you'll put your eye out, kid!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  170. This is why if it's useful/important I encrypt it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not very concerned about that aspect of it as I encrypt everything of any real value on any computer that will ever access a network. If someone is going to recover it, they will have to go through a lot more work to get it. Good encryption tools (such as Drivecrypt) are readily available.

  171. my g/f's dad saw my pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believe me, I know about the perils of "data mining". I met a great girl online and after a while we started talking on the phone. We'd been talking for weeks and eventually it turned sexual and very arrousing. Well, I sent her pictures of myself naked. The pictures were taken while we were talking, so I was also arroused.. She was at her parents house and she just couldn't wait to take them home to look at them, so she looked at them on her Dad's computer... Of course a week after that she told me that despite her attempts to clear her tracks, her Dad undeleted the pictures.. I couldn't imagin going home to meet her parents after that!

  172. What about Norton Ghost? by permaculture · · Score: 1

    I work for a University. A couple of years ago I was called in to fix a PC that had BSOD'd. The data was intact but the OS wouldn't boot. Rather than reinstall from scratch, we use a ghost image with service packs and antivirus etc preinstalled, as we have a lot of PCs to support (>1000 per support person.) I explained to the user that this would wipe their hard drive, and asked if she had backed up her data to the network, as stipulated in the AUP (Acceptable Use Policy). She confirmed that she had, so I reimaged her hard drive and got her back up and running.

    That afternoon she rang up in a tizzy, asking where her 'book' was. This (economist) had been writing a book for three years, and the only copy was on that hard drive. We sent the drive to a data recovery service, who charged us £200 to tell us the data was not recoverable. Luckily the user was able to recover most of her data from printouts, fragments she copied to the network, floppies and so-on.

    So if you can read data after only overwriting it a couple of times, how come Norton Ghost can render data unrecoverable in one pass?

    N.B.
    The user said she thought I meant had she saved the Word document she was working on at the time. She had saved it, to the local hard drive!

    I've been extra careful with Ghost ever since, but still had two more instances of massive data loss, where both times a technician allowed me to Ghost a PC then got irate because I'd ghosted 'the hard drive with the data on it, not the new clean one' after failing to mention there were two hard drives in the PC rather than the usual one.

    --
    Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    1. Re:What about Norton Ghost? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Im sorry but this is kind of your fault for not thinking about this before hand. Users of broken computers will never be able to fully anticipate what is going to happen to their computer or even why it will happen. As an admin you need to be ready for their lack of knowledge. First of all whenever you ghost a computer that had important files on it EVEN IF it has been "backed up" you should do your own backup. Take the hard drive out and copy off whatever you can.

      Also if YOU didn't notice that there were two hard drives and one was empty then maybe you need to be a little more observant of the computer your working on. I never trust what anyone tells me about their broken computer. Whenever i go to replace something like RAM i get ready to see all different kinds. No matter how sure someone is about their computer they are many times still wrong and its your job to not be stopped up by this.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:What about Norton Ghost? by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right.. heck, he should have pulled out the old hard drive and stored it somewhere, made an image of it as well, then mounted a brand new hard drive in there, installed the new OS by hand, tuned it to optimum performance, then delivered it to the user and stayed around to make sure everything was okay. Unless, of course, he's a tech working in the REAL WORLD, which means he probably had 9 more priority 1 calls that had to be done that day, 40 overdue priority 2 calls, 300 low priority calls, a bunch of paperwork that still needed to be done... in that case, if the user says "yes, my data is backed up", you take their word for it, zap the drive, close the ticket, and move on. Better 20 jobs a day at 90% success then 8 a day at 100%.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    3. Re:What about Norton Ghost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do work in the real world and know how it is to be overwhelmed by "work tickets". However, as a "reasonable level of data salvage", we ghost the old hard drive before re-ghosting it. At least that way if the data was there an unsalvageable at current the re-imaged drive(at a later date) can be slaved to grab data. The cost of cd Media is minimal to the cost of data recovery. New Ghost versions make this easier as well with tools like Ghost Explorer, etc... but those are probably a non-issue in this case as this most likely happened years ago.

    4. Re:What about Norton Ghost? by permaculture · · Score: 1

      I appreciate your comments about my massive data loss situation. My only excuse is that we work to certain 'Service Level Agreements' which allow
      us to manage such a large installed userbase with a small number of support staff. One of the stipulations in the AUP is that any data the user wants backed up should be kept on the network where we back it up automagically. Currently we backup more than a Terabyte (sic) of data in total.

      Users are however asked to backup any data held on their local hard drives themselves, or copy it to the network where we can back it up for them. Evidently this Lecturer hadn't read or hadn't understood her obligations under the AUP, even though she had signed off against them when getting her account.

      But back to my question: Do you think the data recovery company could have recovered the data Norton Ghost overwrote, but didn't because it would have been very time consuming or something? If the data was in fact really unrecoverable, then I'd propose Norton Ghost as an effective data stripping device.

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    5. Re:What about Norton Ghost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a dick like you that cant even get the commands in his sig right is probably not the best source of advice about this kind of thing. agree ??

  173. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Welcome to 1979 - I was just learning how not to repond to my own trolls."

  174. man shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shred command is rather useful

  175. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm saddened that my favorite Bowie-watching link, bowiejpoagis.batshitinsane.com, no longer contains the history of Bowie, chronicled with actual Bowie comments.

    Ah, but I still have google.

  176. The old Western Digital tool. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    WDclear is widely available for download. This will write zeros to the entire drive. Google on it and you'll get lots of hits. You can put it on a bootable floppy, but whatever you do, don't bring this floppy to CumpU$A with you. That wouldn't be "nice."

    BCwipe is also available for download. This is a DoD grade DOS tool that will not only write zeros but do a 7 pass overwrite with random data. Mind you this takes a long time. About 35 hours on my 40 gig drive. The great thing about this tool is that you can install it under Windows and it will let you wipe your deletes as you make them from the right click menu, or wipe your recycle bin when you empty it or only overwrite the *empty* sectors of your drive. It can also be run from a floppy under DOS. This is the one that I won't leave home without.

    This one is nagware though, so let your conscience be your guide on registration.

    I'll also point out to the Windows users in the crowd that the linux dd solutions posted by others are still perfectly available to you as well. There are a number of single floppy bootable Linux distributions available for sysadmins and techs to carry around for various emergency and admin situations, like a machine that refuses to boot from its HD. I always like to have one of these about my person, even when I know I'm going to be working on pure Windows machines, because they offer far more functionality than the usual Windows "rescue" disk, often including full network capability and a text based web browser, just in case you need to access the network and/or web to get the files to restore the machine you're working on.

    KFG

    1. Re:The old Western Digital tool. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.knoppix.net

      Has a complete Debian on a disk including full network access and Mozilla, Konqueror, etc. I use it to image a hard drive to our forensics server so that I can work on it using Task/Autopsy (@stake).

  177. Hoax!! by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

    So, you think you cleaned all your personal files from that old computer you got rid of? Two MIT graduate students suggest you think again. Over two years, Simson Garfinkel and ...... It's an obvious hoax, no way that's someones real name! ;)

    1. Re:Hoax!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a guy named "Engelbert Humperdink" can exist, then that one can too.

  178. Obligatory Aliens quote by eetvar · · Score: 1

    "I say we nuke them from orbit, it's the only way to be sure"

  179. Re:DOD has specific guidelines that define Overkil by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Funny

    7. Profit!!!

  180. Carelessness and irresponsibility are news, now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Most major companies and organisations that handle sensitive information will have policies and procedures for disposal of storage that's no longer needed. Hell - at the place I work, there's no question of staff being given the opportunity to buy even old office PCs, let alone stuff that's been inside the higher security zones, where the rule is that HDs and suchlike that emerge again go to one of just two destinations: the off-site disaster recovery store, and the dismantle'n'meltdown workshop.

    But it's no surprise that there are places that can't even be bothered to do a low-level format. Probably reckon it would cost too much, and we can't evade our sacred duty to maximise profits, can we?

  181. want to securely delete data from your HD? by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    try this then.. http://w1.270.telia.com/~u27007970/ghetto.htm you can be smug with the knowledge that your data's gone down the drain.

  182. Better yet! by IncarnationTwo · · Score: 1

    Why on earth has no-one done a "wipe-it-all" linux disc distribution.

    A minimum system, that has one goatse picture and ability to connect to something like news://alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.[like I know the group name].disgusting

    The system asks if you are sure you want to empty your hard disk, then formats it twice (or formats, writes random seed data and formats), and writes it full of "random" images from disk and nntp host!

    Happy datamining to someone intrested in your "stuff" ;-)

    --
    In dream society, people could be given the ability to mod replies. In real life, it would be disaster.
    1. Re:Better yet! by ktambascio · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out Autoclave

      Its a mini-linux distribution that boots off a floppy, then allows you to pick which hard drive you want to wipe clean.

    2. Re:Better yet! by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Blowfish http://bsn.ch/Lasse/bfacs.htm
      (sorry, me mechanical engineer, me think link is machine part)

      Has a utility to blow away hard drives, or at least clear all the empty space.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:Better yet! by Sivar · · Score: 1

      Why on earth has no-one done a "wipe-it-all" linux disc distribution.

      dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/sda bs=512 && dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda bs=512

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  183. dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda by jridley · · Score: 1

    I'm betting this will keep most folks from getting much useful from my hd's. Of course, I've never given away a hard drive that I hadn't already put into another machine and reinstalled a new OS on anyway....

  184. How much heat? by kerling · · Score: 1

    After reading articles on how to read data after it has been overwritten and also reading about how to draw pictures(magnetic pictures) on tape, writing over them qiute often and retreving them. I think I will use the aluminium factory near by to dispose of my old harddrives.

    I think melting them will delete the data.

    What do you think?

  185. A story of DISK, SRAM and DRAM data recovery by tagman2 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Summary of the long posting below:
    • Data from a hard disk that as been wiped multiple times can be recovered.
    • Data left in SRAM and DRAM for a long period of time can be recovered even though the system has been powered off for a while and the SRAM has been cleared.
    • While it is hard to recover wiped and old data, it is not impossible.

    First, a little background:

    I belong to a group that polls/tracks certain elections around the world. In one recent election, there were a number of claims of voting irregularities. Our group became part of a post-election analysis team to look into these irregularities.

    We were able to determine that one desktop system in particular contained some critical raw voting data (raw precinct counts of per ballot slot data). The election officials were more than reluctant to give us a copy of that raw data. By the time we were granted a order requiring the election officials to let us access the data, someone had attempted to throughly wipe the desktop system of all traces of data.

    We thought we had lost that critical data. But thanks to a chain of contacts we were referred to a consultant that specializes in extremely difficult data recovery. After checking some references (and obtaining more money from OUR client: the consultant was VERY expensive), we hired this consultant.

    Much to the surprise of the election officials we obtained an order that allowed us to physically take possession of the system. The system was turned over to the consultant who recovered enough critical election data for our needs.

    The recovery included data from the wiped system hard drive as well as from SRAM and DRAM.

    Regarding disk recovery:

    The disk drive had been wiped by a utility that, we presume, had been run from a CDROM. The wipe tool wrote over the entire disk 35 times, 8 of them were random and 27 of them were fixed patterns of 3 bytes each.

    Not all disk data was recovered. Part of the reason was that the data recovery method was not 100% perfect. Part of the reason that some data was not recovered was a simple matter of time. (The consultant was in between two already committed projects and only had a limited amount of time to work for us.)

    The consultant did recover some deleted files that were critical to our work. Not everything was recovered, however. Parts of the swap/VM-paging area that might have contained some useful data were not recovered. Also some disk data critical to file and directory layout was not recovered making recovery of parts of the file system layout difficult to map.

    Still, some important files (a spreadsheet, simple database file, browser cache, some EMail, etc.) were recovered even though the drive had been wiped 35 times!

    Regarding SRAM recovery:

    n3rd posted a comment asking about recovering data from RAM.

    There are methods that can recover RAM data. Both SRAM and DRAM can be recovered.

    According to the consultant, the storage of the same data in SRAM over a long period of time has the effect of altering the preferred power-up state. They said that SRAM can ''remember'' data for days after it held it for a long period of time. This memory can be determined by a ''partial powerup'' (I presume they mean a lower than normal voltage?) and then going ''full on'' and reading the initial values of memory.

    In the case described above, the SRAM had been deliberately cleared prior to our group taking possession of the system. The consultant was able to recover the original data even though the SRAM had been cleared and the system has been powered off for more than a day. A simple clearing of memory was not enough to wipe out the long held memory effect.

    Regarding DRAM recovery:

    DRAM data was also recovered. Data left in DRAM for a long period of time can leave an ''impression'' thru a process somewhat different from SRAM.

    As explained by the consultant: With DRAM, recovery comes not from detecting any left over charge, but rather detecting the stress (or lack of stress) from the thin oxide of the cells storage capacitor dielectric. The effect of this stress can be measured by using the DRAM self-test feature. In self-test mode, a small voltage is applied to a cell in order to measure its margin for error. The self-test margin is increased or decreased by the amount of oxide stress.

    Not all of the DRAM memory was recovered. However certain critical portions of the DRAM held values for long enough period of time that data was recovered, even though the system has been powered off for more than a day. Data recovered included memory associated with a browser and a spreadsheet. Even though both the browser and the spreadsheet were closed prior to the system being wiped, they were left running long enough to leave behind their DRAM oxide stress.

    Based in part on the recovered data, we concluded that candidate A was declared the winner due to a ''mistake'' in mapping ballot slot numbers to candidates. In some cases the slots for candidate A and B were reversed.

    An incorrect vote count was reported by the election officials. It is our guess that when we came around asking for the raw data, someone began to collect it. At some point some official(s) discovered the blunder. The system was left on while they stalled for time. When it was clear that we were going to force them to turn over the data someone wiped the system and shut it down.

    BTW: The majority of the election officials involved were supporters of candidate B. Even though their blunder caused them to declare candidate A the winner, they still tried to coverup their mistake.

    Our conclusion was that the attempt to coverup the mistake was motivated by not wanting to admit the major blunder instead of because of candidate A's influence. This conclusion was reached in part because of messages that we recovered on another system that was not wiped. However we would have never been able to find that other system, nor would we have been able to match the raw slot numbers with the reported vote counts by candidate name without the help of the data recovery consultant and the critical data that they recovered.

    I'll offer a few observations:

    • Volatile data such as SRAM and DRAM is not as volatile as you might think.
    • With enough will, skill and effort, old data can be recovered from a disk that has been overwritten multiple times.
    • Packages such as PGP file wipe, GNU shred or Boot and Nuke are likely to only make it harder, but not impossible to recover the data.
    • To quote from a paper by Peter Gutmann:
      '' Data which is overwritten an arbitrarily large number of times can still be recovered provided that the new data isn't written to the same location as the original data (for magnetic media), or that the recovery attempt is carried out fairly soon after the new data was written (for RAM). For this reason it is effectively impossible to sanitise storage locations by simple (sic) overwriting them, no matter how many overwrite passes are made or what data patterns are written.''
      And even though in that paper next says:
      '' However by using the relatively simple methods presented in this paper the task of an attacker can be made significantly more difficult, if not prohibitively expensive.''
      For our consultant, the recovery process was hard but not extremely difficult. It was expensive for us, however. :-( But we were happy to pay to have it done. :-)
    • Whoever wrote the 35-pass disk wipe tool must have read that paper, or one similar to it because the overwrite patterns looked similar to the recommended list.

    P.S. I know that some people doubt that one can obtain old data from SRAM and DRAM after poweroff. I did too until it was done for our group. To those who still doubt this: I will refer you to Peter Gutmann's paper on Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory for another source on data recovery methods.

    1. Re:A story of DISK, SRAM and DRAM data recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If this is really true, then much of these postings about disk wiping tools destroying the data is useless!

      I'm going back to blow torching my discarded disk drives. But what should I use on memory? Would zapping memory with a tesla coil (cattle prod) be enough?

    2. Re:A story of DISK, SRAM and DRAM data recovery by chongo · · Score: 1
      I have worked with groups who were very concerned about data theft. These people did not believe data destruction by multiple over-writes.

      They only wrote critical data onto permanent magnetic media in encrypted form. They also physically destroyed hardware and media when they no longer needed it.

      If the above posting about RAM and disk recovery is true, then those people were justified in their practices. At the time I thought that physical destruction of RAM was a bit much, but based on that Gutmann paper that was sited, they may not have been that far off.

      So if people are doing data mining by going through old disk drives as the article about the 2 MIT grad students says, and if tools that wipe a disk drive are not good enough, then physical destruction is about the only thing left to protect discarded hardware.

      --
      chongo (was here) /\oo/\
    3. Re:A story of DISK, SRAM and DRAM data recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A question about your story:

      How much did it cost to recover the data?

      OK, 2 Q's: Who did the data recovery?

      Actially 5 (no 3!) Q's: Which election was it?

    4. Re:A story of DISK, SRAM and DRAM data recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. What was the data recovery vendor? I am very familiar with the current state of computer forensics and what you describe is well beyond the reach of any group.

    5. Re:A story of DISK, SRAM and DRAM data recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I call bullshit. ...

      Of course you call bullshit.
      Like me, you are an Anonymous Coward troll.

      A better troll would have been to setup
      the person by a normal looking posting
      that asked a question such as:

      What was the data recovery vendor? Do you
      know of other computer forensics that perform
      such services?

      That way the person might be tempted to
      reply to you. And when they do, you
      hit them with some truly troll-ish
      remark back. A sort of sucker setup.

      Anyway try to be a better troll next time!

    6. Re:A story of DISK, SRAM and DRAM data recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. You got that troll all wrong.

      Trolls are too busy a shuv'n hot grits up
      their arse to understand the current
      state of computer forensics!

      I know I am!

  186. Shred? by starX · · Score: 1

    Can't you also use shred to blank individual files?

  187. Refurbished computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I bought a refurbished power mac not so long ago and it appeared to come from united airlines and did contain quite an amount of serious sensitive data. Reports/emails about illness of an employee, financial stuff, flight planning etc.

    It was right there, no attempt had been made to delete it at all. Sigh.

  188. Thermite by Detritus · · Score: 1
    When I was in the Army, we had thermite packaged in convenient rack-sized slabs in case we needed to destroy sensitive equipment. You put the slab on top of the equipment, wired it up and got the hell out of there before it was ignited.

    If you try this at home you may get prosecuted by the BATF for having unregistered/unlicensed "destructive devices". So you could still end up in prison, even if you destroyed all of your computer hardware.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  189. We strip our old drives by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Totally break them down to components after a reformat, then beat on the parts with a hammer just for insruance.

    Then of to the dumpster they go.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  190. Wiping and physics by Antity · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you wipe, remember to take your device's physics into account.

    Wipe it once when it is completely "cold" (computer has been turned off for at least several hours), then wipe it again after it has been running for an hour or so, and wipe it a third time after you've giving the disk some serious thrashing (that is, disk activity that moves the head around quite a bit).

    The reason is temperature. Data is saved on circles on a magnetic medium. The read/write head has a certain amount of thickness, and so have the tracks on the platter (the tracks have to be a bit widther than the head is, to take thermal expansion into account so the head won't overwrite data on neighbour tracks).

    So, for some specialized data recovery company, it may even be possible to recover different data from the same track, because after a while of use, a track can look like this:

    ................ Free space to next track
    ---------------- Outer track end
    AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Older data 1
    BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
    BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB Actual data
    BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
    CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC Older data 2
    ---------------- Inner track end
    ................ Free space to next track

    So, your drive will always read the data in 'B'. In 'C' there might still be data your computer saved when the drive had just spun up and was cold, while 'A' might still hold a copy of data that was written on very heavy disk activity when the drive was really hot.

    To overwrite all of this data, you need to have the drive write in any of the temperature states that it has been in within this life.

    "Simple" writing might only destroy all 'B' data and leave all 'A' and 'C' data intact on the drive, where they can be recovered.

    --
    42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  191. Not just old hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    My company bought a new hard drive once from a large retailer. It had a conspicuous scratch on it so we checked out the contents before overwriting, thinking it might not be all that new. We found some rather personal stuff there. Pictures of baby taking a bath with dad and so forth. I can understand regular people not thinking of wiping a drive before returning it (and perhaps being unable to, if it's not functioning quite right or the box won't even boot), but if you're going to sell a refurbished drive at the price of a new one, better wipe that sucker good. Then there's the more serious issue of them handing their customer's private data over to another customer.

    Another interesting case came up when my company was in its death throes and was firing people left and right. When the admin was backing up the content of their hard drives prior to wiping, a lot of interesting non-work-related stuff cropped up. I'm not talking about a little gay porn. One guy had dozens of documents related to different couples' divorce proceedings! Ouch ;)

    The real lesson here is that the people you sometimes have to entrust your data to can't necessarily be trusted.

  192. just break the drive by caveat · · Score: 1

    chisel it open (even if you do have torxes; it's much more destructive, and amusing), bend up the platters, and sandpaper the hell out of them, that should do it.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  193. Re: FYI: HOWTO: Secure HD for Donation or Disposal by Antity · · Score: 1
    • Don't reformat the drive.
    • Make sure you install a DynDNS client that is activated on bootup
    • Check back after a week or so if the box showed up again on some T1/E1 or higher connection
    --
    42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  194. Secure Harddisk Eraser (boot floppy, GPL) by infolib · · Score: 2, Informative

    what you need to do is overwrite the whole harddisk several times with different patterns. Peter Gutmann recomends 35 passes with different patterns. The DoD 5220.22-M NISPOM recomends 3 passes.

    Secure Harddisk Eraser implements these 35 or 3 passes on a single floppy. Just boot from the floppy, wait 60 seconds and the harddisk will start to erase.


    The homepage

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  195. DoD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company I work for uses the DoD 3 passes to wipe drives.

    I still have the last two drives from my last couple of home PCs. Lately I was thinking about taking them apart and sanding down the platters. How effective would this be in assuring nothing can be recovered?

  196. Computer Repairs by Gigacorpse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing to consider is turning your system in for repairs. I used to own an Apple G4 Cube and when I sent it in for repair, Apple decided simply to send me a new one. While I didn't have anything on the hard drive except some MP3s and Email, who knows where that disk is now and who has it? It is something to think about if you have your computer serviced.

    After reading all the posts of this topic, I have concluded that physical destruction is the best way to go. Although I have no doubt that a program designed to securely erase the hard disk would be effective enough for me, my hard disks are simply too big for this approach. Who wants to wait on 7 or more passes on a 120GB hard disk?

  197. Well, duh? by DSL-Admin · · Score: 1

    That's one of the great things about Data Recovery... It's like a metal detector on the beach, sometimes you'll find valuable stuff, sometimes you'll find important missing items, other times you'll just find junk.

  198. (OT).. is that Quatro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the spreadsheet program?.. wow!.. nice colors!.. Those were the days!..

  199. Sixth day by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
    OP's hard drives won't be read, he claims] not if i've cracked them open and cum/shit/bled on the platters after perforating them with an awl

    Well, in that case, first they'll read your DNA, have uncontestable proof you (or your identical twin) had had possesion of them, and then they'll read your data.

    Then they'll clone your ass and threaten to rat you out to the 6th day fundamentalists, who would assassinate you if they knew you weren't "as God made you."

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  200. And this is is an excuse... by Watcher · · Score: 1

    for why I take dead hard drives to a friend's range and shoot them. Of course, its really just have some fun (hard drives explode quite nicely, especially if you hit the magnets). I would love to see someone reconstruct much of anything on a hard drive I've put 50 rounds of .30-06 through.

  201. Sounds Interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A quick way to make a few bux. Buy some drives and if the data is damaging enough extort some money from the poor bastards.

  202. Hard Drive Destructo Kit by mrobinso · · Score: 2, Funny

    First, a night in a box with a dozen or so neodymium iron boron magnets, and then a few minutes of lovin with one of these puppies, and presto, hard drive toast.

    Throwing drives in the trash reminds me of the age old story of the bank robber that goes into a bank and hands the teller one of those nifty holdup notes. You know, the one with his name and social insurance number on the other side. .mike

    -- Ok ok, I'll be good. Gimme back my karma.--

    --
    -- Karma whore? You betcha. --
  203. Random Data by wls · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't several loops of this be better?

    # dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda

  204. dot bomb servers are cheap... by Spoing · · Score: 1

    The AIX credit card server here probably has boat loads of information. I haven't gotten around to formatting it, though it does boot to a login prompt. It was for Homeruns, a failed grocery delivery service.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  205. HD Killling techniques by UltimaL337Star · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever try drilling a small hole in a hard drive and dumping in water and pure sodium? Or how about microwaving a hard drive

  206. Get Data Back by Shanep · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've tried lots of data restoration software, from shareware to super expensive. Almost all of them worked pretty badly. Except one, and I mention it here if it helps someone who is desperate and thinks there's no hope, to go down a potentially fruitfull track...

    I've tried Get Data Back for FAT and for NTFS on drives that were formatted, partially zeroed (both FAT's gone on a FAT drive) and new partitions partially used and they restored perfectly almost all files (luckily every file I needed). They cost money (frequently found on warez sites though) and the programs and web site don't look all that professional, but I've never found anything that worked as well. I rekon these guys deserve to be paid for this great software.

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    1. Re:Get Data Back by GenetixSW · · Score: 1

      That's interesting to know. Thanks for the link.

      I've also had great success with a program called R-Studio. It managed to recover plenty of data from a very badly damaged drive, including files long-ago deleted. I only bought the NTFS version though, so I'll be sure to try out your suggestion if I ever need to recover other data.

  207. Recycling by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

    They are amazing fridge magnets. And the platters, BTW, make superb coasters for your coffee table.

    I am a little worried that there may be something toxic on the platters...it's not like they intend for disk platters to be food service approved.

    The only data point I have is that there are no particular EPA requirements for disposal of the platters. So they probably don't contain anything too dangerous.

    1. Re:Recycling by wompser · · Score: 1

      I do this too! Fridge magnets and coasters!

      A great way to change the look of these a bit is to hit them with some heat. Propane torches are great, alternatly a gas range will do. They change the color depending how hot you get them, if you do it right it looks very much like the spectrum you see of oil on wet pavemnent.

      The platters also sound really cool when you strike them, a clear slightly tinny brassy sound. I made one into wind chimes in fact. YOu can also vary the resonant frequenccy by bending the platters. I've always wanted to make a marimba/vibes type instrument out of drive platters.

      --
      .....
  208. A useful idea for the Trolls! Fill a hard drive! by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2, Funny
    Trolls, got too much time on your hands? Here is an idea to get your rocks off. Build a small Linux distribution CD that "erases" a hard drive by filling it with...
    • Pr0n
    • Convincing evidence of some popular conspiracy theory
    • Fake contrived evidence of some crime (say, a murder)
    • ...anything else you can think of to yank someone's chain
    --
    The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
  209. A similar tale... by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

    Most hard drives I get from old computer still have intact data with Quicken files, resumes, and business correspondence on them. Most of it is boring and gets deleted.

    Macintosh hard drives from the older systems are my favourite though as they have lots of games and neat programs on them and it's easy to copy over to other drives for backup. The last mac drive I got from a junk machine had photoshop, a neat SCSI drive utility, after dark, and SPECTRE, one of the great mac games.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  210. Hospital computers by mgbaron · · Score: 0

    I was once given an old computer from a local hospital that contained all of the towns medical records. I was able to see which of my friends had stds and other sensative information. This sort of thing should be more carefully disposed of.

  211. format the modem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the day on Macs I think "initialize" meant the same thing as "format" in DOS. In high school my teacher was afraid to let us initialize the modem, because she thought it would wipe it clean! :D

    And this was in a gifted Telecommunications/Networking class. Sad.

  212. Secure erasure by beef3k · · Score: 1

    AFAIK there are secure ways of removing data from a HD writing so-and-so bit patterns that many times to the disk.

    What I don't understand is why tools for performing such erasure is not more widely known and spread. Hell, why they are not incorporated into OS distributions as a tool.

    Somebody make an 'srm' (secure remove) command for UNI*'s, a "Do you really, really, really want to remove this file" option in W**, and a linux boot disk totally wiping complete disks before you trash them, or sell them off eBay.

  213. Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5000 credit card numbers on 49 hard drives? Anyone care to speculate?

  214. Re:Cryptonomicon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If what you say is true, then that scene in Cryptonomicon where those lawyers seize that computer and it passes through the strong magnet in the doorway and then gets wiped, well, that wouldn't have happened that way, eh?

  215. Selling? by Komarosu · · Score: 1

    My harddrive never make it out of my house ALIVE...i slave drive them to death.

    A the moment i still have a 600mb seagate churning away in my server...it will only leave the case when it pops its clogs :P

    --

    "What do you mean you have no ice? Do you expect me to drink this coffee hot?" - Random Customer, Clerks
  216. A feature I'd like to see in hard drives by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to see IDE hard drives that encrypt every sector -- but done in the drive's electronics.

    Before the drive can be used, the mainboard (bios?) must first issue an ide command to set the key that the drive used for reading/writing each sector.

    WIth a properly configured bios, the bios could ask you for the key during power on self test.

    You run your computer off a UPS. If the bad guys are going to serve a warrant, raid you and steal your gear, they might first cut the power to prevent you from inserting a linux "reformt-the-drive" floppy and punching reset. The UPS helps against this.

    But even if you can't get the drive reformatted, and the bad guys attach your drive to one of those drive copying gizmos to collect evidence, all they get is encrypted blocks. Or better, if the drive electronics detects an attempt to do this, massive sequential copying of blocks, but without first having issued the decryption key command, then the drive electronics could simultaneously return random bytes to through the ide interface to the copying gizmo while actually overwriting the corresponding sector on the drive with different random data.

    Another way to look at this from the point of view of the drive electronics is that if the drive is powered up, and very much access is attempted without the decryption key command, then the drive can assume that it is NOT physically in the good guy's computer where it belongs.

    While the technique described here is also good to prevent data mining of your hard drive, it is most useful in preventing data mining by the bad guys who might steal your drive for evidence.

    --
    The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    1. Re:A feature I'd like to see in hard drives by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      That would be a powerful setup.

      Unfortunately, the arguments against freedom of quality encryption systems included that drug dealers would use them to keep track of something or other...I'm kind of foggy on the exact arguments the War On Families has been using over the years. I'm not sure if there ever was a good one.

      That didn't scare the common citizen much. After all, envisioning common crack/whatever dealers using systems like that is kind of silly if though about long enough.

      But now, the scare tactic is that good encryption systems are the teherorizsts tool of choice.

      The Teherorizst 'card' will unfortunately push back high quality disk-based encryption for the masses.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
  217. At UBS in Z�rich... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to one of my lecturers at ETH in Zürich (this guy works in the IT department of a bank here in Zürich) the rival bank UBS disposes of hard drives using a 3-ton pneumatic press standing in their serverroom, ie disks never leave the *serverroom* in a readable state ;=). This guy himself had problems with his computer vendor (Dell, ..., whatever) since they, when voiding warranty, returned the computers without harddrives...

  218. Re:Better yet! - Snowdisk by UranusHertz · · Score: 1

    You don't need a whole distro for that, just a clever application. You can use snowdisk to encrypt the whole drive with random useless data. It wasn't originally developed for that, but I have had no problem using it for completely wiping drives clear of useful data.
    Snowdisk

    Quis custodiet iposos custodes?

  219. Not all that surprising... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    I went to a bankrupcy auction a few weeks ago, an engineering and testing company that had gone bankrupt. None of the computer they were selling had been wiped - about 20 laptops in various states of function, and about 2 dozen desktops and servers. The prices were way high, so I didn't buy anything, but I have to wonder what kind of data was on there.

    Although as far as wiping the OS's, you could always just tell them you wanted to make sure you didn't violate the EULA.

  220. Clean your floppies, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just as it's a good practice to shred papers with personal info before recycling or discarding them, it makes sense to wipe clean or cut up your old floppies, too.

  221. YASS (yet another similar story) by lhand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Years ago I bought a CP/M system complete with a 30MB 14" hard disc at a computer show consignment table. I couldn't get it to boot up but I was able to poke around on the disc by writing and reading directly to the controller. I discovered some erased files and one was the previous owner's resume, a developer for Pickles and Trout. So....I called him up and he helped me get it working. He was suprised I found his deleted resume and I assured him I'd wipe it as soon as I got it working. That drive also had the source to most of their CP/M development. It made for some fun reading, pre-DMCA, of course.

  222. How to destory a hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get out your B.F.G. and...

    oh wait.

    D'oh

  223. My own experience here by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    My neighbor recently caught his house on fire and destroyed part of ours, too. Among the casualties of the fire department hoses were three computers (5 hard drives in all). When are damaged goods were being tossed in the dumpster, I grabbed the computers and had my kids take hammers to the hard drives (they loved that!)

    By the way - the Macintoshes still booted and ran, but the PC did not!

  224. Nothing comes out of govt agencies by leeet · · Score: 1

    I can confirm you that *NO* drives or any computer parts which can contain non-volatile data (cpu/ram/bios/etc) will come out of government agencies unless they are stolen by employers.

    I work for a large company and on-site people can't bring in anything (laptop/cd/floppies). If they bring it in, they have to leave it in.

    Now this is, of course, following the legit procedure. One can remember the hard drive incident at Los Alamos...

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  225. Potentially harmful article by SamTheButcher · · Score: 1
    I can see someone reading this and saying "Well, that's crap! I'll just throw my old hard drives right into the trash!" Contributing to landfill and the whole "poisonous chemicals in the landfill & water supply" debate.

    If the situation is that bad, then I must say I really do support some sort of recycling program for computers (I do anyway, but am saying that maybe more needs to be done to make it worthwhile for your average joe/company).

    At the very least, the article should have addressed it when it mentioned that hard drives end up in the trash, with something to the effect of "...however, just throwing the drive in the trash contribues to {insert environmental harm issue here}, so they should be zeroed out, then recycled at the Computer Recycling Center." Especially in a San Francisco paper!!

  226. What about a hammer? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    I like the ole Sledgamatic(tm).

    Mashes, bashes, can even sterilize.

  227. cleaning hd's by rlabutis · · Score: 1

    I worked at one company where the policy of removing data with classified data was: 1.) erase the files with delete command 2.) remove platters from hd frame 3.) smash platters with ball peen hammer 4.) put pieces in incenerator. I don't think you can data mine this one.

  228. "squeeze" a hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only sure way to erase a hard drive is to "squeeze" it: writing over the old information with new data -- all zeros, for instance -- at least once, but preferably several times.

    I must say, this is the first time I've ever heard zeroing a hard drive as "squeezing" it. Sounds more like compressing the data on the hard drive to allow more to be stored in a riskier way. Where in the world did this term originate, or did this Justin Pope just make it up? I can't even find an entry for it in the Jargon File (I've found nothing between square tape and squirrelcide.)

  229. No brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    #1 I rarely dispose of computers. No that's not it. I rarely dispose of computers with hard drives. I pull the drives before I get rid of them. If I keep the drive in a box in my closet (or reuse it in another machine) then data integrity is not much of a concern.

    #2 When I have a drive go south on me that's out of warranty and can't be RMA'd, I garuntee that the better than average Joe can't extract data from it by blowing 2-4 holes in it with my Glock 22 (.40 cal). It really does lay to rest the debate about whether I provide adequate data protection on my drives. Of course I also have a string in my welcome dialogs that simply states: This computer is protected by Glock. I don't have many security problems.

  230. Then what is secure? by Dioji · · Score: 1

    With all this data recovery and such, the question becomes, what is truly secure? As a precaution I've begun overwriting all of my files with Slashdot articles...

  231. GIVE IT A SHOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA HA! Funny!

  232. subsurface DRAM data recovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am not surprised that someone was able to recover disk drive data after it has been overwritten 35 times. We have been able to recover data from a disk that was erased by ``autoclave level 5''.

    One of the major problems with these hard drive erase tools is that they only immediately impact upper surface levels of the device. The magnetic field from data stored on a drive as an effect on impurities deeper within the data material layer. Such impurities move as a function of time. Data long held on a disk drive will have a much greater impact on these deeper impurities than the most recent overwrite.

    You can over-write the disk 100 times in the course of a day. Such wipes will have little effect on the deep impurity migration that occurred when the data sat on disk for months. True, the final wipe pattern will, over time, swamp the previous long term impurity migration. The longer you leave the erased data on the drive, the less the chance you will be able discover the previous old data.

    I am not surprised that data sections such as the swap/VM-paging area and parts of the file system structure were not recovered. Such areas are usually in flux (no pun) and so

    From the above story, it appears that data recovery started only a few days after the disk was wiped. Data that was stored for several weeks would be recoverable by removing the upper surface and analyzing the impurity structure of the next layer.

  233. You can have fast deletion, or secure deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but usually not both. that's what I told my bosses when our dotcom was being liquidated. they opted for fast. *sigh* oh well. my other concern was backup tapes. those were sold at auction as well. my HR and payroll data was kept there. anyone have luck bulk demagging DLT (or 8mm or AIT)?

    On a side not, another boss used to work for the NSA, and their data scrubbing procedure I think was 11 overwrites, then open the drive and sandblast the platters, then incinerate the platters! All of this was done by the NSA in the building where he worked (he'd even operated the incinerator)! They couldn't allow the drives to leave their building even for destruction.

  234. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is
    whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling
    is that it is not crazy enough.
    -- Niels Bohr

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...