Slashdot Mirror


User: chris_eineke

chris_eineke's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
709
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 709

  1. Re:Apple and Ford is a perfect match on Apple Partners with Ford · · Score: 1

    F.O.R.D.: Found On Road, Dead. ;-)

  2. Re:Stupid activists (not a flame here.) on Cyberwar on NASA Websites · · Score: 1
    If Israel does not take care of this cockroach problem today [emphasis mine]
    Holy shit... it looks like you have some deep-rooted hatred. May I suggest the final solution?

    I am Canadian and I have family in Israel.
    I am Canadian, too. Your attitude is wholly un-Canadian.
  3. Re:Sure There Is! on Computer Job w/ No Computer Degree? · · Score: 1
    The manager was regarded as one of the best in the department. Major.
    So, does that prove that big multinationals suck balls majorly, or that anyone may become part of a software development team, or good managers are in and far between?
  4. Re:It's also somewhat disturbing on ComputerWorld's Help Form Elicits Some Laughs · · Score: 1

    (Run-on sentences anyone?)

    Please remember that only those who can't do will send those emails. What about people who are perfectly fine using their computer systems? You and I don't hear about them.

    That's called skewed statistics.

  5. Re:We have a server closet on How Have You Equipped a Tiny Server Closet? · · Score: 1
    The thing gives me nightmares. I imagine the A/C failing, the servers dying, and the room catching fire and taking the building with it.
    But... wouldn't that be your dream come true? :P
  6. Re:The most important question... on New Code Discovered in DNA? · · Score: 1

    I don't think that PHP is the best solution here. If you want sequence processing, you will need... wait for it... wait for it...

    Lisp! :D

  7. Re:our galactic stone-age on Solar Power Minus the Light · · Score: 1

    Ich bin ein Canadian!

  8. Re:You're not understanding. on The Future of Computing · · Score: 1

    I 100% agree with your conclusion.

    Please don't forget that I emphasized "verrrrrry small datasets". I was trying to point out that, let's say, for three elements using a bubble-sort algorithm is faster than quicksort.

    And yes, compilers aren't little magical black boxes. But the human brain is. :P

  9. Re:Bloat on The Future of Computing · · Score: 3, Informative
    Please remember that a Windows system by default doesn't come with a shitload of libraries like any desktop linux distribution does nowadays. kTorrent's payload is
    ceineke@lapsledge:/home/eineke$ d /usr/bin/ktorrent
    -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 284636 2006-05-23 14:51 /usr/bin/ktorrent*
    284636 bytes. Not too bad for a K-app. But consider this, Batman: (leading whitespace removed)
    ceineke@lapsledge:/home/eineke$ ldd /usr/bin/ktorrent
    linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
    libktorrent.so.0 => /usr/lib/libktorrent.so.0 (0xb7e38000)
    libkparts.so.2 => /usr/lib/libkparts.so.2 (0xb7df5000)
    libkio.so.4 => /usr/lib/libkio.so.4 (0xb7aca000)
    libkdeui.so.4 => /usr/lib/libkdeui.so.4 (0xb7807000)
    libkdesu.so.4 => /usr/lib/libkdesu.so.4 (0xb77f1000)
    libkwalletclient.so.1 => /usr/lib/libkwalletclient.so.1 (0xb77e1000)
    libkdecore.so.4 => /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 (0xb75b9000)
    libDCOP.so.4 => /usr/lib/libDCOP.so.4 (0xb7588000)
    libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libresolv.so.2 (0xb7574000)
    libutil.so.1 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libutil.so.1 (0xb7571000)
    libart_lgpl_2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2 (0xb755c000)
    libidn.so.11 => /usr/lib/libidn.so.11 (0xb752d000)
    libkdefx.so.4 => /usr/lib/libkdefx.so.4 (0xb7501000)
    libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0xb6d18000)
    libaudio.so.2 => /usr/lib/libaudio.so.2 (0xb6d03000)
    libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 (0xb6cb5000)
    libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0xb6c96000)
    libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0xb6c8e000)
    libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0xb6c8b000)
    libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0xb6c82000)
    libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0xb6c7e000)
    libXft.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXft.so.2 (0xb6c6c000)
    libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0xb6c03000)
    libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xb6bd5000)
    libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb6bd2000)
    libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xb6baf000)
    libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xb6ba1000)
    libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb6abb000)
    libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0xb6ab3000)
    libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0xb6a9b000)
    libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0xb6a93000)
    libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb6a7f000)
    libfam.so.0 => /usr/lib/libfam.so.0 (0xb6a76000)
    libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xb6a64000)
    libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1 (0xb6a5c000)
    libattr.so.1 => /lib/libattr.so.1 (0xb6a58000)
    libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb6983000)
    libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb6961000)
    libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb6956000)
    libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb6827000)
    libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0xb6823000)
    libexpat.so.1 => /usr/lib/libexpat.so.1 (0xb6804000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7efb000)
    libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0xb6800000)
    I'm sure that when you claim that uTorrent isn't as large as other Shareware programs you have looked into its library dependencies. Or did you?
  10. Re:virtualization, generators, and languages on The Future of Computing · · Score: 1
    also missing the boat on the trends in language flexibility that are turning application development into "domain specific language" development. we're at a tipping point over the current 2-3 year horizon where developers are building out the language AT THE SAME time they write their application. coupled with effective reuse strategy, this will revolutionize how quickly and how functional all our apps can be.


    Old is new and new is old.
  11. Re:It's not the language, stupid! on The Future of Computing · · Score: 1
    It's the algorithm. It's straight complexity theory; C/C++ is not a panacea. If you write a 2^n or n! algorithm in C, it'll have its doors blown off by an nlogn algorithm in Python.
    And here is where a couple of people would disagree with you. C/C++ has extremely well-performing optimizing compilers (alignment, instruction sets, etc.) and so for verrrry small datasets, a 2^n algorithm in C will most likely run faster than a n log n algorithm in, say, Ruby.

    (I don't have data to support my hypothesis, but I will point you toward the gaming industry that has to squeeze every little bit of performance out of a system. There have been some successful attempts at using high-level languages (Lisp in Jax&Dexter 2 comes to my mind) in games, but I doubt (again, no data to support my hypothesis) that the kernels of game engines are written in anything other than a C-derived language.

    By the way, not that that's a bad idea. It's just that there are some myths about high-level languages you can't get rid of. (Again, sadly, Lisp comes to my mind. (I'm biased towards Lisp, did you notice that? (One more level of brackets just to make it clear!)))) :-)
  12. Re:Wirth's law on The Future of Computing · · Score: 1
    But for the majority of code that's going to be run over and over again, the time you saved writing the code could be wasted 10 times over waiting for it to run.
    Then why not use a language that supports churning out inefficient programs in a short time and highly-efficient programs in a bit more time? :P
  13. Re:Wirth's law on The Future of Computing · · Score: 1
    I'd rather do it efficiently in C/C++ right now than wait for a faster CPU that may never come.
    Even if it takes you ten times longer?
  14. Re:Waste of bandwidth on World Firefox Day · · Score: 1
    There are many things to worry about but worrying about wasting bandwidth on names is just rediculous.
    But... think of the tubes!
  15. Re:Dangers of international content? on The Dangers of Open Content · · Score: 1
    When writing a program, you don't look up the meaning of a command in three sources do you? When wiring a house, you don't check three different copies of the electrical code. When working on your car, all you need is your Chilton's.
    Your analogy is flawed.

    When I program in three different languages, I will have to look up the meaning of a command in at least three sources.
    When I wire a house in two different countries, I will have to check at least two different copies of the electrical code.
    When I work on someone else's car, I will have to check at least one different car manual.

  16. Re:Blast + Gravity = No more Holland Tunnel on FBI Foils Attack by Monitoring Chat Rooms · · Score: 1

    The question is: who would want to use any of the tunnels into NYC? :P

  17. Re:Spyware and spam will remain on Does Sophos' Switch Argument Hold Water? · · Score: 1

    I <3 u.

  18. Re:Skype isn't a security risk... on Skype Addresses Visibility Concerns · · Score: 1

    Holy shit, viral marketing! :P

  19. Things a student strives on? on The $899 Educational iMac · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Whoa there, if a $899 computer is what a student strives on, then what about student loans, rent, utilities, and groceries?

    Get a prev-gen iMac for less than half the price and spend the rest on beer and hookers or callboys.

  20. Re:accident maybe? on Take Two Investigated by New York Grand Jury · · Score: 1
    Normally you would could REM out some code
    Duuuuuuuuude, REMing out code? That's so BASIC.
  21. Re:Violence and Patents on An inside look at Intellectual Ventures · · Score: 1

    Please read the links I supplied before going on about this nonsense that circumcision prevents AIDS.

  22. Re:Violence and Patents on An inside look at Intellectual Ventures · · Score: 1
    Your response is low on facts and high on fluff. I did a quick GoogleCheck(tm) and discovered that the studies you are talking about haven't been published in a journal yet. Are you a troll?

    The extraordinary history of circumcision as a panaceaa, and before that as a rite, strongly suggest that latter-day claims of prophylaxis should be regarded with a sceptical, if not jaundiced, eye. Few if any men can be truly neutral about circumcision. The temptation to justify what was done to oneself seems almost irresistible.
    - from http://www.circumstitions.com/Short-HIV.html
  23. Re:Nice but ... on Billions Donated to Charity · · Score: 1
    If a drug baron
    Two steps backward

    donated a million dollars to charity
    one step forward.
  24. Re:Heh on Mixing brain cells and nanodots · · Score: 1

    (defun detect-poison (neural-activity)
        (= neural-activity 0))

  25. Re:Lame on The Story of the RedBerry · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    an idiot who discovered simple modding.

    Wait, hold on! HOLD ON! I am confused now.

    One slashdot (and engineering mantra) is: KISS - Keep It Simple, Stupid. And then you go on ragging on that guy for doing a "simple mod?"

    Who the fuck are you? The Hypocrit?