Slashdot Mirror


User: NotClever

NotClever's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
120
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 120

  1. Re:Fuck 'em on Copyright Office Rules Against Lexmark · · Score: 1
    grumpyoldmanvoice on
    Bah. In my day sonny we used 300 baud modems with cups for the phone's headset. And we were happy to have it!

    When I first started programming all we had were 0's and 1's... and sometimes the 1's didn't work!
    grumpyoldmanvoice off

  2. Re:Yes, they watch all 50,000 employees... on Microsoft Fires Mac Fan For Blog Photo · · Score: 1
    Thank you for trying to insult me. Pretty petty. I read blogs of a lot of people I've never met, so do a lot of other people.

    I'm done with you. Buh-bye.

  3. Yes, they watch all 50,000 employees... on Microsoft Fires Mac Fan For Blog Photo · · Score: 1
    "The most disturbing part of this, however, is that MS Security was either watching his blog, or running searches on all MS related postings to scan for things they didn't like."

    Geez, when you get a speeding ticket does this mean the state is watching your every move waiting for you to screw up?! Seriously, people read peoples blogs, right? Maybe someone at MS actually reads his site and when he saw what was done, he mentioned it, and things went on from there. Naw, much more likely that MS is watching every move all 50,000 employees are making.

  4. Re:Who's ass and what line? on Cringley on Microsoft and Linux · · Score: 1

    Ugh, you had to mention ladybugs! Those damn things have been *everywhere* for the past month.

  5. Re:Who's ass and what line? on Cringley on Microsoft and Linux · · Score: 1
    Of course not. But that's not even close to what is happening. In reality, even if I leave my house or car unlocked, you don't have a right to go in and take stuff out of it. It's still theft. And if you break a window just to prove that windows are breakable, you don't get a free pass on that either.

    As I mentioned in another response, I agree that the punishments threatened are absolutely rediculous.

  6. Re:Who's ass and what line? on Cringley on Microsoft and Linux · · Score: 1
    But MS is releasing fixes (a lot of them). See the reply to a prior message above.

    I'm not an MS apologist by any stretch, but by virtue of their own success, they are in an impossible position today. And when they are replaced by another company, they too will have the same issues.

  7. Re:Who's ass and what line? on Cringley on Microsoft and Linux · · Score: 1
    No doubt there is (a lot) of room for improvement. But how do you handle things like Windows 95/98/ME? No matter how good MS makes the latest version of Windows, there are going to be a zillion users using old stuff. Even more important, how do you get everyone to patch? The thing that I think keeps getting overlooked is how often the patches were available, but not deployed. How many of the fixes that MS is releasing are for exploits that people really knew about beforehand, and how many are from potential exploits that MS found doing code reviews?

    The one thing that they should do is create a roll-up fix and put it on a CD and scatter them in every retail store in the nation, like AOL does, to get the XP fixes out there. Yeesh, install a clean copy of XP and you need 48 patches to get it up to date. Good luck doing that on a modem!

  8. Re:Who's ass and what line? on Cringley on Microsoft and Linux · · Score: 1
    I totally agree about the idiotic penalties being handed out (proposed/threatened/etc) for misc computer crimes. There is definitely room for some common sense. Maybe in another 10 years :( But the fact remains that people *are* doing wrong, and should be punished.

    Good thing I never speed, or do anything else 'wrong'... yeah right! :)

  9. Re:Who's ass and what line? on Cringley on Microsoft and Linux · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Oh, and don't forget about the kids that get locked up for writing viruses and other mischevious software that exploit said vulnerabilities. They're an easy scape goat to relieve Microsoft yet again of any responsibility what so ever."

    When you have a house and it's broken into, you're going to hope that the kids that did it are caught and put in jail. Just remember that it's your fault because you didn't put unbreakable glass in your windows, and encase the entire house in armor plating.

  10. Re:I would like to have seen... on X10 Pays $4.3 million In Damages For Pop-Unders · · Score: 1

    X10 has been around for decades. Long before X10.com.

  11. Re:Chinese embassy all over again on Warfare at the Speed of Light · · Score: 1

    No, those are valid targets (IMO). The mixing is when they put an AA battery next to a mosque, or park tanks next to civilian homes.

  12. Re:What happens with XML... on StarOffice 7, GNOME-Office 1.0 Released · · Score: 1
    "If they want to do business with you, then you shouldn't have to buy over-priced software."

    And the potential customer that you just told off will never be heard from again...

  13. Re:The Shuttle wasn't a huge leap forward on The Return of Apollo? · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hey, serious question - do you have something to back up that comment about the Soviets being able to hit orbits better than American rockets? It's something I've never even thought about, and it would be interesting to read more about that particular issue. Thanks!

  14. Open Source project! on The Return of Apollo? · · Score: 1

    Open Source can solve all problems! Just turn a bunch of software geeks loose on the problem and watch that baby go!

  15. Re:It's about time on The Return of Apollo? · · Score: 1
    The Space Shuttle program was approved in July 1972. President Reagan was sworn into office in 1981. The first Shuttle (Columbia) flew in April 1981.

    How exactly was Reagan involved?

  16. Re:Hi. You're a liar. on RIAA Sues 261 Major P2P Offenders · · Score: 1

    Estrada has been called lots of things, but calling him a Nazi is probably a new one on him. Of course, the Nazi's probably would have killed him, but hey, don't let anything get in the way of hurling invective.

  17. Why mention unnecessary upgrades? on Java vs .NET · · Score: 1

    Why would you need to factor in upgrades to Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 just to use a .NET based language? Lots of people run it on Windows 2000, and hit Windows 2000 Servers. Applications built in VS.NET (or any other .NET language / environment) can be deployed all the way down to Windows 98 and NT 4 machines.

  18. Pick one of the languages on Java vs .NET · · Score: 1

    Why wouldn't you just pick one of the .NET languages and make them all learn it? It's the same thing as making all the developers learn Java.

  19. Re:Proof that LINUX is insecure by design on Windows Is 'Insecure By Design,' Says Washington Post · · Score: 1
    And the holes that the worms have been crawling through on Windows are easy to fix as well. It's just that people don't bother to do it, or get caught up in bureaucracy.

  20. Re:Perhaps I'm doing something wrong... on Windows Is 'Insecure By Design,' Says Washington Post · · Score: 1
    You're not alone, although sometimes it may feel like it. :)

  21. Re:Professionalism on Part Two: Technical Self-Employment For All · · Score: 2, Informative
    The way I read it he was just using 'Monkey Boy' as a placeholder for your real name. A bit of humor in a write up like that isn't a bad thing.

  22. Re:Cool ;-) IBM forked over the few milllion.... on IBM Clinches Security Certification for Linux · · Score: 1
    Since it's all open source, why don't you just remove the 'back door'?

  23. Re:start leading.. on Windows XP Edges Out KDE in Usability Test · · Score: 1
    Oh yeah, there are games and video cards under windows that will run across multiple monitors. The neatest on is the Matrox Parhelia 512 - spread your game across 3 monitors :) A review of the card

  24. Re:start leading.. on Windows XP Edges Out KDE in Usability Test · · Score: 1

    Given a dual head video card (I have a nVidia GeForce 4 ti4200) and Windows XP, simply plug the second monitor in and you're good to go. It wasn't as simple under Win2k, but it is absolutely no effort in XP.

  25. Re:No OS but GNU? on Red Hat Sues SCO, Sets Up Legal Fund · · Score: 1

    I'm unclear - are you saying that Microsoft doesn't sell any OS's? Or that they stole all the different OS's they sell?