I'll go out on a limb and say if we do get AI it will be because people like him got sandbagged and diverted away from anywhere the actual work was being done.
Devil is in the details. I was thinking after I wrote it, he might want to force a discussion of just what does constitute interference in our elections.
I didn't realize you were an old fart. Sorry thought you actually wanted to know what was happening.
It's Trump who's the old fart in the big white house and it's him you'll have to shake in hopes of getting a new result. If you shake him long enough, and if you're lucky enough, he won't bankrupt the US like he did those six hotels/casinos.
Yeah I mean that 9 trillion in debt Obama added is hard to top.
I get it. You are a retard who refuses to listen to any peer reviewed studies but think that the "facts" you pull out of your ass are worthwhile to spread. Flag as Inappropriate
You just cited a leftwing wiki https://www.sourcewatch.org/in... while complaining someone else pulls facts out their ass ? What's more somehow you don't even get that as problematical ?
Then you cite the people in charge of a project to show that it will work as opposed to say outside sources ? Despite the fact they have already been caught lying ?
...I'm sure all of Trump's detractors will agree that he has done the right thing and it's about time.
Won't they?
When it comes to Trump you get all the consistency of a magic 8 ball. If somebody shakes the old fart between now and the election we will get a totally different reaction to any election meddling from what he's rambling about now. In the absence of any consistency in this White House I'll believe he's willing to slap sanctions on Russia it when I see him do it.
I hate to say this, but the executive order is likely illegal and a violation of the first amendment. The constitution extends its protections to foreign nationals while they reside in the country. Of course as Alan Dershowitz has pointed out, so far no one has a crime that actually involves the Russians. Well unless you count Mueller indicting a company that didn't exist until after the elections
Trains have a huge advantage over other modes of transport, in that they can reliably pick up electrical power while in motion
As opposed to automobiles that take you where you actually want to go instead of train stations ? Or do you want to argue that it's a public good that everyone should have to pay to visit a train station whether they want to or not ?
Won't work. Immigration actually reduces the strain, as shown by the collapse of the NHS due to the ban on health tourism and foreign doctors.
Lets see, more clients same number of hospitals same number of doctors = less strain
Collapse of NHS ?
Tell you what I'll let you take a mulligan on that come back when you can actually say what you think you mean
Immigration actually raises wages by producing a richer culture and thus greater diversity in employment and therefore a stronger economy, as demonstrated by Britain.
Because having a supply of labor that dwarfs the demand at any given price point lets people sell the labor for more ?
Protective tariffs actually hurt social welfare programs by raising costs and reducing the supply of skilled workers and necessary gear.
Would you like a mulligan on this one as well ? I am kind of curious how having people unemployed in an industry that is no longer existent in a country lowers the cost of any social welfare program, I am also kind of curious how having job opportunities for workers reduces the supply ? Perhaps the supply of the unemployed ?
You heard that platform, yes, but not from anyone I would consider to be competent at business.
The interesting thing about that is competency at business is objectively measured, not subjectively. It's both a pass fail sort of thing profit/loss and size of profit over time. So when you say " but not from anyone I would consider to be competent at business." all you are doing is saying the facts of the matter are irrelevant to you.
Aren't you just precious. I mean it's almost like you don't understand anyone means any legitimate voter.
I remember when you were complaining that California lets anyone vote. Falsely, but still you went on a tirade.
Sure you do. That anyone wouldn't have happened to be non citizens here illegally would it ?
I mean it's not like there is a vast difference between allowing citizens to participate in any party's primary process vs not allowing non citizens who are here illegally participate.
I fault you for your partisan support, as I know you would do a 360 and walk away if your immediate advantage was the other way, and for the tortious lengths of falsehood you use to justify it
Looks up, sees someone who lied not once but twice before accusing someone else of being dishonest. I think that speaks for itself, even without your aggument consisting of nothing but the words "jungle primary" repeated over and over again. Just a thought given the amount of evidence you have brought out to make your case someone might think you don't even know how it works to make the case let alone prove that it provides a superior result.
Oh just a note, doing a 360 would be a full rotation, you might wish / want to say is a 180 which aka an about face.
"Paying for itself" isn't the point of a public utility or public service -- it's to provide a public good, even if the sacred tax dollar has to be spent.
LOL emotion coming out again ? Just what is the public good of California's high speed train ? well other than putting money into the hands of large political contributors.
But yes, I'm emotional. I love trains, so much that I want to cut, run, and spend the rest of my life in Europe and Asia so I can ride nice ones:D
Then go and stop demanding other people pay for your toys, while pretending otherwise.
especially undocumented immigration that puts a strain on your social services and depresses the wages and bargaining positions of existing citizens. You might want to back that with a protective tariffs to keep the costs for social welfare programs from becoming unsupportable and having the industries that are vulnerable wiped out before they can adapt.
You know I think I heard this platform somewhere recently .
Any group that "lobbies on behalf of $group" will whore their services to the highest bidder. It just happens that the Equipment Dealers Association offered them a sweeter deal than the farmers that they ostensibly represent. Not that they will return the farmers' money or anything like that.
Thank you. I'll go one further and say it's sad just how many fools out there think "BBBUT they are our guys"
My point is that neither left and right has anything other than emotion behind their ideas.
Hmm. So where on the political spectrum are the people who point out that raising the cost of power in California will hurt the states economy ? The people who point out that the highspeed rail initiative will never pay for itself are arguing from emotion ? Or the people who would just like to have sufficient infrastructure to provide water in a dry climate ?
Yet you carp about being stuck in a sardine can with smelly people yaddadee, bladadee, blah.
Seems you have lots of emotion there. or at the very least are trying to appeal to emotion.
Yep 2016 has given us the best apocalypse ever. If I had of known ruining the economy, putting NAZIs in office, starting a nuclear war in Asia, and turning the environment into a radioactive ruin on an earth scorched by global warming would have been so pleasant I would have worked to make it happen long ago.
Raw emotion and bad socialization sounds more like the religious right, which takes orders from an imaginary fairy in the sky.
Maybe so, but I was speaking about you specifically. That's what "It's great to see you", means. Being an agnostic Jew I am really not qualified to comment on the motivations of the religious anything. Well except maybe to make the observation that the left has mostly replaced traditional religion with a hodge podge of unsupported beliefs that they really don't understand.
I suppose I'll have more to say about it, when their religion makes it out of alpha testing. I do however wish they would stop trying to fool themselves by cloaking it in pseudo science.
Now about you again, does lashing out randomly ever actually work for you ? I mean in an objective way that other people verify. You seem hardly capable of making the call.
Slashdot Mirror
Yep that's the guy I want making AI happen
I'll go out on a limb and say if we do get AI it will be because people like him got sandbagged and diverted away from anywhere the actual work was being done.
Capitalism fails when all the money is just in one pot too.
I'd love to see an example of that actually happening any time in human history would be acceptable.
Show me one Republican that will balance the budget. you can't.
Ron and Rand Paul would likely be good for that. Auditing the Fed might be a little dicey though.
And who added the first half of that debt?
Errr not Trump ? Little defensive there aren't you chief ?
I don't think about you at all.
Indeed, it is more of a delusional ranting that nobody would consider thinking.
Without going through at least a 1440 anyway.
Looks like someone is upset they didn't know how many degrees were in a circle.
Devil is in the details. I was thinking after I wrote it, he might want to force a discussion of just what does constitute interference in our elections.
Don't you mean ::Shakes Old Fart:: ??
I didn't realize you were an old fart. Sorry thought you actually wanted to know what was happening.
It's Trump who's the old fart in the big white house and it's him you'll have to shake in hopes of getting a new result. If you shake him long enough, and if you're lucky enough, he won't bankrupt the US like he did those six hotels/casinos.
Yeah I mean that 9 trillion in debt Obama added is hard to top.
I get it. You are a retard who refuses to listen to any peer reviewed studies but think that the "facts" you pull out of your ass are worthwhile to spread.
Flag as Inappropriate
You just cited a leftwing wiki https://www.sourcewatch.org/in... while complaining someone else pulls facts out their ass ?
What's more somehow you don't even get that as problematical ?
Then you cite the people in charge of a project to show that it will work as opposed to say outside sources ? Despite the fact they have already been caught lying ?
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/1...
Otay buckwheat. Maybe you can be a diversity hire in the future.
I'm describing what you would do, so yes, a 360 and walk away is accurate for you.
Well why how nice for me to figure so prominently in your life. I don't think about you at all.
What an amazing coincidence seeing as only 59% of the gas taxes goes to road upkeep.
Don't you mean ::Shakes Old Fart:: ??
I didn't realize you were an old fart. Sorry thought you actually wanted to know what was happening.
Should pedestrians and public transit riders be forced to pay taxes for large freeways?
https://www.mercurynews.com/20...
...I'm sure all of Trump's detractors will agree that he has done the right thing and it's about time.
Won't they?
When it comes to Trump you get all the consistency of a magic 8 ball. If somebody shakes the old fart between now and the election we will get a totally different reaction to any election meddling from what he's rambling about now. In the absence of any consistency in this White House I'll believe he's willing to slap sanctions on Russia it when I see him do it.
::Shakes Magic 8 Ball:: You may rely on it
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/08...
I hate to say this, but the executive order is likely illegal and a violation of the first amendment. The constitution extends its protections to foreign nationals while they reside in the country. Of course as Alan Dershowitz has pointed out, so far no one has a crime that actually involves the Russians. Well unless you count Mueller indicting a company that didn't exist until after the elections
https://www.politico.com/story...
If the Russians have time travel this is all moot anyway.
Trains have a huge advantage over other modes of transport, in that they can reliably pick up electrical power while in motion
As opposed to automobiles that take you where you actually want to go instead of train stations ? Or do you want to argue that it's a public good that everyone should have to pay to visit a train station whether they want to or not ?
English isn't your first language is it ?
Won't work. Immigration actually reduces the strain, as shown by the collapse of the NHS due to the ban on health tourism and foreign doctors.
Lets see, more clients same number of hospitals same number of doctors = less strain
Collapse of NHS ?
Tell you what I'll let you take a mulligan on that come back when you can actually say what you think you mean
Immigration actually raises wages by producing a richer culture and thus greater diversity in employment and therefore a stronger economy, as demonstrated by Britain.
Because having a supply of labor that dwarfs the demand at any given price point lets people sell the labor for more ?
Protective tariffs actually hurt social welfare programs by raising costs and reducing the supply of skilled workers and necessary gear.
Would you like a mulligan on this one as well ? I am kind of curious how having people unemployed in an industry that is no longer existent in a country lowers the cost of any social welfare program, I am also kind of curious how having job opportunities for workers reduces the supply ? Perhaps the supply of the unemployed ?
You heard that platform, yes, but not from anyone I would consider to be competent at business.
The interesting thing about that is competency at business is objectively measured, not subjectively. It's both a pass fail sort of thing profit/loss and size of profit over time. So when you say " but not from anyone I would consider to be competent at business." all you are doing is saying the facts of the matter are irrelevant to you.
Not surprising.
Aren't you just precious. I mean it's almost like you don't understand anyone means any legitimate voter.
I remember when you were complaining that California lets anyone vote. Falsely, but still you went on a tirade.
Sure you do. That anyone wouldn't have happened to be non citizens here illegally would it ?
I mean it's not like there is a vast difference between allowing citizens to participate in any party's primary process vs not allowing non citizens who are here illegally participate.
I fault you for your partisan support, as I know you would do a 360 and walk away if your immediate advantage was the other way, and for the tortious lengths of falsehood you use to justify it
Looks up, sees someone who lied not once but twice before accusing someone else of being dishonest. I think that speaks for itself, even without your aggument consisting of nothing but the words "jungle primary" repeated over and over again. Just a thought given the amount of evidence you have brought out to make your case someone might think you don't even know how it works to make the case let alone prove that it provides a superior result.
Oh just a note, doing a 360 would be a full rotation, you might wish / want to say is a 180 which aka an about face.
"Paying for itself" isn't the point of a public utility or public service -- it's to provide a public good, even if the sacred tax dollar has to be spent.
LOL emotion coming out again ? Just what is the public good of California's high speed train ? well other than putting money into the hands of large political contributors.
But yes, I'm emotional. I love trains, so much that I want to cut, run, and spend the rest of my life in Europe and Asia so I can ride nice ones :D
Then go and stop demanding other people pay for your toys, while pretending otherwise.
especially undocumented immigration that puts a strain on your social services and depresses the wages and bargaining positions of existing citizens. You might want to back that with a protective tariffs to keep the costs for social welfare programs from becoming unsupportable and having the industries that are vulnerable wiped out before they can adapt.
You know I think I heard this platform somewhere recently .
Any group that "lobbies on behalf of $group" will whore their services to the highest bidder.
It just happens that the Equipment Dealers Association offered them a sweeter deal than the farmers that they ostensibly represent.
Not that they will return the farmers' money or anything like that.
Thank you. I'll go one further and say it's sad just how many fools out there think "BBBUT they are our guys"
The people are getting to choose their top two candidates from the jungle primary.
Oh so those states with gerrymandered districts don't have primaries and none of them have primaries where anyone can vote ? /Sarcasm
Actually, you already did promote gerrymandering. Foolishly and falsely claiming it did something it does not.
Don't fault me because you don't understand the process or the court rulings that govern it's use.
http://www.ncsl.org/research/r...
My point is that neither left and right has anything other than emotion behind their ideas.
Hmm. So where on the political spectrum are the people who point out that raising the cost of power in California will hurt the states economy ?
The people who point out that the highspeed rail initiative will never pay for itself are arguing from emotion ?
Or the people who would just like to have sufficient infrastructure to provide water in a dry climate ?
Yet you carp about being stuck in a sardine can with smelly people yaddadee, bladadee, blah.
Seems you have lots of emotion there. or at the very least are trying to appeal to emotion.
From a mechanics of dealing with copyright it isn't bad.
The Europeans might not like the idea of Google or Facebook interfering in their elections
https://www.washingtonexaminer...
You go through the bloodiest conflicts in human history, and the whole better to seek forgiveness than ask permission idea gets a little threadbare.
I'll have you know that America already voted to wreck the Internet.
Yep 2016 has given us the best apocalypse ever. If I had of known ruining the economy, putting NAZIs in office, starting a nuclear war in Asia, and turning the environment into a radioactive ruin on an earth scorched by global warming would have been so pleasant I would have worked to make it happen long ago.
You seem confused People are actually having a choice,
Confused or choice ? One of those words possibly both doesn't mean what you think it does.
Tell me again how being able to pick between the democrat and the democrat is a choice ?
Me? I know you're just ranting your standard partisan blather.
Maybe so, but I am willing to consider the idea, and I am not the person promoting a system that produces one party elections as creating choice.
Raw emotion and bad socialization sounds more like the religious right, which takes orders from an imaginary fairy in the sky.
Maybe so, but I was speaking about you specifically. That's what "It's great to see you", means. Being an agnostic Jew I am really not qualified to comment on the motivations of the religious anything. Well except maybe to make the observation that the left has mostly replaced traditional religion with a hodge podge of unsupported beliefs that they really don't understand.
I suppose I'll have more to say about it, when their religion makes it out of alpha testing. I do however wish they would stop trying to fool themselves by cloaking it in pseudo science.
Now about you again, does lashing out randomly ever actually work for you ? I mean in an objective way that other people verify. You seem hardly capable of making the call.